Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Polarity effects, resistance, and probiotic enhancement of intoxication of Salmonella enterica fraB mutants in murine models

  • Anice Sabag-Daigle,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

  • Erin F. Boulanger,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

  • Maryam Baniasad,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

  • Yongseok Kim,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

  • Madalyn Moore,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

  • Bailyn Hogue,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

  • Andrew Schwieters,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

  • Venkat Gopalan,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

  • Vicki Wysocki,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

  • Brian M. M. Ahmer

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    ahmer.1@osu.edu

    Affiliations Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America, Department of Microbiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

Abstract

FraB is a deglycase in a metabolic pathway that allows Salmonella to utilize fructose-asparagine (F-Asn). Some fraB mutants are sensitive to F-Asn due to the accumulation of 6-phosphofructose-aspartate (6-P-F-Asp), a toxic intermediate in this pathway. We determined that different alleles of fraB cause different amounts of 6-P-F-Asp-mediated toxicity due to effects on the expression of the downstream gene, fraD, a kinase. Mutations in fraD or fraA (a transporter) cause resistance to F-Asn intoxication, and these mutations occur during infection. To better mimic the effect of a hypothetical FraB inhibitor in mouse models, we characterized a non-polar mutant encoding a catalytically inactive FraB (FraB E214A). We also compared a typical mouse chow and a high-fat chow and found that the latter decreases the variation in colonization typically observed during infection of CBA/J mice with Salmonella. Because the high-fat chow lacks F-Asn, the fraB E214A mutant was not attenuated in mice fed this diet unless F-Asn was supplemented. F-Asn supplementation resulted in a 100-fold reduction of colony forming units (CFU) recovered from feces compared to wild-type. Co-infection of Salmonella with a Salmonella “probiotic” strain that is neither virulent nor capable of consuming F-Asn (a SPI1 SPI2 fraR-BDAE ansB mutant) led to a dramatic 10,000-fold reduction in CFU and a 1000-fold reduction in lipocalin-2, a proxy marker of inflammation. This probiotic strain presumably competes for nutrients other than F-Asn, driving the fraB mutant to consume a higher proportion of F-Asn and greater 6-P-F-Asp intoxication. Thus, a putative inhibitor of FraB, when administered with F-Asn and a probiotic, may provide a new therapeutic strategy for treating Salmonella gastroenteritis.

Introduction

Salmonella enterica is one of the top three causes of food-borne infections in the United States and is a leading cause of hospitalization and deaths [1]. Globally, diarrheal disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, especially among children, of which non-typhoidal Salmonella infections from contaminated food and water are a major contributing factor [2,3]. Salmonella enterica subspecies enterica includes many serovars that cause acute gastroenteritis, characterized by fever and diarrhea. Here, we study serovar Typhimurium, which we will refer to as Salmonella. Disease pathology is marked by extensive intestinal inflammation mediated by the two Salmonella pathogenicity islands that encode type three secretion systems, SPI1 and SPI2 [4,5]. Inflammation disrupts the microbiota, eliminating competitors for nutrients and providing alternative electron acceptors for respiration [4,613]. Currently, broad-spectrum antibiotics are used to treat only high risk but not uncomplicated cases, largely because these drugs disrupt the normal microbiota and lead to higher susceptibility to the pathogen and increased shedding of Salmonella over time [1418]. Resistance of microbial pathogens to existing antibiotics is a growing problem that necessitates novel therapeutics. Both the CDC and the WHO have released reports stating that new drugs are needed for the non-typhoidal Salmonella serovars due to increasing fluoroquinolone resistance [19,20].

A gainful strategy for identifying new drug targets is to use one of several parallel screening strategies to identify genes that contribute to bacterial fitness during infection [2123]. An early example of these strategies, called Transposon Site Hybridization (TraSH), revealed that mutations in the previously uncharacterized fra locus of Salmonella are highly attenuated in several mouse models [24]. The fra locus is a horizontal acquisition encoding five genes that encode a transcription factor, a transporter, and three enzymes, all involved in the uptake and catabolism of fructose-asparagine (F-Asn) (Fig 1) [2527]. F-Asn is an Amadori product formed by the non-enzymatic condensation of asparagine and glucose [24,28,29]. F-Asn enters the periplasm of Salmonella where FraE, a fructose-asparaginase, releases ammonia from F-Asn to make fructose-aspartate (F-Asp) [26] (Fig 1B, 1C). AnsB, a periplasmic asparaginase, can also deamidate fructose-asparagine and partially complement a fraE mutant [26]. FraA, a DcuA-family transporter, transports F-Asp into the cytoplasm where it is phosphorylated by FraD forming 6-phosphofructose-aspartate (6-P-F-Asp) [25]. FraB, a deglycase, converts 6-P-F-Asp to glucose-6-phosphate (Glc-6-P) and aspartate [27]. A fraB80::kan mutant accumulates 6-P-F-Asp, displays reduced growth, and has greatly reduced fitness during infection of mice via the oral route [24,30]. This growth inhibition is bacteriostatic as growth resumes upon removal of F-Asn. However, within the murine gastrointestinal tract, F-Asn is bactericidal to the fraB80::kan mutant as the number of bacteria decline over time [30]. The mechanism by which F-Asn inhibits the fraB mutant of Salmonella is unknown. Throughout this report, we refer to the inhibition of the fraB mutant by F-Asn as intoxication.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Fructose-asparagine metabolism in Salmonella enterica.

A) Salmonella genes involved in the metabolism of fructose-asparagine. The sizes of intergenic regions are indicated above the operon depiction. B and C) Proposed pathway for metabolism of F-Asn, including locations of the transporter and catabolic enzymes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339602.g001

F-Asn can be found in a number of human foods and is especially prevalent in dessicated foods such as dried apricots [31]. The concentrations present in these foods are physiologically relevant as the IC50 for F-Asn on a fraB mutant of Salmonella is between 10 and 30 μM ( [30] and this report) while the concentration of F-Asn present in mouse chow is approximately 10-fold higher than this, and the concentration in some human foods is 800-fold higher (dried apricots) [31]. We also determined that the genes of the fra locus likely originated in the Clostridia [32]. Among Gram-negative bacteria, the fra genes are found only within Salmonella, and a few close relatives in the Klebsiella and Citrobacter genera [32]. Mutants lacking fraB, fraD, or fraA are unable to utilize F-Asn as sole carbon source. However, mutants lacking fraD or fraA can grow on other nutrients in the presence of F-Asn (i.e., F-Asn negative) while a fraB mutant cannot (i.e., F-Asn sensitive). This finding suggested that the fraB mutant was somehow intoxicated by F-Asn, and we determined that 6-P-F-Asp (the FraB substrate) indeed accumulates in the fraB mutant and is likely to be the intoxicating compound [30].

Upon ingestion, F-Asn is consumed by specific members of the normal intestinal microbiota, primarily members of the class Clostridia [7,32]. Salmonella-mediated inflammation eliminates these organisms, allowing Salmonella access to the nutrient [7]. Salmonella typically fails to induce inflammation in mice colonized with a healthy microbiota and thus fails to gain access to F-Asn. However, treatment of laboratory mice (e.g., Swiss-Webster) with streptomycin dramatically reduces the population of Clostridia and allows Salmonella to quickly inflame the intestinal tract and gain access to F-Asn [6,7,24,30,33]. The use of antibiotics to disrupt the microbiota is not always essential [3436]; for example, CBA/J mice are unusual in that they allow long term intestinal colonization by Salmonella, which eventually leads to inflammation (at 8–10 days post-infection) in roughly 30% of the mice. Here, we report that switching CBA/J mice to a high-fat chow allows all the mice to become inflamed by Salmonella. Additionally, because the high-fat chow does not include F-Asn, we show that F-Asn supplementation is necessary for a fraB mutant to be attenuated in mice. We determine that different mutant alleles of fraB have very different phenotypes with regard to intoxication by F-Asn in vitro and in mouse models. We also demonstrate that coinfection of a Salmonella fraB mutant with a probiotic strain that cannot utilize F-Asn enhances the mutant’s attenuation and greatly reduces inflammation in the gut. These results collectively suggest that presumptive inhibitors of FraB, when administered with F-Asn and a probiotic, would represent a new therapeutic strategy to treat Salmonella-mediated gastroenteritis.

Materials and methods

Bacterial culture media

All bacterial cultures were maintained in LB broth (Fisher BioReagents) or on agar plates with 1.5% (w/v) agar (Fisher BioReagents). Strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. Antibiotics were added to media for plasmid maintenance or marker selection at the following concentrations: kanamycin (kan, 50 μg/ml), chloramphenicol (cam, 30 μg/ml), ampicillin (amp, 100 μg/ml). Ten mM EGTA was used to stop P22 phage infection. Screening for pseudolysogens after P22 transductions entailed the use of Evans Blue-Uranine (EBU) plates consisting of (per L): 10 g tryptone, 5 g yeast extract, 5 g NaCl, 1.5 g glucose, 1.5% (w/v) agar. After autoclaving, the medium was supplemented with 40 mL of 12.5% (w/v) K2HPO4, 1.25 mL 1% (v/v) Evans Blue solution, and 2.5 mL 1% (w/v) Uranine [37].

Growth assays

For growth studies with minimal medium, we used M9 minimal medium supplemented with 19 mM ammonium chloride as previously described [30]. F-Asn was synthesized as previously described [29]. Growth of bacteria was measured in a 96-well clear, flat bottom plate with M9 minimal medium supplemented with the specified carbon sources at the concentrations stated and inoculated 1:100 with an overnight culture that had been washed twice in sterile water [30]. Growth was measured with hourly absorbance measurements (600 nm) at 37°C for 15 h in a SpectraMax i3X (Molecular Devices) microplate reader and the SoftMax Pro 6.1 software.

Minimum inhibitory concentration

The MIC for each strain was calculated from a growth assay after 15 h incubation at 37°C using three biological replicates with three technical replicates each (nine total data points). IC50 and IC90 values were calculated with Prism (GraphPad).

