Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Multidisciplinary study of human remains from the 3rd century mass grave in the Roman city of Mursa, Croatia

  • Mario Novak ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Mario Novak, Orhan Efe Yavuz, Cosimo Posth

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    mario.novak@inantro.hr

    Affiliations Centre for Applied Bioanthropology, Institute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia, Department of Archaeology and Heritage, Faculty of Humanities, University of Primorska, Koper, Slovenia

  • Orhan Efe Yavuz ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Mario Novak, Orhan Efe Yavuz, Cosimo Posth

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Archaeo- and Palaeogenetics, Institute for Archaeological Sciences, Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

  • Mario Carić,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Centre for Applied Bioanthropology, Institute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia

  • Slavica Filipović,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Archaeological Museum Osijek, Osijek, Croatia

  • Cosimo Posth

    Contributed equally to this work with: Mario Novak, Orhan Efe Yavuz, Cosimo Posth

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Archaeo- and Palaeogenetics, Institute for Archaeological Sciences, Department of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, Senckenberg Centre for Human Evolution and Palaeoenvironment at the University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany, Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany

Abstract

During excavations in 2011, a peculiar archaeological feature representing a mass grave with seven completely preserved skeletons was discovered at the site of the Roman period city of Mursa (modern-day Osijek, Croatia). The archaeological context and direct radiocarbon dating indicate that the bodies were interred during the mid-3rd century CE. Bioarchaeological analysis shows that all seven individuals are adult males exhibiting numerous pathological lesions (e.g., enthesopathies, injuries). Carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes analysis indicates they had a mixed C3/C4-based vegetal diet with limited amounts of terrestrial animal protein and a very limited marine protein consumption. Ancient DNA analysis shows that individuals from the Mursa mass grave had a heterogenous ancestry. None of them show genetic continuity with the preceding local Early Iron Age population. The presented multidisciplinary analyses of the Mursa mass grave strongly suggest that the studied individuals were Roman soldiers, victims of a catastrophic event occurring as the result of the ‘Crisis of the Third Century’, most probably the battle of Mursa from 260 CE.

Introduction

Throughout its history, the Roman Empire produced every imaginable form of intentional violence, varying from individual violence such as homicide, through the community/societal scales of violence like gladiatorial games and sacrifices, to mass warfare. Today, numerous examples of Roman period violence (both archaeological and osteological) from Europe have been studied and published [1]. During the antiquity the remains of the victims of mass warfare such as battles and massacres were usually interred in mass graves without any special consideration for the deceased as can be seen on the examples from Skopje (Scupi) in North Macedonia [2], Hradisko in Czechia [3], and Ibida in Romania [4], just to name a few.

A comprehensive overview of documented Roman period mass burial sites was recently provided by McCormick [5,6] with details on their size, geographic and chronological distribution, and their rural, urban, or military character. The author suggested that most of these features represent the victims of various epidemics such as Antonine, Justinian and/or Cyprian plagues that ravaged the Roman Empire during the Late Antiquity (ca 2nd-6th centuries CE). Moreover, it was noted that about one third of the listed mass burials provide clear evidence of violent death [5], and only two sites characterized as violent death burials are located within the borders of the Roman Empire.

Mass burials and mass graves in general were not a customary way of interring the dead in the Roman Empire as these were mostly used during catastrophic events similar to the other periods [5,6]. During the Late Republic (200−27 BCE) and the Early Empire (27 BCE-180 CE), Roman burials mostly consisted of cremations, i.e., the cremated remains of the deceased were placed in various receptacles such as urns (ceramic, glass, metal) which were inserted in the grave. After the 2nd c. CE, inhumation burials became increasingly common and completely predominant in the 3rd/4th centuries CE. The deceased were usually laid in the plain ground or brick tombs, and only the wealthiest were placed in stone or lead sarcophagi [7].

In the Roman province of Pannonia, Osijek was one of the most important settlements located in the immediate vicinity of the Danube military border (limes). The Romans conquered the region during the 1st c. BCE. After their victory in the Pannonian-Delmatian Uprising in 9 CE (the so-called Bellum Batonianum), they began implementing measures to consolidate their power by building military fortifications on the Danubian limes. An auxiliary camp was established in the immediate vicinity of the already existing Celtic-Pannonian settlement. Soon thereinafter, a Roman civilian settlement (canabe) developed near the camp. Due to its favorable location on the elevated southern bank of the Drava River, a bridge and a road intersection, Mursa became an important trade and craft center. The process of urbanization, which was initiated by Emperor Trajan, fully developed during the reign of Emperor Hadrian, who in 133 CE granted it the status of a colony (Colonia Aelia Mursa) [8]. As one of the largest settlements in the eastern part of the Roman province Pannonia Inferior, Mursa was the civilian and administrative center of this part of the military border zone. It continued to develop from the time of Hadrian until the Marcomannic Wars in the second half of the 2nd century CE, when it was severely damaged. This was followed by a reconstruction phase under the Severan dynasty (193–235 CE), when the city again flourished and developed economically. The city played an important role in several historic events, especially in the 3rd/4th centuries CE during the so-called ‘Crisis of the Third Century’ (235–284 CE) when various emperors and claimants fought for the throne resulting in numerous battles that significantly weakened the Empire. For example, in 260 CE emperor Gallienus fought against Ingenuus, and in 351 CE emperor Constantius II defeated Magnentius in battles that took place outside the walls of Mursa [911]. After the Gothic incursions in 378 CE, no significant reconstructions were undertaken, and with the Hunnic conquests in 441 CE, Mursa ceased to exist as an urban settlement [8,9].

Here we present new radiocarbon, bioarchaeological, isotopic and genomic data for an unusual burial feature (mass grave) recently excavated at the location of the University Library in Osijek, eastern Croatia (Roman period Mursa; Fig 1A). By describing this Roman period burial context and by presenting new cultural and biological information on the individuals interred in this mass grave we hypothesize that these are the victims associated with one of numerous catastrophic events occurring as a direct result of the ‘Crisis of the Third Century’, most probably the battle of Mursa from 260 CE.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Map showing: (A) the geographic location of Osijek (base map credit: USGS National Map Viewer, https://apps.nationalmap.gov/viewer/); (B) the exact location of the well SU 233/234 during the excavation (in red circle).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.g001

Materials and methods

Radiocarbon dating

Direct radiocarbon dating of human bone/tooth samples was conducted at the Curt-Engelhom-Centre for Archaeometry, Mannheim, Germany (SK 2, SK 4, SK 5) and the HUN-REN Institute for Nuclear Research (HUN-REN ATOMKI), Debrecen, Hungary (SK 7).

Bioarchaeological analysis

Conventional bioarchaeological analysis (sexing, ageing, metric and non-metric analysis, paleopathology) was conducted at the Laboratory for Evolutionary Anthropology and Bioarchaeology, Centre for Applied Bioanthropology, Institute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia. The methods described by Buikstra and Ubelaker [12] and Klales [13] were used to estimate the sex and the age at death of the studied individuals. All individuals were thoroughly examined for the potential presence of different pathological conditions as described in Ortner’s [14], and Aufderheide and Rodriguez-Martin’s [15] identifications of pathologies. The stature was reconstructed based on the maximum humerus and femur length by using regression formulae proposed by Trotter [16].

