https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2043-8785
Figures
Abstract
Successful transition from endogenous yolk utilization to exogenous feeding is critical for survival in fish larvae, yet the changes in the brain during this transition remain incompletely described. In this study, whole-brain RNA sequencing was used to investigate transcriptomic changes over 48 h during endogenous yolk utilization (720 day degrees (dd)) and after the onset of exogenous feeding (920 dd) in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), focusing on appetite-related genes. Key components of appetite control, including melanocortin system and nutrient-sensing pathway, were present at 720 dd and elevated levels were observed at 920 dd. Before onset of first feeding, 16 appetite-related genes displayed a significant cyclic profile, where most had a periodicity of 20 h or 28 h. Following the transition from endogenous to exogenous feeding, the majority of significantly cyclic appetite-related genes exhibited a periodicity of 24 h, suggesting the establishment of circadian regulation associated with energy homeostasis. These results indicate that a pre-programmed expression of appetite and energy-related genes occurs in the brain before the yolk is fully utilized. Two weeks into the first feeding period (920 dd), the whole-brain transcriptome showed better responsiveness to feeding, but a fully developed satiety system remained underdeveloped. Additionally, characterization of hypothalamic melanocortin neuropeptides distribution during early salmon development revealed a spatial organization distinct from that reported in later life stages.
Citation: Norland S, Eilertsen M, Gomes AS, Dolan DWP, Karlsen R, Rønnestad I, et al. (2026) Emergence of appetite and circadian rhythmicity in Atlantic salmon brain transcriptome from endogenous to exogenous feeding. PLoS One 21(3): e0344769. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344769
Editor: Tzong-Yueh Chen, National Cheng Kung University, TAIWAN
Received: June 30, 2025; Accepted: February 25, 2026; Published: March 18, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Norland et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The data presented in this publication have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under accession number PRJEB74272. Accessible via https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB74272. All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This study was funded by the Research Council of Norway (projects LeuSense–267626; ExcelAQUA-2.0—309368; NoFood2Waste–317770; Photobiol–254894; and Lightbiotrans–315106) and the Regional Research Fund West (Greenbag–259183). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
During the development of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), the energy needed for growth and metabolism derives from the catabolism of nutrients deposited in the endogenous yolk sac until it commences exogenous feeding [1,2]. In this period, the Atlantic salmon embryo and alevin can be viewed as an energetically closed system wherein the yolk fully supports the development of the fish, and no external energy is provided. Throughout larval ontogeny, many biological processes related to development are significantly influenced, leading to considerable physiological and morphological changes [3–7]. Once the yolk is nearly fully absorbed, the fish depends on acquiring exogenous resources to maintain metabolism, development, and growth. Furthermore, the transition from endogenous nutrient utilization to exogenous feeding is a critical and irreversible event. This transition needs the development of morphological features such as mouth opening, mouth gape size, fish size, and food-seeking swimming capacity and behavior, all of which contribute to hunting success. Additionally, it requires physiological and functional changes to detect, capture, ingest, digest, and assimilate food particles [8–10].
Transcriptomic studies analyzing differential gene expression have been vital for understanding the dynamic changes of the whole organism during the transition from endogenous to exogenous feeding. In recent years, a growing number of studies investigating this transition have emerged using RNA sequencing, including studies on Atlantic haddock [7], Atlantic salmon [11,12], bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) [6], Clearhead icefish (Protosalanx chinensis) [13], common sole (Solea solea) [14], estuarine tapertail anchovies (Coilia nasus) [15], giant grouper (Epinephelus lanceolatus) [16], longfin yellowtail (Seriola rivoliana) [5], Mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi) [17], and zebrafish (Danio rerio) [4,18,19]. These studies have provided unique insights into the developmental processes of the whole organism, including aerobic metabolism and ATP generation, light perception, nutrient digestion, absorption, and metabolism.
The metabolic regulation, and subsequently the energy used for cell proliferation, differentiation, and growth, depends on different intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Indeed, nutrient availability and nutrient-sensing ability allow an organism to respond to its metabolic state [20]. As a fish undergoes a substantial nutrient source change from endogenous to exogenous feeding, there is a need for a network that regulates overall energy utilization and metabolism. The hypothalamic region of the fish brain is a neuroendocrine control center that receives and integrates signals from the body, playing a critical role in energy homeostasis and the regulation of food intake [20–24]. In vertebrates, the hypothalamus contains two major neuronal entry points, which are interoceptive neurons, linking energy deficits with the decision to seek and consume food [20]. When these neurons and circuits are stimulated, food intake is either stimulated (orexigenic) or inhibited (anorexigenic). While the hypothalamus is a widely recognized region as a key region for appetite control, other brain regions also contribute to the control of feeding and energy homeostasis [25–29]. Many of the molecular and neuroendocrine factors involved in appetite control and food intake described in mammals have also been identified in fish, indicating an evolutionary conservation of these mechanisms (reviewed by [22–24,30,31]. These include nutrient sensors and genes in the downstream signaling pathways for the melanocortin system, the best-characterized system in the homeostatic model for regulating the energy balance. Specifically, these systems consist of agrp, npy, cart, and pomc neuropeptides and melanocortin receptors, and transcription factors related to the melanocortin system in fish, as well as genes related to reward-based appetite (wanting or liking driven hunger) [30,32–34].
The mechanisms that drives the adaptation of hypothalamic neuronal precursors to anorexigenic and orexigenic neurons is not fully understood. During the first feeding period of marine fish larvae, reports have shown that larvae continue to ingest food, although their gut is full [8,35]. This indicates that the fish are constantly hungry and motivated to ingest food, that they lack a fully developed anorexigenic feedback system, or that the two are combined when the exogenous feeding begins [23]. However, there are limited studies on energy homeostasis and appetite control in fish larvae.
Recently, the onset of circadian rhythmicity in the brain of Atlantic salmon was linked to the developmental transition from endogenous to exogenous feeding, marked by molecular clock genes beginning to cycle with a periodicity of 24 h [12]. A persistent circadian rhythmicity in the brain suggests a synchronization to the light-dark cycles, enabling the feeding fry to search and capture feed [12], and the circadian signals affect the production and release of factors regulating feed intake in fish [30]. However, there is a knowledge gap in the establishment of circadian rhythm linked to the dynamics of appetite-related factors in the first feeding salmon brain. In this study, we have utilized the already published transcriptomic data from Eilertsen et al., [12], and the two circadian sampling series at endogenous and exogenous feeding have been interpreted in the context of appetite control. The study specifically focused on genes involved in the melanocortin system and other important appetite-controlling factors in the brain, revealing circadian rhythmicity in several of them in feeding fry. The melanocortin system was selected for focused analysis due to its conserved role in integrating energy status and feeding behavior across vertebrates. Core neuropeptides in this pathway (agrp, npy, cart and pomc) form a central component of the homeostatic feeding network, in both Atlantic salmon fry [36] and older stages [37–42], and their spatial hypothalamic expression has recently been confirmed [43].
Results
Transcriptional changes between endogenous and exogenous feeding for genes related to appetite and metabolism
The transcriptional profile from normalized data displayed a clear separation between stages, as summarized in Fig 1A. The heatmap shows the expression patterns for all genes identified in the normalized count file for 720 dd and 920 dd. As illustrated by the Venn diagram (Fig 1B), 357 appetite-related genes (Ensembl IDs) were present across all three normalized count files (720 dd, 920 dd, and merged 720 dd and 920 dd), while 90 were absent in any dataset (the complete list of appetite-related genes is provided in S2 Table). Additionally, 15 genes were found to be present in one or two of the three normalized count files (see S2 Table details). Genes associated with appetite and metabolism were categorized by functional class or gene family. Overall, genes that had a higher expression before first feeding (720 dd) compared to after feeding (920 dd) were grouped into calcitonin-related, neuromedins, second-order neuron receptors, adipose-related, hormone receptors (cholecystokinin receptors, leptin receptors), and signaling proteins of cellular metabolism and signaling (transcription factors ampk, akt, creb, mTOR) (Fig 1C). Genes that were higher expressed after the onset of exogenous feeding (920 dd) were grouped in appetite-regulating neuropeptides (npy, cart, pomc), melanocortin receptors, nutrient sensing (e.g., lxr, glut2, glucokinase, cd36), corticotropin-releasing hormone system (including corticotropin-releasing hormone/factor, corticotropin-releasing hormone binding protein, urotensin), second-order neurons (e.g., orexin/hypocretin, galanin, serotonin, somatostatin), thyroid hormone system (thyroid hormones, and thyroid transporters), and genes linked to metabolism (adiponectin, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha) (Fig 1C). Genes grouped in reward-based (hedonic) appetite control (e.g., endocannabinoid receptor and fatty acid amid hydrolase) displayed a mosaic pattern (Fig 1C). Analysis of the differential gene expression comparing 720 dd to 920 dd showed that a higher number of genes associated with appetite were significantly downregulated than those genes that were upregulated at 920 dd (p-value < 0.05, S3 and S4 Tables). However, most appetite-related genes had no significant change in their expression levels between 720 dd and 920 dd.
(A) Hierarchically clustered heatmap of the whole brain transcriptome (36 734 genes) at 720 dd and 920 dd, scaled by row, shows the average normalized counts for each gene per sampling time point (n = 13 per stage) using the merged normalized count file. (B) Venn diagram showing the presence of appetite-related genes (see S2 Table for more details) in the three normalized count files (for 720 dd, 920 dd, and merged 720 dd and 920 dd). Figure made in: https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/ (C) Hierarchically clustered heatmap of grouped genes related to appetite and metabolism at 720 dd and 920 dd (358 genes), scaled by row, shows the average normalized counts for each group per sampling point (n = 13 per stage) using the merged normalized count file. The lower bar at the x-axis indicates the light period (light/dark) and feeding time twice a day (brown) for 920 dd. For the expression pattern of individual genes related to appetite, see S1 Fig. Abbreviation: dd, day-degree..
