Figures
Abstract
Introduction
Burnout syndrome presents a serious problem for medical students in their training and professional career. The aim of this study was to investigate the dimensions of burnout syndrome and associated risk factors among medical students in Serbia.
Methods
This was a cross-sectional study. Prevalence of high risk of burnout in medical students was determined following the three-dimensional criteria, based on high levels of emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and low academic efficacy, according to the Maslach Burnout Inventory Student Survey. Odds ratios (OR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were determined using multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results
Risk for high level of all three burnout dimensions (emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and academic inefficacy) was increasing with higher frequency of alcohol consumption (p for trend = 0.008, p = 0.030, p = 0.040, respectively) in medical students. Risk for high level of emotional exhaustion was associated with clinical training level of studies (OR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.38–2.80, p = .007) and use of sedatives (OR = 3.08, 95% CI = 1.29–7.38, p = 0.011). Length of study >6 years and use of sedatives were associated with high level of cynicism in medical students (OR = 1.98, 95% CI = 1.08–3.62, p = 0.027; OR = 3.19, 95% CI = 1.31–7.75, p = 0.010, respectively). Higher grade point average (>8) was most common in medical students with lower risk of academic inefficacy (OR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.44–0.95, p = 0.026). Positive personal medical history (presence of any chronic disease) was frequently reported in medical students who had a high risk of academic inefficacy (OR = 2.45, 95% CI = 1.30–4.61, p = 0.006).
Citation: Ilic I, Zivanovic Macuzic I, Ilic M, Ravic-Nikolic A, Milicic V (2026) Burnout dimensions and associated risk factors in medical students: A cross-sectional study in Serbia. PLoS One 21(3): e0344119. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0344119
Editor: Hiroyuki Maruyama, Takushoku University, JAPAN
Received: June 16, 2025; Accepted: February 16, 2026; Published: March 6, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Ilic et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are available within the paper, and from the Harvard Dataverse (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NWPBUN).
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Burnout syndrome is defined as a “psychological syndrome that implies emotional exhaustion, cynicism and a feeling of little personal accomplishment, in people who perform their work in dynamic relationships with other people, in professionally demanding situations” [1]. Symptoms of emotional exhaustion are central and accompanied by depersonalization and a feeling of reduced personal accomplishment [2,3]. Emotional exhaustion is marked by a feeling of emotional overspending due to work. Depersonalization is characterized by emotional indifference and dehumanization of those receiving services. Reduced personal achievement is reflected in feelings of professional stagnation, incompetence and lack of fulfillment. Emotional exhaustion refers to feeling emotionally “stretched” and exhausted from contact with other people and it represents the “stressful” component of burnout. Depersonalization (i.e., cynicism, dehumanization), representing the interpersonal component of burnout, involves emotional distance in professional roles and refers to an emotionless and indifferent attitude towards those receiving help, which can turn into rude or even inappropriate behavior toward patients, as well as other people at work [2,4]. Reduced personal accomplishment, the self-evaluative component of burnout, refers to the perceived decline in skillfulness and successful achievement at jobs that involve working with people, which can lead to a profound sense of failure, due to persistent relational stressful events at workplace [2–4].
Due to intense, strenuous studying and psychophysical exhaustion, medical students may experience a certain degree of burnout syndrome, as academic stress. Burnout can have serious professional and personal consequences – it can affect students’ attitudes toward a career in medicine, and lead to thoughts of dropping out, depression, alcohol and drug abuse and suicide [5,6]. Among medical students, burnout often arises from the intense stress they have experienced and the expectations of high standards placed on individuals involved in careers in helping professions [2,7]. The medical school curriculum and some components of training/practice can lead to chronic stress and burnout in some medical students [8,9]. Some studies report that, in the developed world, at least every second medical student experiences some form of burnout during their studies [10–13].
A meta-analysis that pooled data from 24 studies, comprising 17,431 medical students, found high prevalence of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal accomplishment (40.8%, 35.1% and 27.4%, respectively) [11]. More recently, one larger meta-analysis showed that the frequency of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment in medical students was 38.08%, 35.07%, and 37.23%, respectively [14].
Some studies have reported associations between burnout prevalence and gender [14,15], year of study [16,17], personal life events and the learning environment [18], but results were not consistent [11,19,20]. Additionally, some authors found no association between burnout and marital status, smoking, presence of chronic diseases in personal health history or completed high school [15]. Among students, findings regarding the association between burnout dimensions and gender are conflicting. While some authors [21] reported a significant association between male gender of students and depersonalization, other authors found no significant association [14,18].
Studies on burnout syndrome among medical students in Serbia are relatively scarce, and only a few of have utilized the validated MBI-SS questionnaire [19]. Existing research shows that burnout is prevalent in medical students in Serbia, with studies reporting high rates of emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and academic inefficacy [20,21]. Factors contributing to this risk include older age, alcohol use, stress related to training conditions, specific factors such as male gender and higher study years, but these findings have not been consistent across studies [20–22]. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of high levels of emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and academic ineffectiveness among medical students in Serbia, as well as their association with characteristics of medical students.
Methods
Setting
This study was conducted at the Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Serbia – the youngest state medical faculty in the country, founded in 1977. The Integrated Academic Studies of Medicine study program (formally and structurally harmonized with the European accreditation standards in 2005) is designed to provide students with complete and comprehensive education and up-to-date scientific and professional knowledge and skills in the field of medicine. The study program lasts six years and leads to the academic professional title of doctor of medicine. Medical studies are free, with approximately 80% of medical students receiving a stipend during their studies. The amount of this state stipend that almost all students receive for the most part covers the compensation for meals in student restaurants and accommodation in student dormitories. During the program, medical students have practical classes in small groups up to a maximum of 6 students for clinical training and up to a maximum of 12 for preclinical courses.
