Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Reasons for stopping Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): A retrospective study to improve future patient selection

  • Anne-Cécile Ezanno,
  • Brice Malgras,
  • Pierre-Louis Conan,
  • Adeline Aime,
  • Jade Fawaz,
  • Hugo Picchi,
  • Solène Doat,
  • Marc Pocard

In the Results section, there is an error in the fourth sentence of the first paragraph. The correct sentence is: The origins of the PM were gastric, colorectal, ovarian, mesothelioma, biliopancreatic or other in 40 (44.9%), 25 (28.1%), 5 (5.7%), 7 (7.9%), 6 (6.7%) and 6 (6.7%) patients, respectively.

In the Discussion section, there is an error in the third sentence of the last paragraph. The correct sentence is: We included seven cases of mesothelioma, but for this kind of PM etiology the patients had an average of six PIPAC procedures, which may point to some effectiveness of PIPAC for this indication.

Reference

  1. 1. Ezanno A-C, Malgras B, Conan P-L, Aime A, Fawaz J, Picchi H, et al. Reasons for stopping Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): A retrospective study to improve future patient selection. PLoS One. 2023;18(11):e0287785. pmid:38033087

Citation: Ezanno A-C, Malgras B, Conan P-L, Aime A, Fawaz J, Picchi H, et al. (2025) Correction: Reasons for stopping Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC): A retrospective study to improve future patient selection. PLoS One 20(10): e0335021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335021

Published: October 17, 2025

Copyright: © 2025 Ezanno et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.