Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Combining lenalidomide with IL-2 family of cytokines enhances activating receptor and perforin/granzyme expression in NK cells

  • Alexandra Calescibetta ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Alexandra Calescibetta, Robert Dalton, Nicole Fortenbery, Sheng Wei, Erika Adriana Eksioglu

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Robert Dalton ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Alexandra Calescibetta, Robert Dalton, Nicole Fortenbery, Sheng Wei, Erika Adriana Eksioglu

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Nicole Fortenbery ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Alexandra Calescibetta, Robert Dalton, Nicole Fortenbery, Sheng Wei, Erika Adriana Eksioglu

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Grace Ward,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America, Cancer Biology PhD Program, University of South Florida and H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Sean Christiansen,

    Roles Methodology, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Xianghong Chen,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Pingyan Cheng,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Tiffany Razabdouski,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Annelise J. Glode,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Nhan Tu,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Thu Le Trinh,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Jinghong Liu,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Kenneth L. Wright,

    Roles Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Immunology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, United Nations of America

  • Sheng Wei ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Alexandra Calescibetta, Robert Dalton, Nicole Fortenbery, Sheng Wei, Erika Adriana Eksioglu

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Resources, Supervision

    ‡ Co-senior authors

  • Erika Adriana Eksioglu

    Contributed equally to this work with: Alexandra Calescibetta, Robert Dalton, Nicole Fortenbery, Sheng Wei, Erika Adriana Eksioglu

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    erika.eksioglu@moffitt.org

    ‡ Co-senior authors

Abstract

Background

Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug approved in the treatment of autoimmune disease, inflammation, and cancer. Its impact continues to grow due to its diverse spectrum of effects hampered only by toxicities and reduced efficacy. Therefore, development of strategies that enhance function while reducing drawbacks remains a prime goal.

Objective and Hypothesis

The mechanisms of action of lenalidomide on the activity of natural killer cells (NK cells) remains understudied yet could be critical for the development of strategies to enhance its efficacy. These cells are critical drivers of anti-tumor immune responses which are often functionally suppressed in malignancies. NK cell and T cell survival and function is driven by the IL-2 family of cytokines (IL-2 or IL-15) and work has shown that lenalidomide potentially works by increasing the secretion of IL-2 by other lymphocytes, such as CD4+ T helper cells. Thus, we hypothesized that improving NK activity with IL-2 family of cytokines could lead to enhanced lenalidomide-induced responses of these cells.

Results

We show that lenalidomide does not affect NK cell viability but reduces their proliferation through cell cycle arrest which could be overcome by exogenous addition of IL-2 family of cytokines. Moreover, lenalidomide induced the secretion of IL-2 on isolated NK cells although it also modulated NK receptor expression, such as NKp46, trough downregulation of PI3K/AKT pathway reduction. This was overcome by exogeneous addition of IL-2 family of cytokines increasing natural cytotoxicity, through higher perforin and granzyme expression. Mechanistically, this increased gene and protein expression occurred through the activation of STAT5 by lenalidomide which was also enhanced through the exogenous addition of IL-2 family of cytokines and modulation of IL-2R subunit changes.

Conclusions

These data provide a rationale for the combination of lenalidomide with IL-2 family of cytokines to enhance the effectiveness of NK cells.

Introduction

Lenalidomide is a second-generation immunomodulatory drug (IMiDs) derived from the thalidomide backbone, itself a derivative of glutamic acid, and currently approved for the treatment of many inflammatory, autoimmune, and neoplastic diseases [1,2]. As an immunomodulatory drug, lenalidomide affects lymphocytes, including NK cells, through the upregulation of CD16 to enhance Antibody Dependent Cell cytotoxicity (ADCC) in vitro [36], secretion of interleukin-2 (IL-2) [7] and increased ‘natural cytotoxicity’ of NK cells through, the direct binding of activating receptors (e.g., NKG2D, 2B4, KIRs) [1,2]. IL-2, and its family members, activates cytotoxic cells reducing the threshold of NK cell activation [8]. Clinically, the effects of lenalidomide vary greatly, evidenced in its effectiveness at treating transfusion-dependent anemia in low-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with abnormal progenitors carrying deletion (5q) genotype while ineffective on other MDS subtypes [9,10]. In this disease, the inflammatory microenvironment leads to chronic dysregulation of immune cells including a decrease in the function of natural killer (NK) cells [11,12], a main target of lenalidomide, including reduced degranulation and ineffective cytotoxicity that contributes to the escape of the malignant clone [13]. While it is well established that lenalidomide increases the effectiveness of NK cells in MDS [14] understanding the precise molecular contributions of lenalidomide in the microenvironment, and its phenotypic impact on NK cells, will provide crucial insight for enhancing its clinical efficacy.

Lenalidomide has a variety of effects on NK cell activation and behavior depending on the initiating stimuli including: apoptosis [15], cell cycle arrest [10,16] and induction of IL-2 production [17]. The majority of IL-2 in the microenvironment after lenalidomide treatment is usually attributed to T cell secretion in the microenvironment suggesting that for NK cells lenalidomide’s indirect effects may come from extra secretion of this cytokine. In this study, we examined the impact of lenalidomide on NK cell viability, proliferation, receptor expression, and cytotoxicity with or without supplementation with IL-2 or IL-15 on isolated NK cells or NK cells measured from the treated whole mononuclear population. We found that NKp46 (a natural cytotoxicity receptor) [18] and two Killing Inhibitory Receptors (KIRs), are downregulated. In support of other studies [6] we also found increased NK cells upon treatment with lenalidomide. Importantly, natural cytotoxicity is enhanced via increased granule mobilization, and expression of granzyme B and perforin when both lenalidomide and IL-15 are present together. The IL-2 family of receptors, signal through a common system where they share the IL-2Rβ and IL-2Rγ chain, the latter being shared by all members of the IL-2 family [19]. Our data show that this upregulation of cytotoxicity is in response to activation of STAT5, and upregulation of IL-2 receptor subunits, and further enhanced by the addition of IL-15, a cytokine which is critical for NK development and function [20]. IL-2Rβ and IL-2Rγ chains are increased at the cell surface of treated NK cells, presumably involved in a positive feedback loop. Our work provides a rationale for further study of activation of NK cells with IL-15 before or during lenalidomide treatment to enhance the immunomodulatory properties of this drug, while eliminating some of the immune suppressive effects seen with lenalidomide monotherapy.

Materials and methods

Reagents

To understand the role of IL-2 family of receptors on NK behavior we used the following NK cell lines: YT (RRID:CVCL_1797), an IL-2 independent cell line courtesy of Eric Long; YTS, an IL-2 independent cell line originally derived from YT cells (CVCL_D324, RRID:CVCL_D324); NK-92 (CRL-2407, ATCC, Manassas, Virginia, RRID:CVCL_2142) and NKL (LGL cell line, RRID:CVCL_0466) are both IL-2 dependent cell lines. All these cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 (cat# 338080, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, United States) supplemented with 12.5% fetal bovine serum (cat# 16000−044, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, United States), 1% pennicillin-streptomycin (cat# MT 30–002-CI, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States), 1mM HEPES (cat# 15630−080, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, United States), 1% non-essential amino acids (cat# 25–025-CI, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States), 1% sodium pyruvate (cat# 25–000-CI, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) and L-glutamine (cat# MT 25–005-CI, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) If IL-2 dependent, they received 300U/mL recombinant human (rh) IL-2 (cat# 200−02, Peprotech, Cranbury, New Jersey) and 50uM β2 mercaptoethanol (cat# 21-985-023, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) every other day. Pathway inhibitors used were: Wortmannin (cat# W1628-1MG Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States), U0126 (cat# 662005 Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States), Ly294002 (cat# 440202 Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States), API-2 (Triciribine hydrate; cat# T3830 Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States), AG 490 (cat# 658401 Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States).

Primary human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were sourced from Florida Blood Services’s (OneBlood, Orlando, Florida, United States) buffy coats and isolated by Ficoll-Paque Plus density gradient (cat# 45001750, GE Healthcare, Chicago, Illinois, United States). Ethical review and approval were waived for this study, due to the use of buffy coats which is considered non-Human research under exemption status 4 since the samples are de-identified and obtained from a commercial source. Therefore, due to lack of characterizing information (i.e.,: age and gender), we did not select the specimens used in our experiments. After PBMC isolation, NK cells were enriched using the negative NK cell enrichment kit from Stem Cell Technologies (cat# 17955, StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) and purity assessed by flow cytometry of CD56+CD3- cells (see flow cytometry section). PBMC were cultured in complete RPMI as cell lines and NK cells were cultured with ImmunoCult NK cell expansion kit (cat# 100−0711, StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, Canada) following the manufacturer’s protocol and supplemented every other day with 300U/mL rhIL-2 and 50uM β2 mercaptoethanol. Immediately after isolation PBMC and isolated NK cells were used. Recombinant human IL-2 was added at 300U/mL for testing and rh IL-15 (cat# 300-138P, GeminiBio, West Sacramento, California, United States) was added at 10ng/mL as indicated in the results section. Lenalidomide (cat# S1029, Selleckchem, Houston, Texas, United States) was dissolved first in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, cat# D2650, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) at a 10mM concentration and aliquots frozen at -80oC until ready to use.

