Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Podocyte injury damages podocytes in chimeric organoids

  • Tomohiro Udagawa,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Department of Physiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan, Department of Pediatrics and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Science Tokyo, Japan

  • Toshikazu Araoka,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Visualization

    Affiliation Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Kenji Osafune,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

  • Taiji Matsusaka

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    taijim@tokai.ac.jp

    Affiliation Department of Physiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan

Abstract

We have previously shown that injury to a subset of podocytes can trigger indirect damage in neighboring podocytes, but whether this phenomenon depends on direct intercellular interaction is unknown. To address this, kidney organoids were generated from nephron progenitor cells of two mouse lines: one expressing a receptor for a podocyte-specific immunotoxin and another expressing a tagged ribosomal protein. In chimeric organoids containing a mosaic of these podocyte types, immunotoxin exposure selectively injured the targeted podocytes and also induced indirect injury in adjacent, non-targeted podocytes. This was evidenced by reduced podocin staining and decreased expression of podocyte-specific genes in the non-targeted podocytes. The indirect injury was absent when organoids of each type were cultured separately but in close proximity, indicating that direct cell-to-cell contact within the same glomerular structure is required. These findings show that podocyte injury can propagate locally within kidney organoids, independent of glomerular filtration or other glomerular cell types, and suggest that local podocyte interactions may contribute to the progression of chronic kidney disease.

Introduction

Podocyte injury is a critical initiating event in the development and progression of glomerulosclerosis [14]. In our previous study, we developed a transgenic mouse model in which podocytes express human CD25 (hCD25), allowing selective injury by the hCD25-targeted immunotoxin LMB2 [5]. In hCD25-expressing podocytes, LMB2 inhibits protein synthesis and induces apoptotic caspase activation [6]. Podocytes with activated caspase are immediately detached by filtration pressure before completing the full apoptosis process. The inhibition of protein synthesis, also seen in conditions like endoplasmic reticulum stress, is a key driver of human kidney disease progression [79].

Notably, a single injection of LMB2 results in progressive kidney injury over several weeks. This progression occurs despite the rapid clearance of the toxin and the elimination of caspase-activated podocytes within seven days. Similar progression has been observed in other models of podocyte injury [10]. In human and animal models, segmental sclerosis lesions are typically localized to a few regions per glomerulus despite widespread injurious stimuli. This local nature suggests that podocyte injury spreads locally and autonomously within the glomerulus [11,12].

To investigate this, we previously generated chimeric and mosaic mouse models in which only a subset of podocytes expresses hCD25 [13,14]. As expected, hCD25(+) podocytes were selectively injured following LMB2 injection. Surprisingly, adjacent hCD25-negative podocytes -which cannot bind LMB2- were also affected. These cells showed reduced nephrin and podocin and increased desmin expression. Ultimately, this led to global glomerulosclerosis. These findings indicate that injured podocytes can indirectly harm healthy neighboring podocytes in a self-amplifying cycle [12]. A similar indirect injury has been observed in other in vivo models [15,16]. However, this phenomenon could not be reproduced in vitro using traditional podocyte culture systems [14].

In conventional 2D cultures, podocytes rapidly lose expression of key differentiation markers such as nephrin and podocin. By contrast, kidney organoids generated from pluripotent stem cells or nephron progenitor cells (NPCs) contain more physiologically relevant, differentiated podocytes. To overcome the limitations of 2D culture, we utilized the culture-dependent purification (CDP) method developed by Li and Araoka [17]. This method allows for the purification and expansion of mouse NPCs, which differentiate into organoids containing physiologically relevant, glomerulus-like structures. Following brief stimulation with Wnt and FGF signals, progenitor cell aggregates differentiate into kidney organoids containing podocytes in glomerulus-like structures and tubular cells in tubular structures.

In the present study, NPCs were isolated from NEP25 mice and from mice lacking hCD25 to generate chimeric kidney organoids. Using this new in vitro system, we successfully isolated direct podocyte-podocyte communication from confounding in vivo factors, such as filtration pressure and other types of cells. We demonstrate for the first time in vitro that podocyte injury propagation is an autonomous, self-sustaining process driven by direct podocyte-to-podocyte interactions.

