Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Comparison of time to death and its predictors among hospitalized children with and without severe acute malnutrition at Mulanje District Hospital, Southern Malawi

  • Masuzgo Rodney Pajogo ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    masuzgopajogo@gmail.com

    Affiliation Department of Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi

  • Miriam Ndholvu

    Roles Writing – review & editing, Conceptualization

    Affiliation Department of Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi

Abstract

Introduction

Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is a major cause of child mortality in sub-Saharan Africa, yet recent data from Mulanje District Hospital, Malawi, showed higher mortality among non-SAM under-five children. This unexpected trend highlights a knowledge gap, as no studies in Malawi have compared time to death and its predictors between SAM and non-SAM children. This study aimed to fill that gap by examining and comparing mortality timing and predictors in both groups.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using medical records of 454 randomly selected under-five children admitted to Mulanje District Hospital between January 2017 and February 2021. Data were collected using structured forms and analysed in STATA version 16. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify mortality predictors, with significance set at p < 0.05.

Results

The overall mortality rate was 14.8%, with higher mortality in non-SAM children (21.2%) than SAM children (8.4%). The median time to death was 5 days (IQR: 2–8) for SAM and 1 day (IQR: 1–2) for non-SAM children. Among SAM children, not having received amoxicillin (AHR: 4.59; CI: 1.46–14.43) was a significant predictor of death. Among non-SAM children, facility referral (AHR: 2.66 (95% CI: 1.34–5.27)), oxygen therapy (AHR: 4.04 (95% CI: 2.11–7.71)), and not having received amoxicillin (AHR: 33.49 (95% CI: 4.47–250.7)) were significant predictors of mortality.

Conclusion

The higher mortality observed among non-SAM children reflected more acute disease presentations and delays in effective intervention, underscoring the need for rapid triage and treatment in this group.

Background

Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) is defined by a very low weight-for-height (below a −3 z-score of the median World Health Organization (WHO) growth standards), visible wasting, or the presence of nutritional oedema [1]. Typically, SAM manifests itself in two forms: marasmus, characterized by severe wasting, and kwashiorkor, characterized by bilateral pitting oedema [2]. Both marasmus and kwashiorkor are associated with several co-morbidities, and they contribute significantly to high rates of hospital admission and mortality in childhood [3].

Globally, SAM remains a public health problem. Every year, almost one million children under five years of age die because of SAM, accounting for nearly 12–15% of all under-five deaths worldwide [4]. Global reports have shown that 45% of child deaths in developing countries are attributed to SAM [5]. In 2018, nearly 17 million children under five years old had SAM in 2018, with 2.9 million receiving inpatient treatment. Of these cases, 4.4 million were cases from sub-Saharan Africa [6]. By 2020, 6.7% of the global under-five population (45.5 million children) experienced at least moderate wasting, including 13.6 million who were severely wasted. Evidence shows that two-thirds of all wasted children live in Asia and over one-quarter in Africa [5]. Meanwhile, the death rate of children under 5 years of age remains between 10 and 40% in sub-Saharan Africa, including Malawi [7,8].

Under-five mortality is a significant public health concern in Malawi [9]. According to the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Malawi, approximately 40,000 children under five die annually from preventable or treatable conditions. Leading causes of under-five mortality in Malawi include pneumonia (14%), diarrhoea (8%), and malaria (7%), with SAM contributing to nearly 25% of these deaths [10].

Severe acute malnutrition is a major contributor of under-five mortality and morbidity in Malawi. Nationally, 37% of children under five years of age are stunted, 3% are wasted, and 12% are underweight [11]. At Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital in Blantyre, SAM-related mortality in under-five children has reached up to 42% [12]. In 2015, the Malawi’s national case fatality rate (CFR) for SAM in was 9.6%. However, seven hospitals in Malawi, including Mulanje District Hospital, had an average CFR of 11.6%, exceeding the Sphere standard of <10% [13]. In Malawi, the analysis of Community Management of Acute Malnutrition (CMAM) trends showed fluctuating rates, with the CFR of 7.9% in 2016, 9.7% in 2017, 8.5% in 2018, and 11% in 2019 [14].In view of this, researchers in Malawi have conducted several studies to investigate predictors of mortality in children with SAM [1517]. Studies have identified human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, Kwashiorkor, shock, and acute respiratory infections (ARI) as independent risk factors for the high death rate among children with SAM [15].

Generally, severely malnourished children do not respond to treatment in the same way as well-nourished children. Therefore, the management of SAM children differs from that of non-SAM children [18]. Non-SAM children are managed by treating the diagnosed condition using appropriate medications. The management of SAM involves several parameters, including nutritional therapy, routine medical treatment, and the management of common complications. Nutritional therapy involves the use of therapeutic feeds enriched with vitamins and minerals. The WHO guidelines recommend the use of Formula 75 (F-75), Formula 100 (F-100), and RUTF in the management of SAM [19]. The medical treatment uses broad-spectrum antibiotics regardless of signs of clinical infections. This is because SAM children may not show signs of infection due to reductive adaptation. As recommended by the WHO, children with uncomplicated SAM are treated with oral broad-spectrum antibiotics, whereas children with complicated SAM are treated with intravenous (IV) broad-spectrum antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics [20]. Meanwhile, evidence shows that the use of antibiotics improves growth and reduces the mortality of children with SAM [21].