Flow cytometry

For cell cycle analysis 7.5x105 cells were fixed in 1.5mL of ice cold 100% ethanol (cat# E7023-6X500ML, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) while gently vortexing to avoid cell clumping, and allowing for a single cell suspension, and stored at -20oC until ready to stain. Cells were then washed with 1X PBS (cat# 14190–250, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) and incubated in PBS supplemented with propidium iodine (PI, 1 mg/mL, cat# 556463, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) and ribonuclease A (RNAse, 10 mg/mL, cat# BP25391, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) at room temperature for 2–3 hours or overnight at 4oC. After acquisition, data was analyzed using ModFit LT Software (Verity Software House, Topsham, Maine, United States, RRID:SCR_016106). Flow cytometry-based proliferation assessment was done by staining cells with either CFSE (Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester, cat# C34554, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, United States) or CellTracker Violet BMQC dye (cat# C10094, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, United States). Apoptosis analysis was done by staining experimental cells with Annexin V FITC (cat# 556547, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA) and PI according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Surface phenotyping of NK cells was measured with the use of the following antibodies: anti-human CD3 FITC (HIT3a, cat# 11-0039-42, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, RRID:AB_1724043), anti-human CD3 PE (HIT3a, cat# 300308, Biolegend, San Diego, California, United States, RRID:AB_314044), anti-human CD16 FITC (3G8, cat# 555406, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States, RRID:AB_395806), anti-human NKG2D PE (1D11, cat# 12-5878-41, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, RRID:AB_1659727), NKp44 PE (p44-8, cat# 558563, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States, RRID:AB_647239), NKp30/CD337 PE (P30-15, cat# 558407, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States, RRID:AB_647240), anti-human CD132/IL-2Rγ chain PE (AG184, cat# 561699, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States, RRID:AB_10896131), anti-human CD122/IL-2Rβ PerCP eFluor 750 (9A2-CD122, cat# 46-1229-41, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, RRID:AB_10698171), anti-Human CD107a (LAMP-1) PE (eBioH4A3, Cat# 12-1079-42, Thermo Fisher Scientific Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, RRID:AB_10853326), anti-human CD107a PECy7 (H4A3, cat# 561348, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States, RRID:AB_10644018), IFN-γ APC (B27, Cat# 554702, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States, RRID:AB_398580), IFN-γ eFluor 450 (4S.B3, cat# 48-7319-42, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, RRID:AB_2043866), CD56 APC (CMSSB, Cat# 17-0567-41, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, RRID:AB_10596498), CD56 FITC (MEM188, cat# 11-0569-42, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, RRID:AB_1834372), 2B4/CD244 PE (2−69, cat# 550816, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States, RRID:AB_393901), DNAM-1/CD226 Alexa Fluor 647 (DX11, cat# 564797, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States, RRID:AB_2738957), NKp46/NCR1/CD335 PE (195314, cat# FAB1850P, R and D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, RRID:AB_2149279), KIR2DL1/KIR2DS5 FITC (143211, cat# FAB1844F, R and D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, RRID:AB_2130402), KIR2DL3/CD158b2 FITC (180701, cat# FAB2014F, R and D Systems, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, RRID:AB_2130677).

Data was acquired in BD LSRII equipment from Moffitt’s Flow cytometry core facility, that maintains daily quality control of each cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo (TreeStar, Ashland, Oregon, United States, RRID:SCR_008520). All analyses included gating on live cells which were staining using 7AAD (cat# 51–2359KC, BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States,) or LIVE/DEAD dyes (cat# L34960, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, United States).

Radioactive isotope-based proliferation and cytotoxicity assays

Apart from flow cytometric assessment, proliferation of NK cells after treatment (as described in the results section) was also measured by [3H] thymidine (1.0 μCi per well; cat# MP01240662, MP Biomedicals, Irvine, California, United States) in 96-well U bottom plates (cat# 3879, Corning Life Sciences, Acton, Massachusetts, United States). To assess the cytotoxic potential of NK cells (primary or cell lines) we used K562 (cat# CCL-243, ATCC, Manassas, Virginia, United States, RRID:CVCL_K562), 721.221 (cat# CRL-1855, ATCC, Manassas, Virginia, United States, RRID:CVCL_6263), or MDS-L (RRID:CVCL_A8QV) target cells pre-loaded with 100 μCi of 51Cr (chromium, cat# NEZ 0305 002MC, PerkinElmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) per 1x106 cells for 60 min at 37°C. After co-culture with NK cells for 5 hours, 200 uL of media was collected for radioisotope release. Quantification was done by measuring radioactivity on a Wizard 1470 gamma counter (PerkinElmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) and plotted as mean counts per minute (cpm) of triplicate wells.

Cytokine production

To measure cytokine release, culture supernatants were collected and frozen at -80C until ready to run the assay. At that point, supernatants were incubated with IL-2, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-6 from the BD Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) Human Th1/Th2/Th17 kit (cat# 560484, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States) measured by flow cytometry, at Moffitt’s flow cytometry core facility, following the manufacturer’s protocol. Using the standard provided in each array, the concentration of each cytokine was assessed and plotted accordingly. Each sample was run in triplicates for each experimental determination.

Western Blot

To measure changes in protein expression, after experimentation cells were harvested and lysed for 30 minutes in a buffer containing: 50 mM Tris-HCl, 1% NP-40, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1 mM sodium fluoride supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (cat# P 2714 Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) and phosphatase inhibitor coacktails I and II (cat# P2850 and cat# P-5726, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) to prevent protein degradation. Total protein was measured in a Bio-Rad protein assay (cat# 500−0006, Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, United States) prior to running on a 10−12% Tris Acrylamide gel (prepared in house using cat# 161−0158 30% Accylamide solution and cat# 161−0800 TEMED both from Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, United States) to resolve protein by size by running constant current at 40 Volts (V) until the protein reached the border between the stacking and running gels (approximately 15 minutes) followed by 100V for approximately 1.5 hours, until the dye reached the bottom of the gel. A total of 50ug of protein per lane was used to allow normalization to a house keeping gene. The proteins were then transferred to a PVDF membrane (cat# 1620177, Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, United States) by electrophoresis overnight at 20 milliAmps (mA) surrounded by ice. After assessing that the highest band transferred completely membranes were retrieved and blocked with 5% nonfat milk-based tris buffer with 0.05% Tween 20 (cat# BP337−500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States). The primary antibodies used for protein expression assessment were: total STAT5 (D3N2B, 1:1000, cat# 25656, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, United States, RRID:AB_2798908), phospho- STAT5 (C11C5, 1:1000, cat# 9359P, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, United States), total AKT (11E7, 1:1000, cat# 4685S, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, United States), phospho-AKT (D25E6, 1:1000, cat# 130385, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, United States), PI3K p85 (I9H8, 1:1000, cat# 4257, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, Massachusetts, United States, RRID:AB_659889) and beta-actin as a loading control (AC-74, 1:5000, cat#A5316, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, United States, RRID:AB_476743). All primary antibodies were incubated overnight and beta-actin for 1 hour. After blotting with the appropriate secondary bands were detected with the SuperSignal™ West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate detection system (cat# 34580, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States).

Real Time PCR

RNA was isolated from treated cells by Trizol Reagent (cat# 15596018, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) lysis and isolation or using the RNeasy kit (cat# 74106, Qiagen, Germantown, Maryland, United States) after lysing in RLT buffer included in the kit. To measure the concentration after isolation we used NanoDrop Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States, RRID:SCR_025369) part of Moffitt’s common equipment. One ug of total RNA was used to prepare cDNA using the qScript cDNA Supermix (cat# 95048–100, Quantabio, Beverly, Massachusetts, United States) followed by real-time semi-quantitative PCR with 1uL of cDNA using the iQ SYBR Green Supermix (cat# 170–8880, Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, United States) for the enzymatic reaction with a total reaction volume of 20uL. After an initial activation step of 3 minutes at 95°C, each reaction continued with 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, 60°C–62°C for 30 seconds and 95°C for 1 minute with fluorescence measurement at the annealing step of each cycle. To ensure the quality of the primers and reactions, a melting curve was run after cycling finished at a 0.5 °C ramp starting from 55 °C till 95 °C. The reactions were done in a 96-well spectrofluorometric thermal cycler (Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (RRID:SCR_018064). For each experiment duplicate determinations of each treatment were done.

Primers specific for each respective mRNA used in this study were: Perforin (PRF1): forward 5’-CAGCACTGACACGGTGGAGT-3’; reverse-5’-GTCAGGGTGCAGCGGG-3’. Granzyme B (GZMB): forward- 5’-TCCTAAGAACTTCTCCAACGACATC 3’; reverse- 5’-GCACAGCTCTGGTCCGCT-3’. Actin (PCR control, ACTB)): forward- 5’- TGGCACCCAGCACAATGAA-3’; reverse- 5’-CTAAGTCATAGTCCGCCTAGAAGCA-3’. After selecting the cycle threshold (Ct) quantification was done using the method 2 −ΔΔCT where first delta is the difference of each point compared to the experimental control and the second delta is the difference with the internal gene ACTB.

Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy

After appropriate culturing conditions for each experiment 100000 cells were collected on slides in a Cytospin by centrifugation for 3 min cetrifugation at 500 rpm and fixed with BD Cytofix/Cytoperm buffer (cat# 554722, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, United States,) for 15 min at room temperature followed by 3 washes with 1X PBS (pH 7.4) and freezing at −20 °C until use. When ready, slides were allowed to defrost, rehydrated with three 5 min washes with 1X PBS followed by blocking with 2% BSA (cat# J30867-A1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Appropriate primary antibodies: Granzyme B (C-19, 1:200 dilution, cat# sc-1968, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, United States, RRID:AB_2279405) or Perforin (H-315, cat# sc-9105, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas, United States, RRID:AB_2168954)), were diluted in blocking buffer used to incubate the slides overnight at 4 °C. The next day the slides were washed three times with 1X PBS after which the appropriate secondary antibodies (donkey anti-goat A647 cat# A-21447 RRID:AB_141844, and donkey anti-rabbit A488 cat# A-21206 RRID:AB_2535792 respectively, both from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States) were diluted in blocking buffer and incubated on the slides for 1 hr in the dark at room temperature. Slides were then washed and mounted with ProLong Gold Antifade Reagent with DAPI (cat# P36930, LifeTechnologies, Carlsbad, California, United States) and covered with a coverslip. Fluorescence imaging was measured with a Leica TCS SP5 AOBS Laser Scanning Confocal microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) at the Microscopy Core Facility of Moffitt Cancer Center where samples were excited with 405, 488, and 638 diode lasers and emissions were tuned to appropriate settings for each dye. Images were captured through a 63X/1.4NA objective lens using two PMT detectors (DAPI and Alexa 488) and one HyD detector (Alexa 647). All system settings remained consistent for all samples within each experiment. Images were viewed and exported in TIF format with Leica Application Suite X software version 3.1.5 (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany RRID:SCR_013673). In each slide (one per treatment per experiment) 10 fields selected at random were captured for analysis and saved as TIF files.

Fluorescence Intensity analysis was performed by the Microscopy Core on the TIF images with Definiens Tissue Studio version 4.7 (Definiens AG, Munich, Germany RRID:SCR_014283). In the software the nucleus detection and cell growth algorithms were used to segment individual cells within each image. Using this cell segmentation the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was calculated for each image and exported to Microsoft Excel for analysis.

Virus production and transduction

Plasmids used for our PI3K studies were originally derived from p110α of class IA PI3K: constitutively active CAp110 is M-p110*-myc a chimera containing the iSH2 domain of p85 fused to the N terminus of p110α by a flexible glycine kinker; while dominant negative DNp110 is M-p110Δkin-myc a kinase-deficient p110α in which the arginine at position 802 is mutated to a lysine residue. These vectors were originally described in [21,22] and were a gift from Dr. Julie Djeu who herself obtained them from A. Klippel (Atugen, Berlin, Germany).

