Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Real-world study of adverse events associated with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate based on FDA adverse event reporting system and VigiAccess database

  • Xiaona Jia,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacy, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China

  • Lei Liu,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacy, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China

  • Pan Wang

    Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    wp12202003@163.com

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacy, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing, China

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate frequencies, types, and signals of adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) used for the treatment of hyperkalemia, in order to inform clinicians of possible safety concerns linked with SZC in real-life usage. ADE reports associated with SZC were collected from both the FAERS and VigiAccess databases. Data extraction from FAERS was performed using OpenVigil 2.1, covering reports from the first quarter of 2004 through the third quarter of 2024. The VigiAccess database was retrieved for reports up to February 5, 2025. The ADEs were standardized and classified by using the preferred term (PT) and the system organ class (SOC) of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) (Version 27.0). The reporting odds ratio (ROR) method and the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) method were used to screen positive signals and analyze the characteristics of ADE signals. In this study, 1384 and 1518 ADE reports related to SZC were obtained from the FAERS database and the VigiAccess database, respectively. At the SOC level, the ADEs retrieved in the two databases involved 26 SOCs, and the top 3 SOCs in terms of the number of reported cases were general disorders and administration site conditions, gastrointestinal disorders, and investigations. At the PT level, among the top 30 PTs in terms of the number of reported cases in the two databases, death, cardiac failure, weight increased, blood pressure increased, cardiac failure congestive, cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, dizziness, dysphagia, and dyspnoea were the ADEs with higher number of reported cases not included in the drug instructions. A total of 41 positive signals were obtained after signal screening in FAERS database. Among them, the top 3 PTs in terms of signal strength were blood potassium abnormal (ROR = 180.224[119.925, 270.842]), blood potassium increased (ROR = 98.789[78.835, 123.792]), blood sodium increased (ROR = 35.248[14.624, 84.961]). Signals of cardiac disorders such as cardiac failure chronic, cardiac failure and cardiac failure congestive, signals of gastrointestinal disorders such as ileus and intestinal perforation, and signals of blood sodium increased and hypernatraemia are positive signals that deserve special attention. In this study, the common ADEs associated with SZC were confirmed, and several intriguing novel signals not included in the drug instructions were discovered, which would provide more safety reference data for the clinical use of SZC.

Introduction

Hyperkalemia is a condition in which serum potassium ions (K+) exceed 5.0 mmol/L. It is a common electrolyte disorder, particularly among specific patient populations such as patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, or heart failure, and those receiving renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASis) [1,2]. This disease can lead to life-threatening conditions such as severe cardiac arrhythmias and sudden death [36]. Previous pharmaceutical interventions for the treatment of hyperkalemia were mainly organic polymer resins such as sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS), but it showed no selectivity for K+, resulting in poor tolerance and/or ineffectiveness [7]. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC) is a novel oral potassium-lowering pharmaceutical agent. It is an inorganic, insoluble, and highly selective K+ binding agent that exchanges sodium and hydrogen ions for K+ or ammonium ions in the gastrointestinal tract, thereby increasing fecal potassium excretion and reducing serum potassium levels [8]. SZC demonstrated significantly greater adsorption capacity for K+ compared to other ions. And it has no impact on the utilisation of RAASis drugs. Additionally, SZC demonstrated a low propensity to induce electrolyte disorders in the body and showed no significant effect on liver function, nutritional status and other indicators, showing good tolerability and safety [4,9,10]. The SZC was first approved for the treatment of hyperkalemia in adults in the European Union and the United States in 2018, and then marketed in China at the end of 2019, and is now widely recommended and used [11,12]. Although some adverse reactions of SZC have been reported in previous clinical trial studies [1316], there is still a lack of research on adverse reactions based on real-world data after being widely used on the market. Clinical trial studies limited by sample size and follow-up time may underestimate the incidence of infrequent or severe adverse drug events (ADEs). The VigiAccess database is a database used by the World Health Organization (WHO) to collect global adverse drug events. The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database of the United States contains adverse event data for a series of drugs marketed in the United States [1719]. In this study, we mined and analyzed the adverse events related to SZC obtained from the FAERS and VigiAccess databases, with a view to providing more reference information for clinical safe drug use.

