Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

The ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 does not affect IL-12 expression and signaling

  • Jinjing Cao,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Division of Immunology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

  • Gerardo Omar Alvarez Salinas,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Division of Immunology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

  • Gunter Schmidtke,

    Roles Methodology, Supervision

    Affiliation Division of Immunology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

  • Michael Basler

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    michael.basler@bitg.ch

    Affiliations Division of Immunology, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Baden-Württemberg, Germany, Institute of Cell Biology and Immunology Thurgau (BITg), University of Konstanz, Kreuzlingen, Switzerland

Abstract

The ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 is strongly expressed in dendritic cells (DCs) and upregulated during inflammation. Interleukin (IL)-12 plays a critical role in promoting CD4+ T cell differentiation into Th1 cells and in IFN-γ induction in T cells. Previously, it was shown that FAT10 is required for IFN-γ expression of activated T cells. In this study, we investigated whether FAT10 influences IL-12 expression or IL-12 induced signaling and thereby contributes to the reduced IFN-γ expression. Presence or absence of FAT10 did not alter IL-12 expression in DC2.4 cells and in bone marrow derived DCs. Furthermore, FAT10 had no influence on the differentiation of naïve T helper cells to Th1 cells under Th1 polarizing conditions. Additionally, FAT10 did not alter STAT4 phosphorylation in IL-12 receptor stimulated T cells. Taken together, FAT10 neither influences IL-12 expression in DCs nor affects IL-12 receptor signaling in T cells. Hence, the previously observed influence of FAT10 on IFN-γ secretion is not mediated by IL-12.

Introduction

Whereas ubiquitin is expressed ubiquitously, human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-F adjacent transcript 10 (FAT10) is mainly expressed in tissues of the immune system such as lymph nodes or thymus [1,2]. Furthermore, FAT10 expression can be induced in a synergistic manner by IFN-γ and TNF [3], or during the maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) [1]. FAT10 is encoded in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) locus [4,5], and is the only ubiquitin-like modifier that directly targets its substrates for degradation by the 26S proteasome in a ubiquitin-independent manner [6,7]. Hitherto, several proteins have been identified as interacting partners of FAT10, including the autophagy adaptor p62 [8], histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) [9], AP-1 transcription factor subunit (Jun) [10], proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) [11], β-catenin [12], mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) [13], FAT10 E3 ligase parkin [13], and the HECT-type ubiquitin E3 ligase HUWE1 [14]. Each of these proteins plays a critical role in different biological processes, underscoring the potential significance of FAT10 in diverse cellular functions. Interestingly, phosphorylation of FAT10 seems to fine-tune FAT10’s interactions with specific interaction partners, indicated by a more efficient conjugation to substrates of phosphorylated FAT10 [15]. Apart from different cellular functions, FAT10 is involved in different immunological processes [16,17]. Due to its selective expression in medullary thymic epithelial cells, it influences T cell selection [2]. Furthermore, FAT10 might play a role in the MHC class I antigen presentation pathway [16,18,19]. Moreover, FAT10 contributes to intracellular defense against bacteria by decorating autophagy-targeted Salmonella [20]. FAT10 knockout mice are viable and fertile, indicating that the lack of FAT10 does not interfere with essential housekeeping tasks [21]. However, lymphocytes of FAT10-deficient mice showed increased spontaneous apoptotic cell death. Infection of mice with influenza virus or lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus rapidly induces FAT10 mRNA expression [22]. Splenocytes from LCMV-infected FAT10-deficient mice exhibited diminished IFN-γ secretion and IL-12 p40 mRNA expression, while displaying enhanced production of type I interferons compared to their FAT10-proficient counterparts. Following viral infection, FAT10 fine-tunes the balance of interferons by reducing the production of type I interferons and increasing the levels of type II interferons [22].

Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is mainly secreted by dendritic cells (DCs), B cells, monocytes, and macrophages [23], and belongs to the IL-12 family, including other cytokines such as IL-23, IL-27, and IL-35 [24]. IL-12 consists of two subunits, IL-12p35 and IL-12p40, which are covalently linked to form the bioactive IL-12p70 [23]. The predominantly proinflammatory cytokine, plays a critical role in the development of T helper (Th)1 cells [24]. The signaling pathway of IL-12 involves the signal transducer activator of transcription (STAT) family, including STAT1, STAT4, and STAT5 [25]. Among these, STAT4 plays a key role in IL-12 receptor induced signaling.