The generation of and infection with vaccinia virus have been described previously [23,24]. Briefly, cells were incubated with recombinant vaccinia viruses encoding CAp110 or DNp110 for 1.5 h at 37oC in serum-free medium at a multiplicity of infection of five. Vaccinia virus expressing CD56 was used as a control for nonspecific effects of viral infection. Transduction was assessed by flow cytometry and confirmed by western blot analysis of PI3K. Cells were not selected post infection and used immediately after testing for expression.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism Software (GraphPad Prism, Boston, Massachusetts, United Stated, RRID:SCR_002798). Sample sizes were estimated based on our previous studies and literature. Data was assessed by normality and appropriate tests were selected for analysis. Statistical significance to assess two treatment groups only, such as the cytokine levels (ELISA) of untreated or treated with lenalidomide, were determined by unpaired Student t tests. Analysis of two variables, such as time and cytotoxicity, were analyzed for significance using two-way ANOVA. A one-way ANOVA was applied to other data with multiple comparison analysis when various treatment groups were analyzed. Data of timelines were assessed by calculating the area under the curve followed by comparison of area measurements. All analysis and graphics show standard error of the mean bars (SEM) of at least three biological replicates (denoted as n on figure legends) and p values < 0.05 were statistically significant.

Results

Lenalidomide combination with IL-2 family of cytokines changes NK cell subsets

To assess the effect of combining lenalidomide treatment of NK cells with IL-2 or its relative IL-15, a more potent activator of NK cells [19,25], we treated either peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC, to assess the potential indirect effect of lenalidomide on NK cells), or isolated NK cells (to understand the direct effect of treatment) with lenalidomide and/or IL-2/IL-15 to study viability and apoptosis. We used the effective dose of lenalidomide we used in our previous studies in these experiments [26]. Lenalidomide decreased the viability of PBMC (live cells defined as Annexin V-/PI-) which was overcome by the addition of IL-2 or IL-15 (S Fig 1a, representative figure of n = 5 separate healthy donor PBMC). However, this did not extend to availability of NK cells in the mononuclear population where we saw an increase in the percentage of these cells in the presence of IL-2, IL-15 or lenalidomide (CD56+CD3- cells gated directly from live cell; Fig 1a, representative figure of n = 6 separate healthy donor PBMC). IL-2 and IL-15 maintained the viability of NK cells regardless of lenalidomide treatment suggesting that the effect of lenalidomide and IL-2 family of cytokines are independent of each other on NK cells (Fig 1b-c). Moreover, it suggests that lenalidomide treatment does not induce enough IL-2 production from other cells in the microenvironment to increase the percentages of NK cells in the mononuclear population.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Combination with IL-2 or IL-15 restores impaired proliferation induced by lenalidomide.

a) Flow cytometric phenotyping of primary healthy human PBMC, gated on NK cell subpopulations as shown from total live cells (total NK cells are defined as CD3-CD56+and percentage is shown on the side of gates, NK cell subsets: CD56dim and CD56bright from total NK and percentages are shown inside each gate) after treatment with 10μM lenalidomide (LEN), or DMSO vehicle for 7 days. Data representative of n = 6 healthy donor individual experiments (biological replicates). Pseudo-coloring denotes the density of cells on each marker. b) Isolated primary human healthy NK cells and subsets: (CD56+CD3- total NK cells, CD56dim and CD56bright) after treatment with lenalidomide, IL-2, IL-15 or their combination for 7 days. Data representative of n = 6 healthy donor individual experiments (biological replicates). Pseudo-coloring denotes the density of cells on each marker. c) Viability of isolated primary NK cells treated with lenalidomide, IL-2, IL-15 or their combination for 72 hours by flow cytometric analysis using a live/dead dye. Proliferation of isolated primary NK subsets (d) CD56bright and (e) CD56dim by flow cytometric analysis of CellTrace Violet from cells gated as in “a” and “b” (n = 6 healthy donor biological replicates). f) Representative figure of proliferation with CellTrace Violet of NK subsets as in d and e from primary isolated NK cells from healthy donor PBMC (representative of n = 6 biological replicates). Grey line shows the recorded data, and the blue lines represent the divisions as calculated by FlowJo. In all figures, error bars represent the SEM of biological replicates and were analyzed by ordinary one-way ANOVA with multiple comparison analysis. P values are shown as asterisk: * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001, **** P ≤ 0.0001 as summarized in Graphpad Prism.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344471.g001

CD56 expression defines the functionality of human NK cell subsets: CD56dim NK cells are more cytotoxic while CD56bright NK cells focus on the production of cytokines after monocyte-induced activation [27]. Lenalidomide can modulate the expression of CD56 potentially shifting the activity of NK cells in the tumor microenvironment [5,6,28]. Therefore, we tested the effect of lenalidomide alone or in combination with IL-2 family of cytokines on NK cell subsets. Lenalidomide increased the percentages of total NK cells (percentage shown on the side of the gates representing total CD56+CD3- NK cells), their populations remained with higher CD56dim proportions (bottom gate labeled “dim” with percentage shown inside the gate). However, treatment with IL-2 increased the proportion of CD56bright (percentages shown on gate labeled “Bright”) as well changing the ratio of these two different NK cell subsets regardless of the presence of other immune cells in the culture (PBMC versus isolated cells, Fig 1a-b, representative figures of n = 6 healthy donors). IL-15 co-treatment with lenalidomide had a better preservation of the CD56dim population (Fig 1a-b). This matches the proliferation potential of NK cell subtypes under these conditions: The number of dividing CD56bright cells decreased with the presence of IL-2 or IL-15 while the combination of lenalidomide with IL-15 did not have a significant reduction, showing the same number of generations as control or lenalidomide only treatments (Fig 1d and f; f is a representative figure of n = 6 healthy donors from tracker dye stained cells gated as in Fig 1b). In comparison, the cytotoxic CD56dim cells did not significantly change the number of dividing cells with any of the teatment combinations (Fig 1e-f; f is a representative figure of n = 6 healthy donors from tracker dye-stained cells gated as in Fig 1b).

Lenalidomide needs extra IL-2 family of cytokines to move from cell cycle arrest

To confirm that IL-2/IL-15 can increase proliferation restricted by lenalidomide separately from just increased survival, we used the NK cell lines YT and YTS (IL-2 independent cell lines), NK-92 and NKL (IL-2 dependent cell lines) to confirm results observed in primary cells as well as to understand the role of the shared IL-2 receptor in lenalidomide’s effects. The IL-2 independent cell lines validated the observations in primary NK cells with reduced proliferation when the cytokines or cytokines and lenalidomide are present, while IL-2 sensitive cell lines did not (S Fig 1b). This suggests that IL-2 needed for survival leads to a bigger threshold to induce proliferation, supporting the need to enhance lenalidomide treatment with IL-2 family of cytokines. We further interrogated this increased proliferation by selecting YT cells for long term culture, where we observed that lenalidomide treated YT cells have significantly impaired cell proliferation (Fig 2a, average of n = 3 biological replicates) although the addition of exogenous IL-2 improved the lenalidomide-induced proliferation impairment, to levels above the control group in YT cells (Fig 2b, average of n = 3 biological replicates). We also compared the proliferative effects of IL-2, IL-15, or their combination with lenalidomide and found that IL-15, alone or in combination, significantly increased the proliferation of cells compared to IL-2 alone (only day 7 shown Fig 2c, n = 3 biological replicates).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Combination with IL-2 with Lenalidomide’s effects on NK cell cycle.

Proliferation of YT cells measured by overnight tritium (3H) incorporation (1.0 μCi per well) after culture for 1,3,5 or 7 days in the presence of 10 or 20μM lenalidomide (LEN) in the (a) absence or (b) presence of human recombinant (hr) IL-2 (100U/mL) or (c) combined results of YT proliferation at 7 days for coculture of lenalidomide with IL-2 and/or IL-15. Results expressed as mean counts per minute (cpm) of triplicate wells for each experiment, and a total of n = 3 biological replicates. Cell cycle analysis of isolated primary NK cells (n = 6 healthy donor biological replicates), treated as indicated, measured via flow cytometric analysis of propidium iodide (PI) staining and expressed as percent of cells in (d) S, (e) G1, or (f) G2 phase. g) Cell cycle analysis of YT cells cultured with 20μM LEN (for up to 14 days) measured via flow cytometric analysis of propidium iodide (PI) staining and expressed as percent of cells in S, G1 and G2 phase. Error bars represent the SEM and were analyzed by 2way ANOVA. P values are shown as asterisk: * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001, **** P ≤ 0.0001 as summarized in Graphpad Prism.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344471.g002

Next, we assessed if the reduced cell proliferation, in the absence of increased apoptosis, is instead the result of cell cycle arrest. In cultures of primary NK cells, the only demonstrable cell cycle change seen was a significant decrease in the percentage of cells in S-phase in the presence of IL-2, which was only achieved by IL-15 when combined with lenalidomide (Fig 2d-f). Longer incubations using YT cells treated with lenalidomide did have a time-dependent increase in cells in G1, decrease in S-phase and corresponding reduction in G2 (Fig 2g) which were not apparent until day 5 (G1 & S) or day 10 (G2). This may explain the lack of effect seen in the short incubation of isolated NK cells. Similarly, PBMC treated for 7 days also had a G1 arrest, overcome by IL-2 or IL-15 (S1C Fig, average of n = 6 biological replicates).

NK receptor expression is selectively modulated by Lenalidomide

NK activating and inhibitory receptor expression has a direct impact on the cytotoxic efficacy of a NK cell [29], which can be modulated by treatment with lenalidomide [5,30]. Due to functional implications of subset switching, we decided to investigate the phenotypic characterization of NK cell activating and inhibitory receptors after lenalidomide treatment. An analysis of lenalidomide’s impact demonstrates that several key NK receptors are affected by treatment including CD16, NKp46, KIR2DL3, KIR2DL1 (Fig 3a) while others remained unchanged by lenalidomide treatment (NKG2D, 2B4 and DNAM1, S Fig 2a). We found that CD16 expression is increased by lenalidomide in CD56bright NK cells, similar to other’s work [6] while in the more cytotoxic CD56dim cells it did not. NKp46, a key NK activating receptor, is downregulated in the CD56bright population, but unchanged on CD56dim cells (Fig 3a). The two inhibitory KIRs, KIR2DL1 and KIR2DL3, were both reduced by lenalidomide. KIR2DL3 was reduced in both NK subsets while KIR2DL1 was only in the CD56dim population (Fig 3a). This suggests that despite a ratio disfavoring CD56dim NK cell, these are likely more active than untreated NK cells. The other receptors studied; NKG2D, 2B4, or DNAM-1 were not affected in either subset (S2a Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Lenalidomide acts directly on NK cells to modulate the expression of CD16 and NKp46.