In terms of injuries, all skeletons were examined macroscopically for the possible presence of trauma using methods proposed by Maples [17] and Lovell [18]. The location of the injury on the skeletal element was recorded, as well as the shape, dimensions, and any possible complications. A distinction was made between ante- and perimortem skeletal injuries. Antemortem injuries were identified by evidence of healing and bone remodeling [19], while perimortem injuries were identified with the following criteria: absence of healing and formation of new bone [19], fragments remaining attached to one another [19], internal beveling [20], defined or sharp edges [21], and flat or polished surfaces with macroscopically visible striations [22]. Considering that ground pressure and postmortem damage can mimic perimortem injuries [23], the differential texture and color of the lesions were used to differentiate between perimortem and postmortem trauma [19,20].

C/N stable isotopes analysis

Collagen extraction for bulk δ13C and δ15N stable isotope analysis for the human samples considered in this study were conducted at the laboratories of the Centre for Applied Bioantropology, Institute for Anthropological Research, Zagreb, Croatia following the modified Longin protocol [24] with recommended modifications by Brown et al. [25], and Collins and Galley [26]. Between 355 and 555 mg of bone samples were first subjected to superficial mechanical abrasion, followed by treatment in 0.5M HCl until complete demineralization. Afterward, the samples were rinsed three times with purified water and gelatinized in a pH3 solution at 70ºC for 48 hours. The reflux-insoluble residues were removed using Ezee-FilterTM separators. The supernatant was frozen for 24 hours before being freeze-dried in preparation for EA-IRMS analysis which was performed at Sercon Analytical Ltd, UK.

Ancient DNA data

Sampling for ancient DNA analyses was performed inside the clean room facilities of the Archeo- and Paleogenetics group at University of Tübingen. Teeth were sampled by cutting at the enamel-dentin junction and drilling into the crown with a dentist drill. Petrous bones were sampled by drilling into the dense inner ear after removing a thin layer from the surface. DNA was extracted from bone/tooth powder and transformed into genetic libraries with the UDG-half protocol to reduce DNA damage [27,28]. The libraries were both shotgun sequenced and enriched for 1.24M SNPs across the human genome [29]. Data processing followed the EAGER pipeline (v1.92.55), which include adaptor trimming, sequence alignment to human reference genome, removal of duplicate sequences, and authentication control for post-mortem damage [3033]. The data was trimmed for 2 bp on both ends to avoid DNA damage-related errors, and genetic sex was determined using X and Y chromosome coverage [34,35]. Contamination was assessed using ANGSD [36], schmutzi [37] and contamLD [38], while mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome haplogroups were determined using Haplogrep2 [39] and Yleaf [40], respectively. ANGSD-based estimates of X chromosome contamination in male individuals are considered reliable when more than 100 SNPs are available on the X chromosome. In the case of female individuals or when this threshold is not met, for petrous bones we relied on mtDNA contamination estimates generated by schmutzi, while for teeth contamLD was employed. We carried out the PCA as discussed in the main text using smartpca [41] (using “shrinkmode: YES”) from the EIGENSOFT package (v18140) and qpAdm/qpWave was conducted using the Admixtools2 software in R with allsnps option YES [42]. The following outgroup populations were used for qpAdm/qpWave: OldAfrica (KPL001, NYA002, NYA003, I0589.AG, I1048.AG, I10871.AG, I10872.AG, I10873.AG, I10874.AG), Russia_MA1_UP.SG, Iran_GanjDareh_N.AG, Israel_Natufian.AG, Turkey_Central_Pinarbasi_Epipaleolithic.AG, WHG (KO1_noUDG.SG, Loschbour.DG, LaBrana1_noUDG.SG), Mesopotamia_PPNA.AG, Morocco_Iberomaurusian.AG, Mongolia_EIA_SlabGrave_1.AG. Using these outgroups, qpWave analysis is conducted for every possible pair among Roman period individuals from Mursa as well as Early Iron Age individuals from Croatia separately (S1 File: qpWave). Using the same outgroups, we conducted distal qpAdm analysis using the five west Eurasian ancestral sources, mentioned in text. As for proximal models, we attempted one-way models with the grouped Croatia_EIA.AG to test for continuity. Next, we added a secondary source from a broad subset of ancient populations guided by the PCA position of each individual (two-way models). Finally, we also tested one-way models and report in Fig 7 those if they have a better statistical fit (p > 0.05) compared to the two-way models. All tested qpAdm models for each individual are reported in Supp Info 1. Genotype data for the source and outgroup populations are accessed from the Allen Ancient DNA Resource (AADR) v62 [43].

thumbnail
Fig 2. The well SU 233/234 during different excavation phases showing the position of the skeletons: (A) SK 2, SK 3 and SK 4; (B) SK 5 and SK 7.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. (A) Broken maxillary central right incisor; (B) cut to the diaphysis of the left humerus, detail, SK 4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. (A) Puncture wound on the anterior side of the manubrium, SK 4; (B) puncture wound on the posterior side of the right ilium, SK 5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.g004

thumbnail
Fig 5. The chart showing C/N stable isotope values for the individuals from Mursa (the faunal baseline adapted from Lightfoot et al.).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6. A West-Eurasian PCA projecting from newly generated and previously published ancient individuals from Mursa and Croatian Iron Age onto the modern-day genetic diversity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.g006

thumbnail
Fig 7. Modelling of ancient individuals from Mursa using proximal sources in qpAdm.

The pre-Roman local ancestry is represented by Croatia Early Iron Age (Croatia_EIA.AG), the Eastern Mediterranean ancestry by Turkey Iron Age (Turkey_Aegean_Bodrum_Halikarnassos_Ancient1.AG), the Northern European ancestry by Denmark Iron Age (Denmark_IA.SG), and the Eastern European ancestry by Ukraine Early Iron Age (Ukraine_Dnieper_EIA.SG). These sources are chosen from a range of viable models and serve as representative population of the distinct ancestries found in Mursa.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.g007

Ethics statement

No permits were required for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations. The curator who excavated and is in charge of the remains is a co-author of the study and gave their permission to use the said remains for the analyses described in this section which complies with all relevant regulations. No ethical approval was required to study the human remains from Mursa (Osijek) as these are archaeological specimens 2,000 years old. The studied human remains are curated by the Archaeological Museum Osijek, Osijek, Croatia.

