Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Total bilirubin-to-albumin ratio and short- and long-term all-cause mortality in acute pancreatitis: Evidence from the MIMIC-IV database

  • XingYi Yang,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology Disease, XianJu People’s Hospital, Zhejiang Southeast Campus of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated Xianju’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Xianju, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China

  • Min Zhang,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology Disease, XianJu People’s Hospital, Zhejiang Southeast Campus of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated Xianju’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Xianju, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China

  • LiHong Lv,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology Disease, XianJu People’s Hospital, Zhejiang Southeast Campus of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated Xianju’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Xianju, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China

  • XuYong Chen,

    Roles Software

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology Disease, XianJu People’s Hospital, Zhejiang Southeast Campus of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated Xianju’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Xianju, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China

  • ZhenMei Li

    Roles Data curation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    xjnhn@163.com

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology Disease, XianJu People’s Hospital, Zhejiang Southeast Campus of Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated Xianju’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Xianju, Taizhou, Zhejiang, China

Abstract

Background

The Total Bilirubin-to-Albumin Ratio (TBAR) is widely recognized and applied as a biomarker in the prognostic evaluation of various diseases. However, its role in predicting survival outcomes in patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate the association between TBAR levels and mortality rates in AP patients, thereby providing a novel prognostic indicator for clinical use.

Methods

This study investigates the association between TBAR and mortality in AP patients. We stratified patient data using X-tile software to analyze intergroup differences. Risk factors significantly associated with mortality were identified through univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Kaplan-Meier (KM) analysis evaluated TBAR’s impact on survival, while Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis assessed its predictive accuracy, sensitivity, and Area Under the Curve (AUC) for mortality. To ensure robustness, we used Restricted Cubic Spline (RCS) modeling to explore non-linear relationships and performed subgroup analyses to verify the consistency of the TBAR mortality association across patient subgroups.

Result

This study included 477 patients. Using X-tile software, we set the optimal TBAR cutoff at 1.33 based on 28-day mortality. Patients were categorized into high-risk (TBAR ≥ 1.33) and low-risk (TBAR < 1.33) groups. Elevated TBAR significantly correlated with increased mortality at multiple time points (7, 14, 21, 28, 90, and 365 days; P < 0.05). KM analysis confirmed lower survival rates in the high-risk group at all time points (P < 0.05). ROC analysis showed TBAR’s predictive accuracy for mortality was comparable to the SOFA score and superior to other indicators. RCS modeling revealed a linear TBAR mortality relationship. Subgroup analyses showed no significant interactions between TBAR and most subgroups.

Conclusion

The TBAR is strongly correlated with short-term and long-term mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis.

1 Introduction

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common acute emergency of the digestive system, with a rising incidence worldwide. The global annual incidence of AP ranges from 13 to 45 cases per 100,000 individuals, and recent increases have been attributed to changes in lifestyle and dietary habits [1]. The pathogenesis of AP primarily involves injury to pancreatic acinar cells and the activation of inflammatory responses. Normally, digestive enzymes secreted by pancreatic acinar cells exist in an inactive form. However, in AP, these enzymes are abnormally activated within the pancreas, leading to autodigestion of pancreatic tissue and subsequent inflammation [2]. This inflammatory activation further triggers the release of inflammatory mediators, such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), which exacerbate local pancreatic inflammation and may induce systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) [3]. Mortality rates in severe AP can reach 20–30% [4]. Therefore, early identification and assessment of prognostic risks in patients with AP are crucial for improving survival rates.

In the prognostic evaluation of AP, serum biomarkers have increasingly attracted attention. Total bilirubin (TB) and albumin (ALB) are two widely used biochemical indicators, and their prognostic significance in AP has been extensively demonstrated. Total bilirubin is a key indicator of liver function, with elevated levels often reflecting liver dysfunction or biliary obstruction [5]. Elevated serum total bilirubin levels are closely associated with disease severity and poor prognosis in AP [6]. Albumin, an essential plasma protein, is typically reduced in the presence of inflammatory responses, malnutrition, and liver dysfunction [7]. Hypoalbuminemia is an established independent risk factor for poor prognosis in patients with AP [8].

