Figures
Abstract
The dual challenges of digitalization and population aging highlight the need to improve the well-being of older adults. Facial recognition payment (FRP), an innovative “face-to-pay” technology, has gained widespread adoption in commercial applications due to its convenience. However, existing research has primarily focused on younger users, leaving a significant gap in understanding FRP adoption and user experience among older adults. To address this gap, this study integrates the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with User Experience Theory (UXT) to develop a comprehensive framework for examining FRP adoption among older users. By incorporating both cognitive and affective dimensions, the proposed model systematically investigates key determinants of FRP acceptance. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey of 387 older adults in China, and hypotheses were tested using structural equation modeling (SEM). The findings reveal that TAM-based factors, including perceived convenience, facilitating conditions, and technology anxiety, significantly influence perceived ease of use (PEOU), perceived usefulness (PU), and user attitudes, with perceived convenience identified as the most influential determinant. From a UXT perspective, perceived enjoyment, personal innovation, and privacy risk also play a crucial role in FRP adoption. Specifically, personal innovation and perceived enjoyment positively affect user attitudes, whereas privacy risk poses a barrier to adoption. Additionally, while technology self-efficacy does not directly impact user attitudes, it indirectly enhances PEOU and PU by increasing personal innovation. By integrating TAM and UXT, this study advances the understanding of older adults’ technology acceptance behavior and offers theoretical and practical implications for the development of age-friendly FRP systems. The findings provide valuable guidance for technology developers, policymakers, and stakeholders in designing user-centered payment technologies that enhance usability, security, and overall user experience, ultimately improving the quality of life for aging populations.
Citation: Liu M, Wang C, Hu J (2025) Understanding older adults’ adoption of facial recognition payment: An integrated model of TAM and UXT. PLoS One 20(7): e0325291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325291
Editor: Simon Dang, Nong Lam University, VIET NAM
Received: January 9, 2025; Accepted: May 10, 2025; Published: July 10, 2025
Copyright: © 2025 Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All data underlying the findings described in our manuscript are fully available without restriction. The data can be found in the public dataset on figshare. The URL of the dataset is: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.28774835, and the DOI is 10.6084/m9.figshare.28774835.
Funding: The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
1. Introduction
Population aging has become a pressing global issue. World Bank projections indicate that by the year 2100, the proportion of individuals aged 65 and older will rise to 22.49% of the total global population, amounting to approximately 2.52 billion people [1]. In China, this demographic trend is particularly significant, with the elderly population expected to reach 190 million, representing 13.5% of the national population [2]. As this transformation progresses, promoting the well-being of older adults has become a vital societal imperative. The rapid evolution of technology offers innovative pathways to address the unique challenges faced by aging populations [3]. Among these advancements, facial recognition payment (FRP) technology is increasingly viewed as a potential solution to enhance convenience and accessibility for senior users.
With the widespread adoption of digital payment technologies, facial recognition payment (FRP) has emerged as an innovative and contactless payment method. China has played a pioneering role in the commercialization and implementation of facial recognition technology. On September 1, 2017, Alipay launched “Face Pay” in a pilot program at a KPRO restaurant in Hangzhou, marking the world’s first trial of FRP in a retail setting. Since then, FRP has gained widespread acceptance and adoption, becoming a key component of both online and offline payment ecosystems. However, while FRP has been extensively deployed across various industries, there is limited research on its usability and acceptance among older adults.
Older adults face unique challenges when adopting new technologies. Prior studies have emphasized that technological innovations can act as catalysts for promoting rehabilitation and improving adaptability, effectively sustaining the functional capacities of older individuals facing age-related challenges [4,5]. From a consumer perspective, FRP offers potential advantages for elderly users, such as eliminating the need for remembering passwords and reducing physical interaction with devices. However, issues related to technology anxiety, technological self-efficacy and perceived convenience remain underexplored in the context of aging populations.
Although FRP provides notable benefits, its adoption among elderly users is still in its early stages. Existing research has primarily focused on younger users [6,7], with limited studies examining how older adults perceive and interact with this technology. Therefore, it is crucial to thoroughly investigate the attitudes and acceptance of elderly users towards FRP. Based on the aforementioned research deficiencies, this study develops an FRP adoption framework tailored for elderly users based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and User Experience Theory (UXT). By considering both the characteristics of elderly users and usage dimensions, this framework identifies the key factors influencing FRP adoption among the elderly and examines their impact on users’ adoption intentions. The study aims to bridge existing research deficiencies, provide theoretical support for the age-friendly optimization of smart payment technologies, and promote the widespread adoption of FRP among aging populations, ultimately enhancing payment convenience and user experience.
2. Literature review
Facial recognition payment technology has garnered substantial scholarly attention due to its innovative approach to payment systems. Some studies have conducted certain explorations from the dimension of the theoretical framework. For instance, Lee utilized the Stressor-Strain-Outcome (S-S-O) framework to elucidate the factors contributing to consumer resistance toward facial recognition mobile payment services [8]. Shiau integrated the belief-attitude-intention (B-A-I) model with an extended TOE-I framework to investigate how perceived convenience, perceived social influence, trust, and satisfaction impact consumer acceptance of facial recognition technology [9]. Jin et al., employing Herzbergs motivation-hygiene theory, examined the impact of motivational and hygiene factors on the acceptance and resistance to mobile facial recognition payment services. Their findings highlight the positive influence of motivational factors on acceptance and the significant effects of hygiene factors on resistance [10]. Liu et al., drawing on privacy calculus theory and innovation resistance theory, constructed a research model for facial recognition payment (FRP) and investigated the privacy concerns among Chinese users [11]. Hwang integrated the Perceived Risk Theory and the Extended Theory of Planned Behavior to conduct a research on the behavioral intentions and switching intentions of South Korean and American consumers regarding the adoption of facial recognition technology in restaurant payment scenarios [12]. Meanwhile, most studies, based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), have extensively explored the factors influencing users’ adoption of facial recognition payment (FRP). For instance, a study conducted by researchers at the University of Macau identified a set of pivotal factors influencing the adoption of facial recognition payment systems. These determinants include perceived enjoyment, facilitating conditions, personal innovation, coupon availability, perceived ease of use (PEOU), perceived usefulness (PU), and users’ overall attitudes toward the technology. They also noted significant gender disparities in adoption rates [13]. Fatemeh examined security concerns related to adversarial attacks in facial recognition systems [14]. Lai et al. conducted a study to explore the public’s familiarity, trust, and attitudes toward different scenarios involving facial recognition technology. Their findings led to the development of a public perception model that categorizes these scenarios into four types [15]. Li et al. analyzed the effects of perceived vulnerability, perceived security, and perceived responsiveness on trust in facial recognition payment systems from privacy and security perspectives [16]. Furthermore, researchers have investigated additional factors affecting consumer adoption of facial recognition payment technologies, including social influence [17], hedonic shopping value [18], technology fear and perceived complexity [19], visibility and social image concerns [20], personal information protection capabilities, negative media exposure [21], perceived novelty [22], self-efficacy [23], and social influence [24].
Focusing on elderly users, the aging process is accompanied by a progressive decline in physiological functions and corresponding psychological changes. Research indicates that technological interventions can facilitate rehabilitation and enhance adaptability among elderly individuals [25,26]. Significant progress has been made in understanding the acceptance of facial recognition payment (FRP) technology within this demographic. Lee et al. reported that elderly users prioritize system reliability, ease of operation, and a sense of security when engaging with FRP systems [27]. Furthermore, Lyu et al. identified privacy concerns as a critical determinant of adoption intention. Their findings suggest that when elderly users perceive a high risk of data breaches, their willingness to use FRP decreases significantly [28]. Additionally, Lim et al. introduced the Artificial Autonomy Theory, which posits that a highly intelligent payment system capable of autonomously performing security verifications and issuing risk alerts can enhance user trust and promote sustained engagement [29]. From a cognitive perspective, Mahler and Murphy demonstrated that optimizing the interaction interface, reducing operational complexity, and providing clear visual feedback significantly improve cognitive fluency, thereby increasing elderly users’ acceptance of FRP technology [30]. Similarly, Yulianti and Ghina highlighted that the intuitiveness of the payment interface and the comprehensiveness of user guidance play a pivotal role in shaping perceived ease of use (PEOU). Their study revealed that when FRP systems offer clear operational instructions and minimize unnecessary interactions, the cognitive load on elderly users is reduced, facilitating greater adoption [31]. Beyond cognitive determinants, cultural factors exert a substantial influence on FRP acceptance among elderly users. Empirical evidence suggests notable cross-national variations in adoption behavior: Chinese users tend to prioritize system controllability and reliability, whereas their American counterparts place greater emphasis on privacy protection and data security. Korean users are predominantly influenced by functional and hedonic innovation motivations, while American users are more driven by social innovation factors [32,33]. Furthermore, emotional factors exert a stronger impact on Korean users, whereas convenience and social influence play a more significant role for American users [34]. These findings underscore the necessity of tailoring FRP implementation strategies to align with the cultural and contextual preferences of different user groups.
From a theoretical perspective, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) posits that Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) are the primary determinants of users’ acceptance of new technologies. However, TAM predominantly emphasizes rational decision-making processes, with limited consideration of affective factors and contextual influences on user behavior. This limitation is particularly salient for elderly users, whose technology adoption is influenced by multidimensional factors, including a sense of security, cognitive load, and trust formation [30]. As a result, there has been a growing academic emphasis on examining elderly users’ technology acceptance from a User Experience (UX) perspective. For instance, Hornbæk and Hertzum investigated the intersection of TAM and UX models, highlighting the significance of experiential components in human-computer interaction. Their findings indicate that user experience exerts a greater influence on technology acceptance than PU and PEOU, particularly through perceived hedonic value and attitudinal formation [35]. Similarly, Xia et al. explored how online experiences shape users’ perceptions of destination imagery within the TAM framework, revealing that, beyond technical considerations, emotional and cognitive factors significantly impact elderly users’ technology acceptance [36]. Additionally, Cho et al. investigated the use of a UX-integrated TAM model in the context of autonomous driving, showing that UX-related factors, such as trust, safety, and emotional satisfaction, play a crucial role in shaping behavioral intentions. Their study further revealed that as the level of automation increases, UX and user acceptance (UX/UA) scores demonstrate significant variations, which ultimately impact adoption decisions [37].
