https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-7616
Figures
Abstract
Anticancer therapies resistance, as well as their existing side effects, has become a significant issue worldwide. The demands of new anticancer agents that prevent cancer from developing and growing or spreading are increasing day by day. In this regard, our investigation assessed the cytotoxic and anticancer properties of secondary metabolites (SMs) obtained from understudied endophytic bacteria inhibiting Alliaria petiolata. The identified SMs were further screened by computational analysis against angiogenic factors of cancer. As a result, the leaf sample-associated isolate was identified as Enterobacter hormaechei AP2 strain. Gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (GC-MS) analysis has shown the existence of 27 compounds present in the crude extract with main compounds being; 4,4-Ethylenedioxy-1-pentylamine (22.54%), Triethanolamine (15.17%) and 2-isobutoxyethyl acetate (12.51%). The extract showed anticancer activity with IC50 = 145 µM against the human glioblastoma cell line and cytotoxic activity with LC50 = 214.1 μg/mL against Artemia salina nauplii. The metabolite; 3-(2-Methylpropyl)hexahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione was predictively found most effective by computational analysis against angiogenic factors of cancer. It also demonstrated high intestinal solubility as well as low toxicity. In conclusion, the presence of E. hormaechei within A. petiolata may provide a wealth of bioactive chemicals. Validating the current discovery, purification, its biosynthesis route and other biological functions were recommended for additional research.
Citation: Khan M, Khan SA, Chang C-W, Chen C-C, Lee B, Hamayun M (2025) Antitumor and cytotoxic activities of endophytic Enterobacter hormaechei derived secondary metabolites: In-vitro and In-silico study. PLoS One 20(11): e0337344. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337344
Editor: Saki Raheem, University of Westminster - Regent Street Campus: University of Westminster, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
Received: June 11, 2025; Accepted: November 4, 2025; Published: November 18, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Khan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: The 16SrRNA gene sequence of E. hormaechei was deposited in NCBI GenBank under the accession number. PQ185533.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The notable global prevalence of cancer is due to the increasing risk factors that expose people to carcinogens. Normal cells are exposed to biological and chemical stressors by the risk factors that result in genetic alteration, proliferation and disruption of normal cell growth. Even though a variety of treatments are available to manage the condition but prevalence and mortality rates from cancer are still very high [1,2]. Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery are the primary pharmaceutical interventions for cancer. However, chemotherapy medications produce substantial organ damage which limits their usage at larger doses. Moreover, medication resistance has a significant impact on the efficacy of cancer treatments. New cancer medicines can be developed by focusing on elements implicated in cancer pathogenesis [3,4].
New medication therapy can be designed to prevent cancer from developing, growing or spreading. These medications can prevent angiogenesis, as the creation of blood vessels must sustain their growth and nourish cancer cells [5]. The two main angiogenic factors that cancer cells release are vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) [6,7]. These factors initiate endothelial cell proliferation, migration and invasion inside new vascular structures. Therefore, drugs that target these factors will limit the migration and proliferation of cancer cells and the subsequent attack on healthy cells. New anticancer drugs are constantly evolving in light of these factors [8].
In recent decades, bacteria have emerged as prolific producers of over two-thirds of natural bioactive compounds [9]. Notably, endophytic bacteria are symbionts, colonizing the tissues of their respective host plant. They offer diverse therapeutic potential for drug discovery, holding promise in combating disease [10,11]. They may be employed as bioactive agents and a source of natural chemicals to treat oxidative stress since they are connected to ethno-medicinal plants [12]. Although metabolites of these bacteria are not essential for their growth, they have an adaptive role in ecological interactions and environmental challenges by performing the role of a defensive compound or signaling molecule. They also generate low molecular weight secondary metabolites [13]. These compounds exhibit a wide range of medicinal presentations including anticancer, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antibacterial and immunosuppressive properties [14].
Moreover, endophytes encompassing plant-dwelling bacteria remain underexplored for their therapeutic potential, as they exist globally in practically every plant species [15]. A medicinal plant, Alliaria petiolata (common name: garlic mustard), belongs to the mustard family (Brassicaceae). It was first identified in 1860 in North America. It is mainly found in Europe, Asia, Africa and Eastern to Northern Pakistan. Due to their spicy taste, they are commonly used for cooking purposes. It contains a variety of bioactive substances that are highly effective in medicine. Due to the availability of limited data on their pharmacological activities, scientists are highly attracted [16]. The chemical composition and possible therapeutic advantages of A. petiolata has also been the subject of recent study. As a result, secondary metabolites such flavonoids, phenolic acids, and glucosinolates have been identified. Notably, the study found a number of chemicals that were previously unknown in this species, expanding our knowledge of the chemical richness of the plant [17].
As far as we know, no comprehensive and systematic studies have been reported exploring endophytic bacteria inhibiting A. petiolata and their pharmacological studies. In this context, the current study was prompted to explore A. petiolata residing endophytic bacteria and its secondary metabolites via GC-MS techniques and screened for in vitro antitumor and cytotoxic activities. Moreover, computational analysis was conducted to explore the best fit possible antitumor agent among these secondary metabolites as well as their pharmacokinetic properties. This study will promote the discovery of novel bioactive metabolites.