The Total Bilirubin-to-Albumin Ratio (TBAR) is a novel prognostic indicator that integrates the prognostic information of total bilirubin and albumin, potentially offering a more comprehensive reflection of systemic inflammation and liver function. Previous studies have demonstrated the potential value of the indirect bilirubin-to-albumin ratio in predicting mortality among patients with hepatic encephalopathy [9]. However, the prognostic significance of TBAR in AP remains to be elucidated. This study aims to leverage the MIMIC-IV database [10] to investigate the association between TBAR and both short-term and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with AP, thereby providing a novel prognostic tool for clinical use.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Database introduction

Data for this study were sourced from the MIMIC-IV (v2.2) database, a publicly accessible and comprehensive dataset developed by the Laboratory of Computational Physiology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. This database includes detailed records of over 70,000 ICU patients admitted to the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (BIDMC) from 2012 to 2019. It encompasses a wide array of data types, including laboratory results, medication schedules, vital signs, and hospital stay durations. This database was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Beth Israel Denconess Medical center (2001P-001699/14). All personal identifiers have been de-identified, with real patient data replaced by randomly assigned numbers. Consequently, the need for ethical approval and informed consent was waived.

2.2 Inclusion and exclusion criteria

In this investigation, we enrolled 5,894 patients with a diagnosis of AP, of whom 1,276 were admitted to the ICU. We applied the following exclusion criteria: (1) not the initial ICU admission; (2) ICU stay shorter than 24 hours; (3) absence of total bilirubin or albumin data within the first 24 hours of admission. After applying these criteria, a final cohort of 477 patients was selected for analysis.

2.3 Data collection

This study systematically collected multidimensional data from the database, including demographic characteristics, clinical vital signs, laboratory test indicators, comorbidities, and treatment outcomes. Specifically, vital signs data included key indicators such as blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature. In terms of laboratory parameters, we comprehensively recorded multiple indicators, including white blood cell count (WBC), red blood cells, platelet count, electrolytes (sodium, potassium), renal function indicators (blood urea nitrogen [BUN], creatinine), liver function indicators (bilirubin, albumin, aspartate aminotransferase [AST]; alanine aminotransferase [ALT]), coagulation function indicators (activated partial thromboplastin time [APTT], international normalized ratio [INR]), and lactic acid levels. Additionally, the study included clinical assessment data such as the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) [11] and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) [12] scores.

The TBAR was specifically selected as the core study variable. The study model was constructed based on the average values of parameters recorded within the first 24 hours of ICU admission for all patients. The study cohort strictly adhered to the diagnostic criteria for AP and followed up with patients for at least 365 days to assess their long-term prognosis. Table 1 provides a detailed list of the variables extracted in the study.

thumbnail
Table 1. Patient demographics and baseline characteristics.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323330.t001

The primary endpoint of this study was all-cause mortality at 7, 14, 21, 28, 90, and 365 days following hospital admission. During this period, we also evaluated ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality to comprehensively understand the short-term and long-term prognosis of patients.

2.4 Statistical analyses

This study employed a range of statistical methods for data analysis and presentation. Continuous variables were described based on their distribution characteristics: those conforming to a normal distribution were presented as mean ± standard deviation (Mean±SD), while non-normally distributed variables were described using the median (interquartile range, IQR). Categorical variables were reported as frequencies and percentages (n,%). In the analysis of baseline characteristics, statistical tests were selected according to the variable type: continuous variables were analyzed using the independent samples t-test or One-Way ANOVA, while categorical variables were assessed using Pearson’s chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. Data with missing values exceeding 20% were deleted, while data with missing values less than 20% were subjected to random forest imputation. The study utilized X-tile software (Version 3.6.1, Yale University, USA) to stratify TBAR scores into two groups based on 28-day mortality outcomes after admission: TBAR<1.33 and TBAR≥1.33. Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed for both univariate and multivariate analyses to identify independent prognostic factors for mortality in AP patients at 7, 14, 21, 28, 90, and 365 days after admission. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. K-M survival curves were plotted, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival differences between the two groups. To evaluate the predictive power of various indicators, ROC curve analysis was conducted, focusing on the predictive ability of TBAR, total bilirubin, albumin, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) for mortality at different time points (7, 14, 21, 28, 90, and 365 days). Sensitivity, specificity, and the AUC were calculated for each indicator. Additionally, RCS analysis was used to explore the potential linear relationship between TBAR and mortality. Subgroup analyses were performed to further validate the clinical application value of the TBAR score, assessing the impact of parameters such as age, sex, race, acute kidney injury (AKI), sepsis, and severe liver disease on the TBAR score. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software (Version 4.22) and MSTATA software.

