Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Phytochemical and biological evaluation of methanolic extracts as a preventive measure for antioxidant and Anticoccidial Eimeria columbae Oocysts

  • Mutee Murshed ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    mmurshed@ksu.edu.sa

    Affiliation Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • Jameel Al-Tamimi,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • Khalid Elfaki Ibrahim,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Resources, Software, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

  • Saleh Al-Quraishy

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization

    Affiliation Department of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background

Herbal products are rich in the source of bioactive ingredients, including phenols, flavonoids, tannins, and essential oil components such as cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, and 1,8-cineole, and have significant potential for therapeutic applications that are associated with antioxidant and anticoccidial activities.

Aims

This study aimed to investigate the phytochemical quantification and antioxidant anticoccidial assay in methanolic extracts of Cinnamomum verum and Laurus nobilis.

Methods

Total phenol, flavonoid, and tannin content was measured using standard spectrophotometric methods. Phytochemical properties were characterized using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Antioxidant activity was assessed using 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (ABTS) free radical scavenging assays. In vitro anticoccidial activity was assessed using seven concentrations: 10, 25, 50, 100, 150, and 200 mg/mL of C. verum and L. nobilis, in addition to K₂Cr₂O₇ as the control at 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours.

Results

FTIR analysis revealed characteristic absorption bands in the C. verum and L. nobilis extracts, indicating the presence of diverse functional groups associated with phenolic and related phytochemical constituents, as evidenced by their characteristic absorption bands across the 400–4000 cm ⁻ ¹ range. All extracts contained measurable levels of phenols, flavonoids, and tannins. The highest total phenolic content was recorded in C. verum (63.56 ± 0.552 mg/g dry weight) and L. nobilis (57.40 ± 6.05 mg/g dry weight). All extracts exhibited strong antioxidant activity, with IC₅₀ values for DPPH (12.59 ± 0.51 and 30.32 ± 3.22 μg/mL) and ABTS (13.95 ± 0.35, 19.56 ± 4.89 μg/mL) assays to C. verum and L. nobilis. The extracts exhibited dose- and time-dependent inhibition of E. columbae sporulated oocysts, at 200 mg/ml, 75.67% at C. verum and 72.57% at L. nobilis (p < 0.05) at higher concentrations at 96 h, alongside increased oocyst destruction of ~12%.

Conclusion

The findings demonstrated that the extracts of C. verum and L. nobilis leaves contain bioactive phytochemicals that inhibit coccidia oocysts in vitro, suggesting a potentially effective and safe natural option for managing coccidiosis in Domestic Pigeons.

Introduction

The increasing interest in natural plant products for disease prevention and treatment is largely attributed to their lower cost and reduced side effects compared with synthetic drugs [1]. Medicinal plants remain an important source of bioactive compounds and continue to influence modern pharmacological research because many of their metabolites exhibit antioxidant, antimicrobial, and antiparasitic properties [2,3]. Phenolic compounds, flavonoids, tannins, and volatile constituents can act as hydrogen- or electron-donating molecules, stabilize free radicals, chelate pro-oxidant metals, and interfere with essential cellular targets, thereby contributing to both antioxidant and anti-infective effects [4].

Cinnamomum verum was selected because previous studies have reported its antiparasitic and antimicrobial potential [5]. Its essential oil contains bioactive constituents such as cinnamaldehyde, cinnamyl acetate, and eugenol, which can alter membrane permeability, disrupt energy metabolism, inhibit key enzymes, and induce redox imbalance in susceptible parasites and microbes [6]. Cinnamon extracts and oils have also shown activity against several parasites, including Leishmania, Plasmodium, and gastrointestinal helminths, supporting their value as candidates for antiparasitic investigation [7]. Laurus nobilis has biological activity against a range of infectious agents and its antiparasitic effects [8]. The essential oil of L. nobilis, characterized by compounds such as 1,8-cineole, linalool, eugenol, and methyl eugenol, has demonstrated antiprotozoal, helminthic, and insecticidal activity in previous studies [9]. The traditional medicinal use of L. nobilis in treating gastrointestinal disorders, diarrhea, and inflammations is consistent with its potential antiparasitic properties. Furthermore, experimental reports have shown that L. nobilis extracts can impair the survival and motility of parasites [8].

In poultry, coccidial infection caused by Eimeria tenella is a major health problem because the parasite completes part of its life cycle through the formation and sporulation of oocysts in the external environment [10]. After being shed in feces, unsporulated oocysts undergo sporulation under suitable temperature, moisture, and oxygen conditions, producing infective sporulated oocysts that can initiate new infections [11]. This process is critical for the transmission of coccidiosis, and any factor that delays, suppresses, or disrupts sporulation can reduce parasite infectivity and disease spread [12]. Recent studies have shown that adding plant-based antioxidants to feed significantly improves the physiological performance and health status of poultry [13]. Phytochemicals, such as phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and essential oil components, mitigate oxidative stress through enzymes like superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase [14]. In animals, oxidative stress is closely linked to impaired growth, immune dysfunction, intestinal damage. Adding antioxidant-rich plant extracts has been shown to improve feed efficiency, growth rate, immune response, intestinal structure, and resistance to infections and parasites, particularly under conditions of environmental and metabolic stress [15]. Despite this progress, there is still insufficient information on the antioxidant activities, such as those tested using ABTS and DPPH assays, and to assess their anticoccidial activity against Eimeria columbae oocysts in comparison with amprolium.

