Figures
Abstract
Background
Recent findings have suggested that implementing the emerging weight-loss strategy of time-restricted eating (TRE) for 6 weeks can have beneficial effects on the key pathophysiologic determinants of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) – namely, pancreatic beta-cell function and insulin resistance. Given the chronic nature of T2DM and the general challenge of long-term adherence to dietary interventions, a critical question is the durability of such effects. Specifically, we seek to determine whether TRE can improve the metabolic health of patients with T2DM over 1 year.
Methods
In this open-label, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial, individuals with overweight/obesity and T2DM of <10 years duration will be randomized to either standard lifestyle recommendations or TRE. The TRE protocol will consist of 18 hours of fasting and a 6 hour window of eating (between 2–8 PM) each day. The duration of the intervention will be 52-weeks and participants will undergo metabolic characterization at baseline, 12–24-, 36- and 52-weeks. The primary outcome of pancreatic beta-cell function will be assessed by Insulin Secretion-Sensitivity Index-2 (ISSI-2). Additional metabolic measures will include insulin resistance and glucose homeostasis.
Discussion
TRE may represent an adjunct therapeutic approach for improving the metabolic profile of overweight/obese individuals with T2DM while also providing the capacity for modification of its underlying pathophysiology. This evaluation of the durability of the metabolic effects of TRE on beta-cell function and insulin resistance could thus identify a role for this dietary strategy as a disease-modifying intervention early in the course of T2DM.
Citation: Retnakaran M, Lessa VL, Kramer CK (2026) Time restricted EAting for Type 2 diabetes and MEtabolic health: The TEA TIME trial study protocol. PLoS One 21(3): e0343494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0343494
Editor: Jennifer Tucker, PLOS: Public Library of Science, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
Received: February 1, 2026; Accepted: February 5, 2026; Published: March 12, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Retnakaran et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. Data will be made available upon study completion.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Background and Rationale
The relationship between excess weight and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is clear with approximately 61% to 74% of T2DM cases directly attributable to obesity [1–3]. Excess weight confers additional morbidity as increased BMI in these patients has been linked to poorer cardiovascular risk profile and higher mortality [4–7]. In this context, nutritional therapies targeting weight loss have been shown to improve glycemic control and, in turn, reduce the need for glucose-lowering medications in patients with T2DM [8–10]. However, studies of lifestyle interventions in T2DM have reflected the challenges of maintaining weight loss and achieving sustained glycemic control using non-pharmacological approaches [11,12]. Indeed, a meta-analysis of eleven such trials came to the conclusion that there was no significant impact on glycemic control after one year [11]. The long-term challenges of lifestyle changes in this patient population likely reflect not only the difficulty of prolonged adherence to lifestyle modification but the progressive natural history of T2DM. The natural history of T2DM is driven by 2 main pathophysiologic defects: (1) target cell resistance to the activity of insulin (insulin resistance) and (2) insufficient secretion of insulin by the pancreatic beta-cells to compensate for this peripheral tissue resistance (beta-cell dysfunction) [13,14]. The chronic nature of T2DM is driven by the progressive worsening of beta-cell dysfunction over time, which itself can be further exacerbated by insulin resistance [15]. While lifestyle interventions that have achieved weight loss have been shown to improve insulin resistance [3,9], their impact on pancreatic beta-cell function is not fully understood. Overall, there is no current anti-diabetic medication or lifestyle intervention that has conclusively been shown to prevent the deterioration of beta-cell function in patients with T2DM [14]. Thus, a fundamental problem in the clinical management of T2DM is the inability of current interventions to prevent the deterioration of beta-cell function that underlies the progressive natural history of this condition [13,14].
A recent lifestyle intervention of interest is time-restricted eating (TRE), which involves limiting food intake to a prescribed window of 4−8 hours [16–20]. Unlike traditional diets, TRE does not require calorie counting or specific food regulations/restrictions yet can achieve weight loss comparable to standard calorie-restrictive approaches [21,22]. Beyond weight reduction, TRE can offer additional metabolic benefits by promoting a shift from glucose utilization via glycogenolysis to lipolysis during prolonged fasting which is a pathway less dependent on insulin [23]. This shift suggests TRE may be a particularly relevant tool in managing conditions characterized by hyperinsulinemia (such as insulin resistance). Given its implications for insulin resistance, the impact of TRE on beta-cell function is of interest. To address this question, we recently conducted a randomized cross-over trial in which 39 overweight/obese participants with early T2DM completed 6 weeks of TRE (20 hours fasting/ 4 hours eating) or standard lifestyle [24]. Compared to standard lifestyle, TRE improved beta-cell function (Insulin Secretion-Sensitivity Index-2 (ISSI-2)), reduced hepatic insulin resistance (Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)), and lowered HbA1c (−0.32 ± 0.48%, p < 0.001) [24]. These improvements were accompanied by reductions of body weight (−3.86 ± 3.1%, p < 0.001), and waist circumference (−3.8 ± 7.5 cm, p = 0.003) [24]. The results of this pilot study suggest that TRE is a pragmatic lifestyle intervention that can improve beta-cell function, insulin resistance, and glucose metabolism in overweight patients with T2DM, accompanied by beneficial effects on adiposity and negligible adverse effects. However, the outstanding question that remains is whether this lifestyle intervention can be sustained over time [25]. We are thus performing an open-label, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial to determine whether TRE over 52-weeks is associated with improvement in beta-cell function, insulin resistance, and glucose homeostasis as compared to standard lifestyle in overweight/obese individuals with early T2DM.