3 Results

3.1 Characteristics of patients at baseline

As shown in Fig 1, This study included 477 patients. Using X-tile software, we analyzed 28-day mortality and determined an optimal TBAR threshold of 1.33. Patients were categorized into two groups based on this threshold: the high-risk group (TBAR≥1.33) and the low-risk group (TBAR<1.33). The high-risk group had a mean age of 57 years, with 67.4% being female. This group exhibited significantly higher levels of several biochemical parameters, including blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), red blood cell count (RBC), international normalized ratio (INR), lactate, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), anion gap, and SOFA score. Conversely, patients in the high-risk group had lower levels of sodium, chloride, glucose, hemoglobin, blood pressure, and body temperature compared to those in the low-risk group. Additionally, the incidence of complications such as AKI, sepsis, and severe liver disease was significantly higher in the high-risk group.

In terms of clinical outcomes, the ICU mortality rate was significantly higher in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (30.4% vs. 10.9%, P < 0.001). Similarly, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in the high-risk group (19.6% vs. 7.8%, P < 0.001). The high-risk group also had significantly higher mortality rates at multiple time points: 7 days (14.1% vs. 2.9%, P < 0.001), 14 days (21.7% vs. 5.7%, P < 0.001), 21 days (26.1% vs. 7.8%, P < 0.001), 28 days (28.3% vs. 9.6%, P < 0.001), 90 days (33.7% vs. 16.9%, P < 0.001), and 365 days (40.2% vs. 21.0%, P < 0.001). Detailed baseline characteristics and differences between the two groups are provided in Table 1.

3.2 Cox regression analysis of TBAR and mortality in AP patients

Cox regression analysis demonstrated a significant association between TBAR levels ≥1.33 and both short-term and long-term mortality in patients with AP, without adjustment for other variables. The HR and 95%CI were as follows: 7 days (HR = 4.07, 95%CI: 1.76–9.43, P = 0.001), 14 days (HR = 4.17, 95%CI: 2.28–7.64, P < 0.001), 21 days (HR = 3.76, 95%CI: 2.20–6.43, P < 0.001), 28 days (HR = 3.35, 95%CI: 2.03–5.53, P < 0.001), 90 days (HR = 2.35, 95%CI: 1.53–3.61, P < 0.001), and 365 days (HR = 2.29, 95%CI: 1.55–3.38, P < 0.001).

In Model 1, after adjusting for age and sex, the group with TBAR≥1.33 continued to exhibit significantly higher mortality at each time point: 7 days (HR = 5.67, 95%CI: 2.50–12.9, P < 0.001), 14 days (HR = 4.78, 95%CI: 2.57–8.86, P < 0.001), 21 days (HR = 4.18, 95%CI: 2.42–7.22, P < 0.001), 28 days (HR = 3.66, 95%CI: 2.20–6.10, P < 0.001), 90 days (HR = 2.63, 95%CI: 1.70–4.06, P < 0.001), and 365 days (HR = 2.48, 95%CI: 1.67–3.68, P < 0.001).

In Model 2, after further adjustments, the group with TBAR≥1.33 maintained significantly higher mortality rates, indicating an independent association between TBAR≥1.33 and mortality. The HR values were: 7 days (HR = 4.62, 95%CI: 1.74–12.3, P = 0.002), 14 days (HR = 3.15, 95%CI: 1.57–6.34, P = 0.001), 21 days (HR = 2.79, 95%CI: 1.52–5.13, P < 0.001), 28 days (HR = 2.27, 95%CI: 1.29–4.01, P = 0.005), 90 days (HR = 1.75, 95%CI: 1.09–2.82, P = 0.021), and 365 days (HR = 1.82, 95%CI: 1.18–2.80, P = 0.007). For detailed results, refer to Table 2.

thumbnail
Table 2. Association between TBAR and mortality in patients with AP.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323330.t002

3.3 Analysis of Kaplan Meier and ROC CURVES

KM survival analysis showed that patients with TBAR≥1.33 had significantly higher mortality rates at multiple time points compared to those with lower TBAR values. The specific mortality rates were as follows: 7 days (11.9% vs. 2.8%, P < 0.001), 14 days (18.4% vs. 4.4%, P < 0.001), 21 days (25.0% vs. 7.5%, P < 0.001), 28 days (25.0% vs. 7.5%, P < 0.001), 90 days (33.6% vs. 15.5%, P < 0.001), and 365 days (39.1% vs. 20.5%, P < 0.001). These findings are illustrated in Fig 2.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis curves for all-cause mortality in patients with AP at 7-d (A), 14-d (B), 21-d (C), 28-d (D), 90-d (E), and 365-d (F) of hospital admission.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323330.g002

