Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Effects of a school-based intervention on 24-hour movement behaviors in adolescents: A quasi-experimental study

  • Jaminson Raul Ricardo-Sejin ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    jaminson.ricardo@udea.edu.co

    Affiliation University Institute of Physical Education and Sports, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia

    ⨯
  • Carlos Mario Arango-Paternina,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation University Institute of Physical Education and Sports, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia

    ⨯
  • Fredy Alonso Patiño-Villada

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation University Institute of Physical Education and Sports, University of Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia

    ⨯

Abstract

Interest in integrating 24-hour movement behaviors (sleep, physical activity, and screen time) has increased in recent years, supporting global guidelines that emphasize their relevance for adolescent health. However, there remains a need for studies that assess the effectiveness of interventions aimed at improving these behaviors. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based intervention grounded in Self-Determination Theory on: (1) 24-hour movement behaviors; (2) adherence to 24-hour movement behaviors recommendations; (3) health-related quality of life; and (4) Self-Determination Theory constructs associated with 24-hour movement behaviors. A quasi-experimental design with experimental and control groups was conducted, including pre-test, post-test, and follow-up assessments. The study involved 82 adolescents aged 14–17 from two conveniently selected schools in the city of Bello, Colombia. The 12-week intervention included educational, family, and extracurricular components. Effectiveness was analyzed using mixed models and relative risk. The results revealed significant effects of the intervention on screen time (weekdays: F(4.68, 156)=2, p = .01; weekend: F(5.51, 156)=2, p = .005; total week: F(6.32, 156)=2, p = .002) and sleep (weekend: F(6.09, 156)= 2, p = .003; total week: F(3.88, 156)=, p = .02). A significant increase in meeting the weakday sleep recommendation was observed in the experimental group (RR: 1.85, IC95% 1.05–3.25), along with improvements in the Self-Determination Theory constructs of competence and relatedness in physical activity. The intervention demonstrated partial effectiveness, achieving improvements in screen time and sleep. This study contributes to the understanding of the design and implementation of educational interventions targeting 24-hour movement behaviors. Future research should refine the integration of motivational strategies to improve physical activity and overall adherence to recommendations, while also exploring the scalability and sustainability of these school-based interventions.

Citation: Ricardo-Sejin JR, Arango-Paternina CM, Patiño-Villada FA (2025) Effects of a school-based intervention on 24-hour movement behaviors in adolescents: A quasi-experimental study. PLoS One 20(11): e0336696. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336696

Editor: Henri Tilga, University of Tartu, ESTONIA

Received: August 2, 2025; Accepted: October 29, 2025; Published: November 21, 2025

Copyright: © 2025 Ricardo-Sejin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

1. Introduction

In the current landscape of public health, 24-hour movement behaviors (24-HMB) have emerged as a critical factor in adolescent well-being. This comprehensive concept encompasses the dynamic interplay among physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior (SB), and sleep, recognizing that these components are not independent but mutually influence one another to shape overall health [1,2]. Adolescence is a stage of the life course characterized by physical, psychological, and social changes, offering a unique context to establish behavioral patterns that may persist into adulthood [3]. In this regard, understanding and optimizing 24-HMB during adolescence is essential for the prevention of non-communicable diseases, the promotion of mental health, and the development of an active lifestyle [4].

24-HMB were introduced in 2016 by the Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology as the “Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines” [5], which recommend: (a) at least 60 minutes of daily moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA); (b) no more than 2 hours of recreational screen time (ST); and (c) uninterrupted sleep of 9–11 hours for children aged 5–13 and 8–10 hours for adolescents aged 14–17 [6]. These were the first evidence-based guidelines to integrate PA, SB, and sleep, providing a comprehensive framework for child and adolescent health [7,8]. A meta-analysis (MA) by Tapia-Serrano et al. [9], including 387,437 participants across 23 countries, reported a global adherence of only 2.68% among adolescents, with South America showing 2.93%. Gender differences were not significant, although adherence was lower in girls (1.86%) than in boys (3.54%). Conversely, non-adherence to all three guidelines reached 28.59% globally and 31.72% in South America, with higher prevalence among girls (14.79%) compared to boys (10.16%).

Despite the growing body of evidence on 24-HMB in adolescents [10], educational interventions targeting this age group remain scarce, and often lack the depth and rigor needed to achieve lasting impact [11,12]. In a recent systematic review (SR) of school-based interventions, only two randomized control trials conducted in adolescents were found [13]. Moreover, the complexity of 24-HMB which involves multiple interrelated behaviors, presents unique challenges for the design and implementation of effective interventions [14].

Self-Determination Theory (SDT) [15] offers a promising framework to address these challenges. By acknowledging the importance of the basic psychological needs of autonomy, competence, and relatedness, SDT provides a solid foundation for developing interventions that promote intrinsic motivation and sustained behavioral change [16]. Interventions grounded in SDT have been shown to be more effective because they move beyond external regulation, fostering self-endorsed forms of motivation that are more likely to persist over time [17,18]. Recent SR and MA highlights that school-based programs informed by theoretical frameworks, particularly SDT, are associated with greater improvements in PA, reduced SB, and enhanced psychological well-being among adolescents [19,20]. The rationale for proposing this intervention under SDT is that adolescents are more likely to engage in and maintain positive health behaviors when they perceive a sense of choice (autonomy) [21,22], feel capable of achieving goals (competence) [23,24], and experience meaningful connections with others (relatedness) [25,26]. Thus, SDT not only guides the design of strategies that target these psychological needs but also provides an evidence-based pathway to strengthen adherence to 24-HMB in school settings.

