Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Experimental assessment of chloride and sulfate ions on the durability of CO2 carbonated backfill materials

  • Ichhuy Ngo,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Coal Resources Green Mining (Xinjiang Institute of Engineering), Ministry of Education, Urumqi, China, School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China

  • Ruizhi Yang ,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    ds23020213p31mz@cumt.edu.cn (RY); ngoichhuy@cumt.edu.cn (IN)

    Affiliation School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China

  • Kunpeng Yu,

    Roles Conceptualization

    Affiliation School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China

  • Zhiyang Zhao,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis

    Affiliation School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China

  • Kaidan Zheng,

    Roles Conceptualization

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Xinjiang Coal Resources Green Mining (Xinjiang Institute of Engineering), Ministry of Education, Urumqi, China

  • Zhishang Zhang,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China

  • Chengkun Peng,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation School of Mines, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, China

  • Hemeng Zhang

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Key Laboratory of Mine Thermodynamic Disasters and Control of Ministry of Education, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao, China

Abstract

The present study investigates the durability of CO2-carbonated coal-based solid waste backfill materials under the deterioration effects of chloride and sulfate ions. The primary objective is to evaluate the feasibility of environmentally favorable, CO2 negative backfilling materials for application in coal mining goaf stabilization. Carbonated samples at various curing stages were immersed in chloride and sulfate solutions, with tap water serving as the reference medium. Several key aspects were assessed, including dimensional alterations, mechanical property variation, phase evolution, and microstructural characteristics. Key phases were identified via XRD and SEM-EDS. The results indicate that the degree of deterioration followed the order: Cl- > tap water> SO42-. Compared with tap water, chloride exposure caused more severe degradation, whereas sulfate exposure partially mitigated the deterioration. Compressive strength decreased by 43.9% and 20.6% after immersion in chloride and sulfate solutions, respectively. The pronounced difference in damages is attributed to the high diffusivity of chloride ion with concentrations approximately 2.5 times higher than sulfate ions at a 5 mm depth, which not only consumed CaCO3 and C-A-S-H gel but also promoted the formation of Friedel’s salt and facilitated anion exchange reactions. In contrast, sulfate exposure led to the formation of ettringite crystals after leaching, which, when maintained below a certain concentration, acted as a filling agent that reduced microstructural porosity. This study provides a fundamental insights into the performance of CO2-carbonated backfill materials in chloride- and sulfate-rich environments, offering guidance for their practical application in sustainable coal mine backfilling.

1. Introduction

The rapid growth of the economy drives a huge demand for the mineral resources, coal exploitation is one of the vital resources for energy supplies in China [1]. The expansion of coal mining industry has risen to a plethora mining related issue, involving the surface solid waste accumulation such as mine tailing, waste rock, coal gangue and fly ash, along with the augmentation of subsurface mine goaf [25]. According to the China Coal Processing and Utilization Association (CCPUA), the cumulative stockpile of coal solid waste is approximately 4.5 billion tons with an annual increment of 795 million tons [6]. At the same time, the subsurface openings associated with coal mining activities could trigger various mining-related disasters such as overburden subsidence, rock bursts, aquifer water loss, and ecological issues that bring substantial hazards to both human safety and environmental integrity [710]. In light of these challenges, proper strategies and mitigation means should be developed.

In recent years, cemented paste backfill (CPB) has emerged as a highly effective and clean mining approach, solving the combination issues of coal mining goaf and surface solid waste accumulation [11]. This technique involves the mixtures of mine tailings with cementitious materials and water, then pumping into the working face of the mine [12]. As ordinary Portland cement (OPC) was the predominant binder, the prepared CPB is not economically viable and also contributes to carbon emissions [13]. In this regard, alkali-activated materials (AAMs) have gained more popularity and stand as a better choice. Jin et al. (2024) [14] prepared an alkali activated slurry using iron tailing, and found that inclusion of fly ash promoted the flowability and stability of the slurry. Liu et al. (2024) [15] effectively disposed phosphorus slag paste backfill material using various activators such as Na2SO4, Na2SiO3, Na2CO3 and NaOH. They concluded that NaOH possessed a better early hydration, but Na2SO4 provided sufficient later strength and enhanced denser hydration products and refined the pore structure characteristics. Yang et al. (2023) [16] studied the mechanical properties and long-term stability of modified magnesium slag cemented coal-based solid waste backfill material, and found that the uniaxial compressive strength, pore characteristics and microstructure were affected by fly ash addition and curing temperature. The effects were related to the hydration reaction and reaction products. Tang et al. (2024) [17] proposed a novel paste backfill material using anaolian sand, red mud and fly ash as primary raw materials. The paste slurry was found following the Herschel-Bulkley model, and the mechanical strength reached 6.4 MPa when hardened. Additionally, the materials meet the class III groundwater standards. Li et al. (2024) [18] used oil shale residue, steel slag, and soda residue to synthesize all solid waste low carbon cemented backfill material. The formulated materials meet the backfill performance requirement, where the compressive strength reached 5.97 MPa and the slump value was 205 mm. Furthermore, the developed materials supersede the cement-based materials with a CO2 emission reduction of 86.9%.