Mutant construction

Lambda Red mutagenesis was used to construct in-frame deletion mutants of targeted genes in Salmonella as previously described using primers listed in Table 2 [43]. Some mutations were constructed using pKD3 or PKD4 as PCR templates, while others were constructed using pCLF3 or pCLF4 as template [40,43]. Others were taken from the BEI resources collection [40] which were constructed similarly using pCLF3 or pCLF4 as templates, and then through phage P22 transduction moved into 14028, our laboratory’s wild-type strain (see below). Antibiotic cassettes were removed by electroporating with pCP20 which encodes FLP recombinase, as previously described [43].

P22 transductions

Alleles were transduced from one strain to another using phage P22HTint. To accomplish this goal, phage P22HTint was propagated on the donor strain and the resulting phage were used to infect the recipient strain. Transductants were selected on LB supplemented with the appropriate antibiotic and 10 mM EGTA. Colonies were streaked to isolation twice on this same medium. Transductants were then tested for pseudolysogeny and full length LPS by streaking against P22HTint on EBU plates [37].

fraD qRT-PCR

Bacterial strains were grown in LB broth using a roller drum at 37°C overnight. The cultures were then washed twice and resuspended in sterile water. The washed cells (500 μL) were used to inoculate 50 mL of M9 minimal medium supplemented with 5 mM glucose resulting in a 1:100 dilution of cells. These cultures were allowed to grow for 4 h, F-Asn was then added to 1 mM, and growth was continued for 30 min before withdrawing 15-mL aliquots for intracellular 6-P-F-Asp measurements and qRT-PCR. The cells were harvested by centrifuging at 5,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. Pellets were stored at −20°C. From the qRT-PCR aliquots, RNA was extracted using the Purelink RNA Miniprep kit (Invitrogen). Briefly, pellets were thawed on ice and resuspended in freshly made lysis buffer and lysed cells run through the column per the manufacturer’s protocol. After the RNA was eluted from the column in 50 μL RNase-free water, residual DNA contaminants were removed by treatment with one-tenth volume of 10x DNase buffer and 2 U of DNase (Turbo DNA-free kit; Invitrogen) for 30 min at 37°C. At the end of this incubation, 5 μL of DNase inactivation reagent was added to the reaction, incubated for 5 min at room temperature (~23°C) with periodic mixing, and centrifuged at 19,000 x g for 1 min. The supernatant was removed and placed in an RNase-free microcentrifuge tube and stored at −20°C. For reverse transcription (RT), 100 ng of total RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using Superscript VILO (Invitrogen) per the manufacturer’s protocol. For quantitation of fraD expression, 1 μL of cDNA was used in a qPCR reaction using iTaq SYBR Green Supermix (BioRad) with either 300 μM of primers BA3405 and BA3406 (fraD) or BA2745 and BA2746 (rpoB) in the CFX96 Touch Real-time PCR machine (BioRad). Amplification efficiencies for each primer pair were calculated using a 10-fold dilution series standard curve of pooled cDNA from all samples from one of the biological replicates (fraD BA3405 and BA3506 was 91.48%; rpoB BA2745 and BA2746 was 90.42%; see Table 2). The Ct values were analyzed using the Pfaffl method where the rpoB control was used as the internal calibrator and the wild-type fraD expression is the reference condition and fraD expression in all mutant backgrounds is relative to the wild-type [45].

Measurement of 6-P-F-Asp concentration in Salmonella cells

To measure intracellular 6-P-F-Asp, 15-mL samples of cells were collected, pelleted (see qRT-PCR section above), and resuspended in 300 μL of LC grade water. Biological replicates were collected on three separate occasions. Each replicate was split into three aliquots of 100 μL. Two aliquots were used as analytical replicates for each analysis. 6-P-F-Asp was extracted from each 100 μL aliquot (equivalent to 5 mL of cells), by adding 250 μL of chilled LC grade water and 500 μL of chilled methanol (Fisher Optima LC/MS grade, Fisher Scientific) with 20 nmol [13C]-F-Asn added as internal standard. The cell suspension was vortexed for 2 min to facilitate pellet disruption and metabolite extraction. Samples were subjected to ten cycles of ultrasonication (30 s on, 30 s off cycles) using a Bioruptor® Pico (Diagenode). Following cell lysis, samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 15 min at 4°C and the supernatants were transferred to new tubes and dried under vacuum (SpeedVac Concentrator, Thermo Scientific). Before mass spectrometry analysis, these dried pellets were resuspended in 50 μL water:acetonitrile (98:2) with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (LC-MS grade, Thermo Scientific) and filtered using a 0.2-µm PTFE filter (Thermo Scientific). The supernatant of the flow-through fraction was then injected for liquid chromatographic-mass spectrometric analysis.

To construct a standard curve, different amounts of standard 6-P-F-Asp (0, 20, 80, 160, 200, 400 or 600 nmol) were spiked into the extraction solvent and were prepared as described above. Ten μL of each sample (equivalent to 1 mL of cells) was introduced into an Ultimate 3000 Ultra Performance LC (Thermo Scientific) system with an HSS T3, C18 column (Waters, 2.1 μm × 100 mm, 1.8 µm) and coupled into a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Quantiva TQ-S). Mobile phases were A [0.1% (v/v) formic acid (LC-MS grade, Thermo Scientific) in water] and B [0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile]. The separation started with 2% B for 3 min at a flow rate of 100 μL/min and was then followed by a gradient: 3–4 min, 2–10% B; 4–7 min, 10–98% B; 7–7.5 min, 98% B; 7.5–7.6 min, 98–2% B; 7.6–10 min, 2% B. The mass spectrometer was operated in positive ion electrospray ionization mode (ESI+) with a capillary voltage at 4 kV, source temperature 100°C, desolvation temperature 350°C, sheath gas flow 12 L/min and auxiliary gas flow 13 L/min. The gas flow rate for the collision cell was 0.15 mL/min. A multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode was used. While the m/z 376 → 242 transition of 6-P-F-Asp with collision energy 15eV was selected for quantitation, m/z 301 → 283 of [13C]-F-Asn with collision energy 13eV was used for normalization. Skyline (v20.2, MacCoss Lab, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA) was used for calculating the peak area of transition.

Measurement of F-Asn in mouse fecal samples

For sample preparation, 1 mL of the extraction solvent (water/acetonitrile, 80/20) with [13C]-F-Asn was added to the fecal sample for F-Asn extraction. The fecal slurry was lysed by the bath sonication with Bioruptor® (Diagenode, Belgium) followed by centrifugation for protein precipitation. The supernatant was dried and reconstituted in water-acetonitrile-formic acid (98/2/0.1, v/v) before LC-MS/MS analysis. For the standard-curve analysis, different amounts of F-Asn standard compound (5.15, 12.9, 25.8, 51.5, 128.8, 257.7, 515.5, 1288.6 nmol) were spiked into the extraction solvent and were prepared as described above. F-Asn and [13C]-F-Asn were separated using Dionex UltimateTM 3000 RSLC liquid chromatography system (Thermo Scientific, USA) with a C18 column (Kinetex® 1.7 µm C18 100 Å, LC Column 100 x 2.1 mm, Phenomenex Inc, USA). Mobile phases were A [0.1% (v/v) formic acid (LC-MS grade, Thermo Scientific) in water] and B [0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile]. The separation started with 2% B for 3 min at a flow rate of 100 μL/min and was then followed by a gradient: 3–7 min, 2% to 98% B; 7–7.5 min, 98% B; 7.5–10 min, 2% B. Thermo Quantiva triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) was used in a positive-ion mode. Transition conditions, including retention time, precursor ion, product ion, and collision energy, are described in Table 3. Skyline (v20.2, MacCoss Lab, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA) was used for calculating the peak area of transition.

thumbnail
Table 3. Transition conditions for F-ASN and 13C6-F-ASN for LC-MS analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339602.t003

Measurement of F-Asn in mouse chow using mass spectrometry

For sample preparation, the mouse chow was lyophilized and approximately 10 mg was aliquoted into a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube and weighed. Five hundred μL of methanol and 500 uL of water was added as an extraction solvent and the sample was spiked with 1 μL of 2.58 mM [13C]-F-Asn. The sample was vortexed and centrifuged at 14,800 x g for 1 hour. The supernatant was transferred to a clean 1.5 mL tube and allowed to dry. For the standard curve analysis, different amounts of F-Asn standard (ranging from 0.000001 to 1.00 nmol) were spiked into the extraction solvent. After drying, the samples were reconstituted in 50 μL of 80/20 acetonitrile/water with 0.1% (v/v) formic acid (LC − MS grade, Thermo Scientific) and injected for mass spectrometry analysis. F-Asn and [13C]-F-Asn were separated using a Dionex UltimateTM 3000 RSLC liquid chromatography system (Thermo Scientific, USA) with an Acquity UPLC BEH Amide column (1.7 µm, 130 Å, 2.1 mm x 150 mm, Waters Corporation, USA). Mobile phases were A [0.1% (v/v) formic acid (LC-MS grade, Thermo Scientific) in 90/10 water/acetonitrile (v/v)] and B [0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile]. The sample injection volume was 1 μL. Gradient elution was applied at a flow rate of 300 μL/min. The gradient began with 80% B for 6 minutes followed by 6 − 20 min, 80 − 50% B; 20 − 26 min, 50% B; 26 − 28 min, 50 − 80% B; 28 − 35 min, 80% B. A Thermo Quantiva triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) was used in a positive-ion mode. Transition conditions, including retention time, precursor ion, product ion, and collision energy, are described in Table 3. Skyline (v 22 MacCoss Lab, Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States) was used for calculating the peak area of transitions. The detection limit of F-Asn was determined to be 50 nM.

Mouse experiments

For competition experiments, a 1:1 mixture of two different bacterial strains were inoculated intragastrically (i.g.) and then recovered from ceca to determine the competitive index (CI) of the two strains. Streptomycin-treated mice were administered 20 mg of streptomycin 24 h prior to inoculation with Salmonella strains [46]. Streptomycin-treated mice were inoculated with 107 total CFU of Salmonella while mice that were not treated with streptomycin were inoculated with 109 total CFU. CI was determined by plating on media selective for WT (LB cam) and mutant (LB kan). For the competitions with the fraB E214A mutant, which is not marked, CI was determined by screening 52 individual colonies recovered from XLD plates for antibiotic resistance by patching on LB plates containing the appropriate antibiotic, thus the limit of detection on these experiments is less than 100-fold.

