Figures
Abstract
The live cochlea is a critical and delicate sensory organ with tissue sampling posing a risk to balance and hearing functions. Consequently, a researchers’ ability to investigate the pathogenesis of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has been limited, commonly involving in vitro models, translational animal models and post-mortem analysis. Previous human studies investigating SNHL have primarily been restricted to using peripheral blood or cerebrospinal fluid samples that indirectly measure inner ear pathologies. More recently, the establishment of a novel, safe, and feasible technique for intraoperative perilymph sampling has enabled the collection of a ‘liquid biopsy’ of the cochlea whilst still preserving inner ear function. This crucial development has opened avenues for characterising the cochlea microenvironment and subsequently investigating the mechanisms of SNHL. Perilymph sampling may also provide insights into why postoperative outcomes vary between cochlear implant users with otherwise similar preoperative clinical characteristics. The present systematic review aimed to elucidate the gap in the literature regarding the utility of perilymph biomarkers in SNHL diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for two groups of keywords related to ‘biomarker’ and ‘SNHL’. Of the 7471 studies initially identified, 15 met the inclusion criteria. Based on the findings of these studies, biomarkers were grouped into six main categories based on their underlying pathological processes: heat shock proteins (HSP), immune-related, microRNA, neurotrophic, metabolome, and structural. For each category, this review identifies potential biomarkers that should be carefully validated in future studies. In particular, HSP70 and HSP90, complement components, mi1299, mi1270, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor regulated proteins may help direct future studies focused on characterising the biomarker profile in patients with SNHL. Future studies should ideally also utilise larger cohorts of patients with specified hearing loss aetiologies. Such studies may help to pave the way towards a more accurate diagnosis of SNHL, improved prediction of cochlear implantation prognosis, and targeted therapeutic management.
Citation: Wanniarachchi K, Clark ST, Donnelly N, Bance M, Creber N (2025) Utility of cochlear perilymph biomarkers for hearing loss - A systematic review. PLoS One 20(10): e0334351. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0334351
Editor: Toru Miwa, Teikyo University Hospital Mizonokuchi, JAPAN
Received: April 2, 2025; Accepted: September 25, 2025; Published: October 17, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Wanniarachchi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data generated or analysed during this study, including the minimal data set, are included in this published article.
Funding: Professor Bance and the SENSE Lab are supported by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203312*). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Sita Tarini Clark was funded by the Woolf Fisher Trust, New Zealand, the Cambridge Commonwealth, European, & International Trust, and by Trinity College, University of Cambridge. Nathan Creber was funded by the Garnett Passe and Rodney Williams Memorial Foundation.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1 Introduction
Disabling hearing loss is estimated to affect more than 430 million people worldwide and is projected to rise to 700 million by 2050 [1]. Despite this, our understanding of the aetiology of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and the characteristics of the cochlear microenvironment remains limited. This is largely due to the live cochlea being a delicate and relatively inaccessible organ, due to the risk of loss of organ function upon tissue sampling, resulting in hearing and balance compromise. This reduced access has subsequently limited researcher’s ability to investigate the pathogenesis and treatment of different types of SNHL, including Ménière’s disease, vestibular schwannoma, presbycusis, and sudden idiopathic SNHL. Additionally, outcome prediction in patients undergoing cochlear implantation has remained difficult, with high inter-individual variability following surgery, even amongst patients with similar clinical histories and implanted devices [2].
Previous reviews of serum biomarkers have been informative in trying to further characterise the cochlear perilymph, but to a limited degree. Parham and colleagues first demonstrated that patients with BPPV have a significantly higher blood otolin-1 than patients without an otologic history [3]. Wang and colleagues also examined the diagnostic and predictive value of different serum metabolites within perilymph and found that N4-acetylcytidine, sphingosine, and nonadecanoic acid levels were all associated with hearing recovery in SNHL patients [4]. Lee et al. also identified multiple autoantibodies in patient serum that may be linked to an autoimmune reaction associated with bilateral SNHL [5]. However, these serum biomarkers have limited specificity and have therefore not been approved for use in clinical otology [6]. Indirect blood, serum, and urine samples are also limited by their lower biomarker concentrations and baseline variability in age, sex, and ethnicity, which further restricts the utility of their findings for diagnostic and therapeutic use in patients with SNHL [7–10].
To understand the pathophysiology of hearing loss it is therefore generally preferable to use tissues or samples in close proximity to the affected regions, as they are more likely to accurately represent the system studied. Recently, the establishment of a novel, safe, and feasible technique for intraoperative perilymph sampling has enabled the collection of a ‘liquid biopsy’ of the cochlea whilst still preserving inner ear function. Concerns regarding the safety of perilymph sampling have been addressed and the feasibility of perilymph sampling has been validated by several groups [11]. Perilymph liquid biopsies subsequently have the potential to more accurately characterise inner ear pathologies and provide clinicians with additional diagnostic tools to aid in the individualised treatment of SNHL. This is particularly useful as a prognostic indicator for performance after cochlear implantation and when considering potential therapeutic targets for other disorders.
Perilymph is an extracellular fluid in the inner ear that is found within the scala tympani and scala vestibuli of the cochlea, and in the vestibule of the inner ear [12]. It bathes the membranous labyrinth and functions to transmit sound vibrations from the oval window to the cochlear duct, as well as maintain the specific ionic components required to generate the endocochlear potential needed for transduction of mechanical to electrical energy [12]. The cochlea is a relatively closed fluid-filled system surrounded by a bony otic capsule. Due to the close proximity and contact of perilymph to the soft tissues structures within the scala tympani, it is reasonable to assume that a protein or metabolite secreted by damaged inner ear cells in pathological states will likely be found in higher concentrations in perilymph compared to cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or blood [13]. Thus, direct perilymph sampling has significant potential to aid the identification of pathology-specific biomarkers in different inner ear diseases.
