The PLOS One Editors retract this article [1] because it was identified as one of a series of submissions for which we have concerns about compromised peer review.
AN and EL did not agree with the retraction. CJ, CB, LS, GB, and GH either did not respond directly or could not be reached.
Reference
- 1. Netter A, Jauffret C, Brun C, Sabiani L, Blache G, Houvenaeghel G, et al. RETRACTED: Choosing the most appropriate minimally invasive approach to treat gynecologic cancers in the context of an enhanced recovery program: Insights from a comprehensive cancer center. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231793. pmid:32324762
Citation: The PLOS One Editors (2025) Retraction: Choosing the most appropriate minimally invasive approach to treat gynecologic cancers in the context of an enhanced recovery program: Insights from a comprehensive cancer center. PLoS One 20(12): e0338982. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338982
Published: December 18, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 The PLOS One Editors. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.