Previous school-based interventions addressing 24-HMB in adolescents have shown promising, yet heterogeneous results. While multicomponent approaches that include family participation have demonstrated effectiveness in improving PA, ST, and sleep, evidence on the overall efficacy and sustainability of these interventions remains limited. For example, programs such as Kids’n Fitness [27] and ACTIVITAL [28], which integrated PA, SB, and dietary components with parental involvement, reported reductions in Body Mass Index, increases in PA, and decreases in ST. Similarly, interventions incorporating structured PA sessions within the school day or targeting sleep education have produced positive effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) [29], sleep duration [30], and psychosocial outcomes [29]. However, SR indicates that the effectiveness of these programs is variable, often constrained by short durations, limited sample sizes, and the lack of long-term follow-up [31]. Moreover, most studies tend to focus on isolated behaviors rather than adopting a fully integrated 24-HMB framework [32–36]. Recent evidence also highlights consistent associations between meeting multiple 24-HMB recommendations and better HRQoL in adolescents, underscoring the importance of comprehensive approaches [37,38]. Collectively, this emerging body of research supports the potential of school-based, theory-driven, multicomponent interventions, but also reveals important gaps regarding their integrated application and sustainability.

Within this context, the present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a school-based intervention grounded in SDT on 24-HMB, adherence to 24-HMB recommendations, SDT-related constructs linked to 24-HMB, and HRQoL in secondary school students. It was hypothesized that the school-based intervention would have effects on 24-HMB, adherence to 24-HMB recommendations, SDT constructs related to the behaviors, and HRQoL.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Design and participants

This study followed a quasi-experimental design following the TREND statement [39]. It was conducted over 12 weeks of intervention plus 12 weeks of follow-up, in two schools located in Bello, Colombia. Both schools had comparable academic schedules, instructional hours, and physical infrastructure, and were situated in neighborhoods with similar sociodemographic characteristics. Although both schools were located in the same city, separated by approximately 3.6 km, participants did not have direct contact between their daily activities, or shared facilities, teachers, or extracurricular programs. These conditions reduced the likelihood of information spillover between groups. The sample size was calculated based on the objective of increasing adherence to 24-HMB recommendations. Using the Epidat 3.1 software, a sample size of 23 students per group was estimated, assuming post-intervention adherence to 2 or 3 24-HMB recommendations based on proportions reported by Sevil-Serrano et al. [40], 65.6% in the experimental group (EG) and 17.6% in the control group (CG). Therefore, the minimum difference to be detected in compliance was 48% in favor of the experimental group. A confidence level of 95% and a statistical power of 90% were used in the calculation.

A convenience sample of 9th-grade students aged 14–17 years from each school was selected; one school constituted the EG (n = 39), and the other the CG (n = 43). Participants were required to be apparently healthy, and parental consent was obtained through signed informed consent forms. The ethics committee of the University Institute of Physical Education and Sport approved the study protocol (Approval ID: ACEI 46/2023). The study protocol was registered on the Open Science Framework with the following identifier: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CZMXA

2.2. Materials and instruments

Sociodemographic variables (age and sex) were collected through a printed, self-administered questionnaire. Height was measured in centimeters using a SECA 206 tape measure (SECA, Hamburg) mounted 2 meters high on a smooth wall, and weight was measured using a SECA 813 digital scale (SECA, Hamburg), with the result recorded in kilograms. Both measurements were taken twice, and the average value was used for analysis.

To assess 24-HMB, self-report questionnaires were administered. MVPA and sleep were measured using the 24-Hour Movement Behavior Questionnaire for Youth [41], which assessed time spent in MVPA and sleep. Based on these data, adherence to the recommendations of at least 60 minutes of MVPA per day [42] and 8–10 hours of sleep [43] were analyzed. This questionnaire showed moderate reliability for weekdays, weekends, and total time (ICC 0.47 to 0.67). This instrument has been cross-culturally adapted in Colombia, demonstrating semantic and structural equivalence with the original English version, no validity across domains, and moderate reliability for weekdays, weekends, and total time [44].

ST was assessed using the SAYCARE questionnaire [45], which evaluates sedentary screen-based activities and determines adherence to the recommendation of two hours or less of screen time per day [42]. This questionnaire presents moderate test-retest reliability in children (rho ≥ 0.45 and k ≥ 0.40) and adolescents (rho ≥ 0.50) for self-report and showed low concurrent validity.

HRQoL was measured using the KIDSCREEN-10 questionnaire [46], which is validated for assessing HRQoL in adolescents. This questionnaire has a reliability of α = 0.78 in the KIDSCREEN-10 version for children and adolescents.

For SDT constructs, adapted instruments were used to assess perceived competence, autonomy, and relatedness in relation to PA [47]. The overall hierarchical omega coefficient (ω) for the NPB was 0.97, and the subscale omega coefficients (ω) were 0.91, 0.91, and 0.94 for the specific factors of competence, autonomy, and relatedness, respectively; the Motivation to Limit Screen-Time Questionnaire was used to evaluate motivation to reduce ST [48]. with ICC values of 0.67 for amotivation and 0.70 and 0.82 for controlled and autonomous motivation, respectively; and the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory was used to assess perceived competence and the value of sleep [49].

