Polyphasic characterization of Nocardioides aquaegermanicae sp. nov., a novel water-derived actinobacterium

Shuangqing Zhou; Sarah Kirstein; Lara Keunecke; Alexandra Lehmann; Lars-Olaf Schulz; Marlen Jando; Gabriele Pötter; Meina Neumann-Schaal; Yvonne Mast; Imen Nouioui

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0340783

Abstract

Strain DSM 117947^T was isolated from a Micromonospora matsumotoense co-culture originating from a water sample collected in Germany. The strain was subjected to a polyphasic taxonomic analysis. It exhibited 99.3% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity with Nocardioides aurantiacus DSM 12652^T. Digital DNA-DNA hybridization and average nucleotide identity values between the strain and its close phylogenetic neighbour were below the threshold of 70% and 95−96% for prokaryotic species demarcation, respectively. The strain had a polar lipid profile composed of diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylmethylethanolamine (PME), phosphatidylinositol (PI), glycophospholipid (GPL), and phospholipids (PLs). The predominant menaquinone (>20%) was MK-8(H₄). The major fatty acids (>5%) were C_16.0, C_16:1 ω7c, and C_18:1 ω9c. The genomic G + C content of the strain is 73%. The chemotaxonomic, biochemical, enzymatic, and genomic features distinguished the strain from its close relative, and justify its assignment to a novel species, for which the name Nocardioides aquaegermanicae sp. nov., is proposed, with strain DSM 117947^T (WG_orange^T = KCTC 59414^T) as the type strain.

Citation: Zhou S, Kirstein S, Keunecke L, Lehmann A, Schulz L-O, Jando M, et al. (2026) Polyphasic characterization of Nocardioides aquaegermanicae sp. nov., a novel water-derived actinobacterium. PLoS One 21(2): e0340783. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340783

Editor: Kandasamy Ulaganathan, Osmania University, INDIA

Received: October 14, 2025; Accepted: December 26, 2025; Published: February 10, 2026

Copyright: © 2026 Zhou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All 16S rRNA gene and genome sequences of the strain are available in the GenBank database (accession number(s) PX207510 and JBQOIK000000000).

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

The genus Nocardioides of the family Nocardioidaceae within the order Propionibacteriales comprises 171 validly named species (https://lpsn.dsmz.de/ [accessed in July 2025]). Members of this genus have been isolated from different environments, including plastic waste [1], Arctic marine sediments [2], stony coral [3], waterfalls [4], the feces of Tibetan antelope [5,6], kaolinite clay [7], sewage sludge [8], the gastrointestinal tract of lake prawn [9], intestines of fish species [10], and cave stalactite surfaces [11]. Nocardioides strains are Gram-positive, aerobic, non-acid-fast bacteria, exhibiting coccoid, short rod-shaped, rod-shaped, or filamentous cell morphologies. Several Nocardioides species do not produce aerial mycelium. The cell wall peptidoglycan contains LL-diaminopimelic acid as the diagnostic diamino acid. The predominant menaquinone is MK-8 (H₄), and the major cellular fatty acid is 14-methyl pentadecanoic acid (iso-C_16:0). The average genome size is approximately5.7 Mb, with a DNA G + C contentranging from 67.5% to74.8 mol% [12].

Nocardioides strains are known for their ability to utilize various carbon and nitrogen sources, and degrade various organic compounds and environmental pollutants, such as hydrocarbons, haloalkanes, aromatic compounds, nitrogen-containing heterocycles, and polyester pollutants. For example, Nocardioides sp. KP7, Nocardioides simplex FJ2-1A, Nocardioides sp. JQ2195, Nocardioides carbamazepine, Nocardioides alcanivorans NGK65^T, Nocardioides limicola DJM-14^T, and Nocardioides sp. JWJ-L0 have been reported to degrade phthalates [13], 2,4-dinitroanisole [14], dibenzofuran [15], ibuprofen [16], hexadecane [17], alkanes [18], and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons [19], respectively. In the course of activating and clarifying the taxonomic status of old actinobacterial strains deposited at the DSMZ before the 1990s, several strains belonging to different orders of the phylum Actinomycetota were found to be candidates for novel species. In this context, Nocardioides sp. DSM 117947^T was obtained from a purification of a culture of Micromonospora matsumotoense isolated from water collected in Germany and deposited at the DSMZ open culture collection. Given the bioremediation potential of Nocardioides, strain DSM 117947^T was subjected to a comprehensive polyphasic taxonomic analysis, including comparative genomic studies. The results demonstrated that the strain represents a novel species of the genus Nocardioides, for which the name Nocardioides aquaegermanicae sp. nov. is proposed.

Materials and methods

Origin and maintenance

The strain DSM 117947^T (WG_orange^T = KCTC 59414^T) was isolated from a co-culture of Micromonospora matsumotoense, which was isolated from water collected in Germany before 1993 and deposited at the DSMZ culture collection. The strain was purified after serial dilution of the original culture. One hundred microliters of bacterial suspension (dilution 10⁻⁶) dissolved in NaCl solution (0.9% w/v) was spread on GYM medium [glucose (4 g), yeast extract (4 g), malt extract (10.0), CaCO₃ (2.0), agar 20.0g, H₂O (1l), pH 7.2] and incubated at 28 °C for 10 days. A single colony was streaked onto GYM medium and incubated at 28 °C for 10 days. The purity of strain DSM 117947^T was confirmed using a light microscope (Nikon Eclipse, 100x objective). For comparative analysis, the closest phylogenetic neighbor of the strain, Nocardioides aurantiacus DSM 12652^T, was included in the study. Information on the origin, history, and growth conditions of strain DSM 12652^T is available in the DSMZ online catalogue (https://www.dsmz.de/collection/catalogue). Phenotypic characterisation and molecular identification were carried out using wet biomass from a 10-day-old culture grown in ISP2 liquid medium [glucose (4 g), yeast extract (4 g), malt extract (10.0), agar 20.0g, H₂O (1l), pH 7.2] at 28 °C with shaking at 150 rpm. Chemotaxonomic studies were performed using freeze-dried cells, except for fatty acid and menaquinone analyses, for which specific sample preparation protocols were applied.

