Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Downhill running regulates cardiac immune response through GCN2

Abstract

Downhill running (DR) has recently emerged as a promising exercise modality for cardiac rehabilitation, but the effect and mechanism of DR on myocardium remains unclear. General control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2), an eukaryotic initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) kinase, is beneficial to the heart when it is deficiency. The current study aimed to explore whether the GCN2 is associated with cardioprotective effects in downhill running. Eight-week-old male wild type (WT) mice and GCN2 knock out (KO) mice were randomly divided into WT control (n = 6), WT exercise(n = 5), GCN2 KO control(n = 5), and GCN2 KO exercise(n = 5) groups. Mice in the exercise groups were subjected to a single session of downhill running treadmill exercise training. In WT mice, DR increased the proportion of basophils, decreased the percentage of lymphocytes in the blood, and decreased the expression of GCN2, Ifn-γ, Tgf-βr1 and immune cell markers in the myocardium. Compared with WT mice, GCN2 KO mice decreased the proportion of monocytes and neutrophils in the blood, decreased expression of Ifn-γ, Tgf-βr1 and immune cell markers, and increased expression of Il-12α in the myocardium. In GCN2 KO mice, DR increased the expression of immune cell markers in the myocardium. DR and GCN2 KO both reduced TGF-β1 expression, and elevated p-eif2a expression in the myocardium. This finding demonstrated that downhill running alters inflammation and immune response in the myocardium, which is associated with GCN2.

Introduction

Cardiovascular disease has become a major health problem with a huge economic and health burden globally [1]. Cardiac rehabilitation is a comprehensive intervention based on a holistic medical assessment, with the key goals including improving the patient’s exercise capacity and health-related quality of life, as well as adjunctive medications to reduce the risk of hospitalization and death [2,3]. Downhill running (DR), a type of eccentric exercise, has gained increasing attention as a suitable and promising intervention for positive rehabilitation and training effects [4,5]. The characteristic of eccentric exercise is the ability to produce greater mechanical loads, cause little cardiovascular stress with lower cardiorespiratory demands than concentric exercise [6,7]. Eccentric exercise is effective in improving cardiovascular fitness and related markers compared to traditional exercise modalities [8]. Eccentric and endurance exercise induced less myocardial apoptosis compared to suspension and resistance exercise [9]. There are many studies out there on the link between DR and muscle inflammation [10,11]. Less is known, however, regarding the effects of DR on the myocardium.

General control nonderepressible 2 (GCN2) is a serine/threonine protein kinase, which is one of the stress kinases that block translation by phosphorylating eIF2α [12]. In general, GCN2 activity in cells must be efficiently inhibited to allow maximum rates of protein synthesis [13]. GCN2 deficiency protects cardiac function in cardiac dysfunction mice by reducing lipid accumulation, myocardial fibrosis, oxidative stress, and cell death [14,15]. Also, exercise preconditioning has been reported to protect against acute cardiac injury via GCN2 [16]. Emerging evidence reveals that GCN2 is closely linked to the immune system and is essential in the maintenance of immune homeostasis [12], such as GCN2 plays an important role in regulate control macrophage functional polarization and CD4+ T cell subset differentiation [13]. However, to date, GCN2-induced myocardial immune responses have not been evaluated.

Therefore, considering the close relationship between immune cells and GCN2, and the potential advantages of DR in attenuating the load of heart, we evaluated the effects of DR on inflammatory response, immune response, and GCN2/eIF2α pathway before and after knockout of the GCN2 gene, respectively.

Materials and methods

Animals

All animal experiments were approved by Shanghai University of Sport Animal Care and Use Committee and were in accordance with the National Institutes of Health guidelines (Ethics No. 102772024DW022). Eight-week-old male WT mice (n = 11) were purchased from Shanghai JieSiJie Laboratory Animal Co.,Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Eight-week-old male GCN2 KO mice (n = 10) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME, USA). Mice were housed in a 12-h light/12-h dark animal room with free access to sterilized water and food. Animal room was maintained under standard conditions of temperature 20–24°C and 45–55% humidity. All the animals were randomly divided into four groups: WT control group (C), WT exercise group (E), GCN2 KO control group (G), GCN2 KO exercise group (GE).