Materials and Methods

Mice

All animal experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Experimentation Committee of Tokai University School of Medicine and were conducted and reported in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the U.S. National Institutes of Health and the ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org).

Three transgenic mouse lines were used in this study, namely, NEP25 (carrying Nphs1-hCD25), Nephrin-Cre (Nphs1-Cre), and Ribotag (Rpl22tm1.1Psam). NEP25 [5] and Nephrin-Cre [18,19] lines were established in our laboratory and maintained in the C57BL/6N genetic background. Ribotag line (IMSR_JAX:011029) was obtained from the Jackson Laboratory and maintained by crossing the Nephrin-Cre line [18]. NEP25 mice expressed hCD25 selectively in podocytes, enabling the induction of selective podocyte injury by the administration of the hCD25-targeted immunotoxin, LMB2 (a gift of Ira Pastan) [5]. Nephrin-Cre/Ribotag mice expressed the ribosomal protein L22 (Rpl22) tagged with a hemagglutinin (HA) epitope specifically in podocytes [18]. To generate NPC lines, mice carrying the combinations of Nphs1-hCD25 (0 or 1 copy), Nphs1-Cre (0 or 1 copy), and Rpl22tm1.1Psam (2 copies) were inter-crossed, and embryos were harvested at embryonic day 12.5. The primers used for genotyping are listed in Table A in S1 Table.

Organoid Culture

NPC lines were established using the CDP method with modifications [6,17]. In brief, the kidneys were isolated from each embryo, and 1 × 10⁴ cells were seeded in NPSR medium on laminin-coated 12-well plates. The FGF-2 and 2-mercaptoethanol concentrations were increased to 300 ng/mL and 0.1 mM, respectively.

Simultaneously, the presence of Nphs1-Cre and Nphs1-hCD25 transgenes was determined by real-time PCR analysis of genomic DNA from embryonic tail biopsies. Cells derived from embryos carrying Nphs1-hCD25 or Nphs1-Cre were selected for further purification. After 4 days of culture, floating cell aggregates were collected, dissociated, and re-cultured in 96-well U-bottom low-attachment plates with NPSR medium. Aggregates were passaged every 4 days. Cell lines that are capable of sustained proliferation formed spherical aggregates over 10 passages. The cells from passages 4–16 were used for organoid generation.

For differentiation, aggregates with a diameter of ~1 mm were transferred to Transwell membranes and cultured in KR5-CF medium containing 4.5 μM CHIR99021 and 300 ng/mL FGF-2 for 2 days and then in KR5 medium alone. LMB2 (20 nM) was added on day 6, and the culture was continued for 2–4 days. Then, the organoids were subjected to histological and polysome analyses. In selected experiments, organoids were co-treated with 100 μM carbenoxolone disodium (CBX, gap junction inhibitor), 1 μM SAR7334 (TRPC6 inhibitor), 1 μM A83-01 (TGF-β receptor inhibitor), or 2 μM IKK-16 (NF-κB inhibitor) alongside LMB2.

Histological analysis

Organoids were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 2 μm for PAS staining and immunohistochemistry. Some organoids were fixed, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, and stained with fluorescent markers for WT1 and Lotus tetragonolobus lectin (LTL). The details of the primary antibodies and lectins are provided in Table B in S1 Table. In addition, CanGet signal amplification solutions (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) were used to detect HA, WT1, podocalyxin, and podocin.

Brightfield images were acquired using an Axioplan 2 microscope (Zeiss), and immunofluorescent images were obtained using a BZ-X710 microscope (Keyence).

For the experiments with LMB2 treatment, podocin and HA staining in the adjacent sections were photographed and quantified using Fiji software. The integrated intensity of podocin was normalized to either the HA-positive area or the total organoid area for each organoid.

