Figures
Abstract
This study aimed to characterize the morpho-structural traits of indigenous goats reared at the Chobela Research Station located in Chobela neighbourhood, Magude District, southern Mozambique. A total of 137 goats were selected, comprising 77 Landim and 60 Pafúri animals. Qualitative (morphological) traits were assessed through visual inspection and summarized using frequencies and percentages, while quantitative (morphometric) traits were measured using a zoometric tape and analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 5% significance level. Due to low expected frequencies in some qualitative trait categories, inferential analysis (Chi-square test) was not performed, and these results are presented descriptively. In terms of morphological traits, all Pafúri goats exhibited a convex head profile, whereas Landim goats showed both convex (57.9%) and concave (42.1%) profiles. Approximately 75% of the goats presented a uniform coat colour pattern. Morphometric comparisons based on inferential analysis of female goats (n = 131) due to the limited number of males (n = 6), showed that Landim goats tended to have higher mean values for horn length (19.21 ± 0.83 cm), withers height (58.67 ± 1.20 cm), and body length (67.31 ± 1.73 cm), whereas Pafúri goats exhibited slightly larger head dimensions and thoracic perimeter. However, none of these differences were statistically significant (p > 0.05). Regarding zoometric indices, Landim goats tended to exhibit higher cephalic and thoracic indices, whereas Pafúri goats showed similar or slightly higher body, particularly among females. In contrast, Pafúri goats exhibited marginally higher proportionality indices, reflecting more elongated body proportions. Similarly, the small variations observed in zoometric indices did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). We hypothesized that, despite being reared under similar environmental conditions, Landim and Pafúri goat ecotypes would exhibit distinct morpho-structural characteristics due to differences in genetic background and adaptive history. These findings indicate that the morpho-structural differences between the two breeds are mainly descriptive rather than statistically supported. These results provide site-specific and preliminary baseline information for future genetic and phenotypic studies, thus may support conservation and sustainable utilization strategies for indigenous goat populations, particularly those reared under similar management and environmental conditions in southern Mozambique.
Citation: Culhe DT, Matola MF, Muatareque E, Morrombe MP, Manhique MA, Tseu RJ, et al. (2026) Phenotypic characterization of Landim and Pafúri goat populations in Southern Mozambique based on morpho-structural traits and zoometric indices. PLoS One 21(6): e0331271. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331271
Editor: Lamiaa Mostafa Radwan, Ain Shams University Faculty of Agriculture, EGYPT
Received: August 13, 2025; Accepted: May 26, 2026; Published: June 17, 2026
Copyright: © 2026 Culhe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Goats (Capra hircus) are among the earliest domesticated livestock species and have supported human livelihoods for over 10,000 years [1]. Their remarkable adaptability enables them to thrive across a wide range of agroecological zones, from arid deserts to tropical forests and highlands [2]. Globally, more than 1,000 recognized breeds contribute to diverse production systems, offering meat, milk, fiber, skins, and fulfilling socio-cultural roles [3,4].
In many developing countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, goats are a cornerstone of smallholder farming systems. They enhance food security, support income diversification, and serve critical functions in traditional ceremonies, dowries, and as a form of insurance against crop failure [5]. In Mozambique, the national goat population is estimated at approximately four million head, and has grown steadily over the past decade [6]. This increase is largely attributed to the species’ resilience to harsh climates, minimal input requirements, and their multiple functions in rural livelihoods [7,8]. Most goats are raised under extensive or semi-extensive systems characterized by low external inputs, high mobility, and limited selective breeding [9]. Despite their socio-economic and cultural importance, many of Mozambique’s indigenous goats remain poorly characterized and lack targeted conservation programs. Landim and Pafúri populations are classified as ecotypes, as they lack clearly defined breeding structures and uniform selection criteria. Both ecotypes are traditionally raised in the southern provinces and are valued for their adaptability and meat quality. However, unregulated crossbreeding and the absence of structured breeding schemes have raised concerns about potential genetic erosion and loss of local adaptation [10,11]. At present, the conservation status of these ecotypes is considered data-deficient, as no formal in situ or ex situ conservation initiatives are currently in place [12].
