Figures
Abstract
Marine invasive macroalgae can be detrimental to native ecosystems. The exotic green macroalga Batophora occidentalis was first reported in 2020 in Estany des Peix lagoon in Formentera (Spain). In 2023 and 2024, our surveys revealed that it had spread to 100% of the surveyed locations within the lagoon. In 2024, B. occidentalis, reached an average cover of 30% in Cymodocea nodosa meadows and 26% in Caulerpa prolifera meadows, with respective biomasses of 52 g m ⁻ 2 and 44 g m ⁻ 2, making it the most abundant macrophyte in these two native benthic habitats. We also found exotic B. occidentalis growing epiphytically on the leaves and rhizomes of Posidonia oceanica within the lagoon, with an average cover of 12% in 2023 and 16% in 2024, and a biomass of 3 g m ⁻ 2 in 2024. Notably, it covered nearly 25% of the P. oceanica leaf surface and reached up to five times the weight of individual leaves. Alarmingly, we report the presence of a B. occidentalis specimen on a P. oceanica shoot in a nearby meadow outside the lagoon, signalling a potential spread beyond its current range. Additionally, the exotic macroalgae colonized various natural and hard substrates, including boat hulls, as it was growing on nearly 20% of boats anchored in the only marina in the lagoon. With this study, we aim to encourage prompt action from local and regional governments. We may be witnessing the early stages of a broader expansion of this exotic alga, highlighting a critical moment to implement early management measures such as monitoring, and, where possible, containment within the lagoon.
Citation: Anton A, Paoletti S, Cucala-Garcia L, Morell C, Muñiz-Quintana S (2026) Expansion of the exotic macroalga Batophora occidentalis in Posidonia oceanica meadows and other native benthic habitats. PLoS One 21(7): e0338173. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338173
Editor: Mattias Gaglio, University of Ferrara: Universita degli Studi di Ferrara, ITALY
Received: November 18, 2025; Accepted: June 20, 2026; Published: July 20, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Anton et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The dataset and R code related to this article [38] are available in Zenodo here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19554825.
Funding: Anton A. was supported by Ramon y Cajal grant (number RYC2021-033047-I), funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033 and by the European Union ‘NextGenerationEU/PRTR,’ by the Universitat de les Illes Balears, and by the ‘Pla Anual d’Impuls del Turisme Sostenible per al període 2023’ of the Balearic Government. This research was carried out within the framework of the “Maria de Maeztu Excellence Unit” accreditation of IMEDEA, Grant CEX2021-001198 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. Paoletti S received the support of an INPHINIT fellowship from the “la Caixa” Foundation (ID 100010434). The fellowship code is “LCF/BQ/DI24/12070025”. We thank Balearia for sponsoring the ferry trips from Mallorca to Formentera. The Spanish Ministry of Science, the Universitat de les Illes Balears, and Balearia accept no responsibility for the opinions, statements and contents included in the project and/or the results thereof, which are entirely the responsibility of the authors.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The introduction of species is an increasingly significant environmental challenge, with an estimated 35% rise in the number of emerging exotic species globally by 2050 [1,2]. The Mediterranean Sea, with more than 1,000 reported exotic species [3], is the most invaded marine region in the world [4]. In this region, marine exotics have significant ecological impacts on biodiversity [5] and on native species [6–9], including endemic taxa [6,9,10]. This high rate of introductions is driven by various factors, including the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869, increased shipping activity, and accidental introductions from aquaculture facilities [4]. Among these introductions, marine exotic macrophytes are responsible for some of the largest environmental impacts on native species [11], primarily through negative effects on native primary producers [12]. For example, the invasive macroalgae Lophocladia lallemandii can increase the mortality of seagrass Posidonia oceanica (Linnaeus) Delile, 1813 shoots by 2.5 to 5 times [4]. The Mediterranean Sea is home to an estimated 118 introduced macrophyte species, including macroalgae and seagrasses, with an average of 22 new introductions per decade since 1990 [13]. One such recent introduction is the green macroalga Batophora occidentalis (Harvey), 1998 (Chlorophyta: Dasycladales).
This exotic macroalgae was first detected in the Mediterranean in the spring of 2020 in the Estany des Peix (Formentera, Balearic Islands, Spain) [14], and its distribution was subsequently updated in 2023. The genus Batophora is native to the tropical and subtropical western Atlantic [14]. Outside its native range, it was first reported in the Canary Islands (Spain) between 1990–1992 [15] and later in the Chesapeake Bay (USA) in 2015 [16]. In the Mediterranean, an additional record of the genus comes from the Mar Menor (Murcia, southern Spain) [17]. The two Mediterranean detections of B. occidentalis occurred almost simultaneously: in Formentera in May 2020 and Mar Menor in November 2021, with specimens from both introductions having overlapping morphological traits [14,17]. It has been hypothesized that both populations may originate from the same introduction event [17], with shipping, particularly luxury yachts that overwinter in the Caribbean and travel to the Mediterranean in the summer, proposed as the most likely pathway of introduction to Formentera [14].
The genus Batophora comprises three recognized taxa: Batophora oerstedii, Batophora occidentalis and Batophora occidentalis var. largoensis [18]. These taxa are taxonomically distinguishable based on morphological characteristics, including algal size, the location of the whorls along the main axis, the location and size of the gametophores, and the size and shape of the gametangia [18]. However, there is no definitive scientific consensus on how these traits define the species, which complicates species identification. Terradas-Fernández et al. (2022) identified the Batophora species in Mar Menor as either Batophora occidentalis or Batophora occidentalis var. largoensis based on morphology. Similarly, Hall and Schneider (2023) reported the introduction of Batophora oerstedii in the Chesapeake Bay using morphological traits. At the Estany des Peix (Formentera), the exotic macroalgae was tentatively identified as Batophora occidentalis var. largoensis based on morphological traits; however, the identification was considered inconclusive [14]. Therefore, in this study we refer to the specimens found in Formentera as B. occidentalis.