Cycling genes during endogenous and exogenous feeding
To determine if genes related to appetite and metabolism displayed a cyclic expression pattern, the normalized count files for 720 dd and 920 dd were analyzed by MetaCycle. Results showed that 16 appetite-related genes among 1090 significant (p-value < 0.05) cycling genes had a cyclic period between 20 h and 28 h at 720 dd (Table 1). Only one gene displayed a significant 24 h periodicity at this stage, the amino acid transporter slc38a2/snat2 (ENSSSAG00000015905), part of the nutrient-sensing group, with an acrophase at 02:00 in the morning. Seven appetite-related genes had a periodicity of 20 h, and eight genes had a 28 h period (Table 1, S2 Fig). The groups containing corticotropin-releasing hormone-related genes (crh-related), genes related to nutrient sensing, and receptors were the dominant groups among the significant cycling genes at 720 dd. At 920 dd, 20 appetite-related genes were among the 1993 significant cycling genes (p-value < 0.05), of which ten had a 24 h period, five had a 20 h period, and the remaining five genes had a 28 h period. Most of these cyclic genes were related to reward-based appetite and transcription factors. The cart3b gene was the only significant cyclic gene at both 720 dd and 920 dd, having a 28 h pattern at both developmental stages. Among other neuropeptides in the melanocortin system, cart4 displayed a 20 h period, while npya2 was cycling with a period of 24 h and had an acrophase at 06:00 in the morning during the dark period, which was 3 h before the first meal of the day (09:00) (Table 1, S3 Fig). Among the 10 appetite-related genes that had a 24 h periodicity at 920dd, six genes peaked during nighttime, and four genes peaked during the daytime (Table 1).
Data is organized according to their function or family, with Ensembl ID, gene name, p-values within corresponding periodicity (20 h, 24 h, and 28 h), and acrophase (time of day the expression peaks for genes having a 24 h periodicity). Abbreviations: Acro; acrophase, dd; day degrees, h; hour. Group: 1: corticotropin-releasing hormone-related genes, 2: glucagon and secretin-related genes, 3: insulin-like growth factor, 4: insulin receptor genes, 5: key melanocortin neuropeptides, 6: nutrient sensing, 7: oxytocin-related genes, 8: receptors. 9: natriuretic: 10: genes related to reward-based appetite, 11: serotonin-related. 12: thyroid system. 13: Transcription factors and signaling pathways. For the expression pattern for individual genes related to appetite, see S2-S4 Figs.
Significantly expressed genes between timepoints
Differential expression analyses were conducted between timepoints in the circadian sampling series at both 720 dd and 920 dd, and the resulting differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were investigated for the presence of appetite-related genes. At 720 dd, none of the appetite-related genes were among the DEGs. At 920 dd, DEGs were found when comparing the different sampling timepoints against each other (Table 2). Analyses showed that most DEGs related to appetite were found in the morning before feeding (04:00 and 08:00) when the light was still off, and before and after the first meal of the day (08:00 and 12:00) (3 appetite-related genes in each comparison, Table 2).
Each cell shows the total number of differentially expressed appetite-related genes for each comparison, and the number given in parentheses indicates the total number of differentially expressed genes.
Among the DEGs at 920 dd, seven unique genes related to appetite displayed a significantly different expression pattern (Fig 2). Based on their temporal expression pattern, several genes showed rhythmicity consistent with circadian regulation (variation across 12 h) and feeding, while others displayed a rhythmicity more closely associated with feeding-related responses only.
A-G: Normalized counts for appetite-related genes at 920 dd with significant changes in expression levels from DESeq2 analysis (p-value < 0.05). Boxplot color coding indicates daytime (blue) or nighttime (red). (A) cnr1 (ENSSSAG00000091836); (B) insrs2b (ENSSSAG00000031099); (C) insrs2b (ENSSSAG00000065410). (D) nppc (ENSSSAG00000074569); (E) cart4 (ENSSSAG00000069679); (F) npp-r1-like (ENSSSAG00000048802); (G) mrap.3 (ENSSSAG00000103286). The grey background indicates nighttime (22:00-08:00). The yellow background indicates the feeding times (09:00-09:30 and 16:00-20:00). Asterix (*) indicates significant (DESeq2 analysis p-value < 0.05) differences between time points. (H) Acrophase distribution of significantly (MetaCycle analysis p-value < 0.05) appetite-related genes and clock genes at 920 dd in Atlantic salmon. Color coding bars indicate whether the acrophase occurs during the daytime (blue) or nighttime (red) (14:12 LD). Appetite-related genes (black) and clock genes (grey) are listed under the respective acrophases. The orange background indicates feeding times. Each radius of the rose plot represents one gene. Data for the clock genes were obtained from Fig 3 in Eilertsen et al., [12].
Genes following a circadian rhythm (significant difference over 12 h) included cannabinoid receptor 1 (cnr1, ENSSSAG00000091836), insulin receptor substrates 2b (insrs2b, ENSSSAG00000031099 and ENSSSAG00000065410), and c-type natriuretic peptide 1 (nppc, also referred to as anfc1, ENSSSAG00000074569). The cnr1 was significantly lower expressed at 12:00 than at 24:00 (Fig 2A). This is in line with MetaCycle results showing that cnr1 has a 24 h period rhythm peaking at 24:00 (Table 1). insrs2b (ENSSSAG00000031099) displayed the most pronounced temporal variation, with significantly lower expression during the night, and elevated levels during the daytime (16:00 vs 04:00 and 20:00 vs 08:00) (Fig 2B). This was in line with the MetaCycle results showing a robust period of 24 h (p-value < 0.001) and an acrophase at 18:00 (Table 1). Similarly, the insrs2b paralog (ENSSSAG00000065410) also showed rhythmicity with decreasing expression during the night (Fig 2C). The expression was significantly lower at 08:00 compared to 20:00. The nppc peaked at night, with a significant increase from 16:00–04:00 and then significantly decreased from 04:00–08:00, supporting the acrophase at 04:00 in MetaCycle (Fig 2D, Table 1).
Genes associated with feeding behavior exhibited temporal dynamics aligned with feeding periods. These genes included cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript 4 (cart4, ENSSSAG00000069679), atrial natriuretic peptide receptor 1-like (npp-r1-like, ENSSSAG00000048802), and melanocortin receptor accessory protein (mrap.3, also referred to as mrap2a, ENSSSAG00000103286). cart4 (ENSSSAG00000069679), npp-r1-like (ENSSSAG00000048802), and nppc (ENSSSAG00000074569) were significantly downregulated between 04:00–08:00, a time window preceding the first meal of the day, suggesting a role in pre-feeding regulation (Figs 2D-F). mrap.3 (ENSSSAG00000103286) showed a postprandial response with significantly lower expression at 12:00 compared to 08:00 (Fig 2G). In contrast, both insrs2b paralogs significantly increased after the first meal, indicating sensitivity to feeding events for these genes. To better assess the circadian entrainment of appetite-regulating genes at 920 dd, the acrophase for appetite-related genes was aligned with the acrophase for clock genes as previously reported in Eilertsen et al., [12], (Fig 2H).
Ontogeny of melanocortin pathway
Based on characterizations of the parr brain described by Norland et al., [43], ISH was performed to validate the presence of hypothalamic expression of key neuropeptides involved in the melanocortin system in endogenous feeding Atlantic salmon (740 dd) (Fig 3A-E). Expression of npya (npya1/a2) and cart2 (cart2b1/b2) was observed dorsally in the hypothalamus, near the anterior and posterior tuberal nucleus (NAT and NPT, respectively) before the onset of exogenous feeding in Atlantic salmon (Fig 3A-B). Expression of agrp1 hypothalamic-specific was detected in the lateral tuberal nucleus (NLT), whereas pomca (pomca1/a2) was observed in both the NLT and the pituitary (Fig 3C-D). The expression of agrp1 was restricted to only a few neurons in the hypothalamus, as the expression in normalized counts was too low to be included in the RNA sequencing analyses. The overall spatial distribution of the melanocortin neuropeptide mRNA expression in the coronal sections of the hypothalamus is summarized in Fig 3E. These neuropeptides are known to compete for binding to the melanocortin 4 receptor (mc4r). Signaling through the melanocortin receptors can be modulated by the mrap, which influences receptor signaling efficiency (Fig 3F). Transcriptomic analyses revealed significant developmental changes in neuropeptide expression between 720 dd and 920 dd (Fig 3G). Expression levels of cart1b1, 1b2, 4, and npya2 were significantly lower at 920 dd compared to 720 dd, while cart2a, 2b1, 2b2, 3b, npya1, pomca1, and b were significantly higher expressed at 920 dd. The results were in line with DESeq2 analyses showing that these genes were significantly differentially expressed (p-value < 0.05) (S4 Table). To complement the neuropeptide expression profile, we examined the expression levels of mc4r, previously characterized by Kalananthan et al., [44], and the accessory protein mrap. The four mc4r paralogs (mc4ra1, a2, b1, and b2) were detected in the brain transcriptome, with mc4ra1 being significantly higher expressed at 920 dd compared to 720 dd. mrap.1 was lower expressed at 920 dd, while mrap.2 and mrap.3 were significantly higher expressed at 920 dd compared to 720 dd. Their presence confirms that the melanocortin signaling machinery is available in the brain and can respond to changes in neuropeptide input.
(A) npya mRNA expression (indicated by black arrow) in the anterior tuberal nucleus at 740 dd. (B) cart2b mRNA expression in the anterior tuberal nucleus at 740 dd. (C) agrp1 mRNA expression in the lateral tuberal nucleus at 740 dd. (D) pomca mRNA expression in lateral tuberal nucleus and adenohypophysis at 740 dd. (E) Schematic illustrating key neuropeptides of the melanocortin system (indicated by color dots) expressed in the hypothalamus in endogenous feeding Atlantic salmon. (F) Conceptual model of melanocortin signaling: agrp/npy and cart/pomc provide opposing neuropeptide input on downstream effector neuron expressing mc4r and mrap. (G) Gene expression analyses of neuropeptides, receptors, and accessory proteins of the melanocortin system between 720 dd and 920 dd in Atlantic salmon. Asterisks (*) show significant levels (DESeq2 analyses) (* indicates p-value < 0.001). Abbreviations: NAT; nucleus anterior tuberis, NLT; nucleus lateralis tuberis, NPT; nucleus posterior tuberis, pit; pituitary. Scalebar A-D: 114 µm.
