Figures
Abstract
Background
Although the burden of depressive and anxiety symptoms among visually impaired adults has become a serious current health issue, relatively little is known in the study setting and in Ethiopia as well. This study aimed to assess the magnitude of depressive symptoms, anxiety, and their associated factors among adult, visually impaired follow-up patients of the Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Eye Care and Training Center, South Ethiopia, 2024.
Methods
From 10 June to 2 August 2024, an institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted on 518 study subjects using a stratified sampling technique. Data were collected using a pretested, structured, and interviewer-administered questionnaire. The Hospital Anxiety Depressive symptoms Scale was used for assessment of depressive and anxiety symptoms among the study subjects in this study. This validated tool is composed of 14 items (7 for depressive symptoms and 7 for anxiety). The clinical and visual impairment related characteristics was extracted from their medical recording chart in daily basis. The statistical package for social science version 26 was used to analyze the data. Binary logistic regression was fitted. Variables with a p-value less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results
From 518 visually impaired follow-up patients who participated in the study, about 34.9% (95% CI: 29.3–41.3) and 39.4% (95% CI: 35.1–43.8) experienced some level of depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms, respectively. Social support, levels of visual impairment, a history of eye surgery, the pattern of vision loss, and patient satisfaction with an eye care service were variables significantly associated with both depressive and anxiety symptoms.
Conclusion and recommendations
Relatively higher burdens of depressive and anxiety symptoms were observed in study subjects. Screening common mental disorders during assessment of visual impairment is helpful. To enhance people's general health, public health programs must primarily target the most vulnerable populations.
Citation: Wube BF, Addis Y, Alemayehu BF, Etsub SA, Eticha BL (2025) Depressive and anxiety symptoms, and their associated factors among adult, visually impaired follow-up patients attending the Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Eye Care and Training Center, South Ethiopia, 2024. PLoS One 20(7): e0326117. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326117
Editor: Yan-Min Xu, Wuhan Mental Health Centre, CHINA
Received: November 14, 2024; Accepted: May 25, 2025; Published: July 2, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Wube et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Abbreviations: HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depressive symptoms Scale; HUCSH-ECTC, Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital-Eye Care and Training Center; OSSS, Oslo Social Support Scale; PSQ, Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire; PVA, Presenting Visual Acuity; VI, Visual Impairment
Introduction
Visual Impairment (VI) refers to a functional limitation of the eye or visual system due to a disorder or disease that results in poor vision in either or both eyes [1]. According to the International Classification of Disease (ICD) 11th definition, it is defined as presenting distance visual acuity (PVA) worse than 6/12 in the better eye [2]. It causes significant impairments to an individual's ability to function independently, which leads to disabilities. There is a visual handicap, and these limitations limit an individual's social and personal independence [3].
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) report, 2.2 billion people are living with some form of VI globally [4]. Global rates of blindness are predicted to triple in the next 30 years, whereas incidences of moderate VI are predicted to double [5]. It affects about 285 million individuals, of whom 266.4 million were adults aged 18 years and above [4]. Over 80% of VI is found among the underserved population in low- and middle-income countries [4]. In Sub-Saharan Africa, the prevalence of VI was 5.3% [6]. In Ethiopia, it ranges from 10.3% in Addis Ababa, central Ethiopia [7], to 37.58% in Northern Ethiopia [8].
Depressive symptoms are characterized by sadness, loss of interest or pleasure, feelings of guilt or low self-worth, disturbed sleep or appetite, feelings of tiredness, and poor concentration. It can be long-lasting or recurrent, substantially impairing an individual’s ability to function at work or school or cope with daily life [9]. Anxiety refers to a group of mental disorders characterized by feelings of fear [9]. Depression and anxiety in visually impaired adults are the most common psychiatric disorders and carry a high burden in terms of treatment costs, the effect on the ability to cope with daily activities, and on families and careers, as well as a loss of workplace productivity [10,11].
As compared to healthy population visually impaired individuals were two to five fold more vulnerable to symptomatic depression [12]. Globally, the results of meta-analysis indicated that 1 in 4 patients with VI who attended eye care services experienced at least significant depressive symptoms or more advanced disorder [13]. Additionally studies conducted on different age group adults suffering from different ocular conditions and related visual conditions experienced from 10 to 61% burden of depressive symptoms [12,14]. On the other hand, a meta-analysis and systematic review involving 91 studies conducted on study subjects suffering from a range of chronic ocular conditions causing VI revealed 21.2% to 53.5% prevalence range of anxiety symptoms [15]. Besides, the prevalence of anxiety among visually impaired individuals ranges from 6.5% to 77.5% [16–18]. In Africa, the range of prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms among visually impaired patients interviewed in different health centers was 8.7% [19] to 50% [20] and 10.4% [21] to 53.2% [20], respectively. Besides, studies conducted in Ethiopia reported quite variety of burden of depressive symptoms, ranging from 26.7% [22] to 30.6% [23].
Age [24,25], marital status [12,26], sex [27], illiteracy [12], residence [27], religion [12], living status [23,28], social support [26], additional physical impairments [25], comorbidity [27], VI duration [26], VI level [12,26], pattern of vision loss [25], VI cause [23], substance use [26], and emotional and personality [12] were significantly associated with depressive symptoms. On the other hand, a significant association was observed between anxiety symptoms and age [29,30], marital status [30], duration of VI [31], unilateral VI [32], and severity of VI [29,30].
However, there are efforts being made to decrease the impact of common mental disorders on individuals’ well-being; limited data were unveiled regarding the current magnitude of depressive and anxiety symptoms among visually impaired patients yet. Hence, knowing the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms among visually impaired patients helps to assess the impacts of this national eye care strategic plan and recast it based on the findings implicating at least minimum manifestations with their respective levels of symptoms. Moreover, it could be considered as evidence for eye care professionals and policymakers to obtain focused, mobilized, and essential resources for the implementation of suitable administrative and therapeutic procedures, early detection, and referral for depressive and anxiety symptoms.