Here, we describe the extent and ecological characteristics of the B. occidentalis invasion in Estany des Peix, Formentera, 3–4 years after its initial report [14]. Specifically, we: 1) assessed the presence of the exotic macroalgae around the perimeter (and nearby locations outside) of the lagoon during the late summers of 2023 and 2024, 2) documented the presence of B. occidentalis with photographs on various habitats, including natural substrates, artificial structures, and boats, 3) quantified by recording with video cameras the B. occidentalis benthic cover in two locations (a P. oceanica meadow and sandy bottom) inside the lagoon in 2023, and in four locations in 2024 (a meadow of Cymodocea nodosa (Ucria) Ascherson, 1870, a meadow of Caulerpa prolifera (Forsskål) J.V. Lamoroux, 1809, and two P. oceanica meadows located inside and outside the lagoon, respectively), 4) measured the biomass of B. occidentalis growing on the blades of these three macrophyte species and/or in the surrounding sediment within the meadows in 2024, and 5) quantified the presence of the exotic macroalgae attached to the hulls of the boats anchored in the main marina of the lagoon.
Methods
To assess the distribution of B. occidentalis around the perimeter of Estany des Peix lagoon (38.72618, 1.41200; Formentera Island, Spain; Fig 1), visual surveys were conducted on September 27th and 28th 2023 and 2nd – 3rd of October 2024. A total of 12 and 44 study locations were surveyed in 2023 and 2024, respectively. In 2023, eight locations were surveyed inside the lagoon (locations 1–8; Fig 1A), one at the lagoon entrance (location 9; Fig 1A), and three outside the lagoon (locations 10–12; Fig 1A). Within the lagoon, seven sites were located around the perimeter at depths of < 1 meter, while one site (location 3; Fig 1A) was surveyed at approximately 2 meters depth. In 2024, 34 locations were surveyed around the perimeter of the lagoon and 10 outside the lagoon (locations 13–55; Fig 1B), all at depths < 1.5 meters. At each location, approximately a 50-meter stretch was visually inspected to determine the presence of B. occidentalis. Environmental parameters were measured at a subset of sites. In 2023, temperature was recorded at two locations (locations 1, and 2; Fig 1A. In 2024, temperature, salinity, and dissolved oxygen (mg l-1 and %) were measured in three study locations (locations 13–15; Fig 1B) using a ProSolo (YSI Xylem) handheld probe. In 2024, we quantified the number of boats moored in the Estany des Peix marina with the exotic algae growing on their hulls by visually inspecting all vessels from the dock.
Points (1-55) indicate the presence (green) or absence (red) of Batophora occidentalis assessed visually in eight locations inside the lagoon and four locations outside the lagoon in 2023, and 34 locations inside the lagoon and 10 locations outside the lagoon in 2024, where pictures were also taken. In 2023, locations 1 and 2 (red squares) were recorded with tape-transects for % benthic cover. In 2024, locations 13-16 (blue squares) were recorded with tape-transects for % benthic cover and sampled with quadrats for biomass analysis. Map outlines were manually digitized from geographical boundaries of Natural Earth data (www.naturalearthdata.com), redrawn and simplified by the authors. The coordinates of the sample sites were measured in the field using GPS.
We quantified the percent benthic cover of B. occidentalis and the main habitat-forming macrophytes using the point intersect method along transect lines [19–21]. In 2023, we surveyed two study locations (location 1 and 2, Fig 1A) corresponding to a sandy bottom habitat and a P. oceanica meadow. We deployed six and two 10-meter-long transect tapes at each site respectively, and conducted video recordings along each transect using a GoPro Hero 7 camera. Similarly in 2024, we quantified benthic cover at four study locations (location [13–16], Fig 1B) corresponding to three benthic habitats inside the lagoon (P. oceanica, C. nodosa and C. prolifera meadows) and one habitat outside the lagoon (a P. oceanica meadow). At each location, three 10 m transects were deployed and recorded. For each transect, the timestamp was noted, and a video of 98 ± 17 seconds was taken while hovering over the transect at a close distance. In the laboratory, benthic cover was quantified at every 10 cm mark along each transect (n = 100 points per transect). The seafloor was classified in one the following categories: (1) meadow (either C. prolifera, C. nodosa or P. oceanica, depending on the habitat), (2) B. occidentalis on sediments, (3) B. occidentalis growing on leaves or fronds of living macrophytes, (4) dead matte, (5) rock or (6) sand. Based on observations from quadrat samples (see below), the invasive alga was classified as occurring on sediments when it was independently attached to the substrate (category 2), even if in close proximity to other species, or as occurring on blades when attached to macrophyte aboveground structures (category 3). When classified as growing on leaves or fronds (category 3), the point was recorded only once, despite also implying coverage by the underlying meadow, to ensure that total cover summed to 100%. Dead matte represented the substrate formed by the residual rhizomes, roots, and subsurface parts of P. oceanica following the loss of the aboveground canopy. Both sides of the 10 cm mark line were considered to aid classification; however, when underlying cover differed between sides, the left side was used. When the underlying cover changed due to frame perspective or when image quality was reduced by movement or glare, annotations were made only when the mark line was in focus and/or positioned at the centre of the frame. Coverage percentages were calculated as follows:
Total coverage of B. occidentalis was calculated as the sum of its coverage on sediments and on leaves. Total meadow coverage was calculated as the sum of meadow and B. occidentalis on leaves or fronds, as the latter indicates the presence of underlying meadow.
In 2024, macrophyte density and biomass per unit area were assessed using quadrat-based methods [22,23]. Macrophytes within three 10 x 10 cm quadrat were collected at the 1, 5, and 9 m points on each transect of the four study locations (totalling 36 quadrat samples). Samples were collected into zip-lock bags and conserved at −18°C until processing. For each quadrat sample, meadow density was estimated from shoot counts, except for the C. prolifera habitat, where total number of fronds was recorded. Specimens were sorted, and biomass was determined as wet weight and dry weight biomass following standard methods [21,22]. Wet weight was measured after pat drying samples on absorbent paper using a precision balance (resolution 100 µg) and dry weight was determined after oven drying at 60°C for several days until samples appeared completely dry [6,24,25]. Biomass was assessed separately for 1) unimpacted meadow biomass, 2) impacted meadow biomass (i.e., with B. occidentalis on leaves), 3) B. occidentalis biomass attached independently to sediments, and 4) B. occidentalis biomass on blades. The total number of B. occidentalis stalks and the proportion of fertile ones were noted for both above categories (3 and 4). In C. nodosa and P. oceanica habitats, the number of leaves per shoot was also noted [22]. For the P. oceanica habitat, shoots were processed individually. For each invaded leaf, we recoded the position within the shoot (chronologically from the centre, following [23]), total length, and minimum attachment height of B. occidentalis. The way rhizoids attached on the macrophyte tissue (directly on blades, or on epiphytes) was noted. Representative specimens were photographed using an Olympus Tough TG-5 camera, and examined under a stereomicroscope and a ZEISS Axio Zoom V16 digital microscope.