Earlier studies have provided preliminary insights into the genetic and morphological diversity of Mozambican goats. Garrine et al. [10] demonstrated genetic differentiation between the Landim and Pafúri populations using microsatellite markers, confirming distinct genetic signatures between ecotypes. Magaço and Felimone [13] applied principal component analysis (PCA) to body measurements of Mozambican local goats and identified key conformation axes that explained most of the observed phenotypic variability. Together, these studies indicate considerable within-population diversity and highlight the need for broader, integrated phenotypic and genomic assessments across regions [14,15].
In this context, morpho-structural traits refer to the qualitative physical features that define the animal’s overall body conformation, such as head profile, horn orientation, ear type, and coat pattern [16,17]. Morphometric traits, on the other hand, are the quantitative linear measurements of the body such as head length, body length, thoracic perimeter, and withers height that provide numerical indicators of size and proportions [8,18]. Meanwhile, breed-specific traits encompass distinctive morphological or genetic characteristics unique to each breed, which allow for breed identification and differentiation [18,19]. Together, these parameters provide complementary information for a robust phenotypic and functional characterization of indigenous goat breeds. Such efforts are fundamental to the development of sustainable breeding programs and the prevention of genetic erosion.
Landim goats have short-eared heads that are concave in females and slightly convex in males; horns curve backward in both sexes but are heavier in males [8,10]. All males and 12% of females carry beards [10,13]. Coats vary in colour (black, white, brown, or spotted), ears are erect, and the hair is short and fine [10,20]. Bucks sport a short, dense mane along the backline and reach about 45 kg at two years, while does average 35 kg [8,10,13,20]. Pafúri goats display a convex head profile with divergent, well-developed horns in males and smaller, scimitar-shaped horns in females [20]. Ears are medium-length, sometimes trimmed, with rounded tips. Both sexes have beards, a strong, well-set neck, straight back, and well-muscled limbs [13]. Adult males weigh roughly 60 kg and females about 43 kg [6,13,16,17]. This study aimed to characterize the morpho-structural traits of two indigenous goat ecotypes Landim and Pafúri reared at the Chobela Research Station in Magude District, southern Mozambique. We hypothesized that, despite sharing the same environment, Landim and Pafúri goats would display distinct morpho-structural profiles resulting from their different genetic backgrounds and adaptive historiesdes.
Materials and methods
(A) Landim female; (B) Landim male; (C) Pafúri female; (D) Pafúri male.
Ethical statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals for scientific purposes, and followed the ethical principles outlined in the Code of Ethics for Animal Experiments and the ARRIVE guidelines (https://arriveguidelines.org). The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Bioethics Committee for the Use of Experimental Animals at Eduardo Mondlane University, Mozambique (Approval Code: CBUAE-112-UEM-MZ, approval date: 20 March 2023).
Field site access and animal handling were authorized by the Directorate of Animal Science of the Agricultural Research Institute of Mozambique (IIAM), which manages the Chobela Research Station where the study was conducted. The work took place entirely within institutional research premises, and therefore, no additional government or private permits were required.
Study location and animal management
This study was conducted at the Chobela Research Station (CZC), located in Chobela neighborhood, Magude District, southern Mozambique. The district lies between latitudes 24°59′20″ S and longitudes 32°45′10″ E, and is bordered by the districts of Chókwè and Bilene to the north, Moamba to the south, Manhiça to the east, and the Republic of South Africa to the west [21]. The area supports both private and communal livestock systems, with the main species being cattle, goats, pigs, sheep, and poultry (primarily indigenous chickens). The climate is classified as dry subtropical (Köppen classification), with average annual temperatures ranging from 22 to 24°C and an average annual rainfall of approximately 630 mm. There are two distinct seasons: a hot and rainy season from October to March, which accounts for around 80% of the annual precipitation, and a cooler, dry season from April to September [21].
The goats were maintained under an extensive production system using natural pasture feeding. To minimize the effect of pregnancy on morphometric measurements, only non-pregnant adult does aged ≥ 2 years were included in the study to reduce the influence of growth-related variation on morphometric traits. However, precise chronological age data were not consistently available; therefore, age classes or age as a covariate could not be incorporated into the statistical analyses. The reproductive status of each female was assessed through visual inspection for abdominal enlargement, palpation, and verification of herd breeding records. Does with any indication of pregnancy were excluded. While very early pregnancies may not have been detected, such cases are expected to be rare and unlikely to influence the overall characterization. For the study, a total of 137 breeding goats were selected, comprising two indigenous ecotypes, Landim (n = 77) and (n = 60). The sampling followed a census approach, whereby all available adult animals meeting the inclusion criteria were evaluated, rather than random sampling. The photographs of the Landim and Pafúri are shown in Fig 1.
