Figures
Abstract
Objective
The use of iodinated contrast media (ICM) in computed tomography (CT) has increased significantly; however, hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) remain a concern. This study aimed to investigate genetic factors associated with ICM-induced immediate HSRs using whole exome sequencing (WES).
Materials and Methods
We conducted a case–control study including 20 patients with ICM-induced immediate HSRs and 11 controls who had received ICM at least three times without HSRs. WES was performed with DNA extracted from saliva samples. Analyses included single-nucleotide variant (SNV) association testing using the Cochran–Armitage trend test with false discovery rate (FDR) correction, gene-wise variant burden (GVB) analysis, and copy number variation (CNV) detection using complementary algorithms.
Results
A variant in FAST kinase domain 1 (FASTKD1, rs12618227) was significantly more prevalent in the control group compared with the case group (72.7% vs. 5.0%, FDR p < 0.10), suggesting a protective role. GVB analysis revealed lower scores for FASTKD1 and 2-hydroxyacyl-CoA lyase 1 (HACL1) in the control group (nominal p < 0.001). CNV analysis identified a significant Signal Regulatory Protein Beta 1 (SIRPB1) deletion in the case group (5/20, 25.0%). In contrast, CNVs in Mucin 12, cell surface associated (MUC12) were observed in both groups. Immune cell expression data showed high expression of FASTKD1, HACL1, and SIRPB1 in granulocytes, particularly basophils.
Conclusion
FASTKD1 and HACL1, which are involved in mitochondrial and metabolic regulation, and SIRPB1, which participates in innate immune signaling, were identified as candidate genes potentially associated with ICM-induced immediate HSRs. These suggest a possible contribution of both metabolic and immune regulatory pathways to genetic susceptibility and require validation in larger, independent cohorts before clinical application.
Citation: Kang N, Kwon H, Seo M-E, Min B-J, Lee B-J, Kim JH, et al. (2026) Genetic variations associated with immediate hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media: A whole exome sequencing study. PLoS One 21(3): e0345313. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345313
Editor: Mohammed Misbah Ul Haq, Deccan School of Pharmacy, INDIA
Received: November 9, 2025; Accepted: March 4, 2026; Published: March 26, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Kang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Data cannot be shared publicly because of data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information. Data are available upon request to Samsung Medical Center Institutional Data Access / Ethics Committee(dm.cha@samsung.com) or corresponding author for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.
Funding: This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (grant number 2023R1A2C3007686 to J.H.K.) and the Future Medicine 20*30 Project of the Samsung Medical Center (grant number SMO1240791 to H.Y.L.). There was no additional external funding received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Iodinated contrast media (ICM) are used with computed tomography (CT) to improve diagnostic accuracy in evaluating diseases and assessing treatment responses. More than 75 million CT scans using ICM are performed globally each year [1]. Although non-ionic ICMs have largely replaced monomeric ionic ICM due to fewer adverse reactions, hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to ICM persist, and the incidence of life-threatening events remains similar between the two types [2].
Immediate HSRs occur within one hour of ICM administration and range from mild cutaneous symptoms to life-threatening anaphylaxis [3]. Although rare, with a pooled incidence of 0.01%, severe immediate HSRs are clinically significant. ICM is among the most commonly reported causes of in-hospital drug-induced anaphylaxis [3–8]. Mechanistically, immediate HSRs can arise through immune-mediated (including IgE-mediated) and non–IgE-mediated pathways, involving activation of mast cells/basophils and mediator release, with proposed roles for pathways such as complement activation [9].
Recent studies have implicated genetic factors in ICM-induced HSRs. For instance, HLA-DRB1*15:02 has been associated with ICM-induced anaphylaxis in Korean populations [10], and HLA-B*38:02 and HLA-B*58:01 alleles have shown associations in other ICM-induced immediate HSRs [11]. These findings raise the possibility that ICM-induced HSRs may involve immune-mediated mechanisms. In particular, it has been proposed that certain HLA variants may enhance antigen presentation to T cells, potentially promoting T-cell–dependent B-cell class switching and the production of ICM-specific IgE [12]. However, the underlying mechanisms remain largely unknown, and while HLA associations provide critical clues, they may not fully account for the diverse spectrum of ICM-HSRs.