Despite these advancements, existing research on elderly users’ acceptance of Facial Recognition Payment (FRP) exhibits several limitations. First, most studies have predominantly focused on the initial adoption phase, neglecting factors influencing continued usage behavior. However, previous research suggests that user stickiness, perceived risk, and habit formation are crucial determinants of sustained engagement with technology [30]. Second, although TAM and User Experience Theory (UXT) are conceptually interconnected, extant studies often apply these frameworks in isolation, rather than integrating them into a comprehensive theoretical model. There remains a notable gap in research attempting to synthesize TAM and UXT to provide a more holistic understanding of the behavioral mechanisms underlying elderly users’ adoption of FRP.
Facial recognition payment technology is particularly beneficial for elderly users. Firstly, in terms of convenience, older adults often experience declines in executive control within working memory, affecting their functional status in daily activities [38]. Facial recognition payment allows elderly individuals to effortlessly complete transactions without the need for passwords, card swipes, or handheld devices, offering unparalleled convenience compared to other technological systems [39,40]. Secondly, from the perspective of human-computer interaction experience, older adults often view digital technologies as challenging to understand and operate [41,42], which may lead to psychological obstacles, including diminished confidence in their abilities and heightened apprehension regarding computer usage [43,44], mistrust of technology adoption [45], and frustration [46]. Facial recognition payment simplifies the transaction process by requiring users only to scan their face, which is inherently simpler for older adults compared to other interactive methods [39,40].
3. Theoretical framework and hypothesis development
This research seeks to explore elderly users’ acceptance of and inclination to adopt facial recognition payment systems. To build a robust theoretical foundation and identify critical influencing factors, a comprehensive literature review was conducted. Key terms, including “Technology Acceptance Model (TAM),” “user experience,” “facial recognition payment,” and “elderly users” were applied to search prominent academic databases such as PubMed, IEEE Xplore, and Web of Science. This systematic approach aimed to identify well-established theoretical frameworks and empirically validated constructs pertinent to the research scope.
3.1 Theoretical Framework: Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and User Experience Theory (UXT)
Among the theoretical models for examining user acceptance of technology, the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), first introduced by Davis [47], remains one of the most widely recognized due to its emphasis on perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness as primary determinants of adoption behavior. As an extension of the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), TAM has undergone numerous refinements. For instance, TAM2 incorporated constructs related to social influence [48], while TAM3 further expanded its scope by integrating factors such as perceived enjoyment and user experience [49]. Moreover, Chen et al. [50] introduced the Senior Technology Acceptance Model (STAM), an adaptation of TAM tailored to older adults, incorporating additional elements such as self-efficacy, technology anxiety, and facilitating conditions to better explain their adoption behaviors. Similarly, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), formulated by Venkatesh et al. [51], extends TAM by integrating constructs like social influence and facilitating conditions, offering a broader perspective on technology acceptance across various demographic groups.
A thorough review of the literature [52] emphasizes the central role of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as a widely recognized and influential framework for understanding technology acceptance among older adults. The model has been widely applied across various domains, including intelligent systems, digital communication tools, healthcare technologies, and personal devices, demonstrating its substantial explanatory power and adaptability. These studies collectively underscore TAM’s ability to identify and elucidate the key factors influencing the adoption of technologies by older adults, reinforcing its position as a foundational model in the field of technology acceptance research [53–64].
The core concept of User Experience is inherently user-centered, emphasizing individuals’ overall perception and subjective responses when interacting with a product, system, or service. According to ISO 9241-210, UX is defined as the subjective experience users develop while using or anticipating the use of a product, system, or service [65]. However, its scope extends beyond this definition. The International Organization for Standardization further elaborates that UX encompasses the entire lifecycle of product or service usage, including pre-use expectations, real-time interactions, and post-use reflections [66]. It incorporates multiple dimensions, including emotional states, cognitive processes, preferences, perceptions, physiological and psychological responses, behavioral patterns, and a sense of achievement. Consequently, UX is recognized as a multidimensional construct that integrates cognitive, affective, and behavioral factors. Hassenzahl proposed that UX comprises two fundamental dimensions: Pragmatic Quality and Hedonic Quality. Pragmatic Quality pertains to the practicality and functional aspects of a product, encompassing usability, operability, and efficiency [67]. In contrast, Hedonic Quality pertains to the experiential and emotional aspects, including pleasure, satisfaction, and aesthetic appeal. These dimensions collectively shape users’ perceptions and influence their interaction with technology.
In the context of facial recognition payment (FRP) for older adults, a comprehensive investigation into the cognitive and emotional determinants of adoption and sustained use is of significant theoretical and practical importance. Recent studies have begun integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with User Experience Theory (UXT) to establish a more holistic framework for understanding the acceptance and engagement of older users with emerging payment technologies. Table 1 presents a comprehensive synthesis of existing research on the acceptance of facial recognition payment (FRP) technology, highlighting key gaps in the literature. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) has been extensively utilized in prior studies [13,24,68–70], demonstrating its robustness in elucidating user adoption behaviors. However, most research has predominantly centered on younger populations, leaving a significant gap in empirical studies specifically examining the acceptance of FRP technology among older adults.
Moreover, while some progress has been made in integrating TAM with User Experience Theory (UXT) [30,35–37], no systematic investigations have been identified that concurrently employ these two frameworks to comprehensively analyze FRP technology acceptance among older adults. This research gap underscores the need for further exploration of the interplay between technological and experiential factors in shaping adoption behaviors within this demographic.
Building upon the previous analysis, this study develops a research framework that integrates the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with User Experience Theory (UXT), incorporating seven supplementary variables. This extension aims to address the limitations of the traditional TAM framework in examining the acceptance of facial recognition payment (FRP) technology among older adults. The selection of variables is informed by three primary criteria: established theoretical frameworks [30,35,47,48], empirical evidence from prior research [10,16,36,37], and an understanding of the physiological and psychological characteristics of older adults [41–46]. Specifically, within the TAM framework, four additional constructs are introduced: Perceived Convenience (PC), Facilitating Conditions (FC), Technology Anxiety (TA), and Technology Self-Efficacy (TSE). From the user experience perspective, three supplementary constructs are integrated: Perceived Enjoyment (PE), Personal Innovation (PI), and Privacy Risk (PR). The hypothesized relationships among these factors are depicted in Fig 1. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of the factors influencing the acceptance and adoption of FRP technology among elderly users, examining both technological and experiential dimensions. By offering valuable insights and practical recommendations, the study seeks to enhance the alignment of FRP technology with the specific needs of older adults, thereby improving its usability and adoption rate. Each construct is defined with relevant scholarly references, and the theoretical foundation underpinning the proposed causal relationships is further elaborated in the subsequent sections.
3.2. Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude, behavioral intention
The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) identifies Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) as critical determinants influencing the acceptance and utilization of technology [77]. PU is conceptualized as the extent to which individuals perceive that a given technology enhances their performance. In the context of facial recognition payment systems, PU represents the perceived convenience and practical benefits that older adults associate with task completion facilitated by the technology [78,79]. PEOU, on the other hand, refers to the perception that using a technology requires minimal effort [77]. For facial recognition payment systems, this ease of use is exemplified by the system’s reliance on facial authentication, eliminating the need for physical interaction, thereby offering a seamless user experience. TAM postulates that both PU and PEOU are significant predictors of Behavioral Intention (BI), with a notable interdependence between these constructs. Moreover, the model suggests that Attitude (ATT) toward the technology exerts a direct influence on BI, wherein a favorable attitude strengthens users’ intentions to adopt the technology.
From the perspective of User Experience Theory (UXT), ease of use extends beyond merely reducing user effort; it also plays a crucial role in fostering a positive user experience by enhancing interaction efficiency and alleviating cognitive load. According to Hassenzahl’ s user experience model [67], intuitive and effortless interactions contribute to a more satisfying and engaging experience, which is particularly significant for older adults who may encounter cognitive and motor difficulties when engaging with digital technology. A positive attitude is typically shaped by both the hedonic and pragmatic aspects of the experience [66]. When a system is both functional (high Perceived Usefulness, PU) and enjoyable or frustration-free (high Perceived Ease of Use, PEOU), users are more likely to develop a favorable attitude toward it, consequently increasing their intention to adopt the technology. Based on these theoretical foundations, the study puts forward the following hypotheses:
H1: Perceived ease of use (PEOU) positively influences perceived usefulness (PU).
H2: Perceived usefulness (PU) positively influences behavioral intention (BI).
H3: Perceived ease of use (PEOU) positively influences attitude (ATT).
H4: Perceived usefulness (PU) positively influences behavioral intention (BI).
H5: Attitude (ATT) positively influences behavioral intention (BI).
The remaining seven exogenous constructs are detailed in the subsequent section.
3.3. Perceived convenience
Aging naturally results in a deterioration of sensory, perceptual, motor, and cognitive functions [38], which creates difficulties when engaging with devices that rely on conventional graphical user interfaces (GUIs) [78,80]. Brown emphasizes that convenience is defined by five key factors: accessibility (products/services should be conveniently located), timeliness (available when needed), usability (user-friendly interface), transaction (multiple financial channels for purchasing), and execution (decision-making convenience) [81]. Therefore, FRP is advantageous as it provides convenient service at suitable times and places while being user-friendly. Compared to conventional methods like fingerprint or numerical/diagram passwords [82], FRP offers superior convenience. As a contactless payment option, paying solely through facial recognition offers customers an engaging experience without physical contact [83]. FRP has been implemented in various offline retail checkout systems and online platforms such as Alipay and online banking applications, enabling elderly individuals to benefit from convenient human-computer interaction anytime, anywhere. Considering the interactive advantage of facial recognition payment (FRP), which removes the necessity for physical interaction with a user interface, we propose that the convenience provided by this approach substantially shapes users’ perceptions of its usefulness. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:
H6: Perceived Convenience (PC) positively influences perceived usefulness (PU).
