Introduction

Bovine tuberculosis (BTB) is a significant infectious disease primarily affecting cattle and other bovine species, with Mycobacterium bovis (M. bovis) as the primary causative agent. In Malawi, the prevalence of bovine tuberculosis in the cattle population is notably high at 9.95% [1], emphasising the greater challenges faced within the sub-Saharan African region [2]. While the impact of BTB on human health is not well documented [3], a focused study in a specific area estimates a prevalence of 3.3% [4], indicating a concerning burden that warrants attention.

Bovine tuberculosis poses a serious economic threat to the cattle industry, leading to significant financial losses from meat condemnations in abattoirs [5]. Furthermore, in humans, the diagnosis and treatment of BTB are complicated by the disease’s drug resistance [6] and the often low bacterial load detected in clinical samples [7,8].

The transmission of M. bovis occurs through various bodily fluids, including exhaled air, nasal discharge, milk, urine, and reproductive secretions [9]. In cattle, the primary mode of transmission is through close contact in environments such as intensive farming setups, communal waterholes, or bustling marketplaces. For humans, infection can occur through the consumption of raw or undercooked animal products, inhalation of aerosols containing the bacteria, or direct contact with contaminated animal skin. In cattle, clinical symptoms manifest as weakness, persistent low-grade fever, loss of appetite, emaciation, rough and unkempt fur, a chronic cough, swollen lymph nodes, laboured breathing, and tachypnoea [10]. Similarly, infected humans may experience a range of alarming symptoms, including night sweats and chest pain [10].

Several risk factors increase cattle’s susceptibility to BTB, including being of a foreign breed, older age, intensive farming practices, herd movements, trading activities, the introduction of new cattle into a group, and interactions with wildlife [10]. For humans, the risk increases with factors such as low immunity, age-related vulnerabilities, consumption of raw animal products, employment in slaughterhouses, and exposure to non-bovine species such as goats [10].

Evaluating knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to bovine tuberculosis is an essential component of efforts to prevent infections in both cattle and humans. Insights from KAP assessments can inform public health officials about the need for targeted health campaigns to reduce the spread of BTB. According to KAP theory [11], enhancing knowledge fosters favourable attitudes towards disease prevention, which, in turn, can lead to positive behaviours. In this context, individuals lacking awareness of BTB—including its transmission routes, clinical features, and associated risk factors—are likely to develop positive attitudes towards risky behaviours, ultimately leading to practices that increase the risk of infection.

The assessment of knowledge regarding bovine tuberculosis (BTB) in northern Malawi revealed a significant level of disease awareness at 74.3% [12]. However, information concerning high-burden areas in the central and southern regions remains limited. Our study aimed to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to BTB, focusing on both animal and human infection aspects. Guided by the KAP theory [11] and prior research findings [12], we postulate two hypotheses: a) a high level of knowledge, attitudes, and practices is anticipated, and b) a negative correlation exists between knowledge and attitude, as well as between knowledge and practices. Given the presumed interrelation among the KAP elements, we will employ multivariate regression analysis rather than conducting separate outcome regressions to identify the determinants of KAP. The advantages of employing multivariate analysis include reduced standard errors and the ability to compare covariate effects across multiple outcomes [13].

Materials and methods

Results

The mean score of knowledge was 18.58 ± 4.96, with a minimum of zero and a maximum of 26 out of 26. Most participants demonstrated appropriate knowledge (88.68%), with 37.74% and 50.94% having good and excellent knowledge, respectively (S2 Fig). The distribution of specific knowledge items (S1 Table) indicates most participants were aware that BTB infects cattle (85.71%), including its transmission to humans (74.09%). Participants were also aware of most of the risk factors in cattle, such as having a kraal with poor ventilation, intensive farming, and animal-wildlife interactions at waterholes. Participants were also aware of the majority of risk factors for humans, including consumption of raw animal products, meat handling, and dairy farming. Knowledge of control and prevention measures such as test and slaughter (83.41%) and use of education campaigns (93.88%) was also good. Regardless of good overall BTB knowledge, participants had limited knowledge on whether being in contact with infected livestock, risks human infection (56.69%). A limited proportion of participants (37.87%) answered “yes,” correctly recognizing that BTB is not transmitted through heredity. Participants also demonstrated limited knowledge on clinical signs, such as lymph node enlargement, weight loss, and low-grade fever.

