Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Predicting habitat suitability of Korean Lindera as Tertiary relict plants under climate change scenarios

  • Jaewon Seol,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Forest Biodiversity Conservation Research Division, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Republic of Korea

  • Hye-jin Kwon,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology

    Affiliation Forest Biodiversity Conservation Research Division, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Republic of Korea

  • Songhie Jung,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation

    Affiliation Forest Biodiversity Conservation Research Division, Korea National Arboretum, Pocheon, Republic of Korea

  • Yong-Chan Cho

    Roles Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    bz0288@korea.kr

    Affiliation DMZ Forest Biological Resources Research Division, Korea National Arboretum, Yanggu, Republic of Korea

Abstract

Climate change profoundly affects plant habitats and ecological niches, particularly among Tertiary relict flora—remnants of warm and humid climatic conditions that prevailed during the Tertiary period—which are recognized as highly climate-sensitive lineages. The genus Lindera (Lauraceae), a representative group of deciduous broad-leaved trees in East Asian temperate forests, provides an ideal model for examining shifts in habitat suitability and changes in predicted suitable environments under future climate change scenarios. In this study, we developed ensemble species distribution models (SDMs) using six algorithms to predict the distributions of four Lindera species—L. obtusiloba, L. glauca, L. erythrocarpa, and L. sericea—under three Shared Socioeconomic Pathway (SSP) scenarios (SSP1–2.6, SSP3–7.0, SSP5–8.5). Among the three categories of environmental variables, climatic factors exerted the greatest influence on habitat suitability, with temperature seasonality (bio4) and growing-season precipitation (gsp) identified as the primary determinants. With intensifying climate change, suitable habitats shifted northward and upward, accompanied by pronounced habitat losses across southern and central Korea. Despite its broad geographic range, L. obtusiloba exhibited an 81% reduction in suitable habitat, whereas L. sericea, due to its localized distribution, showed a 91% decrease and was identified as the most climate-vulnerable species. Ecological niche overlap (Schoener’s D) declined across all scenarios, indicating increasing ecological differentiation among species. Although the four Lindera species exhibited distinct spatial responses, all consistently experienced range contractions and reduced overlap in predicted suitable environments, indicating high vulnerability to climate change. These results suggest that intrinsic ecological traits, climatic sensitivity, and niche stability—rather than current geographic range extent—are key determinants of species persistence. Accordingly, Lindera species in southern Korea should be considered climate-vulnerable taxa, and conservation strategies should integrate the protection of climatically stable refugia with complementary conservation measures beyond natural habitats to ensure long-term persistence under future climate change.

1. Introduction

Climate change profoundly influences the ecological niches of plant species, driving shifts in species distributions along elevational and latitudinal gradients and ultimately reshaping regional biodiversity patterns [14]. Species distribution models (SDMs) has been increasingly employed to project future species distributions under various climate scenarios [59] and to forecast large-scale biodiversity patterns [10]. Although ecological models have inherent limitations in fully representing climatic sensitivity [11], SDMs remains one of the most powerful and widely used analytical tools for evaluating habitat suitability under present and future climate conditions [12].

On the Korean Peninsula, southern temperate plants may benefit from ongoing warming, as their suitable habitats are projected to expand northward under climate change. For instance, several members of the Lauraceae—such as Machilus, Cinnamomum, and Neolitsea, which are characteristic species of evergreen broad-leaved forests—are predicted to expand throughout southern Korea [13].

In contrast, southern endemic species such as Coreanomecon hylomeconoides and Stewartia koreana are projected to face extinction across all scenarios [14,15]. These contrasting projections highlight that climatic responses can differ substantially among taxa, emphasizing the importance of species- or population-level modeling to detect shifts in biodiversity patterns and to provide spatially explicit information for prioritizing conservation targets [10].

In East Asia, members of the Lauraceae, including Lindera, are regarded as relict taxa that retreated to lower latitudes following the warm and humid climatic conditions of the Tertiary period and are thus considered highly sensitive to contemporary climatic change. The remaining Tertiary relict flora in temperate East Asia are characterized by disjunct distributions, climatic vulnerability, and locally high genetic diversity shaped by complex mountain topography and climatic heterogeneity [16,17]. Assessing the responses of such southern temperate plants to climate change is therefore crucial for developing conservation strategies that incorporate both ecological and genetic dimensions of relict taxa.

In this study, we focused on the genus Lindera (Lauraceae) which comprises four deciduous broad-leaved species in Korea: L. obtusiloba, L. glauca, L. erythrocarpa, and L. sericea [18]. Unlike evergreen Lauraceae species adapted to warmer climatic conditions, Lindera species are deciduous taxa that may exhibit different climatic sensitivities and responses to warming. Except for L. obtusiloba, which occurs widely across the peninsula, the remaining three species are confined mainly to the mountainous regions of southern Korea, each exhibiting distinct ecological and geographical patterns. Although L. obtusiloba has a broad distribution extending from southern China to the Russian Far East, previous studies suggest that even widely distributed temperate species may experience habitat loss under future climate scenarios [19]. These patterns indicate that southern temperate taxa such as Lindera may be particularly vulnerable to rapid climatic shifts.

Accordingly, understanding the spatial dynamics and diversity changes of deciduous Lindera species in southern Korea is essential for developing adaptive conservation strategies. Specifically, this study aimed to: (1) quantify changes in the distribution ranges and climatic sensitivity of each species; (2) identify ecological differentiation and interspecific relationships within the genus through analyses of ecological niche overlap; and (3) delineate climate-vulnerable areas and diversity distribution patterns to inform conservation planning for Lindera species under future climate conditions.

