Figures
Abstract
Climate change is affecting ecosystems worldwide. Ocean temperature is increasing, leading to more frequent and intense extreme weather events such as heatwaves (HWs) and marine heatwaves (MHWs). These extreme temperature events can affect marine biodiversity, the relative success of different life history strategies, and the structure and function of whole ecological communities. Understanding the effects of HWs on marine communities and the mechanisms that enable marine communities to resist and recover from heat stress has become a research priority. Here, we investigated the effects of a simulated HW on macrobenthic communities and their functional traits in intertidal estuarine sediments using a novel in-situ seafloor warming experiment with two heatwave duration treatments. Our results revealed that the simulated HW influenced macrobenthic abundance and diversity, yet, functional traits and functional metrics were less affected. This suggests resilience to the simulated HW related to redundancy of macrobenthic functional traits. The idiosyncratic responses observed in our study reflects the complex and context-dependent macrobenthic responses to thermal extremes. Our findings suggest that maintaining functional trait diversity and redundancy could be key for boosting ecosystem resilience under increasing climatic extremes.
Citation: Lam-Gordillo O, Douglas EJ, Hailes SF, Lohrer AM (2026) Redundancy of macrobenthic functional traits boosts resilience to a simulated heatwave. PLoS One 21(1): e0340819. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340819
Editor: Marcos Rubal García, UMinho CBMA: Universidade do Minho Centro de Biologia Molecular e Ambiental, PORTUGAL
Received: August 13, 2025; Accepted: December 27, 2025; Published: January 12, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Lam-Gordillo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This research was funded by the New Zealand Government’s Strategic Science Investment Fund (SSIF) to the New Zealand Institute for Earth Sciences (ESNZ; FPRS2604 and FPRS2606).
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Global climate is warming due to the increasing release of anthropogenic greenhouse gases to the atmosphere [1–3]. The increasing global temperature is leading to hotter summers and more frequent extreme climatic events such as heatwaves [1,2,4,5]. In coastal ecosystems, marine heatwaves (MHWs) have already increased in intensity, frequency, and duration, with projections suggesting that this increasing pattern will continue in the future due to climate variability [2,4,6–8]. Intertidal coastal ecosystems are exposed to both marine and atmospheric heatwaves (HW) making them very vulnerable to climate change driven temperature anomalies [9].
Extreme temperature events including MHWs (i.e., prolongated periods – five or more days of sea surface temperatures above the 90th percentile) and HWs (i.e., prolonged periods of abnormally hot weather relative to the expected conditions) are likely to affect marine biodiversity, modifying the structure of communities, their distributional ranges, life history strategies, and survival [4,6,10–13]. These changes in biodiversity can have profound consequences to society, with losses of the essential ecosystem processes, functions, and services that these organisms and ecosystems provide to humankind [14–18]. Although several studies have assessed the effects of MHWs on biodiversity, focusing on kelp, macroalgae, coral reefs, and some marine invertebrates [e.g., 19, 20–23], less is known about the effects of HWs on intertidal macrobenthic assemblages and the factors affecting resistance and resilience to acute thermal stress in estuarine ecosystems.
Estuarine ecosystems are hotspots for biogeochemical cycling and biodiversity, and contribute to a wide range of ecosystem functions, services, and values (e.g., nutrient cycling, carbon storage, coastal protection, food production, cultural practices, amenity values) [24–26]. Estuarine macrobenthic fauna is generally well adapted to natural fluctuations such as tidal cycles and seasonal changes, particularly intertidal species that are exposed to air during low tide periods [27–29]. Estuarine macrobenthic organisms have the potential to cope with extreme weather events such as MHWs for short periods [30–32], however, negative impacts may occur when organisms face prolonged periods of elevated temperature that exceed their tolerance levels [31,33–35].
Marine heatwaves, alongside atmospheric heatwaves, can particularly affect the fitness of ectothermic estuarine organisms that cannot independently regulate their body temperatures and metabolic rates in a thermally fluctuating environment. These organisms are predicted to be more sensitive to temperature as global warming continues to increase, particularly when the temperature extremes are prolonged [36–39]. Because temperature fluctuations affect ectotherm metabolism [36,37,40], there may be associated consequences for growth and reproductive rates, maximum body sizes, feeding behaviours, bioturbation, and other vital functions of macrobenthos [31,35,37,41–43].
Understanding the mechanisms by which communities may resist and recover from HWs and MHWs has become a research priority. Some research has assessed the effects of HWs on intertidal rocky shores [e.g., 44], yet limited information is available for estuarine soft sediments. In soft-sediment systems, analysis of functional traits is expanding our understanding of organismal responses to thermal extremes and the mechanisms underpinning community and functional change. Functional traits are properties of organisms that can be measured (e.g., body size, life span, feeding mode, movement behaviours), usually at the individual organism level and used comparatively across species, facilitating the understanding of how different types of organisms present in a community respond to environmental change [45,46]. For example, mobile species or those capable of vertical migration within the sediment may avoid peak thermal exposure by relocating to cooler microhabitats, while deep-burrowing or tube-building taxa may experience buffered thermal regimes compared to surface dwellers [31,32,46]. Functional diversity, defined as the collective combination and variety of functional traits expressed in an ecological assemblage that influence how an ecosystem operates or functions also plays a critical role in resilience [46–51]. Multiple metrics have been developed to quantify functional diversity, including functional richness, evenness, divergence, dispersion, and redundancy [50–55]. These complementary facets, all based on the analysis of functional traits and their modalities, provide complementary angles for understanding the relationships between biodiversity and how ecosystems function, i.e., the roles of organisms in communities and their links to ecosystem properties such as resistance and resilience to stressors [46,50–53]. Theory suggests that assemblages with high trait diversity are more likely to contain species that can maintain ecosystem functioning under stress, either through redundancy (i.e., multiple species sharing similar functional roles) or complementarity (i.e., different species compensating for different aspects of function) [51,56,57]. Identifying which traits boost resistance or facilitate recovery can improve predictions of ecosystem responses to climate extremes and inform conservation and management strategies.
In this study, we investigated the effects of a simulated heatwave during low tide on macrobenthic communities and their functional traits. We carried out an in-situ warming experiment with daily heat treatments applied for zero (control), five, or seven days. We aimed to (i) evaluate changes in macrobenthic communities, their functional traits, and functional diversity in different warming scenarios, (ii) investigate the relationship between thermal stress (simulated heatwave) and macrobenthic communities, functional traits, and functional diversity, and (iii) elucidate if the variability in responses of functional traits and functional metrics to thermal stress confers resilience to heatwaves. We hypothesised that macrobenthic taxonomical (i.e., abundance, richness, diversity) and functional metrics (i.e., single-trait indices (Community-weighted means), and multi-trait indices (Functional Richness, Evenness, Dispersion, Redundancy)) would decrease with a longer duration of warming (7 days, relative to 5 days) as temperature is a natural trigger of essential ecological processes with profound consequences if the thermal tolerance of the organisms is exceeded.
