Figure 1.
Main distribution of G. tachinoides and G. fuscipes fuscipes based on data in Rogers and Robinson (2004) [2].
Figure 2.
Placing adhesive film on bi-coloured target, Mfangano Island, Lake Victoria, Kenya.
Figure 3.
Transporting devices between trapping positions around Mfangano Island, Lake Victoria, Kenya.
Table 1.
Dimensions and surface areas of trapping devices.
Table 2.
Detransformed1 mean daily catches2 of G. f. fuscipes and G. tachinoides with unbaited and POCA-baited trapping devices made of different blue fabrics and on transparent adhesive film set on its own.
Figure 4.
Daily catch rates of G. f. fuscipes and G. tachinoides by devices covered with adhesive film.
Catch rates of traps are divided into fly catches on the cloth part and those trapped in the cage of the trap. The limits of the boxes indicate the twenty-fifth and seventy-fifth percentiles; the solid line in the box is the median; the capped bars indicate the tenth and the ninetieth percentiles, and data points outside these limits are plotted as circles: dtr. mean detransformed mean; obl. oblong; sq. square; std. standard.
Table 3.
Catch indices (detransformed mean daily catch) per m2 and per m edge of different sized targets compared to a regular 1 m2 square target.
Table 4.
Mean1 daily catch rate2 and percentage of total catch by sex at different landing heights on 1 m2 square (left) and 1.5 m2 rectangular (right) targets: G. f. fuscipes, Kenya (2011).
Table 5.
Medians1 of landing distribution of G. f. fuscipes and G. tachinoides between the blue and black portions of targets of different sizes.