Therefore, this study was designed to comparatively evaluate the methanolic extracts of C. verum and L. nobilis for their phytochemical composition, antioxidant potential, and anticoccidial activity against E. columbae oocysts. In particular, we aimed to quantify total phenolics, flavonoids, and tannins; assess radical-scavenging activity using ABTS and DPPH assays; and determine the ability of both extracts to inhibit oocyst sporulation in vitro. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare these two plant species under the same experimental framework for both antioxidant and anticoccidial evaluation, thereby providing a clearer basis for their potential use as natural alternatives in coccidiosis control.

Materials and methods

Ethics approval

The oocysts that infect pigeons were isolated from the feces of naturally infected pigeons, and the pigeons were not sacrificed. The effect of the extracts was tested as a preventive procedure to prevent the oocysts from sporulating, because if the oocysts sporulate, they will cause infection and the pigeons’ infection.

Plant material collection and botanical authentication

The herbaceous plants Cinnamomum verum (C. verum) and Laurus nobilis (L. nobilis) were purchased from local spice markets in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Their botanical identities were verified by Prof. Mohamed El-Sheikh and Dr. Rajakrishnan R. from the Department of Botany, King Saud University, and voucher specimens were deposited under accession numbers KSU No: 10504 and 24649, respectively.

Preparation of plant materials and extracts

The bark of C. verum and the leaves of L. nobilis were cleaned and shade-dried at 25 °C for ten days. The dried materials were ground into fine powder and stored in sealed plastic bags at 4 °C until further use. For extraction, 150 g of powdered plant material was macerated in 70% methanol and placed on a shaker at 4 °C for 24 h. The mixture was filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper, and the combined filtrates were concentrated under reduced pressure using a Büchi R 300 rotary evaporator (water bath 50 °C, 120 rpm, ~ 80 mbar), following the method of Yang et al. (2016), [16]. The extraction yield ranged between 40–50 g. The crude extracts were dissolved in distilled water for subsequent analyses.

FT IR Analysis of C. verum and L. nobilis Extracts

Fourier-transform infrared (FT IR) spectroscopy was used to identify the major functional groups in the extracts. Each sample was ground and homogenized with potassium bromide (KBr) powder in a 1:99 w/w ratio, pressed into pellets, and analyzed using a Thermo Scientific NICOLET 6700 FT IR spectrometer at 25 °C with a resolution of 4 cm ⁻ ¹, as described by Altemimi et al. (2017) [17].

Determination of total phenolic content

The Folin–Ciocalteu colorimetric method measured the extracts’ total phenolic content was done according to Al-Quraishy et al. (2026) [18]. In brief, 100 μL of sample or gallic acid standard was combined with 200 μL of 10% Folin-Ciocalteu reagent in 2 mL Eppendorf tubes. The mixture was incubated in the dark for 2 hours after adding 800 μL of 0.7 M Na₂CO₃ after brief vortexing. Using 765 nm absorbance, TPC was calculated as mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE/g DW).

Determination of total flavonoid content

Total flavonoids were quantified using the aluminum chloride colorimetric assay was done according to Al-Quraishy et al. (2022) [18]. Samples (30 μL) were mixed with 160 μL methanol, followed by 30 μL of 10% AlCl₃ in methanol, 850 μL distilled water, and 30 μL of 1 M sodium acetate. After vortexing, mixtures were left at room temperature for 30 min, and absorbance was recorded at 415 nm. Results were expressed as mg quercetin equivalents (QE/g DW).

Determination of total tannin content

The total tannin content (TTC) was determined following the modified Folin–Ciocalteu method [18]. In brief, 0.1 mL of the sample extract was mixed with 1.5 mL Milli Q water and 1 mL diluted Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. After adding 0.8 mL of 7.5% NaHCO₃, the mixture was incubated at 45 °C for 45 min in the dark. Absorbance was measured at 700 nm, and results were expressed as mg tannic acid equivalents (TAE/g DW.

ABTS radical scavenging assay

The antioxidant capacity was evaluated using the ABTS radical cation decolorization assay, as described by Murshed et al. (2025) [19]. ABTS⁺ radicals were generated by mixing 7 mM ABTS with 2.45 mM potassium persulfate and incubating the mixture in the dark for 16 h at 25 °C. The working solution was diluted with methanol to an absorbance of 0.70 ± 0.02 at 734 nm. Equal volumes (1 mL) of the ABTS⁺ solution and sample were mixed, incubated for 7 min, and absorbance was measured at 734 nm. Trolox was used as a standard, and antioxidant activity was expressed as µM Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC).