All statistical analysis were done using R. Statistical analyses were mainly performed on data from 2024 as in 2023 data only included coverage of two habitats, one of which (sand habitat) was not surveyed in 2024. Meadow and B. occidentalis coverages in P. oceanica habitat in 2023 and 2024 were compared using a t-test. The differences in mean coverage among biogenic habitats were compared in 2024 with a one-way ANOVA test followed by a post-hoc Tukey HSD test. When ANOVA assumptions (Kozak and Piepho, 2017) were not met, non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test were used instead. The differences in biomass among benthic habitats in 2024 were compared using a linear mixed model (lme() function using package nlme) with transect ID as random effect, followed by a post-hoc Tukey HSD (emmeans() function using package emmeans) [26]. Residual plots were used to check for violations of normality on residuals (Schielzeth et al., 2020). The relationships between continuous variables were explored using linear regression modelling (lm() function using package stats). Surveys were conducted under authorization issued by the Direcció General de Medi Natural i Gestió Forestal, Conselleria d’Agricultura, Pesca i Medi Natural, Govern de les Illes Balears (A04013554).
Results
The average temperature in the lagoon during the surveys was 26.5 in 2023 and 25.1 ºC in 2024. In 2024, mean salinity and dissolved oxygen were 38.9 ppt and 7.6 mg l-1 (or 116% saturation), respectively. B. occidentalis was present in all surveyed locations along the perimeter of the lagoon in 2023 and 2024 at <1 m depth (Fig 1A and B), as well as at the additional site surveyed within the lagoon in 2023 at approximately 2 m depth (location 3; Fig 1A). The species was also observed at the lagoon entrance in rock pools in 2023 (location 9; Fig 2A), but was not detected there during the 2024 surveys (location 16; Fig 1B). No individuals of B. occidentalis were observed at any of the surveyed locations outside the lagoon in either year (locations 10–12 in 2023 and locations 16, 18–23, 54, and 55 in 2024; Fig 1A and B).
(C) growing on meadows of the macroalgae Caulerpa prolifera, (D) proliferating on pebbles and rocky outcrops, (E) growing on the leaves of the seagrass P. oceanica, (F) expanding on the rhizome of sparse areas within P. oceanica meadows, (G) proliferating on meadows of the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa, (H) growing on detrital leaves of P. oceanica, and (G-H) growing on natural hard substrates in sandy areas (e.g., old sea shells; G and H) in the Estany des Peix in the island of Formentera in September 2023 and October 2024. Photo credit: Andrea Anton.
B. occidentalis was observed growing across a variety of natural habitats (Fig 2) including the leaves and rhizomes of healthy seagrass P. oceanica meadows (Fig 2E and F), detrital leaves of P. oceanica (Fig 2H), sediments within C. nodosa meadows (location 5; Fig 2G), as well as rocks and rubble (Fig 2D). It was also found attached to other biogenic hard substrates scattered across sandy bottoms, such as seashells (Fig 2I, and J). The species was likewise common on artificial substrates, including wooden harbour structures (Fig 3A), marine debris (e.g., cans, plastic pieces; Fig 3B), boat anchor chains (Fig 3C), and boat hulls (Fig 3D). Notably, B. occidentalis was recorded on 17.4% (11 out of 63) of the boat hulls anchored in the main marina of the lagoon (38.727519, 1.415702). Additionally, floating clumps of B. occidentalis were observed throughout the lagoon.
Photo credit: Andrea Anton.
Transect-tape surveys conducted in 2023 revealed a widespread distribution of B. occidentalis within the lagoon, both sand and a P. oceanica meadows, with mean coverages of 15.8 ± 7.3% and 17.5 ± 14.8%, respectively (Fig 5A, S2 Table, Table 1 and [38]). In sandy areas (62.8 ± 15.0% sand coverage; location 1; Fig 1A and Table 1), B. occidentalis was mainly attached to detached debris and detrital P. oceanica leaves. Within the P. oceanica meadow inside the lagoon (location 1; Fig 1A), both the P. oceanica coverage and the percentage of leaves containing B. occidentalis in 2023 were similar to that of 2024 (t-test; p = 0.1225 and p = 0.3311; respectively), with 12.0 ± 12.7% in 2023 and 16.3 ± 3.2% in 2024 of the latter (Table 1).
A) Examples of each benthic habitat sampled by video recordings; top left: Caulerpa prolifera habitat (location 13 on Fig 1B), top right: Cymodocea nodosa habitat (location 14 on Fig 1B), bottom left: Posidonia oceanica habitat inside the lagoon (location 15 on Fig 1B), and bottom right: P. oceanica habitat outside the lagoon in the open sea (location 16 on Fig 1B). Barplots of (B) total meadow coverage (%), (C) total B. coverage (%), and (D) coverage (%) of B. occidentalis on leaves, in each benthic habitat in 2024. The results of the one-way ANOVA and of Kruskal-Wallis test are shown, while letters indicate statistically significant differences in the means tested by post-hoc pairwise comparison using Tukey HSD and Dunn’s test, respectively. Black dots indicate raw data in panels B, C and D.
In 2024, tape-transects indicated that total meadow coverage across benthic habitats ranged from 23% to 82%, with C. prolifera covering 23 ± 12.5% of the seafloor, C. nodosa 25 ± 12%, P. oceanica inside the lagoon 71 ± 5.6%, and P. oceanica in the open sea 81.7 ± 6.8% (Fig 4B, Table 1, and [38]). B. occidentalis was present in three out of four locations (Fig 4C), being absent from P. oceanica meadows outside the lagoon. Its coverage reached 25.7 ± 4.7% in C. prolifera habitats, 30.0 ± 3.6% in C. nodosa habitats, and 17.0 ± 2.7% in P. oceanica habitats inside the lagoon, exceeding the coverage of the native habitat-forming species in the first two cases (Fig 4B and Table 1). Post hoc Tukey HSD tests indicated significant differences in total B. occidentalis coverage among habitats, except between C. prolifera and C. nodosa (Fig 4C). In P. oceanica meadows, B. occidentalis was observed exclusively on leaves, with coverage significantly lower than the other habitats (p < 0.0005, one-way ANOVA; Table 1, Fig 4D).
