Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Do we still need a canary in the coal mine for laboratory animal facilities? A systematic review of environmental health monitoring versus soiled bedding sentinels

  • Megan R. LaFollette,
  • Caroline S. Clement,
  • Kerith R. Luchins,
  • Christopher A. Manuel,
  • Patricia L. Foley,
  • Wai H. Hanson,
  • Christina Pettan-Brewer,
  • Caroline B. Winn,
  • Joseph P. Garner

The acronym REM was defined incorrectly throughout the article. REM should be defined as “Room and Equipment Monitoring” rather than “Research Equipment Monitoring.”

As a result of the correction throughout the article, please see the correct Table 1 here.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Common terminology for environmental health monitoring.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353658.t001

Reference

  1. 1. LaFollette MR, Clement CS, Luchins KR, Manuel CA, Foley PL, Hanson WH, et al. Do we still need a canary in the coal mine for laboratory animal facilities? A systematic review of environmental health monitoring versus soiled bedding sentinels. PLoS One. 2024;19(12):e0311840. pmid:39636910

Citation: LaFollette MR, Clement CS, Luchins KR, Manuel CA, Foley PL, Hanson WH, et al. (2026) Correction: Do we still need a canary in the coal mine for laboratory animal facilities? A systematic review of environmental health monitoring versus soiled bedding sentinels. PLoS One 21(7): e0353658. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353658

Published: July 10, 2026

Copyright: © 2026 LaFollette et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.