Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Barcode high-resolution melting (Bar-HRM) analysis to authenticate true cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) from its adulterants and contaminants

  • M. A. L. M. Peiris,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Postgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

  • Dhanesha Nanayakkara,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Agricultural Biology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

  • Cristian Silva,

    Roles Formal analysis, Visualization

    Affiliation Postgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

  • Sachith P. Abeysundara,

    Roles Formal analysis, Software, Visualization

    Affiliation Department of Statistics and Computer Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka,

  • Priyanga Wijesinghe

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    priyangaw@sci.pdn.ac.lk

    Affiliations Postgraduate Institute of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka

Abstract

Sri Lankan cinnamon, widely known as true cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum), is a world-renowned commodity. With the high market demand, many incidents have reported adulteration of true cinnamon with other cinnamon species such as Cinnamomum aromaticum, Cinnamomum burmanni, and Cinnamomum loureiroi. Moreover, the contamination of cinnamon products with fungi (Aspergillus flavus) has also significantly negatively impacted the cinnamon export market. Morphological and chemical detection of adulterations has limitations, benchmarking the necessity for precise and effective new detection methods. The current study reports gene-specific novel molecular markers that can be used in Barcode High-Resolution Melting (Bar-HRM) analysis to distinguish C. verum from other substitutes. Six barcode regions (rbcL, trnH-psbA, matK, ITS2, trnL, trnL-trnF) were analyzed. The results demonstrate that trnH-psbA can effectively discriminate all selected cinnamon species from one another. Novel markers were designed to target the diagnostic nucleotide variations found within the designated barcode regions. Commercial cinnamon products and authentic samples of C. verum were used to validate the assay, and the DNA extraction protocol was optimized to ensure the acquisition of high-quality DNA. Bar-HRM was performed with the novel markers, and the four major cinnamon species in the international market were successfully distinguished. The spiked-in A. flavus DNA was also detected in a cinnamon admixture. Hence, these Bar-HRM conditions with the novel gene-specific markers can serve as an economical, efficient, and promising assay to detect the authenticity and purity of cinnamon samples.

Introduction

The genus Cinnamomum belongs to the family Lauraceae, consisting of 110 species [1,2]. In the fifth century BC, Cinnamomum verum J. Presl; syn. Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume became famous in Egypt and Europe. Large-scale commercial-level cultivations can be seen in Sri Lanka, India, Seychelles, Madagascar, Brazil, Southeast Asia, and other tropical countries [3]. In Sri Lanka, large-scale cultivations of C. verum are located along the coastal belt from Negombo to Matara, as well as in inland areas such as Kalutara, Ambalangoda, and Rathnapura [4].

The major constituent of C. verum leaf oil is eugenol, whereas its bark and roots predominantly contain cinnamaldehyde and camphor, respectively. In addition to these, linalool, cinnamyl acetate, benzyl benzoate, α-Pinene, α-Phellandrene, p-cymene, α-Humulene, and α-Terpineol can be found in all types of cinnamon oil in variable quantities, and the majority of these are bioactive [5]. These compounds have been found to possess anti-bacterial [6,7], anti-fungal [812], anti-viral [13,14], anti-diabetic [15,16], anti-oxidant [17], and anti-cancer [18,19] properties.

Four major types of cinnamon are currently available in the international market, viz., Ceylon cinnamon (C. verum), Chinese cinnamon [C. aromaticum Nees], Indonesian, Korintje, Java, or Padang cinnamon [Cinnamomum burmanni (Nees & T. Nees) Blume], and Vietnamese or Saigon cinnamon (Cinnamomum loureiroi Nees) with the latter three commonly referred to as cassia or cassia cinnamon [2022]. Among these, only Ceylon cinnamon is recognized as the ‘true cinnamon’, and Sri Lanka is the premier exporter responsible for 80–90% of global production [22,23]. Cinnamon quills, quilling, powder, leaf oil, bark oil, and value-added products are significant exported cinnamon products. The cinnamon industry in Sri Lanka has encountered numerous challenges as a result of intense competition from inferior-quality substitutes [24], where some cassia products cost only a tenth of the price of C. verum, and this price difference has a significant impact on the elevated adulterations [25]. While cassia is more economical, it contains a substantial amount of the hepatotoxin, coumarine (up to 5%), whereas Ceylon cinnamon contains only trace amounts (about 0.004%) [26].

It has been reported that the C. verum bark and its products are frequently adulterated with C. aromaticum and C. burmanni for commercial purposes [2628]. Nearly 51% of cinnamon products labeled as C. verum in the market were found to be C. aromaticum, with 10% being blend of C. aromaticum and C. verum, leaving only 39% that were truly C. verum [26]. In general, cassia is sold in the United States (US) as cinnamon, with the trade data showing that 90% of the cinnamon imported to the US was C. burmanni [29,30].

In addition to cinnamon adulterations, cinnamon products are particularly vulnerable to contamination, especially with Aspergillus and Penicillium fungal species. Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus glaucus, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus clavatus, Aspergillus niger, and Penicillium restrectum are among the potential contaminating species [31,32]. Therefore, frequent testing of cinnamon products for contamination is crucial to ensure the safety of food, medicine, and an array of value-added products. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate the feasibility of detecting A. flavus contamination alongside cinnamon authentication.

The identification of plant species and their products primarily relies on morphological and chemical properties. However, in the case of cinnamon powder or admixtures of the products, morphological and chemical methods for detecting adulterants are ineffective due to their inherent limitations [25,33,34]. In this context, DNA-based identification methods such as barcoding provide a precise platform to identify the samples, even to the species level, based on the differences in their genetic makeup. Initially, the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I (COI) gene was utilized to identify various animal groups [35]. However, when researchers attempted to apply the COI region for plant identification, they did not achieve the anticipated results. Consequently, they explored different gene regions for identifying plant species, including coding regions (rbcL and matK) and non-coding regions (trnL, trnL-trnF, trnT-trnL, and trnH-psbA) in the chloroplast genome, in addition to the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) in nuclear ribosomal DNA. These regions have been recommended for the identification and classification of plant species [3638]. Furthermore, barcoding can be employed to detect fungal contamination in cinnamon products [39]. Nonetheless, DNA barcoding requires DNA sequencing facilities, with accessibility to these facilities being restricted in technology-limited countries [40], often resulting in a turnaround time of one month from sample collection to results. The new technique developed by combining DNA barcoding with high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis is known as Barcode high-resolution melting (Bar-HRM) analysis. Currently, this DNA Bar-HRM system has been successfully implemented to detect adulteration in food and herbal products [4147]. Most importantly, Bar-HRM is a sequencing-free, close-tubed, precise, rapid, and economical analysis tool [42].

Here, we report the first application of Bar-HRM to detect adulterations and contaminations in cinnamon, along with the introduction of novel gene-specific Bar-HRM-compatible markers, selected through empirical testing of multiple primer pairs. Additionally, we used a modified protocol for DNA extraction from cinnamon bark, powder, and value-added products, enabling efficient DNA isolation. This assay efficiently distinguished among C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, C. loureiroi, and C. verum, as well as identifying contamination by A. flavus.

Results and discussion

In-silico studies and simulated HRM analysis

Based on the analyzed nucleotide sequences of the barcode regions rbcL, trnH-psbA, matK, ITS2, trnL, and trnL-trnF of the four Cinnamomum species, Table 1 presents the calculated shortest and longest sequence lengths (in base pairs), characters used in analysis (base pairs), along with the percentage of conservative sites, variable sites, parsimony-informative sites, and singleton sites. The NCBI accession numbers of the retrieved sequences are given in the S1 Table in S1 File.

thumbnail
Table 1. Characteristics of the selected gene region derived through in silico analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328808.t001

The ITS2 region was found to exhibit the highest percentage of variable sites (26.94%), followed by the trnH-psbA (5.04%), rbcL (3.70%), and matK (2.82%) regions. By contrast, the trnL (0.65%) and trnL-trnF (0.26%) regions exhibited the lowest percentages of variable sites. These findings indicated that, ITS2 region was the most suitable barcode region for species identification, whereas the trnL and trnL-trnF regions were demonstrated to be the least suitable. Details of the SNPs are provided in the S2 Table in S1 File.

