Figures
Abstract
Neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) is a selectable marker gene that is commonly used in plant molecular genetics and crop improvement, helping researchers to identify and select transgenically modified plants. The NPTII enzyme binds to and phosphorylates the aminoglycoside family of antibiotics, which are known translation inhibitors. Once the aminoglycoside is phosphorylated it is unable to bind to the ribosome and can no longer disrupt translation. Currently, the most widely used selection agent for screening NPTII expressing seedlings is kanamycin. Because the nptII transgene is frequently silenced epigenetically, kanamycin can be too toxic to seedlings that weakly express NPTII, leading to false negatives and making it harder to accurately identify transgenic plants. In this study we investigate the related aminoglycoside, paromomycin, as an alternative, non-lethal, selection agent to kanamycin across a series of transgenic Arabidopsis lines with varying NPTII expression. We investigated phenotypes of transgenic seedlings during and after antibiotic exposure. Seedling pigmentation and size are useful phenotypes for selecting seedlings with low nptII expression. Additionally, monitoring the photosynthetic efficiency and flowering time can help reduce the risk of false-positive results when treating seedlings with paromomycin.
Citation: Goodman CP, Padgett VN, Evans ER, von Arnim AG (2025) Paromomycin is a more effective selection agent than kanamycin in Arabidopsis harboring the neomycin phosphotransferase II transgene. PLoS One 20(6): e0325322. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325322
Editor: Mohammad Irfan, Cornell University, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Received: January 20, 2025; Accepted: May 9, 2025; Published: June 25, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Goodman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are with the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health: NIH R15 GM129672 and the National Science Foundation: NSF-IOS-2350447 to AGV. URL of funders’ websites: https://reporter.nih.gov/advanced-search and https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/advancedSearch.jsp. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
The neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) gene is widely used as a selectable marker for transgenes in Arabidopsis and other plants. Specifically, the nptII gene is part of T-DNAs and transposons that serve as insertional mutagens in the Feldmann [1], WISC [2], CSHL [3], FLAGdb [4], and SALK [5] collections among others, as well as in numerous T-DNA expression cassettes such as pBin19 [6]. The presence of the nptII gene is typically scored by its expression, which confers resistance to certain aminoglycoside antibiotics, such as kanamycin. Kanamycin inhibits prokaryotic (chloroplast) ribosomes, causing chlorosis and bleaching. When nptII is expressed well, which is typically the case in primary transformants, kanamycin is a more robust selection agent than other aminoglycosides such as gentamycin or hygromycin, which are detoxified by resistance genes other than nptII.
Many plant strains that harbor nptII suffer from partial epigenetic silencing of the nptII gene expression. Often strongly resistant stains will give rise to progeny with progressively weaker kanamycin resistance [7,8]. Because kanamycin is highly toxic to sensitive seedlings, partial silencing of the nptII gene results in poor survival. This makes it difficult or impossible to rely on kanamycin as a selection agent when following the transgene in segregating families and other genetic pedigrees, to confirm the presence of the transgene, or rule out contamination of seed batches with nontransgenic seeds. Silencing is typically attributed to RNA interference and RNA-dependent DNA methylation triggered by double-stranded RNA transcripts that themselves arise from complex, inverted-repeat T-DNA loci [7,9,10]. Researchers have been advised to not rely on the antibiotic resistance gene when following the T-DNA [8]. Overall, kanamycin has proven to be too harsh for transgenic lines where nptII has been silenced, making it a suboptimal selection agent.
