Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Work-related musculoskeletal disorder and its associated factors among bank workers in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Abebe Kassa Geto ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    abebekassa2129@gmail.com

    Affiliation Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia

  • Hussien Mekonnen,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Dessie Health Science College, Dessie, Ethiopia

  • Tesfalem Tilahun Yemane,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Dessie Health Science College, Dessie, Ethiopia

  • Endalew Minwuye Andargie,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Health Service Management, School of Public Health, Asrat Woldeyes Health Science Campus, Debre Berhan University, Debre Berhan, Ethiopia

  • Birhanu Sewunet,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Project administration, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Environmental Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

  • Tarikuwa Natnael,

    Roles Data curation, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Environmental Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

  • Chala Daba

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Software, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Environmental Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wollo University, Dessie, Ethiopia

Abstract

Introduction

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders are among the major global public health problems and contributors to disability and workers’ absence in occupational areas which certainly disrupts work productivity and expected results. In Ethiopia, different studies investigated work-related musculoskeletal disorders. However, the findings were not consistent and conclusive enough, and there is no nationwide data representing this growing public health concern. This in turn hinders the efforts of intervention activities. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of and factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorder among bank workers in Ethiopia.

Methods

To retrieve all the relevant studies, international databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, LIVIVO, African Journals Online, African Index Medicus (AIM), HINARI, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar, and Google were used. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guideline was followed for this study. The extracted data were analyzed using STATA 17 software. The heterogeneity of the included studies was determined by the Higgs I2 statistics. With a 95% confidence interval, this meta-analysis with the random-effects model was carried out to determine the pooled prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder.

Result

In this meta-analysis, eight articles in total with 3399 study participants were included. The overall pooled prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder was 57.41% (95%; CI: 38.87%, 75.95%; I2 = 99.4%; P = 0.000). Gender, job stress, physical activity, and work experience were found to be factors significantly associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorder.

Conclusion

A high prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder among bank workers in Ethiopia was recorded. This underscores the importance of implementing effective intervention measures such as job rotation, job enrichment, extended breaks, mitigating negative social factors, and establishing physical exercise facilities to address the underlying issues.

Introduction

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) are musculoskeletal disorders resulting from workplace exposures. They largely affect body parts such as muscles, bones, fascia, joints and tendons, ligaments, nerves, or circulation systems that priorly are induced or worsened by work and the circumstances of the occupational areas [14]. Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are impairments of body structures that are caused or worsened by poor fitness, and poor habits of health, but a larger proportion of MSDs are caused by exposures to physical work [3] and this problem occurs secondary to cumulative trauma and suddenly happened injuries, with the former being the most frequent mechanism behind WMSDs [5,6].

WMSDs in the working environment are a major public health concern across the globe. They are common occupational area health problems mainly manifested by a range of symptoms like pain, aches, and discomfort in different parts of the body region. Despite WMSD has been stated as one of the major contributors to disability and workers’ absence in the workplace which certainly disrupts work productivity and expected work results, it is responsible for multiple work interruptions/stoppages and substantial direct and indirect costs [1,2,5,7]. Employees of many occupations live with a health burden linked with the disabling musculoskeletal pain and injuries of an occupational-related cause, collectively known as WMSDs [8]. Banks are one of the occupational areas where employees are subjected to various physical demands, prolonged sitting or standing and awkward postures, long working hours, a repetitive tasks in front of computers without having adequate rest and recovery time which may lead to WMSDs [9,10].

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the global prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists found that WRMSD pooled prevalence in neck, upper back, lower back, shoulders, elbows, wrists/hands, thumb, hips/thighs, knees/legs, and ankles/feet was 26.4%, 17.7%, 40.1%, 20.8%, 7.0%, 18.1%, 35.4%, 7.0%, 13.0%, and 5% respectively [5]. Another systematic review and meta-analysis conducted among African school teachers revealed that the overall estimated pooled prevalence of low back pain was found to be 59% [11]. Another study in Ethiopia found that the pooled prevalence of occupational-related pain on elbow, wrist/hand, knee/leg, foot/ankle, and hip/thig in the previous one year was 19.7%, 24.2%, 25.0%, 20.2%, and 15.5%, respectively [12].

A study in Pakistan reported that back pain was one of the main symptoms causing burnout in bank employees [10]. Working with a computer poses awkward postures that are continually and forcefully maintained and this subsequent change from normal sitting postures while using a computer has been noticed and influences the development of musculoskeletal system pain, back and neck pains being more common [13].