3.4. Perceived enjoyment
Perceived enjoyment (PE) is recognized as a key factor influencing technology acceptance and adoption [84,85]. Hedonic motivation, defined as the pleasure or satisfaction gained from engaging with technology, plays a significant role in this process [86]. Numerous studies have emphasized the importance of hedonic drivers, such as enjoyment and playfulness, in shaping users’ attitudes toward adopting new technologies [87–89]. When users find enjoyment in utilizing a technology, they may perceive it as more intuitive, even if it involves underlying complexities [90]. Research on mobile services [91] suggests that users who derive enjoyment from a service are more inclined to adopt it positively. Enjoyment can influence users’ intentions to adopt technology either directly or indirectly through psychological mechanisms tied to their beliefs [92]. Additionally, Celik [90] found that enjoyment significantly enhances users’ perceptions of Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and their willingness to engage in online shopping. From the user experience perspective, Perceived Enjoyment (PE) plays a pivotal role in facilitating the adoption of new technologies among older adults [66]. It not only enhances emotional engagement by reducing cognitive load and improving interaction efficiency but also contributes to increased overall satisfaction, thereby fostering sustained usage intentions. Hornbæk and Hertzum’s study further underscores that the influence of perceived enjoyment on user attitudes often surpasses that of perceived usefulness and ease of use [35]. This highlights the critical importance of enjoyable experiences in shaping older adults’ acceptance of new technologies, significantly enhancing their adoption intentions.
Within the consumer context, PE is recognized as a crucial component influencing technology acceptance and usage [86,93]. Facial recognition technology, as an innovative approach, holds appeal for customers exploring this new payment method. It offers an interactive experience that enhances shopping enjoyment by reducing wait times and improving service efficiency [94]. This novel method presents a simplified and enjoyable payment experience, potentially enhancing customers’ acceptance and intention to adopt it. Based on these studies, the following hypothesis is proposed:
H7. Perceived Enjoyment (PE) positively influences attitude (ATT).
3.5. Personal innovation
Personal innovation (PI) can be defined as an individual’s propensity to explore and experiment with emerging technologies [95]. This disposition significantly influences consumers’ comprehension of and attitudes toward the utility and user-friendliness of new technologies [96]. According to the International Organization for Standardization [66], user experience encompasses multiple dimensions, including emotional states, cognitive processes, and individual preferences. Individuals with higher levels of personal innovation exhibit greater openness and optimism toward emerging technologies, making them more likely to engage with novel and innovative products or services. This propensity fosters a proactive approach to technological exploration, which in turn positively influences their intention to adopt new technologies. The indirect impact of personal innovation on the inclination to adopt Facial Recognition Payment (FRP) is increasingly apparent. For instance, Ciftci et al. [97] found no direct correlation between personal innovation and the intention to use facial recognition technology in quick-service restaurant environments. Similarly, The study by Palash et al. focuses on consumer behavior regarding facial recognition payments (FRP) in offline markets, underscoring the critical role of personal innovation in shaping users’ attitudes toward adopting new payment technologies [98]. Morosan underscored personal innovation as a pivotal determinant of perceived ease of use, which subsequently predicts adoption intentions for FRP in dining contexts [99]. Kim and Forsythe proposed that personal innovation directly impacts perceptions of ease of use (PEOU) and usefulness (PU) in the context of adopting product virtualization technology [100]. Moreover, it serves as a predictor of customers’ cognitive attitudes toward embracing and applying information technologies [101]. In the absence of personal traits such as innovation, consumer attitudes and purchasing intentions may tend to reflect habitual choices among similar products [102]. Therefore, innovation emerges as a key predictor of consumers’ motivation and readiness to explore novel concepts and technologies [100]. Consumers with a strong preference for novelty tend to have a positive outlook on emerging technologies and are more inclined to engage with innovative products, services, and experiences [103]. Currently, facial recognition technology remains relatively nascent among many older Chinese consumers. Those exhibiting higher levels of innovation are more inclined to embrace such innovations with enthusiasm [104]. The empirical findings from these studies underscore the pivotal role of personal innovation in shaping consumer perceptions of ease of use, usefulness, and overall attitudes toward technology adoption. Based on the aforementioned research, the following hypotheses are proposed:
H8. Personal innovation (PI) positively influences perceived ease of use (PEOU).
H9. Personal innovation (PI) positively influences perceived usefulness (PU).
3.6. Technological self-efficacy
Self-efficacy, a cornerstone concept in social cognitive theory, refers to individuals’ assessments of their capability to execute specific actions [105]. In the context of technology applications, self-efficacy reflects individuals’ confidence in possessing the necessary expertise and skills to effectively utilize technology [106]. Empirical research consistently underscores the pivotal role of self-efficacy in facilitating the adoption and proficient use of information technology [107,108]. Drawing upon social learning theory [105], older adults’ confidence in their capacity to perform unfamiliar tasks, such as using computers or navigating the Internet, emerges as a critical determinant of their success in these domains. Investigations into Internet usage further highlight the extensive impact of self-efficacy, demonstrating its strong associations with constructs such as perceived ease of use (PEOU), perceived usefulness (PU) [109], behavioral intention (BI) [110], and overall patterns of Internet engagement [111]. This study defines technological self-efficacy as individuals’ perceptions or judgments of their ability to effectively utilize Facial Recognition Technology (FRT). Researchers have integrated self-efficacy across various technological domains, including computers [112–114], the internet [115,116], mobile technologies [117–119], and robotics [120,121]. Self-efficacy plays a pivotal role in shaping individuals’ behavioral decisions and the level of effort they invest in adopting and using technologies [122]. Prior literature consistently indicates that individuals with higher self-efficacy maintain positive attitudes and exhibit greater openness to adopting new technologies, driven by their confidence in mastering technological skills [123–126]. Individuals with elevated self-efficacy typically exhibit a positive outlook and display greater receptiveness toward the adoption of new technologies. This tendency reflects their confidence in mastering and effectively utilizing these innovations [127]. Building upon the aforementioned research, the following hypothesis is proposed:
H10: Technological self-efficacy (TSE) positively influences attitude (ATT).
3.7. Facilitating conditions
Facilitating conditions refer to customers’ perceptions regarding the availability of essential resources and support needed to carry out a specific task [86,128]. It also encompasses motivational factors and environmental barriers that shape an individual’s perception of the ease or difficulty associated with a task [129]. Derived from Venkatesh et al.’s [130] Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), facilitating conditions are fundamental components within the UTAUT model. Venkatesh et al. [130] posit that these conditions influence user behavior rather than just behavioral intentions, encompassing accessibility to necessary resources and support for technology use. Insufficient assistance, information, and resources can impede the adoption of web-based technologies [131]. Facilitating conditions are essential for users who heavily rely on technical support and resources when adopting new technologies. These conditions can significantly enhance users’ attitudes [132,133] and increase their intention to use the technology [134].
Facial recognition payment methods typically require integration with other technologies or systems, such as linking to specific digital payment platforms or bank accounts (commonly WeChat Pay and Alipay in China). Given its novelty, older consumers may benefit from additional technical guidance, particularly during the initial adoption phases. Zhong et al. underscore the significance of facilitating conditions as an external variable influencing Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Perceived Usefulness (PU), and behavioral intentions [13]. This highlights the critical role of adequate resources or support in mitigating technological adoption challenges. Consequently, facilitating conditions are considered an independent variable crucial for assessing consumers’ intentions to adopt facial recognition payment systems. Based on the above analysis, the following hypotheses are proposed:
H11: Facilitating Conditions (FC) positively influences perceived ease of use (PEOU).
3.8. Technology anxiety
Anxiety refers to a range of negative emotions, including fear, sadness, and tension, that arise in response to stressful circumstances [135]. In the realm of information and communication technology (ICT), technology anxiety denotes users’ apprehension and unease about the potential adverse outcomes associated with specific technological applications [136,137]. Extensive research has empirically demonstrated that anxiety negatively influences users’ intentions [138–140]. For instance, McFarland and Hamilton, utilizing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), demonstrated that computer anxiety exerts a significant influence on users’ intentions to engage with computers [141]. Similarly, Lu and Su identified anxiety as a barrier to the adoption of innovative systems, revealing a negative association with customers’ intentions to adopt mobile phones [142]. Further studies, including those by Celik and Yesilyurt [143] and Patil et al. [144], have consistently highlighted the detrimental effects of anxiety on users’ attitudes toward technology. Compeau and Higgins [145] posited that individuals are inclined to avoid activities that induce anxiety. Those experiencing heightened levels of technological anxiety often exhibit reduced confidence in navigating technology, leaving them more prone to feelings of vulnerability or unease when confronted with technological challenges [146]. Against this backdrop, the current study aims to examine the relationship between technological anxiety and attitudes toward adopting facial recognition payment (FPR), thereby proposing the following hypotheses:
H12: Technology Anxiety (TA) negatively influences perceived ease of use (PEOU).
H13: Technology Anxiety (TA) negatively influences Attitude (ATT).
3.9. Privacy risk
Privacy risk (PR) refers to individuals’ concerns regarding potential privacy breaches when disclosing information to specific external entities [147,148]. Such concerns profoundly shape individuals’ trust in external entities and their approaches to establishing personal boundaries within their external surroundings [149]. User experience encompasses both perception and emotional state [66]. The influence of privacy risk is largely driven by users’ subjective perceptions rather than objective realities, often eliciting feelings of anxiety, unease, or concern [28]. These emotional responses can significantly shape users’ attitudes toward technology and their subsequent adoption behaviors. In the context of facial recognition payment (FRP), users frequently divulge private information, such as contact details and demographic data, during mobile transactions, whether consciously or unconsciously. Additionally, FRP services necessitate users to submit facial information stored in sensitive databases [150]. Consequently, users’ privacy attitudes often drive their resistance to adopting FRP [11,21]. Research indicates that privacy risk diminishes users’ perceived value of mobile payment services [151]. Recent studies underscore privacy risk as a critical factor in increasing user resistance to FRP, particularly when users perceive heightened privacy risks associated with this technology [152,153]. Thus, we hypothesize the following:
H14: Privacy Risk (PR) negatively influences Attitude (ATT).