Discussion
This study provides a characterization of Atlantic salmon brain reorganization before (720 dd) and during the first-feeding period (920 dd), a developmental window marked by a major shift in nutrient source while a circadian rhythm began to be established [12]. By comparing the whole-brain transcriptome at 720 dd and 920 dd, we identified broad developmental changes in the melanocortin system and other key appetite-controlling circuits in the brain during this transition, with significantly different expression profiles and rhythmic gene expression. These findings offer new insight into global comparison of the neurodevelopmental transitions change in energy homeostasis, including hormone signaling, nutrient sensing, and signaling pathways, providing novel insight into how feeding circuits mature at first feeding. Although some genes included in this study are hypothalamus-specific, other genes are not confined to the hypothalamus and may contribute to broader brain-wide regulatory networks. This supports the relevance of our RNA-seq data derived from the whole brain, as it captures both hypothalamic and extrahypothalamic expression of appetite-related genes. At the same time, we recognize that whole-brain RNAseq reduces spatial resolution or low-abundant transcripts. Together, the data define a foundational framework for the establishment of feeding circuits in Atlantic salmon, which can be refined through future cell-type resolved transcriptomics or functional studies.
Activation and maturation of appetite control mechanisms
Several studies have confirmed that the hypothalamic nucleus lateral tuberis pars ventralis (NLTv) is the putative homolog in teleosts based on the hypothalamic mRNA and protein expression for agrp1, npy, cart, and pomc in different fish species [22,24,30,43,45–57]. In the present study, the mRNA level of these key neuropeptides was expressed in the brain before the onset of exogenous feeding (Fig 3). Recently, we demonstrated that the NLTv region in Atlantic salmon represents a key region in appetite control expressing agrp1, npya, cart2b, and pomca [43]. In addition, the widespread distribution of npya and cart in hypothalamic and extrahypothalamic brain regions, in addition to pomca expression in the pituitary, indicates that several other brain regions are involved in appetite control, either directly or indirectly, in Atlantic salmon [37,38,43], as in mammals [58,59]. This is in line with studies showing whole-brain or region-specific responses for these neuropeptides in Atlantic salmon [37,38,41,44,60,61]. The integration of signals in the hypothalamus is not fully understood in fish, but studies have indicated the presence of a network of hormones, receptors and a nutrient-sensing system that changes the expression of agrp, npy, cart, and pomc in a feeding-related manner (reviewed in [22,30,32]). Therefore, we assume that the expression of these neuropeptides in NLTv and other brain regions has a role in the overall regulation of energy expenditure and metabolism in Atlantic salmon. A model of neuronal regulation during both endogenous and exogenous feeding is presented in Fig 4.
The brain responds to hormonal and nutrient-sensing signals that modulate downstream signaling cascades and regulate the expression of key neuropeptides in the melanocortin system. The daily cycle is controlled by oscillations of signal factors. (A) During endogenous feeding at 720 dd only a few appetite-related genes cycled. (B) During the first-feeding period at 920 dd, several genes had started to cycle and were upregulated compared to 720 dd. Color codes are based on the average normalized counts in the heatmap of grouped genes related to appetite and metabolism at 720 dd and 920 dd (Fig 1C) and the heatmap for the expression pattern of individual appetite-related genes (S2 Fig). The cycling symbol indicates if there was a significant cycling (MetaCycle analyses, p-value < 0.05) for a gene or a gene within a group (i.e., genes linked to nutrient sensing) (Table 1). The gene agrp1 was absent in the normalized count file for 720 dd and 920 dd and was given no color code at 720 dd, while at 920 dd the color code is based on the 920 dd normalized count file. Abbreviations: agrp, agouti-related peptide; akt, protein kinase B; ampkα, AMP-activated protein kinase; bsx, brain homeobox transcription factor; cart, cocaine- and amphetamine-related transcript; cck, cholecystokinin; creb, cAMP response-element binding protein; foxo1, forkhead box protein O1; mtor, mechanistic target of rapamycin; NLTv, lateral tuber nucleus pars ventralis; npy, neuropeptide Y; pomca, pro-opiomelanocortin a. The schematic drawing is modified from Soengas [32].
Hormone signaling involved in brain development
During endogenous feeding (720 dd), the yolk supports Atlantic salmon growth, development, and metabolism as the fish are considered to have an energetically closed system at this stage [1]. However, the precise mechanisms involved in energy homeostasis and yolk sac utilization are not fully understood. During development in Atlantic salmon, leptin and cholecystokinin (cck) are two of the first major metabolic hormones being expressed [62,63]. In adults, leptin and cck proteins suppress food intake in both mammals and several fish species [64–68], and have been suggested to play a role in long and short-term signaling after a meal, respectively [22,32]. Conversely, studies have shown that several hormones related to appetite contradict this function in different fish species [30,69–71]. In this study, the presence of leptin and cck in the brain displayed lower mRNA expression levels at 720 dd compared to 920 dd, while their putative receptors (leptin and cck receptors) showed a higher expression level in the brain at 720 dd compared to 920 dd (Fig 4A, 4B). In mammals, it has been demonstrated that pleiotropic hormones, especially leptin, affect brain development, both in the establishment of hypothalamic circuits, including axon outgrowth, and neuronal plasticity both pre- and postnatally [72–75]. Similarly, there might be a correlation between hormone levels and corresponding receptor levels that can affect neuronal development in Atlantic salmon. In zebrafish, knock-out of leptin has shown that this gene is important in behavior (anxiety, aggression, fear, and circadian rhythm behavior) [76], while knock-out of leptin receptor showed minor differences in morphometric parameters, but did affect appetite-related genes response [77]. In mammals, leptin has an anorexigenic effect, which occurs after several weeks of oral feeding; its early postnatal presence does not seem to affect feeding [74]. During the first feeding period, decreased receptor expression may allow for a more targeted response of feeding-related feedback of leptin in the brain as negative feedback systems can begin to operate, and that hormone levels are now sufficient to activate downstream pathways. However, further studies are needed to investigate the role of leptin in fish development.
Changes in amino acid sensing mechanisms
Among nutrient sensors, amino acid sensors and the glucose sensor liver X receptor (lxr) displayed a significant cyclic expression pattern at 720 dd (Table 1). This may indicate a sensing mechanism in the brain during endogenous feeding, which in turn may activate appropriate metabolic responses in Atlantic salmon alevins. Several components are involved in glucosensing in fish, including lxr [34,78,79]. While glucose may be unlikely to play a pivotal role in nutrient-sensing pathways in endogenous-feeding, the fish’s energetic budget relies on the catabolism of proteins, lipids, and amino acids stored in the yolk [2], its levels can induce modifications in epigenetic mechanisms, such as histone acetylation, and contribute to altered metabolism [80]. Two lxr paralogs were identified in the Atlantic salmon brain transcriptome, and both were significantly higher at 920 dd compared to 720 dd (S4 Table). Further, we have previously shown that the glycolytic process was upregulated at 920 dd, with several important enzymes involved in the breakdown of glucose to pyruvate among those DEGs [12]. This indicates possible nutritional adaptation to cope with enhanced carbohydrate levels in exogenous feeding compared to endogenous feeding, helping to optimize the energy utilization obtained from food as the brain requires stable glucose levels to support neuronal development and differentiation while protecting the developing brain from potential damage (hypoglycemia) [34]. In general, higher mRNA expression levels of nutrient sensors were observed at 920 dd compared to 720 dd (Fig 4). This indicates adaptive responses where an exogenous-feeding fish can better sense and regulate nutrient levels in the organism, and regulate energy homeostasis accordingly to meet the metabolic demands of a growing fish. This is in line with GO-terms related to lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, and glucose homeostasis being upregulated at 920 dd [12]. Additionally, the digestion of carbohydrates in exogenous feeding fish may help to increase the energy obtained from feed [8].
At 720 dd and 920 dd, different solute carriers (SLC) for amino acid transporters, which mediate the uptake of amino acids, displayed periodicity. SLC transfers nutrients over the membrane and is linked to electrogenic activity that alters the transmembrane potential, which subsequently can stimulate hormone release [81]. During endogenous feeding, Y + L amino acid transporter 1 (slc7a7) and sodium-coupled neutral amino acid symporter 2 (slc38a2a) had a significant cyclic expression pattern, while cationic amino acid transporter 3 (slc7a3) showed a cyclic expression pattern at exogenous feeding. Both slc7 and slc38 are leucine transporters distributed in several brain regions and may function as a transporter of leucine into the cell, sense nutrient levels, or be involved in other cellular processes [82]. The slc38a2a was the only appetite-related gene examined that displayed a 24 h rhythm at 720 dd, while slc7a7 exhibited a 20 h rhythm. Discriminating between functional metabolic oscillations and rhythms associated with developmental progression will be important for understanding the emergence of feeding competence. The present study suggests that SLC transporters may reflect the sensing of amino acid levels, in which early metabolic rhythm can contribute to developmental mechanisms in the transition from endogenous to exogenous feeding. As fish lack a single master clock like mammals [83], further studies can help determine neurodevelopmental dynamics linking how metabolic and biological rhythms become hierarchically organized in fish [84,85].