To further evaluate and confirm the suitability of barcode regions for use in Bar-HRM, four barcode regions, rbcL (459 bp), trnH-psbA (258 bp), matK (531 bp), and ITS2 (188 bp), were subjected to a simulated HRM (uMeltSM v 2.4.1) using the sequences that were meticulously trimmed at both the 5′ and 3′ ends to form a high-quality dataset for subsequent analysis. This analysis excluded trnL and trnL-trnF regions because of their extremely low percentages of variable sites. The results of the simulated HRM analysis provided the predicted melt curves for the selected barcode regions across four cinnamon species, demonstrating the ability of each barcode region to effectively differentiate C. verum from other cinnamon species (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Normalized curves and melting temperature (Tm) were generated from simulated HRM analyses (uMeltSM v 2.4.1) (A) and (B) rbcL, (C) and (D) trnH-psbA, (E) and (F) ITS2, (G) and (H) matK primers for the four cinnamon species: C. verum, C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, and C. loureiroi.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328808.g001

Based on the normalized curves generated by uMeltSM analysis, the barcode region trnH-psbA was the only region with adequate ability to discriminate all four selected cinnamon species from each other. By contrast, ITS2, the barcode region with the highest variable site percentage, could not distinguish C. verum from other cinnamon species based on its predicted melt curves. This limitation may arise because the ITS2 region often exhibits complex secondary structures and high GC content, which contribute to its thermodynamic stability. These characteristics can lead to intricate melting behaviors, complicating the differentiation of species [48]. Furthermore, while the ITS2 sequences exhibited a higher number of nucleotide variations compared to trnH-psbA, most of the variable sites within the trnH-psbA region are classified as parsimony-informative. Thus, interspecific variation of the ITS2 region is less effective than that of the trnH-psbA for the discrimination of Cinnamon species.

Therefore, trnH-psbA, the barcode region that exhibited the second highest percentage of variable sites among the regions assessed, was elected as the most suitable barcode for the design of novel gene-specific molecular markers in this study. This choice was not arbitrary but was guided by both the performance of our preliminary studies and the precedence set by previous studies on cinnamon and other plant taxa as described below. It is important to note that the discriminatory ability of DNA barcode regions can vary significantly across different plant lineages [43,44,4951]. For example, a 149 bp fragment of the rbcL barcode region was employed to authenticate Annona muricata tea [46], and the matK barcode region effectively differentiated between and identified Hebanthe eriantha and Pfaffia glomerata, commonly known as ‘Brazilian ginseng’ [52]. Furthermore, the trnH-psbA barcode region has also been utilized to identify Uvaria species [53], and has also demonstrated effectiveness in identifying various taxa, including species of the Rhododendron and Physalis genera, as well as species of the Apocynaceae and Fabaceae families [5457]. This confirms the significant potential of the trnH-psbA region for species identification across diverse plant lineages because of its favorable characteristics, including high universality, reliable amplification efficiency, and proven effectiveness in species discrimination.

Leveraging the extensive applications of molecular barcoding, existing literature on Cinnamomum spp. highlights that one single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) within the trnL-trnF region and three sites within the trnL region have been used in molecular identification of C. cassia, C. zeylanicum, C. burmanni, and C. sieboldii [58]. Moreover, SNPs specific to C. cassia have been identified in the rbcL locus, enabling use of this locus to determine whether C. cassia was present as an adulterant in market samples of C. verum [30]. Furthermore, the ITS2 barcode region has been utilized for the identification of various Cinnamomum species, including C. osmophloeum, and for the construction of phylogenetic trees within the Cinnamomum genus [2,59,60]. In parallel, the authentication of C. verum has also been demonstrated using real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) assays [61]. It is essential to recognize here that qRT-PCR is primarily utilized for the real-time quantification of DNA during the amplification process. This technique offers quantitative data in the form of cycle threshold (Ct) values, which enables the assessment of DNA copy numbers and is predominantly employed for gene expression analysis. The process typically consists of three stages: denaturation (generally conducted at 95°C), annealing, and extension (commonly at 70–72°C) [62]. In contrast, the Bar High-Resolution Melting (Bar-HRM) assay incorporates an additional melting phase, during which the instrument reheats the amplified product to generate comprehensive melting curve data. Moreover, Bar-HRM is specifically designed to differentiate and detect sequence variation, such as SNPs, by analyzing differences in melting temperatures (Tm), which reflect the stability of DNA duplexes through the examination of post-amplification melting profiles. Importantly, the output generated by Bar-HRM signifies differences in sequence rather than DNA quantity, making it particularly effective for species-level identification. To our knowledge, the present study represents the first to use the Bar-HRM assay, along with the trnH-psbA barcode region, to effectively differentiate C. verum from its potential adulterants.

Weighing all, we derived the trnH-psbA barcode region both systematically as well as through trial and error as the most suitable region to distinguish C. verum from the three other most important cinnamon samples using Bar-HRM.

DNA extraction and confirmation of the authenticity of cinnamon samples

In the international market, cinnamon is available in various forms, including dried bark, powder, mixtures, and value-added products. The initial step in any DNA-based methodology involves the extraction of high-quality DNA. Nonetheless, isolating DNA from dried bark presents greater challenges than from fresh materials. Cinnamon bark and powder typically contain higher amounts of polyphenols and polysaccharides than cinnamon leaves, which can act as PCR inhibitors, leading to erroneous interpretations. To minimize their presence, this protocol utilized a high concentration of Cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) buffer (5%) to effectively remove polysaccharides [63,64]. Additionally, the effects of phenolic compounds were minimized using polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) [65,66]. The incorporation of β-mercaptoethanol delayed sample oxidation by phenolic compounds, facilitating DNA recovery [67], and sodium acetate was included to reduce DNA solubility in water, enhancing DNA precipitation [68,69]. These specific chemicals yielded high-quality DNA. Furthermore, this study introduces modifications to the standard protocol previously employed to isolate DNA from the barks of Cinnamomum species [70]; for instance, we tested the stirring speeds of 30, 70, 120, 160, and 170 rpm. Through a trial and error approach, the speed was reduced to 70 rpm to minimize the shearing and fragmentation of the DNA molecule, while the centrifugation speed was increased to 7000 rpm to enhance the precipitation of DNA, ensuring that the integrity and quality of the DNA remained intact [71].

DNA quantification was conducted with a nano spectrophotometer (Nabi UV/Vis, South Korea). The DNA concentration and quality control (QC) values were comparable to those obtained from leaf extraction, demonstrating the effectiveness of the modified DNA extraction protocol from the cinnamon bark.

PCR reactions were performed using the selected universal markers (Table 2) to amplify the target barcode regions from all cinnamon samples. The resulting PCR products were sequenced bi-directionally to validate the authenticity of the samples prior to further analysis. Based on BLAST homology search results, the species level of the selected cinnamon samples was confirmed. The sample information is provided in the S3 Table in S1 File.

thumbnail
Table 2. Universal and novel markers used for PCR amplification of DNA extracted from cinnamon samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328808.t002

Assaying of novel Bar-HRM markers in a standard PCR

To optimize and confirm the PCR program conditions and product amplification prior to Bar-HRM analysis, the newly designed Bar-HRM-compatible markers targeting the diagnostic SNP sites in the trnH-psbA barcode regions were assessed by standard PCR (Table 2). The marker AP-trnH-psbA resulted in a 368 bp amplicon without non-specific amplifications and primer dimers, thus validating the optimum PCR program conditions.