Methods
This study was conducted as part of the same experimental framework described in Lam-Gordillo, Douglas (34) and Douglas, Lam-Gordillo (58), and followed identical field and analytical methodologies. Yet, the present work addresses a distinct research question, focusing specifically on understanding the effects of heatwaves on macrobenthic functional traits, which was not examined in the previous studies. In brief, we described the methods and experimental design used for this research below.
Study area
The experiment was carried out in Waihī Estuary, in the Bay of Plenty region of the North Island of New Zealand (Fig 1). Waihī Estuary is a tidal lagoon type estuary (tidal range 1.7 m) that is permanently open to the sea and dominated by intertidal soft-sediment flats (57% of the estuary), which are fully submerged for several hours each tidal cycle [34,58]. The selection of the experimental site (Fig 1b-c) was based on a previous habitat mapping in the estuary [58] showing moderate muddy conditions (silt-clay: 26.65%), representing the overall condition of estuaries across New Zealand, and the site that previous studies had reported to be more influenced by simulated heatwaves (i.e., where there was a stronger experimental response signal) [34,59]
(d) Close-up view of OTC showing position of stake with temperature loggers attached. Imagery retrieved from Land Information New Zealand (https://data.linz.govt.nz/).
Experimental design and set up
The experiment was conducted over a seven-day period in austral summer (17–23 February 2024). We deployed purpose-built Open Topped Chambers (OTCs) to the tidal flat in our experimental site (Fig 1d) at the start of each low tide period during seven days, following the protocols described by Lam-Gordillo, Douglas (34) and Douglas, Lam-Gordillo (58). In brief, the cone-shaped OTCs (80 cm base diameter, 30 cm top diameter) were constructed from transparent polycarbonate plastic (1.5 mm thickness) to promote the passive heating of enclosed sediments [34,59]. OTCs were deployed (bottom edge pushed 1 cm into the sediment surface) for four hours during daytime low tides for a period five and seven days (Short and Long duration treatments, respectively) [34,59]. Experimental plots were unenclosed and OTCs were removed at night and during every high tide period during the experiment [34,59]. Ten replicate plots per treatment (Control: without OTCs, Short, Long; total n = 30) were established and arranged using a randomised block design which covered an area of 10 x 60 m with 5 m separation between each plot [34,59]. Our design enabled statistical analysis based on the factor “Treatment” (three levels: Control, Short, Long) [34,59].
Data collection
Temperature data.
Temperatures (°C) inside all control and treatment plots were measured using temperature loggers (EnvLoggers, Electric Blue CRL) located 1 cm below the sediment surface on wooden stakes (Fig 1d). Temperatures were recorded every minute and logged in all plots (Control, Long, Short) during the experiment. Temperature loggers remained in place throughout the experiment to ensure continuous temperature recording throughout the diurnal and tidal cycles.
Macrobenthic fauna sampling
One core of sediment for the sampling of macrobenthos was collected from each of the control and experimental plots at the conclusion of each of the experimental treatment periods: Short treatment plots were sampled for macrofauna on Day 5 (21/02/2024) and controls and long treatment plots were sampled on Day 7 (23/02/2024). Macrobenthic fauna were collected by hand using a PVC corer (13 cm diameter by 15 cm depth) near the centre of each plot. Immediately after collection, the entire volume of sediment collected in each core was sieved through a 0.5 mm mesh screen and preserved in 70% isopropanol. Benthic macrofauna were sorted, identified to the lowest possible taxonomic level following standardised protocols [60], and counted.
Data analysis
Data recorded by the temperature loggers were analysed using the ‘myClim’ package [61] in R software [62]. Temperature data were first trimmed to only include times when the OTCs were deployed, and the resulting one-minute observations from each OTC period were averaged, providing one representative mean sediment temperature value per day per plot. In addition, we also calculated the minimum and maximum sediment temperature recorded during the times when the OTCs were deployed.
To test for differences in temperature between treatments, univariate PERMutational ANalysis Of VAriance (PERMANOVA) tests were conducted. PERMANOVA tests were based on Euclidean distance for the single variables (i.e., mean, minimum, and maximum temperature), permutation of residuals under a reduced model, Type III sums of squares, and 9999 permutations. In addition, multiple contrasts (pair-wise tests with 9999 permutations) were conducted if the fixed factor was significant in the main tests. Boxplots were constructed using the package ‘ggpubr’ [63] in R software [62].
To evaluate the effects of the simulated HWs on macrobenthic fauna, traditional and functional metrics were calculated using the packages ‘vegan’ [64] and ‘FD’ [54] in R software [62]. Traditional diversity metrics included taxonomic richness (S), Shannon-Wiener diversity (H’, log e), and the total abundance (N) of macrofauna at each control and experimental plot. Functional metrics were calculated based on the selection of a suite of six functional traits and 27 traits modalities (Table 1; S1 Table). The functional traits selected describe behavioural, morphological, and physiological characteristics of the organisms that can be influenced by thermal stress. Trait information was retrieved from The New Zealand Trait Database for shallow-water marine benthic invertebrates – NZTD [65]. The NZTD uses a fuzzy coding procedure, assigning scores from 0 to 1 to each taxon, with 0 being no affinity and 1 being high affinity to a trait [for details see 65]. Four functional metrics were calculated including Functional Richness (FRic), Fucntional Evenness (FEve), Fucntional Dispersion (FDis), and Functional Redundancy (FR – calculated as the ratio between RaoQ entropy and H’). In addition, Community-level Weighted Means of trait values (CWM) were calculated to compare trait expression across treatments. Calculations of the four functional metrics were based on the combination of the macrobenthic taxa abundance matrix and the taxon-specific functional trait matrix using the R package FD [54]. The FD package produces an integrated data matrix by weighing the macrobenthic fauna abundances and functional traits data matrices, which is used for the calculation of all the functional metrics and CWM. To facilitate trend visualisation, taxonomic and functional metrics were presented as boxplots constructed using the package ‘ggpubr’ [63], while trends in CWM trait values are showed as circular plots created using the package ‘ggplot2’ [66]. To investigate the effects of simulated MHWs in metrics (abundance, S, H’, FRic, FEve, FDis, FR, and CWM) between treatments, PERMANOVA was used to analyse variation among the Control, Short, and Long treatments, based on Euclidean distances for the single and multi macrobenthic metrics (i.e., abundance, S, H’, FRic, FEve, FDis, FR, and CWM), permutation of residuals under a reduced model, sums of squares type III, and 9999 permutations [67]. In addition, multiple pair-wise tests were conducted to identify which treatment(s) contributed to the differences observed from PERMANOVA main tests.