In this study, we investigate whether altered IL-12 expression or signaling contribute to the previously observed reduced IFN-γ secretion of FAT10-deficient mouse CD8+ T cells.

Materials and methods

Mice

C57BL/6 mice were originally purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Sulzfeld, Germany). FAT10-/- mice [21] were kindly provided by A. Canaan and S. M. Weissman (Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT). Mice were housed in a pathogen-free environment. They were matched by sex and age, and used when they were between 6–10 weeks of age. Mouse organ collection was approved by the Regierungspräsidium Freiburg ethics review board (approval number T-24/02TFA). Mice were euthanized using CO₂ inhalation, in accordance with approved animal care protocols. No experiments on living mice were performed.

Cells

DC2.4 is a dendritic cell line (a kind gift from Dr. K. Rock, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA) and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Gibco, 61870010), supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS, Gibco, 10270106), 1x Penicillin-Streptomycin (Gibco, 15140122). FAT10 expressing DC2.4 cells were generated by infecting DC2.4 cells with lentiviral particles encoding murine 3xFLAG-FAT10. After three days of cultivation, the cells were selected with 5 μg/ml puromycin (Gibco, A1113802).

To generate bone marrow-derived DCs (BMDCs), bone marrow from the femur and tibia of 10-weeks-old C57BL/6 wild-type mice and FAT10-/- mice was harvested. Isolated bone marrow cells were cultured in 10 cm dishes in RPMI 1640 medium, supplemented with 10% FBS, 1x penicillin/streptomycin, 50 µ M β-mercaptoethanol (β-Me, ROTH, 4227.3), and 20 ng/ml recombinant murine GM-CSF (peprotech, 315–03) for 10 days.

Lentivirus production

Production of lentiviruses was exactly performed as previously described [26]. In brief, lentiviral particles were produced by transient co-transfection of the expression vector 3xFlag-FAT10, the envelope vector pMD2.G, and the packaging vector psPAX2 into HEK293T cells using polyethylenimine (PEI, Polysciences, 23966). For this purpose, HEK293T cells were cultured in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium (IMDM) containing GlutaMAX (Gibco, 31980022) supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. Supernatant containing lentiviral particles was harvested 48 h and 72 h post-transfection. The lentiviral particles were stored at ‐80 °C.

Th1 cell differentiation

CD4+ T cells were magnetically isolated from the spleens according to the manufacturer´s protocol (CD4 (L3T4) MicroBeads, Miltenyi Biotec, 130-117-043). Th1 differentiation was performed as previously described [27]. Shortly, purified cells were activated with plate-bound anti-mouse CD3ε antibody (BioLegend, 100302, Clone 145-2C11) and anti-mouse CD28 antibody (BioLegend, 102102, Clone 37.51) for 3 days in the presence of 10 ng/ml IL-12, 10 ng/ml IL-2, and 10 μg/ml anti-IL-4 (CytoBox Th1; Miltenyi Biotec, 130-107-761).

Intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry

Polarized CD4+ T cells were restimulated for 5 h with 25 ng/ml phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and 500 ng/ml ionomycin in the presence of 10 µg/ml brefeldin A. After surface staining with PE anti-mouse CD4 Antibody (BioLegend, 100408, Clone GK1.5), cells were fixed with 70 µl 4% paraformaldehyde, washed with permeabilization buffer (Invitrogen), and stained with FITC anti-mouse IFN-γ antibody (BioLegend, 505805, Clone XMG1.2). The samples were measured and analyzed on Accuri C6 flow cytometers (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA).

Immunoblotting

Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.6, 50 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1% NP40, 1x EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, 4693132001), 1x PhosSTOP (Roche, 4906845001), incubated on ice for 30 min and centrifuged for 15 min at 13,000 x g. Total cell lysates were boiled with 4 × SDS sample buffer (250 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 40% glycerol, 8% SDS, 0.004% bromophenol blue) supplemented with 20% β-mercaptoethanol at 95°C for 5 min. Equal amounts of cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Protein was analyzed by the following antibodies: anti-pSTAT1 antibody (Cell Signaling, 7649S), anti-STAT1 antibody (Cell Signaling, 9172S), and anti-pSTAT4 antibody (Cell Signaling, 4134S). Anti-GAPDH antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, G9545) served as loading control. IRDye680RD goat anti-mouse (LICOR, 926-68070) or anti-rabbit (LICOR, 926-68071) and IRDye800CW goat anti-rabbit (LICOR, 926-32211) or anti-mouse (LICOR, 926-32210) were used as secondary antibodies. The LI-COR Odyssey Imager (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA) and the Image Studio Lite Version 5.2 were used for analyzing signals.