2. Methods

2.1. Study area

This study was conducted in southern Korea (33°–38° N, 125°–131° E), a region characterized by complex mountainous terrain and numerous islands. Such geomorphological diversity creates a wide range of environmental conditions that support diverse plant assemblages [20,21].

The area experiences a mixed continental and oceanic climate, with cold-temperate conditions in the north and warm-temperate conditions in the south, accompanied by pronounced seasonal temperature variation [22]. The Baekdudaegan mountain range serves as a central climatic and floristic divide across the peninsula, while its moderate slopes and heterogeneous topography facilitate the dispersal and migration of many plant species [23].

2.2. Species and occurrence data

The genus Lindera (Lauraceae) is distributed mainly across temperate and subtropical regions of East Asia. Although Lindera species can tolerate a broad range of environmental conditions, their habitat ranges and climatic sensitivities differ markedly among species. In particular, L. sericea exhibits an extremely localized distribution and is likely the most climate-sensitive species within the genus. Species occurrence data were compiled from nationwide vegetation surveys conducted between 2002 and 2023. A total of 7,011 occurrence records for L. obtusiloba, 1,029 for L. glauca, 2,088 for L. erythrocarpa, and 37 for L. sericea were collected and used for modeling analyses (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Geographic distribution and elevational range of the Lindera genus in South Korea.

The map shows the recorded occurrences of Lindera species (black dots) across South Korea. Background colors represent elevation gradients (green for lowlands, yellow–brown for mid-elevations, and white for high mountains). The accompanying graph illustrates the relationship between elevation (x-axis, m) and latitude (y-axis) of Lindera occurrences. Geographic layers (e.g., country boundaries and coastlines) were obtained from Natural Earth (https://www.naturalearthdata.com/), which is in the public domain. The maps were generated using ArcGIS Pro version 3.2 (Esri Inc.).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350199.g001

Lindera obtusiloba is a large deciduous shrub widely distributed across Korea, Japan, China, and the Russian Far East, typically inhabiting adequately moist foothill and valley forests. L. glauca, found in China, Japan, and Korea [18], generally grows in lowland and valley forests as a small deciduous tree [24,25]. L. erythrocarpa is a large deciduous tree occurring in temperate forests of Korea, Japan, and China [26]. L. sericea, native to Korea and Japan, is a large deciduous shrub that inhabits rocky slopes and humid foothills [27,28].

In Korea, L. obtusiloba has the broadest distribution, extending from northern to southern regions of the peninsula, whereas L. erythrocarpa, L. glauca, and L. sericea are largely confined to southern provinces such as Chungcheong, Jeolla, and Gyeongsang. Among these, L. sericea is a rare and geographically restricted species with an extremely narrow distribution range.

2.3. Selection and processing of environmental variables

Environmental variables were prepared for four time periods: the baseline period (1981–2010), near future (2011–2040), mid-future (2041–2070), and far future (2071–2100), and for three SSP scenarios (SSP1–2.6, SSP3–7.0, SSP5–8.5). An initial set of 38 variables (27 bioclimatic, 7 soil-related, and 4 topographic variables) was considered. To minimize multicollinearity among predictors, variables with pairwise Pearson correlation coefficients |r| ≥ 0.7 were excluded, resulting in a final set of 25 variables for modelling. All variables were standardized to a spatial resolution of 250 m. The final dataset included 14 bioclimatic variables obtained from the CHELSA dataset (v2.1; [29]; www.chelsa-climate.org), which provides baseline (1981–2010) and CMIP6-based future climate projections derived from the GFDL-ESM4 general circulation model, downscaled following the ISIMIP3b bias correction framework. In addition, eight soil-related variables were obtained from SoilGrids (www.soilgrids.org), and three topographic variables were derived from NASA SRTM 90 data (www.cmr.earthdata.nasa.gov) (S1 Table in S1 File).

2.4. Construction of species distribution models (SDMs)

Species distribution modeling was performed using presence–background data. For each species, 1,000 pseudo-absence points were randomly generated using the biomod2 framework. To account for large differences in occurrence sample sizes among species, records for L. obtusiloba were randomly subsampled to 500 prior to modelling. The number of pseudo-absences was fixed at 1,000 for all species, resulting in varying effective prevalence across species. To reduce potential spatial sampling bias, duplicate occurrence records within the same raster grid cell were removed during data formatting.

An ensemble modeling framework was implemented by combining six algorithms, which were grouped into three methodological categories: (1) Machine-learning methods: Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM; [30]), Random Forest (RF; [31]), and Artificial Neural Network (ANN; [32]); (2) Regression-based methods: Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS; [33]) and Generalized Additive Model (GAM; [34]); and (3) Classification-based method: Classification Tree Analysis (CTA; [35]). This combination was selected to represent diverse methodological approaches, as ensemble modelling across multiple algorithms has been shown to improve predictive performance [36,37].

