Figures
Abstract
Effective infection control requires identifying and eliminating carbapenemase-producing (CP) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in high-risk groups like intensive care unit (ICU) patients and from contaminated environmental surfaces. This study aimed to describe the diversity of carbapenemase-encoding genes among critical GNB isolates from ICU patients with infection and/or gastrointestinal (GI) colonization, as well as from ICU environmental surfaces in the Amhara National Regional state, Ethiopia.A total of 169 carbapenem-resistant isolates were identified, including 26 from infections, 82 from GI colonization, and 61 from environmental samples. These comprised Klebsiellapneumoniae (n = 107), Escherichia coli (n = 16), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 9), and Acinetobacter species (n = 37), of which 147 were analyzed.Singleplex and multiplex PCR were performed to detect predominant carbapenemase-encoding genes, including KPC (blaKPC), MBLs (blaIMP, blaVIM, and blaNDM), and OXA (blaOXA-48, blaOXA-23, and blaOXA-58). PCR analysis revealed that at least one carbapenemase-encoding gene was detected in 133 (78.7%) of the 169 carbapenem-resistant isolates from patients and environmental surfaces. They were detected in 22/133(16.5%), 70/133(52.6%), and 41/133(30.8%) isolates obtained from infection, GI colonization, and environmental samples, respectively. The most prevalent carbapenemase-encoding gene, blaNDM, was found in 101 (75.9%) of the 133 CP isolates. Other detected carbapenemase-encoding genes included blaOXA-23 in 5 (3.8%) isolates, blaVIM in 4 (3.0%), blaOXA-48 in 1 (0.8%), and blaOXA-58 in 1 (0.8%). K. pneumoniae and Acinetobacter spp. harbored all the gene types detected in this study. Co-harboring of two or more carbapenemase-encoding genes, in combination with blaNDM, was observed in 21 of 133 (15.8%) isolates, including 7 K. pneumoniae and 14 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. However, blaKPC and blaIMP were not identified in any of the tested isolates. This study highlights the presence of carbapenemase-encoding genes among critical GNB across all sample source types in the study area. Moreover, the detection of isolates harboring multiple carbapenemase-encoding genes underscores the need for enhanced infection control measures in ICU settings.
Citation: Kindu M, Moges F, Alemu A, Hailu D, Joseph R, Besufikad E, et al. (2025) Carbapenemase-encoding genes in critical gram-negative bacteria isolated from ICU patients with infections and/or gastrointestinal carriage, and environmental samples in the amhara National Regional state, Ethiopia. PLoS One 20(9): e0330613. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330613
Editor: Dhammika Leshan Wannigama, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine: Yamagata Daigaku Igakubu Daigakuin Igakukei Kenkyuka, JAPAN
Received: May 13, 2025; Accepted: August 5, 2025; Published: September 4, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Kindu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supporting information files.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Carbapenems have become the last resort antibiotics for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram negative bacterial (GNB) infections, particularly in hospital settings [1]. However, the emergence of carbapenem resistant bacteria is threatening the effectiveness of these antibiotics. Carbapenemase enzymes are the most common resistance mechanism to carbapenem worldwide [2]. Initially, carbapenemases were chromosomally mediated in a few specific species, but now they are mediated by a plasmid, or both a chromosomal and a plasmid. This results in a more violent spread of resistance due to clonal expansion and horizontal gene transfer between different bacterial species and genera [3,4]. Carbapenem resistance has been labeled in Enterobacterales, mostly in Klebsiella pneumoniae compared to Escherichia coli or other Enterobacterial species, and in non-fermentativeGram-negative bacilli such as Acinetobacterbaumanniiand Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Moreover, World Health Organization (WHO) listed these carbapenem-resistant GNB isolates as pathogens of critical importance [5].
