Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Loading metrics

Phenotypic and genotypic antibiotic susceptibility profiles of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from bloodstream infections at a referral hospital, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Kaunda Yamba ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    kaundayamba@gmail.com

    Affiliations Department of Pathology & Microbiology Laboratory, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia, Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Chileshe Lukwesa-Musyani,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Pathology & Microbiology Laboratory, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Mulemba Tillika Samutela,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia Lusaka, Zambia, Department of Paraclinical Studies, University of Zambia, School of Veterinary Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Christine Kapesa,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Pathology & Microbiology Laboratory, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Mudenda Bernard Hang’ombe,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Paraclinical Studies, University of Zambia, School of Veterinary Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Evans Mpabalwani,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Paediatrics & Child Health, School of Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Lottie Hachaambwa,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases Unit, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Sombo Fwoloshi,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases Unit, University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Raphael Chanda,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Pathology & Microbiology Laboratory, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Mirfin Mpundu,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation ReAct Africa, Honnington Close, Greystone Park, Harare, Zimbabwe

  • Glory Kashweka,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Pathology & Microbiology Laboratory, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Ruth Nakazwe,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Pathology & Microbiology Laboratory, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia

  • Steward Mudenda,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia, Department of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

  • John Bwalya Muma

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Disease Control, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

Abstract

Bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. Third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) have been used as empiric treatment for BSI and other invasive infections for years; however, their overuse could promote the emergence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs). Thus, this study aimed to determine the epidemiological, clinical and microbiological features and the effects of antimicrobial resistance on the outcomes of BSIs at a referral hospital in Lusaka, Zambia. This was a six-month prospective facility-based study undertaken at a referral hospital in Lusaka, Zambia. As part of the routine diagnosis and patient care, blood samples for bacteriological culture were collected from patients presenting with fever and processed for pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the VITEK 2 Compact instrument. ESBLs and plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) associated genes were determined using the polymerase chain reaction method. Patient information was collected using a structured data collection sheet and entered in CSpro 7.6. Data were analysed in WHOnet and STATA version 14. A total of 88 GNB were isolated, of which 76% were Enterobacterales, 14% Acinetobacter baumannii and 8% Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Resistance to third and fourth-generation cephalosporins was 75% and 32%, respectively. Noteworthy was the high prevalence (68%) of inappropriate empirical treatment, carbapenem resistance (7%), multi-drug resistance (83%) and ESBL-producers (76%). In comparison to E. coli as a causative agent of BSI, the odds of death were significantly higher among patients infected with Acinetobacter baumannii (OR = 3.8). The odds of death were also higher in patients that received 3GCs as empiric treatment than in those that received 4GCs or other (none cephalosporin) treatment options. Structured surveillance, yearly antibiogram updates, improved infection control and a well functional antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program, are of utmost importance in improving appropriate antimicrobial treatment selection and favourable patient outcomes.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the greatest public health threats of the 21st century [1]. Globally, the economic impact of healthcare costs is predicted to increase in a range equivalent to US$300 billion—US$1 trillion each year by 2050, with a corresponding 10 million deaths annually by the same year [2]. In 2019, the Global Research on Antimicrobial Resistance (GRAM) study evaluated the global burden associated with drug-resistant infections and projected an estimated 4·95 million (95% UI 3·62–6·57) deaths, of which 1·27 million (0·911–1·71) were directly attributable to drug resistance [3]. Multi-drug resistance (MDR) is increasingly prevalent in clinically essential pathogens and threatens to hinder the treatment of diseases [4]. MDR has worsened the outcome of bloodstream infections (BSIs) or bacteraemias that are already a growing public health concern [5]. Enterobacterales such as E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter species and other Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter species have been implicated in hospital acquired infections (HAI)) and community-acquired infections (CAI) [6, 7].

Successful treatment of BSIs relies on prompt identification of the causative pathogen, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and selecting appropriate treatment. The rise in resistance to beta-lactam antibiotics, driven by the production of beta-lactamases, is now a public health threat [7]. Most literature review studies done on the prevalence of Extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) in Africa have found a high prevalence with varying incidence from country to country [8, 9]. ESBLs are plasmid-mediated enzymes resulting from point mutation of TEM or SHV β-lactamases that are widely distributed among the Enterobacterales. In recent years, several new ESBLs (CTX-M, PER, VEB, and the GES) lineages have emerged [10]. Although class C β-lactamases (AmpC) confer resistance to the same antibiotics as ESBL, AmpC activity additionally affects cephamycins and is not affected by ESBLs inhibitors [7]. Furthermore, AmpC-producing GNB act as a hidden reservoir for ESBLs; thus, the co-existence of these enzymes complicates the treatment of GNB as AmpC beta-lactams may mask the recognition of ESBLs [7].

Patients with infections caused by ESBL-producing bacteria have poorer clinical outcomes, increased hospital stay, higher hospital costs and can lead to sepsis. Sepsis is a significant driver of antibiotic use and is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. According to surviving sepsis guidelines, it causes severe morbidities and mortality [1113]. Poor clinical outcomes have been worsened by the co-existence of ESBLs and resistance to other classes of antibiotics such as aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones. Carbapenems are the treatment of choice for serious infections caused by ESBL-producing organisms [14]. However, using carbapenems as first-line treatment would increase the hospital cost and facilitate the spread of carbapenem-resistant pathogens, thereby limiting treatment options for invasive infections and raising mortality [15]. Therefore, we hypothesized that third-generation cephalosporin-resistant GNB could contribute to BSI’s poor treatment outcomes at the University Hospital (UTH) in Lusaka, Zambia.

In low-or middle-income countries (LMICs), beta-lactams are widely prescribed as empiric treatment, with third-generation cephalosporins (3GCs) being the most commonly used antibiotics [16]. A 2016 study that looked at aetiology, antibiotic resistance and risk factors associated with neonatal sepsis at the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) in Lusaka, Zambia, found 3GC resistance to be above 95% [17]. However, a point prevalence survey conducted at the same hospital in 2018 still found 3GCs to be the most commonly prescribed antibiotics in hospitalized patients and prescription of 3GCs was at 57.9% [18]. Thus, this study aimed to determine the epidemiological, clinical and microbiological features and the effects of antimicrobial resistance on the outcomes of BSIs at a referral hospital in Lusaka, Zambia.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Study site and design

A prospective study was conducted at the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) in Lusaka, Zambia from October 2021 to March 2022. UTH is a national tertiary referral hospital with a bed capacity of about 1,665, offering specialized care to referral patients. It is a highly specialized facility comprised of five hospitals, namely: The Adult Hospital, Children’s Hospital, Mother and Newborn Hospital, Eye Hospital and Cancer Disease Hospital (CDH).