For the generation of a simulated HRM profile using the uMeltSM software, a 258 bp region of the trnH-psbA (DNA positions 71–329, 5′–3′, NCBI reference sequence: MF137971.1) was employed to model the melting behavior. Subsequently, multiple primer pairs were designed to amplify the selected gene region, However, several of these primers did not yield the desired results, as indicated by low amplicon intensity, the presence of non-specific products, and significant primer dimer formation. Therefore, the primer pair used in the actual Bar-HRM assay was selected through a process of trial and error. This primer pair extended the amplified region by 100 bp, resulting in a 368 bp amplicon spanning positions 32–400 of the trnH-psbA region. The extension of the amplicon was intended to incorporate additional SNPs (S1B Fig in S1 File), As expected, the extended amplified region provided sufficient resolution to accurately differentiate all four cinnamon species with high accuracy, with the same graph pattern. Although the recommended amplicon length for HRM analysis typically ranges between 50 and 300 bp [42], considering thermodynamic properties, numerous studies have demonstrated that fragments extending to 300–400 bp can also be analyzed with sufficient sensitivity and specificity, yielding up to 100% accuracy [7275] in similar context. Moreover, successful applications of amplicons longer than 300 bp have been reported for species-level identification [76]. Accordingly, the primer pair demonstrating the most robust and specific amplification was selected, ensuring clear and reliable PCR products suitable for high-resolution melting analysis.

Assaying of Aspergillus flavus

A. flavus DNA was subjected to PCR amplification using the universal marker aflR, which targets the aflatoxin synthesis regulatory gene (aflR) (Table 2). Although an optimal PCR has been optimized for aflR amplification [39], the present study used the same PCR program and conditions used for the Ap-trnH-psbA marker of cinnamon to amplify the aflR gene. This protocol successfully obtained the amplicon in expected size for both cinnamon and A. flavus without any non-specific amplification. The compatibility of the PCR program and conditions for both the Ap-trnH-psbA and aflR markers enabled a single Bar-HRM assay to differentiation among all four cinnamon species, C. verum, C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, and C. loureiroi, while also detecting A. flavus.

Bar-HRM analysis

Relatively early attempts to identify economically significant cinnamon species were based on their morphological characteristics and chemical compositions [77,78]. Subsequently, molecular techniques were incorporated for cinnamon species identification including Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA (RAPD) [33,79,80], Inter Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) [81,82], Sequence Related Amplified Polymorphism (SRAP) [33], and DNA barcoding analysis [2,30,58], all of which showed enhance precise identification of cinnamon species. The present study introduced a more advanced assay, Bar-HRM, which showed greater sensitivity than previous methods, making it highly effective in distinguishing among samples at the molecular level. This approach combined HRM with DNA barcoding, enabling rapid analysis of genetic variations in PCR amplicons [41]. During the HRM phase, the temperature was ramped from 65 ̊C to 95 ̊C. The DNA dye (SYTO® 9), intercalated within double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), was released during the dissociation process of dsDNA, resulting in a decrease in fluorescence intensity. Changes in fluorescence over time yielded a melt curve profile for the DNA sample with the melting temperature (Tm) specific to each PCR product, providing a temperature-shifted melt curve for each sample, enabling discrimination at the species level [44].

The results of Bar-HRM analysis for the trnH-psbA barcode region in this study were presented as distinct melting curve profiles for each cinnamon species. These profiles were generated based on the patterns of normalized temperature-shifted curves and the corresponding difference plot. The barcode region trnH-psbA was selected for use in the Bar-HRM platform as it could discriminate all four selected cinnamon species, C. verum, C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, and C. loureiroi, from each other (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Melting curve profiles of amplicons obtained from the novel AP-trnH-psbA marker (A) Normalized melting curves, (B) Difference melting curves, and (C) Cluster plot showing the first two principal components and the four clusters for the C. verum, C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, and C. loureiroi.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328808.g002

Bar-HRM analysis of the trnH-psbA region produced a normalized melting curve profile, characterized by a pre-melt region with a Tm ranging from 70.96°C to 71.4°C, and a post-melt region from 84.96°C to 86.36°C across all species (Fig 2A). This normalized melting curve pattern allowed for the successful differentiation of all cinnamon samples, achieving a confidence limit of 90%. Moreover, the distinct melting curve patterns showed greater resolution than the normalized melting curve profile in discriminating the four cinnamon samples, C. verum, C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, and C. loureiroi from each other (Fig 2B). The principal components obtained by Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were used to cluster and distinguish the Cinnamomum spp. based on Bar-HRM fluorescence data, with the four species were clearly distinguished by clustering into four clusters (Fig 2C). Nucleotide differences in the trnH-psbA barcode region were effective in distinguishing among the four species of cinnamon. Analysis of the 368 base pair fragments amplified by the AP-trnH-psbA primer pair revealed four specific SNPs for C. verum, seven for C. aromaticum, and one each for C. burmanni and C. loureiroi. Details of the SNPs are provided in the S2 Table in S1 File. These unique variations contributed to the observed differences in melting curve profiles, validating the efficacy of the selected barcode region for species authentication.

When developing an assay to detect both cinnamon adulterants and fungal contamination from A. flavus in cinnamon products, it is essential to amplify both cinnamon-specific primers (AP-trnH-psbA) and fungus-specific primers (aflR) within the same PCR mixture under the same PCR conditions. The PCR conditions should be optimized to avoid the generation of non-specific bands and primer dimers. These nonspecific bands could obscure the melting behavior of the target amplicon, making it difficult to distinguish between specific and nonspecific products [83,84]. Bar-HRM analysis of the trnH-psbA regions of all four cinnamon species and the aflR region of A. flavus yielded a normalized melting curve profile with a pre-melt region of Tm from 70.96°C to 71.4°C and a post-melt region from 84.96°C to 86.36°C (Fig 3). A similar assay was conducted with all four cinnamon species, which showed a distinct separation of profiles. The data are illustrated in the S2 Fig in S1 File.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Melting curve profiles of amplicons obtained from the novel AP-trnH-psbA marker and aflR marker (multiplex) (A) Normalized melting curves, (B) Difference melting curves, and (C) Cluster plot drawn using the first two principal components and the two clusters for C. verum and A. flavus.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328808.g003

The melting curve patterns generated for C. verum and A. flavus were distinct, demonstrating the ability of the multiplex to distinguish between C. verum and A. flavus (Figs 3A and B). Based on Bar-HRM fluorescence data, the first two principal components derived from the PCA could distinguish C. verum from A. flavus, with the two species clearly forming two separate clusters (Fig 3C).

The clustering tendency of the melting curves was evaluated using Hopkins’s statistics. The PCA revealed that first, three principal components accounted for 99% of the total variability, thereby facilitating subsequent cluster analysis. K-means clustering indicated a clear distinction among the four species of cinnamon, showing effective separation without misclustering. The resulting cluster plot (Fig 4) closely resembles Fig 2C, further confirming the ability of this method to detect adulterations in cinnamon.

thumbnail
Fig 4. The cluster tendency of Bar-HRM fluorescence data obtained from the novel AP-trnH-psbA marker was assessed by Hopkins’s statistics, and the K-means algorithm demonstrated four separate clusters of the C. verum, C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, and C. loureiroi.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328808.g004

To validate the practical application of our method, we analyzed six independent commercial cinnamon products (S4 Fig in S1 File). Out of these, four products were identified as C. verum (Test samples 1, 2, 3, and 4), while two samples were classified as cassia cinnamon (Test samples 5 and 6).

This method also has potential in the development of a classification model for the accurate identification of the four main cinnamon species based on HRM curve analysis.