Additionally, ROC curve analysis was used to evaluate the predictive ability of five parameters for all-cause mortality at different post-admission intervals: total bilirubin, albumin, TBAR, SOFA score, and GCS. The results indicated that the AUC for TBAR was higher than that of the other parameters. Although the ROC value was lower than that of the SOFA score, there was no statistically significant difference, suggesting consistent accuracy in predicting both short-term and long-term outcomes. Detailed results are presented in Table 3 and Fig 3.

thumbnail
Fig 3. ROC curves for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with AP at 7-d (A), 14-d (B), 21-d (C), 28-d (D), 90-d (E), and 365-d (F) after admission.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323330.g003

3.4 Restricted cubic spline analysis of TBAR in relation to AP prognosis

In this study, we utilized RCS analysis to examine the relationship between TBAR and mortality rates at specific time intervals following baseline assessment. The results demonstrated a significant linear association between TBAR and mortality, which was consistent across various intervals. These intervals included 7 days (P = 0.021, P-Nonlinear = 0.203), 14 days (P < 0.001, P-Nonlinear = 0.143), 21 days (P < 0.001, P-Nonlinear = 0.301), 28 days (P < 0.001, P-Nonlinear = 0.347), 90 days (P < 0.001, P-Nonlinear = 0.486), and 365 days (P < 0.001, P-Nonlinear = 0.486). At each examined time point, TBAR was significantly associated with mortality, suggesting that elevated TBAR levels are linked to a higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes. For detailed results, refer to Fig 4.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Association between TBAR and Survival with the RCS function at 7-d (A), 14-d (B), 21-d (C), 28-d (D), 90-d (E), and 365-d (F) after admission.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323330.g004

3.5 Subgroup analyses of TBAR in AP patients

In our subgroup analyses, we evaluated the influence of several factors—age, race, AKI, sepsis, and severe liver disease—on outcomes. No significant interactions were observed between these factors and TBAR. Notably, in the gender subgroup analysis, significant interactions were detected for early mortality rates at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. However, these interactions attenuated over time and became non-significant at 90 and 365 days. Detailed results are presented in Fig 5.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Forest plots of subgroup analysis of the relationship between all-cause mortality and TBAR in patients with AP admitted 7-d (A), 14-d (B), 21-d (C), 28-d (D), 90-d (E), and 365-d (F).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323330.g005

4 Discussion

Our study demonstrated that the TBAR is an independent predictor of short-term and long-term all-cause mortality in patients with AP, as confirmed by both univariate and multivariate analyses. KM survival analysis revealed that patients with a TBAR ≥ 1.33 had significantly worse short-term and long-term prognoses compared to those with a TBAR < 1.33 (P < 0.001). In the context of long-term mortality prediction, Although the ROC value was lower than that of the SOFA score, there was no statistically significant difference, thereby establishing TBAR as a reliable prognostic indicator. Additionally, RCS analysis indicated a linear relationship between increasing TBAR values and mortality rates among AP patients. Subgroup analyses further validated TBAR’s accuracy in predicting clinical outcomes in AP patients. Gender differences were observed, which may be attributed to the influence of estrogen. Previous studies have shown that estrogen enhances bilirubin metabolism by regulating cytochrome P4502A6[13]. Moreover, estradiol has been shown to upregulate heme oxygenase - 1 (HO - 1) expression and activity, leading to increased carbon monoxide production. This, in turn, helps maintain microcirculation and mitigate hepatic cell dysfunction and injury [14,15]. Estrogen may also reduce bilirubin levels by influencing the activity of UDP - glucuronosyltransferase in the liver [16]. Collectively, these actions exert a positive influence on bilirubin metabolism. Conversely, estrogen downregulates the expression of adhesion and chemokine molecules in response to inflammatory stimuli, thereby diminishing the recruitment and adhesion of leukocytes to the endothelium induced by inflammatory agonists [17]. This anti - inflammatory effect can indirectly impact albumin levels. Regarding etiology, a large - scale global disease burden study revealed significant gender - based differences in the causes of acute pancreatitis. Men are predominantly affected by alcohol - related pancreatitis, which is more likely to result in liver damage [18]. Impaired hepatic bilirubin metabolism consequently leads to bilirubin accumulation and elevated levels in the body. Sachit et al. [19] conducted a large - scale retrospective population study and found that men with acute pancreatitis had a significantly higher mortality rate than women (P < 0.05). This may lead to lower albumin levels and higher bilirubin levels in men. The protective and anti - inflammatory effects of estrogen may exacerbate the albumin level differences between genders. Over time, however, complications and treatment may gradually weaken this interaction. This explains the observed gender interaction in short - term subgroup analyses, which became less pronounced over time and disappeared in long - term follow - up exceeding 90 days.