According to evidence from the recent global burden of disease (GBD), 31.3% of the global disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) in 2021 were due to years lived with disability (YLDs). Of which, low back pain (LBP) was the leading Level 3 cause of YLDs with 70.2 million YLDs, and other MSDs combined were the fifth-ranked causes of YLDs with 43 million YLDs [14]. Many of the work-related problems are preventable. However, there are about 2.9 million work-related deaths globally every year. Moreover, 6% of all the deaths in the world were attributed to be work-related. In every single day, over 7,500 people die following workplace accidents [15]. Globally, there were 322.75 million incident cases, 117,540 deaths, and 150.08 million DALYs of MSDs in 2019 [16].

The prevalence of WMSD in Africa is estimated to range from 15% to 93.5% [17] and it remains less focused and overlooked in low-middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly in Ethiopia due to the focus on more pressing and life-threatening health issues like infectious diseases and non-communicable diseases (NCDs) [18]. WMSD is a multi-factorial problem having many possible causes and determining predictors for it is a very difficult task. Age, female gender, physical activity, socioeconomic status, and increased body mass index (BMI) were identified as predictors of WMSD according to different studies [1921]. Moreover, predictors such as job dissatisfaction, limited social support from workplace partners and supervisors, job stress, sleeplessness, and depression were also depicted as predictors associated with WMSD in the literature [22].

Although studies have been carried out on WMSDs among bank workers across various areas of the country Ethiopia [2330], the findings have not been consistent with the prevalence ranging from 11.7% [30] to 77.6% [23] and conclusive, which could hamper the assessments of ongoing intervention efforts and activities. Additionally, no study provides countrywide evidence of the pooled prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder among bank workers in Ethiopia. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder and identify associated factors among bank workers in Ethiopia. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will help policy-makers, healthcare planners, and other concerned bodies to plan and implement strategies to prevent, control, and reduce the impacts of WMSD.

Materials and methods

Study registration

A clear protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database. The registration number is CRD42023441157.

Search strategy and study selection

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, published and unpublished studies were searched from different electronic databases such as PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct, Cochrane Library, LIVIVO, CINAHL, African Journals Online, Web of Science, African Index Medicus (AIM), HINARI, Semantic Scholar, Google, and Google Scholar. Besides, gray literature were also identified from digital libraries and repositories of different universities. The search was carried out using the following keywords: “musculoskeletal disorder”, musculoskeletal disease”, “musculoskeletal pain”, “orthopedic disorder”, “musculoskeletal problem”, “musculoskeletal injur*”, “musculoskeletal condition*”, banker*, “bank employe*”, “bank worker*”, “bank staff*”, “bank officer*”, “bank professional*”, “bank accountant*”, “bank manager*”, “bank cashier*”, “bank financer*”, “bank teller*”, “associated factor*”, “risk factor*”, determinant*, predictor*, precursor*, cause*, “factors associated” and “Ethiopia.” Using the Boolean operators “AND” or “OR” as appropriate, all keywords were combined. The search was carried-out until 19 January 2024 by four independent authors (AKG, CD, HM, and BS). The articles searched from the selected electronic databases were transferred to the Endnote version 8 software and all duplicate files were excluded. Selecting all the relevant articles followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines [31] (S1 Table).

Inclusion criteria

Population: All the studies conducted on work-related musculoskeletal disorder among bank workers in Ethiopia.

Exposure: Bank workers that exhibited WMSD

Comparison: Workers that didn’t exhibit WMSD

Outcome: Studies assessed WMSD at least at one of the body regions (neck, shoulder, elbow, wrist/hand, upper back, lower back, hip/thigh, knee, and foot/ankle) as the primary outcome in the last 12 months.

Study setting: Institution-based studies.

Study design: All gray literatures and published studies following cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control study designs were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis.

Publication: Published and unpublished studies.

Country: All the relevant studies conducted in Ethiopia.

Language: Only studies reported in the English language were included.

Exclusion criteria

Studies with no full text, unidentified reports, abstracts, editorials, irretrievable studies, letters, qualitative studies, and studies that did not report the outcome of interest (WMSD) were excluded.

Outcome assessment

The main outcome of this study was to determine the pooled prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder among bank workers. This is determined by multiplying by 100 after the number of study participants (the numerator) who had WMSD at least at one of their body regions (neck, shoulder, elbow, wrist/hand, upper back, lower back, hip/thigh, knee, and foot/ankle) was divided by the actual sample size (the denominator). In addition to this, the systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at identifying the factors associated with WMSD in log odds ratio form.

Operational definition

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: These are the developed impairments on the muscles, tendons, fascia, ligaments, joints, nerves, bones, or circulation systems of the body that are caused, induced, or worsen by work and the circumstances of its performance in workplaces or occupational settings at least at one part of the body organs (neck, shoulder, elbow, wrist/hand, upper back, lower back, hip/thigh, knee and foot/ankle) [3,4,32].

