Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Individualized diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: A rank-based qualitative T cell-related signature

  • Hang Su ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Hang Su, Xingyi Li

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of clinical medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China

  • Xingyi Li ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Hang Su, Xingyi Li

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization

    Affiliation School of clinical medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China

  • Yawei Li

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    liyawei@gmc.edu.cn

    Affiliation School of Biology and Engineering, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease with persistent synovitis and joint destruction, leading to a huge economic and physical burden on patients. The detection of RA is important for the individual’s guiding therapeutic. However, current signatures lacked enough effects for the diagnosis of RA. Here, a pariwise signature, including genes ICAM2 and OSTF1, was derived based on a rank-based method, which was called ICAM2-OSTF1 signature (IOS). The sensitivity and specificity of IOS in the training dataset were 87.39% and 86.79%, respectively. The accuracy of IOS was 91.07% in the validation dataset that contained a total of 280 samples from two independent datasets. Besides, when using eight methods, such as ssGSEA, xCell and TIMER, to quantitate the immune infiltration characteristics in RA. We found that RA presented elevated pro-inflammation immune infiltration and immune score. In addition, transcriptome analysis demonstrated that the consistent transcriptional differences between RA and healthy control were significantly enriched in some pathways typically related to the immune microenvironments, such as T cell activation. Finally, network analysis demonstrated that ICAM2, CXCL16, CKLF and SLPI may be related to the occurrence of RA. In brief, IOS can individually distinguish RA from healthy controls measured by different laboratories, and be an auxiliary test for diagnosing RA.

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease, with an incidence of 0.5 to 1% in the world [1]. With the development of the disease, the inflammation caused by RA leads to irreversible joint damage, disability and even a shortened lifespan [2,3]. Fortunately, evidence suggested that early detection of RA can effectively reduce the degree of joint destruction, and associated problems in about 90% of patients [4]. Currently, serum biomarkers used to detect RA in clinical settings lack enough accuracy, including serum rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody [5]. Therefore, it is urgent to develop an accurate molecular signature for the detection of RA, thereby improving the patient’s prognosis.

Many transcriptional signatures for diagnosing RA have been provided [69]. However, a critical limitation of such quantitative signatures is that their applications are commonly based on the quantitative measurements of the signature genes, which are impractical for clinical applications due to the considerable variance in the expression levels of the same gene across samples [10]. In contrast, signatures developed based on within-sample relative expression orderings (REOs) of gene pairs are resistant to batch or normalization effects by different technical sources and can be applied to individual samples [1113].

In addition, T cells play critical roles in RA pathogenesis by producing and releasing various inflammatory mediators, including chemokines and cytokines [14]. And T cells are also related to inflammatory responses and interferon responses [15]. For example, regulatory T cells are involved in maintaining immune balance and tolerance to self-antigens, whose dysfunction contributes to RA pathogenesis [16,17]. Type 1 T helper cells also are highly activated in RA patients, which have the ability to secrete pro-inflammatory factors such as interferon-gamma [18]. Moreover, as a part of the innate immune system, natural killer T cells significantly decrease in the peripheral blood of RA patients when compared with healthy controls [19,20]. In total, T cells are implicated in RA occurrence and development by triggering long-term pathological chronic inflammation. Therefore, T cell-related genes may have the potential ability for diagnosing RA.

In the present study, we used the expression profiles of T cell-related genes, including regulatory T cells, T helper cells and natural killer T cells, to extract a classification biomarker. Quantitative measurements of the same gene are highly varied across different samples, even from the same type. Thus, we applied an REO-based method to discover a qualitative signature for the classification of RA by transforming the quantitative expression of a single gene into a binary relation of the within-sample REOs of gene pairs. The performance of the signature was validated in two independent datasets.

Materials and methods

Data collection and preprocessing

Three datasets of RA and normal peripheral blood samples profiled by different microarray platforms were downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). As summarized in Table 1, GSE17755 dataset measured by the Hitachisoft AceGene Human Oligo Chip 30K 1 Chip Version (GPL1291) was used as the training dataset, which includes 53 normal and 112 RA peripheral blood samples. The 33 normal samples from GSE97475 dataset, together with the 247 RA samples from GSE97810 dataset, were used as the validation dataset.