For the single-infection Swiss Webster experiments, streptomycin-treated Swiss-Webster mice were inoculated with a single bacterial strain at 107 CFU. Where indicated, 100 μL of 1 M F-Asn was administered intragastrically (i.g.) daily and/or a probiotic strain was administered in a 1:1 mixture with the tested Salmonella strain. Ceca and feces were harvested on day four post-infection. CFU enumeration was determined by plating on media selective for WT (LB cam) and the mutant (LB kan). For the fraB E214A mutant, which is not marked, CFU enumeration was determined by plating on XLD.

For experiments involving the CBA/J mice on a high-fat chow, CBA/J mice were switched to this diet (Bioserv S3282) three days prior to inoculation with a single Salmonella strain, either JLD1214 or ASD4355, at 109 CFU (day 0). Where indicated, the mice were also inoculated with either 109 CFU of ASD203 or E. coli Nissle on day 0, and 100 μL of 1 M F-Asn was administered intragastrically on days 0–3. Salmonella strains JLD1214 and ASD4355 were enumerated from feces or cecum by plating on LB cam while ASD203 was enumerated by plating on LB kan. Lipocalin was measured from feces as previously described [6].

Limiting dilution series

Cecal contents from a 1:1 competition of WT and fraB80::kan mutant were used to calculate the percentage of fraB mutants that had become resistant to F-Asn intoxication in vivo. The cecum of each infected mouse was homogenized and serially diluted. One dilution series was plated on LB kan plates to determine the total number of fraB80::kan mutants present. The other dilution series were performed in 96-well plates in medium selective for fraB80::kan mutants that have become resistant to F-Asn (M9 medium supplemented with 5 mM glucose, 5 mM F-Asn, and 50 μg/ml kanamycin). Each plate was incubated at 37°C overnight. After growth overnight, the lids were removed, and the absorbance was read at 600 nm in the Spectra Max M2 (Molecular Devices). The frequency at which a particular dilution yielded growth was used to determine the percentage of resistant mutants present: percentage mutant = -ln(frequency that growth was not obtained)/total bacteria per well. For example, if 3 of 10 wells had no growth at a dilution where there were 240 bacteria per well, we determined that 0.5% of the fraB80::kan mutants were F-Asn resistant.

Mutation fluctuation tests- To calculate the mutation rate to F-Asn resistance, 94 colonies of fraB80::kan were inoculated into the wells of a 96-well plate containing 1X M9 medium supplemented with 5 mM glucose and 5 mM F-Asn. One well was inoculated with wild-type as a positive growth control and one well was inoculated with wild-type but the growth medium was supplemented with chloramphenicol as a negative control for growth. Three of the wells were immediately titered by serial dilution and drip plated on LB plates to enumerate the starting number of CFU in each well. The plate was lidded and incubated at 37ºC for 16 h. After incubation, three of the wells were titered by serial dilution and drip plated on LB plates to enumerate the total CFU in each well after incubation. Then, the lid was removed and the absorbance was read at 600 nm in a Spectra Max M2 plate reader (Molecular Devices). The mutation rate in events per culture (m) = -ln(# of wells with no growth/total number of wells). This rate was then multiplied by the number of cell divisions per culture to obtain the mutation rate per cell division using the method of Luria and Delbrück [47].

Isolation of transposon mutants resistant to F-Asn

A mutant library was created by transducing a T-POP transposon [Tn10dTet[del25] [48]] into the fraB80::kan mutant background, HMB206. To prepare the lysate, Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain TH3923 was grown overnight in LB at 30°C. The cells were washed and subcultured to OD550 of ~0.4. One mL of 0.5 mg/mL mitomycin C was added to induce phage production, and the cells were allowed to lyse with shaking at 37°C for 4 h. The solution was filter sterilized, transferred to a glass tube, and 100 μL of chloroform was added. The transduction was performed immediately after lysate preparation. A 5-mL culture of HMB206 carrying pNK2880, a plasmid that encodes a Tn10 transposase with relaxed target specificity, was grown in LB with ampicillin at 37°C overnight with shaking. In a sterile flask, 5 mL of the TH3923 lysate was added to 5 mL of the HMB206 + pNK2880 culture, and incubated for 25 min at 37°C. The cells were washed twice in LB with EGTA and resuspended in 50 mL of LB with EGTA for a 60-min outgrowth. At this point, the number of mutants in the culture was determined by titering on LB with tetracycline. Tetracycline was then added to the remainder of the culture and the culture allowed to grow at 37°C overnight after which glycerol stocks were created and stored at −80°C. The library contained 25,000 mutants.

A selection was applied to the library to obtain mutants that could grow in the presence of F-Asn. Ninety-six mutants were obtained using a 96-well format in which 2 μL of library was inoculated into 200 μL of medium and one mutant was isolated from each well after overnight growth at 37 °C. Growth of all mutants in M9 + glucose + F-Asn was confirmed. Inverse PCR was used to amplify the transposon insertion site. Genomic DNA of the mutant was purified using the GenElute bacterial genomic DNA kit (Sigma). The genomic DNA was digested with the restriction enzyme NlaIII (NEB). The reaction was incubated at 37°C for 3 h, and then the enzyme was heat inactivated at 65°C for 20 min. The digested DNA was self-ligated to form circular DNA using T4 DNA ligase at 15°C overnight (NEB). The ligation was purified with a QIAprep® Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen). The DNA was then digested with DraI for 3 hours at 37°C and then the enzyme heat inactivated for 20 min at 65°C (NEB). PCR was performed with primers IPCRF and IPCRR [49]. The PCR product was purified with QIAquick® PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) and submitted for Sanger sequencing to the Plant-Microbe Genomics Facility at the Ohio State University.

Histopathology

Samples of the proximal colon were removed from mice, and a portion was immersion fixed in 10% (v/v) neutral buffered formalin, processed by routine methods, and embedded in paraffin wax by the Comparative Pathology and Mouse Phenotyping Shared Resource (CPMPSR) at the Ohio State University. Sections (4 μm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as previously described [39] and scored in a blinded fashion by a veterinary pathologist, board certified by the American College of Veterinary Pathologists (ACVP).

Animal assurance

All animal work was performed using protocols approved by our Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; OSU 2009A0035) and in accordance with the relevant guidelines set forth in the PHS “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals”.

Results

Alleles of fraB have different phenotypes with regard to F-Asn sensitivity

We previously reported that the growth of a fraB80::kan mutant of Salmonella is inhibited by the presence of F-Asn with an IC50 of 19 μM [30]. Here, we report that the growth of a fraB1::cam mutant of Salmonella is unaffected by the presence of F-Asn (Fig 2). We hypothesize that the fraB1::cam mutation is polar on fraD expression, while the fraB80::kan mutation is not. Since fraD expression is required for synthesis of the toxic metabolite, 6-P-F-Asp, expression of fraD would be required for F-Asn to inhibit the growth of a fraB mutant. Both mutations replace nearly all of fraB, except for ten codons each at the 5’ and 3’ termini. The kan cassette is oriented in the same orientation as fraB, while the cam cassette is oriented in the opposite direction (Fig 2). Although neither cassette has a Rho-independent terminator of transcription, the kan (but not cam) promoter may increase fraD expression above wild-type levels. This possibility prompts the question of how much growth inhibition would be observed if expression of the operon was not altered. This question is relevant to drug discovery efforts, as it is essential to determine if a putative small molecule inhibitor of FraB would inhibit the growth of wild-type Salmonella in the presence of F-Asn [5052]. To address this key question, we utilized multiple strategies.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Different alleles of fraB exhibit different growth phenotypes, altered fraD expression levels, and variable 6-P-F-Asp build-up.

Growth of different fraB mutants in M9 minimal medium containing (A) 5 mM glucose, (B) 5 mM F-Asn, or (C) 5 mM glucose and 1 mM F-Asn. (D) A diagram of the different fraB alleles indicating the antibiotic cassette, and its orientation, used to replace fraB, or the deletion of the antibiotic cassette, or the location of the point mutation E214A (not to scale). The IC50 and IC90 values are listed for all fraB mutants, along with the respective 95% confidence interval. The expression of fraD relative to wild-type, and the concentration of 6-P-F-Asp for each strain are also shown. The fraD expression and 6-P-F-Asp measurements were collected from the same cultures that were grown for 4 h in M9 minimal medium supplemented with 5 mM glucose, at which point F-Asn was added to 1 mM and incubation continued for 30 min. qRT-PCR data were obtained from two biological replicates, each with two technical replicates. 6-P-F-Asp concentrations (expressed as nanomoles per volume cells * the optical density of the culture, or nmol/OD ml) were determined from three biological replicates, each with two technical replicates. “None” indicates that inhibition of growth was not observed at concentrations of F-Asn up to 5 mM. a A 95% confidence interval could not be calculated for this strain, so a 50% confidence interval was used instead. Color gradient from white to red indicates level of growth inhibition observed. E) Graphical representation of the relative fraD expression and 6-P-F-Asp concentration for each strain (data from panel D). Dotted line is the limit of detection line (LOD) at 42 nmol per OD*mL of cells which was measured based on a calibration curve and area under the curve analysis for standard samples. Color gradient from white to red indicates level of growth inhibition observed.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339602.g002

First, we utilized a fraB E214A mutation in the native fra locus [27]. This mutation should have no polar effects on fraD expression. Additionally, the FraB E214A mutant is catalytically inactive, making it a good proxy for a wild-type cell in the presence of a presumptive drug targeting FraB [27,5052]. Second, we constructed a strain in which the cam cassette was inserted in the same orientation as fraB (fraB53::cam). Finally, we also made strains in which the cam and kan cassettes were removed by Flp-mediated recombination (ΔfraB1, ΔfraB53, and ΔfraB80). For each strain, we then measured fraD expression, the accumulation of 6-P-F-Asp, and growth in the presence of F-Asn (Fig 2).