(a) Flow cytometric phenotyping of NK cell receptor expression in primary human healthy PBMC, gated on NK cell subpopulations (total NK cells CD3-CD56+, NK cell subsets CD56dim and CD56bright from total NK) after treatment with 10μM lenalidomide (LEN), or DMSO. Shown are: CD16, NKp46, KIR2DL3, KIR2DL1. Data representative of n = 5 independent experiments. (b) Western blot analysis of phosphorylated AKT (pAKT) in either primary isolated NK cells or YT cells treated as shown. Full raw gels are shown in supplemental figure 2. (c) Quantification of western blots showing the ratio of phosphor-AKT (phosphorylated threonine 308) to total AKT (n = 3) and representative figure for p85 in YT cells treated with 20μM of LEN, or a DMSO control, for 1, 3, 5, or 7 days. (d) Corroboration of phosphor AKT reduction by LEN treatment measured with phospho-flow. To adjust data across samples to minimize technical variation (batch effects) for biological comparisons the Y-axis overlay normalization in FlowJo was used in this analysis as shown. Error bars represent the SEM and were analyzed by ANOVA with multiple comparison analysis. P values are shown as asterisk: * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001, **** P ≤ 0.0001 as summarized in Graphpad Prism.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344471.g003

The PI3K/AKT/mTOR (Phosphoinositide 3-kinases/ Protein kinase B/ mechanistic target of rapamycin) pathway regulates the expression of crucial NK receptors, including NKp46 [31,32], and lenalidomide can affect PI3K activity [33]. Hence, to define the mechanism by which lenalidomide affects these receptors, we first dissected the role of lenalidomide on this pathway. Lenalidomide inhibits AKT activation in both primary isolated human NK and YT cells, as measured by AKT phosphorylation in western blot, but did not affect the overall protein level of p85 (the regulatory subunit of PI3K, [34]) suggesting a specific inhibition of AKT activation (Fig 3b-c, representative figure of n = 5 healthy donors and n = 3 biological replicates, S2b-S2d Figs shows raw gels). We validated this reduction of phosphorylated AKT in YT cells by intracellular flow cytometry (Fig 3d, representative figure of n = 3 biological replicates) and observed a time-dependent inhibition with the strongest reduction at day 1 and restoration of normal phosphor-AKT levels by day 7 post lenalidomide treatment.

NKp46 expression is selectively modulated by Lenalidomide through PI3K inhibition

To confirm that NKp46 regulation by lenalidomide is linked to AKT we did chemical inhibition of key pathways linked or peripheral to PI3K/AKT pathway to assess their role (schematized in Fig 4a). We have previously used a similar strategy to demonstrate that PI3K is the key upstream regulator of MAPK-ERK in the NK lytic process and that Wortmannin- or LY294002-inhibition of PI3K in NK cells blocked ERK activation and perforin–granzyme B movement towards target cells, and subsequently tumor cytotoxicity [35,36]. While both Wortmanin (IC50 5nM) and LY294002 (IC50 1.4μM,) are highly specific PI3K inhibitors, it has been shown that they have different effects on phosphorylation of the p85 and p110 subunits [37,38]. Wortmannin makes a covalent bond with the catalytic subunit p110 making a conformation change in the protein [37]. LY294002 on the other side binds reversibly and competes directly for the ATP binding site of p110 catalytic subunit [37]. As such, Wortmanin treatment decreases the phosphorylation of both p85 and p110 while LY294002, under the same conditions, has residual phosphorylation of both subunits even at large quantities. Importantly both have been shown to have different effects on apoptosis and proliferation in cells [39]. They affect iNOS and immune responses below it differently too [40]. Lenalidomide decreased the levels of NKp46, even at a lower dose of 5uM (Fig 4b, representative figure of n = 3 biological replicates) which was mimicked by Wortmannin at the two doses tested (0.2nM and 20nM, Fig 4c, representative figure of n = 3 biological replicates). However, LY294002 did not reduce NKp46 at 20nM and only slightly reduced NKp46 at the 2uM dose (Fig 4c, representative figure of n = 3 biological replicates). This suggests that complete abrogation of the PI3K signaling is needed for the effect observed with lenalidomide.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Lenalidomide acts directly on NK cells to modulate the expression of CD56 and NKp46.

(a) Schematic representation of pathways targeted with inhibitors to understand how NKp46 is regulated. Created in BioRender. Eksioglu, E. (2025) https://BioRender.com/rg1nk09. (b) NKp46 expression by flow cytometry in YT cells after treatment with either 20μM or 5μM lenalidomide (figure representative of n = 3 biological replicates). Legend inside gate shows the percentage of events inside the gate shown from total live cells measured. (c) NKp46 expression by flow cytometry in YT cells after treatment with the PI3K inhibitors Wortmannin (doses tested 0.2nM and 20nM) and LY294002 (doses tested 20nM and 2μM). Figure representative of n = 3 biological replicates. Legend inside gate shows the percentage of events inside the gate shown from total live cells measured. (d) NKp46 expression by flow cytometry in YT cells after inhibition of other AKT targeting pathways: U0126 (MEK inhibitor, 0.1μM), AG490 (JAK2 inhibitor, 25μM) and API-2 (AKT inhibitor, 10μM). Figure representative of n = 3 biological replicates. (e) Mechanistic validation of PI3K signaling in YT cells infected with viral vectors expressing a CD56 (control), DNp110, or CAp110; followed by treatment with lenalidomide for 4 days. Graph shows the percent of NKp46 positive cells after transfection with either CD56 (control), CAp110 or DNp110 in the presence or absence of lenalidomide measured by flow cytometry. Error bars represent the SEM of n = 4 biological replicates and were analyzed by ordinary ANOVA with multiple comparison analysis. P values are shown as asterisk: * P ≤ 0.05, ** P ≤ 0.01, *** P ≤ 0.001, **** P ≤ 0.0001 as summarized in Graphpad Prism.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344471.g004

Our group previously demonstrated that inhibition of PI3K in NK cells blocks MAPK kinase (MEK) and ERK activation suppresses NK cytotoxicity [35]. To assess if NKp46 reduction induced by PI3K inhibition is linked to MAPK inhibition we treated cells with U0126, a MEK inhibitor [41]. Inhibition of MEK did not affect the expression of NKp46 suggesting that while PI3K inhibition modulates NK function through MEK it does not affect NK receptor expression (Fig 4d, representative figure of n = 3 biological replicates). The other pathway linked to NK function leads to AKT activation via gene expression upregulation in JAK2 pathway which can be blocked by AG-490 (Tyrphostin) [42]. However, blocking JAK2 did not lead to a significant change to NKp46 protein expression at the cell surface in YT cells. Similarly, blocking directly AKT signaling with API-2 [43] did not change this expression. These data suggest that lenalidomide’s induction of NKp46 expression in the surface of NK cells is directly regulated by PI3K inhibition separate from the other NK function linked pathways (Fig 4d, representative figure of n = 3 biological replicates).

To directly validate the role of lenalidomide and PI3K regulation of NKp46 expression, we infected YT cells with vaccinia viral vectors expressing the constitutively active PI3K (CAp110) or a dominant negative PI3K (DNp110) prior to lenalidomide (Fig 4e). Lenalidomide significantly inhibited NKp46 expression in CAp110 expressing cells but not significantly in DNp110 expressing cells, consistent with a role of lenalidomide inhibiting NKp46 through the PI3K pathway. Interestingly, DNp110 also induced an increase in NKp46 positive cells, however, this was not significantly altered by lenalidomide. Lenalidomide had a significant inhibition of NKp46 suggesting that it uses a similar but separate process as PI3K p110 to reduce NKp46, as DNp110 was not capable of completely preventing the effect of lenalidomide on NKp46 expression (Fig 4e). This data provides evidence that lenalidomide reduces NKp46 through inhibition of PI3K on CD56bright cells, but not CD56dim.

Lenalidomide does not induce activating cytokines but increases production of cytolytic mediators

NK cells, especially CD56bright cells, are potent cytokine producers contributing to the inflammatory microenvironment, regulate immune cell activation, and direct response to tumor cells [27,44]. Lenalidomide and thalidomide (its parent compound) are well known for their immunomodulatory effects [15,45]. Further, lenalidomide has diverse effects on cytokine secretion, depending on the environment and cell type [46,47]. We found that lenalidomide treatment of whole PBMCs resulted in decreased IL-10 and IL-4 but significantly increased IL-2 while IFNγ, IL-6 and IL-17 were not significantly changed (S3a Fig, n = 3 separate healthy donor PBMC each run in n = 3 independent determinations). Similar experiments in isolated primary NK cells revealed that secretions of IL-2 and IL-6 were significantly decreased by lenalidomide treatment while IFN-γ was significantly reduced only after 6 days of treatment (Fig 5a, n = 3 separate healthy-donor isolated NK cells each run in n = 3 independent determinations). Furthermore TNF-α was downregulated by lenalidomide in isolated primary NK (Fig 5a, n = 3 healthy donor isolated NK cells each run in n = 3 independent determinations). NK cells produce IFN-γ in response to tumor cells or other stimulatory conditions to stimulate an antitumorigenic immune response [48]. Therefore, we reasoned that without stimulation IFN-γ production might be unaffected by lenalidomide, as observed in PBMC and in isolated NK cells. Hence, we treated isolated healthy NK cells with lenalidomide for 7 days followed by a 5-hour pulse with K562 cells as tumor target cells and assess the intracellular level of IFN-γ in NK cells (Fig 5b, n = 3 separate healthy donor isolated NK cells). However, while exposure to tumor target cells enhanced the activation of NK cells, neither CD107+ granule mobilization nor IFN-γ production was significantly altered by lenalidomide.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Lenalidomide modulates NK cytokine production and enhances natural cytotoxicity.

