Figures
Abstract
Aim
This study aimed to assess the knowledge level of sarcopenia and its influencing factors among Chinese community-dwelling older adults.
Methods
We conducted a cross-sectional study using the sociodemographic questionnaire, the Sarcopenia Knowledge Awareness Survey Scale and the SARC-CalF scales for data collection in 5 communities in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. Influencing factors of sarcopenia knowledge were analyzed by logistic regression, and a decision tree model.
Results
A total of 569 participants were included in the analysis. Only 17.8% participants had heard of sarcopenia, 19.3% of participants screened positive for sarcopenia, and 29.0% had a self-assessed muscle status that was inconsistent with the actual screened sarcopenia status. Those aged 75 years and above were more likely to have inadequate sarcopenia knowledge (OR=0.468,95% CI = 0.303–0.723). The group with the highest proportion of low sarcopenia knowledge consisted of those who lived alone or with children, had an education level of middle school or below, and never engaged in any social activities (97.6%).
Citation: Guo W, Wang T, Dai H, Wang Y, Zhou Z, Wang Y, et al. (2025) The knowledge level and influencing factors of sarcopenia among Chinese community-dwelling older adults. PLoS One 20(10): e0333557. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333557
Editor: Simone Agostini, Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, ITALY
Received: April 25, 2025; Accepted: September 15, 2025; Published: October 16, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Guo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and supporting information files.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Sarcopenia, as one of the geriatric syndromes, is characterized by a loss of muscle mass, accompanied by a decline in muscle strength and or physical function [1]. Depending on different definitions of sarcopenia, its estimated prevalence ranges from 9.9 to 40.4% in the elderly [2]. Sarcopenia is an age-related condition that also causes multiple adverse health outcomes, including decreased self-care ability and quality of life, overall functional decline, and even death [3]. In fact, sarcopenia is a modifiable and dynamic process, that can be effectively avoided and reversed by early identification, screening, and prevention of modifiable risk factors [4].
However, despite its clinical significance, awareness of sarcopenia remains alarmingly low among older populations. Previous studies have shown that the older population frequently have a lack of understanding. This lack of knowledge itself may prevent older adults from accurately assessing their muscle health status, causing them to miss opportunities for early intervention. For instance, Dutch research revealed that most elderly individuals lack comprehension of sarcopenia, with only a minority of affected persons accurately recognize their condition [5,6]. Similarly, a Malaysian study reported public awareness hovers around low-to-moderate levels, strongly influenced by age and education [7]. This pervasive knowledge gap results in missed opportunities for early detection and intervention among at-risk groups.
Because the onset of sarcopenia is insidious and slow, the Asian Sarcopenia Working Group recommends timely identification of high-risk groups for effective intervention [8]. It is therefore crucial to improve awareness of sarcopenia among older adults, enhance their understanding of its risk factors, emphasize preventive approaches, and promote preventive behaviors. These steps may help to mitigate the onset and progression of sarcopenia at its root, ultimately reducing functional decline and healthcare costs [5,9].
Disease awareness is influenced by various factors, including age, education level, occupation, and social environment. Previous studies have shown that a patient’s status of sarcopenia affects their understanding of the condition [10]. If individuals perceive their health as adequate, they may become less motivated to seek medical or social support, which could result in reduced awareness of sarcopenia [11]. Therefore, assessing sarcopenia status is crucial for evaluating older adults’ understanding of this condition.
This study thus aimed to examine sarcopenia knowledge, its influencing factors, and the needs for health education on sarcopenia in older Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Although logistic regression highlights the main effects of influencing factors, it does not deal well with interactions or provide good decision recommendations [12]. In contrast, decision tree models can summarize classification rules by systematically learning the attribute features of existing data, and thereby eliminating collinearity among variables [13]. The combined use of decision tree and logistic regression models can enhance analytical performance. In this study, we employed both of these methods simultaneously to analyze the factors influencing the knowledge level of sarcopenia among the older adults. The results of this study should provide a reference for improving the knowledge of sarcopenia among older adults and thereby, improving their quality of life.
Methods
Study design
This was a cross-sectional study that used convenience sampling to recruit 569 participants who participated in physical examination from 5 community health service center in Wuhan, China, from December 2023 to April 2024. The inclusion criteria were those who aged ≥ 60 years and were able to communicate with researchers without impediment. Older adults were excluded if they 1) had critical conditions or were in a state of end-stage organ failure, 2) had received surgery to the legs, feet, or hands in the previous 3 months, or complete disability [14], or 3) had severe cognitive dysfunction or severe visual or hearing impairments that limited cooperation.
The study was approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Wuhan University on May 8, 2023, No.WHU-LFMD-IRB2023017, and all participants provided written informed consent prior to the study.