The fraD gene is most highly expressed, 6-P-F-Asp is at its highest concentrations, and growth is the most severely inhibited, in the fraB80::kan and fraB53::cam mutants (Fig 2). In contrast, the lowest expression of fraD, the lowest concentrations of 6-P-F-Asp, and the least growth inhibition are observed with the fraB1::cam, ΔfraB1, and ΔfraB53 mutants. The fraB E214A and the ΔfraB80 mutants had fraD expression similar to wild-type. 6-P-F-Asp accumulation and growth inhibition were also intermediate in these mutants compared to the other strains. Although the IC50 of F-Asn for the E214A mutant is similar to that of the fraB80::kan mutant, the magnitude of the inhibitory effect is lower based on growth in vitro. The expression of fraD in the fraB E214A or ΔfraB mutants is driven by the native fraB promoter, while fraD expression is increased in the fraB80::kan mutant, presumably by the kan promoter. Despite the seemingly strong correlations, not all the results are easily interpreted.

First, similar to the fraB80::kan strain, the fraB53::cam mutant is severely intoxicated by F-Asn and consistently shows high 6-P-F-Asp accumulation but fraD expression is not higher than the wild-type. It is also not clear why the ΔfraB1 and ΔfraB53 mutants fail to accumulate as much 6-P-F-Asp as the ΔfraB80 mutant. It is likely that there are aspects of FraD (post-transcriptional) regulation that remain to be elucidated. Second, the fraB53::cam but not the fraB1::cam mutant is highly intoxicated by F-Asn (Fig 2). The difference in these mutations is the orientation of the cam cassette. There is intoxication by F-Asn only when the cassette is oriented with fraB and not opposite to fraB. When oriented opposite to fra, there is a stop codon created in the fraB gene that is likely polar on fraD (i.e., premature termination of transcription due to uncoupling of translation and transcription); indeed, fraD is not expressed in fraB1::cam (Fig 2). Without FraD, there can be no synthesis of the toxic intermediate, 6-P-F-Asp, explaining the absence of intoxication in fraB1::cam. In the fraB80::kan mutant, the kan cassette is oriented with fraB, and fraD expression is three-fold higher than wild-type, providing an explanation for the enhanced intoxication of this strain by F-Asn (Fig 2).

Competition experiments to determine the fitness of a fraB E214A mutant in mouse models

The intermediate level of growth inhibition observed with the fraB E214A mutant in the presence of F-Asn suggested that this mutant may not be as attenuated in mice as the fraB80::kan mutant. This notion was confirmed in several mouse models using competition experiments in which the wild-type was inoculated with a mutant in a 1:1 ratio (Fig 3). If the mutant is recovered in less than a 1:1 ratio, it is considered less fit than the wild-type. Initial studies were performed in a streptomycin-treated C57BL/6 mouse model. In this model, the fraB E214A mutant has a 4-fold decrease in fitness compared to wild-type, while the fraB80::kan mutant has a 524-fold decrease in fitness (Fig 3A). Similarly, in the streptomycin-treated Swiss Webster mouse model, the fraB E214A mutant is significantly less attenuated than the fraB80::kan mutant (9-fold vs > 10,000-fold, respectively) (Fig 3B).

thumbnail
Fig 3. The Salmonella fraB E214A mutant is attenuated in different murine models.

In each experiment, a 1:1 mixture of two different bacterial strains is inoculated intragastrically (i.g.) and then recovered later from ceca to determine the competitive index (CI) of the two strains. The pairs of strains inoculated are listed on the X-axis. The use of strain JLD1214 (wild-type 14028 marked with a chloramphenicol-resistance cassette in a neutral location [24,30,39,53,54]) is indicated as “WT”. The use of strain HMB206 (fraB80::kan) is indicated as “fraB”. The use of strain ASD1312 (fraB E214A) is indicated as “fraB E214A”. A) Streptomycin-treated C57BL/6 mice inoculated with 107 total CFU and harvested after four days. B) Streptomycin-treated Swiss-Webster mice inoculated with 107 total CFU and harvested after four days. C) CBA/J mice inoculated with 109 total CFU and harvested after either one or ten days. D) Streptomycin-treated CBA/J mice inoculated with 107 total CFU and harvested after four days. Black circles indicate that the CI was determined by plating on media selective for WT (LB cam) or the mutant (LB kan). Open circles indicate that the CI was determined by screening 52 individual colonies recovered from XLD plates for antibiotic resistance by patching on LB plates containing the appropriate antibiotic, thus the limit of detection on these experiments is less than 100-fold. The data were transformed and the mean with standard deviation is shown. Statistical significance of logCI being different than zero was determined using a one sample t-test (two-tailed). Statistical significance of two competitions being different from each other was determined using a student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed). * = P value <0.05, ** = P value <0.005, *** = P value <0.0005, **** = P value <0.00005.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339602.g003

We next chose to test the fraB mutant phenotypes in a CBA/J model. In this model, the gastrointestinal tract slowly becomes inflamed in the presence of Salmonella (8–12 days post-infection) without the need for perturbation of the normal microbiota with antibiotics [34,35]. At 10 days post-infection, the fraB80::kan mutant was significantly attenuated (25-fold) while the fraB E214A mutant was not (Fig 3C). However, the presence of only the wild-type or the mutant in 50% of the mice suggested that the bacterial population was undergoing a population bottleneck. To circumvent this issue, we repeated the experiment but pre-treated the mice with streptomycin. In streptomycin-treated CBA/J mice, both the fraB80::kan and the fraB E214A mutants are equally attenuated one day post-infection (10- and 8-fold, respectively) (Fig 3D). After 10 days post-infection, the fraB80::kan mutant was no longer recovered. Comparison to the number of wild-type recovered indicates that the fraB80::kan mutant is at least 10,000-fold attenuated. The fraB E214A mutant was not recovered either, but since the fraB E214A mutant is not marked with an antibiotic resistance gene, Salmonella was first recovered on XLD plates and then 52 individual colonies from each mouse were patched on LB cam, with growth indicating the strain was wild-type and no growth indicating the strain was a fraB E214A mutant. The limit of detection in this experiment is low, but the fraB E214A mutant was nonetheless not recovered.

The roles of SPI1 SPI2, and ttrA

Salmonella benefits from SPI1 and SPI2, each encoding a type III secretion system, as they provoke an inflammatory response that disrupts the microbiota [10]. The disruption of the microbiota provides access to nutrients including 1,2-propanediol, ethanolamine, glucarate, galactarate, L-lactate, and F-Asn [7,8,31,5557]. Unique access to nutrients is beneficial, but gaining increased energy over the competition (e.g., through respiration of metabolites) is even more advantageous from a pathogen expansion perspective. The oxidative burst that accompanies inflammation leads to the accumulation of tetrathionate, nitrate, and even oxygen, all of which are used as terminal electron acceptors by Salmonella for respiration [56,5860]. The ttrA gene is required for Salmonella to utilize one of these electron acceptors, tetrathionate [59].

In 2014, we tested and believed that we had confirmed the requirement of SPI1 and SPI2 in order for Salmonella to gain access to F-Asn [24]. However, the studies performed here reveal an error in that paper [24]. In our earlier study, we demonstrated that two independently constructed fraB::kan mutants were attenuated in a variety of mouse models that are susceptible to inflammation, and not attenuated in mouse models that are not susceptible to inflammation. Both mutants had fitness restored by complementation with a plasmid encoding the fra island. Those results are correct. However, because SPI1 and SPI2 are required for Salmonella to induce inflammation of the intestine, we then tested the hypothesis that in the absence of SPI1 and SPI2, a fraB mutant would no longer gain access to F-Asn and be intoxicated. Therefore, a competition experiment was performed between a SPI1 SPI2 double mutant and a SPI1 SPI2 fraB triple mutant in germ-free or strep-treated C57BL/6 mice. Both strains were recovered in equivalent numbers indicating that the fraB mutation does not cause attenuation in the SPI1 SPI2 mutant background [24]. Unfortunately, we used a fraB1::cam mutation to construct the SPI1 SPI2 fraB triple mutant because the SPI2 locus had already been disrupted with a kan cassette [24]. Since we now know that the fraB1::cam mutation is not intoxicated by F-Asn, there was no toxicity for the SPI1 and SPI2 mutations to alleviate in the SPI1 SPI2 fraB triple mutant. (Incidentally, the figure in that paper [24] is mislabeled and indicates that it was a fraB::kan mutation in the SPI1 SPI2 strains, although the figure legend correctly states that it was a fraB1::cam mutation.)

We have repeated the experiments here, placing a fraB80::kan mutation into a SPI1 SPI2 background. In competition experiments using CBA/J mice at ten days post-infection, the fraB80::kan mutant was attenuated 25-fold compared to wild-type, while a fraB80::kan SPI1 SPI2 triple mutant was not attenuated compared to a SPI1 SPI2 double mutant (Fig 3C). While this finding would appear to confirm that a fraB mutation does not cause attenuation when present in a SPI1 SPI2 background, it is not an unambiguous result as the SPI1 SPI2 strains appeared to undergo a population bottleneck in these mice, with roughly half of the mice containing only fraB mutant bacteria and half of the mice containing only fraB+ bacteria at the end of the experiment. This bottleneck is likely due to both strains in the competition lacking SPI1 and SPI2 and failing to induce inflammation. When the CBA/J mice were pre-treated with streptomycin, the bottleneck effects were ameliorated and the fraB80::kan mutant was greatly attenuated compared to wild-type (>30,000-fold). Moreover, the fraB80::kan SPI1 SPI2 triple mutant was attenuated, but not as much as the SPI1 SPI2 double mutant (251-fold) (Fig 3D). Thus, it appears that the SPI1 and SPI2 mutations at least in CBA/J mice partially abrogate the fraB80::kan phenotype. Since inflammation eliminates competitors for F-Asn [7], we hypothesize that the SPI1 SPI2 mutants fail to provoke inflammation and leave intact competitors for F-Asn. Therefore, there is less F-Asn is available to intoxicate the fraB mutant. Interestingly, in strep-treated C57BL/6 mice and strep-treated Swiss-Webster mice, the SPI1 and SPI2 mutations did not abrogate the fraB80::kan phenotype at all (Fig 3A, 3B). This outcome is likely attributable to the fact that streptomycin treatment eliminates competitors for F-Asn, thereby allowing the fraB mutant to acquire F-Asn and to be intoxicated by 6-P-F-Asp. Thus, SPI1 and SPI2 are essential for fraB phenotypes in some scenarios but not others presumably because access to F-Asn is being regulated by other factors. These results also emphasize how different mouse models could result in different conclusions as to the essentiality of specific genes for Salmonella pathogenesis.