DPPH radical scavenging assay

The free radical scavenging ability of the extracts was determined using the DPPH assay, following Desmarchelier et al. (1997) [20]. A 0.1 mM DPPH methanolic solution was mixed with various concentrations of the extract (12.5–150 μg/mL) in a 2.4 mL:1.6 mL ratio. After vertexing, the samples were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 30 min, and absorbance was recorded at 517 nm. The percentage inhibition of DPPH radicals was calculated as:

where A0 represents absorbance of the control and A1 is that of the extract/standard. The percentage inhibition versus concentration graph allowed for IC50 calculation; experiments were repeated three times at each concentration.

Antiparasitic activity

Assay of sporulation inhibition

Commonly infected wild pigeons were used to isolate the parasite. Feces-derived non-sporulated oocysts were sporulated in 2.5% potassium dichromate. The assay used 24-well flat-bottom microtitration plates [21]. Two-fold serial dilution was performed on methanolic extracts of C. verum and L. nobilis at 10, 25, 50, 200, 150, and 200 mg/mL. VAPCO compound amprolium (Amman, Jordan) served as the positive control, while K₂Cr₂O₇ served as the negative control. In each well, 1 × 10³ E. columbae oocysts were dissolved in 2 mL of K₂Cr₂O₇. Plates were incubated at 28°C with 60–80% humidity consistently. The experiment employed three samples per treatment. All plates were semi-covered and shook regularly. sporulated and non-sporulated oocysts were observed at 24, 48, 72, and 96 h [21]. A light microscope (BX51TF, OLYMPUS, Tokyo, Japan) was used to inspect 5 µL of solution at 40x magnification. Each group was examined. The percentages of oocysts were computed utilizing the formulas:

Statistical analysis

All experiments were conducted in triplicate, and results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Data were analyzed using factorial ANOVA to examine the effects of plant species, concentration, and time, followed by Tukey’s post-hoc multiple comparison test to determine significant differences among groups. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05 [22].

Results

Fig 1 displays the transmittance spectrum of C. verum extract across ~400–4000 cm ⁻ ¹, with peaks corresponding to functional group/absorption band descriptions of moieties as tabulated. Key features include broad O-H stretches at 3932 cm ⁻ ¹ (59.53% T; alcohols) and 3417 cm ⁻ ¹ (5.33% T; primary amines), indicative of hydrogen-bonded phenolics; strong N-H at 2915 cm ⁻ ¹ (26.24% T; amine salts); conjugated C = O at 1666 cm ⁻ ¹ (23.25% T; ketones, e.g., cinnamaldehyde); phenolic O-H bend at 1314 cm ⁻ ¹ (26.57% T); and clustered C-O stretches (1294–1026 cm ⁻ ¹; aromatic esters/ethers/alcohols, low T ~ 5–46%) signaling flavonoids/polyols. Aromatic C-H bends (672–900 cm ⁻ ¹) confirm benzene derivatives. Collectively, these 18 + bands highlight C. verum’s polyphenolic richness, consistent with its known essential oil profile (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Fourier spectrum of C. verum bark extracts by frequency range.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353429.t001

thumbnail
Fig 1. FTIR Chromatogram of methanolic extract of C. verum extracts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353429.g001

Fig 2 presents L. nobilis spectrum with fewer, moderately intense peaks, detailed in Table 2. Dominant signals are O-H stretches at 3409 cm ⁻ ¹ (21% T; sharp, alcohols) and 2927 cm ⁻ ¹ (29% T; broad); strong C = O at 1712 cm ⁻ ¹ (36% T; aliphatic ketones); C = C at 1606 cm ⁻ ¹ (24% T); carboxylic O-H at 1368 cm ⁻ ¹ (38% T); and C-O stretches (1152–1066 cm ⁻ ¹; ethers/alcohols, 26–32% T). Unique features include S = O at 1033 cm ⁻ ¹ (23% T; sulfoxides) and halo C-Cl at 596 cm ⁻ ¹ (63% T), (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. FT-IR spectra analysis of dried L. nobilis plant leaf extracts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353429.t002

thumbnail
Fig 2. FT-IR spectrum of L. nobilis extracts based on the frequency range.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353429.g002

Compared to C. verum, L. nobilis shows simpler profiles skewed toward terpenoids/ketones rather than conjugated aromatics. Also, C. verum (Fig. 1/Tab. 1) exhibits ~20% more peaks with lower transmittance (stronger absorptions) in bioactive zones (1200–1700 cm ⁻ ¹), signaling higher metabolite density versus L. nobilis’ moderate ketone/ether focus (Fig. 2/Tab. 2). This aligns with cinnamon’s superior antioxidant potential, as conjugated systems enhance radical stability. These spectra validate the extracts’ phytochemical integrity for downstream bioassays.