Model performance was evaluated using three accuracy metrics: Cohen’s Kappa, True Skill Statistic (TSS), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) (S2 Table in S1 File). Model calibration and evaluation were performed using repeated random cross-validation with a 70/30 split between calibration and evaluation datasets across three replicates. Ensemble models were constructed using three ensemble approaches implemented in biomod2: coefficient of variation (EMcv), confidence interval (EMci), and weighted mean (EMwmean). Only models with AUC values ≥ 0.7 were retained for ensemble modeling [38] (S3 Table in S1 File). Variable importance was assessed using a permutation-based approach implemented in the biomod2 ensemble framework, which evaluates the decrease in model performance when the values of each predictor are randomly permuted. Importance values were derived from the weighted mean ensemble model (EMwmean, range 0–1) and interpreted descriptively as relative contributions of each predictor.

2.5. Evaluation of geographic shifts and climatic sensitivity

The biogeographical characteristics of the four Lindera species were analyzed based on their occurrence frequencies across vegetation climate zones and floristic regions in Korea. The Korean Peninsula was divided into three vegetation climate zones—northern temperate, central temperate, and southern temperate—and four floristic regions: I (cold), II (cool), III (warm), and IV (maritime) [39].

Geographic shifts in latitude, longitude, and elevation were quantified using the predicted maps generated from ensemble SDMs under each climate change scenario. Suitable habitats were defined using the threshold that maximizes the True Skill Statistic (TSS), as implemented in the biomod2 framework. To minimize the influence of outliers, the median rather than the mean was used when calculating changes in latitude, longitude, and elevation [40]. These analyses were conducted consistently across all three SSP scenarios (SSP1–2.6, SSP3–7.0, and SSP5–8.5).

Climatic sensitivity to climate change was assessed by calculating the proportional change in suitable habitat area (increase or decrease). For this purpose, the Range Change Index (RCI) was computed, representing the relative net change in suitable area compared with the baseline distribution [41]. A positive RCI indicates an expansion of suitable habitat, whereas a negative RCI indicates contraction. For example, RCI = –100 denotes complete habitat loss within the study area. The RCI was calculated as:

(1)

where, is the area of newly suitable habitat, is the area of lost habitat, and is the baseline suitable habitat area.

2.6. Ecological niche overlap analysis

To quantify overlap in predicted suitable habitat among the four Lindera species, Schoener’s D index was applied [42]. Overlap between each pair of species was calculated by comparing binary habitat suitability rasters derived from ensemble model outputs. Schoener’s D measures the degree of overlap in predicted suitable habitat between two species on a scale from 0 to 1, where values near 0 indicate minimal overlap in suitable conditions and values near 1 indicate high similarity in predicted suitable habitat [4143]. The analysis was performed for both the baseline period and the far-future period (2071–2100) under three climate change scenarios (SSP1–2.6, SSP3–7.0, and SSP5–8.5).

To characterize spatial shifts in habitat suitability, geographic centroids of predicted suitable habitat and the Range Change Index (RCI) were also calculated for each species and scenario (Fig 6). All analyses were conducted in R version 4.3.0 [44]. Species distribution modeling (SDMs) was performed using the biomod2 package [37], and overlap was quantified using Schoener’s D implemented in the dismo package [45].

3. Results

3.1. Biogeographic characteristics

Lindera erythrocarpa (64.6%), L. glauca (78.5%), and L. sericea (70.3%) exhibited their highest occurrence frequencies within the southern temperate vegetation climate zone, whereas L. obtusiloba showed the highest frequency (42.3%) in the northern temperate zone (Fig 2A). Except for L. obtusiloba, the other three species displayed an increasing trend in occurrence frequency from the northern to the southern temperate zones.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Biogeographic occurrence patterns of Lindera species across vegetation and floristic zones.

(A) Number of occurrences in each vegetation climate zone: Northern temperate, Central temperate, and Southern temperate. (B) Number of occurrences in each floristic zone: I (cold, high-elevation midland areas), II (cool, high-elevation southern areas), III (warm, hilly middle and southern regions), and IV (maritime coastal and island zones).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350199.g002

Across floristic regions, all four species recorded their highest occurrences in the warm floristic zone (Zone III): L. erythrocarpa (73.0%), L. glauca (80.9%), L. obtusiloba (57.9%), and L. sericea (62.2%) (Fig 2B). In contrast to the other species, L. sericea was absent from the maritime floristic zone (Zone IV).

3.2. Relative contribution of environmental variables

Model performance was evaluated using the True Skill Statistic (TSS), the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC), and Cohen’s Kappa. The models showed good predictive performance across algorithms, with mean TSS values ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 and ROC values exceeding 0.87 (Supplementary S2 and S3 Tables in S1 File).

The results of SDMs indicated that climatic variables showed high relative importance across Lindera species (Table 1). Among the four species, temperature seasonality (bio4) showed the highest relative importance for L. erythrocarpa (0.35) and L. obtusiloba (0.45), both of which are widely distributed across southern Korea. For L. glauca, isothermality (bio3, 0.13) had the highest relative importance. For L. sericea, growing-season precipitation (gsp, 0.25) had the highest relative importance, followed by temperature seasonality (bio4, 0.18) and surface solar radiation (srad, 0.10).

thumbnail
Table 1. Relative importance of environmental variables in SDMs. Values are expressed as permutation-based importance (0–1). Bold values indicate the most influential variable for each species.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350199.t001

3.3. Predicted changes in suitable habitats and diversity distribution

The baseline suitable habitat of L. erythrocarpa was predicted primarily in the southern provinces—Chungcheong, Jeolla, Gyeongsang, and Jeju Island. Under all future scenarios, its suitable area was projected to decrease markedly, particularly in central and southern inland regions (Fig 3A). For L. glauca, baseline suitable habitats were also concentrated in Chungcheong, Jeolla, and Gyeongsang provinces, but were predicted to shrink substantially with increasing climate-change severity across the SSP1–2.6 to SSP5–8.5 scenarios (Fig 3B).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Predicted suitable habitats of four Lindera species under baseline and future climates.