We also confirmed and extended our previous studies on the dependence of the fraB phenotype on ttrA, a gene required for the utilization of tetrathionate as an electron acceptor (Fig 3) [8,24,61,62]. Confirming our previously published result, the fraB phenotype is dependent on ttrA in a streptomycin-treated C57B/6 mouse model (Fig 3A) [24]. Additionally, we determined that the ttrA1 mutation partially abrogates the attenuation of a fraB80::kan mutant in streptomycin-treated Swiss webster mice (Fig 3B). Interestingly, in a streptomycin-treated CBA/J model, tetrathionate utilization is required for a fraB80::kan phenotype at one day post-infection but not at 10 days post-infection when a fraB80::kan ttrA1 double mutant is just as attenuated as the fraB80 single mutant (Fig 3D). The mechanism by which ttrA affects the intoxication of a fraB mutant by F-Asn is not clear.

Acquisition of resistance of a Salmonella fraB mutant to F-Asn

An important aspect of any therapeutic strategy is to understand the mechanism(s) by which cells can become resistant. To determine the mechanisms by which a Salmonella fraB80::kan mutant may become resistant to F-Asn, we performed a selection for resistant mutants. A library of 25,000 T-POP mutations was created in the Salmonella fraB80::kan strain HMB206. The T-POP transposon is a mTn10 derivative that lacks a transcription terminator at the end of the tetA gene encoding the tetracycline efflux pump [48]. This design allows transcription to proceed into neighboring genes, albeit under the control of tetracycline. Thus, in addition to the disruption of genes, artificial activation can be achieved. Selection was applied to the library by growing the cells in M9 minimal medium containing 5 mM glucose, 5 mM F-Asn, kanamycin and tetracycline. To avoid the characterization of siblings, the library was grown in the wells of a 96-well plate and one mutant was obtained from each well. The insertion site was determined for 96 mutants resistant to F-Asn. Of 96 sequences, nine mapped to fraD, 86 mapped to fraA and one mapped to narU. When the narU mutation was transduced into HMB206 (a clean background), it no longer conferred resistance to F-Asn. This finding indicates narU is not responsible for the F-Asn-resistance phenotype and that there was a second mutation in the original strain (which we did not map). Thus, in this genetic screen, only fraD and fraA conferred resistance to F-Asn. Interestingly, fraE mutations were not isolated, which is consistent with our findings that the ansB gene encodes an asparaginase that can partially compensate for the lack of fraE [26].

We determined the spontaneous mutation rate to F-Asn resistance (no transposons, just natural mutation rate) using a fluctuation test in which 94 separate cultures of a fraB80::kan mutant were grown in the presence of 5 mM F-Asn. The number of cultures that yielded no resistant mutants was used to calculate the mutation rate using the method of Luria and Delbrück [47]. The rate of spontaneous mutation to F-Asn resistance was determined to be 6.5 x 10−8 mutants per cell division. This rate is similar to the rate that Luria and Delbrück obtained when selecting for resistance to T1 phage and is expected as simple knock-outs confer resistance in each system (i.e., tonB or fhuA for T1r, and fraA or fraD for F-Asnr).

When a wild-type (JLD1214) and fraB80::kan mutant (HMB206) are inoculated into CBA/J mice in a 1:1 ratio (109 CFU), the wild-type is recovered in 1000-fold higher numbers than the mutant after 16 days (Fig 4). We were curious as to why fraB80::kan mutants were recovered given the evidence that F-Asn is bactericidal to the fraB80::kan mutant during infection of mice [30]. We hypothesized that the fraB80::kan mutants may be acquiring secondary mutations (presumably in fraA or fraD) that make them resistant to F-Asn. To test this hypothesis, we performed a limiting-dilution experiment on recovered homogenized ceca from ten infected mice to determine the percentage of fraB80::kan mutants that had become resistant to F-Asn. In four of the mice, all of the fraB80::kan mutants recovered had become resistant to F-Asn. In two mice, none of the fraB80::kan mutants recovered had become resistant to F-Asn. Three mice yielded intermediate values in which 0.4%, 0.4% and 50% of the fraB80::kan mutants recovered were resistant to F-Asn. No fraB80::kan mutants were recovered at all from the tenth mouse so a percentage could not be obtained. In conclusion, fraB80::kan mutants often become resistant to F-Asn in this mouse model.

thumbnail
Fig 4. A fraD mutant and a mutant lacking the fra island are slightly attenuated in a CBA/J mouse model.

In each experiment, 6 to 10-week-old CBA/J mice were inoculated intragastrically (i.g.) with a 1:1 mixture of two different bacterial strains (109 total CFU) and then recovered from ceca 15 days later to determine the competitive index (CI) of the mutant. The pairs of bacterial strains inoculated are listed on the X-axis. The wild-type strain is JLD1214 which is 14028 marked with a neutral chloramphenicol resistance cassette. The fraD4::kan strain is HMB184, the fraA4::kan strain is HMB247, the fraRBDAE80::kan is HMB205, and the fraB80::kan strain is HMB206. B) The competitive index data from panel A of fraD4::kan, fraA4::kan and fraRBDAE80::kan combined. The CI was determined by plating on media selective for WT (LB cam) or the mutant (LB kan). The data were transformed and the mean with standard deviation is shown. Statistical significance of a logCI being different than zero was determined using a one sample t-test (two-tailed). Statistical significance of two competitions being different from each other was determined using a student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed). * = P value <0.05, ** = P value <0.005.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339602.g004

Since suppressor mutations that arise in vivo render a fraB80::kan mutant resistant to F-Asn, we tested the hypothesis that these mutants might still be attenuated due to a lack of F-Asn utilization. We have previously tested this idea using a fraD mutant and a fra island mutant (lacking all of fraR-fraBDAE) and found that neither were attenuated in a strep-treated Swiss Webster mouse model [30]. Here, we re-examined this possibility using larger numbers of CBA/J mice. We tested a fraD mutant, fra island mutant, and a fraA mutant. We found that in competition with wild-type (JLD1214), the fraA mutant was 2.6-fold attenuated, the fraD mutant was 14-fold attenuated, and the fra island mutant was 9-fold attenuated (Fig 4). Thus, any suppressor mutant that can no longer utilize F-Asn should be at least slightly attenuated in CBA/J mice over time.

Use of single infections to determine the amount of inflammation caused by a Salmonella fraB mutant

We have typically measured the fitness of fraB mutants during competitive infections with the wild-type given their higher precision compared to single and separate infections of mice with these strains. However, we recognize that the presence of wild-type Salmonella during competitive infections would contribute additively to inflammation and thereby help the fraB mutant gain access to F-Asn [7]. If a fraB mutant were to be used alone, SPI1 and SPI2 in the fraB mutant should induce inflammation thus engendering F-Asn availability but the F-Asn would soon after intoxicate the fraB mutant. If inflammation subsides upon elimination of the fraB mutant, the availability of F-Asn may also decline and promote a revival of the remaining fraB mutant cells. This oscillation triggered by the undulating inflammation and F-Asn prompts the question of whether the need for inflammation (a pre-requisite for F-Asn) be offset by adding exogenous F-Asn. To answer this question, we infected streptomycin-treated Swiss Webster mice with wild-type alone or the fraB E214A mutant alone. Four days later, the ceca were harvested for enumeration of bacteria, the proximal colon was collected for histopathology, and fecal samples were collected for determination of F-Asn concentration. The fraB E214A mutant was recovered 48-fold lower than the wild-type, however, the inflammation induced by the fraB mutant was similar to that induced by the wild-type (Fig 5). Surprisingly, providing exogenous F-Asn did not substantially change the results.

thumbnail
Fig 5. A fraB E214A mutant is attenuated in a single infection streptomycin-treated mouse model.

Streptomycin-treated Swiss Webster mice were infected with the indicated strains. On day 4 post-infection, CFU were enumerated (A, D), F-Asn in feces was measured by LC-MS/MS (B, E), and histopathology scores of proximal colon were determined (C, F). Mock samples are mice that were not inoculated with Salmonella and “strep-only” mice are mice that received only streptomycin-treatment. Some groups were administered 29.4 mg of F-Asn intragastrically (i.g.) daily. For panels A-C the wild-type is JLD1214 which is 14028 marked with a chloramphenicol resistance cassette in a neutral location in the chromosome, and the fraB E214A mutant is ASD1312. For panels D-F the wild-type is JLD1214 and the fraB E214A mutant is ASD4355 which is marked with a chloramphenicol resistance cassette in a neutral location in the chromosome. Where indicated, the probiotic strain ASD203 was inoculated i.g. on day 0 (109 CFU). Panel A shows the results from two separate experiments (5 mice per group in each experiment, 10 mice per group total). The inoculum was 1.3 x 108 and 8.4 x 107 for the wild-type and 9.8 x 107 and 7.2 x 107 for the fraB E214A mutant. The CFU recovered of the wild-type strain was determined by plating on LB cam, while the number of fraB mutant recovered was determined by plating on XLD. Panel D shows the results from two separate experiments (5 mice per group in each experiment, 10 mice per group total). The inoculum was 1.2 x 108 and 5 x 107 for the wild-type and 1.5 x 108 and 2.8 x 107 for the fraB E214A mutant. When probiotic ASD203 is present, CFU of each strain was determined by plating on media selective for WT (LB cam), the mutant (LB cam), or the probiotic (LB kan). Probiotic counts are indicated by the blue squares. The data were transformed and the mean with standard deviation is shown. Statistical significance of two groups being different from each other was determined using an ordinary one-way ANOVA. * = P value <0.05, ** = P value <0.005, *** = P value <0.0005, **** = P value <0.00005.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339602.g005

