Skip to main content
Advertisement

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Recruitment, treatment and follow-up of PKDL patients.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Case definition for recording treatment outcome of PKDL patients.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Profile of patients treated with miltefosine and relapsed cases.*

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

A PKDL patient (Case 11, table no. 3) that relapsed after MIL treatment and was subsequently cured with AmB.

Papulo-nodules present on face before treatment (A), and complete regression after 3 months of MIL treatment (B), relapse at 13 months after completion of MIL treatment with papules on the root of nose (C), and cured after treatment with AmB (D).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Scatter plot showing parasite load at the pre-treatment stage in the cases that eventually relapsed vs those that remained cured.

Parasite load was determined by Q-PCR in slit aspirate sample at the time of diagnosis of PKDL and expressed as the number of Leishmania parasite/μl slit aspirate. P value was calculated using Mann-Whitney test. Horizontal bars indicate mean± SEM.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

In vitro MIL susceptibility of parasite isolates from cured (n = 7) and relapsed (n = 6) PKDL patients.

MIL susceptibility at (A) promastigote stage (B) amastigote stage. Each individual value represents mean IC50± SD of the results from two separate assays. P value was calculated using Mann-Whitney test. Horizontal bars indicate mean ±SEM.

More »

Fig 4 Expand