In 2024, B. occidentalis was found in all quadrat samples collected inside the lagoon (location 12–15; Fig 1B) except for one sample within C. nodosa habitat. Outside the lagoon, in the open sea, only a single B. occidentalis stalk was found on one P. oceanica leaf (location 16; Fig 1B and S3 Fig). Total biomass of B. occidentalis irrespective of attachment type, differed between C. nodosa and P. oceanica habitats in the open sea (p = 0.03, Tukey’s test). The biomass of P. oceanica, both inside the lagoon and in the open sea, were significantly higher than that of C. prolifera and C. nodosa inside the lagoon (Tukey’s test, Fig 5A). In C. prolifera and C. nodosa habitats, B. occidentalis was predominantly attached directly to sediments, where it reached higher biomass than the native habitat-forming species (Table 2, Fig 5B). The size of B. occidentalis bundles varied across samples (Table 2), with the largest (in both biomass and number of stalks) observed in C. nodosa habitat (Fig 5C). However, bundles in C. prolifera habitat had a higher proportion of fertile stalks (23.2 ± 15.6%) compared to C. nodosa (15.9 ± 21.4%) and P. oceanica habitats (2.5 ± 5.3%). In P. oceanica habitat within the lagoon, B. occidentalis was almost exclusively attached to seagrass leaves. Its biomass on leaves ranged from 0 to 5.2 g g ⁻ ¹ DW, with a mean of 0.50 ± 0.96 g g ⁻ ¹ DW (Fig 5F). Attachment to other macrophyte species was rare and observed only four times: once on C. nodosa, twice on C. prolifera, and once on a Halimeda tuna specimen found while sampling the C. prolifera location. Due to their rarity, these cases are documented only as photographic evidence in the Supplementary Material (S4 Fig).
In the P. oceanica meadow within the lagoon, B. occidentalis was primarily attached to the oldest (71% of cases) and second oldest (22% of cases) leaves of the shoots (Fig 5D), with a significantly higher biomass on the oldest leaf (p = 0.0002, Tukey’s test) than the subsequent younger leaves. However, in many cases where B. occidentalis occurred on the second oldest leaf, the oldest leaf was broken and shortened, suggesting that it may have previously hosted the alga before losing its tip. B. occidentalis was consistently found at the apex of the leaf, with attachment height significantly correlated with leaf length (Adj-R2 = 0.45, p < 0.0005, linear regression model; Fig 5E).
Closer inspection of colonized P. oceanica leaves revealed that the leaf tips were covered by a dense network of B. occidentalis brown rhizoids from which the vegetative (free of spherical gametophores) and fertile (with spherical gametophores) stalks emerged (Fig 6). The rhizoid system and the stalk bases were observed to attach primarily to epiphytes growing on the leaf surface. Due to the fluffy nature of the stalks, sediment particles were frequently trapped within the bundles. In the sheath of the leaves, fewer and smaller stalks were observed, although the rhizoid network remained relatively extensive wherever epiphytes were present (Fig 6 A to D). The bottom panels of Fig 6 (E-H) highlighted how an array of spot-like green patches not visible to the naked eye seem to be the precursor of new rhizoids and stalks in the lower parts of the leaf.
D) Boxplot distribution of B. occidentalis biomass of Posidonia oceanica leaves inside the lagoon as a function of leaf position in the shoot (left y-axis). The superimposed red points indicate the proportion (%) of leaves with B. occidentalis for each position among the total number of shoots covered with B. occidentalis (right y-axis). E) Relationships between the height of B. occidentalis attachment on the leaf and the total length of the latter. F) Epiphytic load of B. occidentalis on leaves expressed in g DW g-1 DW leaf. Barplots show the results of the linear mixed models with letters indicating statistically significant differences in the means, while the scatterplot shows the results of the linear regression model. Black dots indicate raw data in all panels.
A–D) B. occidentalis consists of a bundle of green stalks and a brown rhizoid system that anchors onto the epiphytes present on P. oceanica leaves, primarily attaching near the top, where most of its biomass is concentrated. Stalks can be distinguished in vegetative ones (without gametophores) and fertile ones (with spherical dark-green gametophores). E) Sedimentation between the stalks occurs due to their fuzzy nature. F-H) Lower along the leaf fewer and smaller stalks are present, but an extensive rhizoid system may help the formation of additional stalks. The formation of new rhizoid and stalks – indicated by red arrows – starts from spot-like green patches. Photo credit: Silvia Paoletti.
Discussion
We detected a widespread presence of B. occidentalis in the Estany des Peix lagoon in both 2023 and 2024, across all studied locations and habitats, including P. oceanica seagrass meadows. Notably, we report for the first time its epiphytic growth on the leaves and rhizomes of P. oceanica (Fig 2E and 2F), where it reached nearly 20% benthic coverage within this endemic habitat. The epiphytic growth of this exotic macroalgae might have detrimental effects on endemic P. oceanica. Most introduced macroalgae in the Mediterranean do not grow epiphytically on the blades of native macrophytes (e.g., seagrasses and macroalgae) but instead spread over sediment or colonize rhizomes in sparse meadows, as observed for Caulerpa racemosa var. cylindracea on P. oceanica meadows [27,28]. An exception is the exotic rhodophyte Lophocladia lallemandii, which also grows epiphytically on P. oceanica leaves and has been shown to increase seagrass mortality by 2.5–5 times compared to non-invaded sites [6].
In Formentera, the exotic B. occidentalis is abundant on P. oceanica leaves, covering nearly 25% of the leaf surface at all canopy levels, from the rhizomes to the blade tips of the seagrass (Fig 2E, 2F, and Fig 6). This extensive coverage may substantially reduce irradiance within the canopy. A comparable effect has been reported for L. lallemandii, which attenuates light within the P. oceanica canopy, thereby limiting seagrass growth and reducing shoot size and internode length [4]. Additionally, the epiphytic growth of B. occidentalis could damage P. oceanica leaves by increasing the epiphytic load. Seagrass leaves with heavy epiphyte loads are known to become more prone to breakage when loads reach 0.8–1.5 g g ⁻ 1 DW, and especially above 1.5 g g ⁻ 1 DW [29]. In Estany des Peix, the epiphytic load of B. occidentalis on P. oceanica leaves ranged from 0 to 5.2 g g ⁻ 1 leaf ⁻ 1 DW, with 27% of leaves exceeding 0.8 g g ⁻ 1 DW and 9% exceeding 1.5 g g ⁻ 1 DW. Field observations indicated that many heavily colonized leaves (Fig 4A and Fig 6A) were bent, folded, or partially torn, likely due to excess weight. Moreover, many detached P. oceanica leaves were found on the lagoon floor, often partially or fully covered by B. occidentalis (Fig 2B and 2H). Whether colonization by B. occidentalis occurred before or after leaf detachment remains to be determined.