Objectives and hypothesis
Our trial has 3 main objectives. Firstly, the primary objective in this study is to evaluate the impact of TRE on beta-cell function in overweight/obese individuals with early T2DM as compared to standard lifestyle recommendations over a 52-week period. Our secondary objective is to evaluate insulin resistance in people implementing TRE in comparison to those who are applying standard lifestyle intervention. Lastly, our tertiary objective is to evaluate the impact of TRE on glucose homeostasis as compared to standard lifestyle intervention. Our hypothesis is that 52 weeks of TRE will yield (i) improvement in pancreatic beta-cell function, (ii) reduction in insulin resistance, and (iii) improvements in glucose homeostasis as compared to standard lifestyle recommendations.
Methods
Trial design and study population
This study is an open-label, parallel-arm, randomized controlled trial that will last a total of 52 weeks. A schematic of the study design can be found in Figs 1 and 2. In this trial, participants with overweight/obesity and T2DM will be randomized to either standard lifestyle recommendations or TRE. The inclusion and exclusion criteria for the study population are listed in Table 1. This study has just started recruitment and has estimated completion date of recruitment and follow up (data collection) of 31/July/2029 with completion of data analysis and reporting of results expected for 2030.
Randomization and intervention
Participants will be randomized 1:1 to either standard lifestyle recommendations or TRE protocol by random number generator (https://www.graphpad.com/quickcalcs/randomize1.cfm). Following randomization, the research coordinator will provide the participants with a booklet containing instruction on healthy eating as per Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines [26,27] as well as answer any questions that arise. Participants will undergo metabolic characterization at weeks 0, 12, 24, 36, and 52. Those randomized to the standard group will be told to follow their normal schedule (e.g., possibly consisting of a 16 hour window for eating and ~8 hours of fasting daily). Individuals in the TRE protocol group will be instructed to only eat during a window of 6 hours (2–8 PM) while fasting for the remainder of the day. During the fasting period, participants will only be able to drink water, tea, and coffee (without any sugar added). Between the study visits, participants will be contacted by the research coordinator (virtual visits by phone) for reinforcement of the study protocol and assessment of safety. For 2 weeks after each study visit, participants will also wear an intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring system (isCGM) device (FreeStyle Libre 2) on their arms to monitor glucose levels. They will scan the isCGM at least 3 times a day, including before and after each meal. Participants will be instructed to record the time of each meal consumed during these two weeks using the FreeStyle Libre free app. Lastly, individuals who do not have a smartphone or who do not want to use their smartphone will be given a FreeStyle Libre 2 reader.
Outcomes
The primary outcome will be beta-cell function at 52-weeks, measured by ISSI-2 [28,29]. The secondary outcomes will be insulin resistance at 52-weeks, measured by HOMA-IR [30], and percentage time in glucose target range at 52-weeks measured by FreeStyle Libre 2 [31]. Additionally, ancillary outcomes of interest will be comparisons between the study arms of the following measures at 52-weeks: (i) further measures of beta-cell function (ΔISR0–120/Δgluc0–120 × Matsuda index where ISR is the pre-hepatic insulin secretion rate determined by C-peptide deconvolution [32,33], insulinogenic index/HOMA-IR, and fasting pro-insulin/C-peptide ratio [34]), (ii) measures of insulin sensitivity (insulin sensitivity measured by Matsuda index on OGTT [35]), and (iii) anthropometric measures (body weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference). We will also evaluate differences in measures of glucose homeostasis as assessed by isCGM (time above glucose target range (%), time below glucose target range (%), and mean glucose values), by OGTT (fasting glucose, 2-h glucose, area-under-curve of glucose from 0–120 min), and by HbA1c.