Data collection
Data collection was based on face-to-face interviews with participants by two trained nursing graduate students and the principal investigator. The interviewers asked the questions, recorded the answers, and explained the questions that the participants could not understand. Participants were not allowed to be given any prompts regarding questions or answers throughout the data collection procedure. The average time for researchers to complete the questionnaires and scales was 15 minutes. A data entry specialist cross-checked the data entered into the computer system that was subsequently used for analysis.
Measurement
The questionnaire consisted of part I on sociodemographic, lifestyle, and health status, part II on knowledge of sarcopenia, part III on current and expected channels to receiving sarcopenia information, and part Ⅳ on sarcopenia status.
Demographic questionnaire.
The researchers designed a general data questionnaire based on the purpose of the study and a literature review. The sociodemographic characteristics of the participants included age, gender, co-residence, marital status, education level, monthly income, occupation, lifestyle, and health status. Lifestyle factors were used to assess current smoking status, alcohol consumption, engagement in regular physical activity (including exercise modalities), and participation in social activities.
Knowledge of sarcopenia.
The knowledge levels of sarcopenia among older adults were assessed using the Sarcopenia Knowledge Awareness Survey Scale, developed by Chinese scholar Li [15] in 2023 (S1 Table). This scale consists of 10 questions to test three dimensions of sarcopenia knowledge: symptoms, risk factors, and management strategies. Responses were scored with one point allocated for a “yes” response and zero points for “do not know” or “no” responses. The total score ranged from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating better sarcopenia knowledge. The Cronbach’s α coefficient for the scale was 0.82, and the split-half reliability was 0.86. Overall, the scale demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity and was deemed appropriate for assessing sarcopenia knowledge in older community-dwelling adults [15]. The scale also demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.801) in this study. Participants were classified as having an adequate or inadequate level of knowledge based on the number of correct responses. An adequate level of knowledge required at least 60% of the responses to be correct (≥6 points). If the number of correct responses was less than 60% (<6 points), the participant was classified as having inadequate knowledge [16].
Health education needs.
Health education needs were tested using three items: “Do you need information about the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia? “, “Which channels do you mainly obtain knowledge about sarcopenia? “, and “In which channels would you most like to gain knowledge about sarcopenia? “.
Assessment of sarcopenia.
The SARC-CalF scale was developed as a sarcopenia screening tool by Barbosa-Silva et al. [17] by combining the SARC-F scale and calf circumference (S2 Table). SARC-F scale examines five domains: (1) strength, (2) walking assistance, (3) rising from a chair, (4) climbing stairs, and (5) falls, with scores ranging between 0 and 2 [18]. The SARC-CalF is composed of 5 items from SARC-F and one additional item of calf circumference (CC). The first five items are scored as in the standard SARC-F. According to AWGS-2019, CC cut-offs were set at 34 cm for men and 33 cm for women. Scores of only 0 or 10 were assigned if CC was above or below the cut-off, respectively. A total score of ≥11 points indicated a positive screening result for sarcopenia [8]. The participants’ calf circumference was measured in a sitting position. Calf circumference was measured by trained researchers using an inelastic tape measure at the thickest part of the calf on the non-dominant side.
Statistical analysis
All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 27.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Continuous variables were checked for normality and expressed as mean (standard deviation [SD]) if normally distributed and as median (interquartile range [IQR]) if skewed. Categorical variables were expressed as number (n) and percentage (%). The chi-square test was used for bivariate analysis between characteristics of the study population and sarcopenia knowledge levels. To leverage the synergistic advantages of combining logistic regression and decision tree algorithms, all variables that were statistically significant in the bivariate analysis were included in both models. Two sided P < 0.05 was assumed to indicate a statistically significant test result for all tests.
We applied tree pruning to the decision tree algorithm to prevent overfitting of the CART prediction model and to ensure proper confirmation of the final splits. The growth depth of the model was set to have three layers. The minimum numbers of samples for parents’ and children’s nodes in the abort rule were set at 80 and 10, respectively, And the data set was split into cases for training and verification in a ratio of 6:4 Performance of the logistic regression and decision tree classifiers was measured in terms of the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results
Sociodemographic characteristics of the participants
The characteristics of the study population are presented in Table 1. A total of 569 participants were included in this study, including 223 males (39.2%) and 346 females (60.8%), with an average age of 74.48 years (SD 7.98). More than half of them were young older adults (aged <75 years) (55.5%), lived with a spouse (52.5%),were married (68.5%), had completed junior high school education or higher (65.2%), or had a monthly income < 4000 yuan (55.6%), and just under half had a BMI between 18.5–23.9 kg/m2 (47.1%). Most participants took <3 medications daily (80.3%), had 1–2 chronic diseases concurrently (65.6%), engaged in social activities regularly(72.8%), did not smoke (88.0%), and did not drink(86.8%).
Participants’ self-reported knowledge of sarcopenia
In our survey, we found that the participants knew very little about sarcopenia. Only 101 participants (17.8%) responded “yes” to the subjective question, “Do you know about sarcopenia?”, but 28.8% of participants noticed substantial muscle loss in certain elderly individuals (Table 2).