This study was conducted using the full populations of Landim and Pafúri goats maintained at the Chobela Research Station for more than 50 years. This station represents a nucleus herd for these two indigenous ecotypes. Thus, all available adult animals that met the inclusion criteria (n = 137; 131 females and 6 males) were evaluated. The sampling framework was therefore determined by the herd composition at the station rather than by proportional national herd size. Although the FAO [2,14] guidelines recommend multi-herd sampling and a minimum of 100 females and 50 males per breed population for phenotypic characterization, this study aimed to provide a controlled comparative assessment under uniform management and environmental conditions. Accordingly, results should be interpreted as a site-specific baseline for these ecotypes.
Data collection
Data collection included the recording of morphological characteristics (qualitative) and linear/ morphometric body measurements (quantitative traits) of Landin and Pafúri goats according to FAO [14].
Qualitative traits
Qualitative (morphological) traits were recorded through direct visual inspection according to guidelines for phenotypic characterization [14]. The traits assessed included head characteristics (head size and shape, and profile), beard presence or absence, horn characteristics (presence, size, orientation, and shape), ear characteristics (size, shape, and position), dorsal line presence, limb type (muscular, intermediate, or fine), coat characteristics (hair length and coat colour pattern), and overall body conformation classified as light, intermediate, or heavy.
Quantitative traits
Quantitative traits (morphometric measurements) were obtained through a linear body measurement using a standard zoometric measuring tape. These measurements included head length, head width, ear length, horn length, withers height, thoracic perimeter, and body length, following proper physical restraint of each animal to ensure both data accuracy and animal and handler safety. Restraint was carried out gently, typically with the aid of halters or hand-held by trained personnel, to minimize movement and stress during measurement. This procedure aligns with the guidelines recommended for the phenotypic characterization of animal genetic resources following the FAO guidelines [2,14]. Specifically, head length was measured from the occipital crest to the tip of the muzzle; head width as the maximum distance between the zygomatic arches; ear length from the base to the tip of the pinna; horn length from the base at the skull to the tip along the outer curvature; withers height from the highest point of the withers to the ground; thoracic perimeter as the circumference of the chest just behind the forelegs; and body length from the scapulo-humeral joint (point of shoulder) to the ischial tuberosity (pin bone). Zoometric indices were calculated using standard formulas to evaluate somatic development and infer functional conformation (Table 1). The following indices were computed as described by FAO [11,22]– 24].
These indices were used to classify the animals according to their body conformation brevilinear, mesolinear, or longilinear and to infer their potential for meat production, particularly regarding compactness, proportionality, and skeletal development.
Statistical analysis
Morphological traits were summarized using frequencies and percentages and due to low expected frequencies in several categories, they were presented descriptively. The effects of ecotypes and sex, as well as their interaction, were initially assessed using a two-way analysis of variance ANOVA. The following model was applied:
where:
- y = observed trait
- μ = overall mean
- Breed = fixed effect of ecotype
- Sex = fixed effect of sex
- Breed × Sex = interaction effect
- e = residual error
The interaction effect of ecotypes and sex was not significant (p > 0.05) for any morphometric trait, thus the final analysis was restricted to the main effect of breed using data from females only, due to the small number of males in the dataset. Tukey’s post hoc test was used for mean comparisons. Assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity were verified using the Shapiro-Wilk and Levene’s tests, respectively. All statistics analysis were performed in RStudio version 2023.06.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) with functions including aov() (base), shapiro.test() (base), and levene Test() from the car package. Statistical significance was set at p ≤ 0.05.
Results
Qualitative characteristics
The distribution of coat colours variant and pattern among the two goat populations is summarized in Table 2. Three coat colour variants, black, brown (light to dark), and white, were observed in both Landim and Pafúri goat populations, with brown being the most frequent variant overall. The distribution of coat colour variants was similar between ecotypes.
The qualitative morphological characteristics of the two breeds are presented in Table 3. Landim goats exhibited two distinct head profiles convex (57.9%) and concave (42.1%) whereas all Pafúri goats displayed a convex profile. Ear orientation differed completely between breeds: Landim goats had erect ears, while Pafúri goats had pendulous ears. All goats were horned, but horn shape and orientation varied, where 36.8% of Landim goats had horns curved backward, compared to 82.4% of Pafúri goats with laterally oriented, spiral-shaped horns. Beard presence was more frequent in Pafúri (36.7%) than in Landim goats (24%). Coat type was predominantly short in both breeds, 70% in Landim, and 60% in Pafúri.