(a). Concentration of cytokines secreted in the supernatants of isolated NK cells treated with 20μM lenalidomide (LEN) or vehicle measured at 1, 3 or 6 days of culture using a cytometric bead array. (b) Primary NK cells cultured in 10μM lenalidomide or DMSO for 7 days followed by pulsing with K562 tumor targets at a 1:1 ratio for 5 hours prior to staining for CD107 granule mobilization or IFN-γ activation by flow. Lysis of K562 targets cells as in “b” by either (c) PBMC (effector to target ratio 10:1), (d) isolated NK cells, or (Supplemental Fig. 4b) YT cells as effectors cultured in the presence or absence of 20μM lenalidomide, or DMSO, with or without hrIL-2 (100U/mL) 7 days after pulsing (effector to target ratio 10:1). (e) Lysis of 721.221 targets cells as in “d” in the presence of 20μM lenalidomide, or DMSO for 7 days after pulsing (effector to target ratio 5:1). (f) NK cells cultured as in “a” to measure the mRNA expression of Perforin (PRF1) and Granzyme B (GZMB) by q-PCR. Values were calculated by the ΔΔCt method with control (DMSO) as the experimental control and the housekeeping gene ACTB as the internal control. (g) Immunohistochemistry of perforin and granzyme B of isolated primary NK cells treated with lenalidomide, IL-2, IL-15 or their combination as shown. Quantification of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of (h) granzyme and (i) perforin immunostaining (n = 4) from representative figure shown in Fig 3g. In all experiments in this figure, error bars represent the SEM of the mean and p-value was calculated by paired student t test (a and e) or ordinary one-way ANOVA with multiple comparisons (b, c and d).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344471.g005

Immune modulating features of lenalidomide include its ability to co-stimulate T cells [49] and enhance NK cell mediated cytotoxicity [6,7]. Lenalidomide by itself did not significantly enhance the killing of K562 target cells by PBMC (Fig 5c, n = 3 separate healthy donor PBMC) or YT cells (S3B Fig, n = 6 separate biological replicates) and only a slight yet significant increase in isolated NK cells (Fig 5d, n = 3 separate healthy donor isolated NK cells). Addition of IL-2 significantly increased the killing ability of PBMC and isolated NK cells (Fig 5c-d), although not in YT cells which are less sensitive to the need for this cytokine (S3b Fig), while combination with lenalidomide increased the killing of K562 target cells in all primary NK cells (Fig 5c-d). Similar results were observed in YT cells with the combination of lenalidomide with IL-2 significantly killing K562 target cells confirming our observations (S3b Fig). Considering the consistently increased cytotoxic activation by IL-2 with lenalidomide it suggests that exogenous addition of IL-2 can enhance NK activity during lenalidomide treatment. To validate our observation, we repeated the isolated NK cell experiment using 721.221 target cells and observed similar results to isolated NK cells targeting K562 cells (Fig 5e, n = 3 separate healthy donor isolated NK cells). We also tested IL-15 which showed the same level of cytotoxicity enhancement as IL-2 (Fig 5e), demonstrating the IL-2 family members have a similar behavior. Since lenalidomide enhanced the killing by NK cells, it may also stimulate the expression of perforin and/or granzyme B, as suggested by others [50]. We found that upon treatment gene expression of perforin (PRF1) and granzyme B (GZMB), evidenced by mRNA levels, increased significantly (Fig 5f, n = 3 separate healthy donor isolated NK cells each run in n = 2 independent determinations). Lenalidomide by itself only significantly increase granzyme protein expression in the primary isolated NK cells after immunostaining of treated cells as measured by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI, Fig 5g-h, n = 3 separate healthy donor isolated NK cells each measured in n = 10 separate images). Granzyme B expression was significantly enhanced by both IL-2 and IL-15 and both enhanced Perforin significantly compared to lenalidomide. Both members of the IL-2 family of cytokines enhanced the expression of both proteins when combined with lenalidomide. This again strengthens the idea that combination of lenalidomide with IL-2 family of cytokines IL-2 or IL-15 can enhance the function of NK cells after treatment.

Lenalidomide combination with IL-15 increases IL-2 receptor subunit expression

IL-2R signaling regulates perforin expression through the activation of its downstream mediator STAT5 [51,52]. Based on our observations, we wanted to determine if lenalidomide can also activate STAT5 in NK cells, despite not being needed for NKp46 expression. Lenalidomide treatment of PBMCs for 7 days induced a robust activation of STAT5 (Fig 6a, representative pictures of n = 3 separate healthy donor isolated NK cells, S4a Fig shows raw gels). Lenalidomide can induce IL-2 production, hence we investigated if IL-2 is contributing to an increase in STAT5 phosphorylation in PBMCs. Indeed, we found that STAT5 activation was further augmented after the addition of exogenous IL-2 to the PBMC culture (Fig 6a). To clarify this cytokine signaling interaction between T cells and NK cells, we isolated NK cells from healthy donors and treated them with IL-2 in addition to lenalidomide. As expected, while NK cells alone had a small amount of phosphorylated STAT5, addition of IL-2 induced a robust activation of STAT5 (Fig 6b, representative pictures of n = 3 separate healthy donor isolated NK cells S Fig 4b shows raw gels), suggesting that pairing lenalidomide with IL-2 leads to restoring full functionality to NK cells and enhancing the effects of lenalidomide alone. Since IL-15 belongs to the same family of cytokines as IL-2, sharing a common receptor, albeit with higher potency at simulating their cytokine expression [25,53], we also determined the effect of IL-15 activation in the activity of lenalidomide. We find that IL-15 enhances the STAT5 activation induced by lenalidomide (Fig 6b-c). This data was validated by flow cytometric analysis of pSTAT5 activation in isolated primary NK cells (Fig 6c, representative figure of n = 5 healthy donors), which was evenly distributed between proliferating and non-proliferating cells. However, while the protein levels of pSTAT5 after treatment with lenalidomide+IL15 were higher than IL-15 alone, the proportion of pSTAT5+ cells was not higher (Fig 6b-c), suggesting that while the number of cells with active pSTAT5 are not changed past ~20% the amount of pSTAT5 activity can get higher in each cell with the combined treatment.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Lenalidomide’s activation of STAT5 in NK cells is linked to differential effects on IL-2R subunits.

(a) Western blot analysis of activation of STAT5 and total STAT5 analysis of healthy PBMCs treated with 10μM lenalidomide (LEN) or DMSO, for 7 days stand alone or in combination with 100U/mL of IL-2. (b) Western blot analysis of activation of STAT5 and total STAT5 analysis of flow sorted healthy NK cells treated with 10μM lenalidomide, or DMSO, for 7 days in the presence of 100U/mL IL-2 or 10ng/mL IL-15. B-actin served as the loading control. (c) Representative flow cytometric analysis of pSTAT5+ isolated NK cells treated with lenalidomide alone or in combination with IL-2 or IL-15 (representative figure). (d) Analysis of IL-2Rα (CD25), IL-2Rβ or IL-2γ receptor chains by flow cytometric analysis of NK cells (CD3-CD56+) or its subsets (CD56bright, CD56dim) in healthy PBMCs treated with 10μM lenalidomide, or DMSO, for 7 days in combination with 100U/mL of IL-2 or 10ng/mL of IL-15 as shown (representative figure of n = 3). To adjust data across samples to minimize technical variation (batch effects) for biological comparisons the Y-axis overlay normalization in FlowJo was used in this analysis as shown.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344471.g006

Production and activation of STAT proteins is a highly regulated process [54]. Hence, we investigated how lenalidomide and or its combination with IL-2/IL-15 changes the expression of IL-2Rα, β and γ chains as a potential contributing factor to the enhanced STAT5 phosphorylation. We found that IL-2Rα expression was strongly induced by IL-15 alone or in combination with lenalidomide but minimally increased by lenalidomide alone and was unaffected by IL-2 (Fig 6d, representative figure of n = 5 healthy donors). In contrast, IL-2Rβ expression was enhanced by lenalidomide alone, lenalidomide plus IL-15 and IL-15 alone. IL-2 alone also increases expression, but this was reversed in the presence of lenalidomide. Lastly, IL-2Rγ responded similarly to IL-2Rβ in response to IL-15 and lenalidomide, however, IL-2 alone suppressed expression. This is in agreement with other work showing similar divergent effects of IL-2 and IL-15 cytokines on IL-2Rβ and γc subunit expression [55]. Similar trends in response were observed when the analysis was done on either CD56 subset. These results suggest that lenalidomide in combination with IL-15 is most effective in enhancing pSTAT5 and all three subunits of the IL-2R, potentially creating a positive feedback loop.

Discussion

In the current study we investigated the impact of lenalidomide on NK cells to ultimately identify a way to enhance lenalidomide’s immunomodulatory properties. Since lenalidomide can induce the secretion of IL-2 in the microenvironment [17], we hypothesized that some of its effects on NK cells could be enhanced by combining the treatment of lenalidomide with recombinant IL-2 or its family member IL-15. We observed a dicotomy between higher apoptosis in PBMC and higher NK cell proportions after lenalidomide treatment was due to two distinct thresholds met by IL-2: the first leads to increased survival while a higher second threshold of IL-2 aids in counteracting cell cycle arrest induced by lenalidomide. While others have suggested that most of the IL-2 induced by lenalidomide comes from CD4+ T cells, we also observed secretion of this cytokine on isolated primary NK cells. We also found that while lenalidomide increases the number of NK cells in PBMC, their subsets are biased towards CD56bright cells, rather than CD56dim even when they are isolated from the mononuclear population. Yet cytotoxic functionality is enhanced when combined with IL-2 family of cytokines through upregulation of perforin and granzyme production through the activation of STAT5. Lenalidomide reduced inhibitor receptor expression and increased CD16, a key activating functional receptor. However, it decreased NKp46, an important activating receptor but only on CD56bright cells which was linked to inhibition of PI3K by lenalidomide, a pathway to which lenalidomide has also been linked to in the past [33]. Therefore, our data suggests that supplementation of lenalidomide with IL-2 family of cytokines can enhance their anti-tumorigenic activity and will be an important avenue of therapeutic development in the future (we have summarized our results in Fig 7). Therefore, our data supports the argument that combining therapeutic treatment of lenalidomide with clinically available IL-2 [56], and recently this year IL-15 [57], has the potential to enhance NK cells anti-tumorigenic functionality.

thumbnail
Fig 7. Enhancement of the effects of lenalidomide on NK Cells by IL-2 family of cytokines.

Schematic representation of the effect of lenalidomide in human NK cells. Our work demonstrates that lenalidomide effects can be enhanced by the addition of IL-2 family of cytokines in two ways: In the first one (left side), lenalidomide leads to the activation of STAT5 through phosphorylation (thin green arrow) which can be enhanced by IL-2 or IL-15 (thick green arrow). This is due to changes in the expression of each of the receptor’s subunits α, β or γ. This is important to differentiate because they both cytokines use mainly IL-2Rβ/γ, while IL-2Rα only enhances the sensitivity of cells to IL-2. STAT5 activation leads to the transcription of cytokine triggered genes, including those involved in growth and survival, and more importantly increased expression of perforin and granzyme which are critical for cytotoxic function. The second lenalidomide effect changed by addition of IL-2 family of cytokines (right side) is expression of activating receptors such as NKp46. Lenalidomide inhibits the activation of the P110 subunit of PI3K which leads to inhibition of NKp46 (red arrow) which can be overcome by the addition of IL-2 family of cytokines (green arrow). This reactivation leads to AKT phosphorylation and activation of AKT-transcribed genes, some of which have been already linked to NK cytotoxic activity. Created in BioRender. Eksioglu, E. (2025) https://BioRender.com/x925jkx.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344471.g007

Understanding the role of IL-2 or IL-15 in therapeutic use with lenalidomide is scarce since most studies use isolated NK cells maintained with either one or both cytokines to allow for longer culture conditions. Thangaraj et al for instance used both IL-12 and IL-15 prior to experimentation [58]. Moreover, expansion of their NK cells was achieved by co-culture with pre-irradiated K562-OX40L-mbIL-18/-IL-21 cells (labeled eNK cells in their studies) further confounding any potential understanding of the combination of lenalidomide with IL-2 family of cytokines [58]. Despite this, their work also showed that lenalidomide induced the proliferation of eNK with IL-2 addition supporting our hypothesis of a secondary threshold for IL-2 enhancement of lenalidomide effects. Another study by Acebes-Huerta et al shows that in their lenalidomide non-responsive CLL clinical patient samples, IL-2 was able to increase the proliferation and cytotoxic activity of NK cells [17], further strengthening the hypothesis of lenalidomide enhancement with IL-2 family of cytokines. This work also showed a similar effect on proliferation, but only after 12 days of treatment since the cells were maintained in IL-2 to allow longer culture [17]. In our study to avoid some of these confounding factors we treated NK cells immediately after isolation with either cytokine alone or in combination with lenalidomide to observe their specific contributions to lenalidomide function. This was also validated using NK cell lines that are either IL-2 sensitive or IL-2 resistant for survival to investigate effects that are separate from the viability induced by this family of cytokines.