Such study focusing on the early or progressive symptoms of depression and anxiety helps to anticipate efficient preventive and rehabilitative management that could equip the health care system act at the grass root level of the problem. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence and associated factors of depressive and anxiety symptoms among adult, visually impaired follow-up patients of the Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Eye Care and Training Center (HUCSH-ECTC), South Ethiopia.
Materials and methods
Study design, area, and period
An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted at HUCSH-ECTC in Hawassa City, South Ethiopia, from June 10 to August 2, 2024. In the area, it is the largest and sole tertiary facility serving around 16 million people in the Sidama Regional State and catchment areas that include Southern Ethiopia People Regional State and the neighboring Oromia Region [33]. The eye care and training center is comparted from both outpatient and inpatient departments and different units that provide medical, surgical, laser, and refractive therapy [34]. The center provides comprehensive eye care services for all new and follow-up visually impaired patients.
Source and study population
All adult, visually impaired patients who were under follow-up at HUCSH-ECTC for at least the last month.
Eligibility criteria
All adult, visually impaired patients who were under follow-up at HUCSH-ECTC for at least the last month were included in the study. However, adult visually impaired patients who could not give a response, including those with medical emergencies, hearing, and speaking problems, were excluded from the study.
Sample size determination
For primary objectives.
The sample size for prevalence was determined using a single population proportion formula, taking into account 0.267 and 0.295 proportions of depressive and anxiety symptoms taken from researches conducted in Ethiopia [22] and Nigeria [29], respectively. Furthermore, the sample size calculations stated below considered a 5% significance level and a 4% margin of error in common.
The final sample size calculated for the primary objective considering depressive and anxiety symptoms became 469.9 and 499.3, respectively.
Where;
n = Sample size
Z = Z statistics for 95% level of confidence = 1.96
P = Proportion of depressive and anxiety symptoms = 0.267 [22] and 29.5 [29], respectively
d = Margin of error = ±4%
For secondary objectives.
Level of VI, duration of illness, and social support were consistent factors of depressive and anxiety symptoms among visually impaired adults in the study done in Ethiopia [17] and Nigeria [16], respectively. The Epidemiological Information version 7.2.6.0 computer software at a 95% confidence level and 80% power was used to determine the maximum sample size for the secondary objective, 210 (Table 1).
To meet both objectives of this study and after bearing in mind the 10% nonresponse rate, we took the maximum sample size, 550 (the sample size for the primary objective), as the final sample size.
Sampling technique and procedure
The study participants were selected from three follow-up clinics found in HUCSH-ECTC. Out of the total of 1,122 expected average number of visually impaired patients attending these follow-up clinics, 550 study participants were selected using the stratified sampling technique (S1 Fig).
Taking the account of patient flow of each clinic, the total sample size was allocated proportionally. Once the allocation was done, the sampling interval for each clinic was calculated, and the value was determined to be two. We used the lottery method to draw the first sample of the first two participants and continued with every other participant. When the number of patients available was equal to or less than the average number of samples for that specific day and clinic, we used all of the eligible patients in that specific clinic as study participant.
Study variables
Dependent variables: Depressive symptoms and anxiety symptoms
Independent variables:
Socio-demographic and economic factors: Age, sex, residence, religion, marital status, educational level, occupation, average family monthly income, family size, valid health insurance, living circumstance, and social support
VI-related factors: Level of VI, pattern of vision loss, current status of VI, and main cause of VI
Clinical factors: Duration of VI, history of eye surgery, history of medical illness, family history of mental illness, substance use, additional physical and sensory impairment, and patient satisfaction
Operational definitions
Depressive symptoms: An individual scored the total score of ≥ 8 points out of a possible 21 subscale points of the depressive symptoms component of the Hospital Anxiety Depressive symptoms Scale (HADS) was deemed as experiencing depressive symptoms [35].
Anxiety symptoms: A study participant that got a total subscale score of ≥8 points out of a possible 21 points of the HADS anxiety subscale was considered as experiencing anxious symptoms [35]. Regarding the levels of anxiety symptoms, study subjects’ anxiety symptoms was leveled as mild, moderate, and severe, based on the individuals’ total score from 8 to 10, 11–15, and 16–21, respectively.
Visual impairment: Defined as per the ICD 11th disease classification [36].
- Mild VI: PVA worse than 6/12–6/18 in the better eye
- Moderate VI: PVA worse than 6/18–6/60 in the better eye
- Severe VI: PVA worse than 6/60 in the better eye
Social support: Participants in the study were classified as acquiring weak, moderate, and strong social support if their scores on the Oslo Social Support Scale (OSSS) ranged from 3 to 8, 9–11, and 12–14 [37].
Satisfied: respondents who mark an overall mean score of 60.00% to 100% or fulfill the overall mean score (54) or more on the given items to measure satisfaction [38].
Adult: A person whose age was ≥ 18 years old [39].
First relative family: Mother, father, sister, brother, husband, and wife of the study participant.
Current substance user: An individual who has a history of specified substance use for non-medical purposes in the last 12 months was identified as a current substance user [40].
Data collection tool and procedures
Under the eyes of a supervisor, three senior optometrists collected the data using a pretested and structured interviewer-administered Amharic, Afan-Oromo, and Sidaamu-Afoo version questionnaire. The questionnaire contained the study subjects’ socio-demographic and economic characteristics, clinical and VI-related characteristics, and the so-called HADS-14 questionnaire used for measuring depressive and anxiety symptoms [35]. The questionnaire prepared in Kobo Collect version 2021.2.4 was used for the face-to-face interview and chart review. The HADS-14 is a validated and reliable instrument designed to detect the states of anxiety and depressive symptoms in a hospital outpatient setting. The HADS questionnaire has seven items each for depressive and anxiety symptoms subscales. Each item was measured with a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 3. The scores of each subscale were summed separately, with higher scores denoting the highest anxiety or depressive symptoms. A total subscale score of ≥ 8 points out of a possible 21 denotes considerable anxiety or depressive symptoms [35]. The item’s reliability was checked by calculating Cronbach’s alpha value (α = 0.993) using a pre-test at Adare General Hospital. The higher validity, reliability and internal consistency of the items of the HADS questionnaire influences us to use to assess the presence of depressive and anxiety symptoms among the study subjects. Social support was assessed by using the OSSS, which had three items used to assess the level of the participant’s social support. The scale ranged from 3 to 14, and the scores 3–8, 9–11, and 12–14 showed “poor,” “moderate,” and “strong” social support [37], respectively. Moreover, patient satisfaction towards an eye care service obtained was assessed by the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18) [38].
