Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Variety-specific selenium accumulation patterns and quality attributes of rice following foliar selenium application

  • Fanbin Meng ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Fanbin Meng, Jing Wang

    Roles Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation College of Resource and Environment, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, China,

  • Jing Wang ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Fanbin Meng, Jing Wang

    Roles Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation

    Affiliation College of Resource and Environment, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, China,

  • Donghai Wang,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, United States of America

  • Jianfei Wang

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    wangjf@ahstu.edu.cn

    Affiliation College of Resource and Environment, Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang, China,

Abstract

In the context of addressing regional selenium (Se) deficiencies in China, this study undertook an investigation into the efficacy of foliar Se spray on 12 rice varieties. The primary focus was on assessing rice quality and Se enrichment in various plant components, namely grain, roots, stems, and leaves. The foliar Se spray led to an increase in soil Se content from 0.13 to 0.26 mg. Growth promotion was observed, with rice variety ZLY experiencing a height increase of 19.10 cm, while variety QYX had only a 0.90 cm increase. However, grain weight and numbers were minimally affected. Foliar Se spray had different impacts on rice quality among varieties and treatments. Specifically, variety TLY consistently had the highest numbers of brown and milled rice grains, whereas TXJ and LY had the lowest numbers of brown and milled rice grains respectively. Foliar Se spray had diverse effects on protein contents, resulting in the highest glutelin content of more than 4% and prolamin content as low as less than 0.1%, while the total protein content remained largely unchanged. Moreover, rice varieties demonstrated varying Se enrichment capacities, with the highest for varieties ZLY and QYX grain, and the lowest for LY, TXJ, and JLY grain. The results offered technical support for the selection and promotion of selenium-enriched rice, thereby presenting a potential solution to Se deficiency in China.

1. Introduction

Selenium (Se), an essential trace element for human health, is renowned for enhancing immune function and preventing age-related cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases [1]. Prolonged deficiency of Se can give rise to various diseases, among which endemic diseases such as Keshan disease are included [2]. According to statistics, over 65% of regions worldwide are at risk of Se deficiency, and in China, the prevalence is approximately 72% [3]. However, the human body cannot synthesize Se and it must be obtained from external sources [4]. Consequently, Se-enriched foods have become a major focus in recent years [5].

Compared with applying Se to the soil, foliar spraying of Se can enhance the utilization of Se fertilizer, reduce Se loss, and to some extent, mitigate soil Se pollution [6]. Foliar spraying of Se has become the main method for Se accumulation in plants [7]. Rice, as a staple food, has a strong capacity for Se bioaccumulation, making it a potential solution to Se deficiency [8]. It should be noted that Se can be a double-edged sword for plants [9]. While optimal Se levels promote plant growth [10], excessive Se can be toxic [11]. Thus, the concentration of foliar spraying of Se has been widely studied [12,13]. And the timing preferences for foliar spraying of Se have also been explored [14]. The effects of different Se forms on rice growth and Se accumulation in roots and grains have also been researched [15]. However, studies on the Se bioaccumulation capacities and its effect on rice quality in diverse rice varieties are scarce.

To explore the effects of Se foliar spray on rice for the bioaccumulation capacities of Se in diverse rice varieties, 12 high-yielding rice varieties grown in Fanshan Town, Lujiang County, Hefei City, Anhui Province, China, have been selected. Simultaneously, the Se enrichment characteristics of different rice varieties and the quality of rice are evaluated. The aim of this study is to obtain Se-enriched rice varieties for large-scale promotion, thereby offering new perspectives for addressing diseases caused by Se deficiency.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Experimental area and rice varieties

The field experiments were carried out during the 2021 and 2023 crop season in Fanshan Town, Lujiang County, Hefei City, Anhui Province, China. This location, at an altitude of 486 meters, with a longitude of 117o26’5.478” east and a latitude of 31o7’10.542” north, is a major rice-producing area. The region’s climate is categorized as subtropical humid monsoon climate, boasting an average temperature of 15.8°C and an average annual rainfall of 1263.2 mm. Twelve locally high-yielding and high-quality rice varieties were selected for the experiment. Details are presented in Table 1.