The management of medical complications in children with SAM depends on the type of complication affecting the child. The most common complications affecting children with SAM include diarrhoea, dehydration, shock, bacterial infections, hypothermia, and hypoglycemia [22]. According to WHO treatment guidelines for SAM, diarrhoea or dehydration is managed with ReSoMal. Bacterial infections, such as lower respiratory tract infections and urinary tract infections, are treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Hypothermia is managed by covering sick children with blankets as well as keeping the child closer to the mother’s body. Hypoglycemia is managed with an intravenous infusion of 10% glucose, IV antibiotics and F-75 [19,20,22]. Meanwhile, the WHO guidelines have proven to be effective, with a CFR of less than 5% even in resource-constrained settings when applied with diligence [23].

Mulanje District Hospital is one of the district hospitals in Malawi that is heavily affected by SAM. On average, each year, the hospital admits 1000–4000 SAM children [24]. A substantial proportion of the malnourished children die while receiving medical treatment. A report has also shown that the mortality rate among children admitted with SAM in the district had risen from 4.3% in 2014 to 8.4% in 2015 [13]. While it is well known that mortality rates among children with SAM remain high in the district, no study has been conducted to compare the time to death and its predictors between SAM and non-SAM children. Therefore, this study was aimed at comparing the time to death and predictors of mortality between SAM and non-SAM under-five children admitted at Mulanje District Hospital. This study addressed a gap in the extant literature by determining how time to death and predictors of mortality differ between SAM and non-SAM children. By comparing SAM and non-SAM groups, this study aimed to uncover clinically actionable risk factors across a spectrum of nutritional statuses, enhancing triage and intervention strategies for in-hospital paediatric care.

Methods and materials

Study area

The study was conducted in Mulanje district, a semi-urban district in the southern region of Malawi, Africa. Mulanje district covers 2056 km2, and has a total population of 684,107, with 23 health centres, 1 mission hospital, and 1 district hospital [25]. Mulanje District Hospital has over 500 beds, of which 100 are in the paediatric ward. Ninety-nine beds are for non-SAM children, while 10 beds are set aside to serve patients suffering from SAM.

Study design and study period

This was a retrospective cohort study that was conducted from February 2021 to June 2022.

Study population

The study population consisted of children under five years of age admitted to Mulanje District Hospital between January 2017 and February 2021.

Inclusion criteria

  • Non-SAM and SAM patients aged 0–59 months
  • All children admitted with medical conditions.

Exclusion criterion

  • Admitted children aged 5 years and above.
  • All hospitalised children who were not assessed for their nutrition status
  • Admitted children with surgical and orthopaedic conditions. These children were excluded due to their distinct pathophysiological profiles and clinical pathways. Their outcomes are more influenced by surgical interventions and injury severity than by nutritional or infectious factors. Including them could have introduced heterogeneity and confounded the relationship between nutritional status and mortality

Sample size determination

The sample size was determined using the formula for detecting a difference between two proportions. We considered the following assumptions to determine the appropriate sample size: an 11.6% mortality rate in the exposed group [7], a 4.16% mortality rate in the unexposed group [26], a 95% confidence interval, an 80% power, and a 10% contingency. After calculations, the total sample size was 412. After adjusting for 10% of the missing files, the final sample size was 454. The sample size among the exposed (n1 = 227) and the sample size among the unexposed (n2 = 227).

Data collection

We used structured data collection forms to collect data from the medical records of the children under 5 years of age who were admitted from January 2017 to February 2021. Patients’ files were collected from the storage room in paediatric department. Data for SAM children was collected from the NRU. Data for non-SAM children were collected from the paediatric medical ward. We developed data collection forms by following the format of the present paediatric admission sheet at Mulanje District Hospital [27]. The parameters in the data collection form followed the order in which information appears in the patient’s records. We designed the first section of the form to collect socio-demographic data. The subsequent sections collected data on clinical characteristics, comorbidities, and routine treatment. The last section collected data on treatment outcomes.

We conducted a pilot test on the data collection form and made appropriate changes as needed. During data collection, medical charts were followed up for 30 days post-admission to assess the occurrence of death. Two nurses were recruited to collect data from the medical records. Data were collected by reviewing patients’ medical charts. Multiple imputation was used to handle the missing data. Missing values were replaced using predictive models based on other variables in the dataset. We collected the following information from the medical charts:

  1. Social-demographic data: This included age, sex, referral status, and date of admission.
  2. Clinical data: This included fevers, vomiting, diarrhoea, dehydration, shock, anaemia, coughing, convulsions, and oedema.
  3. Routine treatment data: This included administered medications, oxygen therapy, and nasal-gastric (NG) feeding tube.
  4. Treatment outcome: This included information about treatment outcomes, including whether the patient had died or was censored.