The nptII gene also confers resistance to the aminoglycoside paromomycin. Aminoglycoside antibiotics are characterized by a common 2-dexoystreptamine ring, which in kanamycin contains two substitutions in the 4,6 positions and in paromomycin has substitutions in the 5,6 positions. Like kanamycin, paromomycin binds to rRNA helix 44 in the A-site of the small ribosomal subunit, which is the tRNA decoding center of the ribosome [11,12]. While kanamycin is mainly active against prokaryotic ribosomes, paromomycin inhibits translation by binding to the prokaryotic 30S subunit [13] as well as to the decoding center in the eukaryotic 40S subunit [12]. In eukaryotes, paromomycin stimulates the misreading of tRNAs and subsequent misincorporation of amino acids. This effect can be seen on cytosolic ribosomes in the wheat germ in vitro translation system [14] and in an in vitro translation assay in cultured human cells [15]. Kanamycin A does not have this activity. In wheat germ, paromomycin only weakly inhibits amino acid incorporation [14]. Paromomycin also stimulates stop codon readthrough in mammalian cells in vivo [16,17], which is stop codon-dependent and sequence context-dependent [18]. Thus, paromomycin has a different activity profile from kanamycin. With a notable exception in plant tissue culture [19], paromomycin is not widely used as a selection agent for nptII.
We tested whether paromomycin may be a more benign selection agent than kanamycin in Arabidopsis seedlings harboring nptII transgenes at various levels of partial gene silencing. Here we demonstrate that paromomycin at the optimized concentration distinguishes nptII-positive from nptII-negative seedlings. Seedlings with weak kanamycin resistance have adequate resistance to paromomycin, which is evident by a larger size and less stress-induced anthocyanin. These plants can survive well after they have been removed from the paromomycin selection medium. However, because paromomycin only stalls growth but does not kill nptII-negative plants, care is needed to prevent the escape of truly sensitive plants. Selecting for the nptII gene using paromomycin is generally more benign than using kanamycin and can be used for plants with fully active or substantially silenced nptII expression.
Results and discussion
Paromomycin selects for Arabidopsis seedlings with weakly expressed nptII transgenes
The neomycin phosphotransferase (nptII) confers resistance to kanamycin but Arabidopsis strains harboring a nptII transgene vary dramatically in the extent of their kanamycin resistance. We chose three nptII-transgenic insertion mutants, one allele each for the translational regulator genes GENERAL CONTROL NONDEREPRESSIBLE1 and 2 (GCN1 and GCN2), and an allele of POLY(A)-BINDING PROTEIN4 (PAB4). Under the typical concentration of 50 mg/L (86μM), resistance may be complete as in the case of the gcn1 mutant, partial, as exemplified by green-yellow variegation on the cotyledons in gcn2, or essentially negligible as demonstrated in pab4 (Fig 1A). The variable resistance observed in these strains was directly correlated to the expression of NPTII protein (S1 Fig). However, on 30μM paromomycin, all three mutants showed some degree of growth advantage compared to the corresponding wild type, ecotype Columbia (Fig 1B). Characteristic phenotypes of individual seedlings are shown in Fig 2. On paromomycin, the wild type remained green and did not bleach out, but expressed purple anthocyanin pigments abundantly. Weakly resistant seedlings such as pab4 had larger cotyledons than wild type, less anthocyanin, and their primary leaves emerged sooner (Fig 2). These results show that paromomycin is a milder selection agent than kanamycin, which enables identification of seedlings with weak, largely silenced kanamycin resistance.
Seedlings of three nptII-positive mutant lines and corresponding nptII-negative wild type (Columbia ecotype) were grown for seven days on ½ x MS medium with 1% sucrose containing the indicated concentrations of (A) kanamycin and (B) paromomycin. The graphic below each image summarizes the consensus phenotype under each condition with a rubric that focuses on seedling pigmentation. The percentages represent the proportion of seedlings within the sample population exhibiting the pigmentation phenotype indicated in the box. Each sample has about 25 seedlings, and the experiment was replicated at least three times.
Representative close-up images of 7-day-old Arabidopsis seedlings grown on ½ strength MS medium with 1% sucrose. The chosen mutants are all from the SALK T-DNA collection and are compared to their wild-type (WT) Columbia. Optimal concentrations of kanamycin and paromomycin were added. All images are at the same magnification.
