Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Whole genome sequence of multidrug-resistant Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Enterococcus faecalis isolates from public gymnasium equipment reveals evolving infection potential and resistance

  • Goutam Banerjee,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America

  • Pratik Banerjee

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    pratik@illinois.edu

    Affiliation Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America

Abstract

Whole genome sequences (WGSs) of Enterococcus faecalis S3 and Staphylococcus haemolyticus S5, isolated from gymnasium equipment in Tennessee, USA, were analyzed. The genome sizes of E. faecalis S3 and S. haemolyticus S5 were approximately 3.0 Mb and 2.5 Mb, respectively. Both isolates were found to harbor genes conferring resistance to multiple antibiotics, including tetracycline, fluoroquinolone, and macrolide. Gene cluster analysis revealed a cyclic lactone inducer cluster in both strains, which is critical for quorum sensing-mediated pathogenicity. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) identified E. faecalis S3 as ST40 and S. haemolyticus S5 as ST52. Notably, evolutionary analysis of gene contraction and expansion in these isolates revealed an expansion of genes associated with horizontal gene transfer. This expansion likely represents an evolutionary strategy to facilitate the spread of antibiotic resistance genes to other isolates. These findings offer valuable insights into the genomic apparatus responsible for antibiotic resistance and potential transmission mechanisms in human-associated environments.

Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in human pathogens poses a significant global threat to human health. In 2019, bacterial AMR was directly linked to approximately 1.27 million deaths, with an estimated 4.95 million deaths attributed to AMR-related causes annually [1]. The persistence of AMR bacteria in the animal gut and different human-associated environments like soil, water, air, and environmental surfaces constitute a significant concern in the One Health program, which connects different sectors to provide better solutions for human, animal, and environmental health [2]. In this direction, Several international organizations, including the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), have collaborated to develop the WHO Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance [3]. One of the challenges in managing infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria is their inherent resistance to many antibiotics. Therefore, healthcare professionals face difficulties selecting effective antimicrobial therapies against illnesses associated with these bacteria. Among several MDR bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria such as Enterococcus faecalis [4] and Staphylococcus haemolyticus [5] are of particular concern in healthcare settings.

Coagulase-negative S. haemolyticus is prevalent in various natural environments, with a notable presence on human skin [6]. This bacterium poses a significant challenge in clinical settings owing to its high antibiotic resistance [7]. S. haemolyticus infections are commonly associated with sepsis in neonates, particularly in low-income countries [8]. Additionally, its ability to form biofilms on clinical instruments, especially catheters, contributes to a wide range of clinical manifestations, including prosthetic joint infections and bacteremia [7]. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), infections caused by drug-resistant Staphylococcus (mainly S. aureus, S. epidermis, and S. haemolyticus) bacteria result in approximately 323,700 cases annually in the USA, leading to 10,600 deaths [9].

Similarly, E. faecalis is commonly found in various environments, including soil, plants, water, animals, and the human gut [10,11]. In clinical settings, E. faecalis is recognized as a significant pathogen capable of causing a range of serious infections, including those in the urinary tract, bloodstream, surgical site, meningitis, and sepsis, which can pose substantial risks to human health [12,13]. According to data provided by the CDC, drug-resistant Enterococcus infections contribute to a considerable burden of disease in the United States, with an estimated 54,500 cases resulting in approximately 5,400 deaths annually [9].

The drug-resistant properties observed in different strains of S. haemolyticus and E. faecalis isolated from animal sources and hospital environments have been well-documented [11,14]. Collecting samples from diverse environmental settings such as water, soil, animal farms, indoor air, public restrooms, community activity centers, and fitness centers is gaining special attention within the One Health framework for antimicrobial surveillance [15]. The One Health approach integrates multidisciplinary efforts from environmental scientists, microbiologists, epidemiologists, and public health professionals to monitor and address the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, their persistence in the environment, and their evolutionary adaptation [16]. Therefore, pathogen genomes obtained from systematic environmental sampling is essential to enrich the global database and support effective health management strategies.