Initial attempts at postmortem human perilymph sampling helped to establish the ionic profile of perilymph [14,15]. Subsequent studies drew comparisons between CSF, serum, and perilymph proteins, including alpha-1 antitrypsin, pre-albumin, and esterase, to identify differences in the molecular profiles and hence, functions of the inner ear [16,17]. Animal studies have also demonstrated dynamic changes in perilymph composition that occur following noise exposure, including a four-fold increase in reactive oxygen species in mice after a 1-hour exposure to 110 dB [18]. While these studies have provided a foundation for our understanding of perilymph composition, they currently have limited clinical utility in the diagnosis of SNHL subtypes in human patients and the development of targeted treatments.
Perilymph samples can now be obtained during cochlear implantation, trans-labyrinthine resections of vestibular schwannomas, labyrinthectomy, and stapedotomy. This has enabled further characterisation of the inflammatory profile of different SNHL diagnoses and the comparison with perilymph samples from patients with conductive hearing loss (CHL), such as from patients with otosclerosis following stapedectomy [19]. Schmitt et al. have demonstrated the safety of these sampling methods by comparing pure-tone audiometry hearing thresholds in patients at the time of their first fitting of the cochlear implant and three months later [11]. The same stability in residual hearing was detected in patients who had undergone perilymph sampling as those that did not. No significant additional differences in hearing thresholds were found.
Lysaght and colleagues were the first to apply mass spectroscopy (MS) to human perilymph samples. They identified 71 proteins common in every sample obtained from twelve vestibular schwannoma patients [20]. As the cochlea is a tiny organ, only small volume samples between 1-5 µl can be safely obtained from the cochlear lumen without damaging function or other structures [21]. Therefore, subsequent advancements in MS-based protein analysis have focused on enhancing the sensitivity and reproducibility of protein identification within these smaller samples. More recent studies have successfully detected approximately 300 different proteins within a single perilymph sample of 1-12 µl [13,22]. Such analytical advances, combined with the establishment of safe and sensitive methods of obtaining a ‘liquid biopsy’ of the inner ear, have provided valuable insight into the previously uncharted microenvironment of the cochlea.
The complexity of the cochlea microenvironment has implicated roles for the proteome [11], metabolome [23], miRNA [24], and inflammasome [25], in the pathogenesis of SNHL. The primary aim of this review is to identify biomarkers from perilymph samples associated with SNHL to inform the diagnosis of specific pathologies. The secondary aims of this review are to investigate biomarkers associated with cochlear implantation outcomes to help predict patient prognosis and identify potential future therapeutic targets.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Search strategy and databases
A search was conducted on the following databases after consulting a specialist librarian (VP): Medline (via Ovid), Embase (via Ovid), Web of Science (Core Collection), and Scopus from inception to April 2024. The search strategy was peer-reviewed by two librarian colleagues of VP using the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) checklist [26], and evaluated against the PRISMA-S guidelines [27]. Databases were searched separately rather than multiple databases being searched on the same platform. The search syntax was adapted for each database, to account for variation in thesaurus terms/controlled vocabulary between databases. In the preliminary stage of this study, Google Scholar was used to identify a broad range of target papers that otherwise may not have been captured by conventional databases. Subsequently, a formal search strategy was performed using only established databases, as listed above.
Keywords were divided into two groups according to biomarker type and hearing loss pathologies. The first group included: Biomarker, Metabolome, Proteome, RNA, miRNA, or Inflammasome, and the second group included: Hearing loss, Deafness, Ménière, or Otosclerosis. Excluding animal studies resulted in a minority of the target papers being omitted as not all human studies were tagged appropriately. Therefore, animal studies were included in the primary search and subsequently removed at screening. This was achieved by excluding studies if the population described was clearly animal-based (e.g. rodent, primate, or other non-human models). Where abstracts were unclear, full texts were retrieved to assess the study population; this was performed by two independent reviewers. This process ensured that only human studies relevant to the review question were retained in the final analysis.
2.2 Study eligibility, inclusion, and exclusion criteria
Inclusion criteria for this study included: peer-reviewed studies; biomarkers from perilymph associated with hearing loss; human studies; international publications; and correlational studies. Correlational studies included cohort studies in which participants were grouped into different SNHL aetiologies with or without a control group, and associated perilymph biomarkers were identified. Exclusion criteria included: animal studies; case studies; inner ear tissue biopsy/cellular samples; endolymphatic sac fluid; review articles; vertigo; tinnitus; serum biomarker; genetic markers; conference poster articles; non-peer-reviewed studies. Only primary studies were included in this systematic review. Review articles were excluded to avoid double-counting evidence and introducing bias into the study conclusions. Similarly, case studies were also excluded due to their limited generalisability.
2.3 Study screening process
After duplicate removal, 7471 papers were identified. The title and abstract screening were completed by two independent reviewers (KW and NC) using the online platform, Rayyan. The most common reasons for exclusion at the title and abstract screening stage were: patients with other types of hearing loss (non-SNHL), reviews, and commentaries. 191 studies were subsequently selected for full text screening. At this stage, the most common reason for exclusion was different sample type (typically serum, CSF, or inner ear tissue). Previously, studies were reliant on these indirect systemic sample types when investigating the cochlear microenvironment. However, due to recent advances in safe, intraoperative sampling techniques, researchers are now able to include direct perilymph samples in their analysis. In turn, this review focused on the biomarker profile of these localised perilymph samples specifically, to help inform future studies utilising this novel technique in different hearing pathologies going forward. 14 eligible papers were identified from this screening. Finally, the reference list of each of the remaining papers were screened, and one additional paper was identified. A total of 15 papers were therefore included in this review, as outlined in (Fig 1).
2.4 Data extraction and analysis
The extracted data included: author, year of publication, country of publication, study design, level of evidence according to ‘The Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine’, perilymph extraction procedure (e.g., cochlear implantation/ vestibular schwannoma resection/ stapedectomy), biomarker identified, and key findings. Some studies included a large volume of screened biomarkers. Those that produced statistically significant results were included in the study analysis.
