Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Environmental relevant concentrations of copper sulphate induce biochemical and molecular toxicity in Labeo rohita

  • Saima Naz,

    Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Zoology, Government Sadiq College Women University, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

  • Riaz Hussain ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Supervision, Validation

    dr.riaz.hussain@iub.edu.pk (RH); hmali_uaf@hotmail.com (HMA)

    Affiliation Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

  • Hafiz Muhammad Ali ,

    Roles Investigation, Validation, Writing – original draft

    dr.riaz.hussain@iub.edu.pk (RH); hmali_uaf@hotmail.com (HMA)

    Affiliation Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

  • Nasir Masood,

    Roles Formal analysis, Resources

    Affiliation Department of Biosciences, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan

  • Ghazala Jabeen,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Zoology, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan

  • Rehana Iqbal,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Institute of Zoology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan

  • Momil Liaquat,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Zoology, Government Sadiq College Women University, Bahawalpur, Pakistan

  • Muhammad Irfan Ullah,

    Roles Resources, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan

  • Kashif Hussain,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources

    Affiliation Department of Pathobiology and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, MNS University of Agriculture, Multan, Pakistan

  • Tuğçe Merve Berberoğlu,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Resources, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Animal Nutrition and Nutritional Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kafkas University, Kars, Türkiy

  • Ahmed A. El-Mansi,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

  • Eman A. Elbealy,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Biology Department, Faculty of Science, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia

  • Abdelalim A. Gadallah,

    Roles Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Biology Department, College of Science, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia

  • Kasim Sakran Abass

    Roles Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Physiology, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk, Iraq

Abstract

Copper is an important element involved in the catalysis of many vital reactions in the body of an organism. However, excessive copper causes cellular damage by accelerating the production of reactive oxygen species and disrupting the physiological reactions. The present research was conducted to determine the toxicological effects including oxidative stress profile, concentrations of anti-oxidant enzymes and genotoxicity of three different doses (0.28 µg/L, 0.42 µg/L and 0.56 µg/L) of copper sulphate (CuSO4) subjected to Labeo rohita for 36days. Micronucleus test indicated a significant (p < 0.05) increase in the frequency of morphological and nuclear changes in the erythrocytes of the treated fish. A significant (p < 0.05) increase was observed in oxidative stress parameters (ROS, TBARS) whereas the activity of anti-oxidant enzymes (SOD, POD, GSH, CAT) was significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in the gills, brain, liver and kidneys of fish exposed to 0.56 µg/L concentration of CuSO4. Moreover, CuSO4 exhibited significant (p < 0.05) DNA damage in lymphocytes, brain cells, hepatocytes and renal cells, as determined by comet test. Hence, it has been concluded that CuSO4causesevere biochemical and physiological disruptions in different organs of Labeo rohita, hence, considered as hazardous even at very low sub-lethal concentrations.

Introduction

Industrial sector is the backbone of the development of a country; however, its untreated effluents are damaging for the environment, since at every day, huge amount of municipal, industrial and agricultural wastes are being released in the water environment causing serious ecological problems [1,2]. These released heavy metals accumulate in liver, gills, kidneys, intestine, integument and muscular tissue inthe body of aquatic animals [3,4], thus posing serious concerns not only for their health and well-being but also for the consumers [58]. The body exposure to metals like cadmium (Cd), mercury (Hg), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), zinc (Zn) and arsenic (As) over an extended period of time affects the organisms by disrupting their cellular functions like growth, proliferation, differentiation, tissue repair processes and thus, cause apoptosis, hepato-renal, skin and cardio-toxicities [9,10]. It has been found that the concentration of Cu (2.14–2.17 mg/L) is relatively higher among the metals, i.e., As (0.015–0.40 mg/L), Cd (0.02–0.029 mg/L), cobalt (Co; 0.31–0.38 mg/L), Cr (1.02–1.09 mg/L) and Hg (0.01–0.04 mg/L) in the groundwater and these levels are considered to be higher than the acceptable threshold values given by WHO [11]. Except the metals like Zn that are essentially required for biological and chemical processes of the body but only in minute concentrations, the bioaccumulation of As, Cd, Cu, Pb, thallium and Zn was observed in gills, liver, kidneys, skin and muscles of different fish like C. aumtus, X. Argentea, P. fulvidraco and O. mossambicus [3,1214] that impart detrimental effects on physiological performance of birds [15] and animals [16,17].

Copper is an important metal, present at plentiful concentrations in mines and the environment (5000ng/m3) [18,19], abundant in rivers [20,21], coastal systems [22] and estuaries [23]. It plays a significant role in critical enzyme reactions in the physiological processes of both human and animals as a co-factor [24,25], is an important biological unit in the oxygen transportation as part of hemocyanin and also a counterpart of hemoglobin (Hb) for oxygen transportation found in shellfish and mussels [26]. Moreover, Cuis an essential element for Hb synthesis, required for blood coagulation, bone formation, proper mitochondrial function, cellular signalling pathways like detoxification of reactive oxygen species and metabolic reprogramming for differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells into diverse cell lineages [19,27] and also an important micro-nutrient needed for cellular functions of vertebrates, invertebrates and aquatic species [25]. However, prolonged exposure to Cu has a number of detrimental biological and physiological effects on organisms, especially fish, including alterations in the blood chemistry, organ histo-pathology and the formation of metallothionein [25]. Cu reaches the aquatic systems through anthropogenic sources including water contamination via industrial wastes, discharge of coolant and municipal/sewage water, manufacturing discharge from pulp and paper board mills, foundries, anti-fouling paints industries and petroleum refining, mine drainage, combustion of coal (fly ash) and oil, corrosion of pipelines, use of copper salts in controlling the aquatic vegetation, application of copper fungicides and influx of Cu containing fertilizers for different crops [28,29]. Copper and other heavy metals accumulate in the body of aquatic organisms and eventually are transmitted to the humans via consumption of affected fish and other sea foods, resulting in severe gastrointestinal, renal and immune system dysfunctions, acute or chronic sickness, nervous system disorders, skin and vascular damages, birth defects and different cancers [30,31].

Fish is a critical bio-indicator for assessing the contamination of heavy metals in the aquatic habitat, since, it is in direct contact with water,have good sensitivity and potential to bio-accumulate the environmental pollutants present in water, even at quite low concentrations and thus, reflects the overall exposure to water pollutants by alterations in its physiological parameters [32,33]. Numerous physiological changes occur in the fish like production of ROS when the natural circumstances of the aquatic habitat alter due to contamination with heavy metals [28,34]. Fish have an anti-oxidative defense system that utilizes both enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms to reduce the detrimental effects of ROS [6]. The decreased anti-oxidant activity along with increased oxidative stress parameters are important indicators of contamination of the aquatic life [3537] and these stress indicators are commonly used in eco-toxicology as an early warning to assess the potential detrimental changes in the exposed animals [3841]. Moreover, different biological markers like level of circulating exosomes [42], hepatic enzymes [43,44], anti-oxidants [4548], hemato-biochemical parameters [4951] and histo-pathological changes in the visceral organs [5255] have previously been described, to establish a relationship between the effects of exposure of hazardous chemical with their toxicological effects in fish and other animal species. Additionally, current trends in molecular biology and their applications to develop a number of sensitive and selective DNA-based eco-genotoxicity tests like micronucleus test and comet assay are considered as effective, reliable and extensively used methods to identify the genotoxic effects [19,41,56,57].