Real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA was extracted (RNeasy Mini Kit, QIAGEN, 74106) from cells, followed by reverse transcription (cDNA Synthesis Kit, Biozym, 331470L). Then, real-time RT-PCR (Biozym Blue S´Green Kit, 331416XL) was executed in a Biometra TProfessional Thermocycler (Analytik Jena). The quantitative value of each sample was normalized to mouse GAPDH, which was used as reference gene. Further information on primer pairs and reagents can be found in Supplementary Tables S1 and S2.

ELISA

The secretion of IL-12 was measured according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (ELISA MAX™ Deluxe Set Mouse IL-12 (p70), BioLegend, 433604).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using Prism software (GraphPad, version 8.0). For comparisons involving two continuous variables, a two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test was used, while for comparisons involving more than two continuous variables, one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test was applied. The data are presented as individual scattered points along with the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Results

FAT10 does not influence IL-12 expression in DC2.4 cells

Mah et al. showed that in the absence of FAT10 IFN-γ secretion of TCR stimulated splenocytes derived from LCMV-infected mice is strongly reduced [22]. Furthermore, these splenocytes expressed less mRNA for IL-12 p40 but secreted more IFN-α and IFN-β. Il-12 secreted by DCs is driving the differentiation of naïve T helper cells into Th1 cells and contributes to the proper activation of cytotoxic T cells. In this study, we intend to investigate the effect of FAT10 on IL-12 expression and signaling. In a first step, the effect of FAT10 on IL-12 expression was investigated in the murine dendritic cell-like cell line DC2.4. Since there are no antibodies available recognizing mouse FAT10 protein, FAT10 expression levels had to be analyzed on mRNA level using real-time RT-PCR. Non-stimulated DC2.4 cells barley express FAT10 mRNA (Fig 1A). Stimulation of DC2.4 with IFN-γ or IFN-γ/TNF strongly induced FAT10 mRNA, whereas LPS alone had no effect on FAT10 expression. Analysis of IL-12 mRNA levels in these stimulated cells, revealed a strong IL-12 mRNA induction (Fig 1B). Hence, DC2.4 is a suitable cell line to investigate the effect of FAT10 on IL-12. DC2.4 cells were stably transfected with FAT10 (Fig 1C). Stimulation with LPS strongly induced IL-12 mRNA in DC2.4 wild type and FAT10 overexpressing cells. However, there was no difference in IL-12 mRNA level in FAT10 overexpressing DC2.4 cells compared to wild type DC2.4 cells.

thumbnail
Fig 1. The Impact of FAT10 on IL-12 expression in DC2.4 cells.

(A, B) DC2.4 cells were treated with TNF (400 U/ml)/IFN-γ (200 U/ml), IFN-γ (200 U/ml) in combination with (indicated +LPS) or without (indicated -) LPS (2 μg/ml) for 1 day. The mRNA level of FAT10 (A) and IL-12 (B) were detected by real-time RT-PCR. (C, D) DC2.4 cells and DC2.4-mFAT10 cells (stably expressing mouse FAT10) were treated with (indicated +LPS) or without (indicated -) LPS (2 μg/ml) for 1 day. The mRNA level of FAT10 (C) and IL-12 (D) were detected by real-time RT-PCR. (A-D) The y-axis depicts relative mRNA levels normalized to GAPDH. Data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. P values are indicated. Data are depicted as mean ± SDs. Each symbol in the graph represents an individual experiment. A, B: n = 5; C: n = 17, D: n = 15.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323005.g001

FAT10 has no significant effect on IL-12 expression in bone marrow-derived dendritic cells

To further explore the effect of FAT10 on IL-12, we conducted experiments using bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) from C57BL/6 wild type mice and FAT10-/- mice. To up-regulate FAT10, in vitro generated BMDCs were stimulated with IFN-γ for one day to induce FAT10 expression. TNF was not included in this stimulation setup to prevent IL-12 expression during FAT10 induction. This was followed by an additional day of LPS stimulation to induce IL-12 expression. Indeed, in this experimental set-up we observed a strong induction of FAT10 (Fig 2A) and IL-12 (Fig 2B). However, FAT10 wild type and FAT10-deficient BMDCs induced similar levels of IL-12 mRNA. Next, we analyzed IL-12 secretion into the supernatant of IFN-γ/LPS stimulated wild type and FAT10-deficient BMDCs by ELISA. Similar to mRNA levels, FAT10 did not affect IL-12 secretion in BMDCs (Fig 2C).

thumbnail
Fig 2. No impact of FAT10 on IL-12 expression in BMDCs.