Participants’ levels of sarcopenia knowledge
In the objective part of sarcopenia knowledge (Table 3), the mean score was 4.77, with a median score of 5 (1, 8) points. Among the three dimensions of sarcopenia knowledge, the questions regarding “management strategy” garnered the lowest percentage of correct answers (31.3%), followed by risk factors (48.9%). Moreover, the accuracy rate of symptom-related knowledge scores was only 54.7%. Regarding the risk factors of sarcopenia, the majority of participants attributed sarcopenia to advanced age (59.2%) and chronic bed rest (58.2%). A small number of participants (28.8%) indicated that having chronic diseases was a risk factor for sarcopenia. Furthermore, in terms of management strategy, only a small percentage of participants were aware that appropriate resistance exercise (27.1%) and adequate protein intake (35.5%) could prevent or relieve sarcopenia. (Table 3).
Comparison of participants’ self-assessed versus measured sarcopenia
The self-assessed sarcopenia of participants did not match the results measured using SARC-CalF. There were 29.0% of participants who could not accurately identify their sarcopenia status. The majority of participants responded that they had no experienced a significant reduction in muscle mass (77.3%). Among participants who screened positive for sarcopenia, only 33.6% could accurately self-identify their muscle status (Table 4).
Health education needs of participants
In this survey, most of the participants (66.6%) had never acquired knowledge about sarcopenia, but 72.4% of the participants wanted to acquire knowledge about sarcopenia. Among their current channels for obtaining sarcopenia knowledge, TV networks (10.4%) and family and friends (6.5%) were the most commonly mentioned. However, a plurality of participants preferred to receive sarcopenia knowledge through healthcare professionals’ introduction (29.2%), and community events (21.4%), followed by television networks (17.9%). The proportion of those who wanted to obtain relevant knowledge through handbooks (7.5%) was significantly lower than the above three channels (Fig 1).
Logistic regression on factors associated with sarcopenia knowledge
In our bivariate analysis, participant’ age, monthly income, co-residence, chronic diseases, education level, sarcopenia status and social activities were found to be significantly associated with their sarcopenia knowledge (Table 1).These factors were further assessed in a binary logistic regression using a stepwise method. The results of this analysis showed that age, co-residence, educational level, social activities, and chronic diseases were all significant factors associated with knowledge about sarcopenia (Table 5).
Analysis of differences in logistic regression models by age subgroup
We further analyzed different age subgroups (Table 6). Co-residence, social activities and education level emerged as independent factors across all age groups. Among those younger than 75 years, participants with 1–2 chronic diseases showed higher awareness of sarcopenia.
Decision tree model of influencing factors for sarcopenia knowledge
Fig 2 presents the optimal decision tree for older adults’ sarcopenia knowledge levels. Residing with a spouse had the most substantial effect on sarcopenia knowledge among all explanatory variables, followed by education level, social activities, age, and chronic diseases (S3 Table).The group with the highest proportion of low sarcopenia knowledge level consisted of those who lived alone or with children, never attended school or completed primary or middle school only, and never engaged in any social activities (97.6%). The group with the highest proportion of high sarcopenia knowledge consisted of those individuals who lived with spouse, had 1–2 chronic diseases concurrently, and whose age was below 75 years (86.5%). The training samples of the decision tree model had an accuracy of 75.1% (sensitivity 74.4% and specificity 75.7%), and the test samples showed 75.0% accuracy (sensitivity74.1% and specificity 76.0%).
The AUC of the logistic regression and decision tree models to predict sarcopenia knowledge levels were 0.835 (95% CI: 0.803, 0.868) and 0.816 (95% CI: 0.782, 0.850) respectively, and their difference was statistically significant (95% CI: 0.001, 0.037, P = 0.036) (Fig 3).
Discussion
This study contributes to the limited quantitative literature on sarcopenia knowledge among older Chinese community-dwelling adults, with a particular focus on associated sociodemographic and behavioral determinants. Our results revealed that the older adults in Chinese communities have little knowledge about sarcopenia, particularly in the dimensions of management strategy and risk factors. Furthermore, there was a significant discrepancy between the participants’ subjective assessments of their sarcopenia condition and our objective measurements (Table 4). There was also a pronounced demand for health education about sarcopenia among the participants. Logistic regression analysis showed that that age, co-residence, educational level, social activities, and chronic diseases were all significant factors associated with knowledge about sarcopenia. In addition, the decision tree model indicated that individuals who lived alone or with children, possessed a lower level of education, and were not engaged in social activities tended to have the lowest sarcopenia knowledge levels.