BSI was defined by positive blood cultures in a patient with systemic signs of infection [19]. The patients whose blood was drawn for blood culture, gave consent and were willing to respond to the questionnaire were included in the study. Patients admitted to the CDH were excluded from the study as a result of restricted entry into the cancer wards that prevented access to the patients for consent and data collection. Patients from the Eye hospital were also excluded because patients were mainly attended to in the out-patient clinic. Two-hundred and six patients were enrolled from the included wards. Blood samples were collected from the patients for bacteriological culture as part of the routine diagnosis and patient care, and were processed for pathogen isolation, identification and antimicrobial susceptibility.

The data collection sheet was administered by trained clinicians, and data was entered in CSpro 7.6 and treated with confidentiality. The socio-demographic, clinical and empiric treatment data collected was age, sex, types of symptoms, on-set and duration of fever, history of past hospital admissions and antibiotics given as empiric treatment. In order to obtain data on patient outcome and duration of hospital stay, a second file review for all patients that had confirmed Gram-negative BSI was done 30 and/or 45 days, post-admission.

2.2. Sample size determination and sampling method

This was a facility based study based on routine analysis of samples submitted to the Microbiology Laboratory at UTH as part of patient management. Convenient sampling was therefore adopted with the aim of isolating at least 50 GNB causing BSI. This sample size was perceived sufficient enough to observe any AMR pattern and genetic diversity if present as described by Nagelkerke et al., 2015 [20]. Based on the 2017 to 2018 UTH Microbiology Laboratory reports on BSI, we expected to process an estimated 250 blood samples, to recover 50 GNB, assuming a conservative 20% recovery rate. All blood culture samples submitted to the Microbiology laboratory from October 2021 to March 2022 were analysed.

2.3. Specimen collection and processing

As part of case management at UTH, blood was drawn from patients presenting with fever or any other symptoms requiring a blood culture, this was done before antibiotic treatment was commenced [21]. Each culture bottle was inoculated with eight to ten mls of blood from adult patients, while the volume of blood drawn from paediatric patients was guided by body weight as described by Kellogg et al. [22]. The blood was inoculated in two (when available) or one automated aerobic blood culture bottle (BD), after which it was transported to the Microbiology Laboratory within the UTH. Collecting two or more blood culture samples from different sites helps to distinguish true bloodstream infection from contaminants. In resource-limited settings like Zambia, a positive result from only one blood culture is interpreted with the help of clinical presentation, such as fever and other signs of sepsis syndrome [23]. The blood culture bottles were incubated in the Bactec machine (BD Bactec FX, Wokingham Berkshire, United Kingdom) till they flagged positive or up to seven days for those that were negative. All blood culture samples that flagged positive had a Gram stain prepared and were sub-cultured on MacConkey, blood, and chocolate agar plates (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK). Before sub-culturing, the blood culture bottle tops were disinfected with iodine to prevent the introduction of contaminants [24]. Iodine was the only available disinfectant at the time of the study and although the recommended ethyl alcohol is more superior to iodine, iodine has also been found to prevent contamination [24, 25]. MacConkey agar plates were incubated aerobically at 37°C for 24 hours, after which, the plates were examined for both lactose fermenters and non-lactose fermenters suggestive of GNB. Gram stain was performed to confirm the isolates were GNB [26].

2.4. Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AST)

The presumptive Gram-negative isolates were then subjected to identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using the VITEK 2 Compact instrument (Biomerieux). This was achieved by using the VITEK GN cards for identification and VITEK AST-GN83 and GN86 cards for AST [26]. Pseudomonas aeruginosa is known to be intrinsically resistant to ceftriaxone and cefotaxime [27], hence the resistance to 3GC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates was based on susceptibility to ceftazidime. Each batch of VITEK cards was quality controlled using Escherichia coli 25922 control strain. The isolates were then stored in glycerol at -80°C. AST data was entered into WHOnet 2020, then managed in Excel spreadsheets and exported to STATA 14 for analysis. The proportion of Resistance (R %), Intermediate (I %), Susceptible (S %), (MDR %), extensively drug-resistant (XDR %), pan drug-resistant (PDR %) were estimated using WHOnet analysis. According to the CLSI guidelines, the definitions of susceptible, intermediate and resistant were based on the CLSI interpretations [28]. MDR isolates were defined as resistance to at least one agent in three or more antibiotic classes, XDR as resistance to at least one agent in all but two or fewer antimicrobial categories (i.e. bacterial isolates remain susceptible to only one or two categories), and PDR was defined as resistance to all agents in all antimicrobial categories [29].

2.5. Molecular analysis

Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) was extracted using the Nuclisense easyMAG (Biomeriux). Fifty-five isolates resistant to both a 3GC and a fluoroquinolone antimicrobial were randomly selected and subjected to PCR using the Sigma-Aldrich primers (S1 Table). The following resistance genes determinants were screened; ESBL determinants (blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M), AmpC β-lactamase (ampC), fluoroquinolone resistance determinants [plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) genes qnrA, qnrB and qnrS) and carbapenem resistance determinants (blaOXA, blaNDM, blaVIM)]. The primer selection and PCR protocol used was based on Farkas et. al [30]. PCR reactions were carried out using the following protocol: 2 μL of extracted DNA was combined with 12.5 μL of 2X master mix, 1 μL forward and 1 μL reverse primer, and the mixture was made up to a 25 μL volume with nuclease-free water. The Veriti 96 Well Thermal Cycler-Applied (Biosystems, Pittsburg, PA, USA), was used for PCR amplification, initiated at 96°C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles at 96°C for 1 min, annealing for 1 min, and lastly, extension at 72°C for 2 min. The final extension was at 72°C for 10 min. Positive controls (previously positive samples) and negative control (nuclease-free water) were included in each amplification reaction [30]. The PCR products (1/10 volume) were analysed by gel electrophoresis (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) at 100 volts for 30 minutes using 1.5% agarose gels (BD Difco) in 1X TAE buffer (Tris-acetate EDTA). The gels were stained with ethidium bromide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), and the PCR products were visualized under ultraviolet light [31]. As shown in (S1 Table), a single band with amplicon sizes was observed.