The concentration of Cu has been reported to be 0.5 µg-1 mg/L (median value: 0.01 mg/L) in surface water in various studies in USA, 6 µg/L (3–19 µg/L) in the River Stour in United Kingdom and 0.8–10 µg/L in an unpolluted zone of River Periyar in India [58] or was found to be quite low (usually <20µg/L) in the surface waters [59]. Moreover, it has been reported that naturally Cu has been found to be 0.03-0.23g/L and 0.20-30g/L in seawater and freshwater systems, respectively [60]. Cu is readily accumulated in the body of different marine plants and animal species including fish, with a bio-accumulation factor ranging from 100 to 26000 and thus, leads to severe toxicological effects when this uptake exceeds the safe limits of physiological or biochemical detoxification and rate of excretion [61]. In this context, it was observed that marine amphipod Allorchestes compressa accumulated 100 mg/kg of copper and lead to reduced growth when exposed to only 10 µg/L of Cu for 28 days [62]. Hence, for the same reason, different low concentrations of CuSO4 were selected in the current project, to determine the effects of these water environment relevant concentrations of Cu on different physiological parameters of the fish, only for a short period of time, i.e., about 01 month. The experimental doses were selected to be of sub-lethal concentrations and were quite below than LC50 of CuSO4 for L. rohita: 3.15 mg/L [63] and 1.60 mg/L [64]. As a part of the current study, our research group has recently reported severe health effects of CuSO4 on hemato-biochemical profile of L. rohita in connection with histo-pathological alterations in different organs at these low concentrations [65]. However, the literature is deprived-off the information about the oxidative stress caused by alterations in these organ tissues of L rohita due to CuSO4 toxicity. Thus, the present study was conducted to assess the oxidative stress profile (ROS, TBARS) and concentrations of different anti-oxidant enzymes (GSH, SOD, CAT, POD) in liver, brain cells, gills and kidneys to determine the toxicological and genotoxic effects of copper sulphate in L. rohita.The current toxicological observations will enhance our understanding about the underlying molecular mechanisms causing breaks in the DNA strands and genome instability leading to different patho-physiological effects and in consistent molecular mechanisms that eventually adversely affects the growth and development of the organ systems and hence, ultimately severely diminish the production potential of the fish.

Materials and methods

The experiment was conducted at the Department of Zoology, The Government Sadiq College Women University, Bahawalpur, as described earlier [65]. This study and the animal experimentations were approved by the Institutional Review Board, The Government Sadiq College Women University, Bahawalpur, Pakistan (124/20/GSCWU).

Experimental fish and treatments

A total number of 72 freshwater fish (Labeo rohita) with similar body weight (200–215 g) were obtained from the Punjab Fisheries Department, Bahawalpur. After collection, the fish were placed in 100L tap water glass aquaria at standard housing conditions under controlled temperature (24 ± 1ºC), pH (7.5)and under continuous aeration at dissolved oxygen level of 6.16 ppm using aquarium air pump (SOBO SB-548A), as previously described [65]. Physicochemical characteristics of water were monitored before the start and during the whole duration of the experiment, by recording the parameters at each stage to provide a continuously comfortable environment to the fish (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Physical and chemical characteristics of water during the experimental period.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328238.t001

The fish were offered commercially available standard feed twice daily containing 25% crude protein in the form of pellets (3% of body weight) twice every day. For acclimatization, the fish (n = 72) were kept untreated for 15 days and then randomly assigned in to four treatment groups (n = 18/ group); group A was kept as control and the groups B to D were treated with CuSO4solution:B = 0.28 µg/L, C = 0.42 µg/L and D = 0.56 µg/L dissolved in fresh clean drinking water. The water of the aquaria was replaced on regular basis to remove the residual feed and the fecal material from the aquaria, to keep the environment clean and healthy, with a fresh addition of CuSO4 to maintain its constant level during the whole duration of the experimental period (36 days). All of the chemicals used in this experiment were of analytical grade and were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (USA).

Collection of samples and biochemical assays

The treated fish (n = 6/ group) of each experimental group were selected for collection of blood and different organ tissues at days-12, 24 and 36 of the experiment. The animal suffering has been reduced by using clove oil (4.5 mg/L), to anaesthetize the experimental fish prior to blood and tissue sample collection [66]. Then, to further reduce the pain and distress to the fish, the blood (2.5mL/ fish) was drawn from caudal vein of each fish by using 26 gauge disinfected hypodermic needle. The collected blood (0.5mL) was then placed in EDTA-coated glass vacutainers, until further hematological analysis. The remaining blood (2.0mL) was kept in anti-coagulant free tubes, was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min, the serum was separated and preserved at −20ºC until further biochemical analysis [67,68].

After collection of blood, the treated fish were dissected and 0.5–1.0 cm tissue samples of heart were collected for histo-pathological examinations and liver, brain, gills and kidneys were collected for genotoxic studies [6971]. The tissue pieces of heart were preserved in 10% neutral buffered formalin solution until further processing [7275]. These tissue samples were processed by paraffin sectioning technique and 4–5μm thick histological sections were stained by Hematoxylin and Eosin staining technique [7678]. All the histo-pathological observations are an average of three independent slides for each tissue.

Genotoxicity of erythrocytes

At the time of sampling, a fine thin blood smear was prepared on a microscope slide by a drop of freshly collected blood of each treated fish, to analyze the morphological and nuclear alterations in the erythrocytes of the treated fish [79]. The smear was quickly dried, fixed with absolute methyl alcohol, stained with Giemsa stain and a total of 1000 red blood cells (RBCs) per smear per fish in each treatment group were observed under oil immersion lens (1000X) of light microscope and percentile rate was computed to determine the morphological and nuclear changes in the erythrocytes [8,8082].

Comet assay for genotoxicity

To assess the DNA damage, the blood lymphocytes, hepatocytes, cells from brain, gills and kidneys were separated, according to previously published method [79]. The frequency of DNA damage in these cells was measured using single cell gel electrophoresis/comet assay under alkaline conditions, as described earlier [8,83].

Determination of oxidative stress parameters and anti-oxidant enzymes

For assessment of oxidative stress parameters and concentration of anti-oxidant enzymes, the tissue specimens were collected at days-12, 24 and 36 of the trial. Briefly, the tissue homogenates were prepared, separately from each organ tissue (brain, liver, kidneys and gills) using cold saline solution and different parameters of oxidative stress and anti-oxidant enzymes were estimated by measuring the optical density at specific relevant wavelengths in spectrophotometer, as described earlier [54].

Reactive oxygen species (ROS)

ROS were measured by following the procedure described earlier [84]. Briefly, two different reagents were prepared; the reagent 1,Diethyl para phenylenediamine sulfate (1 mg) was mixed in 10mL deionized water, while reagent 2 was prepared by mixing 50 μL ferrous sulfate stock solution (100 mg FeSO4 in 20mL of sodium acetate buffer; pH 4.8) in 100mL of sodium acetate buffer. Then, both reagents were mixed at a ratio of 1:25 and placed in the dark for 2 min. Finally, about 70 μL tissue homogenate was mixed in 1.7mL of the mixed reagents and values of ROS were recorded after an interval of 20sec using UV spectrophotometer at 505nm.

Thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS)

TBARS was recorded as described earlier [85]. Briefly, the reaction mixture was prepared containing 100 μL each of Tris-HCl (150mM), ascorbic acid (1.5mM), ferrous sulphate (1.0mM) and tissue homogenate (100 μL) in 600 μL of distilled water. The mixture was vortexed and kept in incubator for 15 min at 37°C. Then, 1 mL trichloroacetic acid (10%) and thiobarbituric acid (0.375%) were added to the mixture, vortexed and then placed in the water bath (100°C) for 15 min. Finally, the contents were centrifuged at 1000g for 10 min,the supernatant was collected and the optical density was determined using UV visible spectrophotometer at 532nm.

Reduced glutathione (GSH)

The quantity of GSH was recorded by following the earlier procedure [86]. Briefly, the reaction mixture containing100μL tissue homogenate, 1000 μL disodium hydrogen phosphate buffer and 500 μL DTNB reagent was prepared and optical density of the mixture was recorded using UV visible spectrophotometer at 412nm wavelength.

Superoxide dismutase (SOD)

The concentration of SOD was measured by following the previous method [86,87]. For this purpose, 1500 μL L-methionine (9.9mM), 1000 μL nitroblue tetrazolium (NBT, 57.0μM) and 750 μL Triton X-100 (0.025%) were mixed in 30mL PBS (50mM,7.8 pH). Then, 90 μL of tissue homogenate was mixed in 1000 μL of prepared mixture. The mixture was then placed under fluorescent light for 10 min and then incubated at 37°C for 5 min. Finally, 10 μL of riboflavin (0.9μM) was added and the mixture was placed at 40°C for 10 min. Then, the values of SOD were measured by using UV visible spectrophotometer at 560nm.

Catalase (CAT)

The quantity of CAT was recorded according to previous method [88]. Briefly, a reaction mixture having 100 μL tissue sample, 2mL potassium phosphate buffer (50mM, pH 7.0) and 1mL H2O2 (5.9mM) was prepared and the values of CAT were determined using UV visible spectrophotometer at 240nm.

Peroxide (POD)

The quantity of POD was recorded using the method as reported earlier [88]. Briefly, a reaction mixture containing 75 μL of H2O2 (40mM), 25 μL of guaiacol (20mM), 625 μL of potassium phosphate buffer (50mM, pH 5.0) and 25 μL of tissue was prepared and the values of POD were measured by using UV spectrophotometer at 470nm.