2.5 Risk of bias
The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. This tool evaluates seven domains of potential bias: confounding, selection of participants, classification of interventions, deviations from intended interventions, missing data, measurement of outcomes, and selection of reported resources. Each domain was assessed as low, moderate, or series risk of bias. The risk of bias was assessed by two independent reviewers (KJ and SC), and discrepancies were resolved through discussion or consulting a third reviewer (NC).
3 Results
All 15 studies included in this review were correlational in design, as outlined in Table 1 [11,20,22,24,25,28–37]. One study utilised machine learning approaches to build disease-specific algorithms to predict the presence of SNHL using only miRNA expression profiles [34]. The majority of studies sampled perilymph in patients with SNHL via the round window during cochlear implantation. In studies with control groups, perilymph was typically obtained from patients with CHL due to otosclerosis during stapedectomy [29,34–36], labyrinthectomy for Ménière’s disease [35], or trans-labyrinthine surgery for vestibular schwannoma resection [11,20,30–32]. Beyond differences in sampling location, the aetiology of SNHL varied between studies. Most patients in these cohorts had SNHL due to Ménière’s disease, vestibular schwannoma, or an enlarged vestibular aqueduct. In nine of the studies, the aetiology of SNHL was not reported for several patients. One study had an unspecified sample size [24].
Two predominant study designs were identified in this review. Firstly, five studies sought to identify biomarkers that correlated with cochlear implant outcomes, particularly loss of residual hearing [22,30,32,34,36]. This involved performing pure tone audiometry following cochlear implantation to group patients into those with residual hearing and those without any residual hearing. The biomarker profile was compared between the two groups. One study grouped patients into “complete deafness” and “residual hearing” before cochlear implantation [25]. The second predominant study design aimed to identify biomarkers correlated with specific SNHL aetiologies. Five studies focused on biomarkers associated with Ménière’s disease in comparison to otosclerosis controls [24,28,33,36]. Two studies looked at biomarkers associated with vestibular schwannomas [20,31]. Interestingly, one study compared biomarker profiles based on the duration of hearing loss (more than 12 years compared to less than 12 years) [37]. Another study compared the biomarker profile of adults and children undergoing cochlear implantation in the hope of gaining potential insights into the pathogenesis of presbycusis [11]. In the following discussion, the findings are discussed by functional group in more detail.
Fourteen studies were classified as moderate bias risk and one study as severe bias risk (Table 2). Importantly, most of the studies were deemed ‘moderate’ in the ‘bias due to confounding’ domain, due to the inclusion of participants with unknown hearing loss aetiologies. One study did not specify the number of patients involved or any further disease aetiology [24]. In some of the studies, bilateral samples were taken from patients [11,22,25,30] but were analysed separately. One paper adopted an unusual methodology for sample analysis; twelve patients were included in the study, six with vestibular schwannomas and six post-CI; however, only four samples were run for analysis and samples were pooled to result in more protein for analysis [20].
4 Discussion
Previous reviews have adopted varying approaches to biomarker classification. For example, Gomaa et al. categorised the biomarkers identified in their study according to their diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic value [6]. Appraising the functional diversity of perilymph biomarkers identified through this review, we have grouped biomarkers into the following functional categories: heat shock proteins, immune/inflammatory mediators, microRNAs, neurotrophic pathway, metabolic, and structural. The rationale for this categorisation is that it may help to discern the key pathological processes underlying SNHL within a complex perilymph microenvironment.
4.1 Heat Shock Proteins
Heat shock proteins (HSP) are a superfamily of proteins that play an important role in cellular protection, particularly under stress conditions such as heat, oxidative stress, or toxins [38]. Mechanical and chemical stressors can result in various changes in genomic transcription and protein folding. In response, however, HSPs work to protect cells from injury by promoting the folding of denatured proteins and preventing aggregation. Moreover, HSPs can suppress apoptotic pathways by interacting with proteins associated with signal transduction in active cell death [39]. These proteins are classified according to their weight into 6 families: small HSPCs, HSP40, HSP60, HSP70, HSP90, and HSP110 [40]. The neuroprotective role of HSPs have also been implicated beyond the cochlea, with HSP70 and small HSPs associated with enhanced retinal ganglion cell survival in optic neuropathies such as glaucoma [39].
In the cochlea, HSPs may play a protective role in hearing preservation following cochlear implantation. The variability in outcomes of cochlear implant patients remains largely unexplained. Clinical factors alone have proved insufficient for predicting patient performance [41], suggesting that additional factors such as the patient’s genetic profile and their individual cochlear microenvironment may influence their postoperative outcomes, particularly with regards to hearing preservation following cochlear implantation. Schmitt et al. evaluated the HSPs associated with residual hearing after cochlear implantation and found that subtypes 1 and 6 of HSP70 were found in all patients with preserved residual hearing [32]. The protective effect of HSP70 is supported by experimental mouse models in which HSP70-overexpressing mice were significantly protected against aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss and hair cell death compared to their wild-type counterparts [42].
Interestingly, not all HSPs exert a protective effect. HSP90 was found in higher levels in patients with a complete loss of residual hearing following cochlear implantation and only one patient with preserved hearing had HSP90 detected in the perilymph following surgery. In this study, 3 patients undergoing translabyrinthine vestibular surgeries were also included, however, no significant difference in HSP distribution was identified when compared to the cochlear implantation group. Furthermore, Edvardsson Rasmussen et al. identified three variations of HSP70 in only one of the 15 patients with vestibular schwannoma included in their study [31].
Of note, Schmitt et al.’s [32] findings were not replicated in Durisin et al.’s [22] analysis of perilymph proteins post-CI. These researchers evaluated hearing performance using speech intelligibility (HSM sentence test in noise at 10dB and Freiberg monosyllable word test) and grouped participants into excellent and poor speech intelligibility groups post-CI. They found higher levels of HSP70 1A/B in the poor speech intelligibility group, in other words, higher levels of this HSP in the group with poorer CI outcomes. Overall, the association of HSP70 with CI outcomes is inconsistent, with further investigation needed to clarify the role of HSPs as a useful marker for CI prognostication.