The identical preprocessing was executed for these datasets, with the gene expression profiles (series.txt) utilized directly following the probe re-annotation process, devoid of any normalization. The probe set IDs were correlated with Entrez gene IDs using the relevant platform annotation file for all gene expression profile data. If numerous probe sets corresponded to the same gene, the expression value was determined by calculating its average value. Furthermore, probes that mapped multiple Entrez gene IDs or failed to map any Entrez gene ID were eliminated.

Development of the REO-based signature

A total of 233 T-related genes were downloaded from TISIDB database [21] (http://cis.hku.hk/TISIDB/), including 36 T follicular helper cell-related genes, 77 type 1 T helper cell-related genes, 27 type 17 T helper cell-related genes, 29 type 2 T helper cell-related genes, 20 regulatory T cell-related genes and 64 natural killer T cell-related genes.

Using T cell-related gene expression profiles, a binary matrix was produced by pairwise comparisons of all genes, with Ei > Ej or Ei < Ej on an individual sample. Ei and Ej were used to represent the expression values of gene i and gene j, respectively. Then, highly stable gene pairs were defined as those whose REO relation was consistent at ≥ 85% of samples. We detected highly stable gene pairs in RA and normal samples from the training dataset, respectively. Finally, the overlap of these two pairwise sets was considered as the REO-based signature.

Identification of immune cells infiltration in RA

The immune infiltration of 28 immune cell types was also evaluated by ssGSEA method, whose signature genes were derived from previous report [22].Transcriptome-based algorithms XCELL [23], TIMER [24], QUANTISEQ [25], MCPCOUNTER [26], EPIC [27] and CIBERSORT [28] were used to estimate the abundance of immune cells infiltration in RA, including 28 immune cell types. Immune score was estimated by Estimate method [29]. Spearman’s rank correlation was used for evaluating the relationship between signature and T cell infiltration.

Differential analysis

The Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to detect differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between normal and RA samples from training and testing datasets. The BenjaminiHochberg (BH) procedure was used to calculate false discovery rate (FDR). The significance was assessed by FDR value of 0.01. Further, the overlaps with consistent dysregulation between these two gene lists were considered consistent DEGs. Inflammatory-related gene lists were obtained from the GeneCards database (https://www.genecards.org/) utilizing four keywords: “Interferon response,” “chemokine,” “Cytokine,” and “Inflammatory response,” under the categories “Protein Coding” and “Proteins” (S1 Table).

Pathway enrichment analysis

Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs and genes in network modules was performed using the R package ‘clusterProfiler’ [30]. Subsequently, histogram and chordal maps of the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) were drawn.

Analysis of immunity features

The one-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test was employed to compare the aforementioned immunity features between normal and rheumatoid arthritis samples. Spearman rank correlation was used to assess the relationships between the expression levels of two signature genes and the immune infiltration of 28 immune cells.

Network analysis

Based on the expression and profiles of testing dataset, Spearman rank correlation, with |r| > 0.6 and FDR < 0.01, was applied to identify DEGs that were co-expressed with signature genes and inflammation-related genes.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses in this study were performed using R software versions 4.0.2 (http://www.r-project.org/).

Results

Development of REO-based diagnostic signature

The discovery workflow is shown in Fig 1. Here, we identified 2,775,389 highly stable gene pairs in 112 RA samples and 808,065 gene pairs in 53 healthy samples (see Materials and methods), wherein REOs of 25,185 candidate gene pairs were stable in healthy samples but reversed in RA samples. Then, a total of 233 T cell-related genes (TRGs) from the TISIDB database were obtained and 25,185 T cell-related gene pairs (TRGPs) were established from these genes by the discretization operation. Only one gene pair, ICAM2-OSTF1, overlapped between TRGPs and reversed gene pairs and was considered the diagnostic signature, called ICAM2-OSTF1 signature (IOS). According to a rule of “winner takes all”, we then directly used IOS to classify samples in the training dataset. A sample was classified into the RA group if the REO of IOS voted for RA (Ei < Ej); else, the sample was classified into the healthy group (Ei > Ej).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Workflow for the identification and validation of qualitative signature in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326027.g001