Materials and methods

Data source

Data for this study were obtained from anonymized adverse event reports in the publicly available FAERS and VigiAccess databases. During the data collection and analysis process, all authors did not have access to information that could identify individual participants. In this study, OpenVigil 2.1 was used to collect ADE reporting data in the FAERS database. OpenVigil 2.1 (https://openvigil.sourceforge.net/) [20,21] is a pharmacovigilance platform for extracting FAERS-related data, which has been widely used and verified [2224]. Using the generic name of “Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate” and the trade name of “Lokelma” as search terms, we obtained the ADE report of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate as primary suspect (PS) drug. The retrieval time is from the first quarter of 2004 to the third quarter of 2024. In addition, the VigiAccess database was also searched up to February 5, 2025 using the generic name of the drug.

Data processing and standardization

ADE report information was standardized and classified by using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) (version 27.0). Each ADE record will be assigned a preferred term (PT) and further classified into different systems according to the system organ class (SOC).

Statistical analysis

The disproportionality analysis is a signal detection method based on a two-by-two contingency table (Table 1) with high sensitivity and is widely used for monitoring and signal mining of adverse drug reactions [25,26]. This study used the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method and the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) method in the disproportionality analysis to identify risk signals in ADE reports collected from the FAERS database. The formulas used for PRR and ROR calculation are shown in Table 2. ROR signals were defined as positive when the number of cases was ≥ 3 and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was > 1. PRR signals were defined as positive when the number of cases was ≥ 3, PRR ≥ 2 and X2 ≥ 4 [2731]. In this study, ADE which meets both PRR and ROR criteria is considered as a positive signal. Statistical analysis and data visualization were performed using Microsoft Office Excel 2019, OmicShare Tools [32] and R software (v.4.4.2).

thumbnail
Table 1. 2×2 contingency table for disproportionality analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333692.t001

Results

Basic information reported by ADEs

A total of 1,384 ADE reports using SZC as the primary suspect in the FAERS database were collected via the OpenVigil 2.1 pharmacovigilance platform, and 1,518 ADE reports using SZC were retrieved from the VigiAccess database. There were significantly more males than females in both databases (FAERS: 48.19% vs 27.46%, p < 0.001; VigiAccess: 52.50% vs 30.83%, p < 0.001). In terms of patients’ age, patients with the age ≥ 75 years old were the most, followed by patients in the age group of 65–74 years old. In terms of geographical distribution, the majority of ADE reports originated from the Americas. The number of ADE reports associated with SZC showed a sustained upward trend over the reporting years, with a significant acceleration in the last two years. See Table 3 for basic information of the ADE reports.

SOC-level analysis for ADE reports

In FAERS database, the total number of reported cases of ADE associated with SZC was 2246, involving 26 SOCs. And the reported cases of general disorders and administration site conditions (714, 31.79%) ranked first, followed by gastrointestinal disorders (280, 12.47%) and investigations (260, 11.58%). In VigiAccess database, the total number of reported cases of ADE associated with SZC was 2555, involving 26 SOCs. The top three SOCs by number of reported cases were the same as in the FAERS database, namely, general disorders and administration site conditions (801, 31.35%), gastrointestinal disorders (324, 12.68%), and investigations (286, 11.19%). The SOCs involved in the two databases were the same, and the details of the SOC distribution of ADEs reported for SZC are shown in Tables 4 and 5.

thumbnail
Table 4. SOC distribution of ADEs reported for SZC in FAERS database.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333692.t004

thumbnail
Table 5. SOC distribution of ADEs reported for SZC in VigiAccess database.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333692.t005

PT-level analysis for ADE reports

In this study, the PTs involved in the ADEs reported for SZC were analyzed, with a focus on ADEs with high reporting frequency and high signal strength. The ADEs reported for SZC involved 546 PTs in FAERS (case number: 2246) and 594 PTs in VigiAccess (case number: 2555), respectively. Among the top 30 PTs in the number of reported cases, there were 28 coincident PTs in the two databases, as shown in Fig 1. The top 5 PTs reported in the FAERS database were death (n = 520, 23.15%), blood potassium increased (n = 81, 3.61%), constipation (n = 56, 2.49%), diarrhoea (n = 41, 1.83%), and oedema (n = 37, 1.65%), with the top 5 PTs reported in the VigiAccess database as death (n = 551, 21.57%), blood potassium increased (n = 83, 3.25%), diarrhoea (n = 61, 2.39%), hypokalemia (n = 56, 2.19%), and constipation (n = 53, 2.07%). Details of the top 30 PTs by number of reported cases are shown in Table 6.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Network Venn diagrams of the top 30 PTs by number of reported cases in FAERS and VigiAccess databases.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333692.g001