Low levels of knowledge about sarcopenia
Our study revealed that 54.7% of older adults could identify sarcopenia symptoms, consistent with the 56.9% reported in the Malaysian study [7]. However, this apparent recognition warrants cautious interpretation, as older adults frequently conflate sarcopenia symptoms with normal aging-related physiological changes, such as the gradual decline in skeletal muscle mass and strength [7]. The relatively short research and clinical history of sarcopenia has led to a very low level of public awareness and confusion with the symptoms of normal aging [8,19].
In terms of perception of the risk factors for sarcopenia, nearly half (48.9%) of the participants did not know what the risk factors were. In particular, up to 71.8% of the participants were unaware of the negative effects of chronic disease on sarcopenia. Chronic diseases can increase the energy consumption of the body, accelerate metabolic activity, and cause chronic inflammation. Chronic inflammation is a persistent, low-grade inflammatory response that can negatively affect multiple bodily systems, including muscle tissue. When chronic inflammation persists, it interferes with the balance between anabolism and catabolism of muscle, and this imbalance leads to progressive loss of muscle tissue, which triggers sarcopenia [20]. In addition, chronic inflammation may also be accompanied by neurodegenerative changes, which further aggravate the development of sarcopenia. Intrinsic molecular mechanisms such as aging and malnutrition may also be related to the occurrence and development of sarcopenia, which further aggravate the impact of chronic diseases on individual health by affecting muscle mass and function [21].Therefore, policy makers and healthcare providers may want to establish a health education system, with the goal of popularizing health knowledge, and guiding the older adults toward more beneficial health choices. Furthermore, personalized health intervention should be provided for the elderly, and risk assessment and intervention guidance given for those at higher risk of sarcopenia due to chronic disease.
In terms of awareness of preventive measures for sarcopenia, only 27.1% of participants were aware that resistance training can help prevent sarcopenia, and just 35.5% knew that adequate protein supplementation could serve the same purpose. This floor effect reflects a significant lack of awareness among older adults regarding the importance of resistance exercise and dietary protein intake. Low awareness among older adults regarding the benefits of resistance training for sarcopenia improvement may be associated with insufficient knowledge about resistance training, cultural preferences, and fear of injury. The results of Chun Qin Y et al. [22]suggest that majority of the older adults in China do not know what resistance training is, and some may be reluctant to engage in such activities due to the fear of falling [23]. Such knowledge limitations manifest in behavioral patterns. In a cross-sectional survey of 113 elderly people conducted by Sun Yujia et al.[24] across various locations in Henan Province, the majority of the elderly preferred walking as their primary form of physical exercise (82.5%), followed by sports dancing (square dancing) (32%). Furthermore, in a study on the preference for fitness activities among Chinese middle-aged and elderly people, Chen Yong et al.[25] pointed out that many individuals believe that the time and effort invested in fitness activities are not proportional to the actual benefits obtained due to the lack of professional guidance. Therefore, these individuals tend to choose gentle and low-intensity fitness activities, such as Tai Chi, jogging, Qigong, swimming, and square dancing. The above studies show that Chinese older adults have a low cognition of resistance training on the whole. Unfortunately, nutritional knowledge gaps parallel these exercise-related deficiencies. For example, Spronk et al.’s [26] study showed that less nutrition-related knowledge is associated with worse eating behaviors. Additionally, Marije et al. found that low education levels and lack of social support are independently associated with low protein intake [27]. Therefore, the low awareness among participants in this study that protein intake can prevent sarcopenia may be due to a lack of awareness of the need for dietary protein in older adults more generally. Integrating both domains, AWGS-2019 notes that lifestyle interventions, especially exercise and nutritional supplements, have potential long-term benefits for sarcopenia. Therefore, strides may be made toward optimal health by guiding the older adults to a better understanding of the benefits of resistance training and protein supplementation for delaying the occurrence and development of sarcopenia.
Factors that influencing knowledge of sarcopenia
The results of this study showed that aging and lower education levels were risk factors for low levels of knowledge about sarcopenia among older adults. Aging is correlated with a decline in cognitive processes, especially in working memory, which affects people’s abilities to acquire and retain health-related information [28,29]. In contrast, younger seniors can participate in more social activities and have the ability to seek health-related information more actively [30,31]. Evidence suggests that people with higher levels of education have a better ability to acquire and process health-related knowledge [32,33]. In addition, educational interventions can significantly increase health knowledge among older adults [34].
Our results also highlight the fact that living alone or with children is a risk factor for a low level of knowledge of sarcopenia in older adults, and the level of knowledge of sarcopenia was higher in older adults who lived with a spouse. This suggests that the support of health information from children is limited. Studies have suggested that spouse support might exert the most significant influence on older adults’ well-being, even more so than supports from other family members or friends [35]. Older adults who live with spouses can supervise, support and encourage each other in health-related issues [36]. Spouses engage in more frequent health information exchange, shared health behaviors, and mutual emotional support in daily life [37,38]. For example, they may encourage healthy habits such as regular physical activity, which is associated with the onset of sarcopenia. Furthermore, a spouse with higher education is more likely to share knowledge about health promotion [37]. Interventions that focus on the spouse as a unit could thus enhance patients’ self-management activities [39], improve patient compliance [40] and quality of life [41], and help to maintain supportive relationships [42].