Suitable habitats were defined using the threshold that maximizes the True Skill Statistic (TSS). Binary maps were generated for each species under three SSP scenarios (SSP1–2.6, SSP3–7.0, SSP5–8.5), averaged across near-future (2011–2040), mid-future (2041–2070), and far-future (2071–2100) periods. (A) L. erythrocarpa, (B) L. glauca, (C) L. obtusiloba, (D) L. sericea.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350199.g003

L. obtusiloba currently occupies almost the entire Korean Peninsula; however, in all future projections, its suitable habitats are expected to contract significantly, persisting mainly along the Taebaek and Sobaek mountain ranges (Fig 3C). The baseline distribution of L. sericea is centered around Mt. Mudeung and other mountainous areas in southern Jeolla Province, but under all climate-change scenarios, its suitable habitats are projected to decline drastically (Fig 3D).

Species richness of the genus Lindera is currently highest in the Chungcheong, Jeolla, and Gyeongsang regions, whereas Gyeonggi and Gangwon Provinces—dominated by L. obtusiloba—exhibit relatively low richness (Fig 4, Baseline). Under SSP1–2.6, the diversity “hotspot” contracted toward southern Jeolla and southern Gyeongsang, and under SSP5–8.5, it became even smaller, remaining only in isolated mountain refugia such as Jirisan and Mudeungsan (Fig 4, Future).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Projected spatial changes in species richness (SR) of the Lindera genus under SSP scenarios.

Maps illustrate normalized species richness (SR; upper panels) and the difference in SR (ΔSR; lower panels) between the baseline period (1981–2010) and future climate scenarios. Background shading represents terrain variation to improve visual interpretation. (A) Baseline period, (B) SSP1–2.6, (C) SSP3–7.0, and (D) SSP5–8.5. The SR scale (green–red) represents relative species richness, while the ΔSR scale (blue–red) indicates the magnitude and direction of change. Geographic layers (e.g., country boundaries and coastlines) were obtained from Natural Earth (https://www.naturalearthdata.com/), which is in the public domain. The maps were generated using ArcGIS Pro version 3.2 (Esri Inc.).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350199.g004

Regions of diversity decline were mainly located in northern Jeolla, northern Gyeongsang, and Chungcheong, and under SSP5–8.5, diversity loss extended across most of southern Korea (Fig 4, ΔSR, blue shades). In contrast, areas showing stable or increasing richness were primarily located in mountainous regions of southern Korea. At the species level, projected habitat reductions ranged from 13% to 91% across scenarios and time periods (Table 2 and S5 Fig in S1 File).

thumbnail
Table 2. Changes in sensitivity and suitable site area of the genus Lindera under different climate scenarios (SSP1–2.6, SSP3–7.0, SSP5–8.5). The table shows the projected changes in climate sensitivity and suitable habitat area (km²) for Lindera species across three future time periods: Near Future (2011–2040), Mid Future (2041–2070), and Far Future (2071–2100).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350199.t002

3.4. Geographic shifts and climatic sensitivity (RCI)

To examine geographic shifts associated with habitat contraction, the average displacement of the centroid of suitable habitats for the genus Lindera was calculated. Across all scenarios, the median latitude and elevation of suitable habitats increased relative to the baseline period, whereas longitude decreased under SSP3–7.0 and showed a slight increase under the other scenarios (Fig 5).

thumbnail
Fig 5. Temporal shifts in the geographic centroid of Lindera genus distributions under SSP scenarios.

Changes in the centroid position of Lindera distributions are shown for longitude (A), latitude (B), and elevation (C) across four time periods (baseline, 2011–2040, 2041–2070, and 2071–2100). Lines represent different climate scenarios: SSP1–2.6 (blue), SSP3–7.0 (orange), and SSP5–8.5 (red). Each point indicates the mean centroid value for the corresponding period and scenario.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350199.g005

At the species level, all four species exhibited a northward shift in their distribution centroids by the end of the century (2071–2100) (Fig 6). Elevation increased under all scenarios except for L. erythrocarpa, which showed a decline under SSP3–7.0 and SSP5–8.5. Overall, all species demonstrated a consistent tendency to shift northward and toward higher elevations in response to future climate change.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Species-specific shifts in distribution centroids of Lindera species under SSP scenarios.

Each panel displays predicted centroid shifts (longitude, latitude, elevation) for individual species under SSP1–2.6, SSP3–7.0, and SSP5–8.5 scenarios across four time periods: baseline, 2011–2040, 2041–2070, and 2071–2100.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350199.g006

The Range Change Index (RCI) analysis revealed consistent habitat loss across all four Lindera species, with the magnitude of loss increasing in proportion to scenario severity (Table 2). Among the species, L. obtusiloba—the most widely distributed taxon—showed the largest average reduction in suitable habitat, reaching 81% under SSP5–8.5 (2071–2100) (S5 Fig in S1 File). The greatest proportional decline was observed in L. sericea, which experienced severe habitat loss under all scenarios and time periods, with a maximum reduction of –91% under SSP5–8.5 (2071–2100). By contrast, L. glauca exhibited relatively higher resistance, showing a temporary 20% increase under SSP3–7.0 (2011–2040), followed by a 30% loss under SSP5–8.5 (2071–2100) (Table 2 and S5 Fig in S1 File).