After screening by ROR and PRR methods, a total of 41 positive signals were screened out in FAERS database, as shown in Fig 2. The top 5 PTs by signal strength were blood potassium abnormal (n = 24, ROR = 180.224), blood potassium increased (n = 81, ROR = 98.789), blood sodium increased (n = 5, ROR = 35.248), computer tomography abnormal (n = 3, ROR = 22.597), and azotaemia (n = 3, ROR = 15.068).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Positive signal detection results of SZC in FAERS database.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333692.g002

Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore sex-based differences in SZC-related adverse events, with comparison of positive signal PTs between male and female patients (Figs 3 and 4). In males, ADEs such as oedema, fluid overload, eye haemorrhage showed higher risk signals. In females, blood sodium increased, glomerular filtration rate decreased, ascites, and cardiac failure were identified as ADEs with higher occurrence risks.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Positive signal detection results of SZC in male subgroup in FAERS database.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333692.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. Positive signal detection results of SZC in female subgroup in FAERS database.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333692.g004

Discussion

Since its introduction to the market, SZC has emerged as the preferred regimen for the treatment of hyperkalemia. However, only a limited number of pre-marketing clinical trial studies have analyzed its safety profile, post-marketing pharmacovigilance studies based on real-world data remain insufficient. In this study, we analyzed the ADEs associated with SZC in real-world use by mining the data from the FAERS and VigiAccess databases, which provided more reference information for its safe clinical use.

This study found that the number of male patients with ADE reported in both databases exceeded that of female patients. This finding aligns with the results reported by Nilsson et al. [1] who conducted a study on the incidence of hyperkalemia within a large healthcare system. Their findings indicated that the incidence of hyperkalemia was lower in women. It is well known that hyperkalemia is prevalent among patients with CKD. A comprehensive review by Gilligan et al. [33] elucidated the prevalence and risk factors of hyperkalemia in patients with CKD, and pointed out that men were associated with higher serum potassium and a heightened risk of hyperkalemia in CKD. This gender difference in the prevalence of hyperkalemia may be a contributing factor to the observed sex disparities in reported ADEs.

In the FAERS and VigiAccess databases, the top 3 SOCs involved in ADEs reported for SZC were general disorders and administration site conditions, gastrointestinal disorders, and investigations, which were consistent with the common adverse drug reactions reported in the drug instructions. In addition, injury, poisoning and procedural complications, cardiac disorders, metabolism and nutrition disorders, nervous system disorders, and renal and urinary disorders were also the SOCs with the highest reported cases, and more attention should be paid to them in clinical application. In the PT-level analysis, most of the ADEs in the top 30 reported cases in the two databases were overlapping, proving the reliability of the results of this study to a certain extent. Among them, death, cardiac failure, weight increased, blood pressure increased, cardiac failure congestive, cerebrovascular accident, myocardial infarction, pneumonia, dizziness, dysphagia, and dyspnea were the ADEs with higher reporting frequency not included in the drug instructions, and they should be especially noted in clinical use.

In this study, according to the ROR method and PRR method, the ADEs in the FAERS database were screened to obtain positive signals, which involved 12 SOCs, including cardiac disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, general disorders and administration site conditions, injury, poisoning and procedural complications, investigations, metabolism and nutrition disorders, among others. Notably, signals such as cardiac failure chronic, cardiac failure, cardiac failure congestive, dysphagia, death, colon cancer, choking, dementia, cerebral hemorrhage, blood sodium increased, blood pressure increased, metabolic acidosis, and feeding disorder are not mentioned in the drug instructions, but these positive signals may be related to the patient’s own disease or edema-related events caused by SZC. Cardiac disorders such as cardiac failure chronic, cardiac failure, and cardiac failure congestive are ADEs not included in the drug instructions of SZC. In the Phase III clinical trial study of Roger et al. [34], there was a report about cardiac disorders caused by SZC, among 737 subjects, 158 subjects had serious adverse reactions, of which 10 patients had congestive cardiac failure and 4 patients had cardiac failure. The positive signals of gastrointestinal system diseases such as ileus and intestinal perforation are known severe gastrointestinal adverse events as traditional potassium-lowering drug SPS [35]. Although it is given a reminder in the precautions of SZC drug instructions, the risk situation is still unclear and more vigilance should be exercised in clinical use. Death is a positive signal of SZC, which has the highest number of reported cases. This may be due to the fact that patients with hyperkalemia are usually complicated with other diseases, such as severe heart failure and severe renal failure, and their baseline situation is poor. Multiple large-scale observational studies have shown that hyperkalemia itself is related to the increased risk of death [3638]. Blood sodium increased and hypernatremia are two novel signals with high signal strength, which may be related to the potential sodium load existing in SZC (400mg sodium is contained in every 5g SZC). Therefore, capacity status should be monitored during use, and dietary sodium intake and diuretic amount should be adjusted in patients at risk of capacity overload [7,39]. In sex-based subgroup analyses, differences in adverse event profiles were observed. Beyond differences in signal strength for shared ADEs, sex-specific analyses revealed distinct positive signals unique to each sex. Notably, male-specific signals included eye haemorrhage and dementia, which were not detected in females. Conversely, females exhibited unique risk signals such as ascites, pulmonary oedema, and pneumonia absent in males. Although direct mechanistic evidence remains limited and requires further validation, these sex-divergent risk signals provide novel insights for pharmacovigilance and adverse reaction monitoring.