On top of CO2 emission reduction by waste materials replacement, scholars deepen the investigation on the active CO2 utilization in backfill materials. Wu et al. (2024) [19] utilized magnesium oxide in magnesium slag and adopt MgCl2 as calcium carbonate crystal modifier via wet carbonation method. The compressive strength was enhanced by 22% by introducing 0.1 M MgCl2, and the CO2 sequestration reached 20.33 g CO2 per 100 g magnesium slag. Chen et al. (2022) [20] addressed the ability of carbon uptake of cemented paste backfill under low CO2 concentration conditions. Using 1.5% concentration of CO2 was found to increase the carbonation rate by 4 times comparing to natural curing. Ngo et al. (2023) [21] used CO2 as a coactivation agent to enhance the setting and mechanical properties of the coal gangue fly ash backfill materials. CO2 was found to shorten the setting time of backfill slurry to up to 90% and strengthen the harden backfill body by up to 5 times. Li et al. (2023) [22] evaluated the direct aqueous carbonation of industrial solid waste for CO2 carbonation and concluded that solid waste with a high Ca content has better carbonation activity at a maximum rate of 544.6 g-CO2/kg. It was added that the particle size, reaction temperature, solid to liquid ratio and CO2 concentration should controlled below 75 μm, at 60 °C, 100g/L and 15%, respectively. As Li et al. (2023) [23] suggested, the carbonation rate and efficiency were in accordance with the CaO content of the materials. High CaO concentration induces an alkaline environment that promotes the pozzolanic reaction, thus generating a large amount of CaCO3.

With regard to long-term safe implementation of the backfill materials, the durability is one of the most important parameters to be considered. Sun et al. (2024) [24] recently studied the durability of biomass-coal mixed combustion ash geopolymer backfill. The mass loss was 0.93% and the compressive strength decrease was 33.2% after the erosion of the compound salt solution. Liu et al. (2020) [25] performed a case study on the effect of water on mechanical properties and permeability of backfill materials implemented in Taiping Coal Mine, China. The backfill materials were found to increase in weakening coefficient due to the slaking process, but the strength of the material was considerably stable due to the low hydraulic conductivity. Chen et al. (2023) [26] addressed the durability of the geopolymer backfill consisting of sodium silicate, fly ash, sand and water in wet-dry cycles. Under the attack of Na2SO4 and CaCl2 solution dry-wet cycles, the variation of hydraulic conductivity, mass and volume in contaminant solutions were observed. The hydraulic conductivity was found to increase by two orders of magnitude after first dry-wet cycle. It is noticeable that most of the studies focused on the durability and variation in the mechanical performance of solid waste backfill materials under different solution attack conditions. Very limited investigation has involved with the durability of CO2 carbonated backfill materials at post water deteriorations. It is actually a significant topic to be considered to extend the safe implementation of CO2 carbonated backfill materials. As mentioned above, the carbonated backfill materials are mainly filled with CaCO3 crystals, which is sensitive to acid, mild acid, or even water interactions. In our previous study [27], the durability of carbonated fly ash backfill materials was addressed considering cation solution attacks. However, anionic solution deteriorations were missing.

Therefore, the importance of this study lies in addressing the durability of CO2 carbonated backfill materials, which are proposed as a novel carbon-negative solution for mine goaf filling. While CO2 carbonation not only immobilizes greenhouse gases but also valorizes coal-based solid waste, the chemical durability of such materials under aggressive underground environments-particularly in the presence of chloride and sulfate ions-remains poorly understood. These ions are commonly present in mine water and can critically impair the mechanical integrity and service life of backfill materials, potentially limiting their large-scale application.

In this regard, this study aims to investigate the resistance and deterioration effects of CO2 carbonated backfill materials when exposed to chloride and sulfate-rich environment. Without other protective means, the deteriorations were determined at different curing time from 3 to 56 d to understand how ion-induced damage influences strength loss at various stages. Meanwhile, the penetration depths of chloride and sulfate ions, and mass loss and diameter changes were also considered. The test results were associated with solution analysis, phase transformations, and microstructural evolution to discover the underlying mechanisms. The study provides essential insights into the feasibility, environmental reliability, and practical deployment of CO2 carbonated backfill materials in underground mining operations.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Materials

In this study, 80% of fly ash was used to replace the ordinary Portland cement (OPC). Fly ash was acquired from a coal-fired power plant in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China. OPC PO 42.5 was purchased from Zhucheng Yangchun Co., Ltd. The collected fly ash was dried at 60 °C for 48 h to eliminate the residual water content. As the fly ash can pass the 200-mesh sieve, it was used as received. Both fly ash and cement were measured the cumulative particle size distribution using a laser diffraction method (Malvern model Mastersizer 2000, UK) as shown in Fig 1. The oxide and mineral composition of fly ash and cement were analyzed by X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF, Bruker model S8 Tiger spectrometer, Germany) and X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker model D8 Advance, Germany), respectively. The characterization results are shown in Table 1. The chemical properties indicated that fly ash mainly composed of SiO2 + Al2O3 + Fe2O3, and its sum is greater than 70%, and CaO is less than 18%. The used fly ash was then classified as Class F ash in accordance to the ASTM C618 standard [28]. The mineral compositions of fly ash are mullite, quartz and hematite, where the cements are tricalcium silicate (C3S), dicalcium (C2S), lime, and periclase.

thumbnail
Table 1. Oxide and mineral compositions of raw materials.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343496.t001

The solid raw materials were coactivated using sodium silicate, which was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (99% pure). The Na2O/SiO2 ratio of sodium silicate is 1.03 with a standard pH and viscosity of 11.5 and 5 mPa.s (10 wt% solution concentration), respectively at 25 °C. The CO2 gas used in the carbonation investigation was supplied by Xuzhou Luyou Gas Co., Ltd. Tap water was used to prepare the alkali solution and the deterioration water of Cl- and SO42-, where its initial pH is 6.8 ± 0.2. The deterioration water was synthesized in-house using NaCl and Na2SO4 supplied by Sigma Aldrich.