4. Research methodology
4.1. Data acquisition
A structured survey questionnaire was designed and conducted to assess the proposed hypotheses and evaluate the conceptual framework. While acknowledging the inherent limitations of such a survey, it remains a valid instrument for this study. Given the cognitive and technological challenges that elderly populations may face, careful consideration was given to the questionnaire’s design to ensure its suitability. In an effort to reduce potential biases, a more refined sampling method was employed, combining both online and offline data collection approaches. Online surveys, commonly used in prior research on user adoption of FRP [71–76], were used to gather data from participants, primarily university faculty members and retired employees aged 55 and above. However, recognizing the unique needs of elderly participants, additional face-to-face interviews were included. This hybrid approach ensured that elderly respondents could independently complete the questionnaire, thereby minimizing the risk of participants providing inaccurate responses for compensation. The data collection focused on individuals aged 55 and older. While 60 is commonly used as the operational definition of older adults, we also included female participants aged 55-60 in consideration of China’s official retirement policy, where the retirement age is set at 60 for men and 55 for women. Given that many retired individuals in this age group exhibit behavioral patterns and technology adoption characteristics similar to those aged 60 and above, their inclusion allows for a more comprehensive understanding of elderly users’ attitudes toward FRP. To ensure that all participants had a basic understanding of FRP systems, a strict participant screening process was employed. All participants were required to have prior exposure to FRP systems and possess a certain level of understanding before completing the survey. To maintain clarity, Table 2 presents demographic categories reflecting this sampling approach.
A pilot study was conducted prior to the full survey to assess the feasibility and content validity of the questionnaire. The primary aim of this pilot was to identify potential issues and make necessary adjustments through a small-scale pretest. Several concerns were raised, especially regarding the clarity of some questions, which had the potential to confuse respondents. As a result, adjustments were made to simplify and clarify the language, ensuring better alignment with the cognitive levels of older respondents. These revisions enhanced the clarity of the questionnaire, thus improving the accuracy and reliability of the data collected. The offline component of the survey was conducted by trained research staff to ensure that elderly participants understood each question and could independently complete the survey. Additionally, all participants were required to sign an informed consent form prior to the survey, which clearly outlined the study’s purpose, content, and requirements. This informed consent form also included the contact details of research assistants for any necessary explanations, ensuring that participants could easily seek clarification if needed. This study has been approved by the Biomedical Ethics Committee of Hefei University of Technology, with the ethical approval number [HFUT20240620001H]. The online survey was conducted via the Chinese data collection platform Sojump (www.wjx.cn) between July and August 2024. Elderly participants who completed the survey received a compensation of 5 RMB each. A total of 450 responses were collected. Rigorous data screening was applied, including attention checks, reverse questions, and an assessment of survey completion times (excluding surveys completed in under 5 minutes). As a result, 387 fully completed questionnaires were retained for further analysis. The demographic information obtained from the first section of the questionnaire is provided in Table 2. The study does not involve any ethical concerns. Prior to participation, all participants were informed about the purpose, content, and their rights regarding the study, with explicit consent obtained for voluntary participation. During the data collection process, all participant information was kept strictly confidential, and the survey results were used solely for academic research, ensuring no personal identification information was disclosed. Moreover, the study did not involve any activities or interventions that could potentially cause physical or psychological discomfort to the participants.
4.2. Measurements
To assess the research constructs in this study, validated multi-item scales, commonly used in previous research [13,20,72], were employed. Each variable was observed using 3–4 scale items, aiming to measure the variable precisely from different dimensions. The specific scale items are detailed in Table 3. All items were rated using a 7-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). Prior to the survey administration, considerable efforts were invested in developing, testing, and refining the items, covering aspects such as question formulation, response options, and scale anchors, to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the survey items. The reliability and validity of the measurement items were evaluated using Cronbach’s alpha and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
5. Date analysis and findings
5.1. Analytical strategy and approach
This study employed Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to examine the hypothesized relationships and pathways within the research framework. SEM, a robust statistical methodology with a history spanning nearly a century, integrates Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and path analysis to explore complex multivariate causal relationships. Rooted in psychometrics, CFA is designed to measure latent psychological constructs such as attitudes and satisfaction [156], making it particularly well-suited for investigating factors influencing older adults’ acceptance of Facial Recognition Payment (FRP) systems. Preliminary analyses were conducted using SPSS 23.0 for descriptive statistics and reliability assessments. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and evaluation of the measurement model, including path analysis, were performed with AMOS 24.0 [157]. SEM, leveraging maximum likelihood estimation, enables a holistic examination of the proposed model and provides a comprehensive analysis of inter-variable relationships based on empirical data [158]. The analytical process adhered to a two-step approach [159]: initially, CFA was conducted to validate the measurement model, followed by SEM to evaluate the structural model’s fit and test the hypothesized path coefficients. Acknowledging the sensitivity of the Chi-square test to sample size, Brown [160] advocated the use of complementary fit indices to achieve a more robust evaluation of model fit. Accordingly, this study incorporated metrics such as the Comparative Fit Index (CFI), Bollen’s Incremental Fit Index (IFI), Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR), and Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) to comprehensively assess the overall model fit. These metrics were instrumental in providing a comprehensive understanding of the model’s adequacy.
5.2. Findings
To evaluate and confirm the causal pathways among the latent variables presented in Fig 1, structural equation modeling (SEM) was utilized. In this study, fit indices such as CFI, IFI, TLI, RMSEA, and SRMR were employed due to their proven effectiveness in past simulations [161,162]. These indices together assess the adequacy of the model, with the recommended reference values for each presented in Table 4. Specifically, CFI, IFI, and TLI values, averaging around 0.93, highlight a robust fit, while RMSEA and SRMR values below 0.071 indicate satisfactory alignment with the data. The calculated fit indices are as follows: χ2/df = 2.942, CFI = 0.933, IFI = 0.933, TLI = 0.924, SRMR = 0.0279, and RMSEA = 0.071. To ensure the reliability of the measurement instruments, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were computed, with all values surpassing the 0.7 threshold. The internal consistency of the scales utilized is thereby confirmed [163]. Moreover, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to evaluate the constructs’ internal consistency, convergent validity, and discriminant validity (refer to Table 5). The analysis revealed that the composite reliability (CR) values ranged from 0.882 to 0.937, which exceeds the threshold of 0.60, indicating robust internal consistency [164,165]. All item factor loadings were statistically significant (p < 0.001), providing strong evidence for the convergent validity of the measurement model. Additionally, the average variance extracted (AVE) values, ranging from 0.723 to 0.876, surpassed the minimum threshold of 0.50, offering further support for convergent validity. To assess discriminant validity, the square root of the AVE for each construct was compared against the correlations among latent variables. As presented in Table 6, diagonal elements (representing AVE square roots) were consistently higher than off-diagonal correlations, affirming the uniqueness of each construct [166].
The path analysis conducted using structural equation modeling (SEM) reveals that 10 out of the 14 hypotheses proposed in this study were strongly supported (p < 0.001), while 3 hypotheses received partial support (p < 0.05). However, the H10 hypothesis was not supported. The detailed results are presented in Fig 2 and Table 7. As anticipated, perceived ease of use (PEOU) exerted a significant positive effect on perceived usefulness (PU) (β = 0.366, p < 0.001), and the relationship between PU and behavioral intention (BI) was validated (β = −0.184, p < 0.05), thereby confirming hypotheses H1 and H2. Elderly users’ attitudes toward FRP were significantly influenced by PEOU (β = 0.21, p < 0.001), PU (β = 0.612, p < 0.001), perceived enjoyment (PE) (β = 0.182, p < 0.001), technology anxiety (TA) (β = 0.075, p < 0.05), and privacy risk (PR) (β = −0.148, p < 0.001), thus affirming hypotheses H3, H4, H7, H13, and H14. Conversely, technology self-efficacy (TSE) did not have a significant effect on user attitude (ATT) (β = −0.039, p > 0.1), resulting in a lack of support for H10. Furthermore, user attitude (ATT) had a positive and significant influence on behavioral intention (BI) (β = 1.203, p < 0.001), supporting H5. Perceived convenience (PC) was found to have a substantial positive effect on perceived usefulness (PU) (β = 0.853, p < 0.001), confirming H6. Personal innovation (PI) had a significant positive impact on both perceived ease of use (PEOU) (β = 0.601, p < 0.001) and perceived usefulness (PU) (β = −0.244, p < 0.001), validating H8 and H9. Facilitating conditions (FC) (β = 0.366, p < 0.001) and technology anxiety (TA) (β = −0.067, p < 0.05) both influenced perceived ease of use (PEOU), confirming H11 and H12.
* p < 0.1; ** p < 0.05; *** p < 0.01.
6.Discussion
6.1. Theoretical implications
This study investigates the acceptance and usage of facial recognition payment (FRP) technology among elderly users by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and User Experience Theory (UXT). The results demonstrate that both Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) have a substantial impact on customer attitudes, which in turn positively influence usage intentions. These findings align with the original TAM model [47].
The study reveals that, from the perspective of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Perceived Convenience (PC) exerts a significant influence on Perceived Usefulness (PU) with a β value of 0.853. This indicates that Perceived Convenience has a notable effect on older users’ perception of the technology’s usefulness. The findings confirm that older adults are more likely to view a technology as useful if it is highly convenient to use, which subsequently influences their Behavioral Intention (BI) to adopt the technology. This underscores the critical importance of simplifying technology operations and interface design for older users. Given that older adults encounter challenges such as complex operations and steep learning curves when using new technologies, convenience becomes a key determinant of technology acceptance. This result is consistent with previous studies, which highlight the pivotal role of convenience in enhancing user experience and perceptions of mobile payment systems [83]. For instance, Facial Recognition Payment (FRP) systems do not require users to enter passwords or carry phones, with transactions completed in under 15 seconds. This level of convenience positions FRP as superior to other payment methods. Additionally, the research confirms that Facilitating Conditions (FC), as an important external variable, has a statistically significant impact on Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU). This finding underscores the importance of providing adequate resources and support for older users, as such provisions can mitigate the challenges of technology usage, enhance its effectiveness, and directly influence the intention to adopt the technology. These findings align with research by Mirjana et al., which demonstrates a significant positive relationship between social influence, social support, and older adults’ self-efficacy [167]. Additionally, Chu et al. found that older adults rely more on tangible family support to improve their internet learning outcomes compared to middle-aged individuals [168]. Thus, Facilitating Conditions (FC) is a crucial factor influencing the adoption of new technologies among older users. Furthermore, the study confirms that Technological Anxiety (TA) has a negative impact on Perceived Usefulness (PU) and Attitude (ATT), consistent with previous findings [141,169]. For example, McFarland and Hamilton demonstrated that computer anxiety markedly impedes users’ intentions to utilize computers [141]. Due to age-related physiological decline [38], older adults generally exhibit lower adaptability to new technologies compared to younger individuals [41,42]. This anxiety often leads to perceptions of greater complexity and operational difficulty, thereby diminishing their willingness to adopt new technologies.