The animals in the exercise groups were subjected to a single session of DR on a motor treadmill (−16° slope) at moderate intensity (16 m/min) for 90 min. The heart of mice in each group were collected 48 h right after exercise. All mice were injected intraperitoneally with 1.25% tribromoethanol anesthetic, and all efforts were made to minimize suffering.

Detection of inflammatory cell levels

To assess the effects of exercise and GCN2 on the populations of Inflammatory cells in blood, routine blood test was performed for both WT and GCN2 KO mice. All mice were euthanized by Tribromoethanol and sacrificed for the further study. Blood was collected by abdominal aortic puncture in EDTA blood collection tubes from mice at the day of sacrifice. The blood cells of the mice were analyzed by using animal automatic hematology analyzer.

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was extracted from each myocardium sample using the FastPureR Cell/Tissue Total RNA Isolation Kit V2 (Vazyme, Lot # RC112–01). The purity and concentration of the extracted RNA were determined by nano drop (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lot # 701–058112). Reverse transcriptional reactions were performed using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Catalog # K1622). The cDNAs were amplified with SYBR green master mix (Vazyme, Lot # Q712-02), with Gapdh as an endogenous control.

RT-PCR was performed on QuantStudio 6 Flex (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using with the following parameters: initial denaturation at 95°C for 30s followed by 40 cycles of 10s at 95°C, and 30s at 60°C for annealing and 15s at 95°C, 60s at 60°C, and 15s at 95°C for extension. The RT-PCR was done in triplicate and repeated at least 3 times. Primers are listed in Table 1.

Western blot

Total protein was extracted from heart tissue with RIPA buffer (Beyotime, P0013B), protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Beyotime, P1045). The total protein concentration was measured using a BCA protein assay kit (Beyotime, P0012). The extracted proteins were separated via sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA). The membrane was blocked in Protein Free Rapid Blocking Buffer (Vazyme, PS108P) for 15 min at room temperature. Then incubated at 4 ◦C overnight with primary antibodies, including anti-IL-6 (1:1000, abcam), anti-TNF-α(1:1000, CST), anti-IL-10 (1:1000, abcam), anti-TGF beta 1 (1:1000, abcam), anti-GCN2 (1:1000, CST), anti-eif2α(1:1000, CST), anti-p-eif2α(1:1000, CST) and anti-GAPDH (1:50000, proteintech). The membranes were washed with TBST and incubated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Proteintech, SA00001−1) or anti-rabbit (ZSGB-BIO, SA00001−1) secondary antibodies for 1.5 h the next day. Then the membranes were washed and exposed using an imaging system (BIO-RAD, Tanon-5200S). ECL kit (Biosharp, BL520A) was used to produce a signal to visualize the protein bands. The captured images were analyzed using Image-J software, and the values of target proteins were normalized to that of the internal control protein on the same membrane.

Statistics and data analysis

Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 8.0. Results are presented as mean ± SD. All figures were made using GraphPad Prism 8.0. All data were tested for normality and homogeneity before statistical analysis using Shapiro-Wilk test. Statistical comparisons were done with a Two-way analysis of variance plus Tukey post hoc tests, and the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn correction. The level of significance was set at p< 0.05.

Results

DR and GCN2 KO affect inflammatory cells and cytokines

The routine blood test found that in WT mice, DR increased the percentage of basophilic granulocytes and decreased the percentage of lymphocytes (Fig 1A). Compared with WT mice, GCN2 KO mice showed a significant decrease in the proportion of monocytes and the same trend in the proportion of neutrophils (Fig 1A).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Effects of downhill running and GCN2 KO on inflammation levels.

(A) The blood profile of mice after downhill running or GCN2 KO. The percentage of Monocyte, Basophilic granulocytes, Lymphocyte and Neutrophils including in blood (n = 4-5). (B) The mRNA expression level of pro-inflammatory cytokines, Il-6, Il-1β, Il-12α, Tnf-α, Nf-κb, Ifn-γ, and of anti-inflammatory cytokines, Il-10, Tgf-βr1, and Tgf-βr2 (n = 4-6). (C) The protein expression of TGF-β1, TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-10 in myocardium were detected by western blotting. (D) Comparison of protein expression in each group (n = 3). Data are expressed as means ± SD, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p< 0.001, Cohen’s d > 0.8.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329973.g001