2.2. Materials and methods

The experiment design employed was randomized block with at least three replications [8]. Each variety was allocated an area of 8 meters by 20 meters. Machine-transplanted seedlings were sown on May 10, and machine transplanting was carried out on June 5, with a plant spacing of 25 centimeters by 14 centimeters. Conventional local management practices were adhered to [16]. After harvest, the Agronomic traits including plant height, weight, grain number per panicle, and imperfect grain number were tested in time. Then the polished rice and brown rice were tested. Briefly, the average of six plants in the plot, measured with a graduated ruler from the soil to the tip of the highest panicle to determine plant height (cm). The panicles of 1 m2 at six different positions, and six replicates from each treatment, were counted to measure panicle numbers per square meter. The panicles were harvested, threshed manually, and the grains were sun dried and adjusted to ~14% moisture content to determine the yield, grains per panicle and filled grain percentage. Six samples of 1,000 filled grains from each treatment were randomly selected, then weighed to determine the 1,000-kernel weight. The harvested panicles/ears were manually threshed. Grains were visually categorized based on established criteria (e.g., filled vs. unfilled, partially filled, sterile, aborted, chalky) to confirm imperfect grain number.

(1)

The polished rice were determined according to inspect the milled grains. Where chalky grains, broken grains, undeveloped kernels, and discolored grains were key imperfections shift. The brown rice were determined through visually inspected. Where unfilled/shriveled, partially filled, aborted/sterile, and physically damaged were key imperfections shift.

2.3. Se-enriched foliar formula and Se foliar spray protocol

A self-developed Se-enriched foliar fertilizer, with sodium selenite as the main ingredient (chemical pure, 99.5%), was uniformly sprayed on the leaf surfaces during the panicle initiation period [17]. According to the preliminary experimental results of our team, the application amount of the Se-enriched fertilizer was 45 grams per hectare, and its spraying volume was 100 milliliters per square meter.

2.4. Analytical procedures

2.4.1. Determination of soil properties.

The content of soil organic matter was determined by the potassium dichromate volumetric method (NYT1121-6-2006) [9]. Available phosphorus in soil was determined by the NaHCO3 extraction method [3]. The available potassium in soil was determined by NH4OAc extraction and flame photometry [18]. The available nitrogen in soil was determined by the alkaline diffusion method [6]. The soil pH was determined by the potentiometric method [19].

2.4.2. Extraction of protein components.

The rice from different varieties were collected as samples. The extraction method for protein contents was in accordance with the Coomassie Brilliant Blue method [20].

2.4.3. Determination of Se content in rice organs.

The determination of soil and plant Se contents followed the national agricultural standards NY/T 1104-2006 and GB/T 21729-2008 respectively [6]. In brief, ground samples (0.5 g) underwent acid digestion using a mixture of 6 ml HNO3 and 2 ml HClO4 in a digestion block. The temperature was sequentially increased to 50°C, 100°C, and 150°C, holding each temperature for 60 minutes, and finally raised to 200°C until the extracts became translucent. After digestion, the extracts were quantitatively transferred to volumetric flasks. The final volume was adjusted to 50 ml with deionized water. Se concentrations were measured using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy.

2.4.4. Se Increment calculation.

The calculation method for Se increment is given by Equation (1).

(2)

2.5. Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed statistically using the IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 22.0, Armonk, NY, IBM Corp, USA), and graphs were generated using Origin 2021. The overall statistical significance among responses to different treatments was α = 0.05. Multiple comparisons with Tukey’s HSD test were then conducted to identify any significant differences between pairs of treatments. All treatments were conducted in two replicates.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Effect of foliar Se spray on soil fertility

