Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genome‑wide identification of the NHX gene family in Forsythia identifies FsNHX3 and FsNHX6 as potential candidates involved in abiotic stress responses

  • Lulu Li,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Forestry Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, P R China

    ⨯
  • Xiaojun Ma,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology, Validation

    Affiliation College of Forestry Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, P R China

    ⨯
  • Aiqin Ding,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation College of Forestry Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, P R China

    ⨯
  • Guanning Zhang,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology

    Affiliation College of Forestry Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, P R China

    ⨯
  • Jiahui Zhou,

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation College of Forestry Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, P R China

    ⨯
  • Congcong Liu,

    Roles Visualization

    Affiliation College of Forestry Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, P R China

    ⨯
  • Chunli Chen,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Forestry Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, P R China

    ⨯
  • Xiaohan Tang,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation College of Forestry Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, P R China

    ⨯
  • Xuexiang Li,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Forestry Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, P R China

    ⨯
  • Jing Shu,

    Roles Data curation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation College of Agricultural Science and Technology, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, P R China

    ⨯
  • Xinhong Wang

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    wangxinhong120@126.com

    Affiliation College of Forestry Engineering, Shandong Agriculture and Engineering University, Jinan, P R China

    ⨯

Abstract

The Na ⁺ /H⁺ antiporter (NHX) gene family plays a central role in maintaining cellular ion homeostasis and responding to abiotic stress in plants. However, the systematic identification and functional characterization of this gene family in woody plants of the genus Forsythia remain unexplored. To address this, genome-wide identification and systematic comparative analysis of the NHX gene family were performed in three Forsythia species, Forsythia suspensa, F. viridissima, and F. ovata, with a focus on elucidating F. suspensa NHX gene expression under various types of stress: salt, drought (PEG-simulated), and exogenous abscisic acid (ABA). In total, 18 NHX members were identified and were classified into three subclasses based on phylogenetic analysis, resulting in 12 vacuolar membrane-localized ‘Vac’-class members, four plasma-membrane-localized ‘PM’-class members, and two endosomal system-localized ‘Endo’-class members. Those proteins within the same evolutionary clade exhibit highly conserved structural features in terms of motif arrangement and gene structure. Synteny analysis identified whole-genome or segmental duplication as the primary driving force for the expansion of this family, with all of the duplicated gene pairs having undergone strong purifying selection. Based on interspecies synteny analysis, F. suspensa and F. viridissima exhibited the highest degree of NHX gene family homology. Expression analysis revealed that the F. suspensa NHX gene family exhibits distinct and tissue-specific responses to drought, salt, and exogenous ABA stress. Among the NHX members, FsNHX3 and FsNHX6 exhibited the most pronounced and sustained transcriptional upregulation across the three stress treatments, suggesting their potential involvement in stress response. These findings provide valuable insights for the further exploration of the functions and molecular mechanisms of the NHX gene family in Forsythia under salt and drought stress, offering valuable candidate genetic resources for breeding Forsythia varieties with enhanced tolerance to salinity and dehydration.

1 Introduction

Soil salinization and drought represent increasing challenges affecting agricultural productivity and ecosystem sustainability globally [1]. When extracellular Na⁺ concentrations are high, Na⁺ enters plant cells, leading to cytoplasmic accumulation of Na⁺. High Na+ levels can lead to osmotic stress, ionic toxicity, and oxidative damage, ultimately affecting plant growth, development, yield, and quality [2]. Drought reduces the soil water potential, ultimately reducing the ability of the roots to take up water, leading to cellular dehydration, osmotic stress, and ion imbalance. Forsythia species, belonging to the Oleaceae family, are important early-spring-flowering shrubs that are widely distributed in East Asia and that possess significant ornamental, medicinal, and ecological value. Forsythia suspensa, a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, produces dried fruits rich in lignan compounds such as forsythin and forsythiaside A, which exhibit anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antibacterial, antiviral, and anti-allergic activities [3–5]. However, in recent years, the cultivation and production of Forsythia species have been increasingly affected globally by drought and soil salinization.

Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter (NHX) family members are key regulators of intracellular ion homeostasis in plants. NHX members synergistically regulate Na⁺ and K⁺ balance and compartmentalization at the cellular, tissue, and whole-plant levels, forming a critical network that enables adaptation to salt stress and other adverse conditions while maintaining normal growth and development [6]. NHX proteins, which belong to the monovalent cation/proton antiporter 1 superfamily, are transmembrane proteins of ca. 550 amino acid residues and contain a highly conserved Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger domain [7]. Most NHX proteins consist of 10–12 transmembrane helices and have a hydrophobic N-terminal domain and hydrophilic C-terminal tail [8]. The N-terminal regions of these NHX species exhibit high levels of homology. For example, the third or fourth transmembrane domain contains the conserved sequence FF(I/L)(Y/F)LFLLPPI, which is an amiloride-binding site and a competitive inhibitor binding site for transport activity [9]. In Arabidopsis thaliana, eight NHX members (AtNHX1–AtNHX8) have been identified. The NHX family can be subdivided into three distinct classes based on subcellular localization, cellular function, and phylogenetic relationships: the vacuolar membrane-localized ‘Vac’ class (e.g., AtNHX1–AtNHX4), the endosomal system-localized ‘Endo’ class (e.g., AtNHX5 and AtNHX6), and the plasma membrane-localized ‘PM’ class (e.g., AtNHX7/SOS1 and AtNHX8) [8,10].

NHX proteins play central and complex roles in maintaining cation homeostasis. They are operated by the transmembrane proton motive force generated by proton pumps like H⁺ -ATPase and H⁺ -PPase that provide the energy for Na⁺/H⁺ or K⁺/H⁺ exchange [6,11]. The cellular role of NHX varies depending on its localization. The plasma membrane-localized members, including AtNHX7/SOS1, actively expel excess Na+ from the cytoplasm and thus alleviate cytoplasmic Na+ toxicity [12,13]. The vacuolar membrane-localized members sequester Na+ into the vacuolar lumen, reduce Na+ toxicity in the cytoplasm, and utilize vacuolar Na+ for osmotic adjustment to maintain cell turgor and enhance salt tolerance [10,14–16]. Recent studies have revealed that, in Arabidopsis, NHX1 and NHX2 have a greater affinity for K⁺ than Na⁺ , predominantly pumping K⁺ into the vacuole; this mechanism maintains cell turgidity and helps to maintain pH, thus affecting cell growth, tissue elongation, and stomatal movement [17,18]. The endomembrane-localized members, such as AtNHX5 and AtNHX6, which are localized to the endosome and Golgi apparatus, regulate vesicle trafficking and protein processing by modulating the compartment pH and ion balance [10,19]. Vesicle trafficking and the fusion of vesicles with vacuoles are important aspects of cellular responses to abiotic stress [20,21].

Regulation of intracellular cation homeostasis by NHX proteins underpins their vital roles in plant tolerance to salinity, alkalinity, and drought. Enhancing salt tolerance—the core function of NHX proteins—has constituted both the primary reason for their initial discovery and the basis for the extensive later research [22]. NHX gene overexpression, heterologous or homologous, has been widely shown to substantially enhance salt tolerance in plants. In cotton, the vacuolar-localized GhNHX1 is significantly activated under salt stress, and its silencing reduces seedling tolerance to high salt concentrations [23]. Both the vacuolar-type GhNHX3D and endosomal-type GhNHX4A have been shown to enhance the salt tolerance of salt-sensitive yeast mutants, whereas virus-induced gene silencing of these genes in cotton plants reduced salt tolerance [24,25]. In transgenic tomato plants, overexpression of NHX genes such as LeNHX2 and LeNHX4, or of the exogenous AtNHX1, significantly enhanced salt tolerance, enabling them to maintain flowering, growth, and fruit yield in high-salinity soils; simultaneously, vacuolar Na⁺ sequestration driven by these genes reduced sodium buildup in the fruit, thereby safeguarding fruit quality against salt‑induced damage [26–28].

