Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Unveiling hub genes and biological pathways: A bioinformatics analysis of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy (TIC)

  • Lingang Zhang ,

    Roles Writing – original draft

    zhanglinggang@163.com

    Affiliation Emergency Department, Yuncheng Central Hospital affiliated to Shanxi Medical University,Yuncheng, Shanxi, China

  • Bo Li ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Bo Li

    Roles Data curation

    Affiliation Reproductive Medicine Department, Yuncheng Central Hospital affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Yuncheng, Shanxi, China

  • Jing Liu,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Pathology Department, Yuncheng Central Hospital affiliated to Shanxi Medical University,Yuncheng, Shanxi, China

  • Yan feng Bian,

    Roles Formal analysis

    Affiliation Emergency sungery, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences,Tongji Shanxi Hospital,Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, China

  • Guo xing Lin,

    Roles Visualization

    Affiliation Emergency Department, Hebei province Xingtai Third People’s Hospital, Xingtai, China

  • Ying Zhou

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Emergency Department, Yuncheng Central Hospital affiliated to Shanxi Medical University,Yuncheng, Shanxi, China

Abstract

Background

Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy is a severe condition that rapidly manifests following traumatic injury and is characterized by shock, hypoperfusion, and vascular damage. This study employed bioinformatics methods to identify crucial hub genes and pathways associated with TIC.

Methods

Microarray datasets (accession number GSE223245) were obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. The data were subjected analyses to identify the Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs), which were further subjected to GO and KEGG pathway analyses. Subsequently, a Protein-Protein Interaction (PPI) network was constructed and hub DEGs closely linked to TIC were identified using CytoHubba, MCODE, and CTD scores. The diagnostic value of these hub genes was evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Results

Among the analyzed genes, 269 were identified as DEGs, comprising 103 upregulated and 739 downregulated genes. Notably, several significant hub genes were associated with the development of TIC, as revealed by bioinformatic analyses.

Conclusions

This study highlights the critical impact of newly discovered genes on the development and progression of TIC. Further validation through experimental research and clinical trials is required to confirm these findings.

1. Introduction

Uncontrolled hemorrhage is a significant preventable factor that contributes to mortality in patients with traumatic injuries. Additionally, among individuals under the age of 50 years, injury is the second most significant cause of mortality, closely following infectious diseases [1]. Impaired coagulation following sudden death due to injury has been recognized and recorded for centuries [2]. TIC refers to the abnormal coagulation processes that occur as a result of trauma. Severe trauma can result in the development of TIC through various mechanisms, including activation of protein C, disruption of the endothelial glycocalyx, consumption of fibrinogen, and platelet dysfunction. The ultimate objective of personalized medicine for patients at risk of TIC is to ensure the delivery of the most suitable products to each individual patient at the right time. Recent studies have highlighted specific molecular factors that play critical roles in the pathogenesis of TIC. Tissue Factor (TF) plays a pivotal role in TIC. Upon endothelial injury, TF is exposed and binds with factor VIIa, activating the extrinsic coagulation pathway, leading to thrombin generation and fibrin formation [1]. Platelet Factor 4 (PF4), released during platelet activation, is closely associated with platelet dysfunction and hypercoagulability in TIC. Studies have demonstrated its role in promoting a procoagulant state and contributing to the progression of TIC [1]. However, despite significant research efforts, our current understanding of the pathophysiology of TIC remains incomplete. This incompleteness is further compounded by limitations in diagnostic testing, which contributes to the imprecision of current clinical decisions.

The rapid development of innovative technologies, including next-generation sequencing (NGS), has significantly accelerated the exploration of diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers for TIC.

Bioinformatics analysis plays a crucial role in uncovering novel clues and essential data for the identification of reliable and functional differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and non-coding transcripts [3]. Furthermore, integrated studies that combine data from various medical sources not only save resources, but also provide valuable evidence for mapping the molecular pathogenesis networks of diseases.