Foliar Se spray significantly altered several rice field soil fertility parameters, including total Se, available Potassium, and pH, particularly increasing the total Se content in the soil from 0.13 to 0.26 mg/kg (Table 2). This doubling of soil Se aligns with findings by Chen et al. [15], the increased Se content in the rice field soil was mainly derived directly from foliar Se spray, with a smaller portion released from the rice root system after being absorbed by rice leaves. In other words, some sodium selenite solution, through the conduction of rice leaves, stems, and roots, entered the soil, resulting in a double increase in soil Se content. This is in accordance with refernce [21]. Meanwhile, the treatment also reduced available potassium significantly from 109.20 to 104.07 mg/kg. The decrease in available potassium was possibly due to the potassium’s involvement in the process of Se absorption and transport by rice leaves, leading to the consumption of a small amount of available potassium [4]. This reduction suggests a nutrient trade-off during foliar Se enrichment. Additionally, the pH of rice field soil decreased from 6.02 to 5.64. The decrease in pH was attributed to the reactions between alkaline earth metals and sodium selenite, which can lock part of Ca2+ and Mg2+, etc., resulting in a decrease in pH [9]. Although Se soil has function to alter soil fertility, it did not show significant effect on organic matter content, total nitrogen, and available phosphorus.

thumbnail
Table 2. Effect of Se foliar spray on rice field soil fertility.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331517.t002

3.2. Effect of foliar Se spray on agronomic traits and quality and kernel weigh of polished and brow rice

Fig 1 shows that foliar Se spray had a significant effect on agronomic traits, including plant height, 1,000-kernel weight, spikelet number, and imperfect grain number, varied with different rice varieties. The foliar Se spray improved plant height across all 12 rice varieties, with ZLY showing the largest gain (19.10 cm) and QYX the smallest (0.90 cm) (Fig 1a). This varietal response supports prior reports by Xu et al. [22] and Di et al. [23] that foliar Se spray treatment can stimulate vegetative growth, though the magnitude of effect remains genotype-dependent. However, the 1,000-kernel weight, grain number per panicle, and imperfect grain number showed irregular trends with little change (Fig 2b2d), the findings align with Mo et al. [24]. As it is, there are too many factors to affect them. For 1,000-kernel weight, NJ, QYX, TLY, JHY, and ZD had higher weight. For grain number per panicle, NJ, LY, NXJ, TLY, and ZD performed excellently, showing the positive effect on these varieties. For imperfect grain number, NJ, QYX, ZD, and TXJ are all in the range of about 10. The results suggest that NJ and ZD, as two typical varieties, have an advantage for promoting Se-enriched rice.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Effect of Se spray on agronomic traits of rice varieties.

(a) plant height, (b) 1,000-kernel weight, (c) grain number per panicle, and (d) imperfect grain number.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331517.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Effect of Se spray on quality and yield of brown and polished rice.

(a) quantity of brown rice, (b) quantity of polished rice, (c) weight of brown rice, and (d) weight of polished rice.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331517.g002

Fig 2 shows that foliar Se spray enhanced both the quality of rice grain and kernel weight of brown and polished rice, indicating a clear benefit to grain kernel weight and grain quality. These outcomes agree with the observations by Niu et al. [25] and Liu et al. [26,27], increasing the rice kernel weight and rice yield. Among the tested varieties, TLY and JHY exhibited the highest grain kernel weight gains, while TXJ and LY performed the least (Fig 2c, 2d). This variability emphasizes the importance of genetic background in determining response to Se biofortification. Our findings not only validate Se’s agronomic potential for improving grain quality but also identified NJ and JHY as strong candidates for functional rice breeding programs, consistent with prior work by Guo et al. [28]. The results suggest that foliar Se spray has a positive effect on rice quality and kernel weight grain for both brown and polished rice [17].

3.3. Effect of foliar Se spray on rice protein content

Fig 3 shows that foliar Se spray had significant effects on protein composition (e.g., glutelin, globulin, albumin, prolamin) across varieties, particularly increasing glutelin and globulin contents in most lines. Notably, glutelin remained the dominant protein fraction, exceeding 4% in QYX (control) and JLY (Se-treated grain), consistent with results by Liu et al. [29] and de Oliveira et al. [30]. Albumin and globulin levels varied widely among varieties, revealing genetic specificity in protein response to foliar Se spray treatment. For instance, QYX and XLY accumulated higher albumin, NJ and ZD showed increased globulin content, and the varieties LY (control) and JLY (Se treatments) showed lowest albumin content (<1%). In addition, varieties LY and JLY had relatively lower albumin protein content in grain, whereas QYX, XLY, and ZD had relatively higher clear protein content. Similarly, varieties QLY and JLY showed comparatively lower globulin content, while NJ, XLY, and ZD had higher levels. These differences align with reports by Liu et al. [29], who noted selenium’s role in regulating protein expression. Although total protein content remained relatively stable, the observed shifts in protein fractions suggest that Se biofortification can tailor rice nutritional profiles through selective variety use [30]. Therefore, by choosing suitable rice varieties, a pathway for targeted protein production through selenium treatment has been discovered [10].

