Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

“I don’t know if it makes a difference to safety?” perception vs actuality: A mixed-methods study on older adults’ experiences of home stair falls revealed during COVID-19 lockdown

  • Emily Wharton ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    e.h.wharton@2021.ljmu.ac.uk

    Affiliations School of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moore’s University, Liverpool, United Kingdom, NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Thomas O’Brien,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moore’s University, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Richard J. Foster,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moore’s University, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Clarissa Giebel,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, United Kingdom, Department of Primary Care & Mental Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Justine Shenton,

    Roles Methodology, Resources

    Affiliation Sefton Older People’s Forum, Sefton, United Kingdom

  • Asan Akpan,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources

    Affiliation Liverpool University Hospital NHS F.T., Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Avril Mills,

    Roles Resources, Visualization

    Affiliation NIHR ARC NWC, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Mike Roys,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources

    Affiliation Rise and Going Consultancy, Watford, United Kingdom

  • Constantinos Maganaris

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Sport and Exercise Science, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moore’s University, Liverpool, United Kingdom

Abstract

In the United Kingdom (UK), stair falls in older adults’ homes cause up to 575 deaths and 350,000 injuries annually, costing the NHS £435 million. The stair falls may be related to hazards such as poorly designed/absent handrails, too steep/narrow stairs, poor step surface (e.g., loose carpets), and poor lighting. Our study aimed to understand older adults’ experiences of independent living and home stair falls during the first COVID-19 lockdown, and shed light on older adults’ physical staircase dimensions that influence stair fall risks in relation to UK government guidelines. A mixed-methods approach was employed, conducting semi-structured interviews alongside quantitative home stair assessments with 22 participants aged ≥ 60 years. The stair assessments captured the physical dimensions (i.e., measurements of pitch, rise and goings) of their home stairs, and if they perceived their stairs safe to negotiate. We identified four overarching themes common across older people living independently: effects of lockdown on daily living during the COVID-19 pandemic; stair-related accidents and perceived causes; fall preventative measures and safety awareness; and attitudes towards ageing and care services. Although all of the participants perceived their stairs to be safe, nearly half of participants’ staircases (40%) did not meeting the UK government guidelines for pitch, rise and going. While the COVID-19 lockdown provided a unique context for exploring fall risk and stair safety, our findings highlight broader, ongoing issues. Despite emotional attachment to their homes, many lacked staircases that meet current UK government guidelines, highlighting a need for targeted interventions to mitigate environmental hazards. Additionally, financial constraints and education further complicate efforts to enhance home safety. Discrepancies between perceived and objective safety assessments highlight the need for comprehensive care approaches and evidence-based home design guidelines, allowing for collaborative support for ageing in place. Bridging this gap is essential for reducing home stair falls.

Introduction

Falls on domestic staircases in the United Kingdom (UK) represent a significant public health concern: in the year 2000 it was estimated that stair falls caused up to 575 deaths and 350,000 injuries annually [1]. While this may not immediately seem like a crisis in a nation of 67 million and over 11 million individuals over 65 (18.6% of the total population), it becomes an important issue when considering that falls are the second leading cause of accidental death among older adults. Stair falls can lead to a loss of independence, greater isolation and depression, reduced mobility, and increased morbidity and mortality [2]. Stair falls also have social impact due to the increased healthcare costs and demands on healthcare professionals. Unaddressed fall hazards in the home environment are estimated to cost the NHS in England £435 million [2]. Such unaddressed hazards may include poorly designed or absent handrails, stairs that are too steep and narrow, step surfaces or covering in poor condition, objects left on steps, and poor lighting [1]. Therefore, housing conditions, and specifically the staircase environment, pose a significant risk for stair falls [3]. Unfortunately, the scale of the problem is set to increase as the UK’s older population continues to grow, alongside the UK possessing one of the oldest housing stocks in Europe [4,5]. Therefore, understanding the need for adaptations and improvements in the individual’s staircase and surrounding environment is vital for the changing needs and abilities of an older population to live safely and independently [3,6].

On March 23rd 2020, the UK Government implemented a nationwide “lockdown” in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, including a prohibition on non-essential travel and interactions with individuals outside of one’s household [7]. The increased exposure to home stairs during lockdowns and restrictive measures may have amplified the risk of falls and related injuries beyond the usual levels [6]. Moreover, lockdown increased social isolation, loneliness, ageism, sedentary behaviours, delayed essential medical treatment, and increased challenges in meeting basic needs (food shopping and/or cleaning the house) [811]. Although studies linking stair falls and social isolation primarily use pre-COVID-19 data [1214], these findings are particularly relevant during the pandemic, as lockdown and distancing measures likely heightened risks of loneliness, isolation, and falls [14].

Real world changes for maintaining the independence and quality of life for older adults requires an understanding of the connection between their perceptions of home safety, housing condition, and home stair falls during lockdown. Therefore, this study aimed to understand older adults’ experiences of independent living and home stair falls during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, the study aimed to shed light on their perceptions regarding the safety of their staircases and whether these perceptions align with the staircase features and design that influence stair fall risks.

Methods

Study design

A nested mixed-methods design was used to investigate the studies aims. The study obtained ethical approval on the 14th June 2022 from the Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU) Ethics Committee (Ref No: 22/SPS/037) prior to study commencement.