Phytochemical quantification

Derived from the curves, C. verum exhibits ~10–13% higher TPC/TTC and 6 × higher TFC than L. nobilis, indicating superior polyphenol recovery and potential for antioxidant applications. These values reflect methodological precision (low SDs) and methanol’s efficacy (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. TPC, TTC, and TFC, of two therapeutic plant preparations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353429.g003

Fig 4AC depict the standard calibration curves used for quantitative phytochemical analysis via spectrophotometry, demonstrating high linearity essential for accurate determination of total phenolic, flavonoid, and tannin contents in the extracts. Figure 4A (Phenolics, Gallic Acid): A linear regression (y = 0.043x + 0.027; R² = 0.9897) plots absorbance at 765 nm against concentration (0–100 µg/mL), confirming the Folin-Ciocalteu assay’s precision for TPC interpolation (e.g., yielding 63.56 mg CE/g DW for C. verum). Figure 4B (Flavonoids, Chrysin): Strong linearity (y = 0.006x + 0.057; R² = 0.987) at 415 nm supports AlCl₃-based TFC quantification, enabling reliable values like 37.56 mg CE/g DW in C. verum. Figure 4C (Tannins, Tannic Acid): Excellent fit (y = 0.008x + 0.051; R² = 0.9901) at ~700 nm validates modified Folin-Ciocalteu for TTC (e.g., 34.81 mg GAE/g DW in C. verum).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Standard calibration curves for the quantification of total phenolic content using gallic acid (A), total flavonoid content using chrysin (B), and total tannin content using tannic acid (C).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353429.g004

The image illustrates these curves’ robust R² (>0.98), underscoring methodological reliability for extract analysis.

Fig 5 showed that C. verum extract exhibited a concentration-dependent increase in ABTS radical scavenging activity, with inhibition rising from about 20% at 12.5 µg/mL to more than 90% at 150 µg/mL, indicating strong dose-responsive decolorization of ABTS- + radicals. In contrast, L. nobilis extract showed a similar trend, but with a slightly shallower slope, reaching approximately 85% inhibition at 150 µg/mL, which suggested comparatively lower radical-quenching efficiency.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Evaluation of ABTS in Cinnamomum verum and Laurus nobilis extracts.

The significances are the average of three tests, and they are expressed mg GAE/L.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353429.g005

Fig 6 (C. verum DPPH): Strong scavenging from ~25% (12.5 µg/mL) to >95% (150 µg/mL) at 517 nm, characteristic of hydrogen atom transfer by polyphenols to DPPH-. Figure 8 (L. nobilis DPPH): Moderate activity (~15–80% across range), reflecting reduced capacity versus C. verum due to lower TFC/TTC.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Evaluation of DPPH in C. verum and L. nobilis extracts.

The significances are the average of three tests, and they are expressed mg GAE/L.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353429.g006

The composite image confirms both extracts’ dose-response patterns, with C. verum consistently achieving higher % inhibition.

C. verum required 29–58% lower concentrations for 50% inhibition, confirming ~2–3 × greater antioxidant potency across both assays. These IC₅₀ correlate directly with its 6 × higher TFC (37.56 vs 6.09 mg QE/g), validating structure-activity relationships where flavonoids drive ROS neutralization (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. IC₅₀ values (μg/mL) of DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging assays for Cinnamomum verum and Laurus nobilis extracts.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353429.t003

Antiparasitic activity

The figures indicate that both Laurus nobilis and Cinnamomum verum extracts exert a clear, concentration‑dependent inhibitory and destructive effect on Eimeria columbae oocysts after 96 h in vitro, with higher doses approaching the sporulation‑inhibitory performance of the reference drug amprolium compared with the potassium dichromate control (Fig 7).

thumbnail
Fig 7. Representative microscopic images of oocyst development showing (A) sporulated oocysts, (B) inhibited sporulation, and (C) destroyed oocysts.

Scale bar 20 µL.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353429.g007

At 96 h, the figure showed a clear concentration-dependent increase in oocyst inhibition for both C. verum and L. nobilis extracts in vitro. Inhibition rises progressively from the lower doses to the highest dose, reaching the greatest effect at 200 mg/ml for C. verum and L. nobilis. 200 mg/ml of extract concentrations produced inhibition: 75.67% at C. verum and 72.57% at L. nobilis, while the control (K₂Cr₂O₇) showed little or no inhibitory effect. The results indicate that the highest-dose effects and the reference drug effect are significantly different from the control at p < 0.05. C. verum appears to produce slightly stronger inhibition than L. nobilis at comparable concentrations, especially at the upper doses. Both extracts are active, but C. verum seems to reach a higher inhibitory level overall. Amprolium shows a marked inhibitory effect and serves as the positive reference treatment. This result suggests that both plant extracts have anticoccidial activity against E. columbae oocysts and that the effect is dose-dependent. In practical terms, the higher the extract concentration, the more strongly it suppresses oocyst development or viability (Fig 8).

thumbnail
Fig 8. Effects of C. verum and L. nobilis extract on the inhibition of E. columbae oocysts at different concentrations compared to the control (K₂Cr₂O₇) and reference drug (Amprolium), in vitro.