Molecular identification and phylogenetic studies

To determine the taxonomic status of strain DSM 117947^T at the species rank, genomic DNA was extracted as described previously [20] and the 16S rRNA gene was amplified by PCR using primers 27F (5′–AGAGTTTGATC(AC)TGGCTCAG–3′) and 1492R (5′–ACGG(CT)TACCTTGTTACGACTT–3′) [21]. Amplicons were sequenced using the Applied Biosystems (ABI) 96-capillary-system, as described by Risdian et al. [22]. The nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequence (1525 bp) of strain DSM 11794^T was compared with those of validly named Nocardioides species, using the EzBioCloud server [23]. The pairwise 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between strain DSM 117947^T and its closest phylogenetic neighbour was determined using EzBioCloud server. Maximum-likelihood (ML) [24–25] and Neighbour Joining (NJ) [26] phylogenetic trees were constructed via MEGA software (v 11.0) with 1000 replicates [27].

Comparative genomic studies

Biomass harvested from strain DSM 117947^T culture, grown under the conditions described above, was used for DNA extraction and whole-genome sequencing by MicrobesNG (Birmingham, UK; https://microbesng.com/). The Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina, San Diego, USA) platform with a 250 bp paired-end protocol was used for sequencing. Library construction, assembly, and quality control were carried out by the service. Genome quality (completeness and contamination) was assessed via CheckM (v1.2.4) [28]. Genome of the strain was automatically annotated by the NCBI GenBank via PGAP (Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/datasets/genome/GCF_052591715.1/) [29]. The genome sequence was deposited in the DDBJ/ENA/GenBank database under the accession number JBQOIK000000000.

Genome-based phylogeny and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values between strain DSM 117947ᵀ and its closest phylogenomic relatives were carried out using the Type Strain Genome Server (TYGS) (https://tygs.dsmz.de/) [30–32]. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) scores between the strain and its neighbours were calculated using the ANI calculator available in the EzBioCloud server (https://www.ezbiocloud.net/tools/ani) [33].

Chemotaxonomic properties of strain DSM 117947^T

Freeze-dried cells of strain DSM 117947^T and its close relative N. aurantiacus DSM 12652^T were analysed, using thin layer chromatography, for whole-cell sugars [34,35], polar lipids [36], and diaminopimelic acid isomers [37]. Isoprenoid quinones of strain DSM 117947^T were examined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) coupled with a diode array detector and high-resolution mass spectrometry (MS) [38]. Cellular fatty acid profiles of the strains were determined using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) on an Agilent GC-MS 7000D instrument [39]. The position of double bonds in fatty acids was determined by derivatization of fatty acid methyl esters with dimethyl disulfide [40].

Growth properties, biochemical, and enzymatic features of strain DSM 117947^T

The growth of strain DSM 117947^T was assessed on a variety of media, including DSMZ 1746 (ISP1), DSMZ 987 (ISP2), DSMZ 84 (ISP3), DSMZ 252 (ISP4), DSMZ 993 (ISP5), DSMZ 1269 (ISP6), DSMZ 1619 (ISP7), DSMZ 535 (TSA, Tryptic Soy Agar), DSMZ 65 (Glucose-Yeast-Malt extract, GYM), DSMZ 83 (Czapek’s agar), and DSMZ 554 (N-Z-Amine agar). The composition of these media is available in the cultivation media database (https://mediadive.dsmz.de/). Growth was tested across a range of different temperatures (4, 10, 16, 20, 25, 28, 35, 37, 42, and 45°C), pH (5, 5.5, 6.0,6.5, 7.0,7.5, 8.0,8.5, and 9.0), and salinity (0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, and 10% NaCl w/v). The following buffer systems were used: 0.1 M citric acid/ 0.1 M sodium citrate for pH < 6; 0.1 M KH₂PO₄/0.1 M NaOH for pH 8.0–8.5; and 0.1 M NaHCO₃/0.1 M Na₂CO₃ for pH 9.0. The morphology of the strain including the colour of the substrate mycelium was determined using RAL colour charts [41]. The cell structures from 7- and 14-day-old cultures, prepared on GYM medium at 28 °C, were observed using a lightmicroscope (Nikon Eclipse, 100x objective).

The biochemical and enzymatic profiles of strain DSM 117947ᵀ and its closest phylogenomic neighbour, N. aurantiacus DSM 12652^T were examined using API 20NE, API 50CH, and API ZYM test strips according to the manufacturer’s instructions (bioMérieux, France). All tests were inoculated with a homogeneous bacterial suspension equivalent to a density of 5 on the McFarland scale, prepared from cultures grown in ISP2 liquid medium for 10 days at 28°C with shaking at 150 rpm.

Potential applications of strain DSM 117947^T

The genome sequence of strain DSM 117947^T and its close phylogenomic neighbour, N. aurantiacus DSM 12652^T, were screened for secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) using the antiSMASH web tool version 8.0 with default settings (https://antismash.secondarymetabolites.org) [[42]]. Antimicrobial activity of crude extracts from strains DSM 117947^T and DSM 12652^T was tested against Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli ΔtolC JW5503–1 and Proteus vulgaris DSM 2140), Gram-positive bacteria (multi-resistant Staphylococcus aureus DSM 18827 and Enterococcus faecium DSM 20477^T), and yeast (Candida albicans DSM 1386). Crude extracts were prepared from 10-day old cultures of the strains grown in 50 ml ISP2, NL19, NL800, and R5 media, respectively, at 28°C with shaking at 180 rpm, as described previously [43]. The potential of strain DSM 117947^T for xenobiotic biodegradation and neutralising biotic and abiotic stresses was evaluated using the PGPT-Pred tool, available in PLaBAse server (https://plabase.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/pb/plabase.php). The aligner used for this study is Blast and blastp+hmmer [44–46].