To assess community and functional traits structure differences between treatments, bootstrapped non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (nMDS) sample ordination plots were created based on a Bray-Curtis similarity resemblance applied to the macrobenthic abundance and functional trait data (i.e., the combination of macrobenthic abundance data and macrobenthic functional trait fuzzy coding data) [67]. To test for differences in community structure for both macrobenthic and trait data, PERMANOVA tests were performed using fourth root transformed macrofauna data, Bray Curtis Similarities, permutation of residuals under a reduced model, sums of squares type III and 9999 permutations [67]. Pairwise tests were also conducted if main effects were significant.
Pearson correlations were performed to investigate the relationships between CWM traits, macrobenthic taxonomic and functional metrics and simulated MHWs conditions (mean, minimum, and maximum temperature) using the package ‘corrplot’ [68], and results were visualised through level plots constructed using the package ‘lattice’ [69].
Results
Simulated marine heatwave: intertidal sediment warming
Open Top Chambers increased the temperature of the sediments in the experimental plots compared to control plots successfully simulating a HW (Fig 2). Mean sediment temperature recorded in the experimental plots (i.e., Short and Long treatments) during the 7-day period ranged from 24°C to 34°C, while in the control plots ranged from 23°C to 28°C (Fig 2a). Mean sediment temperature was significantly different among treatments (PERMANOVA p < 0.05; Fig 2a). Pairwise post-hoc tests revealed that both Short and Long treatments were significantly warmer than Controls (p < 0.05; Fig 2a). Minimum temperature across the experimental plots ranged from 20°C to 30°C and in the control plots 20°C to 27°C, while the maximum temperature recorded ranged from 24°C and 36°C in the experimental plots and from 24°C to 30°C in the control plots (Fig 2a). Similar to mean sediment temperature, there were significant differences in minimum and maximum sediment temperature among treatments (p < 0.05; Fig 2a). Pairwise tests again showed that both Short and Long treatments were significantly warmer than Controls (p < 0.05; Fig 2a). The overall temperature (i.e., combining the temperatures from all the experimental days recorded during OTC incubations) showed similar patterns to the daily temperatures (Fig 2b). Mean, minimum, and maximum sediment temperature differed significantly between Controls and Long and Short treatments (PERMANOVA p < 0.05; Fig 2b), showing higher temperature in the experimental plots compared to the Controls.
Column a) shows the mean, minimum, and maximum temperature recorded during each OTC period each day (seven consecutive days) for each treatment (Control, Short, Long, n = 10). Column b) shows the mean, minimum, and maximum temperature recorded during all OTC periods for the week (7 days) for each treatment (Control, Short, Long, n = 70). Note the lower temperatures and smaller control-treatment differences on days 6 and 7 due to the arrival of cooler, cloudier weather. Thick lines = median, dots = outliers.
Effects of simulated heatwaves on macrobenthic and functional metrics
In total, 8,769 macrobenthic organisms were collected and 25 macrobenthic taxa were identified in our experimental plots (S2, S3, and S4 Tables). Macrobenthic richness ranged from 9 to 26 taxa. The highest macrobenthic richness was recorded in the Long treatment while the lowest richness was recorded in the Control treatment (Fig 3a). Median macrobenthic richness was higher in the Long treatment than the Control treatment, though there was no statistically significant difference across treatments (PERMANOVA p > 0.05; Fig 3a). Macrobenthic abundance ranged from 105 organisms per core in the Short treatment to 895 macrobenthic organisms per core recorded in Control treatment (Fig 3b). The highest macrobenthic median total abundance was recorded in the Control treatment, while the lowest macrobenthic median total abundance was found in the Short treatment (Fig 3b). Significant differences in macrobenthic abundance were found between treatments (PERMANOVA p < 0.05; Fig 3b), revealing significantly lower abundance in the Short and Long treatments compared to the Control treatment (p < 0.05; Fig 3b). Macrobenthic diversity ranged from 0.63 to 2.38 (Fig 3c). The highest median macrobenthic diversity was found in the Long treatment and the lowest macrobenthic diversity in the Control treatment (Fig 3c). Significant differences in macrobenthic diversity across treatments were also found (PERMANOVA p < 0.05; Fig 3c), which followed the same pattern as macrobenthic abundance, showing significantly higher diversity in Short and Long treatments compared to Control treatment (p < 0.05; Fig 3c).
Thick lines = median, dots = outliers. Significant differences p < 0.05 between treatments are shown as “a, b”.
Across all treatments, the most expressed functional trait modalities, based on community-level weighted means (CWM) analyses of trait values, were surface modifiers (Bioturbation; contribution: 52%), medium body size (5–20 mm) (contribution: 100%), filter/suspension feeders (Feeding mode; contribution: 74%), tube dwelling (Living habit; contribution: 75%), burrowing (Movement method; contribution: 53%), and organisms positioned in shallow surface sediments (<3 cm; Living position; contribution: 50%) (Fig 4; S5 Table). Significant differences in functional traits and their modalities (as CWM) across treatments were identified (p < 0.05; Table 2; Fig 4; S5 Table). Most of the significant differences were found in the functional trait ‘Feeding mode’, for example, suspension feeders were significantly higher in the Control treatment compared to the Short and Long treatment, while predators and scavengers were significantly lower in the Control treatment compared to the Short and Long treatment (Table 2; Fig 4; S5 Table). Other significant differences in CWM trait modalities were identified in ‘Bioturbation’, ‘Living habit’, and ‘Sediment position’ and mostly between the Control and Long treatment (Table 2; Fig 4; S5 Table).
Scale represents the proportional contribution (each concentric line represents 0.25) to CWM recorded in (a) Control, (b) Short, and (c) Long treatments in Waihī Estuary. Trait modalities labels (acronyms) are defined in Table 1.
Significant differences in community and functional traits composition were detected between treatments (PERMANOVA p < 0.05; Fig 5). The bootstrapped nMDS plot for macrobenthic community structure revealed two main groups (Fig 5a). These groups were significantly different in community structure, differentiating the Control treatment from the Short and Long treatments (p < 0.05, Fig 5a). The macrobenthic taxa driving differences in community structure between Control and Short and Long treatments were the amphipod Paracorophium excavatum and the small bivalve Arthritica sp. Functional traits composition followed the same pattern as the community structure, revealing significant differences in functional trait structure between the Control treatment and the Short and Long treatments (p < 0.05; Fig 5b). The functional trait modalities that contributed the most to the differences between Control and Short and Long treatments were ‘Streamlined” (Morphology), “Filter suspension” (Feeding mode), “Medium sized, 5-20 mm” (Body size), and “Tube dwelling” (Living habit).
Symbols close together in ordination space indicate greater similarity in multivariate composition.