Results

Archaeology and absolute chronology

In 2011, protective archaeological excavations were carried out at the location of the future library of the Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, located in the northern part of the university campus, i.e., the former ‘Drava’ barracks; coordinates 45°33′26″N 18°42′31″E (S1A1B Figs). The largest number of recorded archaeological features is attributed to the water-wells of different depths with diameters ranging between 1.50 and 4.47 m, while the smaller number of features were pits of different shapes and depths (Fig 1B) [44]. The water-wells were filled with dirt after losing their primary function, and new ones were dug next to them. The number of wells found during the excavation indicates their importance in supplying the inhabitants of Mursa with water. Small archaeological finds preliminarily date the site to the 2nd/3rd century CE [44]. The well SU 233/234 (G 4) was a well dug in the plain ground with a diameter of 2 m and depth of about 3 m. The complete remains of seven adult individuals were found in this used water-well that was repurposed for the grave (Figs 2A2B; S2A2B Figs); the skeletons were found articulated, in different positions and in different depths (SK 1 at the top, and SK 7 at the bottom of the feature). Four direct radiocarbon dates–one from the top (SK 2) and one from the bottom (SK 7) and two in between (SK 4 and SK 5)–place the burial to the second half of the 3rd and the beginning of the 4th century CE (SK 2: MAMS-68836, 1783 ± 18 BP, 232–335 cal CE; SK 4: MAMS-73951, 1748 ± 19 BP, 244–375 cal CE; SK 5: MAMS-73944, 1765 ± 19 BP, 239–346 cal CE; SK 7: DeA-43762, 1770 ± 15 BP, 240–340 cal CE) (S1 File: Radiocarbon dates). Radiocarbon dates agree with a coin found in the fill of SU 233/234 approximately at a depth of 1.5 m – a Roman sestertius minted in Viminacium during the rule of emperor Hostilian in 251 CE (S3A3B Figs). There is no evidence to indicate that the burial was disturbed by subsequent activities, either human or animal.

Demography and general health

All seven skeletons (SK 1-SK 7) from the well SU 233/234 belong to adult males: four are younger adults (between 18 and 35 years), and three are middle-aged adults (between 36 and 50 years). All individuals were robust, and their average stature was around 172.5 cm ranging between 167 and 176 cm. The skeletons exhibit a certain number of pathological changes such as vertebral osteophytosis, Schmorl’s nodes, dentoalveolar disease (antemortem tooth loss, caries and alveolar abscess), pronounced entheseal changes on the upper and lower limbs, and indicators of early-life stress (enamel hypoplasia, cribra orbitalia, porotic hyperostosis) (S1 File: Demography, pathology, stature). All individuals show evidence of active new periosteal bone formation on the visceral side of the ribs (S4A4B Figs). Beside these changes, there are several examples of healed and unhealed antemortem injuries: SK 1 (20-25y) exhibits rounded (7 mm in diameter), very shallow, antemortem healed blunt force trauma with remodeled edges on the right side of the frontal bone (located approximately 44 mm superior of the right orbit); SK 4 (32-42y) exhibits antemortem unhealed fracture of the 6th left and the 8th right rib (S5 Fig); SK 5 (35-45y) shows oval-shaped, very shallow, antemortem healed blunt force trauma on the left side of the frontal bone (located approximately 34 mm superior of the left orbit) with the dimensions of 5 x 3 mm. And finally, two skeletons show perimortem injuries sustained by different types of a weapon/tool. SK 4 (32-42y) exhibits: (i) a puncture wound on the anterior side of the manubrium that completely pierced the bone (on the anterior side the dimensions of the injury are 8 x 5 mm with indented edges while on the posterior side the dimensions are 3 x 3 mm with a bone fragment projecting toward the lungs); (ii) broken maxillary central right incisor with the main impact on the anterolateral side of the root; (iii) a cut on the medial side of the diaphysis of the left humerus that penetrated into the bone approximately 7 mm almost reaching the medullary cavity (the cut is polished with the dimensions of 19 x 3 mm followed by active inflammation superior and inferior of the cut); (iv) a cut on the tubercle of the 9th right rib that split the tubercle in half (Figs 3A3B, 4A; S6A6B Figs). SK 5 (35-45y) reveals a puncture wound on the posterior side of the superior iliac spine of the right ilium that did not pierce the bone completely – the dimensions of the injury are 2 x 2 m with the indented edges and without any signs of healing and/or inflammation (Fig 4B).

Carbon/nitrogen stable isotopes

The samples for C/N stable isotopes analysis were taken from the 7th left rib of each individual to avoid the possibility of using two samples from the same skeleton and to obtain a comparable measurement. All seven samples provided collagen of good quality with C:N ratios falling between 3.1 and 3.2 [45,46]. The values of both carbon and nitrogen for all individuals are broadly uniform and fall in the range between −19.9 and −18.5‰ for δ13C with a mean value of −19.4‰ (± 0.6), and between 9.6 and 11.0‰ for δ15N with a mean value of 10.1‰ (± 0.5) (S1 File: C/N stable isotopes). Fig 5 shows that the isotopic values are indeed uniform for all individuals (the faunal baseline is adapted from Lightfoot et al. [47]). One individual (SK 7) exhibits a more positive shift in 13C values, which can imply an additional intake of C4/marine component in their diet while the individual SK 2 shows increased 15N values, yet with the lesser amount of C4 plant component.

Genomic data

We screened either a tooth or a petrous bone from each of the seven individuals for ancient DNA (aDNA) analysis using shallow shotgun sequencing. All except SK 1 yielded sufficient endogenous DNA (> 0.1%) paired up with the typical aDNA damage to undergo a targeted enrichment approach known as “1240K Capture” [29]. As a result, we generated genome-wide data for six individuals (SK 2–7). After the estimation of DNA contamination in the newly generated data, SK 5 and SK 6 did not pass our quality filters (see Materials and methods). Consequently, we proceeded with downstream analyses using the four remaining individuals (SK 2, SK 3, SK 4, and SK 7). We genetically sexed all the individuals as male, corroborating the anthropological findings (S1 File: aDNA Data Review).

We carried out a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) by projecting the genomic data of the ancient Mursa individuals onto the genetic diversity of 60 modern west Eurasian populations [48]. As reference, we also projected the published Iron Age individuals from present-day Croatia [49,50], along with eight other Roman individuals from a different archeological context in Mursa, whose genome-wide data have been previously reported [4951] (Fig 6).

In the PCA, all newly sequenced individuals from the Mursa mass burial display a high genetic diversity. On the other hand, the Croatian Iron Age genetic background shows a largely homogenous cluster. We corroborate this genetic heterogeneity using qpWave [52] by showing that none of the individuals in this archaeological context can be modeled in genetic continuity with the local Early Iron Age population (S1 File: qpWave). This contrasts with eight published Roman individuals from the same city, the majority of whom show PCA placements and qpWave results consistent with the local Iron Age variation (though with three outliers). The high diversity among the tested mass grave individuals is further reflected by the fact that SK 2, SK 3, SK 4, and SK 7 belong to the distinct paternal haplogroups N1a1, R1b1, I2a1b, and I1a3a1, respectively (S1 File: aDNA Data Review). Despite this large genetic heterogeneity, we can observe a general trend with SK 2, SK 3, SK 7 and two published outliers (R3656.SG and R3657.SG) plotting higher along PC2 than the proceeding Iron Age group, in proximity of present-day Northern and Eastern European populations. In contrast, SK 4 is shifted to the right along PC1 and projects on-top of modern-day Sicilians. This shift towards eastern Mediterranean populations has been previously described for Roman-associated individuals from the Italian, Iberian and the Balkan peninsula [5357]. Notably, one of three previously published genetic outliers from Mursa (R3653.SG) exhibits a PCA placement in close proximity to present-day Near Eastern populations.