Carbapenemases can be classified into various categories according to the Ambler classification scheme as A, B, and D. Globally, the most common carbapenemases consist of K.pneumoniaecarbapenemases (KPC) are clinically the most common enzymes among the class A carbapenemases. New Delhi metallo-β-lactamases (NDM), Verona integronencodedmetallo-β-lactamases (VIM), and imipenemase (IMP) types belong to class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), whereas oxacillinases, including OXA-23, OXA-24, OXA-58, and OXA-48, are part of the class D enzymes [2]. A few studies conducted in Ethiopia have provided evidence of infections caused by carbapenemase-producing (CP) GNB and have reported NDM carbapenemase being the most commonly identified enzyme [6,7].
For effective infection control, it is crucial to identify and eliminate carbapenemase-producing critical GNB among high-risk groups, such as intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and contaminated environmental sources [8]. Additionally, gastrointestinal(GI) colonized patients serve as reservoirs for CP pathogens, facilitating their dissemination [9]. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the diversity of genes encoding carbapenemase enzymes among critical GNB isolates from ICU patients with GI colonization and/or infection, as well as from ICU environmental samples in the AmharaNational Regional state, Ethiopia.
Materials and methods
Study area, patients, and specimen collection
Samples were obtained from patients and environmental surfaces in the ICUs of the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (UoGCSH) and FelegeHiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (FHCSH), located in the AmharaNational Regional state, North-West Ethiopia, the 1st of June 2021 to the 30th, December 2022.During the study period, non-duplicated clinical samples were collected from each of the 600 study participants based on clinical suspicion of infection. These included blood, urine, pus/wound swabs, and other specimens. In addition to the clinical samples, rectal swabs were collected from these study participants to identify GI colonization with CP critical GNB. Simultaneously, 384 environmental swab samples were collected from ICUs during the same period [10].
Critical GNB isolates with reduced susceptibility to carbapenem
Bacterial identification using various biochemical tests, antibiotic susceptibility testing by disk diffusion technique, and phenotypic detection of carbapenemase enzymes were performed as described in our previously published work by Mizan et al. [10]. A total of 169 carbapenem-resistant isolates were identified, including 26 from infections, 82 from gastrointestinal colonization, and 61 from environmental samples. These comprised K. pneumoniae (n = 107), E. coli (n = 16), P. aeruginosa (n = 9), and Acinetobacter spp. (n = 37) (S1 Table).
From carbapenem-resistant critical GNB isolates, rectal and environmental isolates that tested phenotypically positive for carbapenemase production using the mCIM test were subjected to carbapenemase-encoding gene detection in the case of K. pneumoniae, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa. However, for clinical samples and Acinetobacter spp., all carbapenem-resistant isolates identified by the disk diffusion test were included for carbapenemase-encoding gene detection using conventional PCR [11].Therefore, total of 147 these isolates were stored at –20 °C, and transported to the Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI) for PCR analysis.
DNA extraction
DNA was extracted from carbapenem-resistant critical GNB isolates using the boiling method, as previously described [12]. Briefly, each isolate was grown overnight on nutrient agar (Oxoid, UK), and 3 to 5 colonies were suspended in 300 µL of 1 × Tris-EDTA buffer. The suspension was subjected to boiling at 94°C for 10 minutes in a water bath (Thermo Fisher Scientific, CA, USA), followed by freezing at −20°C for 10 minutes, incubation at room temperature for 1 minute, and centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 5 minutes. Finally, 150 µL of the supernatant was transferred into a nuclease-free Eppendorf tube and assessed using a Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific, USA) to measure the quality and quantity of the extracted DNA. The samples were then stored at −20°C until further analysis.
PCR-based detection of carbapenemase genes
K. pneumoniae, E. coli, P.aerugniosa and Acinetobacter spp.isolates resistant to carbapenems were analyzed for the presence of carbapenemase-encoding genes using PCR-based methods. Singleplex and multiplex PCR were performed to detect the most common carbapenemase-encoding genes, including KPC (blaKPC), MBLs (blaIMP, blaVIM, and blaNDM), and OXA (blaOXA-48, blaOXA-23, and blaOXA-58), using a panel of primers as previously described [11].The sets of specific primers used for the detection of carbapenemase genes are shown in supplementary table (S2 Table).