In this study, we assessed the gene expression profile for traumatic coagulopathy from the GEO database. The GEO database is an open-access resource that offers comprehensive genetic information, making it a valuable tool for bioinformatic analysis and identification of new disease targets [4]. Using bioinformatics methods, we successfully identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs). DEGs were subsequently subjected to analysis using protein–protein interactions (PPI), Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways. Furthermore, the study analyzed the pathways associated with TIC, as well as the interactions between DEGs and pathways. Subsequently, the hub DEGs were identified using CYTOHubba, MCODE, and CTD scores. CYTOHubba is a Cytoscape plugin used to identify key hub genes within molecular networks. MCODE helps detect densely connected modules in large-scale networks, while CTD is a database that provides insights into gene-disease and chemical-gene interactions. Lastly, Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic value of the identified hub genes. The ROC curve is a graphical tool used to evaluate the performance of binary classification models by plotting the True Positive Rate (TPR) against the False Positive Rate (FPR) at various thresholds. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) quantifies the overall ability of the model to distinguish between classes, with higher AUC values indicating better performance. As a result, the identified hub genes have the potential to become a novel area of research focus. The elucidated molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways may provide valuable insights into understanding TIC.

2. Methods

2.1 Microarray data retrieval

Coagulopathy datasets were acquired from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) GEO (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) [5] public repository. Lastly, we obtained GSE223245 from the NCBI GEO. The GSE223245 dataset was generated using the GPL33038 platform, which includes ceRNA chipset samples from Homo sapiens. This dataset comprised 12 patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 4 healthy controls, with peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) collected for analysis.

2.2 Data Processing and Differentially Expressed Genes Identification

Microarray data were accessed from GEO using the R package “GEOquery.” Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained from the microarray data using the R package “limma.” All identified differentially expressed genes (DEGs) met the criteria of p-value < 0.05 and log2 (fold-change) ≥1. The resulting differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were visualized using a Volcano Plot created using the R packages “ggplot2”[6] and “dplyr.” Additionally, a Heatmap was generated using the R package “pheatmap” to further visualize DEGs.

2.3 Functional enrichment analysis

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) [7] was performed using the R package “clusterProfiler” [8]. The process of conducting Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analyses of Differentially Expressed Genes (DEGs) were performed using the R package “clusterProfiler” [8]. The results were visualized using the R packages “ggplot2” [6].

2.4 Analysis of PPI and identifcation of Hub genes

Protein-protein interaction network construction and module analysis were performed following established protocols, as described in previous studies [9]. The overlapping DEGs were subjected to protein-protein interaction (PPI) analysis using the STRING database (https://string-db.org/) [10]. Network visualization of the resulting interactions was achieved using Cytoscape version 3.8.2 [11]. Hub genes were identified using CytoHubba and MCODE plugins, which were implemented in Cytoscape version 3.8.2.

2.5 Expression and ROC analysis

Based on their centrality values, the top ten genes in the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network were identified as critical genes. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated using the pROC R package to analyze the performance of the classification model, and ROC curves were used to assess the predictive capability of the identified biomarkers.

2.6 Ethical approval

The data for this study were obtained from the public GEO database, and ethical committee approval was not required.

3. Results

3.1 Identification of differentially expressed genes

A flowchart depicting the overall data-screening strategy is shown in Fig 1. In the coagulopathy dataset GSE223245, 823 DEGs were filtered when we compared the 12 coagulopathy samples with 4 healthy controls. In the GSE223245 dataset, the differential analysis revealed a total of 269 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with 103 genes up-regulated and 166 genes down-regulated in coagulopathy samples compared to healthy samples.The DEGs were visualized through Volcano Plots, Heatmaps, PCA, and Boxplots, providing comprehensive insights into their expression patterns. (Fig 2A-D). We observed a correlation between the DEGs (Fig 3a, b)

thumbnail
Fig 1. The multistep screening strategy for bioinformatics data is presented in the flowchart below.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322043.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. DEG in traumatic coagulopathy.