Performance of IOS in the training and independent datasets

For peripheral blood samples in the training dataset (GSE17755) with 112 RA samples and 53 healthy samples, the AUC of IOS reached 87.10% (95% CI, 81.50–92.60%, Fig 2A). 97 out of 112 RA samples and 46 out of 53 healthy samples were accurately categorized. The accuracy of IOS was 87.20% (Fig 2B). The performance of the signature was evaluated using the union of the datasets GSE97475 and GSE97810. As shown in Fig 2C-D, the signature resulted in a 92.3% AUC (95% CI, 87.80–96.80%), and a prediction of RA samples with a 90.69% sensitivity, 93.94% specificity, and 91.07% accuracy. Further, as shown in Fig 2E, the fold change of the expression levels between ICAM2 and OSTF1 took values ranging from 0.96 to 1.20 with the median of 1.07 in the normal samples, while in the RA samples the fold change took values ranging from 0.85 to 1.06 with the median of 0.96 (Fig 2F). Similar results were observed in training dataset (S1 Fig), indicating that the fold changes of IOS are quite different across different samples for each of the two subtypes but the REO patterns of IOS are stable.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Performance of IOS in the training and validation datasets.

(A-B) ROC curve and confusion matrix for the training dataset by IOS. (C-D) ROC curve and confusion matrix for the validating dataset by IOS. (E-F) The distribution of the quantitative expression levels of ICAM2 and OSTF1 in the validating dataset.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326027.g002

RA sample presenting elevated immune infiltration

The occurrence and development of RA are associated with immunological microenvironments [31]. Utilizing the ssGSEA approach, the abundance of 28 infiltrating immune cell types was illustrated using 280 samples from the testing datasets to investigate the correlation between RA and microenvironments. The results indicated that RA exhibited a greater abundance of immune cell infiltration, including activated dendritic cells, activated CD8 T cells, and type 1 T helper cells (Fig 3A). We also found that RA displayed a lower ssGSEA score of natural killer T cell in RA, which was consistent with the previous research [19] (Fig 3A).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Immune infiltration analysis between RA and normal samples.

(A) Identifying the relative infiltration of immune cell populations for 280 samples from the test dataset using ssGSEA method. The relative infiltration of each cell type is normalized with a z-score. (B) The fraction of immune cells in 280 samples is calculated based on seven algorithms in the test dataset. Immune cells with significantly higher (red dots) or lower (blue dots), or without significant difference (gray dots) fractions in RA than normal samples were displayed. Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.05. The shade of the color represents the degree of significance. (C) The correlation heatmap among signature genes and fraction of immune cells was drawn. The shade of the color represents the degree and direction of correlation. The correlation coefficient was computed by Spearman rank correlation method. (D) Distribution of immune scores computed by Estimated method between RA and normal samples from the test dataset. p values in the heatmap and box plot were calculated by one-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326027.g003

Further, seven widely used algorithms were employed to calculate the infiltrating immune cell fraction in RA samples. In comparison to healthy samples, RA samples exhibited a significantly elevated proportion of monocyte, myeloid dendritic cell, activated myeloid dendritic cell, neutrophil and activated NK cell, in over two algorithms (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fig 3B). In contrast, RA samples consistently exhibited a reduced proportion of naïve CD4 + T cell across more than two algorithms (p < 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fig 3B). The Spearman correlation heatmap was plotted between immune cells and signature genes. As shown in Fig 3C, the expression level of ICAM2 was negatively correlated with the fraction of most immune cells, such as type 1 T helper cell, regulatory T cell and neutrophil. In contrast, there was a positive relationship between the expression of OSTF1 and these immune cell infiltrates. Besides, IOS was found negative correlation with T cell infiltration (r = −0.36, spearman’s rank correlation, S2 Fig). Furthermore, using Estimate method, we found the immune score in RA samples was significantly higher than in healthy samples (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fig 3D). In summary, these results demonstrated that RA samples display an increased immune cell infiltration.