4.2 Immune/ Inflammatory mediators
Historically, the inner ear, including the cochlea, was assumed to be an immune-privileged organ similar to the eyes or brain, due to the presence of a blood-labyrinthine-barrier (BLB) with tight junctions [43]. This forms a protective barrier blocking immune cells, inner ear antigens, and antibodies from entering. However, recent studies have demonstrated the presence of a complex immune microenvironment within the cochlea itself [44]. An initial study demonstrating the responsiveness of certain types of SSHL to steroid treatment was the first to challenge the idea of the cochlea as an immune-privileged organ [45]. Later, Zhang and colleagues revealed two cell types of macrophage lineage in the lateral wall of the cochlea: cochlear macrophages and perivascular macrophage-like melanocytes, which are involved in clearing cell debris, maintaining cochlear fluid homeostasis, and regulating BLB permeability [46]. Animal studies have demonstrated changes in inflammatory gene expression in the cochlea following noise exposure, including the upregulation of genes such as CXL10, SOCS3, and TCl1b1 [47]. Other studies have identified increased pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 following noise exposure [48]. Since these initial findings, an extensive list of inflammatory gene regulations has been reported by Karayay and colleagues [49]. Collectively, these findings suggest a role for inflammatory cells/mediators in the development of cochlear damage and SNHL.
Soluble components of the innate immune system have recently been identified in the perilymph which correlate with cochlear implant performance. Warnecke and colleagues identified higher concentrations of inflammatory cytokines, IL-13 and IL-9, in patients with complete hearing loss following CI surgery when compared to patients with some residual hearing following surgery, although the difference in IL-9 did not reach statistical significance [25]. The complement system is another crucial part of the innate immune system and has roles in pathogen opsonisation, chemotaxis and activation of leukocytes, cytolysis, as well as clearance of apoptotic cells and immune complexes [50]. Higher levels of complement component C8 alpha chain were found in patients with excellent speech intelligibility at 1-year post-CI compared to the poor speech intelligibility group [22]. Complement C8 is an important antibacterial immune effector and is part of the membrane attack complex that forms a pore in bacterial membranes and leads to cell lysis. Complement C1r subcomponent and complement H were also found to be in higher abundance in the perilymph of patients with Ménière’s disease compared to the perilymph of otosclerosis controls [33]. Furthermore, complement C4 was found in a higher abundance in adults when compared to children following cochlear implantation, potentially providing insight into differences in perilymph composition in presbycusis by age [11]. Finally, one study identified alpha-2-HS glycoprotein as an independent variable for tumour-associated hearing loss [31]. Alpha-2-HS glycoprotein is an acute phase response protein and is involved in neutrophil degranulation [51]. Recent studies have also hypothesised that alpha-2-HS may be excreted from vestibular schwannomas into the extracellular perilymph where it exerts pro-inflammatory activity [31]. These findings are in congruence with a previous study by Schmitt et al. that identified alpha-2-HS in several samples from patients with an unknown cause of sensorineural hearing loss [11].
Components of the adaptive immune system, specifically immunoglobulin (Ig) chains, have also been associated with SNHL. One study found Ig Kappa chain V-IV regions upregulated in patients with excellent hearing performance following cochlear implantation. However, a different subset of immunoglobulins was upregulated in patients with poor hearing performance, specifically genes IGHV1–2 and IGHV1–46 which encode various regions on the immunoglobulin heavy chain, and IGKV6–21 for immunoglobulin kappa variable 6–21 [22]. Two further studies have also suggested a role for attractin in SSHL [11,22]. Attractin is a circulating glycoprotein that is rapidly expressed on activated T cells [52] and was found to be more abundant in patients with Ménière’s disease but also patients with higher speech intelligibility after CI surgery. Collectively, these findings suggest that a diverse set of immune or inflammatory mediators may be associated with SNHL, with a potential impact on CI performance, ranging from interleukins and complement proteins to acute phase reactants and immunoglobulins.
4.3 microRNAs
Changes in the protein environment, or ‘proteome’ of the inner ear may also contribute to SNHL, a process regulated in part by microRNAs (miRNA). MiRNAs are 19–23 base pair single-stranded RNA sequences that regulate gene expression through mRNA degradation and silencing [53,54]. Beyond the ear, miRNAs in CSF are being evaluated as potential markers of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s [55] and in the aqueous humour of the eye for glaucoma [56]. Equally, miRNAs have been shown to play a crucial role in inner ear development. The miR-183 family is expressed as the otic vesicle develops from the otic placode and is later restricted in expression to hair cells and the spiral ganglion [57].
Previous studies on peripheral blood samples identified 24 differentially expressed miRNAs in SNHL patients when compared to healthy controls, with subsequent functional annotation analysis revealing target genes in arachidonic acid metabolism, complement, and coagulation cascades [58]. Focusing on perilymph samples in particular, work by Shew et al. [24,34–36] has identified a diverse set of miRNAs correlated with SNHL of varying aetiologies. In their 2018 study, three miRNAs (mi1233-5p, mi455-3p, mi638) were expressed in patients undergoing cochlear implantation who were diagnosed with Ménière’s disease, but not in the other implantation patients without Ménière’s disease [24]. Mi1233-5p, mi455-3p, and mi638 form part of a regulatory network, including two proteins, aquaporin 4, and TNFSF12, which have been implicated in the pathogenesis of Ménière’s disease [59,60]. However, caution should be exercised when interpreting these findings, as the number of control participants was not stated in this study [24]. Shew and colleagues subsequent study in 2021 corroborated these findings and identified miRNA 1299 and 1270 uniquely and differentially expressed in the perilymph of patients with Ménière’s disease [35]. Both miRNA 1299 and 1270 are linked to inflammatory and autoimmune pathways, while miRNA-1299 can be linked to aquaporin expression specifically. The author’s 2019 study also utilised a machine learning approach and identified several ‘critical miRNA’ that differentiated conductive and SNHL. The downstream targets were identified as KCNJ10, HCN, and Otoferlin which are important for propagating endocochlear potentials [61], post-synaptic potentials [62], and Ca2 + evoked vesicular endocytosis in inner hair cells [63], respectively.