3.5. Ecological niche overlap

The average ecological niche overlap (Schoener’s D) between the baseline and far-future periods (2071–2100) decreased across all three SSP scenarios (Fig 7). Under baseline conditions, niche overlap was highest between L. glauca and L. erythrocarpa (D = 0.654), followed by L. obtusilobaL. erythrocarpa (D = 0.411) and L. obtusilobaL. glauca (D = 0.281). Species pairs including L. sericea exhibited very low overlap values: L. erythrocarpaL. sericea (D = 0.052), L. glaucaL. sericea (D = 0.047), and L. obtusilobaL. sericea (D = 0.020).

thumbnail
Fig 7. Changes in niche overlap among four Lindera species under SSP scenarios.

Niche overlap is quantified by Schoener’s D (0 = no overlap; 1 = complete overlap). Panels compare baseline with the far-future period (2071–2100) for (A) SSP1–2.6, (B) SSP3–7.0, and (C) SSP5–8.5. Labels are shown only for species pairs with maximum Schoener’s D values exceeding 0.1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350199.g007

Under SSP1–2.6, L. glaucaL. erythrocarpa decreased to D = 0.479 (–26.8%), L. obtusilobaL. erythrocarpa to D = 0.246 (–40.1%), and L. obtusilobaL. glauca to D = 0.125 (–55.5%). Under SSP3–7.0, these values were D = 0.556 (–15.0%), D = 0.085 (–79.3%), and D = 0.062 (–77.9%), respectively; and under SSP5–8.5, D = 0.342 (–47.7%), D = 0.074 (–81.9%), and D = 0.050 (–82.2%). Overall, niche overlap consistently declined with increasing climate-change intensity. An exception was observed for the L. glaucaL. erythrocarpa pair, which showed a slight increase from SSP1–2.6 to SSP3–7.0 before declining again under SSP5–8.5 (S6 Fig in S1 File).

4. Discussion

4.1. Species-specific climatic responses

All four Lindera species showed contractions of suitable habitats under projected climate scenarios, with differences in the magnitude and spatial pattern of their responses. Among the examined environmental variables, climatic factors exerted the strongest influence on habitat suitability, highlighting the dominant role of temperature-related variables in shaping species distributions [47].

Lindera erythrocarpa showed the highest relative importance for temperature seasonality (bio4) (S1 Fig in S1 File), suggesting that its distribution may be influenced by multiple climatic gradients rather than a single dominant factor [47,48]. The species’ association with mid-elevation slopes and moderately warm–humid conditions may indicate a degree of ecological flexibility within southern temperate forests.

L. glauca showed the highest relative importance for isothermality (bio3) (S2 Fig in S1 File), which may reflect an association with relatively stable thermal conditions. Although it may tolerate a range of climatic conditions, projected warming and increasing temperature variability may affect its future distribution, particularly in low-elevation areas.

L. obtusiloba showed the highest relative importance for temperature seasonality (bio4) (S3 Fig in S1 File), consistent with its broad distribution across the Korean Peninsula. However, a wide distribution does not necessarily imply climatic resilience, as species occupying diverse environments may also experience increased exposure to climatic variability. The projected reduction in suitable habitats is consistent with previous studies that have identified L. obtusiloba as sensitive to climate change in East Asia [19].

In contrast, L. sericea showed the highest relative importance for growing-season precipitation (gsp), followed by temperature seasonality (bio4) (S4 Fig in S1 File), suggesting an association with humid climatic conditions and relatively stable temperature regimes. However, these results should be interpreted with caution, as the limited occurrence data reflect the naturally restricted distribution of this species. These patterns should be interpreted within the comparative framework applied in this study.

Overall, the predicted climatic responses of Lindera species suggest an association with warm–humid environmental conditions. This pattern supports previous studies emphasizing that Tertiary relict flora in East Asia are highly sensitive to thermal and hydrological fluctuations [16,49]. These results further suggest that L. sericea may be more vulnerable to climatic instability, as its distribution appears to be associated with relatively humid and thermally stable environments.

4.2. Range shifts and climate-change sensitivity

Although the Lindera species occupy distinct ecological niches, all are projected to undergo range contractions accompanied by shifts in suitable habitats toward higher elevations and variable latitudinal changes depending on scenario and time period, likely reflecting species-specific responses to interacting temperature and precipitation gradients under different climate scenarios. As climate warming intensifies, southern and low-elevation regions are expected to become increasingly unsuitable, whereas potential refugia may persist in mountainous areas of central and northern Korea. Longitudinal shifts likely reflect the spatial distribution of major mountain ranges in South Korea, where higher elevations occur predominantly in the eastern part of the peninsula, indicating that these longitudinal shifts are closely linked to altitudinal gradients, as species track cooler conditions available in higher-elevation mountainous regions predominantly located in the eastern part of the peninsula. These upslope shifts, combined with projected reductions in suitable habitat area, are consistent with the mountain-top trap dynamic, whereby species tracking cooler climatic conditions toward higher elevations face progressively reduced habitat availability near upper elevational limits, potentially increasing extinction risk [50,51].