2.6 Data analysis

Data were managed in Excel spreadsheets and analysed in STATA version 14. The variable age was grouped into three categories as follows: Neonates (≤ 28 days), Paediatrics (≥ 29 days to < 16 years), and Adults (≥16 years).

To facilitate the analysis, the continuous variable "Length of Hospital Stay (LOS)" was transformed into categorical variable with binary outcomes by grouping those who stayed less than 25 days (short stay) and those who stayed ≥ 25days (long stay). The potential associations between the hypothesised categorical explanatory variables and the dichotomous outcomes (Recovery or death) were assessed using Fisher’s exact test. Collinearity between explanatory variables was checked using Fisher’s exact test. Explanatory variables in a univariate analysis showing a p-value <0.20 from Fisher’s exact test were selected as candidate variables and taken into the multivariable logistic models. The multivariable model was built using a backward selection strategy, using a p-value of <0.05 of the likelihood ratio test as inclusion criteria. Model fit was assessed using the Hosmer Lemeshow test, lfit, lroc and lsens procedures in Stata for the logistic model.

2.7 Ethical clearance

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee at Eres Converge institutional review board (Ref. No. 2019-Aug-017). The regulatory approval was obtained from the National Health Research Authority (NHRA) of Zambia. Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

3. Results

Two hundred and six patients met the inclusion criteria and were enrolled to the study. Seventy-five percent had fever prior to admission, while 25% developed fever 48 hours post-admission. Only one patient among those that developed fever 48 hours post admission had a culture positive Acinetobacter baumannii BSI from a burns patient. The Acinetobacter baumannii isolated from this patient was MDR with resistance to both 3GCs and 4GCs respectively. Fifteen patients had a history of hospital admission in the last 30 days, and only one patient had received ceftriaxone during that admission. Of those that had history of admission in the last 30 days, only one patient had a culture positive E. coli BSI, an isolate that was susceptible to both 3GCs and 4GCs. Forty-three percent (88/206) of the enrolled patients had a confirmed GNB-BSI of which 42% and 18% received 3GCs and 4GCs as an empiric treatment, respectively. Notably, 68% of the patients that received 3GCs as empiric treatment had confirmed 3GC resistant pathogens (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Flowchart of the enrolled patients and selection criteria.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.g001

Fourth generation cephalosporins (4GCs) were mainly prescribed in the NICU and other paediatric wards. Other antibiotics given as empiric treatment were ciprofloxacin and imipenem. Tuberculosis (TB) fixed-dose combination (FDC) with two or more anti-TB drugs, penicillin, metronidazole and co-trimoxazole were also commonly prescribed in combination with 3GCs. Co-morbidities in adult patients are listed in Table 1.

thumbnail
Table 1. The age and gender distribution and the co-morbidities of adult patients with confirmed GNB-BSI.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.t001

Patients with confirmed GNB-BSI were categorized as neonates (≤ 28 days), paediatrics (≥ 29 days to < 16 years) and adults (≥16 years). There were relatively more adult cases than neonatal and paediatric cases, and the males were more represented than females (Table 1).

Out of the 88 GNB isolated, 77% were Enterobacterales (E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella aerogenes, Citrobacter freundii and Proteus mirabilis), 15% Acinetobacter baumannii and 8% Pseudomonas aeruginosa respectively. Escherichia coli was the most prevalent cause of BSI, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Distribution of GNB isolated from blood cultures at UTH (2020 to 2021).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.t002

Table 3 highlights the GNB distribution per ward, with E. coli mainly being isolated in internal medicine (56%), Klebsiella pneumoniae in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (42%), Acinetobacter baumannii in the surgical/burns unit (30%) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the renal unit (71%). Of note is the high prevalence of MDR GNB and the presence of possible XDR and PDR isolates in our study population. E. coli (42%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (31%) had the most MDR isolates.

thumbnail
Table 3. Distribution of GNB per ward and MDR, XDR and PDR data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.t003

Antibiotic susceptibility patterns for all the GNB (n = 88) are shown in Table 4 and Fig 2. Resistance to cefotaxime was highest in Klebsiella pneumoniae (88%), Acinetobacter baumannii (78%), E. coli (68%) and Klebsiella aerogenes (67%). Resistance to ceftazidime in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates was 29%. Notable was high resistance to ciprofloxacin (64%), with Klebsiella pneumoniae and Klebsiella aerogenes having the highest ciprofloxacin resistance. Acinetobacter baumannii had the highest resistance to beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor (BL/BLI) (piperacillin-tazobactam). Carbapenem (meropenem) resistance was observed in three Acinetobacter baumannii, two Pseudomonas aeruginosa and one Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate, mostly from NICU 50% (3/6), renal unit 33% (2/6) and admission ward 17% (1/6).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Resistance profiles of GNB to 3GCs and other commonly used antimicrobials in the treatment of BSI.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.g002

thumbnail
Table 4. Antimicrobial susceptibility results (RIS %) to all the tested antimicrobials.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.t004

In order to detect ESBLs, ampC and PMQR resistant gene determinants, a total of 55 GNB resistant to 3GCs and fluoroquinolones were subjected to PCR. Seventy-six per cent (42/55) were ESBL-producers, of which 50% were Klebsiella pneumoniae, 41%, E. coli, 5%, Klebsiella aerogenes and 2%, Proteus mirabilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, respectively. Those that harboured the ampC resistant gene were three Klebsiella pneumoniae and one Pseudomonas aeruginosa, all of which had ESBL resistance genes and were resistant to cefoxitin. PMQR determinants qnrA, qnrB and qnrS were confirmed in some GNB, with qnrA being the most prevalent. A few other multiple gene combinations were also confirmed in some isolates (Table 5).

thumbnail
Table 5. ESBL, ampC and PMQR resistant genes determinants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.t005

In order to determine potential risk factors associated with treatment outcome, the association between the dichotomous outcome variable (death/recovery) and explanatory variable were analysed using the Fisher’s exact test. All variables with a p-value <0.20 (Table 6) were selected in the univariable analysis to build the multivariable logistic regression. Collinearity was observed between the "age category” and “length of hospital stay” (p-value = < 0.001) and between the "age category” and “empirical treatment” (p-value = < .001).

thumbnail
Table 6. Results of the univariate analysis in the Fisher’s exact test, with treatment outcome (death or recovery) as an outcome variable for patients at UTH.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.t006

Results from the multivariable logistic regression analysis are shown in Table 7. As shown, "Type of Bacterial species", "Empirical Treatment", and "Sex of Participants” were explanatory variables retained in the final model. The logistic regression model adequately fitted the data (Hosmer and Lemeshow test: Pearson chi2 (14) = 17.38; Prob > chi2 = 0.24), with reasonable explanatory power, with ROC areas around 0.76 (a ROC area of 0.50 indicates no explanatory power).

thumbnail
Table 7. Multivariable logistic regression model for risk factors associated with treatment outcome (death/recovery) in patients at UTH.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.t007

In comparison to E. coli as a causative agent, the odds of death were significantly higher among patients infected with Acinetobacter baumannii (OR = 3.8) than Klebsiella pneumoniae (OR = 0.9) or other causative agents (OR = 1.1). The odds of death were significantly higher among patients receiving 3GCs (OR = 13.4) or other types of antibiotics (OR = 3.1) than those receiving 4GCs as empiric treatment. The odds of death in female patients compared to male patients was 3.3.