The primary objective of this study was to develop a method that could distinguish Ceylon cinnamon from the cassia samples. Because the biology of the C. verum flowering pattern can promote genetic diversity due to the phenomenon known as protogynous dichogamy [85], the stability and suitability of the SNPs for the Bar-HRM assay were assessed in various collected cinnamon samples. Fresh leaf samples were collected from five distinct agricultural fields in Sri Lanka (Ambalangoda, Southern Province, Sri Lanka) where cinnamon is cultivated to export. The samples were subjected to Sanger sequencing and the resulting sequences were subsequently deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database (PQ348605, PQ348606, PQ348607, PQ348608, PQ348609, PQ348610, PQ348611, PQ348612, PQ348613, PQ348614, PQ348615). Following this, an analysis of the sequences was conducted to identify the SNPs. Based on the alignment file, we identified two distinct groups of C. verum. One group featured 5’-GTTCTATT’ while the other contained 5’-AATAGAAC’. These groups were a result of chromosomal rearrangements, identified as inversion mutation. This nucleotide variation is observed within positions 86–93 of the trnH-psbA region of C. verum [NCBI reference sequence: AF268784.1]. To further validate this nucleotide variation, relevant sequences deposited to date in the NCBI were evaluated. The alignment files are incorporated within S3 Fig in S1 File. The results indicated that all sequences exhibited either one of the nucleotide variations as those previously identified in C. verum, thereby reinforcing the applicability of the assay regardless of the cinnamon collection site (Fig 5). Because the developed assay was based primarily on the melting temperatures of a specific genetic region, however, the number of hydrogen (H) bonds in that region significantly affects the shape of the melting curves. As the chromosomal rearrangement that contributed to the origin of the two cinnamon types belongs to an ‘inversion’, both regions exhibited 18 H bonds, with a balanced ratio giving identical melting signatures, benchmarking the feasibility of the assay across all cinnamon samples available. This balance was further supported by the simulated HRM analyses without any separation (Fig 5) using uMeltSM v 2.4.1. Consequently, these results indicate that the developed assay was not affected by the protogynous dichogamy exhibited by the flowers of cinnamon and can effectively distinguish among C. verum, C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, and C. loureiroi.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Sequence alignment results of collected samples for the trnH-psbA region, focusing on H bond comparison, and a normalized curve was generated from simulated HRM analyses (uMeltSM v 2.4.1) for the two groups of C. verum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328808.g005

This study has successfully demonstrated the effectiveness of the designed assay to accurately identify four main species of cinnamon. The next step of this study will focus on precisely quantifying the percentage of adulteration in an admixture. The high sensitivity of Bar-HRM technology allows for the detection of even minute levels (as low as 1%) of adulteration through distinct shifts in the melting curve profile [86,87]. This level of sensitivity has been widely supported in previous literature, which demonstrates the capacity of HRM to reliably detect and differentiate plant species and identify adulterants in admixtures [41,8890]. The present findings, however, developed a robust and flexible screening method coupling the cinnamon biology with the power of Bar-HRM, providing valuable insights into the precise identification of the four main species of cinnamon in the world and of A. flavus contamination in cinnamon.

Conclusion

This study presents a novel application of DNA barcoding coupled with high-resolution melting analysis (Bar-HRM) for the authentication of cinnamon species, specifically aimed at distinguishing C. verum from its common adulterants. Targeting the trnH-psbA intergenic spacer, we have developed a rapid, cost-effective, and robust assay suitable for processed cinnamon products, where conventional morphological and chemical identification methods are often limited.

Our findings demonstrate that the Bar-HRM approach can effectively differentiate C. verum from closely related cassia species, including C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, and C. loureiroi, thereby ensuring the authenticity of true cinnamon in commercial products. Furthermore, we introduce a novel assay based on the universal aflR marker, which facilitates the detection of A. flavus contamination. This advancement enables the simultaneous detection of adulteration and potential mycotoxin-producing fungi in cinnamon samples. Grounded in the principles of advanced cinnamon biology and molecular diagnostics, this innovative dual-function assay offers a timely and practical solution for ensuring the authenticity and safety of cinnamon in the global spice trade.

Materials and methods

Sequence retrieval, alignment, and in-silico analysis

DNA barcode sequences of C. verum, C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, and C. loureiroi were retrieved from NCBI repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) using the keyword “Cinnamomum” and barcode region viz., rbcL, matK, trnL, trnL-trnF, trnH-psbA, ITS1, ITS2, and trnT-trnL. Retrieved sequences were 5’ and 3’ trimmed [documented under the name of characters used in the analysis (bp) in Table 1], and aligned and analyzed in MEGA v7.0 [91]. To determine the suitable barcode regions that can be applied in Bar-HRM, parameters such as conserved site (%), variable site (%), parsimony-informative site (%), singleton site (%), and the number of specific SNPs were calculated using MEGA v7.0 software.

Simulated high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis and development of novel markers for Bar-HRM

Barcode regions were then used to perform the simulated HRM using the uMeltSM v 2.4.1 application [92] to predict the melting profile for each selected barcode region to test the feasibility for Bar-HRM [46]. Barcode regions that can be used to discriminate cinnamon species were selected based on the simulated HRM analysis, and specific novel markers for Bar-HRM were manually designed, targeting the identified diagnostic SNP sites. When designing the markers, 5’ to 3’ DNA strand was used and additionally, two main criteria were considered to obtain successful results in the HRM analysis: (i) the primer pair should generate a PCR product not exceeding 400 bp [7375], (ii) the primer pairs should cover enough variable sites to enable discrimination among the tested species. Furthermore, primer properties (GC clamps, self-dimer formation, hairpin loop formation, and cross-dimer formation) were analyzed using NetPrimer software (http://www.premierbiosoft.com/netprimer) to evaluate the suitability of the designed primers for the Bar-HRM analysis.

Sample collection

Fresh cinnamon leaf samples were collected from five distinct cultivated fields in Ambalangoda, Southern Province, Sri Lanka, where cinnamon is cultivated for the export market, and the C. verum was authenticated with the consent of the respective farmers. We didn’t collect any wild samples. Consequently, obtaining permission or licenses for sample collection was not required. The collected samples were identified using general morphological characteristics by the research team. The collected specimens were meticulously cross-referenced with the voucher specimens at the National Herbarium (PDA) at the Royal Botanic Garden, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, to ensure accuracy. Five types of C. verum products, including quills and powders, were sourced from local markets. C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, and C. loureiroi samples were purchased from the United States and the Republic of South Korea. The authenticity of the samples was confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The pure fungal culture of A. flavus was obtained from the Tea Research Institute of Sri Lanka, Thalawakelle, Sri Lanka.

DNA extraction from cinnamon samples

Cinnamon leaves.

DNA extraction was performed following a CTAB method [93] using approximately 1 g of healthy cinnamon leaves from each sample. Leaf samples were separately ground into a fine powder and incubated at 60 ⁰C for 30 minutes in 1.5 ml of preheated (60 ⁰C for 15 minutes) 2% Cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) extraction buffer [1M Tris base, 0.5 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 5 M sodium chloride (NaCl), 0.2% β-mercaptoethanol]. Then, the samples were cooled down to room temperature, and 2/3 volume of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1, v/v) was added. Samples were inverted several times and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 2 min. The aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube, and the chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1, v/v) step was repeated. Then 2/3 volume of ice-cold isopropanol was added, the tube inverted several times, and stored overnight at – 20 ⁰C. The tubes were centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 minutes. The pellet was washed with ice-cold 70% ethanol, dried, and dissolved in nuclease-free water. The samples were quantified using a nano spectrophotometer (Nabi UV/Vis, South Korea).

Cinnamon bark and powder.