Whole exome sequencing (WES) enables comprehensive interrogation of protein-coding regions and is possibly an effective approach for identifying both common and rare variants associated with drug response and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) within pharmacogenomics research [13]. In this study, we performed WES to identify genetic variations potentially contributing to ICM-induced immediate HSRs, evaluating candidate single-nucleotide variant (SNV) and gene-level aggregation of variants, and additionally assessing copy number variable regions to provide a comprehensive genetic landscape.
Materials and methods
Study participants and data collection
Adult patients (≥18 years) who experienced immediate HSRs after ICM administration between September 2006 and July 2018, were recruited as the case group. Immediate HSRs were defined as a reaction occurring within one hour of ICM exposure. The control group included individuals who had received ICM at least three times without experiencing immediate HSRs. Adverse events such as nausea or chills were not classified as HSRs. A total of 31 patients were enrolled: 20 with ICM-induced immediate HSRs and 11 controls. All participants provided written informed consent, and this study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Samsung Medical Center (IRB No. 2016-03-105). Data and biospecimens were accessed for research purposes between May 4, 2016, and March 3, 2021, in accordance with IRB approval. All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.
Clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records, including age, sex, comorbidities, type of ICM used, symptoms/signs of HSRs, severity of reactions, number of previous ICM exposures, and history of anaphylaxis. Symptoms were categorized as cutaneous (erythema, urticaria, angioedema, pruritus), respiratory (dyspnea, stridor, wheezing), gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain), cardiovascular (chest tightness, diaphoresis, dizziness), and neurological (syncope). The severity of HSRs was classified according to the American College of Radiology guidelines for contrast media [14].
ICM-induced immediate HSRs and premedication for HSR
Six non-ionic monomeric low-osmolar ICMs were administered intravenously for CT during the study period: iobitridol (Xenetics; Guerbet), iohexol (Omnipaque; GE Healthcare), iomeprol (Iomeron; Bracco), iopamidol (Pamiray; Dongkook Pharm. Co., Ltd.), iopromide (Ultravist; Bayer Healthcare), and ioversol (Optiray; Mallinckrodt PLC). The specific brand used varied by year, based on annual competitive bidding.
Premedication regimens were automatically recommended through the hospital order communication system when physicians ordered contrast-enhanced CT for patients with a prior history of ICM-induced immediate HSRs. Patients received intravenous chlorpheniramine and hydrocortisone 30 minutes before ICM administration. The steroid dose was adjusted at the discretion of the attending physician, based on the severity of the previous reaction.
Genomic DNA extraction and library preparation for whole exome sequencing
Genomic DNA was extracted from saliva samples collected using Oragene DNA kits (DNA Genotek Inc.), and purified using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA concentrations were quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Exome libraries were prepared from 100 ng of genomic DNA using the Ion AmpliSeq Library Kit Plus and Ion AmpliSeq Exome RDY Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Barcoded libraries were generated using the Ion Xpress Barcode Adapter Kit and purified twice with AMPure XP Reagent (Beckman Coulter). Library quality was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies) and diluted to 100 pM. Libraries were loaded onto an Ion Chef instrument for templating using the Ion 540 Kit-Chef (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sequencing was performed using the Ion S5XL system (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
Germline variant calling and preprocessing
Sequencing reads were aligned to the GRCh37 human reference genome using the Torrent Mapping Alignment Program (TMAP, Torrent Suite Software v5.10.0). Binary alignment map (BAM) files were generated for each sample. Germline variants were identified using the Torrent Variant Caller (TVC) with parameters recommended by Thermo Fisher Scientific (S1 Table). Variants were annotated using Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor [15]. Only autosomal variants present in the 1000 Genomes Project [16] or Genome Aggregation Database [17] were included in downstream analyses.