Macrobenthic Functional Richness (FRic) ranged from 0.01 to 947.62 (S6 Table). FRIc was homogenous across treatments and no significant differences were found between treatments (PERMANOVA p > 0.05; Fig 6a). The highest median total FRic was recorded at the Long treatment, while the lowest median total was identified at the Short treatment (Fig 6a; S6 Table). Functional Evenness (FEve) ranged from 0.60 to 0.74 (S6 Table). The highest mean FEve was 0.55 recorded in the Short treatment, while the lowest mean FEve was 0.51 in the Long treatment (S6 Table). Significant differences in macrobenthic FEve between treatments were identified (PERMANOVA p < 0.05), and pairwise test revealed significant differences between the Short and Long treatments but no difference between Control and either Short or Long (p < 0.05; Fig 6b). Macrobenthic Functional Dispersion (FDis) ranged from 1.45 to 5.30 (S6 Table). FDis was significantly different across treatments (PERMANOVA p < 0.05) with significantly higher values in Short (mean value of 3.75) and Long (mean value of 4.03) treatments compared to the Control treatment (p < 0.05; Fig 6c; S6 Table). Macrobenthic Functional Redundancy (FR) ranged from 9.5 to 13.56. The higher mean FR value was in the Long treatment but was lower in the Short treatment (S6 Table). FR followed a similar pattern as FRic with no significant differences between treatments (PERMANOVA p > 0.05; Fig 6d; S6 Table).
Thick lines = median, dots = outliers. Significant differences p < 0.05 between treatments are shown as “a, b, c”.
Correlations between CWM trait modalities and the mean, minimum, and maximum temperature recorded during the in-situ warming experiment showed idiosyncratic positive and negative correlations (Fig 7). For example, in the Control treatment, significant positive correlations (p < 0.05) were found between the trait modality ‘burrower’ and the mean, minimum, and maximum temperature, relationships that were not evident in the OTC treatments. In the Short and Long treatments, the “bioirrigator”, “scavenger”, and “predator” trait modalities were positively correlated to temperature, compared with weak or negative relationships in the Controls. In general, the long treatment showed more positive correlations compared to Control and Short treatments. All correlations, except for ‘burrower’ in the Control treatment, were not statistically significant (p > 0.05; Fig 7). Correlations between taxonomical and functional metrics and temperatures (i.e., mean, minimum, maximum) recorded in the in-situ experiment showed similar patterns across treatments (Fig 8). Significant negative relationships (p < 0.05) were identified between the FEve and mean, minimum, and maximum temperature in the Short treatment (Fig 8). Macrobenthic richness and abundance were positively correlated to temperature, similar to FRic and FDis. Except from FEve, whereas all other correlations were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
Functional traits – orange: Bioturbation, sky blue: Body size, green: Feeding mode, yellow: Living habit, blue: Movement method, vermilion: Sediment position. The colour scale indicates the magnitude of the correlations based on the Spearman correlation coefficient (rho (ρ) = + 1, 0, −1).
The colour scale indicates the magnitudes of the correlations based on the Spearman correlation coefficient (rho (ρ) = + 1, 0, −1). S: richness, N: abundance, H: diversity, FRic: Functional Richness, FEve: Functional Evenness, FDis: Functional Dispersion, FR: Functional Redundancy.
Discussion
Marine and atmospheric heatwaves are becoming more frequent, longer, and more intense globally. These extreme temperature events have repercussions when the thermal tolerances of species are exceeded, causing for example mass mortalities and shifts in community structure of marine assemblages [4,20,21,35,70,71]. In this study, we evaluated the effects of a simulated HW on macrobenthic communities and their functional traits using a novel in-situ intertidal warming experiment and two heatwave durations. Our findings revealed that the simulated HW influenced the macrobenthic fauna taxonomical descriptors (i.e., abundance, diversity), however, functional traits and functional metrics were less affected, suggesting redundancy in functional diversity, which could enhance the macrobenthic resilience to short-term disturbances such as the simulated HW.
In contrast with our hypothesis, we found idiosyncratic responses to the simulated HW. Clear evidence of larger effects on macrobenthic fauna metrics (i.e., taxonomical and functional) with longer duration of warming was lacking. Our results demonstrated that the simulated HW influenced macrobenthic community descriptors, particularly macrobenthic abundance and diversity. These findings are consistent with previous studies reporting decreased abundance and altered species composition following natural or experimental heatwaves [35,71–73]. For example, in our study, most of the differences between the control and warming treatments were driven by decreases in the abundance of the amphipod Paracorophium excavatum. The mean abundance of this amphipod decreased by almost half in Short and Long (~90 and 108 organisms per core-1, respectively) treatments compared to the abundance recorded in the Control (~183 organisms per core-1). These effects could be attributed to direct physiological stress or increased metabolic demand leading to energy deficits, reproductive failure, or mortality [34,74–76]. However, again, consistent or stronger effects associated with longer heatwave duration were missing. This lack of clear duration-dependent effects suggests that the macrobenthic responses may be driven more by species-specific thermal tolerances or pre-existing environmental variability than by the heatwave duration alone [22,31,76,77]. Temporal mismatches between peak temperature exposure and sensitive life stages, or behavioural adaptations such as vertical burrowing in the sediment, could further modulate exposure and susceptibility to the simulated HW [31,32,78,79]. Diversity was significantly lower in Control treatment compared to Short and Long treatments, however, this effect was driven by the overall high abundance of dominant species (e.g., Paracorophium excavatum, oligochaete worms, Arthritica sp.), reducing the evenness in abundance across species and explaining the lower diversity in the Control treatment [80,81] rather than an effect due to the simulated HW. Furthermore, the sediment temperature measurements in our study were restricted to the upper 1 cm layer. This surface layer is ecologically relevant because many macrobenthic organisms occupy or interact with it during low tide, yet it does not capture potential thermal gradients deeper in the sediment [25]. Heat transfer to lower layers is expected to occur but at a reduced rate, and macrobenthic organisms capable of vertical migration may have experienced different thermal conditions than those recorded.