One important observation is that lenalidomide can shift the balance towards higher CD56bright cells. This is a similar observation others have made on NK cells undergoing a subset switch towards CD56bright cells in the presence of lenalidomide after treatment of whole PBMC [17]. We validated this observation and extended it to isolated primary NK cells. While that bias can be reduced by addition of IL-2 family of cytokines, stand-alone treatment with lenalidomide is still induced and increased cytotoxicity correlated to the upregulation of the activating receptor CD16, and reduction of inhibitory receptors, while also increasing perforin and granzyme production, especially after enhancement of lenalidomide with IL-2 family of cytokines. This combination treatment also brought back the expression of NKp46, a key activating receptor that was reduced by lenalidomide. We identified that lenalidomide combined with IL-2 family of cytokines affects two specific pathways that may aid in enhancing NK cells cytotoxic abilities: One is PI3K inhibition, changed by IL-2, leading to increased CD16 and NKp46 expression (both activating receptors) and the second is STAT5 activation to induce expression of perforin/granzyme and surface expression of IL-2 family receptors. Using a strategy we have used in the past we inhibited related pathways including using the two PI3K inhibitors Wortmannin and LY29400233 [35] and found a mechanistic correlation between AKT activation and NKp46 increased expression. Considering that some of these inhibitors can have off-target effects, we validated the role of PI3K inhibition in the NKp46 expression by using a dominant negative or constitutively active p110 sub-unit of PI3K and demonstrated that inhibition of PI3K/AKT signaling by lenalidomide is specifically involved in its expression in these cells. This can be rescued by addition of IL-2 family of cytokines without interfering in other of its activities. However, this does not necessarily exclude other potential pathways linked to lenalidomide’s effect in the expression of activating or inhibitory receptors in NK cells suggesting that a more extensive analysis, potentially a proteomic analysis of receptor expression on isolated NK cells, could prove useful to both understand lenalidomide’s effects and enhance it clinically with combination therapeutics.

Another pathway we studied in the context of lenalidomide combinatorial treatment with IL-2 family of cytokines was the involvement of STAT5. Lenalidomide increased the cytolytic ability of NK cells which could be further enhanced by combining with IL-2 or IL-15, both critical NK cell activating cytokines [19,53,59]. The activation of this pathway by lenalidomide improved NK cell natural cytotoxic function against tumor targets through the induction of perforin and granzyme B, the transcription of both known to be regulated by STAT5 [52,60]. In contrast, lenalidomide did not change NK pro-inflammatory cytokine production. The enhanced sensitivity to IL-2 family of cytokines after lenalidomide treatment is likely due to the promotion of the cell surface expression of IL-2 receptor subunits IL-2Rβ and IL-2Rγ, which are critical for NK natural cytotoxic abilities. This was enhanced through the addition of IL-2 or IL-15 which can initiate a STAT5-mediated activation cascade [61]. Based on these findings we propose that lenalidomide can induce and sustain STAT5 activation in NK cells, which can be enhanced by the presence of extra IL-2 or IL-15, and increased expression of IL-2R subunits further supporting the idea of a combination treatment of lenalidomide with IL-2 family of cytokines. Importantly, STAT5 is critical for NK cell survival in the periphery, increase in cell numbers and cytolytic responses, as well as maturation, demonstrated in studies of both deficient mice and humans [62,63]. Reduced STAT5 activation in NK cells on the other hand has also been linked to increased tumor formation [63]. Addition of IL-2 or IL-15 can revert these exhausted NK cells to produce perforin and IFNγ [64,65]. While we only investigated the main activation of STAT5, lenalidomide has been shown to enhance JAK-STAT signaling in many cell types, including NK cells (here and [66]), T cells [66,67], and erythroid cells [68,69]. The unifying theme is that lenalidomide treatment results in hyperactive JAK-STAT signaling, in particular STAT5, by inhibiting different negative regulators of this pathway, such as CD45, which results in T cell activation and improved antigen-specific responses, and rescued differentiation in erythroid progenitors [67,70]. However, this effect goes beyond T and NK cells since lenalidomide can restore impaired erythropoietin (Epo)-induced STAT5 signaling in MDS [71]. Once again suggesting the importance of STAT5 activation in lenalidomide’s pleiotropic effects.

Between both cytokines, in the assays were we tested either IL-2 or IL-15, the latter had a stronger impact on lenalidomide functional enhancement of NK cell activity, which is not surprising based on its known enhanced potency compared to IL-2 [19,25]. This is due to the fact that IL-15 is required for NK development and IL-2, although important for NK survival and function in vitro, is not required for NK development or survival in vivo [19,72]. Moreover, although IL-2 has been used for immunotherapy, there have been variable degrees of success [7375] which is in accordance with IL-15 requirement for NK development [7678]. IL-15 therapy may have other beneficial effects since it can induce the proliferation of CD8+ memory T cells, CD4+ T cells and B cells [76,77] as well as increases in overall immune function to eliminate tumors [59,7983]. However, while there does not seem to be anything specifically different in the activity of both cytokines, when considering a clinical future a potential for the use IL-15 is more likely since one of the main reasons for its recent approval is the reduced side effects compared to clinical IL-2 use [57]. Our study has limitations on differentiating between the two IL-2 family cytokine members in the context of lenalidomide as our goal and experiments were geared towards understanding the effect of IL-2 family of cytokines and not a full assessment on the individual contributions of each. Hence, a more robust study comparing the use of either or both in the context of lenalidomide enhancement will be important. Other important considerations in future studies will be the source of the cells studied since past studies have observed that the provenance of the cells matters in the responses to lenalidomide or its combination with other therapeutic strategies: for instance CLL patients, ex vivo expanded multiple myeloma lymphocytes, CD71+ erythroid precursors or healthy PBMC from blood banks [17,58,68]. Apart from donor variability, one possibility for this discrepancy is the use of the whole PBMC population, as we saw certain effects of lenalidomide on NK cells are observed after isolation but not when the NK cells are together with the rest of the mononuclear population. In particular, further understanding of the suppressive microenvironment and its role in therapeutic failure will make it imperative that future studies understand the role of immunosuppression effectors and cells on lenalidomide’s function. An example of this is the effect of lenalidomide on NKT cells seen by Chang et al. [84] where they describe stimulation of these cells by stimulated αGalCer loaded dendritic cells changing the effectiveness of lenalidomide.

Considering the advent of immunotherapies, it will be important to carry studies observing the role of different cells of the microenvironment and the role of prior immunotherapy resistance in the use of lenalidomide or its enhancement with IL-2. In our work we only focused on PBMC and isolated NK cells but since we did negative isolation there was the potential for surviving T cells or even NKT cells affecting some of our results. However, most of the proliferation and survival observed and subset switch was done on gated NK cells reinforcing our observations. Future studies started by us suggest the potential for suppressive mediators and cells to modulate the function of NK cell cytotoxicity and its potential to modulate NK function, suggesting that understanding this context can aid lenalidomide expand its therapeutic potential. Moreover, once these connections have been assessed the focus should be on preclinical models to validate these interactions in a full in vivo microenvironment. Unfortunately, lenalidomide does not have effects in wild-type mice due to the differences in the cereblon (Crbn) protein between human and mice, making native mouse models naturally resistant to lenalidomide’s direct effects unless genetically modified [85]. Since our studies were focused on the mechanisms of lenalidomide in combination with IL-2 family of cytokines, we focused only on human cells. However, in future studies this combinatorial treatment will need to be carefully assessed in the right preclinical model to study these effects taking into consideration that genetic modification of cereblon may also affect other pathways like MYC [86], which both affect lymphocytes as well as immunosuppressive pathways [87], obscuring or changing results.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Lenalidomide’s effects on NK cell cycle.

(a) Measurement of Annexin V/PI straining for apoptosis of healthy donor PBMCs cultured in the presence or absence of 20uM lenalidomide (LEN), or DMSO (vehicle) alone or in combination with IL-2 (100U/mL) or IL-15 (10ng/mL). Pseudo-coloring denotes the density of cells on each marker. b) YTS, YT, NK92 and NKL cells were cultured for 72 hours in the absence (control/vehicle) or presence of 20μM lenalidomide with or without IL-2 (100U/mL) or IL-15 (10ng/mL) (representative of n = 3). CellTrace Violet was added at the beginning of the culture prior to treatment and assessed by flow cytometry. Blue lines represent the divisions as calculated by FlowJo. Figures that do not have a blue line denote lack of proliferation/cell division. c) PBMCs from healthy donors were cultured and NK cells were gated from live cells by the phenotype CD56+CD3- shown in Fig. 1a and looked at cell cycle phases. Error bars represent the SEM and were analyzed by ordinary one-way ANOVA with multiple comparison analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344471.s001

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Lenalidomide differentially affects the expression of key NK receptors.

(a) NK cells were gated based on their expression of CD56 and analyzed for the differential expression of receptors in NK subsets (representative data, not shown: NKp30, NKp44, NKG2C). (b) Raw western gels of figure 1B isolated NK cells. (c) Raw western gels of figure 3B YT cells ran for 30 minutes post-treatment with Len, IL-2 or both as indicated. (d) Raw western gels of images shown in figure 3C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344471.s002

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Functional effects of lenalidomide alone or in combination with IL-2.

(a) Concentration of cytokines secreted in the supernatants of isolated NK cells treated with 20μM Lenalidomide (LEN) or vehicle measured at 1, 3 or 6 days of culture. (b) Percent lysis of K562 cells from YT cells treated, as shown, with lenalidomide alone or in combination with IL-2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344471.s003

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Phosphorylation of STAT5 after lenalidomide in combination with IL-2 family of cytokines.