RNA Analysis

Approximately 14–16 organoids were harvested after treatment with TrypLE containing cycloheximide (100 μg/mL). Then, the samples were homogenized in 220 μL of lysis buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 100 mM KCl, 12 mM MgCl2, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM DTT, 200 U/mL RNasin, 1 mg/mL heparin, 100 μg/mL cycloheximide, and 1% protease inhibitor cocktail) and vortexed for 1 min. After centrifugation (10,000 rpm, 10 min, 4°C), HA-tagged ribosomes were immunoprecipitated (IP) using an anti-HA.11 antibody (clone 16B12) (S7 Fig) as previously described [18]. Briefly, 2.5 μg of anti-HA.11 epitope tag antibody was added to the supernatant, and the sample was rotated for 4 hours at 4°C. 100 μL of Dynabeads Protein G (Thermo Fisher) was then added to the samples, and they were rotated overnight at 4°C. On the following day, the samples were placed on a magnet on ice, and the supernatant was separated. The remaining pellet was washed 3 times for 10 minutes in a high-salt buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, 300 mM KCl, 12 mM MgCl2, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM DTT, 100 μg/mL cycloheximide). RNA was extracted from IP polysomes using the RNeasy Micro Kit (QIAGEN), and RNA was extracted from unbound fractions using the RNeasy Mini Kit (QIAGEN). The columns of the RNeasy Micro Kit were eluted with 40 μL of water, and ethanol precipitated. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the ΔΔCT method, with Actb as the internal control. The primer and probe information is shown in Tables C and D in S1 Table.

Statistical analysis

Log-transformed RNA ratios (IP polysomes vs. the supernatant, and IP with LMB2 vs. IP without LMB2) were analyzed by one-sample t-tests, with comparison to log (1) = 0. Holm’s method was used to adjust the p-values. Relative hCD25 mRNA levels were compared using unpaired t-tests. All statistical analyses were performed using EZR version 4.5.0, and p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data were logarithmically transformed to satisfy the assumption of normality for the one-sample t-test. The robustness of the statistical significance was confirmed by alternative transformation methods (square-root or reciprocal) where appropriate.

AI tools

ChatGPT-4 was used to check and correct grammatical errors in the manuscript.

Results

Generation of Kidney Organoids from NEP25 and Ribotag Mice

Using the CDP method, NPCs were obtained from three types of transgenic embryos, namely, (1) NEP25 (carrying Nphs1-hCD25), (2) Ribotag (Nphs1-Cre), and (3) NEP25/Ribotag (Nphs1-hCD25/Nphs1-Cre). The NPC aggregates were cultured on Transwell membranes and exposed to CHIR99021 and FGF-2 to initiate differentiation. Although these organoids did not fully recapitulate the kidney’s architecture because of the absence of endothelial, interstitial, and ureteric bud-derived cells, they developed glomerulus-like and tubular structures. Immunostaining confirmed the presence of differentiated podocytes and proximal tubular cells, as evidenced by the expression of WT1, nephrin, podocalyxin, podocin, and LTL (Fig 1 and Fig 2). In addition, NEP25/Ribotag organoids co-expressed hCD25 and HA in podocytes, mirroring the parental transgenic mice.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Characterization of kidney organoids derived from NEP25/RiboTag mice.

Kidney organoids were generated from NEP25/Ribotag nephron progenitor cells. (a–f) Glomerulus-like clusters visualized by PAS staining (a) and immunostaining for podocyte markers: nephrin (b), HA (c), hCD25 (d), WT1 (e), and podocalyxin-1 (f). (g) Tubular structures identified by LTL staining. Images (a–g) represent equivalent visual fields from serial sections.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Selective podocyte injury induced by LMB2 in NEP25/RiboTag organoids.