4. Discussion

Our findings suggest that the prevalence of BSI caused by GNB resistance to 3GCs was high, and the use of 3GCs as empiric treatment negatively affected the outcome of admitted patients, as is seen by the high mortality in the patients that received 3GCs as empiric treatment.

The number of patients that received 3GCs as empiric treatment and were later confirmed to have BSI caused by 3GC resistant GNB was equally high at 68%. This finding indicates a high prevalence of inappropriate empirical treatment at our referral hospital, similar to a previous study done three years ago at the same hospital, that found 67% of antimicrobial orders to be inappropriately prescribed, with 3GCs being the most prescribed (83%) [18]. Inappropriate prescribing in this study, could be attributed to the lack of an updated antibiogram and the microbiology diagnostic challenges as result of reagent stock outs [18]. In 2022, the hospital released and launched an updated antibiogram coupled with a mobile application which is currently in use [21]. Contrary to our findings, a study done in Cape Town, South Africa, recorded a lower prevalence of inappropriate empiric treatment (30.6%) [32].

Inappropriate empirical antimicrobial therapy has been shown to be associated with increased mortality in young children and neonates, thereby highlighting the importance of appropriate empirical antibiotic recommendations [33]. However, the lack of AMR structured surveillance and reporting that is required to support the most appropriate local treatment guidelines and the lack of rapid diagnostic tests in our setting delays the de-escalation or commencement of target-specific antibiotics. This has led to the prolonged use of broader spectrum antibiotics and inappropriate regimens, a practice known to create selective antibiotic pressure, thereby increasing resistance among pathogens [16, 33, 34].

Given the extensive dependence on beta-lactams, especially ceftriaxone, for management of BSI in our setting, 3GC resistant Enterobacterales are of particular concern as the knowledge of AMR patterns, and effective surveillance has significant implications on patient management and outcome. Notable is that despite the high prevalence of 3GC resistance in our setting, as was also noted in previous studies [17, 18, 21], there has limited guidance based on institutional surveillance and formulation of institution/unit-specific antibiogram guidelines until recently in 2022 [21]. A recent multi-facility cross-sectional study that reviewed and analysed the antibiotic prescribing patterns in adult patients at primary healthcare hospitals in Zambia found ceftriaxone (20.3%) to be the most prescribed antibiotic [35]. Although lower than what was previously recorded at the UTH, most primary healthcare hospitals in Zambia lack fully functional diagnostic laboratories that perform culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, hence rely on empiric treatment with no further guidance on target-specific antimicrobial treatment or de-escalation. This use of 3GCs in primary care facilities promotes the emergence of 3GC-resistant pathogens thereby further limiting treatment options for patients being referred to tertiary hospital where 3GCs are widely used as empiric treatment [36].

Similar to the findings at the UTH and the primary care facilities in Lusaka [35, 36], another study in Zambia that reviewed antibiotic use and stewardship indicators in the first- and second-level hospitals in ten provinces at ten different hospitals found the prevalence of antibiotic use among the in-patients to be at 59% with a high rate of empiric prescribing (97%), of which ceftriaxone was 36% of all antibiotics prescribed [37]. Low compliance to the national standard treatment guidelines (STGs), low justified antibiotic use at 16% and only 3% of the treatment having been guided by microscopy, culture and sensitivity (MCS). Practices that drive the emergence of AMR [37].

The paediatric age group with the most infections was ≤12 months; this was comparable to studies in South Africa [32] but contrary to a study in Tanzania which found children above one year of age to be the most admitted with BSI [38]. Among other factors, an immature immune system in the age group ≤12 months is likely to contribute to the high prevalence of BSI seen in this study [39]. Prematurity and malnutrition are other factors associated with high BSI prevalence in this age group and are common in low-resource countries [17, 38]. The high prevalence of E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae observed in this study is comparable to findings in a previous Zambian study at the same hospital [40] and other studies done in, Tanzania, Ethiopia, South Africa and Botswana [4143]. Only one MDR Acinetobacter baumannii was associated with HAI in a burns patient. Notably is the high prevalence of Klebsiella pneumoniae-BSI in NICU, similar to the findings in a previous study in Zambia [17], South Africa [44, 45] and Malawi [46]. This finding can result from extensive physical contact, vertical transmission and poor infection control measures, posing treatment challenges due to AMR and limited permitted antibiotics in this age group [47].

A study that reviewed the prevalence and outcomes of MDR-BSIs found that patients admitted with MDR-BSIs were more likely to receive inappropriate empiric treatment, leading to longer ICU LOS, higher treatment costs and mortality [48]. Resistance to 3GCs was also seen in the community on-set infections, replicating the findings of a Malawian study that although the prevalence of community-acquired (CA) ESBL-E was low (16.67%), they confirmed the existence of ESBL-E in patients that had no history of hospital admission in the last three months [49]. This finding has been observed over the years in high-, middle- and low-income countries [5055]. Comparable to our findings, a seven-year Korean study and another study in Taiwan observed increased community on-set ESBL-producing E. coli infections [56, 57]. This was attributed to the spread of CTX-M type ESBLs in the community worldwide, especially in Escherichia coli [56]. In our setting, the high prevalence of CA AMR infections could result from the over-the-counter non-prescribed purchase of oral antibiotics, non-compliance to treatment duration, and other environmental and food animal sources [58, 59].