The dense growth of B. occidentalis on rhizomes and matte in sparse P. oceanica areas, reaching 16.3% cover in 2024 (Fig 2F), raises concerns for the native seagrass species. For example, the invasive L. lallemandii also colonizes rhizomes and leaves at meadow edges and low-density P. oceanica patches, leading to reduced seagrass shoot size, lower leaf biomass, and reduced percentage of living shoots [27]. Similarly, sparse seagrass beds and meadow edges are negatively affected by the invasive green macroalga C. cylindracea [26]. For both of these invasive species, the ability to attach to and overgrow P. oceanica rhizomes and leaves seems crucial in their invasion process [27,30]. Like C. cylindracea and Caulerpa taxifolia, which use rhizoids to attach to the seagrass tissues [27], B. occidentalis has a holdfast with rhizoids that facilitates attachment to structures [17]. This mechanism, potentially enhanced by the presence of epiphytic communities on P. oceanica leaves, may enable B. occidentalis to establish at the leaf apex and subsequently spread downwards (Fig 6).
Quite alarmingly, we found a stalk of B. occidentalis growing on a leaf of P. oceanica at location outside the lagoon (S4 Fig). Based on our sampling effort, this corresponds to an estimated density of nearly 12 colonized shoots m-2 in the adjacent P. oceanica meadow outside the lagoon. In 2023, B. occidentalis was also found inside three small rock pools at the lagoon entrance. Although Batophora species are eurythermal and euryhaline in its native range and can occupy a variety of habitats [31], their distribution tends to be concentrated in sheltered, low-exposure environments, likely in relation to wave energy [32]. This pattern was consistent with the initial detection of B. occidentalis in Formentera [13]. However, over time, the species may expand to other suitable areas beyond the lagoon. Such spread would pose a significant threat to the P. oceanica meadows of the Pityusic Islands, which are among the most extensive and well-preserved in the Mediterranean and are designated UNESCO World Heritage Site [33,34]. The potential presence of B. occidentalis in other areas around the Pityusic Islands is undetermined, nevertheless fundamental for documenting the ongoing expansion.
Estany of Peix (Formentera) is a sandy-bottom lagoon characterized by extensive accumulations of detrital P. oceanica leaves in the northwestern sector, as well as meadows of C. prolifera and C. nodosa distributed throughout the lagoon and a P. oceanica meadow at the entrance on the lagoon (Dantart et al. 1990). In the southern part of the lagoon (location 5 and 14; Fig 1A and 1B), B. occidentalis was observed growing on the sediment of C. nodosa meadows, where it became the dominant macrophyte in terms of both percentage cover and biomass (S2 Fig, Fig 5A and 5B, Fig 6A and 6B). Previous studies have documented negative ecological effects of exotic macrophytes on C. nodosa canopies. For instance, in Sicily, the exotic seagrass Halophila stipulacea reduced the shoot density of native C. nodosa year-round by forming a dense rhizome mats that outcompete native rhizomes, potentially displacing them down into anoxic sediment layers [35,36]. Similarly, in the Gulf of Naples, invasive C. cylindracea has been shown to impair the photosynthetic performance of C. nodosa through the phytotoxic effects of the secondary metabolite caulerpenyne produced by the invasive macroalga [37]. Although limited, we also observed B. occidentalis growing on C. nodosa leaves (Table 1 and S5 Fig). Given that C. nodosa leaves are smaller than those of P. oceanica (leaf surface of 9 and 83 cm2, respectively; [38]), they are likely less able withstand heavy epiphytic loads of B. occidentalis, potentially leading to increased leaf breakage or detachment. Additionally, C. nodosa has a shorter leaf lifespan (~55 days; [39,40]) than P. oceanica (202–345 days; Hemminga and Duarte 2000), which may limit the time available for B. occidentalis to establish and grow on its leaves. In contrast, in the Mar Menor lagoon in Murcia, Terradas-Fernández et al. (2022) found no B. occidentalis in C. nodosa meadows, suggesting that B. occidentalis may face challenges colonizing dense seagrass canopies. However, our observations in Estany des Peix differ, as B. occidentalis was abundant in C. nodosa meadows, reaching mean cover approximately twice that of the native seagrass (30% vs 15.3%, respectively in 2024; Table 1).
Similarly, B. occidentalis dominated both in percentage cover and biomass within C. prolifera meadows in the eastern part of the lagoon (location 7 and 13; Fig 1A and 1B, S2 Fig, Fig 5A and 5B, Fig 6A and 6B). On two occasions, B. occidentalis was found growing on the rhizome and fronds of C. prolifera; however, in both cases, the host plants appeared to be in poor health condition (S4 Fig). The limited colonization of C. prolifera by B. occidentalis might be explained by several factors. C. prolifera exhibits rapid growth and high regenerative capacity, allowing it to outcompete native seagrasses for space in lagoonal environments [41,42]. Additionally, Caulerpa species produce caulerpenyne, a secondary metabolite that serves as a chemical defence against herbivory [31], further enhancing their competitive advantage for space. The combination of chemical defence, fast growth and a short blade turnover may limit the overgrowth of C. prolifera by the exotic species.
To our knowledge, this study provides the first quantitative record of benthic coverage and abundance of B. occidentalis worldwide. In all surveyed lagoon habitats other than P. oceanica meadows, B. occidentalis was the dominant macrophyte in terms of both benthic coverage and biomass. Its cover exceeded that of native species, reaching values approximately twice those of C. nodosa (30% B. occidentalis vs 15.3% C. nodosa in 2024), and nearly twice those of C. prolifera (25.7% B. occidentalis vs 18% C. prolifera, respectively in 2024), while also being the main macrophyte on bare sand habitats 15.8% B. occidentalis in 2023). At times, the spread of exotic benthic algae can lead to extensive substrate coverage, with cascading effects on biodiversity, native assemblages, and trophic interactions, often resulting in habitat homogenization and ecosystem degradation [7,43]. For example, Caulerpa cylindracea and Womersleyella setacea invaded a range of Mediterranean habitats becoming the main macrophyte species causing habitat impoverishment [43]. In an extreme example, the brown algae Rugulopteryx okamurae has exceeded 85% coverage in parts of the Strait of Gibraltar [44] and reached 100% coverage in areas of the North-western Mediterranean [7]. The high coverage values of B. occidentalis observed at Estany des Peix are therefore concerning, as they suggest potential for this species to dominate benthic substrates over time.