Sample size
The primary outcome requires a sample size of 96 participants. This sample will provide 80% power to detect a 15% difference in ISSI-2 (%) between the study groups at a significant level (alpha) of 0.05. We performed this calculation using an estimated standard deviation of 18% as previously documented in our pilot study [24]. Factoring in an 18% loss-to-follow-up rate, a total of 112 participants, with 56 in each study group, would be required to ensure a minimum of 96 participants.
Setting and recruitment
This trial will take place at a single academic center, Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) in Toronto, Canada. It has received institutional research ethics and board approval (#REB 002) and all participants will provide informed consent form. We will conduct recruitment by contacting eligible participants at MSH, recruiting through nearby family physicians’ offices, and advertising with social media. To enable stratified analyses by sex, a maximum ratio of 1.5 female:male (n = 67 females and n = 45 males) will be recruited. Initial contact with interested participants will be made by one of the patient’s healthcare providers. Following the first interaction, the individuals will then be contacted by our research coordinator to determine eligibility. Potential participants will be emailed a consent form and provided with as much time as needed to review and decide on whether or not they wish to participate.
Analysis plan
The primary analysis will be a comparison of the baseline-adjusted ISSI-2 between the study groups and will be evaluated by Students’ t test. In addition, given the repeated measures of metabolic characterization over follow-up, we will also evaluate the longitudinal change in ISSI-2 over time between the two study groups by Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) model. The GEE model will examine (i) ISSI-2 change effect of TRE versus standard lifestyle, (ii) time effect on ISSI-2 changes, and (iii) treatment-by-time interaction (to determine whether ISSI-2 changes differentially over time between the study arms). Statistical analyses will only be performed after all study visits have been completed. No interim analysis is planned. Finally, given the sex differences in body fat deposition, we are planning stratified analyses by biological sex for the primary analysis.
Knowledge dissemination
The knowledge translation plan includes methods that we will use to share the findings from this study. We will work with patient partners to ensure that the research results are communicated in a manner that is easily accessible to the patients’ community. Specifically, we will modify our knowledge dissemination strategies to target stakeholders. For researchers, we plan to make presentations at the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and Diabetes Canada annual meetings and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) congress, as well as publish scientific papers. Patients will be informed about our findings at the end of the study through a newsletter sent out to all participants. Lastly, the general public will be informed of our findings through forms of media such as newspaper coverage, online articles, and television outlets.
No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. Data will be made available upon study completion.
Conclusion and future perspectives
Lifestyle interventions are an important component of the multi-disciplinary clinical management of T2DM. Nonetheless, the long-term adherence to lifestyle interventions and the maintenance of resultant weight loss have proved to be challenging. Furthermore, lifestyle interventions have not been shown to affect the natural history of worsening beta-cell function over time in T2DM. If TRE is proven beneficial to metabolic health in overweight/obese individuals with T2DM over a prolonged period of time, these findings could ultimately impact nutritional recommendations in this patient population. A novel, economical, non-pharmacological intervention with the following three attributes could prove beneficial. These attributes would be the ability to induce weight loss, the capacity to improve glycemic control and, above all, the potential to improve beta-cell dysfunction. Thus, TRE might represent an adjunct therapeutic approach capable of improving the metabolic profile of overweight/obese individuals with T2DM while also providing the capacity for modification of its underlying pathophysiology that could ultimately change the natural history of diabetes.
References
- 1. Janssen I. The public health burden of obesity in Canada. Can J Diabetes. 2013;37:90–6. pmid:24070798
- 2. Hossain P, Kawar B, El Nahas M. Obesity and diabetes in the developing world - a growing challenge. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:213–5. pmid:17229948
- 3. Leitner DR, Frühbeck G, Yumuk V, et al. Obesity and type 2 diabetes: two diseases with a need for combined treatment strategies - EASO Can Lead the Way. Obes Facts. 2017;10(5):483–92. pmid:29020674
- 4. Kramer CK, Zinman B, Retnakaran R. Are metabolically healthy overweight and obesity benign conditions?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2013;159:758–69. pmid:24297192
- 5. Khalangot M, et al. Body mass index and the risk of total and cardiovascular mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes: a large prospective study in Ukraine. Heart. 2009;95:454–60. pmid:18697804