Materials and methods
Bacterial isolation
A. petiolata plants in zipper bags were collected from Shamozai, Swat, Pakistan (34°41’5.3052’‘ N, 72°7’40.7676’‘ E). The plant was identified by Botanist at Department of Botany, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan (AWKUM), Mardan 23200, Pakistan, under voucher no. AWKUM-BOT-089/2022. After properly cleaning the leaf samples with tap water to get rid of any dust or debris, they were rinsed with distilled water. After that, subjected to further surface sterilization treatment and divided into 0.5–1.0 cm segments [18]. Four leaf segments were placed (in triplicate) in each nutrient agar plate, followed by incubation at 37°C for 24–48 hours. Initially, the obtained colonies were purified on the basis of colony morphology, Gram staining and biochemical characteristics. The bacteria were further identified by 16SrRNA gene sequencing by Macrogen Inc., Korea. The obtained sequences were uploaded into NCBI nucleotide BLAST tool followed by phylogenetic analysis statistical neighbor joining bootstrap method using MEGA 11 software. Further, the sequences were submitted into NCBI GenBank database for obtaining accession numbers [19].
Production, extraction, and identification of secondary metabolites (SMs)
The selected bacteria were cultivated [20] with minor modifications. Briefly, bacteria were inoculated in 250 mL of Luria Bertani (LB) broth medium and incubated at 200 rpm shaking for seven days at 37°C. Then, cell-free supernatant was collected using sterile Whattman filter paper. After adding ethyl acetate (Sigma-Aldrich) in a 1:1 (v/v) ratio, the liquid was briskly stirred for 5–10 minutes. It was split into two layers and the supernatant was collected. Then, ethyl acetate was evaporated using a rotary evaporator to produce crude extract. The SMs found in the crude extract were identified using the described GC-MS method [20]. Briefly, a Rt-Q-Bond capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 8 μm) was used for the GC-MS analysis. The oven temperature was first adjusted at 40°C for three minutes and then increased at a rate of 5°C per minute to 220°C. The carrier gas was helium at a 10:1 split ratio and 1.0 mL/min. The MS system ran at an ion source temperature of 250°C and an electron impact ionization voltage of 70 eV while the injector temperature was 250°C. At a rate of 10 spectra per second, mass spectra were gathered in the 40–660 m/z range. Using ChromaTOF-HRT1 software compounds were identified by comparing their spectra and retention indices with the NIST-17 library.
In-vitro bioactivities of crude SMs extract
Antitumor assay.
The crystal violet test is a rapid, easy and accurate way to assess the anticancer activity of cultured cells. It involves separating adherent cells on culture plates after they die and then using crystal violet dye staining to assess the adherence of the surviving cells [21]. Currently, an assay was carried out with a few minor adjustments in accordance with protocol [22] at Cancer Cell Culture & Precision Oncomedicine Lab, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Khyber Medical University, Peshawar 25100, Pakistan. To put it briefly, the human glioblastoma cell line (U87-MG) was used to assay for anticancer efficacy in crude SMs extract. A 96-well plate was filled with 10,000 cells, 10% FBS, 90% DMEM-F12 medium, and 1% antibiotics. The dish was then incubated for 24–48 hours at 37°C. Following seeding, several amounts of crude SMs extract (200, 100, 50, 25, 12.5, and 6.25 μM) were applied, along with cisplatin (Highnoon Laboratories Ltd.) as a positive control and an untreated negative control (0μM). To find the crude SMs extract’s maximum half inhibitory concentration (IC50), the plate was incubated for an additional 48 hours. Following treatment, 50 μL of a 4% paraformaldehyde solution was added to fix the cells and 50 μL of 0.1% crystal violet was added for staining. The plate was cleaned with tap water and allowed to dry completely after 20 minutes. After adding 200 μL of glacial acetic acid (Merck, Germany) to each well, the absorbance at 630 nm was measured. A 96-well plate was used for the triplicate test.
Cytotoxic assay.
The brine shrimp lethality assay is crucial for early cytotoxicity testing because it has the potential to kill laboratory-grown larvae (Artemia salina nauplii) [23]. With a few minor adjustments, crude SMs extract was tested for cytotoxicity as previously described [24]. Before treatment, A. salina nauplii were hatched in artificial sea water that contained 30 g of sea salt and 1 L of distilled water. They were then incubated for 24–48 hours at 27–30°C with strong aeration and constant lighting. Following hatching, each set of 15 A. salina nauplii were treated with 50–1000 μg/mL of crude SMs extract. They were then incubated for 24–48 hours at 27–30°C with vigorous aeration and constant lighting. The positive control was 5% potassium dichromate while the negative control was pure artificial sea water. The assay was run in triplicate and the LC50 value was determined using probit analysis. The result was then compared to Clarkson’s toxicity index to determine the toxicity level. The mortality rate (%) was computed using the following formula: number of dead nauplii/ Initial quantity of live nauplii (control) × 100.
Statistical analysis.
Data was analyzed using GraphPad Prism 10.4.1 software. Antitumor and cytotoxic activities were conducted in triplicate, and mean variation was analyzed using a t-test. A one-way ANOVA test was employed to evaluate significance (p < 0.05).
Computational analysis of SMs against angiogenic factors.
A computational technique known as molecular docking, which predicts the affinity of binding between the ligand and receptor protein [25], was utilized in the present study. GC-MS identified compounds in the crude SMs extract were selected as ligands. The angiogenic factors including VEGF and EGFR were chosen as target proteins. The known inhibitors of VEGF and EGFR were utilized as standards. The three dimensional (3D) structures of ligands and target proteins were retrieved from the PubChem web server and the Protein Data Bank web server. The target protein and ligand were prepared according to the method [26]. Briefly, the extra ligand and water molecules were removed from target protein and active site was determined using BIOVIA Discovery Studio 2021 software. The sdf files of ligands were converted into pdb files format by using the same software. Docking was carried out in accordance with the methodology described by Yusof et al. [27]. Initially, all ligands were docked against target protein by using multi-docking PyRx virtual screening software. The results were validated by repeated docking analysis using Autodock Vina tools. The protein-ligand complex was examined and visualized using Chimaera UCSF and BIOVIA Discovery Studio 2021 software [26]. High binding affinity and the best model compound present in the crude SMs extract were further screened for pharmacokinetics characteristics using the online tool http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/pkcsm/prediction (accessed on 1 March 2025), followed by the standard protocol [28].