2.2. Preparation

The CO2 carbonated backfill samples were prepared in accordance to the Chinese standard (GB/T17671) [29]. To ensure a well-mixed backfill slurry, dry phase raw materials and activation solution were prepared separately, and the dosage of sodium silicate solution accounted for 30% by weight of the total mass of the mixture. Fly ash was added to cement in a 4:1 ratio and mechanically stirred at 500 rpm for 5 min. The alkali activation solution was formulated by adding 10 wt% of sodium silicate to tap water. The solution was stirred at 500 rpm for 30 min at room temperature. After which, the activator solution was mixed with the dry mixture in the reactor at 850 rpm for 3 min. Then the stirring speed was decreased to 500 rpm while CO2 gas was fed into the reactor at a constant rate of 1L/min for 20 min. It is worth highlighting that the dry to liquid ratio was selected based on our previous study [4]. The mortar was then molded into a cylindrical shape with a standard dimension of Φ 50 mm × 100 mm. The molds were covered to avoid water loss and allowed to stand for 48 h prior to demolding. The obtained samples were then transferred to a standard curing box with a constant temperature of 20 ± 2 °C and humidity of 95 ± 2%. The overall workflow of the this study is presented in Fig 2, and the details of the properties of the mixture are listed in Table 2.

thumbnail
Table 2. The mix ratio of CO2 carbonated backfill materialsa).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343496.t002

2.3. Exposure condition

The immersion temperature was set at 25 ± 1°C, and the liquid-solid ratio was 10:1. A total of 3 cycles were performed using a saturation-drying cycle mode. The CO2 carbonated backfill material was subjected to seven different types exposures of deionized water, 2, 4, 6 wt% NaCl solution and 2, 4, 6 wt% Na2SO4 solution, as presented in Table 3. Backfill samples exposed to deionized water were presented as the reference group. At the predefined curing time of 3–56 days, the samples were exposed to deterioration solution for 7 days, followed by air dry at a constant temperature of 45 °C for 24 h.

thumbnail
Table 3. Synthesized NaCl and Na2SO4 deterioration water (wt%).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343496.t003

2.3.1. Chloride and sulfate concentration.

The concentrations of chloride and sulfate were measured by drilling the sample at a depth of 5, 10, 15, and 20 mm. The collected powder samples were then analyzed using Hitachi DR UV-3900 of ultra-violet and visible spectrometer. Prior testing, the powder samples were dissolved in deionized water and allowed to stand for 48 h.

2.3.2. Solution analysis.

The leachate of the sample was collected after exposure for Al, Ca, Na, and Si analysis using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (ICP-OES). The leachate sample was prepared by filtering 15 cm3 of sample through a 0.45 um filter and adding 1 cm3 of 7.85 mol/L nitric acid. Prior to analysis, the samples were refrigerated to reduce the chance that solids precipitated from the solution during storage.

2.3.3. Mass and diameter change.

Prior to the mass and diameter change measurements, the dried samples were allowed to stand in the glass desiccator for at least 6 h. The mass change of deteriorated samples was weighted using an electronic scale with accuracy of 0.001 g. The measurements were repeated three times to ensure accuracy. The mass change was calculated following Eq. (1). For the same instance, the diameter variation of sample was monitored by an electric vernier caliper with an accuracy of 0.001 mm. The evaluation was as well repeated three times at the marked location to improve accuracy. The diameter change was calculated using Eq (2).

(1)

where is the initial mass is the mass after exposure.

(2)

where is the initial mass is the mass after exposure.

2.3.4. Mini-slump and porosity test.

According to the standard GB/T 50080-2016, the Mini-slump test was carried out to evaluate the fluidity of fresh filling slurry. The test equipment adopted a truncated mini-slump cone with a top diameter of 50 mm, bottom diameter of 100 mm, and height of 150 mm. The porosity of the deteriorated backfill samples was determined by the water saturated method in accordance with the GB/T 34533-2023.Testing equipment includes an electronic balance (accuracy 0.01g) used for weighing dry mass and saturated mass, along with one YT-700 constant temperature drying oven.

2.3.5. Uniaxial compressive strength test (UCS).

The samples were subjected to UCS test in accordance to the national standard (GB/T1761-2021) using a WDW-300 electronic universal testing machine. Displacement loading was controlled at a constant speed of 1 mm/min. The peak stress and displacement were recorded and utilized in further inspection. All tests were repeated three times.

2.3.6. Morphological analysis.

The deteriorated samples by chloride and sulfate attacks were further analyzed to investigate the microstructure and the underlying deterioration mechanisms. A small portion of the sample collected during UCS test and its hydration was stopped with anhydrous ethanol. The sample was then oven dried at a constant temperature of 50 °C for 24 h. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) were performed using a field emission microscope (Hitachi model Regulus 8100) with an energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDXA model 560). The magnification was 100,000 times. The sample was observed in the 20-kV voltage field in a high vacuum condition. The spectrum from each measurement point was collected over a 30 s period. The working distance was 10.5 mm, and the spot was controlled at 3.5 mm.

2.3.7. X-ray diffraction (XRD).

The mineral and chemical components analysis was performed using advanced X-ray diffractometer (Bruker model D8 Advance) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.15419 nm) over 2θ ranging from 5 to 90o and a step length of 0.02o. The deteriorated sample was ground in an agate mortar and sieved through a 200-mesh screen.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Chloride and sulfate concentration

Fig 3 illustrates the penetration depth of chloride and sulfate ions within the samples. The ion concentration profiles for all exposures followed a similar trend, regardless of ion type: concentrations decreased with both penetration depth and curing time. At depth of 5 mm, the average concentrations of chloride and sulfate ions were 3.8 mg/g and 1.5 mg/g, respectively, which declined steadily to 1.04 mg/g and 0.29 mg/g at 10 mm. Beyond this depth, the reduction became less pronounced, reaching only 0.02 mg/g and 0.004 mg/g at 20 mm. As widely recognized, chloride and sulfate ions diffusion in cementitious materials is governed by concentration gradients, whereby ions migrate directionally from regions of high concentration at the material’s surface toward regions of lower concentration within the pore solution [30]. During this process, infiltrated ions are partly bonded or absorbed by the cementitious phases of the backfill matrix [31], limiting their continued penetration. Consequently, only a fraction of the ions advance deeper into the material, resulting in markedly lower concentrations at greater depths. These findings are consistent with the established diffusion mechanisms.