These results demonstrate that a broad distribution does not necessarily confer climatic resilience. For instance, L. obtusiloba—despite its wide geographic range—exhibited the largest mean decrease (–81%) in suitable habitat, indicating that even widespread taxa can remain highly vulnerable to climate change [41]. Conversely, narrowly distributed species such as L. sericea experienced severe yet spatially concentrated habitat losses, reflecting limited adaptive capacity to shifts in temperature and moisture regimes. Interestingly, L. erythrocarpa did not exhibit a consistent upslope shift over time, unlike the other Lindera species (Fig 6A). Instead, centroid elevation showed contrasting trajectories among SSP scenarios, suggesting that this species may respond to climate change primarily through spatial redistribution of suitable habitats rather than uniform upward shifts (Fig 3A).

The projected habitat suitability maps indicate relatively high stability for L. erythrocarpa and L. glauca on Jeju Island across all climate scenarios. This pattern contrasts with the substantial habitat losses projected across mainland Korea. Jeju Island has been suggested as a potential glacial refugium for warm-temperate plant species in East Asia due to its oceanic climate and complex topography [52]. These environmental characteristics may buffer climatic extremes and allow suitable habitats to persist even under future warming scenarios. Consequently, Jeju Island may function as an important climatic refugium for Lindera species under climate change, highlighting its potential significance for long-term conservation planning. Although such patterns may partly reflect model-related uncertainties, the consistent stability observed across scenarios suggests that this pattern is likely ecologically meaningful.

High-elevation regions, particularly the Taebaek and Sobaek mountain ranges, are likely to serve as long-term refugia that provide stable habitats for conserving genetic diversity and facilitating altitudinal migration [19]. The persistence of Lindera populations in these refugia will depend not only on local microclimatic stability but also on landscape connectivity among potential migration corridors [53]. Because Lindera species produce fleshy drupes that are dispersed by frugivorous birds [54], habitat fragmentation may limit their ability to track shifting climatic conditions through dispersal. Although genus-level assessments of climate-change impacts on Lindera remain limited, previous studies indicate that species within this genus are sensitive to climatic and environmental gradients. Strong genetic discontinuities have been reported in L. obtusiloba across East Asia, suggesting that historical climatic fluctuations have played an important role in shaping its distribution and population structure [19]. In addition, studies on other Lindera species have shown that local environmental conditions can strongly influence their persistence; for instance, biomass accumulation in the endangered shrub L. melissifolia is affected by light availability and soil flooding regimes [55]. These findings support the projected vulnerability of Lindera species to ongoing climatic change. The projected range contractions highlight the importance of identifying and preserving climate refugia within increasingly unsuitable landscapes.

Overall, although the trajectories of range shifts vary among species, all four Lindera taxa can be regarded as climate-vulnerable groups. Conservation planning should prioritize climatically stable and topographically heterogeneous areas that can function as refugia under future climate scenarios. Such mountainous regions may buffer climatic stress by maintaining locally suitable conditions and facilitating altitudinal migration. In addition, the current climatic zone associations of Lindera species (Fig 2) suggest that southern temperate taxa may be particularly vulnerable to warming, highlighting the importance of monitoring potential shifts in vegetation climate zones when identifying future conservation priorities.

4.3. Ecological differentiation under climate change

The analysis of ecological niche overlap (Schoener’s D) revealed a consistent decline across all future scenarios, indicating increasing ecological differentiation within the genus Lindera. The relatively high baseline niche overlap between L. obtusiloba and L. erythrocarpa (D = 0.41) reflects their shared environmental tolerances, whereas the extremely low overlap involving L. sericea (D < 0.05) suggesting relatively distinct environmental characteristics and a narrower ecological distribution pattern.

The progressive decrease in niche overlap under intensified climate change suggests increasing environmental segregation among species. However, because niche overlap metrics do not directly reflect interspecific interactions, further studies examining competitive dynamics and species interactions would be necessary to determine whether reduced niche overlap translates into weakened competition. This pattern is broadly consistent with theoretical predictions that climate-induced environmental filtering can promote niche divergence among closely related taxa [41,56]. The growing segregation of ecological niches among Lindera species underscores the need to incorporate multi-species perspectives into conservation planning. Management strategies should focus on securing areas that still support co-occurrence where niche overlap remains possible, while ensuring the long-term survival of species with distinct climatic requirements. By integrating niche-based modeling with landscape-scale connectivity analyses, future research can more effectively identify priority areas for maintaining Lindera diversity and enhancing the resilience of temperate forest ecosystems under changing climates.

5. Conclusion

This study comprehensively evaluated the effects of climate change on the habitat suitability and ecological niches of four Lindera species in Korea. Ensemble species distribution models (SDMs) projected northward and upward shifts in suitable habitats, accompanied by substantial habitat losses in southern and central regions.

Across all scenarios, the consistent contraction of suitable habitats and the decline in ecological niche overlap suggest that Lindera species will experience increasing ecological segregation and vulnerability under future climate conditions. The genus as a whole displayed a pronounced trend toward range contraction and reduced overlap in predicted suitable environments, reflecting the high climatic sensitivity characteristic of East Asian Tertiary relict flora.

These findings highlight that intrinsic ecological traits, climatic sensitivity, and niche stability—rather than the extent of current distribution—are the key determinants of long-term persistence in Lindera species. Accordingly, conservation planning should prioritize the identification of climatically stable refugia and the maintenance of ecological connectivity along potential migration corridors. Integrating spatial modeling with genetic diversity assessments and long-term ecological monitoring will be essential to safeguard Lindera diversity and the resilience of temperate forest ecosystems under accelerating climate change.