The primary aim of this study is to perform a comprehensive genomic characterization of two multidrug-resistant bacterial strains, S. haemolyticus S5 and E. faecalis S3, isolated from skin-contact surfaces of exercise equipment in a public fitness center. By analyzing their antibiotic resistance genes, virulence factors, and gene clusters, we seek to enhance understanding of the potential health risks posed by these bacteria in communal environments. Additionally, this study aims to contribute valuable genomic data to support surveillance efforts and inform public health strategies within the One Health framework.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

The bacterial isolates used in this study were collected as part of an environmental investigation, as described previously [17,18]. In brief, a total of 32 surface swab samples were collected (October 2013) from four fitness centers located in the Memphis metropolitan area, Tennessee, using cotton-tipped swabs (Sanicult™; Thermo Remel/Starplex Scientific Inc., Etobicoke, ON, Canada). Trained volunteers swabbed skin-contact surfaces of exercise equipment like Nautilus machines, power striders, stationary bikes, treadmills, elliptical machines, leg presses, dumbbells, stair handrails, and toilet handles. Swabs were immediately placed into tubes containing sterile diluent solution and transported in a refrigerated container to the laboratory for further analysis. Pure cultures of bacteria were isolated by repeated streaking on tryptic soy agar (TSA) medium.

Bacterial culture and DNA extraction

Bacteria were cultured in tryptic soy broth (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) for 18 h at 37 °C, followed by DNA extraction using an Omega BIO-TEK bacterial DNA extraction kit (USA, Cat. No. D3350-02). The quality and quantity of the extracted DNA were assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA) and 0.8% agarose gel, respectively.

Library preparation, sequencing, and read quality assessment

The shotgun genomic library was prepared using an Illumina DNA preparation kit (Illumina cat no 20060060). The libraries were pooled and quantified in qPCR, followed by sequencing on a NovaSeq 6000 platform using V1.5 sequencing kit in paired-end mode (2 × 150 bp configuration). Fastq files, generated from the sequencing platform were used for downstream analysis. We used FastQC v0.11.9 to assess raw reads quality and fastp v0.23.4 [19] with parameters -f 14, -t 10, -F 14, -T 10, -q 25 for trimming.

Genome assembly construction and de novo assembly statistics

We used a k-mer based de novo approach to assemble the genome fragments with SPAdes v3.15.5 [20] utilizing de Bruijn graph algorithms and the “--careful” option to generate longer contigs from short read data (2 × 150 bp). Assembly statistics were computed using QUAST v5.2.0 [21] with default parameters.

Genome integrity evaluation and annotation prediction

The genome annotation was performed byProkka v1.14.6 [22] with specific settings: --kingdom bacteria, --addgenes, --evalue 1e-9, --rfam, -gcode 11, and –force. Following annotation, the completeness and contamination of the generated genomes were assessed using CheckM v1.2.2 [23].

WGS-based prediction of putative antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs)

Putative antibiotic resistance genes in the two bacterial genomes were assayed in the RGI main server (https://card.mcmaster.ca/analyze/rgi) using the CARD (Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database) database v3.2.1 [24] considering perfect (100% identity) and strict (>95% identity) parameters.

WGS-based prediction of associated virulence factors

The genes associated with virulence determinants were predicted in abricate v1.0.1 (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) using VFDB database [25]. We used the contig file generated from the assembled construction with 70% identity and 80% coverage parameters.

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) using WGS data

The sequence types (ST) of the two isolates were identified through multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis based on sequence variations in specific housekeeping genes. For this purpose, we used the mlst package v2.23.0, which facilitates MLST analysis, and accessed typing schemes from the PubMLST database [26].

WGS-based phylogenetic tree construction

The phylogenetic relationship between the genomes of our isolates and other similar sequence type clones (E. faecalis ST40 and S. haemolyticus ST52) available in the NCBI Genome Database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/) was analyzed using an online tool named REALPHY (https://realphy.unibas.ch/realphy/), which integrates Bowtie2 for mapping-based alignment and PhyML for inferring phylogenetic trees. For this purpose, five genomes of E. faecalis ST40 and five genomes of S. haemolyticus ST52 were downloaded to construct phylogenetic trees, allowing a comparative assessment of genetic relatedness. Detailed information about these isolates, including accession numbers and metadata, is provided in S1 Table. This analysis helped contextualize the genomic characteristics of our isolates within the broader phylogenetic landscape of these sequence types.

Comparative proteomics and gene family expansion/contraction analysis

To elucidate the evolutionary relationships between S. haemolyticus S5, E. faecalis S3, and other closely related strains within their respective species, we utilized the OrthoFinder algorithm as implemented in the OrthoVenn 3 package [27]. This analysis was conducted with an e-value threshold of 1e − 5 and an inflation value set to 1.5, enabling accurate identification and clustering of orthologous gene families. To further explore the evolutionary dynamics, we performed gene family expansion and contraction analysis using CAFÉ v5.0 [28]. This program employs a birth-and-death process model to estimate rates of gene gain and loss across a given phylogenetic tree. By analyzing the distribution of family sizes under this model, we assessed the significance of observed differences in gene family sizes among taxa, providing valuable insights into the adaptive evolution of these strains.