Participants and recruitment

Twenty-two participants (9 stair-fallers, 1 near faller, and 12 non-fallers) aged ≥ 60 years agreed to a home visit to carry out stair assessments and semi-structured interviews, between September 2022 and February 2023. Consent was obtained either verbally or written at the time of the home visit (semi-structured interviews and stair assessments) and recorded in the interviewer’s notes. The number of participants recruited were consistent with recommendations for semi-structured interview studies that aim to identify patterns across data (Guest, Brunce & Johnson, 2006).

Participants were recruited from a survey study previously conducted. Briefly, the online and telephone survey was conducted with 164 UK residents aged ≥ 60 years between June and October 2021, to understand the extent to which COVID-19 lockdowns increased home stair falls. The survey included collecting participants postcodes to generate an Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) quintiles for socio-economic status and collecting the participants falls/near-falls experiences before (June 2019–23 March 2020) and during (23 March 2020 – October 2021) the first COVID-19 UK lockdown. The participants agreed for their contact details to be stored for the purpose of contacting them about future studies. Participants who had either reported experiencing a stair fall in their home environment, reported experiencing a stair near-fall in their home environment, and reported not having experienced a home stair fall were recruited. Participants volunteering to participate in the study were contacted via email or telephone by the primary researcher (E.W.) to inform them about the study’s purpose, risks, benefits, and informed consent.

Data collection

The semi-structured interviews were conducted by E.W. either by telephone, via videoconferencing or in the person’s home according to the participant’s preferences. The participant then chose a suitable time for the researcher to conduct a stair assessment in their home. The majority of participants (95%) chose to conduct the semi-structured interviews and stair assessments in one home visits.

A semi-structured topic guide (see S1 Appendix) was developed in co-operation with two public advisors (A.A. and J.S.) and older adults from Women’s Club forum. The semi-structured interviews explored the participant’s fall experiences and how the COVID-19 pandemic had affected the participant’s activities, socialising, care routines, and details about how the fall occurred. Interviews lasted between 20–60 min (35.18 ± 9.71 min) and were recorded using an encrypted digital Dictaphone.

The stair assessment was conducted after the semi-structured interviews, using a protocol (see S2 Appendix) that identified whether the participants’ staircases met existing national building regulations for stair pitch, rise and going [1517]. We captured the physical dimensions (i.e., pitch, rise and going) and visual appearance (i.e., handrails and lighting) of their staircase. To assess the visual appearance, we adapted the housing health and safety rating system (HHSRS) assessment [17] and a previously developed Stair Assessment Questionnaire (SAQ) by researcher M.R. The stair assessment required the participants to describe their staircase dimensions (i.e., steepness, narrowness, wear and tear), record their behaviour related to stair safety, such as their use of handrails, and if they perceived their stairs safe to negotiate. Photographs of the participants stairs were taken.

We also collected background data on participant age, gender, ethnic background and postcode.

Equipment and measurements

To enhance measurement precision, a custom-made ruler (acrylic sheet) measuring 400 mm x 270 mm, marked with a scale on both long sides (Fig 1), was utilised.

thumbnail
Fig 1. The equipment used for measuring stair dimensions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326850.g001

The top left of Fig 1, shows the custom-made ruler (acrylic sheet) that was utilised, measuring 400 mm x 270 mm, marked with a scale on both long sides. The middle part of Fig 1 shows the rise, going, nosing, and pitch of a staircase. The right part of Fig 1 shows the process of measuring the rise and going with the custom-made ruler.

The bottom edge of the acrylic sheet was carefully aligned with the edge of the nosing, positioned close to the side of the step, to measure the length to the next nosing. An inclinometer was used to measure the angle of the acrylic sheet. This angle measurement provided the necessary data for determining the pitch of each step. Using the nosing-to-nosing length and inclination data the rise and going of each step was calculated using trigonometry.

Data analysis

Qualitative analysis.

The semi-structured interviews were digitally audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim and imported into NVivo (QSR International Pty Ltd). The transcripts were anonymised and checked for accuracy. The data were analysed using an inductive thematic approach (Braun & Clarke, 2021) to extract meaningful insights from the interview data. The aim of this method was to explore and identify patterns, themes, and insights that emerged directly from the data, without being constrained by pre-existing theories or predetermined coding schemes.

The interview transcripts were thoroughly read to gain a comprehensive understanding of the data, immerse in the content and to identify initial impressions and ideas. After becoming familiar with the data, initial codes were generated to capture meaningful concepts, ideas, or patterns within the dataset. These codes were generated in an open-ended manner, allowing for a flexible and exploratory analysis. The initial codes were reviewed, refined, and organised into potential themes.

The data was continuously reviewed and discussed (C.M., C.G., T.O., and R.F.) until a consensus was reached on the final themes and subthemes. This iterative review process facilitated the refinement and consolidation of codes, ensuring a comprehensive and coherent representation of the interview data.

Frequency analysis.

The stair assessment element of the study employed a frequency analysis to examine the occurrence and distribution patterns of the variables under investigation.

Public involvement

Four public advisors (A.A., J.S., A.M., and M.R.) formed part of the research team, and assisted with conceptualising the study, designing the interview guide, interpreting the findings and with dissemination. This ensured that the study and the interpretation and implications of findings were grounded in the lived experiences of those affected by stair falls and COVID-19 lockdown. Public advisors were reimbursed for their time according to NIHR guidance.