Statistical analysis

The obtained results were presented as mean±standard error of mean (SEM) of three independent observations in each experiment. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in IBM SPSS® statistics software (version 20). The significant differences among the means were compared with Tukey’s post-hoc test at p < 0.05 level of significance.

Results

Clinical signs of toxicity

The animal health parameters and behavioral signs were monitored on daily basis and different clinical signs like loss of equilibrium, jerking movements, surface breathing and swimming on one side were observed in the fish exposed to higher concentrations of CuSO4 at days-24 and 36 of the experiment. However, since the doses of CuSO4selected for experimentation were quite low and of sub-lethal level, thus, no mortality was observed during the whole study period, even in the treated fish exposed to higher concentration (0.56 µg/L) of CuSO4 at the end of the experiment, i.e., at day-36.

Morphological and nuclear changes in erythrocytes

The frequency of different morphological and nuclear alterations in the erythrocytes subjected to different concentrations of CuSO4was found to be significantly (p < 0.05) higher in the fish exposed to 0.42 µg/L (group C) and 0.56 µg/L (group D) of CuSO4 (Table 2). A significantly (p < 0.05) increased number of micronuclei in the erythrocytes and abnormal shaped cells such as droplet cells, elliptocytes, spindle shaped cells, microcytes and pear-shaped cells were observed in the groups treated with 0.42 µg/L and 0.56 µg/L of CuSO4 (Fig 1). Moreover, in the fish treated with highest concentration of CuSO4 (0.56 µg/L), the erythrocytes exhibited abnormalities like dividing nucleus indicating regeneration along with the presence of micronucleus (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Frequency of different morphological and nuclear changes in the erythrocytes of fish exposed to various concentrations of CuSO4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328238.t002

thumbnail
Fig 1. Photomicrograph of morphological abnormalities in the erythrocytes of freshwater fish (Labeo rohita).

The fish were treated with CuSO4at 0.42 µg/L (A) and 0.56 µg/L (B) concentrations showing different aberrations in the erythrocytes like micronucleus (arrow), dividing cells (arrowhead), abnormal shaped cells (a), droplet cells (d), elliptocytes (e), spindle shaped cells (s), microcytes (m) and pear-shaped cells (p). Giemsa stain, 1000X (oil immersion lens).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328238.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Photomicrograph of nuclear changes in the erythrocytes of Labeo rohita.

The normal erythrocytes (A) of Labeo rohita became severely affected with different erythrocytic abnormalities (B) on treatment with CuSO4 (0.56 µg/L) and thus, showing nuclear changes micronucleus (arrow) and dividing nucleus (arrowhead). Giemsa stain, 1000X (oil immersion lens).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328238.g002

Oxidative stress parameters and anti-oxidant enzymes

The oxidative stress profile (ROS, TBARS) and the concentrations of various anti-oxidant enzymes (GSH, SOD, CAT, POD) in the gills (Table 3), brain (Table 4), liver (Table 5) and kidneys (Table 6) tissues of fish were found to be significantly (p < 0.05) affected in the fish exposed to increased concentrations (0.42 µg/L; group C, 0.56 µg/L; group D) of CuSO4.The concentrations of ROS and TBARS were significantly (p < 0.05) increased in all these tissues in the groups C and D while GSH contents and concentrations of SOD, CAT and POD showed a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in all the organ tissues of these two treated groups(C and D) exposed to higher (0.42 µg/L, 0.56 µg/L) concentrations of CuSO4compared to the control group A.

thumbnail
Table 3. Oxidative stress parameters (ROS, TBARS) and anti-oxidant enzymes (GSH, SOD, CAT, POD) in the gills of Labeo rohita exposed to various concentrations of CuSO4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328238.t003

thumbnail
Table 4. Oxidative stress parameters (ROS, TBARS) and anti-oxidant enzymes (GSH, SOD, CAT, POD) in the brain of Labeo rohita exposed to various concentrations of CuSO4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328238.t004

thumbnail
Table 5. Oxidative stress parameters (ROS, TBARS) and levels of anti-oxidant enzymes (GSH, SOD, CAT, POD) in the liver of Labeo rohita exposed to various concentrations of CuSO4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328238.t005

thumbnail
Table 6. Oxidative stress parameters (ROS, TBARS) and concentrations of anti-oxidant enzymes (GSH, SOD, CAT, POD) in the kidneys of Labeo rohita exposed to various concentrations of CuSO4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328238.t006

DNA damage by Comet assay

A significant damage to the DNA of lymphocytes (Fig 3A), hepatocytes (Fig 3B), isolated kidney cells (Fig 3C) and brain cells (Fig 3D) of fish was observed at highest (0.56 µg/L) treatment concentration of CuSO4. The intensity of fluorescence around the nucleus depicts the severity of the damage and thus, an increase in the fluorescence around the nuclei has been observed with an increase in the concentration of the treatment (Fig 3). The severity of damage in the DNA of leukocytes (Fig 4a), brain (Fig 4b), liver (Fig 4c) and kidneys (Fig 4d) of Labeo rohita increased with an increase in the dose of CuSO4 and the duration of exposure (Fig 4). A significantly (p < 0.05) higher DNA damage was occurred in all the tissues of fish of the group D (0.56 µg/L) as compared to the control group A. It has been observed that with an increase in the concentration of CuSO4, the damage in these tissues was increased with the passage of time and thus, the greatest damage was recorded at the highest dose, at day-36 of the trial (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Photomicrograph of comet assay.

The normal cells (A) compared to DNA damage in the treated cells: hepatocytes (B), isolated kidney cells (C) and brain cells (D) of fish exposed to higher concentration (0.56 µg/L) of CuSO4. The normal cells are depicting the intact DNA while the treated cells illustrate the DNA damage. The intensity of fluorescence around the nucleus depends upon the degree of damage and increase with an increase in the concentration of the treatment. Ethidium bromide staining; 400X.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328238.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. Comet assay (% of cell damage) in the leukocytes.

The cells of (a), brain (b), liver (c) and kidneys (d) of the control (Group A) and CuSO4 treated groups (Group B: 0.28 µg/L; Group C: 0.42 µg/L; Group D: 0.56 µg/L). The severity of DNA damage has found to be significantly (p < 0.05) increased with an increase in the dose of CuSO4 and the duration of exposure. Bars are showing mean±SEM values. The bars bearing asterisk differ significantly than the control group A, * = p < 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328238.g004

Histo-pathological observations

The histo-pathological alterations in the heart of fish exposed to higher levels of CuSO4 were neutrophilic infiltration, vacuolar degeneration, necrosis of cardiac myocytes, myofibrillosis, edema, inflammation, hemorrhages and deposition of fibrin were observed in the fish exposed to higher concentrations of CuSO4(0.42 µg/L and 0.56 μg/L) at days-24 and 36 of the experiment (Fig 5). The lesions were observed to be mild in the fish treated with lower dose of CuSO4 (0.28 µg/L) and at the start of the experiment (days-12), however the abnormalities were found to be significantly increased with an increase in the concentration of the treatment and duration of the experiment, i.e., days-24 and 36 (Table 7).

thumbnail
Table 7. Severity of various histo-architectural alterations in the heart of Labeo rohita exposed to different doses of copper sulphate.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328238.t007

thumbnail
Fig 5. Photomicrograph of different sections of heart of Labeo rohita.

The fish were exposed to different concentrations of CuSO4 at days-36 of the experiment. A) normal histological arrangements of cardiac tissue; B) vacuolar degeneration (arrow heads); C) edema (*), necrosis of cardiac myocytes (arrow heads) and myofibrillosis (arrow); D) edema (*), necrosis of cardiac myocytes (arrow heads) and myofibrillosis (**). Scale bar: 50μm. Hematoxylin and Eosin Staining. Left panels: 400X, Right panels: 200X.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0328238.g005

Discussion

Copper has been found to cause patho-physiological disorders, oxidative stress, inflammation and toxicity in Labeo rohita [55,65,89] and Cyprinus carpio [90]. Copper poisoning results in significant increase in WBCs, blood glucose and cholesterol and levels of serum enzymes, i.e., alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, lactate dehydrogenase, while erythrocyte count, Hb concentration, hematocritand serum total proteins, albumin and globulin were significantly decreased that clearly indicatea decline in the health of freshwater fish Labeo rohita [65].In a previous study, the genotoxic effects of water of the Helong Reservoir (China) were studied on four common fish species (Labeo rohita, Cirrhinus molitorella, red tilapia and Oreochromis niloticus) present in the reservoir, wherein, no significant difference were observed in different parameters (DNA damage) among these four species as compared to the control [33]. It depicts that the toxicity effects are comparable among these four species, hence, we selected Labeo rohita, as a representative fish species in the current study that is also a commonly available fish in our region.