(a, b) Expression of WT1 and LTL in control organoids. (h, i) Effects of LMB2 treatment (4 days); WT1 expression is markedly reduced, while LTL remains unaffected. (c–g, j–n) Higher magnification of podocyte clusters in control (c–g) and LMB2-treated (j–n) organoids stained for nephrin, WT1, HA, and podocin. LMB2 treatment causes the loss of cluster morphology and podocyte marker expression, whereas LTL-positive proximal tubule structures remain unaffected, demonstrating the cell-type specificity of the immunotoxin. Panels (c–f) and (j–m) show equivalent visual fields from serial sections. Quantification of podocin staining intensity is provided in Table S2A in S2 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.g002

LMB2-induced Selective Podocyte Injury in NEP25 Organoids

Treatment of NEP25 and NEP25/Ribotag organoids with LMB2 resulted in podocyte-specific injury. Fluorescent imaging revealed reduced WT1 staining and preserved LTL staining 4 days after treatment (Fig. 2). During the 4-day treatment, the medium was changed, which washed away cell debris. In NEP25/Ribotag organoids, PAS and immunostaining showed the loss of podocyte clusters, with only scattered HA-positive cells between tubular structures. The expression level of WT1, nephrin, and podocin was markedly reduced, while megalin and LTL signals persisted (Fig. S1). Two days after the treatment, residual HA-positive clusters remained WT1 positive, but they showed decreased nephrin and podocin staining (S2 Fig).

HA immunoprecipitation enabled the isolation of podocyte-specific polysomes in NEP25/Ribotag organoids. In untreated organoids, Nphs1, Nphs2, Wt1, and hCD25 mRNAs were enriched in IP samples, whereas Lrp2 (megalin) was diluted (Fig 3). LMB2-treated organoids showed undetectable Nphs2, reduced Nphs1 and Wt1 expression levels, and increased injury-related transcript expression, including Cxcl1, Gadd45b, Egr1, and P2rx7, which is consistent with injured podocyte profiles in NEP25 mice [18](Fig 3b). Of note, suppression of Nphs1 and Nphs2 mRNAs was more pronounced after 4-day LMB2 treatment than 2-day treatment, suggesting a time-dependent accumulation of the indirect injury signal.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Quantitative RNA analysis of podocyte injury in organoids.

(a) Enrichment of podocyte-specific polysomal RNA (IP) relative to total organoid RNA (SUP) in NEP25/RiboTag organoids (n = 6). (b) Fold-change in polysomal RNA expression following LMB2 treatment in NEP25/RiboTag organoids (n = 6). (c) Comparison of hCD25 mRNA abundance in IP samples between chimeric (n = 13) and NEP25/RiboTag (n = 6) organoids. (d) Expression changes in polysomal RNA specifically from hCD25(−) podocytes within chimeric organoids after LMB2 treatment. Nphs2 was undetectable in all LMB2-treated samples, and not shown in the graph. Bars represent geometric means. Statistical significance was determined by one-sample t-test (a, b, d) or unpaired t-test (c); *p < 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.g003

Podocyte injury propagates in chimeric organoids

Chimeric organoids were generated by combining NEP25 and Ribotag NPCs at a 1:1 ratio to assess the potential intercellular propagation of podocyte injury. Podocytes in these organoids expressed either hCD25 or HA but not both (Fig 4). Two days after the LMB2 treatment, the expression of hCD25 was lost, but HA staining persisted. Despite the survival of HA-positive podocytes, podocin staining was nearly absent (Fig 5).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Validation of chimeric kidney organoids.

Immunostaining for hCD25 and HA in (a, b) NEP25 organoids, (c, d) RiboTag organoids, and (e, f) chimeric organoids. (g) High-magnification image of a chimeric cluster showing mutually exclusive expression of hCD25 (brown) and HA (gray), confirming successful mosaicism of different podocyte genotypes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.g004

thumbnail
Fig 5. Propagation of podocyte injury (bystander effect) in chimeric organoids.

(a–c) Robust expression of hCD25, HA, and podocin in untreated control chimeric organoids. (d–f) Chimeric organoids after LMB2 treatment. Note the complete loss of hCD25(+) podocytes (d) and the indirect reduction of podocin staining (f) in the persisting HA(+) podocytes (e), visually demonstrating the propagation of injury to non-targeted neighboring cells within the same glomerular-like structure. Panels (a–c) and (d–f) represent equivalent fields of serial sections. Quantified data for podocin intensity are shown in Table S2B in S2 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.g005

By contrast, the coculture of separate NEP25 and Ribotag organoids on the same Transwell showed that podocin loss occurred only in NEP25 organoids (S3 Fig), indicating that the indirect effect requires close cell-cell contact.