thumbnail
Fig 3. The concentration of chloride and sulfate ions (a) 3d, (b) 7d, (c) 14d, (d) 28d, and (e) 56d.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343496.g003

The concentration of chloride and sulfate ions decreased with increasing curing time. For instance, at depth of 5 mm, chloride and sulfate declined from averages of 3.8 mg/g and 1.5 mg/g to 3.48 mg/g and 1.35 mg/g, respectively, as the curing period was extended from 3 to 56 d. This reduction can be attributed to the enhanced formation of hydration products during prolonged curing, which provided additional binding sites that immobilized diffusing ions and restricted their further penetration. Notably, chloride ions exhibited a greater penetration capacity compared to sulfate ions. At equivalent depths, chloride concentrations were approximately 30% higher than those of sulfate. The lower detection of sulfate ions may be explained by the formation of ettringite near the surface and pore-matrix interface, which densified the microstructure and acted as a barrier to further sulfate ingress [32].

3.2. Solution analysis

After exposure, the reacted solutions were collected and analyzed for their major ionic components, as shown in Fig 4.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Leaching concentration within exposed solution (a) Ca ion, (b) Si ion, and (c) Al ion.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343496.g004

Ca was the most abundantly released ion across all scenarios, followed by Al and Si, indicating that deterioration primarily affected by the hydration gel. The extent of ion release decreased with increasing curing time, reflecting improved stability of the backfill. For example, in the reference case (W0), Ca concentration decreased from 621 to 300 μg/L, Al from 176 to 68 μg/L, and Si from 132 to 57 μg/L as curing time extended from 3 to 56 d. This reduction is attributed to the greater development of hydration products during longer curing, which created a denser backfill matrix that limited solution ingress and subsequent ion leaching.

Using W0 as the baseline, it was further observed that ion release in chloride solutions (C1-C3) was consistently higher than in sulfate solution (S1-S3). For example, after 3 d of curing, Ca, Al, and Si concentrations in C1 were 873, 259, and 183 μg/L, respectively, compared with 459, 111, and 105 μg/L in S1. This behavior can be explained by the high transmissibility of chloride ions, which penetrate the backfill through diffusion, capillary wicking, and absorption [33]. During migration, a portion of chloride ions is bound within the cementitious matrix, while unbound ions remain in the pore solution [34]. These free chlorides participate in secondary reactions, altering the microstructure through the formation of Friedel’s salts, which occurs via adsorption and anion-exchange mechanisms [35,36]. The latter process facilitates calcium leaching from backfill body. In contrast, sulfate attack follows a “diffusion-reaction-expansion” or “diffusion-concentration-crystallization” mechanism. The sulfate reaction products, such as gypsum, ettringite, thaumasite, and magnesium silicate, continue to grow, resulting in significant volume expansion [37]. This expansion concentrates deterioration around capillary walls, leading to microcracking and accelerated erosion. The extent and nature of these corrosion products are strongly influenced by both pH and sulfate concentration [38]. Due to these mechanistic differences, the concentrations of leached ions in sulfate-exposed solutions were consistently lower than those in chloride-exposed solutions.

3.3. Mass and diameter changes

Fig 5 presents the mass and diameter changes of samples subjected to different curing times and exposure conditions.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Evolution of (a) Mass and (b) diameter under different exposure conditions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343496.g005

The results show two distinct trends among the seven conditions tested. Samples exposed to deionized water and chloride solutions exhibited decreases in both mass and diameter, whereas those exposed to sulfate solutions displayed increases. For the control group (W0), mass decreased sharply between 3 and 14 d, followed by a gradual reduction up to 28 d, and then stabilized by 56 d. Changes in diameter followed a similar pattern. The reductions can be attributed to partial dissolution of surface and edge particles in water, as previously discussed [27]. The chloride-exposed group experienced more pronounced mass and diameter losses, likely due to internal interactions between Cl- ions and hydration products. This interpretation is supported by solution analysis, which showed higher concentrations of leached Ca, Si, Al. In carbonated backfill materials, C-A-S-H hydrate forms initially but subsequently dissolves under chloride attack, as carbonate ions are replaced by chloride ions through an anion-exchange mechanism [39].

In contrast, sulfate exposed samples exhibited increases in both mass and diameter. This behavior reflects the fundamentally different deterioration mechanism compared with chloride attack. Sulfate diffusion initiates chemical reactions that generate expansive corrosion products, such as ettringite and gypsum, thereby increasing the overall volume [40]. However, this expansion effect diminished with longer curing times, as the denser backfill structure restricted the sulfate ingress. Additionally, the physical and adsorption of sulfate ions around Ca2+ sites may have induced repulsive forces within the matrix, further contributing to the observed dimensional changes [41].

3.4. Compressive strength

Fig 6 shows the compressive strength of backfill materials exposed to different solutions under varying curing conditions.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Influence of various exposure conditions on (a) compressive strength, (b) strength reduction.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343496.g006

Overall, the compressive strength of all carbonated samples decreased after exposure, regardless of the solution type. However, the degree of deterioration was influenced by curing duration and the concentration of dissolved ions. Longer curing times mitigated strength loss due to the enhanced formation of binding phases through the pozzolanic reaction of fly ash, the activation agent, and the precipitation of CaCO3 [4]. For instance, compressive strength declined from 2.7 to 1.35 MPa at 3 days and from 5.88 to 3.56 MPa at 56 days, corresponding to reductions of 50% and 39.5%, respectively.