(A-C) BMDCs were generated from C57BL/6 wild type mice or FAT10-/- mice. BMDCs were treated with IFN-γ (200 U/ml) for 1 day, followed by LPS (1 μg/ml) treatment for 1 further day (indicated IFN-γ + LPS) or were left untreated (indicated untreated). (A, B) The mRNA level of FAT10 (A) and IL-12 (B) were detected by real-time RT-PCR. The y-axis depicts relative mRNA levels normalized to GAPDH. (C) The secretion of IL-12 into the supernatant was measured by ELISA. (A-C) Data was analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. P values are indicated. Data are depicted as mean ± SDs. Each symbol in the graph represents BMDCs derived from an individual mouse. n = 6 per group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323005.g002

FAT10 does not affect Th1 cell differentiation

IL-12 is essential for Th1 cell differentiation, which plays a crucial role in protective cell-mediated immunity against various intracellular pathogens [28,29]. In vitro, Th1 cells can be generated in the presence of IL-12. If FAT10 plays a crucial role in response to IL-12 stimulation, this should affect differentiation of FAT10-deficient Th1 cells. CD4+ T cells were magnetically isolated from the spleens of C57BL/6 wild type mice and FAT10-/- mice and cultured under Th1-polarizing conditions for 72 hours. IFN-γ is the signature cytokine of Th1 cells. Therefore, efficiency of Th1 differentiation was analyzed by intracellular IFN-γ staining of CD4+ T cells. No significant differences in Th1 differentiation between C57BL/6 wild type and FAT10-/- CD4+ T cells could be observed (Fig 3), indicating that FAT10 does not play an important role in the Th1 skewing process.

thumbnail
Fig 3. FAT10 does not affect Th1 differentiation.

CD4+ T cells were magnetically purified from the spleen of C57BL/6 wild type mice or FAT10-/- mice. Purified cells were cultured under Th0 or Th1 skewing condition for 72 h. Cells were restimulated with PMA/ionomycin in the presence of brefeldin A for 4 h, stained for CD4 and intracellular IFN-γ, and analyzed by flow cytometry. (A) Representative dot plots. (B) Bar graph depicting percentage of IFN-γ + CD4 cells. Data are depicted as mean ± SDs of CD4+ cells isolated from 6 different mice per group (n = 6) statistically analyzed by unpaired Student’s t-test.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323005.g003

FAT10 does not modulate STAT signaling pathway

Although the absence of FAT10 had no crucial role on Th1-polarizing condition, we further investigated the effect of FAT10 in IL-12 receptor signaling. IL-12 activates CD4+ T cells to produce IFN-γ via the STAT signaling pathway [30]. After IL-12 interacts with its receptor subunits IL-12Rβ1 and IL-12Rβ2, it triggers two signaling pathways: the Janus kinase (JAK) and STAT pathways [31,32]. STAT4 serves as the primary downstream signaling target of IL-12, whereas IL-12 has less influence on STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 molecules [28]. Therefore, we only investigated STAT4 and STAT1. Murine naïve T cells barely express FAT10 [33]. Therefore, magnetically isolated CD4+ T were stimulated with TNF/IFN-γ for 1 day. Analysis of STAT1 phosphorylation by western blot revealed that this treatment induced the pSTAT1 (Fig 4A). Hence, this experimental set-up could not be used to investigate activation of STAT1 after IL-12R stimulation. Nevertheless, we observed no influence of FAT10 on STAT1 phosphorylation after TNF/IFN-γ stimulation (Fig 4A,B). After IL-12R stimulation, STAT4 is phosphorylated, and dimerization enables subsequent nuclear translocation. Magnetically isolated CD4+ T cells were treated with TNF/IFN-γ to induce FAT10 for 24 h [33]. Interestingly, this treatment did not induce STAT4 phosphorylation (Fig 4C). TNF/IFN-γ pre-treated cells were stimulated with IL-12 for 2h. Phosphorylation of STAT4 was analyzed by western blot. Within 2h, pSTAT4 could be detected. However, no difference in STAT4 phosphorylation could be observed between C57BL/6 wild type and FAT10-deficient CD4+ T cells (Fig 4D). These results suggest that FAT10 does not modulate the STAT signaling pathway in CD4+ T cells.

thumbnail
Fig 4. FAT10 does not modulate the IL-12 signaling pathway.