Sampling procedure

Annually, the paediatric department at Mulanje District Hospital admits approximately 3000 children. A total of 7,685 children under five years of age were admitted between January 2017 and February 2021. Of these, we drew 643 samples from NRU and 5614 samples from the paediatric medical ward, which fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 1428 patients did not fulfil inclusion criteria, and therefore their charts were excluded from the study. All SAM and non-SAM under-five children who had met the inclusion criteria were separately listed in cells in the Excel spreadsheet. We used the RAND function to assign a random number to each cell and selected the required sample size of 454 from the eligible patient population using an index rank formula.

Data quality control

We achieved data quality by creating a data collection form that was appropriate for the study’s objectives. Besides this, we used two qualified nurses for data collection. Before data collection process, the nurses underwent a two-day intensive training that covered the study protocol, operational definitions of variables, and best practices for extracting data from medical records. The training aimed to enhance their competence, ensure consistency in data collection, and improve efficiency.

To assess and reinforce consistency between data collectors, we conducted an inter-rater reliability test during the training phase. Both nurses independently extracted data from a subset of the same medical records, and their results were compared. Agreement across key variables was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa statistic, which demonstrated substantial agreement (κ > 0.75), indicating high inter-rater reliability.

Throughout the data collection period, close supervision and routine quality checks were conducted to ensure ongoing accuracy, completeness, and consistency of the data. Any discrepancies or uncertainties were promptly reviewed and resolved through discussion and feedback, further enhancing the validity and reliability of the dataset.

Operational definitions

Severe acute malnutrition: Weight-for-height < −3 SD, mid-upper arm circumference of <11.5 cm, or bilateral pitting oedema.

Mortality: Any death of a child under five years of age receiving treatment in the hospital.

Time to death: Time in days from the date of admission to the date of death.

Censored: Individuals whose time to death was not observed because of the termination of the study before the occurrence of death or because subjects left the study before death had occurred.

Survival time: The number of days that an individual child had survived in the hospital over the follow-up period from the date of admission for a disease until death or censorship had occurred.

Variables

Outcome variable.

The outcome variable was the “time to death” of an admitted child under five years of age.

Event of interest.

Death of an admitted child under five years of age.

Exposure variables.

Exposure variables included predictors of interest such as sex, child age, sex, breastfeeding status, referral status, HIV status, and administered treatments such as amoxicillin, oxygen therapy, and NG tube.

Data management

We examined the raw data for errors and omissions. We checked the data and removed incorrect, redundant, and incomplete data. We cleaned up the data to maintain consensus. Besides this, we coded the data, entered it into the MS Excel spreadsheet, and then stored it on a laptop in a protected folder.

Data analysis

Data from the MS Excel spreadsheet was directly imported into STATA 16 for analysis. Descriptive statistics such as frequencies, medians, and percentages were used to describe the data. We used Kaplan Meier (KM) curves and Log-rank tests to estimate survival probability and compare survival curves across distinct groups. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to identify predictors of mortality. Predictor variables with a p-value < 0.25 in the bivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model were entered into the multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression model to control for confounding. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model, we also included variables that demonstrated a significant association with the outcome of interest in previous studies. An adjusted hazard ratio with a 95% confidence interval presented the output of the analysis, and we declared it statistically significant when the p-value was less than 0.05.

Ethical considerations

This study (protocol number: P.09/21/3415) was reviewed and approved by the Malawi’s College of Medicine Research and Ethics Committee (COMREC) (certificate of ethical approval attached). Since we used secondary data, it was impractical to get individual patient consent. Therefore, we got an approval to use secondary data from the Mulanje District Research Coordinating Committee (approval letter attached). We also obtained an approval letter from the Kamuzu University of Health Sciences (approval letter attached). In this study, we used codes to identify subjects instead of collecting specific personal identifiers, thereby maintaining confidentiality. Since we used pre-existing data, there was no physical harm to the subjects.

Results

Participants

A total of 7,685 under-five children were admitted to Mulanje District Hospital between January 2017 and February 2021. After applying eligibility criteria, 6,257 records were retained. Of these, 1,041 children with surgical conditions or burns and 387 with incomplete data were excluded. Among the remaining 4,829 records, 643 were SAM cases and 5,614 were non-SAM.

Using simple random sampling, 227 SAM and 227 non-SAM children were selected for analysis. Each participant was followed up for 30 days from admission to determine survival status. Among SAM children, 19 (8.4%) died, while 208 survived. Among non-SAM children, 48 (21.2%) died, and 179 survived (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Sampling flow for the selection of participants (Developed by authors).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333585.g001

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants

Table 1 presents the sociodemographic characteristics of the study population. The mean age distribution and admission patterns were similar between the groups. Male children were slightly more represented among non-SAM cases (60.8%) than among SAM cases (51.5%) (p = 0.047). Most admissions in both groups were primary admissions and self-referrals. Breastfeeding was more common among non-SAM children, while SAM children had a higher proportion with unknown vaccination status.

thumbnail
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics between SAM and non-SAM children (n = 454).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333585.t001