Data extraction procedure, study quality, and risk of bias assessment

A standard data extraction template consisting of several details of the study such as author name, region, year of publication, study design, response rate, quality score, bank type, methods of data collection, and prevalence was prepared. Three independent authors (AKG, CD, and BS) undertook all the required data extraction activities. Duplicate articles were removed after the relevant articles for inclusion were carefully screened by three different reviewers (AKG, CD, and HM). Using the Joana Brigg Institute (JBI) checklist of critical appraisal for cross-sectional studies, the quality of each article was critically evaluated [33] (S2 Table). With scores measured on a scale of 100%, the quality of each article was independently assessed by two different authors (AKG and CD) and a third author (HM) was ready to address and resolve any discrepancies encountered during the quality assessment.

For further analysis, articles having a quality score of 50% and above were included [34,35].

The mean score was computed from the evaluations of all the reviewers to address and resolve any differences in the case of any discrepancies encountered during the quality assessment. Missing data were successfully handled by providing critical care prior to data extraction and giving a special emphasis during data extraction along with the study quality assessment result.

Statistical analysis procedures

Data was analyzed using STATA (Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA) version 17 software after the extracted data were imported. Heterogeneity within the included studies was assessed using the Higgs I2 test, with values of 75%, 50%, and 25% showing high, moderate, and low levels of heterogeneity respectively [36]. In this meta-analysis, high heterogeneity was observed across the studies included (I2 = 99.4%; P = 0.000). The issue of heterogeneity was addressed by undertaking sensitivity test and subgroup analysis. With a 95% confidence interval, Der Simonian and Liard’s [37] method of random-effects model was used to determine the pooled prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder among bank workers since a random effects model can provide more accurate estimates when there is substantial heterogeneity between studies. The odds ratio was computed to show the strength of the association between WMSD (the outcome variable) among bank workers and its risk factors.

To present the pooled prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder, a forest plot was used. To determine the influence of an individual study on the pooled prevalence estimate of WMSD, a sensitivity analysis was performed. Subgroup analysis was also computed to identify the possible sources of heterogeneity based on the year of publication (before 2022 and 2022 and after), study regions (Amhara region and other regions), method of data collection (self-administration and interview), and sample size category (425 and above and lower than 425). Besides, the presence of potential publication bias was determined by using a funnel plot and Egger’s test [38].

Results

Study selection

Overall, 2896 studies were identified from an electronic database and reference searching. Endnote 8 was used as a reference manager. Thirty-three duplicated articles were removed. The total number of articles excluded based on their titles and abstracts due to the failure to meet the criteria of inclusion was 2844. Besides, 11 articles were excluded as they failed to meet quality assessment methods and did not report the outcomes of interest. In this meta-analysis, a total of 8 full-text articles were included to estimate the pooled prevalence of WMSD by following the PRISMA guideline (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. A PRISMA flow chart showing study selection for systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of WMSD and its associated factors among bank workers in Ethiopia, 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.g001

Characteristics of the included studies

In this meta-analysis, eight cross-sectional studies with a total of 3399 study participants were included. The highest prevalence of WMSD was found to be 77.6% [23] and the lowest prevalence was 11.7% [30] among the included studies. Regarding the study region, four of the included studies were conducted in the Amhara region [26,27,29,30], and the remaining four studies were conducted in Oromia [25], Tigray [24], Addis Ababa [23], and SNNPR [28]. Four [24,25,27,30] of the included articles used interviews as a data collection method, and the other four [23,26,28,29] used self-administration (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. characteristics of the included studies to estimate the pooled prevalence of WMSD among bank workers in Ethiopia, 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.t001

Meta-analysis

Pooled prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder (WMSD).

To determine the pooled prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder in this meta-analysis, eight articles were included. The pooled prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder among bank workers in Ethiopia was found to be 57.41% (95%; CI: 38.87%, 75.95%).

A random effects model was employed to estimate the pooled prevalence of WMSD following the high level of heterogeneity among the included studies (I2 = 99.4%; P < 0.000) (Fig 2).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Forest plot showing the pooled prevalence of WMSD among bank workers in Ethiopia, 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.g002

Test for publication bias.

The symmetrical distribution of the included studies shown by the funnel plot indicated that there was no publication bias (Fig 3). Statistically, Eggers’s test result also depicted the absence of statistically significant publication bias (small studies effect) (p = 0.484).

thumbnail
Fig 3. A funnel plot to test the publication bias of the included studies of the meta-analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.g003

Sensitivity analysis.