(A-D) CD4+ T cells were magnetically purified from spleens of C57BL/6 wild type mice or FAT10-/- mice. (A, B) CD4+ T cells were treated with TNF (400 U/ml)/IFN-γ (200 U/ml) (indicated +) for 1 day or were left untreated (indicated -). pSTAT1, STAT1, and GAPDH were analyzed by western blot. (B) Quantification of pSTAT1 normalized to GAPDH. Data are depicted as mean ± SDs derived from 7 different experiments (n = 7). (C, D) CD4+ T cells were treated with TNF (400U/ml)/IFN-γ (200 U/ml) for 1 day or left untreated, followed by a treatment with IL-12 (10 ng/ml) for 2 h. Treatment regime is indicated. pSTAT4 and GAPDH were analyzed by western blot. (D) Quantification of pSTAT4 normalized to GAPDH. Data are depicted as mean ± SDs derived from 5 different experiments (n = 5).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323005.g004

Discussion

FAT10 is the only ubiquitin-like modifier targeting proteins for degradation by the proteasome [7]. By this mean it can potentially control any processes, such as signaling or transcription, within cells. Since FAT10 is expressed in lymphoid tissues and can be strongly induced in an inflammatory environment, such processes might play a crucial role in inflammation. Indeed, phosphorylated FAT10 is essential for the efficient inhibition of IFN-β secretion upon TNF stimulation and during influenza A virus infection [34]. Phosphorylated FAT10 has been demonstrated to interact with OTUB1, leading to a reduction in whole ubiquitylation levels and suppression of IFN-I induction through modulation of TRAF3 signaling. Furthermore, during influenza A virus infection, the presence of FAT10 leads to a reduction in the total ubiquitination of the E3 ligase TRIM21. The degradation of TRIM21 mediated by FAT10 decreased IFN-β production.[35]. Dendritic cells initiate antigen-specific immune responses and are considered as the master regulators of the immune response [36]. FAT10 is strongly expressed in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells [1]. Notably, FAT10 mRNA expression is increased during the later stages of dendritic cell maturation. Dendritic cells stimulated with LPS exhibited enhanced FAT10 expression and an accumulation of FAT10 conjugates [37]. IL-12 is primarily secreted by monocytes, macrophages, B cells and dendritic cells [23]. IL-12 secreted by DCs is crucial for proper activation of cytotoxic T cells and T helper cells and for promoting Th1 differentiation [38]. Interestingly, FAT10-/- mice exhibit higher IL-12p40 expression in the spleen compared to FAT10+/- mice three days post LCMV infection [22]. This raised the question whether FAT10 is involved in regulating IL-12 expression in dendritic cells or influencing IL-12 receptor signaling in T cells.

The murine DC cell line DC2.4 is an established model to study DC functions [39]. DC maturation stimuli, such as LPS, poly (I:C), IL-1β, and R848 can induce IL-12 production [3941]. In a first step, we investigated whether LPS can induce IL-12 mRNA in DC2.4. Indeed, LPS induced IL-12p40 mRNA 24 h post stimulation (Fig 1B). IL-12p35 mRNA induction could not consistently and reliably be detected in our set-up, which might slightly limit the interpretation of our results. Whereas LPS barely induced FAT10, IFN-γ or TNF/IFN-γ strongly upregulated FAT10 expression in DC2.4 cells (Fig 1A). Interestingly, IFN-γ or TNF/IFN-γ treatment strongly enhanced LPS induced IL-12p40 mRNA expression. To study the effect of FAT10 on IL-12p40 mRNA induction in DC2.4 cells, DC2.4 cells stably overexpressing FAT10 were generated (Fig 1C). Notably, wild type DC2.4 cells barely express FAT10. LPS stimulation induced a strong induction of IL-12p40 mRNA in wild type and FAT10 overexpressing DC2.4 cells. However, absence of FAT10 (wild type DC2.4 cells) or overexpression of FAT10 had no influence on IL-12p40 mRNA expression. These results were confirmed in primary bone marrow derived dendritic cells derived from wild type C57BL/6 mice and FAT10-deficient mice (Fig 2). Although FAT10 was strongly up-regulated in wild type LPS/IFN-γ stimulated BMDCs (Fig 2A), no influence of FAT10 on IL-12 mRNA (Fig 2B) or protein (Fig 2C) levels could be observed in BMDCs. Taken together, these data strongly indicate that FAT10 does not play a significant role in IL-12 expression in murine DCs (Figs 1,2).