Results
Enterobacter hormaechei isolation and identification
The collected fresh leaf samples were first cleaned of any dust or debris. Then, they were surface sterilized by immersing them in a 70% ethanol solution for five to ten minutes. Double-deionized distilled water was then used for washing. Following air drying, 0.5–1.0 cm pieces were placed on nutrient agar plates and incubated (Fig 1A). The purification of the bacterial isolate was achieved by repeatedly sub-culturing it on new nutrient agar plates. Enterobacter hormaechei (Fig 1B) was preliminarily identified as Gram-negative, rod-shaped, catalase positive, urease-positive, and was termed AP2. The obtained 16SrRNA gene sequence was searched in the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) for evolutionary relationships. The Nucleotide BLAST analysis showed the relationship of the AP2 isolate with the E. hormaechei strain. The sequence was submitted to NCBI GenBank under the accession number: PQ185533 (Fig 2).
SMs production, extraction, and identification
E. hormaechei AP2 strain produced around 200 mg of crude SMs extract upon cultivation, using ethyl acetate (Sigma-Aldrich) as the solvent. GC-MS analysis of crude SMs extract showed the existence of 27 compounds with main compounds being; 4,4-Ethylenedioxy-1-pentylamine (22.54%), triethanolamine (15.17%) and 2-isobutoxyethyl acetate (12.51%), as listed in Table 1.
In-vitro bioactivities of crude SMs extract
Antitumor assay.
The crude SMs extract was tested against the human glioblastoma cell line (U87-MG) at doses ranging from 0 µM to 400 µM. With an IC50 of 145 µM against the human glioblastoma cell line, the extract has shown to be considerably effective (p < 0.05) lower then positive control (IC50 = 312 µM) (Fig 3A–3C). The cell shape was significantly impacted by higher quantities of SMs extract both before and after crystal violet stain, as shown in Fig 3D.
Cytotoxic assay.
The cytotoxicity of crude SMs extract in concentrations ranging from 50 to 1000 μg/mL was checked by the brine shrimp lethality method against A. salina nauplii. The extract was found significant (p < 0.05), further based on plotting probit versus log concentrations of crude SMs extract graph, the LC50 was found to be 214.1 μg/mL (Fig 4A). In comparison with Clarkson’s toxicity index, crude SMs extract was found medium toxic. The positive control was found highly toxic with LC50 = 97.4 μg/mL. The detailed mortality rate was presented in Fig 4B.
Computational analysis of identified SMs against angiogenic factors
EGFR and VEGF, two angiogenic factors were chosen as target proteins. The protein data bank website provided the EGFR 3D structure with the known kinase domain inhibitor gefitinib (PDB ID: 1m17) (Fig 5A). On the other hand, the protein data bank website provided the VEGF 3D structure with the known kinase domain inhibitor sunitinib (PDB ID: 3vhe) (Fig 5B). Gefitinib and sunitinib were used as standard and for active site determination since they explicitly confirm the ATP binding site. The Pubchem website (S1 and S2 Tables) provided the 27 SMs’ 3D structures that were detected by GC-MS analysis. Using BIOVIA Discovery Studio 2021, the target proteins and ligands were made ready for molecular docking. Using multi-docking PyRx virtual screening software, all SMs were first docked to VEGF and EGFR proteins in order to identify the best SM with high binding affinities, which may be in charge of the extract’s anticancer action. Consequently, 3-(2-Methylpropyl)hexahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione (PubChem CID: 7074739) (Fig 5C) was named as compound 1 due to its high binding affinity (−7.7) against EGFR and VEGF proteins, details binding affinities were presented in S1 and S2 Tables. Additionally, Autodock Tools 1.5.7 software was used to dock this compound once more in order to verify the outcome and examine its interaction.
In docking result with VEGF, compound 1 and standard (sunitinib) demonstrated possible common alkyl bond with alanine (A: 866) and valine (A: 916) while compound 1 has shown alkyl interaction with leucine (A: 1035) and with same residue standard shown pi-sigma interaction. Compound 1 has shown alkyl interaction and standard shown halogen interaction with cysteine (A: 1045). Compound 1 has shown alkyl interaction and standard shown van der waals interaction with valine (A: 899). Compound 1 has shown alkyl interaction and standard shown pi-sigma interaction with leucine (A: 889) and with aspartic acid (A: 1046) compound 1 displayed a carbon hydrogen bond whereas standard displayed a typical hydrogen bond; the whole interaction models were shown in Fig 6A and 6B.
In docking result with EGFR, compound 1 and standard (gefitinib) demonstrated probable mutual van der waals interaction with alanine (A: 719) and alkyl bond with valine (A: 702) while with leucine (A: 820) compound 1 has shown van der waals interaction and standard shown alkyl interaction. Compound 1 has shown conventional hydrogen bond and standard shown carbon hydrogen bond with threonine (A: 830). Compound 1 has shown traditional bond of hydrogen and standard shown pi-anion bond with aspartic acid (A: 831). Compound 1 has shown alkyl interaction and standard shown van der waals interaction with lysine (A: 721) and leucine (A: 764) while with phenylalanine (A: 699) compound 1 has shown alkyl interaction and standard shown pi-pi stacked interaction, complete interaction models were presented in Fig 6C and 6D.