Single-nucleotide variant analysis
Non-synonymous variants were selected, resulting in 8,664 variants for SNV analysis (Fig 1). Associations between genotypes and phenotypes were evaluated using the Cochran–Armitage trend test (CATT). A false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected p-value < 0.1 was considered significant. Statistically significant variants were manually reviewed in raw sequence data to exclude false positives.
Three independent analyses were conducted. SNV, single-nucleotide variant; GVB, gene-wise variant burden; CNV, copy number variation; CNVR, copy number variation region; FDR, false discovery rate.
Gene-wise variant burden analysis
To assess gene-level aggregation of variants, gene-wise variant burden (GVB) scores were calculated for 10,756 genes (Fig 1) [18]. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare GVB scores between groups. Genes with nominal p-values < 0.001 were considered statistically significant. Variants in significant genes were manually reviewed, and genes containing false positives were excluded.
Detection and analysis for copy number variations
CNVs were detected using GATK-gCNV and cn.MOPS, as the combination of multiple tools improves CNV detection [19,20]. Overlapping CNVs (duplication or deletion) from the two tools were identified per patient using the R package GenomicRanges, and CNV regions (CNVRs) were defined using the R package CNTools (S1 Fig). A total of 39 CNVRs were included in downstream analyses. CATT was performed for CNVRs, with a significance threshold of p < 0.01 (Fig 2).
(A) FASTKD1 and (B) HACL1 showed statistically significantly lower GVB in the control group than in the case group (Wilcoxon rank sum test).
Analyses of public data
To assess gene expression in immune cells, transcriptomics data across 18 immune cell types and total PBMCs were obtained from the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) version 23.0 [21]. Cell specificity and expression clusters were also extracted. Conserved regions and protein domains of candidate genes were examined using the UCSC Genome Browser. Correlations between CNVs and gene expression were analyzed using Spearman correlation, based on RNA and CNV data from the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) [22].
Statistical analysis
Categorical variables are expressed as numbers (%), and continuous variables as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR). Comparisons were made using Pearson’s chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables. All analyses were conducted using R version 4.1.2.
Results
Baseline characteristics of study populations
The clinical characteristics of the study participants are summarized in Table 1. The case group included a higher proportion of female patients than the control group (50% vs 9%, p = 0.047). Malignancy was the most common comorbidity in both groups, whereas cardiovascular disease was more prevalent in the control group; however, the difference was not statistically significant.
Cutaneous symptoms were the most common manifestations of ICM-induced immediate HSRs. Severe reactions accompanied by hypoxia, hypotension, or neurologic compromise were observed in 20% of the case group. These patients received antihistamines and intravenous corticosteroids prior to subsequent ICM administration. The number of prior ICM exposures did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.219). However, more than half of the patients in the case group had a history of ICM-induced immediate HSRs (p = 0.001). The types of ICM administered are listed in S2 Table.
Genetic variations associated with ICM-induced immediate HSRs
The mean sequencing depth did not differ significantly between the case and control groups (S2 Fig). In the SNV analysis, the FAST kinase domain 1 (FASTKD1) gene variant rs12618227 was identified with an FDR-corrected p < 0.100 (Table 2). In GVB analysis, FASTKD1 and 2-hydroxyacyl-CoA lyase 1 (HACL1) showed significantly lower scores in the control group (nominal p < 0.001) (Fig 2). Notably, the rs12618227 variant in FASTKD1, one of the two FASTKD1 variants included in the GVB analysis, was also significant in the SNV analysis (S3 Table).
CNV analysis revealed five CNVRs in Mucin 12, cell surface associated (MUC12) and one CNVR in Signal Regulatory Protein Beta 1 (SIRPB1) (S4 Table). A weak but statistically significant correlation was observed between gene copy number and expression levels for these genes in the CCLE database (ρ = 0.16, p < 0.001) (S3 Fig).