Differences in functional traits (as CWM) were found across treatments with most of the significant differences observed in the functional trait Feeding mode. For example, suspension feeders were significantly higher while predators and scavengers were significantly lower in the Control treatment compared to the Short and Long warming duration treatment. The elevated proportion of scavengers and the decreased proportion of filter/suspension feeders (as CWM) in the Short (5% and 73% respectively) and Long (6% and 67% respectively) treatments compared to Control (3% and 82% respectively) treatment likely reflect the cascading effects of thermal stress on benthic assemblages. Elevated temperatures can cause direct mortality or force organisms to emerge from the sediment, increasing their vulnerability to predation [31,32,71,35]. Such events create feeding hotspots that can attract mobile predators and scavengers from surrounding areas [70,82–84]. Similar scavenger aggregations have been documented following marine heatwaves and other disturbance events that elevate carrion availability on the seafloor, which may influence trophic interactions and nutrient cycling [31,32,70,71,77,84,85]. Nevertheless, the influence of elevated temperatures on resource availability and trophic interactions, and the further potential mechanisms such as organisms surfacing or increased scavenging, were not directly tested or observed in our study and require further investigation. Functional Evenness in the Short and Long treatments was influenced by the simulated HW. Observed differences in FEve were high FEve in the Short treatment and low FEve in the Long treatment. These patterns could be related to the even distribution of trait strategies and efficient use of functional space but low redundancy in the Short treatment, in contrast to trait clustering and high redundancy but reduced functional niche breadth in the Long treatment [50–52]. However, the FEve recorded in the Control treatment was not significantly different to that in the Short and Long treatments.
In contrast to FEve, Functional Dispersion (FDis) was significatively influenced by the simulated HW. Higher FDis was recorded in the Short and Long treatments compared to the Control treatment. High FDis suggests that the functional traits are widely dispersed, the macrobenthic community exhibits broad functional niche breadth, high complementarity, and potentially higher ecosystem multifunctionality and resilience [50–53]. A previous study suggested [57] that disturbance often leads to a contraction of functional space and reduced FDis, yet, empirical responses are context-dependent such the findings in our study. In open, well-connected systems like an estuary, disturbance can promote colonisation by species with trait combinations not previously present, thereby expanding functional space and increasing FDis rather than reducing it [86,87]. For example, connectivity to adjacent habitats (seascape proximity or terrestrial–aquatic linkages) has been shown to maintain or even enhance functional complementarity by supplying species with complementary trait values [86,87]. Furthermore, the direction of change depends strongly on disturbance intensity, frequency and spatial scale, e.g., low-to-moderate disturbances or pulse disturbances can create opportunities for coexistence and trait overdispersion, whereas long-lasting, high-intensity disturbances more commonly lead to trait loss. Functional Richness and Functional Redundancy were less responsive to the simulated HW than Functional Evenness and Functional Dispersion. This observation suggests high redundancy of the macrobenthic
functional traits. Overall, the combined patterns from the functional metrics, i.e., Functional Richness, Evenness, Dispersion, and Redundancy, suggest a degree of resilience within the macrobenthic assemblages, even when community composition and abundance was altered. In other words, functional traits (e.g., “Bioturbator”, “Feeding mode”, “Movement method” and “Sediment position”) and its modalities appear to remain well represented following heat exposure despite impacts on key individual species (i.e., Paracorophium excavatum, Oligochaeta, Arthritica sp.) that drove the composition structure differences between treatments.
Resilience based on functional traits could be explained by redundancy, where multiple taxa share similar trait modalities and therefore contribute similarly to ecosystem processes [22,50,51,57,88]. Our findings aligned with previous research suggesting weak or delayed effects of heatwaves on benthic ecosystem functioning [35,71,89]. Furthermore, species that differ taxonomically but share similar traits related to sediment mixing, feeding, or mobility may compensate for one another functionally. This redundancy could be acting as a buffer against thermal stress, maintaining processes such as bioturbation, bioirrigation, and nutrient cycling under changing environmental conditions [22,31,35,71,89,90]. It is also plausible that certain heatwave-resistant taxa (characterised by traits such as deep burrowing behaviour, deposit feeders, or broad thermal tolerances) persisted across treatments and contributed largely to the functional profile of the assemblage [22,31,91,92]. These traits may be acting as ecological filters, selecting for functionally important taxa under stress scenarios such as HWs.
The idiosyncratic nature of the responses observed in our study reflects the complex and context-dependent macrobenthic responses to thermal extremes. While temperature is a key driver of ectotherm organisms physiology, the response of macrobenthic communities is also shaped by multiple interacting environmental conditions and stressors such as anoxia, organic enrichment, eutrophication, and sediment characteristics [89,93–97]. These factors could potentially either amplify or dampen the effects of thermal stress, depending on local habitat characteristics. Moreover, the response of functional traits and functional metrics to heat stress may not manifest uniformly across time and space. Traits related to feeding mode, bioturbation, and reproductive strategy can be slow to change or exhibit lagged effects following a HW [22,28,29,98].
Our study supports the idea that maintaining and enhancing functional trait diversity and redundancy could be key for boosting ecosystem resilience under increasing climatic extremes. Protecting habitat heterogeneity and limiting cumulative anthropogenic pressures that affect macrobenthic communities, their functional traits and ecological functions, may help preserve ecosystem functioning in a rapidly warming world. It is important to highlight that the settings of our simulated heatwave experiment (e.g., only during low tide, ~ 4 hours of exposure per day, 5- and 7-day duration), represent a relatively subtle short-term thermal stress rather than prolonged or continuous warming, and therefore the patterns observed in macrobenthic metrics should be interpreted as short-term responses at the sediment surface. Longer or more intense heatwave events could produce different ecological outcomes, including greater shifts in trait composition or community structure. Future studies incorporating multi-depth temperature measurements and extended exposure durations (i.e., more days of heatwave) would help to assess whether the trends observed here persist or intensify under more severe conditions and provide a more comprehensive understanding of thermal stress effects on infaunal communities.
Conclusion
We simulated an in-situ heatwave on estuarine intertidal sediments. Our results revealed variable responses in macrobenthic assemblages, with larger effects on macrobenthic abundance and diversity, while in general, functional trait responses remained relatively stable during the warming experiment. These findings suggest that benthic communities may exhibit a degree of short-term functional resilience to heat stress, likely mediated by the filtering and redundancy of functional traits. However, the absence of clear duration effects and the idiosyncratic nature of responses highlight the complexity of predicting community and functional dynamics under future climate extremes. Continued use of in-situ experimentation and trait-based frameworks will be critical for improving our understanding of benthic ecosystem resilience in the face of climate change and increasing heatwaves.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Macrobenthic taxa and functional trait modalities assessed for the simulated heatwave in situ experiment.
Fuzzy coding was applied to each of the taxa ranging from 0 to 1.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340819.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Macrobenthic taxa list showing the taxa recorded in the simulated heatwave in-situ experiment.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340819.s002
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Macrobenthic abundance (organisms per core-1) collected in the control (C), short (S), and long (L) duration treatments from the simulated heatwave in situ experiment.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340819.s003
(DOCX)
S4 Table. Summary statistics of the macrobenthic taxa metrics recorded in simulated heatwave in situ experiment.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340819.s004
(DOCX)
S5 Table. Summary table of the macrobenthic CWM (Community-level Weighted Means) of trait values recorded in simulated heatwave in situ experiment.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340819.s005
(DOCX)
S6 Table. Summary statistics of the macrobenthic functional metrics recorded in simulated heatwave in situ experiment.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340819.s006
(DOCX)
S1 Dataset. Supplementary raw data. Macrobenthic abundance, diversity, and functional raw data and temperature raw data.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340819.s007
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Whakahemo and Professor Kura Paul-Burke (Waikato University) for inviting and warmly welcoming ESNZ team on to the Pukehina Marae and encouraging us to carry out the fieldwork and experimentation in Waihī estuary. We also thank the ESNZ Marine Ecology team in Hamilton, New Zealand for the processing of sediment and macrobenthic samples.