At the Faculty of Medical Sciences in Kragujevac, each medical student is assigned a mentor from the teaching staff. Mentors have weekly (and more frequent if needed) meetings of the entire assigned mentor group to consider and discuss all matters related to attending classes, exams and any possible difficulties during the studies. Each mentoring group typically consists of 6 students, who maintain contact with the mentor via email, phone, or in-person conversation at meetings. Medical students also participate in the student parliament and the sports club, where they can engage in various sports activities. Systemic improvements are continuously being implemented, including better financial support and enhanced institutional resources to facilitate student participation in congresses, sports festivals, international exchanges, etc. The mentor is assigned to each medical student from the outset of their studies and is obliged to monitor their progress in studies throughout the course. This mentoring approach is intended to provide a supportive environment that helps students address the significant demands of medical education, while fostering a sense of togetherness and solidarity within the student community.
Study design
This study employed a cross-sectional design. Self-reported data were collected through questionnaires that all medical students were given during classes, accompanied by a cover letter containing study information and consent form.
Study population, study sample and simple size calculation
All students enrolled as regular students at the study year at medical faculty were invited to participate in the study. Students from all six years of medical studies who voluntarily provided signed informed consent to participate were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were: age > 18 years, regular student status, attendance at lectures, signed written informed consent to participate and lack of exclusion criteria. Exclusion criteria were: age < 18 years and non-attendance at regular lectures.
The sample size was calculated using the Epi Info StatCalc software (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA). Based on the population size of 836 students, a 5% margin of error, a 99.99% confidence level and an expected prevalence of 22.6%, the minimum required sample size was determined to be 467 [23]. After adjusting for a potential non-response rate of 15%, the final estimated sample size was 538. Of the 836 eligible medical students, 760 participated in research and completely filled out the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 90.9%. Among the medical students who did not respond to the survey, the main reason for exclusion from the study was absence from regular classes for 45 students, 12 students refused to participate (most commonly due to a lack of interest in the study), while some respondents did not return the questionnaire or did not complete it during the study recruitment or the questionnaires were not fully completed (a total of 19 students).
Data collection
In addition to the epidemiological questionnaire (which collected data on socio-demographic characteristics, academic performance, habits, personal medical history, etc.), this study assessed the level of risk for burnout syndrome in medical students using the Maslach Burnout Inventory – Student Survey [24]. The survey was self-reported, anonymous and administered in the paper-and-pencil format. Students filled out the questionnaires in amphitheater and lecture auditoriums at the Faculty of Medical Sciences in Kragujevac from February 15 to March 14 2014. Authors of this manuscript, medical doctors, were present while medical students completed the questionnaires. Study participants had about 15(± 5) minutes to fill out the survey.
Instruments
The epidemiologic questionnaire included items on student characteristics, such as sex (male/ female), age (years: ≤ 21/ 22–24/ ≥ 25), type of completed secondary school (grammar school/ medical and other schools), marital status (with partner/ without partner), whether they have children (No/ Yes), study financing (state-sponsored/ self-funded), housing (in own home/ with parents/ as subtenants/ in student dormitory), enrolled academic year (I – VI study year), achieved academic results (cumulative total point average grade ≤ 8/ > 8, where grade is the average of the subjects taken according to the European credits scores on a 10-point scale, with a passing score established at 6 points), repeated a year of study (No/ Yes), level of study (medical students of first-third year: preclinical training; students of fourth-sixth year: clinical training), number of exams passed (dichotomized: ≤ 23 exams/ > 23 exams), length of study (dichotomized: ≤ 6 years/ > 6 years), habits (smoking cigarettes, drinking alcohol), personal medical history (presence of any chronic disease), use of sedatives and use of psychoactive substances. Students were considered smokers if they regularly smoked at least a cigarette a day during one year, categorized as current smokers if they smoked at least one cigarette every day during the last 12 months, and as former smokers if it has been at least a year since they stopped smoking.
Maslach Burnout Inventory – Student Survey (MBI-SS) is designed to measure burnout level in students and it was developed by Schaufeli et al [24,25]. MBI-SS consists of 15 items that assess three dimensions of burnout: Emotional Exhaustion – EE (5 items), Cynicism – CY (4 items), and Academic Efficacy – AE (6 items). All items refer to the student’s feelings about university, i.e., feelings about their academic work. Students responded to questions by indicating the level to which they agree with each item, scored on a 7-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 to 6 (0 – never, 1 – several times a year, 2 – once a month, 3 – several times a month, 4 – once a week, 5 – several times a week, 6 – every day), in order to describe how often they felt in a certain way. License to use the MBI-SS was obtained from the current owner (i.e., Mind Garden, Menlo Park, CA, USA). Following this, a linguistic adaptation and validation were done. The validity and reliability of the original three-factor structure of the MBI-SS questionnaire were confirmed in this study: the Cronbach’s α coefficients for EE, CY, and AE were 0.869, 0.856, and 0.852, respectively [19]. In this study, standard Maslach criteria were used (classifying the sample into thirds, with each third indicating “low”, “medium” and “high” burnout) [1–4]. A high level of burnout was defined as: emotional exhaustion over 14 (MBI EE), cynicism over 6 (MBI CY) and low academic efficacy – less than 23 (reverse Аcademic Еfficacy = MBI rAE) [24,25].
Statistical analysis
Descriptive and analytical statistics were used to analyze the data. Categorical variables were presented as proportions (%), while continuous variables were expressed as means ± standard deviations (SD). Differences between medical students according to burnout dimensions (emotional exhaustion, cynicism, academic inefficacy) were assessed using the chi-square test and t-test. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the association between medical students’ characteristics and high risk of burnout syndrome (high risk of emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and academic inefficacy), by determining Odds Ratio (OR) with corresponding 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI).