The impact of individual studies on the pooled estimate of WMSD was evaluated by performing a sensitivity analysis. The finding revealed that none of the included studies affected the pooled estimate (Fig 4).

thumbnail
Fig 4. A sensitivity analysis result of the included studies for WMSD among bank workers in Ethiopia, 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.g004

Subgroup analysis.

Based on region category, the highest pooled prevalence of WMSD was recorded among studies conducted in other regions (67%, 95% CI: 55–79%) as compared to studies conducted in the Amhara region (48%, 95% CI: 18–77%) (Fig 5). Regarding the articles’ publication year category, the highest pooled WMSD was observed among studies published before 2022 (72%, 95% CI: 65–79%) as compared to those studies published in 2022 and after (49%, 95% CI: 26–71%) (Fig 6). The pooled prevalence of WMSD was higher among the studies having a sample size of 425 and above (68%, 95% CI: 59–77%) as compared to those with lower than 425 (47%, 95% CI: 20–74%) (Fig 7). The highest pooled prevalence was recorded for those studies that used self-administration as a data collection method (62%, 95% CI: 48–76%) (Fig 8).

thumbnail
Fig 8. Subgroup analysis by the method of data collection.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.g008

Factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorder.

There were seventeen factors repeatedly presented in the included articles of this meta-analysis. The factors were gender, age (30–39 years, ≥ 40 years), BMI (underweight, overweight), type of sitting position (back-twisted, back-bent), worktime break, repetitive motion, type of chair, job stress, awkward/sideway reaching, physical activity, ergonomic training, work experience and duration of computer use per day (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. The pooled odds ratio for factors associated with WMSD among bank workers in Ethiopia, 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.t002

The association between gender and WMSD among the included five studies [23,2628,30] has been assessed. The result showed that there was a significant association in three of the included studies. According to this meta-analysis, the odds of WMSD were two times higher among female bank workers as compared to their counterparts (POR = 2.03; 95% CI: 1.13–2.92) (Fig 9). Based on the findings of four studies, the association between WMSD and job stress was assessed [2326]. In all of these studies, a positive association was found. According to the results of this meta-analysis, the odds of WMSD were 3 times higher among bank workers who had job stress as compared to those who had no job stress (POR = 3.09; 95% CI: 1.89–4.28) (Fig 10). Six articles [2428,30] were included to identify the association between physical activity and WMSD. Four of the included studies had a significant association. Based on the results of the meta-analysis, it was revealed that the odds for the occurrence of WMSD among bank workers who did not experience physical activity were 3 times higher when compared to those bank workers who did (POR = 3.13; 95% CI: 1.62–4.65) (Fig 11). Similarly, two articles [24,30] were included to determine the link between work experience and WMSD. In this case, both articles had a positive and significant association with WMSD. The results of this meta-analysis revealed that the odds for the occurrence of WMSD among bank workers who had five years and above work experience were 5 times higher as compared to those who had less than five years of work experience (POR = 4.78; 95% CI: 1.48–8.09) (Fig 12).

thumbnail
Fig 9. A forest plot of odds ratio showing the association between gender and WMSD among bank workers in Ethiopia, 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.g009

thumbnail
Fig 10. A forest plot of odds ratio showing the association between job stress and WMSD among bank workers in Ethiopia, 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.g010

thumbnail
Fig 11. A forest plot of odds ratio showing the association of physical activity and WMSD among bank workers in Ethiopia, 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.g011

thumbnail
Fig 12. A Forest plot of odds ratio showing the association between work experience and WMSD among bank workers in Ethiopia, 2024.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.g012

Discussion

Work-related musculoskeletal disorders have continued to be a global burden to have a substantial impact on the health and productivity of workers in occupational settings. So far, many studies have been conducted to identify the possible risk factors associated with WMSD. However, these findings were not found to be consistent and conclusive enough. This in turn hinders the efforts of effective and timely intervention activities. Therefore, the current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the pooled prevalence of WMSD and its associated factors among bank workers in Ethiopia was conducted.

The pooled prevalence of WMSD among bank workers in Ethiopia was found to be 57.41% (95%; CI: 38.87%, 75.95%). This figure is in line with a global systematic review and meta-analysis of pooled prevalence reports on musculoskeletal disorders at the lower back among operating room personnel (61.48%) [39] and the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorder among healthcare professionals in Africa [40]. Additionally, the pooled prevalence is congruent with a systematic review and meta-analysis done among workers in the automobile manufacturing industry in China (53.1%) [41] and other studies conducted among electronic manufacturing workers in China (40.6%) [42], office workers in Lebanon (45.2%) [43], bank staff in Kigali, Rwanda (45.8%) [44], healthcare providers working in the operation room in Ethiopia (64.2%) [45] and higher education institutions’ office workers in Ethiopia (71.9%) [46].