Supporting information

S1 File. Supporting figures and tables including response curves, projected suitable habitat changes, niche overlap heatmaps, environmental variables, ensemble threshold statistics, and predictive performance metrics for the four Lindera species.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0350199.s001

(DOCX)

References

  1. 1. Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB. Niche properties and geographical extent as predictors of species sensitivity to climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2005;14(4):347–57.
  2. 2. Parmesan C. Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2006;37(1):637–69.
  3. 3. Fitzpatrick MC, Gove AD, Sanders NJ, Dunn RR. Climate change, plant migration, and range collapse in a global biodiversity hotspot: theBanksia(Proteaceae) of Western Australia. Global Change Biology. 2008;14(6):1337–52.
  4. 4. Román-Palacios C, Wiens JJ. Recent responses to climate change reveal the drivers of species extinction and survival. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(8):4211–7. pmid:32041877
  5. 5. Estopinan J, Bonnet P, Servajean M, Munoz F, Joly A. Modelling species distributions with deep learning to predict plant extinction risk and assess climate change impacts. arXiv preprint. 2024.
  6. 6. Wang T, Zhang T, An W, Wang Z, Li C. Predicting the Potential Geographic Distribution of Invasive Freshwater Apple Snail Pomacea canaliculate (Lamarck, 1819) under Climate Change Based on Biomod2. Agronomy. 2024;14(4):650.
  7. 7. Zhang Y, Hu J, Wang C, Wan Y, Ji M, Ma F, et al. Estimating global geographical distribution and ecological niche dynamics of Ammannia coccinea under climate change based on Biomod2. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):30579. pmid:39706877
  8. 8. van Tiel N, Zbinden R, Dalsasso E, Kellenberger B, Pellissier L, Tuia D. Multi-Scale and Multimodal Species Distribution Modeling. In: 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-92387-6_10
  9. 9. MacDonald ZG, Beninde J, Matsunaga K, Zhou B, Gillespie TW, Shaffer HB. Species distribution modeling for conservation science: new predictor layers, reproducible code, and an evaluation of California protected areas. bioRxiv. 2025;2025:23.634559.
  10. 10. Cho YC, Seol J, Lim CH. Climate-induced distribution dynamics and niche adaptation of South Korean endemic plants across the Korean Peninsula. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):22253. pmid:39333738
  11. 11. Porfirio LL, Harris RMB, Lefroy EC, Hugh S, Gould SF, Lee G, et al. Improving the use of species distribution models in conservation planning and management under climate change. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113749. pmid:25420020
  12. 12. del Río S, Canas R, Cano E, Cano-Ortiz A, Musarella C, Pinto-Gomes C, et al. Modelling the impacts of climate change on habitat suitability and vulnerability in deciduous forests in Spain. Ecological Indicators. 2021;131:108202.
  13. 13. Yu S-B, Kim B-D, Shin H-T, Kim S-J. Habitat Climate Characteristics of Lauraceae Evergreen Broad-leaved Trees and Distribution Change according to Climate Change1. Korean J Environ Ecol. 2020;34(6):503–14.
  14. 14. Seol J, Jung S, Cho Y-C. Assessment of extinction risk of the endemic plant Coreanomecon hylomeconoides by species distribution modeling and climate change scenarios. Korean J Pl Taxon. 2024;54(4):247–66.
  15. 15. Seol J, Kwon HJ, Cho YC. Climate change-related prediction of changes in geographic and niche overlap of Korean endemic tree species Stewartia koreana. Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science. 2024;113(4):404–21.
  16. 16. López-Pujol J, Zhang F-M, Sun H-Q, Ying T-S, Ge S. Centres of plant endemism in China: places for survival or for speciation?. Journal of Biogeography. 2011;38(7):1267–80.
  17. 17. Qian H, Ricklefs RE. Large-scale processes and the Asian bias in species diversity of temperate plants. Nature. 2000;407(6801):180–2. pmid:11001054
  18. 18. Kim T, Kim J. Woody plants of Korean Peninsula. Dolbegae. 2018.
  19. 19. Ye J, Bai W, Bao L, Wang T, Wang H, Ge J. Sharp genetic discontinuity in the aridity‐sensitive Lindera obtusiloba (Lauraceae): solid evidence supporting the Tertiary floral subdivision in East Asia. Journal of Biogeography. 2017;44(9):2082–95.
  20. 20. Park SJ. Generality and specificity of landforms of the Korean Peninsula, and its sustainability. The Korean Geographical Society. 2014;49(5):656–74.
  21. 21. Kim J, Lee M, Kong W, Kim T, Kang C, Park K. Physical geography of Korea. Seoul: Seoul National University Press. 2012.
  22. 22. Park S, Park H, Im J, Yoo C, Rhee J, Lee B, et al. Delineation of high resolution climate regions over the Korean Peninsula using machine learning approaches. PLoS One. 2019;14(10):e0223362. pmid:31600268
  23. 23. Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport. The national atlas of Korea II. Suwon: National Geography Information Institute. 2016.
  24. 24. Yun CW, Kim HJ, Lee BC, Shin JH, Yang HM, Lim JH. Characteristic community type classification of forest vegetation in South Korea. Journal of Korean Forestry Society. 2011;100(3).