Gene cluster prediction

To identify potential gene clusters within the genomes of S. haemolyticus S5 and E. faecalis S3, we utilized the bacterial version of the antiSMASH v6.0 tool [29]. This powerful bioinformatics tool specializes in the prediction of secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters. The nucleotide sequences and corresponding GenBank files generated during the genome annotation process were used as inputs. Gene cluster prediction was performed using the ‘strict’ detection parameter to ensure high-confidence results. This approach allowed for the identification of genomic regions potentially involved in the production of bioactive compounds, providing further insights into the functional and adaptive capabilities of these isolates.

Results and discussion

Raw sequence read, quality check, and trimming

The sequencing platform generated 1,063,199 and 901,900 paired-end reads for E. faecalis S3 and S. haemolyticus S5, respectively (S2 Table). The initial quality assessment revealed Q30 bases of 87.86% and 86.96% for E. faecalis S3 and S. haemolyticus S5, respectively, prior to filtering. Subsequently, theraw reads were trimmed to improve read quality for downstream analysis, resulting in increased Q30 bases to 88.28% for E. faecalis S3 and 87.29% for S. haemolyticus S5 (S2 Table). The high percentage of Q30 bases indicates the overall good quality of the sequencing data.

Genome assembly from fragmented DNA sequence and annotation

The trimmed reads were used for genome assembly, resulting in 39 contigs for E. faecalis S3, with the largest contig spanning 590,494 bp and an N50 value of 183,877 bp. For S. haemolyticus S5, the assembly produced 58 contigs, with the largest contig measuring 249,943 bp and an N50 value of 93,523 bp. Assembling complete genomes from fragmented data is challenging and critical in whole-genome sequence (WGS) analysis. Various assemblers are available, but we opted for the k-mer based de novo assembler SPAdes [30] based on the standard recommendations [31], followed by annotation using Prokka. Annotation revealed GC contents of 37.41% for E. faecalis S3 and 32.77% for S. haemolyticus S5. E. faecalis S3 had 2826 CDS, 5 rRNA, 78 misc_RNA, and 52 tRNA genes, while S. haemolyticus S5 had 2385 CDS, 12 rRNA, 78 misc_RNA, and 64 tRNA genes. Completeness and contamination assessments showed high completeness scores of 99.63% for E. faecalis S3 and 99.62% for S. haemolyticus S5, with no detectable contamination, indicating that the genomes are nearly complete and suitable for further genomic analysis.

WGS-based antimicrobial resistance gene prediction

The putative antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes were predicted and are presented in Table 1. E. faecalis S3 harbored multiple AMR genes, including dfr(E), tet(M), efrA, efrB, IsaA, IreK, and emeA, conferring resistance to various antibiotic classes such as diaminopyrimidine, tetracycline, macrolide, streptogramin, and pleuromutilin (Table 1). Additionally, the emeA gene in E. faecalis encodes an efflux pump that expels biocides and ammonium-containing compounds commonly used in disinfectants [32]. A previous study reported a high prevalence of emeA gene (42.8%) among clinical isolates of E. faecalis [32]. The presence of the emeA gene in E. faecalis S3 is prevalent, and therefore, cleaning surfaces with ammonium-based disinfectants alone may not effectively eliminate this pathogen. However, phenotypic resistance was not assessed in this study. Previous studies have also identified several AMR genes, such as lsa(A), RlmA(II), LiaR, LiaS, dfr(E), and tet(M), in E. faecalis isolated from diseased fish [22] and resistance to chloramphenicol, linezolid, and teicoplanin in dental plaque isolates [33]. In contrast, S. haemolyticus S5 exhibited resistance to macrolide (mphC), aminoglycoside (ANT(4’)-Ia), tetracycline (tetK), and fluoroquinolone (qacA) antibiotics (Table 1). A study of 365 S. haemolyticus isolates found 91.3% and 85.4% resistance to cefoxitin and erythromycin, respectively, and 57.3%, 52.8%, and 3.7% resistance to co-trimoxazole, clindamycin, and linezolid, respectively [34]. The presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria on environmental surfaces, such as those found in healthcare facilities [35], public restrooms [36], supermarket shopping carts [37], and fitness facilities [38], is a growing concern for community health. Surveillance of these environments is a key component of the One Health approach. This approach recognizes that human health is closely linked to the surrounding environment, making regular surveillance essential for effective public health management [39]. Through source tracking, monitoring, prevention strategies, and intervention policies, the One Health framework aims to control the spread of MDR bacteria and protect community health. In April 2019, the Interagency Coordination Group on Antimicrobial Resistance, comprising the WHO, OIE, and FAO, presented a report titled “We Can’t Wait: Securing the Future Against Drug-Resistant Infections” to the UN Secretary-General. To combat this situation, all agencies agreed to raise awareness of the AMR problem among general people, healthcare professionals, and policymakers to control the spread of antibiotic use and AMR bacteria [40].