Signaling proteins and developmental transition
The hypothalamic nutrient-sensing system integrates metabolic cues through different signaling pathways, including AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), and protein kinase B (Akt), which regulate key transcription factors, including brain homeobox transcription factor (BSX), phosphorylated cAMP (CREB), and forkhead box protein 01 (FOX01) and thereby appetite and energy allocation [32,86,87]. The transition from yolk utilization to exogenous feeding marks a shift in which the brain and metabolism must adapt to an external food supply. In this context, higher levels of akt and mtor were observed at 720 dd, and higher ampk expression at 920 dd than at 720 dd (Fig 4). AKT/mTOR are broadly linked to cell growth, cell proliferation, cellular energy metabolism, and neurogenesis [88,89]. High akt/mTOR expression is correlated with rapid embryonic growth and development in carp [90]. Here, the upregulation in alevins may favor fast growth and neurogenesis before the onset of active food intake, while ampk remains relatively low as ATP demands are met by the yolk substrates [87].
As development progresses and exogenous feeding commences, relative lower akt/mTOR levels and elevated ampk is consistent with an adaptive transition to a different brain state, shaped by nutrient availability and food seeking that is aligned with circadian rhythm at 920 dd [12,87]. Ampk may work as an energy sensor where elevated levels of nutrients are inversely correlated with Ampk [32]. The upregulation of brain ampk in exogenous-feeding Atlantic salmon is in line with a recent study demonstrating an upregulation of ampk when longfin yellowtail larvae had an active food-seeking behavior (swirling near the water surface) [5]. In contrast, studies show that akt and mtor are activated in fed conditions in exogenous feeding fish [32,67,91]. Thus, rather than being markers of “fed” or “fasted”, these signaling proteins are better viewed as part of coordinated reprogramming of the brain metabolism and signaling supporting the life-history transition from endogenous to exogenous feeding Atlantic salmon.
At 720 dd, higher levels of the transcription factors creb and bsx and lower levels of fox01 co-occurred with an overall lower expression of agrp1, npya1, cart2a, 2b, 3b, and pomca, and higher expression of npya2, cart1b, 3a, and 4 in Atlantic salmon compared to 920 dd (Fig 4). High expression levels of CREB and BSX are observed together with high levels of Npy and Agrp in mammals, resulting in stimulation of appetite [92,93]. In rainbow trout, both creb and bsx decreased in response to elevated nutrient levels or the presence of satiety signals [67,94]. An unexpected finding in this study was the high expression of creb and bsx, while agrp1 (detected by ISH but not present in the normalized counts for 720 dd, see Fig 3 and S2 Table) and npya1 were lower expressed during endogenous feeding, and the opposite pattern was observed in exogenous feeding Atlantic salmon. These results indicate that creb and bsx may inhibit the expression of agrp1 and npya1 in Atlantic salmon, the presence of paralog-specific interactions between creb/bsx and agrp1/npya1, or that these transcription factors play a role in energy homeostasis and development that is unexplored. Indeed, more studies are necessary to understand the functions of these transcription factors in the transition from endogenous to exogenous feeding.
Spatial and transcriptional remodeling of the melanocortin pathway
Spatial distribution of hypothalamic melanocortin neuropeptide expression during endogenous feeding in Atlantic salmon suggests that the melanocortin pathway undergoes developmental reorganization. agrp1 and pomca were restricted to the hypothalamic NLT, whereas npya and cart2b were located more dorsally towards the anterior tuber nucleus (NAT). This organization differs from that observed at the parr stage, in which agrp1, npya, cart2b, and pomca are expressed in neighboring cells of the ventral NLT (NLTv) [43], highlighting the progressive spatial organization as the hypothalamus matures. Comparable developmental plasticity has been described in mammals, where Pomc-positive progenitor cells are widely distributed in the immature hypothalamus, but many of these neurons will gradually adopt a non-POMC fate during hypothalamic maturation [73,74,95]. Ontogenetic analysis of npy and cart expression in Atlantic cod brain demonstrates developmental shifts in expression profile in the hypothalamus, as well as detectable expression in multiple brain regions beyond the hypothalamus, including the telencephalon and preoptic area [96]. Taken together with the persistent expression of hypothalamic and extrahypothalamic expression of these key neuropeptides in the melanocortin system, these findings support that appetite regulation in teleosts emerges through both region-specific differentiation of the NLTv and developmental refinement of whole-brain networks involved in energy homeostasis [36,44,62,96].
The mc4r is considered the primary receptor mediating melanocortin signaling [27] was neither significantly different nor cyclically expressed. Although all four salmon mc4r paralogs were detected [44], only mc4ra1 was higher expressed at 920 dd, suggesting mc4r maintains relatively stable transcriptional levels or may be regulated post-transcriptionally. Interestingly, the differentially expressed melanocortin receptor accessory protein mrap.3 at 920 dd may modulate the melanocortin receptors postprandial availability and signaling strength towards energy homeostasis [97]. While the current study focused on the whole-brain transcriptome, it is important to note that paralog- and region-specific expressions may be masked in the dataset. Future research targeting specific neuronal populations can provide deeper insights into these mechanisms.
Emergence of satiety during onset of exogenous feeding
At 920 dd, the Atlantic salmon brain is likely to be hunger-promoted, and adapting the fry towards active food-seeking behavior. During this stage, the fish may learn the sensory properties of food and become conditioned to the feeding regime [30,98], consistent with the significant periodicity of several genes related to reward-based (hedonic) appetite (Table 2). Behavioral changes were observed as Atlantic salmon transitioned from a demersal behavior (720 dd) towards an active free-swimming (food-seeking) behavior at 920 dd, indicating neuromuscular readiness along with morphological and physiological adaptations essential for successful feeding [9,63]. Indeed, several reports indicate that marine fish larvae that have started on exogenous feeding may continue to ingest food even though their gut is already full [8,35], in line with the concept that fish larvae are “feeding machines” and are motivated to feed [23]. The neuronal signals generated at 920 dd may allow the salmon to be hungry and motivated to feed, at least at the start of the first-feeding period, although their feeding behavior is inefficient [99].
None of the key neuropeptides of the melanocortin system displayed a detectable significant postprandial transcriptional response in the whole brain of Atlantic salmon at two weeks into first-feeding period (920 dd). In contrast, three weeks into first-feeding period, npya1, pomca1, and pomca2 displayed significant postprandial neuronal anorexigenic responses [36], indicating that several important neurodevelopmental processes and circuit reorganization occur during this period. Additional pathways, including PYY [100], may also influence the early regulation of satiety and energy homeostasis. The postprandial upregulation of two insrs2 and reduced mrap.3 in the salmon brain at 920 dd (Fig 2) further indicates that feeding modulates the sensitivity and signaling efficiency of insulin and melanocortin pathways by intracellular adaptors and accessory proteins, while maintaining transcriptional regulation of ligands and receptors largely unchanged at the whole-brain level. Meal timing also influenced the transcriptional changes, where prolonged feed deprivation (i.e., 13 h overnight) resulted in a significant change in appetite-related genes, as opposed to short feed deprivation (i.e., 6 h), which did not result in a significant change for the genes in our in-house database, consistent with inter-meal interval affecting the food intake [101]. This pattern points to a brain that adjusts metabolic and neuroendocrine responsiveness by tuning signaling capacity rather than altering the transcription of appetite-regulating genes.
Transition from endogenous to exogenous feeding affects cyclic gene expression
Analysis of cyclic appetite-related genes at 720 dd revealed a predominance of transcripts cycling with a periodicity of 20 h or 28 h, whereas at 920 dd the majority had a periodicity of 24 h. These patterns align with Eilertsen et al., [12] showing that only three clock genes were significantly cyclic in the yolk sac alevins, significant cycling of the clock genes and genes of the circadian rhythm pathway in the exogenous feeding fry. Together, these findings indicate that the circadian machinery might not be fully operational in controlling metabolic genes at 720 dd and could represent an intermediate developmental phase where endogenous oscillators are present but are but not fully entrained to the LD cycle [12]. The periodicity of 20 h and 28 h at 720 dd is likely due to lack of coordination or might also indicate data reflecting individual variations. Except for cart3, none of the cyclic appetite-related genes at endogenous feeding were among the genes that cycled in exogenous feeding salmon fry.
The shift in energetics supply from yolk to a pellet diet changed the oscillation of genes and the establishment of a persistent circadian rhythmicity [12], potentially affecting the coordination of rhythmic physiological functions, and clock-controlled gene outputs affecting appetite and feeding behavior. Genes grouped in insulin receptors, melanocortin neuropeptides, nutrient sensing and natriuretic were cyclic at both 720 dd and 920 dd. The unique cyclic expression of corticotropin-related, insulin-like growth factors, oxytocin-related, and thyroid-related genes at 720 dd might be linked to mobilization of energy and yolk-sac utilization, and developmental progression [23,102,103]. Thus, future studies may explore the role of cyclic appetite-related genes at 720 dd and yolk utilization.
Interestingly, cyclic expression of akt with a 24 h period was observed in exogenous-feeding salmon, which peaked at 22:00, after feeding and when the lights were switched off (Table 1). In mammalian model organisms and mammalian cell culture studies, rhythmic activation of AKT can be achieved in response to external signals such as food ingestion, and it also exhibits cell-autonomous circadian oscillations in the absence of external stimuli such as light:dark cycle [104–106]. All appetite-related genes that exhibited a nocturnal peak aligned with a minimum of one clock gene peaking at the same acrophase (Fig 2H). During daytime, acrophase for clock genes occurred earlier in the day compared to appetite-related genes, suggesting a phase delay in the rhythmic regulation of appetite signals relative to the core clock machinery. The photoperiod is considered the most important synchronizer of biological rhythm, but periodic feeding can also work as an entrainment cue in fish, leading to physiological and behavioral patterns involved in food anticipatory behavior [107–115]. Multiple internal rhythms can also coexist and be entrained by different cues [85]. Our results suggest that there might be an interaction between LD regime and feeding that influences the overall expression of cyclic genes, while underlying mechanisms remain to be solved. Future research should aim to manipulate light-dark cycles and uncouple the feeding time from the LD regime, combined with tissue-specific analyses.