The fourth variable derived from the TAM framework is Technological Self-Efficacy (TSE). However, the research findings related to this variable contradict the expected hypothesis, which is at odds with the majority of existing studies [170,171]. However, this observation aligns with the findings of Mohammed et al., who reported that General Self-Efficacy (GSE) and Computer Self-Efficacy (CSE) had minimal impact on attitudes toward health technology within the context of health technology use [172]. This finding also corroborates Bandura’s assertion that self-efficacy is more context-specific than a general perception and should be tailored to specific domains [173]. In the context of older adults using facial recognition payment (FRP) technology, the lack of a significant influence of TSE on their technology use attitudes is particularly noteworthy. One possible explanation is that FRP, by employing a “face scan to pay” mechanism, significantly simplifies both the user interface and operational procedures, thereby reducing the need for users to rely on their technological self-efficacy. Unlike traditional digital payment systems, which require multiple steps such as inputting passwords or scanning QR codes, FRP operates in an almost automatic manner. This means that even individuals with lower confidence in their technological abilities can use it with ease, as the intuitive and effortless nature of FRP mitigates the need for self-efficacy in shaping user attitudes. From a User Experience Theory (UXT) perspective, these results highlight a critical insight into elderly users’ technology adoption behavior. Unlike younger users, who may develop a strong attitude toward technology based on their confidence in handling digital tools, elderly users tend to evaluate new technology primarily based on its perceived simplicity, convenience, and security rather than their own technological competence. This underscores the significance of age-friendly design, which can enhance user experience by focusing on the intuitive usability of the technology and its emotional appeal. Age-friendly design reduces the cognitive and operational burden associated with new technologies, making them more acceptable to older populations. Therefore, developers should prioritize optimizing the usability of FRP systems, ensuring minimal cognitive effort and promoting seamless user experiences to foster broader adoption among elderly users.
Another perspective of this study is developed based on User Experience Theory (UXT). The findings reveal that Personal Innovation (PI) significantly impacts both Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU), corroborating existing literature [100]. This confirms that individuals with higher levels of personal innovation tend to have a more favorable view of the usefulness of new technologies [104]. This effect is especially pronounced among older adults, who are generally more inclined to experiment with and adapt to new technologies when they exhibit higher personal innovation, as also evidenced by research on older users’ acceptance of voice assistants [174]. This insight suggests that incorporating strategies to stimulate and enhance personal innovation(PI) could significantly improve technology adoption rates and user experience for older adults.
The second variable derived from User Experience Theory (UXT) is Perceived Enjoyment (PE), the study finds that Perceived Enjoyment directly influences older users’ attitudes towards FRP, validating that the enjoyment derived from using a technology is crucial for its acceptance [84]. This finding further substantiates the pivotal role of Emotional Design in enhancing user experience. Integrating interactive feedback, engaging elements, and personalized customization tailored to older users within interface design can significantly improve their overall interaction and satisfaction. Furthermore, this aligns with the findings of Hornbæk and Hertzum, who highlighted that user experience exerts a more substantial influence on technology acceptance than perceived usefulness and ease of use, particularly through the impact of perceived enjoyment on user attitudes [35]. These results underscore that, beyond technical factors, emotional and cognitive aspects play a critical role in shaping technology adoption among older users [36].
In addition to Personal Innovation (PI) and Perceived Enjoyment (PE), the third variable derived from User Experience Theory (UXT) is Privacy Risk (PR). The findings demonstrate that Privacy Risk (PR) significantly negatively impacts older users’ attitudes toward Facial Recognition Payment (FRP), which is consistent with prior research [11,21,151]. This indicates that concerns about privacy often drive users to resist adopting FRP technology. Recent studies further highlight that privacy risk is a critical factor contributing to user reluctance toward FRP technology, particularly when users perceive a high level of privacy risk [152]. Privacy risk is particularly pronounced among older users, who tend to be more sensitive to privacy issues associated with emerging technologies. Specifically, technologies involving the processing of personal data, such as FRP systems that require the upload or storage of biometric information, can evoke considerable unease and concern in older individuals. This discomfort is largely attributed to fears of privacy breaches and a lack of trust in the technology’s protective measures, which may lead to reduced acceptance of FRP technology and negatively affect their willingness to adopt it. Furthermore, the relatively recent implementation of privacy-related legislation in China may contribute to a less mature level of privacy awareness and understanding among older citizens [175]. This context further elucidates the heightened concern regarding privacy risks among older users. The user experience theory places substantial emphasis on the comprehensive subjective perceptions that users develop regarding products or services. Cognition, within this context, occupies a pivotal position. In line with cognitive psychology theory, during the decision-making process, humans typically perform risk assessments of novel entities by leveraging their pre - established cognitive patterns. The elderly, being fettered by traditional mindsets and possessing relatively restricted technological knowledge, are more inclined to assume a cautious stance when confronted with new technologies compared to other demographic groups. In the case of Facial Recognition Payment (FRP), once the elderly become aware that it has the potential to result in severe outcomes such as privacy infringement, identity theft, or property damage, this substantially diminishes their propensity to use FRP [27,28].
6.2. Practical implications
The findings of this study have significant practical implications for the design and implementation of age-friendly Facial Recognition Payment (FRP) systems and analogous technologies tailored for older users. The results reveal that Perceived Convenience (PC) significantly influences Perceived Usefulness (PU), with a β coefficient of 0.853. This indicates that older users are more likely to perceive technologies that are easy to use as more useful. Therefore, developers should adopt the “Less is More” principle in UX design by streamlining payment processes, offering intuitive operational guidance, and integrating real-time feedback mechanisms to optimize the user experience [176]. Additionally, the study highlights that Perceived Enjoyment (PE) directly impacts older users’ attitudes towards FRP. This underscores the importance of incorporating elements of entertainment and pleasant experiences into technology design for older users. Design teams should integrate interactive and personalized features into FRP systems to enhance user engagement and enjoyment, thereby improving the overall user experience.
Moreover, Facilitating Conditions (FC) significantly affect Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), emphasizing the critical role of adequate technical support and resources in the adoption of technology by older users. Therefore, government agencies should consider implementing measures such as providing detailed operational guides, organizing regular technology training sessions for older users, and establishing technical support hotlines [177]. The negative impact of Technological Anxiety (TA) should also be addressed. Older adults frequently experience anxiety towards new technologies, which can increase perceived complexity and reduce adoption willingness. Developers should focus on mitigating this anxiety by offering clear instructions, conducting training sessions, and designing intuitive systems to enhance technology acceptance. Although Technological Self-Efficacy (TSE) did not significantly affect older users’ technology attitudes in this study, it remains important to enhance users’ confidence. Future research should explore how self-efficacy interacts with other factors, such as technology design and environmental support, across various technological contexts. This approach will contribute to a more nuanced understanding of older adults’ technology use behaviors and aid in optimizing technology design. By integrating these considerations, we can enhance technology usability and acceptance, ultimately creating a more user-friendly technological environment for older adults.
Lastly, the study identifies Privacy Risk as a negative factor influencing older users’ acceptance of FRP technology. This finding provides crucial guidance for both technology developers and policymakers. FRP service providers should ensure that privacy protection measures are transparent and reliable to build older users’ trust in the technology’s security. Designers and developers should also address privacy protection needs by incorporating privacy control options and clear privacy management features into the technology interfaces. This approach can help mitigate older users’ concerns about data security and enhance technology acceptance. Furthermore, given the relatively recent implementation of privacy-related laws in China, it is recommended that the government strengthen public education on privacy protection, increase awareness among older users, and continuously refine privacy regulations to adapt to evolving technological landscapes and user needs, thus effectively safeguarding users’ privacy rights.
7. Conclusion and limitations
This study offers several significant theoretical contributions to the academic community. Firstly, unlike existing research that predominantly focuses on general or younger populations, this study uniquely investigates the usage and acceptance of Facial Recognition Payment (FRP) among elderly users in China. Given the dual challenges of aging and digitalization in contemporary society, technologies that support and benefit the elderly represent an essential trend in social development. The “face scan to pay” feature of FRP largely mitigates the “digital divide” for older users. The primary contribution of this research lies in exploring the factors and mechanisms affecting the adoption of FRP among elderly users, promoting the technology within this demographic, and enhancing their shopping experience and overall quality of life. Secondly, in the realm of theoretical model construction, this research demonstrates remarkable innovation by seamlessly integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the User Experience Technology (UXT) framework. A comprehensive and highly tailored technology acceptance integrated model for the elderly user segment is meticulously formulated. From the TAM vantage point, this study pioneers the incorporation of four external variables, namely Perceived Convenience (PC), Facilitating Conditions (FC), Technological Anxiety (TA), and Technological Self-Efficacy (TSE). This endeavor successfully surmounts the inherent constraints of the traditional TAM model in elucidating the technology acceptance behaviors of elderly users. As a result, it significantly broadens the application frontier of the TAM model within the purview of specific user-group research, thus charting a novel course for in-depth exploration of the technology adoption behaviors of the elderly. In the context of the UXT perspective, this research introduces three external variables: Perceived Enjoyment (PE), Personal Innovation (PI), and Privacy Risk (PR). This approach comprehensively takes into account the emotional experiences and distinctive psychological traits of elderly users during the technology utilization process. It effectively remedies the deficiency in the attention to the emotional dimensions of elderly users in prior related research, rendering the study of the technology acceptance behaviors of the elderly more comprehensive and multi – faceted, thereby validating and extending previous research [13,71–76,83].
Through rigorous and scientific empirical investigations, this study conclusively validates the existence of a close and significant correlation between these newly introduced variables and the acceptance level of Facial Recognition Payment (FRP) among elderly users. This accomplishment not only furnishes a more consummate and precise theoretical analysis instrument for subsequent research but also substantially extends the TAM from a novel perspective that focuses on the hierarchical structure of user needs. This will powerfully stimulate more scholars to conduct in-depth inquiries into the technology acceptance behaviors of elderly users from multi-dimensional and cross - framework perspectives. Consequently, it will continuously propel the refinement and development of the theoretical system in this domain, injecting new impetus and orientation into the research and practice of technology applications relevant to the elderly population.