Results

Demographic characteristics

Participants were all from a White ethnic background (100%), and were predominately female (68%), lived with other(s) (73%), and were retired (73%), with more participants living in less disadvantaged neighbourhoods, as measured by the IMD quintiles. A large proportion of the participants were from the North West region (82%), lived in urban major conurbation areas (77%), and owned their homes outright (91%). Additionally, the majority of participants had existing medical conditions or long-term illnesses (64%), and were in the age ranges of 70–79 years (55%). Characteristics of all participants are presented in Table 1.

Quantitative findings

During the home stair assessment, only 20% of stair fallers stated that they were struggling to fit most of their foot on the steps, and 30% acknowledged that their stairs were steep. All stair fallers perceived their stairs as entirely safe for negotiation. However, the stair dimensions and measurements showed that 45% of staircases did not meet the safety guidelines established by the UK government, and 50% of these belonged to stair fallers.

Eight percent of stair fallers had turning stairs with quarter landings (90°/180° turn to a second flight), compared to 58% of non-fallers. Forty percent of stair fallers had patterned carpets compared to 25% of non-fallers, and 70% of stair fallers had a moveable item at the bottom of stairs compared to 30% of non-fallers. Additionally, 30% of stair fallers had items left on the steps compared to only 80% of non-fallers. Moreover, there was a difference in the use of handrails while descending stairs, with 55% of stair fallers stating that they do not used handrails compared to 45% of non-fallers (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Potential staircase hazards identified during home assessments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326850.g002

Qualitative findings

Using reflective thematic analysis, we identified four overarching themes: Effects of Lockdown on Daily Living during the COVID-19 Pandemic; Stair-Related Falls and Perceived Causes; Fall Preventative Measures and Safety Awareness; Attitudes towards Ageing and Care Services. The main findings, including quotes from participants who had experienced a fall, a near fall on the home stairs, and who had not experienced a fall on their stairs (Table 2) are presented below.

thumbnail
Table 2. Themes and quotes from participants on the impact of covid-19 and falls on home stairs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326850.t002

Effects of lockdown on daily living during the COVID-19

Impact of lockdown on physical activity and routine.

Older adults articulated a notable shift in their daily routines during the COVID-19 lockdown, resulting in a decline in physical activity and exercise. This transitioned towards a more sedentary lifestyle, influencing both their indoor and outdoor activities. Despite participants initial efforts to maintain outdoor physical activity, such activities diminished with the onset of adverse weather conditions and subsequent lockdowns. Although this observation is not particularly unusual, the previous classes or activities that would get older adults out of the house during the colder and darker months were unavailable due to the lockdown restrictions. While some attempted to shift their exercise routines to online classes as a substitute, most participants faced challenges with this transition having long term affects. The lack of physical activity during lockdown contributed to overall physical well-being concerns among participants and while only a few participants reflected on falls, the ones who did commonly expressed uncertainty about the causes of these falls. A few participants often suggested a probable link between reduced exercise during lockdown and the occurrence of their falls. This connection between sedentary behaviour and health concerns is an aspect of the broader challenges faced by older adults during the pandemic.

Emotional and social impact of lockdowns.

With the rapid spread of the virus and limited understanding of its implications, older adults often found themselves dealing with the emotional and social repercussions of lockdown and social distancing measures. Public transportation was regarded as a potential hotspot for virus transmission due to close quarters and shared spaces, which lead to the participants’ fearing leaving the house. Furthermore, participants frequently articulated feelings of isolation, frustration, and a longing for social interactions. This frustration of the loss of social engagement due to lockdown led one participant to experience a fall. This sentiment of frustration was echoed when the participants discussed how they coped with the discomfort of lockdown by immersing themselves in household projects as a distraction. The emotional complexity of living through a lockdown was shown to be a challenge. Especially when the participants spoke about major life changes, such as the loss of a spouse, the absence of familiar gatherings, and the change in the dynamics of human interaction during lockdown.

Stair-related falls and perceived causes

Home environment hazards.

Participants identified various elements such as the presence of a stair lift, rugs on the floor, tight turns, and lighting as potential hazards contributing to incidents and falls. For instance, the lack of a continuous banister and slippery surfaces were cited as factors in several falls. The participants’ experiences underscored the importance of considering not only the visual aspects of safety features, but also their tactile properties, in assessing and addressing fall risks on stairs. Rugs, especially on wooden floors, were noted as trip hazards, and the tactile properties of safety features like bannisters were highlighted as important for preventing falls. However, many participants struggled to recall what their stairs looked like or acknowledge their stairs as the reason for their falls and injuries.

Behavioural hazards.

Some respondents attributed their falls to their own actions, such as running or jumping on the stairs. These responses suggest a behavioural aspect linked to the falls experienced rather than the design of the stairs being considered the sole causal factor. Participants frequently discussed various situations where unsafe behaviours, such as carrying too many items or heavy loads, wearing inappropriate footwear, or rushing downstairs, led to falls and injuries. The narratives of these stair fallers reflected a mix of casual attitudes towards stair use, a lack of awareness about the risks involved, and the absence of a clear recollection of the fall adds an element of unpredictability to their behaviour. These incidents illustrate how unsafe behaviours on stairs can lead to severe outcomes and underscore the importance of addressing behavioural risks to prevent stair-related falls among older adults.

Consequences of falls and injuries on stairs.