We explored the dose-response characteristics of both kanamycin and paromomycin. Using lower concentrations of kanamycin can be a solution (gcn2 in Fig 1A). However, identifying the ideal dose of kanamycin is not practical, given that researchers who receive a new strain with unknown nptII expression often receive very few seeds. Lowering the dose of paromomycin allowed both wild type and nptII-positive lines to grow faster, while raising it to 40μM was not advantageous (Fig 1B). Over the course of many experiments, 30μM paromomycin resulted in an acceptable and reproducible difference between wild type and mutants; in combination, the larger size of the cotyledons, lesser hyponasty (‘curled-under’), greener and less purple pigmentation of the cotyledons, and the earlier emergence of primary leaves are four phenotypes that together help to identify weakly nptII-expressing seedlings on paromomycin.
Related seedling phenotypes on paromomycin
Neither of the antibiotics affected the seedling’s ability to germinate at any concentration (S2 Fig). While our medium routinely contained 1% sucrose, paromomycin also selected well on plates lacking sucrose (S3 Fig). However, because seedlings grow more uniformly and vigorously when sucrose is included, adding sucrose makes it easier to distinguish wild type from marginally resistant seedlings.
The pigmentation observed in the cotyledons reflects the ability of seedlings to perform processes such as photosynthesis. On paromomycin the quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) was decreased in wild-type seedlings but maintained in all NPTII transgenic strains (Fig 3A, B). Furthermore, the harshness of kanamycin was reflected by a decrease of the quantum yield in gcn2 and no measurable data in pab4 and wild type (Fig 3C).
The quantum yield of photosystem II is defined as the ratio of variable fluorescence over maximal fluorescence (Qymax = Fv/Fm) when dark-adapted seedlings are exposed to a saturating pulse of light using the Fluorocam. Panels (A), (B), and (C) display the same four genotypes under the indicated antibiotic conditions. Each sample has about 25 seedlings. Error bars indicate standard deviations. An ordinary one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparison test was done to compare the genotypes. Data series that share the same letter are not significantly different.
We tested whether root length scored on vertical plates would be informative in revealing paromomycin resistance. However, in moderately or weakly resistant strains such as gcn2 and pab4, the roots were too sensitive to paromomycin to differentiate mutants from wild type (Fig 4A-D).
Root lengths were measured daily for seedlings grown on vertical plates containing ½ strength MS media with 1% sucrose as the control (blue). Antibiotic treatments consisted of 30μM paromomycin (red) and 86μM kanamycin (black). (A) Wild type. (B) pab4. (C) gcn2-2. (D) gcn1-5. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean.
S4 Fig demonstrates that paromomycin is effective for selecting NPTII positive gcn2 seedlings out of segregating families where kanamycin resistance is variable, weak or absent.
One might hypothesize that paromomycin resistance may be a phenotype of certain Arabidopsis mutations that affect some aspect of translation, given that paromomycin inhibits translation. GCN1, GCN2, and PAB4 are all implicated in translational control. However, NPTII positive mutants in genes that bear no relation to the translation machinery also express paromomycin resistance (S5 Fig), if they harbor nptII.
Adult plant phenotypes on paromomycin
On paromomycin the seedling phenotypes do not distinguish resistant seedlings from wild type as clearly as on kanamycin. Therefore, we compared how adult plant phenotypes, rosette growth, flowering time, and overall survival were affected by the two antibiotics. Of note, nptII negative seedlings such as wild type that were germinated on 30μM paromomycin did recover and survive when transplanted to soil, whereas wild-type seedlings exposed to kanamycin generally did not survive (Fig 5A). This disadvantage of paromomycin was compensated because weakly resistant pab4 and gcn2−2 mutants survived after paromomycin but not kanamycin (Fig 5B-D).
Seedlings of four genotypes were germinated on the indicated concentrations of antibiotics and transplanted to soil on day 7. No antibiotic was applied after transplantation. Survival was scored as the ability of the plant to complete all stages of its life cycle and produce seeds. (A) Wild type. (B) pab4. (C) gcn2-2. (D) gcn1-5. The difference between paromomycin and kanamycin survival rates was evaluated using a Fisher’s exact test. Data represent one experiment out of three biological replicates. Not significant (ns).