In the prognostic evaluation of AP, multiple scoring systems have been developed to assess disease severity. However, these systems often involve complex criteria that limit their utility in clinical practice for diagnosis and treatment. In recent years, ratio-based indicators have gained considerable attention for their ability to predict disease severity and outcomes effectively. Studies have identified several key ratios, including the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [20], red cell distribution width-to-platelet ratio [21], blood glucose-to-lymphocyte ratio [22], and lactate-to-albumin ratio [23], as significant predictors of AP prognosis. These indicators are easily accessible and cost-effective, providing clinicians with a simple and efficient means for rapid prognostic assessment.

The TBAR has been widely investigated as a prognostic indicator in various diseases. Zhang et al. [24] conducted a retrospective study of 188 patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma and demonstrated that TBAR is an independent prognostic factor, using preoperative TBAR scores and survival analysis. Huang et al. [25] performed a retrospective analysis of 3,442 patients with acute kidney injury, revealing a mortality rate of 25% in the high-TBAR group. After multivariate adjustment, the HR for the high-TBAR group compared to the low-TBAR group was 1.15 (95% CI: 1.03–1.28), further confirming TBAR as an independent risk factor for acute kidney injury. In a study involving 404 patients with traumatic brain injury, Bai et al. reported that the HR adjusted for multiple factors, including the bilirubin-to-albumin ratio, was 1.217. This finding suggests a significant association with the prognostic risk factors for patients [26]. Additionally, studies [27] have shown that bilirubin encephalopathy is closely associated with TBAR, with higher TBAR levels increasing the risk of bilirubin encephalopathy by 23% (OR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.16–2.48). In a study of 204 patients with liver failure, Li et al. [9] demonstrated that the indirect bilirubin to albumin ratio remains an independent prognostic factor for hepatic encephalopathy, even after univariate and multivariate adjustments (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.32–2.00). Collectively, these studies underscore the prognostic value of the bilirubin to albumin ratio across different diseases, providing a robust theoretical foundation for our research.

Elevated total bilirubin levels, representing the end product of bilirubin metabolism, are commonly associated with pathological conditions such as liver dysfunction and biliary obstruction [28]. In patients with pancreatitis, increased total bilirubin levels may result from biliary obstruction or impaired liver function secondary to pancreatic inflammation [29,30]. Hyperbilirubinemia is not merely a marker of pancreatitis severity but can also exacerbate pancreatic tissue damage through the induction of oxidative stress and inflammatory responses [31]. Additionally, elevated bilirubin levels may disrupt the gut microbiota via altered bile acid metabolism, thereby worsening systemic inflammation [32]. Popa et al. [33] identified an 82.2% correlation between total bilirubin levels and mortality in a retrospective study involving 238 patients with pancreatitis, which may be attributable to liver dysfunction. Similarly, Yu et al. [34] demonstrated that total bilirubin is an independent risk factor for predicting in-hospital mortality in acute pancreatitis (OR=1.247) and has been incorporated into a combined predictive model. A retrospective study focusing on the prognosis of elderly patients with acute pancreatitis also confirmed that bilirubin is an independent risk factor for prognosis [35]. Consequently, elevated total bilirubin levels are significantly associated with adverse outcomes in patients with pancreatitis [36], underscoring its utility as a prognostic indicator. Albumin, the primary plasma protein synthesized by the liver, plays a crucial role in maintaining plasma colloid osmotic pressure, transporting various substances, and providing anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects [37]. Hypoalbuminemia is frequently observed in severe cases of pancreatitis and may result from decreased hepatic synthesis due to inflammation, increased protein catabolism, and capillary leakage [38]. Reduced albumin levels can further exacerbate pancreatic tissue damage and systemic inflammation by diminishing its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant functions [39,40]. Hypoalbuminemia not only reflects the patient’s nutritional status and inflammation level but is also closely associated with the incidence of complications and mortality in pancreatitis [41].

The correlation between total bilirubin and albumin levels with pancreatitis prognosis underscores the interplay between liver function, nutritional status, and the pathological processes of pancreatitis. Systemic inflammation and oxidative stress, triggered by pancreatitis, are the primary drivers of impaired liver function and reduced albumin synthesis [42,43]. Biliary obstruction and cholestasis further strain liver function, leading to elevated total bilirubin levels [44]. These pathological changes interact, forming a vicious cycle that ultimately deteriorates the prognosis in pancreatitis patients.