In our study, erythrocytes with notched nucleus, binucleated, condensed, spindle shaped and spherocytes were observed in Labeo rohita exposed to CuSO4 and the damage was found to be increased with as increase in the concentration of the treatment and the time of exposure. These significantly higher frequency of nuclear abnormalities like lobbed, blebbed, vacuolated and pear-shaped nuclei found in the erythrocytes are most likely due to toxicity stress caused by CuSO4 leading to severe alterations in the nuclear and cellular morphology. Formerly, it was observed that metal pollutants like Cu caused a significant increase in the frequency of micronuclei in Channa punctatus [57] and Pagrus major [91]. Similarly, different nuclear aberrations have been observed in the fish erythrocytes including nuclear remnants, micronuclei, anucleated, notched, condensed and blebbed nuclei as well asmorphological alterations like leptocytes, vacuolated nucleus, stomatocytes and tear shaped cells have also been observed subjected to thiamethoxam [92], fipronil [93] and cadmium [94]. Similarly, likewise that of copper, other metals also found to cause nuclear alterations in the blood cells and histo-morphological modifications in different organs of Ctenopharyngodon idella [95] and Labeo rohita [96].Similarly, it was observed that CuSO4 decreased the erythrocytes count, Hb values and hematocrit in Oreochromis niloticus [97]. The binucleated and pear-shaped erythrocytes, notched nuclei, lobed, blebbed nuclei and micronuclei have also been found in the erythrocytes of grass carp [36] zebrafish [98] common carp Cyprinus carpio [99], Wistar rats [100] and other avian and mammalian species [101] on treatment with insecticides (pyrethroid) that might cause mitochondrial oxidative damage leading to oxidative stress.

The level of oxidative stress parameters like ROS and TBARS in the gills, liver, brain and kidneys of fish subjected to CuSO4 were significantly elevated in a time- and dose-dependent manner in our study. Under the treatment of different doses of CuSO4, initially there observed a non-significant increase in the level of ROS and TBARS at low dose (0.28 µg/L) of CuSO4, the level further increased at high concentration (0.42 µg/L) and became significantly (p < 0.05) adverse at higher concentration (0.56 µg/L) of CuSO4. The same is true for decrease in the concentrations of SOD, POD, GSH and CAT, wherein the decrease was mild at lower doses (0.28 µg/L, 0.42 µg/L) of CuSO4and at the start or mid of the experiment (day-24) and then their levels were significantly (p < 0.05) decreased at higher (0.56 µg/L) dose of CuSO4at the end of the experiment, i.e., day-36. Furthermore, owing to the detoxifying systems of exposed animals, exposure of diverse species to various toxicants produces faster and greater production of ROS from various visceral organs of fish like liver, gills and muscles [102] and thus, the production of ROS stimulates the denaturation of proteins and lipid peroxidation system that lead to cell membrane defects and thus, the production of TBARS [103]. Various contaminants and toxicants have also been reported to elevate the level of oxidative stress indices such as product of lipid peroxidation, ROS and nitric oxide in juvenile red sea bream [91] and rats [104,105]. Likewise, CuSO4 was found to decrease SOD and CAT activities while elevated the glutathione and malondialdehyde levels in Oreochromis niloticus [106]. The total proteins and GSH contents in the gills, liver, brain and kidney tissues of treated fish have been found to be lower in the current investigation that might be attributed to altered tissue functioning, since the cadmium toxicity also leads to oxidative stress in Labeo rohita and thus, a decrease in GSH contents in the hepatic tissue [107]. Moreover, the same has also been previously reported that the oxidative damage was caused in the liver tissue after being exposed to heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Cr, Pb, Zn) in Labeo rohita [108,109]. Similarly, lower levels of GSH have been observed in the hepatic tissue of Delta Smelt [110] and Jundiara [111] fish and in the plasma of goldfish [112]. In the same context, the reduced amounts of these anti-oxidant enzymes in the gills, liver, brain and kidneys seen in this study might be related to CuSO4-induced generation of free radicals in these organs, as previously elaborated [113].

The excessive synthesis of free radicals like ROS causes oxidative damage that activates the body defense system to counteract the toxic impact of these radicals including stimulation of glutathione reductase, glutathione-S-transferase, SOD, GPx and CAT enzymes, as well as other compounds associated with anti-oxidant defense mechanism [114116]. It is also documented that CuSO4 and CuO-NPs alone or in combination decrease the plasma total proteins and tissue SOD, CAT, glutathione-S-transferase, glutathione reductase and glutathione in Oreochromis niloticus [106]and zebrafish [117]. In the same context, in the current investigation, the toxicity stress of CuSO4considerably decreased the concentration of anti-oxidant enzymes (POD, SOD, CAT) in visceral organs of the fish in a dose-dependent manner as likely the reduction was observed in the concentrations of CAT, POD and SOD in the hepatic tissue of Oreochromis niloticus, when exposed to CuSO4 [118]and hence, is coherent with the results of our study.

The comet test is usually used to assess the metal-induced substantial changes in the level of DNA damage and the method successfully screens a wide range of genetic pollutants in the blood of Oreochromis niloticus [119], Cyprinus carpio [120], Labeo rohita [56], Aristichthys nobilis [121]and four fresh water fish; Labeo rohita, Cirrhinus molitorella, red tilapia and Oreochromis niloticus [33]. In the same context, it has been observed that CuSO4 caused an increase in DNA damage in Labeo rohita in a dose-dependent manner in the current study (Fig 4) that has also previously been reported that CuSO4 has genotoxic capacity to interact with DNA and causes detrimental changes in the mammalian cells as measured by an increase in the comet percentage [122]. The DNA damage is happened in a time and concentration related manner, with the most damage occurred at the lethal concentration [123,124] and the greatest DNA damage was seen at the highest concentration of the treatment [125,126]; thus, these observations equally support our findings.

The results of the current study indicate that CuSO4at sub-lethal concentrations causes a significant increase in the oxidative stress profile in different organs (gills, liver, brain and kidneys) and significant decrease in the anti-oxidant enzymes along with DNA damage in different cells in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Previously, as a part of the same research project, we observed that CuSO4 significantly decreased the blood cells (RBCs count, packed cells volume) and Hb concentration [65] that might be due to DNA damage and morphological alterations in the erythrocytes of the treated fish, as we have observed in the current study. Similarly, the previously found histo-pathological alterations in the gills, liver and kidneys of the treated fish [65] has now been confirmed by imbalance in the concentrations of stress parameters and the level of anti-oxidant enzymes in these organs. These toxic effects are also further depicted by neutrophilic infiltration at the inflammatory site, degeneration of the affected tissue and necrosis of the cells, as we have observed for cardiac myocytes in the histo-pathological observations. The effects of CuSO4 on different studied parameters were found to be mild to moderate at low (0.28 µg/L) to high (0.42 µg/L) concentrations of CuSO4 at the start (day-12) or mid (day-24) of the experiment, while these effects become adverse at higher (0.56 µg/L) concentration up-to the end of the experiment, i.e., day-36. The decreased number of erythrocytes, severe morphological alterations along with a decrease in the oxygen carrying capacity (level of hemoglobin) of these blood cells leading to severe health effects and thus greatly affects the growth performance of the fish. That is ultimately depicted by an overall decrease in the body weight of the treated fish on increasing the dose of CuSO4 and duration of the experiment and hence, clearly depicts the toxic effects of CuSO4 on the health status and thus, eventually affects the production potential of the fish.

Conclusions

The results indicated that copper sulphate induces significant tissue damage in freshwater fish (Labeo rohita) by causing severe morphological and nuclear changes in the erythrocytes and a significant increase the level of oxidative stress parameters (ROS, TBARS),while a significant decrease in the anti-oxidant enzymes (SOD, GSH,POD,CAT) in these organs. These hemato-biochemical parameters are imperative biomarkers used to analyze the physiological condition of the fish and to assess the degree of damage to its vital organs. Hence, it could be concluded that CuSO4 is a hazardous compound that causes severe physio-biochemical disruptions in different organ systems of the fish by entering in to the food chain, even at quite low environment relevant and sub-lethal concentrations and thus, could ultimately affects the human health on consumption of these affected fish. It is therefore recommended to avoid the discharge of extensively used pesticides and waste materials of different industries in the canal or river waters that thus becomes severely harmful for natural inhabitants of freshwater environment.