* significant differences compared to the control, (P < 0.05). n = 3. h, hours.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353429.g008

The figure showed a clear dose-dependent destructive effect of both C. verum and L. nobilis extracts on E. columbae oocysts in vitro, with higher concentrations producing greater oocyst destruction. Both extracts performed better than the untreated control (K₂Cr₂O₇), and the asterisk indicates that the observed differences were statistically significant at P < 0.05. At 200 mg/ml, both extracts produced the highest oocyst destruction, around 11–12%. As the concentration decreased from 150 to 10 mg/ml, destructive activity gradually declined in both panels. The K₂Cr₂O₇ control shows essentially no destruction, confirming the baseline untreated condition. Amprolium also showed a strong effect, comparable to the highest extract concentrations (Fig 9).

thumbnail
Fig 9. Effects of C. verum and L. nobilis extract on the destruction of E. columbae oocysts at different concentrations compared to the control (K₂Cr₂O₇) and reference drug (Amprolium), in vitro.

* significant differences compared to the control, (P < 0.05). n = 3. h, hours.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0353429.g009

Discussion

Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy provided comprehensive spectral fingerprints that confirmed the presence of diverse bioactive metabolites in both C. verum bark and L. nobilis leaf methanolic extracts. These spectral features align with the known phytochemical profile of cinnamon, particularly the presence of cinnamaldehyde and eugenol, which produce characteristic carbonyl and aromatic signatures [23,24]. Similarly, L. nobilis displayed 15 absorption bands, including prominent O-H stretches (3409 cm ⁻ ¹), aliphatic ketones (C = O at 1712 cm ⁻ ¹), and ether linkages (C-O at 1152–1066 cm ⁻ ¹), indicative of terpenoids and polyphenolics [25]. These FTIR results validate the extraction of pharmacologically relevant secondary metabolites, including phenols, flavonoids, tannins, alkaloids, and steroids, which are well-documented for their broad therapeutic potential. Phenolic compounds and flavonoids serve as free radical scavengers, while tannins exhibit protein-binding and antimicrobial properties [26]. The greater spectral complexity in C. verum suggests higher metabolite diversity, which correlates with its superior antioxidant performance observed in subsequent assays [27].

Quantitative analysis revealed substantial levels of total phenolic content, tannin, and particularly striking differences in total flavonoid content [28]. These values, derived from robust calibration curves (R² > 0.98 for most standards), demonstrate methanol’s efficacy as a polar solvent for polyphenol recovery [29,30]. The pronounced TFC disparity directly predicts antioxidant capacity differences. However, antioxidant efficacy extends beyond total flavonoid concentration [31,32]. Structural features such as B-ring hydroxylation, 2,3-double bond conjugation, and glycosylation patterns determine individual flavonoid activity. Thus, L. nobilis may contain fewer but potentially more bioactive flavonoids, compensating for lower total content through qualitative superiority [33].

The DPPH and ABTS assays provided complementary insights into the extracts’ radical scavenging mechanisms [34]. DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) evaluates hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) capacity through decolorization at 517 nm, while ABTS (2,2’-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) assesses both HAT and single electron transfer (SET) via absorbance reduction at 734 nm. This dual-assay approach captures hydrophilic and lipophilic radical interactions comprehensively [35, 36].

Both extracts exhibited concentration-dependent scavenging, with % inhibition increasing linearly from ~20% at 12.5 µg/mL to >90% at 150 µg/mL. C. verum achieved significantly lower IC₅₀ values compared to L. nobilis, representing 29–58% greater potency (Gulcin et al., 2019). These IC₅₀ values rival synthetic antioxidants and surpass many commercial herbal extracts, positioning both species as viable natural alternatives [37,38].

L. nobilis exhibits more variable antioxidant performance (IC₅₀ 15–60 µg/mL), reflecting genetic and environmental influences on polyphenol profiles. The observed moderate activity corresponds to its documented content of 1,8-cineole (20–40%), eugenol, and hydroxycinnamic acids. Notably, laurel’s ABTS scavenging often exceeds DPPH capacity due to hydrophilic polyphenol dominance, consistent with the 1.5 × IC₅₀ disparity observed here [39].