The high resistance to 3GCs (75%) observed in this study confirmed an increase from what was previously observed at the same hospital in 2015 to 207 [40]. This finding confirms the growing problem of 3GC resistance in our hospital, thereby emphasizing the need for improved rapid laboratory diagnostic capacity and AMR screening with decent turn-around time, continuous hospital-based surveillance and yearly antibiogram revision. Our findings replicated a two-decade study in Malawi that found a marked increase in resistance to first-line beta-lactam antibiotics and a systematic review in sub-Saharan countries that found the prevalence of 3GC resistance in E. coli-BSI greater than estimates from high-income countries, with E. coli being the leading cause of death in 2019 [3, 47, 60, 61]. The growing trend of intermediate resistance and full resistance in other antibiotic classes such as BL/BLI, fluoroquinolones and carbapenems further complicate the treatment options for patients presenting with BSI. This is more so for carbapenems, the treatment of choice for MDR and ESBL-producing-Enterobacterales BSI [14, 15].

ESBL detection in GNB is considered an essential marker for treatment outcomes. The importance of studying the ESBL-encoding genes (bla genes) and characteristics of their location on mobile genetic elements such as plasmids and integrons responsible for horizontal transfer between species, other Enterobacterales and GNB cannot be overemphasized [62]. Most studies in Zambia on the subject of 3GC resistance and ESBLs were based on characterisation of phenotypic resistance patterns rather than the genes responsible [17, 40]. This undermines the understanding of ESBL gene diversity implicated in HCAI and CAI caused by ESBL-producing strains [62]. The blaSHV gene was the most prevalent among the blagenes detected in this study, compared to studies that found blaCTX-M to be more prevalent in the developed world [63], Poland [64], and Eastern, Southern, Northern, Western, and Central African countries [65, 66]. An earlier study at UTH similarly found blaSHV to be the predominant ESBL-encoding gene [67]. However, this previous study did not find blaCTX-M, the second-highest resistance gene observed in this study. This finding confirms the evolution of ESBL-encoding genes in our setting.

Bacteria that carry ESBL and AmpC genes often carry additional genes or mutations in genes that mediate resistance to a broad range of antibiotics [68]. This was observed in our findings of ESBLs and PMQR determinants qnrA, qnrB and qnrS co-existence, further limiting the treatment options for BSI. Of serious concern was the emergence of carbapenem resistance (7%). Currently, antibiotic options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) treatment are minimal and complex, with polymyxins, high-dose tigecycline, fosfomycin, next-generation aminoglycosides, and new BL/BLI as the mainstays of therapy [69]. These antibiotics are effective, but the need for new and effective anti-CRE therapies cannot be over-emphasized [70].

The LOS and outcome of in-patients depend on the hospital environment, the severity of the disease, and treatment efficiency and effectiveness [71]. In neonatal patients, the prolonged LOS could also be attributed to other factors such as prematurity and low birth weight while, co-morbidities such as HIV, HTN, diabetes, and kidney failure contribute to prolonged LOS and poor treatment outcomes in adult patients [72, 73]. The significantly high odds of death in patients that received 3GCs as empiric treatment compared to those that received 4GCs confirms the negative effect of delayed appropriate antimicrobial therapy in patients infected with MDR GNB [74]. Noteworthy prolonged LOS, high mortality and in-hospital costs have also been attributed to carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales CRE [75]. CRE was relatively low (7%) in this study.

This study provided information on epidemiological, clinical and microbiological features and the effects of antimicrobial resistance on the outcomes of BSIs at a referral hospital in Lusaka, Zambia. Information that can form a basis for surveillance and antimicrobial stewardship programs.

4.1 Study limitation

The findings in this study should be taken with caution because the study was limited to only one health facility, which was purposely selected. Further, the study was limited to only those patients whose blood samples were submitted to the Microbiological Laboratory for analysis which meant a possible exclusion of patients with blood infections but had no opportunity to have their blood tested. This could bias the study population and therefore reduces the external validity of the findings. Despite these limitations, the study has provided valuable insights into understanding the resistance pattern of GNB-BSI and the patient treatment outcomes.

5. Conclusions

The prevalence of BSI caused by GNB resistant to 3GCs was high, and the use of 3GCs as empiric treatment negatively affected the outcome of patients, as was seen by the high mortality in the patients that received 3GCs as empiric treatment. Notably was the high number of cases of inappropriate empirical treatment. Yearly antibiogram formulation and updates using locally generated antimicrobial susceptibility data, coupled with a well functional Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program will not only reduce the emergence of AMR and healthcare costs associated with inappropriate antimicrobial use and prolonged LOS, but will also improve patient clinical outcomes.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primers and PCR condition used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.s001

(TIF)

S1 Data. Gram negative antimicrobial susceptibility inputs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.s002

(XLSX)

S4 Data. Statistical analysis for proportion of resistance genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.s005

(DOCX)

S5 Data. Statistical analysis for relationship between treatment and outcomes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0001414.s006

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Ministry of Health, The University Teaching Hospital and the Bacteriology Unit under the Pathology and Microbiology Department for providing a conducive working environment to enable this work.

