Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

A rhombus–keyhole shaped circularly polarized dual-band implantable antenna with low SAR compliance

  • Nagarajan Vasugi,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Software, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Communication Engineering, School of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

  • Madurakavi Karthikeyan

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    karthikeyan.m@vit.ac.in

    Affiliation Department of Communication Engineering, School of Electronics Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

A compact dual-resonance implantable antenna with circular polarization (CP) has been proposed in this paper for bio telemetry applications. The antenna, with dimensions of , is designed using a reversed L-shaped patch, dual key-hole shaped structures and a central rhombus-shaped element. A shoring pin is employed to achieve dual-band resonance, while structural modification enables circular polarization. The proposed antenna resonates at 1.4 GHz (WMTS band) and 2.45 GHz (ISM band). The antenna is fabricated and measured using minced pork meat and saline solution. The measurement results show good agreement with the simulation results. Further, the SAR analysis and link budget analysis, prove that the antenna is suitable for real-time applications.

1. Introduction

With the rapid growth of recent services for health care technologies, implantable medical devices (IMDs) are essential for patients’ diagnosis and care [1]. These implantable medical devices are used in different medical applications, including cardiac leadless pacemakers [2], retinal prosthesis [3], skin application [4], continuous blood sugar monitoring [5], capsule endoscopy [6], brain-machine interface and intracranial pressure monitors [7]. The biological data are wirelessly transferred to the external world; the antenna plays a crucial role in IMD’s [8]. However, we must take into account a few limitations while constructing the implantable antenna, including miniaturization, bio-compatibility, improved efficiency, impedance matching, patient safety, and work in the medical frequency band. The implantable medical devices operate at different frequency range, which is allocated by Federal Communication Commission (FCC), such as WMTS Bands (1395−1400 MHz, 0.608–0.614 GHz) MICS (0.402–0.405 GHz), ISM (0.43305–0.43479 GHz, 0.902–0.928 GHz, 2.38–2.4835 GHz and 5.725–5.850 GHz) Med Radio (0.401–0.406 GHz, 0.413–0.419 GHz, 0.451–0.457 GHz 0.426–0.432 GHz and 0.438–0.444 GHz) [9]. Among this medical frequency band, the WMTS and ISM are used for bio-telemetry remote health monitoring and wireless data transmission applications.

The frequent activities and postural movements of the human body lead to the multipath reflection. Due to this, the polarization mismatch will occur in the linear polarization (LP) antenna [10]. An antenna with circular polarization (CP) is a good option for dependable communication [11,12]. In [13], by using two triangular radiators embedded at the bottom and top of the proposed antenna, exhibiting 2.45 GHz with a size of . Additionally, the ARBW of 3.7% was attained through V-shaped slots in the patch. The shorting pin and quarter-wavelength inverted- F shaped structure of the reported antenna achieved miniaturized and dual-band resonance at WMTS and ISM bands. Additionally, at the lower band, the circular polarization was achieved by using two crossed strips, placed orthogonally, as reported in [14]. Nevertheless, the SAR is high, the antenna size is large, and its gain and ARBW are low. With a size of , the antenna used a notched ring slot in the patch to operate at the 2.4 GHz band. Additionally, the CP was exhibited at the same band with ARBW of 15.8% through creating two C-shaped slots in the radiating element. However, ARBW is low, and an antenna having a high volume with low gain has been reported in [15]. In [16], by using a horizontal U-shaped patch and a shorting pin, the antenna achieved dual resonance with the physical size of , operating at UHF and ISM-band. Additionally, circular polarization was achieved by using DGS. However, the SAR value is high, and the axial ratio bandwidth is low. In [17], the antenna exhibits dual resonance and dual-circular polarization by using characteristic mode analysis. Even though dual-CP was achieved with less volume of proposed antenna, the antenna reports a high SAR value and a narrow ARBW. In [18], the compact implantable duplex antenna with an open-end slot, a semi-circular slot, and a shorting pin is proposed for data telemetry at 2.4 GHz and wireless power transfer at 1.8 GHz. Employing an in-band full duplex antenna function at 2.45 GHz ISM band with a compact volume of 7.17 mm3, is used for capsule endoscopy application, has been reported in [19].