RA-related genes were enriched with immune pathways

To investigate the dysregulated biological pathways related to RA, we performed pathway enrichment analysis on consistent genes dysregulated in RA across different datasets. Here, 4,030 and 4,107 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected between RA and normal samples from the training and the integrated test datasets, respectively (FDR < 0.01, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). 800 of 1,454 DEGs were consistent between training and test datasets, which were defined as RA-related genes (Fig 4A). RA-related genes were significantly enriched in some pathways typically associated with immune microenvironment regulation processes (p < 0.05, Fig 4B), including “neutrophil degranulation”, “neutrophil activation involved in immune response”, “neutrophil activation”, “neutrophil mediated immunity” and “T cell activation” and so on. Similarly, using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test with FDR < 0.01 control, 683 IOS-related DEGs were identified between groups classified by IOS. And these DEGs participated T cell immune-related pathways such as “Human T-cell leukemia virus 1 infection” and “PD-L1 expression and PD-1 checkpoint pathway in cancer” (p < 0.05, S3 Fig) [32,33]. Additionally, when localizing inflammatory-related genes such as cytokine, inflammatory response, interferon response and chemokine, we found that some genes were also dysregulated in RA (Fig 4C-D). For example, compared with normal samples, CKLF had an increased expression level in RA, which was consistent with the previous reports [34]. As a gene related to inflammatory response, JAK3 was a typical target treated with RA by JAK inhibitor, which was also overexpressed in RA [35]. These genes were associated with immune or inflammatory responses [36,37], thus possibly leading to the occurrence of RA.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Analysis of transcriptome differences between RA and normal samples.

(A) Venn diagram showing the overlap of RA-related DEGs between the training and test datasets. (B) GO pathways significantly enriched with 800 consistent DEGs were determined. p value was detected by hypergeometric distribution model and p < 0.05 was considered significant. Heatmap displaying the distribution for chemokine, cytokine, inflammatory response and interferon response genes with significant differences between the RA and normal samples in (C) training and (D) test datasets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326027.g004

Network analysis of co-regulated genes by IOS

To investigate the dysregulated genes by RA, we performed Spearman correlation network analysis. RA-related genes and inflammation-related genes were used to construct the modulation network of RA. As shown in Fig 5A, the 43 RA-related genes regulated by ICAM2 were significantly enriched in a biological pathway related to the occurrence and development of inflammatory arthritis, namely “Ferroptosis” [38] (p < 0.05, hypergeometric distribution model, Fig 5B). In addition, another enriched pathway, “Necroptosis”, triggered innate immune responses, thus playing key roles in the inflammatory process (Fig 5B) [39]. Similarly, RA-related genes that interacted with CXCL16 were found to be significantly enriched with inflammation- and/or immune-related pathways, such as “Ferroptosis”, “Primary immunodeficiency” and “TNF signaling pathway” (p < 0.05, hypergeometric distribution model, Fig 5C). Using the hypergeometric distribution model and 33 RA-related genes linked with CKLF (p < 0.05), some inflammation- or immune-related pathways were also observed, such as “IL-17 signaling pathway” and “Fluid shear stress and atherosclerosis” (Fig 5D). Focusing on cytokine, we found SLPI was simultaneously connected to 24 RA-related genes, which affected some inflammation- or immune-related functions, such as “Fluid shear stress and atherosclerosis” and “Estrogen signaling pathway” (p < 0.05, hypergeometric distribution model, Fig 5E). As expected, these results suggest that the signature and inflammation-related genes are driving some RA-related transcriptome alterations. The relationship between IOS and these three genes was also evaluated. In addition to SLPI, a moderate positive correlation between IOS and the expression levels of other genes was achieved in training and test datasets (r > 0.3, spearman’s rank correlation, S4 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 5. The co-expression network of signature genes.