2.3. Intervention

During the pre- and post-intervention assessments, the following were evaluated: 24-HMB, adherence to 24-HMB recommendations, SDT constructs related to 24-HMB, and HRQoL. A follow-up assessment was conducted 12 weeks after the intervention concluded for both groups, in which 24-HMB and adherence to the corresponding recommendations were measured. The study was carried out in the classroom and sports facilities of the participant schools.

The intervention was described according to TIDieR parameters [50] and was implemented by the physical education (PE) teacher between February and April 2024 and was carried out in the EG through the application and monitoring of four components: a) Educational component: two hours per week of theoretical-practical classes addressing the components of 24-HMB, framed within SDT constructs and emphasizing the benefits of PA, the implications of SB, sleep hygiene, and the 24-hour cycle and its importance for health; b) Family involvement: distribution of infographics to parents aimed at raising awareness about the practice and adherence to 24-HMB in their children; c) Recess-time intervention: weekly 30-minute sessions including playful activities, instructions, and tips to reduce SB; And d) Leisure-time activities: goal setting and planning around the development of healthy and physically active extracurricular habits. To ensure treatment fidelity, the PE teacher responsible for delivering the intervention was trained through a structured treatment manual that detailed the objectives, strategies, and examples of activities to be implemented during the PE sessions. In addition, the PE teacher registered his adherence to the prescribed activities after each session. The intervention was implemented in its entirety with the experimental group, and 100% of the planned activities were carried out as scheduled. After completing all assessments, the intervention will also be provided to the CG to ensure equitable access to its potential benefits. The same content and implementation procedures as described in the manual will be applied, thus respecting ethical standards and ensuring that all participants can benefit from the strategies designed to promote healthy movement habits. A more detailed description of the intervention components is provided in Table 1 and practical application of SDT constructs in Table 2.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Discriminated distribution of interventions by components.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336696.t001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Behavior change techniques and strategies based on SDT constructs implemented in the school-based intervention program.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336696.t002

The CG participated in regular PE classes (two hours per week for twelve weeks) following the school’s standard curriculum and the didactic plan developed by the teacher. Topics covered included healthy habits, safety measures in PA, body hygiene and care, awareness of non-communicable chronic diseases, and team sports practice.

To minimize potential biases, several control strategies were implemented. To address selection bias due to dropout or absenteeism, students received follow-up phone calls to encourage continued participation, particularly in the EG. To prevent adaptation bias, the EG and CG were kept separate. Instrument-related biases were addressed through standardized measurement techniques, the use of validated and calibrated tools, questionnaire timing adjustments, breaks to reduce respondent fatigue, randomization of response categories, and the use of response scales to mitigate acquiescence and social desirability bias.

2.4. Data analysis

Parametric and non-parametric tests were used to compare baseline characteristics between groups. For age, weight, and height, data normality was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test (p > 0.05) and homogeneity of variances with Levene’s test (p ≥ 0.05). Height was analyzed with parametric tests (Student’s t-test) and summarized using means and standard deviations (SD). For age and weight, non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney U) were applied, with medians and interquartile ranges (25th–75th percentiles) reported. Differences in the categorical variable sex were examined using the chi-square test, and group distributions were expressed as percentages. Mixed-effects models were applied to analyze the effect of the intervention on 24-HMB, SDT constructs, and HRQoL, adjusting for sex, age, weight, and height. Relative risk (RR) measures were calculated to assess the effect of the intervention on adherence to 24-HMB recommendations. Data analysis was conducted following the intention to treat. A p-value < .05 was considered statistically significant, with a 95% confidence level. Effect sizes were reported using the conditional R-squared (R²c) for mixed-effects models, which quantifies the variance explained by fixed and random effects; and the RR with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for binary outcomes, which provide a direct and interpretable measure of association. No correction methods for multiple comparisons were applied in the present analysis. All data analyses were performed using the open-source statistical software Jamovi (Version 2.6.25) [51].

3. Results

A total of 82 students participated in the study, distributed between two groups. The participant selection process is detailed in Fig 1. The demographic and anthropometric characteristics of the participants in each group are presented in Table 3. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of age, height, or weight. Likewise, no significant difference was observed in sex distribution. The average adherence to the intervention was 85.7% (SD = 23.3%) in the EG and 87.0% (SD = 11.1%) in the CG. No adverse events were reported during the activities conducted as part of the study.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. Characteristics of participants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336696.t003

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Flowchart for the selection of study participants.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336696.g001

3.1. Mixed models and fixed and random effects for 24-HMB

Table 4 presents the results of the mixed model analysis used to examine differences in 24-HMB (Sleep, MVPA and ST) between groups across the three assessment points (pre-test, post-test, and follow-up). For weekday sleep, no significant group-by-time interaction was found (F(1.50, 156) = 2, p = 0.22). However, for weekend sleep, a significant interaction between group and time was observed (F(6.09, 156) = 2, p = .003), suggesting that changes in weekend sleep patterns differed between the groups over time. Similarly, a significant interaction was observed for total weekly sleep (weekdays + weekends) (F(3.88, 156) = 2, p = .02), indicating differential change patterns between groups over time. Overall, sleep pattern behavior was inconsistent in CG, increasing in post-test and decreasing in the follow-up, while in EG, the intervention caused a progressive reduction in weekend and total sleep time.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 4. Mixed models for 24-hour movement behaviors, within- and between-group differences, interaction, and random effects.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336696.t004

For MVPA (weekly average), intragroup differences were found in the CG across time (F(3.70, 156) = 2, p = .02), with a decrease of 0.39 h/day from post-test to follow-up (t(156) = 2.69, p < .01). However, no significant group-by-time interaction was observed.