Clinical characteristics of the study participants

Clinical characteristics differed significantly between groups (Table 2). Fever was more prevalent in non-SAM children (95.2%) than in SAM children (79.7%, p < 0.0001). Convulsions were markedly higher in non-SAM children (46.7%) than in SAM children (7.1%, p < 0.0001), likely reflecting the burden of severe malaria and other neurological conditions.

thumbnail
Table 2. Comparison of clinical characteristics between SAM and non-SAM children (n = 454).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333585.t002

Treatment administered

Treatment modalities varied significantly (Fig 2). Almost all SAM children (98.2%) received IV antibiotics, while 76.2% of non-SAM children did. Antimalarial treatment was more common among non-SAM children (67.8%) than SAM children (34.8%), aligning with the higher prevalence of malaria. Oral amoxicillin use was more frequent in SAM children (54.2%) compared to non-SAM children (34.8%).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Types of treatment given to SAM and non-SAM children (Developed by authors).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333585.g002

Follow-up duration

The median duration of hospital stay and follow-up was longer for SAM children (7 days) than for non-SAM children (2 days). The total cumulative follow-up time was 2,204 child-days, with 1,666 for SAM and 538 for non-SAM participants.

Inpatient treatment outcomes

Treatment outcomes are summarized in Table 3. Mortality was significantly higher among non-SAM children (21.2%) compared to SAM children (8.4%) (p = 0.0003). Discharge rates were similar between the groups (~75%). However, SAM children had a significantly higher absconding rate (14.1% vs. 0.4%, p < 0.0001).

thumbnail
Table 3. Comparison of the treatment outcomes between SAM and non-SAM children (n = 454).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333585.t003

Cause-specific mortality

Among the 454 children, the most common diagnoses were SAM (50%) and severe malaria (31.7%). Severe malaria accounted for the highest proportion of deaths (41.8%), followed by SAM (28.4%) (Table 4). Other causes included pneumonia, gastroenteritis, and sepsis.

Mortality outcomes by nutrition status

Table 5 summarizes the mortality outcomes among under-five children by nutritional status. The overall inpatient mortality rate was 14.8% (67/454). Mortality was significantly higher in non-SAM children (21.1%) compared to SAM children (8.4%), and this difference was statistically significant (Z = 3.84, p < 0.001). The median time to death differed substantially between the two groups. Among SAM children, the median time to death was 5 days (IQR: 2–8), while among non-SAM children it was only 1 day (IQR: 1–2), suggesting that non-SAM children tended to present more acutely and deteriorated more rapidly.

thumbnail
Table 5. Mortality outcomes by nutritional status (n = 454).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333585.t005

Kaplan-Meier survival estimates

The overall Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival estimate indicated that the probability of survival among under-five children remained high during the first 12 days of hospitalization but gradually declined with longer follow-up. The median survival time for the entire cohort was 22 days (Fig 3). When stratified by nutritional status, the KM survival curves showed a distinct pattern: SAM children consistently demonstrated higher survival probabilities than non-SAM children during the first 9 days of admission. This suggests that non-SAM children experienced earlier deterioration and death, while SAM children tended to survive longer in the initial phase of hospitalization (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 3. An overall Kaplan-Meier survival graph for all in-patient paediatric admissions at Mulanje District Hospital.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333585.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. The Kaplan-Meier survival graphs for SAM and non-SAM children at Mulanje District Hospital.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333585.g004

Predictors of mortality

Table 6 shows the results of Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. In SAM children, not receiving amoxicillin was a significant independent predictor of mortality (AHR: 4.59 (95% CI: 1.46–14.43), p = 0.009)). In non-SAM children, several factors independently predicted mortality, including facility referral (AHR 2.66 (95% CI: 1.34–5.27), p = 0.005)), oxygen therapy (AHR 4.04 (95% CI: 2.11–7.71), p < 0.0001)) and not receiving amoxicillin: AHR 33.49 (95% CI: 4.47–250.7), p = 0.001.

thumbnail
Table 6. Predictors of mortality among SAM and non-SAM children (n = 454).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333585.t006

The extremely large effect size associated with not receiving amoxicillin in non-SAM children suggests strong clinical significance. This finding indicates that early antibiotic administration may be life-saving in this group, possibly due to the high burden of severe bacterial infections such as pneumonia and sepsis, which progress rapidly without prompt treatment. The strength of this association, even after adjusting for confounders, underscores the critical role of timely empirical antibiotic therapy in reducing mortality risk.

Discussion

In this study, the inpatient mortality rate for all under-five admissions was 14.8%. This rate is disproportionately high compared to those observed in studies done in Iran and South Sudan, whose mortality rates were 1.35% and 5.7%, respectively [28,29]. The higher incidence of mortality in the present study could be attributed to several factors, including inadequate case management, late presentation, delayed initiation of care and treatment, inadequate staffing, and a lack of essential medical supplies.

Contrary to the WHO’s report [6], the majority of deaths in the present study occurred among non-SAM children rather than those with SAM. This unexpected trend may be attributed to the acute and rapidly fatal nature of illnesses such as severe malaria, pneumonia, or sepsis, which were more prevalent among non-SAM children. The shorter median time to death among this group further suggests that many children arrived at the hospital in critical condition, with limited opportunity for effective intervention.