Quantitative characteristics
The mean values for linear body measurements are shown in Table 4. No statistically significant differences were detected between breeds (p > 0.05). However, Landim females tended to have slightly higher mean values for horn length (19.21 ± 0.83 cm), withers height (58.67 ± 1.20 cm), and body length (67.31 ± 1.73 cm), whereas Pafúri females exhibited marginally larger head dimensions (head length 17.43 ± 0.75 cm; head width 11.17 ± 0.59 cm) and thoracic perimeter (67.20 ± 2.27 cm).
The calculated zoometric indices are presented in Table 5. None of the indices differed significantly between breeds (p > 0.05). Landim goats showed slightly higher mean values for body index (99.45 ± 3.16), cephalic index (64.10 ± 4.09), and thoracic index (114.10 ± 4.72). Conversely, Pafúri goats exhibited marginally higher proportionality and anamorphosis indices (87.22 ± 8.33 and 78.28 ± 5.56, respectively). Based on standard classification criteria, Landim goats were characterized as mesolinear, while Pafúri goats were brevilinear in conformation.
Discussion
This study was based on the assumption that, although the Landim and Pafúri goat breeds were raised under similar environmental and management conditions, they would show morpho-structural differences due to their distinct genetic backgrounds and adaptive histories [10]. However, the results revealed a high degree of similarity between the two ecotypes, particularly in morphometric traits, for which no statistically significant differences were observed. Overall, the morphometric and zoometric analyses revealed no statistically significant differences between Landim and Pafúri goats and should be interpreted as descriptive trends rather than evidence of phenotypic differentiation.
Despite this overall similarity in morphometric traits, certain qualitative morphological characteristics suggest some degree of differentiation between breeds. For example, all Pafúri goats displayed a convex head profile, whereas Landim goats showed greater qualitative variation in head profile, horn orientation and shape. Despite that these qualitative differences are subtle, they may reflect breed-specific phenotypic adaptive features shaped by management and crossbreeding histories [15,19].
The non-observed morphometric divergence between the Landim and Pafúri populations possibly indicates substantial phenotypic overlap. This may be linked to widespread uncontrolled mating and the lack of structured breeding programs. These findings emphasize the limitations of relying solely on phenotypic characterization to distinguish local breeds, especially in low-input systems with little reproductive control.
The phenotypic variation observed in Landim and Pafúri goats reflects the richness and complexity of indigenous goat populations in Mozambique. The wide range of horn orientations and diverse coat patterns among Landim goats indicates substantial intra-breed variability. The phenotypic variation observed in Landim and Pafúri goat ecotypes likely reflects a combination of historical and ongoing gene flow between populations, as well as shared ancestry prior to the establishment of the nucleus herds. These processes are consistent with production systems commonly found in sub-Saharan Africa, where communal grazing and limited control over mating facilitate continuous genetic exchange among populations. As a result, weak phenotypic differentiation and overlapping breed boundaries are frequently observed in indigenous goat populations under such management conditions [2,23]. Additionally, the long-term maintenance of genetically heterogeneous breeding stocks at the research station may have further contributed to the observed phenotypic overlap [26,27].
The uniform convex head profile and predominance of spiral-shaped horns in Pafúri goats are consistent with their lineage as crossbreeds between Boer bucks and indigenous does [20]. However, the limited phenotypic differentiation between the two breeds observed in this study may indicate ongoing gene flow and the absence of structured selection programs which is a concern also noted in phenotypic assessments of indigenous goats across Eastern and Southern Africa [15].