In order to investigate the expression profile associated with an inflammatory response, we examined the expression levels of inflammation-related factors in myocardial tissues. It was found that in WT mice, acute DR induced significant decrease in Ifn-γ and Tgf-βr1 (Fig 1B). We next determined whether GCN2 would influence inflammation cytokines in myocardium. GCN2 KO attenuated the expression of Ifn-γ and Tgf-βr1 (Fig 1B) compared with WT group. By contrast, the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokine Il-12α was obviously increased by knockout of GCN2 (Fig 1B). Moreover, compared with WT exercise mice, the expression of Il-12α, Nf-κb, Ifn-γ were significantly increased in myocardium of GCN2 KO mice under the treatment of DR (Fig 1B).Consistent with the trend in gene expression, western blot analysis showed DR and GCN2 KO both decreased the expression of TGF-β1 and there were no differences in IL-10, IL-6, or TNF-α protein expression regardless of downhill running or GCN2 KO (Fig 1C and 1D).

WT mice Presents a Decrease of the Immune Response After DR, while GCN2 KO mice Presents an Increase

It was found that DR significantly decreased the expression of Cd3, Nkg2d, Cd15 and Cd209 in WT mice (Fig 2A, 2B, 2D, and 2E). The expression of Cd3 and Nkg2d in GCN2 KO mice was lower than in WT mice (Fig 2A and 2B). In GCN2 KO mice, transcript levels of immune cell markers such as T cells (Cd8, Cd69), NK cells (Nkp46) and macrophages (Inos) were significantly elevated in DR mice (Fig 2A-2C). It is suggested that T cell, NK cell, and macrophage in the myocardium are more sensitive to exercise and can be activated, trafficking more after GCN2 KO. In addition, compared with WT exercise mice, immune cell markers were significantly increased in myocardium of GCN2 KO mice under the treatment of DR. The results showed that the T cells, NK cells, pro-inflammatory M1-like macrophages, and neutrophil were elevated, as demonstrated by increased levels of the markers of immune cells, such as Cd69, Nkp46, Inos and Cd15 (Fig 2A-2D).

thumbnail
Fig 2. The effects of downhill running and GCN2 KO in the myocardial of immune cell markers.

The mRNA levels of (A) T cell markers, (B) NK cell markers, (C)Macrophage markers, (D)Neutrophil marker and (E) Dendritic cell marker were determined in mice myocardium (n = 4-6). Data are expressed as means ± SD, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p< 0.001, ****p< 0.0001, Cohen’s d > 0.8.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329973.g002

DR attenuates myocardial GCN2 expression and elevates p-eIF2α expression

To determine whether the GCN2 affects DR induced immune response through eIF2α pathway, we evaluated the levels of GCN2, p-eIF2α, and eIF2α in the myocardium of mice at 48h after DR. It was found that the expression of GCN2 protein was lower in DR mice than in WT mice (Fig 3), suggesting that exercise preconditioning decreased myocardial GCN2 expression. Although GCN2 is an eIF2α kinase, downhill running significantly elevated myocardial eIF2α phosphorylation under basal conditions (Fig 3). Moreover, GCN2 KO also increases p-eIF2α protein expression (Fig 3).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Effects of downhill running on GCN2/eIF2α pathways in WT and GCN2 KO mice.

(A) Western blot detected the expression of p-eIf2α, eIF2α and GCN2 with GAPDH as an internal reference. (B) Comparison of protein expression in each group (n = 3). Data are expressed as means ± SD, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, Cohen’s d > 0.8.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329973.g003

Discussion

The main finding of this study is that acute downhill running alters immune cells and cytokines in the myocardium, which is associated with GCN2/eIF2α pathway.

The body responds to exercise via complex adaptive processes to maintain cardiac function. Central to this process is inflammation and immune cell signaling [17]. Immune system provides the protective inflammatory response that the host needs to fight off infection [18]. A growing body of research suggests that interleukins, neutrophils, and inflammasome are associated with the inflammatory process of cardiac injury [19]. It has been reported that serum neutrophils were elevated 4 hours after DR [20], and muscle neutrophils were elevated 24 hours after DR [21]. Emerging evidence suggested that acute graded exercise stress test significantly increased lymphocyte, T cell, and CD8+ T cell counts in peripheral blood, while 6 weeks of eccentric exercise was not sufficient to affect changes in lymphocyte and T-cell subsets [22]. The results of the study suggested an increase in the proportion of basophils and a decrease in the percentage of lymphocytes in the blood after 48 hours of DR, with no change in monocytes or neutrophils. It is suggested that blood is redistributed after exercise, and the body’s immune cells may migrate through the bloodstream to different tissues at different points in time.