Older adults who participated in social activities also had a higher level of sarcopenia knowledge. One possible reason is that older people discuss their common health problems with each other in the course of social activities. Evidently, the health problems caused by muscle loss are common problems for them. Studies have shown that social participation even provides opportunities for socioeconomically disadvantaged groups to receive health-related information from others [43–45], resulting in increased acquisition of health-related knowledge. Interestingly, our study revealed that older adults with 1–2 chronic diseases were more knowledgeable about sarcopenia. Other studies have also found that patients with a certain chronic disease are more likely to have a higher level of health knowledge [46–48]. One possible explanation for this might be that people with 1–2 chronic diseases demonstrate increased attention to their health, which prompts them to obtain health information more actively [49]. Moreover, previous studies have indicated that it is difficult for older people with multiple chronic diseases to access and manage health information effectively due to technological, emotional, and systemic challenges [50–52]. One cross-sectional study from China showed an inverse association between nutritional health knowledge and the number of chronic diseases, especially among participants with three or more chronic diseases [53]. In our study, most older adults were unaware that chronic diseases are a risk factor for sarcopenia. Therefore, to improve the knowledge levels of sarcopenia in the older adults, it may be necessary to pay close attention to the elderly people with multiple chronic diseases.
Subgroup analyses indicated that knowledge of sarcopenia was associated with living arrangements, social activity, education level, and chronic disease status, and this consistency with the overall population analysis further confirms the robustness of the results.
Although logistic regression achieved marginally higher predictive accuracy (Fig 3), decision tree models are mostly presented in the form of tree diagrams, that are simpler to interpret and hence more convenient for clinical decision-making. The ranking of variable importance in decision trees also provides a clear priority framework for developing intervention strategies. Co-residence exerted the most significant influence on sarcopenia knowledge levels among older adults. Consequently, interventions should prioritize addressing the distinct needs associated with different living arrangements, and design targeted strategies aligned with their specific information access characteristics. The group with the highest proportion of inadequate sarcopenia knowledge consisted of those who lived alone or with children, had an education level of middle school or below, and never engaged in any social activities. Therefore, based on the results of this study, we recommended that policymakers take as a starting point in increasing the knowledge level regarding sarcopenia in older adults a concerted effort to understand the living arrangement, education, and social participation of older adults and implementing targeted health education strategies for people with different backgrounds.
Methods to improve the sarcopenia knowledge
AWGS-2019 Guidelines [8] states that the promotion of early lifestyle interventions in primary health care centers and communities are more beneficial for improving the quality of life of older people with sarcopenia. Our study showed that the vast majority (72.4%) of participants were willing to learn about sarcopenia and preferred to obtain relevant information from medical professionals and primary health care personnel. However, studies by Yeung SSY [54], Ji M [55], and Guralnik [56] show that except in specific departments, the understanding and application of sarcopenia among medical personnel is very limited. One qualitative study of nurses in primary care services showed that nurses had little knowledge of sarcopenia [57]. In China, the tasks of community health professionals are more concentrated on chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes [58]. Training community healthcare workers may thus be a pivotal strategy for enhancing sarcopenia screening and education within communities. Improving health care workers’ awareness of sarcopenia and reaching a broad consensus on its diagnostic criteria, screening algorithms, treatment guidelines, prevention strategies, patient education and interdisciplinary collaboration may help to identify high risk individuals and to delivery initial health education in community settings, thereby addressing limitations in specialist resources. The Chinese government has already promulgated the Key Tasks for Deepening the Reform of the Medical and Health System [59], which directs the allocation of medical resources to be tilted to the community level, and may thusly help improve the capacity of primary medical services. Hospitals and communities should respond to the national call to actively disseminate knowledge about sarcopenia. While possessing health knowledge is crucial, it does not automatically translate into healthy behaviors. Thus, future health education and community-based interventions should extend beyond knowledge dissemination to improve functional health literacy among older adults. Enhancing these skills will empower them to access, comprehend, and apply health information for informed decision-making [60], thereby facilitating the adoption of healthier behaviors.
Strengths and limitations of the Study
This study contributes to the limited quantitative literature on sarcopenia knowledge among older Chinese community-dwelling adults. It used both logistic regression and a decision tree model to explore factors that influence this knowledge level, and the two methods complement each other. Moreover, our study not only identified many modifiable risk factors that affect sarcopenia knowledge, but also investigated several channels by which older adults can obtain sarcopenia-related health information. Our results provided a basis for tailored sarcopenia education interventions for older adults in Chinese communities.