Regarding ST on weekdays, significant intragroup differences were found in the EG (F(7.38, 156) = 2, p < .01), indicating a notable reduction in screen use. The group-by-time interaction was also significant (F(4.68, 156) = 2, p = .01), suggesting that changes over time differed between groups. For weekend ST, significant reductions were observed in the EG (F(11.29, 156) = 2, p < .01), with a decrease of 2.12 h/day (t(156) = 2.66, p < .01) from pre- to post-test, and 1.66 h/day (t(156) = 4.74, p < .001) from post-test to follow-up. A significant group-by-time interaction was also found (F(5.51, 156) = 2, p = .005), with a 1.88 h/day reduction in the EG at follow-up, indicating again that ST changes differed between groups. For total weekly ST, significant reductions were observed in the EG of 1.73 h/day (t(156) = 2.59, p = .01) and 1.49 h/day (t(156) = 2.22, p = .02) from pre- to post-test and from post-test to follow-up, respectively. A significant group-by-time interaction was found (F(6.32, 156) = 2, p = .002), with a 2.18 h/day reduction in total ST for the EG at follow-up (t(190) = 2.75, p = .00), indicating that the EG significantly reduced its ST over time compared to the CG.

The marginal R-squared values (R²m) ranged from 0.08 to 0.22, indicating that the fixed effects (such as group or time of measurement) explained between 8% and 22% of the variance in the different behaviors (sleep, MVPA, and ST). The R²c values ranged from 0.34 to 0.55, suggesting that the full model (including both fixed and random effects) explained between 34% and 55% of the variance in the outcomes. The consistently higher R²c compared to R²m across all variables indicates that both fixed and random effects substantially contributed to the explained variance in the dependent variables.

The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranged from 0.26 (95% CI 1.71–6.99) to 0.44 (95% CI 0.96–2.44), indicating that between 26% and 44% of the total variance in 24-HMB was attributable to between-subject differences. High ICC values (>0.40) were observed for MVPA, weekend sleep, and total sleep, while moderate values (0.25–0.40) were found for weekday sleep, weekly MVPA, and ST. The likelihood ratio test showed that the random effect for subjects was significant in all models (p < .001), confirming sufficient inter-subject variability that justified the inclusion of random effects in the models.

3.2. Meeting with 24-HMB recommendations

Table 5 displays the intra- and intergroup differences and the RR of meeting the 24-HMB recommendations. Regarding sleep, the EG showed a significant increase in weekday sleep compliance post-intervention (56.4%) compared to baseline (38.5%) (χ²(1, N = 82) = 5.73, p = .01), suggesting a positive effect of the intervention. Additionally, post-intervention, the EG was 1.8 times more likely to meet the sleep recommendation (8–10 h/day) compared to the CG (RR = 1.85, 95% CI: 1.05–3.25). For MVPA, at follow-up, the EG demonstrated a significantly higher compliance rate during weekdays (48.7%) than the CG (25.6%) (χ²(1, N = 82) = 4.72, p = .03). However, the intervention did not have effect on the meeting of MVPA recommendation. No significant differences were found between groups in ST compliance at any assessment point. Likewise, there were no significant differences observed regarding compliance with one, two, or all three 24-HMB recommendations.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 5. Descriptive statistics of 24-hour movement behavior adherence, within- and between-group differences, and relative risk.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336696.t005

3.3. Mixed models for SDT constructs related to 24-HMB and HRQoL

Table 6 presents the SDT variables in relation to 24-HMB. In the EG, the competence construct in PA showed a significant increase (t(78) = −3.25, p = .002). The interaction was also significant (F(4.78, 78) = 1, p = .03), suggesting that the EG improved compared to the CG. The R²c explained 84% of the variance in competence by including both fixed and random effects. For the relatedness construct, the EG showed a significant post-intervention increase (t(78) = −3.42, p < .001). Regarding motivation to limit ST, the CG showed a significant increase (t(78) = −2.99, p = .004) with a significant group × time interaction (F(7.56, 78) = 1, p = .007), indicating important differences in group trajectories. The R²c of 48% suggests a moderate explanation of motivation variance when including fixed and random effects. No significant differences were found between groups for SDT constructs related to sleep and HRQoL at any assessment time.

thumbnail
Download:
Table 6. Mixed models for SDT constructs and HRQoL, within- and between-group differences, interaction and random effects.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0336696.t006

4. Discussion

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a school-based intervention grounded in SDT on 24-HMB, compliance with 24-HMB recommendations, SDT constructs related to 24-HMB, and HRQoL in secondary school students. The intervention partially improved 24-HMB, with reductions in ST and increased compliance with weekday sleep recommendations, but showed no significant effects on MVPA, SDT constructs of competence and relatedness, or HRQoL.

The intervention had partial effects in improving weekend and total sleep behaviors, as indicated by significant group × time interactions, with progressive reductions observed across pre-, post-intervention, and follow-up assessments in the EG. These findings align with Sevil-Serrano et al. [40], who reported similar results for weekend sleep and overall sleep behaviors.