Finally, we modeled the four mass burial individuals, along with the other published Roman genomes from Mursa using qpAdm [58] (Fig 7). Following [55], we first attempted to quantify the five distal genetic components for the ancient individuals using Caucasian Hunter Gatherers (CHG), Eastern Hunter Gatherers (EHG), Iron Gates Mesolithic, Levant Neolithic, and Turkey Neolithic individuals. Individual components of these distal ancestries varied greatly for each individual, confirming the large genetic diversity found in the mass grave and more generally in the Roman population of Mursa (S1 File: Distal qpAdm; S7 Fig). In addition, and in line with the PCA and qpWave findings, none of the newly sequenced individuals could be modelled in qpAdm using the Croatian Iron Age population as the only source, while five of the published individuals fit this model successfully (S1 File: 1-way Proximal qpAdm). We then attempted to model the mass burial individuals and the previously published genetic outliers as a mix between the local gene-pool and other ancient ancestries of related periods, guided from the direction of their shift in PCA space. SK 3 required a contribution from a Northern or Central European source, modelled as Iron Age populations from Denmark [56], Sweden [56], Norway [56], Northern Germany [59,60] and Poland [51], and ranging between 50 and 78% (S1 File: qpAdm SK 3). Instead, SK 2 and R3657.SG can be better modelled as fully deriving from similar Northern/Central European sources (S1 File: qpAdm SK 2, qpAdm R3657.SG). For SK 7 and R3656.SG, a two-way admixture model between the local Croatian Iron Age ancestry and Eastern European sources was required (42–66%), with multiple statistical fits for Iron Age populations from the Pontic Caspian region such as modern-day Ukraine [61], western Russia [62] or Kazakhstan [6163] (S1 File: qpAdm SK 7, R3656.SG). Finally, SK 4 is best modeled using a two-way approach, with one ancestry deriving from the local Croatian Iron Age and a secondary contribution from a Eastern Mediterranean source, either from Western Anatolia [50] or mainland Greece [50] (48–60%) (S1 File: qpAdm SK 4). Interestingly, the published I26753.AG individual can be better modelled as fully deriving from a Near Eastern source, suggesting the presence of putatively first-generation migrants from the Eastern Mediterranean in Mursa (S1 File: qpAdm I26753.AG).

Discussion

In this study we provide new insights about the victims of a catastrophic event occurring in the second half of the 3rd century CE near Roman period Mursa by presenting new radiocarbon, bioarchaeological, isotopic and genomic data on the individuals recovered from a mass grave inside a water-well located just outside of the walls of Mursa. To better understand this rare find we contextualized the presented information with the available archaeological data as well as known historic sources.

The available archaeological data suggest that the site of the University Library in Osijek was in use for various purposes during the 2nd/3rd century CE. The archaeological object in question (SU 233/234) represents a used water-well where the remains of seven individuals were interred (most probably thrown in) before the well was filled with soil. The vertical stratigraphy of the whole feature as well as the position of the skeletons strongly indicate that this was a single episode rather than a recurring deposition over a longer period. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that four direct radiocarbon dates (from the top, middle and bottom of the well; SK 2, SK 4, SK 5 and SK 7) are almost identical pointing to the second half of the 3rd century CE. Furthermore, all skeletons were found completely articulated indicating that the individuals were thrown into the well while their bodies were still fully fleshed, and not partially or completely skeletonized, suggesting a very short time between their death and the moment of interment.

Most of the 3rd century CE in the Roman Empire was characterized by the so-called ‘Crisis of the Third Century’ that ended with Diocletian’s reorganization of the Empire [64]. During this crisis, numerous battles fought between various claimants to the throne, significantly weakening the Empire. One such battle took place in the immediate vicinity of Mursa in 260 CE when the emperor Gallienus defeated the claimant to the imperial throne Ingenuus. Although very few details about this battle are known and the total number of casualties cannot be reconstructed with certainty, available contemporary sources state that during the battle many Roman soldiers have perished [9,65] with Ingenuus either being killed by his own soldiers or drowning himself in the river after the battle [65]. Slightly more information is available for the second battle of Mursa that took place in 351 CE between the emperor Constantius and the usurper Magnentius. According to the contemporary sources it was one of the bloodiest battles in the history of the Roman Empire with supposedly 30,000 killed on Constantius’ side that was victorious and 24,000 killed on Magnentius’ side [9,66]. However, it is not known what happened to the victims of both battles of Mursa as written sources did not provide any information on this topic and archaeological features that could be associated with these battles have been nonexistent so far. The deceased from both sides that probably numbered in hundreds and even thousands could have been buried in mass graves or burnt on huge pyres to prevent the spread of diseases but could have also been dumped in the nearby Drava River. All four direct radiocarbon dates from the mass grave are consistent with the battle of Mursa in 260 CE rather than the one taking place in 351 CE. Historic sources mention that after the battle of Mursa in 260 CE, Gallienus showed no clemency towards Ingenuus’ supporters and it would appear that mass executions were not only limited to prisoners of war [67]. In this context, the presented data open the possibility that the individuals from the mass grave in Osijek were soldiers, possibly representing the victims of the battle of Mursa in 260 CE whose remains were interred in a well outside of the city walls after the battle. There is only one known case that slightly resembles the example from Osijek and that is the find of the complete skeleton of a Roman soldier in a well from Velsen I in Northern Netherlands – the individual was presumably a victim of a violent act, and his body was disposed of in a water-well and was found below the deposition of stones, pottery and domestic refuse [68,69].

Another possibility should be accounted for. Namely, the losses incurred by both loyalists and rebels at the battle of Mursa, as well as the ensuing large-scale retaliation, must have critically weakened the frontier garrisons, a detail which could not have escaped the attention of Rome’s Danubian neighbors [67]. It seems that during the same year (260 CE), the invasion led by the Sarmatians and Quadi targeting Pannonia inflicted grievous losses and was a major disaster for the whole province [70]. Although unambiguous archaeological data about destruction layers dated to that period in the southern part of Pannonia Inferior (the region around Mursa) is absent [67], the possibility that the victims of these incursions have been interred in the water-well from Osijek must be taken into consideration.

Demographic characteristics of the skeletal assemblage from Osijek are rather unusual as these remains represent seven younger/ middle-aged males. This is significantly different from demographic characteristics of attritional (normal) mortality assemblages as well as those catastrophic assemblages associated with epidemics, indiscriminate massacres and/or famine [7177]. However, the demographic composition of the Osijek sample is almost identical to those seen in battle-related assemblages such as Tollense Valley [78], Himera [79] and Aljubarrota [80], a mass grave from Vilnius containing the remains of soldier’s from Napoleon’s Grand Army [81] or the one from Skopje (Scupi) probably representing a mass execution of soldiers [2,5]. Considering that in all these sites (as in Osijek) younger males are predominant with a complete absence or a very small percentage of women and children being present, the main hypothesis is that the individuals from Mursa were active soldiers. During the Roman period, approximately two-thirds of all soldiers (legionaries) enlisted between ages 17 and 20, while most of the others signed on between ages 21 and 25 [82]. Starting from the late 1st c. CE, legionaries were generally expected to serve for 25 years [82]. Therefore, according to these criteria all individuals from Osijek fall into the category of ‘soldiers’. Moreover, the 4th/5th century CE historian Vegetius stated that the recruits for the Roman army had to be between 1.70 and 1.77 m tall, but shorter men of good build could also be accepted since a strength was more important to a soldier than just a height [83]. In Osijek, all individuals (apart from SK 3) were over 1.70 m (average 172.5 m) which is much higher than the average height of males (168.6 m) recorded in the province of Pannonia during this period [84]. Besides, all individuals but one (SK 6) have pronounced entheseal changes on the upper and lower limbs as well as numerous Schmorl’s nodes on the vertebrae (apart from SK 4) indicating intense use of certain muscles, long-term physical activity, and mechanical load of the spine [85,86]. All these features suggest that the individuals from the Osijek mass burial were indeed soldiers.