Chloride exposure caused more severe deterioration compared to W0. In C1, compressive strength fell to 1.17 MPa at 3 days and 3.3 MPa at 56 days, representing reductions of 56.7% and 43.9%. The effect was amplified at higher chloride concentrations: C2 exhibited reductions of 64.1% and 46.6%, while C3 showed the most pronounced deterioration, with reductions of 71.1% at 3 days and 54.6% at 56 days. These results indicate that chloride-induced strength loss is highly dependent on ion concentration. Chloride permeation promotes the formation of Friedel’s salt through adsorption and anion-exchange, progressively altering the internal microstructure. Higher chloride concentrations increased ion diffusivity, thereby accelerating chemical reactions and structural degradation, consistent with previous findings [42].

In contrast, sulfate exposure induced less strength reduction compared with both W0 and chloride attack. For S1, compressive strength was 1.53 MPa at 3 days and 4.67 MPa at 56 days, corresponding to reductions of 43.3% and 20.6%. The reductions for S2 were 40% at 3 days and 17.9% at 56 days, while S3 samples exhibited 46.3% and 22.3% reductions, respectively. Unlike chloride attack, the deterioration trend under sulfate solutions showed a non-linear pattern: strength loss decreased from S1 to S2, then increased again at S3. This behavior is attributed to the swelling effect of corrosion products. Sulfate ions reacted with cementitious phases to form gypsum and ettringite, initially filling pores and densifying the microstructure at moderate concentrations (S2). However, at higher concentration (S3), excessive expansion exceeded the accommodation capacity of internal voids, inducing cracking and renewed strength loss [43].

3.5. Morphological analysis

Fig 7 presents the microstructural features and corrosion product morphologies of carbonated backfill materials under different exposure conditions.

thumbnail
Fig 7. SEM images and representative dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) spectra of carbonated backfill samples after various exposures.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343496.g007

As shown in Fig 7a-1, the unexposed sample exhibited a dense structure in which particles were coated with flocculent phases. EDS analysis of spot 1 (Fig 7a-2) revealed high concentrations of Ca, Al, Si, and O, confirming the presence of C–A–S–H gel [44]. In addition, numerous white crystalline deposits were observed on the flocculent structures. These crystals (spot 2, Fig 7a-3) were rich in C, Ca, and O, characteristic of CaCO3, while the associated gelling agent (spot 3, Fig 7a-4) was composed mainly of Si and O, consistent with silica gel [44]. The combined presence of C–A–S–H gel, CaCO3, and silica gel contributed to the compact structure and strength of the carbonated backfill material. After exposure to deionized water (W0), the microstructure became noticeably looser with extensive pore development (Fig 7b-1). EDS spectra from spots 4–6 (Fig 7b-2 to 7b-4) indicated no new crystalline products; instead, leaching of Ca, Si, and Al occurred, consistent with solution analysis results. Strength reduction in this case was mainly attributed to dissolution of the binding phases (C–A–S–H and silica gel) and the loss of CaCO3 as a filling component.

Exposure to chloride solution induced more severe alterations (Fig 7c). C–A–S–H gels were swollen and degraded, reducing their binding capacity. EDS analysis of spot 7 (Fig 7c-2) showed substantial decreases in Ca, Al, and Si contents, while intact fly ash particles with clean surfaces were visible (spot 8), indicating weakened particle bonding and reduced structural integrity [4]. Additionally, flake-like crystals were observed (spot 9), which EDS confirmed as Friedel’s salt (high Ca, O, Al, and Cl; Fig 7c-4) [45]. These findings align with the strength reduction results: chloride ions penetrated the matrix, adsorbing Ca and Al through anion exchange, forming Friedel’s salt, and disrupting the stability of C–A–S–H and CaCO3.

In the case of sulfate exposure, the microstructure expanded and became irregularly porous (Fig 7d-1). Similar to chloride attack, C–A–S–H phases leached and lost binding ability, as evidenced at spot 10 (Fig 7d-2). Clean fly ash particle surfaces (spot 11, Fig 7d-3) further indicated poor bonding within the matrix. Importantly, sulfate reactions generated acicular crystals identified as ettringite (spot 12, Fig 7d-4), confirmed by EDS spectra showing high Ca, Al, O, and S concentrations [46]. The growth of ettringite induced internal expansion, which explains the observed increases in sample diameter after sulfate exposure. This expansive pressure caused microcracking and structural damage, consistent with the measured increases in porosity shown in Fig 8, ultimately leading to strength reduction.

thumbnail
Fig 8. Porosity of backfill materials after exposure to various solutions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343496.g008

3.6. Evolution of hydration and carbonation products

Fig 9 presents the XRD diffraction patterns of carbonated backfill samples at the initial stage and after 56 days of exposure to different deterioration solutions.

thumbnail
Fig 9. XRD diffraction peaks of carbonate backfill materials after exposure to various solutions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343496.g009

In the initial state, the carbonated backfill consisted primarily of fly ash crystals, identified as mullite and calcite, along with an amorphous phase attributed to C–A–S–H gel, which appeared between 15o and 35o. As confirmed by SEM–EDS analysis, C–A–S–H gel served as the main binding agent, integrating fly ash particles and calcite crystals to enhance material strength. After exposure to water, chloride, and sulfate solutions, this amorphous phase was significantly reduced, indicating the loss of binding capability—consistent with the observed strength reduction and microstructural deterioration.

According to literature [47], the corrosion mechanism of cementitious materials under sulfate attack involves the dissolution of portlandite (Ca(OH)2), which reacts with incoming sulfate ions to form gypsum (Eq. 3). Calcium aluminate phases subsequently react to form monosulfoaluminate (AFm) or ettringite (AFt), while AFm may further convert into the more stable ettringite in the presence of gypsum (Eq. 4). Ettringite growth is expansive, generating internal stresses that induce microcracking and structural damage. In this study, strong diffraction peaks of ettringite were observed in the sulfate exposure group (S3), whereas samples immersed in tap water (W0) exhibited only weak or trace ettringite peaks. This confirms that new ettringite formed within the matrix during sulfate attack, consistent with the swelling and expansion observed in micromorphological analysis.