The TBAR serves as a composite indicator that integrates these two markers into a ratio, leveraging their inverse relationship to provide a comprehensive assessment of disease severity. This ratio simultaneously reflects liver function, inflammatory status, and oxidative stress levels, making it a valuable tool for prognostic evaluation in clinical practice. By integrating two readily accessible laboratory parameters into a single, interpretable metric, the TBAR provides significant clinical utility, particularly in emergency settings involving critically ill patients with pancreatitis. The straightforward calculation of TBAR allows for rapid identification of patients at higher risk of adverse outcomes. Elevated TBAR values typically reflect increased total bilirubin levels and decreased albumin levels, prompting clinicians to adopt more aggressive treatment strategies, such as early fluid resuscitation and enhanced nutritional support. Additionally, TBAR facilitates risk stratification and improves patient outcomes. Overall, TBAR serves as a simple yet effective prognostic marker, offering reliable predictive value for the severity of AP and patient prognosis.

Biliary and alcoholic pancreatitis are widely acknowledged as the primary etiological factors of AP [37]. Biliary pancreatitis predominantly arises from biliary obstruction triggered by gallstones, which is intrinsically linked to the elevation of bilirubin levels [45]. Conversely, The development of hyperbilirubinemia in alcoholic pancreatitis is primarily driven by hepatic injury and inflammatory cascades [46,47]. Prolonged alcohol consumption in individuals with alcoholic pancreatitis exacerbates hypoalbuminemia, attributable to hepatic dysfunction and chronic malnutrition [48]. Furthermore, the severity of acute pancreatitis may act as a potential confounding factor and exert a certain influence on the study outcomes. Severe cases frequently manifest multi-organ dysfunction, predisposing patients to marked elevations in bilirubin levels, pronounced fluid redistribution, and hypoalbuminemia secondary to malnutrition [49]. Consequently, the TBAR values in severe pancreatitis are significantly higher compared to those in mild cases. The two confounding factors mentioned above may lead to variability in the predictive performance of TBAR.

This study employed a public database to analyze the prognostic factors of diseases. Despite the data being sourced from real-world scenarios, the study is subject to several limitations. First, as a single-center investigation, the study may be biased by geographical, demographic, or healthcare setting differences, which limit the generalizability of the findings. Second, certain key variables, such as etiological information, disease severity stratification, and data for non - ICU patients, were severely missing and unavailable due to database limitations, thereby hindering in-depth analyses of specific issues. Finally, the study population spans a long period, which may not fully account for the impact of contemporary medical advancements on mortality rates.

5 Conclusion

Our study indicates that the TBAR effectively predicts mortality outcomes in patients with pancreatitis, both in the short and long term. This finding supports the potential utility of TBAR as a prognostic marker for AP. However, these results require validation through further research.

Acknowledgments

Not applicable.