Recent studies have demonstrated that NHX proteins can enhance plant drought tolerance. By promoting the compartmentalization of Na⁺ and K⁺ into vacuoles, NHX proteins directly enhance the osmotic adjustment capacity of plants. Arabidopsis plants overexpressing the wheat tonoplast TNHX1 and H⁺ -pyrophosphatase TVP1 exhibited enhanced salt and drought tolerance as well as improved water retention capacity [29]. Under drought stress, transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing soybean GmNHX1 or GmNHX3 accumulated more Na⁺ and K⁺ ions, thereby reducing their cell water potential, facilitating water uptake from dry soil, and maintaining higher relative water content in the leaves [30]. Under water-deficit conditions, the activity of antioxidant enzymes such as peroxidase and superoxide dismutase was significantly higher in these transgenic plants than in the wild-type plants, whereas their malondialdehyde content was reduced, indicating less oxidative damage to cell membranes [30].

Forsythia species have adapted to diverse habitats during their long evolutionary history. For example, F. suspensa is widely distributed in China but is more commonly found in warm temperate regions. Forsythia viridissima is predominantly distributed in the subtropical regions of China, particularly in the Yangtze River basin [31], and Forsythia ovata is native to the Korean Peninsula and cultivated in northeastern China. This divergence in ecological adaptation provides ideal natural material for investigating the molecular basis of stress adaptation in Forsythia species.

NHX genes, important transmembrane transporters of Na+, K+, and H+, are central to cellular ionic homeostasis, pH balancing, and plant responses to abiotic stresses such as salt and drought [17,32]. Although NHX genes have been systematically identified and functionally characterized in various models and crop plants, including Arabidopsis thaliana, rice, and cotton, their genome-wide identification, evolutionary features, and regulatory mechanisms under stress conditions remain largely unexplored in Forsythia.

To address this gap, genome-wide identification and systematic comparative analysis of NHX genes were conducted in three Forsythia species: F. suspensa, F. viridissima, and F. ovata. The research objectives were to identify NHX members in these Forsythia species and systematically analyze their physicochemical properties, phylogenetic relationships, gene structures, conserved motifs, and predicted subcellular localization. The evolutionary mechanisms and duplication events within this family were examined through intra- and inter-species synteny analysis. Finally, transcriptomic data and quantitative real-time PCR were used to examine NHX gene expression in F. suspensa under salt and drought stress and exogenous abscisic acid treatment. This study aimed to elucidate the evolutionary characteristics and potential functions of NHX genes in these Forsythia species, to reveal their potential regulatory mechanisms in response to different abiotic stresses, and provide key candidate gene resources for breeding salt- and drought-tolerant Forsythia varieties.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Identification of NHX genes

We retrieved eight AtNHX sequences from the TAIR database. Whole-genome and annotation data for F. suspensa were obtained from the National Genomics Data Center (https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/) under accession PRJCA023056 [33]; for F. ovata, these data were sourced from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) via accession PRJNA1086660 [34]; and for F. viridissima, these data were acquired from The Integrated Medicinal Plantomics database [31] (https://www.bic.ac.cn/IMP/#/speciesInfo?ID=494). Using TBtools v2.372 [35], these genome and annotation datasets were filtered to remove fragmented contigs, and the longest transcript per gene was extracted as the basis for subsequent analyses. Using the eight AtNHX sequences as queries, BLASTP homology searches were performed against the proteomes of F. suspensa, F. ovata, and F. viridissima, with an E-value threshold of 1 × 10−5. Concurrently, the hidden Markov model (HMM) profile of the NHX conserved domain PF00999 was retrieved from the Pfam database and used to screen the three proteomes via HMMER. Candidate NHX genes were defined as those sequences identified by both BLASTP and HMMER searches. To verify that all of the candidate sequences possess the typical Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger domain, they were analyzed using the NCBI CDD and SMART databases under the default parameters.

Publicly available transcriptome data were used to refine the gene models of FsNHX members whose Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger domain annotations were incomplete. RNA-seq reads of F. suspensa (accessions SRR10766265, SRR10766266, SRR10766267, SRR10829626, and SRR10829647) were retrieved from the NCBI SRA database. Using the ‘Convert SRA to Fastq Files’ utility within TBtools v2.372 [35], the SRA files were transformed into the FASTQ format. The obtained reads were then mapped onto the reference genome, and sorted BAM files were produced using the sort function in SAMtools. To manually refine the exon–intron structure of the annotated target genes, the resulting alignments were visually examined using IGV-GSAman.

2.2 Chromosomal localization and physicochemical properties

Based on the F. suspensa, F. ovata, and F. viridissima genome annotation data, the chromosomal location of each NHX gene was extracted using TBtools v2.372 and the resulting positions were visualized for chromosome mapping [35]. The ExPASy ProtParam server (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/) was used to compute the physicochemical properties of the NHX proteins [36]. The subcellular destinations of FsNHX, FvNHX, and FoNHX were predicted using the Plant-mPLoc algorithm (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/) [37]. Transmembrane helix regions were identified using TMHMM Server v2.0 (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/). Secondary structural elements were characterized using the SOPMA web server (https://npsa.lyon.inserm.fr/cgi-bin/npsa_automat.pl?page=/NPSA/npsa_sopma.html), while three-dimensional models were generated using AlphaFold3 (https://deepmind.google/technologies/alphafold/alphafold-server/) [38].

2.3 Phylogenetic analysis

Multiple sequence alignment of the NHX proteins was performed using the MUSCLE algorithm integrated in MEGA11, applying the default parameters [39]. For the subsequent phylogenetic reconstruction, NHX protein sequences from ten plant species, namely F. suspensa, F. ovata, F. viridissima, A. thaliana, Populus euphratica, Triticum aestivum, Oryza sativa, Solanum lycopersicum, Punica granatum, and Vitis vinifera, were included. Maximum likelihood (ML) inference was performed under the JTT + G + F model, which combines the Jones–Taylor–Thornton substitution matrix with empirical amino acid frequencies and incorporates a gamma distribution along with a proportion of invariant sites to account for rate heterogeneity across sites. Branch support was evaluated via nonparametric bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates. The resulting phylogenetic tree was visualized and annotated using the iTOL web server (https://itol.embl.de).

2.4 Conserved motifs, gene structure, and multiple sequence alignment

Conserved motifs in the NHX proteins were predicted using the MEME online tool (https://meme-suite.org/meme/tools/meme), with the maximum motif number increased from the default of 3–10 [40]. To determine the exon–intron architecture of the NHX genes, their coding sequences (CDS) were aligned with the corresponding genomic DNA sequences using TBtools v2.372 [35]. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using the Clustalw online tool (https://www.genome.jp/tools-bin/clustalw), using the default settings, to assess conservation of functional domains. The resulting multiple sequence alignments were visualized using ESPript v3.2 [41].

2.5 Synteny and selection pressure analysis

Intra- and inter-species synteny analyses of FsNHX, FoNHX, and FvNHX were performed using the McScanX plugin of TBtools, with an E-value threshold of ≤1.0E-10 [35]. TBtools was used to compute the Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks ratios for the syntenic gene pairs [35]. Divergence times were then calculated as T = Ks / 2r × 10−6 million years ago (Mya), where r represents the synonymous substitution rate of 8.83 × 10−9 substitutions per site per year for Fraxinus species [42].

2.6 Cis-acting element analysis

For each NHX gene, 2 kb sequences upstream of the transcription start site were retrieved from the genome assemblies of F. suspensa, F. viridissima, and F. ovata using TBtools v2.372 [35]. The PlantCARE database (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) was then used to identify cis‑acting regulatory elements (CAREs) within these promoter sequences [43]. The identified CAREs encompassing motifs related to stress, hormones, development, and light responses were visualized using GraphPad Prism 9.