In chimeric organoids, HA-immunoprecipitated RNA represents transcripts from hCD25-negative (LMB2-unexposed) podocytes. The mRNA levels of hCD25 were significantly lower in chimeric IP samples than in NEP25/Ribotag organoids (Fig 3c). Following LMB2 treatment, these indirectly affected podocytes displayed reduced Nphs1, Nphs2, and Wt1 expression levels and increased Gadd45b expression level, which is consistent with indirectly injured podocyte profiles in chimeric mice [13](Fig 3d). Because it is frequently reported that gap junctions mediate bystander killing in other tissues by transferring cytotoxic molecules, we hypothesized that intercellular signaling through gap junctions might mediate the indirect injury. RT-PCR revealed a high expression level of Gja3 (Cx46), Gja5 (Cx40), and Gjc1 (Cx45) but a low expression level of Gja1 (Cx43) in the podocytes of mosaic mice and organoids (S5 Fig). Treatment with CBX, which is a gap junction inhibitor, failed to prevent the loss of podocin in chimeric organoids (Fig. 6). Additional treatments with SAR7334 (TRPC6 inhibitor), A83-01 (TGF-β inhibitor), or IKK-16 (NF-κB inhibitor) also failed to block the injury (S4 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Effect of gap junction inhibition on indirect podocyte injury.

Chimeric organoids were treated with LMB2 alone (a, b) or co-treated with the gap junction inhibitor carbenoxolone (CBX) (c, d). (a, c) HA staining confirms the presence of bystander podocytes. (b, d) CBX treatment fails to rescue the loss of podocin expression induced by LMB2, suggesting gap junctions are not the primary mediators of this injury propagation. (a–b) and (c–d) show equivalent visual fields from serial sections. Data quantification is provided in Table S2C in S2 Table.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.g006

Discussion

We hypothesized that indirect podocyte injury occurs in kidney organoids. In chimeric organoids containing both immunotoxin-sensitive and -resistant podocytes, we found that primary injury to a subset of podocytes led to indirect damage in neighbors. We confirmed this through podocin staining and quantitative polysome analysis (14–16 organoids per data point). These findings indicate that podocyte injury can propagate independently of glomerular filtration or interaction with other glomerular cell types.

Indirect injury, which is also referred to as bystander killing, is well recognized in nervous tissue damage models [20]. However, our initial attempt to recapitulate this effect in conventionally cultured podocytes was unsuccessful. Factors unique to the in vivo environment, such as the physical forces of glomerular filtration, macromolecular leakage into the Bowman’s space, or interactions with other types of glomerular cells, may contribute to the propagation of podocyte injury. Previous ultrastructural analysis of NEP25 mice revealed that glomerular filtration triggers the detachment of podocyte clusters from the glomerular basement membrane. This detachment was preceded by the expansion of the subpodocyte space, forming pseudocysts [21]. These findings indicate that initially uninjured podocytes adjacent to damaged ones may also be lifted and detached by the pseudocyst. Such hemodynamic forces may contribute to indirect podocyte damage because glomerular filtration exacerbates podocyte injury [22].

Although the involvement of these in vivo factors cannot be excluded, this study showed that indirect podocyte injury can occur independently of glomerular filtration. Our findings also indicate that other glomerular cell types, namely endothelial and mesangial cells, are not necessary for this process. Within two days after LMB2 treatment, podocin staining disappeared in hCD25-negative podocytes of chimeric organoids, but not in hCD25-negative organoids co-cultured with hCD25-positive organoids. These observations indicate that direct cell-cell communication mediates the indirect podocyte injury. Such communication may be mediated via the interaction of membrane proteins, paracrine factors, extracellular vesicles, gap junctions, or tunneling nanotubes (TNTs) [23].