thumbnail
Fig 3. Effect of foliar Se spray on (a) total protein content, and protein fractions.

(b) albumin content, (c) globulin content, (d) prolamin content, and (d) glutenin content.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331517.g003

3.4. Distribution of foliar Se spray in different rice organs

Fig 4 shows that there are notable differences in Se accumulation among various plant parts including grain, roots, stems, and leaves, among the different varieties. The highest Se concentrations were found in the grains of ZLY and QYX, roots of JHY and LY, stems of QYX and JHY, and leaves of JHY. Conversely, the lowest Se concentrations were in the grains of LY, TXJ, and JLY, roots of XLY, ZLY, NXJ, and TLY, stem of ZD, and leave of TXJ. Based on Se accumulation capability, varieties ZLY and QYX can be cultivated to obtain Se-rich grain; LY and JHY are the good candidates to serve as phytoremediators for Se-enriched roots; QYX, JHY, and QLY are preferred to be used as fodder to address Se deficiency in grazing animals such as cattle and sheep. Our results confirm the findings of Wu et al. [31], who observed similar Se localization patterns, as well as that Lavu et al. [32] reported that the Se enrichment capacity can be ranked by the order of leaves, stem, grain, and root. Among all plant parts, leaves consistently exhibited the highest Se enrichment capacity, likely due to its direct contact with the high Se concentration during foliar Se spray [33]. Additionally, Se’s differential distribution among the tissues also highlights its synergistic role in photosynthetic enhancement, leading to strong Se fixation in the leaves, supporting the findings of Ding et al. [7]. Furthermore, Se-enriched grain may be due to the inherently stronger expression of Se accumulation genes and greater stress resistance in naturally Se-rich rice [12]. This underscores that different rice varieties possess varying Se enrichment capacities, and the Se enrichment abilities of different rice plant parts also vary. The research findings advance our understanding of Se transport mechanisms in rice and offer practical guidelines for breeding Se-enriched crops tailored to specific nutritional or environmental applications.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Se accumulation in rice varieties.

(a) grain, (b) root, (c) stem, and (d) leaves.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331517.g004

4. Conclusions

Foliar Se spray exhibited diverse effects on rice field soil fertility, plant growth, grain quality, and protein composition across different rice varieties. It significantly increased soil Se content and the Se content in the soil is nearly doubled. It promoted the plant growth with limited impact on grain weight and yield. The Se enrichment capacity differed among plant parts and rice varieties. While foliar Se spray had minimal impact on total protein content, it influenced the composition of specific proteins, and its effect on grain quality varied by variety. These research findings demonstrated that selenium treatment has a significant effect on rice quality and underscore varietal differences in Se accumulation. This study provides valuable guidance for selecting selenium-enriched rice for various applications. For future research, it is recommended to investigate the effects of foliar Se spray on additional nutritional attributes (e.g., antioxidants, minerals, vitamins), explore varying application conditions (e.g., different concentrations, timing, and Se compounds), account for broader environmental variability, assess long-term impacts, and evaluate consumer acceptability.