Only variables (potential correlates) that were significant at the p < 0.05 level based on the chi-square test were entered in the multivariate logistic regression models. Age and year of study were not included in the models due to their collinearity (the Variance Inflation Factor = 4.322), as well as with some variables (level of training, length of study, re-enrollment of study year, number of passed exams, grade point average). Model fit was checked with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test of goodness of fit and Cox and Snell’s and Nagelkerke’s Pseudo R square measures. A test for linear trend in risk was based on the logistic regression model.
All statistical analyses were performed separately for three domains of the MBI-SS. Statistical significance was indicated by p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were done with the SPSS Software (SPSS Inc, version 20, Chicago, IL).
Results
Table 1 presents the triad of symptoms of burnout syndrome. Mean subscale scores were: MBI EE (12.8 ± 7.2; range 0–30), MBI CY (3.6 ± 4.9; range 0–24) and MBI rAE (9.1 ± 8.3; range 0–36).
According to the risk categories for burnout syndrome, a high risk of emotional exhaustion was recorded in 308 medical students (40.5% of respondents) (Table 2). The cynicism subscale showed a high risk of burnout in 266 participants (i.e., 35.0%). The academic inefficacy subscale showed that 37.7% of students were in the high risk of burnout category.
A significant association was found between gender and lower cynicism: compared to men, fewer women showed high levels of cynicism (31.6% vs. 41.3%; p = 0.007) (Table 3). Age significantly correlated with all three burnout dimensions – cynicism and academic inefficacy increased significantly with age (p < 0.001), while emotional exhaustion decreased significantly with age (p < 0.001). The self-funded way of study financing was significantly associated with greater cynicism and greater academic inefficacy (p < 0.05).
Senior academic year, average length of study, training level, and number of exams passed were significantly associated with high emotional exhaustion, high cynicism, and high academic ineffectiveness (p < 0.05) (Table 4). Re-enrollment of a study year was associated with high cynicism and academic inefficacy. A higher GPA was significantly associated with lower cynicism and academic inefficacy (p < 0.05).
Compared to non-smokers, cigarette smokers more frequently exhibited high cynicism (40.7% vs. 32.3%; p = 0.023), and high academic inefficacy (43.6% vs. 35.0%; p = 0.022) (Table 5). Medical students who consumed alcohol more frequently showed high emotional exhaustion (p = 0.001), high cynicism (p = 0.003), and high academic inefficacy (p = 0.013). A positive personal medical history (for the presence of any chronic disease) was significantly associated with high academic inefficacy (p = 0.017). Sedative use was significantly associated with high emotional exhaustion (p = 0.026), high cynicism (p = 0.001), and lower academic efficacy (p = 0.022). Substance use showed significant associations with all three dimensions of burnout, with medical students who used psychoactive substances showing high emotional exhaustion (p = 0.046), high cynicism (p = 0.002), and high academic inefficacy (p = 0.029).
The risk for high level for all three burnout dimensions (emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and academic inefficacy) in medical students was significantly increased with higher frequency of alcohol consumption (p for trend = 0.008, p = 0.030, p = 0.040, respectively) (Table 6). Risk for high level of emotional exhaustion was associated with clinical training level of studies (OR = 1.82, 95%CI = 1.38–2.80, p = 0.007) and use of sedatives (OR = 3.08, 95%CI = 1.29–7.38, p = 0.011). Among medical students, length of study >6 years was associated with high risk of cynicism (OR = 1.98, 95%CI = 1.08–3.62, p = 0.027). Also, the use of sedatives was linked to high risk of cynicism in study participants (OR = 3.19, 95%CI = 1.31–7.75, p = 0.010). A higher grade point average (>8) was significantly more frequently reported by medical students with lower risk of academic inefficacy (OR = 0.65, 95%CI = 0.44–0.95, p = 0.026). Positive personal medical history (presence of any chronic disease) was significantly more often noted in study participants who had high risk of academic inefficacy (OR = 2.45, 95%CI = 1.30–4.61, p = 0.006).
Discussion
This study revealed that high level of all three burnout dimensions (emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and academic inefficacy) was significantly associated with higher frequency of alcohol consumption among medical students. The risk for high level of emotional exhaustion was associated with clinical training level of studies and use of sedatives. High level of cynicism in medical students was significantly associated with the length of study of >6 years and use of sedatives. Medical students who had high risk of academic inefficacy more often reported a positive personal medical history (presence of any chronic disease).
A recent meta-analysis on burnout among medical students reported current prevalence of 40.8% for emotional exhaustion, 35.1% for cynicism, and 27.4% for personal achievement [11]. Similarly, a study in medical and dentistry university students found overall prevalence of burnout syndrome dimensions to be 55.4%, 31.6% and 30.9% for emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and academic efficacy, respectively [26]. In line with these findings, the present study, using the MBI-SS questionnaire, reported prevalence of high risk of 40.5% for emotional exhaustion, 35.0% for cynicism and 37.7% for academic inefficiency. When compared to medical students in Kragujevac, those studying at two universities in Brazil [27,28], the United Kingdom [29], Saudi Arabia [18] and Malaysia [30] exhibited higher prevalence of emotional exhaustion, cynicism and academic inefficacy. In contrast, dentistry students in Turkey [31,32] and medical students in Colombia [33] showed lower prevalence rates. Among general medicine students from four hospitals and universities of medicine in Hungary, 38.6% showed medium or high emotional exhaustion, 34.0% cynicism and 24.0% reduced academic efficiency [34]. Several factors may account for the observed variations in the frequency of dimensions of burnout syndrome in medical students. These include differences across countries, in study populations, culture and socio-economic status. Another explanation could be the high level of heterogeneity in research on medical students’ burnout. For instance, while some studies included medical students from only one or only a few study years, the present study encompassed students from all six years of study. Moreover, studies have employed different instruments for measuring burnout and applied varying cutoff-criteria for burnout. A challenge in comparing findings across studies may also be in the use of different definitions of burnout. While some authors assessed burnout using all three dimensions, others evaluated only two dimensions, or even just one (most commonly emotional exhaustion [35–37]. Additionally, there is a conceptual divergence in how burnout is understood: health professionals often regard burnout as a dichotomous phenomenon, whereas other researchers mostly consider burnout as a continuous phenomenon with ranges from absence to medium to high [35–37]. Further on, variability in sample sizes across studies could also contribute to the observed differences in prevalence of certain dimensions of burnout syndrome [38].