Results and discussion

Taxonomic novelty and distinctive genomic features of strain DSM 117947^T

The authenticity of strain DSM 117947^T was confirmed by comparing the 16S rRNA gene sequence obtained by PCR with that extracted from the whole genome sequence. The 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity values between strain DSM 117947^T and validly named Nocardioides species ranged from 94.7% to 99.3%, with N. aurantiacus (99.3%) identified as the closest relative (S1 Table). These results were consistent with the close phylogenetic relatedness between DSM 117947^T and N. aurantiacus in the ML and MP phylogenetic trees, in which these strains formed a well-supported sub-cluster next to Nocardioides scoriae (Fig 1).

Download:

Fig 1. ML and NJ phylogenetic trees based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the phylogenetic position of strain DSM 117947^T within the radiation of the genus Nocardioides.

The numbers above the branches are support values when greater than 50% from ML and NJ bootstrapping. Bar indicates 1 nucleotide substitutions per 1000 nucleotides.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340783.g001

The genomes of strain DSM 117947^T and its close neighbour N. aurantiacus DSM 12652^T had a size of 4.1 Mbp and 4.0 Mbp, with G + C contents of 73.0% and 72.5%, containing 49 and 54 RNAs, and 4,077 and 3,905 coding sequences, respectively (Table 1). The genomic features of strain DSM 117947^T were consistent with those reported for the genus Nocardioides, which typically exhibit G + C contents ranging from 67.5 to 74.8% [12]. The whole genome-based tree further confirmed the close phylogenetic relationship between strain DSM 117947ᵀ and N. aurantiacus (Fig 2). The dDDH and ANI values between the genome sequences of DSM 117947^T and N. aurantiacus DSM 12652^T were 35.2% and 88.6%, respectively; values well below the accepted species delineation thresholds of 70% for dDDH and 95–96% for ANI [49,50] (S2 Table).

Download:

Table 1. Biochemical, enzymatic and genomic features that distinguish strain DSM 117947^T from its close phylogenetic neighbour Nocardioides aurantiacus DSM 12652^T.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340783.t001

Download:

Fig 2. Tree inferred with FastME from GBDP distances calculated from genome sequences.

The branch lengths are scaled in terms of GBDP distance formula d_5. Only Bootstrap values above 60% are displayed above the branches.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340783.g002

Growth properties, phenotypic, and chemotaxonomic features of strain DSM 117947^T

The phenotypic and morphological characteristics of strain DSM 117947^T were consistent with those of the genus Nocardioides [23]. The strain grew well on ISP1, ISP2, ISP6, TSA, GYM, Czapek’s agar, and N-Z-Amine agar media, forming a yellow substrate mycelium after 10 days of incubation at 28°C (RAL 1028). The morphology of the strain in GYM medium plate is available in the DSMZ online catalogue (https://www.dsmz.de/collection/catalogue/details/culture/DSM-117947). Strain DSM 117947^T showed good growth on GYM medium at 16, 20, 25, 28, and 37°C. The strain grew at pH values ranging from 5.5 to 9.0 and tolerated up to 2.5% NaCl in GYM medium. Optimal growth on GYM medium was observed at 28, 35, and 37°C at pH 7.5–8.5, and in the absence of added salt. The strain developed yellow colonies under optimal growth condition (RAL 1028). Coccoid-shaped cells were observed in 15 days-old culture after incubation at 28°C (S1 Fig).

Strain DSM 117947^T was able to metabolise L-arabinose, cellobiose, D-fructose, galactose, D-glucose, glycerol, maltose, D-mannose, melibiose, D-raffinose, trehalose, and D-xylose, as sole carbon sources (Table 1). Strain DSM 117947^T was distinguished from its close phylogenetic neighbour, strain DSM 12652^T, by its ability to hydrolyse gelatin, oxidise tyrosine, and produce alkaline phosphatase, α-galactosidase, and lipase (Table 1). In addition, strain DSM 117947^T could be distinguished from its phylogenetic relatives, Nocardioides scoriae and Nocardioides korecus, and the type species, Nocardioides albus, by several biochemical and enzymatic features as shown in Table 1.

Whole-cell hydrolysates of strain DSM 117947^T were rich in LL-diaminopimelic acid (LL-DAP) and galactose, glucose, and ribose as whole cell sugars while N. aurantiacus DSM 12652ᵀ lacked galactose [51]. The polar lipid profile of strain DSM 117947^T consisted of diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylmethylethanolamine (PME), phosphatidylinositol (PI), glycolipid (GL), and phospholipids (PLs) (S2 Fig), whereas its close relatives N. aurantiacus, N. korecus and N. scoriae lacked PE and contained phosphatidylglycerol (PG) including the type species N. albus [12,47,48,51] (Table 1). The menaquinone profile of the strain consisted of MK-8 (H₄) (89.1%) and MK-7 (H₄) (12.6%); coherent with its close relatives (Table 1) [12,47,48,51]. The major fatty acids (>5%) of strains DSM 117947ᵀ and DSM 12652^T,were C_16.0, C_16:1 ω7c, and C_18:1 ω9c (Table 1). C_16.0 and C_18:1 ω9c were also present in N. korecus and N. scoriae, while the type species exhibited a different profile, reflecting its distant phylogenetic relationship to the studied strain (Table 1).

Potential applications of strain DSM 117947^T

Genome mining for secondary metabolite BGCs revealed that strain DSM 117947^T and its close relative N. aurantiacus DSM 12652^T each possessed only a single terpene BGC, showing certain similarity to an isorenieratene and carotenoid BGC, respectively (S3 Table). These findings were consistent with the absence of antimicrobial activity of the crude extracts prepared from various production media when tested against different microbial strains, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as well as yeast.

In silico genome analysis of strains DSM 117947^T and DSM 12652^T revealed the presence of genes associated with the degradation of various aromatic compounds, including benzoate, biphenyl, gentisate, p-hydroxybenzoate, quinate, naphthalene, protocatechuate, toluene, salicylate, xylene and (S4 Table). In addition, strain DSM 117947^T harboured in its genome several genes whose products are involved in xenobiotics biodegradation, including oil (dichloroethane, vinylchloride, dichloropropene, dichloromethane), and steroid (adrostenedione, epiandrosterone, cholesterol) and styrene (acrylamide, phenylacetate) degradation. Genes associated with heavy metal detoxification (arsenic, bismuth, cadmium, chromate, cobalt, copper, iron, lead, manganese, nickel, selenium, tellurium, and zinc) were also present in the studied genomes. These compounds, which possess diverse toxicological properties, can originate from natural sources or anthropogenic activities, and their accumulation in the environment disrupt ecosystem functions and pose a threat to human health [52,53].