The intervention was not effective for MVPA, consistent with findings by Tapia-Serrano et al. [52]. This may be due to the necessity of longer interventions (at least six months) and extracurricular practical activities such as sports tournaments and educational outings to improve MVPA [53,54]. In contrast, Sevil-Serrano et al. [40] found significant MVPA improvements by integrating other knowledge areas and involving all educational community agents.

The intervention effectively reduced ST, as shown by group × time interaction analyses. After 12 weeks, the EG reduced ST by 1.34 h/day (weekdays), 2.12 h/day (weekend), and 1.73 h/day (total week), with improvements maintained at follow-up. These findings resemble patterns observed by Sevil-Serrano et al. [40] in a year-long intervention. The present study’s effectiveness was achieved with a shorter exposure time compared to long-term interventions focusing on ST reduction [28,55]. The effectiveness may be attributable to intervention strategies targeting ST reduction, such as device use restrictions during school hours and awareness campaigns for students and parents. Evidence indicates that incremental decreases in screen exposure are associated with measurable improvements in physical, mental, and social health outcomes, including reduced risk of obesity, enhanced sleep quality, and improved psychosocial well-being [56]. From a public health perspective, such reductions represent a substantial behavioral shift, given the typically high baseline levels of ST in this population. Importantly, these findings suggest that even partial adherence to the 24-HMB ST recommendation can yield tangible health benefits [4], reinforcing the value of school-based interventions that aim not only for full compliance but also for gradual, realistic reductions in SB among adolescents.

The intervention increased compliance with weekday sleep recommendations by 17.9 percentage points between pre- and post-intervention (p < .05) in the EG, similar to the 15.2-point increase reported by Sevil-Serrano et al. [40]. School schedules likely facilitate stable sleep patterns during weekdays [57], and this may have been reinforced by parental control, as parents received information about strategies of how to improve the 24-HMB of participants. For instance, sleep-related strategies implemented with parents included infographics about awareness, knowledge, hygiene, and sleep health effects.

Consistent with continuous variable analyses, no effectiveness was found for MVPA, differing from Sevil-Serrano et al. [40], who documented increased MVPA compliance. Similarly, no significant differences were observed between groups in ST compliance post-intervention, consistent with Tapia-Serrano et al. [52]. Conversely, Sevil-Serrano et al. [40] reported significant ST compliance improvements after 12 months. Despite absolute ST reductions, no significant compliance changes (≤ 2 h/day) were detected, possibly due to variability in assessment tools ranging from TV-only questionnaires to broader digital device usage surveys.

Changes were found in SDT competence and relatedness constructs related to PA in the EG, consistent with Gonzalez-Cutre et al. [18], who reported favorable changes in all SDT constructs with a different intervention design (three 90-minute sessions per week over 30 weeks) involving parental participation. SR and MA [58,59] suggest small, statistically nonsignificant effect sizes for SDT-based PA interventions. Motivation related to ST did not explain ST reduction in the EG, aligning with limited evidence on SDT use in ST reduction [60,61].

No significant intervention effects were observed for HRQoL. To our knowledge, no previous interventions have examined HRQoL as an outcome within the framework of 24-HMB, which limits the possibility of direct comparisons. Nevertheless, prior studies have shown that changes in PA can positively influence HRQoL among adolescents, particularly in interventions lasting between 2 and 12 months [62]. In contrast, the relatively short duration of the present program, coupled with potential limitations in study design and the sensitivity of the measurement instruments employed, may have hindered the detection of meaningful effects. These considerations underscore the importance of conducting further research with longer intervention periods, more robust methodological designs, and culturally sensitive instruments to clarify the causal relationships between 24-HMB and HRQoL.

Few experimental studies have been documented in literature and conducted to identify the effect of interventions on 24-HMB. Only two studies have been identified in children and adolescents [40,52]. However, when comparing the findings with those reported in the present study, it is worth noting that caution should be exercised considering the gradient of influence of family dynamics, school routines, cultural norms, and age group on 24-HMB in different geographic and sociocultural contexts. Therefore, it is important to tailor the interventions not only to cultural contexts but also to school environments and developmental stages.

Findings of the present study could be informative for strengthening current policies aimed at school health and formulating new ones. For example, in Colombia, PE is a mandatory subject at all levels of basic education. Therefore, its implementation is feasible. Additionally, the findings can enhance the strategies included in the “Healthy educational environment program” [63], since this program encourages parental involvement as an essential component of the educational environment.

4.1. Limitations and strengths

The study presents some limitations that must be acknowledged. First, the quasi-experimental design, potentially affecting internal validity. This convenience allocation may have introduced selection bias, as unmeasured contextual factors (school environment, teaching practices and contents), may partly explain the intervention effects. Second, the sample size was calculated considering information from a prior study and did not adjust for the clustering effect at the school level. This limitation may have affected the effective sample size and impacted the precision of the estimates. Third, the use of self-report questionnaires is related to information bias, which may result in over- or under-estimation of actual behaviors. Consequently, the precision of the observed effects may be limited. Future studies should incorporate objective measurements tools, such as accelerometers to strengthen validity. Fourth, taking into account that the study was conducted in an area of low socioeconomic position, findings present limited generalizability. And fifth, three separated mixed models were analyzed, without adjustments for multiple comparisons. This approach may increase the overall risk of Type I error. Future research with larger samples should consider adjustments when testing multiple outcomes simultaneously.

The strengths of the study include implementation in a real-world setting, family involvement, use of SDT as a theoretical framework, robust analytical methods, and a combination of educational, familial, and extracurricular strategies.