In our signal detection analysis based on the FAERS database, several positive signals were consistent with prior findings by Yu et al. [40], including cardiac failure congestive, cardiac failure chronic, ileus, intestinal perforation, blood sodium increased, hypernatremia, death. Utilizing the latest data from two databases for cross-validation, our study confirmed previously reported ADEs associated with SZC while also identified several new unreported signals of potential clinical significance, such as colon cancer, dementia, cerebral hemorrhage, choking, dysphagia, and feeding disorders. Special attention should be paid to these risks in clinical practice.

This study has several limitations. Both the FAERS database and VigiAccess database are spontaneous reporting systems for adverse events. As is well recognized, such pharmacovigilance databases are subject to biases, including underreporting, duplicate entries, inaccurate or incomplete information, and other factors that may affect the analysis. In this study, OpenVigil 2.1 platform was used to mine and analyze the data of FAERS. In OpenVigil 2.1, the cleaned data were only loaded with reports with complete case information, which sacrificed the original sample size to a certain extent but ensured high data quality [20]. Although the findings of large-scale data mining provide more reference information for safe medication use, the mining results can only show that there is a statistical correlation between drugs and the detected signals, and the exact causal relationship needs further clinical verification. Future research should be grounded in the findings of big data mining, and more high-quality clinical studies should be conducted on the focused adverse reactions to identify the occurrence of relevant adverse events in clinical use.

Conclusion

This study conducted a comprehensive analysis of SZC by mining real-world adverse drug event databases, systematically evaluating high frequency and high signal strength adverse events to enhance clinical safety awareness. The research not only confirmed known adverse reactions but also identified previously unreported safety signals not mentioned in the drug instructions. These findings provide clinicians with more comprehensive safety references, particularly highlighting the importance of monitoring for these newly detected adverse reactions in clinical practice. In clinical use, healthcare professionals need to pay special attention to monitoring patients’ blood sodium levels, preventing cardiac risks such as chronic heart failure and gastrointestinal system risks such as ileus and intestinal perforation, as well as other risk signals detected. Pharmacovigilance research based on real-world data is imperative for providing recommendations for clinical decision-making and improving medication safety for patients.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and WHO-VigiAccess database, which provided important pharmacovigilance data for our study.