For both singleplex and multiplex PCR, the reaction conditions were optimized by testing a range of annealing temperatures to determine the optimal annealing conditions for all primers. PCR was performed in a total volume of 25 µL, consisting of 12.5 µL (final concentration 1×) of HotStarTaq Master Mix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 5 µL of genomic DNA, 0.4 µM of each primer, and 5.5 µL of nuclease-free water.
PCR amplification of carbapenemase-encoding genes was carried out under the following cycling conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 seconds, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 57°C for 1 minute, and extension at 72°C for 1 minute, with a final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes. The PCR amplicons were analyzed by 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis stained with ethidium bromide. The presence or absence of carbapenemase genes was determined using a UV transilluminator (GelDoc, Bio-Rad), and PCR product bands were compared against a 100 bp DNA ladder.
Quality control
For the optimization of the multiplex PCR, known control strains were used as positive controls. DNA samples from K. pneumoniae ATCC 1706 served as a negative control for blaKPC, blaNDM, blaOXA-48, and blaVIM. K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-1705, K. pneumoniae ATCC BAA-2146, P. aeruginosa AR Bank #00546, and K. pneumoniae AR Bank #0039 were used as positive controls for blaKPC, blaNDM, blaVIM, and blaOXA-48, respectively, all in conjunction with carbapenemase detection. Before multiplexing the primers for carbapenemase-encoding genes, each primer was tested individually using a singleplex PCR reaction. The DNA samples for both negative and positive controls were obtained from the Ethiopian Public Health Institute
Ethical approval and consent/assent to participate
Ethical approval was obtained from the institutional review board of the University of Gondar with reference number O/VIP/RCS/05/1773/2019. Informed written consent was obtained from each study participant with the help of caregivers. Briefly, since most of the study participants were neonates, assent was taken from their parents or guardians. Moreover, consent was obtained from the caregiver for critically ill or unconscious individuals whose age was 18 years and above.
Results
A total of 169 carbapenem resistance isolates of critical GNB were recovered phenotypically. CP critical GNB isolates carrying carbapenemase-encoding genes were identified across all sample source, obtained from ICU patients with an infection and/or GI colonization, as well as from environmental surfaces (Table 1). Carbapenemase-encoding genes were detected in 133 (78.7%) of the 169 carbapenem resistance isolates. Among CP critical GNB, the majority were K. pneumoniae 87 (65.4%), followed by Acinetobacterspp. 31 (23.3%), E. coli 12 (9%) and P. aeruginosa 3 (2.3%).
Characteristics of PCR confirmed carbapenemase positive ICU patients
Critical GNB carrying carbapenemase-encoding genes were detected among ICU patients with prevalence of an infection and GI colonization rate of 3.7% (22/600) and 11.3% (68/600), respectively. Five patients had both an infection and GI colonization, while two other patients had GI colonization with mixed species of CP critical GNB.Majority of the patients were from the neonatal ICU (NICU) (n = 62) (Table 2).
Distribution of carbapenemase encoding genes detected among critical Gram negative bacteria
The most prevalent carbapenemase-encoding gene detected was blaNDM, 101/133 (75.9%) followed by blaOXA-23 gene, 5/133 (3.8%); blaVIM 4/133 (3.0%); blaOXA48 1/133(0.8%) and blaOXA-58 gene 1/133(0.8%) isolates. Co-harboring of two or more types of carbapenemase-encoding genes with blaNDM genes were observed in 21/133(15.8%) isolates. blaNDM + blaOXA-23 were detected in 9 isolates; blaNDM + blaVIM in 5 isolates; blaNDM + blaOXA-58 in 4 isolates; blaNDM + blaOXA-48 in 1 isolate; blaNDM + blaOXA-23 + blaVIM in 1 isolate and blaNDM + blaOXA-23 + blaOXA-48 in 1 isolate. However, blaKPC, and blaIMP genes were not detected (S1 Fig).