References
- 1. Wong C. Earth just had its hottest year on record - climate change is to blame. Nature. 2023;623(7988):674–5. pmid:37949987
- 2.
Möller V, van Diemen R, Matthews JBR, Méndez C, Semenov S, Fuglestvedt JS, et al. Annex II: Glossary. In: Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Tignor M, Poloczanska ES, Mintenbeck K, Alegría A, editors. Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA. 2022. p. 2897–930.
- 3. Huguenin MF, Holmes RM, England MH. Drivers and distribution of global ocean heat uptake over the last half century. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4921. pmid:36071053
- 4. Oliver ECJ, Donat MG, Burrows MT, Moore PJ, Smale DA, Alexander LV, et al. Longer and more frequent marine heatwaves over the past century. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):1324. pmid:29636482
- 5. Dong T, Zeng Z, Pan M, Wang D, Chen Y, Liang L, et al. Record-breaking 2023 marine heatwaves. Science. 2025;389(6758):369–74. pmid:40705884
- 6. Prum P, Harris L, Gardner J. Widespread warming of Earth’s estuaries. Limnol Oceanogr Letters. 2024;9(3):268–75.
- 7. Coumou D, Rahmstorf S. A decade of weather extremes. Nature Clim Change. 2012;2(7):491–6.
- 8. Oliver ECJ, Benthuysen JA, Darmaraki S, Donat MG, Hobday AJ, Holbrook NJ, et al. Marine Heatwaves. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2021;13:313–42. pmid:32976730
- 9. Stillman JH, Amri AB, Holdreith JM, Hooper A, Leon RV, Pruett LR, et al. Ecophysiological responses to heat waves in the marine intertidal zone. J Exp Biol. 2025;228(2):JEB246503. pmid:39817480
- 10. Campana SE, Stefánsdóttir RB, Jakobsdóttir K, Sólmundsson J. Shifting fish distributions in warming sub-Arctic oceans. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1).
- 11. Scanes E, Scanes PR, Ross PM. Climate change rapidly warms and acidifies Australian estuaries. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1803. pmid:32286277
- 12. Hobday AJ, Alexander LV, Perkins SE, Smale DA, Straub SC, Oliver ECJ, et al. A hierarchical approach to defining marine heatwaves. Progress in Oceanography. 2016;141:227–38.
- 13. Gomes DGE, Ruzicka JJ, Crozier LG, Huff DD, Brodeur RD, Stewart JD. Marine heatwaves disrupt ecosystem structure and function via altered food webs and energy flux. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1).
- 14. Nagelkerken I, Connell SD. Global alteration of ocean ecosystem functioning due to increasing human CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(43):13272–7. pmid:26460052
- 15. Mendoza-Portillo V, García-De León FJ, von der Heyden S. Responses of population structure and genomic diversity to climate change and fishing pressure in a pelagic fish. Glob Chang Biol. 2023;29(14):4107–25. pmid:37078996
- 16. Virgen-Urcelay A, Donner SD. Increase in the extent of mass coral bleaching over the past half-century, based on an updated global database. PLoS One. 2023;18(2):e0281719. pmid:36780497
- 17. Queirós JP, Borras-Chavez R, Friscourt N, Groß J, Lewis CB, Mergard G, et al. Southern Ocean food-webs and climate change: A short review and future directions. PLOS Clim. 2024;3(3):e0000358.
- 18. Huang M, Chen Y, Zhou W, Wei F. Assessing the response of marine fish communities to climate change and fishing. Conserv Biol. 2024;38(6):e14291. pmid:38745485
- 19. Harris RMB, Beaumont LJ, Vance TR, Tozer CR, Remenyi TA, Perkins-Kirkpatrick SE, et al. Biological responses to the press and pulse of climate trends and extreme events. Nature Clim Change. 2018;8(7):579–87.
- 20. Oliver ECJ, Benthuysen JA, Bindoff NL, Hobday AJ, Holbrook NJ, Mundy CN, et al. The unprecedented 2015/16 Tasman Sea marine heatwave. Nat Commun. 2017;8:16101. pmid:28706247
- 21. Wernberg T, Smale DA, Tuya F, Thomsen MS, Langlois TJ, de Bettignies T, et al. An extreme climatic event alters marine ecosystem structure in a global biodiversity hotspot. Nature Clim Change. 2012;3(1):78–82.
- 22. Leung JYS, Russell BD, Connell SD. Adaptive responses of marine gastropods to heatwaves. One Earth. 2019;1(3):374–81.
- 23. Maucieri DG, Kushner DJ, Bates AE. Enduring a major marine heatwave: the role of local cool refugia and kelp forests in the resilience of marine invertebrates. Diversity and Distributions. 2025;31(6).
- 24. Townsend M, Thrush SF. Ecosystem functioning, goods and services in the coastal environment. 2010/033. Auckland Regional Council. 2010.
- 25. Thrush SF, Hewitt JE, Pilditch C, Norkko A. Ecology of Coastal Marine Sediments: Form, Function, and Change in the Anthropocene. Oxford. 2021.
- 26. Cloern JE, Abreu PC, Carstensen J, Chauvaud L, Elmgren R, Grall J, et al. Human activities and climate variability drive fast-paced change across the world’s estuarine-coastal ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol. 2016;22(2):513–29. pmid:26242490
- 27. Johnson RG. Temperature variation in the infaunal environment of a sand flat. Limnol Oceanography. 1965;10(1):114–20.
- 28. Hewitt JE, Ellis JI, Thrush SF. Multiple stressors, nonlinear effects and the implications of climate change impacts on marine coastal ecosystems. Glob Chang Biol. 2016;22(8):2665–75. pmid:26648483
- 29. Lam-Gordillo O, Hewitt JE, Douglas EJ, Dudley BD, Holmes SJ, Hailes S, et al. Climatic, oceanic, freshwater, and local environmental drivers of New Zealand estuarine macroinvertebrates. Mar Environ Res. 2024;197:106472. pmid:38537362
- 30. Verdelhos T, Marques JC, Anastácio P. Behavioral and mortality responses of the bivalves Scrobicularia plana and Cerastoderma edule to temperature, as indicator of climate change’s potential impacts. Ecological Indicators. 2015;58:95–103.