2.7 NHX gene expression under drought and low temperature stress based on RNA-Seq data

Transcriptome data for four populations of F. suspensa under drought stress (accession numbers SRR10829625 to SRR10829648) [44] and cold stress (accession numbers SRR10766265 to SRR10766288) [45] were obtained from the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) database. The four populations were from Wuzhi Mountain, Hebei (HBWZ); Wulaofeng, Shanxi (SXWL); Huashan, Shaanxi (SXHM); and Laojun Mountain, Shaanxi (SXLJ). For the drought-treatment group, samples were collected from leaves of six-month-old F. suspensa seedlings subjected for 3 h to soil water contents of 80% (control) or 20%. For the cold-treatment group, samples were collected from the leaves of six-month-old F. suspensa seedlings subjected for one day to a cultivation temperature of 25 °C (control) or 4 °C.

The SRA Toolkit v2.10.9 was used to retrieve RNA-seq datasets from the NCBI SRA database. For every sample, the corresponding SRA file was fetched using the prefetch command, followed by conversion into FASTQ format using fastq-dump (or fasterq-dump) with the --split-files flag to separate paired‑end reads. Raw sequencing reads were subjected to quality control and preprocessing using Fastp v0.23.2 [46] with the default parameters. Adapter sequences were removed and bases with Phred quality scores below Q20 were eliminated, and after adapter trimming, reads shorter than 36 bp were discarded. An index for transcriptome quantification was constructed using RSEM v1.3.3 [47] in conjunction with the Bowtie2 alignment tool v2.4.4 [48]. The reference genomes and their associated gene annotation files in GTF format were downloaded [33]. Index generation was performed by executing the rsem-prepare-reference command with the --gtf flag, using the reference genome FASTA file. For each sample, the filtered paired‑end reads were mapped to the reference genome and simultaneously quantified using the rsem-calculate-expression command, which was run using the following arguments: --paired-end, --bowtie2, --estimate-rspd, --append-names, and -p 8 (eight CPU threads were utilized). The resulting output provides both gene‑ and transcript‑level expression measures, including expected read counts, FPKM, and transcripts per million (TPM). From these results, the TPM values were extracted for subsequent differential expression and functional analyses.

2.8 Plant materials and treatments

Seeds of F. suspensa were collected from Yuncheng, Shanxi Province, China. Healthy and plump seeds were selected and germinated in a constant-temperature incubator at 30°C for 7 d. The germinated seeds were then sown in seedling trays filled with a vermiculite and nutrient soil mixture (1:1, v/v) and cultivated at 22–25°C under a 16 h light/8 h dark photoperiod. Upon reaching the eight-true-leaf stage, uniformly grown seedlings were transferred to Hoagland’s nutrient solution and acclimatized for one week. For the salt stress treatment, seedlings were exposed to Hoagland’s solution supplemented with 100 mM NaCl. This concentration was chosen based on a preliminary gradient experiment (using concentrations of 50, 100, and 200 mM NaCl), in which 100 mM NaCl induced visible stress symptoms within an appropriate timeframe without causing rapid lethality, thus allowing reliable monitoring of transcriptional changes. Leaf and root samples were collected at 0 h (control), 3 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 2 d after treatment. For drought stress, Hoagland’s solution containing 20% PEG 6000 was applied, and samples were harvested at 0 h (control), 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, 2 d, 4 d, and 8 d. For abscisic acid (ABA) induction, seedlings were placed in Hoagland’s solution with 100 μM ABA, and sampling was performed at 0 h (control), 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h. Three biological replicates were used for each time point, with each replicate comprising three seedlings. The collected samples were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C until further analysis.

2.9 RNA extraction and gene expression analysis

To isolate total RNA from each biological replicate, an RNA purification kit (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) was used. RNA concentration and purity were measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). First-strand cDNA was synthesized using the HiScript III RT SuperMix (+gDNA wiper) (Vazyme). The transcript EF1αH was used as an endogenous control for quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR). PCR reactions were run on a QuantStudio 5 system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the ChamQ Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme). Three technical replicates were used for each sample. The 2−ΔΔCt method [49] was used to estimate relative transcript levels. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 27.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) and one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s honest significant difference (HSD) post hoc test were used for multiple comparisons. The threshold for significance was set at p < 0.05. Plots were generated using GraphPad Prism 9. The primer sequences used here are listed in S1 Table.

3 Results

3.1 Identification, chromosomal localization, and physicochemical properties of NHX genes in Forsythia

In F. suspensa, six FsNHX genes, distributed across five chromosomes, were identified and were designated FsNHX1–FsNHX6; in F. viridissima, seven FvNHX genes, located on six chromosomes, were identified and were designated FvNHX1–FvNHX7; and in F. ovata, five FoNHX genes, mapped to three chromosomes, were identified and were designated FoNHX1–FoNHX5 (S2 Table; S1 Fig). In the three Forsythia species, a total of 18 NHX proteins were identified, with 482–1,146 amino acids and molecular weights of 53.7–128.3 kDa (Table 1). The isoelectric point (pI) of the different proteins was theoretically predicted to be between 5.43 and 9.07, with eight proteins predicted to be acidic based on their pI (pI < 7) and 10 predicted to be basic. Stability analysis revealed that 13 of the proteins were stable, whereas the other five proteins were unstable. Transmembrane domain prediction revealed that all but two of the NHX proteins have 9–12 transmembrane domains, whereas FoNHX1 and FoNHX2 have 6–7 transmembrane domains. Hydrophilicity analysis revealed that 16 of the proteins are mostly hydrophobic, whereas FoNHX1 and FoNHX2 are hydrophilic. Based on subcellular localization prediction, 14 of the NHX proteins were predicted to be localized in the vacuoles, whereas FsNHX2, FvNHX3, FoNHX1 and FoNHX2 were predicted to be localized in the plasma membrane. These differences in physicochemical characteristics and subcellular localization suggest that these NHX proteins in Forsythia have diverged in terms of function.

thumbnail
Table 1. The information and physicochemical properties of NHX family proteins in Forsythia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.t001

Within these NHX proteins, α-helices and random coils were identified as the predominant secondary structures, comprising 47.93–56.47% and 29.48–34.85% of the amino acid residues, respectively (S3 Table), based on secondary structure analysis. To obtain deeper insights into the structural features of the proteins, their three-dimensional structures were predicted and viewed using AlphaFold3 for homology modeling (S2 Fig). The resulting models revealed that these NHX members possess a highly conserved structural architecture, providing a structural basis for their functional similarity.

3.2 Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic analysis was performed to elucidate the evolutionary relationships among the NHX family members in these Forsythia species and to clarify their orthologous relationships with NHX proteins in other plant species (S4 Table). The full-length NHX protein sequences were aligned, and a maximum likelihood tree was constructed using the full sequences for F. suspensa, F. ovata, F. viridissima, and seven other representative species (Fig 1). The final tree, which clearly separates all of the 92 NHX proteins into the three categories Vac, Endo, and PM (Fig 1), is strongly supported (with a 100% bootstrap value) by the fact that it recapitulates the known classification of the AtNHX subfamilies. The Vac clade, which contains four F. suspensa proteins, five F. viridissima proteins, and three F. ovata proteins, was the most abundant clade among the 18 Forsythia NHX proteins; the Endo clade, in contrast, is the least abundant, comprising only FsNHX5 and FvNHX2, indicating the possible loss of this subclass in F. ovata. The PM clade includes four members, FoNHX1 and FoNHX2 from F. ovata, one ortholog from F. suspensa, and one from F. viridissima. Interestingly, the NHX genes of each Forsythia species are clustered together within each protein subfamily (Endo, Vac, and PM), revealing their high homology and recent divergence. This phylogenetic framework is consistent with prior findings for Arabidopsis and other dicots and is suitable for further functional characterization.

thumbnail
Fig 1. The phylogenetic tree of the NHX gene family.