References

  1. 1. Nilsson E, Gasparini A, Ärnlöv J, Xu H, Henriksson KM, Coresh J, et al. Incidence and determinants of hyperkalemia and hypokalemia in a large healthcare system. Int J Cardiol. 2017;245:277–84. pmid:28735756
  2. 2. Maddirala S, Khan A, Vincent A, Lau K. Effect of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on serum potassium levels and renal function in ambulatory outpatients: Risk factors analysis. Am J Med Sci. 2008;336(4):330–5. pmid:18854676
  3. 3. Cases A, Gorriz JL. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate: A new potassium binder for the treatment of hyperkalemia. Drugs Today (Barc). 2018;54(10):601–13. pmid:30398481
  4. 4. Takkar C, Nassar T, Qunibi W. An evaluation of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate as a treatment option for hyperkalemia. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021;22(1):19–28. pmid:32892634
  5. 5. Rosano GMC, Tamargo J, Kjeldsen KP, Lainscak M, Agewall S, Anker SD, et al. Expert consensus document on the management of hyperkalaemia in patients with cardiovascular disease treated with renin angiotensin aldosterone system inhibitors: Coordinated by the Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2018;4(3):180–8. pmid:29726985
  6. 6. Bandak G, Sang Y, Gasparini A, Chang AR, Ballew SH, Evans M, et al. Hyperkalemia after initiating renin-angiotensin system blockade: The stockholm creatinine measurements (SCREAM) project. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(7):e005428. pmid:28724651
  7. 7. Rastogi A, Hanna RM, Mkrttchyan A, Khalid M, Yaqoob S, Shaffer K, et al. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for the management of chronic hyperkalemia in kidney disease, a novel agent. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol. 2021;14(9):1055–64. pmid:34227913
  8. 8. Stavros F, Yang A, Leon A, Nuttall M, Rasmussen HS. Characterization of structure and function of ZS-9, a K+ selective ion trap. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e114686. pmid:25531770
  9. 9. Joyce O, Corpman M. Comparison of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate to sodium polystyrene sulfonate in the inpatient management of acute hyperkalemia. J Pharm Pract. 2024;37(3):728–35. pmid:37254518
  10. 10. Paolillo S, Basile C, Dell’Aversana S, Esposito I, Chirico A, Colella A, et al. Novel potassium binders to optimize RAASi therapy in heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Intern Med. 2024;119:109–17. pmid:37648583
  11. 11. Yap DYH, Ma RCW, Wong ECK, Tsui MSH, Yu EYT, Yu V, et al. Consensus statement on the management of hyperkalaemia-An Asia-Pacific perspective. Nephrology (Carlton). 2024;29(6):311–24. pmid:38403867
  12. 12. Kim K, Fagerström J, Chen G, Lagunova Z, Furuland H, McEwan P. Cost effectiveness of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for the treatment of hyperkalaemia in patients with CKD in Norway and Sweden. BMC Nephrol. 2022;23(1):281. pmid:35953778
  13. 13. Spinowitz BS, Fishbane S, Pergola PE, Roger SD, Lerma EV, Butler J, et al. Sodium zirconium cyclosilicate among individuals with hyperkalemia: A 12-month phase 3 study. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2019;14(6):798–809. pmid:31110051
  14. 14. Zannad F, Hsu B-G, Maeda Y, Shin SK, Vishneva EM, Rensfeldt M, et al. Efficacy and safety of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for hyperkalaemia: The randomized, placebo-controlled HARMONIZE-Global study. ESC Heart Fail. 2020;7(1):54–64. pmid:31944628
  15. 15. Peacock WF, Rafique Z, Vishnevskiy K, Michelson E, Vishneva E, Zvereva T, et al. Emergency potassium normalization treatment including sodium zirconium cyclosilicate: A phase II, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ENERGIZE). Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(6):475–86. pmid:32149451
  16. 16. Liang X, Lu W, Yu X, Cheng H, He Q, Peng Q, et al. HARMONIZE Asia: A phase III randomized study to investigate the efficacy and safety of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate in patients with hyperkalemia in China. Clin Ther. 2024;46(9):702–10. pmid:39112102
  17. 17. Rong L, Xie M, Jiang M, Qiu H, Kong L. A post-marketing pharmacovigilance study of avapritinib: Adverse event data mining and analysis based on the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024;90(8):1816–26. pmid:36702463
  18. 18. Li M, You R, Su Y, Zhou H, Gong S. Characteristic analysis of adverse reactions of five anti-TNFÉ’ agents: A descriptive analysis from WHO-VigiAccess. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1169327. pmid:37554981
  19. 19. Pandey D, Mehta G, Sachdeva M, Tripathi R. Adverse event following immunization (AEFI) in children: An analysis of reporting in VigiAccess. Drug Res (Stuttg). 2022;72(8):435–40. pmid:35724674