The findings provide crucial insights for the design and development of age-friendly FRP systems. Firstly, designers should adhere to the “user-centered” principle inherent in user experience theory, simplifying the FRP usage process, while emphasizing user engagement and the enjoyment experienced during the interaction, thereby enhancing the overall user experience. Secondly, drawing from both TAM and UXT, it is crucial to provide adequate technical support and assistance mechanisms to foster elderly users’ technological self-efficacy, which remains a pivotal focus for product designers and developers. Lastly, developers and policymakers must consider privacy concerns by incorporating privacy protection options into technology interfaces and strengthening public education on privacy protection to safeguard users’ privacy rights effectively. Our findings are anticipated to motivate future research efforts aimed at advancing the age-friendliness and user experience of facial recognition payment (FRP) systems. These improvements hold the potential to foster greater well-being and independence among older adults, thereby enhancing their overall quality of life.
Although this study provides valuable insights and practical implications, certain limitations should be acknowledged. One primary limitation is the sample, which is restricted to elderly participants exclusively from China. FRP services may vary across different countries and cultures, and technology maturity and market conditions differ internationally. Therefore, future research should encompass elderly users from various countries and cultural backgrounds to enhance the generalizability of the current model. Additionally, the study found that Technological Self-Efficacy did not significantly impact Attitude, despite its recognized importance in promoting and stimulating the adoption of new technologies among elderly users. This warrants further analysis. As Bandura posited, self-efficacy is highly context-specific and should be tailored to particular domains [173]. Future studies should explore how self-efficacy interacts with other factors, such as technology design and environmental support, across diverse technological contexts to deepen the understanding of elderly users’ technology usage behaviors. Finally, while the combined TAM and UXT research model incorporates seven external variables, future studies should delve deeper into additional factors, such as emotional design and usability testing, which hold significant potential for further exploration within the context of TAM and UXT.
Supporting information
S1 Data. The original survey data of this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325291.s001
(XLSX)
References
- 1. Projected population by broad age group, World, 2022 to 2100. Available from: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/population-by-age-group-to-2100?country=~OWID_WRL
- 2.
Ning JZ. Report on main data of the Seventh National Census (2021). 2021.
- 3.
Czaja SJ. Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches. 3rd ed. New York: CRC Press. 2020.
- 4. Charness N. A framework for choosing technology interventions to promote successful longevity: Prevent, Rehabilitate, Augment, Substitute (PRAS). Gerontology. 2020;66(2):169–75. pmid:31487742
- 5. Pirhonen J, Lolich L, Tuominen K, Jolanki O, Timonen V. These devices have not been made for older people’s needs – Older adults’ perceptions of digital technologies in Finland and Ireland. Technology in Society. 2020;62:101287.
- 6. Yu T, Wang C, Bian Q, Teoh AP. Acceptance of or resistance to facial recognition payment: A systematic review. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 2023.
- 7. Zhang X, Zhang Z. Leaking my face via payment: unveiling the influence of technology anxiety, vulnerabilities, and privacy concerns on user resistance to facial recognition payment. Telecommunications Policy. 2024;48(3):102703.
- 8. Lee CT, Pan L-Y. Resistance of facial recognition payment service: a mixed method approach. JSM. 2022;37(3):392–407.
- 9. Shiau W-L, Liu C, Zhou M, Yuan Y. Insights into customers’ psychological mechanism in facial recognition payment in offline contactless services: integrating belief–attitude–intention and TOE–I frameworks. INTR. 2023;33(1):344–87.
- 10. Jin X, Park J, Suk JJ e o n g. Effects of motivation-hygiene factors on acceptance and resistance of mobile facial recognition payment services: Focusing on Chinese users. Knowledge Management Review. 23(2):143–68.
- 11. Liu Y, Yan W, Hu B. Resistance to facial recognition payment in China: the influence of privacy-related factors. Telecommunications Policy. 2021;45(5):102155.
- 12. Hwang et al. An integrated model of artificially intelligent (AI) facial recognition technology adoption based on perceived risk theory and extended TPB: A comparative analysis of US and South Korea. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. 2024;33(8):1071–99.
- 13. Zhong Y, Oh S, Moon HC. Service transformation under industry 4.0: Investigating acceptance of facial recognition payment through an extended technology acceptance model. Technology in Society. 2021;64:101515.
- 14. Vakhshiteh F, Nickabadi A, Ramachandra R. Adversarial attacks against face recognition: a comprehensive study. IEEE Access. 2021;9:92735–56.
- 15. Lai X, Patrick Rau P-L. Has facial recognition technology been misused? A public perception model of facial recognition scenarios. Computers in Human Behavior. 2021;124:106894.
- 16. Li C, Li H. Disentangling facial recognition payment service usage behavior: A trust perspective. Telematics and Informatics. 2023;77:101939.
- 17. Gao J, Rong Y, Tian X, Yao Y. Improving convenience or saving face? an empirical analysis of the use of facial recognition payment technology in retail. Information Systems Research. 2024;35(1):16–27.
- 18. Dang VT, Nguyen N, Nguyen HV, Nguyen H, Van Huy L, Tran VT, Nguyen TH. Consumer attitudes toward facial recognition payment: an examination of antecedents and outcomes. International Journal of Bank Marketing. 2022;40(3):511–35.
- 19. Palash MdAS, Talukder MdS, Islam AKMN, Bao Y. Positive and negative valences, personal innovativeness and intention to use facial recognition for payments. IMDS. 2022;122(4):1081–108.
- 20. Zhang WK, Kang MJ. Factors affecting the use of facial-recognition payment: an example of chinese consumers. IEEE Access. 2019;7:154360–74.
- 21. Cheng X, Qiao L, Yang B, Zhang X. Investigation on users’ resistance intention to facial recognition payment: a perspective of privacy. Electron Commer Res. 2022;24(1):275–301.
- 22. Hu B, Liu Y, Yan W. Should I scan my face? The influence of perceived value and trust on Chinese users’ intention to use facial recognition payment. Telematics and Informatics. 2023;78:101951.
- 23. Moriuchi E. An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use biometric facial recognition as a payment method. Psychology and Marketing. 2021;38(10):1741–65.
- 24. Ciftci O, Choi E-K, Berezina K. Let’s face it: Are customers ready for facial recognition technology at quick-service restaurants? International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2021;95:102941.
- 25. Charness N. A framework for choosing technology interventions to promote successful longevity: Prevent, Rehabilitate, Augment, Substitute (PRAS). Gerontology. 2020;66(2):169–75. pmid:31487742
- 26. Pirhonen J, Lolich L, Tuominen K, Jolanki O, Timonen V. “These devices have not been made for older people’s needs” – Older adults’ perceptions of digital technologies in Finland and Ireland. Technology in Society. 2020;62:101287.
- 27. Lee JC, Bi L, Liu H. User stickiness to facial recognition payment technology: insights from Sako’s trust typology, privacy concerns, and a cross-cultural context. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2024;11(1):1–15.
- 28. Lyu T, Guo Y, Chen H. Understanding people’s intention to use facial recognition services: the roles of network externality and privacy cynicism. Information Technology & People. 2024;37(3):1025–51.
- 29. Lim XJ, Cheah JH, Chang JYS, et al. Pay with a smile? Modelling the continuance use intention of facial recognition payment. Internet Research. 2024.
- 30. Mahler M, Murphy A. Risk of desirable user experiences: insights from those who create, facilitate and accept mobile payments. Electronic Commerce Research. 2024:1–22.
- 31. Yulianti AE, Ghina A. Optimizing user experience in digital payments: The case of Finpay Money. International Journal of Innovation in Engineering. 2024;4(4):1–27.
- 32. Joo F, et al. Effects of foodservice consumers’ perceptions of face recognition payment on attitude, desire, and behavioral intentions: a cross-cultural study. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing. 2024;41(3):359–76.
- 33. Hwang S, et al. Effects of motivated consumer innovativeness on facial recognition payment adoption in the restaurant industry: A cross-cultural study. International Journal of Hospitality Management. 2024;117:103646.
- 34. Kim JJ, Kim J, Joo KH. The antecedents and consequences of task–technology fit of facial recognition payment systems in the restaurant industry: cultural differences. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology. 2024;15(3):397–416.
- 35. Hornbæk K, Hertzum M. Technology acceptance and user experience: A review of the experiential component in HCI. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction. 2017;24(5):1–30.
- 36. Xia M, Zhang Y, Zhang C. A TAM-based approach to explore the effect of online experience on destination image: A smartphone user’s perspective. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management. 2018;8:259–70.
- 37. Cho Y, Park J, Park S. Technology acceptance modeling based on user experience for autonomous vehicles. Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea. 2017;36(2):87–108.
- 38. Royall DR, Palmer R, Chiodo LK, Polk MJ. Declining executive control in normal aging predicts change in functional status: the Freedom House Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52(3):346–52. pmid:14962147
- 39.
Anjusree V.K, Darsan G. Interactive email system based on blink detection, 2015 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Kochi, India, 2015. 1274–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/icacci.2015.7275788
- 40.
Huang H, Sun R, Zhou G, Zhao P. Human Computer Interaction Method for Feeding Demands of the Disabled and the Sick Based on Micro Facial Posture Capture, 2022 4th International Conference on Advances in Computer Technology, Information Science and Communications (CTISC), Suzhou, China, 2022. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ctisc54888.2022.9849777
- 41. Friemel TN. The digital divide has grown old: Determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society. 2014;18(2):313–31.
- 42. Vaportzis E, Clausen MG, Gow AJ. Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: a focus group study. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1687. pmid:29071004
- 43. Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, et al. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging. 2006;21(2):333–52. pmid:16768579
- 44. Lee C, Coughlin JF. PERSPECTIVE: Older Adults’ Adoption of Technology: An Integrated Approach to Identifying Determinants and Barriers. J of Product Innov Manag. 2014;32(5):747–59.
- 45. Knowles B, Hanson VL. Older Adults’ Deployment of ‘Distrust’. ACM Trans Comput-Hum Interact. 2018;25(4):1–25.