Herein, we report a modified protocol for DNA extraction from cinnamon bark and cinnamon powder that is optimized based on the protocol in Swetha et al., 2014 [70]. Approximately 1 g of each sample was measured and homogenized using 10 mL of preheated 5% CTAB extraction buffer (1 M Tris base, 0.5 M EDTA, 3 M NaCl, 5% CTAB, 1% polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), and 0.3% β-mercaptoethanol). Then, the homogenized samples were incubated at 65 °C in a shaking water bath with constant stirring at 70 rpm for 2 h. An equal volume of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1, v/v) was added after the samples were cooled down to room temperature. Samples were centrifuged at 3500 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant was transferred to a new tube. One-third of the sample volume of 3 M Sodium acetate (pH 5.2) and 2/3 of the sample volume of chloroform: isoamyl alcohol (24:1, v/v) were added to the supernatant. The samples were again centrifuged for 15 min at 3500 rpm, and the resulting supernatant was separated. An equal volume of ice-cold isopropanol was added and kept overnight at – 40 °C. Incubated samples were centrifuged at 7000 rpm for 20 min, and the resulting pellet was washed with 70% ethanol. The pellet was dried and dissolved in nuclease-free water. The samples were quantified using the nano spectrophotometer (Nabi UV/Vis, South Korea).

Preparation of A. flavus for PCR amplification

The authentic cultures were sub-cultured in potato dextrose agar (PDA) at room temperature using the streak plate technique. The direct colony polymerase chain reaction (DCPCR) method was performed on the mycelia grown on the PDA plates. Briefly, a loop of fungal mycelium was added to a sterilized 500 µL of nuclease-free water sample and mixed. A series of thermal shocks was given as 10s, 10s, 20s, and 10s using a microwave oven. Then, the sample was vortexed vigorously for 3–5 minutes following a centrifugation step at 8000 rpm for 10 minutes. The resulting aliquot was used as the PCR template.

PCR amplification and sequencing

The PCR was performed to amplify the barcode regions trnH-psbA and aflR using three gene-specific universal markers (Table 2). The total volume of the PCR reaction mixture was 10 µL which includes 24 ng/µl template DNA, 0.2 µM of forward and reverse primer (IDT, USA), 1 × Colorless Go Taq® Flexi buffer (Promega, USA), 1 U Go Taq® DNA polymerase (Promega, USA), 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Promega, USA), 0.1 mM dNTPs (Bio Basic Inc., Canada). The template DNA was replaced with nuclease-free water in the no-template control. The PCR was performed in a thermal cycler (Takara, USA) following different PCR programs for the selected genes. For trnH-psbA and aflR consisted of an initial denaturation at 92°C for 1 min, denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 52°C for 1 min, extension at 64°C for 1 min, final extension at 64°C for 8 min with 35 cycles.

The SNPs of all resulting amplified products of cinnamon were confirmed by bi-directional Sanger sequencing using Applied Biosystems Genetic Analyzer 3500 in the Department of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka. Minor changes in sequences were manually checked and edited using Bioedit software (v7.0.5.3) by referring to respective chromatograms (Chromas v2.6.6). All these sequences were subjected to a homology search against the NCBI database, and confirmation of the authenticity of the selected cinnamon samples was done based on sequence similarity.

Bar-HRM analysis

Real-time PCR was performed to distinguish the four cinnamon species using the newly designed gene-specific diagnostic primer pairs. The final PCR reaction volume was 10 µL which includes 24 ng/µl template DNA, 0.2 µM of forward and reverse primers (IDT, USA), 2 µM of SYTO® 9 green-fluorescent nucleic acid stain (Invitrogen, USA), 1 × Colorless Go Taq® Flexi buffer (Promega, USA), 1 U Go Taq® DNA polymerase (Promega, USA), 1.5 mM MgCl2 (Promega, USA), and 0.1 mM dNTPs (Bio Basic Inc., Canada) in a Rotor-Gene Q thermal cycler using Q-Rex v1.0.0 plugin (Qiagen, Germany). The template DNA was replaced with nuclease-free water in the no-template control. Different PCR programs were used for the amplification. For trnH-psbA and aflR; an initial denaturation at 92 °C for 1 min, denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 52°C for 1 min, extension at 64 °C for 1 min, repeated for 35 cycles, and a final extension at 64 °C for 8 min followed by a melt curve analysis at 65 ⁰C to 95 ⁰C with a ramping rate of 0.05 ⁰C. The Rotor-Gene Q Series Software version 1.0.0 was used to analyze the captured fluorescence signals. A normalized curve of declining fluorescence with escalating temperature was plotted. Tm was given by the negative derivative of fluorescence (F) over the temperature (T) curve (dF/dT). Pre- and post-melt normalization regions were set to express the main temperature boundaries of the normalized and different schemes, where the distinct melting profile of each species is detected to derive normalized melting curve profiles. The melting curves were analyzed using the Rotor-Gene Q Series Software version 1.0.0 to distinguish Cinnamon species. The means of conventional derivative plots showed the melting temperature (Tm) value for trnH-psbA amplicons. All selected cinnamon samples were triplicated, and three independent Bar-HRM runs were carried out to check the reproducibility and confirm the results.

Statistical analysis

Sixteen normalized melting curves from four different cinnamon species were analyzed using R statistical software 4.2.1 [94]. To have a maximum separation between clusters and to minimize miscalculations, the temperature range between 70⁰C to 90⁰C was selected for subsequent analysis. This range was manually selected after a thorough examination of the raw fluorescence data against the temperature plot [95]. The chosen interval encompasses both the pre-melt region (70.96 °C to 71.4 °C) and the post-melt region (84.96 °C to 86.36 °C), thereby effectively illustrating the distinctions and separations among the species under investigation. Hopkin statistics were estimated by the factoextra R package [96] to determine the tendency of clustering of the normalized HRM dataset derived from the Rotor-Gene Q Series Software version 1.0.0.

In this software, the process of melting curve normalization is accomplished through the delineation of two key regions: the pre-melt region, which denotes baseline fluorescence prior to the denaturation of DNA, and the post-melt region, which indicates fluorescence following the complete melting of DNA. Fluorescence data within these specified regions undergo normalization via a scaling method, whereby pre-melt fluorescence is standardized to 100% and post-melt fluorescence is scaled to 0%. This normalization process is carried out by fitting a line of best fit, with the highest recorded fluorescence values assigned a value of 100 and the lowest values set to 0. The fluorescence average and slope observed within the transitional zone between the pre- and post-melt regions are utilized in the normalization calculations. Consequently, normalized melt curves are produced for comparative analysis across various samples. Moreover, the software enables the visualization of samples as difference plots, with respect to a selected control, thereby enhancing the ability to detect subtle sequence variations with greater precision. [97]. Linear dimension reduction was done by Principal Component Analysis (PCA), and the optimal number of principal components was identified [98]. K- means algorithm was used to cluster the fluorescence data. The optimal number of clusters was identified using standard methods such as the elbow, silhouette, and Gap statistics [99].

Supporting information

S1 File.

Supplementary data. S1 Fig. Alignment of sequences retrieved from GenBank (NCBI) for trnH-psbA barcode region (A) Gene region that was used in simulated HRM profile using the uMeltSM software, (B) Gene region that was used in the actual Bar-HRM assay. S2 Fig. Melting curve profiles of amplicons obtained from the novel AP-trnH-psbA marker and aflR marker (multiplex) (A) Normalized melting curves, (B) Difference melting curves of the C. verum, C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, C. loureiroi, and A. flavus. S3 Fig. Sequence alignments of C. verum in the trnH-psbA barcode region(A) Sequences of samples collected from agricultural fields and (B) C. verum sequences retrieved from GenBank (NCBI). S4 Fig. Difference melting curves of the C. verum, C. aromaticum, C. burmanni, C. loureiroi, and commercial products were derived from amplicons obtained using the novel AP-trnH-psbA marker. S1 Table. DNA sequences corresponding to the rbcL, trnH-psbA, matK, ITS2, trnL, and trnL-trnF regions of Cinnamomum species were retrieved from GenBank (NCBI), with accession numbers documented for each species. S2 Table. Comparison of nucleotide variation among Cinnamomum species (A) Number of SNPs specific to each gene region which can be used to distinguish up to species level, (B) position of nucleotide variation of rbcL, and trnH-psbA, trnL, trnL-trnF matK, and ITS2 regions of Cinnamomum species. S3 Table. Details of the samples that were used for the study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328808.s001

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Dr. Ganga Sinniah from the Tea Research Institute (TRI) of Sri Lanka kindly provided the authentic sample of Aspergillus flavus fungi. Mr. R.A.A.K. Ranawaka from the Department of Export Agriculture kindly provided the Cinnamon samples. The authors are grateful to Prof. Venura Herath and Dr. Dimanthi Jayatilake, Department of Agricultural Biology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, for giving assistance in using the Rotor Gene Q real-time thermocycler to carry out the HRM studies.