The average of attitude scores was 13.82 ± 4.60, with a minimum of 8 and a maximum of 33 out of 40. Many participants demonstrated an appropriate attitude (92.27%), representing 65.68% and 26.59% with good and excellent attitudes, respectively (S2 Fig). Specifically (S2 Table), most participants had negative perceptions towards drinking or eating and selling products of an infected animal, including the perception that BTB is fatal. Nevertheless, a considerable proportion of participants had a positive perception of living together with sick animals or people, including not being afraid of them. A substantial proportion of participants also had the perception that people with BTB have human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).

The average practice score was 4.27 ± 2.05, with a minimum of zero and a maximum of 11 out of 12. Overall, a high proportion of participants demonstrated appropriate practices (86.83%), where 49.88% and 36.95% showed good and excellent practice behaviour, respectively (S2 Fig). Specific good practices (S3 Table) involved not drinking or eating raw animal products, and not selling animal products from a sick animal. Despite overall good and excellent participants’ behaviour, a notable proportion of participants were not using protective wear when handling animal products, including mixing cattle from different households during grazing, grazing animals close to a wildlife reserve, keeping animals in the house, and drinking or eating raw meat and milk. Furthermore, a substantial proportion of participants engaged in treatment malpractices, such as arriving late at the hospital, buying medicine from the pharmacy before going to the hospital, and buying medicine for livestock before calling the veterinary officer.

Tables 1 and 2 show the results of univariate and multivariate regression of knowledge, attitude, and practice scores on demographic characteristics. There was no significant diference in the model efficiency between univariate and multivariate regression (S4 Table). Participants with secondary and higher education had lower attitude scores than those without formal education, suggesting that secondary and higher education were associated with more negative perceptions of engaging in risky behaviours than non-formal education. The effect of secondary and higher education was different between attitudes and practices (Table 2, S4 Table), with education having a greater negative impact on perceptions than on behaviours. Increased age (18 and above) and being a student were negatively associated with BTB practice score. This means that adults aged 18 and above had better practices than youths aged less than 18, and students were associated with good practices compared to farmers. The variance-covariance matrix of the residuals (S5 Table) indicated a significant negative correlation between knowledge and attitude (r: −0.139; p: 0.004), suggesting that greater knowledge about BTB was associated with more negative feelings towards engaging in risky behaviours. There was a positive correlation between attitude and practice (r: 0.218; p: < 0.001), translating to positive feelings towards engaging in risky behaviours, encouraged malpractices.

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Table 1. Univariate linear regression of knowledge, attitudes and practices about BTB.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341968.t001

Download:

• PPT
  PowerPoint slide
• PNG
  larger image
• TIFF
  original image

Table 2. Multivariate linear regression of knowledge, attitudes and practices about BTB.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0341968.t002

Discussion

This study investigated the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding BTB infection in cattle and humans, with a focus on high-burden areas in Malawi. We used data from a stratified sample survey involving butchers and dairy farmers from the central region, including cattle farmers from the southern region. Overall, participants demonstrated good knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding BTB. Nevertheless, a notable proportion of participants demonstrated poor knowledge of certain clinical signs, such as lymph node enlargement, held positive perceptions of living with sick animals or people, and engaged in malpractice by failing to wear protective equipment, sharing a house with livestock, and consuming raw animal products. Participants with secondary and higher education were associated with a more negative attitude towards engaging in risky behaviours than those without formal education. Adults aged 18 and above, and students, demonstrated better practices than youths and farmers, respectively.