Mah et al. reported a reduced IFN-γ production of TCR-stimulated FAT10-deficient splenocytes [22]. The authors speculated that altered IL-12 expression could account for the diminished IFN-γ production in the absence of FAT10. However, we demonstrated that IL-12 expression is not altered in presence or absence of FAT10 (Figs 1,2). IL-12 stimulation of T cells strongly contributes to IFN-γ expression of activated T cells [42]. Hence, an altered IL-12 signaling in T cells might also lead to the reduced IFN-γ expression observed by Mah et al. [22]. Since IL-12 stimulates CD4+ T cell differentiation into Th1 cells via the STAT signaling pathway, the influence of FAT10 on Th1 differentiation was investigated. Wild type and FAT10-deficient CD4+ T cells were polarized in Th1 skewing condition. Both wild type and FAT10-/- CD4+ cells differentiated to IFN-γ producing Th1 cells. However, no influence of FAT10 on Th1 differentiation was observed (Fig 3). This indicates that the absence of FAT10 in T cells does influence IL-12R signaling induced by the Th1 skewing cytokine IL-12. Although the requirement of IL-12 for Th1 differentiation is well established, we can not completely exclude that IL-12 is required at all for Th1 differentiation in our in vitro Th1 differentiation set-up, which might limit the interpretation of our results. Nevertheless, IL-12 receptor signaling was further investigated in T cells (Fig 4). However, IL-12 induced signaling in CD4+ T cells manifested in similar phosphorylation of STAT4 in FAT10-proficient and FAT10-deficient cells, showing that FAT10 does not influence IL-12R signaling in CD4+ T cells.

Taken together, we found no indications that FAT10 alters IL-12 expression in DCs nor IL-12 induced signaling in T cells. Therefore, we conclude that a different mechanism is responsible for the previously observed reduction of IFN-γ secretion in FAT10-deficient splenocytes [22].

Supporting information

S1 Table. Primer pairs for used for real-time RT PCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323005.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. The fat10 gene expression in C57BL/6 mice of Fig 4. CD4+ T cells were magnetically purified from spleens of C57BL/6 wild type mice.

CD4+ T cells were treated with TNF (400 U/ml)/IFN-γ (200 U/ml) (indicated +) for 1 day or were left untreated (indicated -). The mRNA level of FAT10 were determined by real-time RT-PCR. The y-axis depicts relative mRNA levels normalized to GAPDH. Data are depicted as mean ± SDs derived from 4 different experiments (n = 4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323005.s004

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Original uncropped western blots of Fig 4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323005.s005

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Katharina Inholz, Natalie Pach, Dennis Mink, Dennis Horvath, Christine Wünsch, and Ilona Kindinger for their continued help.