A Volcano plot of DEGs in GSE223245; B Clustered heatmap of DEGs in GSE223245; C The box plot showcases the expression levels of the first three up-regulated genes and the last three down-regulated genes; D the PCA score plots show a comparison between the coagulopathy group and the healthy group in the datasets.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322043.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. (a) The corrplot showcases the expression levels of the first three up-regulated genes and the last three down-regulated genes. (b) The Clustered heatmap showcases the expression levels of the first ten up-regulated genes and the last ten down-regulated genes.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322043.g003

3.2 GO and KEGG enrichment pathway analysis

To explore the functional aspects of the DEGs more comprehensively, gene symbols were analyzed using the latest versions of the GO and KEGG pathway databases. This analysis aimed to ascertain the potential functions associated with DEGs.

The results of the KEGG analysis demonstrated significant enrichment primarily in some pathways: tryptophan metabolism, autoimmune thyroid disease, steroid hormone biosynthesis, inflammatory bowel disease, natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity, viral protein interaction with cytoking and cytoking receptors, Pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, and the NOD-like receptor signaling pathway (Fig 4a). GO analysis indicated that the DEGs were primarily enriched in some categories: regulation of immune effector process, regulation of response to biotic stimulus, regulation of cell killing, regulation of innate immune response, and defense response to virus (Fig 4b-c). These pathways play a significant role in the occurrence and progression of traumatic coagulopathy.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Enrichment analysis of the DEGs.

(a) Outcomes of the KEGG enrichment analysis for the DEGs. (b and c) Outcomes of the GO functional analysis demonstrating the significantly enriched terms for the DEGs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322043.g004

A correlation exists between the primary pathways and genes (Fig 5a-b, Fig 6b). These pathways primarily exhibit a high concentration in defense responses to viruses, regulation of cell killing, regulation of immune effector processes, regulation of innate immune responses, and regulation of responses to biotic stimuli. The genes intricately linked to these pathways are CXCL6, CD160, KLRC4, DDX60, IFIT1, RSAD2, CFH, VSIG4. It is possible to gain an understanding of the interrelationships between these pathways (Fig 6a). The pathways that exhibit the highest concentration are predominantly those regulating cell killing, regulation of immune effector processes, regulation of innate immune response, and regulation of response to biotic stimulus.

thumbnail
Fig 5. The relationship between the main pathways and DEGs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322043.g005

thumbnail
Fig 6. There is a correlation between different pathways

(a). The Clustered heatmap showcases the relationship between the main pathways and DEGs (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322043.g006

3.3 Exploring PPI networks and identifying hub genes: uncovering key interactions in DEGs

A protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was constructed using the PPI pairs from the STRING database, representing the interactions among proteins encoded by the DEGs. The PPI network was visualized using Cytoscape, allowing for a comprehensive analysis of protein interactions (Fig 7a). Significant modules (gene clusters) were identified using the MCODE plugin, which facilitates the detection of densely connected regions within the PPI network.

thumbnail
Fig 7. PPI network construction (a); Top 10 hub genes explored by CytoHubba. (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322043.g007

The PPI network was analyzed using the MCC algorithm from the CytoHubba plugin, resulting in the identification of 10 hub genes as the top candidates. OAS2, OAS3, IFIT2, IFIT1, IFIT3, HERC5, IFI44, IFI44L, RSAD2, and DDX60 (Fig 7b).

3.4 Assessing the diagnostic value of hub genes

To validate the diagnostic value of the 10 hub genes obtained from the previous analysis, ROC curves were constructed and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for gene expression levels in the traumatic coagulopathy datasets (Fig 8). The AUC for OAS2, OAS3, IFIT2, IFIT1, IFIT3, HERC5, IFI44, IFI44L, RSAD2, DDX60 were 0.854,0.833, 0.854, 0.854, 0.854,0.812,0.833,0.833,0.833,0.875.