In-silico ADMET analysis was used to further evaluate compound 1 for pharmacokinetic properties. With no hepatotoxicity, the findings showed intestinal absorption (84.241%), water solubility (−2.058 log mol/L), T. pyriformis toxicity (0.305 log ug/L) and minnow toxicity (2.465 log mM). The full ADMET attributes are compiled in Table 2.
Discussion
Despite the availability of a wide range of medicines, cancer is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. The resistance mechanisms of cancer cells significantly reduce the efficacy of existing cancer therapies. These therapies mainly concentrate on novel protein targets. Among these targets, VEGF and EGFR play a role in tumor cell proliferation and dissemination [1]. In bioactive microbial natural products, bacterial endophytes offer a rich source of bioactive secondary metabolites that can potentially treat cancer. They play a crucial role in the ongoing hunt for new cancer therapies that may target novel target proteins [1,29]. The computational study of the metabolites provides cost-effective and efficient methods for screening potential anticancer drugs [30].
This study was applied to identify and characterize bioactive metabolites of a bacterial endophyte isolated from the untapped A. petiolata leaf samples. This plant is widely found in moist to dry forest edges and used in traditional medicine as an antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and for improving digestion [31]. However, no study reported their associated endophytes potential biological activities. So, for the first time E. hormaechei AP2 was isolated as an endophytic bacterium associated with A. petiolata, as they reported previously as an endophyte associated with Persea americana Mill. [32], Stevia rebaudiana [33], Ananas comosus L. [34], and Allium sativum L. [35] plants.
The endophytic bacteria produce numerous bioactive SMs including alkaloids, steroids, terpenoids, peptides, flavonoids, polyketones, quinols, and phenols [13]. Presently, GC-MS profile of E. hormaechei AP2 extracted SMs displays the existence of 27 bioactive metabolites. Among the Enterobacter specie, previously reported studies shown the existence of 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenol [36], hexadecane [37], hexahydro-Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione [38], 3-(2-Methylpropyl)hexahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione [39], n-Hexadecanoic acid [40], and hexadecanoic acid ethyl ester [41]. The remaining compounds were reported for the first time as secondary metabolites from Enterobacter specie including 2-(2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl acetate, 1,3,5-triazine-1,3,5(2H,4H,6H)-triethanol, 2-Coumaranone, 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane, (Hydroxymethyl)ethylene acetate, triethanolamine, 2-isobutoxyethyl acetate, tributyl phosphate, isopropyldiethanolamine, tetradecane, ethanol, 2,2′-[1,2-ethanediylbis(oxy)]bis-, diacetate, 2,6,11-trimethyldodecane, carbamic acid, ((methylnitrosamino)methyl)-, isopropyl ester, 2,6,11-trimethyldecane, 3,3,4-trimethyldecane, 4,4-Ethylenedioxy-1-pentylamine, 3-methyl-dodecane, N-Decanoylmorpholine, pentadecanoic acid, 2-methyl-2-(1-methylethyl)-1,3-dioxolane, and Z-11-hexadecenoic acid.
The secondary metabolites identified in E. hormaechei AP2 derived crude extract, previously reported for various biological activities including 2-(2-(2-Methoxyethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl acetate reported for cytotoxic activity [42], 1,3,5-triazine-1,3,5(2H,4H,6H)-triethanol for acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase inhibitory activities [43], 2-Coumaranone for nematicidal activity [44], 2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolane for cytotoxic activity [45], (Hydroxymethyl)ethylene acetate for anti-ulcer activity [46], triethanolamine for antimicrobial activity [47], 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)phenol for antifungal activity [48], tributyl phosphate for inhibition of neurogenesis [49], tetradecane for antimicrobial activity [50], ethanol, 2,2′-[1,2-ethanediylbis(oxy)]bis-, diacetate for textile application [51], 2,6,11-trimethyldodecane for antioxidant and anti-diabetic activities [52], 3,3,4-trimethyldecane for antimicrobial activity [53], 4,4-Ethylenedioxy-1-pentylamine for anti-diabetic and anti-inflammatory activities [29], hexahydro-Pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione for antioxidant activity [54], pentadecanoic acid for antifungal activity [55], 3-(2-Methylpropyl)hexahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione for antimicrobial activity [55], n-Hexadecanoic acid for antibacterial and antioxidant activity [56], hexadecanoic acid ethyl ester for antibacterial activity [57], and Z-11-hexadecenoic acid for antioxidant and cholinesterase inhibitory activities [58].
Bacterial endophytes-derived SM extract can combat various types of cancer cells [15,59,60]. Endophytic E. hormaechei has multiple activities like antioxidant [32], antibacterial [61] and plant growth-promoting activity [62] which have been reported till now. Still, based on the literature study, no study has reported the antitumor ability of endophytic E. hormaechei-derived SM extract; this work was the first to reveal its anticancer potential. Since the crude SMs extract from the E. hormaechei AP2 strain has shown considerable activity against human glioblastoma cell lines (IC50 = 145 µM). This was significantly (p < 0.05) lower than that of the positive control cisplatin (IC50 = 312 µM). This suggests that the extract outperformed the conventional medication in terms of anticancer activity. Compared to cisplatin, which acts through a single main mechanism, the crude extract exhibits higher cytotoxic effects due to the existence of many bioactive secondary metabolites that work in concert on a variety of molecular targets. The specific chemicals causing this activity have not yet been determined, though, as the current work is based on crude extract; more fractionation, purification and mechanistic research are required to confirm these results. By raising the concentration of SMs extract, they also have an impact on cell shape. Similarly, Huang et al. [63] and Romero-Arguelles et al. [64] both found strong anticancer activity of the crude SMs extract from endophytic bacteria.