References

  1. 1. Dhingra S, Rahman NAA, Peile E, Rahman M, Sartelli M, Hassali MA, et al. Microbial Resistance Movements: An Overview of Global Public Health Threats Posed by Antimicrobial Resistance, and How Best to Counter. Front. Public Heal. 2020;8:1–22. pmid:33251170
  2. 2. Ahmad M, Khan AU. Global economic impact of antibiotic resistance: A review. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist.2019;19:313–6. pmid:31176071
  3. 3. Murray CJ, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet [Internet] 2022 [cited 2022 Jan 24];399:629–55. Available from: pmid:35065702
  4. 4. Vivas R, Barbosa AAT, Dolabela SS, Jain S. Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria and Alternative Methods to Control Them: An Overview. Microb. Drug Resist. [Internet] 2019 [cited 2022 Jan 27];25:890–908. Available from: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/mdr.2018.0319 pmid:30811275
  5. 5. Goto M, Al-Hasan MN. Overall burden of bloodstream infection and nosocomial bloodstream infection in North America and Europe. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2013;19:501–9. pmid:23473333
  6. 6. Schaumburg F, Alabi A, Kokou C, Grobusch MP, Köck R, Kaba H, et al. High burden of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Gabon. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. [Internet] 2013 [cited 2021 Nov 11];68:2140–3. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jac/article/68/9/2140/784281
  7. 7. Tekele SG, Teklu DS, Tullu KD, Birru SK, Legese MH. Extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase and AmpC beta-lactamases producing gram negative bacilli isolated from clinical specimens at International Clinical Laboratories, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. PLoS One [Internet] 2020 [cited 2021 Sep 2];15:e0241984. Available from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0241984 pmid:33180785
  8. 8. Sangare SA, Maiga AI, Guindo I, Maiga A, Camara N, Savadogo S, et al. Prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolated from blood cultures in Africa. Med. Mal. Infect. [Internet] 2015 [cited 2022 Feb 22];45:374–82. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26433872/ pmid:26433872
  9. 9. Saravanan M, Ramachandran B, Barabadi H. The prevalence and drug resistance pattern of extended spectrum β–lactamases (ESBLs) producing Enterobacteriaceae in Africa [Internet]. Microb. Pathog.2018 [cited 2022 Feb 22];114:180–92. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29196174/
  10. 10. Shashwati N, Kiran T, Dhanvijay A. Study of extended spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae and antibiotic coresistance in a tertiary care teaching hospital. J. Nat. Sci. Biol. Med. [Internet] 2014 [cited 2021 Nov 30];5:30. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC3961948/
  11. 11. Esteve-Palau E, Solande G, Sánchez F, Sorlí L, Montero M, Güerri R, et al. Clinical and economic impact of urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing Escherichia coli requiring hospitalization: a matched cohort study. J. Infect. 2015;71:667–74. pmid:26380898
  12. 12. Santoro A, Franceschini E, Meschiari M, Menozzi M, Zona S, Venturelli C, et al. Epidemiology and Risk Factors Associated with Mortality in Consecutive Patients with Bacterial Bloodstream Infection: Impact of MDR and XDR Bacteria. Open Forum Infect. Dis. [Internet] 2020 [cited 2021 Nov 29];7. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/7/11/ofaa461/5913277 pmid:33209951
  13. 13. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet [Internet] 2020 [cited 2021 Nov 29];395:200–11. Available from: http://www.thelancet.com/article/S0140673619329897/fulltext pmid:31954465
  14. 14. Harris PNA, Tambyah PA, Lye DC, Mo Y, Lee TH, Yilmaz M, et al. Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Meropenem on 30-Day Mortality for Patients With E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA [Internet] 2018 [cited 2022 Feb 1];320:984–94. Available from: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2702145 pmid:30208454
  15. 15. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, Rodríguez-Baño J. Current options for the treatment of infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in different groups of patients. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2019;25:932–42. pmid:30986558
  16. 16. Wen SCH, Ezure Y, Rolley L, Spurling G, Lau CL, Riaz S, et al. Gram-negative neonatal sepsis in low- And lower-middle-income countries and WHO empirical antibiotic recommendations: A systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. PLoS Med.2021 [cited 2022 Apr 20];18. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC8478175/
  17. 17. Kabwe M, Tembo J, Chilukutu L, Chilufya M, Ngulube F, Lukwesa C, et al. Etiology, Antibiotic Resistance and Risk Factors for Neonatal Sepsis in a Large Referral Center in Zambia. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2016;35:191–8.
  18. 18. Masich AM, Vega AD, Callahan P, Herbert A, Fwoloshi S, Zulu PM, et al. Antimicrobial usage at a large teaching hospital in Lusaka, Zambia. PLoS One [Internet] 2020 [cited 2021 Nov 19];15. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32040513/
  19. 19. Timsit JF, Ruppé E, Barbier F, Tabah A, Bassetti M. Bloodstream infections in critically ill patients: an expert statement. Intensive Care Med. [Internet] 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 2];46:266. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7223992/ pmid:32047941
  20. 20. Nagelkerke MMB, Sikwewa K, Makowa D, De Vries I, Chisi S, Dorigo-Zetsma JW. Prevalence of antimicrobial drug resistant bacteria carried by in- and outpatients attending a secondary care hospital in Zambia. BMC Res. Notes [Internet] 2017 [cited 2018 Dec 5];10:378. Available from: https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/s13104-017-2710-x pmid:28797299
  21. 21. Chanda D, Fwoloshi S, Chanda R, Sa FCP. University Teaching Hospital Antibiotic Guidelines Series Editors. 2022;
  22. 22. Kellogg JA, Manzella JP, Bankert DA. Frequency of low-level bacteremia in children from birth to fifteen years of age. J. Clin. Microbiol. [Internet] 2000 [cited 2022 Jul 18];38:2181–5. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC86758/ pmid:10834973
  23. 23. Tenderenda A, Łysakowska M, Dargiewicz R, Gawron-Skarbek A. Blood Culture Contamination: A Single General Hospital Experience of 2-Year Retrospective Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022;19. pmid:35270715
  24. 24. Calfee DP, Farr BM. Comparison of four antiseptic preparations for skin in the prevention of contamination of percutaneously drawn blood cultures: A randomized trial. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002;40:1660–5. pmid:11980938
  25. 25. Madeo M, Williams C, Jackson T. Simple measures to reduce the rate of contamination of blood cultures in Accident and Emergency. Emerg. Med. J. 2005;22:810–1. pmid:16244343
  26. 26. Monteiro ACM, Fortaleza CMCB, Ferreira AM, Cavalcante R de S, Mondelli AL, Bagagli E, et al. Comparison of methods for the identification of microorganisms isolated from blood cultures. Ann. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. [Internet] 2016 [cited 2022 Nov 14];15:1–11. Available from: https://ann-clinmicrob.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12941-016-0158-9