References

  1. 1. Abeysinghe PD, Wijesinghe KGG, Tachida H, Yoshda T, Thihagoda M. Molecular characterization of Cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum Presl) accessions and evaluation of genetic relatedness of Cinnamon species in Sri Lanka based on trnL intron region, intergenic spacers between trnT-trnL, trnL-trnF, trnH-psbA and nuclear ITS. RJABS. 2009;5(6):1079–88.
  2. 2. Lee SC, Lee CH, Lin MY, Ho KY. Genetic identification of Cinnamomum species based on partial internal transcribed spacer 2 of ribosomal DNA. JFDA. 2010;18(4):3.
  3. 3. Joy P, Thomas J, Samuel M. Cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum Presl) for flavour and fragrance. Pafai J. 1998;20(2):37–42.
  4. 4. Kumarathilake D, Senanayake S, Wijesekera G, Wijesundera D, Ranawaka R. Extinction risk assessment at the species level: national red list status of endemic wild cinnamon species in Sri Lanka. 2010.
  5. 5. Wijesekera R, Jayewardene A, Rajapakse LS. Volatile constituents of leaf, stem and root oils of cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum). J Sci Food Agric. 1974;25(10):1211–20.
  6. 6. Friedman M, Henika PR, Mandrell RE. Bactericidal activities of plant essential oils and some of their isolated constituents against Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella enterica. J Food Prot. 2002;65(10):1545–60. pmid:12380738
  7. 7. Shan B, Cai Y-Z, Brooks JD, Corke H. Antibacterial properties and major bioactive components of cinnamon stick (Cinnamomum burmannii): activity against foodborne pathogenic bacteria. J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(14):5484–90. pmid:17567030
  8. 8. Bullerman L, Lieu F, Seier SA. Inhibition of growth and aflatoxin production by cinnamon and clove oils. Cinnamic aldehyde and eugenol. J Food Sci. 1977;42(4):1107–9.
  9. 9. Sinha K, Sinha A, Prasad G. The effect of clove and cinnamon oils on growth of and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus flavus. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1993;16(3):114–7.
  10. 10. Avasthi S, Gautam AK, Bhadauria R, editors. Antifungal activity of plant products against Aspergillus niger: A potential application in the control of a spoilage fungus. Biol Forum-IntJ; 2010: Citeseer.
  11. 11. Manso S, Cacho-Nerin F, Becerril R, Nerín C. Combined analytical and microbiological tools to study the effect on Aspergillus flavus of cinnamon essential oil contained in food packaging. Food Control. 2013;30(2):370–8.
  12. 12. Kabak B, Dobson ADW. Mycotoxins in spices and herbs-An update. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2017;57(1):18–34. pmid:26528824
  13. 13. Premanathan M, Rajendran S, Ramanathan T, Kathiresan K, Nakashima H, Yamamoto N. A survey of some Indian medicinal plants for anti-human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) activity. Indian J Med Res. 2000;112:73–7. pmid:11094851
  14. 14. Hayashi K, Imanishi N, Kashiwayama Y, Kawano A, Terasawa K, Shimada Y, et al. Inhibitory effect of cinnamaldehyde, derived from Cinnamomi cortex, on the growth of influenza A/PR/8 virus in vitro and in vivo. Antiviral Res. 2007;74(1):1–8. pmid:17303260
  15. 15. Altschuler JA, Casella SJ, MacKenzie TA, Curtis KM. The effect of cinnamon on A1C among adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(4):813–6. pmid:17392542
  16. 16. Blevins SM, Leyva MJ, Brown J, Wright J, Scofield RH, Aston CE. Effect of cinnamon on glucose and lipid levels in non insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(9):2236–7. pmid:17563345
  17. 17. Chericoni S, Prieto JM, Iacopini P, Cioni P, Morelli I. In vitro activity of the essential oil of Cinnamomum zeylanicum and eugenol in peroxynitrite-induced oxidative processes. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(12):4762–5. pmid:15941312
  18. 18. Kwon BM, Lee SH, Choi SU, Park SH, Lee CO, Cho YK, et al. Synthesis and in vitro cytotoxicity of cinnamaldehydes to human solid tumor cells. Arch Pharm Res. 1998;21(2):147–52. pmid:9875422
  19. 19. Ka H, Park H-J, Jung H-J, Choi J-W, Cho K-S, Ha J, et al. Cinnamaldehyde induces apoptosis by ROS-mediated mitochondrial permeability transition in human promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 cells. Cancer Lett. 2003;196(2):143–52. pmid:12860272
  20. 20. Oketch-Rabah HA, Marles RJ, Brinckmann JA. Cinnamon and Cassia Nomenclature Confusion: A Challenge to the Applicability of Clinical Data. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018;104(3):435–45. pmid:29947417
  21. 21. Rebull J, Pérez-Ràfols C, Serrano N, Díaz-Cruz JM. Analytical methods for cinnamon authentication. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2024;:104388.
  22. 22. Ravindran P, Nirmal-Babu K, Shylaja M. Cinnamon and cassia: the genus Cinnamomum. CRC press; 2003.
  23. 23. De Silva AM, Esham M. Ceylon cinnamon production and markets. J Ind Eng Chem. 2020;63:63–84.
  24. 24. Piyasiri K, Wijeratne M. Comparison of the cultivated area and the production trends of Ceylon cinnamon with the main competitors in the worlds’ total cinnamon market. Int J Sci Res Publ. 2016;6(1):476–80.
  25. 25. Suriyagoda L, Mohotti AJ, Vidanarachchi JK, Kodithuwakku SP, Chathurika M, Bandaranayake PC. Ceylon cinnamon: Much more than just a spice. PPP. 2021;3(4):319–36.
  26. 26. Lungarini S, Aureli F, Coni E. Coumarin and cinnamaldehyde in cinnamon marketed in Italy: a natural chemical hazard? Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2008;25(11):1297–305. pmid:19680836
  27. 27. Sproll C, Ruge W, Andlauer C, Godelmann R, Lachenmeier DW. HPLC analysis and safety assessment of coumarin in foods. Food Chem. 2008;109(2):462–9. pmid:26003373
  28. 28. Wang Y-H, Avula B, Nanayakkara NPD, Zhao J, Khan IA. Cassia cinnamon as a source of coumarin in cinnamon-flavored food and food supplements in the United States. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61(18):4470–6. pmid:23627682
  29. 29. Ghidotti M, Papoci S, Pietretti D, Ždiniaková T, de la Calle Guntiñas MB. Use of elemental profiles determined by energy-dispersive X-ray fluorescence and multivariate analyses to detect adulteration in Ceylon cinnamon. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2023;415(22):5437–49.
  30. 30. Swetha VP, Parvathy VA, Sheeja TE, Sasikumar B. DNA Barcoding for Discriminating the Economically ImportantCinnamomum verumfrom Its Adulterants. Food Biotechnology. 2014;28(3):183–94.
  31. 31. Abdel-Hafez SII, El-Said AHM. Effect of garlic, onion and sodium benzoate on the mycoflora of pepper, cinnamon and rosemary in Egypt. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation. 1997;39(1):67–77.
  32. 32. Amal AA- j. Natural occurrence of fungi and aflatoxins of cinnamon in the Saudi Arabia. Afr J Food Sci. 2011;5(8):460–5.