Toxicity studies are critical in maintaining the safety of natural products [65]. The brine shrimp lethality test is one of the most frequent bioassays used to assess the toxicity of compounds as a screening tool for pharmacological activity. This test used brine shrimp to assess lethality by determining the LC50 value, the concentration required to kill 50% of brine shrimp nauplii. This approach is often used as preliminary screening because of its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and rapid results [24]. In current investigation by the brine shrimp lethality method, the cytotoxicity of SMs extract was found significant (p < 0.05) and moderately toxic with LC50 = 214.1 μg/mL while positive control was found highly toxic with LC50 = 97.4 μg/mL. Moreover, in comparison with control the extract showed less dose-dependent cytotoxic activity. The complex composition of the secondary metabolites in the combination may be the reason why the crude extract did not clearly show dose-dependent cytotoxic action. Synergistic or antagonistic interactions between various chemicals, the instability of active constituents at increasing concentrations, or the likelihood that just a fraction of metabolites contribute to the observed activity might all be reasons for the lack of a linear response. Crude extracts frequently exhibit such non-dose-dependent effects; hence, further fractionation and purification are necessary to pinpoint the precise bioactive ingredients causing cytotoxicity. These finding aligns with previous studies [65–67].
A computational analysis was conducted to explore the antitumor potential of crude SMs extract derived from the E. hormaechei AP2 strain. Among the 27 identified metabolites, 3-(2-Methylpropyl)hexahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione was found highly efficient (Binding affinity = −7.7) against target angiogenic factors including VEGF and EGFR. This compound is a homodetic cyclic peptide, mainly produced by microorganisms [68]. Various biological activities were reported previously for this compound including anticancer [69,70], antimicrobial [71] and antibiofilm [68]. Furthermore, the ADMET characteristics of 3-(2-Methylpropyl)hexahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione were determined, as besides the efficient docking result, safety is an essential factor in drug discovery [1]. As a result, it displays high intestinal solubility as well as low toxicity, which strongly suggests the compound as an anticancer agent. Low toxicity and carrying to the target place are crucial characteristics of a medicine during development [72]. Moreover, the 3-(2-Methylpropyl)hexahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione has shown comparable binding interactions to the known inhibitor utilized as a reference, according to molecular docking studies. Our compound’s potential as a promising lead chemical is supported by the overlap in critical bonding contacts with the active site residues which implies that they may have a similar mode of action. This concordance between the test compound and the standard compound emphasizes the therapeutic importance of the discovered metabolite and further confirms the accuracy of the docking results.
Conclusion
In the present study, E. hormaechei AP2 associated with A. petiolata produce 27 bioactive SMs. The crude extract of SMs was found effective for antitumor and cytotoxic activities. In computational analysis, 3-(2-Methylpropyl)hexahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione metabolite was found potent against angiogenic factors VEGF and EGFR with high intestinal solubility and low toxicity. Consequently, SMs generated from endophytic E. hormaechei may provide a wealth of resources for creating new bioactive compounds. The docking results presented here should be regarded as preliminary and predictive, serving primarily to guide future studies involving purification and definitive structural elucidation of 3-(2-Methylpropyl)hexahydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. GC-MS spectra of the E. hormaechei strain AP2 crude SMs extract.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337344.s001
(PNG)
S1 Table. Binding affinities of E. hormaechei strain AP2 derived secondary metabolites against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337344.s002
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Binding affinities of E. hormaechei strain AP2 derived secondary metabolites against vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0337344.s003
(DOCX)
References
- 1. Maumela P, Serepa-Dlamini MH. In silico analysis of novel bacterial metabolites with anticancer activities. Metabolites. 2024;14(3):163.
- 2. Zhang Z, Zhou L, Xie N, Nice EC, Zhang T, Cui Y, et al. Overcoming cancer therapeutic bottleneck by drug repurposing. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):113. pmid:32616710
- 3. Wang X, Zhang H, Chen X. Drug resistance and combating drug resistance in cancer. Cancer Drug Resist. 2019;2(2):141–60. pmid:34322663
- 4. Sharma P, Mehta M, Dhanjal DS, Kaur S, Gupta G, Singh H, et al. Emerging trends in the novel drug delivery approaches for the treatment of lung cancer. Chem Biol Interact. 2019;309:108720. pmid:31226287
- 5. Badodekar N, Sharma A, Patil V, Telang G, Sharma R, Patil S, et al. Angiogenesis induction in breast cancer: a paracrine paradigm. Cell Biochem Funct. 2021;39(7):860–73. pmid:34505714
- 6. Zhu W, Pei J, Lu X. A patent review of small molecular inhibitors targeting EGFR exon 20 insertion (Ex20ins) (2019-present). Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2025;35(2):91–110. pmid:39708287
- 7. Stephen NM, Deepika UR, Maradagi T, Sugawara T, Hirata T, Ganesan P. Insight on the cellular and molecular basis of blood vessel formation: a specific focus on tumor targets and therapy. MedComm – Oncol. 2023;2(1):e22.