Data quality assurance
The quality of the data was ensured by using a pretested structured questionnaire in Amharic, Afan-Oromo, and Sidaamu-Afoo. To ensure reliability and consistency, questions were translated by language experts into Amharic, Afan-Oromo, and Sidaamu-Afoo before being retranslated back into English. Once a pretest was done on 5% (27) of the sample size at Adare General Hospital, appropriate modification was done based on the feedback acquired. Besides, training was adequately given for the data collectors using standardized questionnaire before data collection. Furthermore, to ensure the quality of the data, daily supervision went on during the data collection period. Prior to analysis, the principal investigator cleaned up, crosschecked the gathered data, and verified that it was accurate, complete, and clear.
Data processing and analysis
The data was entered into Kobo Collect version 2021.2.4 and was exported and checked, cleaned, and analyzed by using Stata version 17. Descriptive statistics such as proportion and frequency were calculated. A bivariable binary logistic regression was used to assess the effects of all independent variables on the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms and to select a candidate variable for the multivariable analysis. To find the final associated factors of the outcome variables, a multivariable binary logistic regression was used for variables with a p-value < 0.20 in bivariable binary logistic regression. Using the Hosmer-Lemeshow model fitness test, the model fitness for depressive and anxiety symptoms was validated with p-values of 0.85 and 0.77, respectively. Likewise, the absence of multicollinearity between predictor variables was checked using the variance inflation factor. The Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR) with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was used to determine the strength of association of actual associated factors of depressive and anxiety symptoms, and the P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Ethical considerations
First, ethical clearance with the reference number of SOM/1456/2024 was obtained from the University of Gondar College of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Medicine Ethical Review Committee. Then, an official support letter and approval were obtained from the Department of Optometry and HUCSH-ECTC, respectively. Following a detailed explanation regarding the purpose, benefit, and risk of the study, verbal informed consent was acquired from each of the study participants. Participants were given full freedom to refuse to participate and withdraw from the study at any point of the study process. To ensure confidentiality, the questionnaires were coded, and the names of respondents were not included in the questionnaire. Data collected in this study were used strictly for research purposes and secured by coding the data and maintaining it during the data collection and analysis. Furthermore, those screened positive for depressive and anxiety symptoms were linked to the psychiatric outpatient department for further evaluation. Finally, it is our pleasure to reassure that the study was conducted with strict adherence to the World Medical Association’s Declaration of Helsinki.
Results
Socio-demographic and economic characteristics of the study participants
This research involved 518 adult, visually impaired, follow-up study participants, with a 94.18% response rate. The median age of the participants was 55 ± 27 Interquartile Range (IQR). Approximately sixty percent of the study subjects, 310 (59.8%) and 307 (59.3%), were male and married, respectively (Table 2).
Clinical and VI-related characteristics of the study participants
Of the respondents, 247 (47.7%) had a moderate level of VI and above eighty percent, 429 (82.8%), had a stable nature of VI. Besides, about two-thirds of the study subjects, 330 (63.7%), had a progressive pattern of vision loss. Regarding the main cause of VI, with the frequency of 182 (35.1%), 142 (27.4%), and 93 (18.0%), cataract, refractive error, and glaucoma were the top three main causes of VI (Table 3).
Prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms
In this study, the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms among adult, visually impaired follow-up patients was 181 (34.9%) (95% CI: 29.3, 41.3) and 204 (39.4%) (95% CI: 35.1, 43.8), respectively.
From individuals who had depressive symptoms, study subjects experienced a moderate level of the condition comparted almost the two-thirds (64.09%) of total participants. By the same token, about three-fourths (75%) of the respondents suffered from the moderate level of anxiety symptoms. Moreover, only 8.82% of the respondents were confirmed to be severely anxious (S2 Fig).
Factors associated with depressive symptoms
The bivariate binary logistic regression at a p-value < 0.2 unveiled that age, residence, marital status, educational status, average family monthly income, living circumstance, family size, level of VI, duration of VI, current status of VI, pattern of vision loss, additional impairment, history of eye surgery, history of medical illness, social support, and patient satisfaction were eligible to undergo multivariable binary logistic regression of depressive symptoms.
The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that age, marital status, vision loss pattern, history of eye surgery, level of VI, social support, and patient satisfaction with service provided were significantly associated with depressive symptoms at a p-value < 0.05 (Table 4).
Participants with the age groups of 36–50 and 50–65 years were more than two and fourfold more likely to have depressive symptoms than those under the age of 36 (AOR = 2.60, 95% CI: 1.13–6.02) and (AOR = 4.09, 95% CI: 1.79–9.36), respectively. Compared to being currently married, being currently unmarried raised the odds of developing depressive symptoms by six times (AOR = 5.95, 95% CI: 3.37–10.50). Moreover, the social support acquired by the study subject, compared to study subjects getting strong social support, those getting low and moderate support were more than six (AOR = 6.73, 95% CI: 3.65–12.42) and four times (AOR = 4.04, 95% CI: 2.22–7.36) higher odds of experiencing depressive symptoms, respectively.
Regarding the level of VI, the odds of experiencing some level of depressive symptoms by severely visually impaired study participants was almost three times (AOR = 2.98, 95% CI: 1.43–6.23) higher than those living with mild VI. Compared to their counterparts, the odds of being depressed was more than threefold higher in the study subjects that had undergone an ocular surgery (AOR = 3.60, 95% CI: 1.93–6.74) and that had a sudden vision loss pattern (AOR = 3.51, 95% CI: 2.04–6.03). Furthermore, dissatisfaction with the service delivered by the tertiary eye care center doubled the likelihood of depressive symptoms occurrence (AOR = 2.03, 95% CI: 1.24–3.31).