- 46. Gatto SL, Tak SH. Computer, Internet, and E-mail Use Among Older Adults: Benefits and Barriers. Educational Gerontology. 2008;34(9):800–11.
- 47. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science. 1989;35(8):982–1003.
- 48. Venkatesh V, Davis FD. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci. 2000;46:186–204.
- 49. Venkatesh V, Bala H. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decis Sci. 2008;39:273–315.
- 50. Chen K, Chan AHS. Gerontechnology acceptance by elderly Hong Kong Chinese: a senior technology acceptance model (STAM). Ergonomics. 2014;57(5):635–52. pmid:24655221
- 51. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems. 2003;27(3):425–78.
- 52.
Liu R, Li X, Chu J. Evolution of applied variables in the research on technology acceptance of the elderly. in international conference on human-computer interaction. Springer, Cham. 2022:500–520.
- 53.
Zaad L, Allouch SB. The influence of control on the acceptance of ambient intelligence by elderly people: an explorative study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2008, p. 58–74.
- 54. Ryu M-H, Kim S, Lee E. Understanding the factors affecting online elderly user’s participation in video UCC services. Computers in Human Behavior. 2009;25(3):619–32.
- 55.
Conci M, Pianesi F, Zancanaro M. Useful, social and enjoyable: Mobile phone adoption by older people. In IFIP conference on human-computer interaction. 2009, August, 63-76). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-03655-2_7
- 56. Pan S, Jordan-Marsh M. Internet use intention and adoption among Chinese older adults: From the expanded technology acceptance model perspective. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010;26(5):1111–9.
- 57. Tsai TH, Chang HT, Chang YM, Huang GS. Sharetouch: a system to enrich social network experiences for the elderly. J Syst Softw. 2012;85:1363–9.
- 58. Hsiao CH, Tang KY. Examining a model of mobile healthcare technology acceptance by the elderly in Taiwan. J Glob Inf Technol Manag. 2015;18:292–311.
- 59.
Xia P. Construction of intelligent health service model for elderly people in community based on the theory of information technology adoption. Zhejiang Chinese Medical University. 2017.
- 60. Luo S, et al. Analysis on demand factors of urban community intelligent elderly care service project based on TAM theory. Chin J Health Stat. 2018;35:372–9.
- 61. Macedo IM. Predicting the acceptance and use of information and communication technology by older adults: an empirical examination of the revised UTAUT2. Computers in Human Behavior. 2017;75:935–48.
- 62.
Lazaro MJS, Lim J, Kim SH, Yun MH. Wearable Technologies: Acceptance Model for Smartwatch Adoption Among Older Adults. In: Gao Q, Zhou J. editors. Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technologies, Design and User Experience. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing. 2020. p. 303–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50252-2_23
- 63. Wu J, Song S. Older adults’ online shopping continuance intentions: applying the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior. Int J Hum Comput Interact. 2020;37:938–48.
- 64.
Ojiako U, Choudrie J, Nwanekezie U, Chikelue C-O. Adoption and use of tablet devices by older adults: a quantitative study. In: Pappas IO, Mikalef P, Dwivedi YK, Jaccheri L, Krogstie J, Mäntymäki M. Editors. I3E 2019. LNCS, vol. 11701, Cham: Springer; 2019, p. 545–558.
- 65.
International Organization for Standardization. Ergonomics of human-system interaction: Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. ISO. 2010.
- 66.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241-210. 2019 Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. 2019.
- 67.
Hassenzahl M. User experience (UX) towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: Proceedings of the 20th conference on l’Interaction homme-machine, 2008. 11–5.
- 68. Verdegem P, De Marez L. Rethinking determinants of ICT acceptance: Towards an integrated and comprehensive overview. Technovation. 2011;31(8):411–23.
- 69. Hernández-Ortega B. The role of post-use trust in the acceptance of a technology: Drivers and consequences. Technovation. 2011;31(10–11):523–38.
- 70. Wu K, Zhao Y, Zhu Q, Tan X, Zheng H. A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. International Journal of Information Management. 2011;31(6):572–81.
- 71. Liao M, Agnihotri D, Zhong X. “Paying with my face” – Understanding users’ adoption and privacy concerns of facial recognition payment. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 2022;66(1):731–5.
- 72. Kim HM, Kim J (Sunny), Joo K, Hwang J. Investigating the technology acceptance model, image congruence and cultural differences in facial recognition payment adoption. APJML. 2024;37(1):20–41.
- 73. Boo HC, Chua B-L. An integrative model of facial recognition check-in technology adoption intention: the perspective of hotel guests in Singapore. IJCHM. 2022;34(11):4052–79.
- 74. Nan D, Kim Y, Huang J, Jung HS, Kim JH. Factors Affecting Intention of Consumers in Using Face Recognition Payment in Offline Markets: An Acceptance Model for Future Payment Service. Front Psychol. 2022;13:830152. pmid:35369237
- 75. Wang JS. Exploring biometric identification in FinTech applications based on the modified TAM. Financ Innov. 2021;7(1).
- 76. Türker C, Altay BC, Okumuş A. Understanding user acceptance of QR code mobile payment systems in Turkey: An extended TAM. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;184:121968.
- 77. Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science. 1989;35(8):982–1003.
- 78. Pal D, Arpnikanondt C. An Integrated TAM/ISS Model Based PLS-SEM Approach for Evaluating the Continuous Usage of Voice Enabled IoT Systems. Wireless Pers Commun. 2021;119(2):1065–92.
- 79. Song Y, Yang Y, Cheng P. The Investigation of Adoption of Voice-User Interface (VUI) in Smart Home Systems among Chinese Older Adults. Sensors (Basel). 2022;22(4):1614. pmid:35214513
- 80. Vacher M, Caffiau S, Portet F, Meillon B, Roux C, Elias E, et al. Evaluation of a context-aware voice interface for ambient assisted living: qualitative user study vs. quantitative system evaluation. ACM Trans Access Comput. 2015;7:1–36.
- 81. Brown LG. The Strategic and Tactical Implications of Convenience in Consumer Product Marketing. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 1989;6(3):13–9.
- 82.
Reis A, Paulino D, Paredes H, Barroso I, Monteiro MJ, Rodrigues V, et al. Using intelligent personal assistants to assist the elderlies An evaluation of Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Microsoft Cortana, and Apple Siri. In: 2018 2nd International Conference on Technology and Innovation in Sports, Health and Wellbeing (TISHW), 2018. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/tishw.2018.8559503
- 83. Dahlberg T, Guo J, Ondrus J. A critical review of mobile payment research. Electron Commer Res Appl. 2015;14(5):265–84.
- 84. van der H. User Acceptance of Hedonic Information Systems. MIS Quarterly. 2004;28(4):695.
- 85. Thong JY, Hong SJ, Tam KY. The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2006;64(9):799–810.
- 86. Brown SA, Venkatesh V. A model of adoption of technology in the household: a baseline model test and extension incorporating household life cycle. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 2005;29(3):11.
- 87. Kim J, Forsythe S. Sensory enabling technology acceptance model (SE‐TAM): A multiple‐group structural model comparison. Psychology and Marketing. 2008;25(9):901–22.
- 88. Hsu C-L, Lin JC-C. Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management. 2008;45(1):65–74.
- 89. Lee HH, Fiore AM, Kim J. The role of the technology acceptance model in explaining effects of image interactivity technology on consumer responses. Int J Retail Distrib Manag. 2006;34(8):621–44.
- 90. Çelik H. Influence of social norms, perceived playfulness and online shopping anxiety on customers’ adoption of online retail shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 2011;39(6):390–413.
- 91. Nysveen H. Intentions to Use Mobile Services: Antecedents and Cross-Service Comparisons. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2005;33(3):330–46.
- 92. Hackbarth G, Grover V, Mun YY. Computer playfulness and anxiety: positive and negative mediators of the system experience effect on perceived ease of use, Inf. Manag. 2003;40(3):221–32, - X.
- 93. Childers TL, Carr CL, Peck J, Carson S. Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing. 2001;77(4):511–35.
- 94. Telpo, Telpo&Alipay&Burger. King Jointly Create Smart Self-Service Kiosks, 2019. https://www.telpo.com.cn/blog/telpo-alipay-burger-king-create-smart-self-service-kiosks.html
- 95. Agarwal R, Prasad J. A Conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research. 1998;9(2):204–15.
- 96.
Rogers EM, Singhal A, Quinlan MM. Diffusion of innovations. An integrated approach to communication theory and research. Routledge. 2014. p. 432–48.
- 97.
Ciftci O, Berezina K, Kang M. Effect of Personal Innovativeness on Technology Adoption in Hospitality and Tourism: Meta-analysis. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2021. Springer International Publishing. 2021. p. 162–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65785-7_14
- 98. Palash MAS, Talukder MS, Islam AKMN. Positive and negative valences, personal innovativeness and intention to use facial recognition for payments. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2022;122(4):1081–108.
- 99. Morosan C. Customers’ adoption of biometric systems in restaurants: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. 2011;20(6):661–90.
- 100. Kim J, Forsythe S. Factors affecting adoption of product virtualization technology for online consumer electronics shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 2010;38(3):190–204.
- 101. Agarwal R, Karahanna E. Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly. 2000;24(4):665.
- 102. Hirschman EC. Innovativeness, Novelty Seeking, and Consumer Creativity. J Consum Res. 1980;7(3):283.
- 103. Domina T, Lee S-E, MacGillivray M. Understanding factors affecting consumer intention to shop in a virtual world. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. 2012;19(6):613–20.
- 104. Ha Y, Im H. Determinants of mobile coupon service adoption: assessment of gender difference. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management. 2014;42(5):441–59.
- 105.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan. 1997.
- 106. Holden H, Rada R. Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. J Res Technol Educ. 2011;43(4):343–67.
- 107. Scott JE, Walczak S. Cognitive engagement with a multimedia ERP training tool: assessing computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance. Inf Manag. 2009;46(4):221–32.