The lack of statistically significant differences in linear body measurements between the breeds suggests a high degree of morphological overlap. Even so, trends such as greater horn length and withers height in Landim goats, and broader heads and larger thoracic perimeters in Pafúri goats, may reflect adaptive responses to ecological niches and local selection pressures [3,25]. Morphological traits in goats are known to be influenced by environmental and climatic factors, which shape phenotypic variation through both natural and human-driven selection. Variation in body size and conformation, including withers height and thoracic development, has been associated with adaptation to different agroecological zones, where larger body dimensions may enhance mobility, foraging efficiency, and thermoregulation under specific environmental conditions. Similarly, structural conformation traits such as body depth, girth, and trunk dimensions have been shown to vary across locations and are considered indicators of environmental adaptation and production potential in indigenous goat populations [28]. Horn characteristics, including size and shape, may also reflect adaptive and functional roles related to thermoregulation, social behavior, and defense, which are influenced by ecological pressures and management systems. More broadly, phenotypic traits in goats are shaped by climate-driven selection processes, where environmental factors such as temperature, feed availability, and terrain contribute to observable differences in morphology across populations [29]. Therefore, although the differences observed in this study were not statistically significant, the directional trends in certain morphometric traits may still reflect underlying adaptive responses to local environmental conditions and historical selection pressures.
This morphometric stability in adult animals is expected, as body measurements tend to stabilize after maturity. It reflects the combined influence of genetic potential and environmental adaptation [10,22]. Nonetheless, differences in certain traits may hold adaptive or functional value within local production systems and should be considered in community-based selection programs [4,26].
Zoometric indices provide useful insights into animal conformation and production potential. In this study, Landim goats exhibited higher body, cephalic, and thoracic index values, while Pafúri goats showed slightly higher proportionality index values. These findings support the classification of Landim goats as mesolinear and Pafúri goats as brevilinear, corresponding to moderate and compact body frames, respectively, which are both suitable for meat production [24].
Although zoometric indices are valuable for comparative analysis, the high morphological similarity between the two breeds suggests that morphometric data alone are insufficient for reliable breed differentiation. Recent studies highlight the importance of integrating morphometric, genomic, and environmental data to achieve comprehensive characterization and sustainable management of indigenous livestock breeds [18].
Uncontrolled mating systems remain a major constraint for breed conservation in low-input livestock systems like in Chobela Research Station. In such contexts, the absence of mating control and structured breeding programs accelerates genetic erosion and threatens the long-term viability of local genetic resources [27]. These observations are consistent with our findings, where both ecotypes showed overlapping morphometric values despite minor qualitative differences.
Limitations and future perspectives
This study provides baseline phenotypic information for Landim and Pafúri goats maintained at the Chobela Research Station; however, several limitations are acknowledged. The limited number of males restricted sex-based analyses, and the absence of precise age records precluded age-adjusted statistical modelling. Additionally, the relatively small sample size limited inferential analysis of qualitative traits. Future studies should incorporate larger and sex-balanced data, and detailed age recording, as well as employ genomic approaches to better elucidate the genetic basis of phenotypic variation and population structure in Landim and Pafúri goat populations.
Conclusion
This study provides baseline phenotypic characterization of Landim and Pafúri goats maintained under uniform environmental and management conditions, although reproduction within the herd occurs under uncontrolled mating without structured breeding programs. The analysis revealed a high degree of phenotypic overlap between the two populations, with most morphometric and zoometric traits showing no statistically significant differences. Although minor descriptive variations were observed, these were not sufficient to support clear phenotypic differentiation between breeds. The findings highlight the influence of shared management, environmental conditions, and historical gene flow on shaping observable morphology and underscore the importance of cautious interpretation of phenotypic variation in the absence of strong statistical support.
Supporting information
S1 File. Dataset used for the phenotypic characterization of Landim and Pafúri goat populations in southern Mozambique.
The file contains the raw data used for the analysis of qualitative morphological traits, morphometric measurements, and calculated zoometric indices of the goats included in the study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331271.s001
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful for the support provided by the Agricultural Research Institute of Mozambique (IIAM-CZS) and all staff involved.
References
- 1. Zeder MA. Domestication as a model system for the extended evolutionary synthesis. Interface Focus. 2017;7(5):20160133. pmid:28839915
- 2.
FAO. Phenotypic characterization of animal genetic resources. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2021.
- 3. Galal S, Rischkowsky B, Haile A. Indigenous animal genetic resources and their contribution to sustainable livestock systems in the developing world. Small Ruminant Research. 2020;189:106234.
- 4. Haile A, Wurzinger M, Gizaw S. Community-based breeding programs for small ruminants in Africa: Achievements, challenges and lessons learned. Animal Frontiers. 2019;9(4):39–45.
- 5. Peacock C. Goats—A pathway out of poverty. Small Ruminant Research. 2005;60(1–2):179–86.
- 6.