In addition to aquaporin and ion channel expression, miRNAs may also play a role in the neurotrophin pathway as discussed below. Shew and colleagues found that a lower expression of miR-1207 and miR4651, which target neurotrophin receptors 2 and 3 (NTR2 and NTR3), was statistically correlated with having no residual hearing (pure tone audiometry threshold > 80dB) prior to cochlear implantation [35]. These findings demonstrate the potential clinical utility of implementing miRNA profiling before CI surgery, to optimise post-operative outcomes in patients with SNHL.
4.4 Neurotrophin pathway proteins
As previously suggested, neurotrophic proteins may represent an important group of perilymph biomarkers for SNHL with several studies directly investigating their presence in the perilymph. Neurotrophins are a family of molecules that play an integral role in the development and support of neurons. In the murine inner ear, BDNF and NT-3 have been shown to regulate the connection of hair cells to neurons [5,64]. One study found that BDNF-regulated proteins were correlated with residual hearing prior to cochlear implantation and improved performance after 1 year, although the samples were obtained from patients with SNHL of various aetiologies [25]. Another study found higher levels of kallikrein in patients with excellent hearing post-CI surgery [22] which works to increase the expression of BDNF and pro-survival Bcl-2 genes [65]. However, Schmitt and colleagues did not detect endogenous BDNF in their samples [11].
Endothelial factors may also play a role in inner ear repair. Warnecke and colleagues found reduced levels of VEGF-D in patients with no residual hearing (PTA threshold > 80dB) compared to patients with residual hearing following cochlear implantation [25]. Interestingly, VEGF-D has a central role in lymphangiogenesis [66], suggesting that reduced levels of VEGF-D in patients with no residual hearing may indicate ongoing damage and reduced repair. Similarly, Schmitt and colleagues found higher levels of HSPG in patients with enlarged vestibular aqueducts and Ménière’s disease, compared to those with otosclerosis [33]. HSPG has complex regulatory roles over VEGF A, VEGFR2, and α2β1 integrin signalling axes [67]. Another growth factor regulator, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP1), which regulates insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), was higher in patients with no residual hearing [25]. Although, the precise correlation of neurotrophins and vascular factors with SNHL is unclear, they are likely to provide insight into the pathogenesis of SNHL and the aetiologies of related diseases.
4.5 Metabolome
A growing body of literature suggests that the metabolic profile of perilymph may provide insight into SNHL pathogenesis. Trinh and colleagues found a correlation between the metabolic profile of perilymph and the duration of hearing loss in patients (less than 12, or more than 12 years of hearing loss), specifically elevated levels of N-acetylneuraminate, which is a metabolite located on the terminal glycoprotein and glycolipid on the surface of cell membranes that increases following cell membrane breakage (hair cell apoptosis) [37]. Other discriminant metabolites found in this study include: glutaric acid, cysteine, butanoate, and xanthine. Similarly, another study found the protein short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase family 9C member 7 (SDR9C7) uniquely in 11 out of 12 samples from Ménière’s disease patients, but not in patients with an enlarged vestibular aqueduct or otosclerosis [33]. SDR9C7 is involved in vitamin A metabolism, specifically the conversion of retinal to retinol in the presence of NADH. Mutations in SDR9C7 have already been linked to dermatological pathology (autosomal recessive ichthyosis). However, the role of this enzyme in the context of the cochlea is yet to be explored.
Reactive oxygen species (ROS) also form a component of the metabolic profile of perilymph. ROS are responsible for direct cellular damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA, and trigger apoptosis or necrosis [68]. Elevated levels of ROS have been detected in patients with profound SNHL and have been attributed to the activity of the xanthine dehydrogenase/xanthine oxidase enzyme system [29]. One study found that proteins related to apoptotic signalling and ROS were upregulated following intratympanic steroid treatment, specifically serine leukocyte inhibitor and annexin A1 which are both involved in ROS processes and have anti-inflammatory activities [69]. In this way, several metabolic markers could provide insight into the pathogenesis of SNHL.
4.6 Structural proteins
Finally, a selection of structural proteins has been detected at higher levels in SNHL patients than in controls. Flnb and ACTB, which encode filamin B and beta-actin respectively, were found to be highly abundant in Ménière’s disease patients compared to those with alternative hearing loss aetiologies [28]. Six out of the seven highly abundant proteins in Ménière’s disease found by Arambula and colleagues [28] were also identified in Schmitt and colleagues’ [33] list of 33 proteins. Another study reported low-density lipoprotein-related protein 2 (LPR2) in the perilymph of vestibular schwannoma patients but not controls undergoing CI without vestibular schwannoma [20]. LRP2 is a transmembrane receptor protein found primarily in absorptive epithelial cells and is a key player in mediating endocytosis and mutations in LPR2 are associated with Donnai-Barrow syndrome and facio-oculo-acoustico-renal syndrome, which present with SNHL [70]. These structural proteins present potential candidates for perilymph biomarkers and should be carefully investigated in future work.
5 Future directions
Taken together, a diverse group of biomarkers have been identified in human perilymph and correlated with SNHL pathologies of varying aetiology, as demonstrated in (Fig 2). This systematic review has identified six main groups of biomarkers that may inform future clinical studies on cochlear sampling. Future targeted studies with larger cohorts and clearer diagnoses are required to help further characterise the prevalence and functional role of these biomarkers. This review highlighted two main study designs: those that compared biomarker profiles based on cochlear implant outcomes, and those that characterised a specific SNHL aetiology by comparison to otosclerosis controls. The authors recommend these methodologies be adopted in future studies to facilitate ongoing comparison of results between studies. Although, one limitation of sampling at the time of cochlear implantation is that it may not fully capture the range of pathogenic mechanisms involved earlier in disease and those in response to the implant following CI surgery.