4.2. Suggestions for future research

Findings of the study allow to identify some aspects to be taken into account in future studies: 1) extending intervention duration to assess effectiveness on MVPA; 2) including and analyzing effects on other mental, physical, and social health markers; 3) investigating external school factors influencing intervention effectiveness on 24-HMB; and 4) exploring implementation processes to enhance external validity.

5. Conclusion

The school-based intervention partially improved 24-HMB in secondary school students, primarily by reducing ST and increasing compliance with weekday sleep recommendations. Positive effects were also observed in SDT competence and relatedness constructs associated with PA, although MVPA improvements were not significant. No significant post-intervention changes were found in HRQoL. Such incremental improvements are particularly relevant in school contexts, where realistic and sustainable strategies are essential for promoting healthier movement behaviors. Future research should build on these insights by examining longer-term interventions, testing scalable implementation models, and integrating multicomponent strategies that address the interconnected nature of sleep, PA, and ST. Strengthening the evidence base in this way will not only advance theoretical understanding but also guide the design of school-based programs that are both feasible and impactful in improving adolescent well-being.

Acknowledgments

We thank the selected schools and the Municipal Education Secretariat of Bello, Colombia, for providing access and facilitating the implementation of this project.

References

  1. 1. Saunders TJ, Gray CE, Poitras VJ, Chaput J-P, Janssen I, Katzmarzyk PT, et al. Combinations of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep: relationships with health indicators in school-aged children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 Suppl 3):S283–93. pmid:27306434
  2. 2. Wong CKH, Wong RS, Cheung JPY, Tung KTS, Yam JCS, Rich M, et al. Impact of sleep duration, physical activity, and screen time on health-related quality of life in children and adolescents. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):145. pmid:33980245
  3. 3. Chong KH, Parrish A-M, Cliff DP, Dumuid D, Okely AD. Changes in 24-hour movement behaviours during the transition from primary to secondary school among Australian children. Eur J Sport Sci. 2022;22(8):1276–86. pmid:33719925
  4. 4. Chong KH, Parrish A-M, Cliff DP, Dumuid D, Okely AD. Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Associations between 24-Hour Movement Behaviours, Recreational Screen Use and Psychosocial Health Outcomes in Children: A Compositional Data Analysis Approach. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):5995. pmid:34204928
  5. 5. Children & youth 5-17 years – 24-hour movement guidelines. https://csepguidelines.ca/guidelines/children-youth/. 2016. Accessed 2022 May 30.
  6. 6. Tremblay MS, Carson V, Chaput J-P, Connor Gorber S, Dinh T, Duggan M, et al. Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth: An Integration of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviour, and Sleep. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41(6 Suppl 3):S311-27. pmid:27306437
  7. 7. Rosenberger ME, Fulton JE, Buman MP, Troiano RP, Grandner MA, Buchner DM, et al. The 24-Hour Activity Cycle: A New Paradigm for Physical Activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2019;51(3):454–64. pmid:30339658
  8. 8. Tremblay MS. Introducing 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for the Early Years: A New Paradigm Gaining Momentum. J Phys Act Health. 2020;17(1):92–5. pmid:31711035
  9. 9. Tapia-Serrano MA, Sevil-Serrano J, Sánchez-Miguel PA, López-Gil JF, Tremblay MS, García-Hermoso A. Prevalence of meeting 24-Hour Movement Guidelines from pre-school to adolescence: A systematic review and meta-analysis including 387,437 participants and 23 countries. J Sport Health Sci. 2022;11(4):427–37. pmid:35066216
  10. 10. Zhao H, Wu N, Haapala EA, Gao Y. Association between meeting 24-h movement guidelines and health in children and adolescents aged 5-17 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1351972. pmid:38774055
  11. 11. Jones M, Defever E, Letsinger A, Steele J, Mackintosh KA. A mixed-studies systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to promote physical activity and/or reduce sedentary time in children. J Sport Health Sci. 2020;9(1):3–17. pmid:31921476
  12. 12. Rollo S, Antsygina O, Tremblay MS. The whole day matters: Understanding 24-hour movement guideline adherence and relationships with health indicators across the lifespan. Journal of Sport and Health Science. 2020;9(6):493–510.
  13. 13. Rodrigo-Sanjoaquín J, Tapia-Serrano MÁ, López-Gil JF, Sevil-Serrano J. Effects of school-based interventions on all 24-hour movement behaviours in young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2025;11(2):e002593. pmid:40256645
  14. 14. Silva AF da, Martins PC, Santiago LN, Silva DAS. Mapping Evidence on Integrated 24-Hour Movement Behaviors in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review of Reviews. Children (Basel). 2025;12(3):260. pmid:40150543
  15. 15. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):68–78. pmid:11392867
  16. 16. Van den Berghe L, Vansteenkiste M, Cardon G, Kirk D, Haerens L. Research on self-determination in physical education: key findings and proposals for future research. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy. 2012;19(1):97–121.