Patient profiles showing significant genetic variations and clinical features of ICM-induced immediate HSRs are presented in Fig 3. The alternative alleles of FASTKD1 rs12618227 and HACL1 rs905650 were also observed in the control group. Although the CNVR deletion in SIRPB1 was found exclusively in the case group, CNV event in MUC12 were found in both groups. All significant genetic variations, except for those in MUC12, were located in protein-coding or highly conserved regions, as assessed using the UCSC genome browsers (S4 Fig).
Heterozygotes or homozygotes of FASTKD1 and HACL1 variants were mostly distributed in the control group. The deletion of SIRPB1 occurred only in the case group, whereas MUC12 deletion was observed in both groups. 0, 1, 2 in FASTKD1 and HALC1 refer to wild-type, heterozygotes, and homozygotes, respectively.
Expression of cell types in HPA
The immune cell expression profiles of the four genes from the three analyses are shown in Fig 4. Expression of levels of granulocytes was very high in FASTKD1, HACL1, and SIRPB1. FASTKD1 and HACL1 showed the highest expression levels in basophils. However, MUC12 was not expressed in any immune cell (nTPM = 0). At the single-cell level in liver, SIRPB1 was highly expressed in monocytes, Kupffer cells, and other cells of the mononuclear phagocytic system (S5 Fig).
(A) FASTKD1 and (B) HACL1 were most expressed in the basophils. (C) SIRPB1 exhibited the highest expression level in the neutrophil. (D) MUC12 was not expressed in all immune cells (nTPM = 0).
Discussion
This study identified genomic variations potentially associated with ICM-induced immediate HSRs. To our knowledge, this is the first WES-based study on ICM-induced immediate HSRs. Previous genomic studies related to adverse reactions to contrast agents have been limited primarily to HLA genotyping. WES offers a powerful approach to detect rare coding variants and heritable factors that may be missed by genome-wide association studies focusing on common variants. It has been successfully applied to elucidate the genetic basis of complex diseases.
FASTKD1 variant (rs12618227) in ICM-induced immediate HSRs was a significant finding of this study. The variant is most prevalent in East Asians but also occurs in other populations, including Europeans, South Asians, and Americans, with an allele frequency >1% (S3 Table). FASTKD1 is a mitochondrial protein that downregulates NADH dehydrogenase 3 (ND3) mRNA, a subunit of mitochondrial respiratory complex I [23]. As a result, FASTKD1 can reduce the activity of the mitochondrial electron transport chain [24]. Mitochondrial damage is typically considered an “off-target” effect of a drug and mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated in drug-induced toxicities [25], and anaphylaxis is known to cause rapid mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage in cardiac tissue [26]. Although the sample size was small and clinical confounders were not fully accounted due to the limitations of the available medical records, we observed that the frequency of rs12618227 in FASTKD1 was approximately 14.5 times higher in the control group than in the case group. This suggests a possible protective role in ICM-induced hypersensitivity reactions (S3 Table). Similarly, FASTKD1 showed low GVB scores in the control group (Fig 2A). The GVB score was obtained by integrating relatively conserved variants (SIFT ≤ 0.7) [18]. Therefore, genes with low GVB scores were likely to be functional. The fact that it was low in the control group suggests that the gene may have tolerance functions in HSRs. We acknowledge that this finding should be interpreted with caution. Given the sample size and lack of detailed phenotype stratification, our results are exploratory in nature and require validation in larger, clinically well-characterized cohorts.
Similar to FASTKD1, HACL1 also showed low GVB scores in the control group (Fig 2B). HACL1 is involved in peroxisomal fatty acid α-oxidation and arachidonic acid metabolism [27]. In mammals, peroxisomes play an indispensable role in modulating diverse physiological and pathological processes, including inflammation, innate immunity, and cell fate transitions, by serving as signaling platforms and participating in the metabolism of reactive oxygen and reactive nitrogen species [28]. It has become increasingly clear that defects in peroxisome biogenesis [29], peroxisomal fatty acid metabolism [30], or peroxisomal antioxidant capacity [31] negatively impact mitochondrial function. Thus, HACL1 may contribute to immune responses and mitochondrial stability, both of which are relevant in the context of ICM-induced HSRs.