However, the figure is higher than a systematic review and meta-analysis report on the occupational- related pooled prevalence of upper extremity musculoskeletal pain at the elbow part of the body among the working population of Ethiopia (33.7%) [47]. Moreover, the report is higher than the prevalence of a study conducted among workers in Taiwan (37%) [48], dentists in India (34.5%) [49], and automobile manufacturing production workers in Korea (27.4%) [50]. The availability and quality of centers for physical exercise, job rotation, provision of psychosocial training, and workload reduction might explain the discrepancy.

The odds of WMSD were two times higher among females as compared to their counterparts. This result is in line with the findings of the studies conducted in India [51], China [41], and Kuwait [52]. The most likely explanation for this might be the hormonal, somatic, and psychological aspects following the difference in gender as evidenced by Gagnon et al [53], in which the structure of muscle and ligaments soft tissue at the lower back or waist are weaker for females than that of males. The odds of WMSD among bank workers who had job stress were three times higher as compared to those who had no job stress. This result is congruent with the findings of the studies conducted in the Hunan province of China [54], Switzerland [55], and Nigeria [56]. The possible justification might be evidenced by the fact that work-stress-induced psychological burdens become heavier, which in turn intensifies muscle strain [57,58]. Implementing practical stress management measures are pivotal and recommended as a study conducted in Ethiopia is in support of this, and highlighted the importance of organizational stress management strategies such as eliminating hazards or minimizing employees’ exposure to them, enhancing the organization’s capacity to identify and address work-related issues, and providing support to help employees cope and recover [59].

The odds of WMSD among bank workers who did not experience physical activity were three times higher as compared to those who did. This is congruent with the evidence from China [60], which elucidates that workers who did not undertake physical exercise showed an elevated risk of WMSD. Moreover, it is evidenced that workplace physical activity programs have shown promise in promoting occupational health and reducing both stress and musculoskeletal pain among employees. By incorporating physical activity into the workday, these programs can improve overall health, decrease discomfort, and enhance the ability to perform job tasks [61,62]. Regular physical activity offers a protective effect against the development of musculoskeletal discomfort and injuries. Engaging in physical activity for twenty minutes three times a week can help alleviate discomfort in various areas, including the shoulders, neck, and lower back [6365]. Participants who engaged in more frequent exercise sessions reported significant improvements in overall well-being. They were 74% more likely to experience psychophysiological well-being, 30% less likely to encounter difficulty in performing tasks, and a remarkable 87% more likely to perceive enhanced interpersonal relationships. These findings underscore the profound impact of physical activity on both physical and mental health, highlighting its potential to improve overall quality of life [61]. Additional evidence from a randomized controlled trial demonstrated the positive effects of workplace exercise on mood, performance, and overall well-being. Participants experienced improved concentration, enhanced problem-solving skills, a clearer mind, renewed energy, strengthened work relationships, and increased resilience to stress. Moreover, exercising provided an opportunity for interaction and connection with colleagues, fostering a more positive and collaborative work environment [66].

The odds of WMSD among bank workers who had five years and above work experience were five times higher as compared to those who had less than five years of work experience. This result is in line with the findings of a study conducted in China [42], which reported that a higher risk of developing WMSD was observed among workers who had work experience of five years and above as compared to those who had less work experience. The possible reason for this might be the development of cumulative trauma or repetitive strains due to the long time which in turn attributed to the development of WMSD. Additionally, the result of this study is in line with the finding of another study conducted in Iran which indicated longer work experience increases the odds of WMSD [67]. However, this result is contrary to the findings of a study conducted in Nigeria [56], which revealed that low work experience is one of the workplace factors that increase the odds of WMSDs. This might be due to the growing awareness to prevent and control risk factors as workers get more experience.

Limitations of the study

Even though the systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted based on the latest PRISMA guideline, it did not consider all the regions in Ethiopia due to a lack of availability of articles. Moreover, due to the limited number of studies with the topic of interest in Ethiopia, the pooled prevalence was estimated with only eight articles.

Conclusion

In this study, the recorded pooled prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorder among bank workers in Ethiopia was high. Female gender, absence of physical activity, presence of job stress, and having work experience of five years and above were the factors significantly associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorder. Even though the effectiveness and timeliness of different intervention methods for work-related musculoskeletal disorders need further research, building centers for physical exercise, provision of psychosocial training, reduction of job-related stresses, and reduction of workload by the government, bank institutions, federal ministry of health (FMOH), and other partners and stakeholders are pivotal in preventing and reducing work-related musculoskeletal disorder in occupational areas such as banks. Furthermore, implementing fundamental occupational health and safety measures in office settings is strongly recommended. These include raising awareness, providing adequate facilities, ensuring supportive management, minimizing repetitive tasks, optimizing workspace layout, and conducting regular inspections.