Key: HSP = Heat Shock Protein; HSPA1B = Heat Shock 70 kDa Protein 1A/B; ACTB = Actin Beta, Cytoplasmic 1; LRP2 = Low Density Lipoprotein Receptor-related Protein 2; PLTP = Phospholipid Transfer Protein; SELENBP1 = Selenium-Binding Protein 1; IL = Interleukin; Alpha-2-HS glycoprotein = Alpha-2 Heremans Schmid Glycoprotein; ESD = S-Formylglutathione Hydrolase; ROS = Reactive Oxygen Species; SDR9C7 = Short-chain Dehydrogenase/Reductase Family 9C member 7; miRNAs = microRNAs; IGFBP1 = Insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1; VEGF-D = Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor D; BDNF = Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor.
6 Conclusion
Analysis of human perilymph has provided novel insights into the complex cochlear microenvironment and shows promise for expanding our understanding of the pathophysiology and ability to treat SNHL. The cochlear microenvironment is evidently more complex than first recognised with roles for heat shock proteins, neurotrophin factors, inflammatory mediators, structural proteins, and metabolites as outlined in this review. The diversity of biomarkers identified, coupled with the heterogenous aetiologies of SNHL, complicates researcher’s abilities to identify direct correlations between biomarkers and hearing loss. Standardisation of methodology and larger controlled studies will be required to establish reliable and translatable results. Overall, sampling human perilymph is a safe procedure that provides insight into a previously ‘black box’ organ and could help characterise and advance the treatment of SNHL.
Acknowledgments
The authors are very grateful to Veronica Phillips (Cambridge University Medical Librarian) for her help in creating and running the search for this systematic review.
References
- 1.
World Health Organisation. Deafness and hearing loss. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss. Accessed 2025 February 11.
- 2. Carlson ML, Driscoll CLW, Gifford RH, McMenomey SO. Cochlear implantation: current and future device options. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012;45(1):221–48. pmid:22115692
- 3. Parham K, Sacks D, Bixby C, Fall P. Inner ear protein as a biomarker in circulation? Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151(6):1038–40. pmid:25245136
- 4. Wang X, Gao Y, Jiang R. Diagnostic and predictive values of serum metabolic profiles in sudden sensorineural hearing loss patients. Front Mol Biosci. 2022;9:982561. pmid:36148011
- 5. Lee JM, Kim JY, Bok J, Kim K-S, Choi JY, Kim SH. Identification of evidence for autoimmune pathology of bilateral sudden sensorineural hearing loss using proteomic analysis. Clin Immunol. 2017;183:24–35. pmid:28648633
- 6. Gomaa NA, Jimoh Z, Campbell S, Zenke JK, Szczepek AJ. Biomarkers for Inner Ear Disorders: Scoping Review on the Role of Biomarkers in Hearing and Balance Disorders. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;11(1):42. pmid:33383894
- 7. Cadoni G, Fetoni AR, Agostino S, De Santis A, Manna R, Ottaviani F, et al. Autoimmunity in sudden sensorineural hearing loss: possible role of anti-endothelial cell autoantibodies. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 2002;(548):30–3. pmid:12211354
- 8. Passali D, Damiani V, Mora R, Passali FM, Passali GC, Bellussi L. P0 antigen detection in sudden hearing loss and Ménière’s disease: a new diagnostic marker? Acta Otolaryngol. 2004;124(10):1145–8. pmid:15768807
- 9. Demirhan E, Eskut NP, Zorlu Y, Cukurova I, Tuna G, Kirkali FG. Blood levels of TNF-α, IL-10, and IL-12 in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(7):1778–81. pmid:23382065
- 10. Avallone E, Schmitt H, Lilli G, Warnecke A, Lesinski-Schiedat A, Lenarz T, et al. A potential serological biomarker for inner ear pathologies: OTOLIN-1. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2022;42(4):364–71. pmid:36254652
- 11. Schmitt HA, Pich A, Schröder A, Scheper V, Lilli G, Reuter G, et al. Proteome Analysis of Human Perilymph Using an Intraoperative Sampling Method. J Proteome Res. 2017;16(5):1911–23. pmid:28282143
- 12.
Casale J, Kandle PF, Murray IV, Murr NI. Physiology, cochlear function. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing. 2025.
- 13. van Dieken A, Staecker H, Schmitt H, Harre J, Pich A, Roßberg W, et al. Bioinformatic Analysis of the Perilymph Proteome to Generate a Human Protein Atlas. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:847157. pmid:35573665
- 14. Palva T, Tikanmäki P. Sodium and potassium concentrations in post-mortem human labyrinthine fluids. J Laryngol Otol. 1969;83(2):147–59. pmid:5787423
- 15. Gamov VP, Vel’tishchev IE. Potassium and sodium content in the perilymph and endolymph of man (a postmortem study). Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn. 1973;33(1):21–4. pmid:4763162
- 16. Arrer E, Oberascher G, Gibitz HJ. Protein distribution in the human perilymph. A comparative study between perilymph (post mortem), CSF and blood serum. Acta Otolaryngol. 1988;106(1–2):117–23. pmid:3421092
- 17. Palva T, Raunio V, Forsén R. Esterases in post-mortem inner ear fluids. Acta Otolaryngol. 1971;71(2):140–6. pmid:5577009
- 18. Ohlemiller KK, Wright JS, Dugan LL. Early elevation of cochlear reactive oxygen species following noise exposure. Audiol Neurootol. 1999;4(5):229–36. pmid:10436315
- 19. Wichova H, Shew M, Staecker H. Utility of Perilymph microRNA Sampling for Identification of Active Gene Expression Pathways in Otosclerosis. Otol Neurotol. 2019;40(6):710–9. pmid:31192899
- 20. Lysaght AC, Kao S-Y, Paulo JA, Merchant SN, Steen H, Stankovic KM. Proteome of human perilymph. J Proteome Res. 2011;10(9):3845–51. pmid:21740021
- 21. Peter MS, Warnecke A, Staecker H. A Window of Opportunity: Perilymph Sampling from the Round Window Membrane Can Advance Inner Ear Diagnostics and Therapeutics. J Clin Med. 2022;11(2):316. pmid:35054010
- 22. Durisin M, Krüger C, Pich A, Warnecke A, Steffens M, Zeilinger C, et al. Proteome profile of patients with excellent and poor speech intelligibility after cochlear implantation: Can perilymph proteins predict performance? PLoS One. 2022;17(3):e0263765. pmid:35239655
- 23. Mavel S, Lefèvre A, Bakhos D, Dufour-Rainfray D, Blasco H, Emond P. Validation of metabolomics analysis of human perilymph fluid using liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy. Hear Res. 2018;367:129–36. pmid:29871827
- 24. Shew M, Warnecke A, Lenarz T, Schmitt H, Gunewardena S, Staecker H. Feasibility of microRNA profiling in human inner ear perilymph. Neuroreport. 2018;29(11):894–901. pmid:29781875
- 25. Warnecke A, Prenzler NK, Schmitt H, Daemen K, Keil J, Dursin M, et al. Defining the Inflammatory Microenvironment in the Human Cochlea by Perilymph Analysis: Toward Liquid Biopsy of the Cochlea. Front Neurol. 2019;10:665. pmid:31293504
- 26. McGowan J, Sampson M, Salzwedel DM, Cogo E, Foerster V, Lefebvre C. PRESS peer review of electronic search strategies: 2015 guideline statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016;75: 40–6.