The blaNDM gene was identified across all species, including 87 K. pneumoniae, 22 Acinetobacterspp., 11 E. coli, and 2 P. aeruginosa. The blaOXA-23 gene was found in 5 Acinetobacterspp., while blaVIM was detected in 3 Acinetobacterspp. and 1 P. aeruginosa. The blaOXA-58 gene was identified in 1 Acinetobacterspp., and the blaOXA-48 gene was identified in 1 E. coli isolate. Co-harboring of two or more carbapenemase-encoding genes, in combination with blaNDM, was observed in 7 K. pneumoniae and 14 Acinetobacterspp. (Fig 1).
Distribution of critical GNB carrying carbapenemase-encoding genes in different ICU environmental surfaces
Critical GNB carrying carbapenemase-encoding genes were detected on various ICU environmental surfaces, with K. pneumoniae and Acinetobacter spp. being the most frequently isolated species. K. pneumoniae carrying blaNDM carbapenemase was primarily detected on baby incubators (n = 7), baby bed sets (n = 5), and over-bed tables (n = 3). Acinetobacter spp. exhibited a wider range of carbapenemase-encoding genes, including blaNDM, blaVIM, blaOXA-23, and blaOXA-58, with notable contamination on baby bed sets, bed rail surfaces, mattress,and over-bed tables. P. aeruginosa carrying blaNDM was found on over-bed table (n = 1) and sink (n = 1), while E. coli carrying blaNDM was detected on the sink (n = 1) and mattress (n = 1) (Table 3).
Distribution of carbapenemase encoding genes detected among different sample sources
Carbapenemase-encoding genes were distributed across infection, GI colonization, and environmental samples. Among K. pneumoniae isolates, blaNDM (n = 80) was detected in infection, GI colonization, and environmental samples. Co-harbored gene, blaNDM + blaOXA-58 (n = 2) was found in both GI colonization and environmental sources while blaNDM + blaOXA-23 (n = 5) was only detected in GI colonization. In Acinetobacter spp., blaNDM (n = 8) were present across all sample types, whereas blaOXA-23 (n = 5) was detected from GI colonization and environmental samples. Additionally, combinations genes such as blaNDM + blaVIM (n = 5) and blaNDM + blaOXA-23 (n = 4), were identified both in infection and environmental samples. For E. coli, blaNDM (n = 11) was detected in GI colonization and environmental, while blaOXA-48 (n = 1) was limited to GI colonization. Among P. aeruginosa, blaNDM (n = 2) was found in environmental samples, and blaVIM (n = 1) was identified in an infection (Table 4).
Discussion
This study detected carbapenemase-encoding genes in CP critical GNB isolated from ICU environmental surface contamination, GI colonization, and infections in ICU patients, using environmental swab, rectal swab, and clinical samples, respectively. Among the CP critical GNB that carried carbapenemase-encoding genes confirmed by PCR, the most common isolates was K.pneumoniae followed by Acinetobacterspp., E. coli and P. aeruginosa. This finding is in line with reports from China that K. pneumoniae, E. coli, A.baumannii, and P. aeruginosa were the predominant isolates CP-GNB [13]. Although the frequency varied, CP critical GNB carrying carbapenemase-encoding genes, particularly K. pneumoniae and Acinetobacter spp., were detected across all sample sources, including clinical, rectal, and environmental samples. The presence of CP critical GNB carrying carbapenemase-encoding genes in all sources sample types may indicate the circulation of these isolates between the environment and patients. Further advanced studies focusing on the transmission dynamics of CP critical GNB isolates are needed to clarify these transmission pathways and inform targeted infection control strategies.