The observed inhibition of E, columbae oocyst sporulation by C. verum and L. nobilis is consistent with the growing body of evidence supporting botanical extracts as potential anticoccidial agents in avian species [12]. Recent studies have shown that methanolic Commiphora myrrha resin extract alleviated oxidative stress, inflammatory injury, and related intestinal damage in pigeons infected with Eimeria labbeana-like organisms, suggesting that plant-derived compounds may help mitigate coccidia pathology [40]. In addition, in vitro work on Calotropis procera demonstrated inhibitory effects on Eimeria oocyst development, further supporting the notion that plant metabolites can interfere with sporulation and parasite viability [41].

Taken together, the time‑course and dose–response data support that L. nobilis and C. verum extracts exert potent, sustained anticoccidial effects against E. columbae oocysts by hindering or arresting sporulation rather than merely delaying it [42]. The progressive divergence between treated groups and the K₂Cr₂O₇ control with time suggests cumulative damage or persistent metabolic disruption in the sporty, likely mediated by phenolic and terpenoid components that compromise membrane integrity, disturb redox homeostasis, and impair mitochondrial function [43]. Although direct reports on E. columbae-specific plant extract studies remain limited, our findings extend this evidence by showing that C. verum and L. nobilis methanolic extracts possess promising anticoccidial potential under in vitro conditions. These findings highlight the potential of both extracts as promising natural candidates for coccidia control, particularly in strategies aiming to reduce environmental oocyst infectivity and reliance on conventional chemotherapeutics.

Conclusions

Phytochemical study showed high quantities of phenols, flavonoids, and tannins in C. verum and L. nobilis methanolic extracts, indicating antioxidant and therapeutic potential. New FTIR characterisation of Saudi-market sources’ phenolic characteristics gives insights for local applications and conservation. Both extracts suppressed E. columbae oocyst sporulation in vitro, suggesting coccidial control. However, GC-MS/LC-MS should isolate active chemicals and demonstrate efficacy in vivo.

Limitations and future plans

Cinnamomum verum and Laurus nobilis methanolic extracts showed promising antioxidant and in vitro anticoccidial action against Eimeria columbae oocysts, although there are significant limitations. The anticoccidial effects were evaluated only in vitro, preventing direct extrapolation to in vivo efficacy, host safety, or field conditions. The analysis was limited to crude methanolic extracts and FTIR functional-group profiling without bioactive compound identification or quantification. Plant material variation (geography, season) and host parameters (toxicity, bioavailability) were ignored. Future research should utilize advanced analytical techniques (e.g., GC-MS, LC-MS) to identify active constituents, perform in vivo trials in pigeons to evaluate therapeutic efficacy, safety, and performance effects, and investigate extract fractionation, dose optimization, and synergistic combinations to improve practical applicability as natural anticoccidial feed additives.

Acknowledgments

Thanks for the Ongoing Research Funding Program No. ORF-2026-3, at King Saud University.