- 27. Rethlefsen ML, Kirtley S, Waffenschmidt S, Ayala AP, Moher D, Page MJ, et al. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews. Syst Rev. 2021;10(1):39. pmid:33499930
- 28. Arambula AM, Gu S, Warnecke A, Schmitt HA, Staecker H, Hoa M. In Silico Localization of Perilymph Proteins Enriched in Meńiere Disease Using Mammalian Cochlear Single-cell Transcriptomics. Otol Neurotol Open. 2023;3(1):e027. pmid:38516320
- 29. Ciorba A, Gasparini P, Chicca M, Pinamonti S, Martini A. Reactive oxygen species in human inner ear perilymph. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130(2):240–6. pmid:19685356
- 30. de Vries I, Schmitt H, Lenarz T, Prenzler N, Alvi S, Staecker H, et al. Detection of BDNF-Related Proteins in Human Perilymph in Patients With Hearing Loss. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:214. pmid:30971872
- 31. Edvardsson Rasmussen J, Laurell G, Rask-Andersen H, Bergquist J, Eriksson PO. The proteome of perilymph in patients with vestibular schwannoma. A possibility to identify biomarkers for tumor associated hearing loss? PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0198442. pmid:29856847
- 32. Schmitt H, Roemer A, Zeilinger C, Salcher R, Durisin M, Staecker H, et al. Heat Shock Proteins in Human Perilymph: Implications for Cochlear Implantation. Otol Neurotol. 2018;39(1):37–44. pmid:29227447
- 33. Schmitt HA, Pich A, Prenzler NK, Lenarz T, Harre J, Staecker H, et al. Personalized Proteomics for Precision Diagnostics in Hearing Loss: Disease-Specific Analysis of Human Perilymph by Mass Spectrometry. ACS Omega. 2021;6(33):21241–54. pmid:34471729
- 34. Shew M, New J, Wichova H, Koestler DC, Staecker H. Using Machine Learning to Predict Sensorineural Hearing Loss Based on Perilymph Micro RNA Expression Profile. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):3393. pmid:30833669
- 35. Shew M, Wichova H, St Peter M, Warnecke A, Staecker H. Distinct MicroRNA Profiles in the Perilymph and Serum of Patients With Menière’s Disease. Front Neurol. 2021;12:646928. pmid:34220670
- 36. Shew M, Wichova H, Warnecke A, Lenarz T, Staecker H. Evaluating Neurotrophin Signaling Using MicroRNA Perilymph Profiling in Cochlear Implant Patients With and Without Residual Hearing. Otol Neurotol. 2021;42(8):e1125–33. pmid:33973949
- 37. Trinh T-T, Blasco H, Emond P, Andres C, Lefevre A, Lescanne E, et al. Relationship between Metabolomics Profile of Perilymph in Cochlear-Implanted Patients and Duration of Hearing Loss. Metabolites. 2019;9(11):262. pmid:31683919
- 38. Tutar L, Tutar Y. Heat shock proteins; an overview. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2010;11(2):216–22. pmid:20170474
- 39. Piri N, Kwong JMK, Gu L, Caprioli J. Heat shock proteins in the retina: Focus on HSP70 and alpha crystallins in ganglion cell survival. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016;52:22–46. pmid:27017896
- 40. Kampinga HH, Hageman J, Vos MJ, Kubota H, Tanguay RM, Bruford EA, et al. Guidelines for the nomenclature of the human heat shock proteins. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2009;14(1):105–11. pmid:18663603
- 41. Tropitzsch A, Schade-Mann T, Gamerdinger P, Dofek S, Schulte B, Schulze M, et al. Variability in Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in a Large German Cohort With a Genetic Etiology of Hearing Loss. Ear Hear. 2023;44(6):1464–84. pmid:37438890
- 42. Taleb M, Brandon CS, Lee F-S, Harris KC, Dillmann WH, Cunningham LL. Hsp70 inhibits aminoglycoside-induced hearing loss and cochlear hair cell death. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2009;14(4):427–37. pmid:19145477
- 43. McCabe BF. Autoimmune inner ear disease: therapy. Am J Otol. 1989;10(3):196–7. pmid:2750868
- 44. Fujioka M, Okamoto Y, Shinden S, Okano HJ, Okano H, Ogawa K, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of cochlear mitochondrial respiratory chain induces secondary inflammation in the lateral wall: a potential therapeutic target for sensorineural hearing loss. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e90089. pmid:24614528
- 45. Wei BPC, Mubiru S, O’Leary S. Steroids for idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(1):CD003998. pmid:16437471
- 46. Zhang W, Dai M, Fridberger A, Hassan A, Degagne J, Neng L, et al. Perivascular-resident macrophage-like melanocytes in the inner ear are essential for the integrity of the intrastrial fluid-blood barrier. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(26):10388–93. pmid:22689949
- 47. Gratton MA, Eleftheriadou A, Garcia J, Verduzco E, Martin GK, Lonsbury-Martin BL, et al. Noise-induced changes in gene expression in the cochleae of mice differing in their susceptibility to noise damage. Hear Res. 2011;277(1–2):211–26. pmid:21187137