Another contributing factor could be delays and systemic challenges in the referral process. Among non-SAM children, facility referral emerged as a significant predictor of mortality. This likely reflects issues such as late presentation, poor transport infrastructure, lack of pre-referral stabilization, and inadequate triage at lower-level facilities. Many children may have deteriorated during transit or arrived too late for life-saving treatment, underscoring the urgent need for strengthening early recognition, referral pathways, and emergency care capacity.

Our study revealed that children with SAM had a longer median time to death (5 days) compared to non-SAM children (1 day). However, this disparity in time to death does not imply that SAM is less critical. Rather, the difference likely reflects variations in underlying biological mechanisms, distinct causes of mortality, and differences in medical interventions. The slower progression to death in SAM children may be due to physiological adaptations to prolonged malnutrition. In contrast, non-SAM children often succumb more quickly to acute, rapidly fatal conditions such as sepsis or malaria, which can cause sudden systemic failure. Additionally, SAM children typically receive intensive medical care, including nutritional therapy, routine antibiotics, and treatment of complications, which may extend survival [30]. Non-SAM children, however, might not receive such interventions or may access care too late, leading to a shorter time to death.

This study found that a higher proportion of non-SAM children, many of whom had severe malaria, died compared to SAM children. In sub-Saharan Africa, severe malaria is a recognized leading cause of pediatric mortality, and it might have contributed to the observed patterns of mortality [31]. Despite hospital treatment, severe malaria’s acute complications, such as cerebral involvement, severe anemia, and respiratory distress, can cause rapid clinical deterioration and death. The higher in-hospital mortality seen in the non-SAM group may have been largely caused by these factors. In contrast, while SAM children were critically ill, they often received targeted therapeutic feeding and supportive care, which might have buffered early mortality during admission.

The present study found that the discharge rates were similar between the SAM and non-SAM groups, indicating that they recovered similarly while still in the hospital. Notably, the study did not track post-discharge outcomes for either group, limiting the ability to assess how post-discharge factors may have influenced the observed mortality difference. Existing research, however, indicates that the post-discharge mortality rate is 2-fold higher in SAM children as compared to non-SAM children [32]. This is probably because of persistent immunosuppression, ongoing nutritional deficiencies, and restricted access to continuity of care. Without accounting for these delayed risks, the lower in-hospital mortality observed among SAM children might underestimate their true vulnerability over time.

Sex has been identified as a potential predictor of mortality in children with SAM, with a study in Ethiopia showing higher mortality risk in male children [33]. This is aligned with the fact that males are biologically weaker than females, making them more susceptible to life risks, including death [34]. However, the present analysis found no significant association between sex and mortality in SAM and non-SAM children. The possible cause for this variation could be differences in sample size, study setting and the severity of the disease.

Consistent with another study [35], our research found that age was not a predictor of mortality in SAM and non-SAM children. This contrasts with studies in Egypt [36] and Ethiopia [37], where age was a significant predictor. In Ethiopia [37], children under 24 months were 2.84 times more likely to die than those over 24 months. Literature has shown that infants possess weak and underdeveloped immune systems, making them more susceptible to severe diseases and death [38,39].

Unlike in SAM children, facility referral was a significant predictor of death among non-SAM children. Non-SAM children who were referred from health facilities had a 2.6-fold increased risk of death as compared to the self-referrals. This could be because patients from health facilities were reporting late while the condition was very critical and had a poor prognosis. This is similar to a study done in Congo, where facility referrals were significantly associated with late referrals and subsequent child deaths [40].

It is scientifically known that antibiotics, including amoxicillin, reduce mortality in children with SAM [21]. This study observed that both SAM and non-SAM children who did not receive amoxicillin had an increased risk of death. This is similar to an Ethiopian study where having not received antibiotics, including amoxicillin was also a significant predictor of death in under-five children [41]. The possible reason to explain this could be the fact that amoxicillin, just like any other antibiotic, improves the clinical response to life-threatening infections, therefore reducing the risk of mortality [42,43].

However, the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) must be weighed against the expanding empirical use of amoxicillin. Due in part to widespread empirical prescribing and subpar drug quality, regional surveillance indicates that common pediatric pathogens are becoming less susceptible to penicillins [44]. Therefore, to maintain the drug’s proven survival benefit and long-term effectiveness, routine amoxicillin administration should be combined with antimicrobial stewardship safeguards, such as strict clinical criteria for initiation, procurement of quality-assured formulations, and regular updates to local treatment protocols based on AMR data.