  20. 20. Böhm R, Bulin C, Waetzig V, Cascorbi I, Klein H-J, Herdegen T. Pharmacovigilance-based drug repurposing: The search for inverse signals via OpenVigil identifies putative drugs against viral respiratory infections. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;87(11):4421–31. pmid:33871897
  21. 21. Böhm R, von Hehn L, Herdegen T, Klein H-J, Bruhn O, Petri H, et al. OpenVigil FDA – Inspection of U.S. American adverse drug events pharmacovigilance data and novel clinical applications. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157753. pmid:27326858
  22. 22. Porwal MH, Razzak AN, Kumar V, Obeidat AZ, Sharma U. An analysis of suicidal and self-injurious behavior reports with antiseizure medications in the FDA adverse event database. Epilepsy Res. 2024;203:107382. pmid:38761467
  23. 23. Li J, Wang Y, Yang X, Zhu H, Jiang Z. Drug-induced hypoglycemia: A disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2024;23(8):1061–7. pmid:37909653
  24. 24. Caruso I, Di Gioia L, Di Molfetta S, Caporusso M, Cignarelli A, Sorice GP, et al. The real-world safety profile of tirzepatide: Pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. J Endocrinol Invest. 2024;47(11):2671–8. pmid:39141075
  25. 25. Ang PS, Chen Z, Chan CL, Tai BC. Data mining spontaneous adverse drug event reports for safety signals in Singapore – A comparison of three different disproportionality measures. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15(5):583–90. pmid:26996192
  26. 26. Noguchi Y, Tachi T, Teramachi H. Detection algorithms and attentive points of safety signal using spontaneous reporting systems as a clinical data source. Brief Bioinform. 2021;22(6):bbab347. pmid:34453158
  27. 27. Zhu J, Hu M, Liang Y, Zhong M, Chen Z, Wang Z. Pharmacovigilance analysis of orlistat adverse events based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. Heliyon. 2024;10(14).
  28. 28. Jacob AT, Kumar AH, Halivana G, Lukose L, Nair G, Subeesh V. Bioinformatics-guided disproportionality analysis of sevoflurane-induced nephrogenic diabetes insipidus using the FDA adverse event reporting system database. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2024;90(8):1804–10. pmid:37536932
  29. 29. Evans SJ, Waller PC, Davis S. Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for signal generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001;10(6):483–6. pmid:11828828
  30. 30. Rothman KJ, Lanes S, Sacks ST. The reporting odds ratio and its advantages over the proportional reporting ratio. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004;13(8):519–23. pmid:15317031
  31. 31. Long P, Li S, Pan L, Wang Y, Chen W, Wang X. Cardiovascular adverse events associated with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs): A pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1378010. pmid:38766629
  32. 32. Mu H, Chen J, Huang W, Huang G, Deng M, Hong S, et al. OmicShare tools: A zero-code interactive online platform for biological data analysis and visualization. Imeta. 2024;3(5):e228. pmid:39429881
  33. 33. Gilligan S, Raphael KL. Hyperkalemia and hypokalemia in CKD: Prevalence, risk factors, and clinical outcomes. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2017;24(5):315–8. pmid:29031358
  34. 34. Roger SD, Lavin PT, Lerma EV, McCullough PA, Butler J, Spinowitz BS, et al. Long-term safety and efficacy of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for hyperkalaemia in patients with mild/moderate versus severe/end-stage chronic kidney disease: Comparative results from an open-label, Phase 3 study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2021;36(1):137–50. pmid:32030422
  35. 35. Laureati P, Xu Y, Trevisan M, Schalin L, Mariani I, Bellocco R, et al. Initiation of sodium polystyrene sulphonate and the risk of gastrointestinal adverse events in advanced chronic kidney disease: A nationwide study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2020;35(9):1518–26. pmid:31377791
  36. 36. Kovesdy CP, Matsushita K, Sang Y, Brunskill NJ, Carrero JJ, Chodick G, et al. Serum potassium and adverse outcomes across the range of kidney function: A CKD Prognosis Consortium meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(17):1535–42. pmid:29554312
  37. 37. Hoppe LK, Muhlack DC, Koenig W, Carr PR, Brenner H, Schöttker B. Association of abnormal serum potassium levels with arrhythmias and cardiovascular mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2018;32(2):197–212. pmid:29679302
  38. 38. An JN, Lee JP, Jeon HJ, Kim DH, Oh YK, Kim YS, et al. Severe hyperkalemia requiring hospitalization: Predictors of mortality. Crit Care. 2012;16(6):R225. pmid:23171442
  39. 39. Morales E, Cravedi P, Manrique J. Management of chronic hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: An old problem with news options. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:653634. pmid:34150795
  40. 40. Yu Y, Zhang K, Gao J, Huang G, Yong C, Wei Y, et al. Safety assessment of sodium zirconium cyclosilicate: A FAERS-based disproportionality analysis. PLoS One. 2025;20(3):e0320585. pmid:40132024