  27. 27. Poole K. Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Resistance to the max. Front. Microbiol. [Internet] 2011;2. Available from: www.frontiersin.org pmid:21747788
  28. 28. CLSI (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute). CLSI M100-ED29: 2021 Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 30th Edition. 2020.
  29. 29. Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG, et al. Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: An international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. [Internet] 2012;18:268–81. Available from: pmid:21793988
  30. 30. Farkas A, Tarco E, Butiuc-Keul A. Antibiotic resistance profiling of pathogenic enterobacteriaceae from cluj-napoca, Romania. GERMS 2019;9:17–27. pmid:31119113
  31. 31. Lee PY, Costumbrado J, Hsu CY, Kim YH. Agarose gel electrophoresis for the separation of DNA fragments. J. Vis. Exp. 2012;1–5. pmid:22546956
  32. 32. Crichton H, O’Connell N, Rabie H, Whitelaw AC, Dramowski A. Neonatal and paediatric bloodstream infections: Pathogens, antimicrobial resistance patterns and prescribing practice at Khayelitsha District Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. S. Afr. Med. J. [Internet] 2018 [cited 2022 Nov 17];108:99. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29429440/ pmid:29429440
  33. 33. Cook A, Hsia Y, Russell N, Sharland M, Cheung K, Grimwood K, et al. Association of Empiric Antibiotic Regimen Discordance with 30-Day Mortality in Neonatal and Pediatric Bloodstream Infection—A Global Retrospective Cohort Study. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2021;137–43. pmid:33395208
  34. 34. Zhang L, Levy K, Trueba G, Cevallos W, Trostle J, Foxman B, et al. Effects of selection pressure and genetic association on the relationship between antibiotic resistance and virulence in Escherichia coli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. [Internet] 2015 [cited 2022 Apr 21];59:6733–40. Available from: https://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/AAC.01094-15 pmid:26282415
  35. 35. Mudenda S, Chomba M, Chabalenge B, Hikaambo CN, Banda M, Daka V, et al. Antibiotic Prescribing Patterns in Adult Patients According to the WHO AWaRe Classification: A Multi-Facility Cross-Sectional Study in Primary Healthcare Hospitals in Lusaka, Zambia. Pharmacol. & Pharm. [Internet] 2022 [cited 2022 Nov 17];13:379–92. Available from: http://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?PaperID=120529
  36. 36. Sulis G, Daniels B, Kwan A, Gandra S, Daftary A, Das J, et al. Antibiotic overuse in the primary health care setting: A secondary data analysis of standardised patient studies from India, China and Kenya. BMJ Glob. Heal. [Internet] 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 10];5:3393. Available from: http://gh.bmj.com/ pmid:32938614
  37. 37. Kalungia AC, Mukosha M, Mwila C, Banda D, Mwale M, Kagulura S, et al. Antibiotic Use and Stewardship Indicators in the First- and Second-Level Hospitals in Zambia: Findings and Implications for the Future. Antibiotics 2022;1–17. pmid:36421270
  38. 38. Seni J, Mwakyoma AA, Mashuda F, Marando R, Ahmed M, Devinney R, et al. Deciphering risk factors for blood stream infections, bacteria species and antimicrobial resistance profiles among children under five years of age in North-Western Tanzania: A multicentre study in a cascade of referral health care system. BMC Pediatr. 2019;19:1–11.
  39. 39. Prabhudas M, Adkins B, Gans H, King C, Levy O, Ramilo O, et al. Challenges in infant immunity: Implications for responses to infection and vaccines. Nat. Immunol. 2011;12:189–94. pmid:21321588
  40. 40. Roth BM, Laps A, Yamba K, Heil EL, Johnson JK, Stafford K, et al. Antibiogram development in the setting of a high frequency of multi-drug resistant organisms at university teaching hospital, Lusaka, Zambia. Antibiotics [Internet] 2021 [cited 2022 Feb 1];10. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC8300684/ pmid:34203126
  41. 41. Mshana SE, Kamugisha E, Mirambo M, Chakraborty T, Lyamuya EF. Prevalence of multiresistant gram-negative organisms in a tertiary hospital in Mwanza, Tanzania. BMC Res. Notes [Internet] 2009 [cited 2022 Aug 10];2:1–6. Available from: https://bmcresnotes.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1756-0500-2-49
  42. 42. Teklu DS, Negeri AA, Legese MH, Bedada TL, Woldemariam HK, Tullu KD. Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production and multi-drug resistance among Enterobacteriaceae isolated in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control [Internet] 2019 [cited 2022 Aug 10];8:1–12. Available from: https://aricjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13756-019-0488-4
  43. 43. Gezmu AM, Bulabula ANH, Dramowski A, Bekker A, Aucamp M, Souda S, et al. Laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infections in two large neonatal units in sub-Saharan Africa. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021;103:201–7. pmid:33227511
  44. 44. Essel V, Tshabalala K, Ntshoe G, Mphaphuli E, Feller G, Shonhiwa AM, et al. A multisectoral investigation of a neonatal unit outbreak of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia at a regional hospital in Gauteng Province, South Africa. S. Afr. Med. J. [Internet] 2020 [cited 2022 Aug 10];110:783–90. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32880307/ pmid:32880307
  45. 45. Dramowski A, Mashau RC, Meiring ST, Dramowski A, Magobo RE, Quan VC, et al. Culture-confirmed neonatal bloodstream infections and meningitis in South Africa, 2014–19: a cross-sectional study. Chris Hani Baragwanath Acad. Hosp. [Internet] 2022 [cited 2022 Aug 10];10:1170–8. Available from: www.thelancet.com/ pmid:35839815
  46. 46. Cornick J, Musicha P, Peno C, Seager E, Tam PYI, Bilima S, et al. Genomic investigation of a suspected Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak in a neonatal care unit in sub-Saharan Africa. Microb. Genomics 2021;7:10–5.
  47. 47. Tam PYI, Musicha P, Kawaza K, Cornick J, Denis B, Freyne B, et al. Emerging resistance to empiric antimicrobial regimens for pediatric bloodstream infections in Malawi (1998–2017) [Internet]. Clin. Infect. Dis.2019 [cited 2022 Feb 1];69:61–8. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6579959/
  48. 48. Aliyu S, McGowan K, Hussain D, Kanawati L, Ruiz M, Yohannes S. Prevalence and Outcomes of Multi-Drug Resistant Blood Stream Infections Among Nursing Home Residents Admitted to an Acute Care Hospital. J. Intensive Care Med. [Internet] 2022 [cited 2022 Mar 31];37:565–71. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33938320/ pmid:33938320
  49. 49. Onduru OG, Mkakosya RS, Rumisha SF, Aboud S. Carriage prevalence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing enterobacterales in outpatients attending community health centers in Blantyre, Malawi. Trop. Med. Infect. Dis. [Internet] 2021 [cited 2022 Feb 22];6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34698289/
  50. 50. Ben-Ami R, Schwaber MJ, Navon-Venezia S, Schwartz D, Giladi M, Chmelnitsky I, et al. Influx of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae into the hospital. Clin. Infect. Dis. [Internet] 2006;42:925–34. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/42/7/925/323117
  51. 51. Pitout JD, Laupland KB. Extended-spectrum-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: an emerging public-health concern. Lancet Infect Dis 2008;8:159–66.