Probiotics enhance the attenuation of fraB E214A in streptomycin-treated Swiss Webster mice

E. cloacae can enhance the attenuation of a fraB mutant in germ-free mice [24]. Since E. cloacae cannot utilize F-asn [32], we hypothesize that this enhancement is due to E. cloacae competing with Salmonella for a large proportion of the nutrients available, driving Salmonella to consume F-Asn as a higher proportion of its nutrient pool. We decided to re-visit this idea, using what we refer to as our “Salmonella probiotic” strain, ASD203, which lacks SPI1 and SPI2 and therefore cannot induce inflammation [10,39]. Additionally, this strain cannot consume F-Asn due to a deletion of the entire fra island (fraR-fraBDAE). The ansB gene is also deleted as this enzyme is capable of converting F-Asn to F-Asp [26]. The addition of this “probiotic” should provide a competitor to Salmonella for all nutrients except F-Asn, effectively forcing the use of F-Asn as a nutrient. The probiotic strain was added in a 1:1 ratio with either wild-type or fraB E214A mutant Salmonella, in the presence or absence of exogenous F-Asn. The number of fraB mutant bacteria recovered, and the resulting inflammation, were dramatically reduced by the probiotic, regardless of whether additional F-Asn was provided (Fig 5).

A high fat diet eliminates the need for streptomycin pretreatment in a Salmonella gastroenteritis model

Mice are quite resistant to Salmonella-mediated inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract unless the microbiota is first disrupted with streptomycin (or other antibiotics) [6368]. These streptomycin-treated mouse models have been extremely useful for studying Salmonella-mediated inflammation. However, the use of streptomycin is not ideal when the research objective is to study the interaction of Salmonella with an intact or “normal” microbiota. The CBA/J mouse model solves this problem in that Salmonella can persist in these mice and given enough time (8–12 days) begin to cause inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and thrive in this inflamed environment. A disadvantage of the CBA/J model is that only about one third of the mice become “high responders” with a high Salmonella burden and inflammation. The remaining mice tend to have a low Salmonella burden and no inflammation. This heterogeneity leads to high variability. Recent reports [69,70] that a high-fat diet can increase susceptibility of mice to Salmonella-mediated inflammation prompted us to test the hypothesis that the percentage of CBA/J mice that become high responders could be increased by placing them on a high-fat diet. This idea was confirmed when we compared the recovery of Salmonella from orally inoculated CBA/J on normal chow versus high-fat diet. The CFU recovered from the mice on a high-fat diet were much more consistent and all mice were high responders (Fig 6).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Optimization of a diet-enhanced colitis mouse model.

Three different mouse models were compared for recovery of wild-type Salmonella (JLD1214), after oral inoculation, from feces or cecum, as indicated. Swiss-Webster mice treated with streptomycin were orally inoculated with 1 x 107 CFU; CBA/J mice on normal chow were inoculated with 1 x 109 CFU; and CBA/J mice that had been on high-fat diet for ten days were inoculated with 1 x 109 CFU. The data was transformed and the mean with standard deviation is shown. Statistical significance of two groups being different from each other was determined using an ordinary one-way ANOVA. * = P value <0.05, ** = P value <0.005, *** = P value <0.0005, **** = P value <0.00005.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339602.g006

We next performed an experiment in which mice were placed on a high-fat diet and were then infected with either wild-type Salmonella or the fraB E214A mutant (Fig 7A) F-Asn was gavaged on days zero through three post-infection which caused greater than a 100-fold reduction of the fraB mutant. Interestingly, after daily F-Asn gavaging was stopped, the fraB mutant CFU recovered to wild-type levels on day 5. Unlike normal mouse chow, the high-fat chow has no F-Asn (detection limit of 50 nM, see Materials and Methods) accounting for the need for F-Asn supplementation to inhibit the fraB mutant. When combined with F-Asn, the administration of the Salmonella probiotic strain ASD203 had no effect on the wild-type infection but greatly reduced the fraB mutant recovered (greater than 10,000-fold). The effect of ASD203 on the fraB mutant persisted through day six when the experiment was ended, and indeed, enumeration of ASD203 showed that this strain persisted throughout the experiment (Fig 7C). Most importantly, the combination of F-Asn and the probiotic ASD203 greatly reduced the inflammation caused by the fraB mutant (greater than 1000-fold on day 6) (Fig 7B).

thumbnail
Fig 7. A combination of F-Asn and a probiotic can reduce the bacterial burden and inflammation caused by a Salmonella fraB E214A mutant during infection of CBA/J mice on a high fat diet.

Groups of five female CBA/J mice were placed on a high-fat diet, ad libitum, 3 days prior to oral inoculation with either 1 x 109 CFU of wild-type (JLD1214) or a fraB E214A mutant (ASD4355). The inoculation of these Salmonella strains marks day 0 and is indicated on the X-axis. Also on day 0, where indicated, the mice were orally inoculated with 1 x 109 CFU of a probiotic strain, either ASD203 or E. coli Nissle, as indicated below the X-axis. On days 0-3, all mice were orally gavaged with 100 μl of 1 M F-Asn. A) On days 1, 3, and 5 Salmonella were enumerated in feces. On day 6, the mice were sacrificed and Salmonella were enumerated in the cecum. B) From the mice in panel A, the lipocalin concentration in feces was measured on days 0, 2, and 4, and in cecum on day 6. C) From the mice in panel A, the probiotic Salmonella strain ASD203 was enumerated from feces on days 1, 3, and 5, and from the cecum on day 6. The data were transformed and the mean with standard deviation is shown. Statistical significance of two groups being different from each other was determined using an ordinary one-way ANOVA. * = P value <0.05, ** = P value <0.005, *** = P value <0.0005, **** = P value <0.00005.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339602.g007

Since a genetically modified Salmonella strain is less appealing as a probiotic, we tested E. coli Nissle, a commercially available probiotic. Like ASD203, E. coli Nissle cannot cause inflammation, and is unable to utilize F-Asn, and thus should act as a competitor for nearly all nutrients that Salmonella can utilize. E. coli Nissle should therefore drive Salmonella to utilize a higher proportion of F-Asn. This expectation was confirmed when E. coli Nissle, combined with F-Asn, dramatically reduced the number of Salmonella fraB E214A mutant bacteria recovered from mice on day 1, but then had progressively less effect on days 3, 5, and 6 (Fig 7A). It appears that E. coli Nissle did not persist in this experiment, although we did not measure the levels of this probiotic strain since it has no easily selectable antibiotic-resistance marker.

Discussion

The comprehensive study in this report was inspired by one question: is Salmonella FraB a viable drug target? By employing different mouse models on a normal and high-fat chow (± probiotics) and leveraging an integrated workplan encompassing histopathology, mass spectrometry, and molecular biology methods, we provide evidence that FraB is a useful drug target.

The extreme attenuation of Salmonella fraB::kan mutants in different mouse models, and the presence of F-Asn in mouse chow and in some human foods, suggests that FraB merits pursuit as an antibacterial target. However, we also discovered that the degree of F-Asn intoxication varies greatly depending upon the fraB allele and the mouse model tested (Fig 2 and Fig 3). The fraB E214A mutant is our best proxy for a wild-type cell inhibited by a hypothetical FraB inhibitor. In competition experiments, the fraB E214A mutant was attenuated 4-fold in strep-treated C57BL/6 mice (at 4 days post-infection), 9-fold in strep-treated Swiss Webster mice (at 4 days post-infection), 8-fold in strep-treated CBA/J mice at day 1 post-infection and no longer detected at 10 days post-infection (Fig 3). In single infections (in strep-treated Swiss Webster mice at four days post-infection), the fraB E214A mutant was 48-fold attenuated (Fig 5A). If F-Asn, probiotic (ASD203), or both were provided, the fraB E214A mutant was 16-fold, 20-fold, or 630-fold attenuated, respectively; the 630-fold difference is misleading because the wild-type increases in abundance when F-Asn is provided. In these experiments, the fraB mutant was recovered at 6.3 x 105, 5 x 106, 1 x 106, and 3.1 x 105 CFU/g (corresponding to 48-, 16-, 20- and 630-fold attenuation). While not as dramatically attenuated as the fraB80::kan mutants, the fraB E214A mutant is still attenuated. For comparison, the fraB E214A mutant is far more attenuated than a SPI1 SPI2 knockout [see the CFU recovered of the Salmonella quadruple mutant ASD203 (SPI1 SPI2 ΔfraR-BDAE ansB) compared to the CFU recovered of the fraB E214A mutant, Fig 5D]. However, a SPI1 SPI2 mutant does not cause inflammation while the fraB E214A mutant does. Providing F-Asn to the fraB E214A mutant does not reduce the Salmonella burden sufficiently to reduce inflammation. However, the co-administration of strain ASD203 further reduces the number of fraB E214A mutants in the gut. ASD203 is what we refer to as our ‘probiotic’ strain, a Salmonella quadruple mutant (SPI1 SPI2 ΔfraR-BDAE ansB). This strain is unable to elicit inflammation due to the mutations in SPI1 and SPI2 but can compete with the fraB E214A mutant for all nutrients except F-Asn. Thus, the fraB E214A mutant consumes primarily F-Asn and intoxicates itself. The presence of ASD203 reduced the colitis index in the strep-treated Swiss Webster mice infected with the fraB E214A mutant from severe to moderate (Fig 5E).