Gap junctions facilitate the intercellular transfer of small molecules, including ions and reactive oxygen species. Notably, they also transport 2’ 3’-cGAMP, the second messenger for the STING pathway [23,24]. Connexins (Cxs) are gap junction proteins that facilitate intercellular organelle transfer and contribute to TNT formation [24,25]. Many studies have implicated the role of Cxs in bystander killing in radiation-induced and ischemic brain injury models [20,23,26]. Injured podocytes have been reported to express Cx43 and Cx45 [27,28], and our previous microarray analyses revealed that mouse podocytes express Gja3 (encoding Cx46) and Gja5 (Cx40) [18]. Our quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed that Gja3 was abundantly expressed at baseline and downregulated following LMB2 treatment in the podocytes of mosaic mice and organoids. The expression of Gja1 (Cx43) was minimal; however, low levels of Gja5 and Gjc1 (Cx45) were detected after injury in the podocytes of mosaic mice (S5 Fig). To test their role in our model, we treated chimeric organoids with the inhibitor carbenoxolone [20]. Unlike previous findings in neural tissue, carbenoxolone did not prevent podocin loss in indirectly injured podocytes. While these pharmacological results suggest that gap junctions may not be the primary mediators of indirect injury in this model, further genetic validation would be required to definitively exclude their contribution.

TNTs represent another direct way of intercellular communication. These membranous structures can bridge distant cells and transfer a wide range of cargos, from ions to organelles [29]. Barutta et al. reported that podocytes express M-Sec (Tnfaip2), which is a key regulator of TNT formation [30,31]. In vitro, Adriamycin-exposed podocytes formed TNTs in a Tnfaip2-dependent manner. Furthermore, Tnfaip2-knockout mice with a BALB/c background spontaneously developed FSGS with associated mitochondrial dysfunction. In C57BL/6 mice, Tnfaip2 deficiency caused no baseline renal abnormalities. However, it exaggerated podocyte injury, lysosomal alterations, and impaired autophagy following streptozotocin-induced diabetes [32]. These findings indicated that TNTs may play a protective role by transferring organelles from healthy to injured podocytes. However, given their bidirectional nature, TNTs could mediate injury propagation. In our current model, LMB2 directly injured approximately 50% of podocytes in chimeric organoids. Under such conditions, it is conceivable that injury signals may be transmitted from hCD25-positive to hCD25-negative podocytes via TNTs. RT-PCR analysis revealed that Tnfaip2 mRNA was expressed in the podocytes of mosaic mice and organoids. LMB2 downregulated the expression level of Tnfaip2 in hCD25-positive podocytes from NEP25/Ribotag organoids but not in those from mosaic mice (S6 Fig). Direct assessment of TNT involvement remains an objective for future studies.

Despite the remarkable results, this study has limitations. First, the molecular mechanism underlying the indirect injury could not be elucidated. It should be noted that our results using specific inhibitors, such as CBX for gap junction blockade, only partially rule out these signaling pathways. As these experiments do not constitute a comprehensive mechanistic screen, further studies are required to fully elucidate the underlying pathways. Second, the direct injury caused by LMB2 may not generally represent podocyte injury in actual kidney diseases. Third, our organoids are generated exclusively from nephron progenitor cells, thereby lacking components derived from interstitial progenitors and ureteric buds. Consequently, the tissue architecture of these organoids differs from that of the in vivo counterpart. While the absence of endothelial and mesangial cells allowed us to isolate and prove that they are not required for injury propagation, in native glomerular diseases, these cell types likely modulate the autonomous podocyte pathways described here.

Our findings indicate that podocytes directly injured by LMB2 can induce indirect damage to neighboring, initially intact podocytes within chimeric organoids. Importantly, this propagation occurs even in the absence of glomerular filtration or other glomerular cell types. Therefore, direct cell-cell communication plays a central role in the intraglomerular spread of injury. Further investigation is necessary to identify the molecular mechanism underlying this indirect podocyte injury in the chimeric organoid and mosaic mouse models. Such mechanisms may also contribute to injury amplification in various glomerular diseases, forming a vicious cycle that leads to global glomerulosclerosis.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Tubular markers in NEP25/Ribotag organoids.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.s002

(PDF)

S2 Fig. NEP25/Ribotag organoids treated with LMB2 treatment for 2 days.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.s003