One significant CNVR was identified in SIRPB1 gene (S4 Table). CNVR includes immunoglobulin domains and SIRPB1 is associated with the innate immune system, which plays a role in promoting phagocytosis by macrophages and facilitating the migration of neutrophils to regulate the inflammatory response [9,32]. SIRPB1 is also involved in secretory granule exocytosis (Reactome pathway R-HSA-6804801) [33]. Although MUC12 was statistically significant in the CNV analysis, it appeared to have limited functional relevance and evolutionary conservation (S4 Fig).
Data from the HPA indicated that FASTKD1 and HACL1 are highly expressed in basophils, while SIRPB1 is enriched in neutrophils (Fig 4). Basophils and mast cells play central roles in immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated immediate drug hypersensitivity reactions through high-affinity IgE receptors (FcεRI) activation, which leads to the release of histamine and tryptase [34]. A recent study showed that ICM increase the degranulation of mast cells and basophils, resulting in the release of inflammatory mediators [9,35,36].
It is also noteworthy that SIRPB1 has enhanced expression levels in neutrophils. Drug-specific IgG complexes can activate neutrophils ex vivo and increase the number of circulating activated neutrophils in patients with anaphylaxis, potentially triggering anaphylactic symptoms through the rapid release of potent lipid and protein mediators and the expulsion of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) via NETosis, which involves the expulsion of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA [37,38]. Moreover, according to HPA, SIRPB1 shows “group enriched” single cell specificity in monocytes, Kupffer cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and Hofbauer cells. These cells are included in the human mononuclear phagocytic system (MPS), a critical regulator of innate and adaptive immune responses [39]. In HPA liver single-cell dataset, SIRPB1 shows its highest expression in Kupffer cells (S5 Fig). Kupffer cells in the liver recognize particulate drug carriers delivered intravenously as foreign agents within the MPS, resulting in their rapid clearance from the circulation [40]. However, drug delivery systems targeting the MPS render important host defense systems susceptible to toxic effects owing to the accumulation of drug [41]. Kupffer cells, in particular, are involved in the clearance of intravenously administered substances, including ICM [42]. Additionally, ICM can impair granulocyte and monocyte phagocytosis, potentially contributing to HSRs [43].
SIRPB1 may also be relevant in IgG-mediated anaphylaxis, which has been demonstrated in murine models and involves FcγRIII-mediated activation of neutrophils, macrophages, and basophils, resulting in the release of platelet-activating factor and NETs [44]. Given the high expression of FASTKD1, HACL1, and SIRPB1 in these immune cells, the findings may have broader implications for both IgE- and IgG-mediated mechanisms of ICM-induced anaphylaxis.
Of note, this study used saliva-derived DNA for WES, which demonstrated comparable quality to blood-derived DNA for germline variant analysis [45], thereby providing a non-invasive and practical alternative to blood collection. Nonetheless, future validation studies incorporating blood samples and cytokine profiling are warranted to further elucidate the mechanisms of ICM-induced HSRs.
This study has several limitations. First, the limited sample size may have constrained the statistical power for novel gene discovery. Second, liver disease was more prevalent among cases than controls, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.241). While hepatic dysfunction could theoretically influence the metabolism and clearance of iodinated contrast media, potentially modifying susceptibility to adverse reactions, this hypothesis requires further investigation. Future studies in larger, independent cohorts are warranted to more rigorously account for liver disease status and its severity. Third, different ICM types were used between groups due to changes in hospital formularies. However, a recent meta-analysis reported no significant differences in acute reaction rates among nonionic ICMs after adjusting for confounders [46]. Lastly, confirmatory laboratory tests such as serum tryptase or skin testing were not available at the study period.