Supporting information

References

  1. 1. Alam S, Afzal G, Hussain R, Ali HM, Sami A, Malik RM, et al. Estimation of median LC50 and toxicity of environmentally relevant concentrations of thiram in Labeo rohita. npj Clean Water. 2025;8(1).
  2. 2. Yamin A, Naz S, Riaz H, Rehman T, Shaheen A, Chatha AMM, et al. Exposure to low concentrations of heavy metals alone and in combination induces histopathological and genotoxic effects in fish (Labeo rohita). Adv Life Sci. 2020;7(4):240–6.
  3. 3. Chan WS, Routh J, Luo C, Dario M, Miao Y, Luo D, et al. Metal accumulations in aquatic organisms and health risks in an acid mine-affected site in South China. Environ Geochem Health. 2021;43(11):4415–40. pmid:33876342
  4. 4. Ray S, Vashishth R. From water to plate: reviewing the bioaccumulation of heavy metals in fish and unraveling human health risks in the food chain. Emerg Contam. 2024;10(4):100358.
  5. 5. Basirun AA, Ahmad SA, Yasid NA, Sabullah MK, Daud HM, Sha’arani S, et al. Toxicological effects and behavioural and biochemical responses of Oreochromis mossambicus gills and its cholinesterase to copper: a biomarker application. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2018;16(2):887–98.
  6. 6. Hussain R, Naz S, Alam S, Ali HM, Ali A, Khan MS, et al. Temporal and dosage impact of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on grass carp: unveiling oxidative stress, DNA damage, and antioxidant suppression. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2025;35(1):19–31. pmid:39034674
  7. 7. Uaidullah K, Rakhshanda T, Hamza M, Sakina K, Sadia K, Masrora Ali K. Isolation and screening of biosurfactant producing bacteria from different fuel contaminated sites. Pak Euro J Med & LS. 2022;5(2):463–72.
  8. 8. Saeed S, Afzal G, Ali HM, Hussain R, Jabeen R, Kiran S, et al. Patho-physiological effects of environmental relevant concentrations of lufenuron in male Japanese quails. Environ Res. 2025;274:121203. pmid:39988040
  9. 9. Balali-Mood M, Naseri K, Tahergorabi Z, Khazdair MR, Sadeghi M. Toxic mechanisms of five heavy metals: mercury, lead, chromium, cadmium, and arsenic. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:643972. pmid:33927623
  10. 10. Mitra S, Chakraborty AJ, Tareq AM, Emran TB, Nainu F, Khusro A, et al. Impact of heavy metals on the environment and human health: novel therapeutic insights to counter the toxicity. J King Saud Univ - Sci. 2022;34(3):101865.
  11. 11. Ashraf I, Ahmad F, Sharif A, Altaf AR, Teng H. Heavy metals assessment in water, soil, vegetables and their associated health risks via consumption of vegetables, District Kasur, Pakistan. SN Appl Sci. 2021;3(5).
  12. 12. Adoho ACC, Konmy BBS, Olounladé PA, Azando EVB, Hounzangbé-Adoté MS, Gbangboché AB. Phytochemistry and larval toxicity of Ipomea asarifolia, Commelinadiffusa, Acalyphaciliata and Eleusineindica against Artemiasalina. Intern J Vet Sci. 2022;11(2):121–128.
  13. 13. Emeish WFA, Soliman SA, Ahmed AE, Alsaegh AA, Alsyaad KM, Ali ME, et al. Osmoregulatory genes expression analysis and chloride cells activity in common carp: insight from fish exposed to salinity. Pak Vet J. 2023;43(3):515–522. http://doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2023.069
  14. 14. Padrilah SN, Sabullah MK, Shukor MYA, Yasid NA, Shamaan NA, Ahmad SA. Toxicity effects of fish histopathology on copper accumulation. Pertanika J Trop Agri Sci. 2018;41(2):519–40.
  15. 15. Satti S, Naz S, Asad F, Ashraf A. Comparative effects of selenium sources and concentrations on growth, nutrient absorption, and biochemistry in Japanese quails. Pak Vet J.2024;4(4):1013–22. http://doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2024.272
  16. 16. Ahmad L, Gul ST, Saleemi MK, Hussain R, Rehman AU, Naqvi SNH. The effect of different repeated doses of cypermethrin on the behavioral and histological alterations in the brain of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculi). Intern J Vet Sci. 2021;10(4):347–54.
  17. 17. Al‑Gheffari HK, Aljahdali SM, Albalawi M, Obidan A, Binothman N, Aljadani M. et al. Mycogenic zinc nanoparticles with antimicrobial, antioxidant, antiviral, anticancer, and anti-alzheimer activities mitigate the aluminium toxicity in mice: effects on liver, kidney, and brain health and growth performance. Pak Vet J. 2024;44(3):763–75. http://doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2024.252
  18. 18. Brewer GJ. Copper excess, zinc deficiency, and cognition loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Biofactors. 2012;38(2):107–13. pmid:22438177
  19. 19. Ruiz LM, Libedinsky A, Elorza AA. Role of copper on mitochondrial function and metabolism. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:711227. pmid:34504870
  20. 20. Couto CMCM, Ribeiro C, Maia A, Santos M, Tiritan ME, Ribeiro AR, et al. Assessment of Douro and Ave River (Portugal) lower basin water quality focusing on physicochemical and trace element spatiotemporal changes. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2018;53(12):1056–66. pmid:29985754
  21. 21. Milivojević J, Krstić D, Šmit B, Djekić V. Assessment of heavy metal contamination and calculation of its pollution index for Uglješnica River, Serbia. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2016;97(5):737–42. pmid:27638703
  22. 22. Santos D, Félix L, Luzio A, Parra S, Cabecinha E, Bellas J, et al. Toxicological effects induced on early life stages of zebrafish (Danio rerio) after an acute exposure to microplastics alone or co-exposed with copper. Chemosphere. 2020;261:127748. pmid:32738713
  23. 23. Tahir R, Ghaffar A, Abbas G, Turabi TH, Kausar S, Xiaoxia DU, et al. Pesticide induced hematological, biochemical and genotoxic changes in fish: a review. Agrobiol Rec. 2021;3:41–57.
  24. 24. Stern BR. Essentiality and toxicity in copper health risk assessment: overview, update and regulatory considerations. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2010;73(2):114–27. pmid:20077283
  25. 25. Malhotra N, Ger T-R, Uapipatanakul B, Huang J-C, Chen KH-C, Hsiao C-D. Review of copper and copper nanoparticle toxicity in fish. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2020;10(6):1126. pmid:32517348
  26. 26. Kato S, Matsui T, Gatsogiannis C, Tanaka Y. Molluscan hemocyanin: structure, evolution, and physiology. Biophys Rev. 2018;10(2):191–202. pmid:29235083
  27. 27. Khan A, Qadir MF, Ahmad A, Ejaz W, Chohan TZ, et al. Allethrin induced toxicopathological alterations in adult male Albino rats. Agrobiol Rec. 2021;5.
  28. 28. Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN. Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2014;7(2):60–72. pmid:26109881
  29. 29. Khayatnezhad M, Nasehi F. Industrial pesticides and a methods assessment for the reduction of associated risks: a review. Adv Life Sci. 2021;8(2):202–10.
  30. 30. Fernandes Azevedo B, Barros Furieri L, Peçanha FM, Wiggers GA, Frizera Vassallo P, Ronacher Simões M, et al. Toxic effects of mercury on the cardiovascular and central nervous systems. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:949048. pmid:22811600
  31. 31. Cobbina SJ, Chen Y, Zhou Z, Wu X, Zhao T, Zhang Z, et al. Toxicity assessment due to sub-chronic exposure to individual and mixtures of four toxic heavy metals. J Hazard Mater. 2015;294:109–20. pmid:25863025
  32. 32. Fatima M, Usmani N, Firdaus F, Zafeer MF, Ahmad S, Akhtar K, et al. In vivo induction of antioxidant response and oxidative stress associated with genotoxicity and histopathological alteration in two commercial fish species due to heavy metals exposure in northern India (Kali) river. Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015;176–177:17–30. pmid:26191657