The presence of new periosteal bone formation on the visceral side of the ribs of all seven individuals suggests a widespread infection while the unhealed state of these changes in all cases indicate that the Mursa individuals suffered from some kind of pulmonary disease during the final days of their lives. The presence of new periosteal bone formation in that skeletal location has been used as evidence for lower respiratory tract disease in the archeological record [87]. Numerous authors propose that fluid/pus accumulation and subsequent inflammation within the pleural cavity, usually resulting from lower respiratory tract diseases, can stimulate inflammatory periosteal reaction on the visceral side of ribs [88,89]. The most common respiratory infections to cause pleural inflammation of the ribs in modern populations include tuberculosis, pneumonia, and actinomycosis [90], thus some of these infectious diseases have to be considered also in this archeological context.

The most obvious paleopathological feature of the Mursa skeletal assemblage is the presence of ante- and perimortem injuries in three skeletons. Two antemortem cranial blunt force injuries on the frontal bones of SK 1 and SK 5 strongly indicate intentional violence as the main cause since this type of injury is usually associated with a face-to-face combat [9193]. Additionally, the location of both of these injuries well above the so-called hat brim line suggests their violent nature rather than accident as the probable cause [94]. The presence of perimortem sharp-force trauma and puncture wounds in SK 4 and SK 5 are definite proofs of intentional violence. The morphology of these injuries strongly suggests that puncture wounds were probably caused by an arrow or a spear tip: the appearance of the entrance/exit wound on the manubrium of SK 4 is typical of high-speed projectile weapons such as arrows [95,96] while the dimensions and the appearance of the hip injury of the individual SK 5 suggests a weapon with rounded or square cross-section rather than the weapon with a flat blade such as a sword. However, due to the obvious challenges when differentiating between these classes of weapons in archaeological contexts it is impossible to determine with certainty the exact weapon in each case. On the other hand, the cuts on the humerus and the rib of SK 4 were caused by a long-bladed weapon (probably spatha) [95]. In the case of SK 4 everything points to a face-to-face combat as all perimortem injuries are located on the anterior side of the skeleton, while in the case of SK 5 the position of the injury suggests that the attacker was located behind the victim. Finally, the presence of multiple injuries in SK 4 and SK 5 provides further confirmation of intentional violence [97], probably sustained through multiple episodes, additionally confirms the hypothesis that during their lifetime these individuals served as soldiers.

Carbon and nitrogen stable isotope analyses provide a direct insight into dietary patterns and subsistence strategies of past populations. For example, carbon isotope values (δ13C) primarily reflect the types of plants consumed, distinguishing between C3 plants (e.g., wheat, barley) and C₄ plants (e.g., millet) or can differentiate marine from terrestrial resources [98,99]. Nitrogen isotope values (δ15N) reveal trophic levels and it is used to identify the relative contributions of protein sources in the diet [98,99]. All seven individuals from Osijek are tightly clustered and show almost uniform isotopic values of both carbon and nitrogen suggesting a very similar diet during the last few years of their lives. Combined C/N isotope values in these individuals indicate that they likely consumed a mixed C3/C4-based vegetal diet (e.g., wheat, vegetables, millet, etc.) with limited amounts of terrestrial animal protein and an even lower consumption of marine protein. Both δ13C and δ15N values are within the range of values presented in the study by Lightfoot et al. [47] showing that the Roman period on the territory of modern-day Croatia is associated with a limited, but isotopically detectable amount of marine consumption. While the samples from that study comprised individuals from coastal sites, a similarity in values can be seen for the skeletons presented here.

To date, no attempt has been made to reconstruct the diet of Roman soldiers by the means of C/N stable isotopes analysis, thus a direct comparison of our results with other similar studies cannot be performed. However, written sources state that the staple food of Roman soldiers was wheat. The rations of wheat were usually supplemented with meat (mostly salted pork), olive oil, wine, salt, lentils, and vinegar [82]. As the army was in the field for a longer period, this diet was usually supplemented and diversified with more protein-rich vegetables like beans [100]. The isotopic values from the Osijek individuals conform well to the available historic information on the everyday diet of Roman soldiers and furthermore suggest a military character of this assemblage.

Based on the aDNA analyses conducted on four individuals from the burial site, none were found to carry the local Iron Age genetic profile even though a group of Roman individuals from Mursa excavated in other contexts showed complete continuity with it. Two non-local ancestries found in the mass grave, which we model using various proxy sources from Iron Age populations located either in Northern/Central or Eastern Europe, are not uncommon in Late Roman contexts (ca 293–476 CE) from the Balkans [55]. Its presence in a military setting aligns with historical accounts of Late Roman armies, which frequently incorporated ethnically diverse groups such as Sarmatians, Saxons, and Gauls [101]. One among many possibilities is that the individual with Eastern European ancestry from Osijek could be descendant of the original Sarmatian soldiers defeated by the Roman Empire as witnessed by the Roman historian Cassius Dio [102]. Defeated Sarmatians were then drafted into the Roman army and posted as far as Britain, an event also supported by recent paleogenomic research [103]. In contrast, SK 4 exhibits a genetic profile carrying a Near Eastern influence as previously observed for several populations across the Roman Empire.

There is another mass burial from Osijek, located quite close to the one presented here and dated to the mid-3rd century CE, containing multiple commingled adult male skeletons with perimortem injuries that can also be associated with the battle of Mursa in 260 CE. However, ancient DNA analysis for this context is still underway so we cannot speculate about the genetic profile of these individuals and determine whether they show a more local genetic profile than the individuals from the well SU 233/234. At the moment, we still cannot say with certainty what does the ‘local’ genetic profile of Mursa in the 3rd century CE looked like, but the existing genomic information indicate that most of the Roman period inhabitants of the city were consistent with the preceding local Iron Age variation with some outliers.

The coexistence of highly diverse genetic backgrounds among the genetically analyzed individuals and with the preceding population, strengthens the interpretation of these burials having militaristic origins. In fact, the observed genetic diversity might reflect the reliance of the Roman Empire on heterogeneous military recruitments, corroborating historical evidence for the integration of ‘foreign’ groups into imperial forces.