As paromomycin-treated seedlings are transplanted to soil, the growth of the vegetative rosette is another indicator of resistance. Seedlings with poorly expressed nptII and thus mild paromomycin resistance recovered quickly despite the antibiotic and grew with just a slight delay as compared to the control (no antibiotic) (Fig 6B,C). In contrast, wild-type seedlings recovered more slowly (Fig 6A), similar to seedlings selected on kanamycin (Fig 6B, C). Of course, fully resistant seedlings such as gcn1–5 grew rapidly, without any delay (Fig 6D).
Seedlings of four genotypes were germinated on the indicated concentrations of antibiotics and transplanted to soil on day 7. Rosette diameters were measured from n = 16 plants using a standard ruler starting on day 6 after transplantation until they were fully grown. Error bars indicate standard deviations. (A) Wild type. (B) pab4. (C) gcn2-2. (D) gcn1-5. Note that the growth rate of paromomycin-treated wild type (A) is strongly reduced compared to pab4 (B) and gcn2-2 (C) and gcn1-5 (D).
Finally, flowering time can be used as an indicator of paromomycin resistance. Weakly resistant plants such as pab4 and gcn2−2 did flower later than strongly resistant plants (Fig 7B,C), but not as late as surviving wild type, most of which had not flowered 30 days after transplanting (Fig. 7A). Again, strongly resistant plants did not delay their flowering (Fig. 7D).
Seedlings of four genotypes were germinated on the indicated concentrations of antibiotics and transplanted to soil on day 7. Plants were scored as flowering once the inflorescence began to emerge from the center of the rosette. Data are cumulative traces from n = 16 plants per line. (A) Wild type. (B) pab4. (C) gcn2−2. (D) gcn1−5. Note that the flowering of paromomycin-treated wild type (A) was delayed compared to pab4 (B), gcn2−2 (C), and gcn1−5 (D). Pretreatment of the moderately resistant gcn2−2 with kanamycin also strongly delayed flowering; kanamycin-treated pab4 did not reach the flowering stage in this experiment.
Conclusion
If the nptII transgene is weakly expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana, exposure of seedlings to kanamycin as a selection agent will harm the plant to the extent that selection will often be impossible. The use of kanamycin on strains that weakly express the NPTII enzyme can often lead to false-negative results. Here we showed how genotypes that weakly express nptII can be selected successfully on 30μM paromomycin. Paromomycin is a milder reagent. While this avoids the problem of false-negative results, it can cause false-positives, but this problem can be managed. Compared to kanamycin, where greening alone is sufficient to distinguish resistant seedlings, several phenotypes should be taken into account with paromomycin. Sensitive seedlings contain more anthocyanin than weakly resistant ones. In addition, sensitive seedlings are generally smaller, have more hyponastic cotyledons, and their primary leaves emerge more slowly. After transplanting candidates to soil, sensitive ‘escapes’ (false-positives) will grow more slowly and flower later than even weakly resistant seedlings. Altogether, using paromomycin as a selection agent does not risk the life of the seedling. It can greatly speed up the identification of nptII-containing transgenic plants as compared to the next best alternative, genotyping for the transgene using polymerase chain reaction.
Materials and methods
Arabidopsis strains
Arabidopsis thaliana strains included homozygous gcn1−5 (ila-3, CS65594, [20]), gcn2−1 mutants of the GT8359 gene trap line [21], and homozygous gcn2−2 (SALK_032196) [22]; and gcn2−3 (SALK_129334.2) [23] and pab4 (SALK_113383) [24,25], the xrn2−1 allele SALK_041148 in strain xrn2−1, xrn3−3 [26], the fry1−6 allele SALK-020882 of SAL1/FRY1 [27], as well as corresponding ecotype Landsberg (Ler-0, for gcn2−1), Columbia (Col-0, other mutants).