Furthermore, the genomic sequences of strains DSM 117947^T and DSM 12652^T were rich in genes controlling environmental stresses (heat shock, cold shock, heat inducible, high and low temperature), reflecting their ability to adapt to different ecological habitats and conditions. The strains seemed to possess the genetic machinery necessary to neutralise acidic (soxalate and spermidine), herbicidal (organophosphate and toxoflavin), osmotic (cardiolipin, trigonelline, glycine-betaine metabolism), salinity (magnesium, sodium, proline, riboflavin, pyridoxine, and folate metabolisms), and oxidative (peroxidised compounds, arylpolyene, carotenoids, glutathione, lipoic acid, terpenoids, spermidine and ubiquinone) stresses. Moreover, genes whose products are involved in the resistance to volatile compounds were also detected.

Several microorganisms, including actinobacteria such as Mycolicibacterium vinylchloridicum, have been found to mineralize such pollutants and their derivatives [54].These findings reflect the bioremediation potential of the studied strains.

These findings were consistent with the previously reported bioremediation potential of several species of the genus Nocardioides [13–19].

This study provides insight into the genetic machinery involved in the catabolism of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. However, further experimental validation is needed to assess the effectiveness with which the proposed novel type strain DSM 117947^T degrades environmentally toxic substances.

Conclusions

Phenotypic, phylogenetic, and genomic data distinguished strain DSM 117947^T from all validly named Nocardioides species, supporting its classification as a representative of a novel species, for which the name Nocardioides aquaegermanicae sp. nov., is proposed.

Description of Nocardioides aquaegermanicae sp. nov

aquaegermanicae (a.quae.ger.ma’ni.cae. L. fem. n. aqua, water; L. fem. adj. germanica, German; N.L. gen. fem. n. aquaegermanicae, of the German water, referring to the freshwater source in Germany from which the type strain was isolated).

Gram-stain-positive, aerobic, catalase positive, oxidase negative with coccoid-shaped cells. The strain exhibits good growth on Czapek’s agar, GYM, ISP1, ISP6, N-Z-Amine agar, and TSA media, producing an orange substrate mycelium. Optimal growth occurs at 28°C, 35°C, and 37°C, within a pH range of 7.5–8.5, and in the absence of salt. The strain utilises L-arabinose, cellobiose, D-fructose, galactose, D-glucose, glycerol, maltose, D-mannose, melibiose, D-raffinose, trehalose, and D-xylose as sole carbon sources. The polar lipids are diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), phosphatidylmethylethanolamine (PME), phosphatidylinositol (PI), glycolipid (GL), and phospholipids (PLs). The predominant menaquinone (>20%) is MK-8 (H4). The major fatty acids (>5%) are C_16.0, C_18:1 ω9c, and C_16:1 ω7c. The genome size of the type strain DSM 117947^T is 4.1 Mbp with a G + C content of 73%.

The type strain DSM 117947^T (WG_orange^T = KCTC 59414^T) was isolated from a Micromonospora matsumotoense co-culture originating from a water sample collected in Germany. The 16S rRNA gene and whole genome sequences have been deposited at NCBI GenBank under accession numbers PX207510 and JBQOIK000000000, respectively.

This Whole Genome Shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession JBQOIK000000000. The version described in this paper is version JBQOIK000000000.

Repositories

The GenBank accession number for the 16S rRNA gene and genome sequences of strain DSM 117947^T are PX207510 and JBQOIK000000000, respectively.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Morphological features (left) and cell structures (right) of strain 117947^T grown on GYM medium at 28 °C for 15 days.

The picture on the right was taken using a light microscope (Nikon Eclipse, 100x objective).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340783.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Two-dimensional TLC plate of polar lipids extracted from strain DSM 117947^T stained with molybdatophosphoric acid (a), molybdenum blue (b), ninhydrin (c), anisaldehyde (d), Dragendorff (e) reagents.

Key: DPG, diphosphatidylglycerol; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; PLs, phospholipids; GL glycolipid: PME, phosphatidylmethylethanolamine. Solvent1: chloroform: methanol: distilled water (65:25:4 v/v/v/); solvent 2: chloroform: glacial acetic acid: methanol: distilled water (80:12:15:4 v/v/v).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340783.s002

(DOCX)

S1 Table. 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between strain DSM 117947^T and its close phylogenetic neighbours.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340783.s003

(DOCX)

S2 Table. dDDH and ANI between the genome sequence of strain DSM 117947^T and its close phylogenomic relatives.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340783.s004

(DOCX)

S3 Table. BGCs associated with terpene biosynthesis of strain DSM 117947^T and N. aurantiacus DSM 12652^T assessed using AntiSMASH.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340783.s005

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Stress envinronmental genes of Nocardioides sp. DSM 117947^T.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0340783.s006

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Sabine Gronow, Rüdiger Pukall, Christiane Baschien, and Andrey Yurkov (DSMZ-German culture collection) for providing reference strains for bioassays. The authors are grateful to Heike Freese (DSMZ-German culture collection) for her help with the etymology of the newly described type strain. We further thank Birgit Grün, Anja Frühling, and Gesa Martens (DSMZ-German culture collection) for excellent technical assistance.