(a) Raw western gels of figure 6A. (b) Raw western gels of figure 6B.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344471.s004

(PDF)

References

  1. 1. Piccolomo A, Schifone CP, Strafella V, Specchia G, Musto P, Albano F. Immunomodulatory Drugs in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(9):2528. pmid:32899586
  2. 2. Bartlett JB, Dredge K, Dalgleish AG. The evolution of thalidomide and its IMiD derivatives as anticancer agents. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4(4):314–22. pmid:15057291
  3. 3. Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Reddy N, Holkova B, Ottman E, Czuczman MS. Immunomodulatory drug CC-5013 or CC-4047 and rituximab enhance antitumor activity in a severe combined immunodeficient mouse lymphoma model. Clin Cancer Res. 2005;11(16):5984–92. pmid:16115943
  4. 4. Davies FE, Raje N, Hideshima T, Lentzsch S, Young G, Tai YT, et al. Thalidomide and immunomodulatory derivatives augment natural killer cell cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2001;98(1):210–6. pmid:11418482
  5. 5. Tai Y-T, Li X-F, Catley L, Coffey R, Breitkreutz I, Bae J, et al. Immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide (CC-5013, IMiD3) augments anti-CD40 SGN-40-induced cytotoxicity in human multiple myeloma: clinical implications. Cancer Res. 2005;65(24):11712–20. pmid:16357183
  6. 6. Lapalombella R, Yu B, Triantafillou G, Liu Q, Butchar JP, Lozanski G, et al. Lenalidomide down-regulates the CD20 antigen and antagonizes direct and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity of rituximab on primary chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Blood. 2008;112(13):5180–9. pmid:18772452
  7. 7. Hayashi T, Hideshima T, Akiyama M, Podar K, Yasui H, Raje N, et al. Molecular mechanisms whereby immunomodulatory drugs activate natural killer cells: clinical application. Br J Haematol. 2005;128(2):192–203. pmid:15638853
  8. 8. Lagrue K, Carisey A, Morgan DJ, Chopra R, Davis DM. Lenalidomide augments actin remodeling and lowers NK-cell activation thresholds. Blood. 2015;126(1):50–60. pmid:26002964
  9. 9. List A, Kurtin S, Roe DJ, Buresh A, Mahadevan D, Fuchs D, et al. Efficacy of lenalidomide in myelodysplastic syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(6):549–57. pmid:15703420
  10. 10. Wei S, Chen X, Rocha K, Epling-Burnette PK, Djeu JY, Liu Q, et al. A critical role for phosphatase haplodeficiency in the selective suppression of deletion 5q MDS by lenalidomide. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(31):12974–9. pmid:19470455
  11. 11. Epling-Burnette PK, List AF. Advancements in the molecular pathogenesis of myelodysplastic syndrome. Curr Opin Hematol. 2009;16(2):70–6. pmid:19468267
  12. 12. Epling-Burnette PK, Bai F, Painter JS, Rollison DE, Salih HR, Krusch M, et al. Reduced natural killer (NK) function associated with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and reduced expression of activating NK receptors. Blood. 2007;109(11):4816–24. pmid:17341666
  13. 13. Wang Y, Feng Z, Li L, Zhang L. Advances in the role of NK cells in MDS immune dysfunction and antitumor research. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1511616. pmid:40103828
  14. 14. Kotla V, Goel S, Nischal S, Heuck C, Vivek K, Das B, et al. Mechanism of action of lenalidomide in hematological malignancies. J Hematol Oncol. 2009;2:36. pmid:19674465
  15. 15. Hideshima T, Chauhan D, Shima Y, Raje N, Davies FE, Tai YT, et al. Thalidomide and its analogs overcome drug resistance of human multiple myeloma cells to conventional therapy. Blood. 2000;96(9):2943–50. pmid:11049970
  16. 16. Mitsiades N, Mitsiades CS, Poulaki V, Chauhan D, Richardson PG, Hideshima T, et al. Apoptotic signaling induced by immunomodulatory thalidomide analogs in human multiple myeloma cells: therapeutic implications. Blood. 2002;99(12):4525–30. pmid:12036884
  17. 17. Acebes-Huerta A, Huergo-Zapico L, Gonzalez-Rodriguez AP, Fernandez-Guizan A, Payer AR, López-Soto A, et al. Lenalidomide induces immunomodulation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and enhances antitumor immune responses mediated by NK and CD4 T cells. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:265840. pmid:25313353
  18. 18. Romero AI, Thorén FB, Brune M, Hellstrand K. NKp46 and NKG2D receptor expression in NK cells with CD56dim and CD56bright phenotype: regulation by histamine and reactive oxygen species. Br J Haematol. 2006;132(1):91–8. pmid:16371024
  19. 19. Ma A, Koka R, Burkett P. Diverse functions of IL-2, IL-15, and IL-7 in lymphoid homeostasis. Annu Rev Immunol. 2006;24:657–79.
  20. 20. Sindaco P, Pandey H, Isabelle C, Chakravarti N, Brammer JE, Porcu P, et al. The role of interleukin-15 in the development and treatment of hematological malignancies. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1141208. pmid:37153603
  21. 21. Leenders F, Möpert K, Schmiedeknecht A, Santel A, Czauderna F, Aleku M, et al. PKN3 is required for malignant prostate cell growth downstream of activated PI 3-kinase. EMBO J. 2004;23(16):3303–13. pmid:15282551
  22. 22. Klippel A, Reinhard C, Kavanaugh WM, Apell G, Escobedo MA, Williams LT. Membrane localization of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is sufficient to activate multiple signal-transducing kinase pathways. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16(8):4117–27. pmid:8754810
  23. 23. Jiang K, Zhong B, Gilvary DL, Corliss BC, Hong-Geller E, Wei S, et al. Pivotal role of phosphoinositide-3 kinase in regulation of cytotoxicity in natural killer cells. Nat Immunol. 2000;1(5):419–25. pmid:11062502
  24. 24. Chen X, Bai F, Sokol L, Zhou J, Ren A, Painter JS, et al. A critical role for DAP10 and DAP12 in CD8+ T cell-mediated tissue damage in large granular lymphocyte leukemia. Blood. 2009;113(14):3226–34. pmid:19075187
  25. 25. Yang Y, Lundqvist A. Immunomodulatory Effects of IL-2 and IL-15; Implications for Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(12):3586. pmid:33266177
  26. 26. Wei S, Chen X, McGraw K, Zhang L, Komrokji R, Clark J, et al. Lenalidomide promotes p53 degradation by inhibiting MDM2 auto-ubiquitination in myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion. Oncogene. 2013;32(9):1110–20. pmid:22525275
  27. 27. Cooper MA, Fehniger TA, Caligiuri MA. The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets. Trends Immunol. 2001;22(11):633–40. pmid:11698225
  28. 28. Le Roy A, Prébet T, Castellano R, Goubard A, Riccardi F, Fauriat C, et al. Immunomodulatory Drugs Exert Anti-Leukemia Effects in Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Direct and Immunostimulatory Activities. Front Immunol. 2018;9:977. pmid:29780393
  29. 29. Lanier LL. NK cell receptors. Annu Rev Immunol. 1998;16:359–93. pmid:9597134
  30. 30. Dauguet N, Fournié J-J, Poupot R, Poupot M. Lenalidomide down regulates the production of interferon-gamma and the expression of inhibitory cytotoxic receptors of human Natural Killer cells. Cell Immunol. 2010;264(2):163–70. pmid:20621290
  31. 31. Mace EM. Phosphoinositide-3-Kinase Signaling in Human Natural Killer Cells: New Insights from Primary Immunodeficiency. Front Immunol. 2018;9:445. pmid:29563913
  32. 32. Shi L, Li K, Guo Y, Banerjee A, Wang Q, Lorenz UM, et al. Modulation of NKG2D, NKp46, and Ly49C/I facilitates natural killer cell-mediated control of lung cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(46):11808–13. pmid:30381460
  33. 33. Herman SEM, Lapalombella R, Gordon AL, Ramanunni A, Blum KA, Jones J, et al. The role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-δ in the immunomodulatory effects of lenalidomide in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2011;117(16):4323–7. pmid:21378270
  34. 34. Rojas JM, Spada R, Sanz-Ortega L, Morillas L, Mejías R, Mulens-Arias V, et al. PI3K p85 β regulatory subunit deficiency does not affect NK cell differentiation and increases NKG2D-mediated activation. J Leukoc Biol. 2016;100(6):1285–96. pmid:27381007
  35. 35. Jiang K, Zhong B, Gilvary DL, Corliss BC, Hong-Geller E, Wei S, et al. Pivotal role of phosphoinositide-3 kinase in regulation of cytotoxicity in natural killer cells. Nat Immunol. 2000;1(5):419–25. pmid:11062502
  36. 36. Zhong B, Liu JH, Gilvary DL, Jiang K, Kasuga M, Ritchey CA, et al. Functional role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in direct tumor lysis by human natural killer cells. Immunobiology. 2002;205(1):74–94. pmid:11999346
  37. 37. Walker EH, Pacold ME, Perisic O, Stephens L, Hawkins PT, Wymann MP, et al. Structural determinants of phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibition by wortmannin, LY294002, quercetin, myricetin, and staurosporine. Mol Cell. 2000;6(4):909–19. pmid:11090628
  38. 38. Geltz NR, Augustine JA. The p85 and p110 subunits of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-alpha are substrates, in vitro, for a constitutively associated protein tyrosine kinase in platelets. Blood. 1998;91:930–9.
  39. 39. Wang Y, Kuramitsu Y, Baron B, Kitagawa T, Tokuda K, Akada J, et al. PI3K inhibitor LY294002, as opposed to wortmannin, enhances AKT phosphorylation in gemcitabine-resistant pancreatic cancer cells. Int J Oncol. 2017;50(2):606–12. pmid:28000865
  40. 40. Tsai K-D, Chang W-W, Lin C-C, Hsu S-C, Lee Y-J, Chen W, et al. Differential effects of LY294002 and wortmannin on inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in glomerular mesangial cells. Int Immunopharmacol. 2012;12(3):471–80. pmid:22240122
  41. 41. Favata MF, Horiuchi KY, Manos EJ, Daulerio AJ, Stradley DA, Feeser WS, et al. Identification of a novel inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(29):18623–32. pmid:9660836
  42. 42. De Vos J, Jourdan M, Tarte K, Jasmin C, Klein B. JAK2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor tyrphostin AG490 downregulates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways and induces apoptosis in myeloma cells. Br J Haematol. 2000;109(4):823–8. pmid:10929036