  52. 52. Lee S, Han SW, Kim KW, Song DY, Kwon KT. Third-generation cephalosporin resistance of community-onset Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia in a secondary hospital. Korean J. Intern. Med. [Internet] 2014 [cited 2022 Jan 24];29:49–56. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24574833/ pmid:24574833
  53. 53. Lim C, Takahashi E, Hongsuwan M, Wuthiekanun V, Thamlikitkul V, Hinjoy S, et al. Epidemiology and burden of multidrug-resistant bacterial infection in a developing country. Elife [Internet] 2016 [cited 2022 Jan 24];5. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC5030096/ pmid:27599374
  54. 54. Droz N, Hsia Y, Ellis S, Dramowski A, Sharland M, Basmaci R. Bacterial pathogens and resistance causing community acquired paediatric bloodstream infections in low- And middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control [Internet] 2019 [cited 2022 Jan 28];8:1–12. Available from: https://aricjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13756-019-0673-5
  55. 55. Jernigan JA, Hatfield KM, Wolford H, Nelson RE, Olubajo B, Reddy SC, et al. Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections in U.S. Hospitalized Patients, 2012–2017. N. Engl. J. Med. [Internet] 2020 [cited 2022 Feb 1];382:1309–19. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32242356/ pmid:32242356
  56. 56. Park SH. Third-generation cephalosporin resistance in gram-negative bacteria in the community: A growing public health concern. Korean J. Intern. Med.2014;29:27–30. pmid:24574830
  57. 57. Lin WP, Huang YS, Wang JT, Chen YC, Chang SC. Prevalence of and risk factor for community-onset third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli bacteremia at a medical center in Taiwan. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019;19.
  58. 58. Belachew SA, Hall L, Selvey LA. Non-prescription dispensing of antibiotic agents among community drug retail outlets in Sub-Saharan African countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis [Internet]. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control2021 [cited 2022 Jan 28];10:1–15. Available from: https://aricjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13756-020-00880-w
  59. 59. Crémet L, Caroff N, Dauvergne S, Reynaud A, Lepelletier D, Corvec S. Prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants in ESBL Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates over a 1-year period in a French hospital. Pathol. Biol. (Paris). [Internet] 2011 [cited 2021 Nov 11];59:151–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19481883
  60. 60. Lester R, Musicha P, Van Ginneken N, Dramowski A, Hamer DH, Garner P, et al. Prevalence and outcome of bloodstream infections due to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. [Internet] 2020 [cited 2022 Jan 31];75:492. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC7021093/ pmid:31742611
  61. 61. Bou-Antoun S, Davies J, Guy R, Johnson AP, Sheridan EA, Hope RJ. Descriptive epidemiology of Escherichia coli bacteraemia in England. Euro Surveill [Internet] 2012 [cited 2022 Jan 31];21:30329. Available from: www.eurosurveillance.org
  62. 62. Jones CH, Tuckman M, Keeney D, Ruzin A, Bradford PA. Characterization and sequence analysis of extended-spectrum-β- lactamase-encoding genes from Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis isolates collected during tigecycline phase 3 clinical trials. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009;53:465–75.
  63. 63. Doi Y, Iovleva A, Bonomo RA. The ecology of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) in the developed world [Internet]. J. Travel Med.2017;24:S44–51. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/jtm/article/24/suppl_1/S44/3782738
  64. 64. Kłos M, Pomorska-Wesołowska M, Romaniszyn D, Wójkowska-Mach J, Chmielarczyk A. Antimicrobial Resistance in Enterobacterales Bacilli Isolated from Bloodstream Infection in Surgical Patients of Polish Hospitals. Int. J. Microbiol. 2021;2021. pmid:33510792
  65. 65. Onduru OG, Mkakosya RS, Aboud S, Rumisha SF. Genetic Determinants of Resistance among ESBL-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in Community and Hospital Settings in East, Central, and Southern Africa: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence [Internet]. Can. J. Infect. Dis. Med. Microbiol.2021 [cited 2022 Jan 28];2021. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC8192179/
  66. 66. Storberg V. ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Africa—a non-systematic literature review of research published 2008–2012. Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 2014;4. pmid:24765249
  67. 67. Mumbula EM, Kwenda G, Samutela MT, Kalonda A, Mwansa JCL, Mwenya D, et al. Extended Spectrum β-Lactamases Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae from the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka, Zambia. Jour Med Sc Tech J Med. Sci. Tech 2015;4:1694–1217.
  68. 68. Xiong Y, Zhang Cong, Gao W, Ma Y, Zhang Q, Han Y, et al. Genetic diversity and co-prevalence of ESBLs and PMQR genes among plasmid-mediated AmpC Î2-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates causing urinary tract infection. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo). [Internet] 2021 [cited 2022 Feb 1];74:397–406. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41429-021-00413-6
  69. 69. Tamma PD, Aitken SL, Bonomo RA, Mathers AJ, van Duin D, Clancy CJ. Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR- P. aeru. Clin. Infect. Dis. [Internet] 2021 [cited 2022 Feb 1];72:e169–83. Available from: www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/
  70. 70. Sheu CC, Chang YT, Lin SY, Chen YH, Hsueh PR. Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: An update on therapeutic options. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:80. pmid:30761114
  71. 71. Stockwell DC, Thomas C, Fieldston ES, Hall M, Czaja AS, Stalets EL, et al. Using Length of Stay to Understand Patient Flow for Pediatric Inpatients. Pediatr. Qual. Saf. [Internet] 2018 [cited 2022 Mar 29];3:e050. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC6132698/ pmid:30229186
  72. 72. Seaton SE, Barker L, Jenkins D, Draper ES, Abrams KR, Manktelow BN. What factors predict length of stay in a neonatal unit: a systematic review. BMJ Open [Internet] 2016 [cited 2022 Mar 29];6:e010466. Available from: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/6/10/e010466 pmid:27797978
  73. 73. Odlum M, Yoon S. Understanding Comorbidities and Their Contribution to Predictors of Medical Resource Utilization for an Age- and Sex-Matched Patient Population Living With HIV: Cross-Sectional Study. JMIR Aging 2019;2(2)e13865 https//aging.jmir.org/2019/2/e13865 [Internet] 2019 [cited 2022 Nov 24];2:e13865. Available from: https://aging.jmir.org/2019/2/e13865 pmid:31516123
  74. 74. Bonine NG, Berger A, Altincatal A, Wang R, Bhagnani T, Gillard P, et al. Impact of Delayed Appropriate Antibiotic Therapy on Patient Outcomes by Antibiotic Resistance Status From Serious Gram-negative Bacterial Infections. Am. J. Med. Sci. [Internet] 2019;357:103–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2018.11.009 pmid:30665490
  75. 75. Kengkla K, Wongsalap Y, Chaomuang N, Suthipinijtham P, Oberdorfer P, Saokaew S. Clinical and economic outcomes attributable to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and delayed appropriate antibiotic therapy in hospitalized patients. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. [Internet] 2021;1–11. Available from: pmid:34724994