The use of mice that have been pre-treated with streptomycin consistently allows Salmonella to colonize and provoke inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract and provide an extremely useful model of Salmonella-mediated gastroenteritis [63,64]. However, humans encountering Salmonella have not likely been pre-treated with streptomycin. An alternative experimental approach is to use the CBA/J mouse model [34,35]. This strain of mouse, for unknown reasons, allows persistent colonization of the gut by Salmonella. Roughly 10% to 30% of the mice become high responders (i.e., high Salmonella burden) after six to twelve days and the mice become highly inflamed [6]. These high responders are valuable for studying Salmonella-mediated gastroenteritis, but large numbers of mice need to be used inevitably causing large variation in the data. Other groups have recently published that diets high in fat, or high in amino acids, can enhance Salmonella colonization and virulence [36,6971]. Therefore, we directly compared Salmonella colonization in the cecum and feces of CBA/J mice on normal chow or high fat diet chow, and Swiss-Webster mice on normal chow but pre-treated with streptomycin (Fig 6). As expected, the variation in Salmonella recovered from CBA/J mice on normal chow was quite high, while the numbers recovered from streptomycin-treated Swiss Webster mice were consistent. The high-fat diet did indeed make the number of Salmonella recovered from CBA/J mice much more consistent. This change could be a valuable modification of the CBA/J mouse model for future studies.

When we tested the virulence of the Salmonella fraB E214A mutant in the CBA/J mice on a high-fat diet, we used single infections in which each mouse only gets one strain of Salmonella, either wild-type or mutant (Fig 7). Since the high fat diet lacks F-Asn, we administered 100 μL of 1 M F-Asn each day on days 0–3. We also tested a one-time administration of a ‘probiotic’ strain, either E. coli Nissle, or ASD203, on day 0. The fraB E214A mutant was recovered in 100-fold lower numbers than wild-type on days 1 and 3, but quickly rebounded on day 5, consistent with the lack of F-Asn administration after day 3. The co-administration of the probiotic strain ASD203 reduced Salmonella burden by 100,000-fold and this effect persisted through the end of the experiment at day 6. Inflammation was also greatly reduced, as lipocalin-2 in the feces of mice infected with the fraB E214A mutant and the probiotic ASD203 was decreased by >99% compared to the mice infected with wild-type Salmonella (day 4 and 6, Fig 7). Other commercially available probiotics may be able to substitute for our Salmonella ‘probiotic’ strain in this capacity, and we confirmed this using E. coli Nissle, which reduced inflammation by 96% on day 4 (Fig 7). The probiotics were only administered on day 0 and while ASD203 persisted through day 6, the effects of E. coli Nissle did not persist. It is possible that daily administration of E. coli Nissle would solve this problem.

Resistance to F-Asn arises among fraB mutants during mouse infection, in the form of fraA and fraD mutations. These arise quickly enough to make FraB inhibitors a poor choice for widespread agricultural use. However, the results from mouse models in this report indicate that Salmonella burden and inflammation can be greatly reduced despite the appearance of resistant mutants during the infection. This reduction in Salmonella burden would provide time for the adaptive immune system to clear the infection and for the normal microbiota to recover and restore colonization resistance. Thus, for human use, or very limited agricultural use, it appears that FraB may be an effective therapeutic target, especially when combined with a probiotic strain that can compete with Salmonella for nutrients other than F-Asn.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Edward Behrman and Alex Bogard (Ohio State University) for synthesis of F-Asn. We thank Will Navarre (University of Toronto) for strain TH3923. We are grateful for helpful discussions and input from Kelly Wrighton and her lab members (Colorado State University).