- 31. Zhou Z, Bouma TJ, Fivash GS, Ysebaert T, van IJzerloo L, van Dalen J, et al. Thermal stress affects bioturbators’ burrowing behavior: A mesocosm experiment on common cockles (Cerastoderma edule). Sci Total Environ. 2022;824:153621. pmid:35124053
- 32. Zhou Z, Steiner N, Fivash GS, Cozzoli F, Blok DB, van IJzerloo L, et al. Temporal dynamics of heatwaves are key drivers of sediment mixing by bioturbators. Limnol Oceanography. 2023;68(5):1105–16.
- 33.
Solan M, Whiteley NM. Physiological responses of marine invertebrates to thermal stress. Stressors in the Marine Environment: Physiological and Ecological Responses; Societal Implications. Oxford University Press. 2016. p. 0.
- 34. Lam-Gordillo O, Douglas EJ, Hailes SF, Cummings V, Lohrer AM. Effects of in situ experimental warming on metabolic expression in a soft sediment bivalve. Sci Rep. 2025;15(1):1812. pmid:39805974
- 35. Dolbeth M, Babe O, Costa DA, Mucha AP, Cardoso PG, Arenas F. Benthic estuarine communities’ contribution to bioturbation under the experimental effect of marine heatwaves. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11422. pmid:34075082
- 36. Valente S, Colloca F. A dataset of thermal preferences for Mediterranean demersal and benthic macrofauna. Sci Data. 2024;11(1):314. pmid:38538659
- 37. Guibourd de Luzinais V, Gascuel D, Reygondeau G, Cheung WWL. Large potential impacts of marine heatwaves on ecosystem functioning. Glob Chang Biol. 2024;30(7):e17437. pmid:39054881
- 38. Barriopedro D, García‐Herrera R, Ordóñez C, Miralles DG, Salcedo‐Sanz S. Heat waves: physical understanding and scientific challenges. Reviews of Geophysics. 2023;61(2).
- 39. Harrington LJ, Frame D. Extreme heat in New Zealand: a synthesis. Climatic Change. 2022;174(1–2).
- 40. Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology. 2004;85(7):1771–89.
- 41. Payne NL, Smith JA, van der Meulen DE, Taylor MD, Watanabe YY, Takahashi A, et al. Temperature dependence of fish performance in the wild: links with species biogeography and physiological thermal tolerance. Functional Ecology. 2016;30(6):903–12.
- 42. Lear KO, Morgan DL, Whitty JM, Whitney NM, Byrnes EE, Beatty SJ, et al. Divergent field metabolic rates highlight the challenges of increasing temperatures and energy limitation in aquatic ectotherms. Oecologia. 2020;193(2):311–23. pmid:32435843
- 43. Plumlee JD, Powers SP, Kimbro DL, Lehrter JC, Herrmann J, Mareska J. Increasing duration of heatwaves poses a threat to oyster sustainability in the Gulf of Mexico. Ecological Indicators. 2024;162:112015.
- 44. Helmuth B, Mieszkowska N, Moore P, Hawkins SJ. Living on the edge of two changing worlds: forecasting the responses of rocky intertidal ecosystems to climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2006;37(1):373–404.
- 45. Petchey OL, Gaston KJ. Functional diversity: back to basics and looking forward. Ecol Lett. 2006;9(6):741–58. pmid:16706917
- 46. Lam-Gordillo O, Baring R, Dittmann S. Ecosystem functioning and functional approaches on marine macrobenthic fauna: A research synthesis towards a global consensus. Ecological Indicators. 2020;115:106379.
- 47. Lam-Gordillo O, Lohrer AM. Climate-related drivers of estuarine macrobenthic functional redundancy and resilience. Climate Change Ecol. 2025;10:100100.
- 48. Dı́az S, Cabido M. Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 2001;16(11):646–55.
- 49. Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs. 2005;75(1):3–35.
- 50. Mouchet MA, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D. Functional diversity measures: an overview of their redundancy and their ability to discriminate community assembly rules. Functional Ecol. 2010;24(4):867–76.
- 51. Villéger S, Mason NWH, Mouillot D. New multidimensional functional diversity indices for a multifaceted framework in functional ecology. Ecology. 2008;89(8):2290–301. pmid:18724739
- 52. Mason NWH, Mouillot D, Lee WG, Wilson JB. Functional richness, functional evenness and functional divergence: the primary components of functional diversity. Oikos. 2005;111(1):112–8.
- 53. Laliberté E, Legendre P. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology. 2010;91(1):299–305. pmid:20380219
- 54. Laliberté E, Legendre P, Shipley B. FD: Measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, and other tools for functional ecology. 2014.
- 55. van der Linden P, Patrício J, Marchini A, Cid N, Neto JM, Marques JC. A biological trait approach to assess the functional composition of subtidal benthic communities in an estuarine ecosystem. Ecological Indicators. 2012;20:121–33.
- 56. Lefcheck JS, Duffy JE. Multitrophic functional diversity predicts ecosystem functioning in experimental assemblages of estuarine consumers. Ecology. 2015;96(11):2973–83. pmid:27070016
- 57. Mouillot D, Graham NAJ, Villéger S, Mason NWH, Bellwood DR. A functional approach reveals community responses to disturbances. Trends Ecol Evol. 2013;28(3):167–77. pmid:23141923
- 58. Lam-Gordillo O, Hailes S, Carter K, Petersen GL, Ferries M, Salmond N, et al. Integrating rapid habitat mapping with community metrics and functional traits to assess estuarine ecological conditions: A New Zealand case study. Mar Pollut Bull. 2024;206:116717. pmid:39002221
- 59. Douglas EJ, Lam-Gordillo O, Hailes SF, Lohrer AM, Cummings VJ. Simulated heatwave alters intertidal estuary greenhouse gas fluxes. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1).
- 60.
Greenfield BL, Hailes S, MacLean F, Peart R, Read GB, Marshall B, et al. Protocol for the Identification of Benthic Estuarine and Marine Macroinvertebrates: A Guide for Parataxonomists. 2023.
- 61. Man M, Kalčík V, Macek M, Brůna J, Hederová L, Wild J, et al. myClim: Microclimate data handling and standardised analyses in R. Methods Ecol Evol. 2023;14(9):2308–20.
- 62. R-Core-Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2022. https://www.R-project.org/
- 63. Kassambara A. ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ based publication ready plots. 2020. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ggpubr
- 64. Oksanen J, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’Hara B, Stevens MHH, Oksanen MJ. The vegan package. Community ecology package. 2007;10(631–637):719.
- 65. Lam-Gordillo O, Lohrer AM, Hewitt J, Dittmann S. NZTD - The New Zealand Trait Database for shallow-water marine benthic invertebrates. Sci Data. 2023;10(1):502. pmid:37516737
- 66. Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag. 2016. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
- 67.