The nodes (circle) represent RA-related genes of co-expression with signature gene (rhombus), chemokine genes (trangle) and cytokine gene (hexagon); the blue and red lines represent negative and positive relationships, respectively. KEGG pathways significantly enriched with RA-related genes connected with ICAM, CXCL16, CKLF and SLPI are shown on (B), (C), (D) and (E), respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326027.g005

Discussion

In this study, we investigated the expression alterations of 233 T-cell related genes in the occurrence of RA and found that IOS could individually classify RA from normal peripheral blood samples. Samples were divided into RA group when the within-sample REO pattern was EICAM2 < EOSTF1; otherwise, the normal group. In comparison to typical quantitative signatures, qualitative signatures are extremely resistant to experimental technical changes and inadequate sample preparation [11,12]. And this signature can be used at the individual level without the need for a pre-collection of samples to establish a valid cutoff or data standardization [40]. For a total of 358 RA and 86 normal peripheral blood samples from GSE17755, GSE97475 and GSE97810, the overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of the signature was 89.66%, 89.53% and 97.57%, indicating the robustness of IOS. It has been reported that the occurrence of RA was related to immune cell infiltration. The RA samples exhibited an increased abundance of five immune cell types, namely monocytes, myeloid dendritic cells, activated myeloid dendritic cells, neutrophils, and activated NK cells, while three immune cell types, specifically activated CD4 + memory T cells, naïve CD4 + T cells, and gamma delta T cells, showed a decreased presence. Besides, the immune score was significantly higher in RA when compared with the normal sample. Further functional enrichment analysis showed that RA-related dysregulated genes were enriched with some immune- and/or inflammation-related pathways. For instance, neutrophils are frequently detected in the synovial fluid in RA. Their presence in the synovial fluid is implicated in the induction of local inflammation, tissue damage, and erosion [41,42]. The “neutrophil activation” pathway could unleash proteolytic enzymes. These enzymes degrade extracellular matrix components in joints, harming cartilage and bone, and thus playing a significant role in the progression of RA [43,44]. “T cell activation” pathway can regulate the balance of different T-cell subsets such as helper T cells and regulatory T cells [45]. In patients with RA, there is usually an increase in type 17 T helper cells and impaired function of regulatory T cells [46]. Cytokines secreted by type 17 T helper cells, such as interleukin-17, can promote the inflammatory response. However, the abnormal function of regulatory T cells fails to effectively suppress the immune response, leading to immune imbalance and exacerbating the condition of RA [47,48]. Finally, we found that the network module driven by signature and inflammation-related genes might play a key role in RA-related transcriptional regulation.

Besides immune-related signature gene ICAM2, three key inflammation-related genes (CXCL16, CKLF and SLPI) were also major regulators in RA by modulating immune- and/or inflammation-related functions. CXC chemokine family genes are involved in inflammatory and immunological diseases, among which CXCL16 influences the onset of inflammation via eliminating leukocyte chemotaxis, leukocyte adhesion, and endotoxin [49]. In addition, it has been revealed that chemokine gene CKLF is implicated in the pathogenic processes of RA and functionally relevant to inflammatory and immune response [50,51]. As a cytokine gene, SLPI promoted local tissue homeostasis by limiting innate immune cell damage and inhibiting the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which leads to the recruitment of immune cells [52]. We also found that individual IOS status was positively correlated with these three key genes.

There are a few limitations in this study. Although our signature displayed a good performance in the testing dataset, it is necessary to collect more independent datasets with peripheral blood samples to validate the signature in the future. Besides, when focusing on the construction of the network, we were unable to verify the function of hub genes through biological experiments. However, enrichment analysis was used to investigate the pathways that these genes may affect.