This study showed that the prevalence of carbapenemase-encoding genes among carbapenem-resistant critical GNB was 78.7%. This is comparable to a previous study conducted in Ethiopia, which reported a prevalence of 69% [14], and a study from Sudan, where the prevalence was 58.75% [15]. However, it is higher than another study conducted in Ethiopia by Seman et al., which reported a prevalence of 44.5% [6]. The variation in prevalence rates may be due to differences in the number of carbapenemase-encoding genes targeted for detection, variations in the mechanisms of carbapenem resistance, and the types of GNB included in studies.
Among carbapenemase-encoding genes, the blaNDM gene was predominant (75.9%) in CP critical GNB isolates. blaNDM was first reported in India, and since its initial detection, blaNDM carrying organisms have disseminated globally [16]. In Ethiopia, the first report of blaNDM presence was in three A. baumannii isolates [17]; however, subsequent studies have identified its occurrence in Enterobacteriaceae [7] and P. aeruginosa [14,18]. In this study, the blaNDM gene was found across all CP critical GNB species, including K. pneumoniae, E. coli, Acinetobacter spp., and P. aeruginosa, indicating its ease of circulation within and between bacterial species. This may also explain blaNDM genes are encoded on highly mobile, conjugative plasmids which ease horizontal inter and intra-species transfer between bacteria [19,20]. Our results are consistent with previous studies conducted in Ethiopia [7,14] and other countries, which also reported the dominance of blaNDM genes among GNB isolates [16]. The occurrence of NDM producing GNB in Ethiopia may be explained by several factors, including frequent travel between Ethiopia and NDM-endemic countries, due to weak infection prevention and control practices in healthcare settings, clonal expansion of NDM producing isolates, and/or the efficient spread of conjugative plasmids carrying the blaNDM gene [19,20].
Interestingly, this study identified isolates co-harboring multiple carbapenemase-encoding genes, including blaNDM in combination with blaOXA-23, blaOXA-48, blaOXA-58, and blaVIM. Similar findings have been reported in other countries, where isolates carrying multiple carbapenemase-encoding genes have been detected [13,15,21,22]. K. pneumoniae and Acinetobacterspp. showed two or more carbapenemase-encoding genes as it was reported previously in other reports that, K. pneumoniae and Acinetobacter spp. have co-existence of multiple carbapenemase-encoding genes [14]. This co-existence of carbapenemase-encoding genes poses a significant therapeutic challenge due to limited treatment options and the potential for horizontal gene transfer, facilitating global dissemination.
The low prevalence of blaVIM, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-58 and blaOXA-48 carbapenemase-encoding genes among critical GNB was reported in this study. In contrast to global reports of a high prevalence of blaKPC genes, we have not detected blaKPC and blaIMP genes among the tested isolates.This was in line with the previous studies done at Addis Ababa hospitals [6,23] and reports from Sudan [15]. Despite the first occurrence of a KPC producer dated from 1996 in the United States, nowadays, Mediterranean countries, especially Italy, Greece and Israel, are endemic for the blaKPC gene [24]. The movement of people between Ethiopia and endemic countries, due to medical visitation, trade, employment, and unrestricted cross-border travel, may contribute to the dissemination of various carbapenemase variants within the country. Additionally, variations in the types and prevalence of carbapenemase-encoding genes among CP-GNB in different studies may be influenced by factors such as geographic region, study population, and the genetic structure of isolates [24,25].