Conclusions
This study identified FASTKD1, HACL1, and SIRPB1 as candidate genes potentially involved in ICM-induced immediate HSRs. These findings may contribute to future efforts in biomarker discovery and the development of precision medicine approaches in radiologic practice. Larger prospective studies are warranted to validate and expand upon these results.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Intersection and split of CNVs.
(A) Intersection of copy number variations derived from multiple callers per patient. (B) Splitting intersection CNVs into CNVRs between patients. CNV copy number variations, CNVR copy number variations regions.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345313.s001
(PNG)
S2 Fig. Mean depth for sequencing reads in two groups.
Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed on the read depth between two groups (p = 0.451).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345313.s002
(JPG)
S3 Fig. Correlation between RNA expression and copy number of genes in CCLE.
(A) MUC12 and (B) SIRPB1 showed significant correlation in their copy number and expression.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345313.s003
(PNG)
S4 Fig. Significant genetic variations in UCSC genome browser.
Red vertical lines indicate significant genetic variations. (A) rs775593326 in FASTKD1. (B) rs12618227 in FASTKD1. (C) rs761709264 and rs905650 in HACL1. (D) CNVR in SIRPB1. (E) CNVRs in MUC12.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345313.s004
(PNG)
S5 Fig. Single-cell type expression of SIRPB1 in liver from HPA.
UMAP projection of liver cells grouped into clusters (c-0–19) annotated by representative cell types.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345313.s005
(PNG)
S1 Table. Parameters for germline variant calling in TVC.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345313.s006
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Variants and genes in SNV or GVB analysis.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345313.s008
(DOCX)
References
- 1. Christiansen C. Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media: An Update. Drug Hypersensitivity. KARGER. 2007. 233–41.
- 2. Li X, Liu H, Zhao L, Liu J, Cai L, Liu L, et al. Clinical observation of adverse drug reactions to non-ionic iodinated contrast media in population with underlying diseases and risk factors. Br J Radiol. 2017;90(1070):20160729. pmid:27928926
- 3. An J, Jung H, Kwon OY, Kang Y, Lee J-H, Won H-K, et al. Differences in Adverse Reactions Among Iodinated Contrast Media: Analysis of the KAERS Database. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(7):2205–11. pmid:30877072
- 4. Lin X, Yang J, Weng L, Lin W. Differences in Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media: Analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023;11(5):1494-1502.e6. pmid:36736956
- 5. Park H-K, Kang M-G, Yang M-S, Jung J-W, Cho S-H, Kang H-R. Epidemiology of drug-induced anaphylaxis in a tertiary hospital in Korea. Allergol Int. 2017;66(4):557–62. pmid:28291680
- 6. Sodagari F, Mozaffary A, Wood CG 3rd, Schmitz B, Miller FH, Yaghmai V. Reactions to Both Nonionic Iodinated and Gadolinium-Based Contrast Media: Incidence and Clinical Characteristics. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210(4):715–9. pmid:29412016
- 7. Wysowski DK, Nourjah P. Deaths attributed to X-ray contrast media on U.S. death certificates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(3):613–5. pmid:16498085
- 8. Yu RJ, Krantz MS, Phillips EJ, Stone CA Jr. Emerging Causes of Drug-Induced Anaphylaxis: A Review of Anaphylaxis-Associated Reports in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(2):819-829.e2. pmid:32992044
- 9. Chiu T-M, Chu S-Y. Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media. Biomedicines. 2022;10(5):1036. pmid:35625773