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Podocyte injury does not propagate between organoids.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.s004

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Effects of inhibitors on indirect podocin suppression in chimeric organoids.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.s005

(PDF)

S5 Fig. Connexin mRNA expression in mosaic mice and organoids.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.s006

(PDF)

S6 Fig. Tnfaip2 mRNA expression in mosaic mice and organoids.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.s007

(PDF)

S7 Fig. Schema showing polysome analysis of organoids.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.s008

(PDF)

S2 Table. Quantification of podocin staining.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337677.s009

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Shiho Kuroiwa, Chie Sakurai, and the Support Center for Medical Research and Education of Tokai University for their excellent technical assistance and Yukiko Tanaka for administrative assistance. We are grateful to former Professor Iekuni Ichikawa (retired) for establishing the foundation of this research. We also thank Dr. Ira Pastan for his years of collaboration and for providing LMB2. Parts of this study were presented in abstract form at the annual meeting of the American Society of Nephrology in 2019 and 2021.

References

  1. 1. Altintas MM, Agarwal S, Sudhini Y, Zhu K, Wei C, Reiser J. Pathogenesis of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and related disorders. Annu Rev Pathol. 2025;20: 329–53.
  2. 2. Kopp JB, Anders HJ, Susztak K, Podestà MA, Remuzzi G, Hildebrandt F, et al. Podocytopathies. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2020;6.
  3. 3. Zhong J, Whitman JB, Yang H-C, Fogo AB. Mechanisms of scarring in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. J Histochem Cytochem. 2019;67(9):623–32. pmid:31116068
  4. 4. D’agati VD, Kaskel FJ, Falk RJ. Medical progress focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011.
  5. 5. Matsusaka T, Xin J, Niwa S, Kobayashi K, Akatsuka A, Hashizume H, et al. Genetic engineering of glomerular sclerosis in the mouse via control of onset and severity of podocyte-specific injury. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(4):1013–23. pmid:15758046
  6. 6. Yamamoto K, Okabe M, Tanaka K, Yokoo T, Pastan I, Araoka T, et al. Podocytes are lost from glomeruli before completing apoptosis. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2022;323(5):F515–26. pmid:36049065
  7. 7. Park S-J, Kim Y, Chen YM. Endoplasmic reticulum stress and monogenic kidney diseases in precision nephrology. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019;34(9):1493–500. pmid:30099615
  8. 8. Hu Y, Qi C, Shi J, Tan W, Adiljan Abdurusul, Zhao Z, et al. Podocyte-specific deletion of ubiquitin carboxyl-terminal hydrolase L1 causes podocyte injury by inducing endoplasmic reticulum stress. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2023;80(4):106. pmid:36952018
  9. 9. Yang C, Zhang Z, Liu J, Chen P, Li J, Shu H, et al. Research progress on multiple cell death pathways of podocytes in diabetic kidney disease. Mol Med. 2023;29(1).
  10. 10. Fukuda A, Wickman LT, Venkatareddy MP, Sato Y, Chowdhury MA, Wang SQ, et al. Angiotensin II-dependent persistent podocyte loss from destabilized glomeruli causes progression of end stage kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2012;81(1):40–55. pmid:21937979
  11. 11. Kriz W. Podocyte is the major culprit accounting for the progression of chronic renal disease. Microsc Res Tech. 2002;57(4):189–95. pmid:12012382
  12. 12. Ichikawa I, Ma J, Motojima M, Matsusaka T. Podocyte damage damages podocytes: autonomous vicious cycle that drives local spread of glomerular sclerosis. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2005;14(3):205–10. pmid:15821411
  13. 13. Okabe M, Yamamoto K, Miyazaki Y, Motojima M, Ohtsuka M, Pastan I, et al. Indirect podocyte injury manifested in a partial podocytectomy mouse model. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2021;320(5):F922–33. pmid:33719575