In conclusion, multidisciplinary work and close collaboration between researchers from various fields can help to gain a more comprehensive view of historically relevant events. The study of a mass grave from Mursa is an excellent example of such an approach as it revealed previously unknown information of the catastrophic consequences of the ‘Crisis of the Third Century’ in this part of the Roman Empire.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The location of: (A) the site of the University Library in Osijek today (in red circle) (base map credit: USGS National Map Viewer, https://apps.nationalmap.gov/viewer/); (B) the site during the excavation (marked in number 5).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. The well SU 233/234: (A) at the beginning of the excavation showing the position of SK 2 and SK 3; (B) after the excavation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.s002

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Roman sestertius minted in 251 CE in Viminacium during the reign of emperor Hostilian: (A) obverse: bust of Hostilian viewed from the right surrounded by the inscription C VAI HOST M QVINTVS CAE; (B) reverse: a woman standing, holding a branch in the right hand, and a globe in the left with a bull and a lion standing at her feet; the inscription PMSC – OLVIM at the top and AN XII on the bottom.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.s003

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Active new periosteal bone formation on the on the visceral side of the ribs: (A) SK 2; (B) SK 7.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.s004

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Antemortem unhealed fracture of the 6th left rib, SK 4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.s005

(TIF)

S6 Fig. (A) Puncture wound on the manubrium, posterior view, SK 4, (B) cut to the diaphysis of the left humerus, SK 4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.s006

(TIF)

S7 Fig. qpAdm modelling of Roman individuals from Mursa using distal ancestral sources.

Sample SK 7 could only be modeled with a negative value for one component and is therefore not depicted in this figure (addition information in S1 File: Distal qpAdm).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.s007

(TIF)

S1 File. The spreadsheet containing additional demographic/ pathological, radiocarbon, isotopic and genomic information about the newly analyzed individuals from Mursa.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0333440.s008

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Emily Gaul and the Archeo- and Paleogenetics group at the University of Tübingen for the support with the lab and computational work.