  17. 17. Sebire SJ, Edwards MJ, Fox KR, Davies B, Banfield K, Wood L, et al. Delivery and Receipt of a Self-Determination-Theory-Based Extracurricular Physical Activity Intervention: Exploring Theoretical Fidelity in Action 3:30. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016;38(4):381–95. pmid:27736294
  18. 18. González-Cutre D, Sierra AC, Beltrán-Carrillo VJ, Peláez-Pérez M, Cervelló E. A school-based motivational intervention to promote physical activity from a self-determination theory perspective. The Journal of Educational Research. 2016;111(3):320–30.
  19. 19. Ntoumanis N, Ng JYY, Prestwich A, Quested E, Hancox JE, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, et al. A meta-analysis of self-determination theory-informed intervention studies in the health domain: effects on motivation, health behavior, physical, and psychological health. Health Psychol Rev. 2021;15(2):214–44. pmid:31983293
  20. 20. B Owen K, Smith J, Lubans DR, Ng JYY, Lonsdale C. Self-determined motivation and physical activity in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2014;67:270–9. pmid:25073077
  21. 21. Reeve J, Jang H. What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2006;98(1):209–18.
  22. 22. Reeve J. Teachers as Facilitators: What Autonomy‐Supportive Teachers Do and Why Their Students Benefit. The Elementary School Journal. 2006;106(3):225–36.
  23. 23. Springer JB. “I am very, very proud of myself”: improving youth activity levels using self-determination theory in program development. Front Public Health. 2013;1:46. pmid:24350215
  24. 24. Moreno JA, González-Cutre D, Sicilia Á, Spray CM. Motivation in the exercise setting: Integrating constructs from the approach–avoidance achievement goal framework and self-determination theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2010;11(6):542–50.
  25. 25. Méndez Giménez A, Cecchini Estrada JA, Fernández Río J, González González de Mesa C. Autodeterminación y metas sociales: un modelo estructural para comprender la intención de práctica, el esfuerzo y el aburrimiento en educación física. Aula abierta. 2012;40(1):51–62.
  26. 26. Moreno Murcia JA, Parra Rojas N, González-Cutre Coll D. Influencia del apoyo a la autonomía, las metas sociales y la relación con los demás sobre la desmotivación en educación física. Psicothema. 2008;20(4):636–41.
  27. 27. Wright K, Suro Z. Using community--academic partnerships and a comprehensive school-based program to decrease health disparities in activity in school-aged children. J Prev Interv Community. 2014;42(2):125–39. pmid:24702663
  28. 28. Andrade S, Verloigne M, Cardon G, Kolsteren P, Ochoa-Avilés A, Verstraeten R, et al. School-based intervention on healthy behaviour among Ecuadorian adolescents: effect of a cluster-randomized controlled trial on screen-time. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:942. pmid:26395439
  29. 29. Kvalø SE, Natlandsmyr IK. The effect of physical-activity intervention on children’s health-related quality of life. Scand J Public Health. 2021;49(5):539–45. pmid:33228472
  30. 30. Bauducco SV, Flink IK, Boersma K, Linton SJ. Preventing sleep deficit in adolescents: Long-term effects of a quasi-experimental school-based intervention study. J Sleep Res. 2020;29(1):e12940. pmid:31691408
  31. 31. Chong KH, Parrish A-M, Cliff DP, Kemp BJ, Zhang Z, Okely AD. Changes in physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep across the transition from primary to secondary school: A systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2020;23(5):498–505. pmid:31848107
  32. 32. Mekary RA, Lucas M, Pan A, Okereke OI, Willett WC, Hu FB, et al. Isotemporal substitution analysis for physical activity, television watching, and risk of depression. Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(3):474–83. pmid:23785112
  33. 33. Smith E, Fazeli F, Wilkinson K, Clark CCT. Physical behaviors and fundamental movement skills in British and Iranian children: An isotemporal substitution analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021;31(2):398–404. pmid:32979234
  34. 34. Brown DMY, Kwan MYW. Movement Behaviors and Mental Wellbeing: A Cross-Sectional Isotemporal Substitution Analysis of Canadian Adolescents. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021;15:736587. pmid:34675788
  35. 35. Del Pozo-Cruz B, Gant N, Del Pozo-Cruz J, Maddison R. Relationships between sleep duration, physical activity and body mass index in young New Zealanders: An isotemporal substitution analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(9):e0184472. pmid:28898295
  36. 36. Dumuid D, Stanford TE, Pedišić Ž, Maher C, Lewis LK, Martín-Fernández J-A, et al. Adiposity and the isotemporal substitution of physical activity, sedentary time and sleep among school-aged children: a compositional data analysis approach. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):311. pmid:29499689
  37. 37. Tan SYX, Padmapriya N, Bernard JY, Toh JY, Wee H-L, Tan KH, et al. Cross-sectional and prospective associations between children’s 24-h time use and their health-related quality of life: a compositional isotemporal substitution approach. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2023;41:100918. pmid:37842643
  38. 38. Khan A, Lee E-Y, Tremblay MS. Meeting 24-h movement guidelines and associations with health related quality of life of Australian adolescents. J Sci Med Sport. 2021;24(5):468–73. pmid:33229218
  39. 39. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N, TREND Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(3):361–6. pmid:14998794
  40. 40. Sevil J, García-González L, Abós Á, Generelo E, Aibar A. Can High Schools Be an Effective Setting to Promote Healthy Lifestyles? Effects of a Multiple Behavior Change Intervention in Adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(4):478–86. pmid:30471871