  43. 43. Noh KH, Kang TH, Kim JH, Pai SI, Lin KY, Hung C-F, et al. Activation of Akt as a mechanism for tumor immune evasion. Mol Ther. 2009;17(3):439–47. pmid:19107122
  44. 44. Poli A, Michel T, Thérésine M, Andrès E, Hentges F, Zimmer J. CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells: an important NK cell subset. Immunology. 2009;126(4):458–65. pmid:19278419
  45. 45. Muller GW, Chen R, Huang SY, Corral LG, Wong LM, Patterson RT, et al. Amino-substituted thalidomide analogs: potent inhibitors of TNF-alpha production. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 1999;9(11):1625–30. pmid:10386948
  46. 46. Saleh A, Davies GE, Pascal V, Wright PW, Hodge DL, Cho EH, et al. Identification of probabilistic transcriptional switches in the Ly49 gene cluster: a eukaryotic mechanism for selective gene activation. Immunity. 2004;21(1):55–66. pmid:15345220
  47. 47. List A, Dewald G, Bennett J, Giagounidis A, Raza A, Feldman E, et al. Lenalidomide in the myelodysplastic syndrome with chromosome 5q deletion. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1456–65. pmid:17021321
  48. 48. Schoenborn JR, Wilson CB. Regulation of interferon-gamma during innate and adaptive immune responses. Adv Immunol. 2007;96:41–101. pmid:17981204
  49. 49. Schafer PH, Gandhi AK, Loveland MA, Chen RS, Man H-W, Schnetkamp PPM, et al. Enhancement of cytokine production and AP-1 transcriptional activity in T cells by thalidomide-related immunomodulatory drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003;305(3):1222–32. pmid:12649301
  50. 50. Reddy N, Hernandez-Ilizaliturri FJ, Deeb G, Roth M, Vaughn M, Knight J, et al. Immunomodulatory drugs stimulate natural killer-cell function, alter cytokine production by dendritic cells, and inhibit angiogenesis enhancing the anti-tumour activity of rituximab in vivo. Br J Haematol. 2008;140(1):36–45. pmid:17995965
  51. 51. Wahle JA, Paraiso KHT, Kendig RD, Lawrence HR, Chen L, Wu J, et al. Inappropriate recruitment and activity by the Src homology region 2 domain-containing phosphatase 1 (SHP1) is responsible for receptor dominance in the SHIP-deficient NK cell. J Immunol. 2007;179(12):8009–15. pmid:18056340
  52. 52. Zhang J, Scordi I, Smyth MJ, Lichtenheld MG. Interleukin 2 receptor signaling regulates the perforin gene through signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat)5 activation of two enhancers. J Exp Med. 1999;190(9):1297–308. pmid:10544201
  53. 53. Zwirner NW, Domaica CI. Cytokine regulation of natural killer cell effector functions. Biofactors. 2010;36(4):274–88. pmid:20623510
  54. 54. Shuai K, Liu B. Regulation of JAK-STAT signalling in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(11):900–11. pmid:14668806
  55. 55. Waldmann TA. The shared and contrasting roles of IL2 and IL15 in the life and death of normal and neoplastic lymphocytes: implications for cancer therapy. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3(3):219–27. pmid:25736261
  56. 56. Im SJ, Lee K, Ha S-J. Harnessing IL-2 for immunotherapy against cancer and chronic infection: a historical perspective and emerging trends. Exp Mol Med. 2024;56(9):1900–8. pmid:39218982
  57. 57. Li Z, Wrangle J, He K, Sprent J, Rubinstein MP. IL-15: from discovery to FDA approval. J Hematol Oncol. 2025;18(1):19. pmid:39966991
  58. 58. Thangaraj JL, Jung S-H, Vo M-C, Chu T-H, Phan M-TT, Lee K-H, et al. Expanded natural killer cells potentiate the antimyeloma activity of daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in a myeloma xenograft model. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2023;72(5):1233–46. pmid:36385211
  59. 59. Gillgrass A, Ashkar A. Stimulating natural killer cells to protect against cancer: recent developments. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2011;7(3):367–82. pmid:21595603
  60. 60. Lin JX, Leonard WJ. The role of Stat5a and Stat5b in signaling by IL-2 family cytokines. Oncogene. 2000;19(21):2566–76. pmid:10851055
  61. 61. Delespine-Carmagnat M, Bouvier G, Bertoglio J. Association of STAT1, STAT3 and STAT5 proteins with the IL-2 receptor involves different subdomains of the IL-2 receptor beta chain. Eur J Immunol. 2000;30(1):59–68. pmid:10602027
  62. 62. Gotthardt D, Sexl V. STATs in NK-Cells: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Front Immunol. 2017;7:694. pmid:28149296
  63. 63. Gotthardt D, Putz EM, Grundschober E, Prchal-Murphy M, Straka E, Kudweis P, et al. STAT5 Is a Key Regulator in NK Cells and Acts as a Molecular Switch from Tumor Surveillance to Tumor Promotion. Cancer Discov. 2016;6(4):414–29. pmid:26873347
  64. 64. Bruno A, Ferlazzo G, Albini A, Noonan DM. A think tank of TINK/TANKs: tumor-infiltrating/tumor-associated natural killer cells in tumor progression and angiogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(8):dju200. pmid:25178695
  65. 65. Cerdeira AS, Rajakumar A, Royle CM, Lo A, Husain Z, Thadhani RI, et al. Conversion of peripheral blood NK cells to a decidual NK-like phenotype by a cocktail of defined factors. J Immunol. 2013;190(8):3939–48. pmid:23487420
  66. 66. Raulet DH, Held W, Correa I, Dorfman JR, Wu MF, Corral L. Specificity, tolerance and developmental regulation of natural killer cells defined by expression of class I-specific Ly49 receptors. Immunol Rev. 1997;155:41–52. pmid:9059881
  67. 67. Giagounidis AAN, Germing U, Wainscoat JS, Boultwood J, Aul C. The 5q- syndrome. Hematology. 2004;9(4):271–7. pmid:15621734
  68. 68. List AF, Estes M, Williams A, Sekharam M, Ozawa U, Gao G, et al. Lenalidomide (CC-5013; Revlimid®) Promotes Erythropoiesis in Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) by CD45 Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase (PTP) Inhibition. Blood. 2006;108(11):1360–1360.
  69. 69. Komrokji RS, List AF. Role of lenalidomide in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Semin Oncol. 2011;38(5):648–57. pmid:21943671
  70. 70. Kim S, Poursine-Laurent J, Truscott SM, Lybarger L, Song Y-J, Yang L, et al. Licensing of natural killer cells by host major histocompatibility complex class I molecules. Nature. 2005;436(7051):709–13. pmid:16079848
  71. 71. Scarpellino L, Oeschger F, Guillaume P, Coudert JD, Lévy F, Leclercq G, et al. Interactions of Ly49 family receptors with MHC class I ligands in trans and cis. J Immunol. 2007;178(3):1277–84. pmid:17237373
  72. 72. Arias F. Maternal death in a patient with Eisenmenger’s syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1977;50(1 Suppl):76s–80s. pmid:876550
  73. 73. McNerney ME, Guzior D, Kumar V. 2B4 (CD244)-CD48 interactions provide a novel MHC class I-independent system for NK-cell self-tolerance in mice. Blood. 2005;106(4):1337–40. pmid:15870174
  74. 74. Kiel MJ, Yilmaz OH, Iwashita T, Yilmaz OH, Terhorst C, Morrison SJ. SLAM family receptors distinguish hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and reveal endothelial niches for stem cells. Cell. 2005;121(7):1109–21. pmid:15989959
  75. 75. Holmberg LA, Miller BA, Ault KA. The effect of natural killer cells on the development of syngeneic hematopoietic progenitors. J Immunol. 1984;133(6):2933–9. pmid:6436368
  76. 76. Fortenbery NR, Paraiso KHT, Taniguchi M, Brooks C, Ibrahim L, Kerr WG. SHIP influences signals from CD48 and MHC class I ligands that regulate NK cell homeostasis, effector function, and repertoire formation. J Immunol. 2010;184(9):5065–74. pmid:20363967
  77. 77. Tangye SG, Lazetic S, Woollatt E, Sutherland GR, Lanier LL, Phillips JH. Cutting edge: human 2B4, an activating NK cell receptor, recruits the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP-2 and the adaptor signaling protein SAP. J Immunol. 1999;162(12):6981–5. pmid:10358138
  78. 78. Ott VL, Tamir I, Niki M, Pandolfi PP, Cambier JC. Downstream of kinase, p62(dok), is a mediator of Fc gamma IIB inhibition of Fc epsilon RI signaling. J Immunol. 2002;168:4430–9.
  79. 79. Spaggiari GM, Carosio R, Pende D, Marcenaro S, Rivera P, Zocchi MR, et al. NK cell-mediated lysis of autologous antigen-presenting cells is triggered by the engagement of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase upon ligation of the natural cytotoxicity receptors NKp30 and NKp46. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31(6):1656–65. pmid:11385609
  80. 80. Held W, Raulet DH. Expression of the Ly49A gene in murine natural killer cell clones is predominantly but not exclusively mono-allelic. Eur J Immunol. 1997;27(11):2876–84. pmid:9394813
  81. 81. Chuang SS, Lee J-K, Mathew PA. Protein kinase C is involved in 2B4 (CD244)-mediated cytotoxicity and AP-1 activation in natural killer cells. Immunology. 2003;109(3):432–9. pmid:12807490
  82. 82. Mathew SO, Vaidya SV, Kim JR, Mathew PA. Human natural killer cell receptor 2B4 (CD244) down-regulates its own expression by reduced promoter activity at an Ets element. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;355(2):483–7. pmid:17300754
  83. 83. Higgins JJ, Tal AL, Sun X, Hauck SCR, Hao J, Kosofosky BE, et al. Temporal and spatial mouse brain expression of cereblon, an ionic channel regulator involved in human intelligence. J Neurogenet. 2010;24(1):18–26. pmid:20131966
  84. 84. Chang DH, Liu N, Klimek V, Hassoun H, Mazumder A, Nimer SD, et al. Enhancement of ligand-dependent activation of human natural killer T cells by lenalidomide: therapeutic implications. Blood. 2006;108(2):618–21. pmid:16569772
  85. 85. Fink EC, McConkey M, Adams DN, Haldar SD, Kennedy JA, Guirguis AA, et al. CrbnI391V is sufficient to confer in vivo sensitivity to thalidomide and its derivatives in mice. Blood. 2018;132(14):1535–44. pmid:30064974
  86. 86. Hesterberg RS, Beatty MS, Han Y, Fernandez MR, Akuffo AA, Goodheart WE, et al. Cereblon harnesses Myc-dependent bioenergetics and activity of CD8+ T lymphocytes. Blood. 2020;136(7):857–70. pmid:32403132
  87. 87. Yun S, Vincelette ND, Yu X, Watson GW, Fernandez MR, Yang C, et al. TFEB links MYC signaling to epigenetic control of myeloid differentiation and acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Cancer Discov. 2021;2(2):162–85. pmid:33860275