From the above studies, it is observed that achieving a compact implantable antenna with wide axial ratio bandwidth, low SAR, and stable circular polarization at dual bands remains a significant challenge. Most existing designs suffer from trade-offs between size, ARBW, SAR, and gain, particularly for WMTS and ISM band applications. This forms the key research gap addressed in this work.

Therefore, the main objective of this work is to design a compact dual-band implantable antenna that simultaneously achieves (i) circular polarization with wide ARBW, (ii) operation in WMTS (1.4 GHz) and ISM (2.45 GHz) bands, (iii) low SAR within IEEE safety limits, and (iv) improved impedance matching while maintaining a compact size.

A compact, dual resonant implantable antenna with circular polarization is proposed in this article for use in bio-telemetry applications. With a low SAR value, the design works at two operating bands (2.45 GHz ISM band and 1.4 GHz WMTS band) and achieved a broad ARBW of 33.2% at the ISM band, with a compact size of . The center rhombus-shaped, reversed L-shaped patch and shorting pin of the designed antenna help to achieve a compact size and dual-band. The rectangular patch added between the rhombus and circular-shaped patch helps to achieve better impedance matching. Additionally, by using the keyhole structure-shaped patch, the antenna exhibits CP at the ISM band. The antenna achieved LP/CP property at 1.4/2.45 GHz. The CST Microwave studio suite is used to design and simulate the antenna performance. The designed antenna has been tested by embedding the antenna out of the top at 4 mm into a homogeneous skin phantom. Minced pork meat and skin-mimicking solution were used to evaluate the simulated outcomes.

This paper’s remaining content is laid out as follows. In Section 2, geometry layout, parametric analysis, evolution stages and CP mechanism. In Section 3, measured and simulated results are reported. Conclusion provided in Section 4.

2. Methodology of the designed antenna

2.1. Antenna design and geometry layout

Fig 1a-1d depicts the designed antenna’s precise geometric arrangement. The antenna radiated element is composed of a reversed L-shaped, circular-shaped, Rhombus-shaped, two-keyhole structure patch and shorting pin, as shown in Fig 1(a). In Fig 1(b), the ground plane is displayed. The exploded profile present in Fig 1(c) and the lateral profile of the antenna present in Fig 1(d). The Rogers 6010, a biocompatible substrate material with = 10.2 and tan δ = 0.0023 is used for constructing the antenna with a thickness of 0.635 mm. To prevent human tissue from damage, the same biocompatibility substrate material is used as a superstrate. The reversed L-shaped patch and shorting pin helped to exhibit dual-band resonance. Additionally, the center circular and rectangular-shaped patches help in achieving the impedance matching of lower and higher resonance bands. The two-keyhole structure attached to the left and right sides of the reversed L-shaped patch helps to attain CP at a higher band. The dimension of the antenna is (in terms of at the lower band where is calculates). The optimized antenna dimensions are listed in Table 1.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Layout of the designed antenna (a) Radiating element, (b) Ground plane, (c) Exploded view and (d) lateral view.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.g001

2.2. Design and evolution stages

The complete steps involved in the process of designing the antenna are laid down in Fig 2(a). The reflection coefficient (S11) and AR of each step are depicted in Fig 2(b) and 2(c), respectively. The design process begins with reversed L-shaped, center Rhombus-shaped, and keyhole-shaped patches with a complete ground structure. As a result, the radiating element with S11 of −17 dB at 2.3 GHz is achieved. However, at this stage, circular polarization (CP) is not attained. We introduced a shorting pin at (Sx, Sy) with the full ground in stage 2. Through this modification, the design produced the dual-band resonance S11 of −16.2 dB at 1.2 GHz and S11 of −20.5 dB at 2.4 GHz. However, the required orthogonal modes for CP are not sufficiently excited, and hence CP is not achieved as shown in Fig 2(c). The mirror of the keyhole-structured patch is added on the right side of the bottom of the reversed L-shaped patch in stage 3. Then, the second band is shifted from 2.4 GHz to 2.42 GHz with an S11 of −21.5 dB, and the lower band is unchanged. This structural asymmetry enables the excitation of two near-degenerate orthogonal modes with improved current distribution along perpendicular directions. As a result, CP is achieved at the higher band (2.42 GHz), where the axial ratio falls below 3 dB, as shown in Fig 2(c). Even though the CP is achieved at the higher band, the lower band is not our targeted band. Moreover, a very narrow ARBW is observed at this stage. The circular-shaped radiating element is added at the bottom of the center arm of the patch at stage 4. This addition enhances mode coupling and improves the phase quadrature between orthogonal current components. Due to this, the lower band shifted to 1.33 GHz from 1.2 GHz, and the higher band moved within the ISM band range at 2.45 GHz with an axial ratio of 2.1 dB. In stage 5, in the center of the rhombus arm patch, a rectangular-shaped patch is added. This further refines the current distribution and stabilizes the orthogonal modes, resulting in improved impedance matching and wider AR bandwidth. At this stage, our designed antenna achieved a targeted at 1.4 GHz WMTS band with S11 of −20.51 dB and 2.45 GHz with −20.70 dB S11 with a wide ARBW of (1.935–2.705) 33.2% as shown in Fig 2(c). The center circular-shaped patch helps to fix impedance matching of the higher band, and the keyhole-shaped patch helps to achieve CP at the higher band. The center rectangular-shaped patch helps to fix impedance matching of the lower band frequency.