B. occidentalis was also observed growing on several natural hard substrates, including rocks, pebbles, and empty shells of gastropods and bivalves (Fig 2). Similarly, [45] reported its presence across all sediment types, from muddy sand to rocks, along Estany of Peix perimeter, while [17] documented its occurrence throughout the north-eastern margin of Mar Menor, attached to substrates such as pebbles and mollusk shells (e.g., Hexaplex trunculus and Pinna nobilis). In the Chesapeake Bay (USA), introduced Batophora oerstedii has also been reported growing on shells in very shallow water (<20 cm depth) [16]. However, it remains unclear whether B. occidentalis can colonize living hard-shell species such as gastropods or bivalves. If so, this could have negative implications for these organisms, as epibiont fouling is known to impair bivalve functional traits [46]. In addition to natural substrates, B. occidentalis was frequently found on artificial structures in Estany des Peix, including wooden peers (Fig 3), plastic debris, and metallic substrates such as cans, boat anchor chains, and hulls (Fig 3), consistent with observations from other regions [16,17,45]. Notably, B. occidentalis was recorded on growing on almost 20% of the hulls of the boats in the main marina of the lagoon in 2024. This is of particular concern, as small recreational vessels may act as vectors to spread B. occidentalis to other marinas and coastal areas in the Mediterranean. Hull fouling is a primary pathway for the global transport of invasive species [47]. Indeed, [48] found that 71% of recreational vessels boats in the Mediterranean hosted at least one exotic species (up to 11 per vessel) and that many of these boats travelled to distant marinas where such species were not yet present, highlighting their role as vectors for biological invasions.
Some species of exotic macroalgae are easily identified by their morphological attributes. For instance, exotic Codium fragile can be distinguished from the native Codium decorticatum by the presence of apiculate utricle tips visible in cross sections [49]. In the case of B. occidentalis, the species can be distinguished from the native relative Dasycladus vermicularis by features such as the spacing between whorls and the distribution of gametophores in the whorl branchlets [17]. However, these morphological criteria are insufficient to reliably distinguish among species within the genus Batophora. Populations of B. occidentalis in Formentera and Mar Menor have been suggested to belong to the same species, and potentially originate from the same introduction event, due to overlapping morphological traits [17]. Specimens from Formentera were tentatively identified as Batophora occidentalis var. largoensis based on morphological descriptions [14]. However, [16] were unable to confirm species-level or varietal identity due to the limited availability of molecular data for this genus. Further genetic investigation is therefore required to accurately resolve the taxonomy of these populations, which is essential for understanding their ecology and invasion dynamics.
Primary producers are ranked one of the most damaging group of marine exotics based on their quantified ecological impacts, often exerting negative effects on other primary producers [11,12,50]. In this study, we document for the first time the exotic B. occidentalis growing on the leaves and rhizomes of the endangered seagrass P. oceanica meadows, as well as within meadows of C. nodosa and C. prolifera. The most severe impacts of exotic species occur when they replace ecosystem engineers [51]. The endemic seagrass P. oceanica is a key engineering species in the Mediterranean Sea [52], covering an estimated area of 1.2 million hectares [53]. Its meadows provide essential ecosystem services, including habitat provision for marine biodiversity, sediments stabilization, and carbon sequestration, and are recognized as priority habitats under the European Habitats Directive (92/43/CEE). Similarly, meadows of C. nodosa provide relevant ecosystem functions, acting as nursery and feeding grounds, reducing coastal erosion and supporting nutrient cycling and carbon sequestration [54]. Finally, C. prolifera also play a key role, particularly in lagoon systems, by facilitating the sinking and removal of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and enhancing resistance to eutrophication [55]. In the present study, we provide evidence of potential ecological threats posed by B. occidentalis to these important native biogenic habitats.
Four years after its first detection in the Estany des Peix, B. occidentalis is now widely distributed across all benthic habitats within the lagoon, with observations suggesting a potential spread beyond its boundaries. While eradication is often proposed for localized invasions [56], successfull stories in marine ecosystems remain rare (e.g., Spartina alterniflora; [57]). Although B. occidentalis in Formentera is currently confined to this small lagoon (approximately 2 km²), it has achieved extensive coverage, with an average density of 5,400 stalks per square meter. Under these conditions, complete eradication may not be feasible. However, targeted management actions could still be effective. Removal efforts focused on the lagoon entrance may help limit natural spread, while measures addressing human-mediated dispersal are essential. Given the high occurrence of B. occidentalis on boat hulls, periodic and mandatory cleaning of biofouling in vessels operating within Estany des Peix should be considered to reduce the risk of secondary spread. Key ecological information necessary for effective management, such as its reproductive cycle and seasonal growth seasonal patterns, remains unknown and requires further investigation. Nonetheless, we propose two urgent actions. First, we call for intensified research and monitoring efforts on B. occidentalis, particularly in lagoonal systems and marinas across the Balearic Islands for early detection. Second, we urge local and regional governments implement immediate management action by prioritizing the removal of B. occidentalis from boat hulls within the lagoon and targeted removal near the lagoon inlet to prevent further colonization in Formentera and other Mediterranean regions.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Coverage percentage (%) in 2023 for each category for each transect assessed in sand and Posidonia oceanica habitats.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338173.s001
(PDF)
S2 Fig. Coverage percentage (%) in 2024 for each category for each transect and benthic habitat assessed.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338173.s002
(PDF)
S3 Fig. A Batophora occidentalis stalk growing on a leaf of Posidonia oceanica from the quadrant samples collected from the meadows outside the lagoon in the open sea.
Photo credit: Silvia Paoletti.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338173.s003
(PDF)
S4 Fig. Four cases where Batophora occidentalis was found attached on leaves of macrophyte species other than Posidonia oceanica.