Several studies have identified an association between alcohol use and burnout syndrome [29,39]. In a national cohort of medical students in the USA, high levels of burnout syndrome domains emotional exhaustion and depersonalization were strongly associated with alcohol abuse/dependence [39]. Similarly, greater alcohol consumption was associated with higher emotional exhaustion and depersonalization among the first-year family medicine residents in the USA [40]. At the University of Cyprus, medical students who consumed alcohol exhibited a higher level of cynicism and lower level of efficacy compared to those who did not consume alcohol, whereby among those who did consume alcohol increasing consumption was significantly associated with lower efficacy [41]. Among 547 medical students in Kazakhstan, 127 (23.2%) reported alcohol consumption, whereby a significant association was found between alcohol consumption and all dimensions of burnout: for high exhaustion and for high disengagement according to the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory for college students, and for personal burnout, studies-related burnout, colleague-related burnout, and teacher-related burnout according to the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory-Students survey [42]. In the present study, high frequency of alcohol use was the main factor that was independently associated with high levels of all three dimensions of burnout syndrome in medical students (every day consumption, P < 0.05; with a significant upward trend – P < 0.05). Similar to this study, a study on burnout syndrome involving 290 medical students from all six years of study in Serbia reported a statistically significant positive correlation between Emotional Exhaustion and alcohol use, as well as between Cynicism and alcohol use [43]. In contrast, research conducted among British medical students found that higher levels of alcohol binge drinking were significantly associated with higher scores of personal accomplishment [29]. But, this link must be interpreted with a lot of caution because even though some studies pointed to the association between alcohol use and burnout syndrome in medical students, there remains the above stated inconsistency in their results and the fact that some studies did not inquire about the use of alcohol due to alcohol consumption being against law and religion [44,45]. Moreover, variations in how the consumption of different forms of alcoholic beverages was assessed across studies may contribute to the differences between reported findings. In addition, given that the mentioned research employed cross-sectional design, it still remains to be determined whether the association between alcohol consumption and burnout syndrome is unidirectional. Namely, some studies suggest that certain individuals use alcohol as a way of coping with stress [46,47]. On the other hand, research from the UK found that young drinkers have a “hedonic” approach to excessive alcohol consumption, implying that medical students may engage in drinking for pleasure rather than to cope with stress and burnout [48]. While numerous studies have reported frequent alcohol use among medical students [41,49,50], this finding is not universal [42]. According to the National Health Research Study conducted in Serbia in 2013, approximately 1.3% of individuals aged 15–34 reported daily alcohol consumption in the previous 12 months [51]. In Serbia, drinking alcohol is considered socially acceptable (as part of traditions and customs), which results in a high prevalence of alcohol use, particularly among young people. A recent systematic review showed that alcohol and illicit substance use were strongly related with burnout syndrome in medical students [44], but emphasized that temporal associations could not be confirmed, due to the risk of reverse causality. These temporal associations can be verified by conducting epidemiological studies with a longitudinal design, to clarify whether alcohol consumption directly leads to burnout syndrome in medical students or whether high levels of burnout lead to resorting to alcohol use.
In this study, sedative use was significantly associated with high level of emotional exhaustion and cynicism among medical students. According to French authors, medical students exhibit a high prevalence of substance use, though the underlying motives remain unclear – whether such behavior is due to attempts at self-medication (e.g., in order to cope with stress) or due to motives such as pleasure or looking for something new [52]. A study in India, which surveyed medical students at the beginning and at the end of their first study year, reported significant increases in depression and stress but not in burnout [53]. Some studies have noted that rates of depression are higher among medical students compared to the general population, however they are not more likely to seek treatment – only 22% of students experiencing depression reportedly pursue help, due to concerns about confidentiality, stigma or cost [54–55]. It remains an open question whether the use of drugs (such as antidepressants, anxiolytics, or sedatives) serves as an indicator of the presence of these basic pathologies, which may in turn make the occurrence of symptoms of burnout more likely. It is unclear whether the use of sedatives directly causes more burnout in students, or whether those students already experiencing high levels of stress resort to recreational drugs for comfort [56,57]. Data on the use of psychoactive substances were provided by a total of 8 (1.1%) respondents – 5 students with burnout (4.3% of those with burnout) and 3 students without burnout (0.5% of those without burnout). This did not allow specification or breakdown by type of the substance used, leading to the loss of interpretability of these results. Interpreting the relationship between risk factors such as sedative use and alcohol use and burnout syndrome in medical students requires careful consideration of bidirectionality, since burnout can also trigger sedative and alcohol use. Current studies, like most research on burnout syndrome and substance and alcohol use, employed cross-sectional design and cannot confirm causality among the examined variables [44]. Longitudinal studies are needed to establish a clear understanding of causal relationship and clarify the direction of influence between burnout and alcohol and substance use. Given that education on drug abuse, alcohol use and illicit substances represents a core component of the medical schools’ curriculums [58–60], this association should be explored further in future longitudinal studies.