References

  1. 1. Lukasiak S, Schiller C, Oehlschlaeger P, Schmidtke G, Krause P, Legler DF, et al. Proinflammatory cytokines cause FAT10 upregulation in cancers of liver and colon. Oncogene. 2008;27(46):6068–74. pmid:18574467
  2. 2. Buerger S, Herrmann VL, Mundt S, Trautwein N, Groettrup M, Basler M. The ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 Is selectively expressed in medullary thymic epithelial cells and modifies T cell selection. J Immunol. 2015;195(9):4106–16. pmid:26401002
  3. 3. Raasi S, Schmidtke G, de Giuli R, Groettrup M. A ubiquitin-like protein which is synergistically inducible by interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Eur J Immunol. 1999;29(12):4030–6. pmid:10602013
  4. 4. Fan W, Liu YC, Parimoo S, Weissman SM. Olfactory receptor-like genes are located in the human major histocompatibility complex. Genomics. 1995;27(1):119–23. pmid:7665158
  5. 5. Fan W, Cai W, Parimoo S, Schwarz DC, Lennon GG, Weissman SM. Identification of seven new human MHC class I region genes around the HLA-F locus. Immunogenetics. 1996;44(2):97–103. pmid:8662070
  6. 6. Hipp MS, Kalveram B, Raasi S, Groettrup M, Schmidtke G. FAT10, a ubiquitin-independent signal for proteasomal degradation. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25(9):3483–91. pmid:15831455
  7. 7. Schmidtke G, Kalveram B, Groettrup M. Degradation of FAT10 by the 26S proteasome is independent of ubiquitylation but relies on NUB1L. FEBS Lett. 2009;583(3):591–4. pmid:19166848
  8. 8. Aichem A, Kalveram B, Spinnenhirn V, Kluge K, Catone N, Johansen T, et al. The proteomic analysis of endogenous FAT10 substrates identifies p62/SQSTM1 as a substrate of FAT10ylation. J Cell Sci. 2012;125(Pt 19):4576–85. pmid:22797925
  9. 9. Kalveram B, Schmidtke G, Groettrup M. The ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 interacts with HDAC6 and localizes to aggresomes under proteasome inhibition. J Cell Sci. 2008;121(Pt 24):4079–88. pmid:19033385
  10. 10. Aichem A, Sailer C, Ryu S, Catone N, Stankovic-Valentin N, Schmidtke G, et al. The ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 interferes with SUMO activation. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):4452. pmid:31575873
  11. 11. Chen Z, Zhang W, Yun Z, Zhang X, Gong F, Wang Y, et al. Ubiquitin‑like protein FAT10 regulates DNA damage repair via modification of proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Mol Med Rep. 2018;17(6):7487–96. pmid:29620277
  12. 12. Dominguez-Brauer C, Khatun R, Elia AJ, Thu KL, Ramachandran P, Baniasadi SP, et al. E3 ubiquitin ligase Mule targets β-catenin under conditions of hyperactive Wnt signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(7):E1148–57. pmid:28137882
  13. 13. Roverato ND, Sailer C, Catone N, Aichem A, Stengel F, Groettrup M. Parkin is an E3 ligase for the ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10, which inhibits Parkin activation and mitophagy. Cell Rep. 2021;34(11):108857. pmid:33730565
  14. 14. Mueller S, Bialas J, Ryu S, Catone N, Aichem A. The ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 covalently modifies HUWE1 and strengthens the interaction of AMBRA1 and HUWE1. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0290002. pmid:37578983
  15. 15. Cao J, Aichem A, Basler M, Alvarez Salinas GO, Schmidtke G. Phosphorylated FAT10 is more efficiently conjugated to substrates, does not bind to NUB1L, and does not alter degradation by the proteasome. Biomedicines. 2024;12(12):2795. pmid:39767703
  16. 16. Basler M, Buerger S, Groettrup M. The ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 in antigen processing and antimicrobial defense. Mol Immunol. 2015;68(2 Pt A):129–32. pmid:25983082
  17. 17. Mah MM, Roverato N, Groettrup M. Regulation of interferon induction by the ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10. Biomolecules. 2020;10(6):951. pmid:32586037
  18. 18. Ebstein F, Lehmann A, Kloetzel P-M. The FAT10- and ubiquitin-dependent degradation machineries exhibit common and distinct requirements for MHC class I antigen presentation. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69(14):2443–54. pmid:22349260
  19. 19. Pach N, Basler M. Cellular stress increases DRIP production and MHC Class I antigen presentation. Front Immunol. 2024;15:1445338. pmid:39247192
  20. 20. Spinnenhirn V, Farhan H, Basler M, Aichem A, Canaan A, Groettrup M. The ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 decorates autophagy-targeted Salmonella and contributes to Salmonella resistance in mice. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(Pt 22):4883–93. pmid:25271057