Growth conditions
Seeds were surface-sterilized in 30% household bleach with 0.1% Triton-X-100 for 10−15 minutes and then washed with sterile water four times. Seedlings were spotted on solid germination medium containing ½ strength MS salts (MP Biomedicals, cat # 2633024), 0.5g/L MES buffer pH 5.7, 1% sucrose and 10% Phytoagar (Bioworld, cat # 40100072−2). Kanamycin (Acros Organics Cat No. AC450810100) was dissolved in water at 50 mg/mL, and paromomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, Cat No. P9297-1G) was dissolved in water at 18 mg/mL. The stock of paromomycin was stable when stored at -20oC for at least 3 months. Once added to the medium and stored in the dark at 4oC, the paromomycin gave consistent results for at least 3 months. Seeds were stratified at 4oC for two days. Seedlings were moved to an incubator set to a constant 22oC on a 16-hour-light 80 μEin m-2 s-1/8-hour-dark cycle, marking the beginning of germination. Seedlings were transplanted to soil seven days after germination to score rosette diameter and flowering time. Germination was scored as the emergence of the radicle from the seed coat. Flowering was scored as the emergence of the inflorescence in the center of the vegetative rosette.
Immunoblotting
The expression level of NPTII protein was characterized by immunoblotting of protein extracts separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis from 10-day-old seedlings using as antibody the mouse anti-neomycin phosphotransferase II from NOVUS catalog # NB110–60487 at a concentration of 1:5000. Gels were blotted using a Biorad wet-transfer apparatus with transfer buffer (25mM Tris, 192mM glycine, 20% methanol). After transfer to PVDF, the membrane was blocked in 1x Tris-buffered saline (25mM Tris, 150mM NaCl, 2.5mM KCl) with 2% bovine serum albumin and 0.2% Tween 20. Blots were developed with 1:20000 anti-mouse IgG coupled to horseradish peroxidase (R&D systems, catalog # HAF007) as secondary antibody and the SuperSIgnal West Pico PLUS Chemiluminescent Substrate (catalog # 34577). Blots were imaged on the Biorad ChemiDoc MP imager and digital signals were quantified with Fiji Image J software.
Photosynthetic efficiency measurement
The maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Qymax = Fv/Fm) was measured on a FluorCam 800MF (Photon Systems Instruments, Drásov, Czechia) as per the manufacturer’s instructions and modifications [28]. Briefly, plants were dark adapted for 10 min (F0) prior to applying a saturating pulse of 1800 μEin m–2 s–1 for 0.8 s (Fm). Variable fluorescence (Fv) was calculated as the difference between baseline fluorescence F0 and maximal fluorescence Fm to obtain the maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm).
Supporting information
S1 Fig. NPTII expression is correlated to kanamycin resistance.
(A) NPTII immunoblots of seedling proteins from three replicate sets of plants of the indicated genotypes. The stochastic variation in signal between replicates is typical for transgenes subject to silencing. The image labeled Loading shows a section of a Coomassie-stained replicate gel to test for equal protein loading in each lane. (B) Graph summarizing the NPTII expression from blots such as that in (A). Data are averages and standard deviation from n = 6–9 bands quantified using Fiji ImageJ. The strongest signal was set to 100% and the remainder were prorated accordingly and plotted on a log scale. Two times the standard deviation of six background intensities reflects the noise of the data and is reflected in the graph by the dotted line. A one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparison test was done to compare the genotypes. Data series that share the same letter are not significantly different.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325322.s001
(PDF)
S2 Fig. Seedling germination is not affected by kanamycin or paromomycin.
Germination percentages of (A) wild-type, (B) pab4, (C) gcn2–2, and (D) gcn1–5 seeds treated with varying concentrations of kanamycin (dark grey) and paromomycin (light grey). The control conditions (black) consisted of ½ MS with 1% sucrose. Germination was recorded as emergence of the radicle from the seed coat four days after seeds had been moved into the light.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325322.s002
(PDF)
S3 Fig. Selection with paromomycin in the absence of sucrose in the medium.
Media consist of ½ x MS with 0.5g MES and 0% sucrose. Images were taken seven days after seed germination.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325322.s003
(PDF)
S4 Fig. Selection under conditions of Mendelian segregation.