Factors associated with anxiety symptoms
Sex, religion, occupation, duration of VI, current status of VI, history of systemic illness, and history of substance use had a p-value of > 0.2, and they did not get fitted to multivariable logistic regression for anxiety symptoms. In the multivariable logistic regression model, living circumstances, pattern of vision loss, history of eye surgery, level of VI, social support, and patient satisfaction were found to have a significant association with anxiety symptoms at a p-value < 0.05 (Table 5).
This empirical study confirmed that living with relatives doubled the occurrence of anxiety symptoms compared to being with first-relative families (AOR = 2.61, 95% CI: 1.13–6.03). Likewise, acquiring moderate (AOR = 3.69, 95% CI: 2.09–6.51) or less (AOR = 4.13, 95% CI: 2.16–7.86) social support raised the odds of being anxious by more than threefold compared to being strongly supported.
The odds of experiencing some level of anxiety symptoms among individuals with moderate and severe VI were nearly 2 (AOR = 1.89, 95% CI: 1.09–3.30) and above 4 times (AOR = 4.59, 95% CI: 2.35–8.96) higher than those with mild VI, respectively. Additionally, compared to its comparator, having a history of ocular surgery upraised being anxious by about fourfold (AOR = 3.94, 95% CI: 2.19–7.12). Adult visually impaired patients who had a sudden vision loss had more than 6 times (AOR = 6.83, 95% CI: 4.12–11.32) higher anxiety symptoms than individuals who lost their vision progressively. Alike to what was observed on depressive symptoms, study subjects unsatisfied with the eye care service being obtained were two times more likely to experience some level of anxiety symptoms (AOR = 2.77, 95% CI: 1.73–4.42).
Discussion
Especially for developing nations, the burden of common mental disorders, such as depressive and anxiety symptoms, is getting the public health concern and becomes a double burden over the established infectious diseases. Understanding the actual burden on different segments of the community could be used as baseline data to catch the eyes of policymakers, leading to modified, efficient, and evidence-based clinical practice resulting in improved quality of life. This facility-based study covering a large sample size assessed the burden of depressive and anxiety symptoms, and their associated factors among adult, visually impaired follow-up patients.
In this study, the magnitude of depressive symptoms in adult follow-up patients suffering from VI was found to be 34.9% (95% CI: 29.3–41.3). This finding was in line with the previous studies conducted in Ethiopia (30.6%) [23], Nigeria (34.1%) [41], New Zealand (29.4%) [42], and the Netherlands (32.2%) [28]. The socioeconomic status similarity would be mentioned as a possible reason for alignment with a study from Africa [43]. Depressive symptoms burden showed significant and consistent correlation with socioeconomic status of the nation, family and individuals as well. Therefore having the same socioeconomic status could result comparable burden of depressive symptoms. Moreover, a report from Netherlands also enrolled comparable population with the same level of visual impairment with this study, which resulting quite similar burden [28].
However, the result of this study was higher than the reports from Ethiopia (26.7%) [22], Nigeria (8.7–27.1%) [19,44,45], Asia (12% and 28%) [46–49], the United States (10.7%) [50], Australia (14.7%) [51], and Europe (9.4%−22.8%) [24,25,52]. This discrepancy could be due to the depressive symptoms measurement tool, data collection technique, study population, and socio-economical difference [53]. For instance, an Ethiopian, Nigerian, and variety of the study were conducted on older adults having VI; this condition potentially underestimated the burden of depressive symptoms on the previous study. Nowadays, depressive symptoms is getting more prevalent in adults compared with those having more than 60 years of age [25,54]. This phenomenon incriminates that sufficient care helps adult visually impaired population to cope with this desperating condition. In the Norway study, the data were gathered via telephone interviews causing reluctance to respond each details of the questions as the face-to-face one collected in the health care center. Additionally, studies carried out in Europe, Asia, USA, and Australia were conducted in middle- and high-income nations with established and integrated eye and health care system resulting with more controlled burden of common mental disorders like depressive symptoms [55]. Additionally, significant fall down of mortality rate was also observed among those getting adequate health care. This finding suggests that early detection and treatment of depressive symptoms in visually impaired people leads to better depressive symptoms control and a higher quality of life.
Conversely, the finding of this study was lower than studies conducted in Pakistan (56%) [27] and Nigeria (50%) [20]. The inconsistency could be due to the variations in clinical characteristics of the study population and measurement tools used for depressive symptoms measurement. Participants in the Nigerian study had moderate to severe VI, which increased their functional, social, and financial burden resulting, boosted burden of depressive symptoms [27]. Furthermore, the HADS scale was applied in this investigation to measure depressive symptoms, with a cutoff point of 8 out of 21 total scores for depressive symptoms; in contrast, the Pakistan study employed the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies-Depressive symptoms scale (CES-D) with a cutoff point of 10 out of 60 total scores. Therefore, in comparison to this study, the previous results were expected to show a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms.
To be consistent with the study from Nigeria (37.5%) [41], the magnitude of anxiety was found to be 39.4% (95% CI: 35.1–43.8) in this study. The relatively similar socio-economic status and the similarity of the tool used for anxiety symptoms measurement would be attributable for this occurrence.
This burden of anxiety symptoms was relatively higher than observed in Nigeria (29.5%) [29,30], (10.4%) [21,29], Malaysia (8%−17%) [48], the Netherlands (15.6%) [28], the United States (27.2%) [56], France – Germany – Italy (30.1%) [57], and China (13.5%) [47]. This discrepancy may result from the fact that different studies use different tools having variety of reliability, consistency, classification, and detailed assessment causing inconsistency in estimation of the burden of depressive symptoms. Moreover, the way and area of data collection affecting the motivation and the social desirability challenge could influence the outcome. However, as the reported anxiety symptoms levels were from various socioeconomic nations across the globe, it is reasonable that there would be a variance in the prevalence of anxiety symptoms due to socioeconomic disparities [58]. The common mental disorders among patients in the health care centers could better addressed early and managed appropriately in developed nations such as Europe and Far East Asia [59].