References

1. Mitzscherling J, MacLean J, Lipus D, Bartholomäus A, Mangelsdorf K, Lipski A, et al. Nocardioides alcanivorans sp. nov., a novel hexadecane-degrading species isolated from plastic waste. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022;72(4). pmid:35482521
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Cong B, Zhang H, Li S, Liu S, Lin J, Deng A, et al. Taxonomic Identification of the Arctic Strain Nocardioides Arcticus Sp. Nov. and Global Transcriptomic Analysis in Response to Hydrogen Peroxide Stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(18):13943. pmid:37762246
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Shi S-B, Cui L-Q, Zeng Q, Long L-J, Tian X-P. Nocardioides coralli sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from stony coral in the South China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022;72(5). pmid:35511243
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Kim I, Chhetri G, Kim J, Kang M, So Y, Lee B, et al. Nocardioides donggukensis sp. nov. and Hyunsoonleella aquatilis sp. nov., isolated from Jeongbang Waterfall on Jeju Island. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(12). pmid:34928203
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Cheng Y, Jiao Y, Zhang S, Yang J, Lu S, Jin D, et al. Nocardioides dongkuii sp. nov. and Nocardioides lijunqiniae sp. nov., isolated from faeces of Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii) and leaves of dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), respectively, on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(7). pmid:34313583
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Zhang G, Liu Y, Cheng Y, Yang J, Jin D, Lu S, et al. Identification of Nocardioides marmotae sp. nov. and Nocardioides faecalis sp. nov., two new members of the genus Nocardioides. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2023;73(5). pmid:37232277
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Yoon DJ, Cho ES, Hwang CY, Nam YD, Park SL, et al. Nocardioides luti sp. nov., belonging to the family Nocardioidaceae isolated from kaolinite, exhibiting the biosynthesis potential of alkylresorcinol. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2021;114:983–95.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Zhang X, Wu Z, Yan C, Chen C, Zheng G, Ye Y, et al. Nocardioides malaquae sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from sewage sludge of a fisheries processing factory. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(7). pmid:34241591
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Kim D-Y, Jeong I-C, Lee S-Y, Jeong Y-S, Han JE, Tak EJ, et al. Nocardioides palaemonis sp. nov. and Tessaracoccus palaemonis sp. nov., isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of lake prawn. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022;72(12). pmid:36748471
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Hyun DW, Jeong YS, Lee JY, Sung H, Lee SY, et al. Description of Nocardioides piscis sp. nov., Sphingomonas piscis sp. nov. and Sphingomonas sinipercae sp. nov., isolated from the intestine of fish species Odontobutis interrupta (Korean spotted sleeper) and Siniperca scherzeri (leopard mandarin fish). J Microbiol. 2021;59:552–62.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
11. Zhou X-K, Huang Y, Zhang T-K, Liu J-J, Liu Z-Y, Zhu M-L, et al. Nocardioides stalactiti sp. nov., isolated from a cave stalactite surface. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(2). pmid:33470924
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Evtushenko LI, Krausova VI, Yoon JH. Genus Nocardioides. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., in association with Bergey’s Manual Trust. 2015 2015:1–81.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
13. Saito A, Iwabuchi T, Harayama S. A novel phenanthrene dioxygenase from Nocardioides sp. Strain KP7: expression in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2000;182(8):2134–41. pmid:10735855
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
14. Ebert S, Fischer P, Knackmuss HJ. Converging catabolism of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (picric acid) and 2,4-dinitrophenol by Nocardioides simplex FJ2-1A. Biodegradation. 2001;12(5):367–76. pmid:11995829
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Qiu J, Zhang Y, Zhao L, He Q, Jiang J, Hong Q, et al. Isolation and characterization of the cotinine-degrading bacterium Nocardioides sp. Strain JQ2195. J Hazard Mater. 2018;353:158–65. pmid:29665494
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Benedek T, Pápai M, Gharieb K, Bedics A, Táncsics A, Tóth E, et al. Nocardioides carbamazepini sp. nov., an ibuprofen degrader isolated from a biofilm bacterial community enriched on carbamazepine. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2022;45(4):126339. pmid:35714383
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Bartholomäus A, Lipus D, Mitzscherling J, MacLean J, Wagner D. Draft Genome Sequence of Nocardioides alcanivorans NGK65T, a Hexadecane-Degrading Bacterium. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2022;11(8):e0121321. pmid:35862914
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Zhu L, Yang B, Guo W, Hu X, Liu S, Xiao X, et al. Nocardioides limicola sp. nov., an alkaliphilic alkane degrading bacterium isolated from oilfield alkali-saline soil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2024;117(1):14. pmid:38170333
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Feng X, Deng M, Yu J, Wang J, Jin W. Highly efficient removing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in coking wastewater by bio-augmentation activated sludge with Nocardioides sp. JWJ-L0 through sodium acetate co-metabolism. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2024;58:104844.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
20. Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey N, Kroppenstedt RM, Stackebrandt E. The genus Nocardiopsis represents a phylogenetically coherent taxon and a distinct actinomycete lineage: proposal of Nocardiopsaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996;46(4):1088–92. pmid:8863440
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol. 1991;173(2):697–703. pmid:1987160
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Risdian C, Landwehr W, Rohde M, Schumann P, Hahnke RL, Spröer C, et al. Streptomyces bathyalis sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from the sponge in a deep sea. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2021;114(4):425–35. pmid:33595745
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Chalita M, Kim YO, Park S, Oh HS, Cho JH, Moon J, et al. EzBioCloud: a genome-driven database and platform for microbiome identification and discovery.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024;74(6). :006421.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17(6):368–76. pmid:7288891
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Stamatakis A, Kozlov AM, Kozlov AM. Efficient maximum likelihood tree building methods. Phylogenetics in the genomic era. 2020:1–2.
26. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406–25. pmid:3447015
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):3022–7. pmid:33892491
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25(7):1043–55. pmid:25977477
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
29. Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, et al. RefSeq: expanding the prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Research. 2021;49(D1):D1020–8.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1): D801–D807.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
31. Freese M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Sardà Carbasse J, Afolayan AO, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN in 2025: a Global Core Biodata Resource for genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes within DSMZ Digital Diversity. Arch MicrobiolNucleic Acid Res. 2025;54(D1):D884–D891.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2182. pmid:31097708
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110(10):1281–6. pmid:28204908