Anderson MJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR. PERMANOVA for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. Plymouth: PRIMER-E. 2008.
- 68. Wei T, Simko V, Levy M, Xie Y, Jin Y, Zemla J. Package ‘corrplot’. Statistician. 2017;56(316):e24.
- 69. Sarkar D. Lattice. New York, NY; Springer: 2008.
- 70. Garrabou J, Coma R, Bensoussan N, Bally M, Chevaldonné P, Cigliano M, et al. Mass mortality in Northwestern Mediterranean rocky benthic communities: effects of the 2003 heat wave. Global Change Biology. 2009;15(5):1090–103.
- 71. Pansch C, Scotti M, Barboza FR, Al-Janabi B, Brakel J, Briski E, et al. Heat waves and their significance for a temperate benthic community: A near-natural experimental approach. Glob Chang Biol. 2018;24(9):4357–67. pmid:29682862
- 72. Grilo TF, Cardoso PG, Dolbeth M, Bordalo MD, Pardal MA. Effects of extreme climate events on the macrobenthic communities’ structure and functioning of a temperate estuary. Mar Pollut Bull. 2011;62(2):303–11. pmid:21071045
- 73. Pitacco V, Mistri M, Munari C. Long-term variability of macrobenthic community in a shallow coastal lagoon (Valli di Comacchio, northern Adriatic): Is community resistant to climate changes?. Mar Environ Res. 2018;137:73–87. pmid:29523351
- 74. Harley CDG, Randall Hughes A, Hultgren KM, Miner BG, Sorte CJB, Thornber CS, et al. The impacts of climate change in coastal marine systems. Ecol Lett. 2006;9(2):228–41. pmid:16958887
- 75. Stillman JH. Heat Waves, the new normal: summertime temperature extremes will impact animals, ecosystems, and human communities. Physiology (Bethesda). 2019;34(2):86–100. pmid:30724132
- 76. Smale D, Wernberg T, Vanderklift M. Regional-scale variability in the response of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages to a marine heatwave. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2017;568:17–30.
- 77. Smale DA, Wernberg T, Oliver ECJ, Thomsen M, Harvey BP, Straub SC, et al. Marine heatwaves threaten global biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. Nat Clim Chang. 2019;9(4):306–12.
- 78. Kristensen E, Penha-Lopes G, Delefosse M, Valdemarsen T, Quintana C, Banta G. What is bioturbation? The need for a precise definition for fauna in aquatic sciences. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2012;446:285–302.
- 79. Queirós AM, Birchenough SNR, Bremner J, Godbold JA, Parker RE, Romero-Ramirez A, et al. A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates. Ecol Evol. 2013;3(11):3958–85. pmid:24198953
- 80. Gilbert B, Turkington R, Srivastava DS. Dominant species and diversity: linking relative abundance to controls of species establishment. Am Nat. 2009;174(6):850–62. pmid:19832033
- 81. Winfree R, Fox JW, Williams NM, Reilly JR, Cariveau DP. Abundance of common species, not species richness, drives delivery of a real-world ecosystem service. Ecol Lett. 2015;18(7):626–35. pmid:25959973
- 82. Schlacher TA, Strydom S, Connolly RM. Multiple scavengers respond rapidly to pulsed carrion resources at the land–ocean interface. Acta Oecologica. 2013;48:7–12.
- 83. Beasley JC, Olson ZH, Devault TL. Carrion cycling in food webs: comparisons among terrestrial and marine ecosystems. Oikos. 2012;121(7):1021–6.
- 84. Rivetti I, Fraschetti S, Lionello P, Zambianchi E, Boero F. Global warming and mass mortalities of benthic invertebrates in the Mediterranean Sea. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115655. pmid:25535973
- 85. Sorte CJB, Pandori LLM, Cai S, Davis KA. Predicting persistence in benthic marine species with complex life cycles: linking dispersal dynamics to redistribution potential and thermal tolerance limits. Mar Biol. 2017;165(1).
- 86. Henderson CJ, Gilby BL, Olds AD, Mosman J, Connolly RM, Hyndes G, et al. Connectivity shapes functional diversity and maintains complementarity in surf zones on exposed coasts. Estuaries and Coasts. 2022;45(6):1534–44.
- 87. Pires-Teixeira LM, Neres-Lima V, Creed JC. How do biological and functional diversity change in invaded tropical marine rocky reef communities?. Diversity. 2021;13(8):353.
- 88. Gladstone-Gallagher RV, Pilditch CA, Stephenson F, Thrush SF. Linking Traits across Ecological Scales Determines Functional Resilience. Trends Ecol Evol. 2019;34(12):1080–91. pmid:31422892
- 89. Kauppi L, Villnäs A. Marine heatwaves of differing intensities lead to distinct patterns in seafloor functioning. Proc Biol Sci. 2022;289(1986):20221159. pmid:36350209
- 90. Solan M, Cardinale BJ, Downing AL, Engelhardt KAM, Ruesink JL, Srivastava DS. Extinction and ecosystem function in the marine benthos. Science. 2004;306(5699):1177–80. pmid:15539601
- 91. Violle C, Navas M, Vile D, Kazakou E, Fortunel C, Hummel I, et al. Let the concept of trait be functional!. Oikos. 2007;116(5):882–92.
- 92. Staniek MA, Pansch C, Shama LNS, Mehler K, Steinmann A, Middelburg JJ, et al. Heatwave intensity drives eco‐physiological responses in infaunal bivalves: a mesocosm experiment. Limnol Oceanography. 2025;70(S2).
- 93. Villnäs A, Janas U, Josefson A, Kendzierska H, Nygård H, Norkko J, et al. Changes in macrofaunal biological traits across estuarine gradients: implications for the coastal nutrient filter. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2019;622:31–48.
- 94. Villnäs A, Norkko J, Lukkari K, Hewitt J, Norkko A. Consequences of increasing hypoxic disturbance on benthic communities and ecosystem functioning. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e44920. pmid:23091592
- 95. Douglas EJ, Hewitt J, Lohrer AM, Stephenson F. Changing intra‐ and interspecific interactions across sedimentary and environmental stress gradients. Ecosphere. 2023;14(1).
- 96. Douglas EJ, Lohrer AM, Pilditch CA. Biodiversity breakpoints along stress gradients in estuaries and associated shifts in ecosystem interactions. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):17567. pmid:31772300
- 97. Douglas EJ, Pilditch CA, Lohrer AM, Savage C, Schipper LA, Thrush SF. Sedimentary environment influences ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment. Estuar Coasts. 2018;41(7):1994–2008.
- 98. Svensson JR, Lindegarth M, Pavia H. Equal rates of disturbance cause different patterns of diversity. Ecology. 2009;90(2):496–505. pmid:19323233