Supporting information

S2 Table. Results of JBI quality assessment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Table. All articles excluded and included in the study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323958.s003

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Al-Hourani Z, Nazzal M, Khader Y, Almhdawi K, Bibars AR. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Jordanian dental technicians: Prevalence and associated factors. Work. 2017;56(4):617–23. pmid:28409763
  2. 2. Bethge M. Work-Related Medical Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2017;56(1):14–21. pmid:28219096
  3. 3. Gómez-Galán M, Pérez-Alonso J, Callejón-Ferre Á-J, López-Martínez J. Musculoskeletal disorders: OWAS review. Ind Health. 2017;55(4):314–37. pmid:28484144
  4. 4. Luttmann A, Jager M, Griefahn B, Caffier G, Liebers F, World HO. Preventing musculoskeletal disorders in the workplace. 2003.
  5. 5. Gorce P, Jacquier-Bret J. Global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among physiotherapists: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):265. pmid:37016332
  6. 6. Oranye NO, Bennett J. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal injuries in health care workers: the implications for work disability management. Ergonomics. 2018;61(3):355–66.
  7. 7. Mekonnen TH, Kekeba GG, Azanaw J, Kabito GG. Prevalence and healthcare seeking practice of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among informal sectors of hairdressers in Ethiopia, 2019: findings from a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):718. pmid:32429958
  8. 8. Putz-Anderson V. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors: a critical review of epidemiologic evidence for work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the neck, upper extremity, and low back. 1997.
  9. 9. Punnett L, Wegman DH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: the epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2004;14(1):13–23. pmid:14759746
  10. 10. Khattak JK, Khan MA, Haq AU, Arif M, Minhas AA. Occupational stress and burnout in Pakistan’s banking sector. Afr J Bus Manag. 2011;5(3):810.
  11. 11. Tesfaye AH, Abere G, Mekonnen TH, Jara AG, Aragaw FM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of low back pain and its associated factors among school teachers in Africa. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):499. pmid:37330490
  12. 12. Mengistu DA, Gutema GD, Demmu YM, Alemu A, Asefa YA. Occupational-related upper and lower extremity musculoskeletal pain among working population of Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Inquiry. 2022;59:469580221088620.
  13. 13. Chang C-HJ, Amick BC 3rd, Menendez CC, Katz JN, Johnson PW, Robertson M, et al. Daily computer usage correlated with undergraduate students’ musculoskeletal symptoms. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50(6):481–8. pmid:17450542
  14. 14. Ferrari A, Santomauro D, Aali A, Abate Y, Abbafati C, Abastabar H, et al. Global incidence, prevalence, years lived with disability (YLDs), disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 371 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2024.
  15. 15. Takala J, Hämäläinen P, Sauni R, Nygård C-H, Gagliardi D, Neupane S. Global-, regional- and country-level estimates of the work-related burden of diseases and accidents in 2019. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2024;50(2):73–82. pmid:37952241
  16. 16. Liu S, Wang B, Fan S, Wang Y, Zhan Y, Ye D. Global burden of musculoskeletal disorders and attributable factors in 204 countries and territories: a secondary analysis of the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study. BMJ Open. 2022;12(6):e062183. pmid:35768100
  17. 17. Wanyonyi NEN, Frantz J. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in Africa: a systematic review. Physiotherapy. 2015;101:e1604–5.
  18. 18. Woolf AD, Brooks P, Akesson K, Mody GM. Prevention of musculoskeletal conditions in the developing world. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2008;22(4):759–72. pmid:18783749
  19. 19. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, March L, Brooks P, Blyth F, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(6):2028–37. pmid:22231424
  20. 20. Chowdhury D, Sarkar S, Rashid MH, Rahaman A, Sarkar SK, Roy R. Influence of body mass index on low back pain. Mymensingh Med J. 2014;23(1):125–9. pmid:24584385
  21. 21. Su CA, Kusin DJ, Li SQ, Ahn UM, Ahn NU. The Association Between Body Mass Index and the Prevalence, Severity, and Frequency of Low Back Pain: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018;43(12):848–52. pmid:29462069
  22. 22. Hoogendoorn WE, van Poppel MN, Bongers PM, Koes BW, Bouter LM. Systematic review of psychosocial factors at work and private life as risk factors for back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(16):2114–25. pmid:10954644