Conclusion
Using whole-brain RNAseq data, we demonstrated that energy homeostasis mechanisms in rapidly developing Atlantic salmon larvae emerge during endogenous feeding. Key components of appetite control and energy homeostasis, including neuropeptides of the melanocortin system, are expressed prior to the onset of exogenous feeding, showing their temporal expression pattern differs markedly from older stages. During endogenous feeding, the brain transcriptome was characterized by a relatively high expression of receptors and intracellular signaling components, including leptin receptor, cck receptor, akt, mtor, creb, and bsx, and low levels of hormones for leptin and cck. The transition from endogenous to exogenous feeding was accompanied by widespread changes in the expression of appetite-related genes. The first-feeding period also represents a critical window in the establishment of internal rhythmicity of appetite-related gene expression. Overall, these results suggest that endogenous alevin brain was relatively insensitive to metabolic cues or, alternatively, these signaling pathways may contribute to the development of neuronal plasticity. Following the onset of exogenous-feeding, Atlantic salmon brain displayed increased responsiveness to nutrient levels and enhanced capacity to integrate metabolic information. At the same time, the satiety system appears to be incompletely developed during the first two weeks of exogenous feeding.
Materials and methods
Ethical statement
As the fish did not undergo handling except euthanasia, special approval for the experiment was not required according to Norwegian National legislation via the Norwegian Animal Welfare Act (LOV-2015-06-09-16-65) and Regulations on the Use of Animals in Experiments (FOR-2017-04-05-451), given by the EU (Directive 2010/63/EU) for animal experiments. All the fish were euthanized on-site with an overdose of metacaine (MS-222TM; MSD Animal Health, Netherlands) before being handled further. The trial was conducted at the Bergen High Technology Center (University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway), in an animal facility approved by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (VSID2135). All personnel involved in the experiment had undergone training (FELASA-C) approved by the Norwegian Food Safety Authority, which is mandatory for running experiments involving animals included in the Animal Welfare Act.
Experimental design, RNA sequencing and post-sequencing analysis
The experimental design, RNA sequencing, and analyses are described in Eilertsen et al., [12] and include normalized count files and differential gene expression analyses generated in DESeq2 [116], and lists of cyclic genes determined by MetaCycle [117]. In summary, two sibling groups of Atlantic salmon eggs (obtained from Mowi, Tveitevågen, Askøy, Norway) were fertilized and incubated under light:dark (LD) period of 14:10 h at 5.7 ± 0.5˚C. Just before first feeding, the fish were transferred to feeding tanks and reared under a 14:10 h light:dark period at 11.05 ± 0.3˚C. The age of the developing alevins and fry was determined using day degree (dd) as a product of days and temperature (day × °C) from the day of fertilization until the last sampling point. To ensure precise age estimation, daily temperature values were computed as the mean of measurements recorded in 10-minute intervals. Food was introduced from 762 dd, and the fish were fed a commercial diet twice a day (09:00–09:30 and 16:00–20:00). Two 48 h circadian sampling series were carried out at 720 dd and 920 dd (i.e., before and after the onset of the exogenous feeding period) with 4 randomly sampled fish every 4 h starting and ending at noon. In total, 104 fish were collected. The brains were dissected from the skull, the total RNA was extracted. Whole brains were dissected for RNA sequencing to maximize the specificity of neuronal tissue. This approach was preferred over head-region or brain-region dissections which could introduce more variability while we acknowledge that whole-brain RNAseq may dilute low-abundant or region-specific transcripts. All RNA sequencing data have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) under accession number PRJEB74272. Accessible via https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/browser/view/PRJEB74272.
The raw sequencing results were trimmed by Trimmomatic v0.38 [118] and subsequently alignment to the published Atlantic salmon genome (http://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-106/gtf/salmo_salar/) using STAR v2.7.0 [119]. The output files from the aligner were processed by Samtools 1.6 [120], and counts were generated using HTSeq v0.11.2 [121]. Using DESeq2 1.26.0 [116], the three normalized count arrays were generated corresponding to (i) 720 dd, (ii) 920dd, and (iii) 720dd and 920 dd together. The normalized count files were filtered by excluding genes with a coefficient of variance greater than 100, and genes with an average count of less than 5 within each sample. DESeq2 was applied to do differential expression analyses using Wald statistical model where genes with counts less than 10 per comparison were not included in the comparisons, and an adjusted p-value threshold was set to < 0.05.
To identify genes exhibiting daily rhythms for the two 48 h circadian sampling series of 720 dd and 920 dd, the normalized count arrays were analyzed by MetaCycle v1.2.0 [117] incorporating JTK_CYCLE algorithm [122]. Period detection parameters were set to default settings in JTK_CYCLE, with a minimum of 20 h and a maximum of 28 h, using Bonferroni correction for combined p-values. Rhythmic genes were identified at multiple adjusted p-value thresholds (p < 0.1, p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001) with a minimum meta2d_Base of 10 counts.
Exploration of the three normalized count arrays was done using Venny v2.1 (RRID:SCR_016561) to visualize shared and unique EnsemblID across the normalized count arrays and in-house database of genes involved in appetite and metabolism. Up to four gene lists were compared and intersections were identified and extracted directly from the interactive diagram. The transcriptome data was further explored in RStudio R.4.2.2 [123], with the packages pheatmap [124] and ggplot2 [125] used to create figures. Heatmap for the whole transcriptome was visualized by calculating the mean value of each gene at each sampling time point, while the heatmap for appetite-related genes was made by calculating the mean value for each “category” at each sampling time point. Expression values were scaled by row to highlight relative differences of gene or gene group. Hierarchical clustering of rows was performed using correlation-based distance, while column order was preserved to reflect sampling sequence. The dendrogram height parameter was adjusted to display row clustering (treeheight_row = 20) and the column dendrogram was suppressed. The 48 h circadian sampling series were further analysed using CircaCompare [126] to generate cosinusoidal expression curves for appetite-related genes identified as rhythmic by MetaCycle, enabling comparison between the two developmental stages.
Identification of genes involved in appetite and metabolism
To identify candidate genes involved in appetite and metabolism, an in-house database of 464 genes putatively involved in these processes was generated independently of the RNA-seq data (S1 Table). The in-house database included (i) key receptors and neurotransmitters of the melanocortin system [20,127] including existing functionally characterized key neuropeptides and melanocortin 4 receptors in the Atlantic salmon melanocortin system [37,38,41,44,60,61] updated to the current annotated salmon genome (Ssal_v3.1), (ii) transcription factors and signaling pathways related to the melanocortin system in the fish hypothalamus [32], (iii) genes related to the adipocytokine signaling pathway (KEGG entry map04920, https://www.genome.jp/kegg/pathway.html), (iv) genes related to nutrient sensing and reward system linked to appetite control in teleosts [30,32,34,78,82,91,128,129], and (v) in-house database for appetite-controlling genes in Atlantic cod Gadus morha [130]. To generate the Atlantic salmon in-house database, annotated genes in Atlantic cod, human, zebrafish, and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) genomes were blasted (BLASTp, https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PROGRAM=blastp&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&LINK_LOC=blasthome) against the Atlantic salmon genome (Ssal_v3.1). BLASTn and multiple sequence alignments (VectorNTI) were used to identify Atlantic salmon paralogs.
Chromogenic in situ hybridization (ISH)
Atlantic salmon were sampled at 740 dd for chromogenic ISH. The fish were euthanized (200 mg/L of MS-222), and heads were cut off and fixated in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline pH 7.4. Atlantic salmon heads were rinsed in 1 × phosphate buffered saline and immersed in 25% sucrose/25% OCT (CellPath, UK) for 24 h as described in Eilertsen et al., [131]. The heads were embedded in 100% OCT and coronal parallel cryo-sectioned across the hypothalamus at 10 µm (Leica CM 3050s, Leica Biosystems, Germany) and dried at 65 °C for 30 min. The topographical distribution of agrp1, npya, cart2b, and pomca in the hypothalamus was investigated based on their hypothalamic expression in the Atlantic salmon parr brain [43]. Synthesis of antisense digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled riboprobes and ISH using 4 M urea was carried out as described in Norland et al., [43]. Sections were imaged using a Leica DM600B microscope (Leica Microsystems, Germany) with a digital Leica DFC 320 (Leica Microsystems) camera.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Heatmap showing individual genes related to appetite and metabolism in Atlantic salmon at 720 dd and 920 dd.
Heatmap was scaled by row, shows the average normalized counts for each time point.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344769.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Fig. Appetite-related genes that were significantly cycling (MetaCycle analysis p-value < 0.05) at 720 dd in Atlantic salmon.
The normalized counts for appetite-related genes at 720 dd are plotted as boxplots, and color coding indicates daytime (blue box, 08:00–22:00) or nighttime (red box, and grey background, 22:00–08:00).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344769.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Fig. Appetite-related genes that were significantly cycling (MetaCycle analysis p-value < 0.05) at 920 dd in Atlantic salmon.
The normalized counts for appetite-related genes at 920 dd are plotted as boxplots, and color coding indicates whether daytime (blue, 08:00–22:00) or nighttime (red, and grey background. 22:00–08:00). The yellow background indicates the feeding times (09:00–09:30 and 16:00–20:00).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344769.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Fig. Cosinusoidal expression profile of significantly cycling appetite-related genes (MetaCycle analysis p-value < 0.05) at endogenous (720 dd) and exogenous (920 dd) feeding in Atlantic salmon brain.
Plots are outputs of CircaCompare with a cosinusoidal curve fitted across the sampling points. Background color coding denotes daytime (white) and nighttime (grey). The x-axis represents chronological sampling points (starting and ending at 12:00). Genes are ordered according to their appearance in Table 1.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344769.s004
(DOCX)
S1 Table. List for appetite-related genes in Atlantic salmon (in-house database) according to their group, gene name, and Ensembl ID.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344769.s005
(DOCX)
S2 Table. List of genes related to appetite present in the files normalized counts arrays.