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier HA. The taxonomic position of the actinomycetic endophytes. Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in the Management of Temperate Forests. 1979:111–21.
35. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol. 1974;28(2):226–31. pmid:4605116
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M, Schaal A, et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 1984;2(5):233–41.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
37. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev. 1972;36(4):407–77. pmid:4568761
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Schumann P, Kalensee F, Cao J, Criscuolo A, Clermont D, et al. Reclassification of Haloactinobacterium glacieicola as Occultella glacieicola gen. nov., comb. nov., of Haloactinobacterium album as Ruania alba comb. nov, with an emended description of the genus Ruania, recognition that the genus names Haloactinobacterium and Ruania are heterotypic synonyms and description of Occultella aeris sp. nov., a halotolerant isolate from surface soil sampled at an ancient copper smelter. Int J Syst Evol. 2021;71(4):004769.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
39. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. Newark: MIDI Inc. 1990.
40. Moss CW, Lambert-Fair MA. Location of double bonds in monounsaturated fatty acids of Campylobacter cryaerophila with dimethyl disulfide derivatives and combined gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27(7):1467–70. pmid:2768436
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Kelly KL. Color-name charts illustrated with centroid colors. Inter-Society Color Council-National Bureau of Standards, Chicago. 1964.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz Z, Augustijn H, et al. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Research. 2025;53(W1):W32–WW38.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Nouioui I, Gomez-Escribano JP, Pötter G, Jando M, Wolf J, Neumann-Schaal M, et al. A novel endophytic species, Streptomyces colwelliae sp. nov., isolated from root nodule of Alnus glutinosa. BMC Microbiol. 2025;25(1):577. pmid:40963147
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Patz S, Rauh M, Gautam A, Huson DH. mgPGPT: Metagenomic analysis of plant growth-promoting traits. BioRxiv. 2024;2024:2024–02.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Patz S, Gautam A, Becker M, Ruppel S, Rodríguez-Palenzuela P, Huson DH. PLaBAse: A comprehensive web resource for analyzing the plant growth-promoting potential of plant-associated bacteria. BioRxiv. 2021;2021–12.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
46. Ashrafi S, Kuzmanović N, Patz S, Lohwasser U, Bunk B, Spröer C, et al. Two New Rhizobiales Species Isolated from Root Nodules of Common Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) Show Different Plant Colonization Strategies. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(5):e0109922. pmid:36005754
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Lee DW, Lee SD. Marmoricola scoriae sp. nov., isolated from volcanic ash. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60(Pt 9):2135–9. pmid:19880634
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Lee SD, Lee DW, Ko Y-H. Marmoricola korecus sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011;61(Pt 7):1628–31. pmid:20693360
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
49. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57(Pt 1):81–91. pmid:17220447
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(45):19126–31. pmid:19855009
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Urzì C, Salamone P, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E. Marmoricola aurantiacus gen. nov., sp. nov., a coccoid member of the family Nocardioidaceae isolated from a marble statue. Int J Syst Evol. 2000;50(2):529–36.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Manoli E, Samara C. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in natural waters: sources, occurrence and analysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 1999;18(6):417–28.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. Suess MJ. The environmental load and cycle of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Science of The Total Environment. 1976;6(3):239–50.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Cortés-Albayay C, Sangal V, Klenk H-P, Nouioui I. Comparative Genomic Study of Vinyl Chloride Cluster and Description of Novel Species, Mycolicibacterium vinylchloridicum sp. nov. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:767895. pmid:35003006
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Mitzscherling J, MacLean J, Lipus D, Bartholomäus A, Mangelsdorf K, Lipski A, et al. Nocardioides alcanivorans sp. nov., a novel hexadecane-degrading species isolated from plastic waste. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022;72(4). pmid:35482521
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Cong B, Zhang H, Li S, Liu S, Lin J, Deng A, et al. Taxonomic Identification of the Arctic Strain Nocardioides Arcticus Sp. Nov. and Global Transcriptomic Analysis in Response to Hydrogen Peroxide Stress. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(18):13943. pmid:37762246
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Shi S-B, Cui L-Q, Zeng Q, Long L-J, Tian X-P. Nocardioides coralli sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from stony coral in the South China Sea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022;72(5). pmid:35511243
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Kim I, Chhetri G, Kim J, Kang M, So Y, Lee B, et al. Nocardioides donggukensis sp. nov. and Hyunsoonleella aquatilis sp. nov., isolated from Jeongbang Waterfall on Jeju Island. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(12). pmid:34928203
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Cheng Y, Jiao Y, Zhang S, Yang J, Lu S, Jin D, et al. Nocardioides dongkuii sp. nov. and Nocardioides lijunqiniae sp. nov., isolated from faeces of Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii) and leaves of dandelion (Taraxacum officinale), respectively, on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(7). pmid:34313583
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Zhang G, Liu Y, Cheng Y, Yang J, Jin D, Lu S, et al. Identification of Nocardioides marmotae sp. nov. and Nocardioides faecalis sp. nov., two new members of the genus Nocardioides. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2023;73(5). pmid:37232277
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Yoon DJ, Cho ES, Hwang CY, Nam YD, Park SL, et al. Nocardioides luti sp. nov., belonging to the family Nocardioidaceae isolated from kaolinite, exhibiting the biosynthesis potential of alkylresorcinol. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek. 2021;114:983–95.
View Article
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Zhang X, Wu Z, Yan C, Chen C, Zheng G, Ye Y, et al. Nocardioides malaquae sp. nov., a novel actinobacterium isolated from sewage sludge of a fisheries processing factory. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(7). pmid:34241591
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Kim D-Y, Jeong I-C, Lee S-Y, Jeong Y-S, Han JE, Tak EJ, et al. Nocardioides palaemonis sp. nov. and Tessaracoccus palaemonis sp. nov., isolated from the gastrointestinal tract of lake prawn. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2022;72(12). pmid:36748471
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Hyun DW, Jeong YS, Lee JY, Sung H, Lee SY, et al. Description of Nocardioides piscis sp. nov., Sphingomonas piscis sp. nov. and Sphingomonas sinipercae sp. nov., isolated from the intestine of fish species Odontobutis interrupta (Korean spotted sleeper) and Siniperca scherzeri (leopard mandarin fish). J Microbiol. 2021;59:552–62.
View Article
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Zhou X-K, Huang Y, Zhang T-K, Liu J-J, Liu Z-Y, Zhu M-L, et al. Nocardioides stalactiti sp. nov., isolated from a cave stalactite surface. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021;71(2). pmid:33470924
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] PubMed/NCBI