This Table 1 summarizes the 10 key hub genes identified in the study and their proposed roles in the pathogenesis of TIC.

thumbnail
Fig 8. ROC curves were employed to evaluate the diagnostic utility of the 10 hub genes in traumatic coagulopathy.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0322043.g008

4 . Discussion

In the global context, injuries hold the position of being the fourth leading cause of mortality [1]. In civilian [12] and military [13] settings, early preventable deaths after injury are mainly caused by uncontrolled hemorrhage [1217], whereas later preventable deaths are typically attributed to hypercoagulability [18]. After experiencing massive trauma with the presence of shock, hypoperfusion, and vascular damage, Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy (TIC) develops rapidly. This condition impairs the ability of the body to form blood clots and can lead to increased bleeding risk [19]. A comprehensive understanding of TIC pathophysiology is indispensable for lowering trauma-related mortality rates [20]. The mechanisms underlying TIC involve the activation of protein C, disruption of the endothelial glycocalyx, decreased fibrinogen levels, and impaired platelet function [19]. Nevertheless, the pathogenesis of TIC remains elusive and there is a scarcity of effective therapeutic strategies to address this condition. In this context, it is imperative to enhance our understanding of TIC pathogenesis and actively seek potential therapeutic targets. Using various bioinformatic methods, the current study successfully retrieved DEGs from TIC-related microarray datasets sourced from the GEO database. Furthermore, the study encompassed GO and KEGG pathway enrichment analyses. Subsequently, a PPI network was assembled to identify the top 10 hub genes among the DEGs. Ten hub genes (OAS2, OAS3, IFIT2, IFIT1, IFIT3, HERC5, IFI44, IFI44L, RSAD2, and DDX60) were selected to validate their diagnostic value in patients with TIC (P < 0.05). These genes possess significant potential for predicting the risk of TIC, making them crucial candidates for further investigation.

Multiple hypotheses have been proposed to explain the underlying mechanisms driving the process, suggesting that tissue injury and shock work synergistically to activate the endothelium, platelets, and immune system. This activation leads to the production of various mediators that have the combined effects of reducing fibrinogen levels, impairing platelet function, and compromising thrombin generation. Consequently, these processes ultimately result in inadequate clot formation, leading to compromised hemostasis. During viral infections, similar to bacterial infections, the coagulation system undergoes activation, and in the initial stages,the activation of the coagulation cascade could potentially serve as a host defense mechanism, working to impede the spread of viruses [21]. Type I interferons (IFNs) play a crucial role in shaping both innate and adaptive immune responses. Activation of the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway through type I IFN signaling leads to the transcription of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) [22].

The study identified RSAD2, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, OAS2, OAS3, IFI44, and IFI44L as the eight hub genes within the ISGs (IFN-stimulated genes). RSAD2, also known as Radical S-adenosyl methionine domain-containing 2, is an interferon-stimulated gene that is significantly upregulated upon viral infection. It responds to both type I and type II interferon signaling through the JAK/STAT pathway [23]. Previous studies have demonstrated that RSAD2 exhibits broad antiviral activity against multiple enveloped viruses. Its function as an antiviral agent has been observed in various viral infections, highlighting its potential as a promising therapeutic target for combating enveloped viruses [24]. By inhibiting the NF-κB pathway, the suppression of RASD2 can effectively decrease the viability of CD19+ B cells and enhance their apoptosis. Furthermore, silencing of RASD2 leads to a reduction in the expression of IL-10 [25].