Comparing normalized count files for 720 dd, normalized counts at 920 dd, normalized counts for 720 dd and 920 dd together, and appetite-related genes absent in the normalized count files. Left side: Ensembl ID. Right side: gene name.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344769.s006
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Number of significantly (p < 0.05) up- and downregulated genes related to appetite and metabolism in DESeq2 at 920 dd compared to 720 dd in Atlantic salmon.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344769.s007
(DOCX)
S4 Table. Appetite-related genes significantly differentially expressed between 720 dd and 920 dd (p < 0.05).
The list was sorted alphabetically, and their corresponding log2-fold change. Color code: Green – Genes with a negative log2-fold change are significantly higher expressed at 920 dd compared to 720 dd in Atlantic salmon; Blue – Genes with a positive log2-fold change are significantly lower expressed at 920 dd compared to 720 dd in Atlantic salmon; Dark green and dark blue indicate the top 10 genes with larger log2fold change that were significantly higher and lower expressed at 920, respectively.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344769.s008
(DOCX)
References
- 1. Ronnestad I, Groot EP, Fyhn HJ. Compartmental distribution of free amino acids and protein in developing yolk-sac larvae of Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus). Marine Biology. 1993;116(3):349–54.
- 2. Rønnestad I, Thorsen A, Finn RN. Fish larval nutrition: A review of recent advances in the roles of amino acids. Aquaculture. 1999;177(1–4):201–16.
- 3. Mazurais D, Darias M, Zambonino-Infante JL, Cahu CL. Transcriptomics for understanding marine fish larval development. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2011;89(7):599–611.
- 4. Xu H, Liu E, Li Y, Li X, Ding C. Transcriptome analysis reveals increases in visceral lipogenesis and storage and activation of the antigen processing and presentation pathway during the mouth-opening stage in zebrafish larvae. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(8):1634. pmid:28758957
- 5. Guerrero-Tortolero DA, Vázquez-Islas G, Campos-Ramos R. A transcriptome insight during early fish larval development followed by starvation in Seriola rivoliana. Marine Biotechnology. 2021;23(5):749–65.
- 6. Fu J, Zhu W, Wang L, Luo M, Song F, Dong Z. Dynamic transcriptome sequencing and analysis during early development in the bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis). BMC Genomics. 2019;20(1):781. pmid:31660854
- 7. Sørhus E, Incardona JP, Furmanek T, Jentoft S, Meier S, Edvardsen RB. Developmental transcriptomics in Atlantic haddock: Illuminating pattern formation and organogenesis in non-model vertebrates. Dev Biol. 2016;411(2):301–13. pmid:26875497
- 8. Rønnestad I, Yúfera M, Ueberschär B, Ribeiro L, Sæle Ø, Boglione C. Feeding behaviour and digestive physiology in larval fish: current knowledge, and gaps and bottlenecks in research. Reviews in Aquaculture. 2013;5(s1).
- 9. Yúfera M, Darias MJ. The onset of exogenous feeding in marine fish larvae. Aquaculture. 2007;268(1–4):53–63.
- 10. Zambonino-Infante J, Gisbert E, Sarasquete C, Navarro I, Gutiérrez J, Cahu C. Ontogeny and physiology of the digestive system of marine fish larvae. Feeding and Digestive Functions in Fishes. Science Publishers. 2008. p. 281–348.
- 11. Eilertsen M, Dolan DWP, Bolton CM, Karlsen R, Davies WIL, Edvardsen RB, et al. Photoreception and transcriptomic response to light during early development of a teleost with a life cycle tightly controlled by seasonal changes in photoperiod. PLoS Genet. 2022;18(12):e1010529. pmid:36508414
- 12. Eilertsen M, Norland S, Dolan DWP, Karlsen R, Gomes AS, Bolton CM, et al. Onset of circadian rhythmicity in the brain of Atlantic salmon is linked to exogenous feeding. PLoS One. 2024;19(11):e0312911. pmid:39546447
- 13. Tang X, Jiang S, Wang H, Zhou Y, Peng F, Zhang X, et al. Transcriptome sequencing analysis reveals dynamic changes in major biological functions during the early development of clearhead icefish, protosalanx chinensis. Fishes. 2022;7(3):115.
- 14. Ferraresso S, Bonaldo A, Parma L, Cinotti S, Massi P, Bargelloni L, et al. Exploring the larval transcriptome of the common sole (Solea solea L.). BMC Genomics. 2013;14:315. pmid:23663263
- 15. Gao J, Xu G, Xu P. Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals metabolism transformation in Coilia nasus larvae during the mouth-open period. Comp Biochem Physiol Part D Genomics Proteomics. 2020;36:100712. pmid:32711389
- 16. Anderson KC, Knuckey R, Cánepa M, Elizur A. A transcriptomic investigation of appetite-regulation and digestive processes in giant grouper Epinephelus lanceolatus during early larval development. J Fish Biol. 2018;93(4):694–710. pmid:30232812
- 17. Li L, Tang S-L, He S, Liang X-F. Transcriptome analysis provides an overview of genes involved in the peculiar food preference at first-feeding stage in mandarin fish (Siniperca chuatsi). Fishes. 2022;8(1):17.
- 18. Yang H, Zhou Y, Gu J, Xie S, Xu Y, Zhu G, et al. Deep mRNA sequencing analysis to capture the transcriptome landscape of zebrafish embryos and larvae. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e64058. pmid:23700457
- 19. Xu H, Fan S-Q, Wang G, Miao X-M, Li Y. Transcriptome analysis reveals the importance of exogenous nutrition in regulating antioxidant defenses during the mouth-opening stage in oviparous fish. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2021;47(4):1087–103. pmid:34036482
- 20. Cone RD. Anatomy and regulation of the central melanocortin system. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(5):571–8. pmid:15856065
- 21. Cerdá‐Reverter JM, Canosa LF. Chapter 1 neuroendocrine systems of the fish brain. Fish Physiology. Elsevier. 2009. p. 3–74.
- 22. Soengas JL, Cerdá-Reverter JM, Delgado MJ. Central regulation of food intake in fish: An evolutionary perspective. J Mol Endocrinol. 2018;60(4):R171–99. pmid:29467140
- 23. Rønnestad I, Gomes AS, Murashita K, Angotzi R, Jonsson E, Volkoff H. Appetite-controlling endocrine systems in teleosts. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017;8:73.
- 24. Volkoff H. The neuroendocrine regulation of food intake in fish: A review of current knowledge. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:540. pmid:27965528
- 25. Andermann ML, Lowell BB. Toward a wiring diagram understanding of appetite control. Neuron. 2017;95(4):757–78. pmid:28817798
- 26. Fischer EK, O’Connell LA. Modification of feeding circuits in the evolution of social behavior. J Exp Biol. 2017;220(Pt 1):92–102. pmid:28057832
- 27. Krashes MJ, Lowell BB, Garfield AS. Melanocortin-4 receptor-regulated energy homeostasis. Nat Neurosci. 2016;19(2):206–19. pmid:26814590
- 28. Morton GJ, Cummings DE, Baskin DG, Barsh GS, Schwartz MW. Central nervous system control of food intake and body weight. Nature. 2006;443(7109):289–95. pmid:16988703
- 29. Waterson MJ, Horvath TL. Neuronal regulation of energy homeostasis: Beyond the hypothalamus and feeding. Cell Metab. 2015;22(6):962–70. pmid:26603190
- 30. Delgado MJ, Cerdá-Reverter JM, Soengas JL. Hypothalamic integration of metabolic, endocrine, and circadian signals in fish: Involvement in the control of food intake. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:354. pmid:28694769
- 31. Volkoff H, Canosa LF, Unniappan S, Cerdá-Reverter JM, Bernier NJ, Kelly SP, et al. Neuropeptides and the control of food intake in fish. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2005;142(1–2):3–19. pmid:15862543
- 32. Soengas JL. Integration of nutrient sensing in fish hypothalamus. Front Neurosci. 2021;15:653928. pmid:33716662
- 33. Chivite M, Comesaña S, Calo J, Soengas JL, Conde-Sieira M. Endocannabinoid receptors are involved in enhancing food intake in rainbow trout. Horm Behav. 2022;146:105277. pmid:36356457
- 34. Conde-Sieira M, Soengas JL. Nutrient sensing systems in fish: impact on food intake regulation and energy homeostasis. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 2016;10:603.
- 35. Harboe T, Mangor-Jensen A, Moren M, Hamre K, Rønnestad I. Control of light condition affects the feeding regime and enables successful eye migration in Atlantic halibut juveniles. Aquaculture. 2009;290(3–4):250–5.
- 36. Norland S, Gomes AS, Rønnestad I, Helvik JV, Eilertsen M. Light conditions during Atlantic salmon embryogenesis affect key neuropeptides in the melanocortin system during transition from endogenous to exogenous feeding. Front Behav Neurosci. 2023;17:1162494. pmid:37153936
- 37. Tolås I, Kalananthan T, Gomes AS, Lai F, Norland S, Murashita K. Regional expression of npy mRNA paralogs in the brain of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar, L.) and response to fasting. Frontiers in Physiology. 2021.
- 38. Kalananthan T, Gomes AS, Lai F, Tolås I, Jordal A-EO, Norland S, et al. Brain Distribution of 10 cart Transcripts and Their Response to 4 Days of Fasting in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.). Front Mar Sci. 2021;8.
- 39. Kalananthan T, Folkedal O, Gomes AS, Lai F, Handeland SO, Tolås I, et al. Impact of long-term fasting on the stomach-hypothalamus appetite regulating genes in Atlantic salmon postsmolts. Aquaculture. 2023;563:738917.