A) Specimen found anchored to the stolon of Caulerpa prolifera (indicated with a red arrow); B) specimen found attached to a leaf of Caulerpa prolifera; C) specimen found attached to a leaf of Halimeda tuna within the C. prolifera meadows; and D) specimen found attached to a leaf of Cymodocea nodosa. Photo credit: Silvia Paoletti.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0338173.s004
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
We thank Balearia for sponsoring ferry travel between Mallorca and Formentera. The Spanish Ministry of Science and Balearia bear no responsibility for the opinions, statements or contents of this work, which are solely those of the authors. During the preparation of this work the authors used ChatGPT in order to improve the readability and language of the manuscript. After using this tool/service, the authors reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the published article.
References
- 1. Seebens H. Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050. Global Change Biology. 2020.
- 2. Anton A. How many alien species will there be in 2050?. Global Change Biology. 2021.
- 3. Zenetos A, Tsiamis K, Galanidi M, Carvalho N, Bartilotti C, Canning-Clode J, et al. Status and Trends in the Rate of Introduction of Marine Non-Indigenous Species in European Seas. Diversity. 2022;14(12):1077.
- 4. Roy HE, Pauchard A, Stoett P, Renard Truong T. IPBES Invasive Alien Species Assessment: Full report. Zenodo. 2024.
- 5. Geraldi NR, Anton A, Santana-Garcon J, Bennett S, Marbà N, Lovelock CE, et al. Ecological effects of non-native species in marine ecosystems relate to co-occurring anthropogenic pressures. Glob Chang Biol. 2020;26(3):1248–58. pmid:31758645
- 6. Marbà N, Arthur R, Alcoverro T. Getting turfed: The population and habitat impacts of Lophocladia lallemandii invasions on endemic Posidonia oceanica meadows. Aquatic Botany. 2014;116:76–82.
- 7. Borriglione M, Ruitton S, Boyer F, Thibault D, Blanfuné A, Guillemain D, et al. Impact of the invasive brown alga Rugulopteryx okamurae on the benthic communities in the Northwestern Mediterranean Sea. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2024;310:109010.
- 8. Pizarro-Borrull M, Font E, Marbà N, Anton A. Prominent Grazing Rates and Feeding Preferences of an Abundant Exotic Benthic Herbivore in the Mediterranean Sea. Ecol Evol. 2025;15(7):e71686. pmid:40708789
- 9. Puentes D, Anton A. Incidence of herbivory of the invasive crab Percnon gibbesi on the endemic Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Biol Invasions. 2024;27(1).
- 10. Anton A, Puentes D. A call for further research on the interaction between the invasive crab Percnon gibbesi and the endemic Mediterranean seagrass Posidonia oceanica. Biol Invasions. 2026;28(3).
- 11. Anton A, Geraldi NR, Lovelock CE, Apostolaki ET, Bennett S, Cebrian J, et al. Global ecological impacts of marine exotic species. Nat Ecol Evol. 2019;3(5):787–800. pmid:30962561
- 12. Anton A, Geraldi NR, Lovelock CE, Apostolaki ET, Bennett S, Cebrian J, et al. Reply to: Indiscriminate data aggregation in ecological meta-analysis underestimates impacts of invasive species. Nat Ecol Evol. 2020;4(3):315–7. pmid:32066890
- 13. Wesselmann M, Hendriks IE, Johnson M, Jordà G, Mineur F, Marbà N. Increasing spread rates of tropical non-native macrophytes in the Mediterranean Sea. Glob Chang Biol. 2024;30(4):e17249. pmid:38572713
- 14. Ballesteros E. On the presence of a species of Batophora J. Agardh, 1854 (Chlorophyta: Dasycladales) in Formentera, Balearic Islands. Bolletí de la Societat d’Història Natural de les Balears. 2020;63:109–17.
- 15.
Afonso Carrillo J, Reyes J, Sansón Acedo M. Notes on some interesting marine algae new from the Canary Islands. 1993.
- 16. Hall JD, Schneider CW. The unexpected occurrence of a persistent population of the tropical green alga Batophora oerstedii (Ulvophyceae, Dasycladales) in Maryland waters. Brittonia. 2023.
- 17. Terradas-Fernández M, Valverde-Urrea M, López-Moya F, Fernández-Torquemada Y. On the Presence and Ubiquity of the Exotic Batophora (J. Agardh) in the Mar Menor Lagoon (SE Spain). Water. 2022;14(18):2909.
- 18. Rodriguez-Reyes JCR, Marcano AM, Figueroa G, Velásquez-Boadas AJ, Fernández Y, V EJM. Características morfológicas y reproductivas de tres especies de Batophora (Chlorophyta, Dasycladaceae) de la isla de Margarita, Venezuela. Acta Biologica Venezuelica. 2018;38:71–84.
- 19. Burdick DM, Kendrick GA. Standards for seagrass collection, identification and sample design. Global Seagrass Research Methods. Elsevier. 2001. p. 79–100.
- 20. Anton A, Simpson MS, Vu I. Environmental and biotic correlates to lionfish invasion success in Bahamian coral reefs. PLoS One. 2014;9(9):e106229. pmid:25184250
- 21. Anton A, Randle JL, Garcia FC, Rossbach S, Ellis JI, Weinzierl M, et al. Differential thermal tolerance between algae and corals may trigger the proliferation of algae in coral reefs. Glob Chang Biol. 2020;26(8):4316–27. pmid:32364636
- 22. Duarte CM, Kirkman H. Methods for the measurement of seagrass abundance and depth distribution. Global Seagrass Research Methods. Elsevier. 2001. p. 141–53.
- 23. Larkum AWD, Orth RJ, Duarte C. Seagrasses: Biology, Ecology and Conservation. Springer Netherlands. 2006.
- 24. Antón A, Cebrian J, Heck KL, Duarte CM, Sheehan KL, Miller M-EC, et al. Decoupled effects (positive to negative) of nutrient enrichment on ecosystem services. Ecol Appl. 2011;21(3):991–1009. pmid:21639061
- 25. Anton A, Baldry K, Coker DJ, Duarte CM. Drivers of the low metabolic rates of seagrass meadows in the Red Sea. Frontiers in Marine Science. 2020;7.
- 26.
Lenth RV, Piaskowski J. Emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. 2026.
- 27. Ballesteros E, Cebrian E, Alcoverro T. Mortality of shoots of Posidonia oceanica following meadow invasion by the red alga Lophocladia lallemandii. botm. 2007;50(1):8–13.
- 28. Ceccherelli G, Piazzi L, Cinelli F. Response of the non-indigenous Caulerpa racemosa (Forsskål) J. Agardh to the native seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile: effect of density of shoots and orientation of edges of meadows. J Experiment Marine Biol Ecol. 2000;243(2):227-240.