The present study yielded a lower result than the previous study conducted in Nigeria, (53.2%) [20]. This discrepancy was may be attributed to differences in the study population, whereby the former study included patients with a more severe level of VI, while this study included patients with a mild to severe level of VI. Consequently, higher prevalence was observed in Nigerian study than us [22]. Therefore giving more attention for more advanced VI is expected to deal with their problems and make them hopeful and productive.
The odds of having depressive symptoms among participants those of older age groups (36–50 years and 51–65 years) was significantly higher than young age adults, making it diverged from an outputs from Norway and Britain [24,25]. A clinical research has demonstrated that growing older is frequently linked to a number of age-related eye disorders. Additionally, growing older on its own increases depressive symptoms because it limits daily activities and introduces psychosocial stressors like retirement, loneliness, and the death of a loved one [60,61]. Likewise, as compared to their comparators the currently unmarried participants had significantly higher odds of developing depressive symptoms. This condition was in agreement with the reported from Ethiopia, Nigeria, Armenia, the Netherlands, and Britain [26]. Being currently single is one of the most devastating life events that are most associated with negative stress among visually impaired patients in particular report less well-being and more symptoms of depressive symptoms compared to married individuals [62]. Especially by the time of challenges, marriage also creates an opportunity to share ideas and support each other helping to cope with the condition [63].
The odds of having depressive symptoms in participants who had poor and moderate social support were 6.73 and 4.04 times higher than in participants who had strong social support respectively. This result was comparable with the studies conducted in Ethiopia, Nigeria, Australia, Pakistan, and Armenia [26]. Prior studies have found that visually impaired patients concerning social support, it is more plausible that low level of received social support will lead to an increased likelihood of loneliness. Again, the vision loss is also causing isolation and loneliness. Furthermore, their families and community do not understand the psychosocial impact of the vision loss, and not support them. These reasons again cause the frequent occurrence of depressive symptoms [60]. Taking care of visually impaired individuals who are working and living around us is vital in protecting them from experiencing some levels of common mental disorders. Similarly, to be in accordance with reports from Ethiopia, Nigeria, and Pakistan [26], severely visually impaired subjects were almost threefold more likely to be depressed than those living with low level VI. This phenomenon was occurred because of the fact that he severe VI hinders the social, functional, and economic disability resulting an individual lonely, desperate, and depressed [22,64].
In contrary with an evidence from Norway [25], depressive symptoms was highly observed in visually impaired patients who lost their vision suddenly. Sudden loss of vision can lead to unfortunate socio-economic disturbance like losing financial leadership and source of income. Usually, this occurs in an unexpected manner that might put the person under stress and leading to depressive symptoms [65]. This result underlines the advantage of the detailed examination of the visual status with the corresponding coping mechanisms employed to deal with the VI they suffering from. Routine monitoring of the psychosocial health with the primary ocular and visual checkup is recommended. The odds of having depressive symptoms among participants who had a history of eye surgery was 3.60 times higher than participants who had no history of surgery. This link explained by surgical therapy associated with result expectancies and fear of complications [66]. Spending adequate time to explain the potential prognosis of the procedure could help the patient to arrange his/her expectation accordingly.
Regarding the eye care delivery, dissatisfaction with an eye care services was observed to double the occurrence of depressive symptoms among adult, visually impaired follow-up ophthalmic patients. Patients who are more satisfied with the eye care services they receive are more likely to follow their treatment plan, take better care of their health, and lead healthy lives. This determines better outcome of their treatment and reduced occurrence of depressive symptoms [67]. Working hard in improving the quality of the service being given and reducing the waiting time will make follow-up patients more satisfied with the service and have healthy psychosocial health.
The odds of having anxiety symptoms in participants who had moderate and severe levels of VI were 1.89 and 4.59 times higher than in participants who had a mild level of VI, respectively. This result is comparable with the studies conducted in Nigeria and Japan [29,30]. Daily activities may become more difficult when visual acuity declines, which could have negative effects on social and economic standing, increase dependency, raise the risk of falling, and result in poor mental well-being and anxiety [68]. Additionally, this study confirmed that getting moderate or less social support raised experiencing anxiety symptoms significantly compared to acquiring strong social support. This result was in convergence with the studies conducted in Nigeria [29]. Prior studies have found bidirectional relations between social support and anxiety symptoms; increased perceptions of social support led to increased self-efficacy and decreased avoidance, which in turn leads to decreased anxiety symptoms. Increases in support perception may arise from changes in resources or cognitions, developing more social skills that may lead to improvements in anxiety symptoms [69].
The likelihood of anxiety symptoms among participants with a sudden pattern of vision loss was 6.83 times higher than among participants with a progressive pattern of vision loss. Sudden loss of vision can lead to unfortunate socio-economic disturbance like losing financial leadership and source of income. Usually, this occurs in an unexpected manner that might put the person under stress [65]. Individuals who lived with relatives had 2.61 times the likelihood of having anxiety symptoms as compared to those who lived with first-relative families. which agrees with research conducted in Ethiopia [23,28], and the Netherlands [23,28]. Their financial load and stress may be the cause, as well as their feelings of rejection and low status. A previous study reported that the psychological well-being of individuals who lived alone or with others was poorer than those who lived with first-relative families; those can provide a sense of well-being and emotional support, producing mutual obligations and reinforcements between them [70].
Study participants with a history of eye surgery were 3.94 times more likely to have anxiety symptoms as compared with those who did not have a history of surgery. This might be due to emotional and physiological reactions to the anticipated surgery, which might have indirectly influenced the results. In addition to this, the high cost of treatment, poor quality of care, an increase in the length of hospital stays, and increases in hospital readmission rates due to surgical treatment [71]. The odds of having anxiety symptoms among participants who were unsatisfied with the eye care service they provided were 2.77 times higher than participants who were satisfied with the eye care service they provided. The increased satisfaction with the provided eye care health services is important as the patients are satisfied with the consultation and more likely to adhere to their treatment plan, take better care of their health, and lead a general well-being of the patient, especially mental health aspects [67].