(3)(4)

For chloride exposure (C3), the XRD patterns revealed the disappearance of ettringite peaks and the emergence of distinct peaks corresponding to Friedel’s salt (3CaO·Al2O3·CaCl2·10H2O). This observation aligns with SEM–EDS results and supports the mechanism described in literature [48], wherein chloride ions, with a diffusion coefficient nearly twice that of sulfate, rapidly penetrate the backfill matrix and react with hydrated aluminate phases to form Friedel’s salt (Eq. 5). Moreover, chloride solutions were slightly acidic (pH 5.8–6.5, Table 3), which further exacerbated deterioration by promoting dissolution of binding phases and generating additional pathways that facilitated ion migration.

(5)

3.7. Strengths and suggestions

This study evaluated the deterioration behavior of carbonated backfill materials after exposure to tap water, chloride, and sulfate solutions. The degree of strength reduction followed the order: Cl- > tap water> SO42-. Chloride exposure exerted the most severe influence, with compressive strength reductions exceeding 50% at early ages and remaining above 40% even after prolonged curing. This accelerated deterioration was attributed to the formation of Friedel’s salt and enhanced permeability, which facilitated internal chemical reactions and progressive weakening. In chloride-rich mine water environments, such degradation could substantially compromise the load-bearing capacity of backfill, threatening the long-term stability of goaf structures.

In contrast, sulfate attack resulted in comparatively moderate strength losses (<25% at 56 days) but progressed via a swelling–cracking mechanism. At moderate concentrations, expansive products such as gypsum and ettringite partially densified the matrix, temporarily mitigating deterioration. However, at higher concentrations, excessive expansion exceeded the pore volume, leading to microcracking and renewed strength loss. These findings highlight that chloride ions represent an immediate and sustained risk to structural integrity, whereas sulfate ions pose a time-dependent risk that may culminate in delayed failure. Accordingly, the development of ion-resistant mix designs and optimized curing strategies is essential to ensure the durability and stability of CO2-carbonated backfill materials in aggressive mine water environments.

3.8. Effect of saturation-drying cycle on material degradation

The sample were soaked for 7 days and then dried at 45 °C for 24 hours. After repeated three cycles, the mass of the sample increased by 3.2% compared with the initial value. The water absorption and dehydration in the process of saturation-drying cycle produce capillary adsorption effect in the sample, which makes the penetration rate of chloride ion and sulfate ion increase by 40% compared with tap water immersion. This significantly accelerates the migration of ions into the matrix.

This enhanced ion penetration further aggravates material degradation. In the chloride ion erosion group, the saturation-drying cycle increased the yield of Friedel ‘s salt in the specimen by 28% compared with tap water immersion. The dissolution of C-A-S-H gel was accelerated. The porosity of the sample increased by 12% compared with the initial state. After 56 days of curing, the compressive strength loss of the sample reached 54.2%. Under the erosion of medium concentration (4wt %) sulfate ions, the pore filling effect of ettringite partially offsets the deterioration of the material. The strength loss of the sample was 25.3%. The strength value was 20.6% higher than that of tap water immersion. However, under the erosion of high concentration (6wt %) sulfate ions, the saturation-drying cycle caused excessive expansion and cracking. The strength loss of the sample increased to 31.7%.

3.9. Fluidity and water content

The test results show that the slump of the slurry reaches 345 mm when the optimized mix ratio (the mass ratio of solid phase (cement + fly ash) to sodium silicate solution is 7:3) is adopted. The value exceeds the 200 mm required for the filling material. It ensures uniform flow in complex goaf, no segregation phenomenon, and no additional vibration. This mobility ensures transport efficiency and stability. The pumping pressure and the risk of blockage are reduced. At the same time, the bleeding amount of the material and the precipitation of the aggregate are reduced. The liquid content of wt 30% can fully promote the pozzolanic reaction, CO2 carbonization and alkali activation reaction, and the generated C-A-S-H gel and calcium carbonate crystal can form a dense matrix [49,50].

3.10. Discussion

The long-term in-situ stability of goaf is very important for coal mine safety. Chloride ions in the specimens cause continuous deterioration by generating Friedel ‘s salt and consuming key binding phases. In the harsh environment may damage the bearing capacity of the filling body. The formation of ettringite by sulfate ions at a medium concentration temporarily improves the compactness of the specimen. Long-term intrusion leads to excessive expansion and strength loss of the specimen. The stability of the specimen under mild conditions is better. A variety of factors in the complex in-situ environment may aggravate the deterioration beyond the scope of laboratory simulation.

The feasible strategies to improve durability mainly include the following points. Respectively, adding highly active mineral admixtures to refine the pore structure, applying protective coatings to achieve physical isolation, optimizing carbonization parameters to increase calcium carbonate content, and using anti-sulfate admixtures to regulate the formation of ettringite. At the environmental level, materials can realize the resource utilization of coal-based solid waste. The amount of CO2 released in the material is extremely low, and it can immobilize heavy metals without leaching of toxic ions, which is in line with the sustainable development goals. Future research should focus on on-site long-term monitoring and multi-ion synergistic erosion tests to further optimize materials to adapt to complex underground environments.

4. Conclusions

In this study, the durability and mechanical behavior of CO2-carbonated backfill materials were investigated under exposure to different deterioration solutions over curing periods ranging from 3 to 56 days.The experiments demonstrated that, regardless of the exposure solution, the mechanical properties and overall durability of the backfill improved with extended curing time. Considering the influence of dissolved ions, the degree of deterioration followed the order: Cl- > tap water> SO42-. Notably, positive correlations were observed between chloride ion penetration, mass loss, and diameter changes, which all increased with chloride concentration. In contrast, these parameters exhibited a non-linear trend under sulfate exposure, initially decreasing and then increasing with higher sulfate concentrations.