There are several limitations to our study. First, as a cross-sectional study, it only reflects the current knowledge level of the population surveyed, and cannot assess dynamic changes in knowledge levels or whether knowledge has been translated into behaviors. Second, participants were recruited only from Wuhan city, reducing the generalizability of our results. Third, sarcopenia status was assessed using the SARC-CalF rather than a full clinical assessment. Future research should aim to validate these findings in cohorts with rigorously confirmed sarcopenia diagnoses using objective measures of muscle mass and function. Finally, self-reported knowledge and behaviors may be subject to recall bias or social desirability bias, especially in older adults. Future randomized controlled trials or longitudinal studies are needed to examine the effectiveness of sarcopenia health education on knowledge, and answer the question of whether health knowledge is translated into health behaviors, especially for those at high risk of sarcopenia
Conclusion
Older Chinese community-dwelling adults were found to have a low level of knowledge about sarcopenia, especially those who lived alone or with children, those with low education, never engaged in any social activities, and those aged over 75 years. We suggest that further educational programs and tailored intervention strategies should be implemented to improve the knowledge levels of sarcopenia in this population.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Sarcopenia knowledge assessment scale.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333557.s001
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Variable importance in the decision tree model.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333557.s003
(DOCX)
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge all of the participants and all of the researchers in this study.
References
- 1. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Landi F, Topinková E, Michel J-P. Understanding sarcopenia as a geriatric syndrome. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2010;13(1):1–7. pmid:19915458
- 2. Mayhew AJ, Amog K, Phillips S, Parise G, McNicholas PD, de Souza RJ, et al. The prevalence of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older adults, an exploration of differences between studies and within definitions: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Age Ageing. 2019;48(1):48–56. pmid:30052707
- 3. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia. Lancet. 2019;393(10191):2636–46. pmid:31171417
- 4. Zhang J, Jia X, Li Y, Li H, Yang Q. The longitudinal bidirectional association between sarcopenia and cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults: Findings from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. J Glob Health. 2023;13:04182. pmid:38148730
- 5. Verstraeten LMG, Mashni A, van Wijngaarden JP, Meskers CGM, Maier AB. Sarcopenia knowledge of geriatric rehabilitation patients is low while they are willing to start sarcopenia treatment: EMPOWER-GR. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024;15(1):352–60. pmid:38124340
- 6. Van Ancum JM, Meskers CGM, Reijnierse EM, Yeung SSY, Jonkman NH, Trappenburg MC, et al. Lack of knowledge contrasts the willingness to counteract sarcopenia among community-dwelling adults. J Aging Health. 2020;32(7–8):787–94. pmid:31156027
- 7. Keng SL, Seman NHC, Krishnan KM, Bee CJ, Sook JLW, Ismail SF, et al. Knowledge of sarcopenia and associated factors among the Malaysian general public: a cross-sectional study. J Prev Med Public Health. 2023;56(2):164–71. pmid:37055358
- 8. Chen L-K, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung T-W, Chou M-Y, Iijima K, et al. Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(3):300-307.e2. pmid:32033882
- 9. Fan H, Li M, Zhang C, Sun H, Shi S, Ma B. Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward sarcopenia among older adults in two cities in Zhejiang province, China. Prev Med Rep. 2024;45:102833. pmid:39175592
- 10. Lv T, Dong Y, Zhang H, Li Y. Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding Sarcopenia in maintenance hemodialysis patients in Northeastern China. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1).
- 11. Wang D, Zeng H, Wu P, Zhou Y, Chen H, Zhao F, et al. Path analysis of the awareness status and influencing factors of sarcopenia in older adults in the community: based on structural equation modeling. Front Public Health. 2024;12:1391383. pmid:39114524
- 12. Zhang M, Rong J, Liu S, Zhang B, Zhao Y, Wang H, et al. Factors related to self-rated health of older adults in rural China: A study based on decision tree and logistic regression model. Front Public Health. 2022;10:952714. pmid:36530664
- 13. Shen F, Duan Z, Li S, Gao Z, Zhang R, Gao X, et al. Factors associated with a better treatment efficacy among psoriasis patients: a study based on decision tree model and logistic regression in Shanghai, China. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):1934. pmid:39026285
- 14. Zhu L, Li J, Li M, Li Z, Lin X, Liu L, et al. Accuracy of SARC-F, SARC-CalF, and Ishii Test in Assessing Severe Sarcopenia in Older Adults in Nursing Homes. J Nutr Health Aging. 2022;26(6):576–80. pmid:35718866
- 15. Li L, Sun X, Gao Y, Chen Y, Qin L, Lin Y, et al. Development and validation of knowledge assessment scales on sarcopenia and fall for Chinese community-dwelling older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2023;23(6):430–6. pmid:37183378
- 16. Akalu Y, Ayelign B, Molla MD. Knowledge, attitude and practice towards COVID-19 among chronic disease patients at Addis Zemen Hospital, Northwest Ethiopia. Infect Drug Resist. 2020;13:1949–60. pmid:32612371
- 17. Barbosa-Silva TG, Menezes AMB, Bielemann RM, Malmstrom TK, Gonzalez MC, Grupo de Estudos em Composição Corporal e Nutrição (COCONUT). Enhancing SARC-F: improving sarcopenia screening in the clinical practice. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(12):1136–41. pmid:27650212
- 18. Malmstrom TK, Miller DK, Simonsick EM, Ferrucci L, Morley JE. SARC-F: a symptom score to predict persons with sarcopenia at risk for poor functional outcomes. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2016;7(1):28–36. pmid:27066316
- 19. Rosenberg IH. Sarcopenia: origins and clinical relevance. J Nutr. 1997;127(5 Suppl):990S-991S. pmid:9164280
- 20. Hanna RM, Ghobry L, Wassef O, Rhee CM, Kalantar-Zadeh K. A practical approach to nutrition, protein-energy wasting, sarcopenia, and cachexia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Blood Purif. 2020;49(1–2):202–11. pmid:31851983
- 21. Damluji AA, Alfaraidhy M, AlHajri N, Rohant NN, Kumar M, Al Malouf C, et al. Sarcopenia and cardiovascular diseases. Circulation. 2023;147(20):1534–53. pmid:37186680
- 22. Yang C. A review of research on elderly sports in china in the past three years. APS. 2023;11(03):625–8.