References

  1. 1. Novak M, Carić M, Osterholtz AJ. Empire of violence: Bioarchaeological aspects of violence in the Roman world. In: Bews EA, Marklein KE, editors. Roman bioarcheology. Interdisciplinary perspectives on life and death in the Roman world. Gainesville: University of Florida Press. 2025:172–201.
  2. 2. Jovanova L, et al. Edna slika za temnata strana na rimskata istorija. Skopje: Muzej na grad Skopje. 2017.
  3. 3. Dočkalová M. A mass grave from the Roman period in Moravia (Czech Republic). Anthropol. 2005;43:23–43.
  4. 4. Soficaru AD, Radu C, Tica CI. A mass grave outside the walls: The commingled assemblage from Ibida. In: Tica CI, Martin DL, editors. Bioarchaeology of frontiers and borderlands. Gainesville: University of Florida Press. 2019:187–211.
  5. 5. McCormick M. Tracking mass death during the fall of Rome’s empire (I). J Rom Archaeol. 2015;28:325–57.
  6. 6. McCormick M. Tracking mass death during the fall of Rome’s empire (II): A first inventory of mass graves. J Rom Archaeol. 2016;29:1004–7.
  7. 7. Prowse T. Burial practices and tombs in the Roman world. In: Smith C, editor. Encyclopedia of global archaeology. New York: Springer. 2014: 1060–9.
  8. 8. Pinterović D. Mursa i njeno područje u antičko doba. Osijek: Centar za znanstveni rad Jugoslavenske akademije znanosti i umjetnosti. 1978.
  9. 9. Vukmanić I. Dunavski limes u Hrvatskoj. University of Zagreb. 2017. http://darhiv.ffzg.unizg.hr/id/eprint/9240/
  10. 10. Angelov A. Mursa and battles of Mursa. In: Nicholson O, editor. The Oxford dictionary of Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2018:1047.
  11. 11. Drinkwater JF. The battle of Mursa, 351: Causes, course, and consequences. J Late Antiq. 2022;15:131–59.
  12. 12. Buikstra JE, Ubelaker DH. Standards for data collection from human skeletal remains. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey. 1994.
  13. 13. Klales AR. Sex estimation of the human skeleton. History, methods, and emerging techniques. London: Academic Press. 2020.
  14. 14. Ortner DJ. Identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains. San Diego: Academic Press. 2003.
  15. 15. Aufderheide AC, Rodríguez-Martín C. The Cambridge encyclopaedia of human Paleopathology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1998.
  16. 16. Trotter ML. Estimation of stature from intact limb bones. In: Stewart TD, editor. Personal identification in mass disasters. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History. 1970:71–83.
  17. 17. Maples WR. Trauma analysis by the forensic anthropologist. In: Reichs KJ, editor. Forensic osteology: Advances in the identification of human remains. Springfield: C.C. Thomas. 1986:218–28.
  18. 18. Lovell N. Trauma analysis in paleopathology. Yearb Phys Anthropol. 1997;40:139–70.
  19. 19. Sauer NJ. The timing of injuries and manner of death: Distinguishing among antemortem, perimortem and postmortem trauma. In: Reichs KJ, editor. Springfield: C.C. Thomas. 1986:321–32.
  20. 20. Facchini F, Rastelli E, Belcastro MG. Peri mortem cranial injuries from a medieval grave in Saint Peter’s Cathedral, Bologna, Italy. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2007;18:421–30.
  21. 21. Wheatley BP. Perimortem or postmortem bone fractures? An experimental study of fracture patterns in deer femora. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53(1):69–72. pmid:18005007
  22. 22. Wakely J. Identification and analysis of violent and non-violent head injuries in osteo-archaeological material. In: Carman J, editor. Material harm: Archaeological studies of war and violence. Glasgow: Cruithne Press. 1997:24–46.
  23. 23. Murphy MS, Gaither C, Goycochea E, Verano JW, Cock G. Violence and weapon-related trauma at Puruchuco-Huaquerones, Peru. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010;142(4):636–49. pmid:20333713
  24. 24. Longin R. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature. 1971;230(5291):241–2. pmid:4926713
  25. 25. Brown TA, et al. Improved collagen extraction by modified Longin method. Radiocarbon. 1988;30:171–7.
  26. 26. Collins MJ, Galley P. Towards an optimal method of archaeological collagen extraction: The influence of pH and grinding. Anc Biomol. 1998;2:209–22.
  27. 27. Dabney J, Knapp M, Glocke I, Gansauge M-T, Weihmann A, Nickel B, et al. Complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a Middle Pleistocene cave bear reconstructed from ultrashort DNA fragments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(39):15758–63. pmid:24019490
  28. 28. Rohland N, Harney E, Mallick S, Nordenfelt S, Reich D. Partial uracil-DNA-glycosylase treatment for screening of ancient DNA. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370(1660):20130624. pmid:25487342
  29. 29. Fu Q, Hajdinjak M, Moldovan OT, Constantin S, Mallick S, Skoglund P, et al. An early modern human from Romania with a recent Neanderthal ancestor. Nature. 2015;524(7564):216–9. pmid:26098372
  30. 30. Peltzer A, Jäger G, Herbig A, Seitz A, Kniep C, Krause J, et al. EAGER: efficient ancient genome reconstruction. Genome Biol. 2016;17:60. pmid:27036623
  31. 31. Schubert M, Lindgreen S, Orlando L. AdapterRemoval v2: rapid adapter trimming, identification, and read merging. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9:88. pmid:26868221
  32. 32. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60. pmid:19451168
  33. 33. Jónsson H, et al. mapDamage2.0: Fast approximate Bayesian estimates of ancient DNA damage parameters. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1682–4.
  34. 34. Jun G, Wing MK, Abecasis GR, Kang HM. An efficient and scalable analysis framework for variant extraction and refinement from population-scale DNA sequence data. Genome Res. 2015;25(6):918–25. pmid:25883319
  35. 35. Fu Q, Posth C, Hajdinjak M, Petr M, Mallick S, Fernandes D, et al. The genetic history of Ice Age Europe. Nature. 2016;534(7606):200–5. pmid:27135931
  36. 36. Korneliussen TS, Albrechtsen A, Nielsen R. ANGSD: Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2014;15(1):356. pmid:25420514
  37. 37. Renaud G, Slon V, Duggan AT, Kelso J. Schmutzi: estimation of contamination and endogenous mitochondrial consensus calling for ancient DNA. Genome Biol. 2015;16:224. pmid:26458810
  38. 38. Nakatsuka N, Harney É, Mallick S, Mah M, Patterson N, Reich D. ContamLD: estimation of ancient nuclear DNA contamination using breakdown of linkage disequilibrium. Genome Biol. 2020;21(1):199. pmid:32778142
  39. 39. Weissensteiner H, et al. HaploGrep 2: Mitochondrial haplogroup classification in the era of high-throughput sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:W58–63.
  40. 40. Ralf A, Montiel González D, Zhong K, Kayser M. Yleaf: Software for Human Y-Chromosomal Haplogroup Inference from Next-Generation Sequencing Data. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(5):1291–4. pmid:29518227
  41. 41. Patterson N, Price AL, Reich D. Population structure and eigenanalysis. PLoS Genet. 2006;2(12):e190. pmid:17194218
  42. 42. Maier R, Flegontov P, Flegontova O, Işıldak U, Changmai P, Reich D. On the limits of fitting complex models of population history to f-statistics. Elife. 2023;12:e85492. pmid:37057893
  43. 43. Mallick S, Reich D. The Allen Ancient DNA Resource (AADR): A curated compendium of ancient human genomes. Harvard Dataverse. 2023.
  44. 44. Filipović S. Osijek – vojarna – sveučilišna knjižnica. Hrvatski arheološki godišnjak. 2012;8/2011:39–41.
  45. 45. DeNiro MJ, Schoeninger MJ, Hastorf CA. Effect of heating on the stable carbon and Nitrogen isotope ratios of bone collagen. J Archaeol Sci. 1985;12:1–7.
  46. 46. van Klinken GJ. Bone collagen quality indicators for paleodietary and radiocarbon measurements. J Archaeol Sci. 1999;26:687–95.
  47. 47. Lightfoot E, Šlaus M, O’Connell TC. Changing cultures, changing cuisines: cultural transitions and dietary change in Iron Age, Roman, and Early Medieval Croatia. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2012;148:543–56.
  48. 48. Lazaridis I, Patterson N, Mittnik A, Renaud G, Mallick S, Kirsanow K, et al. Ancient human genomes suggest three ancestral populations for present-day Europeans. Nature. 2014;513(7518):409–13. pmid:25230663
  49. 49. Patterson N, Isakov M, Booth T, Büster L, Fischer C-E, Olalde I, et al. Large-scale migration into Britain during the Middle to Late Bronze Age. Nature. 2022;601(7894):588–94. pmid:34937049
  50. 50. Lazaridis I, Alpaslan-Roodenberg S, Acar A, Açıkkol A, Agelarakis A, Aghikyan L, et al. The genetic history of the Southern Arc: A bridge between West Asia and Europe. Science. 2022;377(6609):eabm4247. pmid:36007055
  51. 51. Antonio ML, Weiß CL, Gao Z, Sawyer S, Oberreiter V, Moots HM, et al. Stable population structure in Europe since the Iron Age, despite high mobility. Elife. 2024;13:e79714. pmid:38288729
  52. 52. Reich D, Patterson N, Campbell D, Tandon A, Mazieres S, Ray N, et al. Reconstructing Native American population history. Nature. 2012;488(7411):370–4. pmid:22801491
  53. 53. Antonio ML, Gao Z, Moots HM, Lucci M, Candilio F, Sawyer S, et al. Ancient Rome: A genetic crossroads of Europe and the Mediterranean. Science. 2019;366(6466):708–14. pmid:31699931