Vacuolar class (Vac), endosomal class (Endo), and plasma membrane class (PM) are marked with blue, yellow, green background bands, respectively. NHX members in Forsythia are highlighted in red font. The numbers at the nodes indicate bootstrap 1000.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.g001

3.3 Conserved domains, motifs, and gene structures

The conserved motifs and gene structures of the 18 NHX members were systematically analyzed to further characterize this gene family in Forsythia. A complete Na⁺/H⁺ exchanger domain (PF00999) was found in all 18 Forsythia NHX proteins, based on conserved domain analysis (S3 Fig). MEME motif analysis identified ten conserved motifs, and the distribution of these motifs reveals significant protein-subfamily specificity (Fig 2B). Motifs 1, 5, 6, 9, and 10 are common to all three subfamilies. Motifs 3 and 4 are exclusive to the Vac subfamily, and motif 7 is common to the Vac and Endo subfamilies. Based on structural analysis, the genes within each same subfamily exhibit substantial structural similarity (Fig 2C). The Vac subfamily members have 12–14 exons, and all of the Endo subfamily members have 22 exons. In the PM subfamily, FsNHX2 and FvNHX4 each have 23 exons, whereas FoNHX1 and FoNHX2 have 17 and 22 exons, respectively.

thumbnail
Fig 2. The phylogenetic relationships, conserved motifs, gene structural features and protein sequence alignment of NHX.

(A) A phylogenetic tree showing relationships of NHX gene family members: Purple: Vac; Yellow: Endo, and Cyan: PM. (B) NHX proteins distribution of conserved motifs (motif 1-10: shown by different colored boxes). (C) Exon-intron structures of NHX genes. Green: CDS, Yellow: UTRs, Black lines: introns. (D) Sequence logos of the conserved motifs found in NHX proteins. (E) Multiple sequence alignment of amiloride-binding site (FFI/LY/FLLPPI) among NHX. The conserved region “FFI/LY/FLLPPI” is represented by blue box.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.g002

Multiple sequence alignment (Fig 2E) revealed that the amiloride-binding site, FF(I/L)(Y/F)LFLLPPI, is highly conserved in all of the Vac subfamily proteins except for FoNHX3, which has one amino acid substitution (F to V), creating the sequence FVIYLLPPI. Interestingly, this binding site also occurs in two of the Endo subfamily NHX proteins, although both of these have a single amino acid substitution, and the Endo subfamily may retain functional characteristics similar to those of the Vac subfamily.

3.4 Duplication events, syntenic relationships, and selective pressure

To investigate the evolutionary mechanisms of the NHX gene family in F. suspensa, F. viridissima, and F. ovata, intra- and inter-species synteny analyses were performed on the NHX members of these three species. This revealed that whole-genome duplication (WGD) or segmental duplication served as the primary driving force for the expansion of the NHX gene family in these Forsythia species, contributing 80% (4/5) of the members in F. viridissima, 57% (4/7) in F. ovata, and 33% (2/6) in F. suspensa (S5 Table). Dispersed duplication accounted for the remaining members. Intra-species synteny analysis further identified five gene pairs (S4 Fig), all of which exhibited Ka/Ks ratios significantly less than 1 (S6 Table), indicating that they have undergone strong purifying selection with conserved sequence functions. In F. suspensa, only one syntenic gene pair (FsNHX3 and FsNHX6) was detected (S4A Fig) with an estimated divergence time of ca. 35.50 Mya. In F. viridissima, two syntenic gene pairs were identified (S4B Fig): For FvNHX6 and FvNHX4, the divergence time is ca. 36.69 Mya, whereas FvNHX6 and FvNHX7 exhibit extremely large differences in their sequences, preventing the determination of an accurate Ks value and thus making it impossible to estimate their divergence time. Similarly, two syntenic gene pairs were detected in F. ovata: FoNHX1 and FoNHX2, with a divergence time of 1.47 Mya, and FoNHX4 and FoNHX5, with a divergence time of 0.28 Mya. These results suggest that the duplication events within F. viridissima occurred during a relatively recent geological period. Inter-species synteny analysis revealed eight syntenic gene pairs between F. suspensa and F. viridissima, indicating a high degree of homology and the closest genetic relationship between their NHX genes (Fig 3A). Four syntenic gene pairs were identified between F. suspensa and F. ovata, revealing less synteny than between F. suspensa and F. viridissima. Additionally, four syntenic gene pairs were identified between F. suspensa and A. thaliana, whereas only two were found between F. suspensa and the monocot O. sativa, representing the weakest syntenic relationship (Fig 3B). These findings demonstrate the extensive evolutionary conservation of the F. suspensa NHX gene family within congeneric species, particularly F. viridissima and with the dicot model plant A. thaliana.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Syntenic examination of NHX genes across Forsythia and other plant species.

(A) Syntenic examination of NHXs among F. suspensa, F. viridissima, and F. ovata. (B) Synteny comparison between FsNHX genes and those of A. thaliana and O. sativa. Blue lines highlight syntenic NHX homologous gene pairs; gray lines indicate collinear genomic regions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.g003

3.5 Cis-element analysis

To clarify the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of the NHX gene family in Forsythia, promoter sequences 2000 bp upstream of the transcription start site were retrieved for all FsNHX, FvNHX and FoNHX genes, and CAREs were analyzed using the PlantCARE database. Within the promoters of the 18 NHX genes, 67 different CAREs were identified. These elements were subdivided into four general functional groups: growth/developmental regulation, light, stress, and phytohormones (Fig 4; S7 Table). Of these, those related to stress were the most prevalent and widespread. The bHLH binding site (MYC) and MYB binding motifs were the most common stress-responsive elements, with 74 and 63 occurrences, respectively. The MYC motif was found in all NHX gene promoters, indicating that the transcription of this gene family may be regulated by both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling pathways [15]. Anaerobic induction elements (AREs) and W box motifs, known to be involved in the response to wounding and pathogen attack, were frequent in several of the promoters, suggesting a wide spectrum of activity for this family in response to hypoxic and biotic stress signals. A wide range of light-responsive elements, such as Box 4, G-Box, and GT1-motif, were also detected, suggesting that the expression of NHX genes is finely regulated by light signals, perhaps in coordination with other light-dependent functions such as photosynthesis and photomorphogenesis. In terms of hormone–responsive elements, the core ABA responsive elements (ABREs) motifs and their variants (ABRE3a and ABRE4) were the most ubiquitous and were found in the promoters of all of the NHX genes. The CGTCA and TGACG motifs, related to responsiveness to MeJA, were often clustered together. These results reflect the importance of the ABA and jasmonate signaling pathways in controlling NHX gene expression. In contrast, elements associated with growth and development (O2-site and CAT-box) were scattered among a few genes, indicating that certain members may have specialized roles in specific tissues or developmental stages. In summary, the promoter cis‑elements of Forsythia NHX genes are abundant in stress‑, hormone‑, and light‑responsive elements, revealing the presence of a complex, multi‑layered transcriptional regulatory network.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Promoter cis‑element composition of Forsythia NHX genes.

Different colors denote distinct functional categories: pink, growth and development regulation; yellow, light; red, stress response; blue, phytohormone response; Numerical values indicate the count of each cis‑element type.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.g004

3.6 Transcriptome-wide expression profiling of FsNHX under drought and low-temperature stress

To determine whether FsNHX genes are involved in the physiological regulation of drought and cold stress and to understand their differential expression, RNA-seq data were employed to profile their expression across distinct geographic populations (S8, S9 Tables). A heat map was used to visualize their relative expression (Fig 5). In all four populations, in the leaf tissue, FsNHX5 and FsNHX6 exhibited the highest expression and FsNHX4 the lowest. Overall, the FsNHX family members exhibited markedly different responses to drought and cold stress. FsNHX3 and FsNHX6 were upregulated under both stress conditions. FsNHX5 displayed a contrasting regulatory pattern induced by drought stress but was suppressed by cold stress. FsNHX2 was broadly upregulated under drought stress, whereas significant upregulation was observed in only one specific population under cold stress. FsNHX1 and FsNHX4 were down-regulated by both treatments. These results indicate that functional divergence occurs among the FsNHX family members in F. suspensa, and the expression patterns of these genes vary among the different geographic populations.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Heatmap of FsNHX expression from four populations under drought and low-temperature stress.