  33. 33. Xian H, Tang M, Chen Y, Lian Z, Li Y, Peng X, et al. Indigenous fish-based assessment of genotoxic potentials of the Helong Reservoir in Guangzhou, China. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021;40(7):1919–27. pmid:33760286
  34. 34. Aziz S, Abdullah S, Anwar H, Latif F. DNA damage and oxidative stress in economically important fish, Bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis) exposed to engineered copper oxide nanoparticles. Pak Vet J. 2022;42(1):1–8.
  35. 35. Balgoon MJ, Alghamdi AM. Biochemical assessment of boswellic acid Enrichfrankincense extract and its antioxidant, Antibacterial, Anticancer and Anti-inflammatory potential in ameliorating the glycerol-toxicity in rats. Pak Vet J. 2024;44(4):1023–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2024.290
  36. 36. Faheem M, Zahid Z, Ferreira NGC. Toxicity assessment of dibutyl phthalate in grass carp: an integrated biomarker approach. Pak Vet J. 2021;41(2):365–71.
  37. 37. Wang J-Q, Hussain R, Ghaffar A, Afzal G, Saad AQ, Ahmad N, et al. Clinicohematological, mutagenic, and oxidative stress induced by pendimethalin in freshwater fish bighead carp (Hypophthalmichthys nobilis). Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:2093822. pmid:35528506
  38. 38. Aboubakr M, Elbadawy M, Ibrahim SS, Khalil E, Darweish M, Farag A, et al. Allicin and lycopene possesses a protective effect against methotrexate-induced testicular toxicity in rats. Pak Vet J. 2023;43(3):559–66. http://doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2023.057
  39. 39. Ahmed HH, El-Toukhey NES, El-ssa R, Hendawy AKH. Efficacy of melatonin against oxidative stress, DNA damage and histopathological changes induced by nicotine in liver and kidneys of male rats. Intern J Vet Sci. 2021;10(1):31–6.
  40. 40. Das D, Moniruzzaman M, Sarbajna A, Chakraborty SB. Effect of heavy metals on tissue-specific antioxidant response in Indian major carps. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017;24(22):18010–24. pmid:28624940
  41. 41. Elsayed A, Aboubakr M, Hassan FW, Zakaria M, Abdelhiee EY, Soliman A, et al. Testicular injury of acrylamide in rats and potential protection of coenzyme Q10 and rosuvastatin. Pak Vet J. 2024;44(2):344–51. http://doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2024.146
  42. 42. Tang M, Chen Y, Xian H, Tan S, Lian Z, Peng X, et al. Circulating exosome level of indigenous fish may be a novel biomarker for the integrated ecotoxicity effect of water environment. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022;229:113084. pmid:34915223
  43. 43. Akbary P, Sartipi Yarahmadi S, Jahanbakhshi A. Hematological, hepatic enzymes’ activity and oxidative stress responses of gray mullet (Mugil cephalus) after sub-acute exposure to copper oxide. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2018;25(2):1800–8. pmid:29101705
  44. 44. Gaber TM, El-Hamamsy SMA, Ahmed NS, Ali MM. Amelioration effect of Carica papaya fruit extracts on doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity in rats. Intern J Vet Sci. 2020;9:349–54.
  45. 45. Arguelles EDLR. Chemical composition and In vitro study of antioxidant and antibacterial activities of Sargassumoligocystum Montagne (Sargassaceae, Ochrophyta). Asian J Agric Biol. 2022;2022(4):202105209.
  46. 46. Aslam J, Imran Shahzad M, Muhammad Ali H, Ramzan M, Ahmad F-D, Tahir Aleem M, et al. A multidirectional phytochemical profiling, antimicrobial, antioxidant and toxicity studies of Neurada procumbens L.: a desert medicinal plant. J King Saud Univ - Sci. 2023;35(8):102862.
  47. 47. Aslam J, Imran Shahzad M, Muhammad Ali H, Ramzan M, Ahmad F-D, Zahid Mustafa M, et al. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory potentials of aerial and floral parts of Neurada procumbens extracts: in vitro and in vivo studies. J King Saud Univ - Sci. 2023;35(7):102822.
  48. 48. Akpinar D, Mercan T, Demir H, Ozdemir S, Demir C, Kavak S. Protective effects of thymoquinone on doxorubicin-induced lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzyme levels in rat peripheral tissues. Pak Vet J. 2023;43(4):651–8.
  49. 49. Kazmi SAH, Iqbal R, Al-AA Doaiss A, Hussain R, Latif F, et al. Azoxystrobin-induced oxidative stress in gills, hematological biomarkers and histopathological ailments in fresh water fish. Pak Vet J. 2023;43(2):321–6.
  50. 50. Sindi RA, Alam S, Rizwan M, Ullah MI, Ijaz N, Iqbal Z. Investigations of hemato-biochemical, histopathological, oxidative stress and reproductive effects of thiram in albino rats. Pak Vet J. 2023;43(2):255–61.
  51. 51. Vo VT, Long LTM, Duong TQA, Mai NAT, Thuong NHT. Assessment of lead toxicity in red tilapia Oreochromis sp. through hematological parameters. Asian J Agric Biol. 2022;2022(2):202101016.
  52. 52. Kalsoom R, Asfour HZ, Ali HM, Qayyum A, Anjum S, Maqbool F, et al. Bifenthrin induced toxic effects on haematological, reproductive and histo-morphological profile in adult male quail (Coturnix japonica). Asian J Agric Biol. 2024;2024(1):2023357.
  53. 53. Saleemi MK, Raza A, Khatoon A, Zubair M, Yongping X, Murtaza B, et al. Toxic effects of aflatoxin B1 on hematobiochemical and histopathological parameters of juvenile white leghorn male birds and their amelioration with vitamin E and Moringa oleifera. Pak Vet J. 2023;43(3):405–411.
  54. 54. Afzal G, Ali HM, Hussain T, Hussain S, Ahmad MZ, Naseer A, et al. Effects of sub-lethal concentrations of lindane on histo-morphometric and physio-biochemical parameters of Labeo rohita. PLoS One. 2024;19(7):e0304387. pmid:38968252
  55. 55. Naseem S, Ghaffar A, Hussain R, Khan A. Inquisition of toxic effects of pyriproxyfen on physical, hemato-biochemical and histopathological parameters in Labeo rohita fish. Pak Vet J. 2022;42(3):308–15.
  56. 56. Hussain R, Ghaffar A, Abbas G, Jabeen G, Khan I, Abbas RZ, et al. Thiamethoxam at sublethal concentrations induces histopathological, serum biochemical alterations and DNA damage in fish (Labeo rohita). Toxin Rev. 2020;41(1):154–64.
  57. 57. Pandey AK, Nagpure NS, Trivedi SP. Genotoxicity assessment of pesticide profenofos in freshwater fish Channa punctatus (Bloch) using comet assay and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD). Chemosphere. 2018;211:316–23. pmid:30077112
  58. 58. Donohue J. Copper in Drinking-water, Background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. World Health Organization; 2004. https://cdn.who.int/media/docs/default-source/wash-documents/wash-chemicals/copper.pdf
  59. 59. Haughey MA, Anderson MA, Whitney RD, Taylor WD, Losee RF. Forms and fate of Cu in a source drinking water reservoir following CuSO4 treatment. Wat Res. 2000;34(13):3440–52.
  60. 60. King ES. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Technology. Aquatic Life Ambient Freshwater Quality Criteria – Copper. EPA-822-R-07-001.2007. https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2019-02/documents/al-freshwater-copper-2007-revision.pdf
  61. 61. Australian Government Initiative. Copper in freshwater and marine water. In: Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. 2000. https://www.waterquality.gov.au/anz-guidelines/guideline-values/default/water-quality-toxicants/toxicants/copper-2000
  62. 62. Ahsanullah M, Williams AR. Sublethal effects and bioaccumulation of cadmium, chromium, copper and zinc in the marine amphipod Allorchestes compressa. Mar Biol. 1991;108(1):59–65.