- 29. Nelson WG. Development of an epiphyte indicator of nutrient enrichment: a critical evaluation of observational and experimental studies. Ecol Indic. 2017;79:207–27. pmid:30220880
- 30. Ceccherelli G, Piazzi L, Cinelli F. Response of the non-indigenous Caulerpa racemosa (Forsskål) J. Agardh to the native seagrass Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile: effect of density of shoots and orientation of edges of meadows. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology. 2000;243(2):227–40.
- 31. Morrison D. Seasonality of Batophora oersted) (Chlorophyta), a tropical macroalga. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1984;14:235–44.
- 32. Nero VL, Sealey KS. Fish–environment associations in the coastal waters of Andros Island, the Bahamas. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 2006;75:223–36.
- 33. Arnaud-Haond S, Duarte CM, Diaz-Almela E, Marbà N, Sintes T, et al. Implications of extreme life span in clonal organisms: millenary clones in meadows of the threatened seagrass posidonia oceanica. PLOS ONE 2012;7(2):e30454.
- 34. del Valle Villalonga L, Pons GX, Bardolet M. Posidonia oceanica Cartography and Evolution of the Balearic Sea (Western Mediterranean). Remote Sensing. 2023;15(24):5748.
- 35. Mannino AM, Balistreri P, Mancuso FP, Bozzeda F, Pinna M. Searching for the competitive ability of the alien seagrass Halophila stipulacea with the autochthonous species Cymodocea nodosa. NB. 2023;83:155–77.
- 36. Mancuso F, Chemello R, Mannino A. The Effects of Non-Indigenous Macrophytes on Native Biodiversity: Case Studies from Sicily. JMSE. 2023;11(7):1389.
- 37. Raniello R, Mollo E, Lorenti M, Gavagnin M, Buia MC. Phytotoxic activity of caulerpenyne from the Mediterranean invasive variety of Caulerpa racemosa: a potential allelochemical. Biol Invasions. 2006;9(4):361–8.
- 38. Duarte C. Allometric scaling of seagrass form and productivity. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1991;77:289–300.
- 39. Perez M, Duarte CM, Romero J, Sand-Jensen K, Alcoverro T. Growth plasticity in Cymodocea nodosa stands: the importance of nutrient supply. Aquatic Botany. 1994;47(3–4):249–64.
- 40.
Hemminga MA, Duarte CM. Seagrass Ecology. Cambridge University Press. 2000.
- 41. Pérez-Ruzafa A, Marcos C, Bernal CM, Quintino V, Freitas R, Rodrigues AM, García-Sánchez M, Pérez-Ruzafa IM. Cymodocea nodosa vs. Caulerpa prolifera: Causes and consequences of a long term history of interaction in macrophyte meadows in the Mar Menor coastal lagoon (Spain, southwestern Mediterranean). 2012;110:101-115.
- 42. Parreira F, Martínez-Crego B, Lourenço Afonso CM, Machado M, Oliveira F, dos Santos Gonçalves JM. Biodiversity consequences of Caulerpa prolifera takeover of a coastal lagoon. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science. 2021;255:107344.
- 43. Piazzi L, Balata D. Invasion of alien macroalgae in different Mediterranean habitats. Biol Invasions. 2008;11(2):193–204.
- 44. García-Gómez JC, Florido M, Olaya-Ponzone L, Rey Díaz de Rada J, Donázar-Aramendía I, Chacón M, et al. Monitoring extreme impacts of Rugulopteryx okamurae (Dictyotales, Ochrophyta) in El Estrecho Natural Park (Biosphere Reserve). Showing radical changes in the underwater seascape. Front Ecol Evol. 2021;9:639161.
- 45.
Forteza V, Castelló M, Ballesteros E. Invasion of Batophora J. Agardh, 1854 (Chlorophyta: Dasycladales) in Formentera, Balearic Islands. 2024.
- 46. Garner YL, Litvaitis MK. Effects of artificial epibionts on byssogenesis, attachment strength, and movement in two size classes of the blue mussel, Mytilus edulis. Invertebrate Biology. 2016;136(1):15–21.
- 47. Costello KE, Lynch SA, McAllen R, O’Riordan RM, Culloty SC. Assessing the potential for invasive species introductions and secondary spread using vessel movements in maritime ports. Mar Pollut Bull. 2022;177:113496. pmid:35272109
- 48. Ulman A, Ferrario J, Forcada A, et al. Alien species spreading via biofouling on recreational vessels in the Mediterranean Sea. J Appl Ecol. 2019;56:2620–9.
- 49. Geraldi NR, Smyth AR, Piehler MF, Peterson CH. Artificial substrates enhance non-native macroalga and N2 production. Biol Invasions. 2013;16(9):1819–31.
- 50. Anton A, Paoletti S, Cucala L, Morell CA, Muñiz-Quintana S. Ecology of the exotic macroalga Batophora occidentalis in Posidonia oceanica meadows and other native benthic habitats. Zenodo. 2026.
- 51. Crooks JA. Characterizing ecosystem‐level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos. 2002;97(2):153–66.
- 52.
Green EP, Short FT. World Atlas of Seagrasses. Berkeley: University of California Press. 2003.
- 53. Telesca L, Belluscio A, Criscoli A, Ardizzone G, Apostolaki ET, Fraschetti S, et al. Seagrass meadows (Posidonia oceanica) distribution and trajectories of change. Sci Rep. 2015;5:12505. pmid:26216526
- 54. Da Ros Z, Corinaldesi C, Dell’Anno A, Gambi C, Torsani F, Danovaro R. Restoration of Cymodocea nodosa seagrass meadows: efficiency and ecological implications. Restoration Ecology. 2021;29:e13313.
- 55. Bernardeau-Esteller J, Sandoval-Gil JM, Belando MD, Ramos-Segura A, García-Muñoz R, Marín-Guirao L, et al. The Role of Cymodocea nodosa and Caulerpa prolifera Meadows as Nitrogen Sinks in Temperate Coastal Lagoons. Diversity. 2023;15(2):172.
- 56. Thresher RE, Kuris AM. Options for Managing Invasive Marine Species. Biological Invasions. 2004;6(3):295–300.
- 57. Kerr DW, Hogle IB, Ort BS, Thornton WJ. A review of 15 years of Spartina management in the San Francisco Estuary. Biol Invasions. 2016;18(8):2247–66.