(A) Expression of FsNHXs in the leaf of F. suspensa seedlings grown under soil water contents of 80% (control) and 20% for three hours. C, control; Ds20%, drought stress under soil water content of 20% for 3 hours. (B) Expression of FsNHXs in the leaf of F. suspensa seedlings grown at 25°C (control) and 4°C for one day. C, control; Lt, low-temperature stress at 4°C for one day. HBWZ, Wuzhi Mountain, Hebei; SXWL, Wulaofeng, Shanxi; SXHM, Huashan, Shaanxi; SXLJ, Laojun Mountain, Shaanxi. Biological replicates are labeled as 1, 2, and 3. Normalized transcripts per million (TPM) values are indicated by the color bar on the right.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.g005

3.7 qRT-PCR validation of FsNHX expression patterns under abiotic stress

To validate and extend the transcriptome-derived expression patterns observed under drought stress, we performed qRT-PCR analysis to examine the expression of all of the FsNHX genes under a broad set of abiotic stress conditions, including drought, salt, and ABA. This confirmed the overall trends observed in the RNA-seq data under drought stress and further revealed that all of the FsNHX genes exhibited significantly different induction patterns, with variations in response timing, intensity, and tissue specificity between the roots and leaves (Fig 6A). FsNHX3 exhibited the most pronounced upregulation in both the roots and leaves, with a more sustained induction duration (Fig 6A). Notably, in the leaves, its expression peaked 35-fold relative to the control and remained significantly higher than the control at all time points, although it declined to the level in the control at 36 h. FsNHX5 and FsNHX6 exhibited sustained upregulation in both the roots and leaves, with a gradual decline after reaching their peak or with persistent induction, suggesting their potential involvement in sustained osmotic adjustment. In the leaves, FsNHX1 and FsNHX2 were significantly upregulated only at 12 h (by 2.7- to 3.6-fold) and exhibited fluctuating expression at other time points, potentially indicating their roles in early signaling responses. In contrast, in the roots, FsNHX1 and FsNHX2 showed sustained upregulation. FsNHX4 expression in the leaves was transiently upregulated (at 12 and 96 h), but was significantly lower than that in the control at all of the other time points; in the roots, in contrast, it was strongly suppressed across the entire time course. This suggests that FsNHX4 plays a negative regulatory role under drought stress.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Expression profiles of FsNHX genes in leaves and roots in response to abiotic stress.

(A) Expression profiles of FsNHX genes in leaves and roots in response to treatment with 20% PEG 6000 for 0 (control), 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 36 h, 2 d, 4 d, and 8 d. (B) Transcript abundance of FsNHX genes in leaf and root tissues subjected to 100 mM NaCl for 0 (control), 3h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h and 2d. (C) Expression profiles of FsNHX genes in leaves and roots with the treatment of 100 μM ABA for 0(control), 6 h, 12 h, and 24 h. The transcript levels of FsNHX genes were normalized against EF1αH and expressed as fold change relative to the 0 h control. Relative quantification was performed using the 2−ΔΔCt method. Values represent the mean ± SD from three biological replicates. Different letters above the bars denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) based on one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s HSD post-hoc test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.g006

Under salt stress, all of the FsNHX genes were significantly upregulated in both the roots and leaves, albeit with distinct tissue-specific patterns (Fig 6B). In the leaves, all of the FsNHX genes were significantly upregulated after 6 h of salt treatment. However, in the roots, the response was more rapid and stronger, with upregulation occurring as early as 3 h after salt stress. Of these, FsNHX3 exhibited the highest expression, at ca. 14-fold higher than in the control. Under salt stress, FsNHX3 and FsNHX5 expression was substantially upregulated and remained at a high level even after 2 d of salt stress, indicating their significance in plant adaptation to prolonged salt stress. FsNHX6 exhibited high and continuous expression in the roots, whereas its expression in the leaves fluctuated. Both FsNHX1 and FsNHX2 exhibited unimodal induction in both the root and leaf tissue, with their expression declining to control levels after 2 d of salt stress. However, the timing at which they were most expressed was different in the roots: FsNHX1 expression peaked at 12 h, whereas FsNHX2 expression peaked at 3 h. This suggests that FsNHX1 and FsNHX2 are involved in the early phase of the response to salt stress, likely participating in transient signaling, although with different roles. FsNHX4 exhibited a unique pattern of expression: In the leaves, it was significantly upregulated only at 6 h, after which its expression declined rapidly and was significantly lower than in the control at 2 d; in contrast, in the roots, its expression fluctuated over time. The different expression profiles of the FsNHX genes indicate that they exhibit functional divergence under salt stress and are therefore functionally complementary.

The NHX gene family was regulated by the complex and diverse effects of ABA treatment (Fig 6C). ABA treatment consistently inhibited the expression of FsNHX1 and FsNHX4 in the leaves, indicating that these genes were negatively regulated by ABA stress. The expression of FsNHX2 was initially downregulated, but then increased, returning to or even surpassing the level in the control at 24–36 h. FsNHX3, FsNHX5 and FsNHX6 were all significantly upregulated at 24–36 h, with FsNHX3 and FsNHX6 being the most highly upregulated (by 3- to 4-fold), implying that these genes may participate in osmotic adjustment or signal transduction in response to ABA. In the roots, all of the FsNHX genes were strongly induced by ABA (Fig 6C). The expression of most of the genes, including that of FsNHX3, FsNHX5, FsNHX6, and FsNHX2, peaked at 24 h. FsNHX6 exhibited the most pronounced response, with an expression level 40-fold higher than that of the control at 24 h, suggesting that it plays a key role in ABA signaling.

4 Discussion

The plant NHX gene family encodes Na⁺/H⁺ (or K⁺/H⁺) antiporters that mediate ion exchange across the plasma membrane, tonoplast, and endosomes. These transporters play critical roles in maintaining cellular Na+/K+ homeostasis, pH balance, osmotic adjustment, and responses to abiotic stresses such as salinity and drought [17,32,50]. In most diploid plants, the NHX gene family comprises 5–10 members, as in A. thaliana (eight members), O. sativa (seven members), P. granatum (ten members) [51], and Eleusine coracana (five members) [52]. Here, 18 NHX genes were identified in three Forsythia species (six in F. suspensa, seven in F. viridissima and five in F. ovata).

These 18 NHX proteins were grouped into three clades: Vac (12 members), PM (four members), and Endo (two members), based on phylogenetic analysis. NHX proteins from F. suspensa and F. viridissima were found in all three clades, whereas F. ovata did not contain any Endo-class proteins. The same result has been observed in other species, such as finger millet, in which five NHX genes have been identified and were assigned to the Vac and PM classes, with no Endo-class genes identified [52]. The lack of Endo-class NHX proteins in F. ovata may be due to lineage-specific gene loss or functional compensation by other NHX classes. In model species, the phylogeny of NHX proteins is broadly related to the subcellular location and biological activities of these proteins. The current findings represent an exception to this pattern: although FsNHX5 and FvNHX2 were placed in the Endo clade, the in silico analysis predicted them to be vacuolar proteins. Similar inconsistencies have been reported in other plants, such as pomegranate [51], tomato [53], and amaranth [54]; these inconsistencies are probably due to the limitations of the existing prediction algorithms for complex membrane proteins [55]. Therefore, the subcellular localization of FsNHX5 and FvNHX2 requires to experimental confirmation.

Within each of the three clades, the gene structures, numbers, and types of conserved motifs in the Forsythia NHX family were highly similar. In the Vac clade, most of the NHX proteins were found to contain 14 exons, those in the PM clade 17–22 exons, and those in the Endo clade 23 exons. This pattern is generally similar to that observed in Arabidopsis, in which proteins with plasma membrane-targeting localizations are longer, and those with intracellular-targeting localizations are shorter [7]. The same pattern has been reported for poplar [56] and tomato [53], implying that the same evolutionary constraints are at work in all dicots.