- 10. Chung SJ, Kang DY, Lee W, Lee SB, Kim S, Lee SE, et al. HLA-DRB1*15: 02 is associated with iodinated contrast media-related anaphylaxis. Investigative Radiology. 2020;55:304–9. pmid:31985601
- 11. Kim EY, Choi SJ, Ghim JL, Kim MY, Seol JE, Oh M. Associations between HLA-A, -B, and -C alleles and iodinated contrast media-induced hypersensitivity in Koreans. Transl Clin Pharmacol. 2021;29:107–16. pmid:34235123
- 12. Ruiz-Pablos M, Paiva B, Zabaleta A. The origin of autoimmune diseases: is there a role for ancestral HLA-II haplotypes in immune hyperactivity. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1710571. pmid:41425584
- 13. McInnes G, Lavertu A, Sangkuhl K, Klein TE, Whirl-Carrillo M, Altman RB. Pharmacogenetics at Scale: An Analysis of the UK Biobank. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021;109:1528–37. pmid:33237584
- 14. Brown SGA. Clinical features and severity grading of anaphylaxis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114(2):371–6. pmid:15316518
- 15. McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, Riat HS, Ritchie GR, Thormann A, et al. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 2016;17:122. pmid:27268795
- 16. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Auton A, Brooks LD, Durbin RM, Garrison EP, Kang HM, et al. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. 2015;526(7571):68–74. pmid:26432245
- 17. Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, Tiao G, Cummings BB, Alföldi J, Wang Q, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581(7809):434–43. pmid:32461654
- 18. Park Y, Seo H, Y Ryu B, Kim JH. Gene-wise variant burden and genomic characterization of nearly every gene. Pharmacogenomics. 2020;21(12):827–40. pmid:32700635
- 19. Gabrielaite M, Torp MH, Rasmussen MS, Andreu-Sánchez S, Vieira FG, Pedersen CB, et al. A Comparison of Tools for Copy-Number Variation Detection in Germline Whole Exome and Whole Genome Sequencing Data. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(24):6283. pmid:34944901
- 20. Gordeeva V, Sharova E, Babalyan K, Sultanov R, Govorun VM, Arapidi G. Benchmarking germline CNV calling tools from exome sequencing data. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):14416. pmid:34257369
- 21. Uhlén M, Fagerberg L, Hallström BM, Lindskog C, Oksvold P, Mardinoglu A, et al. Proteomics. Tissue-based map of the human proteome. Science. 2015;347(6220):1260419. pmid:25613900
- 22. Barretina J, Caponigro G, Stransky N, Venkatesan K, Margolin AA, Kim S, et al. The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modelling of anticancer drug sensitivity. Nature. 2012;483(7391):603–7. pmid:22460905
- 23. Jourdain AA, Popow J, de la Fuente MA, Martinou J-C, Anderson P, Simarro M. The FASTK family of proteins: emerging regulators of mitochondrial RNA biology. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(19):10941–7. pmid:29036396
- 24. Han S, Udeshi ND, Deerinck TJ, Svinkina T, Ellisman MH, Carr SA, et al. Proximity Biotinylation as a Method for Mapping Proteins Associated with mtDNA in Living Cells. Cell Chem Biol. 2017;24(3):404–14. pmid:28238724
- 25. Rodríguez-Hernández MA, de la Cruz-Ojeda P, López-Grueso MJ, Navarro-Villarán E, Requejo-Aguilar R, Castejón-Vega B, et al. Integrated molecular signaling involving mitochondrial dysfunction and alteration of cell metabolism induced by tyrosine kinase inhibitors in cancer. Redox Biol. 2020;36:101510. pmid:32593127
- 26. Oulehri W, Collange O, Tacquard C, Bellou A, Graff J, Charles A-L, et al. Impaired Myocardial Mitochondrial Function in an Experimental Model of Anaphylactic Shock. Biology (Basel). 2022;11(5):730. pmid:35625458
- 27. Khalil Y, Carrino S, Lin F, Ferlin A, Lad HV, Mazzacuva F, et al. Tissue Proteome of 2-Hydroxyacyl-CoA Lyase Deficient Mice Reveals Peroxisome Proliferation and Activation of ω-Oxidation. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(2):987. pmid:35055171
- 28.