Usage of Artificial Intelligence: The authors confirm that no artificial intelligence technologies were used in the preparation of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1. Singh S, Sharma S, Sharma H. Naturally Occurring Herbs and their Bioactive Metabolites: Potential Targets and Signaling Pathways of Antiviral Agents. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2023;23(12):1505–37. pmid:37350004
  2. 2. Karunamoorthi K, Jegajeevanram K, Vijayalakshmi J, Mengistie E. Traditional medicinal plants: a source of phytotherapeutic modality in resource-constrained health care settings. Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine. 2013;18(1):67–74.
  3. 3. Fitzgerald M, Heinrich M, Booker A. Medicinal Plant Analysis: A Historical and Regional Discussion of Emergent Complex Techniques. Front Pharmacol. 2020;10:1480. pmid:31998121
  4. 4. Oke OE, Akosile OA, Oni AI, Opowoye IO, Ishola CA, Adebiyi JO, et al. Oxidative stress in poultry production. Poult Sci. 2024;103(9):104003. pmid:39084145
  5. 5. Batiha GE-S, Beshbishy AM, Guswanto A, Nugraha A, Munkhjargal T, M Abdel-Daim M, et al. Phytochemical Characterization and Chemotherapeutic Potential of Cinnamomum verum Extracts on the Multiplication of Protozoan Parasites In Vitro and In Vivo. Molecules. 2020;25(4):996. pmid:32102270
  6. 6. Choi O, Cho SK, Kim J, Park CG, Kim J. In vitro antibacterial activity and major bioactive components of Cinnamomum verum essential oils against cariogenic bacteria, Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine. 2016;6(4):308–14.
  7. 7. Sharifi-Rad J, Sureda A, Tenore GC, Daglia M, Sharifi-Rad M, Valussi M, et al. Biological Activities of Essential Oils: From Plant Chemoecology to Traditional Healing Systems. Molecules. 2017;22(1):70. pmid:28045446
  8. 8. El Faqer O, Elkoraichi I, Latif M, Debierre-Grockiego F, Ouadghiri Z, Rais S, et al. Pharmacological insights into Laurus nobilis: HPLC profiling and evaluation of its anti-Toxoplasma, antioxidant, and anti-hemolytic properties. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology. 2024;117:104891.
  9. 9. Paparella A, Nawade B, Shaltiel-Harpaz L, Ibdah M. A Review of the Botany, Volatile Composition, Biochemical and Molecular Aspects, and Traditional Uses of Laurus nobilis. Plants (Basel). 2022;11(9):1209. pmid:35567209
  10. 10. López-Osorio S, Chaparro-Gutiérrez JJ, Gómez-Osorio LM. Overview of Poultry Eimeria Life Cycle and Host-Parasite Interactions. Front Vet Sci. 2020;7:384. pmid:32714951
  11. 11. Laverty L. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of antimicrobial activity, oocyst sporulation rate, oocyst integrity and oocyst infectivity in Eimeria maxima M6 oocyst suspensions treated with chlorhexidine salts in comparison with potassium dichromate. University of Arkansas. 2023.
  12. 12. Zhao D, Suo J, Liang L, Liang R, Zhou R, Ding J, et al. Innovative prevention and control of coccidiosis: targeting sporogony for new control agent development. Poult Sci. 2024;103(12):104246. pmid:39260244
  13. 13. Obianwuna UE, Chang X, Oleforuh-Okoleh VU, Onu PN, Zhang H, Qiu K, et al. Phytobiotics in poultry: revolutionizing broiler chicken nutrition with plant-derived gut health enhancers. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2024;15(1):169. pmid:39648201
  14. 14. Muscolo A, Mariateresa O, Giulio T, Mariateresa R. Oxidative Stress: The Role of Antioxidant Phytochemicals in the Prevention and Treatment of Diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(6):3264. pmid:38542238
  15. 15. El-Ghareeb WR, Kishawy ATY, Anter RGA, Aboelabbas Gouda A, Abdelaziz WS, Alhawas B, et al. Novel Antioxidant Insights of Myricetin on the Performance of Broiler Chickens and Alleviating Experimental Infection with Eimeria spp.: Crosstalk between Oxidative Stress and Inflammation. Antioxidants (Basel). 2023;12(5):1026. pmid:37237892
  16. 16. Yang XX, Li CM, Huang CZ. Curcumin modified silver nanoparticles for highly efficient inhibition of respiratory syncytial virus infection. Nanoscale. 2016;8(5):3040–8. pmid:26781043
  17. 17. Altemimi A, Lakhssassi N, Baharlouei A, Watson DG, Lightfoot DA. Phytochemicals: Extraction, Isolation, and Identification of Bioactive Compounds from Plant Extracts. Plants (Basel). 2017;6(4):42. pmid:28937585
  18. 18. Al-Quraishy S, Al-Misned FA, Maodaa S, Murshed M. Phytochemical study of Capparis cartilaginea extract and its potential effect on the inhibition of Eimeria tenella oocysts. Vet Parasitol. 2026;345:110796. pmid:42140093
  19. 19. Murshed M, Al-Tamimi J, Al-Quraishy S. In vitro comparative study of enzyme inhibitory properties of herbal plants and their phenolic, tannin, and flavonoid content as natural inhibitors in public health. Quality Assurance and Safety of Crops & Foods. 2025;17(4):1757-837X.
  20. 20. Desmarchelier C, Novoa Bermudez MJ, Coussio J, Ciccia G, Boveris A. Antioxidant and prooxidant activities in aqueous extracts of Argentine plants. International Journal of Pharmacognosy. 1997;35(2):116–20.
  21. 21. Murshed M, Mares MM, Aljawdah H, Al-Quraishy S. Anticoccidial efficacy of sheep bile as a potential therapy alternative for eimeria columbae infection in domestic pigeons: An in vitro study. Journal of Biological Regulators and Homeostatic Agents. 2023;37(12):6979–87.
  22. 22. Horton NJ, Switzer SS. Statistical methods in the journal. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(18):1977–9. pmid:16267336