[42] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Evtushenko LI, Krausova VI, Yoon JH. Genus Nocardioides. Bergey’s Manual of Systematics of Archaea and Bacteria. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., in association with Bergey’s Manual Trust. 2015 2015:1–81.
View Article
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Saito A, Iwabuchi T, Harayama S. A novel phenanthrene dioxygenase from Nocardioides sp. Strain KP7: expression in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 2000;182(8):2134–41. pmid:10735855
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[47] View Article

[48] PubMed/NCBI

[49] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Ebert S, Fischer P, Knackmuss HJ. Converging catabolism of 2,4,6-trinitrophenol (picric acid) and 2,4-dinitrophenol by Nocardioides simplex FJ2-1A. Biodegradation. 2001;12(5):367–76. pmid:11995829
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[51] View Article

[52] PubMed/NCBI

[53] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Qiu J, Zhang Y, Zhao L, He Q, Jiang J, Hong Q, et al. Isolation and characterization of the cotinine-degrading bacterium Nocardioides sp. Strain JQ2195. J Hazard Mater. 2018;353:158–65. pmid:29665494
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] PubMed/NCBI

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Benedek T, Pápai M, Gharieb K, Bedics A, Táncsics A, Tóth E, et al. Nocardioides carbamazepini sp. nov., an ibuprofen degrader isolated from a biofilm bacterial community enriched on carbamazepine. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2022;45(4):126339. pmid:35714383
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Bartholomäus A, Lipus D, Mitzscherling J, MacLean J, Wagner D. Draft Genome Sequence of Nocardioides alcanivorans NGK65T, a Hexadecane-Degrading Bacterium. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2022;11(8):e0121321. pmid:35862914
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Zhu L, Yang B, Guo W, Hu X, Liu S, Xiao X, et al. Nocardioides limicola sp. nov., an alkaliphilic alkane degrading bacterium isolated from oilfield alkali-saline soil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2024;117(1):14. pmid:38170333
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] PubMed/NCBI

[69] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Feng X, Deng M, Yu J, Wang J, Jin W. Highly efficient removing polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in coking wastewater by bio-augmentation activated sludge with Nocardioides sp. JWJ-L0 through sodium acetate co-metabolism. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2024;58:104844.
View Article
Google Scholar

[71] View Article

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Rainey FA, Ward-Rainey N, Kroppenstedt RM, Stackebrandt E. The genus Nocardiopsis represents a phylogenetically coherent taxon and a distinct actinomycete lineage: proposal of Nocardiopsaceae fam. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1996;46(4):1088–92. pmid:8863440
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ. 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol. 1991;173(2):697–703. pmid:1987160
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Risdian C, Landwehr W, Rohde M, Schumann P, Hahnke RL, Spröer C, et al. Streptomyces bathyalis sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from the sponge in a deep sea. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2021;114(4):425–35. pmid:33595745
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Chalita M, Kim YO, Park S, Oh HS, Cho JH, Moon J, et al. EzBioCloud: a genome-driven database and platform for microbiome identification and discovery.. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2024;74(6). :006421.
View Article
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17(6):368–76. pmid:7288891
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Stamatakis A, Kozlov AM, Kozlov AM. Efficient maximum likelihood tree building methods. Phylogenetics in the genomic era. 2020:1–2.

[ref26] 26. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406–25. pmid:3447015
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[94] View Article

[95] PubMed/NCBI

[96] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S. MEGA11: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 11. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(7):3022–7. pmid:33892491
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[98] View Article

[99] PubMed/NCBI

[100] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25(7):1043–55. pmid:25977477
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[102] View Article

[103] PubMed/NCBI

[104] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Li W, O’Neill KR, Haft DH, DiCuccio M, et al. RefSeq: expanding the prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline reach with protein family model curation. Nucleic Acids Research. 2021;49(D1):D1020–8.
View Article
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1): D801–D807.
View Article
Google Scholar

[109] View Article

[110] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Freese M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Sardà Carbasse J, Afolayan AO, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN in 2025: a Global Core Biodata Resource for genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes within DSMZ Digital Diversity. Arch MicrobiolNucleic Acid Res. 2025;54(D1):D884–D891.
View Article
Google Scholar

[112] View Article

[113] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Meier-Kolthoff JP, Göker M. TYGS is an automated high-throughput platform for state-of-the-art genome-based taxonomy. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2182. pmid:31097708
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[115] View Article

[116] PubMed/NCBI

[117] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Yoon S-H, Ha S-M, Lim J, Kwon S, Chun J. A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2017;110(10):1281–6. pmid:28204908
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[119] View Article

[120] PubMed/NCBI

[121] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Lechevalier MP, Lechevalier HA. The taxonomic position of the actinomycetic endophytes. Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation in the Management of Temperate Forests. 1979:111–21.

[ref35] 35. Staneck JL, Roberts GD. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl Microbiol. 1974;28(2):226–31. pmid:4605116
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[124] View Article

[125] PubMed/NCBI

[126] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Minnikin DE, O’Donnell AG, Goodfellow M, Alderson G, Athalye M, Schaal A, et al. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. Journal of Microbiological Methods. 1984;2(5):233–41.
View Article
Google Scholar

[128] View Article

[129] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Schleifer KH, Kandler O. Peptidoglycan types of bacterial cell walls and their taxonomic implications. Bacteriol Rev. 1972;36(4):407–77. pmid:4568761
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[131] View Article

[132] PubMed/NCBI

[133] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Schumann P, Kalensee F, Cao J, Criscuolo A, Clermont D, et al. Reclassification of Haloactinobacterium glacieicola as Occultella glacieicola gen. nov., comb. nov., of Haloactinobacterium album as Ruania alba comb. nov, with an emended description of the genus Ruania, recognition that the genus names Haloactinobacterium and Ruania are heterotypic synonyms and description of Occultella aeris sp. nov., a halotolerant isolate from surface soil sampled at an ancient copper smelter. Int J Syst Evol. 2021;71(4):004769.
View Article
Google Scholar

[135] View Article

[136] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Sasser M. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. Newark: MIDI Inc. 1990.