Strength and limitation of the study
This study encountered some limitations such as recall and social desirability bias. The outcome may be subject to social desirability and recall bias due to the self-reported interview used to address several important socio-demographic, economic, and other characteristics of the study subjects. Appropriate correction was done on optimizing the recall time for patients and strict and detail instruction and clarification for the patient before data collection, to address some challenges identified during the pre-test. A thorough explanation was provided, covering topics such as data security, anonymity, safe output communication, and interview room privacy. Moreover, the cross-sectional nature of the study potentially hinders the assessment of the time-based status of depressive and anxiety symptoms. It does not also show the cause-and-effect relationship between dependent and independent variables assessed. This study also fails to assess some potentially important factors including detailed lifestyle and behavioral status, functional disability, wealth status, and systemic comorbidity among the study subjects, which could affect the conclusion and generalizability of the results. Furthermore, limited generalizability of the results of this study is observed. Since this study was conducted at a specified setting, generalizing results to the wider general population is not possible. Anticipating future researches addressing those limitations of the study will complement the quality of this output and help the clinical practice. Nonetheless, using validated tool to assess depressive and anxiety symptoms is one of strength of the study, the symptom-based tools we used only screen the depressive and anxiety symptom based mental conditions; not actually meaning depressive and/or anxiety disorder is observed. We advise researchers consider more clinical and objective techniques based investigation of common mental disorders among this vulnerable population, especially in a resource-constrained areas. Additionally, those study subjects confirmed to live with depressive or anxiety symptoms were linked to the psychiatry clinic of the Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital for further investigation and timely management.
Conclusion
In contrast to earlier researches, a significant proportion of visually impaired people attending the HUCSH-ECTC had depressive and anxiety symptoms. This finding indicated that it is crucial to integrate treatment services for co-occurring mental disorders with VI and implement evidence-based interventions. Getting poor and moderate social support, suffering from moderate and severe levels of VI, having a history of eye surgery, having a sudden pattern of vision loss, and being unsatisfied with the eye care service received were variables significantly associated with both depressive and anxiety symptoms.
Supporting information
S1 Fig. Schematic presentation of sampling technique and procedures used for assessing depressive and anxiety symptoms and their associated factors.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326117.s001
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Severity of depressive and anxiety symptoms among the study subjects.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326117.s002
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
We would like to acknowledge the University of Gondar, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, for providing us the ethical clearance to conduct this study. We would also like to express our gratitude to the study subjects for their willingness to take part in this study. Our gratitude will also go to the data collectors and supervisor. Finally, thanks to all with significant contributions to the success of this study.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
- 1.
WHOJA. ICD update and revision platform: change the definition of blindness. WHOJA; 2010. 8.
- 2.
Organization WH. Report of the 12th FAO/WHO joint meeting on pesticide management. World Health Organization; 2020.
- 3. Frick KD, Foster A. The magnitude and cost of global blindness: an increasing problem that can be alleviated. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003;135(4):471–6. pmid:12654362
- 4. GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators, Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9(2):e144–60. pmid:33275949
- 5. Bourne RRA, Flaxman SR, Braithwaite T, Cicinelli MV, Das A, Jonas JB, et al. Magnitude, temporal trends, and projections of the global prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(9):e888–97. pmid:28779882
- 6. Naidoo K, Gichuhi S, Basáñez MG, Flaxman SR, Jonas JB, Keeffe J. Prevalence and causes of vision loss in sub-Saharan Africa: 1990–2010. Ophthalmology. 2014;98(5):612–8.
- 7. Cherinet FM, Tekalign SY, Anbesse DH, Bizuneh ZY. Prevalence and associated factors of low vision and blindness among patients attending St. Paul’s Hospital Millennium Medical College, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Ophthalmology. 2018;18:1–6.
- 8. Seid MA, Ambelu A, Diress M, Yeshaw Y, Akalu Y, Dagnew B. Visual impairment and its predictors among people living with type 2 diabetes mellitus at Dessie town hospitals, Northeast Ethiopia: institution-based cross-sectional study. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022;22(1):52. pmid:35114950
- 9.
Organization WH. Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. 2017.
- 10. Kempen GI, Zijlstra GRJTA. Clinically relevant symptoms of anxiety and depression in low-vision community-living older adults. Aging & Mental Health. 2014;22(3):309–13.
- 11. Tastan S, Iyigun E, Bayer A, Acikel C. Anxiety, depression, and quality of life in Turkish patients with glaucoma. Psychol Rep. 2010;106(2):343–57. pmid:20524533
- 12. Li W, Zhong B, Liu X, Huang X, Dai X, Hu Q, et al. Depressive symptoms among the visually disabled in Wuhan: an epidemiological survey. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2013;25(5):306–13. pmid:24991169
- 13. Parravano M, Petri D, Maurutto E, Lucenteforte E, Menchini F, Lanzetta P, et al. Association Between Visual Impairment and Depression in Patients Attending Eye Clinics: A Meta-analysis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2021;139(7):753–61. pmid:34042966
- 14. Zhong B-L, Xu Y-M, Li Y. Prevalence and Unmet Need for Mental Healthcare of Major Depressive Disorder in Community-Dwelling Chinese People Living With Vision Disability. Front Public Health. 2022;10:900425. pmid:35812506
- 15. Ulhaq ZS, Soraya GV, Dewi NA, Wulandari LR. The prevalence of anxiety symptoms and disorders among ophthalmic disease patients. Therapeutic Advances in Ophthalmology. 2022;14:25158414221090100.
- 16. Yochim BP, Mueller AE, Kane KD, Kahook MY. Prevalence of cognitive impairment, depression, and anxiety symptoms among older adults with glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 2012;21(4):250–4. pmid:21336151
- 17. Ryu SJ, Lee WJ, Tarver LB, Shin YU, Kang MH, Seong M. Depressive symptoms and quality of life in age-related macular degeneration based on Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES). Korean Journal of Ophthalmology. 2017;31(5):412–23.