The detection of CP K.pneumoniae, Acinetobacter spp., E. coli, and P. aeruginosa on various ICU environmental surfaces underscores the significant role of the hospital environment in harboring and potentially transmitting antimicrobial-resistant pathogens. Notably, NDM-type carbapenemases were predominantly identified, particularly in K.pneumoniae and Acinetobacterspp.. This finding aligns with previous research indicating the widespread presence of NDM variants in healthcare settings [26].The co-existence of multiple carbapenemase encoding genes, such as blaNDM and blaOXA-23 genes, within Acinetobacter spp. suggests a high potential for horizontal gene transfer, thereby increasing the risk of MDR outbreaks [27]. The contamination of high-contact surfaces, including baby incubators, bed rails, and sinks, further emphasizes the need for stringent infection control measures, as these areas may serve as reservoirs for CP critical GNB [26]. Moreover, these findings highlight the critical importance of routine environmental screening and the implementation of targeted disinfection strategies to mitigate the spread of resistant pathogens within ICU healthcare settings.
The frequency of CP critical GNB isolates with different carbapenemase-encoding genes across sample sources was varied. K. pneumoniae was found in both GI colonization and environmental samples, with a higher presence in GI colonization. This indicates that asymptomatic carriers and contaminated surfaces may serve as reservoirs, contributing to the spread and eventually increase in infection cases [9,28]. In contrast, Acinetobacter spp. was more frequently detected in environmental samples rather than in GI colonization. Likewise, the presence of multiple carbapenemase-encoding gene combinations, such as blaNDM + blaOXA-23 and blaNDM + blaVIM was observed in Acinetobacter spp. from both infection and environmental samples. This reinforces the possibility that patients may acquire these resistant strains from environmental surfaces during the healthcare process [29,30]. For E. coli, the majority of carbapenemase-positive isolates were identified in GI colonization samples, with fewer found in environmental samples. This may support a study suggesting that E. coli primarily remains a gut colonizer, with a lower likelihood of transmission to the hospital environment or progression to infection [28]. P. aeruginosa with carbapenemase-encoding gene, particularly blaNDM, was detected in a sink, supporting its ability to persist in moist environments and contribute to outbreaks in critically ill patients. The presence of blaVIM in an infection isolate further highlights the ability of P. aeruginosa to acquire and express carbapenemase genes, posing significant challenges in treatment and infection control [31,32].
One of the limitations of this study is that the environmental sampling was conducted after the COVID-19 pandemic, during a period when infection prevention and control (IPC) measures may have been intensified. This could have influenced the detection rate of critical GNB in the environment, underestimating the true level of contamination.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates the presence of carbapenemase-encoding genes among critical GNB in ICU environmental contamination, GI colonization, and infections. The detection of critical GNB carrying these genes across all sample sources suggests possible circulation of these isolates between the environment and patients, highlighting the need for further research on transmission dynamics. Moreover, the identification of isolates harboring multiple carbapenemase genes underscores the importance of strengthening infection control measures in ICU settings.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5% agarose, run for 50 min).
A. blaNDM, blaKPC and blaOXA-48, Lane PC1,PC2 and PC3:positive control for blaNDM, blaKPC and blaOXA-48 respectively, B. blaOXA-58 and blaOXA-23, Lane PC1 and PC2: positive control for blaOXA-23 and blaOXA-58 respectively C. blaVIM and blaIMP Lane PC1: positive control for blaVIM. First line Ladder (1,00 bp), NC: negative control, Lanes 1,2,3…: represent of isolates bands.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330613.s001
(TIF)
S1 Table. Row data for carbapenem resistance critical GNB obtained from ICU patients with GI colonization and/orinfection, as well as from ICU environmental samples in the Amhara National Regional state, Ethiopia, 2021 to 2022
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330613.s002
(XLSX)
S2 Table. Primer sequences used for the detection carbapenemase-encoding genes.
For degenerate primers: D = A, G or T; R = A or G; Y = C or T; K = G or T; W = A or T.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330613.s003
(DOCX)
S1 Raw Images. The original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0330613.s004
(PDF)
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, FelegeHiwot Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, and the ICU healthcare workers. We also extend our gratitude to the staff members of the Microbiology and Molecular Department at the Armauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI) for their support.