[ref40] 40. Moss CW, Lambert-Fair MA. Location of double bonds in monounsaturated fatty acids of Campylobacter cryaerophila with dimethyl disulfide derivatives and combined gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27(7):1467–70. pmid:2768436
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[139] View Article

[140] PubMed/NCBI

[141] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Kelly KL. Color-name charts illustrated with centroid colors. Inter-Society Color Council-National Bureau of Standards, Chicago. 1964.
View Article
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Blin K, Shaw S, Vader L, Szenei J, Reitz Z, Augustijn H, et al. antiSMASH 8.0: extended gene cluster detection capabilities and analyses of chemistry, enzymology, and regulation. Nucleic Acids Research. 2025;53(W1):W32–WW38.
View Article
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Nouioui I, Gomez-Escribano JP, Pötter G, Jando M, Wolf J, Neumann-Schaal M, et al. A novel endophytic species, Streptomyces colwelliae sp. nov., isolated from root nodule of Alnus glutinosa. BMC Microbiol. 2025;25(1):577. pmid:40963147
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[149] View Article

[150] PubMed/NCBI

[151] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Patz S, Rauh M, Gautam A, Huson DH. mgPGPT: Metagenomic analysis of plant growth-promoting traits. BioRxiv. 2024;2024:2024–02.
View Article
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Patz S, Gautam A, Becker M, Ruppel S, Rodríguez-Palenzuela P, Huson DH. PLaBAse: A comprehensive web resource for analyzing the plant growth-promoting potential of plant-associated bacteria. BioRxiv. 2021;2021–12.
View Article
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Ashrafi S, Kuzmanović N, Patz S, Lohwasser U, Bunk B, Spröer C, et al. Two New Rhizobiales Species Isolated from Root Nodules of Common Sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia) Show Different Plant Colonization Strategies. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(5):e0109922. pmid:36005754
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] PubMed/NCBI

[161] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Lee DW, Lee SD. Marmoricola scoriae sp. nov., isolated from volcanic ash. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60(Pt 9):2135–9. pmid:19880634
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[163] View Article

[164] PubMed/NCBI

[165] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Lee SD, Lee DW, Ko Y-H. Marmoricola korecus sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011;61(Pt 7):1628–31. pmid:20693360
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[167] View Article

[168] PubMed/NCBI

[169] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57(Pt 1):81–91. pmid:17220447
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] PubMed/NCBI

[173] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R. Shifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(45):19126–31. pmid:19855009
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[175] View Article

[176] PubMed/NCBI

[177] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Urzì C, Salamone P, Schumann P, Stackebrandt E. Marmoricola aurantiacus gen. nov., sp. nov., a coccoid member of the family Nocardioidaceae isolated from a marble statue. Int J Syst Evol. 2000;50(2):529–36.
View Article
Google Scholar

[179] View Article

[180] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Manoli E, Samara C. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in natural waters: sources, occurrence and analysis. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 1999;18(6):417–28.
View Article
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Suess MJ. The environmental load and cycle of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Science of The Total Environment. 1976;6(3):239–50.
View Article
Google Scholar

[185] View Article

[186] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Cortés-Albayay C, Sangal V, Klenk H-P, Nouioui I. Comparative Genomic Study of Vinyl Chloride Cluster and Description of Novel Species, Mycolicibacterium vinylchloridicum sp. nov. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:767895. pmid:35003006
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] PubMed/NCBI

[190] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Origin and maintenance

Molecular identification and phylogenetic studies

Comparative genomic studies

Chemotaxonomic properties of strain DSM 117947T

Growth properties, biochemical, and enzymatic features of strain DSM 117947T

Potential applications of strain DSM 117947T

Results and discussion

Taxonomic novelty and distinctive genomic features of strain DSM 117947T

Growth properties, phenotypic, and chemotaxonomic features of strain DSM 117947T

Potential applications of strain DSM 117947T

Conclusions

Description of Nocardioides aquaegermanicae sp. nov

Repositories

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Morphological features (left) and cell structures (right) of strain 117947T grown on GYM medium at 28 °C for 15 days.

S2 Fig. Two-dimensional TLC plate of polar lipids extracted from strain DSM 117947T stained with molybdatophosphoric acid (a), molybdenum blue (b), ninhydrin (c), anisaldehyde (d), Dragendorff (e) reagents.

S1 Table. 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between strain DSM 117947T and its close phylogenetic neighbours.

S2 Table. dDDH and ANI between the genome sequence of strain DSM 117947T and its close phylogenomic relatives.

S3 Table. BGCs associated with terpene biosynthesis of strain DSM 117947T and N. aurantiacus DSM 12652T assessed using AntiSMASH.

S4 Table. Stress envinronmental genes of Nocardioides sp. DSM 117947T.

Acknowledgments

References

Chemotaxonomic properties of strain DSM 117947^T

Growth properties, biochemical, and enzymatic features of strain DSM 117947^T

Potential applications of strain DSM 117947^T

Taxonomic novelty and distinctive genomic features of strain DSM 117947^T

Growth properties, phenotypic, and chemotaxonomic features of strain DSM 117947^T

Potential applications of strain DSM 117947^T

S1 Fig. Morphological features (left) and cell structures (right) of strain 117947^T grown on GYM medium at 28 °C for 15 days.

S2 Fig. Two-dimensional TLC plate of polar lipids extracted from strain DSM 117947^T stained with molybdatophosphoric acid (a), molybdenum blue (b), ninhydrin (c), anisaldehyde (d), Dragendorff (e) reagents.

S1 Table. 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity between strain DSM 117947^T and its close phylogenetic neighbours.

S2 Table. dDDH and ANI between the genome sequence of strain DSM 117947^T and its close phylogenomic relatives.

S3 Table. BGCs associated with terpene biosynthesis of strain DSM 117947^T and N. aurantiacus DSM 12652^T assessed using AntiSMASH.

S4 Table. Stress envinronmental genes of Nocardioides sp. DSM 117947^T.