thumbnail
Fig 2. (a) Evolution stages, (b) Comparison of S11 of each stage, and (c) Comparison of AR of each stage.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.g002

2.3. Parametric analysis of the proposed antenna

In this section, we provide extensive parametric analysis of key elements, including W1, L2, and the shorting pin of the designed antenna to understand the impact of various antenna elements.

2.3.1. Variation in W1.

As illustrated in Fig 3(a) and 3(b), the antenna width W1 is adjusted from 1.8 mm to 2.2 mm. Due to these adjustments of W1, the S11 and AR are significantly affected. Initially, W1 was set to 2 mm. When we adjust W1 = 1.8 mm, the lower and upper band S11 values slightly shift to the right side of the targeted band, while the AR in the upper band is significantly affected. When we adjust W1 = 2.2 mm, the S11 of the lower band and upper band are significantly affected, and AR is also dramatically affected. When W1 is set to 2 mm, both bands of S11 resonate at the targeted WMTS and ISM bands. At the same time, AR in the upper band is less than 3 dB with a wide ARBW of 770 MHz. Hence, the W1 is the crucial element for impedance matching and the CP property of the proposed design.

2.3.2. Variation in L2.

The length L2 plays a dominant role in achieving a dual desired band resonance and circular polarization property. Fig 4(a) and 4(b), we can clearly observe that when we set L2 = 1.15 mm, the resonance of the higher and lower bands changes drastically. The respective AR of the upper band is less than 3dB. When L2 = 0.95 mm, the resonance slightly moves towards the right at 1.45 GHz (with S11 = −16 dB) and 2.6 GHz (with S11 = −21 dB). The corresponding AR is greater than 3 dB. When we set L2 = 1.05 mm, the antenna achieved the desired dual-targeted band at 1.4 GHz and 2.45 GHz. The respective AR is < 3 dB at 2.45 GHz with ARBW of 33.2%.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Effect of varying L2 on (a) S11 and (b) AR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.g004

2.3.3. Variation in the location of the shorting pin.

To achieve dual-band resonance of the designed antenna, the shorting pin location plays a vital on dual-band resonance. From Fig 5(a), we can clearly observe that without the shorting pin, the antenna exhibits a single band with S11 of – 29 dB at the higher band. After inserting the shorting pin, the designed antenna exhibits dual-band resonance. Hence, the analysis was performed over the location of the shorting pin (Sx, Sy). The location of shorting pin is varied as Sx = 0, Sy = 0, Sx = 0, Sy = 0.5 and Sx = 0, Sy = 1. When we choose Sx = 0, Sy = 0 and Sx = 0, Sy = 1, mainly affects S11 of the lower band while the upper band is not affected. When we set Sx = 0, Sy = 0.5, the antenna resonates at 1.4 GHz and 2.45 GHz with good impedance aligned as displayed in Fig 5(b). The respective circular polarization is attained at 2.45 GHz as shown in Fig 5(c).

thumbnail
Fig 5. (a) S11 with and without shorting pin.