  21. 21. Canaan A, Yu X, Booth CJ, Lian J, Lazar I, Gamfi SL, et al. FAT10/diubiquitin-like protein-deficient mice exhibit minimal phenotypic differences. Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26(13):5180–9. pmid:16782901
  22. 22. Mah MM, Basler M, Groettrup M. The ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 is required for normal IFN-γ production by activated CD8+ T cells. Mol Immunol. 2019;108:111–20. pmid:30818228
  23. 23. Gee K, Guzzo C, Che Mat NF, Ma W, Kumar A. The IL-12 family of cytokines in infection, inflammation and autoimmune disorders. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets. 2009;8(1):40–52. pmid:19275692
  24. 24. Vignali DAA, Kuchroo VK. IL-12 family cytokines: immunological playmakers. Nat Immunol. 2012;13(8):722–8. pmid:22814351
  25. 25. Gollob JA, Murphy EA, Mahajan S, Schnipper CP, Ritz J, Frank DA. Altered interleukin-12 responsiveness in Th1 and Th2 cells is associated with the differential activation of STAT5 and STAT1. Blood. 1998;91(4):1341–54. pmid:9454765
  26. 26. Schmidtke G, Schregle R, Alvarez G, Huber EM, Groettrup M. The 20S immunoproteasome and constitutive proteasome bind with the same affinity to PA28αβ and equally degrade FAT10. Mol Immunol. 2019;113:22–30. pmid:29208314
  27. 27. Oliveri F, Basler M, Rao TN, Fehling HJ, Groettrup M. Immunoproteasome inhibition reduces the T Helper 2 response in mouse models of allergic airway inflammation. Front Immunol. 2022;13:870720. pmid:35711460
  28. 28. Trinchieri G. Interleukin-12 and the regulation of innate resistance and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2003;3(2):133–46. pmid:12563297
  29. 29. Sinigaglia F, D’Ambrosio D, Panina-Bordignon P, Rogge L. Regulation of the IL-12/IL-12R axis: a critical step in T-helper cell differentiation and effector function. Immunol Rev. 1999;170:65–72. pmid:10566142
  30. 30. Thierfelder WE, van Deursen JM, Yamamoto K, Tripp RA, Sarawar SR, Carson RT, et al. Requirement for Stat4 in interleukin-12-mediated responses of natural killer and T cells. Nature. 1996;382(6587):171–4. pmid:8700208
  31. 31. Zou J, Presky DH, Wu CY, Gubler U. Differential associations between the cytoplasmic regions of the interleukin-12 receptor subunits beta1 and beta2 and JAK kinases. J Biol Chem. 1997;272(9):6073–7. pmid:9038232
  32. 32. Bacon CM, McVicar DW, Ortaldo JR, Rees RC, O’Shea JJ, Johnston JA. Interleukin 12 (IL-12) induces tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK2 and TYK2: differential use of Janus family tyrosine kinases by IL-2 and IL-12. J Exp Med. 1995;181(1):399–404. pmid:7528775
  33. 33. Schregle R, Mah MM, Mueller S, Aichem A, Basler M, Groettrup M. The expression profile of the ubiquitin-like modifier FAT10 in immune cells suggests cell type-specific functions. Immunogenetics. 2018;70(7):429–38. pmid:29508036
  34. 34. Saxena K, Roverato ND, Reithmann M, Mah MM, Schregle R, Schmidtke G, et al. FAT10 is phosphorylated by IKKβ to inhibit the antiviral type-I interferon response. Life Sci Alliance. 2023;7(1):e202101282. pmid:37940187
  35. 35. Saxena K, Inholz K, Basler M, Aichem A. FAT10 inhibits TRIM21 to down-regulate antiviral type-I interferon secretion. Life Sci Alliance. 2024;7(9):e202402786. pmid:38977311
  36. 36. Mellman I. Dendritic cells: master regulators of the immune response. Cancer Immunol Res. 2013;1(3):145–9. pmid:24777676
  37. 37. Ebstein F, Lange N, Urban S, Seifert U, Krüger E, Kloetzel P-M. Maturation of human dendritic cells is accompanied by functional remodelling of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41(5):1205–15. pmid:19028597
  38. 38. Langrish CL, McKenzie BS, Wilson NJ, de Waal Malefyt R, Kastelein RA, Cua DJ. IL-12 and IL-23: master regulators of innate and adaptive immunity. Immunol Rev. 2004;202:96–105. pmid:15546388
  39. 39. He T, Tang C, Xu S, Moyana T, Xiang J. Interferon gamma stimulates cellular maturation of dendritic cell line DC2.4 leading to induction of efficient cytotoxic T cell responses and antitumor immunity. Cell Mol Immunol. 2007;4(2):105–11. pmid:17484804
  40. 40. Rouas R, Lewalle P, El Ouriaghli F, Nowak B, Duvillier H, Martiat P. Poly(I:C) used for human dendritic cell maturation preserves their ability to secondarily secrete bioactive IL-12. Int Immunol. 2004;16(5):767–73. pmid:15096480
  41. 41. Zhou J, Nouri-Shirazi M, Tang H, Shen Y, Zeng M. R848/TLR7-mediated stronger CD8+ T immunity is dependent on DC-NK cell interactions. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2022;183(8):860–75. pmid:35263757
  42. 42. Watford WT, Moriguchi M, Morinobu A, O’Shea JJ. The biology of IL-12: coordinating innate and adaptive immune responses. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2003;14(5):361–8. pmid:12948519