- 40. Kalananthan T, Murashita K, Rønnestad I, Ishigaki M, Takahashi K, Silva MS, et al. Hypothalamic agrp and pomc mRNA Responses to Gastrointestinal Fullness and Fasting in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar, L.). Front Physiol. 2020;11:61. pmid:32116771
- 41. Valen R, Jordal A-EO, Murashita K, Rønnestad I. Postprandial effects on appetite-related neuropeptide expression in the brain of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011;171(3):359–66. pmid:21377470
- 42. Lai F, Rønnestad I, Stien LH, Madaro A. Cross-regulatory interaction between the HPI axis and appetite regulation in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) parr under chronic and acute stress. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025;16:1685870. pmid:41268156
- 43. Norland S, Eilertsen M, Rønnestad I, Helvik JV, Gomes AS. Mapping key neuropeptides involved in the melanocortin system in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) brain. J Comp Neurol. 2023;531(1):89–115. pmid:36217593
- 44. Kalananthan T, Lai F, Gomes AS, Murashita K, Handeland S, Rønnestad I. The melanocortin system in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and its role in appetite control. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy. 2020;14.
- 45. Porter DT, Roberts DA, Maruska KP. Distribution and female reproductive state differences in orexigenic and anorexigenic neurons in the brain of the mouth brooding African cichlid fish, Astatotilapia burtoni. J Comp Neurol. 2017;525(14):3126–57. pmid:28649723
- 46. Amano M, Takahashi A, Yamanome T, Oka Y, Amiya N, Kawauchi H, et al. Immunocytochemical localization and ontogenic development of alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH) in the brain of a pleuronectiform fish, barfin flounder. Cell Tissue Res. 2005;320(1):127–34. pmid:15726422
- 47. Sakharkar AJ, Singru PS, Sarkar K, Subhedar NK. Neuropeptide Y in the forebrain of the adult male cichlid fish Oreochromis mossambicus: Distribution, effects of castration and testosterone replacement. J Comp Neurol. 2005;489(2):148–65. pmid:15984003
- 48. Forlano PM, Cone RD. Conserved neurochemical pathways involved in hypothalamic control of energy homeostasis. J Comp Neurol. 2007;505(3):235–48. pmid:17879270
- 49. Zhang C, Forlano PM, Cone RD. AgRP and POMC neurons are hypophysiotropic and coordinately regulate multiple endocrine axes in a larval teleost. Cell Metab. 2012;15(2):256–64. pmid:22245570
- 50. Shainer I, Buchshtab A, Hawkins TA, Wilson SW, Cone RD, Gothilf Y. Novel hypophysiotropic AgRP2 neurons and pineal cells revealed by BAC transgenesis in zebrafish. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44777. pmid:28317906
- 51. Song Y, Golling G, Thacker TL, Cone RD. Agouti-related protein (AGRP) is conserved and regulated by metabolic state in the zebrafish, Danio rerio. Endocrine. 2003;22(3):257–65. pmid:14709799
- 52. Cerdá-Reverter JM, Peter RE. Endogenous melanocortin antagonist in fish: Structure, brain mapping, and regulation by fasting of the goldfish agouti-related protein gene. Endocrinology. 2003;144(10):4552–61. pmid:12960082
- 53. Jeong I, Kim E, Kim S, Kim HK, Lee DW, Seong JY, et al. mRNA expression and metabolic regulation of npy and agrp1/2 in the zebrafish brain. Neurosci Lett. 2018;668:73–9.
- 54. Otero-Rodiño C, Rocha A, Sánchez E, Álvarez-Otero R, Soengas JL, Cerdá-Reverter JM. Sensing glucose in the central melanocortin circuits of rainbow trout: A morphological study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:254. pmid:31057490
- 55. Akash G, Kaniganti T, Tiwari NK, Subhedar NK, Ghose A. Differential distribution and energy status-dependent regulation of the four CART neuropeptide genes in the zebrafish brain. J Comp Neurol. 2014;522(10):2266–85. pmid:24374761
- 56. Kojima K, Amiya N, Kamijo M, Kageyama H, Uchiyama M, Shioda S, et al. Relationship between alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone- and neuropeptide Y-containing neurons in the goldfish hypothalamus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010;167(3):366–72. pmid:20005228
- 57. Agulleiro MJ, Cortés R, Leal E, Ríos D, Sánchez E, Cerdá-Reverter JM. Characterization, tissue distribution and regulation by fasting of the agouti family of peptides in the sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2014;205:251–9. pmid:24561275
- 58. Schwartz MW, Woods SC, Porte D Jr, Seeley RJ, Baskin DG. Central nervous system control of food intake. Nature. 2000;404(6778):661–71. pmid:10766253
- 59. Watts AG, Kanoski SE, Sanchez-Watts G, Langhans W. The physiological control of eating: Signals, neurons, and networks. Physiol Rev. 2022;102(2):689–813. pmid:34486393
- 60. Murashita K, Kurokawa T, Ebbesson LOE, Stefansson SO, Rønnestad I. Characterization, tissue distribution, and regulation of agouti-related protein (AgRP), cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2009;162(2):160–71. pmid:19332070
- 61. Murashita K, Jordal A-EO, Nilsen TO, Stefansson SO, Kurokawa T, Björnsson BT, et al. Leptin reduces Atlantic salmon growth through the central pro-opiomelanocortin pathway. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2011;158(1):79–86. pmid:20840870
- 62. Moen A-GG, Murashita K, Finn RN. Ontogeny of energy homeostatic pathways via neuroendocrine signaling in Atlantic salmon. Dev Neurobiol. 2010;70(9):649–58. pmid:20506200
- 63. Sahlmann C, Gu J, Kortner TM, Lein I, Krogdahl Å, Bakke AM. Ontogeny of the Digestive System of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar L.) and Effects of Soybean Meal from Start-Feeding. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0124179. pmid:25923375
- 64. Volkoff H, Peter RE. Characterization of two forms of cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) peptide precursors in goldfish: Molecular cloning and distribution, modulation of expression by nutritional status, and interactions with leptin. Endocrinology. 2001;142(12):5076–88. pmid:11713200
- 65. Elias CF, Lee C, Kelly J, Aschkenasi C, Ahima RS, Couceyro PR, et al. Leptin activates hypothalamic CART neurons projecting to the spinal cord. Neuron. 1998;21(6):1375–85. pmid:9883730
- 66. Subhedar N, Barsagade VG, Singru PS, Thim L, Clausen JT. Cocaine- and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptide (CART) in the telencephalon of the catfish, Clarias gariepinus: Distribution and response to fasting, 2-deoxy-D-glucose, glucose, insulin, and leptin treatments. J Comp Neurol. 2011;519(7):1281–300. pmid:21452197
- 67. Velasco C, Comesaña S, Conde-Sieira M, Míguez JM, Soengas JL. Effects of CCK-8 and GLP-1 on fatty acid sensing and food intake regulation in trout. J Mol Endocrinol. 2019;62(3):101–16. pmid:30608904
- 68. Rønnestad I, Nilsen TO, Murashita K, Angotzi AR, Gamst Moen A-G, Stefansson SO, et al. Leptin and leptin receptor genes in Atlantic salmon: Cloning, phylogeny, tissue distribution and expression correlated to long-term feeding status. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010;168(1):55–70. pmid:20403358
- 69. Blanco AM, Soengas JL. Leptin signalling in teleost fish with emphasis in food intake regulation. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2021;526:111209. pmid:33588023
- 70. Jørgensen EH, Bernier NJ, Maule AG, Vijayan MM. Effect of long-term fasting and a subsequent meal on mRNA abundances of hypothalamic appetite regulators, central and peripheral leptin expression and plasma leptin levels in rainbow trout. Peptides. 2016;86:162–70. pmid:26471905
- 71. Fuentes EN, Safian D, Einarsdottir IE, Valdés JA, Elorza AA, Molina A, et al. Nutritional status modulates plasma leptin, AMPK and TOR activation, and mitochondrial biogenesis: Implications for cell metabolism and growth in skeletal muscle of the fine flounder. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2013;186:172–80. pmid:23500005
- 72. Bouret SG, Draper SJ, Simerly RB. Trophic action of leptin on hypothalamic neurons that regulate feeding. Science. 2004;304(5667):108–10.
- 73. Bouret SG, Draper SJ, Simerly RB. Formation of projection pathways from the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus to hypothalamic regions implicated in the neural control of feeding behavior in mice. J Neurosci. 2004;24(11):2797–805. pmid:15028773
- 74. Bouret SG. Neurodevelopmental actions of leptin. Brain Res. 2010;1350:2–9. pmid:20399755
- 75. Bouret SG, Simerly RB. Developmental programming of hypothalamic feeding circuits. Clin Genet. 2006;70(4):295–301. pmid:16965320
- 76. Audira G, Sarasamma S, Chen J-R, Juniardi S, Sampurna BP, Liang S-T, et al. Zebrafish Mutants Carrying Leptin a (lepa) Gene Deficiency Display Obesity, Anxiety, Less Aggression and Fear, and Circadian Rhythm and Color Preference Dysregulation. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(12):4038. pmid:30551684
- 77. Del Vecchio G, Murashita K, Verri T, Gomes AS, Rønnestad I. Leptin receptor-deficient (knockout) zebrafish: Effects on nutrient acquisition. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2021;310:113832. pmid:34089707
- 78. Soengas JL. Contribution of glucose- and fatty acid sensing systems to the regulation of food intake in fish. A review. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2014;205:36–48. pmid:24530522
- 79. Polakof S, Mommsen TP, Soengas JL. Glucosensing and glucose homeostasis: From fish to mammals. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;160(4):123–49. pmid:21871969
- 80. Rocha F, Dias J, Engrola S, Gavaia P, Geurden I, Dinis MT, et al. Glucose metabolism and gene expression in juvenile zebrafish (Danio rerio) challenged with a high carbohydrate diet: Effects of an acute glucose stimulus during late embryonic life. Br J Nutr. 2015;113(3):403–13. pmid:25609020
- 81. Ueberschär B, Navarro-Guillén C, Gomes A, Rønnestad I, Rojas-Garcia C, Hanke I, et al. Variability in digestive enzyme capacity in early stages of marine fish larvae: Ontogenetic variations, biorhythms, hormonal control and nutrient sensing mechanisms. Emerging Issues in Fish Larvae Research. Springer International Publishing. 2018. p. 87–129.