- 48. Fujioka M, Kanzaki S, Okano HJ, Masuda M, Ogawa K, Okano H. Proinflammatory cytokines expression in noise-induced damaged cochlea. J Neurosci Res. 2006;83(4):575–83. pmid:16429448
- 49. Karayay B, Olze H, Szczepek AJ. Mammalian Inner Ear-Resident Immune Cells-A Scoping Review. Cells. 2024;13(18):1528. pmid:39329712
- 50. Rus H, Cudrici C, Niculescu F. The role of the complement system in innate immunity. Immunol Res. 2005;33(2):103–12. pmid:16234578
- 51. Sumanth MS, Jacob SP, Abhilasha KV, Manne BK, Basrur V, Lehoux S, et al. Different glycoforms of alpha-1-acid glycoprotein contribute to its functional alterations in platelets and neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol. 2021;109(5):915–30. pmid:33070381
- 52. Duke-Cohan JS, Gu J, McLaughlin DF, Xu Y, Freeman GJ, Schlossman SF. Attractin (DPPT-L), a member of the CUB family of cell adhesion and guidance proteins, is secreted by activated human T lymphocytes and modulates immune cell interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(19):11336–41. pmid:9736737
- 53. Vidigal JA, Ventura A. The biological functions of miRNAs: lessons from in vivo studies. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25(3):137–47. pmid:25484347
- 54. Yates LA, Norbury CJ, Gilbert RJC. The long and short of microRNA. Cell. 2013;153(3):516–9. pmid:23622238
- 55. Burgos K, Malenica I, Metpally R, Courtright A, Rakela B, Beach T, et al. Profiles of extracellular miRNA in cerebrospinal fluid and serum from patients with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases correlate with disease status and features of pathology. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e94839. pmid:24797360
- 56. Tanaka Y, Tsuda S, Kunikata H, Sato J, Kokubun T, Yasuda M, et al. Profiles of extracellular miRNAs in the aqueous humor of glaucoma patients assessed with a microarray system. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5089. pmid:24867291
- 57. Mittal R, Liu G, Polineni SP, Bencie N, Yan D, Liu XZ. Role of microRNAs in inner ear development and hearing loss. Gene. 2019;686:49–55. pmid:30389561
- 58. Li Q, Peng X, Huang H, Li J, Wang F, Wang J. RNA sequencing uncovers the key microRNAs potentially contributing to sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(47):e8837. pmid:29381991
- 59. Dong SH, Kim SS, Kim SH, Yeo SG. Expression of aquaporins in inner ear disease. Laryngoscope. 2020;130(6):1532–9. pmid:31593306
- 60. Eckhard A, Gleiser C, Arnold H, Rask-Andersen H, Kumagami H, Müller M, et al. Water channel proteins in the inner ear and their link to hearing impairment and deafness. Mol Aspects Med. 2012;33(5–6):612–37. pmid:22732097
- 61. Wangemann P, Itza EM, Albrecht B, Wu T, Jabba SV, Maganti RJ, et al. Loss of KCNJ10 protein expression abolishes endocochlear potential and causes deafness in Pendred syndrome mouse model. BMC Med. 2004;2:30. pmid:15320950
- 62. Yi E, Roux I, Glowatzki E. Dendritic HCN channels shape excitatory postsynaptic potentials at the inner hair cell afferent synapse in the mammalian cochlea. J Neurophysiol. 2010;103(5):2532–43. pmid:20220080
- 63. Beurg M, Michalski N, Safieddine S, Bouleau Y, Schneggenburger R, Chapman ER, et al. Control of exocytosis by synaptotagmins and otoferlin in auditory hair cells. J Neurosci. 2010;30(40):13281–90. pmid:20926654
- 64. Flores-Otero J, Davis RL. Synaptic proteins are tonotopically graded in postnatal and adult type I and type II spiral ganglion neurons. J Comp Neurol. 2011;519(8):1455–75. pmid:21452215
- 65. Nokkari A, Abou-El-Hassan H, Mechref Y, Mondello S, Kindy MS, Jaffa AA, et al. Implication of the Kallikrein-Kinin system in neurological disorders: Quest for potential biomarkers and mechanisms. Prog Neurobiol. 2018;165–167:26–50. pmid:29355711
- 66. Melincovici CS, Boşca AB, Şuşman S, Mărginean M, Mihu C, Istrate M, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) - key factor in normal and pathological angiogenesis. Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2018;59(2):455–67. pmid:30173249
- 67. Gubbiotti MA, Neill T, Iozzo RV. A current view of perlecan in physiology and pathology: A mosaic of functions. Matrix Biol. 2017;57–58:285–98. pmid:27613501
- 68. Henderson D, Bielefeld EC, Harris KC, Hu BH. The role of oxidative stress in noise-induced hearing loss. Ear Hear. 2006;27(1):1–19. pmid:16446561
- 69. Jung JW, Hwang Y-J, Suh M-W, Han D, Oh SH. Intratympanic steroid treatment can reduce ROS and immune response in human perilymph investigated by in-depth proteome analysis. Proteomics. 2023;23(1):e2200211. pmid:36259158
- 70. Kantarci S, Al-Gazali L, Hill RS, Donnai D, Black GCM, Bieth E, et al. Mutations in LRP2, which encodes the multiligand receptor megalin, cause Donnai-Barrow and facio-oculo-acoustico-renal syndromes. Nat Genet. 2007;39(8):957–9. pmid:17632512