Supporting information

References

  1. 1. Wang Q, Guan X, Lai C, Gao H, Zheng Y, Huang J, et al. Selenium enrichment improves anti-proliferative effect of oolong tea extract on human hepatoma HuH-7 cells. Food Chem Toxicol. 2021;147:111873.
  2. 2. Zeng J-Y, Guan D-X, Dai Z-H, Chen J-Y, Dong W-J, Ding S, et al. Selenium contents, speciation and bioaccessibility of Se-enriched rice grains from Chinese markets. Soil Environ Heal. 2023;1(3):100037.
  3. 3. Félix MR, Zauza SB, Namorato FA, Castro DG, Martins FAD, de Lima Lessa JH, et al. Biofortification of upland rice using selenium-enriched urea: Evaluation of potential genotypes. J Food Compos Analysis. 2023;122:105409.
  4. 4. Gui J-Y, Rao S, Huang X, Liu X, Cheng S, Xu F. Interaction between selenium and essential micronutrient elements in plants: A systematic review. Sci Total Environ. 2022;853:158673. pmid:36096215
  5. 5. Li X, Luo Y, Zeng C, Zhong Q, Xiao Z, Mao X, et al. Selenium accumulation in plant foods and selenium intake of residents in a moderately selenium-enriched area of Mingyueshan, Yichun, China. J Food Compos Analysis. 2023;116:105089.
  6. 6. Deng X, Liu K, Li M, Zhang W, Zhao X, Zhao Z, et al. Difference of selenium uptake and distribution in the plant and selenium form in the grains of rice with foliar spray of selenite or selenate at different stages. F Crop Res. 2017;211:165–71.
  7. 7. Barman F, Kundu R. Foliar application of selenium affecting pollen viability, grain chalkiness, and transporter genes in cadmium accumulating rice cultivar: A pot study. Chemosphere. 2023;313:137538. pmid:36521741
  8. 8. de Lima Lessa JH, Raymundo JF, Branco Corguinha AP, Dias Martins FA, Araujo AM, Melo Santiago FE, et al. Strategies for applying selenium for biofortification of rice in tropical soils and their effect on element accumulation and distribution in grains. J Cereal Sci. 2020;96:103125.
  9. 9. Farooq MU, Ishaaq I, Barutcular C, Skalicky M, Maqbool R, Rastogi A, et al. Mitigation effects of selenium on accumulation of cadmium and morpho-physiological properties in rice varieties. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2022;170:1–13. pmid:34839203
  10. 10. Reis ARD, Boleta EHM, Alves CZ, Cotrim MF, Barbosa JZ, Silva VM, et al. Selenium toxicity in upland field-grown rice: Seed physiology responses and nutrient distribution using the μ-XRF technique. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;190:110147. pmid:31918255
  11. 11. Cardoso AAdS, Gomes FTdL, Antonio JRR, Guilherme LRG, Liu J, Li L, et al. Sulfate availability and soil selenate adsorption alleviate selenium toxicity in rice plants. Environ Exp Botany. 2022;201:104971.
  12. 12. Jiao L, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Wang R, Lu B, Liu X. Transcriptome analysis provides new insight into the distribution and transport of selenium and its associated metals in selenium-rich rice. Environ Pollut. 2022;301:118980. pmid:35150800
  13. 13. Guan H, Zhang J, Wang T, Xu J, Liu X. Lowered oral bioaccessibility of cadmium and selenium and associated health risk by co-digestion of rice and vegetables. Sci Total Environ. 2023;898:165489. pmid:37451439
  14. 14. Moulick D, Ghosh D, Mandal J, Bhowmick S, Mondal D, Choudhury S, et al. A cumulative assessment of plant growth stages and selenium supplementation on arsenic and micronutrients accumulation in rice grains. J Clean Prod. 2023;386:135764.
  15. 15. Chen X, Zhang Z, Gu M, Li H, Shohag MJI, Shen F, et al. Combined use of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and selenium fertilizer shapes microbial community structure and enhances organic selenium accumulation in rice grain. Sci Total Environ. 2020;748:141166. pmid:32798860
  16. 16. Qin Z, Zhuang Q, Cai X, He Y, Huang Y, Jiang D, et al. Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2018;82:2387–400.
  17. 17. Huang H, Li M, Rizwan M, Dai Z, Yuan Y, Hossain MM, et al. Synergistic effect of silicon and selenium on the alleviation of cadmium toxicity in rice plants. J Hazard Mater. 2021;401:123393. pmid:32763692