References

  1. 1. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102–11. pmid:23100216
  2. 2. Mihoc T, Latcu SC, Secasan C-C, Dema V, Cumpanas AA, Selaru M, et al. Pancreatic Morphology, Immunology, and the Pathogenesis of Acute Pancreatitis. Biomedicines. 2024;12(11):2627. pmid:39595191
  3. 3. Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt J, Vege SS, American College of Gastroenterology. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(9):1400–15; 1416. pmid:23896955
  4. 4. Petrov MS, Yadav D. Global epidemiology and holistic prevention of pancreatitis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(3):175–84. pmid:30482911
  5. 5. Ling S, Diao H, Lu G, Shi L. Associations between serum levels of liver function biomarkers and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):3302. pmid:39604890
  6. 6. Wu BU, Johannes RS, Sun X, Tabak Y, Conwell DL, Banks PA. The early prediction of mortality in acute pancreatitis: a large population-based study. Gut. 2008;57(12):1698–703. pmid:18519429
  7. 7. Abedi F, Zarei B, Elyasi S. Albumin: a comprehensive review and practical guideline for clinical use. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2024;80(8):1151–69. pmid:38607390
  8. 8. Li S, Zhang Y, Li M, Xie C, Wu H. Serum albumin, a good indicator of persistent organ failure in acute pancreatitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017;17(1):59. pmid:28446147
  9. 9. Li Y, Liu H, Chen K, Wu X, Wu J, Yang Z, et al. Pathological Significance and Prognostic Roles of Indirect Bilirubin/Albumin Ratio in Hepatic Encephalopathy. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:706407. pmid:34527681
  10. 10. Johnson AEW, Bulgarelli L, Shen L, Gayles A, Shammout A, Horng S, et al. MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset. Sci Data. 2023;10(1):1. pmid:36596836
  11. 11. Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2(7872):81–4. pmid:4136544
  12. 12. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707–10. pmid:8844239
  13. 13. Kao T-L, Chen Y-L, Kuan Y-P, Chang W-C, Ho Y-C, Yeh S, et al. Estrogen-Estrogen Receptor α Signaling Facilitates Bilirubin Metabolism in Regenerating Liver Through Regulating Cytochrome P450 2A6 Expression. Cell Transplant. 2017;26(11):1822–9. pmid:29338386
  14. 14. Toth B, Yokoyama Y, Kuebler JF, Schwacha MG, Rue LW 3rd, Bland KI, et al. Sex differences in hepatic heme oxygenase expression and activity following trauma and hemorrhagic shock. Arch Surg. 2003;138(12):1375–82. pmid:14662543
  15. 15. Szalay L, Shimizu T, Schwacha MG, Choudhry MA, Rue LW 3rd, Bland KI, et al. Mechanism of salutary effects of estradiol on organ function after trauma-hemorrhage: upregulation of heme oxygenase. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;289(1):H92-8. pmid:15734876
  16. 16. Muraca M, Fevery J. Influence of sex and sex steroids on bilirubin uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase activity of rat liver. Gastroenterology. 1984;87(2):308–13. pmid:6428963
  17. 17. Nilsson B-O. Modulation of the inflammatory response by estrogens with focus on the endothelium and its interactions with leukocytes. Inflamm Res. 2007;56(7):269–73. pmid:17659431
  18. 18. Li C-L, Jiang M, Pan C-Q, Li J, Xu L-G. The global, regional, and national burden of acute pancreatitis in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021;21(1):332. pmid:34433418
  19. 19. Sharma S, Weissman S, Aburayyan K, Acharya A, Aziz M, Systrom HK, et al. Sex differences in outcomes of acute pancreatitis: Findings from a nationwide analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2021;28(3):280–6. pmid:33417740
  20. 20. Kong W, He Y, Bao H, Zhang W, Wang X. Diagnostic Value of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio for Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis: A Meta-Analysis. Dis Markers. 2020;2020:9731854. pmid:32454909
  21. 21. Cetinkaya E, Senol K, Saylam B, Tez M. Red cell distribution width to platelet ratio: new and promising prognostic marker in acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(39):14450–4. pmid:25339831
  22. 22. Chen Y, Tang S, Wang Y. Prognostic Value of Glucose-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Pancreatitis. Int J Gen Med. 2021;14:5449–60. pmid:34526812
  23. 23. Liu Q, Zheng H-L, Wu M-M, Wang Q-Z, Yan S-J, Wang M, et al. Association between lactate-to-albumin ratio and 28-days all-cause mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis: A retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1076121. pmid:36591285
  24. 24. Zhang X-J, Fei H, Sun C-Y, Li Z-F, Li Z, Guo C-G, et al. Novel prognostic score based on the preoperative total bilirubin-albumin ratio and fibrinogen-albumin ratio in ampullary adenocarcinoma. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;15(10):2247–58. pmid:37969714
  25. 25. Huang X, Huang Y, Chen M, Liao L, Lin F. Association between total bilirubin/Albumin ratio and all-cause mortality in acute kidney injury patients: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One. 2023;18(11):e0287485. pmid:37910573