In conclusion, the identified IOS might be used to classify RA from normal samples at the individual level, which would be useful in RA non-invasive diagnosis. As a result, IOS requires verification in a prospective clinical investigation to potentially minimize unnecessary costs associated with the early detection of RA.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The distribution of the quantitative expression levels of ICAM2 and OSTF1 in the training dataset.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326027.s001

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Relationship between IOS and T cell infiltration calculated by MCPCOUNTER.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326027.s002

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Analysis of transcriptome differences between groups stratified by IOS.

Venn diagram showing the overlap of IOS-related DEGs between the training and test datasets. KEGG pathways significantly enriched with 683 consistent DEGs were determined. p value was detected by hypergeometric distribution model and p < 0.05 was considered significant.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326027.s003

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Relationship between IOS and the expression of CXCL16, CKLF, and SLPI in (A) training dataset and (B) test dataset, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326027.s004

(PDF)

S1 Table. Inflammatory-related gene lists used in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326027.s005

(PDF)

References

  1. 1. Smolen JS, Aletaha D, McInnes IB. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2016;388(10055):2023–38. pmid:27156434
  2. 2. Orr C, Vieira-Sousa E, Boyle DL, Buch MH, Buckley CD, Cañete JD, et al. Synovial tissue research: a state-of-the-art review. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(8):463–75. pmid:28701760
  3. 3. Gibofsky A. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis: A Synopsis. Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(7 Suppl):S128–35. pmid:25180621
  4. 4. Aletaha D, Smolen JS. Diagnosis and management of rheumatoid arthritis: a review. JAMA. 2018;320(13):1360–72.
  5. 5. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569–81. pmid:20872595
  6. 6. Dunaeva M, Blom J, Thurlings R, Pruijn GJM. Circulating serum miR-223-3p and miR-16-5p as possible biomarkers of early rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Immunol. 2018;193(3):376–85. pmid:29892977
  7. 7. Cheng Q, Chen X, Wu H, Du Y. Three hematologic/immune system-specific expressed genes are considered as the potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of early rheumatoid arthritis through bioinformatics analysis. J Transl Med. 2021;19(1):18. pmid:33407587
  8. 8. Zhou S, Lu H, Xiong M. Identifying immune cell infiltration and effective diagnostic biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis by bioinformatics analysis. Front Immunol. 2021;12:726747. pmid:34484236
  9. 9. Yu R, Zhang J, Zhuo Y, Hong X, Ye J, Tang S, et al. Identification of diagnostic signatures and immune cell infiltration characteristics in rheumatoid arthritis by integrating bioinformatic analysis and machine-learning strategies. Front Immunol. 2021;12:724934. pmid:34691030
  10. 10. Guan Q, Yan H, Chen Y, Zheng B, Cai H, He J, et al. Quantitative or qualitative transcriptional diagnostic signatures? A case study for colorectal cancer. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):99. pmid:29378509
  11. 11. Li Y, Zhao Z, Ai L, Wang Y, Liu K, Chen B, et al. Discovering a qualitative transcriptional signature of homologous recombination defectiveness for prostate cancer. iScience. 2021;24(10):103135. pmid:34622176
  12. 12. Liu K, Geng Y, Wang L, Xu H, Zou M, Li Y, et al. Systematic exploration of the underlying mechanism of gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Mol Oncol. 2022;16(16):3034–51. pmid:35810469