  18. 18. Bader BR, Taban SK, Fahmi AH, Abood MA, Hamdi GJ. Potassium availability in soil amended with organic matter and phosphorous fertiliser under water stress during maize (Zea mays L) growth. J Saudi Soc Agri Sci. 2021;20(6):390–4.
  19. 19. Zhang B, Zhou M, Zhu B, Kemmann B, Pfülb L, Burkart S, et al. Threshold-like effect of soil NO3− concentrations on denitrification product N2O/(N2O+N2) ratio is mediated by soil pH. Soil Biol Biochem. 2023;187:109213.
  20. 20. Cheng Y, Liu Y, Wei H, Sun R, Tian Z, Zheng X. Quantitation of low concentrations of polysorbates 80 in protein formulations by Coomassie brilliant blue. Anal Biochem. 2019;573:67–72. pmid:30853377
  21. 21. Sharma S, Goyal R, Sadana US. Selenium accumulation and antioxidant status of rice plants grown on seleniferous soil from northwestern India. Rice Sci. 2014;21(6):327–34.
  22. 22. Xu J, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Wei X, Zhou Y. Effects of foliar selenium application on Se accumulation, elements uptake, nutrition quality, sensory quality and antioxidant response in summer-autumn tea. Food Res Int. 2024;175:113618. pmid:38128974
  23. 23. Di X, Qin X, Zhao L, Liang X, Xu Y, Sun Y, et al. Selenium distribution, translocation and speciation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) after foliar spraying selenite and selenate. Food Chem. 2023;400:134077. pmid:36084597
  24. 24. Mo Z, Cheng S, Ren Y, He L, Pan S, Liu H, et al. Reduced tillage coupled with straw return improves the grain yield and 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline content in fragrant rice. J Integr Agric. 2025;24(5):1718–37.
  25. 25. Niu H, Zhan K, Cheng X, Deng Y, Hou C, Zhao M, et al. Selenium foliar application contributes to decrease ratio of water-soluble fluoride and improve physio-biochemical components in tea leaves. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2023;266:115568. pmid:37832482
  26. 26. Liu X, Huang Z, Li Y, Xie W, Li W, Tang X, et al. Selenium-silicon (Se-Si) induced modulations in physio-biochemical responses, grain yield, quality, aroma formation and lodging in fragrant rice. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;196:110525. pmid:32224370
  27. 27. Moulick D, Santra SC, Ghosh D. Rice seed priming with Se : A novel approach to mitigate As induced adverse consequences on growth, yield and As load in brown rice. J Hazard Mater. 2018;355:187–96. pmid:29852460
  28. 28. Guo Z, Guo J, Yu H, Huang H, Ye D, Liu T, et al. OsWNK9 regulates cadmium concentration in brown rice by restraining cadmium transport from straw to brown rice. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2024;283:116810. pmid:39096692
  29. 29. Liu K, Chen F, Zhao Y, Gu Z, Yang H. Selenium accumulation in protein fractions during germination of Se-enriched brown rice and molecular weights distribution of Se-containing proteins. Food Chem. 2011;127(4):1526–31.
  30. 30. de Oliveira AP, Naozuka J, Landero-Figueroa JA. Effects of Se(IV) or Se(VI) enrichment on proteins and protein-bound Se distribution and Se bioaccessibility in oyster mushrooms. Food Chem. 2022;383:132582. pmid:35255370
  31. 31. Wu M, Cong X, Li M, Rao S, Liu Y, Guo J, et al. Effects of different exogenous selenium on Se accumulation, nutrition quality, elements uptake, and antioxidant response in the hyperaccumulation plant Cardamine violifolia. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2020;204:111045. pmid:32745785
  32. 32. Lavu RVS, Van De Wiele T, Pratti VL, Tack F, Du Laing G. Selenium bioaccessibility in stomach, small intestine and colon: Comparison between pure Se compounds, Se-enriched food crops and food supplements. Food Chem. 2016;197(Pt A):382–7. pmid:26616964
  33. 33. Hu J, Tao R, Xie X, Lu H, Shi X, Ye W. Basal application combined with topdressing and foliar application of silicon and selenium fertilizers reduces soil cadmium and lead bioavailability and their translocation to brown rice. Pedosphere. 2025;35(4):667–77.