The first sentence of the third paragraph in the Discussion should have cited references 5, 14 and 25 instead of 4, 5 and 25.
The correct sentence should read: Results from mirco-CT showed that 1MFP1-2 was the most prevalent configuration in the current study (19.54%), which aligns with previous research [5, 14, 25].
There is an error in reference 15, 16, 17. The correct references are.
- 15. Ahmed HMA, Versiani MA, De-Deus G, Dummer PMH. A new system for classifying root and root canal morphology. International Endodontic Journal 2017. 50(8): p.761–770
- 16. Turner CI. Scoring produces for key morphological traits of the permanent dentition: The Arizona State University dental anthropology system. Adv Dent Anthropol. 1991:13–31.
- 17. Malaysia, D.O.S., Department of Statistics Malaysia, Press Release Current Population Estimates, Malaysia. 2020. Available from: https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/pdfPrev&id=OVByWjg5YkQ3MWFZRTN5bDJiaEVhZz09
Reference
- 1. Karobari MI, Ahmed HMA, Bin Khamis MF, Ibrahim N, Noorani TY. Comparative evaluation of root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars with deep radicular grooves using direct vision, dental operating microscope, 2D radiographic visualisation and micro-computed tomography. PLoS One. 2025;20(7):e0329439. pmid:40743213
Citation: Karobari MI, Ahmed HMA, Bin Khamis MF, Ibrahim N, Noorani TY (2026) Correction: Comparative evaluation of root canal morphology in mandibular first premolars with deep radicular grooves using direct vision, dental operating microscope, 2D radiographic visualisation and micro-computed tomography. PLoS One 21(5): e0349881. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349881
Published: May 26, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Karobari et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.