  13. 13. Chen T, Yu T, Zhuang S, Geng Y, Xue J, Wang J, et al. Upregulation of CXCL1 and LY9 contributes to BRCAness in ovarian cancer and mediates response to PARPi and immune checkpoint blockade. Br J Cancer. 2022;127(5):916–26. pmid:35618786
  14. 14. Masoumi M, Alesaeidi S, Khorramdelazad H, Behzadi M, Baharlou R, Alizadeh-Fanalou S, et al. Role of T cells in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis: focus on immunometabolism dysfunctions. Inflammation. 2023;46(1):88–102. pmid:36215002
  15. 15. Podojil JR, Miller SD. Molecular mechanisms of T-cell receptor and costimulatory molecule ligation/blockade in autoimmune disease therapy. Immunol Rev. 2009;229(1):337–55. pmid:19426232
  16. 16. Shevyrev D, Tereshchenko V. Treg heterogeneity, function, and homeostasis. Frontiers in Immunology. 2019;10:3100.
  17. 17. Ehrenstein MR, Evans JG, Singh A, Moore S, Warnes G, Isenberg DA, et al. Compromised function of regulatory T cells in rheumatoid arthritis and reversal by anti-TNFalpha therapy. J Exp Med. 2004;200(3):277–85. pmid:15280421
  18. 18. Luo P, Wang P, Xu J, Hou W, Xu P, Xu K, et al. Immunomodulatory role of T helper cells in rheumatoid arthritis : a comprehensive research review. Bone Joint Res. 2022;11(7):426–38. pmid:35775145
  19. 19. Yanagihara Y, Shiozawa K, Takai M, Kyogoku M, Shiozawa S. Natural killer (NK) T cells are significantly decreased in the peripheral blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Clin Exp Immunol. 1999;118(1):131–6. pmid:10540170
  20. 20. Fathollahi A, Samimi LN, Akhlaghi M, Jamshidi A, Mahmoudi M, Farhadi E. The role of NK cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Inflamm Res. 2021;70(10–12):1063–73. pmid:34580740
  21. 21. Ru B, Wong CN, Tong Y, Zhong JY, Zhong SSW, Wu WC, et al. TISIDB: an integrated repository portal for tumor-immune system interactions. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(20):4200–2. pmid:30903160
  22. 22. Charoentong P, Finotello F, Angelova M, Mayer C, Efremova M, Rieder D, et al. Pan-cancer immunogenomic analyses reveal genotype-immunophenotype relationships and predictors of response to checkpoint blockade. Cell reports. 2017;18(1):248–62.
  23. 23. Aran D, Hu Z, Butte AJ. xCell: digitally portraying the tissue cellular heterogeneity landscape. Genome Biol. 2017;18(1):220. pmid:29141660
  24. 24. Li T, Fu J, Zeng Z, Cohen D, Li J, Chen Q, et al. TIMER2.0 for analysis of tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(W1):W509–14. pmid:32442275
  25. 25. Finotello F, Mayer C, Plattner C, Laschober G, Rieder D, Hackl H, et al. Molecular and pharmacological modulators of the tumor immune contexture revealed by deconvolution of RNA-seq data. Genome Med. 2019;11(1):34. pmid:31126321
  26. 26. Becht E, Giraldo NA, Lacroix L, Buttard B, Elarouci N, Petitprez F, et al. Estimating the population abundance of tissue-infiltrating immune and stromal cell populations using gene expression. Genome biology. 2016;17(1):218.
  27. 27. Racle J, de Jonge K, Baumgaertner P, Speiser DE, Gfeller D. Simultaneous enumeration of cancer and immune cell types from bulk tumor gene expression data. Elife. 2017;6:e26476. pmid:29130882
  28. 28. Newman AM, Liu CL, Green MR, Gentles AJ, Feng W, Xu Y, et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat Methods. 2015;12(5):453–7. pmid:25822800
  29. 29. Yoshihara K, Shahmoradgoli M, Martínez E, Vegesna R, Kim H, Torres-Garcia W, et al. Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2612. pmid:24113773
  30. 30. Wu T, Hu E, Xu S, Chen M, Guo P, Dai Z, et al. clusterProfiler 4.0: A universal enrichment tool for interpreting omics data. Innovation (Camb). 2021;2(3):100141. pmid:34557778
  31. 31. Firestein GS, McInnes IB. Immunopathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Immunity. 2017;46(2):183–96. pmid:28228278
  32. 32. Olière S, Douville R, Sze A, Belgnaoui SM, Hiscott J. Modulation of innate immune responses during human T-cell leukemia virus (HTLV-1) pathogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2011;22(4):197–210. pmid:21924945