Microstructural observations provided direct evidence of the chemical interactions underlying deterioration. Chloride attack consumed CaCO3 and C–A–S–H gel while generating Friedel’s salt via anion exchange within micropores, leading to increased porosity and microcracking. Sulfate attack promoted the formation of ettringite, which initially reduced microvoids and partially densified the matrix at moderate concentrations. However, when ettringite formation exceeded a critical threshold, porosity increased, resulting in microcracks and further structural weakening. These findings elucidate the distinct mechanisms by which chloride and sulfate ions influence the durability of CO2-carbonated backfill materials.

References

  1. 1. Cheng F, et al. Eliminating environmental impact of coal mining wastes and coal processing by-products by high temperature oxy-fuel CFB combustion for clean power generation: A review. Fuel. 2024;373:132341.
  2. 2. Abbadi A, Mucsi G. A review on complex utilization of mine tailings: Recovery of rare earth elements and residue valorization. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering. 2024;12(3):113118.
  3. 3. Wang B, Kang M, Liu C, Yang L, Li Q, Zhou S. Experimental study on mechanical and microstructure properties of cemented tailings-waste rock backfill with continuous gradation. Journal of Building Engineering. 2024;95:110146.
  4. 4. Ngo I, Ma L, Zhai J, Wang Y. Enhancing fly ash utilization in backfill materials treated with CO2 carbonation under ambient conditions. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology. 2023;33(3):323–37.
  5. 5. Ma Z, Qin B, Shi Q, Zhu T, Chen X, Liu H. The location analysis and efficient control of hidden coal spontaneous combustion disaster in coal mine goaf: A case study. Process Safety and Environmental Protection. 2024;184:66–78.
  6. 6. Zhang J, Yang K, He X, Zhao X, Wei Z, He S. Research status of comprehensive utilization of coal-based solid waste (CSW) and key technologies of filling mining in China: A review. Sci Total Environ. 2024;926:171855. pmid:38522538
  7. 7. Xu J, Yan C, Boota MW, Chen X, Li Z, Liu W, et al. Research on automatic identification of coal mining subsidence area based on InSAR and time series classification. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024;470:143293.
  8. 8. Gu S, et al. Study on the technical management practice of rock burst prevention and control - case study of Yankuang Energy Group Co., Ltd. Geohazard Mechanics. 2024.
  9. 9. Bai E, Guo W, Tan Y, Wu D, Zhang Y, Wen P, et al. Green coal mining and water clean utilization under Neogene aquifer in Zhaojiazhai coalmine of central China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;368:133134.
  10. 10. Zhang H, Wang P, Rahimi M, Vo Thanh H, Wang Y, Dai Z, et al. Catalyzing net-zero carbon strategies: Enhancing CO2 flux Prediction from underground coal fires using optimized machine learning models. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024;441:141043.
  11. 11. Zhao Q, Jiang H, Wang C, Zhao S, Wang L, Kang G, et al. Facile fabrication of FAS-PDMS/PEEK composite hollow fiber membrane with honeycomb-like structure for CO2 capture from flue gas by membrane absorption. Separation and Purification Technology. 2024;329:124845.
  12. 12. Hu Y, Hu R, Zhang B, Han B. Research on mechanical properties and mix proportion design of solid waste-based cemented paste backfill. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2024;21:e03618.
  13. 13. Qin H, Cao S, Yilmaz E. Mechanical, energy evolution, damage and microstructural behavior of cemented tailings-rock fill considering rock content and size effects. Construction and Building Materials. 2024;411:134449.
  14. 14. Jin J, Chen Y, Li M, Liu T, Qin Z, Liu Q, et al. Preparation of self-consolidating cemented backfill with tailings and alkali activated slurry: Performance evaluation and environmental impact. Construction and Building Materials. 2024;438:137088.
  15. 15. Liu S, Wang Y, Wu A, Shi D, Zhang M, Ruan Z, et al. Study on the performance of alkali-activated phosphorus slag cemented paste backfill material: Effect of activator type and amount. Construction and Building Materials. 2024;425:136036.
  16. 16. Yang P, Liu L, Suo Y, Qu H, Xie G, Zhang C, et al. Investigating the synergistic effects of magnesia-coal slag based solid waste cementitious materials and its basic characteristics as a backfill material. Sci Total Environ. 2023;880:163209. pmid:37001664
  17. 17. Tang R, Zhao B-C, Xin J, Sun J, Xu B, Tian C, et al. Multisolid waste collaborative production of aeolian sand-red mud-fly ash cemented paste backfill. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2024;20:e02843.
  18. 18. Li K, Li X, Yao J, Sun Q, Xue H, Du C. Innovative synthesis of low-carbon cemented backfill materials through synergistic activation of solid wastes: An integrated assessment of economic and environmental impacts. Case Studies in Construction Materials. 2024;20:e03203.
  19. 19. Wu B, Wang X, Zhu S, Zhang Y, Ye J, Zhang H, et al. CO2 sequestration by wet carbonated magnesium slag with high-content aragonite whiskers for improving cement performance as underground filling material. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2024;140:413–21.
  20. 20. Chen Q, Zhu L, Wang Y, Chen J, Qi C. The carbon uptake and mechanical property of cemented paste backfill carbonation curing for low concentration of CO2. Sci Total Environ. 2022;852:158516. pmid:36063952
  21. 21. Ngo I, Ma L, Zhai J, Wang Y, Xu Y, Wei T, et al. Effect of the co-activation of sodium silicate and CO2 on setting and mechanical properties of coal gangue-fly ash backfill (CGFB). Environ Earth Sci. 2023;82(7).
