Figure 1.
The figure shows the upper levels of the ontology. The small circles denote an “is_a” relation between the term and its parent, and small rectangles show the presence (plus) or absence (minus) of children for a given term. The children of the four “biological material”, “insecticidal substance”, “method” and “resistance” are shown in a depth of 2 levels. The “gazetteer” class has been loaded into MIRO (see Results and Discussion) and is therefore visible here.
Figure 2.
The “biological material” class.
The figure shows, in a depth of 5 levels, the class “biological material” (A) and, within the “Cellia” subgenus, the Anopheles gambiae s.s.-related terms (B), that also include the chromosomal and molecular forms.
Figure 3.
The groups of insecticides in MIRO.
The figure shows the list of the groups of substances with differing modes of action containing the individual insecticides.
Figure 4.
The “resistance” class has been opened to show the different contents. The black boxes denote an “agent_in” relation.
Figure 5.
The figure shows the different tables that make up the schema. 1 and * denote a “one to many” relationship.
Figure 6.
A map output providing summary information.
The figure shows a screen shot of a search involving studies in Cote d'Ivoire. The pink “droplets” point to the sites of mosquito collections while the balloon that appears when clicking on any one of them includes summary data for the collection site. A link to the respective full report is also provided in the balloon.