- 23. Hurst C, Dismore L, Granic A, Tullo E, Noble JM, Hillman SJ, et al. Attitudes and barriers to resistance exercise training for older adults living with multiple long-term conditions, frailty, and a recent deterioration in health: qualitative findings from the Lifestyle in Later Life - Older People’s Medicine (LiLL-OPM) study. BMC Geriatr. 2023;23(1):772. pmid:38001414
- 24. Sun Y. Study on exercise style and aging attitude of the elderly. Diet and Health Care. 2019;6(7):271.
- 25. Chen Y. Research on national sports preference of middle aged and old people. Sports Sci Technol. 2022;43(6):114–5, 8.
- 26. Spronk I, Kullen C, Burdon C, O’Connor H. Relationship between nutrition knowledge and dietary intake. Br J Nutr. 2014;111(10):1713–26. pmid:24621991
- 27. Verwijs MH, Haveman-Nies A, Borkent JW, Linschooten JO, Roodenburg AJC, de Groot LCPGM, et al. Protein Intake among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The Influence of (Pre-) Motivational Determinants. Nutrients. 2022;14(2):293. pmid:35057473
- 28. Pappas MA, Demertzi E, Papagerasimou Y, Koukianakis L, Voukelatos N, Drigas A. Cognitive-based e-learning design for older adults. Soc Sci. 2019;8(1):6.
- 29. Latorre-Postigo JM, Ros-Segura L, Navarro-Bravo B, Ricarte-Trives JJ, Serrano-Selva JP, López-Torres-Hidalgo J. Older adults’ memory for medical information, effect of number and mode of presentation: an experimental study. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(1):160–6. pmid:27567498
- 30. Zhao YC, Zhao M, Song S. Online health information seeking behaviors among older adults: systematic scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2022;24(2):e34790. pmid:35171099
- 31. Medlock S, Eslami S, Askari M, Arts DL, Sent D, de Rooij SE, et al. Health information-seeking behavior of seniors who use the Internet: a survey. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(1):e10. pmid:25574815
- 32. Johnston DW, Lordan G, Shields MA, Suziedelyte A. Education and health knowledge: evidence from UK compulsory schooling reform. Soc Sci Med. 2015;127:92–100. pmid:25459203
- 33. Brunello G, Fort M, Schneeweis N, Winter-Ebmer R. The causal effect of education on health: what is the role of health behaviors? Health Econ. 2016;25(3):314–36. pmid:25581162
- 34. Turner R, Reese C, Brigman S, Cherry KE. Does instruction improve older adults’ knowledge of memory aging? Innov Aging. 2020;4(Supplement_1):363–363.