  23. 23. Kumar S, Pandey AK. Chemistry and biological activities of flavonoids: an overview. ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:162750. pmid:24470791
  24. 24. Kurek M, Benaida-Debbache N, Elez Garofulić I, Galić K, Avallone S, Voilley A, et al. Antioxidants and Bioactive Compounds in Food: Critical Review of Issues and Prospects. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11(4):742. pmid:35453425
  25. 25. Maruthamuthu R, Ramanathan K. Phytochemical analysis of bark extract of cinnamomum verum: a medicinal herb used for the treatment of coronary heart disease in malayali tribes, pachamalai hills, tamil nadu, india. International Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research. 2016;8(7):1218–22.
  26. 26. Bhati P, Tiwari R, Kothari SL, Ray K, Lamba NP, Kumar Y, et al. Green synthesis of silver NPs using aqueous extract of Artemisia scoparia for hydrogenation of aromatic nitro compounds and their biological activity. Front Microbiol. 2025;16:1584066. pmid:40351317
  27. 27. Islam T, Barmon J, Dey SS, Chowdhury TA, Karmaker P, Ghos BC, et al. Green extraction of essential oils from Cinnamomum verum leaves through microwave and hydrodistillation techniques: comparative analysis of chemical profiling, in vitro and in silico investigations. LWT. 2025;118787.
  28. 28. Sinan KI, Zengin G, Uba AI, Caprioli G, Angeloni S, Vittori S, et al. Chemical characterization and biological abilities of Anthocleista djalonensis collected from two locations of Ivory Coast. eFood. 2023;4(4):e100.
  29. 29. Oztürk Sarikaya SB, Topal F, Sentürk M, Gülçin I, Supuran CT. In vitro inhibition of α-carbonic anhydrase isozymes by some phenolic compounds. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2011;21(14):4259–62. pmid:21669522
  30. 30. Khalfa H. Ethnobotanical study, phytochemistry, and biological activities of medicinal plants in the region of Boussaâda, M’sila (Ruta montana L.). Université IBN KHALDOUN. 2024.
  31. 31. Nasr A, Saleem Khan T, Zhu G-P. Phenolic compounds and antioxidants from Eucalyptus camaldulensis as affected by some extraction conditions, a preparative optimization for GC-MS analysis. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2019;49(5):464–76. pmid:30821596
  32. 32. Song J, Li W, Gao L, Yan Q, Zhang X, Liu M, et al. miR-276 and miR-182013-5p modulate insect metamorphosis and reproduction via dually regulating juvenile hormone acid methyltransferase. Commun Biol. 2024;7(1):1604. pmid:39623057
  33. 33. Shehata AI, Shahin SA, Taha SA, Elmaghraby AM, Alhoshy M, Soliman AA, et al. Essential Oil of Bay Laurel (Laurus nobilis) Enhances Growth and Immunity in Cold-Stressed Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis Niloticus). J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2025;109(4):926–41. pmid:39898367
  34. 34. Murshed M, AL-Tamimi J, Alzaylaee H, Al-Qurishy S. Medicinal Plant Extracts as Potential Green Antioxidants: Their Role in Environmental and Waste Management. GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL. 2025;27(8).
  35. 35. Muñiz-Márquez DB, Rodríguez R, Balagurusamy N, Carrillo ML, Belmares R, Contreras JC, et al. Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of extracts of Laurus nobilis L., Coriandrum sativum L. and Amaranthus hybridus L. CyTA-Journal of Food. 2014;12(3):271–6.
  36. 36. Lian X, Shi M, Liang Y, Lin Q, Zhang L. The Effects of Unconventional Feed Fermentation on Intestinal Oxidative Stress in Animals. Antioxidants (Basel). 2024;13(3):305. pmid:38539839
  37. 37. Gulcin I, Kaya R, Goren AC, Akincioglu H, Topal M, Bingol Z, et al. Anticholinergic, antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) bark extracts: Polyphenol contents analysis by LC-MS/MS. International Journal of Food Properties. 2019;22(1):1511–26.
  38. 38. Qiao L, Zhuang Z, Wang Y, Xie K, Zhang X, Shen Y, et al. Nocturnin promotes NADH and ATP production for juvenile hormone biosynthesis in adult insects. Pest Manag Sci. 2025;81(6):3103–11. pmid:39865336
  39. 39. Eruygur N, Koçyiğit UM, Taslimi P, Ataş M, Tekin M, Gülçin İ. Screening the in vitro antioxidant, antimicrobial, anticholinesterase, antidiabetic activities of endemic Achillea cucullata (Asteraceae) ethanol extract. South African Journal of Botany. 2019;120:141–5.
  40. 40. Lebda MA, Mostafa RE, Taha NM, Abd El-Maksoud EM, Tohamy HG, Al Jaouni SK, et al. Commiphora myrrh Supplementation Protects and Cures Ethanol-Induced Oxidative Alterations of Gastric Ulceration in Rats. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021;10(11):1836. pmid:34829707
  41. 41. Murshed M, AL-Tamimi J, Mares M, Aljawdah HMA, Al-Qurishy S. Effectiveness of Calotropis procera Leaf Extract in Treating Eimeriosis-Induced Inflammation Alteration of the Jejunum in Mice. Journal of the Hellenic Veterinary Medical Society. 2025;76(2):9085–96.
  42. 42. Murshed M, Al-Tamimi J, Al-Quraishy S. Phytochemical analysis, cytotoxic, antioxidant, and anti-coccidian activities of Vitis vinifera leaves grown in Saudi Arabia. Natural Product Communications. 2024;19(10):1934578X241284871.
  43. 43. Sokan-Adeaga AA, Sokan-Adeaga MA, Sokan-Adeaga ED, Oparaji AN, Edris H, Tella EO, et al. Environmental toxicants and health adversities: A review on interventions of phytochemicals. J Public Health Res. 2023;12(2):22799036231181226. pmid:37440795