thumbnail
Table 1. Putative antibiotic resistance genes present in E. faecalis S3 and S. haemolyticus S5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324894.t001

Public gymnasium centers are high-contact environments where individuals frequently share fitness equipment and floor surface, often under conditions of limited or inconsistent disinfection. The combination of perspiration-induced warmth and moisture, along with frequent skin-to-skin contact, creates an optimal environment for bacterial persistence and transmission [41]. The detection of MDR bacteria in such settings is critical for understanding potential non-clinical transmission routes and for guiding effective public health interventions.

WGS-based virulence factor prediction

The prediction of virulence factors is crucial for assessing the pathogenic potential of a pathogen. In our analysis, E. faecalis S3 harbored 19 virulence genes (identity 92–99%, coverage 86–100%), including biofilm-associated pilus genes (EbpA, EbpB, EbpC), gelatinase (gelE), and serine protease (sprE), known for enhancing pathogenicity (Table 2). Previous studies have highlighted the importance of the ebpABC-bps gene cluster in attachment, a critical step in biofilm formation initiation [42]. Furthermore, gelatinase and serine protease encoded by gelE and sprE are also reported as major virulence factors in E. faecalis [43]. In comparison, S. haemolyticus S5 showed only two virulence genes, ClpP and ClpC, with ClpP known for enhancing infectivity in Staphylococcus species [44]. Thus, the presence of virulence genes alongside antibiotic resistance properties suggests that these isolates may pose a higher risk of pathogenicity.

thumbnail
Table 2. Predicted virulence factors in E. faecalis S3 and S. haemolyticus S5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324894.t002

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of the isolated strains using WGS

S. haemolyticus S5 was identified as ST52 based on allelic variations in arcC(2), SH_1200(1), hemH(6), leuB(1), SH1431(2), cfxE(1), and Ribose_ABC(4). The prevalence of sequence type (ST) 52 is relatively uncommon in nature. However, a previous study reported the emergence of ST52 strains of S. haemolyticus isolated from hospitals and hospital-associated environments in China [14]. Interestingly, all these isolates exhibited resistance to a broad spectrum of antibiotics. In contrast, E. faecalis S3 was assigned ST40 based on allelic variations in gdh(3), gyd(6), pstS(23), gki(12), aroE(9), xpt(10), and yqiL(7). ST40 is a major clone reported across diverse habitats, including humans, animals, and environmental sources [45] and is associated with infections [46]. MLST is a standardized, sequence-based method that characterizes bacterial strains by analyzing the allelic profiles of several housekeeping genes [47]. This makes it a valuable tool for epidemiological tracking, antimicrobial resistance monitoring, and understanding the population structure and evolutionary history of pathogens [48]. A comparative genomics analysis revealed that the distribution of virulence-associated genes was not significantly different between E. faecalis ST40 strains isolated from animal and human sources, nor between those from commensal and clinical backgrounds [45]. In contrast, S. haemolyticus ST52 is an uncommon strain type and has primarily been reported from home environments [49]. Its detection in a public gymnasium setting may indicate potential environmental dissemination and warrants further investigation into its reservoirs, transmission pathways, and public health implications. Furthermore, pathogenic strains with an MLST designation can be compared with the same ST isolates in the global database to understand genome-relatedness and antibiotic resistance patterns. Thus, MLST can guide antibiotic selection against AMR bacteria, though correlations between MLST and resistance can vary by species, as seen in recent studies with Staphylococcus epidermidis [50].

WGS-based phylogenetic tree construction of the sequenced strains

A whole-genome sequencing (WGS)-based phylogenetic tree was constructed using five strains of S. haemolyticus ST52 and five strains of E. faecalis ST40 (S1 Table). The analysis revealed that S. haemolyticus S5 exhibited a close genetic relationship with S. haemolyticus C86FS1, a strain isolated from hospital-associated feces in China (Fig. 1A). Notably, like S. haemolyticus S5, the S. haemolyticus C86FS1 strain was resistant to multiple antibiotics, including ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and linezolid [14]. Similarly, E. faecalis S3 showed a close relationship with E. faecalis 1MPA3, a strain isolated from a hospital-associated environment in South Africa (Fig. 1B). This genetic proximity highlights the global dissemination of specific antibiotic-resistant clones in healthcare-associated environments.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Core genome-based phylogenetic tree of the selected strains.