Contrary to the results observed among SAM children, having received oxygen therapy was a predictor of mortality among non-SAM children. Our study showed that non-SAM children who received oxygen therapy were 4 times more likely to die than those patients who had not received oxygen therapy. The association suggests that poor outcomes may partly result from oxygen toxicity, although it could also reflect confounding by severity, as oxygen is typically given to critically ill patients. Excessive or prolonged oxygen use can cause hyperoxia, leading to oxidative stress, inflammation, and organ damage. In young children, this may result in lung injury, retinopathy, or multi-organ failure, particularly when high-flow oxygen is used without proper monitoring. [45,46]. A similar relationship was found in a study done in the United States of America, where oxygen therapy was associated with increased inpatient mortality in children because of hyperoxia [47]. Our study suggested that nurses and clinicians should use a cautious, evidence-based approach to oxygen therapy, aided by pulse oximetry whenever feasible, to reduce the risk of oxygen toxicity. Oxygen should be initiated only when clear indications exist (e.g., SpO₂ < 90% or signs of respiratory distress) and should be titrated to maintain saturations within the recommended target range (90–95%).

NGT insertion is a key factor associated with mortality in hospitalized children, with literature linking improper insertion to complications such as tracheal intubation, pneumothorax, ventilatory failure, and death [48]. A report has shown that NGT insertion is mostly used in critically ill children with poor prognosis and hence higher risk of death [49]. A study in Ethiopia found NGT insertion to be a significant predictor of mortality in SAM children [50]. However, this was not the case in the present study, where NGT insertion did not significantly predict mortality in either SAM or non-SAM children. This discrepancy may be due to differences in study setting, caseload, sample size, and disease severity.

The association between HIV infection and mortality in SAM has been described in several studies [40,51]. Research has aligned this association with nutritional acquired immune deficiency syndrome (NAIDS) which worsens the fragility of a deteriorating immune system [52]. A study has shown that HIV-infected children with SAM are three times more likely to die as compared to HIV-negative children [51]. However, the present study showed that HIV was not a significant predictor of mortality for SAM and non-SAM children. This study did not investigate why such was the case.

Strengths and limitations

In this study, we applied the right sampling technique, the right sample size, and accurate research procedures. We used a simple random sampling technique, therefore preventing selection bias. Besides this, our sample size was large and representative of the target population, hence strengthening the power of the study. However, we acknowledged the presence of a few limitations. Our study was affected by unmeasured confounding from the unmeasured variables. In this study, we did not investigate the predictive effects of biochemical and health system factors. Additionally, the high mortality rate observed in non-SAM children may have been influenced by the confounding effects of severe malaria, potentially leading to an overestimation of the mortality rate in non-SAM children compared to SAM children. This study excluded surgical admissions, which may have introduced selection bias. Surgical conditions often carry high mortality risk, and their exclusion may have influenced the observed mortality rates in non-SAM children by disproportionately including acutely ill medical cases. As such, caution is needed when generalizing these findings to the broader under-five inpatient population. Lastly, the study did not track post-discharge outcomes for either group, limiting the ability to assess how post-discharge factors may have influenced the observed mortality difference

Conclusion and recommendations

This study showed a longer median time to death among SAM children compared to non- SAM children. Among SAM children, not receiving amoxicillin was a significant predictor of mortality. Among non-SAM children, facility referral, receiving oxygen therapy, and not receiving amoxicillin were found to be significant predictors of mortality. Therefore, to reduce under‑five deaths, clinical and nursing interventions must target these modifiable risk factors and ensure that the health‑system inputs required to implement those interventions are reliably available

The present results also bring up significant issues regarding the antibiotics stewardship. More research is necessary to weigh the risk of antibiotic resistance against life-saving empirical therapy, given the observed association between amoxicillin and survival. National antimicrobial stewardship strategies should be implemented in tandem with efforts to guarantee the proper access and prudent use of antibiotics such as amoxicillin. Furthermore, the association between oxygen treatment and death emphasizes the necessity of protocol changes and increased clinical supervision. In particular, oxygen should only be used when hypoxia is confirmed or highly suspected, and should be titrated according to clinical severity and pulse oximetry. To prevent both underuse and overuse, it is critically necessary to train staff and standardize oxygen initiation criteria, monitoring, and weaning procedures

We also suggested that an analytical study that includes multidimensional predictors of mortality is needed to prevent confounding effects originating from unmeasured confounders. Additionally, the study recommends that future research should track post-discharge outcomes for both groups in order to evaluate the impact of post-discharge factors on the mortality differences between the groups.