Fransen M, Lismont C, Walton P. The Peroxisome-Mitochondria Connection: How and Why? Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18061126 28538669
- 29. Salpietro V, Phadke R, Saggar A, Hargreaves IP, Yates R, Fokoloros C, et al. Zellweger syndrome and secondary mitochondrial myopathy. Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174(4):557–63. pmid:25287621
- 30. Fourcade S, Ferrer I, Pujol A. Oxidative stress, mitochondrial and proteostasis malfunction in adrenoleukodystrophy: A paradigm for axonal degeneration. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015;88(Pt A):18–29. pmid:26073123
- 31. Góth L, Nagy T. Inherited catalase deficiency: is it benign or a factor in various age related disorders?. Mutat Res. 2013;753(2):147–54. pmid:24025477
- 32. Barclay AN, Brown MH. The SIRP family of receptors and immune regulation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(6):457–64. pmid:16691243
- 33. Wu G, Haw R. Functional Interaction Network Construction and Analysis for Disease Discovery. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1558:235–53. pmid:28150241
- 34. Rodríguez-Pérez R, de Las Vecillas L, Cabañas R, Bellón T. Tools for Etiologic Diagnosis of Drug-Induced Allergic Conditions. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(16):12577. pmid:37628756
- 35. Böhm I, Speck U, Schild HH. Pilot study on basophil activation induced by contrast medium. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2011;25(2):267–76. pmid:20412314
- 36. Zou W, Yang S, Chen L, Hu S, Hao G, Hu C. Iodixanol activation of mast cells: Implications in the pathogenesis of iodixanol-induced delayed cutaneous adverse reactions. Toxicology. 2022;465:153034. pmid:34774977
- 37. Gallizzi AA, Heinken A, Guéant-Rodriguez R-M, Guéant J-L, Safar R. A systematic review and meta-analysis of proteomic and metabolomic alterations in anaphylaxis reactions. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1328212. pmid:38384462
- 38. Jönsson F, de Chaisemartin L, Granger V, Gouel-Chéron A, Gillis CM, Zhu Q, et al. An IgG-induced neutrophil activation pathway contributes to human drug-induced anaphylaxis. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(500):eaat1479. pmid:31292264
- 39. Miah M, Goh I, Haniffa M. Prenatal development and function of human mononuclear phagocytes. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:649937. pmid:33898444
- 40. Tsoi KM, MacParland SA, Ma XZ, Spetzler VN, Echeverri J, Ouyang B, et al. Mechanism of hard-nanomaterial clearance by the liver. Nat Mater. 2016; 15: 1212–21. pmid:27525571
- 41. Zelepukin IV, Shevchenko KG, Deyev SM. Rediscovery of mononuclear phagocyte system blockade for nanoparticle drug delivery. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):4366. pmid:38777821
- 42. Yanagisawa K, Moriyasu F, Miyahara T, Yuki M, Iijima H. Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;33(2):318–25. pmid:17207907
- 43. Khalili K, Atri M, Kim TK, Jang H-J. Recognizing the Role of the Reticuloendothelial System in the Late Phase of US Contrast Agents. Radiology. 2021;298(2):287–91. pmid:33290174
- 44. Montanez MI, Mayorga C, Bogas G, Barrionuevo E, Fernandez-Santamaria R, Martin-Serrano A. Epidemiology, mechanisms, and diagnosis of drug-induced anaphylaxis. Frontiers in Immunology. 2017;8:614. pmid:28611774
- 45. Ibrahim O, Sutherland HG, Haupt LM, Griffiths LR. Saliva as a comparable-quality source of DNA for Whole Exome Sequencing on Ion platforms. Genomics. 2020;112(2):1437–43. pmid:31445087
- 46. Suh YJ, Yoon SH, Hong H, Hahn S, Kang D-Y, Kang H-R, et al. Acute Adverse Reactions to Nonionic Iodinated Contrast Media: A Meta-Analysis. Invest Radiol. 2019;54(9):589–99. pmid:30998567