- 108. Lagana L. Enhancing the attitudes and self-efficacy of older adults toward computers and the internet: results of a pilot study. Educ Gerontol. 2008;34(9):831. pmid:20148185
- 109. Mitzner TL, Rogers WA, Fisk AD, Boot WR, Charness N, Czaja SJ, et al. Predicting older adults’ perceptions about a computer system designed for seniors. Univers Access Inf Soc. 2016;15(2):271–80. pmid:31186624
- 110. Lam JCY, Lee MKO. Digital inclusiveness—longitudinal study of Internet adoption by older adults. J Manag Inf Syst. 2006;22(4):177–206.
- 111. Erickson J, Johnson GM. Internet use and psychological wellness during late adulthood. Can J Aging. 2011;30(2):197–209. pmid:24650669
- 112. Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 1995:189–211.
- 113. Isman A, Celikli GE. How does student ability and self-efficacy affect the usage of computer technology?. Online Submission. 2009;8(1).
- 114. Kinzie MB, Delcourt MA, Powers SM. Computer technologies: attitudes and self-efficacy across undergraduate disciplines. Research in Higher Education. 1994;35(6):745–68.
- 115. Lai ML. Technology readiness, internet self-efficacy and computing experience of professional accounting students. Campus-Wide Information Systems. 2008.
- 116. Torkzadeh G, Van Dyke TP. Development and validation of an Internet self-efficacy scale. Behav Inf Technol. 2001;20(4):275–80.
- 117. Abulibdeh ES, Hassan SSS. E-learning interactions, information technology self efficacy and student achievement at the University of Sharjah, UAE. Australas J Educ Technol. 2011;27(6).
- 118. Tilton J, Hartnett M. What are the influences on teacher mobile technology self-efficacy in secondary school classrooms?. J Open, Flex Dist Learn. 2016;20(2):79–93.
- 119. Yang SH. Exploring college students’ attitudes and self-efficacy of mobile learning. Turk Online J Educ Technol. 2012;11(4):148–54.
- 120.
Latikka R, Turja T, Oksanen A. Self-Efficacy and Acceptance of Robots; 2019.
- 121. Turja T, Rantanen T, Oksanen A. Robot use self-efficacy in healthcare work (RUSH): development and validation of a new measure. AI & Soc. 2019;34(1):137–43.
- 122. Barling J, Beattie R. Self-efficacy beliefs and sales performance. J Organ Behav Manag. 1983;5(1):41–51.
- 123. Jokisch MR, Schmidt LI, Doh M, Marquard M, Wahl HW. The role of internet self-efficacy, innovativeness and technology avoidance in breadth of internet use: comparing older technology experts and non-experts. Comput Hum Behav. 2020;111:106408.
- 124. Kumar JA, Bervell B, Annamalai N, Osman S. Behavioral intention to use mobile learning: evaluating the role of self-efficacy, subjective norm, and WhatsApp use habit. IEEE Access. 2020;8:208058–74.
- 125. Mitzner TL, Savla J, Boot WR, Sharit J, Charness N, Czaja SJ, et al. Technology Adoption by Older Adults: Findings From the PRISM Trial. Gerontologist. 2019;59(1):34–44. pmid:30265294
- 126. Ratten V. Cloud computing: a social cognitive perspective of ethics, entrepreneurship, technology marketing, computer self-efficacy and outcome expectancy on behavioural intentions. AMJ. 2013;21(3):137–46.
- 127. Conrad AM, Munro D. Relationships between computer self-efficacy, technology, attitudes and anxiety: development of the computer technology use scale (CTUS). J Educ Comput Res. 2008;39(1):51–73.
- 128. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly. 2003;27(3):425.
- 129. Taylor S, Todd PA. Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf Syst Res. 1995;6(2):144–76.
- 130. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003;27(3):425–78.
- 131. Ambarwati R, Harja YD, Thamrin S. The role of facilitating conditions and user habits: a case of Indonesian online learning platform. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business. 2020;7(10):481–9.
- 132. Ngai EWT, Poon JKL, Chan YHC. Empirical examination of the adoption of WebCT using TAM. Computers & Education. 2007;48(2):250–67.
- 133. Igbaria M. End-user computing effectiveness: A structural equation model. Omega. 1990;18(6):637–52.
- 134. Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X. Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly. 2012;36(1):157.
- 135.
Spielberger CD. State-trait anxiety inventory for adults. Palo Alto, CA: Mind Garden. 1983.
- 136. Pillai R, Sivathanu B. Adoption of AI-based chatbots for hospitality and tourism. IJCHM. 2020;32(10):3199–226.
- 137. Sam HK, Othman AEA, Nordin ZS. Computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and attitudes toward the internet: A study among undergraduates in Unimas. Journal of Educational Technology & Society. 2005;8(4):205–19.
- 138. Cazan A-M, Cocorada E, Maican CI. Computer anxiety and attitudes towards the computer and the internet with Romanian high-school and university students. Comput Hum Behav. 2016;55:258–67.
- 139. Ekizoglu N, Ozcinar Z. The relationship between the teacher candidates’ computer and internet based anxiety and perceived self-efficacy. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2010;2(2):5881–90.
- 140. Meuter ML, Ostrom AL, Bitner MJ, Roundtree R. The influence of technology anxiety on consumer use and experiences with self-service technologies. J Bus Res. 2003;56(11):899–906.
- 141. McFarland DJ, Hamilton D. Adding contextual specificity to the technology acceptance model. Comput Hum Behav. 2006;22(3):427–47.
- 142. Lu HP, Su PYJ. Factors Affecting Purchase Intention on Mobile Shopping Web Sites. Internet Research. 2009.
- 143. Celik V, Yesilyurt E. Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Comput Educ. 2013;60:148–58.
- 144. Patil P, Tamilmani K, Rana NP, Raghavan V. Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: extending Meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal. Int J Inf Manag. 2020;54:102144.
- 145. Compeau DR, Higgins CA. Computer self-efficacy: development of a measure and initial test. MIS Q. 1995;:189–211.
- 146. Meng F, Guo X, Peng Z, Ye Q, Lai K-H. Trust and elderly users’ continuance intention regarding mobile health services: the contingent role of health and technology anxieties. ITP. 2021;35(1):259–80.
- 147. Dinev T, Hart P. Internet Privacy Concerns and Social Awareness as Determinants of Intention to Transact. International Journal of Electronic Commerce. 2005;10(2):7–29.
- 148. Xu H, Dinev T, Smith J, Hart P. Information Privacy Concerns: Linking Individual Perceptions with Institutional Privacy Assurances. JAIS. 2011;12(12):798–824.
- 149. Hong W, Thong JYL. Internet privacy concerns: An integrated conceptualization and four empirical studies. MIS Quarterly. 2013;37(1):275–98.
- 150. Wilkinson S. Artificial intelligence, facial recognition technology and data privacy. J Data Prot Priv. 2020;3(2):186–98.
- 151. Yang Y, Liu Y, Li H, Yu B. Understanding perceived risks in mobile payment acceptance. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2015;115(2):253–69.
- 152. Liu Y, Yan W, Hu B. Resistance to facial recognition payment in China: The influence of privacy-related factors. Telecommunications Policy. 2021;45(5):102155.
- 153. Hu B o, Liu Y u- l i, Yan W e n j i a. Should I scan my face? The influence of perceived value and trust on Chinese users’ intention to use facial recognition payment. Telematics and Informatics. 2023;78:101951.
- 154.
Financial News of China, Pay by your face, are you ready?. 2019. Available from: https://www.financialnews.com.cn/shanghai/201912/t20191216_173497.html
- 155. Cyberspace Administration of China. Experiencing “facial recognition” payment in physical stores, expected to be used commercially in large-scale this year. 2019. Available from: http://www.cac.gov.cn/2019-02/24/c_1124154210.htm
- 156. Galton F. Personal identification and description. J Anthropol Inst G B Ireland. 1889;:177–91.
- 157. Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, Bate P, Kyriakidou O. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Q. 2004;82(4):581–629. pmid:15595944
- 158. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. Recent developments in structural equation modeling. J Market Res. 1982;19(4):404–16.
- 159. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(3):411.
- 160.
Brown TA. Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. 2 ed. Guilford Publications. 2015.
- 161. Hu L t., Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to under parameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods. 1998;3(4):424.
- 162. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y. Specification, evaluation, and interpretation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci. 2012;40(1):8–34.
- 163.
Pallant J. SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis. 5 ed. New York: Open University Press. 2013.
- 164. Bagozzi RP, Yi YJ. On the use of structural equation models in experimental-designs. J Market Res. 1989;26(3):271–84.
- 165. Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res. 1981;18(1):39–50.
- 166.
Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate Data Analysis: Pearson New International Edition. 7 ed. Pearson Education, Limited. 2014.
- 167. Pejić Bach M, et al. Internet usage among senior citizens: self-efficacy and social influence are more important than social support. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research. 2023;18(3):1463–83.
- 168. Chu RJ u- c h u n. How family support and Internet self-efficacy influence the effects of e-learning among higher aged adults–analyses of gender and age differences. Computers & Education. 2010;55(1):255–64.
- 169. Liu AI, et al. How technology paradoxes and self-efficacy affect the resistance of facial recognition technology in online microfinance platforms: Evidence from China. Technology in Society. 2022;70:102041.
- 170. Moriuchi E. An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use biometric facial recognition as a payment method. Psychol Market. 2021;38(10):1741–65.
- 171.
Li C, Li H, Wang P. Facial payment use in China: an integrated view of privacy concerns and perceived benefits, in: Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 2020 Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), 2020.
- 172. Rahman MS, Ko M, Warren J, Carpenter D. Healthcare Technology Self-Efficacy (HTSE) and its influence on individual attitude: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2016;58:12–24.
- 173.
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 1986.
- 174. Liu M, Wang C, Hu J. Older adults’ intention to use voice assistants: Usability and emotional needs. Heliyon. 2023;9(11):e21932. pmid:38027966
- 175. Chen W, Wang M. Regulating the use of facial recognition technology across borders: A comparative case analysis of the European Union, the United States, and China. Telecommunications Policy. 2023;47(2):102482.
- 176. Zhou C, Qian Y, Huang T, Kaner J, Zhang Y. The impact of different age-friendly smart home interface styles on the interaction behavior of elderly users. Front Psychol. 2022;13:935202. pmid:36248527
- 177. Lam JCY, Lee MKO. Digital inclusiveness--longitudinal study of Internet adoption by older adults. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2006;22(4):177–206.