References

  1. 1. Scallan E, Hoekstra RM, Angulo FJ, Tauxe RV, Widdowson M-A, Roy SL, et al. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(1):7–15. pmid:21192848
  2. 2. Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, Panchalingam S, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):209–22. pmid:23680352
  3. 3. Kirk MD, Pires SM, Black RE, Caipo M, Crump JA, Devleesschauwer B, et al. World Health Organization Estimates of the Global and Regional Disease Burden of 22 Foodborne Bacterial, Protozoal, and Viral Diseases, 2010: A Data Synthesis. PLoS Med. 2015;12(12):e1001921. pmid:26633831
  4. 4. Galán JE. Salmonella Typhimurium and inflammation: a pathogen-centric affair. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021;19(11):716–25. pmid:34012042
  5. 5. Fattinger SA, Sellin ME, Hardt W-D. Salmonella effector driven invasion of the gut epithelium: breaking in and setting the house on fire. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2021;64:9–18. pmid:34492596
  6. 6. Borton MA, Sabag-Daigle A, Wu J, Solden LM, O’Banion BS, Daly RA, et al. Chemical and pathogen-induced inflammation disrupt the murine intestinal microbiome. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):47. pmid:28449706
  7. 7. Wu J, Sabag-Daigle A, Borton MA, Kop LFM, Szkoda BE, Deatherage Kaiser BL, et al. Salmonella-Mediated Inflammation Eliminates Competitors for Fructose-Asparagine in the Gut. Infect Immun. 2018;86(5):e00945–17. pmid:29483291
  8. 8. Thiennimitr P, Winter SE, Winter MG, Xavier MN, Tolstikov V, Huseby DL, et al. Intestinal inflammation allows Salmonella to use ethanolamine to compete with the microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(42):17480–5. pmid:21969563
  9. 9. Nuccio S-P, Bäumler AJ. Comparative analysis of Salmonella genomes identifies a metabolic network for escalating growth in the inflamed gut. mBio. 2014;5(2):e00929–14. pmid:24643865
  10. 10. Stecher B, Robbiani R, Walker AW, Westendorf AM, Barthel M, Kremer M, et al. Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium exploits inflammation to compete with the intestinal microbiota. PLoS Biol. 2007;5(10):2177–89. pmid:17760501
  11. 11. Faber F, Bäumler AJ. The impact of intestinal inflammation on the nutritional environment of the gut microbiota. Immunol Lett. 2014;162(2 Pt A):48–53. pmid:24803011
  12. 12. van der Heijden J, Finlay BB. Type III effector-mediated processes in Salmonella infection. Future Microbiol. 2012;7(6):685–703. pmid:22702524
  13. 13. Clare B. Inflammasome activation by Salmonella. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2021;64:27–32. pmid:34563937
  14. 14. Aserkoff B, Bennett JV. Effect of antibiotic therapy in acute salmonellosis on the fecal excretion of salmonellae. N Engl J Med. 1969;281(12):636–40. pmid:4897014
  15. 15. Dolowschiak T, Mueller AA, Pisan LJ, Feigelman R, Felmy B, Sellin ME, et al. IFN-γ Hinders Recovery from Mucosal Inflammation during Antibiotic Therapy for Salmonella Gut Infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20(2):238–49. pmid:27453483
  16. 16. Nelson JD, Kusmiesz H, Jackson LH, Woodman E. Treatment of Salmonella gastroenteritis with ampicillin, amoxicillin, or placebo. Pediatrics. 1980;65(6):1125–30. pmid:7375236
  17. 17. Onwuezobe IA, Oshun PO, Odigwe CC. Antimicrobials for treating symptomatic non-typhoidal Salmonella infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11(11):CD001167. pmid:23152205
  18. 18. Wiström J, Jertborn M, Ekwall E, Norlin K, Söderquist B, Strömberg A, et al. Empiric treatment of acute diarrheal disease with norfloxacin. A randomized, placebo-controlled study. Swedish Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(3):202–8. pmid:1616214
  19. 19. WHO bacterial priority pathogens list, 2024: Bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance. World Health Organization. 2024. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-UCN-GMP-2024.1
  20. 20. Centers for Disease Control. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Centers for Disease Control. 2019.
  21. 21. Wetmore KM, Price MN, Waters RJ, Lamson JS, He J, Hoover CA, et al. Rapid quantification of mutant fitness in diverse bacteria by sequencing randomly bar-coded transposons. mBio. 2015;6(3):e00306–15. pmid:25968644
  22. 22. van Opijnen T, Bodi KL, Camilli A. Tn-seq: high-throughput parallel sequencing for fitness and genetic interaction studies in microorganisms. Nat Methods. 2009;6(10):767–72. pmid:19767758
  23. 23. Gallagher LA, Shendure J, Manoil C. Genome-scale identification of resistance functions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa using Tn-seq. mBio. 2011;2(1):e00315–10. pmid:21253457
  24. 24. Ali MM, Newsom DL, González JF, Sabag-Daigle A, Stahl C, Steidley B, et al. Fructose-asparagine is a primary nutrient during growth of Salmonella in the inflamed intestine. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(6):e1004209. pmid:24967579
  25. 25. Biswas PK, Behrman EJ, Gopalan V. Characterization of a Salmonella sugar kinase essential for the utilization of fructose-asparagine. Biochem Cell Biol. 2017;95(2):304–9. pmid:28177776
  26. 26. Sabag-Daigle A, Sengupta A, Blunk HM, Biswas PK, Cron MC, Bogard AJ, et al. Salmonella FraE, an Asparaginase Homolog, Contributes to Fructose-Asparagine but Not Asparagine Utilization. J Bacteriol. 2017;199(22):e00330–17. pmid:28847920
  27. 27. Sengupta A, Wu J, Seffernick JT, Sabag-Daigle A, Thomsen N, Chen T-H, et al. Integrated Use of Biochemical, Native Mass Spectrometry, Computational, and Genome-Editing Methods to Elucidate the Mechanism of a Salmonella deglycase. J Mol Biol. 2019;431(22):4497–513. pmid:31493410
  28. 28. Mossine VV, Mawhinney TP. 1-Amino-1-deoxy-D-fructose (“fructosamine”) and its derivatives. Adv Carbohydr Chem Biochem. 2010;64:291–402. pmid:20837201
  29. 29. Hansen AL, Behrman EJ. Synthesis of 6-phosphofructose aspartic acid and some related Amadori compounds. Carbohydr Res. 2016;431:1–5. pmid:27258673
  30. 30. Sabag-Daigle A, Blunk HM, Sengupta A, Wu J, Bogard AJ, Ali MM, et al. A metabolic intermediate of the fructose-asparagine utilization pathway inhibits growth of a Salmonella fraB mutant. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28117. pmid:27403719
  31. 31. Wu J, Sabag-Daigle A, Metz TO, Deatherage Kaiser BL, Gopalan V, Behrman EJ, et al. Measurement of Fructose-Asparagine Concentrations in Human and Animal Foods. J Agric Food Chem. 2018;66(1):212–7. pmid:29232127
  32. 32. Sabag-Daigle A, Wu J, Borton MA, Sengupta A, Gopalan V, Wrighton KC, et al. Identification of Bacterial Species That Can Utilize Fructose-Asparagine. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84(5):e01957–17. pmid:29269489
  33. 33. Gillis CC, Hughes ER, Spiga L, Winter MG, Zhu W, Furtado de Carvalho T, et al. Dysbiosis-Associated Change in Host Metabolism Generates Lactate to Support Salmonella Growth. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(1):54–64.e6. pmid:29276172
  34. 34. Lopez CA, Winter SE, Rivera-Chávez F, Xavier MN, Poon V, Nuccio S-P, et al. Phage-mediated acquisition of a type III secreted effector protein boosts growth of salmonella by nitrate respiration. mBio. 2012;3(3):e00143–12. pmid:22691391
  35. 35. Rivera-Chávez F, Winter SE, Lopez CA, Xavier MN, Winter MG, Nuccio S-P, et al. Salmonella uses energy taxis to benefit from intestinal inflammation. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(4):e1003267. pmid:23637594
  36. 36. Shealy NG, Baltagulov M, de Brito C, McGovern A, Castro P, Schrimpe-Rutledge AC, et al. Short-term alterations in dietary amino acids override host genetic susceptibility and reveal mechanisms of Salmonella Typhimurium small intestine colonization. bioRxiv. 2025. pmid:40196486
  37. 37. Maloy SR, Stewart VJ, Taylor RK. Genetic analysis of pathogenic bacteria: a laboratory manual. Plainville, NY. 1996.
  38. 38. Nissle A. Explanations of the significance of colonic dysbacteria & the mechanism of action of E. coli therapy (mutaflor). Medizinische. 1959;4(21):1017–22. pmid:13673841
  39. 39. Sabag-Daigle A, Blunk HM, Gonzalez JF, Steidley BL, Boyaka PN, Ahmer BMM. Use of Attenuated but Metabolically Competent Salmonella as a Probiotic To Prevent or Treat Salmonella Infection. Infect Immun. 2016;84(7):2131–40. pmid:27185789
  40. 40. Porwollik S, Santiviago CA, Cheng P, Long F, Desai P, Fredlund J, et al. Defined single-gene and multi-gene deletion mutant collections in Salmonella enterica sv Typhimurium. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e99820. pmid:25007190
  41. 41. Stojiljkovic I, Bäumler AJ, Heffron F. Ethanolamine utilization in Salmonella typhimurium: nucleotide sequence, protein expression, and mutational analysis of the cchA cchB eutE eutJ eutG eutH gene cluster. J Bacteriol. 1995;177(5):1357–66. pmid:7868611
  42. 42. Teplitski M, Goodier RI, Ahmer BMM. Catabolite repression of the SirA regulatory cascade in Salmonella enterica. Int J Med Microbiol. 2006;296(7):449–66. pmid:16949866
  43. 43. Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97(12):6640–5. pmid:10829079
  44. 44. Cherepanov PP, Wackernagel W. Gene disruption in Escherichia coli: TcR and KmR cassettes with the option of Flp-catalyzed excision of the antibiotic-resistance determinant. Gene. 1995;158(1):9–14. pmid:7789817
  45. 45. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(9):e45. pmid:11328886
  46. 46. Barthel M, Hapfelmeier S, Quintanilla-Martínez L, Kremer M, Rohde M, Hogardt M, et al. Pretreatment of mice with streptomycin provides a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium colitis model that allows analysis of both pathogen and host. Infect Immun. 2003;71(5):2839–58. pmid:12704158
  47. 47. Luria SE, Delbrück M. Mutations of Bacteria from Virus Sensitivity to Virus Resistance. Genetics. 1943;28(6):491–511. pmid:17247100
  48. 48. Rappleye CA, Roth JR. A Tn10 derivative (T-POP) for isolation of insertions with conditional (tetracycline-dependent) phenotypes. J Bacteriol. 1997;179(18):5827–34. pmid:9294441
  49. 49. Sabag-Daigle A, Dyszel JL, Gonzalez JF, Ali MM, Ahmer BMM. Identification of sdiA-regulated genes in a mouse commensal strain of Enterobacter cloacae. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015;5:47. pmid:26075189
  50. 50. Thirugnanasambantham P, Kovvali S, Cool A, Gao Y, Sabag-Daigle A, Boulanger EF, et al. Serendipitous Discovery of a Competitive Inhibitor of FraB, a Salmonella Deglycase and Drug Target. Pathogens. 2022;11(10):1102. pmid:36297159
  51. 51. Sabag-Daigle A, Boulanger EF, Thirugnanasambantham P, Law JD, Bogard AJ, Behrman EJ, et al. Identification of Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the Salmonella FraB Deglycase Using a Live-Cell Assay. Microbiol Spectr. 2023;11(2):e0460622. pmid:36809033
  52. 52. Law JD, Gao Y, Kovvali S, Thirugnanasambantham P, Wysocki VH, Ahmer BMM, et al. Identification of inhibitors of the Salmonella FraB deglycase, a drug target. FEBS Open Bio. 2025;15(5):773–92. pmid:39945759
  53. 53. Dyszel JL, Smith JN, Lucas DE, Soares JA, Swearingen MC, Vross MA, et al. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium can detect acyl homoserine lactone production by Yersinia enterocolitica in mice. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(1):29–37. pmid:19820103
  54. 54. Gunn JS, Ryan SS, Van Velkinburgh JC, Ernst RK, Miller SI. Genetic and functional analysis of a PmrA-PmrB-regulated locus necessary for lipopolysaccharide modification, antimicrobial peptide resistance, and oral virulence of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium. Infect Immun. 2000;68(11):6139–46. pmid:11035717
  55. 55. Faber F, Thiennimitr P, Spiga L, Byndloss MX, Litvak Y, Lawhon S, et al. Respiration of Microbiota-Derived 1,2-propanediol Drives Salmonella Expansion during Colitis. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13(1):e1006129. pmid:28056091
  56. 56. Faber F, Tran L, Byndloss MX, Lopez CA, Velazquez EM, Kerrinnes T, et al. Host-mediated sugar oxidation promotes post-antibiotic pathogen expansion. Nature. 2016;534(7609):697–9. pmid:27309805
  57. 57. Gillis CC, Hughes ER, Spiga L, Winter MG, Zhu W, Furtado de Carvalho T, et al. Dysbiosis-Associated Change in Host Metabolism Generates Lactate to Support Salmonella Growth. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;23(4):570. pmid:29649446
  58. 58. Rivera-Chávez F, Zhang LF, Faber F, Lopez CA, Byndloss MX, Olsan EE, et al. Depletion of Butyrate-Producing Clostridia from the Gut Microbiota Drives an Aerobic Luminal Expansion of Salmonella. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19(4):443–54. pmid:27078066
  59. 59. Winter SE, Thiennimitr P, Winter MG, Butler BP, Huseby DL, Crawford RW, et al. Gut inflammation provides a respiratory electron acceptor for Salmonella. Nature. 2010;467(7314):426–9. pmid:20864996
  60. 60. Winter SE, Winter MG, Xavier MN, Thiennimitr P, Poon V, Keestra AM, et al. Host-derived nitrate boosts growth of E. coli in the inflamed gut. Science. 2013;339(6120):708–11. pmid:23393266
  61. 61. Winter SE, Bäumler AJ. A breathtaking feat: to compete with the gut microbiota, Salmonella drives its host to provide a respiratory electron acceptor. Gut Microbes. 2011;2(1):58–60. pmid:21637020
  62. 62. Leleiwi I, Kokkinias K, Kim Y, Baniasad M, Shaffer M, Sabag-Daigle A, et al. Gut microbiota carbon and sulfur metabolisms support Salmonella infections. ISME J. 2024;18(1):wrae187. pmid:39404095
  63. 63. Bohnhoff M, Drake BL, Miller CP. Effect of streptomycin on susceptibility of intestinal tract to experimental Salmonella infection. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954;86(1):132–7. pmid:13177610
  64. 64. Hapfelmeier S, Hardt W-D. A mouse model for S. typhimurium-induced enterocolitis. Trends Microbiol. 2005;13(10):497–503. pmid:16140013
  65. 65. Stecher B, Macpherson AJ, Hapfelmeier S, Kremer M, Stallmach T, Hardt W-D. Comparison of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium colitis in germfree mice and mice pretreated with streptomycin. Infect Immun. 2005;73(6):3228–41. pmid:15908347
  66. 66. Sekirov I, Tam NM, Jogova M, Robertson ML, Li Y, Lupp C, et al. Antibiotic-induced perturbations of the intestinal microbiota alter host susceptibility to enteric infection. Infect Immun. 2008;76(10):4726–36. pmid:18678663
  67. 67. Woo H, Okamoto S, Guiney D, Gunn JS, Fierer J. A model of Salmonella colitis with features of diarrhea in SLC11A1 wild-type mice. PLoS One. 2008;3(2):e1603. pmid:18270590
  68. 68. Kaiser P, Diard M, Stecher B, Hardt W-D. The streptomycin mouse model for Salmonella diarrhea: functional analysis of the microbiota, the pathogen’s virulence factors, and the host’s mucosal immune response. Immunol Rev. 2012;245(1):56–83. pmid:22168414
  69. 69. Wotzka SY, Kreuzer M, Maier L, Arnoldini M, Nguyen BD, Brachmann AO, et al. Escherichia coli limits Salmonella Typhimurium infections after diet shifts and fat-mediated microbiota perturbation in mice. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4(12):2164–74. pmid:31591555
  70. 70. Kreuzer M, Hardt W-D. How Food Affects Colonization Resistance Against Enteropathogenic Bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2020;74:787–813. pmid:32692613
  71. 71. Yoo W, Zieba JK, Foegeding NJ, Torres TP, Shelton CD, Shealy NG, et al. High-fat diet-induced colonocyte dysfunction escalates microbiota-derived trimethylamine N-oxide. Science. 2021;373(6556):813–8. pmid:34385401