According to the findings of this study, high level of emotional exhaustion was significantly increased with the clinical training level of studies in medical students. Even though these results align with many prior studies showing that medical students have relatively low burnout rates when enrolling the medical school but experience a significant increase in emotional exhaustion upon exposure to clinical courses [61–63], some authors have reported different findings [38,64]. Contrary to this research, another study on burnout syndrome among medical students of the first and fifth year of studies in Serbia observed statistically significant differences in the values of all three burnout subscales in those students, with MBI EE being higher among first-year students [21]. A study conducted in Brazil recorded higher scores for emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and personal accomplishment among medical students in final stage of their studies [65]. The transition from preclinical to clinical training can be associated with factors such as emotional load due to moving from classroom to clinic, and educational pressure anxiety which is related to performing clinical skills, fear of unintentional harm to patients, wrong treatment, concerns of risk of infections from patients and loss of control over personal time, particularly sleeping hours. Research showed that rates of depression, anxiety and psychological distress are higher in the higher years of studies compared to the general population [66]. In a study conducted in Trinidad and Tobago, medical students had the highest levels of burnout and depression in the final year of study [67].
In this study, a positive personal medical history (presence of any chronic disease) was frequently reported among medical students who had high risk of academic inefficacy. However, only a few studies have examined the relationship between mental and physical health of medical students and burnout [26]. At an academic health center in the USA, both ever diagnosed physical and mental conditions were more associated with higher burnout among medical students, faculty and staff [68]. Regarding the personal accomplishment subscale, significant differences were observed only in relation to psychological health among fourth year medical students at the University of South Africa [69]. A cross-sectional study conducted across 22 medical schools in Brazil found significant associations between personal accomplishment and psychological quality of life and reduced personal distress [65]. The burnout–disease relationship can be regarded as part of a process in which academic demands compromise students’ mental and physical resources, leading to consequences such as academic inefficacy [58].
This study demonstrated significant correlations between medical student characteristics and dimensions of burnout, with the most prominent determinant being high frequency of alcohol use (every day consumption, P < 0.05; with a significant upward trend – P < 0.05). The findings of this study have important implications for student support services, suggesting counsellors should provide useful educational and psychological advice to all medical students, particularly students who are at high risk for burnout. The considerable variability in reported frequency of burnout among medical students can be attributed to the use of different questionnaires for burnout assessment, use of different criteria for identifying the syndrome (in addition to the three-dimensional – the use of one- and/or two-dimensional criteria) by researchers, and the application of non-validated instruments instead of validated ones [11]. For research in the student population, additional longitudinal studies that should use defined criteria and standardized instruments, adhering to a rigorous scientific approach, are necessary.
During the period of online learning necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic, the prevalence of burnout syndrome in medical students ranged from 16.7 to 59.9% [70]. Available evidence indicates that medical students encountered numerous challenges during distance learning [71–73]. Circumstances that had an impact on the psychological well-being of medical students included transition to distance learning, reduced contact with peers, impaired transfer of knowledge, particularly for clinical courses, and often additional responsibilities such as volunteer work with patients with COVID-19 [71–76]. Throughout medical school, students generally exhibited a trend of consistently high scores on the personal accomplishment and emotional exhaustion subscales, along with an increasing trend on the depersonalization subscale [70,74–77]. In addition to burnout syndrome, medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic reported elevated levels of stress, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbances, lack of social support, suicidal ideation, and lack of physical activity, all of which have been related to burnout [75–77]. To effectively address and prevent these problems in the context of potential future health crises, medical schools should take proactive measures to support students, which include counseling students by promoting mental well-being and healthy lifestyle, planning interventions to prevent burnout syndrome – such as coping strategies and self-motivation, and integrating them into the curriculum. Key findings indicate the need for the development of health-related guidelines, which should include monitoring quality of life of medical students, particularly during the clinical courses, and actively promoting a healthy lifestyle which involves regular exercise, adequate sleep, stress management skills, and a positive learning environment [72,76,78,79].
Strengths and limitations of the study
Despite the high response rate and the use of a validated questionnaire, several limitations may have affected the findings of this study. Notably, while the MBI was applied according to the traditional use of cut-off points, it is important to acknowledge that the most recent MBI manuals recommend avoiding cut-off points when interpreting MBI results and treating burnout as a continuous variable/phenomenon, and this change in approach is a potential source of limitation in the current study [35–37]. First, due to the well-known shortcomings of cross-sectional studies, the causality cannot be attributed to the associations between burnout dimensions and medical students’ characteristics observed in this study. Second, this study was conducted at a single medical faculty study, which may limit the generalizability of findings. Additionally, the question of sample size can always be raised. Furthermore, data on academic performance and other student characteristics are based on self-reporting by medical students, without any insight or verification in their relevant documentation. A significant limitation of this study is its reliance on data collected in 2014, which may reduce the applicability of some of the original findings of the study for understanding the contemporary situation. Finally, the possibility of bias (informational and/or response) cannot be excluded. In addition, it cannot be disregarded that the burnout dimensions are related to some other characteristics (such as socio-economic status, etc.) that were not examined. Therefore, the findings should be confirmed in future research or using longitudinal studies.
Conclusions
This study highlights the relationship between the dimensions of burnout syndrome (i.e., high level of emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and academic inefficacy) and certain characteristics of medical students. The identification of modifiable factors that are associated with burnout in Serbian medical students underscores the need for targeted support that would provide medical students the necessary help in order to prevent burnout syndrome. Since this study was conducted at a single Faculty of Medicine in Serbia, the findings cannot be properly generalized, indicating the need for further research involving a national sample of medical students.