- 8. Elebiyo TC, Rotimi D, Evbuomwan IO, Maimako RF, Iyobhebhe M, Ojo OA, et al. Reassessing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in anti-angiogenic cancer therapy. Cancer Treat Res Commun. 2022;32:100620. pmid:35964475
- 9. Gunatilaka AAL. Natural products from plant-associated microorganisms: distribution, structural diversity, bioactivity, and implications of their occurrence. J Nat Prod. 2006;69(3):509–26. pmid:16562864
- 10. Monowar T, Rahman MS, Bhore SJ, Raju G, Sathasivam KV. Silver nanoparticles synthesized by using the endophytic bacterium pantoea ananatis are promising antimicrobial agents against multidrug resistant bacteria. Molecules. 2018;23(12):3220. pmid:30563220
- 11. Costa SS, Muzitano MF, Camargo LMM, Coutinho MAS. Therapeutic potential of kalanchoe species: flavonoids and other secondary metabolites. Nat Prod Commun. 2008;3(12):1934578X0800301236.
- 12. Nongkhlaw FM, Joshi SR. Investigation on the bioactivity of culturable endophytic and epiphytic bacteria associated with ethnomedicinal plants. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2015;9(9):954–61. pmid:26409736
- 13. Mercado-Blanco J, Bakker PAHM. Interactions between plants and beneficial Pseudomonas spp.: exploiting bacterial traits for crop protection. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2007;92(4):367–89. pmid:17588129
- 14. Korkina LG. Phenylpropanoids as naturally occurring antioxidants: from plant defense to human health. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2007;53(1):15–25. pmid:17519109
- 15. Damavandi MS, Shojaei H, Esfahani BN. The anticancer and antibacterial potential of bioactive secondary metabolites derived from bacterial endophytes in association with Artemisia absinthium. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):18473. pmid:37891400
- 16. Cipollini D, Cipollini K. A review of garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata, Brassicaceae) as an allelopathic plant. J Torrey Bot Soc. 2016;143(4):339–48.
- 17.
Rodgers VL, Scanga SE, Kolozsvary MB, Garneau D, Kilgore JS, Anderson LJ. Where is garlic mustard? Understanding the context for dense invasions of Alliaria petiolata. 2022.
- 18. Rat A, Naranjo HD, Krigas N, Grigoriadou K, Maloupa E, Alonso AV, et al. Endophytic bacteria from the roots of the medicinal plant Alkanna tinctoria Tausch (Boraginaceae): exploration of plant growth promoting properties and potential role in the production of plant secondary metabolites. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:633488. pmid:33633713
- 19. Nxumalo CI, Ngidi LS, Shandu JSE, Maliehe TS. Isolation of endophytic bacteria from the leaves of Anredera cordifolia CIX1 for metabolites and their biological activities. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020;20(1):300. pmid:33028279
- 20. Purwestri YA, Kartikasari NA, Putri SG, Wilson W, Sembiring L, editors. Metabolic profiling of endophytic bacteria from Purwoceng (Pimpinella pruatjan Molkend) root and antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing; 2016.
- 21. Feoktistova M, Geserick P, Leverkus M. Crystal violet assay for determining viability of cultured cells. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2016;2016(4):pdb.prot087379. pmid:27037069
- 22. Konain K, Faheem M, Ullah K, Ayub S, Ahmed J, Huma Z, et al. Biomarker-guided drug repurposing and molecular validation of angiotensin-2 receptor type-1 in brain tumor. Precis Med Com. 2023;3(1):27–42.
- 23. Sarah QS, Anny FC, Misbahuddin M. Brine shrimp lethality assay. Bangladesh J Pharmacol. 2017;12(2):186–9.
- 24. Abd Jabar N-A, Nor-Khaizura MAR, Ismail SI, Loo YY, Chong KH, Padmanabhan K, et al. Are Bentong ginger (Zingiber officinale) biosynthesized silver nanoparticles safe and effective? An optimization, characterization, and toxicity evaluation study. OpenNano. 2025;21:100224.
- 25. Agu PC, Afiukwa CA, Orji OU, Ezeh EM, Ofoke IH, Ogbu CO, et al. Molecular docking as a tool for the discovery of molecular targets of nutraceuticals in diseases management. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):13398. pmid:37592012
- 26. Meng X-Y, Zhang H-X, Mezei M, Cui M. Molecular docking: a powerful approach for structure-based drug discovery. Curr Comput Aided Drug Des. 2011;7(2):146–57. pmid:21534921
- 27. Mohamed Yusof NIS, Abdullah ZL, Othman N, Mohd Fauzi F. Structure-activity relationship analysis of flavonoids and its inhibitory activity against BACE1 enzyme toward a better therapy for Alzheimer’s disease. Front Chem. 2022;10:874615. pmid:35832462
- 28. Ahmad W, Ansari MA, Alsayari A, Almaghaslah D, Wahab S, Alomary MN, et al. In vitro, molecular docking and in silico ADME/Tox studies of emodin and chrysophanol against human colorectal and cervical carcinoma. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022;15(11):1348. pmid:36355520
- 29. Naveed M, Ishfaq H, Rehman SU, Javed A, Waseem M, Makhdoom SI, et al. GC-MS profiling of Bacillus spp. metabolites with an in vitro biological activity assessment and computational analysis of their impact on epithelial glioblastoma cancer genes. Front Chem. 2023;11:1287599. pmid:38116103
- 30. Ouma RBO, Ngari SM, Kibet JK. A review of the current trends in computational approaches in drug design and metabolism. Discov Public Health. 2024;21(1):108.
- 31.
McTavish MJ, Katovich EJ, Becker RL, Cortat G, Smith SM, Bourchier RS. Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieberstein) Cavara & Grande, Garlic Mustard/Alliaire officinale (Brassicaceae). Biological Control Programmes in Canada, 2013-2023: CABI GB; 2024. p. 428–36.
- 32. Rustini R, Rahmi K, Putra PP, Andayani R, Dwinatrana K. Enterobacter hormaechei: an endophytic bacterium found in avocado peel (Persea americana Mill.) with antioxidant properties. J Appl Microbiol. 2023;32(1):1–10.
