Table 1.
Traditional and revised WHO classifications for dengue severity [2], [10].
Table 2.
Demographic characteristics of study population, 2005–2010.
Figure 1.
Traditional and revised WHO classification for dengue severity in Nicaraguan study, 2005–2010.
The percentage of laboratory-confirmed dengue cases classified as DF (n = 385), DHF (n = 106), or DSS (n = 53) in the traditional scheme or classified as Dengue without Warning Signs (n = 36), Dengue with Warning Signs (n = 266), or Severe Dengue (n = 242) according to the revised scheme is shown.
Table 3.
Concordancea between Traditional and Revised WHO classification in capturing severe cases of dengue, 2005–2010.
Table 4.
Traditional WHO classification of severity versus level of care, 2005–2010.
Table 5.
Revised WHO classification of severity versus level of care, 2005–2010.
Table 6.
Concordancea between clinical diagnosis and diagnosis by computer algorithm according to the traditional WHO classification.
Table 7.
Concordancea between clinical diagnosis and diagonsis by computer algorithm according to the revised WHO classification.
Table 8.
Association between traditional and revised WHO classifications for dengue severity and serotype, 2005–2010.