It has been well accepted that DR is an effective method for rehabilitation and training, as it causes little cardiovascular stress with lower cardiorespiratory demands [6,7]. However, there are fewer studies on the effects of DR on the heart. Our findings revealed that Ifn-γ, Tgf-βr1 and immune cell (T cell, NK cell, dendritic cell and neutrophil) markers in the myocardium decreased after a single bout of DR. It suggested that cytokines can interact with immune cells to regulate cardiac adaptation to various physiological stresses.

GCN2, one of four stress kinases in the body that regulate the amino acid starvation response, is closely linked to the immune system and is essential in the maintenance of immune homeostasis [12]. Our results revealed that GCN2 KO decreased the proportion of monocytes in the blood, and the same trend was observed for the percentage of neutrophils. Normally, the immune system senses pathogens through pathogen recognition receptors, but emerging evidence suggests that it can also sense and response to cellular stresses [23]. When GCN2 is deficient, it affects the release of inflammatory cytokines [24]. Consistent with the effects of downhill running, results in the myocardium showed that GCN2 deficiency decreases the expression of Ifn-γ, Tgf-βr1, and immune cell markers, whereas Il-12α expression is elevated. In addition, cardiac pressure overload activates the TGFβ cascade, which can initially be protective. However, chronically overactive TGFβ signaling in pressure-overloaded cardiomyocytes promotes cardiac fibrosis and dysfunction [25]. Thus, both DR and GCN2 KO reduce TGF-β1 expression may be cardioprotective.

Immune cells play important roles in cardiac homeostasis and response to stress [17]. T cells, NK cells, and macrophages have been shown to benefit cardiac repair [17,26]. It has been reported that GCN2 is required for the proliferation and trafficking of cytotoxic T cells [27], which is opposite of what we observed. In the case of GCN2 deficiency, we observed that downhill running caused the up-regulation of T cells, NK cells, and M1 macrophages expression in the myocardium. This suggests that after GCN2 KO, DR induces the release of cell signaling molecules from the myocardium, and mobilizes more immune cells to exert cardioprotective effects. Dendritic cells (DCs) are antigen-presenting cells that orchestrate innate and adaptive immune responses [28]. DCs sense pathogens and signals through pattern recognition receptors, deliver antigens to helper T cells receiving instructions, helper T cells activate cytotoxic T cells, natural killer cells, macrophages and release inflammatory cytokines to initiate innate immune responses [23,28]. The results suggested that GCN2 KO may attenuated the inhibition of DC, and DR after GCN2 KO may activating the expression of T cells, NK cells and M1 macrophages in the myocardium, thus exerting an immune effect to protect the myocardium.

Sun et al. reported that exercise preconditioning led to a decrease in cardiac GCN2 expression, which was beneficial in improving cardiac dysfunction and inflammation and reducing cardiac injury [16]. In agreement with this, in the current study, the expression of myocardial GCN2 decreased after DR. As eIF2α is the only identified substrate for GCN2, GCN2 deficiency attenuates cardiotoxicity by reducing apoptosis and oxidative stress via eIF-2α/CHOP-dependent pathway [14], we observed p-eif2a expression in myocardium. In fact, we found that DR and GCN2 KO both elevate p-eif2a expression. The eIF2α upstream kinases PERK, PKR, GCN2, and HRI modulate protein synthesis and trigger integrated stress responses (ISR) through phosphorylation eIF2α [29,30]. In the acute phase of ISR, phosphorylation of eIF2α reducing unfolded protein stress, which is beneficial for maintaining cellular function [31]. Though DR reduces myocardial GCN2 expression, other kinases may exert a protective effect by compensatory activation driving eif2a phosphorylation and adapting cardiomyocytes to stress. Therefore, more studies are needed to address this point.

There are some limitations in our work. First, flow cytometry was not performed in this study, which allows for more direct detection of changes in immune cell markers. In addition, the benefit of GCN2 KO in modulating cardiac immune function after DR was not assessed at the protein level and future studies are needed to evaluate these questions. Moreover, repetitive DR training has been reported to have a sustained protective effect on the muscle [32,33], which make a hint that the relationship between repetitive DR and the myocardium is worth exploring. Therefore, the benefits of DR on cardiac immune function have not been fully evaluated and more investigations are needed to elucidate the comprehensive mechanisms.