  23. 23. Dagne D, Abebe SM, Getachew A. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders and associated factors among bank workers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. Environ Health Prev Med. 2020;25(1):33. pmid:32718332
  24. 24. Kasaw Kibret A, Fisseha Gebremeskel B, Embaye Gezae K, Solomon Tsegay G. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders and Associated Factors Among Bankers in Ethiopia, 2018. Pain Res Manag. 2020;2020:8735169. pmid:32963658
  25. 25. Etana G, Ayele M, Abdissa D, Gerbi A. Prevalence of work related musculoskeletal disorders and associated factors among bank staff in Jimma city, Southwest Ethiopia, 2019: an institution-based cross-sectional study. J Pain Res. 2021;2071–82.
  26. 26. Workneh BS, Mekonen EG. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Low Back Pain Among Bank Workers in Gondar City, Northwest Ethiopia. Orthop Res Rev. 2021;13:25–33. pmid:33603503
  27. 27. Demissie B, Yenew C, Amsalu A, Yideg Yitbarek G, Dagnew Baye N, Walle G, et al. Magnitude of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders and its Associated Factors Among Computer User Bankers in South Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021. Environ Health Insights. 2022;16:11786302221125048. pmid:36185497
  28. 28. Jonga T, Samuel B, Aynalem A, Israel E, Balta B, Ameno A. Prevalence of low back pain and associated factors among bank workers at Hawassa district, northern zone, Sidama region, southern Ethiopia. 2023.
  29. 29. Temesgen T, Sisay T, Teym A, Yirdaw G, Adane B, Tegegne E, et al. Musculoskeletal disorders: prevalence and its factors among computer user bankers of Dessie city, northeast Ethiopia, 2022. 2023.
  30. 30. Demissie B, Yenew C, Alemu A, Bantie B, Sume B, Deml Y, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome and its associated factors among computer user bankers in south gondar zone, northwest ethiopia, 2021: a cross sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023;24(1):1–9.
  31. 31. Page M, McKenzie J, Bossuyt P, Boutron I, Hoffmann T, Mulrow C, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372.
  32. 32. Magee DJ, Zachazewski JE, Quillen WS, Manske RC. Pathology and intervention in musculoskeletal rehabilitation. Elsevier Health Sciences. 2015.
  33. 33. Peters M, Godfrey C, McInerney P, Soares C, Khalil H, Parker D. The joanna briggs institute reviewers’ manual 2015: methodology for jbi scoping reviews. 2015.
  34. 34. Moola S, Munn Z, Tufanaru C, Aromataris E, Sears K, Sfetcu R, et al. Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewer’s Manual. Adelaide, Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2017. p. 217–69.
  35. 35. Munn Z, Moola S, Lisy K, Riitano D, Tufanaru C. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015;13(3):147–53. pmid:26317388
  36. 36. Higgins JPT, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58. pmid:12111919
  37. 37. DerSimonian R, Laird N: Meta-analysis in clinical trials revisited. Contemporary Clinical Trials. 2015;45:139–45.
  38. 38. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34. pmid:9310563
  39. 39. Tavakkol R, Kavi E, Hassanipour S, Rabiei H, Malakoutikhah M. The global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among operating room personnel: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health. 2020;8(4):1053–61.
  40. 40. Aremu AB, Afolabi IB, Odongo OA, Shehzad S, Khan KS. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among healthcare professionals in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 2023.
  41. 41. He X, Xiao B, Wu J, Chen C, Li W, Yan M. Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among workers in the automobile manufacturing industry in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):2042. pmid:37858206
  42. 42. Yang F, Di N, Guo W-W, Ding W-B, Jia N, Zhang H, et al. The prevalence and risk factors of work related musculoskeletal disorders among electronics manufacturing workers: a cross-sectional analytical study in China. BMC Public Health. 2023;23(1):10. pmid:36597111
  43. 43. Bawab W, Ismail K, Awada S, Rachidi S, Al Hajje A, Salameh P. Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain among office workers in lebanon. Int J Occup Hyg. 2015;7(1):45–52.
  44. 44. Kanyenyeri L, Asiimwe B, Mochama M, Nyiligira J, Habtu M. Prevalence of Back Pain and Associated Factors among Bank Staff in Selected Banks in Kigali, Rwanda A Cross Sectional Study. 2017.
  45. 45. Yizengaw MA, Mustofa SY, Ashagrie HE, Zeleke TG. Prevalence and factors associated with work-related musculoskeletal disorder among health care providers working in the operation room. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021;72:102989. pmid:34849216
  46. 46. Okezue OC, Anamezie TH, Nene JJ, Okwudili JD. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders among Office Workers in Higher Education Institutions: A Cross-Sectional Study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020;30(5):715–24. pmid:33911832