- 18. Rees G, Xie J, Fenwick EK, Sturrock BA, Finger R, Rogers SL, et al. Association Between Diabetes-Related Eye Complications and Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(9):1007–14. pmid:27387297
- 19. Aina F, Ajayi I, Agbesanwa T, Dada M, Fadare J. Association between visual impairment, family support, and depression among older adults in Ekiti, Nigeria: findings and implications. Saudi J Med. 2023;8(4):171–7.
- 20. Onwubiko SN, Nwachukwu NZ, Muomah RC, Okoloagu NM, Ngwegu OM, Nwachukwu DC. Factors associated with depression and anxiety among glaucoma patients in a tertiary hospital South-East Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23(3):315–21. pmid:32134029
- 21. Aina FO, Ajayi IA, Omotoye JO, Agbesanwa TA, Dada MU, Fadare JO. Anxiety disorder among older adults with visual impairment in Ekiti, Nigeria: implications for the potential opportunity to mitigate the impact of the disability and prevent psychological harm. Folia Medica Indonesiana. 2023;59(1):1–7.
- 22. Yimer YM, Buli MB, Nenko G, Mirkena Y, Kassew T. The prevalence and determinant factors of self-reported depressive symptoms among elderly people with visual impairment attending an outpatient clinic in Ethiopia. Clinical Optometry. 2021;63–72.
- 23. Metekiya WM, Mulat AW, Gebregergis AG, Tsehay M, Amare TA. Prevalence of Depression and Associated Factors among Ophthalmic Patients in Mekelle Quiha General Hospital Ophthalmic Clinic: A Cross-Sectional Study in North Ethiopia. Journal of Ophthalmology. 2023.
- 24. Evans JR, Fletcher AE, Wormald RPL. Depression and anxiety in visually impaired older people. Ophthalmology. 2007;114(2):283–8. pmid:17270678
- 25. Brunes A, Heir T. Visual impairment and depression: Age-specific prevalence, associations with vision loss, and relation to life satisfaction. World J Psychiatry. 2020;10(6):139–49. pmid:32742947
- 26. Birhan GS, Belete GT, Eticha BL, Ayele FA. Magnitude of maladaptive coping strategy and its associated factors among adult glaucoma patients attending tertiary eye care center in Ethiopia. Clinical Ophthalmology. 2023;711–23.
- 27. Tajwidi C, Bari A, Amin M, Kashani SA. Frequency and associated risk factors of depression in patients with visual impairment. Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences. 2021;15(3):116–21.
- 28. van der Aa HPA, Comijs HC, Penninx BWJH, van Rens GHMB, van Nispen RMA. Major depressive and anxiety disorders in visually impaired older adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56(2):849–54. pmid:25604690
- 29. Okeke S, Onu JU, Asimadu IN. Onyebueke GCJJotNAoM. Burden of significant anxiety and stress symptoms in persons with visual impairment in a Nigerian hospital. Association with Vision-Related Quality of Life. 2023;2(1):37–44.
- 30. Donoyama N, Munakata T. Trait anxiety among Japanese massage practitioners with visual impairment: what is required in Japanese rehabilitation education?. British Journal of Visual Impairment. 2009;27(1):25–47.
- 31. Ray CT, Horvat M, Williams M, Blasch BB. Clinical assessment of functional movement in adults with visual impairments. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness. 2007;101(2):108–13.
- 32. Williams RA, Brody BL, Thomas RG, Kaplan RM, Brown SI. The psychosocial impact of macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(4):514–20. pmid:9565052
- 33.
Gebru EA, Alem KD, G/Silassie MGJCO. Profile of amblyopia among children aged from 5 to 15 years at Hawassa University Comprehensive Specialized Hospital Pediatric Eye Clinic, South Ethiopia, 2020/21. 2022;149–57.
- 34. Alem KD, Arega DD, Weldegiorgis ST, Agaje BG, Tigneh EG. Profile of ocular trauma in patients presenting to the department of ophthalmology at Hawassa University: Retrospective study. J Ophthalmol. 2019;14(3):e0213893.
- 35. Rishi P, Rishi E, Maitray A, Agarwal A, Nair S, Gopalakrishnan S. Hospital anxiety and depression scale assessment of 100 patients before and after using low vision care: A prospective study in a tertiary eye-care setting. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65(11):1203–8. pmid:29133652
- 36.
World Health Organization. International classification of diseases: ICD-11 for mortality and morbidity statistics. 2018.
- 37.
Kocalevent RD, Berg L, Beutel ME, Hinz A, Zenger M, Härter M. Social support in the general population: standardization of the Oslo social support scale (OSSS-3). 2018;6:1–8.
- 38.
Marshall GN, Hays RD. The patient satisfaction questionnaire short-form (PSQ-18). Santa Monica, CA: Rand; 1994.
- 39.
Mulusew M. Prevalence and associated factors of ophthalmic self-medication among adult ophthalmic patients in Gondar city, Northwest Ethiopia. University of Gondar; 2017.
- 40. Bernards S, Graham K, Kuendig H, Hettige S, Obot I. “I have no interest in drinking”: a cross-national comparison of reasons why men and women abstain from alcohol use. Addiction. 2009;104(10):1658–68. pmid:19681798
- 41. Ani N, Inye Nathaniel G. Prevalence and predictors of anxiety and depression among glaucoma patients in a tertiary health institution in South-South Nigeria. Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal. 2022;16(2):13–21.
- 42. Hayman KJ, Kerse NM, La Grow SJ, Wouldes T, Robertson MC, Campbell AJ. Depression in older people: visual impairment and subjective ratings of health. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(11):1024–30. pmid:18043421
- 43. Freeman A, Tyrovolas S, Koyanagi A, Chatterji S, Leonardi M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, et al. The role of socio-economic status in depression: results from the COURAGE (aging survey in Europe). BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1098. pmid:27760538
- 44. Sewuese B, Oye G, Charles B, Terkaa B. Depression among visually impaired adults in Ibadan. EC Ophthalmology. 2019;10(7):530–5.