With the exception of FoNHX1 and FoNHX2, which have six transmembrane domains, the other NHX proteins have 9–12 transmembrane domains, which is typical of Na+/H+ exchangers [57]. Most NHX proteins exhibit an amiloride-binding site, FFI/LY/FLLPPI, that inhibits Na+/H+ exchange activity. Although this motif was initially thought to be specific to vacuolar-type NHX proteins [58], it has been found in endosomal-type NHX proteins in many different species [53,59]. Here, interestingly, this motif was found in all Vac-class and Endo-class members; a single amino acid substitution was found in FoNHX3 (F → V; FVIYLLPPI), whereas in the two Endo-class proteins, a single substitution (F → L; FLIYLLPPI) was observed. This finding may indicate partial functional conservation between the Vac and Endo class NHX proteins [50]. The same conserved substitutions have been described in sorghum [60]. Both residues are hydrophobic, and the overall structure of the protein and its core transport function are likely to remain the same. However, further experimental analysis is required to clarify whether this exchange influences sensitivity to inhibitors, cation selectivity, or any other regulatory properties. Importantly, this variant could be a lineage-specific trait among Forsythia species, and additional functional assays are required to determine whether it has any adaptive significance.

Analysis of promoter cis-acting elements revealed that the promoter regions of the Forsythia NHX genes contained ABRE, MYB, and MYC motifs, which are known to be involved in hormone signaling and stress responses. Therefore, these genes are likely to be widely involved in responses to abiotic stress. The results of qRT-PCR analysis of FsNHX expression under abiotic stress supported these findings, revealing that these genes are expressed differently in various tissues. Different members of the FsNHX family exhibited both transient and persistent response patterns in leaves and roots under drought and salt stress, suggesting that these FsNHX genes function differently and participate in different mechanisms involved in tolerance toward salt and drought stress. Vacuolar FsNHX3 and FsNHX6 both exhibited prolonged and strong upregulation under salt and drought stress and were also induced by ABA; thus, they can be considered ABA-dependent osmosensitive genes. Based on these findings, FsNHX3 and FsNHX6 may participate in Na⁺ sequestration and play an important role in K⁺ accumulation in the vacuole; their activity therefore adjusts the osmotic potential by compartmentalizing Na⁺ and K⁺ in the vacuole, enabling the plants to maintain ion homeostasis and regulate water relations at the cellular level in response to osmotic stress. FsNHX6 exhibited the highest ABA-induced upregulation in roots. This strong induction is similar to the high expression patterns previously observed for KvNHX1 [61] and PbNHX2.2 [62] under ABA treatment. Thus, FsNHX6 is likely one of the major components of the ABA signaling pathway. Based on promoter analysis, the FsNHX6 promoter region has the highest density of ABA-responsive elements among all FsNHX genes. Therefore, this suggests that FsNHX6 plays a more important role in ABA-mediated long-term osmotic adjustments under drought and salt stress than the other FsNHX members. In contrast, vacuolar FsNHX1 exhibited only a short-term response in leaves under salt and drought stress and was not induced by ABA; thus, FsNHX1 may be regulated by an ABA-independent signaling pathway. These observations are consistent with prior results for A. thaliana [15], rice [63], and mulberry (Morus atropurpurea) [64]. Therefore, it can be deduced that both ABA-dependent and ABA-independent signaling pathways exist among the FsNHX family members in Forsythia, and this is consistent with the functional predictions of their promoter elements.

FsNHX3 was also expressed more rapidly and strongly in leaves under drought stress, but its induction in the roots under salt stress was more pronounced. Therefore, vacuolar FsNHX may have different physiological functions in different tissues in response to salt and drought stress. Under drought stress, the leaves are the main sites of water loss through transpiration and photosynthesis, and they are the first sites to sense water shortages. The rapid and effective induction of FsNHX3 in the leaves enhances vacuolar K+/H+ exchange, adjusts the osmotic potential of mesophyll cells, and maintains turgor pressure, thus maintaining photosynthetic activity. The roots are the first organs to come into direct contact with high concentrations of Na+ under salt stress; the greater upregulation of FsNHX3 in the roots indicates that FsNHX3 actively transports Na+ into the root vacuoles to reduce the amount of Na+ transmitted to the shoot. This is consistent with the prior finding for Zygophyllum xanthoxylum that, under drought conditions, ZxNHX is expressed preferentially in the leaves [65]. Similarly, after 6 h of salt treatment, in P. euphratica, PeNHX exhibits far greater upregulation in the roots than in the stems and leaves [66]. Among the genes examined here, vacuolar FsNHX3 exhibited the most pronounced and sustained transcriptional response to osmotic stress, suggesting its potential involvement in this adaptive process.

In A. thaliana, the endosomal proteins NHX5 and NHX6 generally exhibit an early and rapid response and are not regulated by ABA, suggesting their involvement in signal transduction or vesicle‑mediated initial Na⁺ transport [15]. However, in F. suspensa, endosomal FsNHX5 was consistently upregulated under salt and drought stress and was induced by ABA. Similar expression patterns have been observed in rice endosomal OsNHX5 [63] and grapevine endosomal VvNHX6 [67], indicating that FsNHX5 in F. suspensa possesses distinct regulatory features and may have undergone functional diversification. This further suggests that endosomal NHX members exhibit complex responses to abiotic stress. In summary, the FsNHX family in F. suspensa exhibits differential expression patterns under drought and salt stress, with members from different subclasses showing distinct temporal and tissue-specific responses. These results suggest that the coordinated yet diverse expression of FsNHX genes contributes to the adaptive responses of F. suspensa to osmotic stress.

5 Conclusions

The present study identifies, for the first time, all of the Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter family genes in three Forsythia species (F. suspensa, F. viridissima and F. ovata) and systematically compares these genes across the three species. Eighteen NHX members were identified and were grouped into three subfamilies: Vac, PM, and Endo. Interestingly, F. ovata lacked Endo-class members, which could be due to either loss of function or compensation during evolution. Synteny analysis revealed that expansion of the NHX gene family in Forsythia species was caused primarily by whole-genome duplication or segmental duplication. The Ka/Ks ratios of all pairs of duplicated genes within each Forsythia species were <1, indicating strong purifying selection and a high level of conservation of the functions of these paralogs. The results of the inter-species synteny analysis reveal that F. suspensa and F. viridissima were the most similar, exhibiting the highest homology. Based on expression analysis, the F. suspensa NHX gene family was found to exhibit highly differentiated and tissue-specific response patterns to drought, salinity, and ABA stress. Notably, FsNHX3 and FsNHX6 exhibited the strongest and most sustained transcriptional induction among all of the FsNHX members across the three stress treatments, particularly in the roots. Given their marked responsiveness to ABA, these genes represent promising candidates for further investigation of their potential roles in ion homeostasis and osmotic adjustment under stress. Overall, this study provides valuable insights and candidate gene resources for the future functional characterization of the NHX genes involved in woody plant stress tolerance. Moreover, these findings offer potential targets for the genetic improvement of Forsythia varieties by enhancing their salt and drought tolerance.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The chromosomal localization schematic for the FsNHX, FoNHX and FvNHX gene families in Forsythia suspensa (A), Forsythia ovata (B) and Forsythia viridissima (C).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Predicted tertiary structures of NHX isoforms in Forsythia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Conserved domain of NHX proteins in Forsythia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Regional collinearity of NHX genes in three Forsythia Species.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s004

(TIF)

S1 Table. List of primers used in RT‑qPCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s005

(XLSX)

S2 Table. The protein, coding sequence, and promoter sequence information of FsNHXs, FvNHXs, FoNHXs retrieved from the genomes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s006

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Secondary structural makeup of Forsythia NHX proteins.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s007

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Sequences employed for phylogenetic tree building.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s008

(XLSX)

S5 Table. Analysis of duplication events within Forsythia NHX genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s009

(XLSX)

S6 Table. Detailed information on the Ka, Ks and divergence-time in Forsythia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s010