  47. 47. Mengistu DA, Gutema GD, Demmu YM, Alemu A, Asefa YA. Occupational-Related Upper and Lower Extremity Musculoskeletal Pain Among Working Population of Ethiopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Inquiry. 2022;59:469580221088620. pmid:35574938
  48. 48. Guo H-R, Chang Y-C, Yeh W-Y, Chen C-W, Guo YL. Prevalence of musculoskeletal disorder among workers in Taiwan: a nationwide study. J Occup Health. 2004;46(1):26–36. pmid:14960827
  49. 49. Koneru S, Tanikonda R. Role of yoga and physical activity in work-related musculoskeletal disorders among dentists. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2015;5(3):199–204. pmid:26236679
  50. 50. Kim JW, Jeong BY, Park MH. A Study on the Factors Influencing Overall Fatigue and Musculoskeletal Pains in Automobile Manufacturing Production Workers. Applied Sciences. 2022;12(7):3528.
  51. 51. Yasobant S, Rajkumar P. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among health care professionals: A cross-sectional assessment of risk factors in a tertiary hospital, India. Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2014;18(2):75–81. pmid:25568602
  52. 52. Akrouf QAS, Crawford JO, Al-Shatti AS, Kamel MI. Musculoskeletal disorders among bank office workers in Kuwait. East Mediterr Health J. 2010;16(1):94–100. pmid:20214165
  53. 53. Gagnon D, Plamondon A, Larivière C. A comparison of lumbar spine and muscle loading between male and female workers during box transfers. J Biomech. 2018;81:76–85. pmid:30286979
  54. 54. Cao W, Hu L, He Y, Yang P, Li X, Cao S. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Hospital Midwives in Chenzhou, Hunan Province, China and Associations with Job Stress and Working Conditions. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:3675–86. pmid:34512055
  55. 55. Hämmig O. Work- and stress-related musculoskeletal and sleep disorders among health professionals: a cross-sectional study in a hospital setting in Switzerland. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):319. pmid:32438929
  56. 56. Ekpenyong CE, Inyang UC. Associations between worker characteristics, workplace factors, and work-related musculoskeletal disorders: a cross-sectional study of male construction workers in Nigeria. Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2014;20(3):447–62. pmid:25189749
  57. 57. Dick RB, Lowe BD, Lu M-L, Krieg EF. Further Trends in Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Comparison of Risk Factors for Symptoms Using Quality of Work Life Data From the 2002, 2006, and 2010 General Social Survey. J Occup Environ Med. 2015;57(8):910–28. pmid:26247646
  58. 58. Bongers PM, de Winter CR, Kompier MA, Hildebrandt VH. Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1993;19(5):297–312. pmid:8296178
  59. 59. Tesfaye S, Abraham G. Workplace stress and its management in Norwegian refugee council, Ethiopia. J Bus Admin Stud. 2013;5(1):89–120.
  60. 60. Yao Y, Zhao S, An Z, Wang S, Li H, Lu L, et al. The associations of work style and physical exercise with the risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in nurses. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2019;32(1):15–24.
  61. 61. da Silva JMN, Gontijo LA, Vieira EM de A, Leite WK dos S, Colaço GA, de Carvalho VDH, et al. A worksite physical activity program and its association with biopsychosocial factors: An intervention study in a footwear factory. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics. 2019;69:73–9.
  62. 62. Miranda Bispo LG, Norte da Silva JM, Bolis I, Karla Dos Santos Leite W, Marama de Araujo Vieira E, Colaço GA, et al. Effects of a worksite physical activities program among men and women: An interventional study in a footwear industry. Appl Ergon. 2020;84:103005. pmid:31765918
  63. 63. Dianat I, Bazazan A, Souraki Azad MA, Salimi SS. Work-related physical, psychosocial and individual factors associated with musculoskeletal symptoms among surgeons: Implications for ergonomic interventions. Appl Ergon. 2018;67:115–24. pmid:29122182
  64. 64. Rodrigues EV, Gomes ARS, Tanhoffer AIP, Leite N. Effects of exercise on pain of musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Acta Ortop Bras. 2014;22(6):334–8. pmid:25538482
  65. 65. Amin MR, Hossain SM, Eusufzai SZ, Barua SK, Jamayet NB. The Prevalence of Computer Related Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Bankers of Dhaka City. Chatt Maa Shi Hosp Med Coll J. 2016;15(1):40–4.
  66. 66. Coulson JC, McKenna J, Field M. Exercising at work and self‐reported work performance. International Journal of Workplace Health Management. 2008;1(3):176–97.
  67. 67. Heidari M, Borujeni MG, Rezaei P, Kabirian Abyaneh S. Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders and Their Associated Factors in Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study in Iran. Malays J Med Sci. 2019;26(2):122–30. pmid:31447615