Effect of varying location of shorting pin on (b) S11 and (c) AR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.g005

2.4. CP Mechanism of implantable antenna

Fig 6(a) reveals the circular polarization mechanism in this design. Without adding the keyhole structure, the antenna has not achieved the CP property at any band of the design. After adding a keyhole structure in right side of the reversed L-shaped patch, the antenna exhibits < 3dB AR at the upper band as described in Section 2.2, stage 3, Fig 2(c). Therefore, we investigated the keyhole structure radius R5. As illustrated in Fig 6(b), changing R5 to 0.6, 0.7 and 0.8 mm, we observe that R5 = 0.6 mm, the AR is affected dramatically, and the AR value is 4.5 dB at the ISM band. The AR value is shifted to 2.2 dB from 4.5 dB at the ISM band. With a narrow AR bandwidth, R5 = 0.8 mm. Finally, R5 adjusted to 0.7 mm, the ISM band becomes 1.7 dB with a wide AR bandwidth of 33.2% (1.935–2.705 GHz).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Variation of CP (a) with and without keyhole structure (b) Effect of varying R5 on AR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.g006

3. Results and discussion

The prototype antenna was fabricated and measured to confirm the results of the simulation as illustrated in Fig 7a-7c. Initially, S-parameters are tested by using a VNA as shown in Fig 7(b). Then, the test was conducted in an anechoic chamber to test the far-field results present in Fig 6(c). Fig 7(a) illustrates the fabricated antenna.

thumbnail
Fig 7. (a) Fabricated prototype antenna (b) S11 measurement setup and (c) far-field test in anechoic chamber.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.g007

3.1. SAR calculation of designed implantable antenna

Human safety needs to be thoroughly examined because the antenna must operate inside human bodies. So, it is essential to evaluate a SAR analysis to ensure that the antenna complies with IEEE safety guidelines set by the ICNIRP and FCC [20]. The 1-g SAR of human tissue is restricted to 1.6 W/Kg [21] and the SAR of 10-g human tissue is restricted to 2 W/Kg [22] at 1W input power. Fig 8(a) shows the maximum simulated SAR value found over 1-g is 377 W/Kg with the highest permitted power (HPP) of 4.2 mW, and 48.1 W/Kg is found over 10-g with HPP of 41.5 mW at the lower band. At 2.45 GHz, the maximum simulated SAR found over 1-g is 417 W/kg with HPP of 3.8 mW, and 52.6 W/Kg is found over 10-gram with HPP of 38.0 mW at a higher band as shown in Fig 8(b). The antenna conforms with safety standards, as indicated by the SAR and HPP values presented in Table 2. It shows that the designed antenna operates well within the allowable bounds and conforms to the IEEE safety standard when scaled to the standard 25µW [23,24] input power used in a medical implantable antenna.

thumbnail
Fig 8. The simulated SAR with a phantom at (a) 1.4 GHz and (b) 2.45 GHz.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.g008

3.2. Surface current of designed implantable antenna

In order to have a better knowledge of the functioning of the polarization process at both operating bands, the behaviour of the implantable antennas was investigated by observing the current flow on the antenna’s area in different phases. Fig 9(a) shows the current flow mainly distributed at the bottom of the patch, near the shorting pin and the maximum current flow is observed at the center of the rectangular and circular patch of the lower band. At 2.45 GHz, the antenna is excited at a phase of , , and degrees in Fig 9(b). When the phase is excited between and degree, the entire patch experiences uniform current flow, whereas the maximum current flow in the reversed L- shaped patch, area near the shorting pin, the two-key hole patch and center of the circular patch is experienced when the phase θ is excited between and degrees. We can clearly observe that the main surface current rotating counter clock wise, which indicates the designed antenna exhibits right- hand circularly polarized (RHCP).

thumbnail
Fig 9. Simulated surface current distribution on radiating element at (a) 1.4 GHz and (b) 2.45 GHz.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.g009

3.3. Equivalent circuit model

The lumped element-based equivalent circuit model of the designed antenna is modelled using ADS software as shown in Fig 10(a). By using an array of RLC-based lumped element circuits, characteristics of antenna dual-band resonance are modelled. The element FC and FL values have been matched with a 50-ohm coaxial cable feeding line [25]. Whereas the SR, SR1 and SC1 represent the skin tissue model [26]. The left side, parallelly connected RLC (LR1, LL1, and LC1), represents the Reversed L-shaped and center rhombus-shaped arm patch, which is dominant in achieving lower band operating frequency. Whereas the higher band operating frequency controlled by the right side, parallelly connected RLC (HR1, HL1, and HC1) depends on the keyhole structure, centrally connected circle and rectangular-shaped patch. The parallelly connected element SPR and SPC between two RLC tank circuit models, the shorting pin [27]. The impedance matching is controlled by two parallel RLC tank circuits. The optimized design is presented in Fig 10(a). The final optimized value is listed in Table 3. There was a noticeable similarity between curves as shown in Fig 10(b).