In conclusion, the present investigation confirmed that a single bout of DR can affect myocardial immune cells and cytokines by a mechanism that may be related to the GCN2/eif2α pathway. Importantly, knockout of GCN2 increases the recruitment of myocardial immune cells after exercise. In addition, DR and GCN2 KO both alleviated the TGF-β1 level and elevated p-eif2a expression, which may be cardioprotective.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. S1_raw_image.

Original images for blot and gel.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329973.s001

(PDF)

References

  1. 1. Martin SS, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Anderson CAM, Arora P, Avery CL, et al. 2024 heart disease and stroke statistics: a report of US and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024;149(8):e347–913. pmid:38264914
  2. 2. Bozkurt B, Fonarow GC, Goldberg LR, Guglin M, Josephson RA, Forman DE, et al. Cardiac Rehabilitation for Patients With Heart Failure: JACC Expert Panel. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77(11):1454–69. pmid:33736829
  3. 3. Redfern J, Gallagher R, O’Neil A, Grace SL, Bauman A, Jennings G, et al. Historical Context of Cardiac Rehabilitation: Learning From the Past to Move to the Future. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:842567. pmid:35571195
  4. 4. Hoppeler H. Moderate Load Eccentric Exercise; A Distinct Novel Training Modality. Front Physiol. 2016;7:483. pmid:27899894
  5. 5. LaStayo PC, Woolf JM, Lewek MD, Snyder-Mackler L, Reich T, Lindstedt SL. Eccentric muscle contractions: their contribution to injury, prevention, rehabilitation, and sport. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2003;33(10):557–71. pmid:14620785
  6. 6. Gluchowski A, Harris N, Dulson D, Cronin J. Chronic Eccentric Exercise and the Older Adult. Sports Med. 2015;45(10):1413–30. pmid:26271519
  7. 7. Touron J, Costes F, Coudeyre E, Perrault H, Richard R. Aerobic Metabolic Adaptations in Endurance Eccentric Exercise and Training: From Whole Body to Mitochondria. Front Physiol. 2021;11:596351. pmid:33584331
  8. 8. Ansari M, Hardcastle S, Myers S, Williams AD. The health and functional benefits of eccentric versus concentric exercise training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci Med. 2023;22(2):288–309. pmid:37293426
  9. 9. Liu Q. The Research of Different Movement Patterns Induced Protein Mitofusin - 2 on The Effects of Myocardial Apoptosis [dissertation]. Dalian City: Liaoning Normal University; 2014. Available from: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=G5Hy7WP7MHM5W-9r0kNXgrysXKI-UDY8aY6_cFRR9lUATT5_KvbrNxjP1UNVrehnlKgZ1eA1f8RrA8X8Q2faRHFOQXojUMJ6TA4moSkGRQJyLc_1QgtKzulCMaYc7B_lgvJhi2b2kNDRp3jzmjtA==&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS
  10. 10. Zuo Q, Qu F, Li N, Wang S, Liu J, Xu C, et al. Eccentric exercise results in a prolonged increase in interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α levels in rat skeletal muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2019;40(3–4):379–87. pmid:31520264
  11. 11. Buford TW, Cooke MB, Shelmadine BD, Hudson GM, Redd L, Willoughby DS. Effects of eccentric treadmill exercise on inflammatory gene expression in human skeletal muscle. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009;34(4):745–53. pmid:19767811
  12. 12. Donnelly N, Gorman AM, Gupta S, Samali A. The eIF2α kinases: their structures and functions. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70(19):3493–511. pmid:23354059
  13. 13. Zhao C, Guo H, Hou Y, Lei T, Wei D, Zhao Y. Multiple Roles of the Stress Sensor GCN2 in Immune Cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(5):4285. pmid:36901714
  14. 14. Feng W, Lei T, Wang Y, Feng R, Yuan J, Shen X, et al. GCN2 deficiency ameliorates cardiac dysfunction in diabetic mice by reducing lipotoxicity and oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019;130:128–39. pmid:30389499