- 82. Comesaña S, Lai F, Olderbakk Jordal AE, Verri T, Espe M, Soengas JL. Amino Acid Carriers of the Solute Carrier Families 7 (SLC7) and 38 (SLC38) Are Involved in Leucine Sensing in the Brain of Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). Frontiers in Marine Science. 2021;8.
- 83. Isorna E, de Pedro N, Valenciano AI, Alonso-Gómez ÁL, Delgado MJ. Interplay between the endocrine and circadian systems in fishes. J Endocrinol. 2017;232(3):R141–59. pmid:27999088
- 84. Yúfera M, Perera E, Mata-Sotres JA, Calduch-Giner J, Martínez-Rodríguez G, Pérez-Sánchez J. The circadian transcriptome of marine fish (Sparus aurata) larvae reveals highly synchronized biological processes at the whole organism level. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12943. pmid:29021622
- 85. Navarro-Guillén C, Yúfera M. Understanding rhythms in the digestive functionality of fish gut. J Exp Biol. 2025;228(14):jeb249942. pmid:40698423
- 86. Otero-Rodiño C, Velasco C, Álvarez-Otero R, López-Patiño MA, Míguez JM, Soengas JL. Changes in the levels and phosphorylation status of Akt, AMPK, CREB and FoxO1 in hypothalamus of rainbow trout under conditions of enhanced glucosensing activity. J Exp Biol. 2017;220(Pt 23):4410–7. pmid:28970346
- 87. Soengas JL, Comesaña S, Conde-Sieira M, Blanco AM. Hypothalamic integration of nutrient sensing in fish. J Exp Biol. 2024;227(15):jeb247410. pmid:39082186
- 88. Yoon M-S. The Role of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) in Insulin Signaling. Nutrients. 2017;9(11):1176. pmid:29077002
- 89. Hay N. The Akt-mTOR tango and its relevance to cancer. Cancer Cell. 2005;8(3):179–83. pmid:16169463
- 90. Huang Z, Dai L, Peng F, Tang L, Wang X, Chen J, et al. mTOR signaling pathway regulates embryonic development and rapid growth of triploid crucian carp. Aquaculture Reports. 2023;33:101860.
- 91. Librán-Pérez M, Geurden I, Dias K, Corraze G, Panserat S, Soengas JL. Feeding rainbow trout with a lipid-enriched diet: effects on fatty acid sensing, regulation of food intake and cellular signaling pathways. J Exp Biol. 2015;218(Pt 16):2610–9. pmid:26089527
- 92. Nogueiras R, López M, Lage R, Perez-Tilve D, Pfluger P, Mendieta-Zerón H, et al. Bsx, a novel hypothalamic factor linking feeding with locomotor activity, is regulated by energy availability. Endocrinology. 2008;149(6):3009–15. pmid:18308842
- 93. Varela L, Vázquez MJ, Cordido F, Nogueiras R, Vidal-Puig A, Diéguez C, et al. Ghrelin and lipid metabolism: Key partners in energy balance. J Mol Endocrinol. 2011;46(2):R43-63. pmid:21169422
- 94. Conde-Sieira M, Ceinos RM, Velasco C, Comesaña S, López-Patiño MA, Míguez JM, et al. Response of rainbow trout’s (Oncorhynchus mykiss) hypothalamus to glucose and oleate assessed through transcription factors BSX, ChREBP, CREB, and FoxO1. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2018;204(11):893–904. pmid:30225518
- 95. Padilla SL, Carmody JS, Zeltser LM. Pomc-expressing progenitors give rise to antagonistic neuronal populations in hypothalamic feeding circuits. Nat Med. 2010;16(4):403–5. pmid:20348924
- 96. Le HTMD, Angotzi AR, Ebbesson LOE, Karlsen Ø, Rønnestad I. The Ontogeny and Brain Distribution Dynamics of the Appetite Regulators NPY, CART and pOX in Larval Atlantic Cod (Gadus morhua L.). PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0153743. pmid:27100086
- 97. Cerdá-Reverter JM, Agulleiro MJ, Cortés R, Sánchez E, Guillot R, Leal E, et al. Involvement of melanocortin receptor accessory proteins (MRAPs) in the function of melanocortin receptors. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2013;188:133–6. pmid:23410915
- 98. Kulczykowska E, Sánchez Vázquez FJ. Neurohormonal regulation of feed intake and response to nutrients in fish: aspects of feeding rhythm and stress. Aquaculture Research. 2010;41(5):654–67.
- 99. Coughlin DJ. Ontogeny of feeding behaviour of first-feeding Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1991;48:1896–904.
- 100. Gomes AS, Jordal A-EO, Olsen K, Harboe T, Power DM, Rønnestad I. Neuroendocrine control of appetite in Atlantic halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus): Changes during metamorphosis and effects of feeding. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2015;183:116–25. pmid:25624165
- 101. Gomes AS, Zimmermann F, Hevrøy EM, Søyland MAL, Hansen TJ, Nilsen TO, et al. Statistical modelling of voluntary feed intake in individual Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Front Mar Sci. 2023;10.
- 102. Chandhini S, Trumboo B, Jose S, Varghese T, Rajesh M, Kumar VJR. Insulin-like growth factor signalling and its significance as a biomarker in fish and shellfish research. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2021;47(4):1011–31. pmid:33987811
- 103. Deal CK, Volkoff H. The role of the thyroid axis in fish. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:596585. pmid:33240222
- 104. Aviram R, Dandavate V, Manella G, Golik M, Asher G. Ultradian rhythms of AKT phosphorylation and gene expression emerge in the absence of the circadian clock components Per1 and Per2. PLoS Biol. 2021;19(12):e3001492. pmid:34968386
- 105. Jouffe C, Cretenet G, Symul L, Martin E, Atger F, Naef F, et al. The circadian clock coordinates ribosome biogenesis. PLoS Biol. 2013;11(1):e1001455. pmid:23300384
- 106. Vollmers C, Gill S, DiTacchio L, Pulivarthy SR, Le HD, Panda S. Time of feeding and the intrinsic circadian clock drive rhythms in hepatic gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(50):21453–8. pmid:19940241
- 107. Bolliet V, Aranda A, Boujard T. Demand-feeding rhythm in rainbow trout and European catfish. Synchronisation by photoperiod and food availability. Physiol Behav. 2001;73(4):625–33. pmid:11495668
- 108. Boulos Z, Terman M. Food availability and daily biological rhythms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1980;4(2):119–31. pmid:6106914
- 109. Deota S, Lin T, Chaix A, Williams A, Le H, Calligaro H, et al. Diurnal transcriptome landscape of a multi-tissue response to time-restricted feeding in mammals. Cell Metab. 2023;35(1):150-165.e4. pmid:36599299
- 110. Mistlberger RE. Circadian food-anticipatory activity: Formal models and physiological mechanisms. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1994;18(2):171–95. pmid:8058212
- 111. Sanchez-Vazquez FJ, Lopez-Olmeda JF, Vera LM, Migaud H, Lopez-Patino MA, Miguez JM. Environmental cycles, melatonin, and circadian control of stress response in fish. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2019;10:279.
- 112. Frøland Steindal IA, Whitmore D. Circadian Clocks in Fish-What Have We Learned so far?. Biology (Basel). 2019;8(1):17. pmid:30893815
- 113. Thraya M, Patel A, Stewart K, Abou-Akl H, Roberts D, Heath D, et al. Integration of photoperiod and time-restricted feeding on the circadian gene rhythms in juvenile salmon. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):16156. pmid:40346079
- 114. López-Olmeda JF. Nonphotic entrainment in fish. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2017;203:133–43. pmid:27642096
- 115. Soengas JL, Comesaña S, Blanco AM, Conde-Sieira M. Feed Intake Regulation in Fish: Implications for Aquaculture. Reviews in Fisheries Science & Aquaculture. 2024;33(1):8–60.
- 116. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550. pmid:25516281
- 117. Wu G, Anafi RC, Hughes ME, Kornacker K, Hogenesch JB. MetaCycle: An integrated R package to evaluate periodicity in large scale data. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(21):3351–3. pmid:27378304
- 118. Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–20. pmid:24695404
- 119. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(1):15–21. pmid:23104886
- 120. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(16):2078–9. pmid:19505943
- 121. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166–9. pmid:25260700
- 122. Hughes ME, Hogenesch JB, Kornacker K. JTK_CYCLE: An efficient nonparametric algorithm for detecting rhythmic components in genome-scale data sets. J Biol Rhythms. 2010;25(5):372–80. pmid:20876817
- 123.
Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2023.
- 124.
Kolde R. pheatmap: Pretty heatmaps. 2019.
- 125.
Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. 2016.
- 126. Parsons R, Parsons R, Garner N, Oster H, Rawashdeh O. CircaCompare: A method to estimate and statistically support differences in mesor, amplitude and phase, between circadian rhythms. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(4):1208–12. pmid:31588519
- 127. Markison S, Foster AC. Targeting melanocortin receptors for the treatment of obesity. Drug Discovery Today: Therapeutic Strategies. 2006;3(4):569–76.
- 128. Comesaña S, Velasco C, Ceinos RM, López-Patiño MA, Míguez JM, Morais S, et al. Evidence for the presence in rainbow trout brain of amino acid-sensing systems involved in the control of food intake. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2018;314(2):R201–15. pmid:29046316
- 129. Conde-Sieira M, Chivite M, Míguez JM, Soengas JL. Stress Effects on the Mechanisms Regulating Appetite in Teleost Fish. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:631. pmid:30405535
- 130.
Rønnestad I, Angotzi AR, Le HD, Edvardsen R, Ebbesson L, Arukwe A, et al. Characterizing appetite controlling system in fast-growing Atlantic cod larvae. Rennes, France, 2014.
- 131. Eilertsen M, Clokie BGJ, Ebbesson LOE, Tanase C, Migaud H, Helvik JV. Neural activation in photosensitive brain regions of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) after light stimulation. PLoS One. 2021;16(9):e0258007. pmid:34587204