Boogaard BK, Moyo S. The multi-functionality of goats in rural Mozambique: Contributions to food security and household risk mitigation. Nairobi: CGIAR. 2015.
- 7.
FAO. World Food and Agriculture Statistical Yearbook 2023. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2023.
- 8. Mataveia GA, Pondja C, Hassen A, Visser C. Morphometric and genetic characterization of indigenous goats of Mozambique. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics. 2018;119(2):31–41.
- 9.
FAO. FAOSTAT Statistical Database. http://www.fao.org/faostat 2023.
- 10. Garrine CMLP, Kotze A, Els H, Grobler JP. Genetic characterization of the indigenous Landim and Pafuri goat breeds from Mozambique. African Journal of Agricultural Research. 2010;5(22):3130–7.
- 11.
FAO. The Second Report on the State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Rome: FAO. 2015.
- 12.
Cavele A. Genetic diversity and conservation perspectives of the Landim Mozambican goat. 2023.
- 13. Magaço FS, Felimone DET. Body conformation of Mozambican local goats explained by principal components analysis. Revista Científica Produção Animal. 2020;22(2):91–5.
- 14.
FAO. Phenotypic characterization of animal genetic resources. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2012.
- 15. Gizaw S, van Arendonk JAM, Haile A. Why phenotype still matters in the genomic era: Insights from developing countries. Animal Genetics. 2020;51(5):636–43.
- 16. Salako AE. Application of Morphological Indices in the Assessment of Type and Function in Sheep. Int J Morphol. 2006;24(1).
- 17. Yakubu A, Salako A, Imumorin I, Ige A, Akinyemi M. Discriminant analysis of morphometric differentiation in the West African Dwarf and Red Sokoto goats. SA J An Sci. 2011;40(4).
- 18. Getaneh M, Zeleke M, Haile A. Morphological and structural indices of indigenous goats in Ethiopia: implications for breed characterization and selection. Heliyon. 2022;8(12):e12244.
- 19. Leroy G, Mészáros G, Boettcher P, Tixier-Boichard M, Besbes B. Integrated approaches to the characterization of animal genetic resources in the era of genomics. Genetics Selection Evolution. 2022;54:65.
- 20.
Cumbula D, Taela M. Morphometric characterization of indigenous goats of Mozambique. In: IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020. 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/482/1/012045
- 21. Maciel SMA, Amimo J, Martins M, Mwai AO, Scholtz MM, Neser FWC. Factors influencing reproductive performance of cows from different Nguni ecotypes in southern Mozambique. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2012;44(3):435–44. pmid:21773680
- 22. Pires LC, Eler JP, Ferraz JBS. Morphological traits and zoometric indices of Morada Nova sheep. Revista Brasileira de Saúde e Produção Animal. 2011;12(4):1012–23.
- 23. Parés-Casanova PM, Caballero M, Perezgrovas R. Comparison of non-linear models for describing growth curves according to sex in ovine Chiapas breed. Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú. 2015;26:389–94.
- 24. Rojas-Espinoza R, Macedo R, Suaña A, Delgado A, Manrique YP, Rodríguez H, et al. Phenotypic Characterization of Creole Cattle in the Andean Highlands Using Bio-Morphometric Measures and Zoometric Indices. Animals (Basel). 2023;13(11):1843. pmid:37417307
- 25. Tadesse M, Tsega W, Kidanie D, Mohamed A. Market chain analysis of live goats: The case of Korahe Zone, Somali Regional State, Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Science & Food Research. 2022;13:497.
- 26. Kosgey IS, Baker RL, Udo HMJ, Van Arendonk JAM. Successes and failures of small ruminant breeding programmes in the tropics: a review. Small Ruminant Research. 2006;61(1):13–28.
- 27. Gicheha MG, Mwai O, Getachew T, Haile A. Sustainable use and management of animal genetic resources in Africa: Progress, challenges and future directions. Frontiers in Genetics. 2023;14:1163922.
- 28. Mathapo MC, Mugwabana JT, Tyasi TL. Phenotypic characterization of Nguni goats in four agro-ecological zones of Limpopo province, South Africa. PLoS One. 2024;19(12):e0314408. pmid:39630780
- 29. Jesuyon OM, Olawumi SO. 207 Structural conformation among spatially distributed West African dwarf goats as measures of adaptation to different environments. Journal of Animal Science. 2019;97(Supplement_3):39–39.