- 45. Osuagwu UL, Ahaiwe KE, Meribe N, Nkanga ED, Ekpenyong BN, Ibanga AA, et al. Quality of life and depression among patients with high myopia in Nigeria: a cross sectional study. Int J Ophthalmol. 2023;16(12):2071–81. pmid:38111950
- 46. Carrière I, Delcourt C, Daien V, Pérès K, Féart C, Berr C, et al. A prospective study of the bi-directional association between vision loss and depression in the elderly. J Affect Disord. 2013;151(1):164–70. pmid:23787409
- 47. Xu L, Chen S, Xu K, Wang Y, Zhang H, Wang L, et al. Prevalence and associated factors of depression and anxiety among Chinese diabetic retinopathy patients: A cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2022;17(4):e0267848. pmid:35482738
- 48. Aziz JRMA. Mental health state of low vision patients using the hospital anxiety and depression scale and the depression, anxiety and stress scale. Journal of Mental Health. 2023;48(1):1–10.
- 49. Giloyan A, Harutyunyan T, Petrosyan V. Visual impairment and depression among socially vulnerable older adults in Armenia. Aging Ment Health. 2015;19(2):175–81. pmid:24898137
- 50. Zhang X, Bullard KM, Cotch MF, Wilson MR, Rovner BW, McGwin G. Association between depression and functional vision loss in persons 20 years of age or older in the United States, NHANES 2005-2008. JAMA Ophthalmology. 2013;131(5):573–81.
- 51. Rees G, Tee HW, Marella M, Fenwick E, Dirani M, Lamoureux EL. Vision-specific distress and depressive symptoms in people with vision impairment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51(6):2891–6. pmid:20164466
- 52. Lupsakko T, Mäntyjärvi M, Kautiainen H, Sulkava R. Combined hearing and visual impairment and depression in a population aged 75 years and older. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;17(9):808–13. pmid:12221653
- 53. Chandran P, Shenoy D, Thavody J, P LM. Assessment of quality of life of stroke survivors in a rural area of North Kerala, India. International Journal Of Community Medicine And Public Health. 2017;4(3):841–6.
- 54. Kessler RC, Birnbaum H, Bromet E, Hwang I, Sampson N, Shahly V. Age differences in major depression: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Psychol Med. 2010;40(2):225–37. pmid:19531277
- 55. Cully JA, Zimmer M, Khan MM, Petersen LA. Quality of depression care and its impact on health service use and mortality among veterans. Psychiatr Serv. 2008;59(12):1399–405. pmid:19033166
- 56. Frank CR, Xiang X, Stagg BC, Ehrlich JR. Longitudinal Associations of Self-reported Vision Impairment With Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression Among Older Adults in the United States. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2019;137(7):793–800. pmid:31095253
- 57. Augustin A, Sahel J-A, Bandello F, Dardennes R, Maurel F, Negrini C, et al. Anxiety and depression prevalence rates in age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(4):1498–503. pmid:17389477
- 58. Azizabadi Z, Aminisani N, Emamian MH. Socioeconomic inequality in depression and anxiety and its determinants in Iranian older adults. BMC Psychiatry. 2022;22(1):761. pmid:36471352
- 59. Ignacio J, Dolmans D, Scherpbier A, Rethans J-J, Chan S, Liaw SY. Stress and anxiety management strategies in health professions’ simulation training: a review of the literature. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn. 2016;2(2):42–6. pmid:35518196
- 60.
Verstraten P, Brinkmann W, Stevens N, Schouten J. Loneliness, adaptation to vision impairment, social support and depression among visually impaired elderly. Elsevier; 2005.
- 61. Kempen GIJM, Ballemans J, Ranchor AV, van Rens GHMB, Zijlstra GAR. The impact of low vision on activities of daily living, symptoms of depression, feelings of anxiety and social support in community-living older adults seeking vision rehabilitation services. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(8):1405–11. pmid:22090173
- 62. Schaan B. Widowhood and depression among older Europeans--the role of gender, caregiving, marital quality, and regional context. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2013;68(3):431–42. pmid:23591571
- 63. Serapinas D, Narbekovas A. Marital Status and Level of Depression and Anxiety. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research. 2022;34(6):60–6.
- 64. Demmin DL, Silverstein SM. Visual impairment and mental health: unmet needs and treatment options. Clin Ophthalmol. 2020;14:4229–51.
- 65. Munaw MB, Tegegn MT. Visual impairment and psychological distress among adults attending the University of Gondar tertiary eye care and training center, Northwest Ethiopia: A comparative cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2022;17(2):e0264113. pmid:35176097
- 66. Nijkamp MD, Kenens CA, Dijker AJM, Ruiter RAC, Hiddema F, Nuijts RMMA. Determinants of surgery related anxiety in cataract patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2004;88(10):1310–4. pmid:15377557
- 67. Nunu WN, Munyewende PO. Patient satisfaction with nurse-delivery primary health care services in Free State and Gauteng provinces, South Africa: A comparative study. African journal of primary health care & family medicine. 2017;9(1):e1–8.
- 68. Yibekal BT, Alemu DS, Anbesse DH, Alemayehu AM, Alimaw YA. Vision-Related Quality of Life among Adult Patients with Visual Impairment at University of Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. J Ophthalmol. 2020;2020:9056097. pmid:32280539
- 69. Dour HJ, Wiley JF, Roy-Byrne P, Stein MB, Sullivan G, Sherbourne CD, et al. Perceived social support mediates anxiety and depressive symptom changes following primary care intervention. Depress Anxiety. 2014;31(5):436–42. pmid:24338947
- 70. Tucker JS. Health-related social control within older adults’ relationships. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57(5):P387-95. pmid:12198097
- 71. Rtbey G, Mihertabe M, Andualem F, Melkam M, Takelle GM, Tinsae T, et al. Anxiety and associated factors among medical and surgical patients in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024;19(7):e0306413. pmid:39046996