thumbnail
Table 3. Optimized parameter value of an implantable antenna using a lumped element.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.t003

thumbnail
Fig 10. (a) Equivalent circuit model of the implantable antenna using lumped elements (b) Simulated S11-parameters using CST and ADS.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.g010

The implantable antenna design procedure differs from a traditional free-space antenna. The implantable antenna should be embedded in the human tissues. The homogeneous skin phantom model chosen in CST microwave studio is used to design and analyse the performance of the antenna at 4 mm depth [16,28,29] in a simulation environment. It mimics a realistic human tissue property [14,30,31] and minced pork meat is used to confirm outcomes of the simulation. Fig 11(b) illustrates that the experimental findings demonstrated that the S-parameter values in the two scenarios are comparable.

thumbnail
Fig 11. (a) Antenna placed inside the homogenous skin phantom and (b) Comparison of the reflection coefficient simulated and measured results.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.g011

The radiation performance of the proposed implantable antenna was evaluated at both resonant frequencies to validate its polarization behavior and overall suitability for biomedical telemetry. The observed and simulated E-plane and H-plane patterns, which demonstrate good consistency and robust directional properties inside the tissue-emulating environment, support the antenna’s linear polarization within the lower operating band (1.4 GHz) as shown in Fig 12(a). At the higher operating band (2.45 GHz), the antenna demonstrates right-hand circular polarization (RHCP). Effective circular polarization creation is confirmed by the simulated and measured LHCP/RHCP radiation patterns in the xoz and yoz planes, where the RHCP component predominates over the LHCP as shown in Fig 12(b). The circular polarization is attributed to the integrated keyhole-shaped perturbation and the overall patch geometry, which promote the required orthogonal field components with a 90° phase shift. The resilience of the antenna design when placed inside biological tissue is further confirmed by the strong consistency between simulated and measured patterns across both resonant frequencies.

thumbnail
Fig 12. Radiation pattern at (a) 1.4 GHz and (b) 2.45 GHz.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.g012

3.4. Link budget analysis

The main function of an implantable antenna is to pass data like pictures and videos from inside the human body to the external world. To ensure reliable wireless communication between them, the link margin (LM) analysis can be done. The gain (TGt) of −29/-28.66 dBi acts as the transmitting antenna gain, with an allowable input power of 25µm [2], and receiving antenna gain (RGr) of 2.15 dBi [23,32]. The LM is defined as the difference between the required power (RPR) and the available power (APR). The LM can be analyzed by the following equation [25].

(1)(2)(3)(4)

Where, TGc code gain, d generally represents the distance between the receiver and transmitter antenna. TGd denotes fixing deterioration, and Lfs is the path loss in free space. A 20 dB link margin is fixed [2] to calculate the reliable wireless communication. In this study, the analysis is carried out for three different bit rates (Br) of 1 Mbps,12 Mbps and 78 Mbps at both the operating frequencies. When the data rate is 78 Mbps, the implantable antenna covers a radius of 5 meters at 1.4 GHz band and 3 meters at the 2.45 GHz band. Fig 13(a) and 13(b), we can clearly observe that, at data rates of 12 Mbps and 1 Mbps, the implantable antenna covers a distance of more than 10 meters at both the operating frequencies. Hence, the implantable antenna is a promising option for applications involving biomedical telemetry.

thumbnail
Fig 13. LM analysis at various data rates at (a) 1.4 GHz and (b) 2.45 GHz.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.g013