  63. 63. Latif A, Ali M, Sayyed AH, Iqal F, Usman K, Rauf M, et al. Effect of copper sulphate and lead nitrate, administered alone or in combination, on the histology of liver and kidney of Labeo rohita. Pak J Zool. 2013;45(4):913–20.
  64. 64. Rana J, Shakir HA, Ara C. Determination of LC50 of copper sulphate for a freshwater carp, Labeo rohita. J Xi’an Shiyou Uni Nat Sci Ed. 2024;20(6):436–41.
  65. 65. Naz S, Hussain R, Guangbin Z, Chatha AMM, Rehman ZU, Jahan S, et al. Copper sulfate induces clinico-hematological, oxidative stress, serum biochemical and histopathological changes in freshwater fish rohu (Labeo rohita). Front Vet Sci. 2023;10:1142042. pmid:36968466
  66. 66. Ghaffar A, Hussain R, Noreen S, Abbas G, Chodhary IR, Khan A, et al. Dose and time-related pathological and genotoxic studies on thiamethaxam in fresh water fish (Labeo rohita) in Pakistan. Pak Vet J. 2020;40(2):151–6. http://doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2020.002
  67. 67. Ayub I, Tanveer Z, Sadaf H, Ahmad I, Talat R, Farooq M, et al. Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic expression of serologic proteins from sera of patients with gastric cancer. Pak Euro J Med Life Sci. 2019;1(1):1–4.
  68. 68. Qureshi AS, Ali HM. Serum enzyme activities and electrolyte concentration of breeding donkeys (Equus asinus): effect of sex, age, lactation and/or pregnancy. J Anim Plant Sci. 2016;26(1):88–92.
  69. 69. Hussain R, Mahmood F, Ali HM, Siddique AB. Bacterial, PCR and clinico-pathological diagnosis of naturally occurring pneumonic pasturellosis (mannheimiosis) during subtropical climate in sheep. Microb Pathog. 2017;112:176–81. pmid:28970175
  70. 70. Luqman Z, Masood S, Zaneb H, Majeed KA, Hameed S, Ikram U. Effects of in-ovo inoculation on productive performances and histo-physiological traits in commercial birds. Intern J Sci Eng Res. 2019;10(6):1664–73.
  71. 71. Luqman Z, Ali HM, Zahra N, Ullah H, Sadeeq M, Zeeshan M. In-ovo effects of lysine amino acid on histomorphometry of thigh muscles, cecal tonsils and pH in Japanese quail. Pak-Euro J Med Life Sci. 2020;3(1):1–5.
  72. 72. Ali OJ, Hassan AH, Saeed NM, Ali TGM. Pyometra in dogs, clinical, bacteriological and histopathological observations. Pak Vet J. 2023;43(4):643–50. http://doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2023.096
  73. 73. Ali HM, Hussain S, Ahmad MZ, Siddique AB, Ali S, Mohiuddin M, et al. Molecular identification of different toxinogenic strains of Clostridium perfringens and histo-pathological observations of camels died of per-acute entero-toxaemia. Heliyon. 2024;10(6):e27859. pmid:38533056
  74. 74. Sikandar A, Adil M, Zaneb H, Arshad M, Ali HM, Khan MA. Concurrent cerebral and extra-cerebral caprine coenurosis: a case report. Pak J Life Soc Sci. 2018;16(1):55–8.
  75. 75. Sikandar A, Nasir A, Rehman AU, Ali HM, Shah M, Adil M. Histopathology: an old yet important technique to diagnose paratuberculosis in non-descript water buffaloes. Buff Bull. 2021;40(4):557–64.
  76. 76. Ali HM, Qureshi AS, Hussain R, Urbinati G, Mustafa MZ, Ali F, et al. Effects of natural environment on reproductive histo-morphometric dynamics of female dromedary camel. Anim Reprod Sci. 2017;181:30–40. pmid:28413155
  77. 77. Luqman Z, Masood S, Ali HM, Rehman TU, Altaf M, Iqbal N, et al. Effects of in-ovo administration of L-arginine on the histo-morphometry of thigh muscles, meat characteristics and growth performance in japanese quails (Coturnixcoturnix japonica). Pak Vet J.2021;41(3):456–58.
  78. 78. Sikandar A, Zaneb H, Nasir A, Adil M, Ali HM, Muhammad N, et al. Effects of Bacillus subtilis on performance, immune system and gut in Salmonella-challenged broiler chickens. South Afr J Anim Sci. 2020;50:654–662. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v50i5.2
  79. 79. Ghaffar A, Hussain R, Ahmad N, Ghafoor R, Akram MW, Khan I, et al. Evaluation of hemato-biochemical, antioxidant enzymes as biochemical biomarkers and genotoxic potential of glyphosate in freshwater fish (Labeo rohita). Chem Ecol. 2021;37(7):646–67.
  80. 80. Akram R, Iqbal R, Hussain R, Jabeen F, Ali M. Evaluation of Oxidative stress, antioxidant enzymes and genotoxic potential of bisphenol A in fresh water bighead carp (Aristichthys nobils) fish at low concentrations. Environ Pollut. 2021;268(Pt A):115896. pmid:33187850
  81. 81. Akram R, Ghaffar A, Hussain R, Khan I, Santana VLDA, Mehmood K, et al. Hematological, serum biochemistry, histopathological and mutagenic impacts of triclosan on fish (bighead carp). Agrobiol Rec. 2022;7:18–28.
  82. 82. Sobia M, Mirza IS, Nuzhat S, Sonia T, Abul H, Hafiz MA, et al. Prevalence and characterization of Trypanosoma species from livestock of Cholistan desert of Pakistan. Trop Biomed. 2018;35(1):140–8. pmid:33601786
  83. 83. Hussain R, Ali F, Rafique A, Ghaffar A, Jabeen G, Rafay M, et al. Exposure to sub-acute concentrations of glyphosate induce clinico-hematological, serum biochemical and genotoxic damage in adult cockerels. Pak Vet J. 2019;39(2):181–6. http://doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2019.064
  84. 84. Hayashi I, Morishita Y, Imai K, Nakamura M, Nakachi K, Hayashi T. High-throughput spectrophotometric assay of reactive oxygen species in serum. Mutat Res. 2007;631(1):55–61. pmid:17499011
  85. 85. Iqbal M, Sharma SD, Rezazadeh H, Hasan N, Abdulla M, Athar M. Glutathione metabolizing enzymes and oxidative stress in ferric nitrilotriacetate mediated hepatic injury. Redox Rep. 1996;2(6):385–91. pmid:27406673
  86. 86. Ijaz MU, Kalsoom A, Hamza A, Ehsan N. Sciadopitysin attenuates paraquat induced renal toxicity by modulating Nrf-2/Keap-1 pathway in male albino rats. Asian J Agri Biol. 2023;4:2023110.
  87. 87. Al-Farraj DA, Kashif M, Ullah F, Ali HM, Qayyum A, Yamin A, et al. Enhanced wound healing effects of herbal gel formulations in a rabbit model: a comparative study. Asian J Agri Biol. 2024;2024(1):2023190.
  88. 88. Chance B, Maehly A. Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods Enzymol. 1955;2:764–75.
  89. 89. Musharraf M, Khan MA. Estimation of dietary copper requirement of fingerling Indian major carp, Labeo rohita (Hamilton). Aquaculture. 2022;549:737742.
  90. 90. Fazelan Z, Hoseini SM, Yousefi M, Khalili M, Hoseinifar SH, Van Doan H. Effects of dietary eucalyptol administration on antioxidant and inflammatory genes in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) exposed to ambient copper. Aquaculture. 2020;520:734988.
  91. 91. Sony NM, Ishikawa M, Hossain MS, Koshio S, Yokoyama S. The effect of dietary fucoidan on growth, immune functions, blood characteristics and oxidative stress resistance of juvenile red sea bream, Pagrus major. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2019;45(1):439–54. pmid:30291545
  92. 92. Yan SH, Wang JH, Zhu LS, Chen AM, Wang J. Thiamethoxam induces oxidative stress and antioxidant response in zebrafish (Danio Rerio) livers. Environ Toxicol. 2016;31(12):2006–15. pmid:26434662
  93. 93. Ghaffar A, Hussain R, Abbas G, Kalim M, Khan A, Ferrando S, et al. Fipronil (Phenylpyrazole) induces hemato-biochemical, histological and genetic damage at low doses in common carp, Cyprinus carpio (Linnaeus, 1758). Ecotoxicology. 2018;27(9):1261–71. pmid:30242594
  94. 94. Jabeen G, Manzoor F, Arshad M, Barbol BI. Effect of cadmium exposure on hematological, nuclear and morphological alterations in erythrocyte of fresh water fish (Labeo rohita). Cont Vet J. 2021;1(1):20–4.
  95. 95. Shah N, Khan A, Ali R, Marimuthu K, Uddin MN, Rizwan M, et al. Monitoring Bioaccumulation (in Gills and Muscle Tissues), Hematology, and Genotoxic Alteration in Ctenopharyngodon idella Exposed to Selected Heavy Metals. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:6185231. pmid:32382561