References

  1. 1. World Health Organization, World Food Programme, United Nations System Standing Committee on Nutrition, United Nations Children’s Fund. Community-based management of severe acute malnutrition: a joint statement. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2007.
  2. 2. Bain LE, Awah PK, Geraldine N, Kindong NP, Sigal Y, Bernard N, et al. Malnutrition in Sub-Saharan Africa: burden, causes and prospects. Pan Afr Med J. 2013;15:120. pmid:24255726
  3. 3. Ubesie AC, Ibeziako NS, Ndiokwelu CI, Uzoka CM, Nwafor CA. Under-five protein energy malnutrition admitted at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu: a 10 year retrospective review. Nutr J. 2012;11:43. pmid:22704641
  4. 4. World Health Organization. INSPIRE handbook: Action for implementing the seven strategies for ending violence against children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
  5. 5. Traves D. All you ever wanted to know about infant formulas (but were afraid to ask). Paediatrics and Child Health. 2021;31(8):316–21.
  6. 6. UNICEF, World Health Organization, World Bank Group. Joint child malnutrition estimates—levels and trends in child malnutrition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019.
  7. 7. Modjadji P, Mashishi J. Persistent Malnutrition and Associated Factors among Children under Five Years Attending Primary Health Care Facilities in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(20):7580. pmid:33086477
  8. 8. Tickell KD, Denno DM. Inpatient management of children with severe acute malnutrition: a review of WHO guidelines. Bull World Health Organ. 2016;94(9):642–51.
  9. 9. Mulagha-Maganga A, Kazembe L, Ndiragu M. Modeling time to death for under-five children in Malawi using 2015/16 Demographic and Health Survey: a survival analysis. J Health Popul Nutr. 2024;43(1):45. pmid:38570888
  10. 10. UNICEF Malawi. Early childhood – the challenge. Lilongwe: UNICEF Malawi; 2022. Available from: https://www.unicef.org/malawi/
  11. 11. National Statistical Office (NSO) [Malawi], ICF International. Malawi demographic and health survey 2015–16. Zomba (Malawi): National Statistical Office, ICF International; 2017.
  12. 12. Kerac M, Bunn J, Chagaluka G, Bahwere P, Tomkins A, Collins S, et al. Follow-up of post-discharge growth and mortality after treatment for severe acute malnutrition (FuSAM study): a prospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e96030. pmid:24892281
  13. 13. Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA). Applying the model for improvement to strengthen the care for children with severe acute malnutrition (SAM) and medical complications in Malawi. Washington (DC): FHI 360/FANTA; 2018.
  14. 14. Daniel AI, Kathumba S, Mitambo C, Chasweka D, Voskuijl W, Kamanga E, et al. Trends in severe acute malnutrition admissions, characteristics, and treatment outcomes in Malawi from 2011 through 2019. Malawi Med J. 2024;36(2):73–9. pmid:40191564
  15. 15. Vonasek BJ, Chiume M, Crouse HL, Mhango S, Kondwani A, Ciccone EJ, et al. Risk factors for mortality and management of children with complicated severe acute malnutrition at a tertiary referral hospital in Malawi. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2020;40(3):148–57. pmid:32242509
  16. 16. Nkosi-Gondwe T, Calis J, Boele van Hensbroek M, Bates I, Blomberg B, Phiri KS. A cohort analysis of survival and outcomes in severely anaemic children with moderate to severe acute malnutrition in Malawi. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246267. pmid:33529189
  17. 17. van der Kroft G, Bours DMJL, Janssen-Heijnen DM, van Berlo DCLH, Konsten DJLM. Value of sarcopenia assessed by computed tomography for the prediction of postoperative morbidity following oncological colorectal resection: A comparison with the malnutrition screening tool. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2018;24:114–9. pmid:29576348
  18. 18. Ashworth A. Guidelines for the inpatient treatment of severely malnourished children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003.
  19. 19. Médecins Sans Frontières. Clinical guidelines: diagnosis and treatment manual. Geneva: Médecins Sans Frontières; 2016.
  20. 20. World Health Organization. Guideline updates on the management of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
  21. 21. Jones KDJ, Berkley JA. Severe acute malnutrition and infection. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2014;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1–29. pmid:25475887
  22. 22. World Health Organization. Training course on the inpatient management of severe acute malnutrition: course director’s guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
  23. 23. Kauchali S, Puoane T, Aguilar AM, Kathumba S, Nkoroi A, Annan R. Scaling up improved inpatient treatment of severe malnutrition: key factors and experiences from South Africa, Bolivia, Malawi, and Ghana. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2022;10(2):e2100381.
  24. 24. Webb P. Achieving food and nutrition security: lessons learned from the Integrated Food Security Programme (IFSP), Mulanje, Malawi. Somerville (MA): Feinstein International Center, Friedman School of Nutrition, Tufts University; 2011.
  25. 25. Menghinello S, Faramondi A, Laureti T. The future role of official statistics in the business data arena. SJI. 2020;36(2):519–33.
  26. 26. Hamazaki K, Matsumura K, Tsuchida A, Kasamatsu H, Tanaka T, Ito M, et al. Maternal dietary intake of fish and PUFAs and child neurodevelopment at 6 months and 1 year of age: a nationwide birth cohort-the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS). Am J Clin Nutr. 2020;112(5):1295–303. pmid:32766751
  27. 27. Mulanje District Hospital. Paediatric admission form: newly admission form for paediatric care and treatment at Mulanje District Hospital. Mulanje (Malawi): Mulanje District Hospital; 2022.