Older adults reported about the physical and emotional tolls of stair-related falls. Participants frequently described feeling stiff, sore, and bruised after their falls, with some sustaining severe injuries such as cracked arms, bruised limbs, and haematomas. Not only were these consequences echoed by the older adults who had experienced a stair fall, but we also found that an injury was sustained from an older adult who experienced a near fall. The immediate reactions to these falls were often marked by surprise, confusion, and fear, leading them to re-evaluate their actions and behaviours on stairs. The physical impact of these falls included mobility limitations and prolonged recovery periods, significantly affecting their daily lives and activities. In some cases, initial falls led to additional, more serious falls, resulting in extended hospital stays and further complications. In addition to physical consequences of falls, emotional responses were common among participants, reflecting self-blame and regret regarding the circumstances of their falls. Despite recognising the risks and emotional impact, some participants admitted to continuing unsafe behaviours after experiencing a fall, suggesting challenges in modifying behaviour. These findings present a multifaceted story of falls, injuries, emotional responses, and the lasting impact on the participant’s mobility and independence.

Fall preventative measures and safety awareness

Use of handrails for stability.

Participants widely reported that handrails played a pivotal role in their safety and stability when navigating stairs and often emphasised how they’d made conscious efforts in using the handrails to prevent falls. Some participants came to realise that they adapted their behaviour as they aged, becoming more inclined to use handrails for stair safety. This observation highlights a common trend among older adults to prioritise safety measures such as handrail usage as they navigate stairs, reflecting a broader recognition of the importance of injury prevention and fall mitigation strategies with age. Additionally, the role of the handrail was not just seen as a supportive and preventative measure by older adults but actually helped them mitigate the impact of a fall. The willingness of older adults to adapt and utilise handrails when feeling unsteady was captured by most respondents. Despite varying levels of autonomy in using handrails, participants actively sought support from them to ensure a sense of safety during stair navigation.

Caution and awareness for non-fallers.

The majority of participants who did not experience a stair fall reported on their conscious efforts and awareness of potential risks and hazards when using the stairs, as well as their proactive measures to ensure safety. Respondents often emphasised their increased level of concern and adaptive behaviours to reduce the potential for falls, particularly when carrying items up or down the stairs. Additionally, participants discussed how dim lighting affected their ability to navigate the stairs safely. The consistent mention of being more “cautious” among all non-faller participants indicates a shared recognition of the potential risks associated with multitasking while on the stairs.

Physical health and fitness as factors in preventing falls on stairs.

Older adults highlighted the role of physical health and fitness in preventing falls on stairs. They often suggested that the older adults who were physically fit might find it easier to maintain balance and be more stable when using stairs, potentially reducing the risk of falls. Participants who engaged in regular exercise, such as yoga, Pilates, or running, reported better balance and quicker reactions to potential hazards, attributing their enhanced stability and fall prevention to their fitness levels. While the majority of participants highlighted the importance of physical fitness, respondents who had experienced a stair fall acknowledged the potential impact of underlying health conditions, on stair safety. The older adults who maintained good physical fitness tended to feel more confident and secure when using stairs, while those with underlying health conditions were more aware of the potential risks and took preventive measures to address them. This reflects a broader awareness among older adults of the potential impact of health conditions on their safety and mobility.

Routine adaptations after a fall.

Older adults who had experienced a fall reported that they adapted their routines to prioritise safety, by becoming more vigilant about potential hazards in their environment, such as uneven surfaces and steps, and adjusted their behaviour to mitigate and avoid these risks. For example, instead of navigating hazardous routes, they chose safer alternatives, such as using facilities on a single level. This change in routine highlights the reactive measures taken by older adults to prevent future falls, showcasing their heightened caution and deliberate actions after a fall. Moreover, participants reflected on the psychological transformation they’ve undergone, acknowledging that they became more cautious and careful as a result of their experiences. Additionally, older adults frequently delved into their specific and individualised routines that they had developed to enhance stair safety after a fall. Although older adults frequently reported on their individualised routines, it conveyed an overall responsive effort rather than proactive measure to prioritise safety and prevent a reoccurring stair fall.

Home design and safety concerns.

Respondents often expressed safety concerns regarding their living environment. They often indicated a heightened awareness of the potential dangers associated with the specific architectural features of their home, such as narrow landings and tight staircases. It was common for the respondents to discuss their narrow staircase. However, only a few participants discussed their narrow staircase in the context of the consideration and decision-making process regarding the stair lift in their home. Furthermore, the idea of future-proofing their homes was mentioned by multiple respondents, indicating a shared recognition of the importance of planning ahead for ageing-related changes. Older adults often offered practical solutions, such as installing additional handrails, to enhance safety and support during stair use. Concerns about architectural features, like steep entryway steps, were also raised, and older adults emphasised the need for more accessible designs. When asked about the barriers to ageing in their current homes, many older adults identified stairs as a significant challenge, although not necessarily the most immediate concern. They acknowledged the inevitability of ageing which prompted evaluations of their living situations.

Attitudes towards ageing and care services

Financial considerations and concerns in ageing.

