In the Abstract, there is an error in the sixth sentence. The correct sentence is: Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed worse prognosis for E4 (mean survival: 5.6 years) than for E1–E3 combined (10.1 years) (p < 0.0001).
In the Results section, there is an error in the sixth sentence of the third paragraph. The correct sentence is: None of the patients in the Past E2 or E3 categories required further examinations that necessitated changes to the treatment plan (mean OP for E2: 2,880 days; mean OP for E3: 2,976 days).
In the Results, there is an error in the third and seventh sentence of the fourth paragraph. The correct third sentence is: The hazard ratio for Past E4 (vs the combined Past E1–E3) was 8.2 (95% CI: 3.7–18.4). The correct seventh sentence is: The hazard ratio for Revised E4 (vs the combined Revised E1–E3) was 5.2 (95% CI: 2.4–11.2).
Reference
Citation: Tomimatsu H, Fujimoto K, Suto T, Matsuo M (2025) Correction: Prognosis of extracolonic findings on clinical computed tomographic colonography: A single-center experience. PLoS One 20(10): e0334534. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334534
Published: October 14, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Tomimatsu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.