  28. 28. Fallahzadeh MA, Abdehou ST, Hassanzadeh J, Fallhzadeh F, Fallahzadeh MH, Malekmakan L. Pattern of in-hospital pediatric mortality over a 3-year period at University teaching hospitals in Iran. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2015;19(6):311–5. pmid:26195856
  29. 29. Ahmed MA, Musa IR, Mahgoub HM, Al-Nafeesah A, Al-Wutayd O, Adam I. Patterns, outcomes and predictors of pediatric medical admissions at Gadarif Hospital in Eastern Sudan. Front Pediatr. 2022;10:902533.
  30. 30. World Health Organization. WHO guideline on the prevention and management of wasting and nutritional oedema (acute malnutrition) in infants and children under 5 years. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024.
  31. 31. White NJ. Severe malaria. Malar J. 2022;21(1):284. pmid:36203155
  32. 32. Deschasaux-Tanguy M, Druesne-Pecollo N, Esseddik Y, de Edelenyi FS, Allès B, Andreeva VA, et al. Diet and physical activity during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown (March-May 2020): results from the French NutriNet-Santé cohort study. Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;113(4):924–38. pmid:33675635
  33. 33. Ashine YE, Ayele BA, Aynalem YA, Yitbarek GY. Time to death and its predictor among children under five years of age with severe acute malnutrition admitted to inpatient stabilization centers in North Shoa Zone, Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Nutr Diet Suppl. 2020;12:167–77.
  34. 34. Pongou R. Why is infant mortality higher in boys than in girls? A new hypothesis based on preconception environment and evidence from a large sample of twins. Demography. 2013;50(2):421–44. pmid:23151996
  35. 35. Tesfa D, Tiruneh SA, Azanaw MM, Gebremariam AD, Engdaw MT, Kefale B, et al. Time to death and its determinants among under-five children in Africa using the recent (2010–2018) Demographic and Health Survey data: country-based shared frailty analyses. BMC Pediatrics. 2021;21(1):496.
  36. 36. Ghazawy ER, Bebars GM, Eshak ES. Survival status and mortality predictors among severely malnourished under 5 years of age children admitted to Minia University maternity and children hospital. BMC Pediatr. 2020;20(1):233. pmid:32429871
  37. 37. Girum T, Kote M, Tariku B, Bekele H. Survival status and predictors of mortality among severely acute malnourished children under 5 years of age admitted to stabilization centers in Gedeo Zone: a retrospective cohort study. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017;13:101–10.
  38. 38. Fikrie A, Alemayehu A, Gebremedhin S. Treatment outcomes and factors affecting time-to-recovery from severe acute malnutrition in 6-59 months old children admitted to a stabilization center in Southern Ethiopia: A retrospective cohort study. Ital J Pediatr. 2019;45(1):46. pmid:30971316
  39. 39. World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund. WHO child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children: joint statement by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.
  40. 40. Kambale RM, Ngaboyeka GA, Ntagazibwa JN, Bisimwa M-HI, Kasole LY, Habiyambere V, et al. Severe acute malnutrition in children admitted in an Intensive Therapeutic and Feeding Centre of South Kivu, Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo: Why do our patients die? PLoS One. 2020;15(7):e0236022. pmid:32678837
  41. 41. Wagnew F, Tesgera D, Mekonnen M, Abajobir AA. Predictors of mortality among under-five children with severe acute malnutrition, Northwest Ethiopia: an institution based retrospective cohort study. Arch Public Health. 2018;76:64. pmid:30275951
  42. 42. Schuttevaer R, Alsma J, Brink A, van Dijk W, de Steenwinkel JEM, Lingsma HF, et al. Appropriate empirical antibiotic therapy and mortality: Conflicting data explained by residual confounding. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225478. pmid:31743361
  43. 43. Delbaere K, Close JCT, Brodaty H, Sachdev P, Lord SR. Determinants of disparities between perceived and physiological risk of falling among elderly people: cohort study. BMJ. 2010;341:c4165. pmid:20724399
  44. 44. Gautsch NA. Antibiotic usage and consumption in the paediatric population. Kaunas (Lithuania): Lithuanian University of Health Sciences; 2021.
  45. 45. Su L, Kudchadkar SR. Optimizing Human Performance in ICUs. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022;23(1):65–7. pmid:34989712
  46. 46. Lius EE, Syafaah I. Hyperoxia in the management of respiratory failure: A literature review. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;81:104393. pmid:36147110
  47. 47. Pelletier JH, Ramgopal S, Horvat CM. Hyperoxemia Is Associated With Mortality in Critically Ill Children. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:675293. pmid:34164417
  48. 48. Lyman B, Peyton C, Healey F. Reducing nasogastric tube misplacement through evidence-based practice. Am Nurse Today. 2018;13(11):6–11.
  49. 49. Abukari AS, Acheampong AK. Feeding the critically ill child in intensive care units: a descriptive qualitative study in two tertiary hospitals in Ghana. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):395. pmid:34507534
  50. 50. Oumer A, Mesfin L, Tesfahun E, Ale A. Predictors of Death from Complicated Severe Acute Malnutrition in East Ethiopia: Survival Analysis. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:8763–73. pmid:34853530
  51. 51. Fergusson P, Chinkhumba J, Grijalva-Eternod C, Banda T, Mkangama C, Tomkins A. Nutritional recovery in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected children with severe acute malnutrition. Arch Dis Child. 2009;94(7):512–6. pmid:18977785
  52. 52. Manary M, Trehan I, Willumsen J. Systematic review of the care of HIV-infected children with severe acute malnutrition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012 Feb.