Acknowledgments
We want to thank the leadership of the Faculty of Medical Sciences Kragujevac for their support and the medical students for their participation in the study. The authors thank Milena Jovanovic and Zeljko Todorovic, who partially helped in data collection and data entry.
References
- 1. Schaufeli WB. Burnot: a multidimensional perspective. In Schaufeli WB, Masalach C, Marek T. (Eds). Professional Burnout. Routledge; 2018.
- 2.
Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter M. Maslach Burnout Inventory. 3rd ed. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 2025.
- 3. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job burnout. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397–422. pmid:11148311
- 4. Maslach C, Jackson SE. The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behavior. 1981;2(2):99–113.
- 5. Lyndon MP, Henning MA, Alyami H, et al. Burnout, quality of life, motivation, and academic achievement among medical students: A person-oriented approach. Perspect Med Educ. 2017; 6(2): 108–14
- 6. Shamsuddin K, Fadzil F, Ismail WSW, Shah SA, Omar K, Muhammad NA, et al. Correlates of depression, anxiety and stress among Malaysian university students. Asian J Psychiatr. 2013;6(4):318–23. pmid:23810140
- 7. Pagnin D, de Queiroz V, Carvalho YTMS, Dutra ASS, Amaral MB, Queiroz TT. The relation between burnout and sleep disorders in medical students. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38(4):438–44. pmid:24683060
- 8. Shadid A, Shadid AM, Shadid A, Almutairi FE, Almotairi KE, Aldarwish T, et al. Stress, burnout, and associated risk factors in medical students. Cureus. 2020;12(1):e6633. pmid:31966946
- 9. Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, Dyrbye LN, Sotile W, Satele D, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians relative to the general US population. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(18):1377–85. pmid:22911330
- 10. Cheng DR, Poon F, Nguyen TT, Woodman RJ, Parker JD. Stigma and perception of psychological distress and depression in Australian-trained medical students: results from an inter-state medical school survey. Psychiatry Res. 2013;209(3):684–90. pmid:23561490
- 11. Frajerman A, Morvan Y, Krebs M-O, Gorwood P, Chaumette B. Burnout in medical students before residency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;55:36–42. pmid:30384110
- 12. Hope V, Henderson M. Medical student depression, anxiety and distress outside North America: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2014;48(10):963–79. pmid:25200017
- 13. Ishak W, Nikravesh R, Lederer S, Perry R, Ogunyemi D, Bernstein C. Burnout in medical students: a systematic review. Clin Teach. 2013;10(4):242–5. pmid:23834570
- 14. Almutairi H, Alsubaiei A, Abduljawad S, Alshatti A, Fekih-Romdhane F, Husni M, et al. Prevalence of burnout in medical students: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2022;68(6):1157–70. pmid:35775726
- 15. Alqahtani NH, Abdulaziz AA, Hendi OM, Mahfouz MEM. Prevalence of burnout syndrome among students of health care colleges and its correlation to musculoskeletal disorders in Saudi Arabia. Int J Prev Med. 2020;11:38. pmid:32363025
- 16. Albalawi AE, Alhawiti TS, Aldahi AS, Alshehri YM, Aldahi SK, Mirghani HO. The assessment of the burnout syndrome among medical students in Tabuk University, a cross‑sectional analytic study. BRJMCS. 2015;6:14–9.
- 17. El-Masry R, Ghreiz S, Helal R, Audeh A, Shams T. Perceived stress and burnout among medical students during the clinical period of their education. Ibnosina Journal of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences. 2013;05(04):179–88.
- 18. Almalki SA, Almojali AI, Alothman AS, Masuadi EM, Alaqeel MK. Burnout and its association with extracurricular activities among medical students in Saudi Arabia. Int J Med Educ. 2017;8:144–50. pmid:28454079
- 19. Ilic M, Todorovic Z, Jovanovic M, Ilic I. Burnout syndrome among medical students at one university in serbia: validity and reliability of the maslach burnout inventory-student survey. Behav Med. 2017;43(4):323–8. pmid:27127903
- 20. Backović D, Jevtić M. Burnout syndrome as a mental health problem among medical students. Med Pregl. 2012;65(3–4):129–32. pmid:22788061
- 21. Vicentic S, Latas M, Barisic J, Matic M, Pantovic-Stefanovic M, Jovanovic A A, et al. Burnout in medical students in Serbia: Preclinical and clinical differences. Engrami. 2015;37(1):5–15.
- 22. Ilić IM, Ilić MD. The relationship between the burnout syndrome and academic success of medical students: a cross-sectional study. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2023;74(2):134–41. pmid:37357875
- 23. Galán F, Sanmartín A, Polo J, Giner L. Burnout risk in medical students in Spain using the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Student Survey. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2011;84(4):453–9. pmid:21373879
- 24. Schaufeli WB, Martínez IM, Pinto AM, Salanova M, Bakker AB. Burnout and engagement in university students. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2002;33(5):464–81.
- 25. Schaufeli WB, Salanova M, González-romá V, Bakker AB. The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies. 2002;3(1):71–92.
- 26. Rosales-Ricardo Y, Rizzo-Chunga F, Mocha-Bonilla J, Ferreira JP. Prevalence of burnout syndrome in university students: A systematic review. Salud Ment. 2021;44(2):91–102.