The IFN-induced proteins with tetratricopeptide repeats (IFITs) family is one of the numerous IFN-stimulated gene families. Within this family, there was a cluster of duplicated loci. IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, and IFIT5 are present in most mammals [26]. Besides initiating a cytokine storm [27], SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to activation of the coagulation pathway by causing damage to vascular endothelial cells [28]. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 suggests potential protective effects of IFIT1, IFIT2, and IFIT3 expression in gingival epithelial cells (GECs) against coronavirus infection [29]. Consequently, the expression of the IFITs family may exert an inhibitory effect on the activation of the coagulation pathway.The 2’-5’-oligoadenylate synthetases (OAS), including OAS1, OAS2, and OAS3, are classified as interferon-induced genes that have long been associated with an antiviral function [30]. Their downstream products can trigger the activation of RNase L, an enzyme that facilitates the breakdown of both cellular and viral components [31]. The IFI44 gene family is recognized as a newly diversified mediator of immune responses in oysters [32].

DDX60, a novel DEAD-box RNA helicase, is an upstream regulator of RIG-I in the innate immune response. It was first discovered through microarray research focused on genes induced by measles virus infection in dendritic cells (DCs) [33]. We present experimental findings that support the co-localization of DDX60 with the RIG-I protein, RIG-I ligand, and a stress granule marker, G3BP. This colocalization provides strong evidence that DDX60 plays a role in the recognition of viral RNA by RIG-I [34]. In this study, we discovered that DDX60 is involved in multiple signaling pathways related to immune regulation. Specifically, DDX60 is implicated in the “regulation of immune effector process,” “regulation of response to biotic stimulus,” and “defense response to virus” signaling pathways (Fig 5a). These findings highlight the significance of DDX60 in orchestrating immune responses against viral infection.

HECT and RCC1-containing protein 5 (HERC5) are immune proteins with potent antiviral properties. It is specifically induced in response to IFN-α/β signal transduction, which plays a crucial role in the innate immune response against viral infections [35]. HERC5 demonstrates antiviral efficacy against a wide range of divergent viruses, including retroviruses such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Simian Immunodeficiency Virus (SIV), as well as papillomaviruses and influenza viruses. Its ability to combat these diverse viral pathogens underscores its broad-spectrum antiviral function of HERC5 [36,37]. In our study, we revealed the involvement of HERC5 in key signaling pathways associated with immune regulation.

Specifically, we found that HERC5 plays a significant role in the “regulation of response to biotic stimulus” and “defense response to virus” signaling pathways (Fig 5a). These findings underscore the importance of HERC5 in modulating immune responses to various biotic stimuli, including viral infection.

This study has certain limitations that should be considered. First, one of the main limitations of this study was the lack of clinical data. Furthermore, despite performing a comprehensive bioinformatics analysis in the present study, we regrettably did not proceed with additional experiments. Hence, it is imperative to further investigate the specific mechanisms underlying TIC through in vivo and in vitro experiments.

5. Conclusions

In summary, through an extensive bioinformatics analysis, we successfully identified the DEGs.

Our study provides novel insight into the crosstalk between genes and pathways associated with TIC, laying the groundwork for future research to validate these findings in clinical setting and prospective cohorts. We identified ten hub genes and validated their diagnostic value using ROC curves. These ten hub genes are OAS2, OAS3, IFIT2, IFIT1, IFIT3, HERC5, IFI44, IFI44L, RSAD2, DDX60.

These eight genes are classified as Interferon-Stimulated Genes (ISGs), namely, RSAD2, IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3, OAS2, OAS3, IFI44 and IFI44L.All of these genes are involved in the immune system and are relevant to antiviral defense. Consequently, they influence the coagulation system.

Our findings indicate that HERC5 plays a crucial role in the signaling pathways related to the “regulation of response to biotic stimulus” and “defense response to viruses”. DDX60 is implicated in the “regulation of immune effector process”, “regulation of response to biotic stimulus” and “defense response to virus” signaling pathways