(A) and (B) indicate the phylogenetic relationship between S. haemolyticus S5 and E. faecalis S3 with other strains isolated from different surfaces. Macrococcoides caseolyticum FDAARGOS 868 and Vagococcus intermedius STAA11 were taken as outgroups for the construction of a phylogenetic tree for S. haemolyticus S5 and E. faecalis S3, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324894.g001

Protein ortholog and gene family expansion and contraction

We compared protein orthologs between S.haemolyticus S5 and five other strains belonging to the ST52 clone (S1 Table). The analysis identified 2,359 proteins in 2,302 clusters and 49 singletons in S. haemolyticus S5 (Fig 2A). Among these, 2,153 clusters were shared with other strains, while S. haemolyticus S5 exhibited one unique cluster (Fig 2B). Gene family expansion and contraction analysis revealed that S. haemolyticus S5 had one expanded gene family (GO:0032196), while 29 gene families, primarily associated with metabolic processes (S3 Table), were contracted in this strain (Fig 2C). The expanded gene family encodes a protein, the putative transposon Tn552 DNA-invertase Bin3, which is a type of mobile genetic element. This protein plays a critical role in the horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes, contributing to the dissemination of resistance within microbial communities [51]. The expansion of this gene family in S. haemolyticus S5 underscores a potential emerging threat, as it enhances the strain’s ability to spread antibiotic resistance within the community.

thumbnail
Fig 2. The protein cluster and protein ortholog comparison.

(A) An overview of the protein clusters and singletons in E. faecalis S3 and other closely related strains, (B) The distribution of shared and unique protein clusters among different strains of E. faecalis, (C) The expansion and contraction of gene families in E. faecalis S3 in comparison with other strains. (D) The protein clusters in S. haemolyticus S5 and its closely related strains, (E) The number of shared and unique protein clusters in S. haemolyticus S3 in comparison to other strains. (F) The evolutionary tree indicates the number of gene family expansions and contractions in S. haemolyticus S5 over the evolutionary period.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324894.g002

The protein orthology analysis among E. faecalis strains (S1 Table) revealed that E. faecalis S3 possesses 2,807 proteins organized into 2,757 clusters and 42 singletons (Fig 2D). Comparative orthology indicated that E. faecalis S3 contains a unique cluster not found in the other strains (Fig 2E). Evolutionary analysis of E. faecalis S3 identified 77 contracted gene families, but no gene family expansions were observed (Fig 2F). These contracted gene families are associated with diverse biological functions, including metabolic processes, carbohydrate transport, responses to stimuli, and other critical pathways (S4 Table). The lack of gene family expansion in E. faecalis S3, coupled with significant contractions in key functional categories, may influence its adaptability and pathogenic potential in specific environments. These findings provide valuable insights into the evolutionary dynamics of E. faecalis S3 and its unique functional attributes.

WGS-based gene cluster prediction

The gene cluster prediction analysis is depicted in Fig. 3. It reveals the presence of a cyclic lactone autoinducer gene cluster in E. faecalis S3, consisting of a biosynthetic gene (agrA), a regulatory gene (hypothetical protein), and a transporter gene (stp) (Fig. 3A). However, a protein BLAST search unveiled that the regulatory hypothetical protein is encoded by a transcriptional family gene lysR, exhibiting 100% similarity with E. faecalis strain ADL-337. The agr system, involving agrB, regulates quorum-sensing responses and virulence in E. faecalis and other Gram-positive pathogens [52]. In S. haemolyticus S5, two gene clusters were identified: cyclic lactone autoinducer and NI-Siderophores (Fig 3B). The lactone-containing autoinducer peptide activates the agr system, a global regulator in Staphylococci that influences virulence-associated protein production [53]. The NI-Siderophores cluster includes SnbF, which is involved in siderophore production, which is crucial for iron acquisition and enhances virulence in Staphylococcus [54]. These gene clusters highlight the pathogenic potential of E. faecalis S3 and S. haemolyticus S5, underscoring their ability to regulate virulence and adapt to host environments.

thumbnail
Fig 3. The predicted gene cluster in both E. faecalis S3 and S. haemolyticus S5.