  26. 26. Bai X, Wang R, Zhang Z, He M. A prognostic model incorporating bilirubin-to-albumin ratio for patients with traumatic brain injury. Asian J Surg. 2022;45(2):756–8. pmid:34955346
  27. 27. Wang Y, Sheng G, Shi L, Cheng X. Increased serum total bilirubin-albumin ratio was associated with bilirubin encephalopathy in neonates. Biosci Rep. 2020;40(1):BSR20192152. pmid:31950971
  28. 28. Vitek L, Hinds TD Jr, Stec DE, Tiribelli C. The physiology of bilirubin: health and disease equilibrium. Trends Mol Med. 2023;29(4):315–28. pmid:36828710
  29. 29. Hoferica J, Borbély RZ, Aghdam AN, Szalai EÁ, Zolcsák Á, Veres DS, et al. Chronic liver disease is an important risk factor for worse outcomes in acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):16723. pmid:39030187
  30. 30. Zhang C, Lin F, Guo D-F, Wang Q-L, Xiao D-X, Lin J-Y, et al. Assessing the causal link between liver function and acute pancreatitis: A Mendelian randomisation study. PLoS One. 2024;19(4):e0300890. pmid:38578756
  31. 31. Huang S-S, Ding Y, Yi X-N, Mao H-Y, Xie Z-Y, Shen X-K, et al. Exploring the inverse relationship between serum total bilirubin and systemic immune-inflammation index: insights from NHANES data (2009-2018). Eur J Med Res. 2024;29(1):362. pmid:38997774
  32. 32. Song X, Sun X, Oh SF, Wu M, Zhang Y, Zheng W, et al. Microbial bile acid metabolites modulate gut RORγ+ regulatory T cell homeostasis. Nature. 2020; 577:410–5. pmid:31875848.
  33. 33. Popa CC, Badiu DC, Rusu OC, Grigorean VT, Neagu SI, Strugaru CR. Mortality prognostic factors in acute pancreatitis. J Med Life. 2016;9(4):413–8. pmid:27928447
  34. 34. Yu L, Zhou X, Li Y, Liu M. Establishment and evaluation of early in-hospital death prediction model for patients with acute pancreatitis in intensive care unit. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2023;35(8):865–9. pmid:37593868
  35. 35. Zhu Q, Lu M, Ling B, Tan D, Wang H. Construction and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in elderly patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study from a tertiary center. BMC Gastroenterol. 2024;24(1):219. pmid:38977953
  36. 36. Ali H, Moond V, Vikash F, Dahiya DS, Gangwani MK, Sohail AH, et al. Risk score to predict inpatient mortality of acute pancreatitis patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Pancreatology. 2024;24(8):1213–8. pmid:39462699
  37. 37. Chaudhuri D, Sasaki K, Karkar A, Sharif S, Lewis K, Mammen MJ, et al. Corticosteroids in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(5):521–37. pmid:33876268
  38. 38. Ocskay K, Vinkó Z, Németh D, Szabó L, Bajor J, Gódi S, et al. Hypoalbuminemia affects one third of acute pancreatitis patients and is independently associated with severity and mortality. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):24158. pmid:34921151
  39. 39. Manolis AA, Manolis TA, Melita H, Mikhailidis DP, Manolis AS. Low serum albumin: A neglected predictor in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur J Intern Med. 2022;102:24–39. pmid:35537999
  40. 40. Xu H, Wan J, He W, Zhu Y, Zeng H, Liu P, et al. Albumin infusion may decrease the mortality of hypoalbuminemia patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2023;23(1):195. pmid:37277756
  41. 41. Hong W, Lin S, Zippi M, Geng W, Stock S, Basharat Z, et al. Serum Albumin Is Independently Associated with Persistent Organ Failure in Acute Pancreatitis. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;2017:5297143. pmid:29147647
  42. 42. Liu X, Zheng Y, Meng Z, Wang H, Zhang Y, Xue D. Gene Regulation of Neutrophils Mediated Liver and Lung Injury through NETosis in Acute Pancreatitis. Inflammation. 2025;48(1):393–411. pmid:38884700
  43. 43. Li X, Cao Y, Liu Z, Chen H, Mao H. The Relationship between Liver Injury and Serum Levels of C-Reactive Protein and Procalcitonin in Patients with Acute Pancreatitis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2019;29(3):287–9. pmid:30823962
  44. 44. Salomon WL, Vreman HJ, Kwong LK, Stevenson DK. Red cell destruction and bilirubin production in adult rats with short-term biliary obstruction. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1986;5(5):806–10. pmid:3761112
  45. 45. Shibayama Y. Factors producing bile infarction and bile duct proliferation in biliary obstruction. J Pathol. 1990;160(1):57–62. pmid:2313481
  46. 46. Dukić M, Radonjić T, Jovanović I, Zdravković M, Todorović Z, Kraišnik N, et al. Alcohol, Inflammation, and Microbiota in Alcoholic Liver Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(4):3735. pmid:36835145
  47. 47. Ramírez-Mejía MM, Castillo-Castañeda SM, Pal SC, Qi X, Méndez-Sánchez N. The Multifaceted Role of Bilirubin in Liver Disease: A Literature Review. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2024;12(11):939–48. pmid:39544246
  48. 48. Styskel B, Natarajan Y, Kanwal F. Nutrition in Alcoholic Liver Disease: An Update. Clin Liver Dis. 2019;23(1):99–114. pmid:30454836
  49. 49. Mederos MA, Reber HA, Girgis MD. Acute Pancreatitis: A Review. JAMA. 2021;325(4):382–90. pmid:33496779