(XLSX)

S7 Table. Full information on cis‑regulatory motifs present in NHX gene promoters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s011

(XLSX)

S8 Table. Expression of FsNHXs in leaves of F. suspensa seedlings grown under soil water contents of 80% (control) and 20% for three hours.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s012

(XLSX)

S9 Table. Expression of FsNHXs in leaves of six-month-old F. suspensa seedlings grown at 25°C (control) and 4°C for one day.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359565.s013

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Montanarella L, Pennock D, Mckenzie N, Alavipanah SK, Alegre J, Alshankiti A. The status of the world’s soil resources (technical summary). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2015. https://hal.science/hal-01241062
  2. 2. Munns R, Tester M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:651–81. pmid:18444910
  3. 3. Qu H, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Li B, Sun W. Antioxidant and antibacterial activity of two compounds (forsythiaside and forsythin) isolated from Forsythia suspensa. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2008;60(2):261–6. pmid:18237475
  4. 4. Zhou M, Huo J, Wang C, Wang W. UPLC/Q-TOF MS screening and identification of antibacterial compounds in Forsythia suspensa (Thunb.) Vahl leaves. Front Pharmacol. 2022;12:704260. pmid:35153732
  5. 5. Wang Z, Xia Q, Liu X, Liu W, Huang W, Mei X, et al. Phytochemistry, pharmacology, quality control and future research of Forsythia suspensa (Thunb.) Vahl: A review. J Ethnopharmacol. 2018;210:318–39. pmid:28887216
  6. 6. Jia Q, Zheng C, Sun S, Amjad H, Liang K, Lin W. The role of plant cation/proton antiporter gene family in salt tolerance. Biol Plant. 2018;62(4):617–29.
  7. 7. Brett CL, Donowitz M, Rao R. Evolutionary origins of eukaryotic sodium/proton exchangers. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2005;288(2):C223-39. pmid:15643048
  8. 8. Abdelrady WA, Mostafa K, Saeed M, Elshawy EE, Kavas M, Mladenov V, et al. NHX transporters: Molecular mechanisms and applications for enhancing crop resilience to soil salinity in changing environments. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2025;229(Pt C):110603. pmid:41086508
  9. 9. Putney LK, Denker SP, Barber DL. The changing face of the Na+/H+ exchanger, NHE1: Structure, regulation, and cellular actions. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2002;42:527–52. pmid:11807182
  10. 10. Bassil E, Coku A, Blumwald E. Cellular ion homeostasis: emerging roles of intracellular NHX Na+/H+ antiporters in plant growth and development. J Exp Bot. 2012;63(16):5727–40. pmid:22991159
  11. 11. Qiu Q-S. Plant and yeast NHX antiporters: roles in membrane trafficking. J Integr Plant Biol. 2012;54(2):66–72. pmid:22222113
  12. 12. Shi H, Ishitani M, Kim C, Zhu JK. The Arabidopsis thaliana salt tolerance gene SOS1 encodes a putative Na+/H+ antiporter. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(12):6896–901. pmid:10823923
  13. 13. Quintero FJ, Ohta M, Shi H, Zhu J-K, Pardo JM. Reconstitution in yeast of the Arabidopsis SOS signaling pathway for Na+ homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(13):9061–6. pmid:12070350
  14. 14. Gaxiola RA, Fink GR, Hirschi KD. Genetic manipulation of vacuolar proton pumps and transporters. Plant Physiol. 2002;129(3):967–73. pmid:12114553
  15. 15. Yokoi S, Quintero F, Cubero B, Ruiz M, Bressan R, Hasegawa P. Differential expression and function of Arabidopsis thaliana NHX Na⁺/H⁺ antiporters in the salt stress response. Plant J. 2002;32:529–39.
  16. 16. WeiQuan W, Yin L, Yiyue Z, CuiPing Y, NuoYan Z, Qi X. Comparative expression analysis of three genes from the Arabidopsis vacuolar Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter (AtNHX) family in relation to abiotic stresses. Chinese Science Bulletin. 2007;52:1754–63.
  17. 17. Barragán V, Leidi EO, Andrés Z, Rubio L, De Luca A, Fernández JA, et al. Ion exchangers NHX1 and NHX2 mediate active potassium uptake into vacuoles to regulate cell turgor and stomatal function in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2012;24(3):1127–42. pmid:22438021
  18. 18. Bassil E, Ohto M, Esumi T, Tajima H, Zhu Z, Cagnac O, et al. The Arabidopsis intracellular Na+/H+ antiporters NHX5 and NHX6 are endosome associated and necessary for plant growth and development. Plant Cell. 2011;23(1):224–39. pmid:21278129
  19. 19. Ashnest JR, Huynh DL, Dragwidge JM, Ford BA, Gendall AR. Arabidopsis intracellular NHX-type sodium-proton antiporters are required for seed storage protein processing. Plant Cell Physiol. 2015;56(11):2220–33. pmid:26416852
  20. 20. Mazel A, Leshem Y, Tiwari BS, Levine A. Induction of salt and osmotic stress tolerance by overexpression of an intracellular vesicle trafficking protein AtRab7 (AtRabG3e). Plant Physiol. 2004;134(1):118–28. pmid:14657401
  21. 21. Leshem Y, Melamed-Book N, Cagnac O, Ronen G, Nishri Y, Solomon M, et al. Suppression of Arabidopsis vesicle-SNARE expression inhibited fusion of H2O2-containing vesicles with tonoplast and increased salt tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(47):18008–13. pmid:17101982
  22. 22. Apse MP, Aharon GS, Snedden WA, Blumwald E. Salt tolerance conferred by overexpression of a vacuolar Na+/H+ antiport in Arabidopsis. Science. 1999;285(5431):1256–8. pmid:10455050
  23. 23. Long L, Zhao J-R, Guo D-D, Ma X-N, Xu F-C, Yang W-W, et al. Identification of NHXs in Gossypium species and the positive role of GhNHX1 in salt tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2020;20(1):147. pmid:32268879
  24. 24. Feng J, Ma W, Ma Z, Ren Z, Zhou Y, Zhao J, et al. GhNHX3D, a vacuolar-localized Na+/H+ antiporter, positively regulates salt response in upland cotton. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(8):4047. pmid:33919933
  25. 25. Ma W, Ren Z, Zhou Y, Zhao J, Zhang F, Feng J, et al. Genome-wide identification of the Gossypium hirsutum NHX genes reveals that the endosomal-type GhNHX4A is critical for the salt tolerance of cotton. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7712. pmid:33081060
  26. 26. Zhang HX, Blumwald E. Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nat Biotechnol. 2001;19(8):765–8. pmid:11479571
  27. 27. Gálvez FJ, Baghour M, Hao G, Cagnac O, Rodríguez-Rosales MP, Venema K. Expression of LeNHX isoforms in response to salt stress in salt sensitive and salt tolerant tomato species. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2012;51:109–15. pmid:22153246
  28. 28. Maach M, Baghour M, Akodad M, Gálvez FJ, Sánchez ME, Aranda MN, et al. Overexpression of LeNHX4 improved yield, fruit quality and salt tolerance in tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Mol Biol Rep. 2020;47(6):4145–53. pmid:32406021
  29. 29. Brini F, Hanin M, Mezghani I, Berkowitz GA, Masmoudi K. Overexpression of wheat Na+/H+ antiporter TNHX1 and H+-pyrophosphatase TVP1 improve salt- and drought-stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana plants. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(2):301–8. pmid:17229760
  30. 30. Pardo EM, Toum L, Pérez-Borroto LS, Fleitas L, Gallino JP, Machi SV. Ectopic expression of GmNHX3 and GmNHX1, encoding two Glycine max Na⁺/H⁺ vacuolar antiporters, improves water deficit tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biol Plant. 2021;65:157–66.
  31. 31. Pei NC, Li Y. The golden bell flower genome provides insights into its evolutionary history and reveals the potential genomic bases of its ecological divergence from weeping forsythia. Sci Hortic. 2024;323.