- 27. Boni RADS, Paiva CE, de Oliveira MA, Lucchetti G, Fregnani JHTG, Paiva BSR. Burnout among medical students during the first years of undergraduate school: Prevalence and associated factors. PLoS One. 2018;13(3):e0191746. pmid:29513668
- 28. da Silva RM, Goulart CT, Lopes LFD, Serrano PM, Costa ALS, de Azevedo Guido L. Hardy personality and burnout syndrome among nursing students in three Brazilian universities-an analytic study. BMC Nurs. 2014;13(1):9. pmid:24678676
- 29. Cecil J, McHale C, Hart J, Laidlaw A. Behaviour and burnout in medical students. Med Educ Online. 2014;19:25209. pmid:25160716
- 30. Kristanto T, Chen WS, Thoo YY. Academic burnout and eating disorder among students in Monash University Malaysia. Eat Behav. 2016;22:96–100. pmid:27131097
- 31. Atalayin C, Balkis M, Tezel H, Onal B, Kayrak G. The prevalence and consequences of burnout on a group of preclinical dental students. Eur J Dent. 2015;9(3):356–63. pmid:26430363
- 32. Eren H, Huri M, Bağış N. Burnout and occupational participation among Turkish dental students. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2016;47(6):1343–52.
- 33. Ferrel Ortega FR, Ferrel Ballesta LF, Cantillo Aguirre AA, Jaramillo Campo J, Jiménez Suárez SM. Variables académicas y sociodemográficas relacionadas con el Síndrome de Burnout, en estudiantes de Ingenierías y Ciencias de la Salud de una universidad estatal de Colombia. Psicogente. 2017;20(38).
- 34. Győrffy Z, Birkás E, Sándor I. Career motivation and burnout among medical students in Hungary - could altruism be a protection factor?. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:182. pmid:27430960
- 35.
Maslach C, Leiter MP, Schaufeli WB. Measuring burnout. In: Cooper CL, Cartwright S, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Wellbeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 86–108.
- 36. Schaufeli WB, Buunk BP. Burnout: An Overview of 25 Years of Research and Theorizing. The Handbook of Work and Health Psychology. Wiley; 2002. 383–425.
- 37. Schaufeli WB. Burnout: A Short Socio-Cultural History. Burnout, Fatigue, Exhaustion. Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 105–27.
- 38. Erschens R, Keifenheim KE, Herrmann-Werner A, Loda T, Schwille-Kiuntke J, Bugaj TJ, et al. Professional burnout among medical students: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2019;41(2):172–83. pmid:29656675
- 39. Jackson ER, Shanafelt TD, Hasan O, Satele DV, Dyrbye LN. Burnout and alcohol abuse/dependence among U.S. medical students. Acad Med. 2016;91(9):1251–6. pmid:26934693
- 40. Lebensohn P, Dodds S, Benn R, Brooks AJ, Birch M, Cook P, et al. Resident wellness behaviors: relationship to stress, depression, and burnout. Fam Med. 2013;45(8):541–9. pmid:24129866
- 41. Nteveros A, Kyprianou M, Artemiadis A, Charalampous A, Christoforaki K, Cheilidis S, et al. Burnout among medical students in Cyprus: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):e0241335. pmid:33206654
- 42. Bolatov AK, Seisembekov TZ, Smailova DS, Hosseini H. Burnout syndrome among medical students in Kazakhstan. BMC Psychol. 2022;10(1):193. pmid:35933418
- 43. Vicentic S, Begenisic N, Tiosavljevic D, Banjac Baljak V, Lalovic N, Nestorovic M, et al. Burnout syndrome and alcohol use among medical students in Serbia. Work. 2026;83(2):384–91. pmid:40853638
- 44. Andrade GF, Menolli PV da S, Clemente PA, Mesas AE, Silva DC, Girotto E. Burnout syndrome and consumption of alcohol and illicit substances in university students. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto). 2021;31.
- 45. Gold JA, Hu X, Huang G, Li W-Z, Wu Y-F, Gao S, et al. Medical student depression and its correlates across three international medical schools. World J Psychiatry. 2019;9(4):65–77. pmid:31799151
- 46. Cooper ML, Russell M, Skinner JB, Frone MR, Mudar P. Stress and alcohol use: moderating effects of gender, coping, and alcohol expectancies. J Abnorm Psychol. 1992;101(1):139–52. pmid:1537960
- 47. Williams A, Clark D. Alcohol consumption in university students: the role of reasons for drinking, coping strategies, expectancies, and personality traits. Addict Behav. 1998;23(3):371–8. pmid:9668934
- 48. Szmigin I, Griffin C, Mistral W, Bengry-Howell A, Weale L, Hackley C. Re-framing “binge drinking” as calculated hedonism: empirical evidence from the UK. Int J Drug Policy. 2008;19(5):359–66. pmid:17981452
- 49. Frank E, Elon L, Naimi T, Brewer R. Alcohol consumption and alcohol counselling behaviour among US medical students: cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:a2155. pmid:18996938
- 50. Ilic I, Zivanovic Macuzic I, Kocic S, Ilic M. High risk of burnout in medical students in Serbia, by gender: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0256446. pmid:34415954
- 51.