We generated F2 families in which the gcn2−2 allele segregated as a Mendelian trait. (A) Using paromomycin, the ratio of resistant to sensitive seedlings reached as high as the theoretically expected 3.0. In contrast, kanamycin resistance was too weak and variable to reliably identify resistant F2 seedlings. A Chi-square test was performed to determine if the expected 3:1 ratio of resistant to sensitive seedlings was observed. Such families are marked with *. (B) Representative view of a family on paromomycin segregating for resistant (large) and sensitive (small) seedlings.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325322.s004
(PDF)
S5 Fig. Paromomycin remains effective when screening nptII transgenic mutants that do not affect translation.
(A) Seedlings were grown on 1% sucrose media with the additives as listed. Seedlings are 10-days post germination. (B) 30μM Paromomycin (C) 86μM Kanamycin. The lines shown are a transgenic line harboring a yellow fluorescent protein fusion with Arabidopsis protein SALT TOLERANCE HOMOLOG (STH, At2g31380, [29]), a mutant of ribonuclease XRN2 (At5g42540), and a mutant of the 3’(2’),5’-bisphosphate nucleotidase SAL1/FIERY1 (At5g63980, [27]).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325322.s005
(PDF)
S6 Fig. Original immunoblots for NPTII protein.
Related to Supplementary Figure 1.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325322.s006
(PDF)
S7 File. Raw numerical data used to generate the graphs in this article.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325322.s007
(XLSX)
Acknowledgments
We thank Morgan House and Abigail Burke for early observations that suggested the benefits of paromomycin.
References
- 1. Azpiroz-Leehan R, Feldmann KA. T-DNA insertion mutagenesis in Arabidopsis: going back and forth. Trends Genet. 1997;13(4):152–6. pmid:9097726
- 2. Krysan PJ, Young JC, Sussman MR. T-DNA as an insertional mutagen in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1999;11(12):2283–90. pmid:10590158
- 3. Parinov S, Sevugan M, Ye D, Yang WC, Kumaran M, Sundaresan V. Analysis of flanking sequences from dissociation insertion lines: a database for reverse genetics in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 1999;11(12):2263–70. pmid:10590156
- 4. Samson F, Brunaud V, Balzergue S, Dubreucq B, Lepiniec L, Pelletier G, et al. FLAGdb/FST: a database of mapped flanking insertion sites (FSTs) of Arabidopsis thaliana T-DNA transformants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):94–7. pmid:11752264
- 5. Alonso JM, Stepanova AN, Leisse TJ, Kim CJ, Chen H, Shinn P, et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science. 2003;301(5633):653–7. pmid:12893945
- 6. Bevan M. Binary agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984;12(22):8711–21. pmid:6095209
- 7. Kilby NJ, Leyser HM, Furner IJ. Promoter methylation and progressive transgene inactivation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol. 1992;20(1):103–12. pmid:1325204
- 8. O’Malley RC, Ecker JR. Linking genotype to phenotype using the Arabidopsis unimutant collection. Plant J. 2010;61(6):928–40. pmid:20409268
- 9. Gelvin SB. Integration of Agrobacterium T-DNA into the Plant Genome. Annu Rev Genet. 2017;51:195–217. pmid:28853920
- 10. Jupe F, Rivkin AC, Michael TP, Zander M, Motley ST, Sandoval JP, et al. The complex architecture and epigenomic impact of plant T-DNA insertions. PLoS Genet. 2019;15(1):e1007819. pmid:30657772
- 11. Agmon I, Bashan A, Zarivach R, Yonath A. Symmetry at the active site of the ribosome: structural and functional implications. Biol Chem. 2005;386(9):833–44. pmid:16164408
- 12. Prokhorova I, Altman RB, Djumagulov M, Shrestha JP, Urzhumtsev A, Ferguson A, et al. Aminoglycoside interactions and impacts on the eukaryotic ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(51):E10899–908. pmid:29208708