  54. 54. Olalde I, Mallick S, Patterson N, Rohland N, Villalba-Mouco V, Silva M, et al. The genomic history of the Iberian Peninsula over the past 8000 years. Science. 2019;363(6432):1230–4. pmid:30872528
  55. 55. Olalde I, Carrión P, Mikić I, Rohland N, Mallick S, Lazaridis I, et al. A genetic history of the Balkans from Roman frontier to Slavic migrations. Cell. 2023;186(25):5472–5485.e9. pmid:38065079
  56. 56. Margaryan A, Lawson DJ, Sikora M, Racimo F, Rasmussen S, Moltke I, et al. Population genomics of the Viking world. Nature. 2020;585(7825):390–6. pmid:32939067
  57. 57. Posth C, Zaro V, Spyrou MA, Vai S, Gnecchi-Ruscone GA, Modi A, et al. The origin and legacy of the Etruscans through a 2000-year archeogenomic time transect. Sci Adv. 2021;7(39):eabi7673. pmid:34559560
  58. 58. Haak W, Lazaridis I, Patterson N, Rohland N, Mallick S, Llamas B, et al. Massive migration from the steppe was a source for Indo-European languages in Europe. Nature. 2015;522(7555):207–11. pmid:25731166
  59. 59. Veeramah KR, Rott A, Groß M, van Dorp L, López S, Kirsanow K, et al. Population genomic analysis of elongated skulls reveals extensive female-biased immigration in Early Medieval Bavaria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(13):3494–9. pmid:29531040
  60. 60. O’Sullivan N, Posth C, Coia V, Schuenemann VJ, Price TD, Wahl J, et al. Ancient genome-wide analyses infer kinship structure in an Early Medieval Alemannic graveyard. Sci Adv. 2018;4(9):eaao1262. pmid:30191172
  61. 61. Allentoft ME, Sikora M, Refoyo-Martínez A, Irving-Pease EK, Fischer A, Barrie W, et al. Population genomics of post-glacial western Eurasia. Nature. 2024;625(7994):301–11. pmid:38200295
  62. 62. Järve M, Saag L, Scheib CL, Pathak AK, Montinaro F, Pagani L, et al. Shifts in the Genetic Landscape of the Western Eurasian Steppe Associated with the Beginning and End of the Scythian Dominance. Curr Biol. 2019;29(14):2430–2441.e10. pmid:31303491
  63. 63. Gnecchi-Ruscone GA, Khussainova E, Kahbatkyzy N, Musralina L, Spyrou MA, Bianco RA, et al. Ancient genomic time transect from the Central Asian Steppe unravels the history of the Scythians. Sci Adv. 2021;7(13):eabe4414. pmid:33771866
  64. 64. Southern P. The Roman Empire from Severus to Constantine. London: Routledge. 2015.
  65. 65. Pinterović D. Novi i neobjavljeni rimski kameni spomenici s terena Murse i okolice. Osječki zbornik. 1958;6:23–64.
  66. 66. Gračanin H. Bitka kod Murse 351. i njezin odjek. Scrinia Slavonica. 2003;3:9–29.
  67. 67. Radman Livaja I. The southern part of Lower Pannonia in the 3rd century: military aspects. Arheološki radovi i rasprave.
  68. 68. Schimmer EL. De Romeinse Waterputten te Velsen. Westerheem. 1979;28:109–16.
  69. 69. Morel J-MAW, Bosman AVAJ. An early Roman burial in Velsen I. In: van Driel-Murray C, editor. Roman military equipment: The sources of evidence. Oxford: Archaeopress. 1989:167–91.
  70. 70. Kovács P. The late Roman army. In: Visy Z, editor. The Roman army in Pannonia: An archaeological guide of the Ripa Pannonica. Budapest: Teleki László Foundation. 2003:31–6.
  71. 71. Gowland R, Chamberlain AT. Detecting plague: Paleodemographic characterisation of a catastrophic death assemblage. Antiquity. 2005;79:146–57.
  72. 72. Margerison BJ, Knüsel CJ. Paleodemographic comparison of a catastrophic and an attritional death assemblage. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2002;119(2):134–43. pmid:12237934
  73. 73. Janković I, Balen J, Potrebica H, Ahern JCM, Novak M. Mass violence in Copper Age Europe: The massacre burial site from Potočani, Croatia. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2021;176(3):474–85. pmid:34418068
  74. 74. DeWitte SN. The effect of sex on risk of mortality during the Black Death in London, A.D. 1349–1350. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009;139:222–34.
  75. 75. DeWitte SN. Age patterns of mortality during the Black Death in London, AD 1349–1350. J Archaeol Sci. 2010;37:3394–400.
  76. 76. Kyle B, Reitsema LJ, Tyler J, Fabbri PF, Vassallo S. Examining the osteological paradox: Skeletal stress in mass graves versus civilians at the Greek colony of Himera (Sicily). Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018;167(1):161–72. pmid:30226641
  77. 77. Franklin ER, Mitchell PD, Robb J. The Black Death in Hereford, England: A demographic analysis of the Cathedral 14th-century plague mass graves and associated parish cemetery. Am J Biol Anthropol. 2023;182(3):452–66. pmid:37650443
  78. 78. Jantzen D, et al. A Bronze Age battlefield? Weapons and trauma in the Tollense Valley, north-eastern Germany. Antiquity. 2011;85:417–33.
  79. 79. Viva S, et al. The mass burials from the western necropolis of the Greek colony of Himera (Sicily) related to the battles of 480 and 409 BCE. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 2020;30:307–17.
  80. 80. Cunha E, Silva AM. War lesions from the famous Portuguese medieval battle of Aljubarrota. Int J Osteoarchaeol. 1997;7:595–9.
  81. 81. Signoli S, et al. Discovery of a mass grave of Napoleonic period in Lithuania (1812, Vilnius). C R Palevol. 2004;3:219–27.
  82. 82. Erdkamp P. A companion to the Roman army. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing. 2007.
  83. 83. Goldsworthy A. The complete Roman army. London: Thames and Hudson. 2003.
  84. 84. Novak M. Antropološka analiza antičke nekropole Zadar-Relja u kontekstu antičkih nekropola Hrvatske. University of Zagreb. 2008. http://darhiv.ffzg.unizg.hr/id/eprint/2338/
  85. 85. Saluja G, Fitzpatrick K, Bruce M, Cross J. Schmorl’s nodes (intravertebral herniations of intervertebral disc tissue) in two historic British populations. J Anat. 1986;145:87–96. pmid:3323152
  86. 86. Villotte S, Castex D, Couallier V, Dutour O, Knüsel CJ, Henry-Gambier D. Enthesopathies as occupational stress markers: evidence from the upper limb. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010;142(2):224–34. pmid:20034011
  87. 87. Davies-Barrett AM, Antoine D, Roberts CA. Inflammatory periosteal reaction on ribs associated with lower respiratory tract disease: A method for recording prevalence from sites with differing preservation. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2019;168(3):530–42. pmid:30613938
  88. 88. Roberts C, Lucy D, Manchester K. Inflammatory lesions of ribs: an analysis of the Terry Collection. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1994;95(2):169–82. pmid:7802094
  89. 89. Roberts CA, Boylston A, Buckley L, Chamberlain AC, Murphy EM. Rib lesions and tuberculosis: the palaeopathological evidence. Tuber Lung Dis. 1998;79(1):55–60. pmid:10645442
  90. 90. Kass SM, Williams PM, Reamy BV. Am Fam Physician. 2007;75:1357–64.
  91. 91. Jurmain R, Bartelink EJ, Leventhal A, Bellifemine V, Nechayev I, Atwood M, et al. Paleoepidemiological patterns of interpersonal aggression in a prehistoric central California population from CA-ALA-329. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009;139(4):462–73. pmid:19170213
  92. 92. Walker PL. Cranial injuries as evidence of violence in prehistoric southern California. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989;80(3):313–23. pmid:2686461
  93. 93. Jiménez-Brobeil SA, du Souich P, Al Oumaoui I. Possible relationship of cranial traumatic injuries with violence in the south-east Iberian Peninsula from the Neolithic to the Bronze Age. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009;140(3):465–75. pmid:19425096
  94. 94. Kremer C, et al. Discrimination of falls and blows in blunt head trauma: Systematic study of the hat brim line rule in relation to skull fractures. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53:716–9.
  95. 95. Novak M. Tavern brawls, banditry and battles - weapon injuries in Roman Iader. In: Sanader M, Rendić Miočević A, Tončinić D, Radman Livaja I, editors. Proceedings of the XVII Roman Military Equipment Conference. Zagreb: Archaeological Museum in Zagreb/ University of Zagreb. 2013:347–56.
  96. 96. Forsom E, Smith MJ. Getting to the point: An experimental approach to improving the identification of penetrating projectile trauma to bone caused by medieval arrows. J Archaeol Sci: Rep. 2017;11:274–86.
  97. 97. Kimmerle EH, Baraybar JP. Skeletal trauma: Identification of injuries resulting from human rights abuse and armed conflict. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 2008.
  98. 98. Richards MP. Isotope analysis for diet studies. In: Britton K, Richards MP, editors. Archaeological science: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2020:125–44.
  99. 99. Lee-Thorp A. On isotopes and old bones. Archaeometry. 2008;50:925–50.
  100. 100. Armstrong J. Diet and nutrition in the Roman republican army. In: Brice L, Donahue J, editors. Brill’s companion to diet and logistics in Greek and Roman warfare. Leiden/Boston: Brill. 2023:126–51.
  101. 101. Dziurdzik T. Ethnic units in the late Roman army? The case of the equites dalmatae. Studia Europaea Gnesnensia. 2017;16:447–62.
  102. 102. Mattews J. King Arthur of the Romans: Lucius Artorius Castus and the Sarmatians in Britain. Prilozi povijesti umjetnosti u Dalmaciji. 2019;44:273–96.
  103. 103. Silva M, Booth T, Moore J, Anastasiadou K, Walker D, Gilardet A, et al. An individual with Sarmatian-related ancestry in Roman Britain. Curr Biol. 2024;34(1):204–212.e6. pmid:38118448