(A) The cyclic lactone autoinducer gene cluster in E. faecalis S3. The core biosynthetic gene agrB encodes regulator protein B, (B) and (C) represent cyclic lactone autoinducer and NI-siderophore gene clusters predicted in S. haemolyticus S5, respectively. Both gene clusters are involved in pathogenicity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324894.g003

Conclusions

The presence of MDR bacteria in public spaces [5557] is a serious health concern. This study focused on the persistence of two multidrug-resistant bacterial isolates, E. faecalis S3 and S. haemolyticus S5, collected from public gymnasium equipment. From a One Health perspective, the availability of MDR bacterial genomes can enhance surveillance and health management efforts. Using advanced genome assembly methods, we obtained near-complete sequences (>99.5% completeness), providing detailed insights into the genetic makeup of these pathogens. Both isolates carried multiple antibiotic resistance genes, indicating their potential to resist commonly used antimicrobials; however, phenotypic antibiotic resistance was not assessed. Additionally, several virulence factors were identified, including biofilm-associated genes in E. faecalis S3, suggesting enhanced persistence in public environments. These findings highlight the potential health risks posed by MDR bacteria in communal spaces. Although this study is limited by reliance on genome-based bioinformatics analysis without phenotypic antibiotic resistance data, we recommend using hand sanitizer after using public gymnasium equipment to minimize the contamination risk.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Reference strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus haemolyticus downloaded from NCBI Genome Database.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324894.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Reads statistics before and after processing.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324894.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. The contracted gene family associated GO and their function in S. haemolyticus S5.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324894.s003

(DOCX)

S4 Table. The contracted gene family associated GO and their function in E. faecalis S3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0324894.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Alvaro G. Hernandez and the DNA Services Core team at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign for DNA sequencing.