  33. 33. Abeysinghe P, Samarajeewa N, Li G, Wijesinghe K. Preliminary investigation for the identification of Sri Lankan Cinnamomum species using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and sequence related amplified polymorphic (SRAP) markers. JNSF. 2014;42(3).
  34. 34. Feltes G, Ballen SC, Steffens J, Paroul N, Steffens C. Differentiating True and False Cinnamon: Exploring Multiple Approaches for Discrimination. Micromachines (Basel). 2023;14(10):1819. pmid:37893256
  35. 35. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 2003;270(1512):313–21. pmid:12614582
  36. 36. Kress WJ, Wurdack KJ, Zimmer EA, Weigt LA, Janzen DH. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(23):8369–74. pmid:15928076
  37. 37. Kress WJ, Erickson DL. A two-locus global DNA barcode for land plants: the coding rbcL gene complements the non-coding trnH-psbA spacer region. PLoS One. 2007;2(6):e508. pmid:17551588
  38. 38. Coissac E, Pompanon F, Gielly L, Miquel C, Valentini A, Vermat T. Power and limitations of the chloroplast trnL (UAA) intron for plant DNA barcoding. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007;35(3).
  39. 39. Renu K, Agarwal M, Bhagayavant SS, Verma P, Nagar D. Detection of Aspergillus flavus using PCR method from fungus infested food grains collected from local market. Ann Plant Sci. 2018;7:2073–7.
  40. 40. Chase MW, Salamin N, Wilkinson M, Dunwell JM, Kesanakurthi RP, Haider N, et al. Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005;360(1462):1889–95. pmid:16214746
  41. 41. Ganopoulos I, Madesis P, Darzentas N, Argiriou A, Tsaftaris A. Barcode High Resolution Melting (Bar-HRM) analysis for detection and quantification of PDO “Fava Santorinis” (Lathyrus clymenum) adulterants. Food Chem. 2012;133(2):505–12. pmid:25683426
  42. 42. Sun W, Li J-J, Xiong C, Zhao B, Chen S-L. The Potential Power of Bar-HRM Technology in Herbal Medicine Identification. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:367. pmid:27066026
  43. 43. Sun W, Yan S, Li J, Xiong C, Shi Y, Wu L, et al. Study of Commercially Available Lobelia chinensis Products Using Bar-HRM Technology. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:351. pmid:28360920
  44. 44. Fadzil NF, Wagiran A, Mohd Salleh F, Abdullah S, Mohd Izham NH. Authenticity Testing and Detection of Eurycoma longifolia in Commercial Herbal Products Using Bar-High Resolution Melting Analysis. Genes (Basel). 2018;9(8):408. pmid:30103564
  45. 45. Liu Y, Xiang L, Zhang Y, Lai X, Xiong C, Li J, et al. DNA barcoding based identification of Hippophae species and authentication of commercial products by high resolution melting analysis. Food Chem. 2018;242:62–7. pmid:29037736
  46. 46. Osathanunkul M. Bar-HRM for authenticating soursop (Annona muricata) tea. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):12666. pmid:30139965
  47. 47. Ballin NZ, Onaindia JO, Jawad H, Fernandez-Carazo R, Maquet A. High-resolution melting of multiple barcode amplicons for plant species authentication. Food Control. 2019;105:141–50. pmid:31680728
  48. 48. Liu Y, Liang N, Xian Q, Zhang W. GC heterogeneity reveals sequence-structures evolution of angiosperm ITS2. BMC Plant Biol. 2023;23(1):608. pmid:38036992
  49. 49. Duan B-Z, Wang Y-P, Fang H-L, Xiong C, Li X-W, Wang P, et al. Authenticity analyses of Rhizoma Paridis using barcoding coupled with high resolution melting (Bar-HRM) analysis to control its quality for medicinal plant product. Chin Med. 2018;13:8. pmid:29449876
  50. 50. Nukool W, Kamol P, Inthima P, Nangngam P, Chomdej S, Buddhachat K. Multiplex Bar-HRM for differentiating Centella asiatica (L.) Urb. from possible substituent species. Ind Crop Prod. 2023;205:117567.
  51. 51. Osathanunkul M, Madesis P, de Boer H. Bar-HRM for Authentication of Plant-Based Medicines: Evaluation of Three Medicinal Products Derived from Acanthaceae Species. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):e0128476. pmid:26011474
  52. 52. Almeida FAN de, Oliveira PV, Matos NS, Fialho VLS, Lugon MD, Vieira M do C, et al. Authentication of Brazilian Ginseng using Bar-HRM analysis. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2023;59.
  53. 53. Osathanunkul M, Madesis P, Ounjai S, Pumiputavon K, Somboonchai R, Lithanatudom P, et al. Identification of Uvaria sp by barcoding coupled with high-resolution melting analysis (Bar-HRM). Genet Mol Res. 2016;15(1):10.4238/gmr.15017405. pmid:26909907
  54. 54. Feng S, Jiao K, Zhu Y, Wang H, Jiang M, Wang H. Molecular identification of species of Physalis (Solanaceae) using a candidate DNA barcode: the chloroplast psbA-trnH intergenic region. Genome. 2018;61(1):15–20. pmid:28961406
  55. 55. Gao T, Ma X, Zhu X. Use of the psbA-trnH region to authenticate medicinal species of Fabaceae. Biol Pharm Bull. 2013;36(12):1975–9. pmid:24432382
  56. 56. Liu Y, Zhang L, Liu Z, Luo K, Chen S, Chen K. Species identification of Rhododendron (Ericaceae) using the chloroplast deoxyribonucleic acid PsbA-trnH genetic marker. Pharmacogn Mag. 2012;8(29):29–36. pmid:22438660
  57. 57. Lv Y-N, Yang C-Y, Shi L-C, Zhang Z-L, Xu A-S, Zhang L-X, et al. Identification of medicinal plants within the Apocynaceae family using ITS2 and psbA-trnH barcodes. Chin J Nat Med. 2020;18(8):594–605. pmid:32768166
  58. 58. Kojoma M, Kurihara K, Yamada K, Sekita S, Satake M, Iida O. Genetic identification of cinnamon (Cinnamomum spp.) based on the trnL-trnF chloroplast DNA. Planta Med. 2002;68(1):94–6. pmid:11842343
  59. 59. Doh EJ, Kim J-H, Oh SE, Lee G. Identification and monitoring of Korean medicines derived from Cinnamomum spp. by using ITS and DNA marker. Genes Genomics. 2017;39(1):101–9. pmid:28090265
  60. 60. Lee SC, Chiou SJ, Yen JH, Lin TY, Hsieh KT, Yang JC. DNA barcoding Cinnamomum osmophloeum Kaneh. based on the partial non-coding ITS2 region of ribosomal genes. J Food Drug Anal. 2010;18(2):7.
  61. 61. Rana P, Lee M-S, Sheu S-C. Authentication of Cinnamomum verum (Ceylon cinnamon) in commercial products by qualitative and real-time quantitative PCR assays. Eur Food Res Technol. 2024;250(12):2895–906.
  62. 62. Ginzinger DG. Gene quantification using real-time quantitative PCR: an emerging technology hits the mainstream. Exp Hematol. 2002;30(6):503–12. pmid:12063017
  63. 63. Raheela Jabeen, Ume Habiba, Sana Khalid, Jafir Hussain Shirazi. Extraction and comparison of quality and purity of DNA of medicinal plants by CTAB and kit method. JCP. 2022;6(1):19–22.
  64. 64. Sahu SK, Thangaraj M, Kathiresan K. DNA Extraction Protocol for Plants with High Levels of Secondary Metabolites and Polysaccharides without Using Liquid Nitrogen and Phenol. ISRN Mol Biol. 2012;2012:205049. pmid:27335662
  65. 65. Lee B-J, Kim S, Lee J-W, Lee H-M, Eo SH. Technical note: Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and proteinase-K improve the efficiency of DNA extraction from Japanese larch wood and PCR success rate. Forensic Sci Int. 2021;328:111005. pmid:34607095