Institute of Public Health of Serbia. National Health Survey 2013 — Key Findings. Belgrade: Ministry of Health of Serbia. 2014. https://www.batut.org.rs/download/publikacije/2013SerbiaHealthSurvey.pdf
- 52. Fond G, Bourbon A, Boucekine M, Messiaen M, Barrow V, Auquier P, et al. First-year French medical students consume antidepressants and anxiolytics while second-years consume non-medical drugs. J Affect Disord. 2020;265:71–6. pmid:31957694
- 53. Goel AD, Akarte SV, Agrawal SP, Yadav V. Longitudinal assessment of depression, stress, and burnout in medical students. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2016;7(4):493–8. pmid:27695226
- 54. Compton MT, Carrera J, Frank E. Stress and depressive symptoms/dysphoria among US medical students: results from a large, nationally representative survey. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2008;196(12):891–7. pmid:19077856
- 55. Goebert D, Thompson D, Takeshita J, Beach C, Bryson P, Ephgrave K, et al. Depressive symptoms in medical students and residents: a multischool study. Acad Med. 2009;84(2):236–41. pmid:19174678
- 56. Smith CK, Peterson DF, Degenhardt BF, Johnson JC. Depression, anxiety, and perceived hassles among entering medical students. Psychol Health Med. 2007;12(1):31–9. pmid:17129931
- 57. Mbanga CM, Efie DT, Aroke D, Njim T. Prevalence and predictors of recreational drug use among medical and nursing students in Cameroon: a cross sectional analysis. BMC Res Notes. 2018;11(1):515. pmid:30055652
- 58. Erschens R, Loda T, Herrmann-Werner A, Keifenheim KE, Stuber F, Nikendei C, et al. Behaviour-based functional and dysfunctional strategies of medical students to cope with burnout. Med Educ Online. 2018;23(1):1535738. pmid:30371222
- 59. Moffat KJ, McConnachie A, Ross S, Morrison JM. First year medical student stress and coping in a problem-based learning medical curriculum. Med Educ. 2004;38(5):482–91. pmid:15107082
- 60. Newbury-Birch D, Walshaw D, Kamali F. Drink and drugs: from medical students to doctors. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2001;64(3):265–70. pmid:11672941
- 61. Brazeau CMLR, Shanafelt T, Durning SJ, Massie FS, Eacker A, Moutier C, et al. Distress among matriculating medical students relative to the general population. Acad Med. 2014;89(11):1520–5. pmid:25250752
- 62. Dyrbye L, Shanafelt T. A narrative review on burnout experienced by medical students and residents. Med Educ. 2016;50(1):132–49. pmid:26695473
- 63. Hansell MW, Ungerleider RM, Brooks CA, Knudson MP, Kirk JK, Ungerleider JD. Temporal trends in medical student burnout. Fam Med. 2019;51(5):399–404. pmid:31081911
- 64. Puranitee P, Saetang S, Sumrithe S, Busari JO, van Mook WNKA, Heeneman S. Exploring burnout and depression of Thai medical students: the psychometric properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Int J Med Educ. 2019;10:223–9. pmid:31786565
- 65. Paro HBMS, Silveira PSP, Perotta B, Gannam S, Enns SC, Giaxa RRB, et al. Empathy among medical students: is there a relation with quality of life and burnout?. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94133. pmid:24705887
- 66. Blanco C, Okuda M, Wright C, Hasin DS, Grant BF, Liu S-M, et al. Mental health of college students and their non-college-attending peers: results from the national epidemiologic study on alcohol and related conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2008;65(12):1429–37. pmid:19047530
- 67. Youssef FF. Medical student stress, burnout and depression in trinidad and Tobago. Acad Psychiatry. 2016;40(1):69–75. pmid:26758738
- 68. Howie EK, Cannady N, Messias EL, McNatt A, Walter CS. Associations between physical activity, sleep, and self-reported health with burnout of medical students, faculty and staff in an academic health center. Sport Sci Health. 2022;18(4):1311–9. pmid:35308038
- 69. Colby L, Mareka M, Pillay S, Sallie F, van Staden C, du Plessis ED, et al. The association between the levels of burnout and quality of life among fourth-year medical students at the University of the Free State. S Afr J Psychiatr. 2018;24:1101. pmid:30263208
- 70. Ilic IM, Ilic MD. Medical e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic and students’ burnout: a narrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. 2024;69(3):567–77.
- 71. Kiss H, Pikó BF. Risk and protective factors of student burnout among medical students: a multivariate analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25(1):386. pmid:40089769
- 72. Chandratre S. Medical students and COVID-19: challenges and supportive strategies. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020;7:2382120520935059. pmid:32637642
- 73. Forycka J, Pawłowicz-Szlarska E, Burczyńska A, Cegielska N, Harendarz K, Nowicki M. Polish medical students facing the pandemic-Assessment of resilience, well-being and burnout in the COVID-19 era. PLoS One. 2022;17(1):e0261652. pmid:35073318
- 74. Daryanto B, Kurniawan J, Wiranigitasari Hioe F, Nurhadi P, Yudhantara DS. Prevalence of burnout and its associated factors among medical students during COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2023;18(6):e0285986. pmid:37384674
- 75. Muaddi MA, El-Setouhy M, Alharbi AA, Makeen AM, Adawi EA, Gohal G, et al. Assessment of Medical Students Burnout during COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(4):3560. pmid:36834259
- 76. Dhachpramuk D, Sonjaipanich S, Theppiban S, In-Iw S. Exercise, mental well-being and burnout in Thai medical students in 2020-2021: an online cross-sectional survey. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):837. pmid:39095768
- 77. Sulaiman R, Ismail S, Shraim M, El Hajj MS, Kane T, El-Awaisi A. Experiences of burnout, anxiety, and empathy among health profession students in Qatar University during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychol. 2023;11(1):111. pmid:37055804
- 78. Peng P, Hao Y, Liu Y, Chen S, Wang Y, Yang Q, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of mental problems in medical students during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2023;321:167–81. pmid:36341802
- 79. Liang JZ, Ng DKW, Raveendran V, Teo MYK, Quah ELY, Chua KZY, et al. The impact of online education during the Covid-19 pandemic on the professional identity formation of medical students: A systematic scoping review. PLoS One. 2024;19(1):e0296367. pmid:38181035