- 6. McEwen LN, Kim C, Karter AJ, et al. Risk factors for mortality among patients with diabetes: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care. 2007;30:1736–41. pmid:17468353
- 7. Zhao W, Katzmarzyk P, Horswell R, et al. Body Mass Index and the risk of all-cause mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2014;130:2143–51. pmid:25378546
- 8. UKPDS Group. UK Prospective Diabetes Study 7: response of fasting plasma glucose to diet therapy in newly presenting type II diabetic patients. Metabolism. 1990;39:905–912. pmid:2392060
- 9. Goldstein DJ. Beneficial health effects of modest weight loss. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1992;16:397–415. pmid:1322866
- 10. Pastors JG, Warshaw H, Daly A, Franz M, Kulkarni K. The evidence for the effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy in diabetes management. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25:608–613. pmid:11874956
- 11. Franz MJ, Boucher JL, Rutten-Ramos S, et al. Lifestyle weight-loss intervention outcomes in overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015;115(9):1447–63. pmid:25935570
- 12. Ikramuddin S, Korner J, Lee WJ, et al. Lifestyle Intervention and medical management with vs without Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and control of hemoglobin A1c, LDL cholesterol, and systolic blood pressure at 5 years in the Diabetes Surgery Study. JAMA 2018;319(3):266–78. pmid:29340678
- 13. Kahn SE. The relative contributions of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction to the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2003;46:3–19. pmid:12637977
- 14. Wajchenberg BL. Beta-cell failure in diabetes and preservation by clinical treatment. Endocr Rev. 2007;28:187–218. pmid:17353295
- 15. Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V, et al. Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). JAMA. 1999;281:2005–12. pmid:10359389
- 16. Ezpeleta M, Cienfuegos S, Lin S, Pavlou V, Gabel K, Tussing-Humphreys L, et al. Time-restricted eating: Watching the clock to treat obesity. Cell Metab 2024;36(2):301–14. pmid:38176412
- 17. de Cabo R, Mattson MP. Effects of intermittent fasting on health, aging, and disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:2541–51. pmid:31881139
- 18. Manoogian ENC, Chow LS, Taub PR, Laferrère B, Panda S. Time-restricted eating for the prevention and management of metabolic diseases. Endocr Rev. 2022;43:405–36. pmid:34550357
- 19. Tinsley G, Bounty P. Effects of intermittent fasting on body composition and clinical health markers in humans. Nutr Rev. 2015;73:661–74. pmid:26374764
- 20. Klempel MC, Kroeger CM, Bhutani S, Trepanowski JF, Varady KA. Intermittent fasting combined with calorie restriction is effective for weight loss and cardio-protection in obese women. Nutr J. 2012;11:98. pmid:23171320
- 21. Liu D, Huang Y, Huang C, Yang S, Wei X, Zhang P, et al. Calorie restriction with or without time-restricted eating in weight loss. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1495–504. pmid:35443107
- 22. Lin S, Cienfuegos S, Ezpeleta M, Gabel K, Pavlou V, Mulas A, et al. Time-restricted eating without calorie counting for weight loss in a racially diverse population: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2023;176:885–95. pmid:37364268
- 23. Anton SD, Moehl K, Donahoo WT, et al. Flipping the metabolic switch: understanding and applying the health benefits of\fasting. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018;26(2):254–68. pmid:29086496
- 24. Kramer CK, Zinman B, Feig DS, Retnakaran R. The impact of time-restricted eating on beta-cell function in adults with type 2 diabetes: a randomized cross-over trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025;110(6):e2045–e2053.
- 25. Varady KA, Chow LS. Optimizing the design of time-restricted eating human trials. Nat Metab. 2024;6(8):1423–5. pmid:38907080
- 26.
Available from: https://www.diabetes.ca/resources/tools---resources/basic-meal-planning
- 27. Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Diabetes Canada 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes. 2018;42(Suppl 1):S1–S325.
- 28. Retnakaran R, Shen S, Hanley AJ, Vuksan V, Hamilton JK, Zinman B. Hyperbolic relationship between insulin secretion and sensitivity on oral glucose tolerance test. Obesity. 2008;16(8):1901–7. pmid:18551118
- 29. Retnakaran R, Qi Y, Goran M, Hamilton J. Evaluation of proposed oral disposition index measures in relation to the actual disposition index. Diabet Med. 2009;26:1198–203. pmid:20002470
- 30. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–9. pmid:3899825
- 31. Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:1593–603. pmid:31177185
- 32. DeFronzo RA, Tripathy D, Schwenke DC, Banerji M, Bray GA, Buchanan TA, et al. Pioglitazone for diabetes prevention in impaired glucose tolerance. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1104–15.
- 33. Kramer CK, Zinman B, Choi H, Retnakaran R. Effect of short-term intensive insulin therapy on post-challenge hyperglucagonemia in early type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(8):2987–95. pmid:26079776
- 34. Couch CA, Piccinini F, Fowler LA, Garvey WT, Gower BA. Proinsulin-to-C-Peptide Ratio as a marker of β-cell function in African American and European American adults. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(12):2129–36. pmid:36787895
- 35. Matsuda M, DeFronzo R. Insulin sensitivity indices obtained from oral glucose tolerance testing: comparison with the euglycemic insulin clamp. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(9):1462–70. pmid:10480510