  66. 66. Michel CI, Meyer RS, Taveras Y, Molina J. The nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) as a practical plant DNA barcode for herbal medicines. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants. 2016;3(3):94–100.
  67. 67. Marín DV, Castillo DK, López-Lavalle LAB, Chalarca JR, Pérez CR. An optimized high-quality DNA isolation protocol for spodoptera frugiperda J. E. smith (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). MethodsX. 2021;8:101255. pmid:34434778
  68. 68. Abdulla FI, Chua LS, Rahmat Z, Samad AA, Wagiran A. Plant Genomic DNA Extraction for Selected Herbs and Sequencing their Internal Transcribed Spacer Regions Amplified by Specific Primers. Nat Prod Commun. 2016;11(10):1491–6. pmid:30549605
  69. 69. Chiong KT, Damaj MB, Padilla CS, Avila CA, Pant SR, Mandadi KK, et al. Reproducible genomic DNA preparation from diverse crop species for molecular genetic applications. Plant Methods. 2017;13:106. pmid:29213298
  70. 70. Swetha VP, Parvathy VA, Sheeja TE, Sasikumar B. Isolation and amplification of genomic DNA from barks of Cinnamomum spp. Turk J Biol. 2014;38(1):151–5.
  71. 71. Arslan M. Effects of centrifugation at different levels of freeze-thawed blood on DNA isolation. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2023;28(1):154–63.
  72. 72. Buddhachat K, Sripairoj N, Punjansing T, Kongbangkerd A, Inthima P, Tanming W. Species discrimination and hybrid detection in terrestrial orchids using Bar-HRM: A case of the Calanthe group. Plant Gene. 2022;29:100349.
  73. 73. Martino A, Mancuso T, Rossi AM. Application of high-resolution melting to large-scale, high-throughput SNP genotyping: a comparison with the TaqMan method. J Biomol Screen. 2010;15(6):623–9. pmid:20371868
  74. 74. Reed GH, Wittwer CT. Sensitivity and specificity of single-nucleotide polymorphism scanning by high-resolution melting analysis. Clin Chem. 2004;50(10):1748–54. pmid:15308590
  75. 75. Słomka M, Sobalska-Kwapis M, Wachulec M, Bartosz G, Strapagiel D. High Resolution Melting (HRM) for High-Throughput Genotyping-Limitations and Caveats in Practical Case Studies. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(11):2316. pmid:29099791
  76. 76. Osathanunkul M, Sawongta N, Madesis P, Pheera W. Bar-HRM for species confirmation of native plants used in forest restoration in Northern Thailand. Forests. 2022;13(7):997.
  77. 77. Ravindran S, Balakrishnan R, Manilal KS, Ravindran PM. A cluster analysis study onCinnamomum from Kerala, India. Feddes Repert. 1991;102(3–4):167–75.
  78. 78. Shylaja M. Studies on Indian cinnamomum. Unpublished Ph D thesis, University of Calicut, India. 1984.
  79. 79. Joy P, Maridass M. Inter species relationship of Cinnamomum species using RAPD marker analysis. EBL. 2008;2008(1):58.
  80. 80. Sandigawad A, Patil C. Genetic diversity in Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume. (Lauraceae) using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(19):3682–8.
  81. 81. Gwari G, Bhandari U, Naik G, Haider SZ, Chauhan N. Genetic diversity in Cinnamomum tamala Nees. Accessions through DNA fingerprinting using molecular markers. Indian J Agric Res. 2016;50(5):446–50.
  82. 82. Ho KY, Hung TY. Cladistic relationships within the genus Cinnamomum (Lauraceae) in Taiwan based on analysis of leaf morphology and inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) molecular markers. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10(24):4802–15.
  83. 83. Druml B, Cichna-Markl M. High resolution melting (HRM) analysis of DNA--its role and potential in food analysis. Food Chem. 2014;158:245–54. pmid:24731338
  84. 84. Hu A, Kong L, Lu Z, Qiao J, Lv F, Meng F. Research on nanogold-assisted HRM-qPCR technology for highly sensitive and accurate detection of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. LWT. 2022;162:113488.
  85. 85. Rohwer JG. Lauraceae. Flowering Plants· Dicotyledons: Springer; 1993. p. 366–91.
  86. 86. Feng J, Liu Y, Xie A, Yang Y, Lv F, Wei J. Successful development of molecular diagnostic technology combining mini-barcoding and high-resolution melting for traditional Chinese medicine agarwood species based on single-nucleotide polymorphism in the chloroplast genome. Front Plant Sci. 2024;15:1405168. pmid:39145191
  87. 87. Villanueva‐Zayas JD, Rodríguez‐Ramírez R, Ávila‐Villa LA, González‐Córdova AF, Reyes‐López MÁ, Hernández‐Sierra D. Using a COI mini‐barcode and real‐time PCR (qPCR) for sea turtle identification in processed food. J Food Process Preserv. 2021;45(10):e15808.
  88. 88. Anthoons B, Lagiotis G, Drouzas AD, de Boer H, Madesis P. Barcoding High Resolution Melting (Bar-HRM) enables the discrimination between toxic plants and edible vegetables prior to consumption and after digestion. J Food Sci. 2022;87(9):4221–32. pmid:35903040
  89. 89. Ganopoulos I, Argiriou A, Tsaftaris A. Adulterations in Basmati rice detected quantitatively by combined use of microsatellite and fragrance typing with High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis. Food Chem. 2011;129(2):652–9. pmid:30634282
  90. 90. Lagiotis G, Stavridou E, Bosmali I, Osathanunkul M, Haider N, Madesis P. Detection and quantification of cashew in commercial tea products using High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis. J Food Sci. 2020;85(6):1629–34. pmid:32468625
  91. 91. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2016;33(7):1870–4.
  92. 92. Dwight ZL, Palais R, Wittwer CT. uAnalyze: web-based high-resolution DNA melting analysis with comparison to thermodynamic predictions. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2012;9(6):1805–11. pmid:22889837
  93. 93. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytocem Bull. 1987.
  94. 94. Team RC. RA language and environment for statistical computing, R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2020.
  95. 95. Kanderian S, Jiang L, Knight I. Automated Classification and Cluster Visualization of Genotypes Derived from High Resolution Melt Curves. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0143295. pmid:26605797
  96. 96. Kassambara A, Mundt F. Package ‘factoextra’. Extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. CRAN. 2017;76(2).
  97. 97. Reja V, Kwok A, Stone G, Yang L, Missel A, Menzel C, et al. ScreenClust: Advanced statistical software for supervised and unsupervised high resolution melting (HRM) analysis. Methods. 2010;50(4):S10-4. pmid:20146938
  98. 98. Fuentes-García M, Maciá-Fernández G, Camacho J. Evaluation of diagnosis methods in PCA-based multivariate statistical process control. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst. 2018;172:194–210.
  99. 99. Lee BB, Schott EJ, Behringer DC, Bojko J, Kough A, Plough LV. Rapid Genetic Identification of the Blue Crab Callinectes sapidus and Other Callinectes spp. Using Restriction Enzyme Digestion and High Resolution Melt (HRM) Assays. Front Mar Sci. 2020;7.