- 33. Oviedo-Pereira DG, López-Meyer M, Evangelista-Lozano S, Sarmiento-López LG, Sepúlveda-Jiménez G, Rodríguez-Monroy M. Enhanced specialized metabolite, trichome density, and biosynthetic gene expression in Stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) Bertoni plants inoculated with endophytic bacteria Enterobacter hormaechei. PeerJ. 2022;10:e13675. pmid:35782100
- 34. Andayani R, Fajriati F, Hanifa D, Rustini R. The isolation, characterization, and identification of endophytic bacteria from pineapple peel (Ananas comosus (L.) Merr). RJPT. 2024:5540–6.
- 35. Rahajeng SM, Yulianti F, Triasih U, Agisimanto D, Devy NF, Hardiyanto H, et al. Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria from the vegetative phase of Indonesian Garlic var. “Tawangmangu Baru”. JSM. 2024;53(12):3871–81.
- 36. Chen P, Huang R, Zuo LZ, Zhang YQ, Li L. Allelopathic potential of root endophytic bacterial metabolites on seeds germination of Casuarina equisetifolia. AJ. 2021;52(2):261–76.
- 37. Makuwa SC, Serepa-Dlamini MH. The antibacterial activity of crude extracts of secondary metabolites from bacterial endophytes associated with Dicoma anomala. Int J Microbiol. 2021;2021:8812043. pmid:33953751
- 38. Lee J, Jung W-K, Ahsan SM, Jung H-Y, Choi HW. Identification of Pantoea ananatis strain BCA19 as a potential biological control agent against Erwinia amylovora. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1493430. pmid:39640859
- 39. Sibanda T, Selvarajan R, Tekere M, Nyoni H, Meddows-Taylor S. Potential biotechnological capabilities of cultivable mycobiota from carwash effluents. Microbiologyopen. 2017;6(5):e00498. pmid:28714266
- 40. Nchabeleng MM, Fonkui TY, Ezekiel G. The indiscriminate chemical makeup of secondary metabolites derived from endophytes harvested from aloe barbadensis miller in South Africa’s Limpopo Region. Molecules. 2024;29(6):1297. pmid:38542933
- 41. Chowhan P, Chakraborty AP. GC-MS analysis of antifungal metabolites secreted by two potent endophytes Enterobacter cloacae and Achromobacter xylosoxidans. J Mycopathol Res. 2024;62:101–15.
- 42. Lazewski D, Kucinska M, Potapskiy E, Kuzminska J, Popenda L, Tezyk A, et al. Enhanced cytotoxic activity of PEGylated curcumin derivatives: synthesis, structure-activity evaluation, and biological activity. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(2):1467. pmid:36674983
- 43. Dong C-E, Li R, Pan Z-X, Li H, Qian J-J, Liu W-W, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological activity of novel 1, 3, 5-Triazine–1, 2, 4-Triazine hybrids as cholinesterase inhibitors. Russ J Org Chem. 2023;59(9):1610–9.
- 44. Sun Y, Wang C, Du G, Deng W, Yang H, Li R, et al. Two nematicidal compounds from lysinimonas M4 against the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus. Forests. 2022;13(8):1191.
- 45. Kuz’mina USh, Raskil’dina GZ, Ishmetova DV, Sakhabutdinova GN, Dzhumaev ShSh, Borisova YuG, et al. Cytotoxic activity against SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells of heterocyclic compounds containing gem-dichlorocyclopropane and/or 1,3-dioxacycloalkane fragments. Pharm Chem J. 2022;55(12):1293–8.
- 46. Akinwumi IA, Sonibare MA, Khan M. In vitro anti-ulcer activity and isolation of 5 – hydroxymethyl furan – 2 – carbaldehyde and palmatine from Curculigo pilosa (schumach. & thonn.) Engl. NJNPM. 2023;26(1):21–7.
- 47. Nayak SPRR, Pohokar P, Dhivya LS, Herold A, Chitra V, Gatasheh MK, et al. Starch films with triethanolamine and chalcone derivative for improved durability and antimicrobial properties in poultry packaging. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;316(Pt 2):144627. pmid:40419049
- 48. Devi TS, Vijay K, Vidhyavathi RM, Kumar P, Govarthanan M, Kavitha T. Antifungal activity and molecular docking of phenol, 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl) produced by plant growth-promoting actinobacterium Kutzneria sp. strain TSII from mangrove sediments. Arch Microbiol. 2021;203(7):4051–64. pmid:34046705
- 49. Chakraborty G, Joshi B, Ahire K, Patra C. Tributyl phosphate inhibits neurogenesis and motor functions during embryonic development in zebrafish. Aquat Toxicol. 2025;279:107203. pmid:39667268
- 50. Nasr ZS, El-shershaby H, Sallam K, Abed N, Abd- El Ghany I, Sidkey N. Evaluation of antimicrobial potential of tetradecane extracted from pediococcus acidilactici DSM: 20284 - CM isolated from curd milk. Egypt J Chem. 2021;0(0):0–0.
- 51. Hassan MM. A comprehensive review of the advances in process engineering and greener solvents in dyeing to impart sustainable textile manufacturing. Sustain Mater Technol. 2025;45:e01490.
- 52.
Narasangagi M, Hiremath L, Shivanadappa S, Kumar N. Metabolite profiling of Scenedesmus dimorphus grown on dairy wastewater and their antioxidant and anti-diabetic activity.