  15. 15. Yuan J, Li F, Cui B, Gao J, Yu Z, Lu Z. Inhibition of GCN2 Alleviates Cardiomyopathy in Type 2 Diabetic Mice via Attenuating Lipotoxicity and Oxidative Stress. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022;11(7):1379. pmid:35883870
  16. 16. Sun ZG, Lu G, Zhao LL, Zhang LZ, Li A, Jing J, et al. Exercise preconditioning protects against acute cardiac injury induced by lipopolysaccharide through general control nonderepressible 2 kinase. Int Heart J. 2020;61(1):138–44. pmid:31875620
  17. 17. Rurik JG, Aghajanian H, Epstein JA. Immune Cells and Immunotherapy for Cardiac Injury and Repair. Circ Res. 2021;128(11):1766–79. pmid:34043424
  18. 18. Lafuse WP, Wozniak DJ, Rajaram MVS. Role of Cardiac Macrophages on Cardiac Inflammation, Fibrosis and Tissue Repair. Cells. 2020;10(1):51. pmid:33396359
  19. 19. Algoet M, Janssens S, Himmelreich U, Gsell W, Pusovnik M, Van den Eynde J, et al. Myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury and the influence of inflammation. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2023;33(6):357–66. pmid:35181472
  20. 20. Van De Vyver M, Engelbrecht L, Smith C, Myburgh KH. Neutrophil and monocyte responses to downhill running: intracellular contents of MPO, IL-6, IL-10, pstat3, and SOCS3. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26(6):638–47. pmid:26059973
  21. 21. Tsivitse SK, McLoughlin TJ, Peterson JM, Mylona E, McGregor SJ, Pizza FX. Downhill running in rats: influence on neutrophils, macrophages, and MyoD+ cells in skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;90(5–6):633–8. pmid:12955516
  22. 22. Peng S-C, Lin Y-T, Hsu C-C, Fu T-C, Wang J-S. Effects of concentric and eccentric exercise regimens on bioenergetic efficiency of lymphocytes in sedentary males. Eur J Sport Sci. 2024;24(12):1830–43. pmid:39520384
  23. 23. Pulendran B. The varieties of immunological experience: of pathogens, stress, and dendritic cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2015;33:563–606. pmid:25665078
  24. 24. Ravindran R, Khan N, Nakaya HI, Li S, Loebbermann J, Maddur MS, et al. Vaccine activation of the nutrient sensor GCN2 in dendritic cells enhances antigen presentation. Science. 2014;343(6168):313–7. pmid:24310610
  25. 25. Frangogiannis NG. Transforming growth factor-β in myocardial disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022;19(7):435–55. pmid:34983937
  26. 26. Cahill TJ, Sun X, Ravaud C, Villa Del Campo C, Klaourakis K, Lupu IE, et al. Tissue-resident macrophages regulate lymphatic vessel growth and patterning in the developing heart. Development (Cambridge, England). 2021;148(3):dev194563. pmid:33462113
  27. 27. Van de Velde L-A, Guo X-ZJ, Barbaric L, Smith AM, Oguin TH 3rd, Thomas PG, et al. Stress Kinase GCN2 Controls the Proliferative Fitness and Trafficking of Cytotoxic T Cells Independent of Environmental Amino Acid Sensing. Cell Rep. 2016;17(9):2247–58. pmid:27880901
  28. 28. Yin X, Chen S, Eisenbarth SC. Dendritic Cell Regulation of T Helper Cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2021;39:759–90. pmid:33710920
  29. 29. Wek RC. Role of eIF2α Kinases in Translational Control and Adaptation to Cellular Stress. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018;10(7):a032870. pmid:29440070
  30. 30. Lu H-J, Koju N, Sheng R. Mammalian integrated stress responses in stressed organelles and their functions. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2024;45(6):1095–114. pmid:38267546
  31. 31. Costa-Mattioli M, Walter P. The integrated stress response: From mechanism to disease. Science. 2020;368(6489):eaat5314. pmid:32327570
  32. 32. Hyldahl RD, Chen TC, Nosaka K. Mechanisms and Mediators of the Skeletal Muscle Repeated Bout Effect. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2017;45(1):24–33. pmid:27782911
  33. 33. Bontemps B, Vercruyssen F, Gruet M, Louis J. Downhill Running: What Are The Effects and How Can We Adapt? A Narrative Review. Sports Med. 2020;50(12):2083–110. pmid:33037592