- 35. Barger SD, Cribbet MR. Social support sources matter: increased cellular aging among adults with unsupportive spouses. Biol Psychol. 2016;115:43–9. pmid:26780266
- 36. Antonelli MT, Grace PJ, Boltz M. Mutual caregiving: living meaningfully as an older couple. Int J Older People Nurs. 2020;15(4):e12340. pmid:32815319
- 37. Liu H, Wang J, Zhang W. Spousal education and memory decline: evidence from the english longitudinal study of aging. Gerontologist. 2025;65(6):gnaf057. pmid:40123377
- 38. Lewis MA, McBride CM, Pollak KI, Puleo E, Butterfield RM, Emmons KM. Understanding health behavior change among couples: an interdependence and communal coping approach. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(6):1369–80. pmid:16146666
- 39. Withidpanyawong U, Lerkiatbundit S, Saengcharoen W. Family-based intervention by pharmacists for type 2 diabetes: a randomised controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(1):85–92. pmid:30150128
- 40. DiMatteo MR. Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2004;23(2):207–18. pmid:15008666
- 41. Liao J, Brunner EJ. Structural and functional measures of social relationships and quality of life among older adults: does chronic disease status matter? Qual Life Res. 2016;25(1):153–64. pmid:26143057
- 42. Gremore TM, Brockstein B, Porter LS, Brenner S, Benfield T, Baucom DH, et al. Couple-based communication intervention for head and neck cancer: a randomized pilot trial. Support Care Cancer. 2021;29(6):3267–75. pmid:33106976
- 43. Lee HY, Jang S-N, Lee S, Cho S-I, Park E-O. The relationship between social participation and self-rated health by sex and age: a cross-sectional survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(7):1042–54. pmid:17658532
- 44. Schmidt NA, Brown JM. Use of the innovation-decision process teaching strategy to promote evidence-based practice. J Prof Nurs. 2007;23(3):150–6. pmid:17540318
- 45. Amoah PA. Social participation, health literacy, and health and well-being: a cross-sectional study in Ghana. SSM Popul Health. 2018;4:263–70. pmid:29854910
- 46. Gellert P, Ernsting C, Salm F, Oedekoven M, Kanzler M, Kuhlmey A. Disease-specific knowledge in individuals with and without chronic conditions. J Public Health. 2017;26(2):145–50.
- 47. Yun LS, Hassan Y, Aziz NA, Awaisu A, Ghazali R. A comparison of knowledge of diabetes mellitus between patients with diabetes and healthy adults: a survey from north Malaysia. Patient Educ Couns. 2007;69(1–3):47–54. pmid:17720351
- 48. Murugesan N, Snehalatha C, Shobhana R, Roglic G, Ramachandran A. Awareness about diabetes and its complications in the general and diabetic population in a city in southern India. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2007;77(3):433–7. pmid:17291622
- 49. Tian M, Chen Y, Zhao R, Chen L, Chen X, Feng D, et al. Chronic disease knowledge and its determinants among chronically ill adults in rural areas of Shanxi Province in China: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:948. pmid:22192681
- 50. Ancker JS, Witteman HO, Hafeez B, Provencher T, Van de Graaf M, Wei E. “You Get Reminded You’re a Sick Person”: personal data tracking and patients with multiple chronic conditions. J Med Internet Res. 2015;17(8):e202. pmid:26290186
- 51. Shahbazi M, Bagherian H, Sattari M, Saghaeiannejad-Isfahani S. The opportunities and challenges of using mobile health in elderly self-care. J Educ Health Promot. 2021;10:80. pmid:34084827
- 52. Mannucci PM, Nobili A, REPOSI Investigators. Multimorbidity and polypharmacy in the elderly: lessons from REPOSI. Intern Emerg Med. 2014;9(7):723–34. pmid:25164413
- 53. Wang S, Wu Y, Shi M, He Z, Hao L, Wu X. Association between nutrition and health knowledge and multiple chronic diseases: a large cross-sectional study in Wuhan, China. Nutrients. 2023;15(9):2096. pmid:37432224
- 54. Yeung SSY, Reijnierse EM, Trappenburg MC, Meskers CGM, Maier AB. Current knowledge and practice of Australian and New Zealand health-care professionals in sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment: time to move forward!. Australas J Ageing. 2020;39(2):e185–93. pmid:31617296
- 55. Ji M, Hang L, Wang T, Luo H, Wu X, Gu D. A survey of nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practice of sarcopenia: a cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Pract. 2024;74:103869. pmid:38183908
- 56. Guralnik JM, Cawthon PM, Bhasin S, Fielding R, Magaziner J, Cruz-Jentoft AJ, et al. Limited physician knowledge of sarcopenia: a survey. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023;71(5):1595–602. pmid:36661200
- 57. Quiñones AR, Botoseneanu A, Markwardt S, Nagel CL, Newsom JT, Dorr DA, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in multimorbidity development and chronic disease accumulation for middle-aged adults. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0218462. pmid:31206556
- 58. Tulloch H, Bouchard K, Clyde MJ, Madrazo L, Demidenko N, Johnson S, et al. Learning a new way of living together: a qualitative study exploring the relationship changes and intervention needs of patients with cardiovascular disease and their partners. BMJ Open. 2020;10(5):e032948. pmid:32381534
- 59. China WTSCIO o t P s R o. The general office of the state council issued the key tasks for deepening the reform of medical and health system in 2024. Shanghai Nursing. 2024;24(7):36.
- 60. Chen S, Bai Q, Zhu J, Liu G. Impact of functional, communicative, critical and distributed health literacy on self-management behaviors in chronic disease patients across socioeconomic groups. BMC Public Health. 2025;25(1):1776. pmid:40369489