References

  1. 1. Moore EE, Moore HB, Kornblith LZ, Neal MD, Hoffman M, Mutch NJ, et al. Trauma-induced coagulopathy. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021;7(1):30. pmid:33927200
  2. 2. Macfarlane RG, Biggs R. Fibrinolysis; its mechanism and significance. Blood. 1948;3(10):1167–87. pmid:18884682
  3. 3. Vernon ST, Hansen T, Kott KA, Yang JY, O’Sullivan JF, Figtree GA. Utilizing state-of-the-art “omics” technology and bioinformatics to identify new biological mechanisms and biomarkers for coronary artery disease. Microcirculation. 2019;26(2):e12488. pmid:29956866
  4. 4. Liu K, Kang M, Li J, Qin W, Wang R. Prognostic value of the mRNA expression of members of the HSP90 family in non-small cell lung cancer. Exp Ther Med. 2019;17(4):2657–65. pmid:30930968
  5. 5. Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF, Tomashevsky M, et al. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets--update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(Database issue):D991–5. pmid:23193258
  6. 6. Gustavsson EK, Zhang D, Reynolds RH, Garcia-Ruiz S, Ryten M. ggtranscript: an R package for the visualization and interpretation of transcript isoforms using ggplot2. Bioinformatics. 2022;38(15):3844–6. pmid:35751589
  7. 7. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(43):15545–50. pmid:16199517
  8. 8. Yu G, Wang L-G, Han Y, He Q-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16(5):284–7. pmid:22455463
  9. 9. Li L, Lei Q, Zhang S, Kong L, Qin B. Screening and identification of key biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from bioinformatic analysis. Oncol Rep. 2017;38(5):2607–18. pmid:28901457
  10. 10. Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Nastou KC, Lyon D, Kirsch R, Pyysalo S, et al. The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein-protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D605–12. pmid:33237311
  11. 11. Doncheva NT, Morris JH, Gorodkin J, Jensen LJ. Cytoscape stringapp: network analysis and visualization of proteomics data. J Proteome Res. 2019;18(2):623–32. pmid:30450911
  12. 12. Tisherman SA, Schmicker RH, Brasel KJ, Bulger EM, Kerby JD, Minei JP, et al. Detailed description of all deaths in both the shock and traumatic brain injury hypertonic saline trials of the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium. Ann Surg. 2015;261(3):586–90. pmid:25072443
  13. 13. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, Cantrell J, Tops T, Uribe P, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001-2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431-7. pmid:23192066
  14. 14. Fox EE, Holcomb JB, Wade CE, Bulger EM, Tilley BC; PROPPR Study Group. Earlier endpoints are required for hemorrhagic shock trials among severely injured patients. Shock. 2017;47(5):567–73. pmid:28207628
  15. 15. Moore HB, Moore EE, Chapman MP, McVaney K, Bryskiewicz G, Blechar R, et al. Plasma-first resuscitation to treat haemorrhagic shock during emergency ground transportation in an urban area: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2018;392(10144):283–91. pmid:30032977
  16. 16. Sperry JL, Guyette FX, Brown JB, Yazer MH, Triulzi DJ, Early-Young BJ, et al. Prehospital plasma during air medical transport in trauma patients at risk for hemorrhagic shock. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(4):315–26. pmid:30044935
  17. 17. Kalkwarf KJ, Drake SA, Yang Y, Thetford C, Myers L, Brock M, et al. Bleeding to death in a big city: An analysis of all trauma deaths from hemorrhage in a metropolitan area during 1 year. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;89(4):716–22. pmid:32590562
  18. 18. Moore HB, Moore EE, Gonzalez E, Chapman MP, Chin TL, Silliman CC, et al. Hyperfibrinolysis, physiologic fibrinolysis, and fibrinolysis shutdown: the spectrum of postinjury fibrinolysis and relevance to antifibrinolytic therapy. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(6):811–7; discussion 817. pmid:25051384