  96. 96. Ghaffar A, Hussain R, Aslam M, Abbas G, Khan A. Arsenic and urea in combination alters the hematology, biochemistry and protoplasm in exposed rahu fish (Labeo rohita) (Hamilton, 1822). Turk J Fish Aqua Sci. 2016;16:289–96. http://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v16_2_09
  97. 97. Fırat Ö, Erol R, Fırat Ö. An Investigation on Freshwater Fish Oreochromis niloticus (Linnaeus, 1758): assessing hemotoxic effects of different copper compounds used as nanomaterial or pesticide. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2022;108(3):549–54. pmid:34216227
  98. 98. Zhao G, Zhang T, Sun H, Liu J-X. Copper nanoparticles induce zebrafish intestinal defects via endoplasmic reticulum and oxidative stress. Metallomics. 2020;12(1):12–22. pmid:31820776
  99. 99. Noureen A, Jabeen F, Tabish TA, Ali M, Iqbal R, Yaqub S, et al. Histopathological changes and antioxidant responses in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) exposed to copper nanoparticles. Drug Chem Toxicol. 2021;44(4):372–9. pmid:31088177
  100. 100. Namratha ML, Lakshman M, Jeevanalatha M, Kumar BA. Hematological alterations induced by glyphosate and ameliorative effect of ascorbic acid in Wistar rats. Cont Vet J. 2021;1:32–6.
  101. 101. Khan A, Ahmad L, Khan MZ. Hemato-biochemical changes induced by pyrethroid insecticides in avian, fish and mammalian species. Intern J Agri Biol. 2012;14(5):834–42.
  102. 102. Sudhabose S, Sooryakanth B, Rajan MR. Impact of acute and sub-acute exposure of magnesium oxide nanoparticles on mrigal Cirrhinus mrigala. Heliyon. 2023;9(4):e15605. pmid:37151616
  103. 103. Manke A, Wang L, Rojanasakul Y. Mechanisms of nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress and toxicity. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:942916. pmid:24027766
  104. 104. El-Demerdash FM. Lipid peroxidation, oxidative stress and acetylcholinesterase in rat brain exposed to organophosphate and pyrethroid insecticides. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011;49(6):1346–52. pmid:21419823
  105. 105. Rasheed M, Zaman MA, Zafar A, Khan MA, Anjum S, Ali HM, et al. Prophylactic effects of methylene blue, coconut and olive oils supplements on hemato-biochemical and histo-pathological parameters against p-Phenylenediamine toxicity in male albino rats. Pak Vet J. 2024;44(3):840–6. http://doi.org/10.29261/pakvetj/2024.193
  106. 106. Fırat Ö, Erol R, Fırat Ö. Effects of Individual and Co-exposure of Copper Oxide Nanoparticles and Copper Sulphate on Nile Tilapia Oreochromis niloticus: Nanoparticles Enhance Pesticide Biochemical Toxicity. Acta Chim Slov. 2022;69(1):81–90. pmid:35298018
  107. 107. Velasquez-Vottelerd P, Anton Y, Salazar-Lugo R. Cadmium affects the mitochondrial viability and the acid soluble thiols concentration in liver, kidney, heart and gills of Ancistrus brevifilis (Eigenmann, 1920). Open Vet J. 2015;5(2):166–72. pmid:26623384
  108. 108. Eroglu A, Dogan Z, Kanak EG, Atli G, Canli M. Effects of heavy metals (Cd, Cu, Cr, Pb, Zn) on fish glutathione metabolism. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015;22(5):3229–37. pmid:24793073
  109. 109. Latif M, Faheem M, Asmatullah X. Study of oxidative stress and histo-biochemical biomarkers of diethyl phthalate induced toxicity in a cultureable fish, Labeo rohita. Pak Vet J. 2020;40(2):202–8.
  110. 110. Jin Y, Zhou T, Li N, Liu S, Xu X, Pan Y, et al. JAK and STAT members in channel catfish: Identification, phylogenetic analysis and expression profiling after Edwardsiella ictaluri infection. Dev Comp Immunol. 2018;81:334–41. pmid:29274790
  111. 111. Moura FRD, Brentegani KR, Gemelli A, Sinhorin AP, Sinhorin VDG. Oxidative stress in the hybrid fish jundiara (Leiarius marmoratus x Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum) exposed to Roundup Original®. Chemosphere 2017;185:445–51.
  112. 112. Li N, Zhou T, Geng X, Jin Y, Wang X, Liu S, et al. Identification of novel genes significantly affecting growth in catfish through GWAS analysis. Mol Genet Genomics. 2018;293(3):587–99. pmid:29230585
  113. 113. Lairion F, Saporito-Magriñá C, Musacco-Sebio R, Fuda J, Torti H, Repetto MG. Nitric oxide, chronic iron and copper overloads and regulation of redox homeostasis in rat liver. J Biol Inorg Chem. 2022;27(1):23–36. pmid:34791544
  114. 114. Bhutta ZA, Kulyar MFA, Jahanzaib X, Sarwar I, Shabbir S, Boruah P, et al. Evaluation of hematological, antioxidant enzymes and oxidative stress parameters in buffaloes infected with babesiosis. Cont Vet J. 2022;2:29–34.
  115. 115. Li X, Naseem S, Hussain R, Ghaffar A, Li K, Khan A. Evaluation of DNA Damage, Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress, and Status of Antioxidant Enzymes in Freshwater Fish (Labeo rohita) Exposed to Pyriproxyfen. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022:5859266. pmid:35720182
  116. 116. Qin Y, Li X, Yang Y, Li Z, Liang Y, Zhang X, et al. Toxic effects of copper sulfate on diploid and triploid fin cell lines in Misgurnus anguillicaudatus. Sci Total Environ. 2018;643:1419–26. pmid:30189558
  117. 117. Wang Y, Tian J, Shi F, Li X, Hu Z, Chu J. Protective effect of surfactin on copper sulfate-induced inflammation, oxidative stress, and hepatic injury in zebrafish. Microbiol Immunol. 2021;65(10):410–21. pmid:34101233
  118. 118. Soliman HAM, Hamed M, Sayed AE-DH. Investigating the effects of copper sulfate and copper oxide nanoparticles in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) using multiple biomarkers: the prophylactic role of Spirulina. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021;28(23):30046–57. pmid:33580857
  119. 119. Matsumoto ST, Mantovani MS, Malaguttii MIA, Dias AL, Fonseca I C, Marin-Morales MA. Genotoxicity and mutagenicity of water contaminated with tannery effluents, as evaluated by the micronucleus test and comet assay using the fish Oreochromis niloticus and chromosome aberrations in onion root-tips. Genet Mol Biol. 2006;29(1):148–58.
  120. 120. Tasneem S, Yasmeen R. Evaluation of genotoxicity by comet assay (single-cell gel electrophoresis) in tissues of the fish Cyprinus carpio during sub-lethal exposure to Karanjin. J Basic Appl Zool. 2018;79(1).
  121. 121. Mahmood Y, Hussain R, Ghaffar A, Ali F, Nawaz S, Mehmood K, et al. Acetochlor Affects Bighead Carp (Aristichthys Nobilis) by Producing Oxidative Stress, Lowering Tissue Proteins, and Inducing Genotoxicity. Biomed Res Int. 2022;2022:9140060. pmid:35655481
  122. 122. Gill HK, Paul K, Dua A. Evaluation of genotoxic and biochemical stress response to mercuric chloride in erythrocytes of freshwater fish Channa Punctuatus. Res Sq. 2021;2021:1–30.
  123. 123. Hashem MA, Abd El Hamied SS, Ahmed EMA, Amer SA, El-Sharnouby ME. Mitigating the Growth, Biochemical Changes, Genotoxic and Pathological Effects of Copper Toxicity in Broiler Chickens by Supplementing Vitamins C and E. Animals (Basel). 2021;11(6):1811. pmid:34204508
  124. 124. Zahoor MA, Gul ST, Khatoon A, Ashraf M, Zubair M, Imran M, Maqbool B, Atif FA. Teratogenic effects of thiamethoxam (a neonicotinoid) on development of chick embryo. Pak Vet J. 2022;42(2):179–84.
  125. 125. Chatterjee N, Walker GC. Mechanisms of DNA damage, repair, and mutagenesis. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2017;58(5):235–63. pmid:28485537
  126. 126. Hussain R, Ghaffar A, Ali HM, Abbas RZ, Khan JA, Khan IA, et al. Analysis of different toxic impacts of Fipronil on growth, hemato-biochemistry, protoplasm and reproduction in adult cockerels. Toxin Rev. 2017;37(4):294–303.