- 13. Dmitriev SE, Vladimirov DO, Lashkevich KA. A quick guide to small-molecule inhibitors of eukaryotic protein synthesis. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2020;85(11):1389–421. pmid:33280581
- 14. Wilhelm JM, Pettitt SE, Jessop JJ. Aminoglycoside antibiotics and eukaryotic protein synthesis: structure--function relationships in the stimulation of misreading with a wheat embryo system. Biochemistry. 1978;17(7):1143–9. pmid:656378
- 15. Wilhelm JM, Jessop JJ, Pettitt SE. Aminoglycoside antibiotics and eukaryotic protein synthesis: stimulation of errors in the translation of natural messengers in extracts of cultured human cells. Biochemistry. 1978;17(7):1149–53. pmid:656379
- 16. Burke JF, Mogg AE. Suppression of a nonsense mutation in mammalian cells in vivo by the aminoglycoside antibiotics G-418 and paromomycin. Nucleic Acids Res. 1985;13(17):6265–72. pmid:2995924
- 17. Wangen JR, Green R. Stop codon context influences genome-wide stimulation of termination codon readthrough by aminoglycosides. Elife. 2020;9:e52611. pmid:31971508
- 18. Manuvakhova M, Keeling K, Bedwell DM. Aminoglycoside antibiotics mediate context-dependent suppression of termination codons in a mammalian translation system. RNA. 2000;6(7):1044–55. pmid:10917599
- 19. Nitovska IO, Avilov ID, Morgun BV. The positive effect of antibiotic paromomycin compared with kanamycin for selection of transgenic plants with NPTII gene on the example of Nicotiana tabacum. Фактори експериментальної еволюції організмів. 2015.
- 20. Monaghan J, Li X. The HEAT repeat protein ILITYHIA is required for plant immunity. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010;51(5):742–53. pmid:20360018
- 21. Zhang Y, Wang Y, Kanyuka K, Parry MAJ, Powers SJ, Halford NG. GCN2-dependent phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor-2alpha in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2008;59(11):3131–41. pmid:18603615
- 22. Faus I, Niñoles R, Kesari V, Llabata P, Tam E, Nebauer SG, et al. Arabidopsis ILITHYIA protein is necessary for proper chloroplast biogenesis and root development independent of eIF2α phosphorylation. J Plant Physiol. 2018;224–225:173–82. pmid:29680783
- 23. Lokdarshi A, Morgan PW, Franks M, Emert Z, Emanuel C, von Arnim AG. Light-Dependent Activation of the GCN2 Kinase Under Cold and Salt Stress Is Mediated by the Photosynthetic Status of the Chloroplast. Front Plant Sci. 2020;11:431. pmid:32411155
- 24. Dufresne PJ, Ubalijoro E, Fortin MG, Laliberté J-F. Arabidopsis thaliana class II poly(A)-binding proteins are required for efficient multiplication of turnip mosaic virus. J Gen Virol. 2008;89(Pt 9):2339–48. pmid:18753244
- 25. Tiruneh BS, Kim B-H, Gallie DR, Roy B, von Arnim AG. The global translation profile in a ribosomal protein mutant resembles that of an eIF3 mutant. BMC Biol. 2013;11:123. pmid:24377433
- 26. Gy I, Gasciolli V, Lauressergues D, Morel J-B, Gombert J, Proux F, et al. Arabidopsis FIERY1, XRN2, and XRN3 are endogenous RNA silencing suppressors. Plant Cell. 2007;19(11):3451–61. pmid:17993620
- 27. Kim B-H, von Arnim AG. FIERY1 regulates light-mediated repression of cell elongation and flowering time via its 3’(2’),5’-bisphosphate nucleotidase activity. Plant J. 2009;58(2):208–19. pmid:19077168
- 28. Murchie EH, Lawson T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J Exp Bot. 2013;64(13):3983–98. pmid:23913954
- 29. Subramanian C, Woo J, Cai X, Xu X, Servick S, Johnson CH, et al. A suite of tools and application notes for in vivo protein interaction assays using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET). Plant J. 2006;48(1):138–52. pmid:16925598