  19. 19. Simmons JW, Powell MF. Acute traumatic coagulopathy: pathophysiology and resuscitation. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(suppl 3):iii31–43. pmid:27940454
  20. 20. Brohi K, Gruen RL, Holcomb JB. Why are bleeding trauma patients still dying?. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45(5):709–11. pmid:30741331
  21. 21. Hoffman M, Pawlinski R. Hemostasis: old system, new players, new directions. Thromb Res. 2014;133 Suppl 1:S1-2. pmid:24759130
  22. 22. Ivashkiv LB, Donlin LT. Regulation of type I interferon responses. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(1):36–49. pmid:24362405
  23. 23. Seo J-Y, Yaneva R, Cresswell P. Viperin: a multifunctional, interferon-inducible protein that regulates virus replication. Cell Host Microbe. 2011;10(6):534–9. pmid:22177558
  24. 24. Kurokawa C, Iankov ID, Galanis E. A key anti-viral protein, RSAD2/VIPERIN, restricts the release of measles virus from infected cells. Virus Res. 2019;263:145–50. pmid:30684519
  25. 25. Zhu H, Zheng J, Zhou Y, Wu T, Zhu T. Knockdown of RSAD2 attenuates B cell hyperactivity in patients with primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS) via suppressing NF-κb signaling pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 2021;476(5):2029–37. pmid:33512636
  26. 26. Zhou X, Michal JJ, Zhang L, Ding B, Lunney JK, Liu B, et al. Interferon induced IFIT family genes in host antiviral defense. Int J Biol Sci. 2013;9(2):200–8. pmid:23459883
  27. 27. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ, et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1033–4. pmid:32192578
  28. 28. Ahmad F, Kannan M, Ansari AW. Role of SARS-CoV-2 -induced cytokines and growth factors in coagulopathy and thromboembolism. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2022;63:58–68. pmid:34750061
  29. 29. Imaizumi T, Hashimoto S, Sato R, Umetsu H, Aizawa T, Watanabe S, et al. IFIT proteins are involved in CXCL10 expression in human glomerular endothelial cells treated with a toll-like receptor 3 agonist. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2021;46(1):74–83. pmid:33326977
  30. 30. Leisching G, Wiid I, Baker B. OAS1, 2, and 3: significance during active tuberculosis?. J Infect Dis. 2018;217(10):1517–21. pmid:29452387
  31. 31. Fagone P, Nunnari G, Lazzara F, Longo A, Cambria D, Distefano G, et al. Induction of OAS gene family in HIV monocyte infected patients with high and low viral load. Antiviral Res. 2016;131:66–73. pmid:27107898
  32. 32. McDowell IC, Modak TH, Lane CE, Gomez-Chiarri M. Multi-species protein similarity clustering reveals novel expanded immune gene families in the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2016;53:13–23. pmid:27033806
  33. 33. Miyashita M, Oshiumi H, Matsumoto M, Seya T. DDX60, a DEXD/H box helicase, is a novel antiviral factor promoting RIG-I-like receptor-mediated signaling. Mol Cell Biol. 2011;31(18):3802–19. pmid:21791617
  34. 34. Onomoto K, Jogi M, Yoo J-S, Narita R, Morimoto S, Takemura A, et al. Critical role of an antiviral stress granule containing RIG-I and PKR in viral detection and innate immunity. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43031. pmid:22912779
  35. 35. Mathieu NA, Paparisto E, Barr SD, Spratt DE. HERC5 and the ISGylation pathway: critical modulators of the antiviral immune response. Viruses. 2021;13(6):1102. pmid:34207696
  36. 36. Paparisto E, Woods MW, Coleman MD, Moghadasi SA, Kochar DS, Tom SK, et al. Evolution-guided structural and functional analyses of the HERC family reveal an ancient marine origin and determinants of antiviral activity. J Virol. 2018;92(13):e00528-18. pmid:29669830
  37. 37. Woods MW, Tong JG, Tom SK, Szabo PA, Cavanagh PC, Dikeakos JD, et al. Interferon-induced HERC5 is evolving under positive selection and inhibits HIV-1 particle production by a novel mechanism targeting Rev/RRE-dependent RNA nuclear export. Retrovirology. 2014;11:27. pmid:24693865