  33. 33. Lin X, Kang K, Chen P, Zeng Z, Li G, Xiong W, et al. Regulatory mechanisms of PD-1/PD-L1 in cancers. Mol Cancer. 2024;23(1):108. pmid:38762484
  34. 34. Szekanecz Z, Vegvari A, Szabo Z, Koch AE. Chemokines and chemokine receptors in arthritis. Front Biosci (Schol Ed). 2010;2(1):153–67. pmid:20036936
  35. 35. Harrington R, Al Nokhatha SA, Conway R. JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: an evidence-based review on the emerging clinical data. J Inflamm Res. 2020;13:519–31. pmid:32982367
  36. 36. Li Y, Yu H, Feng J. Role of chemokine-like factor 1 as an inflammatory marker in diseases. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1085154. pmid:36865551
  37. 37. Lü L, Yakoumatos L, Ren J, Duan X, Zhou H, Gu Z, et al. JAK3 restrains inflammatory responses and protects against periodontal disease through Wnt3a signaling. FASEB J. 2020;34(7):9120–40. pmid:32433819
  38. 38. Zhao T, Yang Q, Xi Y, Xie Z, Shen J, Li Z, et al. Ferroptosis in rheumatoid arthritis: a potential therapeutic strategy. Front Immunol. 2022;13:779585. pmid:35185879
  39. 39. Yu Z, Jiang N, Su W, Zhuo Y. Necroptosis: a novel pathway in neuroinflammation. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021;12:701564.
  40. 40. Patil P, Bachant-Winner P-O, Haibe-Kains B, Leek JT. Test set bias affects reproducibility of gene signatures. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(14):2318–23. pmid:25788628
  41. 41. Wright HL, Moots RJ, Edwards SW. The multifactorial role of neutrophils in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2014;10(10):593–601. pmid:24914698
  42. 42. Mayadas TN, Cullere X, Lowell CA. The multifaceted functions of neutrophils. Annu Rev Pathol. 2014;9:181–218. pmid:24050624
  43. 43. Zhang L, Yuan Y, Xu Q, Jiang Z, Chu C-Q. Contribution of neutrophils in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. J Biomed Res. 2019;34(2):86–93. pmid:32305962
  44. 44. Khandpur R, Carmona-Rivera C, Vivekanandan-Giri A, Gizinski A, Yalavarthi S, Knight JS, et al. NETs are a source of citrullinated autoantigens and stimulate inflammatory responses in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(178):178ra40. pmid:23536012
  45. 45. Li MO, Rudensky AY. T cell receptor signalling in the control of regulatory T cell differentiation and function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(4):220–33. pmid:27026074
  46. 46. Wang T, Rui J, Shan W, Xue F, Feng D, Dong L. Imbalance of Th17, Treg, and helper innate lymphoid cell in the peripheral blood of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical Rheumatology. 2022;41(12):3837–49.
  47. 47. Cope AP, Schulze-Koops H, Aringer M. The central role of T cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25(5 Suppl 46):S4-11. pmid:17977483
  48. 48. Weyand CM, Bryl E, Goronzy JJ. The role of T cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2000;48(5):429–35. pmid:11140470
  49. 49. Sun J, Zhang H, Liu D, Cui L, Wang Q, Gan L, et al. A functional variant of CXCL16 is associated with predisposition to sepsis and MODS in trauma patients: genetic association studies. Front Genet. 2021;12:720313. pmid:34539750
  50. 50. Li T, Zhong J, Chen Y, Qiu X, Zhang T, Ma D, et al. Expression of chemokine-like factor 1 is upregulated during T lymphocyte activation. Life Sci. 2006;79(6):519–24. pmid:16522323
  51. 51. Zhang M, Xu Y, Liu Y, Cheng Y, Zhao P, Liu H, et al. Chemokine-Like Factor 1 (CKLF-1) is overexpressed in keloid patients: a potential indicating factor for keloid-predisposed individuals. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(11):e3082. pmid:26986142
  52. 52. Nugteren S, Samsom JN. Secretory Leukocyte Protease Inhibitor (SLPI) in mucosal tissues: protects against inflammation, but promotes cancer. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2021;59:22–35. pmid:33602652