References
- 1. Bassetti M, Garau J. Current and future perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021;76(Suppl 4):iv23–37. pmid:34849997
- 2. Aurilio C, Sansone P, Barbarisi M, Pota V, Giaccari LG, Coppolino F, et al. Mechanisms of Action of Carbapenem Resistance. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;11(3):421. pmid:35326884
- 3. Hussain HI, Aqib AI, Seleem MN, Shabbir MA, Hao H, Iqbal Z, et al. Genetic basis of molecular mechanisms in β-lactam resistant gram-negative bacteria. Microb Pathog. 2021;158:105040. pmid:34119627
- 4. Abou-assy RS, Aly MM, Amasha RH, Jastaniah S, Alammari F, Shamrani M. Carbapenem Resistance Mechanisms, Carbapenemase Genes Dissemination, and Laboratory Detection Methods: A Review. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Allied Sciences. 2023;12(1–2023):123–38.
- 5.
World heath Organization (WHO). WHO Bacterial Priority Pathogens List, 2024: bacterial pathogens of public health importance to guide research, development and strategies to prevent and control antimicrobial resistance (Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2024.
- 6. Seman A, Mihret A, Sebre S, Awoke T, Yeshitela B, Yitayew B, et al. Prevalence and molecular characterization of extended spectrum β-lactamase and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates from bloodstream infection suspected patients in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2022:1367–82.
- 7. Legese MH, Asrat D, Mihret A, Hasan B, Mekasha A, Aseffa A, et al. Genomic Epidemiology of Carbapenemase-Producing and Colistin-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae among Sepsis Patients in Ethiopia: A Whole-Genome Analysis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66(8):e0053422. pmid:35876577
- 8. Mangalea MR, Halpin AL, Haile M, Elkins CA, McDonald LC. Decolonization and Pathogen Reduction Approaches to Prevent Antimicrobial Resistance and Healthcare-Associated Infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30(6):1069–76. pmid:38781679
- 9. Cai S, Wang Z, Han X, Hu H, Quan J, Jiang Y. The correlation between intestinal colonization and infection of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A systematic review. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance. 2024.
- 10. Kindu M, Moges F, Ashagrie D, Tigabu Z, Gelaw B. Multidrug-resistant and carbapenemase-producing critical gram-negative bacteria isolated from the intensive care unit environment in Amhara region, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2023;18(11):e0295286. pmid:38033134
- 11. Bogaerts P, Rezende de Castro R, De Mendonça R, Huang TD, Denis O, Glupczynski Y. Validation of carbapenemase and extended-spectrum β-lactamase multiplex endpoint PCR assays according to ISO 15189. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2013;68(7):1576–82.
- 12. Yamagishi J, Sato Y, Shinozaki N, Ye B, Tsuboi A, Nagasaki M, et al. Comparison of Boiling and Robotics Automation Method in DNA Extraction for Metagenomic Sequencing of Human Oral Microbes. PLoS One. 2016;11(4):e0154389. pmid:27104353
- 13. Li C, Chen R, Qiao J, Ge H, Fang L, Liu R, et al. Distribution and molecular characterization of carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria in Henan, China. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):14418. pmid:38909136
- 14. Gashaw M, Gudina EK, Ali S, Gabriele L, Seeholzer T, Alemu B. Molecular characterization of carbapenem-resistance in Gram-negative isolates obtained from clinical samples at Jimma Medical Center, Ethiopia. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2024;15:1336387.
- 15. Elbadawi HS, Elhag KM, Mahgoub E, Altayb HN, Ntoumi F, Elton L, et al. Detection and characterization of carbapenem resistant Gram-negative bacilli isolates recovered from hospitalized patients at Soba University Hospital, Sudan. BMC Microbiol. 2021;21(1):136. pmid:33947325
- 16. Dortet L, Poirel L, Nordmann P. Worldwide dissemination of the NDM‐type carbapenemases in Gram‐negative bacteria. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014(1):249856.