  32. 32. Fu X, Lu Z, Wei H, Zhang J, Yang X, Wu A, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the NHX (sodium/hydrogen antiporter) gene family in cotton. Front Genet. 2020;11:964. pmid:32973884
  33. 33. Cui J, Zhu C, Shen L, Yi C, Wu R, Sun X, et al. The gap-free genome of Forsythia suspensa illuminates the intricate landscape of centromeres. Hortic Res. 2024;11(9):uhae185. pmid:39247880
  34. 34. Jang H, Cho A, Kim H-J, Kim H, Jeong S-H, Huh SM, et al. Chromosome-level assemblies of the endemic Korean species Abeliophyllum distichum and Forsythia ovata. Sci Data. 2024;11(1):1372. pmid:39695258
  35. 35. Chen C, Wu Y, Li J, Wang X, Zeng Z, Xu J, et al. TBtools-II: A “one for all, all for one” bioinformatics platform for biological big-data mining. Mol Plant. 2023;16(11):1733–42. pmid:37740491
  36. 36. Duvaud S, Gabella C, Lisacek F, Stockinger H, Ioannidis V, Durinx C. Expasy, the swiss bioinformatics resource portal, as designed by its users. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W216–27. pmid:33849055
  37. 37. Chou K-C, Shen H-B. Cell-PLoc: a package of Web servers for predicting subcellular localization of proteins in various organisms. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(2):153–62. pmid:18274516
  38. 38. Waterhouse A, Bertoni M, Bienert S, Studer G, Tauriello G, Gumienny R, et al. SWISS-MODEL: Homology modelling of protein structures and complexes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(W1):W296–303. pmid:29788355
  39. 39. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):3022–7. pmid:33892491
  40. 40. Bailey TL, Johnson J, Grant CE, Noble WS. The MEME suite. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(W1):W39-49. pmid:25953851
  41. 41. Robert X, Gouet P. Deciphering key features in protein structures with the new ENDscript server. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:W320-4. pmid:24753421
  42. 42. Liu JN, Yan L, Chai Z, Liang Q, Dong Y, Wang C, et al. Pan-genome analyses of 11 Fraxinus species provide insights into salt adaptation in ash trees. Plant Commun. 2025;6(1):101137. pmid:39308021
  43. 43. Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, Van de Peer Y, et al. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):325–7. pmid:11752327
  44. 44. Li Y, Shi L-C, Pei N-C, Cushman SA, Si Y-T. Transcriptomic responses to drought stress among natural populations provide insights into local adaptation of weeping forsythia. BMC Plant Biol. 2021;21(1):273. pmid:34130656
  45. 45. Li Y, Shi L-C, Cushman SA. Transcriptomic responses and physiological changes to cold stress among natural populations provide insights into local adaptation of weeping forsythia. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2021;165:94–103. pmid:34034164
  46. 46. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–90. pmid:30423086
  47. 47. Li B, Dewey CN. RSEM: Accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genome. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:323. pmid:21816040
  48. 48. Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–9. pmid:22388286
  49. 49. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat Protoc. 2008;3(6):1101–8. pmid:18546601
  50. 50. Bassil E, Zhang S, Gong H, Tajima H, Blumwald E. Cation specificity of vacuolar NHX-type cation/H+ antiporters. Plant Physiol. 2019;179(2):616–29. pmid:30498025
  51. 51. Dong J, Liu C, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Ge D, Yuan Z. Genome-wide identification of the NHX gene family in Punica granatum L. and their expressional patterns under salt stress. Agronomy. 2021;11(2):264.
  52. 52. Rakkammal K, Muthuramalingam P, Maharajan T, Awere CO, Umamaheswari R, Ceasar SA. Genome-wide identification and validation of Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter (NHX) gene family in finger millet under salt stress. Curr Res Biotechnol. 2026;11:100365.
  53. 53. Cavusoglu E, Sari U, Tiryaki I. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of Na+/H+antiporter (NHX) genes in tomato under salt stress. Plant Direct. 2023;7(11):e543. pmid:37965196
  54. 54. Liu S, An Z, Li Y, Yang R, Lai Z. Genome-wide identification of the cation/proton antiporter (CPA) gene family and functional analysis of AtrNHX8 under salt stress. Plants (Basel). 2024;13(12):1701. pmid:38931134
  55. 55. Sharma H, Taneja M, Upadhyay SK. Identification, characterization and expression profiling of cation-proton antiporter superfamily in Triticum aestivum L. and functional analysis of TaNHX4-B. Genomics. 2020;112:356–70.
  56. 56. Tian F, Chang E, Li Y, Sun P, Hu J, Zhang J. Expression and integrated network analyses revealed functional divergence of NHX-type Na+/H+ exchanger genes in poplar. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2607. pmid:28572621
  57. 57. Yamaguchi T, Apse MP, Shi H, Blumwald E. Topological analysis of a plant vacuolar Na+/H+ antiporter reveals a luminal C terminus that regulates antiporter cation selectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2003;100(21):12510–5. pmid:14530406
  58. 58. Counillon L, Noël J, Reithmeier RA, Pouysségur J. Random mutagenesis reveals a novel site involved in inhibitor interaction within the fourth transmembrane segment of the Na+/H+ exchanger-1. Biochemistry. 1997;36(10):2951–9. pmid:9062125
  59. 59. Paul A, Chatterjee A, Subrahmanya S, Shen G, Mishra N. NHX gene family in Camellia sinensis: In-silico genome-wide identification, expression profiles, and regulatory network analysis. Front Plant Sci. 2021;12:777884. pmid:34987532
  60. 60. Hima Kumari P, Anil Kumar S, Ramesh K, Sudhakar Reddy P, Nagaraju M, Bhanu Prakash A, et al. Genome-wide identification and analysis of Arabidopsis sodium proton antiporter (NHX) and human sodium proton exchanger (NHE) homologs in sorghum bicolor. Genes (Basel). 2018;9(5):236. pmid:29751546
  61. 61. Wang H, Ding Q, Wang H. A new Na⁺/H⁺ antiporter gene KvNHX1 isolated from the halophyte Kosteletzkya virginica improves salt tolerance in transgenic tobacco. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2018;32:1378–86.
  62. 62. Li H, Liu W, Yang Q-S, Lin J, Chang Y-H. Isolation and Comparative Analysis of Two Na+/H+ antiporter NHX2 genes from Pyrus betulaefolia. Plant Mol Biol Rep. 2018;36(3):439–50.
  63. 63. Fukuda A, Nakamura A, Hara N, Toki S, Tanaka Y. Molecular and functional analyses of rice NHX-type Na+/H+ antiporter genes. Planta. 2011;233(1):175–88. pmid:20963607
  64. 64. Cao B, Long D, Zhang M, Liu C, Xiang Z, Zhao A. Molecular characterization and expression analysis of the mulberry Na+/H+ exchanger gene family. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2016;99:49–58. pmid:26730882
  65. 65. Wu G-Q, Xi J-J, Wang Q, Bao A-K, Ma Q, Zhang J-L, et al. The ZxNHX gene encoding tonoplast Na+/H+ antiporter from the xerophyte Zygophyllum xanthoxylum plays important roles in response to salt and drought. J Plant Physiol. 2011;168(8):758–67. pmid:21216025
  66. 66. Ye C-Y, Zhang H-C, Chen J-H, Xia X-L, Yin W-L. Molecular characterization of putative vacuolar NHX-type Na+/H+ exchanger genes from the salt-resistant tree Populus euphratica. Physiol Plant. 2009;137(2):166–74. pmid:19678897
  67. 67. Ayadi M, Martins V, Ben Ayed R, Jbir R, Feki M, Mzid R, et al. Genome wide identification, molecular characterization, and gene expression analyses of grapevine NHX antiporters suggest their involvement in growth, ripening, seed dormancy, and stress response. Biochem Genet. 2020;58(1):102–28. pmid:31286319