  14. 14. Matsusaka T, Sandgren E, Shintani A, Kon V, Pastan I, Fogo AB, et al. Podocyte injury damages other podocytes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(7):1275–85. pmid:21719786
  15. 15. Patek CE, Fleming S, Miles CG, Bellamy CO, Ladomery M, Spraggon L, et al. Murine Denys-Drash syndrome: evidence of podocyte de-differentiation and systemic mediation of glomerulosclerosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(18):2379–94. pmid:12915483
  16. 16. Mollet G, Ratelade J, Boyer O, Muda AO, Morisset L, Lavin TA, et al. Podocin inactivation in mature kidneys causes focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and nephrotic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(10):2181–9. pmid:19713307
  17. 17. Li Z, Araoka T, Wu J, Liao H-K, Li M, Lazo M, et al. 3D Culture Supports Long-Term Expansion of Mouse and Human Nephrogenic Progenitors. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;19(4):516–29. pmid:27570066
  18. 18. Okabe M, Motojima M, Miyazaki Y, Pastan I, Yokoo T, Matsusaka T. Global polysome analysis of normal and injured podocytes. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2019;316(2):F241–52. pmid:30379099
  19. 19. Asano T, Niimura F, Pastan I, Fogo AB, Ichikawa I, Matsusaka T. Permanent genetic tagging of podocytes: fate of injured podocytes in a mouse model of glomerular sclerosis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005;16(8):2257–62. pmid:15987751
  20. 20. Contreras JE, Sánchez HA, Véliz LP, Bukauskas FF, Bennett MVL, Sáez JC. Role of connexin-based gap junction channels and hemichannels in ischemia-induced cell death in nervous tissue. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2004;47(1–3):290–303. pmid:15572178
  21. 21. Saga N, Sakamoto K, Matsusaka T, Nagata M. Glomerular filtrate affects the dynamics of podocyte detachment in a model of diffuse toxic podocytopathy. Kidney Int. 2021;99(5):1149–61. pmid:33582108
  22. 22. Matsusaka T, Kobayashi K, Kon V, Pastan I, Fogo AB, Ichikawa I. Glomerular sclerosis is prevented during urinary tract obstruction due to podocyte protection. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2011;300(3):F792-800. pmid:21177778
  23. 23. Kandouz M. Cell death, by any other name…. Cells. 2024;13:325.
  24. 24. Norris RP. Transfer of mitochondria and endosomes between cells by gap junction internalization. Traffic. 2021;22(6):174–9. pmid:33797162
  25. 25. Lucaciu SA, Leighton SE, Hauser A, Yee R, Laird DW. Diversity in connexin biology. J Biol Chem. 2023;299(11):105263. pmid:37734551
  26. 26. Ramadan R, Baatout S, Aerts A, Leybaert L. The role of connexin proteins and their channels in radiation-induced atherosclerosis. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78(7):3087–103. pmid:33388835
  27. 27. Kosovic I, Filipovic N, Benzon B, Vukojevic K, Saraga M, Glavina Durdov M, et al. Spatio-temporal patterning of different connexins in developing and postnatal human kidneys and in nephrotic syndrome of the Finnish type (CNF). Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):8756. pmid:32471989
  28. 28. Yaoita E, Yao J, Yoshida Y, Morioka T, Nameta M, Takata T, et al. Up-regulation of connexin43 in glomerular podocytes in response to injury. Am J Pathol. 2002;161(5):1597–606. pmid:12414508
  29. 29. Zurzolo C. Tunneling nanotubes: Reshaping connectivity. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2021;71:139–47. pmid:33866130
  30. 30. Ohno H, Hase K, Kimura S. M-Sec: Emerging secrets of tunneling nanotube formation. Commun Integr Biol. 2010;3(3):231–3. pmid:20714400
  31. 31. Barutta F, Kimura S, Hase K, Bellini S, Corbetta B, Corbelli A, et al. Protective Role of the M-Sec-Tunneling Nanotube System in Podocytes. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32(5):1114–30. pmid:33722931
  32. 32. Barutta F, Bellini S, Kimura S, Hase K, Corbetta B, Corbelli A, et al. Protective effect of the tunneling nanotube-TNFAIP2/M-sec system on podocyte autophagy in diabetic nephropathy. Autophagy. 2023;19(2):505–24. pmid:35659195