In Table 4, the comparison of the designed antenna with recently published works is given. In [13,15] the designed antenna produced a single-band resonance with circular polarization. However, they possess high volume, high SAR and low gain. However, our designed antenna produced comparably lower SAR and high gain with a compact antenna size. In [17], the author produced a dual-band, dual CP with less antenna volume. However, the design produced low gain with a high SAR value. In [14,16], the authors achieved a dual-band resonance with LP/CP property, having limitations of high antenna volume, high SAR and low gain. However, our designed antenna exhibits dual-band with LP/CP property and produces low SAR, high gain with compact dimensions. Overall, the comparison of our designed antenna depicts that the proposed design achieves dual-band LP/CP property with wide ARBW.

thumbnail
Table 4. Comparison with recently published literature.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354130.t004

4. Conclusion

This article reports a compact, circularly polarized dual resonance implantable antenna working at two different frequencies, on 1.4 GHz and 2.45 GHz, for applications involving bio-telemetry, with a compact size of . The compactness and dual resonance are attained through, reversed L-shaped patches, shoring pin, center rhombus and two-key hole structure shaped patches. Additionally, the circular polarization is achieved at a higher band with a wide ARBW of 33.2%. Also, the realized peak gain is observed −28.66 dBi. The fabricated antenna was tested in order to verify the simulated outcomes by using minced pork meat and saline solution. The validated results are well aligned with the simulated ones. Furthermore, SAR values for the implantable antenna were simulated, and the results are compiled with the IEEE safety guidelines. The LM analysis was conducted to ensure dependable communication, and the results show that the developed antenna is an optimal choice for applications involving wireless biomedical telemetry.