  41. 41. Song Y, Yoon YJ, Lee HJ, Kim YS, Spence JC, Jeon JY. Development of a 24-Hour Movement Behavior Questionnaire for Youth: Process and Reliability Testing. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2021;53(12):1081–9. pmid:34690078
  42. 42. Tremblay MS, Leblanc AG, Janssen I, Kho ME, Hicks A, Murumets K, et al. Canadian sedentary behaviour guidelines for children and youth. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011;36(1):59–64; 65–71. pmid:21326378
  43. 43. Hirshkowitz M, Whiton K, Albert SM, Alessi C, Bruni O, DonCarlos L, et al. National Sleep Foundation’s sleep time duration recommendations: methodology and results summary. Sleep Health. 2015;1(1):40–3. pmid:29073412
  44. 44. Montoya-Garcia E, Ricardo-Sejin JR, Arango-Paternina CM, Florez-Pregonero A, Patiño-Villada FA. Adaptación, validez de criterio y confiabilidad de un cuestionario para evaluar los comportamientos del movimiento en 24 horas en adolescentes colombianos. Universidad de Antioquia. 2024.
    • 45. De Moraes ACF, Nascimento-Ferreira MV, Forjaz CL de M, Aristizabal JC, Azzaretti L, Nascimento Junior WV, et al. Reliability and validity of a sedentary behavior questionnaire for South American pediatric population: SAYCARE study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):5. pmid:31924168
    • 46. Ravens-Sieberer U, Erhart M, Rajmil L, Herdman M, Auquier P, Bruil J, et al. Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents’ well-being and health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(10):1487–500. pmid:20668950
    • 47. Brunet J, Gunnell KE, Teixeira P, Sabiston CM, Bélanger M. Should We Be Looking at the Forest or the Trees? Overall Psychological Need Satisfaction and Individual Needs as Predictors of Physical Activity. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016;38(4):317–30. pmid:27736369
    • 48. Lubans DR, Lonsdale C, Plotnikoff RC, Smith J, Dally K, Morgan PJ. Development and evaluation of the Motivation to Limit Screen-time Questionnaire (MLSQ) for adolescents. Prev Med. 2013;57(5):561–6. pmid:23954182
    • 49. McAuley E, Duncan T, Tammen VV. Psychometric properties of the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory in a competitive sport setting: a confirmatory factor analysis. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1989;60(1):48–58. pmid:2489825
    • 50. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687. pmid:24609605
    • 51. Love J, Dropman D, Selker R, Gallucci M, Jentschke S, Balci S. The Jamovi Project. https://www.jamovi.org/about.html. 2022.
    • 52. Tapia-Serrano MA, Sevil-Serrano J, Sánchez-Oliva D, Vaquero-Solís M, Sánchez-Miguel PA. Effects of a school-based intervention on physical activity, sleep duration, screen time, and diet in children. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English ed). 2022;27(1):56–65.
    • 53. Neil-Sztramko SE, Caldwell H, Dobbins M. School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;9(9):CD007651. pmid:34555181
    • 54. Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, James ME, Moore SA, Sharma R, Martin Ginis KA. Movement behaviours and health of children and youth with disabilities: Impact of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. Paediatr Child Health. 2022;27(Suppl 1):S66–71. pmid:35620557
    • 55. Hynynen S-T, van Stralen MM, Sniehotta FF, Araújo-Soares V, Hardeman W, Chinapaw MJM, et al. A systematic review of school-based interventions targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviour among older adolescents. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol. 2016;9(1):22–44. pmid:26807143
    • 56. Babic MJ, Smith JJ, Morgan PJ, Lonsdale C, Plotnikoff RC, Eather N, et al. Intervention to reduce recreational screen-time in adolescents: Outcomes and mediators from the “Switch-Off 4 Healthy Minds” (S4HM) cluster randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2016;91:50–7. pmid:27471018
    • 57. Díaz-Morales JF, Escribano C, Jankowski KS. Chronotype and time-of-day effects on mood during school day. Chronobiol Int. 2015;32(1):37–42. pmid:25153134
    • 58. Kelso A, Linder S, Reimers AK, Klug SJ, Alesi M, Scifo L, et al. Effects of school-based interventions on motivation towards physical activity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 2020;51:101770.
    • 59. Tapia-Serrano MÁ, López-Gajardo MA, Sánchez-Miguel PA, González-Ponce I, García-Calvo T, Pulido JJ, et al. Effects of out-of-school physical activity interventions based on self-determination theory in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2023;33(10):1929–47. pmid:37381660
    • 60. Patti Jean N. Screen Smart: Evaluation of a Brief School Facilitated and Family Focused Intervention to Encourage Children to Manage Their Screen-Time. J Child Adolesc Behav. 2014;02(01).
    • 61. Smith JJ, Morgan PJ, Lonsdale C, Dally K, Plotnikoff RC, Lubans DR. Mediators of change in screen-time in a school-based intervention for adolescent boys: findings from the ATLAS cluster randomized controlled trial. J Behav Med. 2017;40(3):423–33. pmid:27844278
    • 62. Bermejo-Cantarero A, Sánchez-López M, Álvarez-Bueno C, Redondo-Tébar A, García-Hermoso A, Martínez-Vizcaino V. Are Physical Activity Interventions Effective in Improving Health-Related Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Sports Health. 2024;16(6):877–85. pmid:37608692
    • 63. MINSALUD. Estrategia de entorno educativo saludable. Dueñas-Contreras J, Torres-Muñoz S, Lizarazo-Bejarano J, Cardenas-Pinilla MA, Picon-Gonzalez A, Toro-Sandoval SJ, editors. Bogota: Ministerio de Salud; 2018.