- 17. Pritsch M, Zeynudin A, Messerer M, Baumer S, Liegl G, Schubert S. First report on blaNDM-1-producing Acinetobacter baumannii in three clinical isolates from Ethiopia. BMC Infect Dis. 2017;17:1–7.
- 18. Sewunet T, Asrat D, Woldeamanuel Y, Aseffa A, Giske CG. Molecular epidemiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of Pseudomonas spp. and Acinetobacter spp. from clinical samples at Jimma medical center, Ethiopia. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:951857. pmid:36204631
- 19. Acman M, Wang R, van Dorp L, Shaw LP, Wang Q, Luhmann N, et al. Role of mobile genetic elements in the global dissemination of the carbapenem resistance gene blaNDM. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):1131. pmid:35241674
- 20. Khan AU, Maryam L, Zarrilli R. Structure, Genetics and Worldwide Spread of New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase (NDM): a threat to public health. BMC Microbiol. 2017;17(1):101. pmid:28449650
- 21. Guo H, Wu Y, Li L, Wang J, Xu J, He F. Global emergence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae co-carrying multiple carbapenemases. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2023;21:3557–63. pmid:37501706
- 22. Kindu M, Derseh L, Gelaw B, Moges F. Carbapenemase‐Producing Non‐Glucose‐Fermenting Gram‐Negative Bacilli in Africa, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. International Journal of Microbiology. 2020;2020(1):9461901.
- 23. Awoke T, Teka B, Aseffa A, Sebre S, Seman A, Yeshitela B, et al. Detection of blaKPC and blaNDM carbapenemase genes among Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Dominance of blaNDM. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0267657. pmid:35476721
- 24. Lee CR, Lee JH, Park KS, Kim YB, Jeong BC, Lee SH. Global dissemination of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: Epidemiology, genetic context, treatment options, and detection methods. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2016;7:895.
- 25. Kindu M. Emergence and spread of carbapenemase producing Gram negative bacteria in Ethiopia: a call for action. Ethiopian Journal of Health and Biomedical Sciences. 2024;14(2):1–2.
- 26. Nieto-Rosado M, Sands K, Portal EA, Thomson KM, Carvalho MJ, Mathias J, et al. Colonisation of hospital surfaces from low-and middle-income countries by extended spectrum β-lactamase-and carbapenemase-producing bacteria. Nature communications. 2024;15(1):2758.
- 27. Wasfi R, Rasslan F, Hassan SS, Ashour HM, Abd El-Rahman OA. Co-Existence of Carbapenemase-Encoding Genes in Acinetobacter baumannii from Cancer Patients. Infect Dis Ther. 2021;10(1):291–305. pmid:33180321
- 28. Kim SH, Kim GR, Kim E-Y, Jeong J, Kim S, Shin JH. Carbapenemase-producing Eenterobacterales from hospital environment and their relation to those from patient specimens. J Infect Public Health. 2022;15(2):241–4. pmid:35065356
- 29. Shamsizadeh Z, Nikaeen M, Nasr Esfahani B, Mirhoseini SH, Hatamzadeh M, Hassanzadeh A. Detection of antibiotic resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in various hospital environments: potential sources for transmission of Acinetobacter infections. Environ Health Prev Med. 2017;22(1):44. pmid:29165152
- 30. Al-Hamad A, Pal T, Leskafi H, Abbas H, Hejles H, Alsubikhy F, et al. Molecular characterization of clinical and environmental carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates in a hospital of the Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(4):632–6. pmid:31551188
- 31. Pham TM, Kretzschmar M, Bertrand X, Bootsma M, Combacte-Magnet Consortium. Tracking Pseudomonas aeruginosa transmissions due to environmental contamination after discharge in ICUs using mathematical models. PLoS Comput Biol. 2019;15(8):e1006697. pmid:31461450
- 32. Yoon E-J, Jeong SH. Mobile Carbapenemase Genes in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol. 2021;12:614058. pmid:33679638