  25. 25. Sun Z, Su X, Lin Y, Long C, Zhang Y, Zhao T. Chemical Composition, and Antioxidant and Cholinesterase Inhibitory Activities of Lindera glauca Fruit Essential Oil and Molecular Docking Studies of Six Selected Compounds. Horticulturae. 2023;9(2):289.
  26. 26. Jo S, Kim Y-K, Cheon S-H, Fan Q, Kim K-J. Characterization of 20 complete plastomes from the tribe Laureae (Lauraceae) and distribution of small inversions. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0224622. pmid:31675370
  27. 27. Kim J. Structure and dynamics of Lindera sericea community in Mt. Chogye, Korea. The Korean Journal of Ecology. 1997;20(1):15–25.
  28. 28. Lim DO, Choi DH, Yun HG. Distribution characteristics and dynamics of the Lindera sericea population at Mt. Mudeung, Mt. Cheonbong and Mt. Chogye. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology. 2015;29(4):570–9.
  29. 29. Karger DN, Conrad O, Böhner J, Kawohl T, Kreft H, Soria-Auza RW, et al. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci Data. 2017;4:170122. pmid:28872642
  30. 30. Ridgeway G. Generalized Boosted Models: A guide to the gbm package. Gen Boosted Models. 2007;1(1):2007.
  31. 31. Breiman L. Random Forests. Machine Learning. 2001;45(1):5–32.
  32. 32. Ripley BD. Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge University Press. 2007.
  33. 33. Friedman JH. Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines. Ann Statist. 1991;19(1).
  34. 34. Hastie TJ. Generalized Additive Models. Statistical Models in S. Routledge. 2017. p. 249–307.
  35. 35. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and Regression Trees. California, USA: Wadsworth. 1984.
  36. 36. Araújo MB, New M. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007;22(1):42–7. pmid:17011070
  37. 37. Thuiller W, Lafourcade B, Engler R, Araújo MB. BIOMOD – a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography. 2009;32(3):369–73.
  38. 38. Ureta C, Ramírez-Barahona S, Calderón-Bustamante Ó, Cruz-Santiago P, Gay-García C, Swingedouw D, et al. Evaluation of animal and plant diversity suggests Greenland’s thaw hastens the biodiversity crisis. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):985. pmid:36115902
  39. 39. Jung S, Cho Y-C. Redefining floristic zones in the Korean Peninsula using high-resolution georeferenced specimen data and self-organizing maps. Ecol Evol. 2020;10(20):11549–64. pmid:33144983
  40. 40. Rotenberry JT, Balasubramaniam P. Connecting species’ geographical distributions to environmental variables: range maps versus observed points of occurrence. Ecography. 2020;43(6):897–913.
  41. 41. Pélissié M, Johansson F, Hyseni C. Pushed Northward by Climate Change: Range Shifts With a Chance of Co-occurrence Reshuffling in the Forecast for Northern European Odonates. Environ Entomol. 2022;51(5):910–21. pmid:36017921
  42. 42. Schoener TW. Sizes of Feeding Territories among Birds. Ecology. 1968;49(1):123–41.
  43. 43. Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evolution. 2008;62(11):2868–83. pmid:18752605
  44. 44. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2023.
  45. 45. Hijmans RJ, Phillips S, Leathwick J, Elith J, Hijmans MRJ. Package ‘dismo’. Circles. 2017;9(1):1–68.
  46. 46. Paulsen J, Körner C. A climate-based model to predict potential treeline position around the globe. Alp Botany. 2014;124(1):1–12.
  47. 47. Austin MP. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecological Modelling. 2002;157(2–3):101–18.
  48. 48. Chapin III FS, Matson PA, Mooney HA. Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology. Springer. 2002.
  49. 49. Milne RI, Abbott RJ. The origin and evolution of Tertiary relict floras. 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2296(02)38033-9
  50. 50. Rumpf SB, Hülber K, Wessely J, Willner W, Moser D, Gattringer A, et al. Extinction debts and colonization credits of non-forest plants in the European Alps. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4293. pmid:31541105
  51. 51. Colwell RK, Brehm G, Cardelús CL, Gilman AC, Longino JT. Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science. 2008;322(5899):258–61. pmid:18845754
  52. 52. Chung MY, Moon M-O, López-Pujol J, Maki M, Yamashiro T, Yukawa T, et al. Was Jeju Island a glacial refugium for East Asian warm-temperate plants? Insights from the homosporous fern Selliguea hastata (Polypodiaceae). Am J Bot. 2013;100(11):2240–9. pmid:24190948
  53. 53. Kequn D, Junlin C, Peihong J, Chong D, Yi Y, Xiaohui X, et al. A New Material of Lindera (Lauraceae) of the Late Pliocene from Tengchong, Yunnan and the Genus’ Biogeography Significance. Acta Geologica Sinica (Eng). 2013;87(3):690–706.
  54. 54. Moore LA, Willson MF. The effect of microhabitat, spatial distribution, and display size on dispersal of Lindera benzoin by avian frugivores. Can J Bot. 1982;60(5):557–60.
  55. 55. Lockhart BR, Gardiner ES, Leininger TD, Hamel PB, Wilson AD, Devall MS, et al. Biomass Accumulation in the Endangered Shrub Lindera melissifolia as Affected by Gradients of Light Availability and Soil Flooding. Forest Science. 2018.
  56. 56. Broennimann O, Fitzpatrick MC, Pearman PB, Petitpierre B, Pellissier L, Yoccoz NG, et al. Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 2011;21(4):481–97.