Figures
In the Abstract section, there is an error in two to fourth sentences. The correct sentences are: Twenty-five plastic samples collected near the Curonian Lagoon in Lithuania were analyzed for 32 elements using an inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS). Five common polymers (polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, polyethersulfone, and polyethylene terephthalate) were identified, with polyethylene exhibiting the highest elemental uptake, followed by polypropylene and polystyrene. Correlation analysis suggested relationships between elemental uptake and geochemical behavior, with alkali and alkaline earth elements potentially enhancing the uptake of intermediate ions.
In the Abstract section, there is an error in the sixth sentence. The correct sentence is: Despite their low mobility, Rare Earth Elements (REEs) were used to infer sources of pollution, and the aluminum to lanthanum ratio was proposed as a potential indicator of possible anthropogenic pollution from industrial, petroleum, and vehicle emissions.
In the Element concentrations overview subsection of the Results, there is an error in the fifth sentence of the third paragraph. The correct sentence is: Cd was highest in PES (104.8 ± 6.59 µg kg-1), while Sb was highest in PET (40.1 µg kg-1 from one sample) (Fig 2).
In the Element concentrations overview subsection of the Results, there is an error in the seventh sentence of the third paragraph. The correct sentence is: PP exhibited the highest mean concentrations of Gd (23.19 ± 4.77 µg kg-1), Y (76.92 ± 18.53 µg kg-1) and Sm and Eu from one sample (32.26 and 4.30 µg kg-1) (Fig 3).
In the Correlation analysis subsection of the Results, there is an error in the third sentence of the first paragraph. The correct sentence is: Correlations that lost significance after FDR correction (p < 0.05, q < 0.1) are highlighted in yellow in Fig 4.
In the Pollution sources and acknowledging uncertainties subsection of the Discussion, there is an error in the second sentence of the third paragraph. The correct sentence is: In our study (Fig 5), this ratio was greater than 0.003 for more than 40% of the samples, a value more closely related to an oil-related origin than a natural one.
Figs 1–5 were uploaded incorrectly. Please see the correct Figs 1–5 and caption here.
There is an error in the caption for Table 1. The word ‘except’ is spelled incorrectly. Please see the correct Table 1 here.
In Table 2, the compounds “HNO3 + HCL” are missing from the ‘Methods’ column in row 11. Please see the correct Table 2 here.
In the Extraction and Digestion subsection of the Materials and methods, there is an error in the first sentence. The correct sentence is: To extract exchangeable metals from the polymer surface and associated biofilm, we used the first step of a modified BCR sequential extraction protocol [34] with 0.11 M acetic acid.
In the Extraction and Digestion subsection of the Materials and methods, there is an error in the sixth sentence. The correct sentence is: Following shaking, the samples were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 min.
In the Instrumental Analysis subsection of the Materials and methods, there is an error in the second sentence. The correct sentence is: Elemental analysis, including Group 1 and 2, transition elements, and REEs, was performed using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometer (ICP-MS).
Significance levels: q < 0.01, dark green; q < 0.05, light green; q < 0.1, yellow; negative correlations, red.
Reference
Citation: Abbasi S, Hashemi N, Oleszczuk P, Sabaliauskaitė V, Dzingelevičius N, Balčiūnas A, et al. (2026) Correction: Geochemical signatures in plastic debris from the Curonian Lagoon, Lithuania. PLoS One 21(4): e0347572. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0347572
Published: April 17, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Abbasi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.