Participants discussed an array of expenses linked to ageing. A focal aspect of financial consideration revolved around the expenses tied to adapting home environments for safety and accessibility. While some participants expressed determination to manage the financial costs, others reflected on their financial ability to upgrade their homes as they age differently. Many expressed concerns about the affordability of such upgrades when attempting to make their homes more age friendly. Beyond home modifications, respondents also touched upon the financial considerations associated with potential future care needs. The prospect of residing in care homes involves significant financial planning, and often participants expressed concerns about these potential costs. This sheds light on the intricate financial landscape that older adults must navigate as they contemplate their future living arrangements. Additionally, the financial considerations extended to day-to-day expenses, including energy costs. Economic challenges, such as increases in energy costs or uncertainties about income, were mentioned, highlighting the impact of broader economic factors on older adults’ daily decisions and behaviours. Moreover, respondents often expressed their emotional and practical aspects of ageing, and the desire to remain independent. Frustration and feelings of dependence on others for assistance were discussed, reflecting the challenges older adults face in overcoming sensory limitations alone. This tension between the desire for many older adults to maintain independence, the acknowledgment of the potential benefits of safety measures and the implementation of these safety features, was resounding. Many participants emphasised the importance of preserving their ability to make choices and decisions.

Seeking and receiving care services.

A few participants described their experiences with the receiving care services, indicating their active engagement in efforts to mitigate the risk of falls. Likewise, receiving care services, such as accessing a guide dog had benefits of increasing activity levels and positive effects on respondents’ well-being. However, access to and seeking care during the COVID-19 pandemic was somewhat challenging for the respondents. Among the respondents who received care services during the pandemic, there was shared a sense of risk and anxiety associated with any form of external contact, due to the fear of contracting COVID-19. Overall, these findings reflect older adults’ proactive approach to maintaining their health and independence by seeking and receiving different types of care and assistance as they age. It also highlights the impact of the fear of contracting COVID-19 had on respondents receiving care services, despite their potential need for assistance.

Emotional attachment to the home and reluctance to move into care homes.

The emotional attachment to the home and reluctance to move into care homes were consistently reported. Many of the older adults included sentiments of comfort, security, and the significance of homeownership. Participants often reflected on the idea that their homes are places with deep emotional and practical importance in their lives. Moreover, the respondents often expressed strong reservations and aversion to the idea of leaving their current homes to live in care homes or assisted living facilities. The respondents’ reservations about care homes stemmed from concerns about the quality of care, the potential loss of independence, and the regimented nature of such facilities. Furthermore, participants expressed a preference for facing end-of-life issues in their familiar home environment rather than moving into care homes. This was a common response to the idea of moving into a care home. Older adults often expressed reluctance to consider alternatives such as moving into care homes, emphasising the importance of maintaining control over their own lives and decisions, even in matters related to the end of life.

Discussion

This mixed-methods study provides insight into older adults’ experiences of independent living and home stair falls during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the COVID-19 lockdown provided an opportunity to explore fall risk and stair safety, our findings extend beyond the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. They highlight a broader gap between older adults’ perceptions of staircase safety and the actual risk factors present in their homes. We identified four overarching themes common across older adults’ living independently: effects of lockdown on daily living during the COVID-19 pandemic; stair-related falls and perceived causes; falls preventative measures and safety awareness; and attitudes towards ageing and care services. The journey to attain and sustain older adults’ independence within their homes is intricate, requiring not only increased awareness, education, and modifications in the physical environment, but also considerations of behavioural and situational factors.

Every single stair faller perceived their stairs as safe, despite a substantial proportion (40%) of them having staircases that did not meet government safety guidelines. Reinforcing these findings, the English Housing Survey Headline Report states that only 9% of homes met the basic standard of accessibility set by government [18]. This discrepancy may be due to the UK’s growing older population and the fact that the UK possesses one of the oldest housing stocks in Europe [4,5], making it challenging to meet modern safety standards. Interestingly, our measurements of stair dimensions failed to distinguish between those who had experienced home stair falls and those who had not, indicating that both groups equally did not meet the safety standards. This suggests that behaviour and décor choices may play a pivotal role in home stair safety. Behaviours such as leaving items on the stairs or neglecting to use handrails and décor choices such as patterned carpet were identified as influential factors in home stair safety.

However, this finding should not downplay the inherent risk, as adhering to safety standards, specifically those set by the British Standard BS5395−1, could potentially reduce the risk of falls by 60% [15]. Our interviews supported the importance of adhering to safety standards, especially the provision of handrails, with several instances where their use prevented more severe falls. While the structural transformation of existing stairs (pitch, rise and going) poses challenges, updating building regulations for new constructions emerges as a proactive preventive strategy [19]. For homes with non-compliant staircases, interventions targeting elements of safety standards, such as slip resistance, stair coverings, and the provision of handrails, can be effective [19,20].

Regarding stair coverings, participants recognised that loose or worn carpets could be a potential hazard. However, 90% of participants who had patterned carpet did not perceive them as a risk, indicating a lack of awareness of the increased fall risks. Surface colour and/or pattern can affect visually locating step edges or judging distances, reduce confidence and increase anxiety for stair negotiation [21,22]. Educational initiatives that inform older adults about the role of behaviour and décor choices in home stair safety are imperative [23]. Increasing the older adults and their carer’s ability to identify hazards, with the knowledge of how to access support for home adaptions can minimise the stair fall risk and risky behaviours [23]. This underscores the need for targeted interventions to modify behaviour and promote safer stair practices among older adults.