References

  1. 1. Lamkaddem A, Yousfi AE, González-Posadas V, Segovia-Vargas D. Miniaturized dual band implantable antenna for implanted biomedical devices. IEEE Access. 2024;12:15026–36.
  2. 2. Alghamdi A, Basir A, Iqbal A, Simorangkir RBVB, Ben Mabrouk I. A low-profile implantable antenna for heart implants. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2025;73(5):3310–5.
  3. 3. Ali R, Cho Y, Shah IA, Hayat S, Basir A, Yoo H. Compact dual-band MIMO implantable antenna system for high-data-rate cortical visual prostheses applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2024;72(8):6374–86.
  4. 4. Kangeyan R, Karthikeyan M. Implantable dual band semi‐circular slotted patch with DGS antenna for biotelemetry applications. Micro Opt Tech Lett. 2022;65(1):225–30.
  5. 5. Song Z, Li M. Ultra-wideband circular polarized implantable patch antenna for implantable blood glucose detection system applications. Sensors (Basel). 2024;24(16):5292. pmid:39204986
  6. 6. Karthikeyan M, Kumaravel S, Vasugi N. Triangular array-based miniaturized capsule antenna for in-body biotelemetry applications. In: 2025 Innovations in Power and Advanced Computing Technologies (i-PACT). IEEE; 2025. pp. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/i-PACT65952.2025.11307841
  7. 7. Shah SIH, Basir A, Yoo H, Yoon IJ. A compact ultra-wideband antenna system with stable broadside radiation patterns for brain-machine interface applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propag. 2024.
  8. 8. Shah SAA, Shah IA, Hayat S, Yoo H. Ultra-miniaturized implantable antenna enabling multiband operation for diverse industrial IoMT devices. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2024;72(2):1352–62.
  9. 9. Mohan A, Kumar N. Implantable antennas for biomedical applications: a systematic review. BioMed Central Ltd. 2024.
  10. 10. Bala Murali S, Elakkiya K, Kumaravel S, Karthikeyan M, Mishra N, Natarajan R. Design and analysis of a miniaturized rhombus-rectangular antenna for WMTS and ISM bands. Phys Scr. 2025;100(4).
  11. 11. Kumaravel S, Karthikeyan M. Circularly polarized dual-band resonance in a miniaturized implantable antenna using combined hexagonal and rhombic patches. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):3543. pmid:39875425
  12. 12. Himavanth N, Arshad M, Kumaravel S, Natarajan R, Chandra A, Karthikeyan M. Compact circle-shaped circularly polarized implantable antenna with combined e and hexagonal shaped patch for wireless biotelemetry. Results Eng. 2025;27:105758.
  13. 13. Fan Y, Liu X, Li J, Chang T. A miniaturized circularly-polarized antenna for in-body wireless communications. Micromachines (Basel). 2019;10(1):70. pmid:30669492
  14. 14. Xu L-J, Chu Z-J, Zhu L, Xu J-P, Duan Z. Design and analysis of dual-band implantable antennas based on effective relative permittivity calculation. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2021;69(5):2463–72.
  15. 15. Xia Z, Li H, Lee Z, Xiao S, Shao W, Ding X, et al. A wideband circularly polarized implantable patch antenna for ISM band biomedical applications. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2020;68(3):2399–404.
  16. 16. Kumaravel S, Karthikeyan M. Horizontally stacked inverted U-shaped dual-band implantable antenna with circularly polarized for biotelemetry application. Phys Scr. 2024;99(12):125532.
  17. 17. Song Z, Xu X, Wang Y, Shi Y, Zheng X, Wang L. Design of a miniaturized dual circularly polarized implantable antenna by using characteristic mode method. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):16384. pmid:39013970
  18. 18. Alshammari A, Basir A, Zada M, Shah SAA, Iqbal A, Ben Mabrouk I. Miniaturized duplex implantable antenna for wireless data communication and power transfer. IEEE Open J Antennas Propag. 2025;6(6):2062–73.
  19. 19. Alshammari A, Iqbal A, Basir A, Al-Hasan M, Simorangkir RBVB, Nedil M, et al. Compact in-band full-duplex implantable antenna for wireless capsule endoscopy. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2025;73(2):897–905.
  20. 20. Le Trong T-A, Shah SIH, Shin G, Radha SM, Yoon I-J. A compact triple-band antenna with a broadside radiation characteristic for head-implantable wireless communications. Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2021;20(6):958–62.
  21. 21. IEEE Standard for Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz. IEEE Std C95.1-2005 (Revision of IEEE Std C95.1-1991). 2006. pp. 1–238. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEESTD.2006.99501
  22. 22. Bailey WH, et al. Synopsis of IEEE Std C95. 1TM-2019 IEEE standard for safety levels with respect to human exposure to electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields, 0 hz to 300 ghz. IEEE Access. 2019;7:171346–56.
  23. 23. Huang J, Liu X, Fan Y, Ju Z. Dual-band and left-/right-handed circularly polarized implantable antenna for arteriovenous grafts in hemodialysis. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2025;73(10):7207–20.
  24. 24. Vasugi N, Karthikeyan M. Compact dual-band implantable antenna for biomedical telemetry with T – shaped and circular patch resonators featuring capacitive ground loading. Results Eng. 2026.
  25. 25. Yu X, Peng H, Xiao P, Gao G, Li G. A novel broadband dual-frequency circularly polarized implantable antenna empowering future intelligent healthcare. IEEE Sensors Journal. 2024.
  26. 26. Shaw T, Mandal B, Mitra D, Rangaiah PKB, Perez MD, Augustine R. Metamaterial integrated highly efficient wireless power transfer system for implantable medical devices. AEU - Int J Electron Commun. 2024;173:155010.
  27. 27. Nguyen D, Nguyen DM, Seo C. A compact broadband circularly polarized patch antenna using ladder slots and grounded capacitors for MedRadio-band applications. IEEE Access. 2023;11:63997–4004.
  28. 28. Liu R, Zhang K, Li Z, Cui W, Liang W, Wang M, et al. A wideband circular polarization implantable antenna for health monitor microsystem. Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2021;20(5):848–52.
  29. 29. Cai H, Liu C. Circularly polarized loop antenna for 2.4 GHz ISM-band biotelemetry devices. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett. 2025;24(2):509–13.
  30. 30. Zhang J, Das R, Hoare D, Wang H, Ofiare A, Mirzai N, et al. A compact dual-band implantable antenna for wireless biotelemetry in arteriovenous grafts. IEEE Trans Antennas Propagat. 2023;71(6):4759–71.
  31. 31. Baumgartner C, Hasgall PA, Di Gennaro F, Neufeld E, Lloyd B, Gosselin MC, et al. IT’IS Database for Thermal and Electromagnetic Parameters of Biological Tissues, Version 5.0. [cited 2025 Aug 21] https://itis.swiss/virtual-population/tissue-properties/database/dielectric-properties
  32. 32. Song Z, Wei J. Design of an ultra-wide bandwidth circularly polarized implantable antenna for wireless biological telemetry systems. IEEE J Electromagn RF Microw Med Biol. 2025;9(4):478–90.