  22. 22. Li Z, Chen J, Lv Z, Tong Y, Ran J, Qin C. Evaluation on direct aqueous carbonation of industrial/mining solid wastes for CO2 mineralization. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. 2023;122:359–65.
  23. 23. Li L, Yu H, Zhou S, Dao V, Chen M, Ji L, et al. Activation and utilization of tailings as CO2 mineralization feedstock and supplementary cementitious materials: a critical review. Materials Today Sustainability. 2023;24:100530.
  24. 24. Sun W, Sun Q, Shi M. Durability and erosion mechanism of biomass-coal mixed combustion ash geopolymer backfill under compound erosion. Construction and Building Materials. 2024;414:135023.
  25. 25. Liu J, Sui W, Zhang D, Zhao Q. Durability of water-affected paste backfill material and its clean use in coal mining. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;250:119576.
  26. 26. Chen H-X, Xue Q-P, Ma Z-P, Gao L, Feng S-J. Experimental study on barrier performance and durability under dry-wet cycles of fly ash based geopolymer cutoff wall backfill. Construction and Building Materials. 2023;368:130415.
  27. 27. Ngo I, Ma L, Zhai J, Wang Y, Wei T. Durability of CO2-fly ash-based backfill materials in cation water deterioration. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment. 2023;37(7):544–67.
  28. 28. ASTM C618, in Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use. 2010.
  29. 29. GB/T 17671-2021, in Test method of cement mortar strength (ISO method). 2021: https://www.antpedia.com/standard/1149097354.html
  30. 30. Zheng JJ, Zhou XZ. Prediction of the chloride diffusion coefficient of concrete. Mater Struct. 2006;40(7):693–701.
  31. 31. Dong L, Yang Y, Liu Z, Yang T, Xue C, Shao R, et al. Effect of chloride ion migration behaviour on the microstructure and mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete: A review. Journal of Building Engineering. 2024;82:108233.
  32. 32. Zuquan J, Wei S, Yunsheng Z, Jinyang J, Jianzhong L. Interaction between sulfate and chloride solution attack of concretes with and without fly ash. Cement and Concrete Research. 2007;37(8):1223–32.
  33. 33. Zhang Y, Zhang M, Ye G. Influence of moisture condition on chloride diffusion in partially saturated ordinary Portland cement mortar. Mater Struct. 2018;51(2).
  34. 34. Justnes H. A review of chloride binding in cementitious systems. Nordic Concrete Research. 1998;21:48–63.
  35. 35. Sreechari RD. Influence of neutral salts (NaCl and KCl) in water on properties of natural admixture cements. Engineering Science and Technology: An International Journal. 2012;2(4):745–52.
  36. 36. Suryavanshi AK, Scantlebury JD, Lyon SB. Mechanism of Friedel’s salt formation in cements rich in tri-calcium aluminate. Cement and Concrete Research. 1996;26(5):717–27.
  37. 37. Xiangpeng F, Liping G, Runsong B, Bangcheng L, Jiandong W. Research progress on sulfate durability of high ductility cementitious composites. Construction and Building Materials. 2023;385:131509.
  38. 38. Bellmann F, Möser B, Stark J. Influence of sulfate solution concentration on the formation of gypsum in sulfate resistance test specimen. Cement and Concrete Research. 2006;36(2):358–63.
  39. 39. Saillio M, Baroghel-Bouny V, Barberon F. Chloride binding in sound and carbonated cementitious materials with various types of binder. Construction and Building Materials. 2014;68:82–91.
  40. 40. Liu X, Feng P, Chen J, Liu Q, Yu X, Cai Y, et al. A critical review on the interaction between calcium silicate hydrate (C-S-H) and different ions. Construction and Building Materials. 2024;413:134931.
  41. 41. Zunino F, Scrivener K. The influence of sulfate addition on hydration kinetics and C-S-H morphology of C3S and C3S/C3A systems. Cement and Concrete Research. 2022;160:106930.
  42. 42. Ma D, Zhang M, Cui J. A review on the deterioration of mechanical and durability performance of marine-concrete under the scouring action. Journal of Building Engineering. 2023;66:105924.
  43. 43. Wu J, Wei J, Huang H, Hu J, Yu Q. Effect of multiple ions on the degradation in concrete subjected to sulfate attack. Construction and Building Materials. 2020;259:119846.
  44. 44. Ngo I. Sol–gel-stabilized CO2 foam for enhanced in-situ carbonation in foamed fly ash backfill materials. Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources. 2024;10(1):80.
  45. 45. Cai Y, Tao Y, Xuan D, Zhu X, Poon CS. Effects of seawater on the formation and mechanical properties of Friedel’s salt associated with tricalcium aluminate. Cement and Concrete Research. 2023;174:107340.
  46. 46. Deng X, Li M, Wang Y, Wang J, Zhang J, Yang Z, et al. Impact of ettringite seeding on hydration, strength and shrinkage of Na2SO4 activated slag. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2024;276:111374.
  47. 47. Wang L, Lu X. A review of the influence of aluminum phases from cement, SCMs and external aluminum phases on the thaumasite sulfate attack in cement-based materials. Journal of Building Engineering. 2024;94:109966.
  48. 48. Wang J, Fu M, Zheng K, Zhang K, Fan Y, Niu D. Ion transport mechanism and diffusion model establishment in recycled aggregate concrete subjected to magnesium, sulfate, and chloride attack. Construction and Building Materials. 2024;428:136273.
  49. 49. Mahamaya M, Jain S, Das SK, Paul R. Engineering Properties of Cementless Alkali Activated CLSM Using Ferrochrome Slag. J Mater Civ Eng. 2023;35(3).
  50. 50. Mahamaya M, Alam S, Kumar Das S. Development and characterization of alkali activated controlled low strength material using mining waste. Construction and Building Materials. 2024;452:138928.