Participants also reflected on unsafe behaviours that resulted in falls and injuries on stairs, such as misjudging step edges, carrying items, or rushing. These falls had considerable impact on their well-being, with consequences such as broken bones, discomfort, and increased fear when navigating their homes. This prompted a reactive response rather than preventative. Reduced confidence and increased anxiety have been linked to changes in visuomotor behaviour during obstacle negotiation, such as decreased walking speed [22,24] and reduced visibility [25]. Anxiety may cause older adults to fixate on future hazards earlier, inducing an attentional bias toward environmental features perceived as more threatening [22,26]. This premature transferral of gaze from a stepping target such as the next step to future obstacles such as a moveable item left on the top of the stairs has been shown to reduce stepping accuracy and increase foot placement variability, which could exacerbate fall risk [22,26]. Therefore, prevention strategies, such as adaptions to the home and education are needed before a fall occurs [2]. Addressing unsafe behaviours can effectively reduce the overall risk of stair falls among older adults [27].

However, our study only captured a brief understanding of the participants behaviour negotiating stairs. We understand that factors such as patterned carpet, items left on the steps or having turning stairs with quarter landings (90°/180° turn to a second flight) may also amplify fall risk. Employing cautious stepping technique might mitigate the likelihood of a stair fall, potentially compensating for reduced functional capabilities or inadequate safety standards [27]. Further research is required to explore the behavioural aspects of stair safety to understand additional perceptions and differences in stepping techniques between fallers and non-fallers, informing effective fall prevention interventions.

During interviews, participants discussed their safety concerns and approach to ‘future proofing’ their homes, emphasising the significance of handrails, lighting, and tight turns on stairs. Financial challenges were significant, as participants often could not afford home upgrades and avoided using lights and heating to reduce costs. Poor lighting can exacerbate stair fall risks, influencing confidence, anxiety, and dynamic balance [28]. Cold homes can also have a severe impact on both physical health (such as respiratory or circulator problems) and mental health, making negotiating stairs a challenging and riskier task [19]. It is clear that there is a huge and urgent need to adapt UK homes. The English Housing Survey (2021) indicates that around 820,000 homes have issues like damp or mould growth, and this is seen as a more concerning issue than adapting their homes for future use or making them more energy efficient [3,18]. Previous research and our findings show that that people cannot afford to make adaptions to their home to ensure their safety and prevent care needs [3,18,29]. Additionally, the high costs of quality care homes underscore the financial burdens and uncertainties older adults and their families confront when contemplating future care options. It is clear that home adaptions can play a key role in supporting older adults to live independently for longer, equally, it can act as a preventive measure against the escalation of care requirements as a result of stair falls and accidents within the home [3].

When we factor COVID-19 lockdown into this, the risk of falls and injuries is amplified beyond the usual levels as prolonged period of home confinement during the pandemic may have heightened exposure to these potentially ‘unsafe’ home [810]. Lockdown measures disrupted regular exercise routines, leading to a decline in physical movement. This has potentially affected the muscle strength and balance necessary for safe stair negotiation [23,28] and contributed to deconditioning and diminished physical fitness, increasing the susceptibility to stair falls, especially for older adults [8]. The long-lasting effects of the closure of organised activities and services were evident as individuals faced difficulties returning to their pre-lockdown routines. These highlight the need for implementation of effective exercise programmes for older adults especially during periods of self-isolation and home-confinement [23].

The varied and sometimes contradictory participant narratives reflect the complex relation between perceived and actual fall risk, and the individual ways older adults respond to the risk. For example some participants actively use handrails or modify behaviour, whereas others express reluctance or overconfidence in their mobility. In addition, some acknowledge environmental hazards, while others attribute falls to personal behaviour or fitness levels. In regards to lockdown, some experienced frustration leading to risky behaviour, whereas others adapted cautiously. These differences highlight how individual experiences that are shaped by physical environment, personal attitudes and situational factors contribute to different perceptions of stair safety, risk-taking behaviours, and fall prevention strategies. This variability highlights the need for flexible, person-centred approaches to fall prevention. The implications of this study extend beyond the COVID-19 pandemic, as the environmental and behavioural factors compromising stair safety that were identified will likely remain until specific actions are taken to mitigate stair fall risk. This study revealed a previously unacknowledged issue: many older adults’ homes fail to meet government guidelines for stair safety, leaving staircases with numerous unaddressed hazards. While COVID-19 provided an opportunity to examine these environments due to increased time spent at home, the associated rise in loneliness and decline in physical activity among older adults [811] emphasises the ongoing importance of addressing home safety beyond the pandemic context. This calls for further research and educational interventions to raise awareness of home hazards and promote fall prevention strategies.

Strengths and limitations

The findings of our study emphasise the importance of fall prevention teams, particularly occupational therapists (OTs) conducting ongoing objective assessments of home environments, to identify potential risks for stair falls specifically. In the UK, fall prevention teams provide assessment and rehabilitation for adults who have fallen. This multidisciplinary team, which includes physiotherapists, occupational therapists, and podiatrists, works with patients in their homes and communities to restore independence, improve confidence, and reduce hospital admissions [30]. The involvement of OTs usually takes place post-fall (intervention stage) due to lack of resources to assess fall risk and intervene accordingly before the occurrence of the first fall. However, given that a fall is on its own a risk factor for consequent falls [2], the fall prevention team should be involved earlier, to prevent the first fall in those identified as high-risk older adults. Implementing multicomponent interventions such as community fostering, housing adaptions, and physical activity recommendations could all potentially help prevent home stair falls for older adults [23], and need to be addressed in future research.