References

  1. 1. Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet. 2022;399(10325):629–55.
  2. 2. WHO. Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. World Health Organization; 2014.
  3. 3. WHO. Monitoring and evaluation of the global action plan on antimicrobial resistance: framework and recommended indicators. 2019.
  4. 4. Farsi S, Salama I, Escalante-Alderete E, Cervantes J. Multidrug-Resistant Enterococcal Infection in Surgical Patients, What Surgeons Need to Know. Microorganisms. 2023;11(2):238. pmid:36838203
  5. 5. Barros EM, Ceotto H, Bastos MCF, Dos Santos KRN, Giambiagi-Demarval M. Staphylococcus haemolyticus as an important hospital pathogen and carrier of methicillin resistance genes. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(1):166–8. pmid:21976766
  6. 6. de Silva GDI, Kantzanou M, Justice A, Massey RC, Wilkinson AR, Day NPJ, et al. The ica operon and biofilm production in coagulase-negative Staphylococci associated with carriage and disease in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40(2):382–8. pmid:11825946
  7. 7. Eltwisy HO, Twisy HO, Hafez MH, Sayed IM, El-Mokhtar MA. Clinical Infections, Antibiotic Resistance, and Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus haemolyticus. Microorganisms. 2022;10(6):1130. pmid:35744647
  8. 8. Afeke I, Amegan-Aho KH, Adu-Amankwaah J, Orish VN, Mensah GL, Mbroh HK, et al. Antimicrobial profile of coagulase-negative staphylococcus isolates from categories of individuals at a neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital, Ghana. Pan Afr Med J. 2023;44:92. pmid:37229305
  9. 9. CDC. Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, 2019. Report. Atlanta (GA): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019. Available from:www.cdc.gov/DrugResistance/Biggest-Threats.html
  10. 10. de Almeida CV, Taddei A, Amedei A. The controversial role of Enterococcus faecalis in colorectal cancer. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2018;11:1756284818783606. pmid:30013618
  11. 11. Daniel DS, Lee SM, Gan HM, Dykes GA, Rahman S. Genetic diversity of Enterococcus faecalis isolated from environmental, animal and clinical sources in Malaysia. J Infect Public Health. 2017;10(5):617–23. pmid:28254461
  12. 12. Eltwisy HO, Abdel-Fattah M, Elsisi AM, Omar MM, Abdelmoteleb AA, El-Mokhtar MA. Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus haemolyticus on primary human skin fibroblast cells. Virulence. 2020;11(1):1142–57. pmid:32799619
  13. 13. Kao PHN, Kline KA. Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hide: How Enterococcus faecalis Subverts the Host Immune Response to Cause Infection. J Mol Biol. 2019;431(16):2932–45. pmid:31132360
  14. 14. Qin M, Chen P, Deng B, He R, Wu Y, Yang Y, et al. The Emergence of a Multidrug-Resistant and Pathogenic ST42 Lineage of Staphylococcus haemolyticus from a Hospital in China. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(3):e02342-21. pmid:35579464
  15. 15. Silva V, Correia S, Pereira JE, Igrejas G, Poeta P. Surveillance and environmental risk assessment of antibiotics and AMR/ARGs related with MRSA: One health perspective. Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance genes: Environmental occurrence and treatment technologies. Springer; 2020. p. 271–95.
  16. 16. Ahmad N, Joji RM, Shahid M. Evolution and implementation of One Health to control the dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and resistance genes: A review. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023;12:1065796. pmid:36726644
  17. 17. Mukherjee N, Dowd SE, Wise A, Kedia S, Vohra V, Banerjee P. Diversity of bacterial communities of fitness center surfaces in a U.S. metropolitan area. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(12):12544–61. pmid:25479039
  18. 18. Mukherjee N, Sulaiman IM, Banerjee P. Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from fitness centers in the Memphis metropolitan area, Tennessee. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44(12):1681–3. pmid:27658767
  19. 19. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(17):i884–90. pmid:30423086
  20. 20. Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A. Using SPAdes De Novo Assembler. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2020;70(1):e102. pmid:32559359
  21. 21. Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(8):1072–5. pmid:23422339
  22. 22. Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–9. pmid:24642063
  23. 23. Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25(7):1043–55. pmid:25977477
  24. 24. Alcock BP, Huynh W, Chalil R, Smith KW, Raphenya AR, Wlodarski MA, et al. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D1):D690–9.
  25. 25. Chen L, Zheng D, Liu B, Yang J, Jin Q. VFDB 2016: hierarchical and refined dataset for big data analysis--10 years on. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D694–7. pmid:26578559
  26. 26. Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ. BIGSdb: Scalable analysis of bacterial genome variation at the population level. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:595. pmid:21143983
  27. 27. Sun J, Lu F, Luo Y, Bie L, Xu L, Wang Y. OrthoVenn3: an integrated platform for exploring and visualizing orthologous data across genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(W1):W397–403. pmid:37114999
  28. 28. Mendes FK, Vanderpool D, Fulton B, Hahn MW. CAFE 5 models variation in evolutionary rates among gene families. Bioinformatics. 2021;36(22–23):5516–8. pmid:33325502
  29. 29. Blin K, Shaw S, Kloosterman AM, Charlop-Powers Z, van Wezel GP, Medema MH, et al. antiSMASH 6.0: improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W29–35. pmid:33978755
  30. 30. Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, Gurevich AA, Dvorkin M, Kulikov AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19(5):455–77. pmid:22506599
  31. 31. Forouzan E, Maleki MSM, Karkhane AA, Yakhchali B. Evaluation of nine popular de novo assemblers in microbial genome assembly. J Microbiol Methods. 2017;143:32–7. pmid:28939423