- 53. Kushwaha J, Singh Y, Mahesh MS, Yadav SK, Sheth PN, Dhoble AS. Metabolomic profiling of cow urine of various breeds reveals bioactive metabolites of diverse industrial applications. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2025:1–27. pmid:40682620
- 54. Thye AY-K, Letchumanan V, Tan LT-H, Law JW-F, Lee L-H. Malaysia’s breakthrough in modern actinobacteria (MOD-ACTINO) drug discovery research. Prog Micobes Mol Biol. 2022;5(1):a0000275.
- 55. Hanif S, Jabeen K, Akhtar N, Iqbal S. GC-MS analysis & antifungal activity of Datura metel L. against Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2022;94(1):e20200851. pmid:35293512
- 56. Purushothaman R, Vishnuram MG, Ramanathan DT. Isolation and identification of N-hexadecanoic acid from Excoecaria agallocha L. and its antibacterial and antioxidant activity. JETIR. 2024;11(1):332–42.
- 57. Shaaban MT, Ghaly MF, Fahmi SM. Antibacterial activities of hexadecanoic acid methyl ester and green-synthesized silver nanoparticles against multidrug-resistant bacteria. J Basic Microbiol. 2021;61(6):557–68. pmid:33871873
- 58. Almeida AMd, Tenório TM, Rodrigues LV, Araujo CAd, Camara CAd, Moraes MMd. Chemical composition, antioxidant potential, and cholinesterase inhibitory activity of essential oils from three Thunbergia species growing wild in Northeast Brazil. Química Nova. 2025;48(6):e-20250139.
- 59. Taechowisan T, Chuen-Im T, Phutdhawong WS. Antibacterial and anticancer properties of diketopiperazines from Streptomyces antimicrobicus BN122, an Endophyte in Oryza sativa var. glutinosa. Pak J Biol Sci. 2025;28(1):27–37. pmid:39820565
- 60. Sari AN, Achnafani D, Budiarti M, Haryanti S, Widodo H, Wijayanti N, et al. Rhizospheric actinomycetes from turmeric (Curcuma longa L.): Isolation, detection of the biosynthetic gene clusters, and anticancer activity against T47D cancer cells. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2025;15(3):122–8.
- 61. Monowar T, Rahman MS, Bhore SJ, Sathasivam KV. Endophytic bacteria enterobacter hormaechei fabricated silver nanoparticles and their antimicrobial activity. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(4):511. pmid:33917798
- 62. Bendaha MEA, Belaouni HA. Tomato growth and resistance promotion by Enterobacter hormaechei subsp. steigerwaltii EB8D. Arch Phytopathol Plant Prot. 2019;52(3–4):318–32.
- 63. Huang X, Chen Z, Wang L, Ran J, Wang J, Jiang J, et al. Metabolite profiling and genomic properties of an endophytic Bacillus siamensis strain with anti-tumor activity isolated from medicinal plant Curcuma Wenyujin. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult. 2024;156(2):64.
- 64. Romero-Arguelles R, Romo-Sáenz CI, Morán-Santibáñez K, Tamez-Guerra P, Quintanilla-Licea R, Orozco-Flores AA, et al. In vitro antitumor activity of endophytic and rhizosphere gram-positive bacteria from Ibervillea sonorae (S. Watson) greene against L5178Y-R lymphoma cells. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(2):894. pmid:35055716
- 65. Ilangage JIMK, Ilangakoon IACS, Fernando KMK, Dissanayake DMMK, Rajapaksha NPD, Walpola LH, et al. In vitro-antibacterial properties of ten medicinal plants against common uropathogenic organisms and toxicity determination using brine shrimp lethality assay. BMC Complement Med Ther. 2024;24(1):301. pmid:39143605
- 66. Fauziah F, Maulinasari M, Harnelly E, Ismail YS, Fitri L. Toxicity test of rose periwinkle (Catharanthus roseus) leaves endophytic bacteria using Brine Shrimp Lethality Test (BSLT) method. Biodiversitas. 2021;23(1).
- 67. Mian P, Heilmann J, Bürgi H-R, Sticher O. Biological screening of terrestrial and freshwater cyanobacteria for antimicrobial activity, brine shrimp lethality, and cytotoxicity. Pharm Biol. 2003;41(4):243–7.
- 68. Vanessa V, Waturangi DE, Yulandi A, Julyantoro PGS, Papuangan N. Antibiofilm activity of Morganella morganii JB8F and Pseudomonas fluorescens JB3B compound to control single and multi-species of aquaculture pathogens. BMC Microbiol. 2024;24(1):381. pmid:39354382
- 69. Kgk D, Kumari S, G S, Malla RR. Marine natural compound cyclo(L-leucyl-L-prolyl) peptide inhibits migration of triple negative breast cancer cells by disrupting interaction of CD151 and EGFR signaling. Chem Biol Interact. 2020;315:108872. pmid:31669320
- 70. Lin W-X, Xie C-L, Zhou M, Xia M-L, Zhou T-T, Chen H-F, et al. Chemical constituents from the deep sea-derived Streptomyces xiamenensis MCCC 1A01570 and their effects on RXRα transcriptional regulation. Nat Prod Res. 2020;34(10):1461–4. pmid:30270742
- 71. Teregulova GA, Manucharova NA, Urazbakhtina NA, Zhemchuzhina NS, Yevtushenko LI, Stepanov AL. Antimicrobial activity of specialized metabolites of soil chitinolytic streptomycetes. Moscow Univ Soil Sci Bull. 2024;79(1):47–55.
- 72. Aaghaz S, Gohel V, Kamal A. Peptides as potential anticancer agents. Curr Top Med Chem. 2019;19(17):1491–511. pmid:30686254