We acknowledge the study has certain limitations. Firstly, we did not collect detailed information on ambulatory impairments or the use of mobility aids such as canes or walkers. The use of walking aids has been identified as a potential risk factor for future falls among older adults [31], which may have influenced our findings. Another limitation may have been recall bias. As individuals age, there can be variations in the accuracy and completeness of their recollections, potentially leading to recall bias [32]. The ability to recall specific details, especially those related to past events or experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic, may be influenced by factors such as cognitive function, health conditions, and the emotional significance of the memories [3336]. Despite efforts to minimise this limitation through careful interview techniques and validation of information, it is crucial to acknowledge that differences in recall abilities among participants might have impacted the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the collected data [37]. While these insights provide valuable qualitative data, future research may benefit from additional methods, such as cross-referencing participant accounts with records from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and general practitioner data records on falls, to further enhance the robustness of data gathered from older adults [37]. In addition to recall bias, this study may also be subject to self-selection bias, as individuals who chose to participate might have had stronger opinions or experiences related to the topic, potentially limiting the generalisability of the findings. An additional limitation is the homogeneity of our sample, which may impact the generalisability of our findings and that the representation of diverse communities may not have been captured. The study included participants that were from a White ethnic background, living in more affluent areas (IMD Quintiles 3, 4, and 5) and mostly homeowners. This limited representation may not fully capture disparities present in other populations, including ethnic minorities and individuals from lower-income backgrounds. Inclusivity and representation in studies is vital for recognising and addressing the needs of diverse communities and socio-economically disadvantaged areas [10,38]. Therefore, solutions may be less effective, further continuing health disparities, and future research aiming to address this issue is needed.

Conclusion

Our study illustrates the gap between what older adults perceive as safe staircases and the actual risk factors present in their own homes. The COVID-19 lockdown provided an opportunity to explore fall risk and stair safety, however, our findings expand beyond the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings highlight the desire of wishing to remain living as independently as possible in their own home, and how stair falls can deeply affect the way older adults navigate their homes. Findings also highlights the importance of conducting objective assessments and emphasise the role behavioural factors may play in stair safety. Stair fall prevention strategies should take a multifactorial approach, with education, home adaptions, community-based interventions and allowing for collaborative support for ageing in place. Installing safety features and implementation of educational practical interventions can help minimise fall risk and enhance the safety of older adults.

Supporting information

S1 Appendix. Semi-structured topic guide used in interviews.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326850.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Appendix. Stair assessment protocol for evaluating staircase safety.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326850.s002

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank the older adults who participated in this study for their time and valuable insights, which were crucial to this research. We also extend our gratitude to the organisations and forums that supported this work, including The Orrell Trust, Sefton Older Persons Forum, the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast Public Advisor Forum, and the Women’s Club Forum. Their contributions and collaboration were invaluable in reaching and engaging with the participant community. We acknowledge the National Institute for Health and Care Research Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast (ARC NWC) for funding this research as part of a PhD studentship. Finally, we acknowledge the institutional support provided by Liverpool John Moores University (LJMU), which enabled the successful completion of this study.