A high level of overall knowledge about BTB among participants may be attributed to the educational information they receive from health workers, veterinary officers, and the mass media [21,22], including peer interactions in groupings such as milk bulking groups. The high level of awareness of BTB infection among participants is consistent with the literature [12]. Increased awareness that BTB is transmitted through the air is consistent with a human tuberculosis study in Malawi [22], in which most participants reported that tuberculosis is spread through the air when coughing or sneezing. Poor knowledge of certain clinical signs may be due to limited formal education among participants, as education is usually positively associated with BTB knowledge [23,24]. Limited awareness of BTB clinical signs has also been documented in the literature, especially among dairy farmers [25–27]. Similar limited knowledge of clinical signs, such as lymph node enlargement, has been documented in a KAP study about human tuberculosis in Malawi [28]. Furthermore, increased awareness of coughing as a BTB clinical sign is consistent with its recognition as a clinical sign of human TB in Malawi [29], where most participants mentioned coughing as a sign of human tuberculosis.

A negative attitude towards engaging in risky behaviours, such as not eating or selling infected meat, could stem from participants’ high knowledge of BTB risk factors, which was driving their negative attitude towards risky behaviours [11], as evidenced by the observed negative correlation between knowledge and attitude. The substantial proportion of participants demonstrating the perception that BTB is fatal and that humans who have BTB, have HIV, is in agreement with a human tuberculosis study [29], where participants viewed TB as dangerous before diagnosis, and that those who are infected with TB look thin, similar to those with HIV.

The practice of keeping animals in the house was reported to be attributed to security concerns, especially among farmers with small ruminants, such as goats and sheep. In this regard, even though BTB mainly infect cattle, goats may also be infected [30], and henceforth poses a risk of infection in humans. A previous study found that sharing premises with livestock, including not using protective gear when handling animal products, was common [18]. Drinking of raw milk could be influenced by food traditions and low education levels [26], while eating raw or undercooked meat might be the issue of gender, where more males might be involved [31]. A considerable proportion of participants going to the hospital late could be related to their fear of testing positive for HIV, and their tendency to initially consult witch doctors before seeking professional health care [32].

A good attitude among participants with secondary and higher education could be attributed to improved knowledge of disease facts through formal education, which, in turn, improved their perceptions of risky behaviours, according to the KAP theory [11]. Better BTB practices among adults aged 18 and above have been consistent with the literature [33], where adults aged 30–59 were purported to have better practices than the younger because of their easier access to information on the internet. Better practices among adults than among youths could also be attributed to long-standing practical knowledge and experience [24]. Good practices among students rather than farmers may be attributed to students’ higher levels of formal education, which negatively affect their perceptions of risk and behaviours. The observed significant correlations between KAP sub-themes are consistent with KAP theory [11], which posits that knowledge influences attitudes, which, in turn, influence behaviours, with no significant relationship between knowledge and practices.

Weaknesses of the study included not establishing a control group with a low BTB burden, thereby preventing comparison of knowledge, attitudes, and practices between the control and high-burden areas. In addition, the observed correlations did not imply causal relationships, since this was a cross-sectional study. Despite these shortcomings, the study’s findings are consistent with a previous study [12] and the KAP theory [11].

Conclusion

Participants had limited knowledge of clinical signs, including the myth of heredity as the mode of transmission. A considerable proportion of participants had the perception that if humans have bovine tuberculosis, they have human immunodeficiency virus, including the belief of living together and not fearing people or animals with bovine tuberculosis. A substantial proportion of participants engaged in malpractice, including eating or drinking raw animal products and sharing a house with animals. Secondary and higher education were associated with negative perceptions towards engaging in risky behaviours. Adults aged 18 and above and students had better practices than youths aged less than 18 and farmers, respectively. Health education about bovine tuberculosis should focus on clinical signs and the myth of heredity as a mode of transmission, while targeting the youths, informally educated, and farmers.

Supporting information