  32. 32. Namaki Kheljan M, Teymorpour R, Peeri Doghaheh H, Arzanlou M. Antimicrobial Biocides Susceptibility and Tolerance-Associated Genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Isolates Collected from Human and Environmental Sources. Curr Microbiol. 2022;79(6):170. pmid:35476302
  33. 33. Bakhti M, Akhondnezhad M, Gholami M, Nasrolahei M, Goli HR. Antibiotic Resistance and Virulence Genes in Enterococcus faecalis Isolated From Human Dental Plaque. Infect Dis Clin Pract. 2021;29(6):e366–70.
  34. 34. Manoharan M, Sistla S, Ray P. Prevalence and Molecular Determinants of Antimicrobial Resistance in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus haemolyticus from India. Microb Drug Resist. 2021;27(4):501–8. pmid:32191566
  35. 35. Gontjes KJ, Gibson KE, Lansing B, Cassone M, Mody L. Contamination of Common Area and Rehabilitation Gym Environment with Multidrug-Resistant Organisms. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(3):478–85. pmid:31851386
  36. 36. Mohamed M, Owens K, Gajewski A, Clabots C, Johnston B, Thuras P, et al. Extraintestinal Pathogenic and Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli Contamination of 56 Public Restrooms in the Greater Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Area. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(13):4498–506. pmid:25911488
  37. 37. Irshaid FI, Jacob JH, Khwaldh AS. Contamination of the handles and bases of shopping carts by pathogenic and multi-drug resistant bacteria. Europ Scientif J. 2014;10(27).
  38. 38. Dalman M, Bhatta S, Nagajothi N, Thapaliya D, Olson H, Naimi HM, et al. Characterizing the molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus across and within fitness facility types. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):69. pmid:30658587
  39. 39. Djordjevic SP, Jarocki VM, Seemann T, Cummins ML, Watt AE, Drigo B, et al. Genomic surveillance for antimicrobial resistance - a One Health perspective. Nat Rev Genet. 2024;25(2):142–57. pmid:37749210
  40. 40. Velazquez-Meza ME, Galarde-López M, Carrillo-Quiróz B, Alpuche-Aranda CM. Antimicrobial resistance: One Health approach. Vet World. 2022;15(3):743–9. pmid:35497962
  41. 41. Baquero F, Saralegui C, Marcos-Mencía D, Ballestero L, Vañó-Galván S, Moreno-Arrones ÓM, et al. Epidermis as a Platform for Bacterial Transmission. Front Immunol. 2021;12:774018. pmid:34925344
  42. 42. La Rosa SL, Montealegre MC, Singh KV, Murray BE. Enterococcus faecalis Ebp pili are important for cell-cell aggregation and intraspecies gene transfer. Microbiology (Reading). 2016;162(5):798–802. pmid:26967674
  43. 43. Qin X, Singh KV, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. Effects of Enterococcus faecalis fsr genes on production of gelatinase and a serine protease and virulence. Infect Immun. 2000;68(5):2579–86. pmid:10768947
  44. 44. Bhandari V, Wong KS, Zhou JL, Mabanglo MF, Batey RA, Houry WA. The Role of ClpP Protease in Bacterial Pathogenesis and Human Diseases. ACS Chem Biol. 2018;13(6):1413–25. pmid:29775273
  45. 45. Zischka M, Künne CT, Blom J, Wobser D, Sakιnç T, Schmidt-Hohagen K, et al. Comprehensive molecular, genomic and phenotypic analysis of a major clone of Enterococcus faecalis MLST ST40. BMC Genomics. 2015;16(1):175. pmid:25887115
  46. 46. Pereira AP, Antunes P, Willems R, Corander J, Coque TM, Peixe L, et al. Evolution of Chlorhexidine Susceptibility and of the EfrEF Operon among Enterococcus faecalis from Diverse Environments, Clones, and Time Spans. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10(4):e0117622. pmid:35862993
  47. 47. Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ. Using multilocus sequence typing to study bacterial variation: prospects in the genomic era. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(5):623–30. pmid:24957089
  48. 48. Floridia-Yapur N, Rusman F, Diosque P, Tomasini N. Genome data vs MLST for exploring intraspecific evolutionary history in bacteria: Much is not always better. Infect Genet Evol. 2021;93:104990. pmid:34224899
  49. 49. Røken M, Iakhno S, Haaland AH, Bjelland AM, Wasteson Y. The Home Environment Is a Reservoir for Methicillin-Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci and Mammaliicocci. Antibiotics (Basel). 2024;13(3):279. pmid:38534714
  50. 50. Katsarou EI, Chatzopoulos DC, Giannoulis T, Ioannidi KS, Katsafadou AI, Kontou PI, et al. MLST-Based Analysis and Antimicrobial Resistance of Staphylococcus epidermidis from Cases of Sheep Mastitis in Greece. Biology (Basel). 2021;10(3):170. pmid:33668332
  51. 51. Rowland SJ, Dyke KG. Tn552, a novel transposable element from Staphylococcus aureus. Mol Microbiol. 1990;4(6):961–75. pmid:2170815
  52. 52. Ali L, Goraya MU, Arafat Y, Ajmal M, Chen J-L, Yu D. Molecular Mechanism of Quorum-Sensing in Enterococcus faecalis: Its Role in Virulence and Therapeutic Approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(5):960. pmid:28467378
  53. 53. Ji G, Pei W, Zhang L, Qiu R, Lin J, Benito Y, et al. Staphylococcus intermedius produces a functional agr autoinducing peptide containing a cyclic lactone. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(9):3139–50. pmid:15838041
  54. 54. Juma PO, Fujitani Y, Alessa O, Oyama T, Yurimoto H, Sakai Y, et al. Siderophore for Lanthanide and Iron Uptake for Methylotrophy and Plant Growth Promotion in Methylobacterium aquaticum Strain 22A. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:921635. pmid:35875576
  55. 55. Małecka-Adamowicz M, Kubera Ł, Jankowiak E, Dembowska E. Microbial diversity of bioaerosol inside sports facilities and antibiotic resistance of isolated Staphylococcus spp. Aerobiologia. 2019;35(4):731–42.
  56. 56. Fadare OS, Durojaye BO. Antibiotic susceptibility profile of bacteria isolated from fitness machines in selected fitness centers at Akure and Elizade University in Ondo State Nigeria. 2019.
  57. 57. Kiborus LJ, Altheide ST, Marion JW. Characterization of the Prevalence and Antibiotic Resistance of Staphylococcus Species in an Exercise Facility in Central Kentucky, USA. Hygiene. 2025;5(1):2.