References

  1. 1. Hill LD, Haslam R, Howarth PA, Brooke-Wavell K, Sloane JE. Safety of older people on stairs: behavioural factors. Loughborough University. 2000. https://repository.lboro.ac.uk/articles/online_resource/Safety_of_older_people_on_stairs_behavioural_factors/9353270/1
  2. 2. Office for Health Improvement & Disparities. Falls: applying All Our Health. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/falls-applying-all-our-health/falls-applying-all-our-health. 2021.
  3. 3. Centre for Ageing Better. Good homes for all: A proposal to fix England’s housing. 2021. (The good home inquiry).
  4. 4. Housing Horizons: Examining UK Housing Stock in an International Context [Internet]. [cited 2024 Feb 6]. Available from: https://www.hbf.co.uk/news/housing-horizons/
  5. 5. Piddington J, Nicol S, Garrett H, Custard M. The Housing Stock of The United Kingdom.
  6. 6. Blanchet R, Edwards N. A need to improve the assessment of environmental hazards for falls on stairs and in bathrooms: results of a scoping review. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18:272.
  7. 7. Vickery A, Willis P, Powell J, Beach B, Cameron A, Johnson E. The impact of COVID-19 lockdown measures on older residents’ social connections and everyday wellbeing within housing schemes that provide care and support in England and Wales. J Aging Studies. 2023;65:101126.
  8. 8. Narici M, Vito GD, Franchi M, Paoli A, Moro T, Marcolin G, et al. Impact of sedentarism due to the COVID-19 home confinement on neuromuscular, cardiovascular and metabolic health: Physiological and pathophysiological implications and recommendations for physical and nutritional countermeasures. Eur J Sport Sci. 2021;21(4):614–35. pmid:32394816
  9. 9. Giebel C, Cannon J, Hanna K, Butchard S, Eley R, Gaughan A, et al. Impact of COVID-19 related social support service closures on people with dementia and unpaid carers: a qualitative study. Aging & Mental Health. 2021;25(7):1281–8.
  10. 10. Giebel C, Lord K, Cooper C, Shenton J, Cannon J, Pulford D, et al. A UK survey of COVID-19 related social support closures and their effects on older people, people with dementia, and carers. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;36(3):393–402. pmid:32946619
  11. 11. Miller EA. Protecting and Improving the Lives of Older Adults in the COVID-19 Era. J Aging Soc Policy. 2020;32(4–5):297–309. pmid:32583751
  12. 12. Hajek A, König H-H. The association of falls with loneliness and social exclusion: evidence from the DEAS German Ageing Survey. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):204. pmid:28874139
  13. 13. Close JCT, Lord SR. Fall prevention in older people: past, present and future. Age Ageing. 2022;51(6):afac105. pmid:35754196
  14. 14. Bu F, Abell J, Zaninotto P, Fancourt D. A longitudinal analysis of loneliness, social isolation and falls amongst older people in England. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):20064. pmid:33303791
  15. 15. BS 5395-1:2010 Stairs - Code of practice for the design of stairs with straight flights and winders [Internet]. [cited 2022 Apr 22]. Available from: https://shop.bsigroup.com/products/stairs-code-of-practice-for-the-design-of-stairs-with-straight-flights-and-winders/standard
  16. 16. HM Government. Approved Document K: protection from falling, collision and impact. The Building Regulations; 2013.
  17. 17. Wilson W. The Housing Health and Safety Rating System (HHSRS).
  18. 18. English Housing Survey: Headline Report. 2023.
  19. 19. BRE report finds poor housing is costing NHS £1.4bn a year - BRE Group [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2022 May 25]. Available from: https://bregroup.com/press-releases/bre-report-finds-poor-housing-is-costing-nhs-1-4bn-a-year/
  20. 20. Roys M . Refurbishing stairs in dwellings to reduce the risk of falls and injuries. BRE Electronic Publications.
  21. 21. Foster RJ, Hotchkiss J, Buckley JG, Elliott DB. Safety on stairs: influence of a tread edge highlighter and its position. Experim Gerontology. 2014;55.
  22. 22. Thomas NM, Skervin TK, Foster RJ, Parr JV, Carpenter MG, O’Brien TD. Influence of step-surface visual properties on confidence, anxiety, dynamic stability, and gaze behaviour in young and older adults. Human Movement Sci. 2021;77:102774.
  23. 23. Montero-Odasso M, van der Velde N, Martin FC, Petrovic M, Tan MP, Ryg J, et al. World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: a global initiative. Age Ageing. 2022;51(9):afac205. pmid:36178003
  24. 24. Brown LA, Doan JB, McKenzie NC, Cooper SA. Anxiety-mediated gait adaptations reduce errors of obstacle negotiation among younger and older adults: Implications for fall risk. Gait & Posture. 2006;24(4):418–23.
  25. 25. Route previewing results in altered gaze behaviour, increased self-confidence and improved stepping safety in both young and older adults during adaptive locomotion. [cited 2023 Dec 4]; Available from: https://core.ac.uk/display/151169190?source=2
  26. 26. Young WR, Hollands MA. Newly acquired fear of falling leads to altered eye movement patterns and reduced stepping safety: a case study. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49765. pmid:23185432
  27. 27. Ackermans T, Francksen N, Lees C, Papatzika F, Arampatzis A, Baltzopoulos V. Prediction of balance perturbations and falls on stairs in older people using a biomechanical profiling approach: A 12-month longitudinal study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021;76(4):638–46.
  28. 28. Thomas NM, Skervin T, Foster RJ, O’Brien TD, Carpenter MG, Maganaris CN, et al. Optimal lighting levels for stair safety: Influence of lightbulb type and brightness on confidence, dynamic balance and stepping characteristics. Exp Gerontol. 2020;132:110839. pmid:31958491
  29. 29. Ministry of Housing Communities & Local Government. English Housing Survey - Stock profile and condition. 2017.
  30. 30. Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust. Falls Prevention Service - Liverpool. Available from: https://www.merseycare.nhs.uk/our-services/liverpool/community-falls-team.
  31. 31. Roman de Mettelinge T, Cambier D. Understanding the relationship between walking aids and falls in older adults: a prospective cohort study. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2015;38(3):127–32. pmid:25594520
  32. 32. Knäuper B, Carrière K, Chamandy M, Xu Z, Schwarz N, Rosen NO. How aging affects self-reports. Eur J Ageing. 2016;13(2):185–93.
  33. 33. McPhail S, Haines T. Response shift, recall bias and their effect on measuring change in health-related quality of life amongst older hospital patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:65. pmid:20618978
  34. 34. Groß J, Bayen UJ. Older and younger adults’ hindsight bias after positive and negative outcomes. Mem Cognit. 2022;50(1):16–28. pmid:34129224
  35. 35. Groß J, Pachur T. Age differences in hindsight bias: A meta-analysis. Psychol Aging. 2019;34(2):294–310. pmid:30652889
  36. 36. Gilchrist AL, Cowan N, Naveh-Benjamin M. Working memory capacity for spoken sentences decreases with adult ageing: recall of fewer but not smaller chunks in older adults. Memory. 2008;16(7):773–87. pmid:18671167
  37. 37. Williams V, Boylan AM, Nunan D. Critical appraisal of qualitative research: necessity, partialities and the issue of bias. BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine. 2019;25:bmjebm-2018.
  38. 38. Rose TC, Mason K, Pennington A, McHale P, Buchan I, Taylor-Robinson DC, et al. Inequalities in COVID19 mortality related to ethnicity and socioeconomic deprivation. medRxiv. 2020.